Findings of Research Misconduct, 42087-42088 [2023-13847]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2023 / Notices draft HHS guidance, Frequently Asked Questions: Limited Institutional Review Board Review and Related Exemptions. Other topics may be added; for the full and updated meeting agenda, see https:// www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/ meetings/. The meeting will adjourn by 5:00 p.m. July 20, 2023. Time will be allotted for public comment on both days of the meeting. The public may submit written public comment in advance to SACHRP@ hhs.gov no later than midnight July 12, 2023, ET. Written comments will be shared with SACHRP members and may be read aloud during the meeting. Public comment must be relevant to topics being addressed by the SACHRP. Dated: June 12, 2023. Julia G. Gorey, Executive Director, SACHRP, Office for Human Research Protections. [FR Doc. 2023–13833 Filed 6–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–36–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of the Secretary Findings of Research Misconduct Office of the Secretary, HHS. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: Findings of research misconduct have been made against Yiorgos (Georgios) I. Laliotis, M.D. (Respondent), who was a Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University (OSU), and Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Respondent engaged in research misconduct in research supported by U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) funds, specifically National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants R01 CA186729, R01 CA198117, P30 CA016058, K22 CA245487, and R21 CA252530 and included in grant applications submitted for PHS funds, specifically R01 CA186729–07 and R01 CA198117– 05 submitted to NCI, NIH. The administrative actions, including supervision for a period of three (3) years, were implemented beginning on June 12, 2023, and are detailed below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila Garrity, JD, MPH, MBA, Director, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 240, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8200. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:21 Jun 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 Integrity (ORI) has taken final action in the following case: Yiorgos (Georgios) I. Laliotis, M.D., The Ohio State University and Johns Hopkins University: Based on the reports of inquiries conducted by OSU and JHU, admissions by Respondent, and analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight review, ORI found that Yiorgos (Georgios) I. Laliotis, M.D., former Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, OSU, and former Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Oncology, JHU, engaged in research misconduct in research supported by U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) funds, specifically NCI, NIH, grants R01 CA186729, R01 CA198117, P30 CA016058, K22 CA245487, and R21 CA252530 and included in grant applications submitted for PHS funds, specifically R01 CA186729–07 and R01 CA198117–05 submitted to NCI, NIH. ORI found that Respondent engaged in research misconduct by intentionally and knowingly falsifying and/or fabricating data, methods, results, and conclusions by representing a fabricated Exon 2 splice variant of U2AF2, which would translate as a Serine-ArginineRich deficient U2AF65 isoform, leading to the repression of lung adenocarcinomas and by enhancing the role of splicing in mutant PIK3CA breast cancer cell lines in the following three (3) published papers, two (2) NIH grant applications, and two (2) unpublished manuscripts: • AKT3-mediated IWS1 phosphorylation promotes the proliferation of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas through cell cycleregulated U2AF2 RNA splicing. Nat. Commun. 2021 Jul 30; 12(1):4624. doi: 10.1038/s41467–021–24795–1 (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Nat. Commun. 2021’’). Retraction in: Nat. Commun. 2022 Jun 28;13(1):3711. doi: 10.1038/s41467– 022–31445–7. • Phosphor-IWS1-dependent U2AF2 splicing regulates trafficking of CAR–Epositive intronless gene mRNAs and sensitivity to viral infection. Commun. Biol. 2021 Oct 11; 4(1):1179. doi: 10.1038/s42003–021–02668-z (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Commun. Biol. 2021’’). Retraction in: Commun. Biol. 2021 Dec 15;4(1):1419. doi: 10.1038/s42003–021– 02941–1. • Overexpression of the SETD2 WW domain inhibits the phosphor-IWS1/ SETD2 interaction and the oncogenic AKT/IWS1 RNA splicing program. bioRxiv 2021.08.12.454141. doi: 10.1101/2021.08.12.454141 (hereafter referred to as ‘‘bioRxiv 2021’’). Withdrawn. The manuscript also was submitted to Commun. Biol. in 2021 but PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42087 was withdrawn prior to completion of peer review. • R01 CA186729–07, ‘‘The role of IWS1-dependent alternative RNA splicing in lung cancer,’’ submitted to NCI, NIH, on November 5, 2020. • R01 CA198117–05, ‘‘The role of IWS1 in development and tumorigenesis,’’ submitted to NCI, NIH, on June 3, 2019. • The transcriptomic landscape of oncogenic P13K reveals key functions in splicing and gene expression regulation. Manuscript submitted to Cancer Res. (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Cancer Res. manuscript’’). • Interpretable deep learning for chromatin-informed inference of transcriptional programs driven by somatic alterations across cancers. Manuscript in preparation (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Manuscript 2021’’). Specifically, ORI finds that Respondent knowingly and intentionally: • falsified the sequencing data in Figure 1g of Nat. Commun. 