AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System, 40741-40742 [2023-13192]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(xvii) Foam seating and bedding
products;
(xviii) Industrial or commercial use in
furniture and furnishings;
(xix) Industrial or commercial use in
building and construction materials; or
(xx) Recycling.
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section.
[FR Doc. 2023–13250 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
41 CFR Part 51–9
AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management
System
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Office of Inspector General.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled (Committee, U.S. AbilityOne
Commission, Commission), Office of
Inspector General (OIG) is seeking
comment on proposed amendments to
agency regulations. This NPRM
proposes that the OIG’s AbilityOne/
OIG–001 Case Management System,
system of records be exempt from
certain sections of the Privacy Act of
1974 pursuant to the general and
specific exemptions listed in the act.
The law enforcement and investigatory
nature of the system of records makes it
inappropriate to allow individual access
to records under the Privacy Act.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: U.S. AbilityOne Commission
Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street
SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC
20024.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
personal identifiers or contact
information.
For
general questions, please contact: Kamil
Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne
Commission Office of Inspector General,
355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335),
Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202)
603–2248, Email: kali@
oig.abilityone.gov. For privacy
questions, please contact: Ms. Kamil
Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne
Commission Office of Inspector General,
355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335),
Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202)
603–2248, Email: kali@
oig.abilityone.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.
522a, governs how the Federal
Government collects, maintains, and
uses personally identifiable information
in systems of record. The Privacy Act
requires that federal agencies publish in
the Federal Register a system of records
notice (SORN) that identifies purpose of
data collection, the routine use of its
disclosures, and how individuals may
get access to their own records and
contest it.
The Inspector General Act of 1978, 5
U.S.C. 401–424; 5 U.S.C. App. 3, allows
the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG to
maintain the system to fulfill its
mission. The U.S. AbilityOne
Commission OIG is responsible for
conducting and supervising
independent and objective audits,
inspections, and investigations of the
programs and operations of the
Committee. OIG promotes economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness within the
U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG and
prevents and detects fraud, waste, and
abuse in its programs and operations.
OIG’s Office of Investigations
investigates allegations of criminal,
civil, and administrative misconduct
involving U.S. AbilityOne Commission
employees, contractors, grantees, and
Departmental programs and activities.
This includes investigating for
violations of criminal laws by entities
regulated by U.S. AbilityOne
Commission, regardless of whether they
receive Federal funds. These
investigations can result in criminal
prosecutions, fines, civil monetary
penalties, and administrative sanctions.
The investigative and law
enforcement nature of the system of
records makes it necessary for the
system to be exempt from the notice and
access requirements. The Privacy Act
contains general and specific
exemptions for law enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40741
purposes that grant these exemptions.
The general exemption, 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), allows exemptions for system
of records that are ‘‘maintained by an
agency or component thereof which
performs as its principal function any
activity pertaining to the enforcement of
criminal laws, including police efforts
to prevent, control, or reduce crime or
to apprehend criminals, and the
activities of prosecutors, courts,
correctional, probation, pardon, or
parole authorities, and which consists of
(A) information compiled for the
purpose of identifying individual
criminal offenders and alleged offenders
and consisting only of identifying data
and notations of arrests, the nature and
disposition of criminal charges,
sentencing, confinement, release, and
parole and probation status; (B)
information compiled for the purpose of
a criminal investigation, including
reports of informants and investigators,
and associated with an identifiable
individual; or (C) reports identifiable to
an individual compiled at any stage of
the process of enforcement of the
criminal laws from arrest or indictment
through release from supervision.’’
Similarly the specific exemption in 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) allows exemptions for
systems of records for ‘‘investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes, other than material within the
scope of subsection (j)(2) of this section:
Provided, however, That if any
individual is denied any right, privilege,
or benefit that he would otherwise be
entitled by Federal law, or for which he
would otherwise be eligible, as a result
of the maintenance of such material,
such material shall be provided to such
individual, except to the extent that the
disclosure of such material would reveal
the identity of a source who furnished
information to the Government under an
express promise that the identity of the
source would be held in confidence, or,
prior to the effective date of this section,
under an implied promise that the
identity of the source would be held in
confidence.’’ The data collected by the
AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management
System falls under these categories and
for this reason, we are proposing to add
41 CFR 51–9.6.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 51–9
Privacy.
For reasons stated in the preamble,
the Committee proposes to amend 41
CFR part 51–9 as follows:
PART 51–9—PRIVACY ACT RULES
1. The authority citation for part 51–
9 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
40742
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
2. Revise subpart 51–9.6 to read as
follows:
■
Subpart 51–9.6 Exemptions
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 51–9.601 Office of Inspector General
Exemptions.
