Safety Advisory 2023-01; Evaluation of Policies and Procedures Related to the Use and Maintenance of Hot Bearing Wayside Detectors (Supplement), 38933-38935 [2023-12724]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
with Indian Tribal Governments; E.O.
11514 Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing E.O. 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal
programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Clarence W. Coleman,
Preconstruction and Environment Director,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2023–12674 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Safety Advisory 2023–01; Evaluation of
Policies and Procedures Related to the
Use and Maintenance of Hot Bearing
Wayside Detectors (Supplement)
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory;
notice No. 2.
AGENCY:
On March 3, 2023, in
response to a series of rail accidents
suspected of being caused by burnt
journal bearings, FRA published Safety
Advisory 2023–01 addressing the use
and maintenance of hot bearing
detectors (HBDs). Since publication of
that Safety Advisory, FRA has
continued to evaluate railroads’ use of
HBDs and on May 10, 2023, in New
Castle, Pennsylvania, another accident
occurred that is suspected of being the
result of a burnt journal bearing.
Preliminary information related to this
most recent accident shows that the
train involved passed a HBD which
alarmed prior to the accident.
Accordingly, FRA is issuing this Notice
to supplement Safety Advisory 2023–01
with one additional recommendation.
Specifically, this Notice adds a fifth
recommendation to Safety Advisory
2023–01 recommending that railroads
take action to evaluate the resiliency
and accuracy of the overall process used
to monitor and measure bearing health.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Alexy, Associate Administrator for
Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer,
Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590, (202)–493–6282.
Disclaimer: This Safety Advisory is
considered guidance pursuant to DOT
Order 2100.6A (June 7, 2021). Except
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
when referencing laws, regulations,
policies, or orders, the information in
this Safety Advisory does not have the
force and effect of law and is not meant
to bind the public in any way. This
document does not revise or replace any
previously issued guidance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In response to recent rail accidents,
on February 21, 2023, while calling on
the freight rail industry and Congress to
take action to improve rail safety, U.S.
Department of Transportation Secretary
Pete Buttigieg reiterated the
Department’s commitment to enhancing
rail safety through specific targeted
actions.1 In addition to various
regulatory and other activities FRA
already had underway at the time of
Secretary Buttigieg’s announcement,
one of the actions announced included
a focused inspection program of routes
over which high-hazard flammable
trains (HHFTs) 2 and other trains
transporting large volumes of hazardous
materials travel (Route Assessment).
Subsequently, in response to continued
derailments and the death of a Norfolk
Southern Railway (NS) worker, FRA
launched a supplemental safety
assessment of NS, issued three safety
advisories and two safety bulletins 3
calling attention to the risks FRA
identified in the recent accidents.
HHFT Route Assessment
As noted above, in March 2023, FRA
initiated a nationwide comprehensive
assessment of HHFT routes and other
rail routes over which large quantities of
other hazardous materials are
transported. The Route Assessment
includes all FRA technical safety
disciplines (i.e., hazardous materials,
track, signal and train control,
mechanical, operating practices, and
grade crossing). The Route Assessment
is designed to evaluate the overall
condition of the rail infrastructure
1 See https://www.transportation.gov/briefingroom/us-department-transportation-fact-sheetsteps-forward-freight-rail-industry-safety.
2 An HHFT is ‘‘a single train transporting 20 or
more loaded tank cars of a Class 3 flammable liquid
in a continuous block or a single train carrying 35
or more loaded tank cars of a Class 3 flammable
liquid throughout the train consist.’’ 49 CFR 171.8.
3 https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safetyadvisory-2023-01-evaluation-policies-andprocedures-related-use-and-maintenance-hot;
https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safety-advisory2023-02-train-makeup-and-operational-safetyconcerns; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safetyadvisory-2023-03-accident-mitigation-and-trainlength; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safetybulletin-2023-01-switching-operation-accident;
https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/
2023-03/Safety%20Bulletin%20202302%20%28031623%29.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38933
(including, but not limited to, the track,
rolling stock, signal systems, and other
equipment that affects or monitors the
safety of rail operations) and railroads’
compliance with both FRA safety
regulations and the regulations of the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration.