2021 by splicing two sequencing chromatograms together to falsely represent a novel identification of a previously undescribed U2AF2 RNA transcript lacking Exon 2 • falsified conclusions about the fabricated U2AF2 splice variant in RT–PCR results in Figures 1f, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4e, 5h, 6f, 6i, and 7c of Nat. Commun. 2021 • falsified conclusions about the fabricated U2AF2 splice variant as the source of two endogenous protein isoforms in immunoblot panels in Figures 5c and 5g of Nat. Commun. 2021 and Figure 2 of R01 CA186729– 07 • falsified the experimental conditions of p-ERK1/2 (Y202/T204), p-CDK1 (Y15), CDK1, and Cyclin B1 immunoblot panels in Figure 5g of Nat. Commun. 2021 and Figure 2 of R01 CA186729–07 by using shControl or shIWS1 instead of the samples as reported in the figure labels to falsely represent the immunoblots as the result of U2AF2 containing spliced Exon 2 • falsified the experimental conditions of the a-actinin immunoblot panel in Figure 1e of Commun. Biol. 2021 by using shIWS1 instead of shISWS1/ U2AF65b-V5 as reported in the figure label • in Commun. Biol. 2021, bioRxiv 2021, R01 CA186729–07, and R01 CA198117–05, reported falsified conclusions highlighting the role of the fabricated U2AF2 RNA transcript lacking Exon 2 from Nat. Commun. 2021 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 42088 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2023 / Notices • fabricated and/or falsified the dose response curves in Figures 3k and S5N of the Cancer Res. manuscript by treating the MCF7 and T47D cells lines with DMSO or Alpelisib instead of treating with the presence or absence of splicing inhibitors H3B– 8800 or E7070 as reported in the figure legend • fabricated and/or falsified the quantitative RNA immunoprecipitation qPCR data in Figures S4c and S4d of the Cancer Res. Manuscript • fabricated and/or falsified the qPCR data in Figure 6 of Manuscript 2021 to show changes in gene expression between control and inhibitor treatment • fabricated and/or falsified the experimental methods described in the legend of Figure 6 of Manuscript 2021 by using CREB1 as a control gene instead of ACTIN as reported in the figure legend Respondent entered into a Voluntary Settlement Agreement (Agreement) and voluntarily agreed to the following: (1) Respondent will have his research supervised for a period of three (3) years beginning on June 12, 2023 (the ‘‘Supervision Period’’). Prior to the submission of an application for PHS support for a research project on which Respondent’s participation is proposed and prior to Respondent’s participation in any capacity in PHS-supported research, Respondent will submit a plan for supervision of Respondent’s duties to ORI for approval. The supervision plan must be designed to ensure the integrity of Respondent’s research. Respondent will not participate in any PHS-supported research until such a supervision plan is approved by ORI. Respondent will comply with the agreed-upon supervision plan. (2) The requirements for Respondent’s supervision plan are as follows: i. A committee of 2–3 senior faculty members at the institution who are familiar with Respondent’s field of research, but not including Respondent’s supervisor or collaborators, will provide oversight and guidance for a period of three (3) years from the effective date of the Agreement. The committee will review primary data from Respondent’s laboratory on a quarterly basis and submit a report to ORI at six (6)-month intervals setting forth the committee meeting dates and Respondent’s compliance with appropriate research standards and confirming the integrity of Respondent’s research. ii. The committee will conduct an advance review of each application for VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:21 Jun 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which Respondent is involved. The review will include a discussion with Respondent of the primary data represented in those documents and will include a certification to ORI that the data presented in the proposed application, report, manuscript, or abstract are supported by the research record. (3) During the Supervision Period, Respondent will ensure that any institution employing him submits, in conjunction with each application for PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which Respondent is involved, a certification to ORI that the data provided by Respondent are based on actual experiments or are otherwise legitimately derived and that the data, procedures, and methodology are accurately reported and not plagiarized in the application, report, manuscript, or abstract. (4) If no supervision plan is provided to ORI, Respondent will provide certification to ORI at the conclusion of the Supervision Period that his participation was not proposed on a research project for which an application for PHS support was submitted and that he has not participated in any capacity in PHSsupported research. (5) During the Supervision Period, Respondent will exclude himself