AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System, 40741-40742 [2023-13192]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules (xvii) Foam seating and bedding products; (xviii) Industrial or commercial use in furniture and furnishings; (xix) Industrial or commercial use in building and construction materials; or (xx) Recycling. (b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part apply to this section. [FR Doc. 2023–13250 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED 41 CFR Part 51–9 AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management System Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, Office of Inspector General. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: The Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (Committee, U.S. AbilityOne Commission, Commission), Office of Inspector General (OIG) is seeking comment on proposed amendments to agency regulations. This NPRM proposes that the OIG’s AbilityOne/ OIG–001 Case Management System, system of records be exempt from certain sections of the Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to the general and specific exemptions listed in the act. The law enforcement and investigatory nature of the system of records makes it inappropriate to allow individual access to records under the Privacy Act. DATES: Submit comments on or before July 21, 2023. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 21, 2023 Jkt 259001 personal identifiers or contact information. For general questions, please contact: Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 603–2248, Email: kali@ oig.abilityone.gov. For privacy questions, please contact: Ms. Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 603–2248, Email: kali@ oig.abilityone.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 522a, governs how the Federal Government collects, maintains, and uses personally identifiable information in systems of record. The Privacy Act requires that federal agencies publish in the Federal Register a system of records notice (SORN) that identifies purpose of data collection, the routine use of its disclosures, and how individuals may get access to their own records and contest it. The Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 401–424; 5 U.S.C. App. 3, allows the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG to maintain the system to fulfill its mission. The U.S. AbilityOne Commission OIG is responsible for conducting and supervising independent and objective audits, inspections, and investigations of the programs and operations of the Committee. OIG promotes economy, efficiency, and effectiveness within the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG and prevents and detects fraud, waste, and abuse in its programs and operations. OIG’s Office of Investigations investigates allegations of criminal, civil, and administrative misconduct involving U.S. AbilityOne Commission employees, contractors, grantees, and Departmental programs and activities. This includes investigating for violations of criminal laws by entities regulated by U.S. AbilityOne Commission, regardless of whether they receive Federal funds. These investigations can result in criminal prosecutions, fines, civil monetary penalties, and administrative sanctions. The investigative and law enforcement nature of the system of records makes it necessary for the system to be exempt from the notice and access requirements. The Privacy Act contains general and specific exemptions for law enforcement PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 40741 purposes that grant these exemptions. The general exemption, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), allows exemptions for system of records that are ‘‘maintained by an agency or component thereof which performs as its principal function any activity pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws, including police efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, and the activities of prosecutors, courts, correctional, probation, pardon, or parole authorities, and which consists of (A) information compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status; (B) information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation, including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with an identifiable individual; or (C) reports identifiable to an individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from supervision.’’ Similarly the specific exemption in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) allows exemptions for systems of records for ‘‘investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of subsection (j)(2) of this section: Provided, however, That if any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit that he would otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such material shall be provided to such individual, except to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.’’ The data collected by the AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management System falls under these categories and for this reason, we are proposing to add 41 CFR 51–9.6. List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 51–9 Privacy. For reasons stated in the preamble, the Committee proposes to amend 41 CFR part 51–9 as follows: PART 51–9—PRIVACY ACT RULES 1. The authority citation for part 51– 9 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a. E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM 22JNP1 40742 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules 2. Revise subpart 51–9.6 to read as follows: ■ Subpart 51–9.6 Exemptions ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 § 51–9.601 Office of Inspector General Exemptions. (a) Pursuant to section (j) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to specified provisions of the Privacy Act: (1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3)–(4); (d); (e)(1)–(3); (e)(4)(G)–(I); (e)(5); (e)(8); and (f)–(g) and from 41 CFR 51–9.1, 51–9.2, 51–9.3, 51–9.4, and 51–9.7. (2) [Reserved] (b) Pursuant to section (k) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to specified provisions of the Privacy Act: (1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), AbilityOne/OIG–001 Case Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set forth in those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d). (e)(4)(G)–(I) and (f) and from 41 CFR 51–9.1, 51–9.2, 51–9.3, 51– 9.4, and 51–9.7. (2) [Reserved] (c) Exemptions from the subsections are justified because application of these provision would present a serious impediment to law enforcement. Access to the records contained in this system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation, of the existence of that investigation; of the nature and scope of the information and evidence obtained as to his activities; of the identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and of information that may enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. These factors would present a serious impediment to effective law enforcement where they prevent the successful completion of the investigation, endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and/or lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of testimony. In addition, granting access to such information could disclose securitysensitive or confidential business information or information that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties. Finally, access to the records could result in the release of properly VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 21, 2023 Jkt 259001 classified information which would compromise the national defense or disrupt foreign policy. Amendment of the records would interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continuously reinvestigated. It is not possible to detect relevance or necessity of specific information in the early stages of a civil, criminal or other law enforcement investigation, case, or matter, including investigations in which use is made of properly classified information. Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing, and it is only after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can be established. Michael R. Jurkowski, Acting Director, Business Operations. [FR Doc. 2023–13192 Filed 6–21–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353–01–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018; FF09E41000 201 FXES111609C0000] RIN 1018–BF88 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to revise our regulations concerning protections of endangered species and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (Act). We are proposing to reinstate the general application of the ‘‘blanket rule’’ option for protecting newly listed threatened species pursuant to section 4(d) of the Act, with the continued option to promulgate species-specific rules. We are also proposing to extend to federally recognized Tribes the exceptions to prohibitions for threatened species that the regulations currently provide to the employees or agents of the Service and other Federal and State agencies to aid, salvage, or dispose of threatened species. We are also proposing minor changes to clarify or correct the existing regulations for endangered and SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 threatened species; these proposed minor changes would not alter the substance or scope of the regulations. We also request comments on an additional provision under consideration, but not currently proposed, that would extend to federally recognized Tribes the exceptions to prohibitions for threatened species that the regulations currently provide to employees or agents of the Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and State agencies for take associated with conservation-related activities. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before August 21, 2023. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. eastern time on the closing date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018, which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, click on the Search button. On the resulting page, in the panel on the left side of the screen, under the Document Type heading, check the Proposed Rule box to locate this document. You may submit a comment by clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’ (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– 3803. We request that you send comments only by the methods described above. We will post all comments on https:// www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see Public Comments, below, for more information). Availability of supporting materials: Supporting materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carey Galst, Branch of Listing and Policy Support, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803, telephone 703/358–1954. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM 22JNP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 119 (Thursday, June 22, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40741-40742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13192]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