Initial observations from the Route
Assessment point to significant
inconsistencies in the railroads’
application of best practices associated
with the installation and maintenance of
HBDs, as well as in the assessment and
use of HBD data to address failing or
failed bearings. FRA is continuing to
evaluate the tools, algorithms, and other
methodologies railroads use to evaluate
bearing health, and the training
practices for all railroad employees
involved in monitoring bearing health
information and/or taking action in
response to that information.
Supplemental Safety Assessment of
Norfolk Southern
On March 15, 2023, FRA initiated a
supplemental safety assessment of NS
(NS Assessment), with a specific focus
on safety culture and training, as well as
a deep dive into compliance with
selected regulations and the status of
recommendations from FRA’s 2022
System Audit of NS performed January
through May of 2022.4 The investigation
phase of FRA’s NS Assessment was
completed mid-May 2023, and analysis
of survey results is currently in process.
While FRA continues to analyze results
to confirm FRA’s findings and any
recommendations, several areas of
concern have arisen, including the
resiliency of NS’s processes and
procedures for monitoring and actioning
bearing health information from the
railroad’s system of HBDs.
New Castle, Pennsylvania Accident—
May 10, 2023
On May 10, 2023, at 11:24 p.m., a NS
general merchandise train (i.e., not an
HHFT) derailed nine cars in New Castle,
Pennsylvania. Five cars derailed on a
bridge over the Mahoning River. Both
the National Transportation Safety
Board and FRA are investigating the
accident and both investigations are
ongoing. Although no final conclusions
as to the cause of the accident have been
identified yet, preliminary information
indicates that a burnt journal bearing
played a role in the derailment and that
the train involved passed at least one
HBD that alarmed before the derailment.
FRA is probing the communication and
4 FRA Audit Number: 2022–NS Special Audit
–01–1; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-auditreport-norfolk-southern-railway-company.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
38934
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
timing of the alarm to both the
locomotive and the dispatch center, as
well as the history and performance of
the bearing in question. Of particular
interest is the impact of failures or
delays in the communication of bearing
health information to those involved in
the data analysis and decision-making
process as to what action to take in
response to the information and to
enable the crew to take appropriate
action.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Safety Advisory 2023–01 Published
March 3, 2023
In Safety Advisory 2023–01, FRA
recognized the value of wayside
detection systems if they are
appropriately installed, maintained, and
utilized. As noted in that Safety
Advisory, if implemented properly,
wayside detectors enable railroads to
assess the health of rail equipment and
infrastructure to enable the early
identification of mechanical or other
defects. Nonetheless, as explained in
Safety Advisory 2023–01, even with
industry’s widespread use of wayside
detection systems (such as HBDs), since
2021, at least five derailments have
occurred that are suspected of being
caused by mechanical defects (burnt
journal bearings in particular).5
Each railroad involved in these five
recent derailments had systems of HBDs
intended to identify defective bearings
or bearings experiencing anomalies that
could lead to failures. However, in each
case, despite the fact that those HBDs
flagged at least one suspected bearing on
each train, the derailments occurred.
Accordingly, Safety Advisory 2023–01,
as originally published, focused its
recommendations on inspection and
maintenance procedures related to the
HBDs, the thresholds at which detectors
are set to flag anomalies, and the
training and qualification of personnel
responsible for installing, inspecting,
and maintaining HBDs. As originally
published, the Safety Advisory also
recommended that railroads ‘‘review
current procedures governing actions
responding to HBD alerts to ensure
required actions are commensurate with
the risk of the operation involved,’’ but
the Advisory did not make any
5 The five derailments include three derailments
that occurred on NS (Warner Roberts, Georgia (July
12, 2022); Sandusky, Ohio (October 8, 2022); and
East Palestine, Ohio (February 3, 2023)) and two
derailments that occurred on the Kansas City
Southern Railway (KCS) in 2021. The three NS
derailments are discussed in detail in Safety
Advisory 2023–01 and the 2021 KCS derailments
occurred on August 2, 2021, and December 3, 2021,
and in both cases, a HBD flagged a suspect bearing,
but the crews were either unable to act in time to
prevent a derailment or were directed to continue
the train move resulting in a derailment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
recommendations related to ensuring
the effectiveness, reliability, and
robustness of such procedures. In other
words, as originally published, Safety
Advisory 2023–01 did not address the
effectiveness of railroads’ established
processes and procedures in ensuring
adequate and accurate bearing health
data is gathered from detectors,
analyzed, and communicated to all
railroad personnel responsible for
making decisions or taking action in
response to that data. FRA notes that the
process of gathering, monitoring,
reporting, analyzing, and actioning
information from detectors includes
tasks that, if incorrectly done, can
introduce risk. For instance, an error in
HBD installation or maintenance that is
not identified by commissioning testing,
may impact the reporting of HBD
measurements. Similarly, processes
with insufficient redundancies or crosschecks to ensure each necessary step or
task is performed timely and accurately
may lead to failures in the processes
that allow a valid detector alert or alarm
to go undetected. Accordingly, in
addition to the four recommendations
contained in Safety Advisory 2023–01
as originally published, with this
supplementary notice, FRA is making a
fifth recommendation to railroads.
