Request for Comments on Southeast Regional Office and Community Outreach Office Locations, 38847-38849 [2023-12824]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
implementing AMLRCA are at 50 CFR
part 300, subpart G. The record keeping
and reporting requirements at 50 CFR
part 300 form the basis for this
collection of information. This
collection of information concerns
research in, and the harvesting and
importation of, marine living resources
from waters regulated by CCAMLR
related to ecosystem research, U.S.
harvesting permit application and/or
harvesting vessel operators and to
importers and re-exporters of Antarctic
marine living resources. The collection
is necessary in order for the United
States to meet its treaty obligations as a
contracting party to the Convention.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit organizations; not-for-profit
institutions; individuals or households.
Frequency: Annually and on occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Public Law 98–623,
Sec. 2439 Antarctic Marine Living
Resources Convention Act.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0648–0194.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023–12691 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO–C–2023–0022]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Request for Comments on Southeast
Regional Office and Community
Outreach Office Locations
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) is
seeking information to inform the
planning and design of the USPTO
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
satellite offices (regional offices) and
newly-authorized community outreach
offices (COOs). The USPTO is also
seeking information on potential
locations for a future USPTO regional
office in the southeast region of the
United States (Southeast Regional Office
or SERO) and a COO in the northern
New England (NNE) region (Northern
New England Community Outreach
Office) that the USPTO was directed to
establish under the Unleashing
American Innovators Act of 2022
(UAIA), signed into law as part of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023
on December 29, 2022.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received by 5 p.m.
ET on or before July 17, 2023, and
should be submitted in accordance with
the instructions in the ADDRESSES and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections.
No public hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, comments must be submitted
electronically by completing the form at
https://tinyurl.com/27srysh4. Complete
the required fields using the preformatted response form that will allow
you to comment on each topic of
interest or question you choose to
address. You may enter your responses
directly into the form or cut and paste
your responses from a MICROSOFT
WORD® or ADOBE® portable document
format (PDF) document into the field
provided for each question. You must
submit any attachments that provide
additional support to a question through
the electronic form. Attachments to the
form will be accepted as ADOBE® PDF
or MICROSOFT WORD® documents. To
be considered, comments must be
submitted through the electronic form.
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that the submitter does not
desire to make public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments.
If submission of comments through
the electronic form is not feasible due to
a lack of access to a computer and/or the
internet, please contact the USPTO
using the contact information below for
special instructions regarding how to
submit comments by mail or by hand
delivery, based on the public’s ability to
obtain access to USPTO facilities at the
time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shirin Bidel-Niyat, Chief of Staff, Office
of the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Director of the
USPTO, at 571–272–8600 or
NewOffices@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38847
I. Background
Enabled by the 2011 America Invents
Act (AIA), the USPTO currently has four
regional offices that are located in
Detroit, Michigan; San Jose, California
(Silicon Valley); Denver, Colorado; and
Dallas, Texas. The purposes of the
regional offices (ROs), as originally
defined in the AIA and amended by the
UAIA, are to:
• RO1: Better connect patent filers
and innovators with the Office,
including by increasing outreach
activities to individual innovators, small
businesses, veterans, low-income
populations, students, rural
populations, and any geographic group
of innovators that the Director may
determine to be underrepresented in
patent filings;
• RO2: Enhance patent examiner and
administrative patent judge retention,
including patent examiners and
administrative patent judges from
economically, geographically, and
demographically diverse backgrounds;
• RO3: Improve recruitment of patent
examiners;
• RO4: Decrease the number of patent
applications waiting for examination;
and
• RO5: Improve the quality of patent
examination.
The USPTO has been focused on
outreach and impact, and is working on
ways to better support those new to the
innovation ecosystem, bringing more
people in America into the fold. The
USPTO is also studying the role of the
regional offices in serving both the
public and the needs of our colleagues
across the agency.
