Final National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures, 43309-43320 [2023-14415]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
their status, threats, and recovery that
has become available since the last 5year reviews in 2018.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct this review, we must receive
your information no later than
September 5, 2023. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit your information,
identified by docket number NOAA–
NMFS–2023–0086, electronically via
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. In the
‘‘Search’’ box, enter the above docket
number for this notice. Then, click on
the ‘‘Search’’ icon. On the resulting web
page, click the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider
comments if they are sent by any other
method or received after the comment
period ends. All comments received are
a part of the public record. NMFS will
post the comments for public viewing
on https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information submitted voluntarily by
the sender is publicly accessible. NMFS
will accept anonymous submissions
(enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if
you wish to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Neuman, NMFS West Coast
Region, 562–980–4115, or Susan Wang,
NMFS West Coast Region, 562–980–
4199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires that we
conduct a review of listed species at
least once every 5 years. The regulations
in 50 CFR 424.21 require that we
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing species currently under
active review. On the basis of such
reviews, under section 4(c)(2)(B) of the
ESA we determine whether a listed
species should be delisted or
reclassified from endangered to
threatened or from threatened to
endangered. As described by the
regulations in 50 CFR 424.11(e), the
Secretary shall delist a species if the
Secretary finds that, after conducting a
status review based on the best
scientific and commercial data
available: (1) The species is extinct; (2)
the species does not meet the definition
of an endangered species or a threatened
species; or (3) the listed entity does not
meet the statutory definition of a
species. Any change in Federal
classification would require a separate
rulemaking process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
The white abalone was listed as
endangered under the ESA on May 29,
2001 (66 FR 29046), and the black
abalone was listed as endangered under
the ESA on January 14, 2009 (74 FR
1937). Background information on white
abalone is available on the NMFS
website at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/whiteabalone. Background information on
black abalone is available on the NMFS
website at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/blackabalone.
Determining if a Species Is Threatened
or Endangered
Section 4(a)(1) of the ESA requires
that we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors: (1)
The present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (2) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (3) disease or
predation; (4) the inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or (5) other
natural or manmade factors affecting its
continued existence. Section 4(b) also
requires that our determination be made
on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available after
conducting a review of the status of the
species and after taking into account
those efforts, if any, being made by any
State or foreign nation, to protect such
species.
Public Solicitation of New Relevant
Information
To ensure that the 5-year reviews are
complete and based on the best
scientific and commercial data
available, we are soliciting new
information from the public,
governmental agencies, Tribes, the
scientific community, industry,
environmental entities, and any other
interested parties concerning the status
of white abalone and/or black abalone.
Categories of requested information
include: (1) species biology including,
but not limited to, population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics; (2) habitat conditions
including, but not limited to, amount,
distribution, and important features for
conservation; (3) status and trends of
threats to the species and its habitats; (4)
conservation measures that have been
implemented that benefit the species,
including monitoring data
demonstrating effectiveness of such
measures; (5) need for additional
conservation measures; and (6) other
new information, data, or corrections
including, but not limited to, taxonomic
or nomenclatural changes and improved
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43309
analytical methods for evaluating
extinction risk.
If you wish to provide information for
the 5-year reviews, you may submit
your information and materials
electronically (see ADDRESSES section).
We request that all information be
accompanied by supporting
documentation such as maps,
bibliographic references, or reprints of
pertinent publications. We also would
appreciate the submitter’s name,
address, and any association,
institution, or business that the person
represents; however, we will also accept
anonymous submissions.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: June 30, 2023.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14314 Filed 7–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID 0648–XV194]
Final National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Tribal
Consultation Policy and Procedures
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
On January 26, 2021, the
White House issued a Presidential
Memorandum on Tribal Consultation
and Strengthening Nation-to-Nation
Relationships that reaffirmed the
Executive order on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (2000). In response,
NOAA sought review and comment on
its Tribal consultation policy and
procedures in November 2021. NOAA
revised its Consultation Handbook
describing procedures for governmentto-government consultation with
federally recognized Indian tribes, and
updated an associated NOAA
Administrative Order (NAO 218–8) and
the Indigenous Knowledge (IK)
guidance.
SUMMARY:
The policy and procedures took
effect on June 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Requests for additional
information or an electronic copy of the
revised Consultation Handbook, the
associated NOAA Administrative Order
(NAO 218–8), and/or the Indigenous
Knowledge (IK) guidance should be
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43310
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
directed to Becky Cruz Lizama, NOAA
Senior Tribal Liaison, NOAA Office of
Legislative and Intergovernmental
Affairs, U.S. Department of Commerce,
NOAA, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW,
Station Number 62006FB, Washington,
DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky Cruz Lizama, NOAA Senior
Tribal Liaison, telephone (202) 482–
0809; email at OLIA.Tribal@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
revised Handbook is intended to assist
NOAA, including its regional and field
staff, in conducting effective
government-to-government
consultations and fulfill NOAA’s
obligations under E.O. 13175 and
associated Presidential memorandums,
the Department Administrative Order
218–8 on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, and the Department of
Commerce Tribal Consultation and
Coordination Policy. The IK guidance
will facilitate inclusion of IK into the
line offices’ environmental science,
policy and decision making process,
and build partnerships with Indigenous
peoples.
On January 26, 2021, the White House
issued a Presidential Memorandum on
Tribal Consultation and Strengthening
Nation-to-Nation Relationships. The
Memorandum requires the Secretary of
Commerce to submit to the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), a detailed plan of actions the
agency will take to implement the
policies and directives of E.O. 13175
(2000) and the Presidential
Memorandum on Tribal Consultation
issued in November 2009.
NOAA’s mission is to understand and
predict changes in climate, weather,
oceans, and coasts, to share that
knowledge and information with others,
and to conserve and manage coastal and
marine ecosystems and resources.
NOAA has established policies and
guidance to provide for meaningful and
timely input from federally recognized
Indian tribes into NOAA’s decisionmaking process on policy matters that
have tribal implications. In addition,
NOAA offers its employees training and
other guidance to support a consistent,
effective, and proactive approach to
conducting government-to-government
consultations with federally recognized
Indian tribes under E.O. 13175, the
Department of Commerce (DOC)
Department Administrative Order 218–
8 Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments (2014), and
the DOC Tribal Consultation and
Coordination Policy (78 FR 33331, June
4, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
While much of NOAA’s existing
policy and guidance has been developed
in consultation with federally
recognized Indian tribes, NOAA
recognized that these documents could
benefit from a review and update. As
part of its effort to implement the
January 26, 2021 Presidential
Memorandum, NOAA requested
comments from Tribal Nations, tribal
officials, members of the public, and
other interested parties to help identify
appropriate updates or revisions to the
following existing NOAA policies and
guidance documents, which facilitate
NOAA’s implementation of E.O. 13175:
(1) Tribal Consultation Handbook titled
NOAA Procedures for Government-toGovernment Consultation With
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and
Alaska Native Corporations (2013); (2)
NOAA Administrative Order 218–8
titled Policy on Government-toGovernment Consultation with
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and
Alaska Native Corporations (Reaffirmed
in 2018); and (3) a traditional ecological
knowledge (TEK) guidance currently
titled NOAA Fisheries and National
Ocean Service Guidance and Best
Practices for Engaging and Incorporating
Traditional Ecological Knowledge in
Decision-Making (2019). NOAA
proposed revisions to its Tribal
Consultation Handbook reflect lessons
learned and improved practices to better
facilitate meaningful and effective tribal
consultations. NOAA also proposed
minor revisions to Administrative Order
218–8 to reflect necessary updates since
its issuance in 2014. We also sought
comments on the existing TEK
Guidance, which had not been
previously made available for public
comment. Though the TEK Guidance
was originally only implemented by
NOAA Fisheries and the National Ocean
Service, NOAA is now extending the
applicability of the TEK Guidance to all
NOAA Offices and renaming it the IK
guidance. Based on written and oral
comments received, NOAA revised its
Tribal Consultation Handbook,
Administrative Order, and IK guidance.
All three documents can be found on
the NOAA website https://
www.noaa.gov/legislative-andintergovernmental-affairs/noaa-tribalresources-updates.
NOAA’s revised Handbook and NAO
also reflect the recent Presidential
Memorandum on Uniform Standards for
Tribal Consultation (November 30,
2022), which among things, commits
agencies to conducting government-togovernment consultation in a manner
that recognizes and respects Tribal selfgovernment and sovereignty; identifies
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and considers Tribal treaty rights,
reserved rights, and other rights;
respects and elevates IK, including
cultural norms and practices relevant to
such consultations; and meets the
responsibilities that arise from the
unique legal relationship between the
Federal Government and Tribal
governments.
NOAA is also releasing guidance on
the recognition and application of IK to
improve decision making for our
partners and within NOAA. Through
the IK guidance, NOAA encourages the
inclusion of IK, as appropriate and to
the extent practicable and permitted by
law, in the line offices’ environmental
science, policy and decision making
process, to better facilitate
consultations, fulfill Federal trust
responsibilities, respect treaty rights,
understand environmental justice
concerns as directed by E.O. 12898,
inform agency decision making, and to
build partnerships with indigenous
peoples.
The consultation policy and
procedures are intended only for NOAA
internal management purposes and does
not create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable
against the United States, its agencies,
entities, or instrumentalities, its officers
or employees, or any other person.
Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Draft Policy and
Procedures
On November 24, 2021, NOAA
published a notice and request for
information on NOAA’s Tribal
consultation draft policy and
procedures in the Federal Register (86
FR 67036). In response, NOAA received
18 written comments on the revised
Tribal Consultation Handbook and the
updated IK guidance. A summary of
comments received and NOAA’s
responses to those comments are
presented below.
Comments received, and responses
thereto, from two national consultation
webinars held on January 10, 2022, and
January 11, 2022, are also included.
General Comments and
Recommendations (Consultation
Handbook and Policy)
Comment 1: The definition of
consultation should include ‘‘with a
goal of reaching consensus.’’
Response: NOAA’s Handbook is
designed to ensure that NOAA
implements a consistent and
accountable process for meaningful and
timely consultation on policies with
tribal implications. The Handbook notes
the Agency’s commitment to working
with the federally recognized Indian
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
tribe(s) to reach agreement during the
consultation process on a path forward
or course of action to the extent
practicable. NOAA has determined,
however, that in some circumstances, it
may not be possible to reach consensus
on actions subject to consultation. In
such circumstances, and as consistent
with the Handbook, NOAA will provide
the consulted tribe(s) with notice of the
course of action adopted by the Agency
and the rationale for that decision. This
approach is consistent with NOAA’s
long-standing implementation of E.O.
13175 and the general approach to
government-to-government consultation
across the Federal Government. See,
e.g., Presidential Memorandum on
Uniform Standards for Tribal
Consultation (November 30, 2022).
Comment 2: Delete ‘‘Consultation is
not necessarily a format for consensus
decision-making’’ as it falls short of
trust obligations.
Response: Partially accepted. As
discussed in NOAA’s Handbook,
consultation supports NOAA’s efforts to
fulfill its trust responsibility to Indian
tribes. There may, however, be
situations where reaching consensus on
policies that have tribal implications is
not possible as discussed in the
response to Comment 1 above. In such
situations, NOAA will comply with the
policies described in the Handbook to
provide an explanation as to why
NOAA will not or cannot address the
concern(s) raised by the tribe.
Comment 3: Explicitly state in
policies and procedures that meaningful
consultation’s goal should always be
obtaining tribal informed consent when
a project would impact tribal land or
resources on or off a reservation.
Response: NOAA’s Handbook
describes the Agency’s commitment to
working with the federally recognized
Indian tribe(s) to reach agreement
during the consultation process on a
path forward or course of action to the
extent practicable.
Comment 4: The current language in
the Handbook indicates that the goal of
consultation is simply the exchange of
information—essentially that the goal is
the process itself. We recommend that
NOAA update this section to align more
closely with the Makah Ocean Policy:
‘‘The goal of early engagement and
formal consultation is to enhance
governing and management efficiencies
by avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating
adverse impacts a federal, state, or local
decision may have on [Tribal] treaty
rights, resources, or interests. The
ultimate goal is to engage [Tribal]
interests at the earliest development of
scoping or planning activities by
identifying possible solutions that avoid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
any adverse impact to the [delete tribe
name] Tribe’s treaty rights, resources, or
governing interests.’’ The goal of
consultation should go beyond the
process itself and include the protection
of treaty rights, resources, and interests.
Response: Accepted and modified
slightly to include all tribes and focus
on Federal rule making. The following
was added to the Handbook ‘‘The goal
of early engagement and formal
consultation is to enhance governing
and management efficiencies by
avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating
adverse impacts a federal decision may
have on tribal treaty rights, resources, or
interests. The ultimate goal is to engage
tribal interests at the earliest stage of
scoping or planning activities by
identifying possible solutions that avoid
adverse impacts to the tribe’s treaty
rights, resources, or governing
interests.’’
Comment 5: Ensure decisions are not
made when consultation occurs.
Response: Accepted. Text added to
pages 6–7 of the Handbook: ‘‘Regardless
of whether it is an informal engagement
or a consultation, such discussions
should happen prior to a decision being
made.’’ In addition, on page 12 the
Handbook states ‘‘it should always
occur at the earliest time practicable,
well before a final policy or regulatory
decision with tribal implications is
made.’’
Comment 6: Training should also
include training from tribes. In addition,
strike ‘‘as financial resources allow’’ as
it is critically important that all
employees of Federal departments and
agencies receive comprehensive training
on working with and communicating
effectively with Tribal Nations. Federal
actions impact Tribal Nations and our
citizens.
Response: NOAA agrees that effective
employee training is an important
component of successful
implementation of the Handbook and
meeting NOAA’s Tribal Trust
Responsibilities. NOAA has established
a team of Tribal Liaisons within each
Line Office to help facilitate employee
training. In addition, online and
regional trainings are available to staff.
However, there are currently no specific
funds appropriated for tribal
consultation training in NOAA’s budget.
Therefore, we have retained ‘‘as
financial resources allow’’.
Comment 7: NOAA personnel in the
role of liaison need clear guidance that
their role is facilitation of
communication. The position of liaison
should have guidance that articulates
the breadth of the role: ‘‘Information
exchange’’ to ‘‘Request to initiate
Government-to-Government.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43311
Response: The Position Description
for the Senior NOAA Tribal Liaison
describes the responsibilities of this
position, including communications
responsibilities. NOAA does not agree
this information is necessary to include
in the Consultation Handbook.
Comment 8: Edit sentence as follows
‘‘If a NOAA line office or staff office
deems necessary, or by request from a
Tribal government, they also may
consider establishing a tribal liaison
within a program or region.’’
Response: Accepted. Added ‘‘or by
request from a Tribal government. . . .’’
See Handbook Section IV.D.
Comment 9: NOAA line offices, staff
offices, and Regional Teams should
designate more than one staff person in
each department as a tribal liaison.
These liaison positions should be
separate positions from existing staff
positions. Communicating,
coordinating, and consulting with tribes
in culturally appropriate and
meaningful ways is year-round, full
time work. Moreover, it is not possible
for one regional tribal liaison to
adequately engage with all the tribes in
their region; for instance, consider that
the NOAA Alaska Region has 229
federally recognized Indian Tribes with
whom NOAA is directed to consult.
Response: NOAA line offices, staff
offices, and Regional Teams have the
ability to designate a Tribal Liaison and
other staff to support consultation
efforts where there is a need and
funding is available.
Comment 10: Include involvement of
Tribes in the hiring process for Tribal
Liaisons wherever possible to ensure
that they have the appropriate
experience and relationships. Given the
important role of Headquarters and
Regional Tribal Liaisons in consultation
processes, engaging tribes in selecting
and building relationships with these
important staff people will help
facilitate effective consultation.
Response: No changes. Comments
regarding Federal hiring processes are
beyond the scope of this Handbook.
Comment 11: NOAA’s consultation
policy should require an office of tribal
liaison be created. NOAA should have
high level staff with expertise in Indian
law and policy. NOAA’s institutional
structure should have Indian law and
policy built into it.