Specifically, FRA recommends that
railroads evaluate each step and task
performed by railroad personnel to
identify any potential points where nonrevealing failures may occur (i.e., any
steps or tasks that, if not performed or
performed incorrectly or timely, could
mislead decision makers when
actioning a HBD report or lack of a HBD
report). FRA also recommends that
railroads implement appropriate
safeguards to minimize the impact of
any non-revealing failures when
monitoring, analyzing, and responding
to detector information.
Recommended Railroad Action
In light of the above discussion, FRA
is revising the recommendations
included in Safety Advisory 2023–01 to
add recommendation number 5 below.
For ease of reference, FRA’s existing
recommendations 1 through 4 are
reproduced below, along with
additional recommendation 5.
Accordingly, FRA recommends that
railroads take the following actions:
1. Review existing HBD system
inspection and maintenance policies
and procedures for compliance with
existing industry standards and
manufacturer recommendations for
HBDs.
2. Review existing procedures to train
and qualify personnel responsible for
installing, inspecting, and maintaining
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HBDs to ensure they have the
appropriate knowledge and skills.
Railroads should also develop and
implement appropriate training on the
inspection and maintenance
requirements for HBDs and provide that
training at appropriate intervals to
ensure the required knowledge and skill
of inspection and maintenance
personnel. Further, railroads should
evaluate their training content and
training frequency to ensure any
employee who may be called upon to
evaluate a suspect bearing has the
necessary training, experience, and
qualifications. FRA also encourages
railroads to ensure these individuals are
available at all hours of operations
across a railroad’s network.
3. Review current HBD detector
thresholds in light of recent
derailments, and all other relevant
available data (including data from any
close calls or near misses), to determine
the adequacy of the railroad’s current
thresholds. Thresholds should be
established for single measurement as
well as multiple measurements of
individual bearings to enable
temperature trend analysis.
4. Review current procedures
governing actions responding to HBD
alerts to ensure required actions are
commensurate with the risk of the
operation involved. With regard to
trains transporting any quantity of
hazardous materials, FRA recommends
railroads adopt the procedures outlined
in AAR’s OT–55 for key trains as an
initial measure.
5. Rigorously evaluate the resiliency
and accuracy of the overall process used
to monitor and act upon information
from wayside detectors, with specific
focus on steps and tasks that, if not
performed or performed incorrectly,
could mislead decision makers. The
process of monitoring, reporting,
inspecting, analyzing, and acting on
information from detectors includes
tasks that, if incorrectly executed, could
introduce risk. Railroads should also
evaluate each step and task performed
by railroad personnel to pinpoint any
HBD reporting failures and implement
appropriate safeguards to minimize the
impact of those failures when
monitoring, analyzing, and responding
to detector information.
Conclusion
In general, as noted in Safety
Advisory 2023–01 as originally
published, the issues identified in this
Safety Advisory and this supplementary
notice are indicators of a railroad’s
safety culture. Implementing procedures
that ensure safety, and training
personnel so those procedures become
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
second nature, is vital. Equally
important is the commitment,
throughout the organization, to safety
and empowerment of personnel to live
up to that commitment. Specifically,
personnel should be encouraged and
empowered to develop, implement, and
comply with procedures that may
temporarily impact operations, but
maximize safety, just as those executing
the procedures should be empowered to
strictly adhere to those procedures, even
if it delays a train. The railroads should
evaluate their safety culture not only as
it relates to the issues indicated in this
Safety Advisory, but to all aspects of
their operations.