The UAIA supports the USPTO’s
expanded outreach efforts by requiring
the USPTO to establish, within three
years of enactment (i.e., no later than
December 29, 2025), a Southeast
Regional Office in the geographic region
comprised of the states of Virginia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia,
Florida, Tennessee, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Arkansas.
The UAIA requires the Office to
consider the following when selecting
the site for the SERO:
• SERO1: Number of patent-intensive
industries that are located near the site;
• SERO2: How many researchintensive institutions, including higher
education institutions, are located near
the site;
• SERO3: Governmental and business
frameworks, at both the State and local
levels, that support intellectual
property-intensive industries that are
located near the site; and
• SERO4: The proximity of the office
to anchor institutions (such as hospitals
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
38848
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
primarily serving veterans and
institutions of higher education),
individual inventors, small businesses,
veterans, low-income populations,
students, rural populations, and any
geographic group of innovators that the
Director may determine to be
underrepresented in patent filings.
The Act also requires the USPTO to
report out within two years on whether
additional offices are necessary to
further increase participation in the
patent system by individuals who have
historically been underrepresented in
patent filings.
In addition to regional offices, the
UAIA requires the USPTO to establish
at least four COOs within five years
from enactment of the Act (i.e., no later
than December 29, 2027). The purposes
of the COOs are to:
• COO1: Further achieve the
purposes described above for the
regional offices;
• COO2: Develop partnerships with
local community organizations,
institutions of higher education and/or
research, and businesses to create
tailored community-based programs that
provide education regarding the patent
system and promote the career benefits
of innovation and entrepreneurship; and
• COO3: Educate prospective
inventors, including individual
inventors, small businesses, veterans,
low-income populations, students, rural
populations, and any geographic group
of innovators that the Director may
determine to be underrepresented in
patent filings, about all public and
private resources available to potential
patent applicants, including the patent
pro bono programs.
The UAIA prohibits the establishment
of a COO in the same state as the
principal location of the USPTO
(Virginia), or in a state that has a
regional office (California, Colorado,
Michigan, or Texas). The UAIA also
requires that at least one of the COOs be
established in the NNE region and serve
the states of Vermont, New Hampshire,
and Maine. Under the Act, the Office
must give preference to locations where:
• NNECOO1: There is at least one
private institution of higher education
and at least one public institution of
higher education;
• NNECOO2: There are no more than
15 registered patent attorneys based on
information from the USPTO’s Office of
Enrollment and Discipline; and
• NNECOO3: According to data from
the 2012 Survey of Business Owners
conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau,
less than 45% of the firms are owned by
women, minorities, or veterans.
The USPTO will use quantitative
metrics and criteria to inform the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
location selection for future ROs and
COOs. The Office plans to consider the
following classes of data (D) at a
minimum:
• D1: Business demographics.
• D2: Concentration of research- and
IP-intensive industries.
• D3: Socioeconomic and
demographic metrics of the regional/
local population.
• D4: Availability and concentration
of existing business development
resources.
• D5: Overall geographic diversity of
office locations.
The USPTO welcomes input from all
stakeholders on any matter that they
believe is relevant to the overall
planning and design of the USPTO RO
and COOs, or the selection of locations
for the new SERO or NNECOO.
Commenters are encouraged to address
any or all of the statutory considerations
listed in the UAIA and summarized
above, any other considerations they
believe the USPTO should consider, and
the questions listed below.
Commenting Instructions: To be
considered, comments must be
submitted through the electronic form
available at https://tinyurl.com/
27srysh4. Please cite any public data
that relates to or supports your
responses. If data is available but nonpublic, describe such data to the extent
permissible.
II. Specific Request for Comments:
Planning and Design of Regional Offices
and Community Outreach Offices
With the addition of COOs to the
agency’s footprint, the USPTO envisions
the joint mission of the ROs and COOs
to be the cultivation and expansion of
a vibrant and inclusive innovation and
entrepreneurship ecosystem supported
by intellectual property across the
United States. To accomplish this
mission, the offices will conduct broad
stakeholder engagement with innovators
ranging from individual inventors to
multinational business entities;
establish and leverage partnerships and
relationships to scale the USPTO’s
work; incentivize regional innovation
and entrepreneurship, especially in key
emerging areas; and promote full
participation by innovators and
entrepreneurs of all backgrounds,
including in rural areas and from our
military, to support U.S. innovation and
jobs.