Response: NOAA has a number of
senior positions with responsibility for
tribal matters. These include a Senior
Advisor to the Under Secretary on
Fisheries and Tribal Engagement, a
Senior NOAA Tribal Liaison, and each
line office and relevant staff office has
a Headquarters Tribal Liaison which
forms the NOAA Headquarters Tribal
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43312
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
Team. The NOAA Office of the General
Counsel also maintains a Tribal Team of
Indian law practitioners. In addition,
many line offices have additional Tribal
Liaisons. For example, every NOAA
Fisheries Science Center and National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
Regional Offices and Science Centers
have a Tribal Liaison, one of which is
a full time position (i.e., the NMFS West
Coast Tribal Liaison).
Comment 12: We recommend that
Tribal Liaison positions be independent
positions (i.e., not duties assigned to
staff already fulfilling other duties, such
as fishery analysts) that are filled by
highly-qualified individuals with the
specific training, expertise and skillsets
related to the tasks such a position is
assigned to. Tribes and Tribal
organizations in Alaska have requested
positions like these be established at the
NMFS Alaska Region and at Alaska
Fisheries Science Center (AFSC) for
many years.
Response: As noted in response to
Comment 11, NOAA employs a number
of staff with a specific focus on the
Agency’s work with tribes and tribal
organizations. These staff include a
Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary
on Fisheries and Tribal Engagement, a
NOAA Senior Tribal Liaison, and a full
time NMFS West Coast Tribal Liaison.
Comment 13: Provide more
information on Tribal Tracker.
Response: The Tribal Tracker is an
internal tracking system that allows
NOAA to collect summary information
on consultations conducted by the
Agency. This system is used, in part, to
support NOAA’s tribal engagement
reporting obligations.
Comment 14: Strengthen the
statement ‘‘NOAA should provide
available information to the tribes in
advance of the consultation to allow the
tribes to prepare: by changing it to
‘‘NOAA must provide all necessary and
available information.’’
Response: Accepted. Edit made: ‘‘In
order to have a meaningful consultation,
NOAA will provide available
information to the tribes in advance of
the consultation to allow the tribes to
prepare. NOAA will work with tribes in
an effort to ensure that the information
is provided to tribes in a format that
tribes can access and use.’’ See
Handbook Section V.A. In addition,
NOAA added language that NOAA will
work with tribes to ensure that the
information is provided to tribes in a
format that tribes can access and use.
NOAA has received comments
previously that there are some
constraints that might limit the ability to
access and use information, such as lack
of internet access or sufficient
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
bandwidth to access or download
materials, such as lengthy PDFs. In light
of these constraints, NOAA will
endeavor to work with tribes to make
sure tribes can access and use the
materials. For example, in some cases,
NOAA may mail materials in advance.
Comment 15: NOAA must make the
utmost effort to protect TEK and other
sensitive cultural information from
public disclosure and ensure Tribal
Nations have the ability to control what
is shared by the Agency, including
through Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests.
Response: While information shared
between NOAA and a tribe may be
beneficial for the consultation process,
it is generally not protected from
disclosure under FOIA, especially if this
information is used in the decisionmaking process and becomes part of the
administrative record. As such, the
Handbook notes the importance of
advance notification to tribes of the
limited capacity of NOAA to protect the
confidentiality of information provided
by the tribe consistent with the
requirements of FOIA or litigation.
Comment 16: Language should be
added to the FOIA section to protect
information shared by tribal religious
and cultural leaders as well as tribal
government officials such as Tribal
Historic Preservation Officers and
environmental, cultural, and natural
resource managers.
Response: While information shared
between NOAA and a tribe may be
beneficial for the consultation process,
it is generally not protected from
disclosure under FOIA, especially if this
information is used in the decisionmaking process and becomes part of the
administrative record. As such, the
Handbook notes the importance of
advance notification to tribes of the
limited capacity of NOAA to protect the
confidentiality of information provided
by the tribe consistent with the
requirements of FOIA or litigation. The
applicable requirements for disclosure
of information subject to FOIA are not
modified by the internal procedures
identified in this Handbook. While
NOAA does make efforts to safeguard
sensitive information submitted by
tribes, it must comply with applicable
Federal information disclosure
requirements.
Comment 17: Make this sentence
stronger ‘‘NOAA will make reasonable
efforts to provide adequate information
about its actions and policies at the
earliest practical time,’’ by changing it
to ‘‘NOAA will provide adequate
information about its actions and
policies at the earliest practical time in
advance of consultation to provide the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
tribe adequate time to review and reflect
on it.’’
Response: Accepted in part. Edit
made: NOAA will provide available
information about its actions and
policies at the earliest practical time.
See Handbook Section V.A.
Comment 18: NOAA recommends
that line offices and regions establish
consultation protocols with tribal
governments consistent with this
Handbook as necessary. Consultation
protocols should not just be made when
NOAA deems necessary.
Response: No changes made. The
Handbook provides that ‘‘it may be
useful and expeditious for those tribes
and NOAA offices to develop protocols
reflecting their mutually preferred
timeline for and means of
communication and exchange of
information’’ and authorizes such
protocols consistent with the Handbook.
Comment 19: The Federal
Government must also recognize that it
has become the norm in recent years
that tribes and other community
organizations are faced with having to
engage with multiple agencies regarding
multiple major projects almost
continuously. NOAA must
acknowledge, and actively work to
reduce, this extraordinary burden on
our people.
Response: The Handbook
acknowledges this issue and includes a
new Section V.C., which directs staff to
coordinate and cooperate with
interested Federal agencies to ensure the
most efficient and expeditious manner
of consultation with tribes on a
particular matter.
Comment 20: Our experience and
observations, consultations are usually
scheduled for certain dates and times
that prioritize the needs of the Federal
regulatory process over those of Native
communities, and those appointments
rarely consider or appreciate the often
competing, conflicting, and overriding
obligations associated with sustaining
our communities.
Response: Accepted. Added the
following sentence ‘‘Timelines should
reflect that tribal members often have
competing, conflicting and overriding
obligations associated with sustaining
tribal communities.’’ See Handbook
Section VI.D.
Comment 21: Document is missing
the direct recognition of the unique role,
and often multiple roles, that tribal
officials and other local leaders play in
their communities, and how that reality
can significantly impact engagement
with Federal agencies and others. It is
critical to understand that often for
these leaders, and particularly for
Alaskan Tribal leaders, their leadership
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
activities are not their primary
employment. Beyond that employment,
virtually all of them also contribute
significant time and energy to the
demands inherent to a subsistence
lifestyle.
Response: Accepted. Added the
following sentence: ‘‘Timelines should
reflect that tribal members often have
competing, conflicting and overriding
obligations associated with sustaining
tribal communities.’’ See Handbook
Section VI.D.
Comment 22: Better recognize the
difference and mandates of Treaty
Tribes in documents including case law.
Response: As noted above, NOAA has
added additional content to explain the
need to account for tribal treaty rights,
reserved rights, and similar rights when
considering actions that may have tribal
implications. See Handbook Section
VI.A. Discussion has also been added to
note the importance of NOAA staff
becoming familiar with relevant treaties
and other sources of reserved and
similar rights. The new discussion also
includes a resource for assisting with
the identification of relevant treaties.
See Handbook Section VI.A.
Comment 23: We recommend that
NOAA construe the consultation
mandate broadly. If NOAA is unsure
whether an action may have tribal
implications, the appropriate approach
would be for NOAA to communicate
with the tribe and determine, based on
an informed exchange of views with the
tribe, whether the action affects the
tribe.
Response: The Handbook provides
that an invitation to consult on a
proposed policy should be sent to the
appropriate representative of the
governing body of the tribe for NOAA
actions ‘‘that may have tribal
implications.’’ See Handbook at Section
VII.A. NOAA believes this directive
provides adequate direction for NOAA
staff to invite consultation on actions for
which there may be tribal implications.
Comment 24: In the list of examples
of policies where consultation with
tribes is appropriate, NOAA should
amend the first bullet point to include
the text: ‘‘A policy or action that will
have effects within or near a reservation
or Alaska Native Village.’’
Response: Accepted in part. However,
this statement should be broader than
AK Natives. The third bullet was
changed to read ‘‘[a] policy or action
affecting a tribal entity, or facility, land,
or resources owned or operated by a
tribal government, or held in trust for a
federally recognized tribe.’’ See
Handbook Section VII.A.
Comment 25: Move this sentence
‘‘While books and other documents may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
serve as useful secondary references for
understanding the political and cultural
history of an indigenous people, agency
staff should remember that the tribal
members themselves are the best source
of knowledge about their particular
tribe’’ to the beginning of the
consultation section and emphasize the
importance of reaching out to a tribe for
this information first.
Response: Accepted. Text moved to
the beginning of the consultation
section.
Comment 26: Make clear that
consultation should be early and often.
Response: The Handbook states that
consultation ‘‘should always occur at
the earliest time practicable, well before
a final policy or regulatory decision
with tribal implications is made.’’ See
Handbook Section VII.
Comment 27: Not enough detail on
the consultation process to ensure it is
not a ‘‘check the box’’ effort. For
example the Handbook does not provide
guidance or elaboration on how NOAA
offices should address and incorporate
the substantive elements of consultation
in order to inform Federal policy and
regulatory development. Instead, the
Handbook identifies a range of factors
that can either enhance or inhibit
effective consultation, and provides
detailed guidance on the procedural
elements of consultation.
Response: The Handbook is a process
document designed to provide—per
E.O. 13175—an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications. The Handbook is designed
to address procedural aspects of this
obligation and not necessarily the
substantive points suggested by the
commenter.
Comment 28: There may be two
phases in a consultation: Tribal
Consultation and Tribal G2G
Consultation. Tribal Consultation is
viewed as a process of sharing
information, coordination, dialogue, and
considering the tribal viewpoint. This
occurs before an agency commits to a
path of action and provides for a tribe
to identify if an action will affect tribal
rights, lands, governance, resources, or
interests. Often the completion of a
Tribal Consultation can ensure that
should a Tribal G2G Consultation
between decision makers be necessary,
it is meaningful and productive. We
encourage NOAA to review: ‘‘Guidance
and Responsibilities for Effective Tribal
Consultation, Communication, and
Engagement’’: A guide for Agencies
Working with West Coast Tribes on
Ocean & Coastal Issues developed by
members of the West Coast Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43313
Caucus of the West Coast Ocean
Alliance.
Response: In the Handbook we have
distinguished the first phase as
‘‘engagement’’ and the second and
formal phase as ‘‘consultation’’.
Comment 29: Timeline: Often tribal
decisions are two and sometimes three
tiered in structure, this allows for our
leadership access to available expertise
both within staff and within its
community. To provide for multiple
discussions could easily occupy a 90
days or more timeline.
Response: Agree. NOAA believes the
Handbook addresses this concern. The
Handbook provides that NOAA staff
should be knowledgeable and respectful
of the decision-making practices of the
tribe. This may require a departure from
highly-structured agendas and
timeframes. It further provides that
consultation should be initiated at the
earliest practicable time and that an
explanation of any time constraints
known to the Agency, such as statutory
deadlines, should be disclosed at the
initiation of the consultation. See
Handbook at Section VII.
Comment 30: Should include an
appeals process if NOAA determines
that a formal consultation is not needed
due to an action not having tribal
implications.
Response: Section VI.H. added to
address dispute resolution procedures.
Comment 31: If the scope changes,
consultation is required. ‘‘Although
consultation need not occur at every
step of the Federal decision-making
process, it should always occur at the
earliest time practicable, well before a
final policy or regulatory decision with
tribal implications is made.’’
Response: The following sentence was
added: ‘‘If the scope of action changes,
that change should be addressed as part
of the ongoing consultation.’’ See
Handbook Section VII.A.
Comment 32: Revise bullet in Section
VII.A., to read: ‘‘A policy or action
affecting a facility or entity land or
resources owned or operated by a tribal
government’’ to account for those areas
that may affect lands that are tribal
lands.
Response: Accepted. Added ‘‘land or
resources’’ to the bullet.
Comment 33: Under ‘‘[e]xamples of
policies where consultation with tribes
is appropriate include but are not
limited to’’, there should be an
inclusion of ‘‘a policy or action that
impacts Treaty areas’’ under the bullet
points listed.
Response: Accepted. A new paragraph
was added to this section on treaty
rights.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43314
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
Comment 34: Page 14, Section B
mentions instances and factors NOAA
takes into consideration when
responding to a request for consultation.
NOAA should amend the second
sentence to include ‘‘change in tribal
government’’ as a factor to be
considered.
Response: Accepted. Added ‘‘change
in tribal government’’ to the second
sentence. See Section VII.B.
Comment 35: We request that NOAA
clarify what circumstances would lead
NOAA to make the determination to
decline to consult.
Response: Accepted in part. Added
the following sentence ‘‘NOAA may
only decline a consultation if it is
determined that an issue of interest does
not have tribal implications.’’ Given the
unique aspects of each determination,
providing an exhaustive list in the
Handbook is not feasible.
Comment 36: NOAA should invite
inter-tribal bodies to consultation along
with the tribes they represent.
Excluding tribal bodies only hinders
NOAA’s attempts to meaningfully
include tribal participation and promote
environmental justice in its work, as
directed by Executive Order 13175.
Response: Information regarding the
permissible role of tribal organizations
in consultations can be found on page
14 at Section VII.E., of the Handbook.
NOAA notes that, where expressly
authorized by a tribe, such an
organization may represent or conduct
consultation on behalf of an authorizing
tribe.
Comment 37: If a Tribe does not
respond to an initiation of Tribal
Consultation within the requested time
frame, NOAA should consider reaching
out to the tribe at least once more and
extending the response time period. It is
likely that the tribe has many pressing
matters to attend to within their
community and/or is participating in
subsistence fishing, hunting, and
gathering seasons. This underscores the
need for NOAA to reach out to tribes
regularly and well before any deadlines
to include tribal input in policy
decisions.
Response: Accepted. The following
sentence was added ‘‘[i]t may be that the
tribe has pressing matters to attend to
within their community and/or is
participating in subsistence fishing,
hunting, and gathering seasons. This
underscores the importance for NOAA
to reach out to tribes regularly and well
before any deadlines to include tribal
input in policy decisions.’’
Comment 38: Include a vetting
process for Tribal Organizations that
includes reaching out to affective tribes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Response: The Handbook includes the
following statement ‘‘If a tribe wants to
authorize a tribal organization to
represent it or conduct consultation on
its behalf, NOAA should confirm that in
writing with the appropriate tribal
officials and with the tribal
organization. NOAA should also
confirm in writing the scope of that
representation (e.g., which tribes are
represented by the tribal organization)
and the role that the tribal organization
will fulfill during the consultation
process.’’ See Handbook Section VII.E.
Comment 39: This requirement
should be mandatory ‘‘if NOAA believes
its action will have substantial direct
effects on that tribe, NOAA staff should
consider following the written
invitation with a phone call, site visit,
and/or an email/fax (assuming those
forms of communication are available to
the tribal points of contact).’’
Response: Accepted. Replaced
‘‘should consider’’ with ‘‘will’’.
Comment 40: Ensure adequate
funding for consultations (e.g., travel for
tribes).
Response: NOAA does not have a
standing appropriation available for
tribal consultations. Where appropriate,
and consistent with federal law,
individual NOAA program offices may
consider requests for funding activities
associated with consultations.
Comment 41: ‘‘If it becomes clear that
NOAA and the tribe have divergent
views about the issues and topics
appropriate for the consultation, effort
should be made by both parties to agree
upon a single statement of the issues. If
the parties cannot reach an agreement,
the record of the consultation should
reflect the different view’’ and reiterate
we should aim for consensus and
differing views should be last resort.
Response: Agree. As previously noted,
the NOAA 13175 Handbook describes
the Agency’s commitment to working
with the federally recognized Indian
tribe(s) to reach agreement during the
consultation process on a path forward
or course of action to the extent
practicable and consistent with NOAA’s
legal requirements. There may,
however, be situations where reaching
consensus on policies that have tribal
implications is not possible. In such
situations, NOAA will comply with the
policies described in the Handbook to
provide an explanation as to why
NOAA will not or cannot address the
concern(s) raised by the tribe.
Comment 42: We strongly disagree
that a tribe’s choice of participants
necessarily indicates how important the
issues and consultation are to the tribe,
as many other considerations (capacity,
expertise, availability, etc.) all may play
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
into the decision as to who participates.
