National Wildlife Refuge System; 2023-2024 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations, 41058-41066 [2023-13360]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
41058
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
• In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The RI DEM did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this
action. Due to the nature of the action
being taken here, this action is expected
to have a neutral to positive impact on
the air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 14, 2023.
David Cash,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2023–13229 Filed 6–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 32
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2023–0038;
FXRS12610900000–234–FF09R20000]
RIN 1018–BG71
National Wildlife Refuge System; 2023–
2024 Station-Specific Hunting and
Sport Fishing Regulations
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
expand hunting opportunities on three
National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). We
also propose to make changes to existing
station-specific regulations in order to
reduce the regulatory burden on the
public, increase access for hunters and
anglers on Service lands and waters,
and comply with a Presidential mandate
for plain language standards. Finally,
the best available science, analyzed as
part of this proposed rulemaking,
indicates that lead ammunition and
tackle have negative impacts on both
wildlife and human health. In this
proposed rule, Blackwater,
Chincoteague, Eastern Neck, Erie, Great
Thicket, Patuxent Research Refuge,
Rachel Carson, and Wallops Island
NWRs are each proposing a non-lead
requirement, which would take effect on
September 1, 2026, if we adopt them as
part of a final rule. While the Service
continues to evaluate the future of lead
use in hunting and fishing on Service
lands and waters, this rulemaking does
not include any opportunities proposing
to increase or authorize the new use of
lead beyond fall 2026.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
August 22, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
type in FWS–HQ–NWRS–2023–0038,
which is the docket number for this
rulemaking. Then, click on the Search
button. On the resulting screen, find the
correct document and submit a
comment by clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’
• By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand delivery: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–HQ–NWRS–
2023–0038, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: PRB
(JAO/3W), Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We will not accept email or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Request
for Comments, below, for more
information).
Supporting documents: For
information on a specific refuge’s or
hatchery’s public use program and the
conditions that apply to it, contact the
respective regional office at the address
or phone number given in Available
Information for Specific Stations under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Harrigan, (703) 358–2440. Individuals in
the United States who are deaf,
deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), as amended
(Administration Act), closes NWRs in
all States except Alaska to all uses until
opened. The Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary) may open refuge areas to any
use, including hunting and/or sport
fishing, upon a determination that the
use is compatible with the purposes of
the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge
System (Refuge System) mission. The
action also must be in accordance with
provisions of all laws applicable to the
areas, developed in coordination with
the appropriate State fish and wildlife
agency(ies), consistent with the
principles of sound fish and wildlife
management and administration, and
otherwise in the public interest. These
requirements ensure that we maintain
the biological integrity, diversity, and
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
41059
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
environmental health of the Refuge
System for the benefit of present and
future generations of Americans.
We annually review hunting and
sport fishing programs to determine
whether to include additional stations
or whether individual station
regulations governing existing programs
need modifications. Changing
environmental conditions, State and
Federal regulations, and other factors
affecting fish and wildlife populations
and habitat may warrant modifications
to station-specific regulations to ensure
the continued compatibility of hunting
and sport fishing programs and to
ensure that these programs will not
materially interfere with or detract from
the fulfillment of station purposes or the
Service’s mission.
Provisions governing hunting and
sport fishing on refuges are in title 50 of
the Code of Federal Regulations at part
32 (50 CFR part 32), and on hatcheries
at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate
hunting and sport fishing to:
• Ensure compatibility with refuge
and hatchery purpose(s);
• Properly manage fish and wildlife
resource(s);
• Protect other values;
• Ensure visitor safety; and
• Provide opportunities for fish- and
wildlife-dependent recreation.
On many stations where we decide to
allow hunting and sport fishing, our
general policy of adopting regulations
identical to State hunting and sport
fishing regulations is adequate to meet
these objectives. On other stations, we
must supplement State regulations with
more-restrictive Federal regulations to
ensure that we meet our management
responsibilities, as outlined under
Statutory Authority, below. We issue
station-specific hunting and sport
fishing regulations when we open
wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to
migratory game bird hunting, upland
game hunting, big game hunting, or
sport fishing. These regulations may list
the wildlife species that you may hunt
or fish; seasons; bag or creel (container
for carrying fish) limits; methods of
hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of
areas open to hunting or sport fishing;
and other provisions as appropriate.
Statutory Authority
The Administration Act, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
Act; Pub. L. 105–57), governs the
administration and public use of
refuges, and the Refuge Recreation Act
of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k–
460k–4) governs the administration and
public use of refuges and hatcheries.
Amendments enacted by the
Improvement Act were built upon the
Administration Act in a manner that
provides an ‘‘organic act’’ for the Refuge
System, similar to organic acts that exist
for other public Federal lands. The
Improvement Act serves to ensure that
we effectively manage the Refuge
System as a national network of lands,
waters, and interests for the protection
and conservation of our Nation’s
wildlife resources. The Administration
Act states first and foremost that we
focus our Refuge System mission on
conservation of fish, wildlife, and plant
resources and their habitats. The
Improvement Act requires the Secretary,
before allowing a new use of a refuge,
or before expanding, renewing, or
extending an existing use of a refuge, to
determine that the use is compatible
with the purpose for which the refuge
was established and the mission of the
Refuge System. The Improvement Act
established as the policy of the United
States that wildlife-dependent
recreation, when compatible, is a
legitimate and appropriate public use of
the Refuge System, through which the
American public can develop an
appreciation for fish and wildlife. The
Improvement Act established six
wildlife-dependent recreational uses as
the priority general public uses of the
Refuge System. These uses are hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
The Recreation Act authorizes the
Secretary to administer areas within the
Refuge System and Hatchery System for
public recreation as an appropriate
incidental or secondary use only to the
extent that doing so is practicable and
not inconsistent with the primary
purpose(s) for which Congress and the
Service established the areas. The
Recreation Act requires that any
recreational use of refuge or hatchery
lands be compatible with the primary
purpose(s) for which we established the
refuge and not inconsistent with other
previously authorized operations.
The Administration Act and
Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry
out the purposes of the Acts and
regulate uses.
We develop specific management
plans for each refuge prior to opening it
to hunting or sport fishing. In many
cases, we develop station-specific
regulations to ensure the compatibility
of the programs with the purpose(s) for
which we established the refuge or
hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery
System mission. We ensure initial
compliance with the Administration Act
and the Recreation Act for hunting and
sport fishing on newly acquired land
through an interim determination of
compatibility made at or near the time
of acquisition. These regulations ensure
that we make the determinations
required by these acts prior to adding
refuges to the lists of areas open to
hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR
parts 32 and 71. We ensure continued
compliance by the development of
comprehensive conservation plans and
step-down management plans, and by
annual review of hunting and sport
fishing programs and regulations.
Proposed Amendments to Existing
Regulations
Updates to Hunting and Fishing
Opportunities on NWRs
This document proposes to codify in
the Code of Federal Regulations all the
Service’s hunting and/or sport fishing
regulations that we would update since
the last time we published a rule
amending these regulations (87 FR
57108; September 16, 2022) and that are
applicable at Refuge System units
previously opened to hunting and/or
sport fishing. We propose this to better
inform the general public of the
regulations at each station, to increase
understanding and compliance with
these regulations, and to make
enforcement of these regulations more
efficient. In addition to finding these
regulations in 50 CFR parts 32, visitors
to our stations may find them reiterated
in literature distributed by each station
or posted on signs.
TABLE 1—PROPOSED CHANGES FOR 2023–2024 HUNTING/SPORT FISHING SEASON
Station
State
Migratory bird
hunting
Upland game
hunting
Big game hunting
Cahaba River NWR ............................
Everglades Headwaters NWR ............
Alabama ...............
Florida ..................