voluntarily from serving in any advisory or consultant capacity to PHS including, but not limited to, service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review committee. Dated: June 26, 2023. Sheila Garrity, Director, Office of Research Integrity, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. [FR Doc. 2023–13847 Filed 6–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–31–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of Global Affairs: Stakeholder Listening Session in Preparation for the G20 Health Working Group Ministers Meeting Notice of public listening session; request for comments. ACTION: Time and Date: The listening session will be held on Wednesday, August 9, 2023, from 12 to 2:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. Place: The session will be held virtually, with online and dial-in PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 information shared with registered participants. Status: This meeting is open to the public but requires RSVP to oga.rsvp@ hhs.gov by August 4, 2023. See RSVP section below for details. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), with support from relevant health-related U.S. Government offices, is charged with leading the U.S. delegation to the Group of 20 (G20) Health Working Group Ministers’ Meeting and will convene an informal Stakeholder Listening Session. The Stakeholder Listening Session is designed to seek input from stakeholders and subject matter experts to help inform and prepare for U.S. government engagement with the G20 Health Ministers. The G20 comprises 19 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States) and the European Union. The G20 members represent around 85% of the global GDP, over 75% of the global trade, and about twothirds of the world population. The G20 is the premier forum for international economic cooperation and plays an important role in shaping and strengthening global architecture and governance on all major international economic issues. Each year, a different member country holds the presidency of the group and hosts the meetings. The presidency proposes the group’s priorities for the year and hosts discussions to work towards consensus positions and actions on those priorities. This year’s G20 presidency is India, which will be hosting the Health Working Group Ministers’ Meeting on August 18 and 19, 2023. Matters to be Discussed: The Stakeholder Listening Session will cover priority areas expected to be addressed at the G20 Health Working Group Ministers Meeting. The following have been identified as priorities for the G20 Health Working Group: Priority I: Health emergencies’ prevention, preparedness and response (including a focus on a One Health approach & antimicrobial resistance). Priority II: Strengthening cooperation on availability of and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable medical countermeasures during health emergencies. Priority III: Digital health innovations and solutions to aid universal health coverage and improve health care service delivery. E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 124 (Thursday, June 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42087-42088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Research Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Findings of research misconduct have been made against Yiorgos 
(Georgios) I. Laliotis, M.D. (Respondent), who was a Postdoctoral 
Fellow, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, 
The Ohio State University (OSU), and Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of 
Oncology, Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Respondent engaged in 
research misconduct in research supported by U.S. Public Health Service 
(PHS) funds, specifically National Cancer Institute (NCI), National 
Institutes of Health (NIH), grants R01 CA186729, R01 CA198117, P30 
CA016058, K22 CA245487, and R21 CA252530 and included in grant 
applications submitted for PHS funds, specifically R01 CA186729-07 and 
R01 CA198117-05 submitted to NCI, NIH. The administrative actions, 
including supervision for a period of three (3) years, were implemented 
beginning on June 12, 2023, and are detailed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sheila Garrity, JD, MPH, MBA, 
Director, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 
240, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453-8200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Office of 
Research Integrity (ORI) has taken final action in the following case:
    Yiorgos (Georgios) I. Laliotis, M.D., The Ohio State University and 
Johns Hopkins University: Based on the reports of inquiries conducted 
by OSU and JHU, admissions by Respondent, and analysis conducted by ORI 
in its oversight review, ORI found that Yiorgos (Georgios) I. Laliotis, 
M.D., former Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Cancer Biology and 
Genetics, College of Medicine, OSU, and former Postdoctoral Fellow, 
Department of Oncology, JHU, engaged in research misconduct in research 
supported by U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) funds, specifically NCI, 
NIH, grants R01 CA186729, R01 CA198117, P30 CA016058, K22 CA245487, and 
R21 CA252530 and included in grant applications submitted for PHS 
funds, specifically R01 CA186729-07 and R01 CA198117-05 submitted to 
NCI, NIH.