The USPTO invites responses to the
following questions:
Regional offices
1. Considering the envisioned mission
above, what essential services—
including outreach, education, customer
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
service, convening space, and employee
support—should a RO provide to
achieve the statutory purposes?
a. Do you prefer to have the services
you identified delivered virtually? Why
or why not?
b. Do you prefer to have the services
you identified delivered in person? Why
or why not?
2. What types of organizations should
the RO pursue relationships and
collaborations with to better leverage
and scale its services?
Community Outreach Offices
3. Considering the envisioned mission
above, what essential services—
including outreach, education, and
customer service—should a COO
provide to achieve the statutory
purposes?
a. Do you prefer to have the services
you identified delivered virtually? Why
or why not?
b. Do you prefer to have the services
you identified delivered in person? Why
or why not?
4. What types of organizations should
the COO pursue relationships and
collaborations with to better leverage
and scale its services?
5. Would you support a COO being
co-located with other public sector
entities/services?
a. If so, please describe the added
value of having a shared location.
b. Which public sector entities/
services would you suggest for the
shared location(s)?
c. If not, please describe the benefit of
having a unique location for a COO.
General Comments Regarding Regional
and Community Outreach Offices
6. What unique services should the
ROs and COOs individually provide,
and how should the full range of
services complement each other?
7. Considering the potential classes of
data listed in part I above, what
additional key indicators or data would
support future RO and COO site
selection?
8. What else should the USPTO
consider when planning for the ROs and
COOs?
III. Specific Request for Comments:
Location of the Southeast Regional
Office
Given the statutory purposes and
considerations of ROs, including those
specific to the SERO, as discussed in
part I, and the planning and design
considerations identified in part II:
9. What data would assist in assessing
potential locations for the SERO site?
10. What is an ideal location for the
SERO? Describe how this location meets
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
the statutory purposes and
considerations.
11. What State or local government,
legal, and business frameworks that
support intellectual property-intensive
industries are located near the
recommended site?
12. What else should the USPTO
consider when determining the ideal
location for the SERO?
IV. Specific Request for Comments:
Location of the Northern New England
Community Outreach Office
Given the statutory purposes and
considerations of COOs, including those
specific to the NNECOO, as discussed in
part I, and the planning and design
considerations identified in part II:
13. What data would assist in
assessing potential locations for the
NNECOO site?
14. What is an ideal location for the
NNECOO? Describe how this location
meets the statutory purposes and
considerations.
15. What community organizations/
businesses near the recommended office
location could the USPTO collaborate
with to help provide intellectual
property education and promote the
career benefits of innovation and
entrepreneurship?
16. What else should the USPTO
consider when determining the ideal
NNECOO?
While the Office welcomes and values
all comments from the public in
response to this request, the comments
submitted do not bind the Office to any
further actions related to the comments,
and the Office may not respond to any
or every comment that is submitted. The
Office will, however, consider all
written submissions.
Any and all decisions made with
regard to the future locations of the RO
and COOs will be made consistent with
the criteria outlined in the UAIA and
the goals and mission of the USPTO.
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2023–12824 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[23–RI–L–04]
Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive
Patent License
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
ACTION:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 209; 37 CFR 404.
Notice of intent.
Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act
and implementing regulations, the
Department of the Air Force hereby
gives notice of its intent to grant an
exclusive patent license to Datalytica,
LLC. duly organized, validly existing,
and in good standing in the State of
Delaware having a place of business at
8823 Boulder Hill, Laurel, MD 20723.
SUMMARY:
Tommy W. Lee,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–12654 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Written objections must be filed
no later than fifteen (15) calendar days
after the date of publication of this
notice.