Closed ..................
E ...........................
Already Open .......
E ...........................
E ...........................
E ...........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Sport fishing
Already Open.
Closed.
41060
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—PROPOSED CHANGES FOR 2023–2024 HUNTING/SPORT FISHING SEASON—Continued
Station
State
Migratory bird
hunting
Upland game
hunting
Big game hunting
Minnesota Valley NWR .......................
Minnesota ............
E ...........................
E ...........................
E ...........................
Sport fishing
Already Open.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Key:
E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the proposed rule would add new lands/waters, modify areas open to hunting or fishing,
extend season dates, add a targeted hunt, modify season dates, modify hunting hours, etc.)
The changes for the 2023–2024
hunting/fishing season noted in the
table above are each based on a
complete administrative record which,
among other detailed documentation,
also includes a hunt plan, a
compatibility determination (for
refuges), and the appropriate National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) analysis, all of
which were the subject of a public
review and comment process. These
documents are available upon request.
The Service remains concerned that
lead is an important issue, and we will
continue to appropriately evaluate and
regulate the use of lead ammunition and
tackle on Service lands and waters. The
Service has initiated stakeholder
engagement to implement a deliberate,
open, and transparent process of
evaluating the future of lead use on
Service lands and waters, working with
our State partners, and seeking input
and recommendations from the Hunting
and Wildlife Conservation Council,
other stakeholders, and the public. The
best available science, analyzed as part
of this proposed rulemaking, indicates
that lead ammunition and tackle have
negative impacts on both wildlife and
human health. Based on the best
available science and sound
professional judgment, where
appropriate, the Service may propose to
require the use of non-lead ammunition
and tackle on Service lands and waters,
as we have done in certain cases
already. While the Service continues to
evaluate the future of lead use in
hunting and fishing on Service lands
and waters, we will continue to work
with stakeholders and the public to
evaluate lead use through the annual
rulemaking process. In the interim, we
will not allow for any increase in lead
use on Service lands and waters.
Therefore, this rule does not include
any opportunities proposing to increase
or authorize the new use of lead.
Minnesota Valley NWR already requires
non-lead ammunition for the migratory
bird and upland game hunting
opportunities proposed to be expanded,
and the refuge’s proposed expansion of
the big game hunt involves only archery
deer hunting, which does not involve
lead ammunition, as part of a special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
hunt program. Cahaba River NWR is
proposing to expand archery deer
hunting, which does not involve lead
ammunition. Everglades Headwaters
NWR is proposing to expand existing
migratory game bird, upland game, and
big game hunting to new acres that will
require the use of non-lead ammunition
immediately in the fall 2023 season; the
proposed rule would require non-lead
ammunition only within the newly
expanded acres for hunting on the
refuge. This proposed restriction on lead
ammunition has been developed in
coordination with the State of Florida’s
Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission. As we noted in our
September 16, 2022, final rule (87 FR
57108), in this proposed rule,
Blackwater, Chincoteague, Eastern
Neck, Erie, Great Thicket, Patuxent
Research Refuge, Rachel Carson, and
Wallops Island NWRs are proposing a
non-lead equipment requirement, which
would be effective on September 1,
2026, if we adopt the provisions in a
final rule. Specifically, all eight refuges
would require the use of non-lead
ammunition by fall 2026, and seven of
the eight, excepting Chincoteague,
would require the use of non-lead tackle
by fall 2026 as well.
The Service is also providing a
supplemental opportunity for public
comment on regulatory provisions
regarding use of dogs on the Silvio O.
Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge
in Vermont and New Hampshire that
were promulgated in 2021 (see 86 FR
48822; August 31, 2021). The Service’s
preference in evaluating these 2021
regulatory changes is to allow dog
training on the refuge from August 1 to
the last Saturday in September. The
Service would not require a permit for
dog training or hunting with more than
two dogs. The Service would only allow
the use of dogs on the Putney Mountain
Unit to hunt ruffed grouse, fall turkey,
squirrel, and woodcock (see the
proposed revisions to 50 CFR 32.64 in
the rule portion of this document). We
recently sought public review and
comment on an update to the refuge’s
2023 hunting and fishing plan and a
supplemental environmental assessment
(EA) that provided description and
analysis of the provisions regarding use
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of dogs. That comment period ended on
May 25, 2023. The Service considered
those comments and used them to
inform the decision in the finding of no
significant impact associated with the
supplemental EA. Comments made on
this proposed rule pertaining to dog use
and removal of the permit requirements
related to dogs on the Silvio O. Conte
Refuge will also be duly considered. If
we receive compelling information or
data that leads us to conclude that the
relevant regulatory provisions should be
removed or revised, then we may take
that action in the final rule.
Fish Advisory
For health reasons, anglers should
review and follow State-issued
consumption advisories before enjoying
recreational sport fishing opportunities
on Service-managed waters. You can
find information about current fishconsumption advisories on the internet
at https://www.epa.gov/fish-tech.
Request for Comments
You may submit comments and
materials on this proposed rule by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We
will not accept comments sent by email
or fax or to an address not listed in
ADDRESSES. We will not consider handdelivered comments that we do not
receive, or mailed comments that are
not postmarked, by the date specified in
DATES.
We will post your entire comment on
https://www.regulations.gov. Before
including personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that we may make your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will post all hardcopy
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Required Determinations
Clarity of This Proposed Rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988
and the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, require us to write all rules
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
in plain language. This means that each
rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To
better help us revise the rule, your
comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell
us the numbers of the sections or
paragraphs that are unclearly written,
which sections or sentences are too
long, the sections where you feel lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. OIRA has determined that this
rulemaking is not significant.
Executive Order (E.O.) 14094
reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
and E.O 13563 and states that regulatory
analysis should facilitate agency efforts
to develop regulations that serve the
public interest, advance statutory
objectives, and are consistent with E.O.
12866, E.O. 13563, and the Presidential
Memorandum of January 20, 2021
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Regulatory analysis, as practicable and
appropriate, shall recognize distributive
impacts and equity, to the extent
permitted by law. E.O. 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
[SBREFA] of 1996) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
whenever a Federal agency is required
to publish a notice of rulemaking for
any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an
41061
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis
to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ‘‘significant impact’’ and a
threshold for a ‘‘substantial number of
small entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would open or
expand hunting on three NWRs. As a
result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent
recreation on these stations will change.
If the stations establishing new
programs were a pure addition to the
current supply of those activities, it
would mean an estimated maximum
increase of 586 user days (one person
per day participating in a recreational
opportunity; see table 2). Because the
participation trend is flat in these
activities, this increase in supply will
most likely be offset by other sites losing
participants. Therefore, this is likely to
be a substitute site for the activity and
not necessarily an increase in
participation rates for the activity.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED MAXIMUM CHANGE IN RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN 2023–2024
[2022 Dollars in thousands]
Additional
hunting days
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Station
Additional
fishing days
Additional
expenditures
Cahaba River NWR .....................................................................................................................
Everglades Headwaters NWR .....................................................................................................
Minnesota Valley NWR ................................................................................................................
120
225
241
........................
........................
........................
$4
9
9
Total ......................................................................................................................................
586
........................
22
To the extent visitors spend time and
money in the area of the station that
they would not have spent there
anyway, they contribute new income to
the regional economy and benefit local
businesses. Due to the unavailability of
site-specific expenditure data, we use
the national estimates from the 2016
National Survey of Fishing, Hunting,
and Wildlife Associated Recreation to
identify expenditures for food and
lodging, transportation, and other
incidental expenses. Using the average
expenditures for these categories with
the maximum expected additional
participation of the Refuge System
yields approximately $22,000 in
recreation-related expenditures (see
table 2, above). By having ripple effects
throughout the economy, these direct
expenditures are only part of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
economic impact of these recreational
activities. Using a national impact
multiplier for hunting activities (2.51)
derived from the report ‘‘Hunting in
America: An Economic Force for
Conservation’’ and for fishing activities
(2.51) derived from the report
‘‘Sportfishing in America’’ yields a total
maximum economic impact of
approximately $56,000 (2022 dollars)
(Southwick Associates, Inc., 2018).