If a tribe has decided to engage in
Consultation on an issue, NOAA should
consider the issue of utmost importance
unless the tribe states otherwise.
Response: Accepted. Deleted: ‘‘will
indicate how important the issues and
consultation are to the tribe.’’
Comment 43: True consultation
should occur at a Leader-to-Leader
level. Duly elected or appointed Tribal
Leaders must be afforded the respect
and opportunity to directly voice Tribal
Nation concerns to those Federal
officials with actual decision-making
authority. In addition, the Federal
Government must not delegate its
consultation obligation to third party
(e.g., non-profit organizations,
industries/corporations, hired
consultants and contractors); the
Federal Government must exercise
appropriate oversight in ensuring tribal
interests are not adversely impacted.
Response: Accepted in part. In
response to this comment, NOAA
updated Handbook Section VII.F.2., to
provide that: ‘‘if the tribe designates its
leader or members of the tribal council
as representatives in the consultation, it
is important that a NOAA official with
decision-making authority participate in
the consultation. The Handbook further
provides that NOAA should ‘‘identify
and prepare consultation participants
who are able to fully address the
concerns and issues articulated for
discussion through government-togovernment consultation.’’ Handbook at
Section VII.F.2.
Comment 44: In the sentence that
states NOAA ‘‘should acknowledge and
discuss the limited capacity of NOAA to
protect the confidentiality of
information provided by the tribe
consistent with the requirements of
[FOIA] or litigation[,]’’ the use of the
term ‘‘limited’’ should be struck from
this section since it could be interpreted
by NOAA staff that the Agency will not
make the utmost effort to protect the
confidentiality of sensitive Tribal
government and cultural information.
Upon removal of the term ’limited’, this
language should also be referenced
under Section IV(A).
Response: Accepted. Sentence revised
to: ‘‘NOAA should, however, in advance
notify tribes of the information
disclosure requirements that may apply
to information shared by tribes with the
Federal Government (examples include
FOIA and litigation discovery).
Although NOAA will endeavor to
comply with a tribe’s request that
information be kept confidential, there
may be applicable Federal disclosure
requirements that compel its release.’’
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
Comment 45: Modify sentence to read
‘‘5) reach agreement with tribes on the
method of recordkeeping and
documentation of the
consultation. . . .’’
Response: Accepted. Added ‘‘and
reach agreement on’’ to Handbook
Section VII.F.5.
Comment 46: The draft consultation
handbook provides one way of closing
a consultation with a one-way-response
letter that does not meet a trust
responsibility. Edit to read ‘‘written
notice from NOAA and consent from
affected tribes or the absence of any
tribal objections by a predetermined
time.’’
Response: NOAA agrees that
transparency is an important aspect of
government-to-government
consultation. In response to this
comment, NOAA added the following
sentence Handbook Section VII.G.: ‘‘As
a best practice, NOAA should share a
draft of the closing record for review
and comment with the tribe before it is
finalized.’’
Comment 47: Add ‘‘6) Prior to
beginning consultation inform the Tribe
of NOAA’s obligations under FOIA.’’
Response: Accepted. Added the
following: ‘‘NOAA and tribes should not
create or share recorded information,
such as summaries, transcripts or
recordings, without first discussing the
government’s obligations under
applicable law, including the Federal
Records Act, FOIA and the Privacy Act,
as well as in response to litigation
obligations or as required by court
order. This discussion should occur
prior to beginning consultation.’’
Comment 48: NOAA agencies do not
abide by the close out guidance which
is disrespectful to the tribe.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
comment. The Handbook Section VII.G.,
describes the process for closing out
government-to-government
consultations. It states that governmentto-government consultation is closed
through a formal, written
communication from the lead NOAA
official to the most senior tribal official.
Comment 49: This title should be
amended to state: ‘‘Completing and
recording the government-togovernment consultation.’’ Consultation
process should include a follow-up
phase. Consultation is an on-going
process, and ‘‘closing’’ carries a
connotation that prompts the
consultation process to come to an end
once formal, written communication has
recounted the agreed-upon issues.
Follow-up and follow-through are key
components for a healthy governmentto-government relationship. Follow-up
and follow-though will also provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
validation for the record that the
consultation was engaging and
meaningful.
Response: Accepted. NOAA changed
the title of Section VII.G., to include the
term ‘‘completing.’’
Comment 50: Recognize the unique
status of Native land tenure in Alaska
and the value of the unique and diverse
systems of Native governance in Alaska.
Response: Accepted in part. NOAA
included additional language requested
concerning the unique system of Native
governance and Native land tenure in
Alaska. The following paragraph was
added to the Handbook Section: There
is a unique system of Native governance
in Alaska, and a variety of entities
represent the interests of Alaska Native
communities, including Alaska Tribes
and governments, Alaska Native
corporations, Alaska Native non-profits,
and Alaska Native organizations. The
purpose and structure of some of these
entities is dictated in part by Federal
law, such as the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) and the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
Moreover, the status of land ownership
in Alaska is similarly defined in part by
Federal law, including ANCSA.
Pursuant to ANCSA, Alaska native
corporations hold title to land in Alaska;
as such, ANCSA lands are not held in
trust by the United States and do not
qualify as Indian Country. There is one
reservation located in Alaska, the
Annette Islands Reserve of the
Metlakatla Indian Community.
However, the lands and reservation
defined under Federal law may not
represent the traditional homelands of
Alaska Native tribes.
In response to this comment, NOAA
added clarification to the following
existing sentence: ‘‘NOAA recognizes
the distinct and individual cultural
traditions and values of Alaska native
peoples and their representative tribal
governments’’ Handbook Section IV.B.
(Emphasis added). Commenter
requested that NOAA include additional
information about ANCSA. We added
an explanation of how ANCSA altered
land ownership in Alaska, with
corporations holding land, and we
added a reference to the statute and a
website with more information about
ANCSA; however, additional details
about ANSCA are beyond the scope of
this Handbook. Handbook Section IX.D.
Comment 51: Tribal Consultation
should not occur after a Fishery
Management Council has taken Action.
Tribes should inform recommendations.
Previsions in the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) do not supersede tribal trust
responsibilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43315
Response: Accepted. Handbook
Section IX.F., was revised to include:
‘‘NOAA and the tribes should continue
to work together to develop specific,
proactive, and effective processes and
procedures to better integrate the
outcomes from tribal consultation
between NOAA Fisheries and tribes
with the appropriate Council
process(es), with the goal that
consultation outcomes would be shared
with the appropriate Council before the
Council takes action. Consultation
should always occur at the earliest time
practicable, well before a final policy or
regulatory decision with tribal
implications is made.’’
Comment 52: Agencies have
increasingly moved to the electronic
distribution of documents. With internet
connectivity often a challenge in small
remote Alaskan communities, the digital
transfer of documents, and particularly
large complex documents featuring
many maps, is impossible. Zoom and
comparable virtual meetings are also
often not an option given the extremely
limited availability of broadband in
rural Alaska. Accommodations must be
made, and appropriate time must be
allowed, for the distribution and review
of all materials necessary for meaningful
consultation to occur.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
concerns expressed in this comment.
There are a number of flexibilities in the
Handbook for this reason. Specifically,
the Handbook states ‘‘[t[he Department
and operating units’ consultation
processes may include one or more of
the following: meetings, letters,
conference calls, webinars, on-site
visits, or participation in regional and
national events.’’ In addition, NOAA
added language that NOAA will work
with tribes to ensure that the
information is provided to tribes in a
format that tribes can access and use. As
this comment reflects, there are some
constraints that might limit the ability to
access and use information, such as lack
of internet access or sufficient internet
bandwidth to access or download
materials, such as lengthy PDFs.
In light of these constraints, NOAA
will endeavor to work with tribes to
make sure tribes can access and use the
materials. For example, in some cases,
NOAA may mail materials in advance.
In response to this comment, NOAA
made the following edits to the
Handbook at Section V.A.: In order to
have a meaningful consultation, NOAA
will provide available information to the
tribes in advance of the consultation to
allow the tribes to prepare. NOAA will
work with tribes in an effort to ensure
that the information is provided to
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43316
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
tribes in a format that tribes can access
and use.
Comment 53: Add The United
Nations Declaration on Rights of
Indigenous Peoples to Appendix to
emphasize consent in consultation.
Response: This is outside the scope of
NOAA’s consultation procedures. As
noted in the ‘‘Announcement of U.S.
Support for the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples,’’ the United States recognizes
the significance of the Declaration’s
provisions on free, prior and informed
consent, which the United States
‘‘understands to call for a process of
meaningful consultation with tribal
leaders, but not necessarily the
agreement of those leaders, before the
actions addressed in those consultations
are taken.’’ NOAA’s 13175 Handbook
reflects this view, and as such, the
Agency does not believe inclusion of the
Declaration as an appendix to the
Handbook is necessary or appropriate.
Comment 54: NOAA Fisheries and
National Ocean Service (NOS) are
obligated, among other things, to follow
Federal statutes regarding tribal
resources, lands, and waters. This
includes the Alaska National Interest
Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) of
1980; specifically, NOAA must adhere
to Title VIII of ANILCA, which
designates that subsistence fish,
wildlife, and other resources used by
Alaska Natives and non-Natives must be
federally protected and prioritized when
experiencing a conservation threat. The
subsistence uses of these resources are
prioritized during conservation closures
and shortages means NOAA Fisheries
and NOS management bodies must
prioritize Alaska Native and non-Native
subsistence users before commercial
interests when multi-use fisheries are in
decline, such as Western Alaska salmon
populations.
Response: No edits made. This
comment is beyond the scope of the
Handbook.
Comment 55: Add Religious Freedom
Act.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of the Handbook. Although
relevant to Tribal Rights, NOAA does
not believe inclusion of the Religious
Freedom Act as an appendix to the
Handbook is necessary or appropriate.
Comment 56: Mass Dear Tribal letters
are not ideal for consultations.
Response: Noted for implementation.
NOAA values direct correspondence.
Frequently in regional consultations
individual letters are sent, however, for
National Policies that may have tribal
implications for hundreds of federally
recognized Indian tribes, direct
correspondence is not always feasible.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Comment 57: NOAA must recognize
the authority of Tribal Nations to
designate cultural resources and
landscapes for protection similar to
those guaranteed by treaty, statute,
judicial decisions, and executive orders.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 58: NOAA’s consultation
policy should explicitly affirm and
differentiate treaty rights issues and the
government-to-government process from
the public and administrative process.
Response: NOAA has added
additional language to the Handbook to
highlight the need to account for tribal
treaty rights, reserved rights, and similar
rights when considering actions that
may have tribal implications. See
Handbook Section VI.A. In addition, the
Handbook notes that ‘‘Consultation
recognizes and distinguishes the views
and policies of tribes from those of the
general public and considers those
views in the context of the
responsibilities of federally recognized
tribes to their people and tribal
members.’’ Consultation Handbook
Section VI.
Comment 59: Provide a redline of
document in the future.
Response: Accepted. A redline
version of the revisions included with
the final version of the Handbook is
available at: https://www.noaa.gov/
legislative-and-intergovernmentalaffairs/noaa-tribal-resources-updates.
Comment 60: Policy was not provided
for review.
Response: The NOAA Policy on
Government-to-Government
Consultations with Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska
Native Corporations is included as
Appendix F to the Consultation
Handbook.
Comment 61: This request should
have been put in the Federal Register.
Response: The request was published
in the Federal Register on November 24,
2021, at 86 FR 67036 and the comment
period extended in a notice published
on January 21, 2022, at 87 FR 3280.
Comment 62: Please capitalize Alaska
Native throughout.
Response: Capitalization is based on
Federal style guides. Including: https://
www.archives.gov/files/federalregister/
write/handbook/ddh.pdf.
Comment 63: It may be useful to add
a section on threats (e.g., plastics, dead
zones, climate change) to the
documents.
Response: This suggested addition is
outside the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 64: Federal Government
should standardize and codify
consultation requirements. For far too
long, Tribal Nations have experienced
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inconsistencies in consultation policies,
the violation of consultation policies,
and mere notification of Federal action
as opposed to a solicitation of input.
Response: NOAA’s goal for the
Handbook, consistent with the
requirements of E.O. 13175, is to
develop an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications. The revisions to the
Handbook are designed to further
enhance NOAA’s consultation process.
Comment 65: Because the U.S. is
engaged in a diplomatic relationship
with each federally recognized Tribal
Nation, greater effort must be made to
consult with Tribal Nations on an
individual basis.
Response: See response to Comment
57 above.
Comment 66: Do not use the number
of tribes to consult with as a reason not
to consult. Many tribes are willing to
meet as a group or by video.
Response: Noted, NOAA will
endeavor to engage and consult tribes
using methods that work best for each
party.
Comment 67: E.O. 13175, Section 3
lays out a set of policy making criteria
that have been implemented unevenly
over the last two decades. In particular,
this includes directives to extend
‘‘maximum administrative discretion’’
to Tribal Nations by encouraging Tribal
Nations to develop our own policies and
standards to achieve objectives as well
as consult with those Tribal Nations on
the necessity of any Federal standards.
Commenter urges NOAA and the Biden
Administration to consider how this
section can be better operationalized
and consistently applied throughout the
Federal Government.
Response: The aspects of this
comment related to the consultation
processes occurring outside of NOAA
are beyond the scope of the Handbook.
NOAA appreciates commenter’s
suggestions regarding better
operationalization of the consultation
process.
Comment 68: E.O. 13175, Section 6
encourages the Federal Government to
facilitate and streamline tribal
applications for waivers of statutory and
regulatory requirements. With some
notable exceptions, this section does not
appear to be actively implemented
across the Federal Government.
Response: This comment regarding
the implementation of E.O. 13175 across
the Federal Government is beyond the
scope of the Handbook. NOAA
considers any tribal application for a
waiver or statutory and regulatory
requirements on a case-by-case basis,
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
and as such, we do not believe it is
necessary or appropriate to address
waivers within the Handbook.
Comment 69: NOAA does not
correctly quote the consultation
provision. In both NOAA
Administrative Order 218–8 and the
Handbook, NOAA states that ‘‘[a]s
defined in Section 5 of E.O. 13175,
[consultation] refers to an accountable
process ensuring meaningful and timely
input from tribal officials on NOAA
policies that have tribal implications.’’
E.O. 13175 states that ‘‘[e]ach agency
shall have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ By omitting the phrase
‘‘in the development of,’’ NOAA
appears to be discounting both the role
and substance of consultation with
respect to the Federal decision-making
process.
Response: NOAA’s Handbook notes
the Agency’s commitment to having an
accountable process with the federally
recognized Indian tribe(s) for
development of policies and guidance.
It is not NOAA’s intent to discount the
role or substance of consultation for the
Federal decision-making process.
Comment 70: There is a need for a
robust communication strategy with
tribes.
Response: Noted, however the need
for a robust communication strategy is
beyond the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 71: NOAA should form a
permanent Tribal Advisory Committee
to advise on decision-making, policy
development, and effective
consultation; and support the
institutionalization of education about
tribes and treaty rights at the Federal
level. The Tribal Advisory Committee
would represent a permanent
investment in NOAA’s commitment to
tribes that would persist beyond
administration changes.
Response: Noted, however the
recommendation to form a Tribal
Advisory Committee is beyond the
scope of the Handbook.
Comment 72: The ‘‘NOAA Tribal
Team’’ on NOAA’s website should
include Regional roles to provide
context, email and phone information
would be most useful.
Response: This comment regarding
the context of NOAA’s website is
beyond the scope of the Handbook.
However, NOAA is updating its tribal
website and will consider this comment
through that process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
General Comments and
Recommendations (IK Guidance)
Comment 1: It is the sole authority of
Tribal Nations and cultural and
religious leaders to determine how TEK
can and should be used to inform these
processes and NOAA must make every
effort to protect the confidentiality of
this sensitive cultural and religious
information. Commenter requested that
the recommendations provided in these
comments on the 2021 draft Tribal
Consultation Handbook regarding FOIA
requests also be referenced in the TEK
Guidance to ensure that NOAA staff
understand that these documents are
inextricably connected.