[Docket ID: USAF–2023–HQ–0012]
Submit written objections to
Stephen Colenzo, AFRL/RI, 525 Brooks
Road, Rome, New York 13441; or email:
stephen.colenzo@us.af.mil. Include
Docket No. 23–RI–L–04 in the subject
line of the message.
AGENCY:
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Colenzo, AFRL/RI, 525 Brooks
Road, Rome, New York 13441; or email:
stephen.colenzo@us.af.mil; Office: 315–
330–7665.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Abstract of Patent Application(s)
Method and apparatus for object or
event of interest detection which
minimizes the level of false alarms and
maximizes the level of detections as
defined on a per event or object basis by
the analyst. The invention allows for the
minimization of false alarms for objects
or events of interest which have a close
resemblance to all other objects or
events mapped to the same
multidimensional feature space, and
allows for the per event or per object
adjustment on false alarms for objects or
events of higher interest.
Intellectual Property
—BLOWERS ET AL, U.S. Patent No.
8,732,100, issued on 20 May 2014,
and entitled ‘‘Method and Apparatus
for Event Detection Permitting per
Event Adjustment of False Alarm
Rate.’’
The Department of the Air Force may
grant the prospective license unless a
timely objection is received that
sufficiently shows the grant of the
license would be inconsistent with the
Bayh-Dole Act or implementing
regulations. A competing application for
a patent license agreement, completed
in compliance with 37 CFR 404.8 and
received by the Air Force within the
period for timely objections, will be
treated as an objection and may be
considered as an alternative to the
proposed license.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38849
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: 60-Day information collection
notice.
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Department of the Air Force announces
a proposed public information
collection and seeks public comment on
the provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of
the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense
for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and
Transparency, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–1700.
Instructions:: All submissions
received must include the agency name,
docket number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38847-38849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12824]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO-C-2023-0022]
Request for Comments on Southeast Regional Office and Community
Outreach Office Locations
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or
Office) is seeking information to inform the planning and design of the
USPTO satellite offices (regional offices) and newly-authorized
community outreach offices (COOs). The USPTO is also seeking
information on potential locations for a future USPTO regional office
in the southeast region of the United States (Southeast Regional Office
or SERO) and a COO in the northern New England (NNE) region (Northern
New England Community Outreach Office) that the USPTO was directed to
establish under the Unleashing American Innovators Act of 2022 (UAIA),
signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 on
December 29, 2022.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be received by 5
p.m. ET on or before July 17, 2023, and should be submitted in
accordance with the instructions in the ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION sections. No public hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, comments must be
submitted electronically by completing the form at https://tinyurl.com/27srysh4. Complete the required fields using the pre-formatted response
form that will allow you to comment on each topic of interest or
question you choose to address. You may enter your responses directly
into the form or cut and paste your responses from a MICROSOFT
WORD[supreg] or ADOBE[supreg] portable document format (PDF) document
into the field provided for each question. You must submit any
attachments that provide additional support to a question through the
electronic form. Attachments to the form will be accepted as
ADOBE[supreg] PDF or MICROSOFT WORD[supreg] documents. To be
considered, comments must be submitted through the electronic form.
Because comments will be made available for public inspection,
information that the submitter does not desire to make public, such as
an address or phone number, should not be included in the comments.
If submission of comments through the electronic form is not
feasible due to a lack of access to a computer and/or the internet,
please contact the USPTO using the contact information below for
special instructions regarding how to submit comments by mail or by
hand delivery, based on the public's ability to obtain access to USPTO
facilities at the time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirin Bidel-Niyat, Chief of Staff,
Office of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the USPTO, at 571-272-8600 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Enabled by the 2011 America Invents Act (AIA), the USPTO currently
has four regional offices that are located in Detroit, Michigan; San
Jose, California (Silicon Valley); Denver, Colorado; and Dallas, Texas.