Since we know that most of the
fishing and hunting occurs within 100
miles of a participant’s residence, then
it is unlikely that most of this spending
will be ‘‘new’’ money coming into a
local economy; therefore, this spending
will be offset with a decrease in some
other sector of the local economy. The
net gain to the local economies will be
no more than $56,000 and likely less.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Since 80 percent of the participants
travel less than 100 miles to engage in
hunting and fishing activities, their
spending patterns will not add new
money into the local economy and,
therefore, the real impact will be on the
order of about $22,000 annually.
Small businesses within the retail
trade industry (such as hotels, gas
stations, taxidermy shops, bait-andtackle shops, and similar businesses)
may be affected by some increased or
decreased station visitation. A large
percentage of these retail trade
establishments in the local communities
around NWRs qualify as small
businesses (see table 3, below). We
expect that the incremental recreational
changes will be scattered, and so we do
not expect that the rule will have a
significant economic effect on a
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
41062
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
substantial number of small entities in
any region or nationally. As noted
previously, we expect at most $22,000
to be spent in total in the refuges’ local
economies. The maximum increase will
be less than one-tenth of 1 percent for
local retail trade spending (see table 3,
below). Table 3 does not include entries
for those NWRs for which we project no
changes in recreation opportunities in
2023–2024; see table 2, above.
TABLE 3—COMPARATIVE EXPENDITURES FOR RETAIL TRADE ASSOCIATED WITH ADDITIONAL STATION VISITATION FOR
2023–2024
[Thousands, 2022 dollars]
Retail trade
in 2017 1
Station/county(ies)
Cahaba River:
Bibb, AL ..........................................
Everglades Headwaters:
Hardee, FL ......................................
Highlands, FL ..................................
Polk, FL ..........................................
Minnesota Valley:
Carver, MN .....................................
1 U.S.
Addition as %
of total
Establishments
in 2017 1
Establishments
with fewer than
10 employees
in 2017
$143,008
$5
<0.1
52
39
223,259
1,505,788
9,949,483
3
3
3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
75
342
1,814
63
246
1,276
1,116,550
5
<0.1
220
142
Census Bureau.
With the small change in overall
spending anticipated from this proposed
rule, it is unlikely that a substantial
number of small entities will have more
than a small impact from the spending
change near the affected stations.
Therefore, we certify that this rule, as
proposed, will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities as defined under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required. Accordingly, a small
entity compliance guide is not required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Estimated
maximum
addition from
new activities
Congressional Review Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Congressional
Review Act. We anticipate no
significant employment or small
business effects. This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
The minimal impact would be scattered
across the country and would most
likely not be significant in any local
area.
b. Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. This proposed rule
would have only a slight effect on the
costs of hunting opportunities for
Americans. If the substitute sites are
farther from the participants’ residences,
then an increase in travel costs would
occur. The Service does not have
information to quantify this change in
travel cost but assumes that, since most
people travel less than 100 miles to
hunt, the increased travel cost would be
small. We do not expect this proposed
rule to affect the supply or demand for
hunting opportunities in the United
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
States, and, therefore, it should not
affect prices for hunting equipment and
supplies, or the retailers that sell
equipment.
c. Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This proposed rule represents only a
small proportion of recreational
spending at NWRs. Therefore, if
adopted, this rule would have no
measurable economic effect on the
wildlife-dependent industry, which has
annual sales of equipment and travel
expenditures of $72 billion nationwide.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this proposed rule would apply
to public use of federally owned and
managed refuges, it would not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
proposed rule would not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. This
proposed rule would affect only visitors
at NWRs and would describe what they
can do while they are on a Service
station.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
As discussed under Regulatory
Planning and Review and Unfunded
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Mandates Reform Act, above, this
proposed rule would not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement under E.O. 13132. In
preparing this proposed rule, we
worked with State governments.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Department of the Interior has
determined that this proposed rule
would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O.
13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
E.O. 13211 on regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. E.O. 13211 requires
agencies to prepare statements of energy
effects when undertaking certain
actions. Because this proposed rule
would expand hunting at two NWRs, it
is not a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866, and we do not expect
it to significantly affect energy supplies,
distribution, or use. Therefore, this
action is not a significant energy action,
and no statement of energy effects is
required.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated possible effects on
federally recognized Indian Tribes and
have determined that there are no
effects. We coordinate recreational use
on NWRs and National Fish Hatcheries
with Tribal governments having
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
adjoining or overlapping jurisdiction
before we propose the regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). OMB previously approved the
information collection requirements
associated with application and
reporting requirements associated with
hunting and sport fishing and assigned
OMB Control Number 1018–0140
(expires 09/30/2025). An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Endangered Species Act Section 7
Consultation
We comply with section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when
developing comprehensive conservation
plans and step-down management
plans—which would include hunting
and/or fishing plans—for public use of
refuges and hatcheries, and prior to
implementing any new or revised public
recreation program on a station as
identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We
complied with section 7 for each of the
stations affected by this proposed
rulemaking.
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this proposed rule in
accordance with the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 43 CFR
part 46, and 516 Departmental Manual
(DM) 8.
A categorical exclusion from NEPA
documentation applies to publication of
proposed amendments to stationspecific hunting and fishing regulations
because they are technical and
procedural in nature, and the
environmental effects are too broad,
speculative, or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis (43
CFR 46.210 and 516 DM 8). Concerning
the actions that are the subject of this
proposed rulemaking, we have
complied with NEPA at the project level
when developing each proposal. This is
consistent with the Department of the
Interior instructions for compliance
with NEPA where actions are covered
sufficiently by an earlier environmental
document (43 CFR 46.120).
Prior to the addition of a refuge or
hatchery to the list of areas open to
hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32
and 71, we develop hunting and fishing
plans for the affected stations. We
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
incorporate these proposed station
hunting and fishing activities in the
station comprehensive conservation
plan and/or other step-down
management plans, pursuant to our
refuge planning guidance in 602 Fish
and Wildlife Service Manual (FW) 1, 3,
and 4. We prepare these comprehensive
conservation plans and step-down plans
in compliance with section 102(2)(C) of
NEPA, the Council on Environmental
Quality’s regulations for implementing
NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508, and the Department of Interior’s
NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We
invite the affected public to participate
in the review, development, and
implementation of these plans. Copies
of all plans and NEPA compliance are
available from the stations at the
addresses provided below.
Available Information for Specific
Stations
Individual refuge and hatchery
headquarters have information about
public use programs and conditions that
apply to their specific programs and
maps of their respective areas. To find
out how to contact a specific refuge or
hatchery, contact the appropriate
Service office for the States and
Territories listed below:
Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and
Washington. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal
Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th
Avenue, Portland, OR 97232–4181;
Telephone (503) 231–6203.
Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and
Texas. Regional Chief, National Wildlife
Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, P.O. Box 1306, 500 Gold
Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103;
Telephone (505) 248–6635.
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and
Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd.
West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN
55437–1458; Telephone (612) 713–5476.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1875 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, GA
30345; Telephone (404) 679–7356.
Connecticut, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West
Virginia. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41063
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035–9589;
Telephone (413) 253–8307.
Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd.,
Lakewood, CO 80228; Telephone (303)
236–4377.
Alaska. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd.,
Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone (907)
786–3545.