(a) Pursuant to section (j) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, the Committee has
deemed it necessary to adopt the
following exemptions to specified
provisions of the Privacy Act:
(1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the
AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management
System, System of Records is exempt
from the following provisions of the
Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3)–(4); (d);
(e)(1)–(3); (e)(4)(G)–(I); (e)(5); (e)(8); and
(f)–(g) and from 41 CFR 51–9.1, 51–9.2,
51–9.3, 51–9.4, and 51–9.7.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Pursuant to section (k) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, the Committee has
deemed it necessary to adopt the
following exemptions to specified
provisions of the Privacy Act:
(1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2),
AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management
System, System of Records is exempt
from the following provisions of the
Privacy Act, subject to the limitations
set forth in those subsections: 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d). (e)(4)(G)–(I) and (f) and
from 41 CFR 51–9.1, 51–9.2, 51–9.3, 51–
9.4, and 51–9.7.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Exemptions from the subsections
are justified because application of these
provision would present a serious
impediment to law enforcement. Access
to the records contained in this system
of records could inform the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation,
of the existence of that investigation; of
the nature and scope of the information
and evidence obtained as to his
activities; of the identity of confidential
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel, and of information that may
enable the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension. These factors would
present a serious impediment to
effective law enforcement where they
prevent the successful completion of the
investigation, endanger the physical
safety of confidential sources, witnesses,
and law enforcement personnel, and/or
lead to the improper influencing of
witnesses, the destruction of evidence,
or the fabrication of testimony. In
addition, granting access to such
information could disclose securitysensitive or confidential business
information or information that would
constitute an unwarranted invasion of
the personal privacy of third parties.
Finally, access to the records could
result in the release of properly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
classified information which would
compromise the national defense or
disrupt foreign policy. Amendment of
the records would interfere with
ongoing investigations and law
enforcement activities and impose an
impossible administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. It is not
possible to detect relevance or necessity
of specific information in the early
stages of a civil, criminal or other law
enforcement investigation, case, or
matter, including investigations in
which use is made of properly classified
information. Relevance and necessity
are questions of judgment and timing,
and it is only after the information is
evaluated that the relevance and
necessity of such information can be
established.
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023–13192 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018;
FF09E41000 201 FXES111609C0000]
RIN 1018–BF88
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
revise our regulations concerning
protections of endangered species and
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (Act). We are
proposing to reinstate the general
application of the ‘‘blanket rule’’ option
for protecting newly listed threatened
species pursuant to section 4(d) of the
Act, with the continued option to
promulgate species-specific rules. We
are also proposing to extend to federally
recognized Tribes the exceptions to
prohibitions for threatened species that
the regulations currently provide to the
employees or agents of the Service and
other Federal and State agencies to aid,
salvage, or dispose of threatened
species. We are also proposing minor
changes to clarify or correct the existing
regulations for endangered and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
threatened species; these proposed
minor changes would not alter the
substance or scope of the regulations.
We also request comments on an
additional provision under
consideration, but not currently
proposed, that would extend to
federally recognized Tribes the
exceptions to prohibitions for
threatened species that the regulations
currently provide to employees or
agents of the Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service, and State
agencies for take associated with
conservation-related activities.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
August 21, 2023. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES,
below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
eastern time on the closing date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018, which
is the docket number for this
rulemaking. Then, click on the Search
button. On the resulting page, in the
panel on the left side of the screen,
under the Document Type heading,
check the Proposed Rule box to locate
this document. You may submit a
comment by clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:
FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Public
Comments, below, for more
information).
Availability of supporting materials:
Supporting materials are available at
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carey Galst, Branch of Listing and
Policy Support, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803, telephone
703/358–1954. Individuals in the
United States who are deaf, deafblind,
hard of hearing, or have a speech
disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 119 (Thursday, June 22, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40741-40742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13192]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED
41 CFR Part 51-9
AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System
AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Office of Inspector General.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or
Severely Disabled (Committee, U.S. AbilityOne Commission, Commission),
Office of Inspector General (OIG) is seeking comment on proposed
amendments to agency regulations. This NPRM proposes that the OIG's
AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System, system of records be exempt
from certain sections of the Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to the
general and specific exemptions listed in the act. The law enforcement
and investigatory nature of the system of records makes it
inappropriate to allow individual access to records under the Privacy
Act.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector
General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact:
Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of
Inspector General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC
20024. Phone: (202) 603-2248, Email: [email protected]. For
privacy questions, please contact: Ms. Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor,
U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street SW
(OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 603-2248, Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 522a, governs how the Federal
Government collects, maintains, and uses personally identifiable
information in systems of record. The Privacy Act requires that federal
agencies publish in the Federal Register a system of records notice
(SORN) that identifies purpose of data collection, the routine use of
its disclosures, and how individuals may get access to their own
records and contest it.
The Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 401-424; 5 U.S.C. App.
3, allows the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG to maintain the system to
fulfill its mission. The U.S. AbilityOne Commission OIG is responsible
for conducting and supervising independent and objective audits,
inspections, and investigations of the programs and operations of the
Committee. OIG promotes economy, efficiency, and effectiveness within
the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG and prevents and detects fraud,
waste, and abuse in its programs and operations. OIG's Office of
Investigations investigates allegations of criminal, civil, and
administrative misconduct involving U.S. AbilityOne Commission
employees, contractors, grantees, and Departmental programs and
activities. This includes investigating for violations of criminal laws
by entities regulated by U.S. AbilityOne Commission, regardless of
whether they receive Federal funds. These investigations can result in
criminal prosecutions, fines, civil monetary penalties, and
administrative sanctions.
The investigative and law enforcement nature of the system of
records makes it necessary for the system to be exempt from the notice
and access requirements. The Privacy Act contains general and specific
exemptions for law enforcement purposes that grant these exemptions.
The general exemption, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), allows exemptions for
system of records that are ``maintained by an agency or component
thereof which performs as its principal function any activity
pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws, including police
efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals,
and the activities of prosecutors, courts, correctional, probation,
pardon, or parole authorities, and which consists of (A) information
compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders
and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and
notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges,
sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status; (B)
information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation,
including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with
an identifiable individual; or (C) reports identifiable to an
individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the
criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from
supervision.'' Similarly the specific exemption in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2)
allows exemptions for systems of records for ``investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the
scope of subsection (j)(2) of this section: Provided, however, That if
any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit that he would
otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he would otherwise
be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such
material shall be provided to such individual, except to the extent
that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a
source who furnished information to the Government under an express
promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence,
or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied
promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.''
The data collected by the AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System
falls under these categories and for this reason, we are proposing to
add 41 CFR 51-9.6.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 51-9
Privacy.
For reasons stated in the preamble, the Committee proposes to amend
41 CFR part 51-9 as follows:
PART 51-9--PRIVACY ACT RULES
0
1. The authority citation for part 51-9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
[[Page 40742]]
0
2. Revise subpart 51-9.6 to read as follows:
Subpart 51-9.6 Exemptions
Sec. 51-9.601 Office of Inspector General Exemptions.
(a) Pursuant to section (j) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the
Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to
specified provisions of the Privacy Act:
(1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case
Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3)-(4); (d); (e)(1)-
(3); (e)(4)(G)-(I); (e)(5); (e)(8); and (f)-(g) and from 41 CFR 51-9.1,
51-9.2, 51-9.3, 51-9.4, and 51-9.7.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Pursuant to section (k) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the
Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to
specified provisions of the Privacy Act:
(1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case
Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set forth in
those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d). (e)(4)(G)-(I) and (f) and
from 41 CFR 51-9.1, 51-9.2, 51-9.3, 51-9.4, and 51-9.7.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Exemptions from the subsections are justified because
application of these provision would present a serious impediment to
law enforcement. Access to the records contained in this system of
records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation, of the existence of
that investigation; of the nature and scope of the information and
evidence obtained as to his activities; of the identity of confidential
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and of information
that may enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. These
factors would present a serious impediment to effective law enforcement
where they prevent the successful completion of the investigation,
endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and
law enforcement personnel, and/or lead to the improper influencing of
witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony. In addition, granting access to such information could
disclose security-sensitive or confidential business information or
information that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the
personal privacy of third parties. Finally, access to the records could
result in the release of properly classified information which would
compromise the national defense or disrupt foreign policy. Amendment of
the records would interfere with ongoing investigations and law
enforcement activities and impose an impossible administrative burden
by requiring investigations to be continuously reinvestigated. It is
not possible to detect relevance or necessity of specific information
in the early stages of a civil, criminal or other law enforcement
investigation, case, or matter, including investigations in which use
is made of properly classified information. Relevance and necessity are
questions of judgment and timing, and it is only after the information
is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can
be established.
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-13192 Filed 6-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P