The purposes of the regional offices (ROs), as originally defined in
the AIA and amended by the UAIA, are to:
RO1: Better connect patent filers and innovators with the
Office, including by increasing outreach activities to individual
innovators, small businesses, veterans, low-income populations,
students, rural populations, and any geographic group of innovators
that the Director may determine to be underrepresented in patent
filings;
RO2: Enhance patent examiner and administrative patent
judge retention, including patent examiners and administrative patent
judges from economically, geographically, and demographically diverse
backgrounds;
RO3: Improve recruitment of patent examiners;
RO4: Decrease the number of patent applications waiting
for examination; and
RO5: Improve the quality of patent examination.
The USPTO has been focused on outreach and impact, and is working
on ways to better support those new to the innovation ecosystem,
bringing more people in America into the fold. The USPTO is also
studying the role of the regional offices in serving both the public
and the needs of our colleagues across the agency.
The UAIA supports the USPTO's expanded outreach efforts by
requiring the USPTO to establish, within three years of enactment
(i.e., no later than December 29, 2025), a Southeast Regional Office in
the geographic region comprised of the states of Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Arkansas. The UAIA requires the Office to
consider the following when selecting the site for the SERO:
SERO1: Number of patent-intensive industries that are
located near the site;
SERO2: How many research-intensive institutions, including
higher education institutions, are located near the site;
SERO3: Governmental and business frameworks, at both the
State and local levels, that support intellectual property-intensive
industries that are located near the site; and
SERO4: The proximity of the office to anchor institutions
(such as hospitals
[[Page 38848]]
primarily serving veterans and institutions of higher education),
individual inventors, small businesses, veterans, low-income
populations, students, rural populations, and any geographic group of
innovators that the Director may determine to be underrepresented in
patent filings.
The Act also requires the USPTO to report out within two years on
whether additional offices are necessary to further increase
participation in the patent system by individuals who have historically
been underrepresented in patent filings.
In addition to regional offices, the UAIA requires the USPTO to
establish at least four COOs within five years from enactment of the
Act (i.e., no later than December 29, 2027). The purposes of the COOs
are to:
COO1: Further achieve the purposes described above for the
regional offices;
COO2: Develop partnerships with local community
organizations, institutions of higher education and/or research, and
businesses to create tailored community-based programs that provide
education regarding the patent system and promote the career benefits
of innovation and entrepreneurship; and
COO3: Educate prospective inventors, including individual
inventors, small businesses, veterans, low-income populations,
students, rural populations, and any geographic group of innovators
that the Director may determine to be underrepresented in patent
filings, about all public and private resources available to potential
patent applicants, including the patent pro bono programs.
The UAIA prohibits the establishment of a COO in the same state as
the principal location of the USPTO (Virginia), or in a state that has
a regional office (California, Colorado, Michigan, or Texas). The UAIA
also requires that at least one of the COOs be established in the NNE
region and serve the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. Under
the Act, the Office must give preference to locations where:
NNECOO1: There is at least one private institution of
higher education and at least one public institution of higher
education;
NNECOO2: There are no more than 15 registered patent
attorneys based on information from the USPTO's Office of Enrollment
and Discipline; and
NNECOO3: According to data from the 2012 Survey of
Business Owners conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, less than 45% of
the firms are owned by women, minorities, or veterans.
The USPTO will use quantitative metrics and criteria to inform the
location selection for future ROs and COOs. The Office plans to
consider the following classes of data (D) at a minimum:
D1: Business demographics.
D2: Concentration of research- and IP-intensive
industries.
D3: Socioeconomic and demographic metrics of the regional/
local population.
D4: Availability and concentration of existing business
development resources.
D5: Overall geographic diversity of office locations.
The USPTO welcomes input from all stakeholders on any matter that
they believe is relevant to the overall planning and design of the
USPTO RO and COOs, or the selection of locations for the new SERO or
NNECOO. Commenters are encouraged to address any or all of the
statutory considerations listed in the UAIA and summarized above, any
other considerations they believe the USPTO should consider, and the
questions listed below.