California and Nevada. Regional
Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800
Cottage Way, Room W–2606,
Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916)
767–9241.
Primary Author
Kate Harrigan, Division of Natural
Resources and Conservation Planning,
National Wildlife Refuge System, is the
primary author of this rulemaking
document.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32
Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife,
Wildlife refuges.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons described in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 32—HUNTING AND FISHING
1. The authority citation for part 32
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k,
664, 668dd–668ee, and 715i; Pub. L. 115–20,
131 Stat. 86.
2. Amend § 32.24 by revising
paragraphs (s)(1)(iv) and (vi) to read as
follows:
■
§ 32.24
California.
*
*
*
*
*
(s) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) We restrict hunters in the spaced
zone area of the East Bear Creek Unit
and West Bear Creek Unit to their
assigned zone except when they are
traveling to and from the parking area,
retrieving downed birds, or pursuing
crippled birds.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) We require State-issued Type A
area permits for accessing the Freitas
Unit on Wednesdays, Saturdays, and
Sundays.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
41064
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
3. Amend § 32.28 by revising
paragraphs (e)(2) and (3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 32.28
Florida.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
upland game hunting and the incidental
take of nonnative wildlife as defined by
the State on designated areas of the
refuge in accordance with State
regulations and applicable State
Wildlife Management Area regulations
and the following condition: We require
the use of non-lead ammunition when
hunting upland game and the incidental
take of nonnative wildlife on the
Corrigan Ranch/Okeechobee Unit.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow big
game hunting and the incidental take of
nonnative wildlife as defined by the
State on designated areas of the refuge
in accordance with State regulations
and applicable State Wildlife
Management Area regulations and the
following condition: We require the use
of non-lead ammunition when hunting
big game and the incidental take of
nonnative wildlife on the Corrigan
Ranch/Okeechobee Unit.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 32.35 by revising
paragraph (a)(1)(v) to read as follows:
§ 32.35
Kansas.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) We close the Neosho River and
refuge lands north of the Neosho River
to all hunting from November 1 through
March 1.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 32.38 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(v);
■ b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and
(3)(i);
■ c. Adding paragraph (f)(1)(v); and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (f)(2)(i), (3)(i),
and (4)(ii).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 32.38
Maine.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii) and (v)
of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii) and (v)
of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (f)(1)(i), (iii), and (v) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions as set forth at
paragraphs (f)(1)(i), (iv), and (v) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(ii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (f)(1)(v) of this section
applies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 32.39 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (a)(1)(iv);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (a)(3)(vi),
(4)(iii), (b)(2)(iv), (3)(iv), (4)(iii), and
(c)(1)(v); and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (c)(2), (3)(i),
and (4).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 32.39
Maryland.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (a)(3)(i)
through (v) of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at
paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section
applies.
(4) * * *
(iii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section
applies.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(3) * * *
(iv) The condition set forth at
paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section
applies.
(4) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section
applies.
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of gray squirrel, eastern
cottontail rabbit, and woodchuck on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following condition: The conditions
set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through
(iii) and (v) of this section apply.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and (v) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following condition: The
condition set forth at paragraph (c)(1)(v)
of this section applies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 32.40 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (a)(4)(iii); and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (b)(4) and
(f)(4).
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
§ 32.40
Massachusetts.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) We allow fishing from legal
sunrise to legal sunset.
(b) * * *
(4) Sport Fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) Sport Fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 32.47 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and
(iii);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (d)(1)(iv) and
(v); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (d)(2)(iii).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 32.47
Nevada.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) We allow hunting on designated
days. We prohibit any migratory game
bird hunting after January 31.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) From October 1 to February 1,
you may only be in possession of or use
25 or fewer shot shells per hunt day.
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(iv) We only allow hunters to use
watercraft to travel to and from their
hunting location for each day’s hunt.
Watercraft must be completely
immobilized while hunting, except to
retrieve downed or crippled birds.
(v) We prohibit shooting 150 feet (45
meters) from the center line of roads
(including access roads and two tracks),
parking areas, levees, or into or from
safety zones.
(2) * * *
(iii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (d)(1)(iii) and (iv) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 32.48 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 32.48
New Hampshire.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Silvio O. Conte National Fish and
Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
allow hunting of duck, goose, coot,
Wilson’s snipe, and American
woodcock on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
condition: We allow the use of dogs
consistent with State regulations, except
dog training is only allowed from
August 1 through the last Saturday in
September during daylight hours.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of coyote, fox, raccoon,
woodchuck, red squirrel, eastern gray
squirrel, porcupine, skunk, crow,
snowshoe hare, muskrat, opossum,
fisher, mink, weasel, ring-necked
pheasant, and ruffed grouse on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following condition: We allow the
use of dogs consistent with State
regulations, except dog training is only
allowed from August 1 through the last
Saturday in September during daylight
hours.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer, moose,
black bear, and wild turkey on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs consistent
with State regulations, except dog
training is only allowed from August 1
through the last Saturday in September
during daylight hours.
(ii) We allow tree stands and blinds
that are clearly marked with the owner’s
State hunting license number.
(iii) You must remove your tree
stand(s) and blind(s) no later than 72
hours after the close of the season (see
§ 27.93 of this chapter).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the
refuge.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
10. Amend § 32.56 by revising
paragraph (l)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 32.56
Oregon.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of upland game birds and
turkey on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following condition: The
condition set forth at paragraph (l)(1)(i)
of this section applies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 32.57 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(v);
■ b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) and
(3)(ii); and
■ c. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(vi).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 32.57
Pennsylvania.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(iii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(ii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of this
section apply.
(4) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at
paragraph (b)(1)(v) of this section
applies.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 32.62
[Amended]
12. Amend § 32.62 by:
a. Removing paragraph (h)(3)(x); and
b. Redesignating paragraphs (h)(3)(xi)
through (xiii) as (h)(3)(x) through (xii),
respectively.
■ 13. Amend § 32.64 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (a)(4)(v); and
■ b. Revising paragraph (b).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 32.64
Vermont.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) We allow fishing from legal
sunrise to legal sunset.
(b) Silvio O. Conte National Fish and
Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
allow hunting of duck, goose, coot,
crow, snipe, and American woodcock
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41065
(i) We allow disabled hunters to hunt
from a vehicle that is at least 10 feet
from the traveled portion of the refuge
road if the hunter possesses a Stateissued disabled hunting license and a
Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3–1383–
G) issued by the refuge manager.
(ii) We allow the use of dogs
consistent with State regulations, except
dog training is only allowed from
August 1 through the last Saturday in
September during daylight hours. We
prohibit dog training on the Putney
Mountain Unit.
(iii) We prohibit shooting from, over,
or within 25 feet of the traveled portion
of any road that is accessible to motor
vehicles.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of coyote, fox, raccoon, bobcat,
woodchuck, red squirrel, eastern gray
squirrel, porcupine, skunk, snowshoe
hare, eastern cottontail, muskrat,
opossum, weasel, pheasant, and ruffed
grouse on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section apply.
(ii) At the Putney Mountain Unit, we
allow the use of dogs only for hunting
ruffed grouse, fall turkey, squirrel, and
woodcock.
(iii) We require hunters hunting at
night to possess a Special Use Permit
(FWS Form 3–1383–G) issued by the
refuge manager.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer, moose,
black bear, and wild turkey on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section apply.
(ii) You may use portable tree stands
and/or blinds. You must clearly label
your tree stand(s) and/or blind(s) with
your hunting license number. You must
remove your tree stand(s) and/or
blind(s) no later than 72 hours after the
close of the season (see § 27.93 of this
chapter).