Response: The current Guidance
references the Handbook and vice versa,
establishing the connections between
these two documents. While
information shared between NOAA and
a tribe may be beneficial for the
consultation process, it is generally not
exempt from disclosure under FOIA,
especially if this information is used in
the decision-making process and
becomes part of the administrative
record. As such, the Guidance notes the
importance of advance notification to
tribes of the limited capacity of NOAA
to protect the confidentiality of
information provided by the tribe
consistent with the requirements of
FOIA or other applicable legal
obligations.
Comment 2: We also support
expanding the TEK Guidance to be
implemented agency-wide at NOAA.
Response: NOAA agrees that the
Guidance should be implemented
agency-wide. This change is reflected in
the finalized TEK Guidance.
Comment 3: Commenter recommends
the inclusion of language in the TEK
Guidance to require NOAA offices to
promote the incorporation and use of
TEK to inform policy and decisionmaking processes when collaborating
with other Federal departments and
agencies on projects that may have
direct or indirect implications for Tribal
Nations.
Response: NOAA agrees that a
discussion of interagency coordination
should be included in the TEK
Guidance. A new section on Interagency
Coordination was added to TEK
Guidance on page 13.
Comment 4: TEK must be respected
and protected as Tribal proprietary
knowledge, as Tribal Nations and
cultures carry the responsibility of its
application for the well-being of our
communities, homelands, and
seascapes. NOAA must make the utmost
effort to protect TEK and other sensitive
cultural information from public
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43317
disclosure and ensure Tribal Nations
have the ability to control what is
shared by the Agency, including
through FOIA requests.
Response: Accepted in part. NOAA
added in the ‘‘Guidance’’ section, 1st
paragraph: ‘‘IK should be respected as
belonging to the IK holder(s).’’ Under
Data Confidentiality, first paragraph,
added, ‘‘NOAA employees should not
begin collecting IK without establishing
mutual trust, respect, and recognition of
knowledge sovereignty.’’ NOAA
acknowledges that IK holders may not
support public disclosure of this
information, however, the Agency has
limited ability under existing public
disclosure obligations to prevent
disclosure of information shared with
NOAA. For this reason, the IK Guidance
describes the need to clearly disclose
any constraints or limitations regarding
the ability to protect sensitive or
confidential information before NOAA
seeks access to IK.
Comment 5: Currently NOAA is
largely unequipped to collect and
engage TEK in a meaningful way. Fixing
this will involve more than revision to
the TEK Guidance, it will involve
continuous employee training, extensive
tribal engagement, and a change in the
culture at NOAA and other Federal
agencies.
Response: Accepted. NOAA agrees
that guidance should reference NOAA
capacity. A new section was added on,
‘‘Building Capacity Within NOAA.’’
Comment 6: When approaching tribes
regarding TEK, NOAA officials must
view tribes as knowledge co-producers
and co-owners and engage tribes as true
partners in acquiring the information
necessary for informed decision-making.
NOAA must inform tribes of the
specific, tangible benefits of such
information sharing and refrain from
making only broad claims that it will
‘‘inform policy.’’
Response: NOAA appreciates the
views expressed in this comment.
Comment 7: The TEK Guidance
should also cite to Article 31 of the
United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
that relates specifically to traditional
knowledge: Indigenous peoples have the
right to maintain, control, protect and
develop their cultural heritage,
traditional knowledge and traditional
cultural expressions, as well as the
manifestations of their sciences,
technologies and cultures, including
human and genetic resources, seeds,
medicines, knowledge of the properties
of fauna and flora, oral traditions,
literatures, designs, sports and
traditional games, and visual and
performing arts. They also have the right
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43318
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
to maintain, control, protect and
develop their intellectual property over
such cultural heritage, traditional
knowledge, and traditional cultural
expressions. In conjunction with
indigenous peoples, states shall take
effective measures to recognize and
protect the exercise of these rights.
Response: Accepted. NOAA added a
reference to Knowledge Sovereignty and
UNDRIP language from Article 31 in a
renamed ‘‘Principles’’ section.
Comment 8: Tribes should have an
opportunity to review and object to any
use or recitation of TEK by NOAA.
Provision needs to be stronger by
removing ‘‘should’’ and replacing it
with ‘‘must.’’
Response: Disagree. While the
Guidance is premised on the principle
of ‘‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent,’’
it is designed to provide best practices
to help ensure that the sharing and
application of IK is responsible,
effective, and mutually beneficial. It
does not create binding or enforceable
rights, and as such, NOAA does not
believe inclusion of mandatory
directives such as ‘‘must’’ is
appropriate.
Comment 9: TEK must come directly
from tribes. On page 4 of the TEK
Guidance, ‘‘literature review’’ is listed
as the first method of identifying and
collecting TEK. If NOAA officials utilize
this method, tribes need to guide the
literature review to ensure that the right
sources are being reviewed. Further,
literature review should always be used
in conjunction with outreach to tribes to
identify and collect TEK.
Response: Accepted. Added to
‘‘literature review’’ section:
‘‘Researchers should work with IK
holder(s) to share information about the
project and seek their guidance on
sources.’’
Comment 10: Confidentiality is
important in order for tribes to candidly
share TEK. In some cases, anonymity
may be appropriate to prevent resource
damage, backlash, enforcement action,
legal risk, or other harms. Before any
information is shared, NOAA and tribes
should fully understand how such
information will be shared. NOAA
personnel should also explain to tribes
if any of that information is subject to
disclosure under the FOIA. NOAA
should not approach individual tribal
members for TEK without first receiving
consent from the tribe through its
formal, identified institutions. The
qualifier ‘‘Ideally’’ should be removed,
since collection outside a method
established by a tribe does not amount
to free, prior, and informed consent
from the tribe to provide such TEK.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Response: Accepted. Removed word
‘‘ideally’’ from ‘‘Identifying and/or
collect IK’’ section. The section now
includes the following sentence: ‘‘No
data should be collected until a
preferred method is established with
indigenous group leaders and, through
them or previous fieldwork, with IK
holder(s).’’
Comment 11: The TEK Guidance
provides one example of successful use
of TEK in decision-making. Providing
additional examples in more detail may
help NOAA personnel and tribes
understand the benefits of sharing TEK
and what TEK may be useful for NOAA
decision-makers.
Response: Accepted. NOAA has
included four examples of the benefits
of using IK in decision making.
Comment 12: NOAA should include
TEK as the best available science.
NOAA should be more forthright in its
TEK Guidance and state that the ‘‘best
available science shall incorporate TEK
and other related indigenous practices.’’
Response: Partly accepted. Under
Guidance, the first paragraph has been
changed to substitute the word
‘‘should’’ for ‘‘can.’’ Under the new
Interagency Coordination section, the
second sentence reads: ‘‘When
conducting formal or informal
consultations with other Federal
agencies on issues with implications for
tribes and indigenous communities,
NOAA should include and acknowledge
IK as part of best available science and
as part of the administrative record.’’ As
noted in the response to IK Comment 8,
NOAA does not believe inclusion of
mandatory directives such as ‘‘shall’’ is
appropriate in this Guidance document.
Comment 13: NOAA should ensure
that TEK is properly incorporated into
decision-making. One impediment to
the sharing of TEK is that knowledge
holders frequently do not understand or
observe how their information or data
are incorporated into Federal decisionmaking. Final results used to inform
Federal decision making and policy
development should also be shared. We
urge NOAA to adhere to these
provisions in the TEK Guidance and
foster true scientific collaboration with
TEK holders.
Response: Accepted. NOAA will
undertake training and outreach to
ensure that staff are aware of the
guidance. In addition, a section on
‘‘Building Capacity within NOAA’’ was
added.
Comment 14: We encourage NOAA to
conduct additional engagement directly
with tribes, Alaska Native corporations,
and other holders of Indigenous
knowledge to further develop
substantive guidance addressing the
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incorporation and consideration of TEK
along with other scientific information.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
recommendation provided in this
comment. NOAA conducted tribal
consultation on this guidance in January
2022, and does not believe additional
consultation is needed at this time to
finalize the IK Guidance, particularly
given the additional consultation
conducted by the White House Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in
developing its interagency guidance on
IK. As noted, the IK Guidance is
intended to be a living document that
will be updated and improved over
time. NOAA anticipates continued
engagement with tribes on this
document as it continues to mature.
Comment 15: We request that the
agency, through regulation or other
means, more formally recognize
indigenous knowledge in its definition
of ‘‘best available science’’ under the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq., and other applicable laws.
Response: Guidance updated to note
that Indigenous Knowledge should be
included in the definition of ‘‘best
available science’’ where possible, but
does not specifically reference the
Endangered Species Act. Under
Guidance, the first paragraph has been
changed to substitute the word
‘‘should’’ for ‘‘can.’’ New text reads:
‘‘Best available science should
incorporate IK and other related
indigenous practices.’’
Comment 16: Commenter requests
that NOAA revise its ‘‘Guidance and
Best Practices for Engaging and
Incorporating Traditional Ecological
Knowledge in Decision-Making’’ to
reflect an acceptance of indigenous
knowledge on their own terms.
Response: Addressed in new
‘‘Context’’ section.
Comment 17: NOAA also should
repudiate any perceived need to
integrate or assimilate indigenous
knowledge into a Western science
format. What is needed instead is a
multiple evidence base approach that
recognizes and respects the inherent
value and worth of indigenous
knowledge systems. We encourage
NOAA to review and integrate TwoEyed Seeing into its tribal policies and
procedures.
Response: Reference to, and
discussion of, ‘‘Two-Eyed Seeing’’ has
been added to the Guidance section.
Comment 18: To the extent the
Agency has questions about the best
way to do this, we suggest that NOAA
invite indigenous community members
to help craft the Agency’s policies and
guidance documents.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
Response: Accepted. NOAA held
tribal consultation on this guidance, and
incorporated most of the tribal input
into the revised version. Added the
Guidance section on co-production of
knowledge. NOAA is interested in
building partnerships with tribes to
recognize and include IK.
Comment 19: Not all environmental
concerns faced by Indigenous peoples
are mere Environmental Justice
concerns, but instead rise to the level of
adverting cultural genocide from
robbing of Environmental Sovereignty
from the Indigenous population. By not
clearly defining that the purpose of this
document is to foster partnership and
not disenfranchisement of Indigenous
lifeways, this document leaves it open
for industry to circumvent the Federal
regulators and other Federal entities
who have the fiduciary trust
responsibilities to the tribes and other
Indigenous peoples of the United States.
Response: In response to this
comment, NOAA added ‘‘fulfill Federal
trust responsibilities’’ to the purposes
addressed by the inclusion of IK.
Comment 20: Commenter notes that
the guidance leaves a big hole in this
portrayal of what NOAA can do by
neglecting to affirm that NOAA with its
science-based objectivity have the
ability to act as an advocate for the
Indigenous peoples when speaking with
other Federal agencies who do have the
ability to ensure enforceability of rights
or the ability to cause action under the
law.
Response: Accepted. NOAA agrees
that IK can be a relevant and valuable
element of interagency coordination. In
response to this section, NOAA has
added a section on ‘‘Interagency
Coordination’’ to acknowledge this
concept and provide guidance to NOAA
staff.
Comment 21: NOAA Fisheries should
recognize generally, and in the subject
documents specifically, the distinct,
unique feature or attribute that
distinguishes the tribe and its members
from most other Americans (such as
those commonly identified among
‘‘Environmental Justice’’ communities).
We have Treaty Rights, and derived
from that fact, the Federal Government
has a Trust Responsibility to us.
Response: Accepted. A reference to
treaty rights and trust responsibilities
has been added to the Introduction
section.
Comment 22: Given that ‘‘Ecology’’ is
a relationship between an organism (or
being) and its environment, NOAA
needs to understand that the tribe has
developed an applied First Foods
management mission, and applied River
and Upland Visions to guide restoration
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
and management of First Foods (water,
native fish, wildlife, plants), that are
based on the ecology between and
among First Foods, the ecology of the
tribe and our Foods, and our
relationship to the landscapes and
waters that provide the Foods. Our
management visions should be
recognized as high level, applied
‘‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge,’’
and given at least equal weight to
Federal agency management guidance.
Where our management goals or
priorities differ, we can consult to
address those differences.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
views expressed in this comment.
Comment 23: Infringement on Treaty
Rights and Trust Irresponsibility have
occurred in the Pacific Northwest, too
often under active Federal oversight, or
from the lack of it. A fundamental
objective of the subject documents
should be to facilitate the correction of
these past and continuing injustices.
Response: A reference to treaty rights
and trust responsibilities has been
added to the Introduction section.
Comment 24: In developing and
revising the documents, it may be
helpful and informative to refer to the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) 2016 Guidance, ‘‘EPA Policy on
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribes: Guidance for Discussing
Tribal Treaty Rights.’’
Response: NOAA appreciates the
recommendation provided in this
comment. As noted above, a reference to
treaty rights and trust responsibilities
has been added to the Introduction.
Comment 25: NOAA Fisheries’
response to our petition thus far has not
only completely ignored the tribe’s TEK
and any sense of a meaningful
Government-to-Government
relationship but has also misrepresented
Western science.
Response: This fact-specific concern
is beyond the scope of the IK Guidance.
Comment 26: We request NOAA
Fisheries’ leadership team to
immediately convene a Government-toGovernment meeting with the [tribe]
and relevant NOAA staff to revisit this
issue and appropriately engage in
consultation and integration of our TEK
into decision making to ensure
Executive Order 13175 is carried out
appropriately.
Response: See response to IK
Guidance Comment 25.
Comment 27: We recommend that
NOAA integrate the best available
Western science with Indigenous
Knowledge provided by tribes to inform
decision-making and management.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43319
Response: NOAA appreciates the
recommendation included with this
comment.
Comment 28: We also recommend
that the TEK guidance document
includes robust protective measures that
ensure that sensitive information that
may be shared with NOAA in the course
of our work together is not made
publicly available. We encourage NOAA
to develop specific data-sharing
agreements with tribes regarding the use
of TEK that outline intellectual property
and data ownership, privacy, and use.
Response: Accepted. Added the
following to Data Confidentiality
section, first paragraph: ‘‘NOAA
employees should not begin collecting
IK without establishing mutual trust,
respect, and recognition of knowledge
sovereignty, preferably in the form of a
jointly developed agreement. The
agreement should outline the purpose of
the data collection, intellectual property
and data ownership, privacy, and use.’’
Comment 29: We further recommend
that NOAA support TEK integration into
management approaches by increasing
dedicated and long-term capacity
funding for natural and cultural
research staff, including Tribal Historic
Preservation Offices, to support
coordinated engagement across tribal
organizations. NOAA should integrate
and fund opportunities for research and
planning, training and capacity
building, and implementation programs
for the safe resumption of traditional
management approaches, as these efforts
would also support the integration of
TEK into management.
Response: Comments regarding
Federal funding allocation decisions are
beyond the scope of the IK Guidance.
Comment 30: We would look forward
to engaging with the NMFS Alaska
Region to discuss the implementation of
this guidance with Alaska Tribes, and
urge you to encourage the Alaska Region
to outreach to tribes and tribal
organizations to engage in such
discussions.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
views expressed in this comment.
Comment 31: The NOAA TEK
Guidance document constitutes an
excellent baseline document on this
topic and we encourage NOAA staff
working with tribes to be familiar with
it.
Response: Accepted. A new section
on ‘‘Building Capacity Within NOAA’’
has been added to the IK Guidance.
Comment 32: As noted above with
regard to the Tribal Consultation
Handbook, it is important to bear in
mind that there are other aspects of
Alaska Native and tribal knowledge
other than TEK which are valuable and
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
43320
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2023 / Notices
should be engaged in NOAA’s work.
This includes the aspects of Traditional
Knowledge (TK) outside those which
are strictly considered ‘ecological,’
understanding the interlinkages
between the ‘ecological’ and ‘other’
aspects of TK, and crucially important
forms of Indigenous Knowledge other
than TK.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
views expressed in this comment, and
notes that the terminology of the IK
Guidance has been revised from TEK to
IK in the final document, in part, to
address considerations noted in this
comment.
Comment 33: We encourage NOAA to
look at the work on Knowledge
Sovereignty and Indigenization in
which the tribe has been engaged.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
recommendation provided in this
comment. Discussion of knowledge
sovereignty has been added to the
Principles section of the IK Guidance.
Comment 34: We encourage NOAA to
work with tribes via a co-productive
framework as pertains to knowledgerelated, as well as other (e.g., policy),
activities.