Commenting Instructions: To be considered, comments must be
submitted through the electronic form available at https://tinyurl.com/27srysh4. Please cite any public data that relates to or supports your
responses. If data is available but non-public, describe such data to
the extent permissible.
II. Specific Request for Comments: Planning and Design of Regional
Offices and Community Outreach Offices
With the addition of COOs to the agency's footprint, the USPTO
envisions the joint mission of the ROs and COOs to be the cultivation
and expansion of a vibrant and inclusive innovation and
entrepreneurship ecosystem supported by intellectual property across
the United States. To accomplish this mission, the offices will conduct
broad stakeholder engagement with innovators ranging from individual
inventors to multinational business entities; establish and leverage
partnerships and relationships to scale the USPTO's work; incentivize
regional innovation and entrepreneurship, especially in key emerging
areas; and promote full participation by innovators and entrepreneurs
of all backgrounds, including in rural areas and from our military, to
support U.S. innovation and jobs.
The USPTO invites responses to the following questions:
Regional offices
1. Considering the envisioned mission above, what essential
services--including outreach, education, customer service, convening
space, and employee support--should a RO provide to achieve the
statutory purposes?
a. Do you prefer to have the services you identified delivered
virtually? Why or why not?
b. Do you prefer to have the services you identified delivered in
person? Why or why not?
2. What types of organizations should the RO pursue relationships
and collaborations with to better leverage and scale its services?
Community Outreach Offices
3. Considering the envisioned mission above, what essential
services--including outreach, education, and customer service--should a
COO provide to achieve the statutory purposes?
a. Do you prefer to have the services you identified delivered
virtually? Why or why not?
b. Do you prefer to have the services you identified delivered in
person? Why or why not?
4. What types of organizations should the COO pursue relationships
and collaborations with to better leverage and scale its services?
5. Would you support a COO being co-located with other public
sector entities/services?
a. If so, please describe the added value of having a shared
location.
b. Which public sector entities/services would you suggest for the
shared location(s)?
c. If not, please describe the benefit of having a unique location
for a COO.
General Comments Regarding Regional and Community Outreach Offices
6. What unique services should the ROs and COOs individually
provide, and how should the full range of services complement each
other?
7. Considering the potential classes of data listed in part I
above, what additional key indicators or data would support future RO
and COO site selection?
8. What else should the USPTO consider when planning for the ROs
and COOs?
III. Specific Request for Comments: Location of the Southeast Regional
Office
Given the statutory purposes and considerations of ROs, including
those specific to the SERO, as discussed in part I, and the planning
and design considerations identified in part II:
9. What data would assist in assessing potential locations for the
SERO site?
10. What is an ideal location for the SERO? Describe how this
location meets
[[Page 38849]]
the statutory purposes and considerations.
11. What State or local government, legal, and business frameworks
that support intellectual property-intensive industries are located
near the recommended site?
12. What else should the USPTO consider when determining the ideal
location for the SERO?
IV. Specific Request for Comments: Location of the Northern New England
Community Outreach Office
Given the statutory purposes and considerations of COOs, including
those specific to the NNECOO, as discussed in part I, and the planning
and design considerations identified in part II:
13. What data would assist in assessing potential locations for the
NNECOO site?
14. What is an ideal location for the NNECOO? Describe how this
location meets the statutory purposes and considerations.
15. What community organizations/businesses near the recommended
office location could the USPTO collaborate with to help provide
intellectual property education and promote the career benefits of
innovation and entrepreneurship?
16. What else should the USPTO consider when determining the ideal
NNECOO?
While the Office welcomes and values all comments from the public
in response to this request, the comments submitted do not bind the
Office to any further actions related to the comments, and the Office
may not respond to any or every comment that is submitted. The Office
will, however, consider all written submissions.
Any and all decisions made with regard to the future locations of
the RO and COOs will be made consistent with the criteria outlined in
the UAIA and the goals and mission of the USPTO.
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2023-12824 Filed 6-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