(iii) You may retrieve moose at the
Nulhegan Basin Division with the use of
a commercial moose hauler, if the
hauler possesses a Special Use Permit
(FWS Form 3–1383–C) issued by the
refuge manager.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
consistent with State regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Amend § 32.65 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(vi);
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(i);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(vii) and
(viii);
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
41066
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
d. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(i);
e. Adding paragraphs (b)(4)(vi) and
(c)(2)(iii);
■ f. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
■ g. Adding paragraph (n)(1)(vi); and
■ h. Revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and
(3)(i).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 32.65
Virginia.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells and
ammunition while in the field (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (vi) of this
section apply. All occupants of a vehicle
or hunt party must possess a signed
refuge hunt brochure and be actively
engaged in hunting unless aiding a
disabled person who possesses a valid
State disabled hunting license.
*
*
*
*
*
(vii) Hunting is allowed only during
the regular State deer season.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jun 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
(viii) We prohibit hunting on
Sundays.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(vi) and (b)(2)(i), (ii),
and (v) through (viii) of this section
apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at
paragraph (b)(1)(vi) of this section
applies.
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) We prohibit hunting on Sundays.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), (iv) through (v),
and (c)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) You may only use or possess
approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the
field (see § 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(i) The conditions set forth in
paragraphs (n)(1)(i), (iii), and (vi) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (n)(1)(i), (ii), (vi), and
(n)(2)(iv) of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Amend § 32.66 by revising
paragraph (b)(4)(i) to read as follows:
§ 32.66
Washington.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) On waters open to fishing, we
allow fishing only from the start of the
State season to September 30, except
that we allow fishing year-round on
Falcon, Heron, Goldeneye, Corral,
Blythe, Chukar, and Scaup Lakes.
*
*
*
*
*
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2023–13360 Filed 6–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41058-41066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13360]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 32
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2023-0038; FXRS12610900000-234-FF09R20000]
RIN 1018-BG71
National Wildlife Refuge System; 2023-2024 Station-Specific
Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
expand hunting opportunities on three National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs).
We also propose to make changes to existing station-specific
regulations in order to reduce the regulatory burden on the public,
increase access for hunters and anglers on Service lands and waters,
and comply with a Presidential mandate for plain language standards.
Finally, the best available science, analyzed as part of this proposed
rulemaking, indicates that lead ammunition and tackle have negative
impacts on both wildlife and human health. In this proposed rule,
Blackwater, Chincoteague, Eastern Neck, Erie, Great Thicket, Patuxent
Research Refuge, Rachel Carson, and Wallops Island NWRs are each
proposing a non-lead requirement, which would take effect on September
1, 2026, if we adopt them as part of a final rule. While the Service
continues to evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on
Service lands and waters, this rulemaking does not include any
opportunities proposing to increase or authorize the new use of lead
beyond fall 2026.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
August 22, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, type in FWS-HQ-NWRS-
2023-0038, which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, click
on the Search button. On the resulting screen, find the correct
document and submit a comment by clicking on ``Comment.''
By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-HQ-NWRS-2023-0038, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: PRB (JAO/3W), Falls Church,
VA 22041-3803.
We will not accept email or faxes. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see Request for Comments, below,
for more information).
Supporting documents: For information on a specific refuge's or
hatchery's public use program and the conditions that apply to it,
contact the respective regional office at the address or phone number
given in Available Information for Specific Stations under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Harrigan, (703) 358-2440.
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in
the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended (Administration Act), closes NWRs in
all States except Alaska to all uses until opened. The Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) may open refuge areas to any use, including
hunting and/or sport fishing, upon a determination that the use is
compatible with the purposes of the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge
System (Refuge System) mission. The action also must be in accordance
with provisions of all laws applicable to the areas, developed in
coordination with the appropriate State fish and wildlife agency(ies),
consistent with the principles of sound fish and wildlife management
and administration, and otherwise in the public interest. These
requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity,
diversity, and
[[Page 41059]]
environmental health of the Refuge System for the benefit of present
and future generations of Americans.
We annually review hunting and sport fishing programs to determine
whether to include additional stations or whether individual station
regulations governing existing programs need modifications. Changing
environmental conditions, State and Federal regulations, and other
factors affecting fish and wildlife populations and habitat may warrant
modifications to station-specific regulations to ensure the continued
compatibility of hunting and sport fishing programs and to ensure that
these programs will not materially interfere with or detract from the
fulfillment of station purposes or the Service's mission.
Provisions governing hunting and sport fishing on refuges are in
title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at part 32 (50 CFR part
32), and on hatcheries at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate hunting
and sport fishing to:
Ensure compatibility with refuge and hatchery purpose(s);
Properly manage fish and wildlife resource(s);
Protect other values;
Ensure visitor safety; and
Provide opportunities for fish- and wildlife-dependent
recreation.
On many stations where we decide to allow hunting and sport
fishing, our general policy of adopting regulations identical to State
hunting and sport fishing regulations is adequate to meet these
objectives. On other stations, we must supplement State regulations
with more-restrictive Federal regulations to ensure that we meet our
management responsibilities, as outlined under Statutory Authority,
below. We issue station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations
when we open wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to migratory game
bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, or sport fishing.
These regulations may list the wildlife species that you may hunt or
fish; seasons; bag or creel (container for carrying fish) limits;
methods of hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of areas open to
hunting or sport fishing; and other provisions as appropriate.
Statutory Authority
The Administration Act, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act; Pub. L. 105-57),
governs the administration and public use of refuges, and the Refuge
Recreation Act of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) governs
the administration and public use of refuges and hatcheries.
Amendments enacted by the Improvement Act were built upon the
Administration Act in a manner that provides an ``organic act'' for the
Refuge System, similar to organic acts that exist for other public
Federal lands. The Improvement Act serves to ensure that we effectively
manage the Refuge System as a national network of lands, waters, and
interests for the protection and conservation of our Nation's wildlife
resources. The Administration Act states first and foremost that we
focus our Refuge System mission on conservation of fish, wildlife, and
plant resources and their habitats. The Improvement Act requires the
Secretary, before allowing a new use of a refuge, or before expanding,
renewing, or extending an existing use of a refuge, to determine that
the use is compatible with the purpose for which the refuge was
established and the mission of the Refuge System. The Improvement Act
established as the policy of the United States that wildlife-dependent
recreation, when compatible, is a legitimate and appropriate public use
of the Refuge System, through which the American public can develop an
appreciation for fish and wildlife. The Improvement Act established six
wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public
uses of the Refuge System. These uses are hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation and photography, and environmental education and
interpretation.
The Recreation Act authorizes the Secretary to administer areas
within the Refuge System and Hatchery System for public recreation as
an appropriate incidental or secondary use only to the extent that
doing so is practicable and not inconsistent with the primary
purpose(s) for which Congress and the Service established the areas.
The Recreation Act requires that any recreational use of refuge or
hatchery lands be compatible with the primary purpose(s) for which we
established the refuge and not inconsistent with other previously
authorized operations.
The Administration Act and Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the Acts
and regulate uses.
We develop specific management plans for each refuge prior to
opening it to hunting or sport fishing. In many cases, we develop
station-specific regulations to ensure the compatibility of the
programs with the purpose(s) for which we established the refuge or
hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery System mission. We ensure initial
compliance with the Administration Act and the Recreation Act for
hunting and sport fishing on newly acquired land through an interim
determination of compatibility made at or near the time of acquisition.
These regulations ensure that we make the determinations required by
these acts prior to adding refuges to the lists of areas open to
hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71. We ensure
continued compliance by the development of comprehensive conservation
plans and step-down management plans, and by annual review of hunting
and sport fishing programs and regulations.