Response: Accepted. Discussion of
knowledge sovereignty has been added
to the Principles section of the IK
Guidance. NOAA has also added the
following text to the Guidance section:
‘‘NOAA staff should consider ways to
co-develop and include IK for decisionmaking through multiple programs and
approaches.’’
Comment 35: Commenter emphasizes
that ‘‘it may be inappropriate to suggest
that TEK should be ‘validated,’ ’’ and,
‘‘rather, indigenous peoples’ own
internal methods of defining, valuing,
and validating their own knowledge/
knowledge systems should be
respected.’’ See NOAA Handbook
(Section IV) regarding the unnecessary
validation of TEK by Western science.
Response: Accepted. In the Guidance
section of the IK Guidance, NOAA
states: ‘‘Depending on the situation, it
may be inappropriate to suggest that IK
should be ‘‘validated’’. Rather,
Indigenous Peoples’ own internal
methods of defining, valuing, and
validating their own knowledge/
knowledge systems should be respected
and trusted.’’
Comment 36: TEK holders and
communities have the right to review
documents that include their TEK as
well as the right to redact, remove, or
reject how their TEK is included.
Commenter requests that NOAA add a
section in the TEK Guidance explicitly
guiding NOAA Fisheries and NOS to let
TEK holders and communities review
the TEK collected and how it is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Jul 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
included in the work and research of
NOAA Fisheries and NOS before it is
used or distributed.
Response: NOAA appreciates the
views expressed in this comment and
has added to the Best Practices for
Identifying and Considering IK section
in the IK Guidance the following
addition: ‘‘NOAA should work to share
and archive any data collected in
cooperation with IK holder(s) and
communities. IK holder(s) and
communities should review NOAA
products that include IK before
publication. Any confidential or
proprietary data that has been provided
for public release solely in the aggregate
form must not be shared in
disaggregated form—except under any
legal requirement (e.g., Freedom of
Information Act) and never without
prior notification of the provider of that
particular IK.’’ NOAA also notes that the
applicability of the IK Guidance now
extends to all of NOAA.
Comment 37: Our only suggestion is
to follow the lead of the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP) and the White House Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) which
recently released a Memorandum for the
Heads of Departments and Agencies on
the subject of Indigenous Traditional
Ecological Knowledge and Federal
Decision Making. Not only in substance,
but also including the use of Indigenous
Knowledge and/or Indigenous
Traditional Ecological Knowledge,
instead of the archaic ambiguous term
TEK, both of which are a more accurate
descriptor of the body of knowledge we
are all referring to.
Response: Accepted. As noted above,
the NOAA IK Guidance now uses the
term ‘‘Indigenous Knowledge’’ in lieu of
TEK.
Richard W. Spinrad,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and
Atmosphere, NOAA Administrator, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023–14415 Filed 7–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Additions
and Deletions
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Proposed additions to and
deletions from the Procurement List.
AGENCY:
The Committee is proposing
to add and service(s) to the Procurement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
List that will be furnished by nonprofit
agencies employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities
and delete product(s) previously
furnished by such agencies.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before: August 06, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, 355 E St. SW, Suite 325,
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or to submit
comments contact: Michael R.
Jurkowski, telephone: (703) 785–6404,
or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published pursuant to 41
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its
purpose is to provide interested persons
an opportunity to submit comments on
the proposed actions.
Additions
If the Committee approves the
proposed additions, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in this
notice will be required to procure the
service(s) listed below from nonprofit
agencies employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
The following service(s) are proposed
for addition to the Procurement List for
production by the nonprofit agencies
listed:
Service(s)
Service Type: Custodial Service
Mandatory for: NSWCDD, Dahlgren, VA and
Pumpkin Neck Annex, King George, VA
Designated Source of Supply: ServiceSource,
Inc., Oakton, VA
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE NAVY,
NSWC DAHLGREN
Deletions
The following product(s) and
service(s) are proposed for deletion from
the Procurement List:
Product(s)
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7520–01–620–3317—Hole Punch, Paper,
Light Duty, 3-Hole, Adjustable, 11 sheet
capacity, Black Base, Metallic Handle
Designated Source of Supply: AbilityFirst,
Pasadena, CA
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
SVCS ACQUISITION BR (2, NEW YORK,
NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7520–01–451–9183—Pen, Ballpoint,
Retractable, Essential LVX, Blue, Fine
Point
7520–01–451–9177—Pen, Ballpoint,
Retractable, Essential LVX, Red, Fine
Point
Designated Source of Supply: Industries for
the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc.,
West Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 129 (Friday, July 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43309-43320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14415]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XV194]
Final National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tribal
Consultation Policy and Procedures
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 26, 2021, the White House issued a Presidential
Memorandum on Tribal Consultation and Strengthening Nation-to-Nation
Relationships that reaffirmed the Executive order on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2000). In response, NOAA
sought review and comment on its Tribal consultation policy and
procedures in November 2021. NOAA revised its Consultation Handbook
describing procedures for government-to-government consultation with
federally recognized Indian tribes, and updated an associated NOAA
Administrative Order (NAO 218-8) and the Indigenous Knowledge (IK)
guidance.
DATES: The policy and procedures took effect on June 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Requests for additional information or an electronic copy of
the revised Consultation Handbook, the associated NOAA Administrative
Order (NAO 218-8), and/or the Indigenous Knowledge (IK) guidance should
be
[[Page 43310]]
directed to Becky Cruz Lizama, NOAA Senior Tribal Liaison, NOAA Office
of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, U.S. Department of
Commerce, NOAA, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Station Number 62006FB,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Cruz Lizama, NOAA Senior Tribal
Liaison, telephone (202) 482-0809; email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The revised Handbook is intended to assist
NOAA, including its regional and field staff, in conducting effective
government-to-government consultations and fulfill NOAA's obligations
under E.O. 13175 and associated Presidential memorandums, the
Department Administrative Order 218-8 on Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments, and the Department of Commerce Tribal
Consultation and Coordination Policy. The IK guidance will facilitate
inclusion of IK into the line offices' environmental science, policy
and decision making process, and build partnerships with Indigenous
peoples.
On January 26, 2021, the White House issued a Presidential
Memorandum on Tribal Consultation and Strengthening Nation-to-Nation
Relationships. The Memorandum requires the Secretary of Commerce to
submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), a
detailed plan of actions the agency will take to implement the policies
and directives of E.O. 13175 (2000) and the Presidential Memorandum on
Tribal Consultation issued in November 2009.
NOAA's mission is to understand and predict changes in climate,
weather, oceans, and coasts, to share that knowledge and information
with others, and to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems
and resources. NOAA has established policies and guidance to provide
for meaningful and timely input from federally recognized Indian tribes
into NOAA's decision-making process on policy matters that have tribal
implications. In addition, NOAA offers its employees training and other
guidance to support a consistent, effective, and proactive approach to
conducting government-to-government consultations with federally
recognized Indian tribes under E.O. 13175, the Department of Commerce
(DOC) Department Administrative Order 218-8 Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2014), and the DOC Tribal
Consultation and Coordination Policy (78 FR 33331, June 4, 2013).
While much of NOAA's existing policy and guidance has been
developed in consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes, NOAA
recognized that these documents could benefit from a review and update.
As part of its effort to implement the January 26, 2021 Presidential
Memorandum, NOAA requested comments from Tribal Nations, tribal
officials, members of the public, and other interested parties to help
identify appropriate updates or revisions to the following existing
NOAA policies and guidance documents, which facilitate NOAA's
implementation of E.O. 13175: (1) Tribal Consultation Handbook titled
NOAA Procedures for Government-to-Government Consultation With
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations
(2013); (2) NOAA Administrative Order 218-8 titled Policy on
Government-to-Government Consultation with Federally Recognized Indian
Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations (Reaffirmed in 2018); and (3) a
traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) guidance currently titled NOAA
Fisheries and National Ocean Service Guidance and Best Practices for
Engaging and Incorporating Traditional Ecological Knowledge in
Decision-Making (2019). NOAA proposed revisions to its Tribal
Consultation Handbook reflect lessons learned and improved practices to
better facilitate meaningful and effective tribal consultations. NOAA
also proposed minor revisions to Administrative Order 218-8 to reflect
necessary updates since its issuance in 2014. We also sought comments
on the existing TEK Guidance, which had not been previously made
available for public comment. Though the TEK Guidance was originally
only implemented by NOAA Fisheries and the National Ocean Service, NOAA
is now extending the applicability of the TEK Guidance to all NOAA
Offices and renaming it the IK guidance. Based on written and oral
comments received, NOAA revised its Tribal Consultation Handbook,
Administrative Order, and IK guidance. All three documents can be found
on the NOAA website https://www.noaa.gov/legislative-and-intergovernmental-affairs/noaa-tribal-resources-updates.
NOAA's revised Handbook and NAO also reflect the recent
Presidential Memorandum on Uniform Standards for Tribal Consultation
(November 30, 2022), which among things, commits agencies to conducting
government-to-government consultation in a manner that recognizes and
respects Tribal self-government and sovereignty; identifies and
considers Tribal treaty rights, reserved rights, and other rights;
respects and elevates IK, including cultural norms and practices
relevant to such consultations; and meets the responsibilities that
arise from the unique legal relationship between the Federal Government
and Tribal governments.
NOAA is also releasing guidance on the recognition and application
of IK to improve decision making for our partners and within NOAA.
Through the IK guidance, NOAA encourages the inclusion of IK, as
appropriate and to the extent practicable and permitted by law, in the
line offices' environmental science, policy and decision making
process, to better facilitate consultations, fulfill Federal trust
responsibilities, respect treaty rights, understand environmental
justice concerns as directed by E.O. 12898, inform agency decision
making, and to build partnerships with indigenous peoples.
The consultation policy and procedures are intended only for NOAA
internal management purposes and does not create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable against the United States, its
agencies, entities, or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or
any other person.
Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Draft Policy and
Procedures
On November 24, 2021, NOAA published a notice and request for
information on NOAA's Tribal consultation draft policy and procedures
in the Federal Register (86 FR 67036). In response, NOAA received 18
written comments on the revised Tribal Consultation Handbook and the
updated IK guidance. A summary of comments received and NOAA's
responses to those comments are presented below.
Comments received, and responses thereto, from two national
consultation webinars held on January 10, 2022, and January 11, 2022,
are also included.
General Comments and Recommendations (Consultation Handbook and Policy)
Comment 1: The definition of consultation should include ``with a
goal of reaching consensus.''
Response: NOAA's Handbook is designed to ensure that NOAA
implements a consistent and accountable process for meaningful and
timely consultation on policies with tribal implications. The Handbook
notes the Agency's commitment to working with the federally recognized
Indian
[[Page 43311]]
tribe(s) to reach agreement during the consultation process on a path
forward or course of action to the extent practicable. NOAA has
determined, however, that in some circumstances, it may not be possible
to reach consensus on actions subject to consultation. In such
circumstances, and as consistent with the Handbook, NOAA will provide
the consulted tribe(s) with notice of the course of action adopted by
the Agency and the rationale for that decision. This approach is
consistent with NOAA's long-standing implementation of E.O. 13175 and
the general approach to government-to-government consultation across
the Federal Government. See, e.g., Presidential Memorandum on Uniform
Standards for Tribal Consultation (November 30, 2022).
Comment 2: Delete ``Consultation is not necessarily a format for
consensus decision-making'' as it falls short of trust obligations.
Response: Partially accepted. As discussed in NOAA's Handbook,
consultation supports NOAA's efforts to fulfill its trust
responsibility to Indian tribes. There may, however, be situations
where reaching consensus on policies that have tribal implications is
not possible as discussed in the response to Comment 1 above. In such
situations, NOAA will comply with the policies described in the
Handbook to provide an explanation as to why NOAA will not or cannot
address the concern(s) raised by the tribe.
Comment 3: Explicitly state in policies and procedures that
meaningful consultation's goal should always be obtaining tribal
informed consent when a project would impact tribal land or resources
on or off a reservation.
Response: NOAA's Handbook describes the Agency's commitment to
working with the federally recognized Indian tribe(s) to reach
agreement during the consultation process on a path forward or course
of action to the extent practicable.
Comment 4: The current language in the Handbook indicates that the
goal of consultation is simply the exchange of information--essentially
that the goal is the process itself. We recommend that NOAA update this
section to align more closely with the Makah Ocean Policy: ``The goal
of early engagement and formal consultation is to enhance governing and
management efficiencies by avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating adverse
impacts a federal, state, or local decision may have on [Tribal] treaty
rights, resources, or interests. The ultimate goal is to engage
[Tribal] interests at the earliest development of scoping or planning
activities by identifying possible solutions that avoid any adverse
impact to the [delete tribe name] Tribe's treaty rights, resources, or
governing interests.'' The goal of consultation should go beyond the
process itself and include the protection of treaty rights, resources,
and interests.
Response: Accepted and modified slightly to include all tribes and
focus on Federal rule making. The following was added to the Handbook
``The goal of early engagement and formal consultation is to enhance
governing and management efficiencies by avoiding, minimizing, or
mitigating adverse impacts a federal decision may have on tribal treaty
rights, resources, or interests. The ultimate goal is to engage tribal
interests at the earliest stage of scoping or planning activities by
identifying possible solutions that avoid adverse impacts to the
tribe's treaty rights, resources, or governing interests.''
Comment 5: Ensure decisions are not made when consultation occurs.
Response: Accepted. Text added to pages 6-7 of the Handbook:
``Regardless of whether it is an informal engagement or a consultation,
such discussions should happen prior to a decision being made.'' In
addition, on page 12 the Handbook states ``it should always occur at
the earliest time practicable, well before a final policy or regulatory
decision with tribal implications is made.''
Comment 6: Training should also include training from tribes. In
addition, strike ``as financial resources allow'' as it is critically
important that all employees of Federal departments and agencies
receive comprehensive training on working with and communicating
effectively with Tribal Nations. Federal actions impact Tribal Nations
and our citizens.
Response: NOAA agrees that effective employee training is an
important component of successful implementation of the Handbook and
meeting NOAA's Tribal Trust Responsibilities. NOAA has established a
team of Tribal Liaisons within each Line Office to help facilitate
employee training. In addition, online and regional trainings are
available to staff. However, there are currently no specific funds
appropriated for tribal consultation training in NOAA's budget.
Therefore, we have retained ``as financial resources allow''.
Comment 7: NOAA personnel in the role of liaison need clear
guidance that their role is facilitation of communication. The position
of liaison should have guidance that articulates the breadth of the
role: ``Information exchange'' to ``Request to initiate Government-to-
Government.''
Response: The Position Description for the Senior NOAA Tribal
Liaison describes the responsibilities of this position, including
communications responsibilities. NOAA does not agree this information
is necessary to include in the Consultation Handbook.
Comment 8: Edit sentence as follows ``If a NOAA line office or
staff office deems necessary, or by request from a Tribal government,
they also may consider establishing a tribal liaison within a program
or region.''
Response: Accepted. Added ``or by request from a Tribal government.
. . .'' See Handbook Section IV.D.
Comment 9: NOAA line offices, staff offices, and Regional Teams
should designate more than one staff person in each department as a
tribal liaison. These liaison positions should be separate positions
from existing staff positions. Communicating, coordinating, and
consulting with tribes in culturally appropriate and meaningful ways is
year-round, full time work. Moreover, it is not possible for one
regional tribal liaison to adequately engage with all the tribes in
their region; for instance, consider that the NOAA Alaska Region has
229 federally recognized Indian Tribes with whom NOAA is directed to
consult.
Response: NOAA line offices, staff offices, and Regional Teams have
the ability to designate a Tribal Liaison and other staff to support
consultation efforts where there is a need and funding is available.
Comment 10: Include involvement of Tribes in the hiring process for
Tribal Liaisons wherever possible to ensure that they have the
appropriate experience and relationships. Given the important role of
Headquarters and Regional Tribal Liaisons in consultation processes,
engaging tribes in selecting and building relationships with these
important staff people will help facilitate effective consultation.
Response: No changes. Comments regarding Federal hiring processes
are beyond the scope of this Handbook.
Comment 11: NOAA's consultation policy should require an office of
tribal liaison be created. NOAA should have high level staff with
expertise in Indian law and policy. NOAA's institutional structure
should have Indian law and policy built into it.