    ORI found that Respondent engaged in research misconduct by 
intentionally and knowingly falsifying and/or fabricating data, 
methods, results, and conclusions by representing a fabricated Exon 2 
splice variant of U2AF2, which would translate as a Serine-Arginine-
Rich deficient U2AF65 isoform, leading to the repression of lung 
adenocarcinomas and by enhancing the role of splicing in mutant PIK3CA 
breast cancer cell lines in the following three (3) published papers, 
two (2) NIH grant applications, and two (2) unpublished manuscripts:
     AKT3-mediated IWS1 phosphorylation promotes the 
proliferation of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas through cell cycle-
regulated U2AF2 RNA splicing. Nat. Commun. 2021 Jul 30; 12(1):4624. 
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24795-1 (hereafter referred to as ``Nat. 
Commun. 2021''). Retraction in: Nat. Commun. 2022 Jun 28;13(1):3711. 
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31445-7.
     Phosphor-IWS1-dependent U2AF2 splicing regulates 
trafficking of CAR-E-positive intronless gene mRNAs and sensitivity to 
viral infection. Commun. Biol. 2021 Oct 11; 4(1):1179. doi: 10.1038/
s42003-021-02668-z (hereafter referred to as ``Commun. Biol. 2021''). 
Retraction in: Commun. Biol. 2021 Dec 15;4(1):1419. doi: 10.1038/
s42003-021-02941-1.
     Overexpression of the SETD2 WW domain inhibits the 
phosphor-IWS1/SETD2 interaction and the oncogenic AKT/IWS1 RNA splicing 
program. bioRxiv 2021.08.12.454141.
    doi: 10.1101/2021.08.12.454141 (hereafter referred to as ``bioRxiv 
2021''). Withdrawn. The manuscript also was submitted to Commun. Biol. 
in 2021 but was withdrawn prior to completion of peer review.
     R01 CA186729-07, ``The role of IWS1-dependent alternative 
RNA splicing in lung cancer,'' submitted to NCI, NIH, on November 5, 
2020.
     R01 CA198117-05, ``The role of IWS1 in development and 
tumorigenesis,'' submitted to NCI, NIH, on June 3, 2019.
     The transcriptomic landscape of oncogenic P13K reveals key 
functions in splicing and gene expression regulation. Manuscript 
submitted to Cancer Res. (hereafter referred to as the ``Cancer Res. 
manuscript'').
     Interpretable deep learning for chromatin-informed 
inference of transcriptional programs driven by somatic alterations 
across cancers. Manuscript in preparation (hereafter referred to as 
``Manuscript 2021'').
    Specifically, ORI finds that Respondent knowingly and 
intentionally:

 falsified the sequencing data in Figure 1g of Nat. Commun. 