41 CFR Part 51-9


AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Office of Inspector General.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or 
Severely Disabled (Committee, U.S. AbilityOne Commission, Commission), 
Office of Inspector General (OIG) is seeking comment on proposed 
amendments to agency regulations. This NPRM proposes that the OIG's 
AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System, system of records be exempt 
from certain sections of the Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to the 
general and specific exemptions listed in the act. The law enforcement 
and investigatory nature of the system of records makes it 
inappropriate to allow individual access to records under the Privacy 
Act.

DATES: Submit comments on or before July 21, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector 
General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet 
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact: 
Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of 
Inspector General, 355 E Street SW (OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 
20024. Phone: (202) 603-2248, Email: [email protected]. For 
privacy questions, please contact: Ms. Kamil Ali, Attorney-Advisor, 
U.S. AbilityOne Commission Office of Inspector General, 355 E Street SW 
(OIG Suite 335), Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 603-2248, Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 522a, governs how the Federal 
Government collects, maintains, and uses personally identifiable 
information in systems of record. The Privacy Act requires that federal 
agencies publish in the Federal Register a system of records notice 
(SORN) that identifies purpose of data collection, the routine use of 
its disclosures, and how individuals may get access to their own 
records and contest it.
    The Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 401-424; 5 U.S.C. App. 
3, allows the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG to maintain the system to 
fulfill its mission. The U.S. AbilityOne Commission OIG is responsible 
for conducting and supervising independent and objective audits, 
inspections, and investigations of the programs and operations of the 
Committee. OIG promotes economy, efficiency, and effectiveness within 
the U.S. AbilityOne Commission/OIG and prevents and detects fraud, 
waste, and abuse in its programs and operations. OIG's Office of 
Investigations investigates allegations of criminal, civil, and 
administrative misconduct involving U.S. AbilityOne Commission 
employees, contractors, grantees, and Departmental programs and 
activities. This includes investigating for violations of criminal laws 
by entities regulated by U.S. AbilityOne Commission, regardless of 
whether they receive Federal funds. These investigations can result in 
criminal prosecutions, fines, civil monetary penalties, and 
administrative sanctions.
    The investigative and law enforcement nature of the system of 
records makes it necessary for the system to be exempt from the notice 
and access requirements. The Privacy Act contains general and specific 
exemptions for law enforcement purposes that grant these exemptions. 
The general exemption, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), allows exemptions for 
system of records that are ``maintained by an agency or component 
thereof which performs as its principal function any activity 
pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws, including police 
efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, 
and the activities of prosecutors, courts, correctional, probation, 
pardon, or parole authorities, and which consists of (A) information 
compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders 
and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and 
notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, 
sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status; (B) 
information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation, 
including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with 
an identifiable individual; or (C) reports identifiable to an 
individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the 
criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from 
supervision.'' Similarly the specific exemption in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) 
allows exemptions for systems of records for ``investigatory material 
compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the 
scope of subsection (j)(2) of this section: Provided, however, That if 
any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit that he would 
otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he would otherwise 
be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such 
material shall be provided to such individual, except to the extent 
that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a 
source who furnished information to the Government under an express 
promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, 
or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied 
promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.'' 
The data collected by the AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case Management System 
falls under these categories and for this reason, we are proposing to 
add 41 CFR 51-9.6.

List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 51-9

    Privacy.

    For reasons stated in the preamble, the Committee proposes to amend 
41 CFR part 51-9 as follows:

PART 51-9--PRIVACY ACT RULES

0
1. The authority citation for part 51-9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.


[[Page 40742]]


0
2. Revise subpart 51-9.6 to read as follows:

Subpart 51-9.6 Exemptions


Sec.  51-9.601  Office of Inspector General Exemptions.

    (a) Pursuant to section (j) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the 
Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to 
specified provisions of the Privacy Act:
    (1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case 
Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following 
provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3)-(4); (d); (e)(1)-
(3); (e)(4)(G)-(I); (e)(5); (e)(8); and (f)-(g) and from 41 CFR 51-9.1, 
51-9.2, 51-9.3, 51-9.4, and 51-9.7.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (b) Pursuant to section (k) of the Privacy Act of 1974, the 
Committee has deemed it necessary to adopt the following exemptions to 
specified provisions of the Privacy Act:
    (1) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), AbilityOne/OIG-001 Case 
Management System, System of Records is exempt from the following 
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set forth in 
those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d). (e)(4)(G)-(I) and (f) and 
from 41 CFR 51-9.1, 51-9.2, 51-9.3, 51-9.4, and 51-9.7.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (c) Exemptions from the subsections are justified because 
application of these provision would present a serious impediment to 
law enforcement. Access to the records contained in this system of 
records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or 
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation, of the existence of 
that investigation; of the nature and scope of the information and 
evidence obtained as to his activities; of the identity of confidential 
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and of information 
that may enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. These 
factors would present a serious impediment to effective law enforcement 
where they prevent the successful completion of the investigation, 
endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and 
law enforcement personnel, and/or lead to the improper influencing of 
witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of 
testimony. In addition, granting access to such information could 
disclose security-sensitive or confidential business information or 
information that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the 
personal privacy of third parties. Finally, access to the records could 
result in the release of properly classified information which would 
compromise the national defense or disrupt foreign policy. Amendment of 
the records would interfere with ongoing investigations and law 
enforcement activities and impose an impossible administrative burden 
by requiring investigations to be continuously reinvestigated. It is 
not possible to detect relevance or necessity of specific information 
in the early stages of a civil, criminal or other law enforcement 
investigation, case, or matter, including investigations in which use 
is made of properly classified information. Relevance and necessity are 
questions of judgment and timing, and it is only after the information 
is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can 
be established.

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-13192 Filed 6-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.