Response: NOAA has a number of senior positions with responsibility
for tribal matters. These include a Senior Advisor to the Under
Secretary on Fisheries and Tribal Engagement, a Senior NOAA Tribal
Liaison, and each line office and relevant staff office has a
Headquarters Tribal Liaison which forms the NOAA Headquarters Tribal
[[Page 43312]]
Team. The NOAA Office of the General Counsel also maintains a Tribal
Team of Indian law practitioners. In addition, many line offices have
additional Tribal Liaisons. For example, every NOAA Fisheries Science
Center and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Regional Offices
and Science Centers have a Tribal Liaison, one of which is a full time
position (i.e., the NMFS West Coast Tribal Liaison).
Comment 12: We recommend that Tribal Liaison positions be
independent positions (i.e., not duties assigned to staff already
fulfilling other duties, such as fishery analysts) that are filled by
highly-qualified individuals with the specific training, expertise and
skillsets related to the tasks such a position is assigned to. Tribes
and Tribal organizations in Alaska have requested positions like these
be established at the NMFS Alaska Region and at Alaska Fisheries
Science Center (AFSC) for many years.
Response: As noted in response to Comment 11, NOAA employs a number
of staff with a specific focus on the Agency's work with tribes and
tribal organizations. These staff include a Senior Advisor to the Under
Secretary on Fisheries and Tribal Engagement, a NOAA Senior Tribal
Liaison, and a full time NMFS West Coast Tribal Liaison.
Comment 13: Provide more information on Tribal Tracker.
Response: The Tribal Tracker is an internal tracking system that
allows NOAA to collect summary information on consultations conducted
by the Agency. This system is used, in part, to support NOAA's tribal
engagement reporting obligations.
Comment 14: Strengthen the statement ``NOAA should provide
available information to the tribes in advance of the consultation to
allow the tribes to prepare: by changing it to ``NOAA must provide all
necessary and available information.''
Response: Accepted. Edit made: ``In order to have a meaningful
consultation, NOAA will provide available information to the tribes in
advance of the consultation to allow the tribes to prepare. NOAA will
work with tribes in an effort to ensure that the information is
provided to tribes in a format that tribes can access and use.'' See
Handbook Section V.A. In addition, NOAA added language that NOAA will
work with tribes to ensure that the information is provided to tribes
in a format that tribes can access and use. NOAA has received comments
previously that there are some constraints that might limit the ability
to access and use information, such as lack of internet access or
sufficient bandwidth to access or download materials, such as lengthy
PDFs. In light of these constraints, NOAA will endeavor to work with
tribes to make sure tribes can access and use the materials. For
example, in some cases, NOAA may mail materials in advance.
Comment 15: NOAA must make the utmost effort to protect TEK and
other sensitive cultural information from public disclosure and ensure
Tribal Nations have the ability to control what is shared by the
Agency, including through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
Response: While information shared between NOAA and a tribe may be
beneficial for the consultation process, it is generally not protected
from disclosure under FOIA, especially if this information is used in
the decision-making process and becomes part of the administrative
record. As such, the Handbook notes the importance of advance
notification to tribes of the limited capacity of NOAA to protect the
confidentiality of information provided by the tribe consistent with
the requirements of FOIA or litigation.
Comment 16: Language should be added to the FOIA section to protect
information shared by tribal religious and cultural leaders as well as
tribal government officials such as Tribal Historic Preservation
Officers and environmental, cultural, and natural resource managers.
Response: While information shared between NOAA and a tribe may be
beneficial for the consultation process, it is generally not protected
from disclosure under FOIA, especially if this information is used in
the decision-making process and becomes part of the administrative
record. As such, the Handbook notes the importance of advance
notification to tribes of the limited capacity of NOAA to protect the
confidentiality of information provided by the tribe consistent with
the requirements of FOIA or litigation. The applicable requirements for
disclosure of information subject to FOIA are not modified by the
internal procedures identified in this Handbook. While NOAA does make
efforts to safeguard sensitive information submitted by tribes, it must
comply with applicable Federal information disclosure requirements.
Comment 17: Make this sentence stronger ``NOAA will make reasonable
efforts to provide adequate information about its actions and policies
at the earliest practical time,'' by changing it to ``NOAA will provide
adequate information about its actions and policies at the earliest
practical time in advance of consultation to provide the tribe adequate
time to review and reflect on it.''
Response: Accepted in part. Edit made: NOAA will provide available
information about its actions and policies at the earliest practical
time. See Handbook Section V.A.
Comment 18: NOAA recommends that line offices and regions establish
consultation protocols with tribal governments consistent with this
Handbook as necessary. Consultation protocols should not just be made
when NOAA deems necessary.
Response: No changes made. The Handbook provides that ``it may be
useful and expeditious for those tribes and NOAA offices to develop
protocols reflecting their mutually preferred timeline for and means of
communication and exchange of information'' and authorizes such
protocols consistent with the Handbook.
Comment 19: The Federal Government must also recognize that it has
become the norm in recent years that tribes and other community
organizations are faced with having to engage with multiple agencies
regarding multiple major projects almost continuously. NOAA must
acknowledge, and actively work to reduce, this extraordinary burden on
our people.
Response: The Handbook acknowledges this issue and includes a new
Section V.C., which directs staff to coordinate and cooperate with
interested Federal agencies to ensure the most efficient and
expeditious manner of consultation with tribes on a particular matter.
Comment 20: Our experience and observations, consultations are
usually scheduled for certain dates and times that prioritize the needs
of the Federal regulatory process over those of Native communities, and
those appointments rarely consider or appreciate the often competing,
conflicting, and overriding obligations associated with sustaining our
communities.
Response: Accepted. Added the following sentence ``Timelines should
reflect that tribal members often have competing, conflicting and
overriding obligations associated with sustaining tribal communities.''
See Handbook Section VI.D.
Comment 21: Document is missing the direct recognition of the
unique role, and often multiple roles, that tribal officials and other
local leaders play in their communities, and how that reality can
significantly impact engagement with Federal agencies and others. It is
critical to understand that often for these leaders, and particularly
for Alaskan Tribal leaders, their leadership
[[Page 43313]]
activities are not their primary employment. Beyond that employment,
virtually all of them also contribute significant time and energy to
the demands inherent to a subsistence lifestyle.
Response: Accepted. Added the following sentence: ``Timelines
should reflect that tribal members often have competing, conflicting
and overriding obligations associated with sustaining tribal
communities.'' See Handbook Section VI.D.
Comment 22: Better recognize the difference and mandates of Treaty
Tribes in documents including case law.
Response: As noted above, NOAA has added additional content to
explain the need to account for tribal treaty rights, reserved rights,
and similar rights when considering actions that may have tribal
implications. See Handbook Section VI.A. Discussion has also been added
to note the importance of NOAA staff becoming familiar with relevant
treaties and other sources of reserved and similar rights. The new
discussion also includes a resource for assisting with the
identification of relevant treaties. See Handbook Section VI.A.
Comment 23: We recommend that NOAA construe the consultation
mandate broadly. If NOAA is unsure whether an action may have tribal
implications, the appropriate approach would be for NOAA to communicate
with the tribe and determine, based on an informed exchange of views
with the tribe, whether the action affects the tribe.
Response: The Handbook provides that an invitation to consult on a
proposed policy should be sent to the appropriate representative of the
governing body of the tribe for NOAA actions ``that may have tribal
implications.'' See Handbook at Section VII.A. NOAA believes this
directive provides adequate direction for NOAA staff to invite
consultation on actions for which there may be tribal implications.
Comment 24: In the list of examples of policies where consultation
with tribes is appropriate, NOAA should amend the first bullet point to
include the text: ``A policy or action that will have effects within or
near a reservation or Alaska Native Village.''
Response: Accepted in part. However, this statement should be
broader than AK Natives. The third bullet was changed to read ``[a]
policy or action affecting a tribal entity, or facility, land, or
resources owned or operated by a tribal government, or held in trust
for a federally recognized tribe.'' See Handbook Section VII.A.
Comment 25: Move this sentence ``While books and other documents
may serve as useful secondary references for understanding the
political and cultural history of an indigenous people, agency staff
should remember that the tribal members themselves are the best source
of knowledge about their particular tribe'' to the beginning of the
consultation section and emphasize the importance of reaching out to a
tribe for this information first.
Response: Accepted. Text moved to the beginning of the consultation
section.
Comment 26: Make clear that consultation should be early and often.
Response: The Handbook states that consultation ``should always
occur at the earliest time practicable, well before a final policy or
regulatory decision with tribal implications is made.'' See Handbook
Section VII.
Comment 27: Not enough detail on the consultation process to ensure
it is not a ``check the box'' effort. For example the Handbook does not
provide guidance or elaboration on how NOAA offices should address and
incorporate the substantive elements of consultation in order to inform
Federal policy and regulatory development. Instead, the Handbook
identifies a range of factors that can either enhance or inhibit
effective consultation, and provides detailed guidance on the
procedural elements of consultation.
Response: The Handbook is a process document designed to provide--
per E.O. 13175--an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have tribal implications. The Handbook is designed to address
procedural aspects of this obligation and not necessarily the
substantive points suggested by the commenter.
Comment 28: There may be two phases in a consultation: Tribal
Consultation and Tribal G2G Consultation. Tribal Consultation is viewed
as a process of sharing information, coordination, dialogue, and
considering the tribal viewpoint. This occurs before an agency commits
to a path of action and provides for a tribe to identify if an action
will affect tribal rights, lands, governance, resources, or interests.
Often the completion of a Tribal Consultation can ensure that should a
Tribal G2G Consultation between decision makers be necessary, it is
meaningful and productive. We encourage NOAA to review: ``Guidance and
Responsibilities for Effective Tribal Consultation, Communication, and
Engagement'': A guide for Agencies Working with West Coast Tribes on
Ocean & Coastal Issues developed by members of the West Coast Tribal
Caucus of the West Coast Ocean Alliance.
Response: In the Handbook we have distinguished the first phase as
``engagement'' and the second and formal phase as ``consultation''.
Comment 29: Timeline: Often tribal decisions are two and sometimes
three tiered in structure, this allows for our leadership access to
available expertise both within staff and within its community. To
provide for multiple discussions could easily occupy a 90 days or more
timeline.
Response: Agree. NOAA believes the Handbook addresses this concern.
The Handbook provides that NOAA staff should be knowledgeable and
respectful of the decision-making practices of the tribe. This may
require a departure from highly-structured agendas and timeframes. It
further provides that consultation should be initiated at the earliest
practicable time and that an explanation of any time constraints known
to the Agency, such as statutory deadlines, should be disclosed at the
initiation of the consultation. See Handbook at Section VII.
Comment 30: Should include an appeals process if NOAA determines
that a formal consultation is not needed due to an action not having
tribal implications.
Response: Section VI.H. added to address dispute resolution
procedures.
Comment 31: If the scope changes, consultation is required.
``Although consultation need not occur at every step of the Federal
decision-making process, it should always occur at the earliest time
practicable, well before a final policy or regulatory decision with
tribal implications is made.''
Response: The following sentence was added: ``If the scope of
action changes, that change should be addressed as part of the ongoing
consultation.'' See Handbook Section VII.A.
Comment 32: Revise bullet in Section VII.A., to read: ``A policy or
action affecting a facility or entity land or resources owned or
operated by a tribal government'' to account for those areas that may
affect lands that are tribal lands.
Response: Accepted. Added ``land or resources'' to the bullet.
Comment 33: Under ``[e]xamples of policies where consultation with
tribes is appropriate include but are not limited to'', there should be
an inclusion of ``a policy or action that impacts Treaty areas'' under
the bullet points listed.
Response: Accepted. A new paragraph was added to this section on
treaty rights.
[[Page 43314]]
Comment 34: Page 14, Section B mentions instances and factors NOAA
takes into consideration when responding to a request for consultation.
NOAA should amend the second sentence to include ``change in tribal
government'' as a factor to be considered.
Response: Accepted. Added ``change in tribal government'' to the
second sentence. See Section VII.B.
Comment 35: We request that NOAA clarify what circumstances would
lead NOAA to make the determination to decline to consult.
Response: Accepted in part. Added the following sentence ``NOAA may
only decline a consultation if it is determined that an issue of
interest does not have tribal implications.'' Given the unique aspects
of each determination, providing an exhaustive list in the Handbook is
not feasible.
Comment 36: NOAA should invite inter-tribal bodies to consultation
along with the tribes they represent. Excluding tribal bodies only
hinders NOAA's attempts to meaningfully include tribal participation
and promote environmental justice in its work, as directed by Executive
Order 13175.
Response: Information regarding the permissible role of tribal
organizations in consultations can be found on page 14 at Section
VII.E., of the Handbook. NOAA notes that, where expressly authorized by
a tribe, such an organization may represent or conduct consultation on
behalf of an authorizing tribe.
Comment 37: If a Tribe does not respond to an initiation of Tribal
Consultation within the requested time frame, NOAA should consider
reaching out to the tribe at least once more and extending the response
time period. It is likely that the tribe has many pressing matters to
attend to within their community and/or is participating in subsistence
fishing, hunting, and gathering seasons. This underscores the need for
NOAA to reach out to tribes regularly and well before any deadlines to
include tribal input in policy decisions.
Response: Accepted. The following sentence was added ``[i]t may be
that the tribe has pressing matters to attend to within their community
and/or is participating in subsistence fishing, hunting, and gathering
seasons. This underscores the importance for NOAA to reach out to
tribes regularly and well before any deadlines to include tribal input
in policy decisions.''
Comment 38: Include a vetting process for Tribal Organizations that
includes reaching out to affective tribes.
Response: The Handbook includes the following statement ``If a
tribe wants to authorize a tribal organization to represent it or
conduct consultation on its behalf, NOAA should confirm that in writing
with the appropriate tribal officials and with the tribal organization.
NOAA should also confirm in writing the scope of that representation
(e.g., which tribes are represented by the tribal organization) and the
role that the tribal organization will fulfill during the consultation
process.'' See Handbook Section VII.E.
Comment 39: This requirement should be mandatory ``if NOAA believes
its action will have substantial direct effects on that tribe, NOAA
staff should consider following the written invitation with a phone
call, site visit, and/or an email/fax (assuming those forms of
communication are available to the tribal points of contact).''
Response: Accepted. Replaced ``should consider'' with ``will''.
Comment 40: Ensure adequate funding for consultations (e.g., travel
for tribes).
Response: NOAA does not have a standing appropriation available for
tribal consultations. Where appropriate, and consistent with federal
law, individual NOAA program offices may consider requests for funding
activities associated with consultations.
Comment 41: ``If it becomes clear that NOAA and the tribe have
divergent views about the issues and topics appropriate for the
consultation, effort should be made by both parties to agree upon a
single statement of the issues. If the parties cannot reach an
agreement, the record of the consultation should reflect the different
view'' and reiterate we should aim for consensus and differing views
should be last resort.
Response: Agree. As previously noted, the NOAA 13175 Handbook
describes the Agency's commitment to working with the federally
recognized Indian tribe(s) to reach agreement during the consultation
process on a path forward or course of action to the extent practicable
and consistent with NOAA's legal requirements. There may, however, be
situations where reaching consensus on policies that have tribal
implications is not possible. In such situations, NOAA will comply with
the policies described in the Handbook to provide an explanation as to
why NOAA will not or cannot address the concern(s) raised by the tribe.
Comment 42: We strongly disagree that a tribe's choice of
participants necessarily indicates how important the issues and
consultation are to the tribe, as many other considerations (capacity,
expertise, availability, etc.) all may play into the decision as to who
participates. If a tribe has decided to engage in Consultation on an
issue, NOAA should consider the issue of utmost importance unless the
tribe states otherwise.
Response: Accepted. Deleted: ``will indicate how important the
issues and consultation are to the tribe.''
Comment 43: True consultation should occur at a Leader-to-Leader
level. Duly elected or appointed Tribal Leaders must be afforded the
respect and opportunity to directly voice Tribal Nation concerns to
those Federal officials with actual decision-making authority. In
addition, the Federal Government must not delegate its consultation
obligation to third party (e.g., non-profit organizations, industries/
corporations, hired consultants and contractors); the Federal
Government must exercise appropriate oversight in ensuring tribal
interests are not adversely impacted.
