Hearing Health and Safety, 40824-40825 [2023-13289]

Download as PDF 40824 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Notices ESTIMATED HOURLY BURDEN—Continued [3064–0153] Type of burden Estimated number of respondents Estimated time per response (hours) Frequency of response Total annual estimated burden (hours) Total Hourly Burden Total One-Time Burden Hours .............................................................................. Total Ongoing Burden Hours ................................................................................ ........................... ........................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ........................... ........................... 1,136 92,485 Total Burden Hours ........................................................................................ ........................... ...................... ...................... ........................... 93,621 General Description of Collection: This collection comprises the recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements associated with minimum capital requirements and overall capital adequacy standards for insured state nonmember banks, state savings associations, and certain subsidiaries of those entities. The data is used by the FDIC to evaluate capital before approving various applications by insured depository institutions, to evaluate capital as an essential component in determining safety and soundness, and to determine whether an institution is subject to prompt corrective action provisions. There is no change in the method or substance of the collection. The 26,635hour decrease in burden hours is a result of economic fluctuation, a decrease in the number of entities subject to the information collection, and efforts to align with the other banking agencies’ related information collections. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Request for Comment Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the FDIC’s functions, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimates of the burden of the information collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All comments will become a matter of public record. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on June 15, 2023. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–13224 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jun 21, 2023 Jkt 259001 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at Secretary@ fmc.gov, or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)–523– 5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. Agreement No.: 201391–001. Agreement Name: South Atlantic Multiport Chassis Pool Agreement. Parties: Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association, Inc.; Consolidated Chassis Enterprises LLC; South Atlantic Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC; CCM Pools LLC; Consolidated Chassis Management LLC; Georgia Ports Authority; Jacksonville Port Authority; North Carolina State Ports Authority; COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC (acting as a single party); Maersk A/ S and Hamburg Sud (acting as a single party); MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.; Ocean Network Express Pte., Ltd.; Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen O’Connor. Synopsis: The Amendment extends the Initial Term of the Agreement from 7 years to 10 years. The Amendment also clarifies the parties’ respective rights at the expiration of the Initial Term. Proposed Effective Date: 7/29/2023. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ AgreementHistory/65506. Dated: June 16, 2023. William Cody, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–13253 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–02–P FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION Hearing Health and Safety Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Beginning on January 3, 3022, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FMSHRC’’) resumed in-person hearings in the manner described in an Order dated December 3, 2021, appearing in the Federal Register on December 9, 2021, and posted on the Commission’s website (www.fmshrc.gov). Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin issued subsequent orders which modified the December 3 Order. On June 16, 2023, the Chief Judge issued an order making further modifications. The June 16 Order is posted on the Commission’s website and contains hyperlinks not included within this notice. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable: June 16, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Stewart, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, at (202) 434–9935. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Administrative Law Judges are committed to a high standard to protect the health and safety of all persons who may appear before them, during the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID– 19) pandemic, while continuing the agency’s mission. As of January 3, 2022, E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Notices the Commission resumed in-person hearings as described in an order dated December 3, 2021. Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin issued subsequent orders which modified the December 3 Order. On June 16, 2023, the Chief Judge issued an order making further modifications. The June 16 Order is posted on the Commission’s website and contains hyperlinks not included within this notice. The contents of the June 16 order are set forth in this notice, and for the duration of the June 16 order, all hearings are subject to its terms. Commission Judges may, at their sole discretion, hold remote hearings (e.g., via Zoom) and in-person hearings. Judges also have the discretion to hold a hybrid hearing, that includes both inperson and video participation. Commission Judges shall exercise this discretion within uniform parameters as set forth herein. Each Judge shall determine (1) when to use remote hearings in lieu of in-person hearings and (2) specific safety procedures to be used at an in-person hearing. In determining the type of hearing, Judges will consider current guidance and safety factors on a case-by-case basis. Judges will ensure all parties appearing pro se who are required to participate in a remote hearing have access to equipment, an internet connection, and other appropriate technology. Prior to conducting an inperson hearing, Judges will schedule a conference call with the attorneys and representatives of each of the parties to discuss, among other things, safety considerations for the in-person hearing. Persons who are not comfortable with travel or appearing in person, may request to attend the hearing via remote access (e.g., via Zoom). The Judge will set a hearing location after considering CDC COVID–19 Hospital Admissions Levels using the tracker and the safety and health rules currently in place by the state and local public health entities. Where community levels are HIGH, individuals who are at high risk of getting very sick should consider avoiding non-essential indoor activities in public where they could be exposed.1 If in-person participants are traveling to attend a hearing, the Judge shall also consider hospital admission levels from where they are traveling. In choosing a courtroom, the Judge will take into consideration the rules and requirements of the court or hearing facility, as well as all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and 1 See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019ncov/your-health/covid-by-county.html. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jun 21, 2023 Jkt 259001 guidelines. If the hearing is to be a hybrid hearing, the Judge will also consider the availability of internet and technology needs in the courtroom. During the prehearing conference, the Judge will consider federal, state, local and courtroom requirements and inform the parties of such requirements. The requirements apply to all persons attending the in-person hearing. The discussion will also address who may enter the courtroom, when, and what safety measures, such as masks and social distancing, must be implemented. No person may enter the courtroom, or the witness room without the permission of the Judge. The Judge may consider all factors, in totality, in determining if a remote hearing will be held and who may be present for the hearing. No single factor is dispositive. These procedures shall remain in place until the June 16 is vacated or otherwise modified by subsequent order. Authority: 30 U.S.C. 823; 29 CFR part 2700. Dated: June 16, 2023. Sarah L. Stewart, Deputy General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. 40825 request.htm. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551–0001, not later than July 24, 2023. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210–2204. Comments can also be sent electronically to BOS.SRC.Applications.Comments@ bos.frb.org: 1. NB Bancorp, Inc., Needham, Massachusetts; to become a bank holding company by acquiring Needham Bank, in connection with the second-step conversion of NB Financial, MHC, both of Needham, Massachusetts, from mutual to stock form. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Margaret McCloskey Shanks, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2023–13292 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P [FR Doc. 2023–13289 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6735–01–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board’s Freedom of Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/ PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board’s Freedom of Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/ request.htm. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act. Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 119 (Thursday, June 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40824-40825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Hearing Health and Safety

