Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC, 41027-41029 [2023-13519]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 575
Administrative practice and
procedure, Gaming, Indian lands,
Penalties.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Commission amends 25
CFR part 575 as follows:
PART 575—CIVIL FINES
1. The authority citation for part 575
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2705(a), 2706, 2713,
2715; and Sec. 701, Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat.
599.
§ 575.4
[Amended]
E. Sequoyah Simermeyer,
Chair.
Jean C. Hovland,
Vice Chair.
[FR Doc. 2023–12625 Filed 6–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0517]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Cooper River,
Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
for certain navigable waters of the
Cooper River near the International
African American Museum in
Charleston, South Carolina to prevent
waterside threats and incidents for
persons under the protection of the
United States Secret Service. The action
is necessary to protect an official party,
public, and surrounding waterways
from terrorist acts, sabotage or other
subversive acts, accidents or other
events of a similar nature. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Charleston, or a designated
representative.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
through 2 p.m. on June 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
USSS United States Secret Service
2. Amend the introductory text of
§ 575.4 by removing ‘‘$57,527’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘$61,983’’.
■
ACTION:
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0517 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Thomas Welker,
Sector Charleston, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 843–740–3184, email
CharlestonWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because certain
details of the event were not available
until two weeks prior to the event.
Therefore, the Coast Guard lacks
sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider
those comments before issuing the rule.
Immediate action is needed to prevent
vessels from approaching the location in
Charleston, SC of persons under the
protection of the United States Secret
Service (USSS protectees). It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM
because we must establish this security
zone by June 24, 2023. It would be
contrary to public interest to postpone
establishing the temporary security
zone.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
prevent interference with the USSS
protectees attendance at the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41027
International African American
Museum in Charleston, SC.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70124. The
Captain of the Port (COTP) Charleston
has determined that the USSS
protectees visit on June 24, 2023,
presents a potential target for terrorist
attack, sabotage, or other subversive
acts, accidents, or other causes of a
similar nature. This security zone is
necessary to protect the official party,
public, and surrounding waterways
adjacent to the visit site in Charleston,
South Carolina.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from 8 a.m. through 2 p.m. on June 24,
2023. The security zone will cover an
area approximately 500 yards in width
by 615 yards in length on the Cooper
River along the waterfront of Charleston,
South Carolina as follows. All navigable
waters of the Cooper River beginning at
32°47′24.87″ N, 079°55′28.41″ W, thence
500 yards east to 32°47′24.87″ N,
079°55′10.84″ W, thence south 615
yards to 32°47′4.74″ N, 079°55′10.84″ W,
thence west to 32°47′4.74″ N,
079°55′25.32″ W, thence north along the
shoreline to the point of origin.
The duration of the zone is intended
ensure the security of the USSS
protectees before, during, and
immediately after the scheduled event.
No vessel or person will be permitted to
enter, transit through, anchor in or
remain within the security zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. If
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the security
zone is granted by the COTP or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the COTP or a designated
representative.
The Coast Guard will provide notice
of the security zone by Broadcast Notice
to Mariners and by on-scene designated
representatives.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
41028
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and location of the
security zone. The security zone is
limited in size and location as it will
cover an area approximately 500 yards
in width by 615 yards in length on the
Cooper River along the waterfront of
Charleston, South Carolina. Although
persons and vessels will not be able to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the security zone without
authorization from the COTP Charleston
or a designated representative, they may
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement period. Furthermore,
the rule will allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone. Persons
and vessels may still enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
security zone during the enforcement
period if authorized by the COTP
Charleston or a designated
representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary security zone enforced
continuously for a period of 6 hours,
which will prohibit entry to a portion of
the Cooper River adjacent to Charleston,
South Carolina. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T07–0517 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T07–0517 Security Zone; Cooper
River, Charleston, SC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All waters of the Cooper
River beginning at 32°47′24.87″ N,
079°55′28.41″ W, thence 500 yards east
to 32°47′24.87″ N, 079°55′10.84″ W,
thence south 615 yards to 32°47′4.74″ N,
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
079°55′10.84″ W, thence west to
32°47′4.74″ N, 079°55′25.32″ W, thence
north along the shoreline to the point of
origin. These coordinates are based on
the 1984 World Geodetic System (WGS
84).
(b) Definitions. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including
coxswains, petty officers, and other
officers operating Coast Guard vessels,
and Federal, state, and local officers
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port (COTP) in the enforcement of
the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) No person or
vessel will be permitted to enter, transit,
anchor, or remain within the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
Charleston or a designated
representative. If authorization is
granted, persons and/or vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP Charleston or designated
representative.
(2) Persons who must notify or
request authorization from the COTP
Charleston may do so by Marine Band
Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz).
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 8 a.m. through 2 p.m.
on June 24, 2023.
[FR Doc. 2023–13519 Filed 6–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG–2023–0452]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Firework Display;
Appomattox River, Hopewell, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 150-yard
radius of a fireworks barge located near
City Point, in Hopewell, VA. The
purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure
the safety of persons and vessels, and to
protect the marine environment within
the navigable waters proximate to
fireworks displays, before, during, and
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Ashley Holm, Chief,
Waterways Management Division,
Sector Virginia, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5580, email
Ashley.E.Holm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Dated: June 20, 2023.