Response: Accepted in part. In response to this comment, NOAA
updated Handbook Section VII.F.2., to provide that: ``if the tribe
designates its leader or members of the tribal council as
representatives in the consultation, it is important that a NOAA
official with decision-making authority participate in the
consultation. The Handbook further provides that NOAA should ``identify
and prepare consultation participants who are able to fully address the
concerns and issues articulated for discussion through government-to-
government consultation.'' Handbook at Section VII.F.2.
Comment 44: In the sentence that states NOAA ``should acknowledge
and discuss the limited capacity of NOAA to protect the confidentiality
of information provided by the tribe consistent with the requirements
of [FOIA] or litigation[,]'' the use of the term ``limited'' should be
struck from this section since it could be interpreted by NOAA staff
that the Agency will not make the utmost effort to protect the
confidentiality of sensitive Tribal government and cultural
information. Upon removal of the term 'limited', this language should
also be referenced under Section IV(A).
Response: Accepted. Sentence revised to: ``NOAA should, however, in
advance notify tribes of the information disclosure requirements that
may apply to information shared by tribes with the Federal Government
(examples include FOIA and litigation discovery). Although NOAA will
endeavor to comply with a tribe's request that information be kept
confidential, there may be applicable Federal disclosure requirements
that compel its release.''
[[Page 43315]]
Comment 45: Modify sentence to read ``5) reach agreement with
tribes on the method of recordkeeping and documentation of the
consultation. . . .''
Response: Accepted. Added ``and reach agreement on'' to Handbook
Section VII.F.5.
Comment 46: The draft consultation handbook provides one way of
closing a consultation with a one-way-response letter that does not
meet a trust responsibility. Edit to read ``written notice from NOAA
and consent from affected tribes or the absence of any tribal
objections by a predetermined time.''
Response: NOAA agrees that transparency is an important aspect of
government-to-government consultation. In response to this comment,
NOAA added the following sentence Handbook Section VII.G.: ``As a best
practice, NOAA should share a draft of the closing record for review
and comment with the tribe before it is finalized.''
Comment 47: Add ``6) Prior to beginning consultation inform the
Tribe of NOAA's obligations under FOIA.''
Response: Accepted. Added the following: ``NOAA and tribes should
not create or share recorded information, such as summaries,
transcripts or recordings, without first discussing the government's
obligations under applicable law, including the Federal Records Act,
FOIA and the Privacy Act, as well as in response to litigation
obligations or as required by court order. This discussion should occur
prior to beginning consultation.''
Comment 48: NOAA agencies do not abide by the close out guidance
which is disrespectful to the tribe.
Response: NOAA appreciates the comment. The Handbook Section
VII.G., describes the process for closing out government-to-government
consultations. It states that government-to-government consultation is
closed through a formal, written communication from the lead NOAA
official to the most senior tribal official.
Comment 49: This title should be amended to state: ``Completing and
recording the government-to-government consultation.'' Consultation
process should include a follow-up phase. Consultation is an on-going
process, and ``closing'' carries a connotation that prompts the
consultation process to come to an end once formal, written
communication has recounted the agreed-upon issues. Follow-up and
follow-through are key components for a healthy government-to-
government relationship. Follow-up and follow-though will also provide
validation for the record that the consultation was engaging and
meaningful.
Response: Accepted. NOAA changed the title of Section VII.G., to
include the term ``completing.''
Comment 50: Recognize the unique status of Native land tenure in
Alaska and the value of the unique and diverse systems of Native
governance in Alaska.
Response: Accepted in part. NOAA included additional language
requested concerning the unique system of Native governance and Native
land tenure in Alaska. The following paragraph was added to the
Handbook Section: There is a unique system of Native governance in
Alaska, and a variety of entities represent the interests of Alaska
Native communities, including Alaska Tribes and governments, Alaska
Native corporations, Alaska Native non-profits, and Alaska Native
organizations. The purpose and structure of some of these entities is
dictated in part by Federal law, such as the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
Moreover, the status of land ownership in Alaska is similarly defined
in part by Federal law, including ANCSA. Pursuant to ANCSA, Alaska
native corporations hold title to land in Alaska; as such, ANCSA lands
are not held in trust by the United States and do not qualify as Indian
Country. There is one reservation located in Alaska, the Annette
Islands Reserve of the Metlakatla Indian Community. However, the lands
and reservation defined under Federal law may not represent the
traditional homelands of Alaska Native tribes.
In response to this comment, NOAA added clarification to the
following existing sentence: ``NOAA recognizes the distinct and
individual cultural traditions and values of Alaska native peoples and
their representative tribal governments'' Handbook Section IV.B.
(Emphasis added). Commenter requested that NOAA include additional
information about ANCSA. We added an explanation of how ANCSA altered
land ownership in Alaska, with corporations holding land, and we added
a reference to the statute and a website with more information about
ANCSA; however, additional details about ANSCA are beyond the scope of
this Handbook. Handbook Section IX.D.
Comment 51: Tribal Consultation should not occur after a Fishery
Management Council has taken Action. Tribes should inform
recommendations. Previsions in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA) do not supersede tribal trust
responsibilities.
Response: Accepted. Handbook Section IX.F., was revised to include:
``NOAA and the tribes should continue to work together to develop
specific, proactive, and effective processes and procedures to better
integrate the outcomes from tribal consultation between NOAA Fisheries
and tribes with the appropriate Council process(es), with the goal that
consultation outcomes would be shared with the appropriate Council
before the Council takes action. Consultation should always occur at
the earliest time practicable, well before a final policy or regulatory
decision with tribal implications is made.''
Comment 52: Agencies have increasingly moved to the electronic
distribution of documents. With internet connectivity often a challenge
in small remote Alaskan communities, the digital transfer of documents,
and particularly large complex documents featuring many maps, is
impossible. Zoom and comparable virtual meetings are also often not an
option given the extremely limited availability of broadband in rural
Alaska. Accommodations must be made, and appropriate time must be
allowed, for the distribution and review of all materials necessary for
meaningful consultation to occur.
Response: NOAA appreciates the concerns expressed in this comment.
There are a number of flexibilities in the Handbook for this reason.
Specifically, the Handbook states ``[t[he Department and operating
units' consultation processes may include one or more of the following:
meetings, letters, conference calls, webinars, on-site visits, or
participation in regional and national events.'' In addition, NOAA
added language that NOAA will work with tribes to ensure that the
information is provided to tribes in a format that tribes can access
and use. As this comment reflects, there are some constraints that
might limit the ability to access and use information, such as lack of
internet access or sufficient internet bandwidth to access or download
materials, such as lengthy PDFs.
In light of these constraints, NOAA will endeavor to work with
tribes to make sure tribes can access and use the materials. For
example, in some cases, NOAA may mail materials in advance. In response
to this comment, NOAA made the following edits to the Handbook at
Section V.A.: In order to have a meaningful consultation, NOAA will
provide available information to the tribes in advance of the
consultation to allow the tribes to prepare. NOAA will work with tribes
in an effort to ensure that the information is provided to
[[Page 43316]]
tribes in a format that tribes can access and use.
Comment 53: Add The United Nations Declaration on Rights of
Indigenous Peoples to Appendix to emphasize consent in consultation.
Response: This is outside the scope of NOAA's consultation
procedures. As noted in the ``Announcement of U.S. Support for the
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,'' the
United States recognizes the significance of the Declaration's
provisions on free, prior and informed consent, which the United States
``understands to call for a process of meaningful consultation with
tribal leaders, but not necessarily the agreement of those leaders,
before the actions addressed in those consultations are taken.'' NOAA's
13175 Handbook reflects this view, and as such, the Agency does not
believe inclusion of the Declaration as an appendix to the Handbook is
necessary or appropriate.
Comment 54: NOAA Fisheries and National Ocean Service (NOS) are
obligated, among other things, to follow Federal statutes regarding
tribal resources, lands, and waters. This includes the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) of 1980; specifically, NOAA
must adhere to Title VIII of ANILCA, which designates that subsistence
fish, wildlife, and other resources used by Alaska Natives and non-
Natives must be federally protected and prioritized when experiencing a
conservation threat. The subsistence uses of these resources are
prioritized during conservation closures and shortages means NOAA
Fisheries and NOS management bodies must prioritize Alaska Native and
non-Native subsistence users before commercial interests when multi-use
fisheries are in decline, such as Western Alaska salmon populations.
Response: No edits made. This comment is beyond the scope of the
Handbook.
Comment 55: Add Religious Freedom Act.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of the Handbook.
Although relevant to Tribal Rights, NOAA does not believe inclusion of
the Religious Freedom Act as an appendix to the Handbook is necessary
or appropriate.
Comment 56: Mass Dear Tribal letters are not ideal for
consultations.
Response: Noted for implementation. NOAA values direct
correspondence. Frequently in regional consultations individual letters
are sent, however, for National Policies that may have tribal
implications for hundreds of federally recognized Indian tribes, direct
correspondence is not always feasible.
Comment 57: NOAA must recognize the authority of Tribal Nations to
designate cultural resources and landscapes for protection similar to
those guaranteed by treaty, statute, judicial decisions, and executive
orders.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 58: NOAA's consultation policy should explicitly affirm and
differentiate treaty rights issues and the government-to-government
process from the public and administrative process.
Response: NOAA has added additional language to the Handbook to
highlight the need to account for tribal treaty rights, reserved
rights, and similar rights when considering actions that may have
tribal implications. See Handbook Section VI.A. In addition, the
Handbook notes that ``Consultation recognizes and distinguishes the
views and policies of tribes from those of the general public and
considers those views in the context of the responsibilities of
federally recognized tribes to their people and tribal members.''
Consultation Handbook Section VI.
Comment 59: Provide a redline of document in the future.
Response: Accepted. A redline version of the revisions included
with the final version of the Handbook is available at: https://www.noaa.gov/legislative-and-intergovernmental-affairs/noaa-tribal-resources-updates.
Comment 60: Policy was not provided for review.
Response: The NOAA Policy on Government-to-Government Consultations
with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations
is included as Appendix F to the Consultation Handbook.
Comment 61: This request should have been put in the Federal
Register.
Response: The request was published in the Federal Register on
November 24, 2021, at 86 FR 67036 and the comment period extended in a
notice published on January 21, 2022, at 87 FR 3280.
Comment 62: Please capitalize Alaska Native throughout.
Response: Capitalization is based on Federal style guides.
Including: https://www.archives.gov/files/federalregister/write/handbook/ddh.pdf.
Comment 63: It may be useful to add a section on threats (e.g.,
plastics, dead zones, climate change) to the documents.
Response: This suggested addition is outside the scope of the
Handbook.
Comment 64: Federal Government should standardize and codify
consultation requirements. For far too long, Tribal Nations have
experienced inconsistencies in consultation policies, the violation of
consultation policies, and mere notification of Federal action as
opposed to a solicitation of input.
Response: NOAA's goal for the Handbook, consistent with the
requirements of E.O. 13175, is to develop an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications. The
revisions to the Handbook are designed to further enhance NOAA's
consultation process.
Comment 65: Because the U.S. is engaged in a diplomatic
relationship with each federally recognized Tribal Nation, greater
effort must be made to consult with Tribal Nations on an individual
basis.
Response: See response to Comment 57 above.
Comment 66: Do not use the number of tribes to consult with as a
reason not to consult. Many tribes are willing to meet as a group or by
video.
Response: Noted, NOAA will endeavor to engage and consult tribes
using methods that work best for each party.
Comment 67: E.O. 13175, Section 3 lays out a set of policy making
criteria that have been implemented unevenly over the last two decades.
In particular, this includes directives to extend ``maximum
administrative discretion'' to Tribal Nations by encouraging Tribal
Nations to develop our own policies and standards to achieve objectives
as well as consult with those Tribal Nations on the necessity of any
Federal standards. Commenter urges NOAA and the Biden Administration to
consider how this section can be better operationalized and
consistently applied throughout the Federal Government.
Response: The aspects of this comment related to the consultation
processes occurring outside of NOAA are beyond the scope of the
Handbook. NOAA appreciates commenter's suggestions regarding better
operationalization of the consultation process.
Comment 68: E.O. 13175, Section 6 encourages the Federal Government
to facilitate and streamline tribal applications for waivers of
statutory and regulatory requirements. With some notable exceptions,
this section does not appear to be actively implemented across the
Federal Government.
Response: This comment regarding the implementation of E.O. 13175
across the Federal Government is beyond the scope of the Handbook. NOAA
considers any tribal application for a waiver or statutory and
regulatory requirements on a case-by-case basis,
[[Page 43317]]
and as such, we do not believe it is necessary or appropriate to
address waivers within the Handbook.
Comment 69: NOAA does not correctly quote the consultation
provision. In both NOAA Administrative Order 218-8 and the Handbook,
NOAA states that ``[a]s defined in Section 5 of E.O. 13175,
[consultation] refers to an accountable process ensuring meaningful and
timely input from tribal officials on NOAA policies that have tribal
implications.'' E.O. 13175 states that ``[e]ach agency shall have an
accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.'' By omitting the phrase ``in the development of,'' NOAA
appears to be discounting both the role and substance of consultation
with respect to the Federal decision-making process.
Response: NOAA's Handbook notes the Agency's commitment to having
an accountable process with the federally recognized Indian tribe(s)
for development of policies and guidance. It is not NOAA's intent to
discount the role or substance of consultation for the Federal
decision-making process.
Comment 70: There is a need for a robust communication strategy
with tribes.
Response: Noted, however the need for a robust communication
strategy is beyond the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 71: NOAA should form a permanent Tribal Advisory Committee
to advise on decision-making, policy development, and effective
consultation; and support the institutionalization of education about
tribes and treaty rights at the Federal level. The Tribal Advisory
Committee would represent a permanent investment in NOAA's commitment
to tribes that would persist beyond administration changes.
Response: Noted, however the recommendation to form a Tribal
Advisory Committee is beyond the scope of the Handbook.
Comment 72: The ``NOAA Tribal Team'' on NOAA's website should
include Regional roles to provide context, email and phone information
would be most useful.
Response: This comment regarding the context of NOAA's website is
beyond the scope of the Handbook. However, NOAA is updating its tribal
website and will consider this comment through that process.
General Comments and Recommendations (IK Guidance)
Comment 1: It is the sole authority of Tribal Nations and cultural
and religious leaders to determine how TEK can and should be used to
inform these processes and NOAA must make every effort to protect the
confidentiality of this sensitive cultural and religious information.
Commenter requested that the recommendations provided in these comments
on the 2021 draft Tribal Consultation Handbook regarding FOIA requests
also be referenced in the TEK Guidance to ensure that NOAA staff
understand that these documents are inextricably connected.
Response: The current Guidance references the Handbook and vice
versa, establishing the connections between these two documents. While
information shared between NOAA and a tribe may be beneficial for the
consultation process, it is generally not exempt from disclosure under
FOIA, especially if this information is used in the decision-making
process and becomes part of the administrative record. As such, the
Guidance notes the importance of advance notification to tribes of the
limited capacity of NOAA to protect the confidentiality of information
provided by the tribe consistent with the requirements of FOIA or other
applicable legal obligations.
Comment 2: We also support expanding the TEK Guidance to be
implemented agency-wide at NOAA.
Response: NOAA agrees that the Guidance should be implemented
agency-wide. This change is reflected in the finalized TEK Guidance.
Comment 3: Commenter recommends the inclusion of language in the
TEK Guidance to require NOAA offices to promote the incorporation and
use of TEK to inform policy and decision-making processes when
collaborating with other Federal departments and agencies on projects
that may have direct or indirect implications for Tribal Nations.
Response: NOAA agrees that a discussion of interagency coordination
should be included in the TEK Guidance. A new section on Interagency
Coordination was added to TEK Guidance on page 13.
Comment 4: TEK must be respected and protected as Tribal
proprietary knowledge, as Tribal Nations and cultures carry the
responsibility of its application for the well-being of our
communities, homelands, and seascapes. NOAA must make the utmost effort
to protect TEK and other sensitive cultural information from public
disclosure and ensure Tribal Nations have the ability to control what
is shared by the Agency, including through FOIA requests.