Proposed Amendments to Existing Regulations
Updates to Hunting and Fishing Opportunities on NWRs
This document proposes to codify in the Code of Federal Regulations
all the Service's hunting and/or sport fishing regulations that we
would update since the last time we published a rule amending these
regulations (87 FR 57108; September 16, 2022) and that are applicable
at Refuge System units previously opened to hunting and/or sport
fishing. We propose this to better inform the general public of the
regulations at each station, to increase understanding and compliance
with these regulations, and to make enforcement of these regulations
more efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR
parts 32, visitors to our stations may find them reiterated in
literature distributed by each station or posted on signs.
Table 1--Proposed Changes for 2023-2024 Hunting/Sport Fishing Season
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Station State Migratory bird hunting Upland game hunting Big game hunting Sport fishing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cahaba River NWR................... Alabama............... Closed................ Already Open......... E.................... Already Open.
Everglades Headwaters NWR.......... Florida............... E..................... E.................... E.................... Closed.
[[Page 41060]]
Minnesota Valley NWR............... Minnesota............. E..................... E.................... E.................... Already Open.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key:
E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the proposed rule would add new lands/waters, modify areas open to hunting or fishing, extend
season dates, add a targeted hunt, modify season dates, modify hunting hours, etc.)
The changes for the 2023-2024 hunting/fishing season noted in the
table above are each based on a complete administrative record which,
among other detailed documentation, also includes a hunt plan, a
compatibility determination (for refuges), and the appropriate National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) analysis, all
of which were the subject of a public review and comment process. These
documents are available upon request.
The Service remains concerned that lead is an important issue, and
we will continue to appropriately evaluate and regulate the use of lead
ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters. The Service has
initiated stakeholder engagement to implement a deliberate, open, and
transparent process of evaluating the future of lead use on Service
lands and waters, working with our State partners, and seeking input
and recommendations from the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council,
other stakeholders, and the public. The best available science,
analyzed as part of this proposed rulemaking, indicates that lead
ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife and human
health. Based on the best available science and sound professional
judgment, where appropriate, the Service may propose to require the use
of non-lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters, as we
have done in certain cases already. While the Service continues to
evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands
and waters, we will continue to work with stakeholders and the public
to evaluate lead use through the annual rulemaking process. In the
interim, we will not allow for any increase in lead use on Service
lands and waters. Therefore, this rule does not include any
opportunities proposing to increase or authorize the new use of lead.
Minnesota Valley NWR already requires non-lead ammunition for the
migratory bird and upland game hunting opportunities proposed to be
expanded, and the refuge's proposed expansion of the big game hunt
involves only archery deer hunting, which does not involve lead
ammunition, as part of a special hunt program. Cahaba River NWR is
proposing to expand archery deer hunting, which does not involve lead
ammunition. Everglades Headwaters NWR is proposing to expand existing
migratory game bird, upland game, and big game hunting to new acres
that will require the use of non-lead ammunition immediately in the
fall 2023 season; the proposed rule would require non-lead ammunition
only within the newly expanded acres for hunting on the refuge. This
proposed restriction on lead ammunition has been developed in
coordination with the State of Florida's Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission. As we noted in our September 16, 2022, final rule (87 FR
57108), in this proposed rule, Blackwater, Chincoteague, Eastern Neck,
Erie, Great Thicket, Patuxent Research Refuge, Rachel Carson, and
Wallops Island NWRs are proposing a non-lead equipment requirement,
which would be effective on September 1, 2026, if we adopt the
provisions in a final rule. Specifically, all eight refuges would
require the use of non-lead ammunition by fall 2026, and seven of the
eight, excepting Chincoteague, would require the use of non-lead tackle
by fall 2026 as well.
The Service is also providing a supplemental opportunity for public
comment on regulatory provisions regarding use of dogs on the Silvio O.
Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge in Vermont and New Hampshire
that were promulgated in 2021 (see 86 FR 48822; August 31, 2021). The
Service's preference in evaluating these 2021 regulatory changes is to
allow dog training on the refuge from August 1 to the last Saturday in
September. The Service would not require a permit for dog training or
hunting with more than two dogs. The Service would only allow the use
of dogs on the Putney Mountain Unit to hunt ruffed grouse, fall turkey,
squirrel, and woodcock (see the proposed revisions to 50 CFR 32.64 in
the rule portion of this document). We recently sought public review
and comment on an update to the refuge's 2023 hunting and fishing plan
and a supplemental environmental assessment (EA) that provided
description and analysis of the provisions regarding use of dogs. That
comment period ended on May 25, 2023. The Service considered those
comments and used them to inform the decision in the finding of no
significant impact associated with the supplemental EA. Comments made
on this proposed rule pertaining to dog use and removal of the permit
requirements related to dogs on the Silvio O. Conte Refuge will also be
duly considered. If we receive compelling information or data that
leads us to conclude that the relevant regulatory provisions should be
removed or revised, then we may take that action in the final rule.
Fish Advisory
For health reasons, anglers should review and follow State-issued
consumption advisories before enjoying recreational sport fishing
opportunities on Service-managed waters. You can find information about
current fish-consumption advisories on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/fish-tech.
Request for Comments
You may submit comments and materials on this proposed rule by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We will not accept comments sent by
email or fax or to an address not listed in ADDRESSES. We will not
consider hand-delivered comments that we do not receive, or mailed
comments that are not postmarked, by the date specified in DATES.
We will post your entire comment on https://www.regulations.gov.
Before including personal identifying information in your comment, you
should be aware that we may make your entire comment--including your
personal identifying information--publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will post all hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Required Determinations
Clarity of This Proposed Rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, require us to write all rules
[[Page 41061]]
in plain language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To better help us
revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences are too long,
the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rulemaking is not significant.
Executive Order (E.O.) 14094 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
and E.O 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should facilitate
agency efforts to develop regulations that serve the public interest,
advance statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O. 12866, E.O.
13563, and the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2021 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review). Regulatory analysis, as practicable and
appropriate, shall recognize distributive impacts and equity, to the
extent permitted by law. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act [SBREFA] of 1996) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a
notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare
and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of
an agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a
regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ``significant impact'' and a threshold for a
``substantial number of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA
amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to
provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule would open or expand hunting on three NWRs. As a
result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent recreation on these stations
will change. If the stations establishing new programs were a pure
addition to the current supply of those activities, it would mean an
estimated maximum increase of 586 user days (one person per day
participating in a recreational opportunity; see table 2). Because the
participation trend is flat in these activities, this increase in
supply will most likely be offset by other sites losing participants.
Therefore, this is likely to be a substitute site for the activity and
not necessarily an increase in participation rates for the activity.
Table 2--Estimated Maximum Change in Recreation Opportunities in 2023-2024
[2022 Dollars in thousands]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Additional Additional
Station hunting days fishing days expenditures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cahaba River NWR................................................ 120 .............. $4
Everglades Headwaters NWR....................................... 225 .............. 9
Minnesota Valley NWR............................................ 241 .............. 9
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 586 .............. 22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent visitors spend time and money in the area of the
station that they would not have spent there anyway, they contribute
new income to the regional economy and benefit local businesses. Due to
the unavailability of site-specific expenditure data, we use the
national estimates from the 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting,
and Wildlife Associated Recreation to identify expenditures for food
and lodging, transportation, and other incidental expenses. Using the
average expenditures for these categories with the maximum expected
additional participation of the Refuge System yields approximately
$22,000 in recreation-related expenditures (see table 2, above). By
having ripple effects throughout the economy, these direct expenditures
are only part of the economic impact of these recreational activities.
Using a national impact multiplier for hunting activities (2.51)
derived from the report ``Hunting in America: An Economic Force for
Conservation'' and for fishing activities (2.51) derived from the
report ``Sportfishing in America'' yields a total maximum economic
impact of approximately $56,000 (2022 dollars) (Southwick Associates,
Inc., 2018).