2021 by splicing two sequencing chromatograms together to falsely 
represent a novel identification of a previously undescribed U2AF2 RNA 
transcript lacking Exon 2
 falsified conclusions about the fabricated U2AF2 splice 
variant in RT-PCR results in Figures 1f, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c, 
4e, 5h, 6f, 6i, and 7c of Nat. Commun. 2021
 falsified conclusions about the fabricated U2AF2 splice 
variant as the source of two endogenous protein isoforms in immunoblot 
panels in Figures 5c and 5g of Nat. Commun. 2021 and Figure 2 of R01 
CA186729-07
 falsified the experimental conditions of p-ERK1/2 (Y202/T204), 
p-CDK1 (Y15), CDK1, and Cyclin B1 immunoblot panels in Figure 5g of 
Nat. Commun. 2021 and Figure 2 of R01 CA186729-07 by using shControl or 
shIWS1 instead of the samples as reported in the figure labels to 
falsely represent the immunoblots as the result of U2AF2 containing 
spliced Exon 2
 falsified the experimental conditions of the [alpha]-actinin 
immunoblot panel in Figure 1e of Commun. Biol. 2021 by using shIWS1 
instead of shISWS1/U2AF65[beta]-V5 as reported in the figure label
 in Commun. Biol. 2021, bioRxiv 2021, R01 CA186729-07, and R01 
CA198117-05, reported falsified conclusions highlighting the role of 
the fabricated U2AF2 RNA transcript lacking Exon 2 from Nat. Commun. 
2021

[[Page 42088]]

 fabricated and/or falsified the dose response curves in 
Figures 3k and S5N of the Cancer Res. manuscript by treating the MCF7 
and T47D cells lines with DMSO or Alpelisib instead of treating with 
the presence or absence of splicing inhibitors H3B-8800 or E7070 as 
reported in the figure legend
 fabricated and/or falsified the quantitative RNA 
immunoprecipitation qPCR data in Figures S4c and S4d of the Cancer Res. 
Manuscript
 fabricated and/or falsified the qPCR data in Figure 6 of 
Manuscript 2021 to show changes in gene expression between control and 
inhibitor treatment
 fabricated and/or falsified the experimental methods described 
in the legend of Figure 6 of Manuscript 2021 by using CREB1 as a 
control gene instead of ACTIN as reported in the figure legend

    Respondent entered into a Voluntary Settlement Agreement 
(Agreement) and voluntarily agreed to the following:
    (1) Respondent will have his research supervised for a period of 
three (3) years beginning on June 12, 2023 (the ``Supervision 
Period''). Prior to the submission of an application for PHS support 
for a research project on which Respondent's participation is proposed 
and prior to Respondent's participation in any capacity in PHS-
supported research, Respondent will submit a plan for supervision of 
Respondent's duties to ORI for approval. The supervision plan must be 
designed to ensure the integrity of Respondent's research. Respondent 
will not participate in any PHS-supported research until such a 
supervision plan is approved by ORI. Respondent will comply with the 
agreed-upon supervision plan.
    (2) The requirements for Respondent's supervision plan are as 
follows:
    i. A committee of 2-3 senior faculty members at the institution who 
are familiar with Respondent's field of research, but not including 
Respondent's supervisor or collaborators, will provide oversight and 
guidance for a period of three (3) years from the effective date of the 
Agreement. The committee will review primary data from Respondent's 
laboratory on a quarterly basis and submit a report to ORI at six (6)-
month intervals setting forth the committee meeting dates and 
Respondent's compliance with appropriate research standards and 
confirming the integrity of Respondent's research.
    ii. The committee will conduct an advance review of each 
application for PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving 
PHS-supported research in which Respondent is involved. The review will 
include a discussion with Respondent of the primary data represented in 
those documents and will include a certification to ORI that the data 
presented in the proposed application, report, manuscript, or abstract 
are supported by the research record.
    (3) During the Supervision Period, Respondent will ensure that any 
institution employing him submits, in conjunction with each application 
for PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-
supported research in which Respondent is involved, a certification to 
ORI that the data provided by Respondent are based on actual 
experiments or are otherwise legitimately derived and that the data, 
procedures, and methodology are accurately reported and not plagiarized 
in the application, report, manuscript, or abstract.
    (4) If no supervision plan is provided to ORI, Respondent will 
provide certification to ORI at the conclusion of the Supervision 
Period that his participation was not proposed on a research project 
for which an application for PHS support was submitted and that he has 
not participated in any capacity in PHS-supported research.
    (5) During the Supervision Period, Respondent will exclude himself 
voluntarily from serving in any advisory or consultant capacity to PHS 
including, but not limited to, service on any PHS advisory committee, 
board, and/or peer review committee.

    Dated: June 26, 2023.
Sheila Garrity,
Director, Office of Research Integrity, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-13847 Filed 6-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.