FRA encourages railroads to continue
to take actions consistent with Safety
Advisory 2023–01 as originally
published and the additional
recommendation in this supplementary
notice, as well as any other
complementary actions, to ensure the
safety of rail transportation. FRA may
modify this Safety Advisory and
supplementary notice, issue additional
safety advisories, or take other actions
necessary to ensure the highest level of
safety on the Nation’s railroads,
including pursuing other corrective
measures under its authority.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Amitabha Bose,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–12724 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2017–0108 (Notice No.
2021–07)]
Hazardous Materials: Notification of
Termination of Certain Explosive
Classification Approvals Due to NonCompliance With the UN Model
Regulation Test Series 6(d)
Requirement
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
EX No.
I. Introduction
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS)
provides notice of the termination of the
approvals listed below. The below-listed
approval holders failed to provide
evidence that their explosives
successfully passed UN Test Series 6(d)
of Part I of the UN Manual of Tests and
Criteria (UN 6(d) testing) as required by
49 CFR 172.102, Special Provision 347.
Publication in the Federal Register is
an authorized method for PHMSA to
serve the approval holders in
accordance with 49 CFR 105.35(a)(3).
The approval holders listed below failed
to submit evidence that the UN 6(d)
testing had been successfully completed
and failed to apply for a modification of
their approval. Therefore, PHMSA
terminated their approvals, effective
June 3, 2021.
II. Background
Final rule HM–215O 1 amended
Special Provision 347 to require
successful completion of UN 6(d)
testing. This change affected explosives
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
UN0367
UN0367
UN0367
UN0367
UN0481
UN0481
UN0481
UN0481
UN0481
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
classified as Division 1.4S hazardous
materials and impacted UN Numbers
UN0349, UN0367, UN0384, and
UN0481. This requirement became
effective for transportation by aircraft
under the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) on January 1, 2019;
for transportation by vessel under the
International Maritime Organization
(IMO) on January 1, 2020; and for
domestic highway and rail
transportation on May 10, 2021. PHMSA
attempted to contact the affected
approval holders in October 2020 via a
Safety Advisory Notice issued from the
PHMSA EX Portal to alert holders of the
May 10, 2021, compliance deadline. On
May 4, 2021, PHMSA issued a Federal
Register Notice 2 [Docket No. PHMSA–
2017–0108, Notice No. 2021–03] which
notified the approval holders of
PHMSA’s intent to terminate all
approvals that failed to provide PHMSA
with documentation showing that the
UN 6(d) test had been successfully
completed by June 3, 2021. As noted
above, publication in the Federal
Register is an authorized method for
PHMSA to serve the approval holders in
accordance with 49 CFR 105.35(a)(3).
The approval holders listed below failed
to submit evidence that the UN 6(d)
testing had been successfully completed
and failed to apply for a modification of
their approval. Therefore, PHMSA
terminated their approvals, effective
June 3, 2021. As of July 2021, PHMSA
had not received any records that the
required UN 6(d) testing had been
successfully completed for the belowlisted EX number(s).
III. Action
PHMSA terminated the below EX
classification approvals in accordance
with § 107.713(b)(1).
IV. Terminated Approvals
EX approval holders are listed in
alphabetical order.
EX approval holder
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
Accurate
FR 27810 (May 11, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
PHMSA has terminated the
Explosive (EX) classification approvals
listed below. PHMSA published a
Federal Register Notice on May 4, 2021,
notifying the approval holders listed
below that PHMSA intended to
terminate their approvals for failure to
provide proof that the approved
explosives successfully completed the
UN Test Series 6(d) of Part I of the UN
Manual of Tests and Criteria. The notice
advised approval holders that they must
either show why their approvals should
not be terminated or apply for a
modification of their approval prior to
June 3, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Harpreet Singh, Chief, Energetic
Materials Branch, Sciences and
Engineering Division, 202–366–4535,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
UN No.
EX1999100239
EX1988040100
EX1988040101
EX1989110272
EX1989110427
EX1989110428
EX1989110429
EX1989110431
EX1989110432
1 85
Notification of termination of
explosive approvals.