Since we know that most of the fishing and hunting occurs within
100 miles of a participant's residence, then it is unlikely that most
of this spending will be ``new'' money coming into a local economy;
therefore, this spending will be offset with a decrease in some other
sector of the local economy. The net gain to the local economies will
be no more than $56,000 and likely less. Since 80 percent of the
participants travel less than 100 miles to engage in hunting and
fishing activities, their spending patterns will not add new money into
the local economy and, therefore, the real impact will be on the order
of about $22,000 annually.
Small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as hotels,
gas stations, taxidermy shops, bait-and-tackle shops, and similar
businesses) may be affected by some increased or decreased station
visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade establishments in
the local communities around NWRs qualify as small businesses (see
table 3, below). We expect that the incremental recreational changes
will be scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a
significant economic effect on a
[[Page 41062]]
substantial number of small entities in any region or nationally. As
noted previously, we expect at most $22,000 to be spent in total in the
refuges' local economies. The maximum increase will be less than one-
tenth of 1 percent for local retail trade spending (see table 3,
below). Table 3 does not include entries for those NWRs for which we
project no changes in recreation opportunities in 2023-2024; see table
2, above.
Table 3--Comparative Expenditures for Retail Trade Associated With Additional Station Visitation for 2023-2024
[Thousands, 2022 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Establishments
Retail trade in maximum addition Addition as % of Establishments with fewer than
Station/county(ies) 2017 \1\ from new total in 2017 \1\ 10 employees in
activities 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cahaba River:
Bibb, AL............................................. $143,008 $5 <0.1 52 39
Everglades Headwaters:
Hardee, FL........................................... 223,259 3 <0.1 75 63
Highlands, FL........................................ 1,505,788 3 <0.1 342 246
Polk, FL............................................. 9,949,483 3 <0.1 1,814 1,276
Minnesota Valley:
Carver, MN........................................... 1,116,550 5 <0.1 220 142
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 U.S. Census Bureau.
With the small change in overall spending anticipated from this
proposed rule, it is unlikely that a substantial number of small
entities will have more than a small impact from the spending change
near the affected stations. Therefore, we certify that this rule, as
proposed, will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial
number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a small entity compliance guide is not required.
Congressional Review Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Congressional Review Act. We anticipate no significant employment or
small business effects. This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. The minimal impact would be scattered across the country and
would most likely not be significant in any local area.
b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This proposed rule would have only a
slight effect on the costs of hunting opportunities for Americans. If
the substitute sites are farther from the participants' residences,
then an increase in travel costs would occur. The Service does not have
information to quantify this change in travel cost but assumes that,
since most people travel less than 100 miles to hunt, the increased
travel cost would be small. We do not expect this proposed rule to
affect the supply or demand for hunting opportunities in the United
States, and, therefore, it should not affect prices for hunting
equipment and supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment.
c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
proposed rule represents only a small proportion of recreational
spending at NWRs. Therefore, if adopted, this rule would have no
measurable economic effect on the wildlife-dependent industry, which
has annual sales of equipment and travel expenditures of $72 billion
nationwide.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this proposed rule would apply to public use of federally
owned and managed refuges, it would not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than
$100 million per year. The proposed rule would not have a significant
or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. This proposed rule would affect only
visitors at NWRs and would describe what they can do while they are on
a Service station.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
As discussed under Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, above, this proposed rule would not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement under E.O. 13132. In preparing this
proposed rule, we worked with State governments.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Department of the Interior has
determined that this proposed rule would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or use. E.O.
13211 requires agencies to prepare statements of energy effects when
undertaking certain actions. Because this proposed rule would expand
hunting at two NWRs, it is not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 12866, and we do not expect it to significantly affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is not a
significant energy action, and no statement of energy effects is
required.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects
on federally recognized Indian Tribes and have determined that there
are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on NWRs and National
Fish Hatcheries with Tribal governments having
[[Page 41063]]
adjoining or overlapping jurisdiction before we propose the
regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB
previously approved the information collection requirements associated
with application and reporting requirements associated with hunting and
sport fishing and assigned OMB Control Number 1018-0140 (expires 09/30/
2025). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
We comply with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when developing comprehensive
conservation plans and step-down management plans--which would include
hunting and/or fishing plans--for public use of refuges and hatcheries,
and prior to implementing any new or revised public recreation program
on a station as identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We complied with section 7
for each of the stations affected by this proposed rulemaking.
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the criteria of
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C.
4332(C)), 43 CFR part 46, and 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 8.
A categorical exclusion from NEPA documentation applies to
publication of proposed amendments to station-specific hunting and
fishing regulations because they are technical and procedural in
nature, and the environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or
conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis (43 CFR 46.210
and 516 DM 8). Concerning the actions that are the subject of this
proposed rulemaking, we have complied with NEPA at the project level
when developing each proposal. This is consistent with the Department
of the Interior instructions for compliance with NEPA where actions are
covered sufficiently by an earlier environmental document (43 CFR
46.120).
Prior to the addition of a refuge or hatchery to the list of areas
open to hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71, we develop
hunting and fishing plans for the affected stations. We incorporate
these proposed station hunting and fishing activities in the station
comprehensive conservation plan and/or other step-down management
plans, pursuant to our refuge planning guidance in 602 Fish and
Wildlife Service Manual (FW) 1, 3, and 4. We prepare these
comprehensive conservation plans and step-down plans in compliance with
section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality's
regulations for implementing NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508,
and the Department of Interior's NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We
invite the affected public to participate in the review, development,
and implementation of these plans. Copies of all plans and NEPA
compliance are available from the stations at the addresses provided
below.
Available Information for Specific Stations
Individual refuge and hatchery headquarters have information about
public use programs and conditions that apply to their specific
programs and maps of their respective areas. To find out how to contact
a specific refuge or hatchery, contact the appropriate Service office
for the States and Territories listed below:
Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside
Federal Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-
4181; Telephone (503) 231-6203.
Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306,
500 Gold Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103; Telephone (505) 248-6635.
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and
Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington,
MN 55437-1458; Telephone (612) 713-5476.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard,
Atlanta, GA 30345; Telephone (404) 679-7356.
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate
Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035-9589; Telephone (413) 253-8307.
Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Utah, and Wyoming. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228;
Telephone (303) 236-4377.
Alaska. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone
(907) 786-3545.
California and Nevada. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2606,
Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916) 767-9241.
Primary Author
Kate Harrigan, Division of Natural Resources and Conservation
Planning, National Wildlife Refuge System, is the primary author of
this rulemaking document.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32
Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife, Wildlife refuges.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons described in the preamble, we propose to amend
title 50, chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as
set forth below:
PART 32--HUNTING AND FISHING
0
1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd-668ee, and
715i; Pub. L. 115-20, 131 Stat. 86.
0
2. Amend Sec. 32.24 by revising paragraphs (s)(1)(iv) and (vi) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.24 California.
* * * * *
(s) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) We restrict hunters in the spaced zone area of the East Bear
Creek Unit and West Bear Creek Unit to their assigned zone except when
they are traveling to and from the parking area, retrieving downed
birds, or pursuing crippled birds.
* * * * *
(vi) We require State-issued Type A area permits for accessing the
Freitas Unit on Wednesdays, Saturdays, and Sundays.