AGENCY: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Beginning on January 3, 3022, the Federal Mine Safety and 
Health Review Commission (the ``Commission'' or ``FMSHRC'') resumed in-
person hearings in the manner described in an Order dated December 3, 
2021, appearing in the Federal Register on December 9, 2021, and posted 
on the Commission's website (www.fmshrc.gov). Commission Chief 
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin issued subsequent orders which 
modified the December 3 Order. On June 16, 2023, the Chief Judge issued 
an order making further modifications. The June 16 Order is posted on 
the Commission's website and contains hyperlinks not included within 
this notice.

DATES: Applicable: June 16, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Stewart, Deputy General Counsel, 
Office of the General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review 
Commission, at (202) 434-9935.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review 
Commission Administrative Law Judges are committed to a high standard 
to protect the health and safety of all persons who may appear before 
them, during the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, while continuing 
the agency's mission. As of January 3, 2022,

[[Page 40825]]

the Commission resumed in-person hearings as described in an order 
dated December 3, 2021. Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn 
F. Voisin issued subsequent orders which modified the December 3 Order. 
On June 16, 2023, the Chief Judge issued an order making further 
modifications. The June 16 Order is posted on the Commission's website 
and contains hyperlinks not included within this notice. The contents 
of the June 16 order are set forth in this notice, and for the duration 
of the June 16 order, all hearings are subject to its terms.
    Commission Judges may, at their sole discretion, hold remote 
hearings (e.g., via Zoom) and in-person hearings. Judges also have the 
discretion to hold a hybrid hearing, that includes both in-person and 
video participation. Commission Judges shall exercise this discretion 
within uniform parameters as set forth herein. Each Judge shall 
determine (1) when to use remote hearings in lieu of in-person hearings 
and (2) specific safety procedures to be used at an in-person hearing.
    In determining the type of hearing, Judges will consider current 
guidance and safety factors on a case-by-case basis. Judges will ensure 
all parties appearing pro se who are required to participate in a 
remote hearing have access to equipment, an internet connection, and 
other appropriate technology. Prior to conducting an in-person hearing, 
Judges will schedule a conference call with the attorneys and 
representatives of each of the parties to discuss, among other things, 
safety considerations for the in-person hearing. Persons who are not 
comfortable with travel or appearing in person, may request to attend 
the hearing via remote access (e.g., via Zoom).
    The Judge will set a hearing location after considering CDC COVID-
19 Hospital Admissions Levels using the tracker and the safety and 
health rules currently in place by the state and local public health 
entities. Where community levels are HIGH, individuals who are at high 
risk of getting very sick should consider avoiding non-essential indoor 
activities in public where they could be exposed.\1\ If in-person 
participants are traveling to attend a hearing, the Judge shall also 
consider hospital admission levels from where they are traveling. In 
choosing a courtroom, the Judge will take into consideration the rules 
and requirements of the court or hearing facility, as well as all 
applicable federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. If the 
hearing is to be a hybrid hearing, the Judge will also consider the 
availability of internet and technology needs in the courtroom.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/covid-by-county.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the prehearing conference, the Judge will consider federal, 
state, local and courtroom requirements and inform the parties of such 
requirements. The requirements apply to all persons attending the in-
person hearing. The discussion will also address who may enter the 
courtroom, when, and what safety measures, such as masks and social 
distancing, must be implemented. No person may enter the courtroom, or 
the witness room without the permission of the Judge.
    The Judge may consider all factors, in totality, in determining if 
a remote hearing will be held and who may be present for the hearing. 
No single factor is dispositive.
    These procedures shall remain in place until the June 16 is vacated 
or otherwise modified by subsequent order.
    Authority: 30 U.S.C. 823; 29 CFR part 2700.

    Dated: June 16, 2023.
Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-13289 Filed 6-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.