ACTION:
Arms Company, Inc.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
Energetic Systems, LLC.
2 86
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
FR 23782 (May 4, 2021).
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38935
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38933-38935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12724]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Safety Advisory 2023-01; Evaluation of Policies and Procedures
Related to the Use and Maintenance of Hot Bearing Wayside Detectors
(Supplement)
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory; notice No. 2.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 3, 2023, in response to a series of rail accidents
suspected of being caused by burnt journal bearings, FRA published
Safety Advisory 2023-01 addressing the use and maintenance of hot
bearing detectors (HBDs). Since publication of that Safety Advisory,
FRA has continued to evaluate railroads' use of HBDs and on May 10,
2023, in New Castle, Pennsylvania, another accident occurred that is
suspected of being the result of a burnt journal bearing. Preliminary
information related to this most recent accident shows that the train
involved passed a HBD which alarmed prior to the accident. Accordingly,
FRA is issuing this Notice to supplement Safety Advisory 2023-01 with
one additional recommendation. Specifically, this Notice adds a fifth
recommendation to Safety Advisory 2023-01 recommending that railroads
take action to evaluate the resiliency and accuracy of the overall
process used to monitor and measure bearing health.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Alexy, Associate Administrator
for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer, Office of Railroad
Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, (202)-
493-6282.
Disclaimer: This Safety Advisory is considered guidance pursuant to
DOT Order 2100.6A (June 7, 2021). Except when referencing laws,
regulations, policies, or orders, the information in this Safety
Advisory does not have the force and effect of law and is not meant to
bind the public in any way. This document does not revise or replace
any previously issued guidance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In response to recent rail accidents, on February 21, 2023, while
calling on the freight rail industry and Congress to take action to
improve rail safety, U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete
Buttigieg reiterated the Department's commitment to enhancing rail
safety through specific targeted actions.\1\ In addition to various
regulatory and other activities FRA already had underway at the time of
Secretary Buttigieg's announcement, one of the actions announced
included a focused inspection program of routes over which high-hazard
flammable trains (HHFTs) \2\ and other trains transporting large
volumes of hazardous materials travel (Route Assessment). Subsequently,
in response to continued derailments and the death of a Norfolk
Southern Railway (NS) worker, FRA launched a supplemental safety
assessment of NS, issued three safety advisories and two safety
bulletins \3\ calling attention to the risks FRA identified in the
recent accidents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/us-department-transportation-fact-sheet-steps-forward-freight-rail-industry-safety.
\2\ An HHFT is ``a single train transporting 20 or more loaded
tank cars of a Class 3 flammable liquid in a continuous block or a
single train carrying 35 or more loaded tank cars of a Class 3
flammable liquid throughout the train consist.'' 49 CFR 171.8.
\3\ https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safety-advisory-2023-01-evaluation-policies-and-procedures-related-use-and-maintenance-hot;
https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safety-advisory-2023-02-train-makeup-and-operational-safety-concerns; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safety-advisory-2023-03-accident-mitigation-and-train-length; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/safety-bulletin-2023-01-switching-operation-accident; https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2023-03/Safety%20Bulletin%202023-02%20%28031623%29.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HHFT Route Assessment
As noted above, in March 2023, FRA initiated a nationwide
comprehensive assessment of HHFT routes and other rail routes over
which large quantities of other hazardous materials are transported.
The Route Assessment includes all FRA technical safety disciplines
(i.e., hazardous materials, track, signal and train control,
mechanical, operating practices, and grade crossing). The Route
Assessment is designed to evaluate the overall condition of the rail
infrastructure (including, but not limited to, the track, rolling
stock, signal systems, and other equipment that affects or monitors the
safety of rail operations) and railroads' compliance with both FRA
safety regulations and the regulations of the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
Initial observations from the Route Assessment point to significant
inconsistencies in the railroads' application of best practices
associated with the installation and maintenance of HBDs, as well as in
the assessment and use of HBD data to address failing or failed
bearings. FRA is continuing to evaluate the tools, algorithms, and
other methodologies railroads use to evaluate bearing health, and the
training practices for all railroad employees involved in monitoring
bearing health information and/or taking action in response to that
information.