* * * * *
[[Page 41064]]
0
3. Amend Sec. 32.28 by revising paragraphs (e)(2) and (3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 32.28 Florida.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow upland game hunting and the
incidental take of nonnative wildlife as defined by the State on
designated areas of the refuge in accordance with State regulations and
applicable State Wildlife Management Area regulations and the following
condition: We require the use of non-lead ammunition when hunting
upland game and the incidental take of nonnative wildlife on the
Corrigan Ranch/Okeechobee Unit.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow big game hunting and the incidental
take of nonnative wildlife as defined by the State on designated areas
of the refuge in accordance with State regulations and applicable State
Wildlife Management Area regulations and the following condition: We
require the use of non-lead ammunition when hunting big game and the
incidental take of nonnative wildlife on the Corrigan Ranch/Okeechobee
Unit.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 32.35 by revising paragraph (a)(1)(v) to read as
follows:
Sec. 32.35 Kansas.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) We close the Neosho River and refuge lands north of the Neosho
River to all hunting from November 1 through March 1.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 32.38 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(v);
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (3)(i);
0
c. Adding paragraph (f)(1)(v); and
0
d. Revising paragraphs (f)(2)(i), (3)(i), and (4)(ii).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 32.38 Maine.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii)
and (v) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii)
and (v) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(i), (iii), and
(v) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions as set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(i), (iv), and
(v) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (f)(1)(v) of this section
applies.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 32.39 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(1)(iv);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(3)(vi), (4)(iii), (b)(2)(iv), (3)(iv),
(4)(iii), and (c)(1)(v); and
0
d. Revising paragraphs (c)(2), (3)(i), and (4).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 32.39 Maryland.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (a)(3)(i)
through (v) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this
section applies.
(4) * * *
(iii) The condition set forth at paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this
section applies.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(3) * * *
(iv) The condition set forth at paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this
section applies.
(4) * * *
(iii) The condition set forth at paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this
section applies.
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of gray squirrel, eastern
cottontail rabbit, and woodchuck on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following condition: The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) and (v) of this section apply.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and (v)
of this section apply.
* * * * *
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following condition: The condition set forth
at paragraph (c)(1)(v) of this section applies.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 32.40 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(4)(iii); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(4) and (f)(4).
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 32.40 Massachusetts.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) We allow fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
(b) * * *
(4) Sport Fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Sport Fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 32.47 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (iii);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (d)(1)(iv) and (v); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (d)(2)(iii).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 32.47 Nevada.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) We allow hunting on designated days. We prohibit any migratory
game bird hunting after January 31.
* * * * *
(iii) From October 1 to February 1, you may only be in possession
of or use 25 or fewer shot shells per hunt day.
[[Page 41065]]
(iv) We only allow hunters to use watercraft to travel to and from
their hunting location for each day's hunt. Watercraft must be
completely immobilized while hunting, except to retrieve downed or
crippled birds.
(v) We prohibit shooting 150 feet (45 meters) from the center line
of roads (including access roads and two tracks), parking areas,
levees, or into or from safety zones.
(2) * * *
(iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(iii) and (iv)
of this section apply.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 32.48 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 32.48 New Hampshire.
* * * * *
(b) Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge--
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, goose,
coot, Wilson's snipe, and American woodcock on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs
consistent with State regulations, except dog training is only allowed
from August 1 through the last Saturday in September during daylight
hours.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of coyote, fox, raccoon,
woodchuck, red squirrel, eastern gray squirrel, porcupine, skunk, crow,
snowshoe hare, muskrat, opossum, fisher, mink, weasel, ring-necked
pheasant, and ruffed grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs consistent with
State regulations, except dog training is only allowed from August 1
through the last Saturday in September during daylight hours.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, moose,
black bear, and wild turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs consistent with State regulations,
except dog training is only allowed from August 1 through the last
Saturday in September during daylight hours.
(ii) We allow tree stands and blinds that are clearly marked with
the owner's State hunting license number.
(iii) You must remove your tree stand(s) and blind(s) no later than
72 hours after the close of the season (see Sec. 27.93 of this
chapter).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec. 32.56 by revising paragraph (l)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 32.56 Oregon.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of upland game birds and
turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
condition: The condition set forth at paragraph (l)(1)(i) of this
section applies.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 32.57 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(v);
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) and (3)(ii); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(vi).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 32.57 Pennsylvania.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of
this section apply.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of
this section apply.
(4) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (b)(1)(v) of this section
applies.
* * * * *
Sec. 32.62 [Amended]
0
12. Amend Sec. 32.62 by:
0
a. Removing paragraph (h)(3)(x); and
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (h)(3)(xi) through (xiii) as (h)(3)(x)
through (xii), respectively.
0
13. Amend Sec. 32.64 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(4)(v); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (b).
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 32.64 Vermont.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) We allow fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
(b) Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge--
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, goose,
coot, crow, snipe, and American woodcock on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow disabled hunters to hunt from a vehicle that is at
least 10 feet from the traveled portion of the refuge road if the
hunter possesses a State-issued disabled hunting license and a Special
Use Permit (FWS Form 3-1383-G) issued by the refuge manager.
(ii) We allow the use of dogs consistent with State regulations,
except dog training is only allowed from August 1 through the last
Saturday in September during daylight hours. We prohibit dog training
on the Putney Mountain Unit.
(iii) We prohibit shooting from, over, or within 25 feet of the
traveled portion of any road that is accessible to motor vehicles.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of coyote, fox, raccoon,
bobcat, woodchuck, red squirrel, eastern gray squirrel, porcupine,
skunk, snowshoe hare, eastern cottontail, muskrat, opossum, weasel,
pheasant, and ruffed grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (iii) of
this section apply.
(ii) At the Putney Mountain Unit, we allow the use of dogs only for
hunting ruffed grouse, fall turkey, squirrel, and woodcock.
(iii) We require hunters hunting at night to possess a Special Use
Permit (FWS Form 3-1383-G) issued by the refuge manager.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, moose,
black bear, and wild turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (iii) of
this section apply.
(ii) You may use portable tree stands and/or blinds. You must
clearly label your tree stand(s) and/or blind(s) with your hunting
license number. You must remove your tree stand(s) and/or blind(s) no
later than 72 hours after the close of the season (see Sec. 27.93 of
this chapter).
(iii) You may retrieve moose at the Nulhegan Basin Division with
the use of a commercial moose hauler, if the hauler possesses a Special
Use Permit (FWS Form 3-1383-C) issued by the refuge manager.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge consistent with State regulations.
* * * * *
0
14. Amend Sec. 32.65 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(vi);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(i);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(vii) and (viii);
[[Page 41066]]
0
d. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(i);
0
e. Adding paragraphs (b)(4)(vi) and (c)(2)(iii);
0
f. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
g. Adding paragraph (n)(1)(vi); and
0
h. Revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and (3)(i).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 32.65 Virginia.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells and
ammunition while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (vi) of
this section apply. All occupants of a vehicle or hunt party must
possess a signed refuge hunt brochure and be actively engaged in
hunting unless aiding a disabled person who possesses a valid State
disabled hunting license.
* * * * *
(vii) Hunting is allowed only during the regular State deer season.
(viii) We prohibit hunting on Sundays.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(vi) and
(b)(2)(i), (ii), and (v) through (viii) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (b)(1)(vi) of this
section applies.
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) We prohibit hunting on Sundays.
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), (iv)
through (v), and (c)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) You may only use or possess approved non-lead shot shells,
ammunition, and tackle while in the field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth in paragraphs (n)(1)(i), (iii), and
(vi) of this section apply.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (n)(1)(i), (ii), (vi),
and (n)(2)(iv) of this section apply.
* * * * *
0
15. Amend Sec. 32.66 by revising paragraph (b)(4)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 32.66 Washington.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) On waters open to fishing, we allow fishing only from the start
of the State season to September 30, except that we allow fishing year-
round on Falcon, Heron, Goldeneye, Corral, Blythe, Chukar, and Scaup
Lakes.
* * * * *
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2023-13360 Filed 6-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P