Response: Accepted in part. NOAA added in the ``Guidance'' section,
1st paragraph: ``IK should be respected as belonging to the IK
holder(s).'' Under Data Confidentiality, first paragraph, added, ``NOAA
employees should not begin collecting IK without establishing mutual
trust, respect, and recognition of knowledge sovereignty.'' NOAA
acknowledges that IK holders may not support public disclosure of this
information, however, the Agency has limited ability under existing
public disclosure obligations to prevent disclosure of information
shared with NOAA. For this reason, the IK Guidance describes the need
to clearly disclose any constraints or limitations regarding the
ability to protect sensitive or confidential information before NOAA
seeks access to IK.
Comment 5: Currently NOAA is largely unequipped to collect and
engage TEK in a meaningful way. Fixing this will involve more than
revision to the TEK Guidance, it will involve continuous employee
training, extensive tribal engagement, and a change in the culture at
NOAA and other Federal agencies.
Response: Accepted. NOAA agrees that guidance should reference NOAA
capacity. A new section was added on, ``Building Capacity Within
NOAA.''
Comment 6: When approaching tribes regarding TEK, NOAA officials
must view tribes as knowledge co-producers and co-owners and engage
tribes as true partners in acquiring the information necessary for
informed decision-making. NOAA must inform tribes of the specific,
tangible benefits of such information sharing and refrain from making
only broad claims that it will ``inform policy.''
Response: NOAA appreciates the views expressed in this comment.
Comment 7: The TEK Guidance should also cite to Article 31 of the
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
that relates specifically to traditional knowledge: Indigenous peoples
have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural
heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions,
as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and
cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines,
knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions,
literatures, designs, sports and traditional games, and visual and
performing arts. They also have the right
[[Page 43318]]
to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property
over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional
cultural expressions. In conjunction with indigenous peoples, states
shall take effective measures to recognize and protect the exercise of
these rights.
Response: Accepted. NOAA added a reference to Knowledge Sovereignty
and UNDRIP language from Article 31 in a renamed ``Principles''
section.
Comment 8: Tribes should have an opportunity to review and object
to any use or recitation of TEK by NOAA. Provision needs to be stronger
by removing ``should'' and replacing it with ``must.''
Response: Disagree. While the Guidance is premised on the principle
of ``Free, Prior and Informed Consent,'' it is designed to provide best
practices to help ensure that the sharing and application of IK is
responsible, effective, and mutually beneficial. It does not create
binding or enforceable rights, and as such, NOAA does not believe
inclusion of mandatory directives such as ``must'' is appropriate.
Comment 9: TEK must come directly from tribes. On page 4 of the TEK
Guidance, ``literature review'' is listed as the first method of
identifying and collecting TEK. If NOAA officials utilize this method,
tribes need to guide the literature review to ensure that the right
sources are being reviewed. Further, literature review should always be
used in conjunction with outreach to tribes to identify and collect
TEK.
Response: Accepted. Added to ``literature review'' section:
``Researchers should work with IK holder(s) to share information about
the project and seek their guidance on sources.''
Comment 10: Confidentiality is important in order for tribes to
candidly share TEK. In some cases, anonymity may be appropriate to
prevent resource damage, backlash, enforcement action, legal risk, or
other harms. Before any information is shared, NOAA and tribes should
fully understand how such information will be shared. NOAA personnel
should also explain to tribes if any of that information is subject to
disclosure under the FOIA. NOAA should not approach individual tribal
members for TEK without first receiving consent from the tribe through
its formal, identified institutions. The qualifier ``Ideally'' should
be removed, since collection outside a method established by a tribe
does not amount to free, prior, and informed consent from the tribe to
provide such TEK.
Response: Accepted. Removed word ``ideally'' from ``Identifying
and/or collect IK'' section. The section now includes the following
sentence: ``No data should be collected until a preferred method is
established with indigenous group leaders and, through them or previous
fieldwork, with IK holder(s).''
Comment 11: The TEK Guidance provides one example of successful use
of TEK in decision-making. Providing additional examples in more detail
may help NOAA personnel and tribes understand the benefits of sharing
TEK and what TEK may be useful for NOAA decision-makers.
Response: Accepted. NOAA has included four examples of the benefits
of using IK in decision making.
Comment 12: NOAA should include TEK as the best available science.
NOAA should be more forthright in its TEK Guidance and state that the
``best available science shall incorporate TEK and other related
indigenous practices.''
Response: Partly accepted. Under Guidance, the first paragraph has
been changed to substitute the word ``should'' for ``can.'' Under the
new Interagency Coordination section, the second sentence reads: ``When
conducting formal or informal consultations with other Federal agencies
on issues with implications for tribes and indigenous communities, NOAA
should include and acknowledge IK as part of best available science and
as part of the administrative record.'' As noted in the response to IK
Comment 8, NOAA does not believe inclusion of mandatory directives such
as ``shall'' is appropriate in this Guidance document.
Comment 13: NOAA should ensure that TEK is properly incorporated
into decision-making. One impediment to the sharing of TEK is that
knowledge holders frequently do not understand or observe how their
information or data are incorporated into Federal decision-making.
Final results used to inform Federal decision making and policy
development should also be shared. We urge NOAA to adhere to these
provisions in the TEK Guidance and foster true scientific collaboration
with TEK holders.
Response: Accepted. NOAA will undertake training and outreach to
ensure that staff are aware of the guidance. In addition, a section on
``Building Capacity within NOAA'' was added.
Comment 14: We encourage NOAA to conduct additional engagement
directly with tribes, Alaska Native corporations, and other holders of
Indigenous knowledge to further develop substantive guidance addressing
the incorporation and consideration of TEK along with other scientific
information.
Response: NOAA appreciates the recommendation provided in this
comment. NOAA conducted tribal consultation on this guidance in January
2022, and does not believe additional consultation is needed at this
time to finalize the IK Guidance, particularly given the additional
consultation conducted by the White House Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) in developing its interagency guidance on IK. As noted,
the IK Guidance is intended to be a living document that will be
updated and improved over time. NOAA anticipates continued engagement
with tribes on this document as it continues to mature.
Comment 15: We request that the agency, through regulation or other
means, more formally recognize indigenous knowledge in its definition
of ``best available science'' under the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq., and other applicable laws.
Response: Guidance updated to note that Indigenous Knowledge should
be included in the definition of ``best available science'' where
possible, but does not specifically reference the Endangered Species
Act. Under Guidance, the first paragraph has been changed to substitute
the word ``should'' for ``can.'' New text reads: ``Best available
science should incorporate IK and other related indigenous practices.''
Comment 16: Commenter requests that NOAA revise its ``Guidance and
Best Practices for Engaging and Incorporating Traditional Ecological
Knowledge in Decision-Making'' to reflect an acceptance of indigenous
knowledge on their own terms.
Response: Addressed in new ``Context'' section.
Comment 17: NOAA also should repudiate any perceived need to
integrate or assimilate indigenous knowledge into a Western science
format. What is needed instead is a multiple evidence base approach
that recognizes and respects the inherent value and worth of indigenous
knowledge systems. We encourage NOAA to review and integrate Two-Eyed
Seeing into its tribal policies and procedures.
Response: Reference to, and discussion of, ``Two-Eyed Seeing'' has
been added to the Guidance section.
Comment 18: To the extent the Agency has questions about the best
way to do this, we suggest that NOAA invite indigenous community
members to help craft the Agency's policies and guidance documents.
[[Page 43319]]
Response: Accepted. NOAA held tribal consultation on this guidance,
and incorporated most of the tribal input into the revised version.
Added the Guidance section on co-production of knowledge. NOAA is
interested in building partnerships with tribes to recognize and
include IK.
Comment 19: Not all environmental concerns faced by Indigenous
peoples are mere Environmental Justice concerns, but instead rise to
the level of adverting cultural genocide from robbing of Environmental
Sovereignty from the Indigenous population. By not clearly defining
that the purpose of this document is to foster partnership and not
disenfranchisement of Indigenous lifeways, this document leaves it open
for industry to circumvent the Federal regulators and other Federal
entities who have the fiduciary trust responsibilities to the tribes
and other Indigenous peoples of the United States.
Response: In response to this comment, NOAA added ``fulfill Federal
trust responsibilities'' to the purposes addressed by the inclusion of
IK.
Comment 20: Commenter notes that the guidance leaves a big hole in
this portrayal of what NOAA can do by neglecting to affirm that NOAA
with its science-based objectivity have the ability to act as an
advocate for the Indigenous peoples when speaking with other Federal
agencies who do have the ability to ensure enforceability of rights or
the ability to cause action under the law.
Response: Accepted. NOAA agrees that IK can be a relevant and
valuable element of interagency coordination. In response to this
section, NOAA has added a section on ``Interagency Coordination'' to
acknowledge this concept and provide guidance to NOAA staff.
Comment 21: NOAA Fisheries should recognize generally, and in the
subject documents specifically, the distinct, unique feature or
attribute that distinguishes the tribe and its members from most other
Americans (such as those commonly identified among ``Environmental
Justice'' communities). We have Treaty Rights, and derived from that
fact, the Federal Government has a Trust Responsibility to us.
Response: Accepted. A reference to treaty rights and trust
responsibilities has been added to the Introduction section.
Comment 22: Given that ``Ecology'' is a relationship between an
organism (or being) and its environment, NOAA needs to understand that
the tribe has developed an applied First Foods management mission, and
applied River and Upland Visions to guide restoration and management of
First Foods (water, native fish, wildlife, plants), that are based on
the ecology between and among First Foods, the ecology of the tribe and
our Foods, and our relationship to the landscapes and waters that
provide the Foods. Our management visions should be recognized as high
level, applied ``Traditional Ecological Knowledge,'' and given at least
equal weight to Federal agency management guidance. Where our
management goals or priorities differ, we can consult to address those
differences.
Response: NOAA appreciates the views expressed in this comment.
Comment 23: Infringement on Treaty Rights and Trust
Irresponsibility have occurred in the Pacific Northwest, too often
under active Federal oversight, or from the lack of it. A fundamental
objective of the subject documents should be to facilitate the
correction of these past and continuing injustices.
Response: A reference to treaty rights and trust responsibilities
has been added to the Introduction section.
Comment 24: In developing and revising the documents, it may be
helpful and informative to refer to the Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) 2016 Guidance, ``EPA Policy on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribes: Guidance for Discussing Tribal Treaty
Rights.''
Response: NOAA appreciates the recommendation provided in this
comment. As noted above, a reference to treaty rights and trust
responsibilities has been added to the Introduction.
Comment 25: NOAA Fisheries' response to our petition thus far has
not only completely ignored the tribe's TEK and any sense of a
meaningful Government-to-Government relationship but has also
misrepresented Western science.
Response: This fact-specific concern is beyond the scope of the IK
Guidance.
Comment 26: We request NOAA Fisheries' leadership team to
immediately convene a Government-to-Government meeting with the [tribe]
and relevant NOAA staff to revisit this issue and appropriately engage
in consultation and integration of our TEK into decision making to
ensure Executive Order 13175 is carried out appropriately.
Response: See response to IK Guidance Comment 25.
Comment 27: We recommend that NOAA integrate the best available
Western science with Indigenous Knowledge provided by tribes to inform
decision-making and management.
Response: NOAA appreciates the recommendation included with this
comment.
Comment 28: We also recommend that the TEK guidance document
includes robust protective measures that ensure that sensitive
information that may be shared with NOAA in the course of our work
together is not made publicly available. We encourage NOAA to develop
specific data-sharing agreements with tribes regarding the use of TEK
that outline intellectual property and data ownership, privacy, and
use.
Response: Accepted. Added the following to Data Confidentiality
section, first paragraph: ``NOAA employees should not begin collecting
IK without establishing mutual trust, respect, and recognition of
knowledge sovereignty, preferably in the form of a jointly developed
agreement. The agreement should outline the purpose of the data
collection, intellectual property and data ownership, privacy, and
use.''
Comment 29: We further recommend that NOAA support TEK integration
into management approaches by increasing dedicated and long-term
capacity funding for natural and cultural research staff, including
Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, to support coordinated engagement
across tribal organizations. NOAA should integrate and fund
opportunities for research and planning, training and capacity
building, and implementation programs for the safe resumption of
traditional management approaches, as these efforts would also support
the integration of TEK into management.
Response: Comments regarding Federal funding allocation decisions
are beyond the scope of the IK Guidance.
Comment 30: We would look forward to engaging with the NMFS Alaska
Region to discuss the implementation of this guidance with Alaska
Tribes, and urge you to encourage the Alaska Region to outreach to
tribes and tribal organizations to engage in such discussions.
Response: NOAA appreciates the views expressed in this comment.
Comment 31: The NOAA TEK Guidance document constitutes an excellent
baseline document on this topic and we encourage NOAA staff working
with tribes to be familiar with it.
Response: Accepted. A new section on ``Building Capacity Within
NOAA'' has been added to the IK Guidance.
Comment 32: As noted above with regard to the Tribal Consultation
Handbook, it is important to bear in mind that there are other aspects
of Alaska Native and tribal knowledge other than TEK which are valuable
and
[[Page 43320]]
should be engaged in NOAA's work. This includes the aspects of
Traditional Knowledge (TK) outside those which are strictly considered
`ecological,' understanding the interlinkages between the `ecological'
and `other' aspects of TK, and crucially important forms of Indigenous
Knowledge other than TK.
Response: NOAA appreciates the views expressed in this comment, and
notes that the terminology of the IK Guidance has been revised from TEK
to IK in the final document, in part, to address considerations noted
in this comment.
Comment 33: We encourage NOAA to look at the work on Knowledge
Sovereignty and Indigenization in which the tribe has been engaged.
Response: NOAA appreciates the recommendation provided in this
comment. Discussion of knowledge sovereignty has been added to the
Principles section of the IK Guidance.
Comment 34: We encourage NOAA to work with tribes via a co-
productive framework as pertains to knowledge-related, as well as other
(e.g., policy), activities.
Response: Accepted. Discussion of knowledge sovereignty has been
added to the Principles section of the IK Guidance. NOAA has also added
the following text to the Guidance section: ``NOAA staff should
consider ways to co-develop and include IK for decision-making through
multiple programs and approaches.''
Comment 35: Commenter emphasizes that ``it may be inappropriate to
suggest that TEK should be `validated,' '' and, ``rather, indigenous
peoples' own internal methods of defining, valuing, and validating
their own knowledge/knowledge systems should be respected.'' See NOAA
Handbook (Section IV) regarding the unnecessary validation of TEK by
Western science.
Response: Accepted. In the Guidance section of the IK Guidance,
NOAA states: ``Depending on the situation, it may be inappropriate to
suggest that IK should be ``validated''. Rather, Indigenous Peoples'
own internal methods of defining, valuing, and validating their own
knowledge/knowledge systems should be respected and trusted.''
Comment 36: TEK holders and communities have the right to review
documents that include their TEK as well as the right to redact,
remove, or reject how their TEK is included. Commenter requests that
NOAA add a section in the TEK Guidance explicitly guiding NOAA
Fisheries and NOS to let TEK holders and communities review the TEK
collected and how it is included in the work and research of NOAA
Fisheries and NOS before it is used or distributed.
Response: NOAA appreciates the views expressed in this comment and
has added to the Best Practices for Identifying and Considering IK
section in the IK Guidance the following addition: ``NOAA should work
to share and archive any data collected in cooperation with IK
holder(s) and communities. IK holder(s) and communities should review
NOAA products that include IK before publication. Any confidential or
proprietary data that has been provided for public release solely in
the aggregate form must not be shared in disaggregated form--except
under any legal requirement (e.g., Freedom of Information Act) and
never without prior notification of the provider of that particular
IK.'' NOAA also notes that the applicability of the IK Guidance now
extends to all of NOAA.
Comment 37: Our only suggestion is to follow the lead of the White
House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the White
House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) which recently released a
Memorandum for the Heads of Departments and Agencies on the subject of
Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Federal Decision
Making. Not only in substance, but also including the use of Indigenous
Knowledge and/or Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge, instead
of the archaic ambiguous term TEK, both of which are a more accurate
descriptor of the body of knowledge we are all referring to.
Response: Accepted. As noted above, the NOAA IK Guidance now uses
the term ``Indigenous Knowledge'' in lieu of TEK.
Richard W. Spinrad,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, NOAA
Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-14415 Filed 7-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P