Supplemental Safety Assessment of Norfolk Southern
On March 15, 2023, FRA initiated a supplemental safety assessment
of NS (NS Assessment), with a specific focus on safety culture and
training, as well as a deep dive into compliance with selected
regulations and the status of recommendations from FRA's 2022 System
Audit of NS performed January through May of 2022.\4\ The investigation
phase of FRA's NS Assessment was completed mid-May 2023, and analysis
of survey results is currently in process. While FRA continues to
analyze results to confirm FRA's findings and any recommendations,
several areas of concern have arisen, including the resiliency of NS's
processes and procedures for monitoring and actioning bearing health
information from the railroad's system of HBDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ FRA Audit Number: 2022-NS Special Audit -01-1; https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-audit-report-norfolk-southern-railway-company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Castle, Pennsylvania Accident--May 10, 2023
On May 10, 2023, at 11:24 p.m., a NS general merchandise train
(i.e., not an HHFT) derailed nine cars in New Castle, Pennsylvania.
Five cars derailed on a bridge over the Mahoning River. Both the
National Transportation Safety Board and FRA are investigating the
accident and both investigations are ongoing. Although no final
conclusions as to the cause of the accident have been identified yet,
preliminary information indicates that a burnt journal bearing played a
role in the derailment and that the train involved passed at least one
HBD that alarmed before the derailment. FRA is probing the
communication and
[[Page 38934]]
timing of the alarm to both the locomotive and the dispatch center, as
well as the history and performance of the bearing in question. Of
particular interest is the impact of failures or delays in the
communication of bearing health information to those involved in the
data analysis and decision-making process as to what action to take in
response to the information and to enable the crew to take appropriate
action.
Safety Advisory 2023-01 Published March 3, 2023
In Safety Advisory 2023-01, FRA recognized the value of wayside
detection systems if they are appropriately installed, maintained, and
utilized. As noted in that Safety Advisory, if implemented properly,
wayside detectors enable railroads to assess the health of rail
equipment and infrastructure to enable the early identification of
mechanical or other defects. Nonetheless, as explained in Safety
Advisory 2023-01, even with industry's widespread use of wayside
detection systems (such as HBDs), since 2021, at least five derailments
have occurred that are suspected of being caused by mechanical defects
(burnt journal bearings in particular).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The five derailments include three derailments that occurred
on NS (Warner Roberts, Georgia (July 12, 2022); Sandusky, Ohio
(October 8, 2022); and East Palestine, Ohio (February 3, 2023)) and
two derailments that occurred on the Kansas City Southern Railway
(KCS) in 2021. The three NS derailments are discussed in detail in
Safety Advisory 2023-01 and the 2021 KCS derailments occurred on
August 2, 2021, and December 3, 2021, and in both cases, a HBD
flagged a suspect bearing, but the crews were either unable to act
in time to prevent a derailment or were directed to continue the
train move resulting in a derailment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each railroad involved in these five recent derailments had systems
of HBDs intended to identify defective bearings or bearings
experiencing anomalies that could lead to failures. However, in each
case, despite the fact that those HBDs flagged at least one suspected
bearing on each train, the derailments occurred. Accordingly, Safety
Advisory 2023-01, as originally published, focused its recommendations
on inspection and maintenance procedures related to the HBDs, the
thresholds at which detectors are set to flag anomalies, and the
training and qualification of personnel responsible for installing,
inspecting, and maintaining HBDs. As originally published, the Safety
Advisory also recommended that railroads ``review current procedures
governing actions responding to HBD alerts to ensure required actions
are commensurate with the risk of the operation involved,'' but the
Advisory did not make any recommendations related to ensuring the
effectiveness, reliability, and robustness of such procedures. In other
words, as originally published, Safety Advisory 2023-01 did not address
the effectiveness of railroads' established processes and procedures in
ensuring adequate and accurate bearing health data is gathered from
detectors, analyzed, and communicated to all railroad personnel
responsible for making decisions or taking action in response to that
data. FRA notes that the process of gathering, monitoring, reporting,
analyzing, and actioning information from detectors includes tasks
that, if incorrectly done, can introduce risk. For instance, an error
in HBD installation or maintenance that is not identified by
commissioning testing, may impact the reporting of HBD measurements.