F.J. DelRosso,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Charleston.
ACTION:
after the scheduled events. Hazards with
this event include potential falling
debris and possible fire, explosion,
projectile, and burn hazards. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Virginia.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:15
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 1, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0452 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable to publish an NPRM for a
safety zone which must be established
by July 1, 2023, to prevent harm from
potential navigation and safety hazards
created by this event. There is not
sufficient time to allow for a notice and
comment period prior to the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of event spectators,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41029
support craft and other vessels
transiting the navigable waters adjacent
to the event. For the safety concerns
noted, it is in the public interest to have
these regulations in effect during the
event. However, advance notifications
will be made to affected users of the
waterway via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Virginia
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the fireworks
events present a safety concern for
anyone within the safety zone. The
purpose of this rule is to ensure safety
of vessels and people in the navigable
waters who might otherwise be in the
safety zone before, during, and after the
scheduled event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 9:15 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 1,
2023. The safety zone will include all
navigable waters within 150 yards of the
fireworks barge located at latitude
37°18′52″ N, longitude 077°17′12.5″ W,
located near City Point in Hopewell,
VA. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these
navigable waters during the fireworks
display. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the on the size, location,
duration, and time-of-day of the safety
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41027-41029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13519]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0517]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for
certain navigable waters of the Cooper River near the International
African American Museum in Charleston, South Carolina to prevent
waterside threats and incidents for persons under the protection of the
United States Secret Service. The action is necessary to protect an
official party, public, and surrounding waterways from terrorist acts,
sabotage or other subversive acts, accidents or other events of a
similar nature. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Charleston, or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. through 2 p.m. on June 24,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0517 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Thomas Welker, Sector Charleston, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 843-740-3184, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
USSS United States Secret Service
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because certain details of the event were not
available until two weeks prior to the event. Therefore, the Coast
Guard lacks sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and
then consider those comments before issuing the rule. Immediate action
is needed to prevent vessels from approaching the location in
Charleston, SC of persons under the protection of the United States
Secret Service (USSS protectees). It is impracticable to publish an
NPRM because we must establish this security zone by June 24, 2023. It
would be contrary to public interest to postpone establishing the
temporary security zone.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
prevent interference with the USSS protectees attendance at the
International African American Museum in Charleston, SC.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Charleston has determined that
the USSS protectees visit on June 24, 2023, presents a potential target
for terrorist attack, sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or
other causes of a similar nature. This security zone is necessary to
protect the official party, public, and surrounding waterways adjacent
to the visit site in Charleston, South Carolina.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from 8 a.m. through 2 p.m. on
June 24, 2023. The security zone will cover an area approximately 500
yards in width by 615 yards in length on the Cooper River along the
waterfront of Charleston, South Carolina as follows. All navigable
waters of the Cooper River beginning at 32[deg]47'24.87'' N,
079[deg]55'28.41'' W, thence 500 yards east to 32[deg]47'24.87'' N,
079[deg]55'10.84'' W, thence south 615 yards to 32[deg]47'4.74'' N,
079[deg]55'10.84'' W, thence west to 32[deg]47'4.74'' N,
079[deg]55'25.32'' W, thence north along the shoreline to the point of
origin.
The duration of the zone is intended ensure the security of the
USSS protectees before, during, and immediately after the scheduled
event. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter, transit through,
anchor in or remain within the security zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. If
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the security zone is granted by the COTP or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the COTP or a designated
representative.
The Coast Guard will provide notice of the security zone by
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and by on-scene designated
representatives.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
[[Page 41028]]
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory
Review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the security zone. The security zone is limited in size and
location as it will cover an area approximately 500 yards in width by
615 yards in length on the Cooper River along the waterfront of
Charleston, South Carolina. Although persons and vessels will not be
able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
security zone without authorization from the COTP Charleston or a
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area
during the enforcement period. Furthermore, the rule will allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone. Persons and vessels may still
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the security zone
during the enforcement period if authorized by the COTP Charleston or a
designated representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary security zone enforced continuously for a period of 6 hours,
which will prohibit entry to a portion of the Cooper River adjacent to
Charleston, South Carolina. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T07-0517 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0517 Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of
the Cooper River beginning at 32[deg]47'24.87'' N, 079[deg]55'28.41''
W, thence 500 yards east to 32[deg]47'24.87'' N, 079[deg]55'10.84'' W,
thence south 615 yards to 32[deg]47'4.74'' N,
[[Page 41029]]
079[deg]55'10.84'' W, thence west to 32[deg]47'4.74'' N,
079[deg]55'25.32'' W, thence north along the shoreline to the point of
origin. These coordinates are based on the 1984 World Geodetic System
(WGS 84).
(b) Definitions. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including coxswains, petty officers, and other
officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) in
the enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) No person or vessel will be permitted to
enter, transit, anchor, or remain within the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP Charleston
or a designated representative. If authorization is granted, persons
and/or vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the
instructions of the COTP Charleston or designated representative.
(2) Persons who must notify or request authorization from the COTP
Charleston may do so by Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz).
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 8 a.m.
through 2 p.m. on June 24, 2023.
Dated: June 20, 2023.
F.J. DelRosso,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2023-13519 Filed 6-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P