Similarly, processes with insufficient redundancies or cross-checks to
ensure each necessary step or task is performed timely and accurately
may lead to failures in the processes that allow a valid detector alert
or alarm to go undetected. Accordingly, in addition to the four
recommendations contained in Safety Advisory 2023-01 as originally
published, with this supplementary notice, FRA is making a fifth
recommendation to railroads. Specifically, FRA recommends that
railroads evaluate each step and task performed by railroad personnel
to identify any potential points where non-revealing failures may occur
(i.e., any steps or tasks that, if not performed or performed
incorrectly or timely, could mislead decision makers when actioning a
HBD report or lack of a HBD report). FRA also recommends that railroads
implement appropriate safeguards to minimize the impact of any non-
revealing failures when monitoring, analyzing, and responding to
detector information.
Recommended Railroad Action
In light of the above discussion, FRA is revising the
recommendations included in Safety Advisory 2023-01 to add
recommendation number 5 below. For ease of reference, FRA's existing
recommendations 1 through 4 are reproduced below, along with additional
recommendation 5. Accordingly, FRA recommends that railroads take the
following actions:
1. Review existing HBD system inspection and maintenance policies
and procedures for compliance with existing industry standards and
manufacturer recommendations for HBDs.
2. Review existing procedures to train and qualify personnel
responsible for installing, inspecting, and maintaining HBDs to ensure
they have the appropriate knowledge and skills. Railroads should also
develop and implement appropriate training on the inspection and
maintenance requirements for HBDs and provide that training at
appropriate intervals to ensure the required knowledge and skill of
inspection and maintenance personnel. Further, railroads should
evaluate their training content and training frequency to ensure any
employee who may be called upon to evaluate a suspect bearing has the
necessary training, experience, and qualifications. FRA also encourages
railroads to ensure these individuals are available at all hours of
operations across a railroad's network.
3. Review current HBD detector thresholds in light of recent
derailments, and all other relevant available data (including data from
any close calls or near misses), to determine the adequacy of the
railroad's current thresholds. Thresholds should be established for
single measurement as well as multiple measurements of individual
bearings to enable temperature trend analysis.
4. Review current procedures governing actions responding to HBD
alerts to ensure required actions are commensurate with the risk of the
operation involved. With regard to trains transporting any quantity of
hazardous materials, FRA recommends railroads adopt the procedures
outlined in AAR's OT-55 for key trains as an initial measure.
5. Rigorously evaluate the resiliency and accuracy of the overall
process used to monitor and act upon information from wayside
detectors, with specific focus on steps and tasks that, if not
performed or performed incorrectly, could mislead decision makers. The
process of monitoring, reporting, inspecting, analyzing, and acting on
information from detectors includes tasks that, if incorrectly
executed, could introduce risk. Railroads should also evaluate each
step and task performed by railroad personnel to pinpoint any HBD
reporting failures and implement appropriate safeguards to minimize the
impact of those failures when monitoring, analyzing, and responding to
detector information.
Conclusion
In general, as noted in Safety Advisory 2023-01 as originally
published, the issues identified in this Safety Advisory and this
supplementary notice are indicators of a railroad's safety culture.
Implementing procedures that ensure safety, and training personnel so
those procedures become
[[Page 38935]]
second nature, is vital. Equally important is the commitment,
throughout the organization, to safety and empowerment of personnel to
live up to that commitment. Specifically, personnel should be
encouraged and empowered to develop, implement, and comply with
procedures that may temporarily impact operations, but maximize safety,
just as those executing the procedures should be empowered to strictly
adhere to those procedures, even if it delays a train. The railroads
should evaluate their safety culture not only as it relates to the
issues indicated in this Safety Advisory, but to all aspects of their
operations.
FRA encourages railroads to continue to take actions consistent
with Safety Advisory 2023-01 as originally published and the additional
recommendation in this supplementary notice, as well as any other
complementary actions, to ensure the safety of rail transportation. FRA
may modify this Safety Advisory and supplementary notice, issue
additional safety advisories, or take other actions necessary to ensure
the highest level of safety on the Nation's railroads, including
pursuing other corrective measures under its authority.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Amitabha Bose,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-12724 Filed 6-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P