Security Zone, Baltimore Harbor, MD., 38749-38751 [2023-12707]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
notification of this enforcement period
via a Marine Safety Information Bulletin
and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: May 25, 2023.
K.K. Denning,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2023–12652 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0467]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone, Baltimore Harbor, MD.
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
for navigable waters within Baltimore
Northwest Harbor, across the West
channel, in the vicinity of North Locust
Point Marine Terminal. The security
zone is needed to protect distinguished
guests and attendees during the
commission of the USS CARL M. LEVIN
(DDG 120). Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
until 1 p.m. on June 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0467 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email BM1 Michael Klopp, Sector
Maryland-NCR, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard: telephone
410–576–2674, email
MDNCRWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The U.S. Navy informed the Coast
Guard that the Commissioning of the
USS CARL M. LEVIN (DDG 120) will be
held on June 24, 2023, in Baltimore
Harbor, MD. The commissioning will be
in close proximity to navigable
waterways within the Captain of the
Port, Maryland-National Capital
Region’s Area of Responsibility, as set
forth in 33 CFR 3.25–15. On May 30,
2023, the U. S. Navy requested that a
security zone be established to be in
effect before, during and after the
commissioning ceremony.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable and contrary to public
interest to delay the effective date of this
rule. Immediate action is needed to
mitigate potential terrorist acts and to
enhance public and maritime safety and
security. The Coast Guard is unable to
publish an NPRM in time to publish a
final rule due to the short time period
between May 30, 2023, when the event
planners notified the Coast Guard of the
security posture for the event, and June
24, 2023, when the security zone must
be in effect Delaying the effective date
to publish an NPRM would be contrary
to the security zone’s intended
objectives of mitigating potential
terrorist acts and enhancing public and
maritime safety and security. It is
therefore impracticable to publish an
NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard also finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action to restrict
vessel traffic is needed to protect life,
property and the environment, and
delaying the effective date would
frustrate the security zone’s intended
objectives of mitigating potential
terrorist acts and enhancing public and
maritime safety and security when the
event takes place.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38749
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard may issue security
zone regulations under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70051 and 70124. The Captain of
the Port, Maryland-National Capital
Region (COTP) has determined that the
commissioning of a U.S. Naval Warship
presents a potential target for terrorist
attack, sabotage, or other subversive
acts, accidents, or other causes of
similar nature. This rule is needed to
protect distinguished guests and
attendants of the commissioning
ceremony of the USS CARL M. LEVIN
(DDG 120) as well as personnel in and
around the commissioning site,
navigable waterways, and waterfront
facilities.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from 8 a.m. until 1 p.m. on June 24,
2023. The security zone will cover all
navigable waters from North Locust
Point Marine Terminal across West
Channel Harbor to the yacht basin Oasis
Marina in Northwest Harbor, MD. The
duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel in and around the
commissioning site, navigable
waterways, and waterfront facilities. No
vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the security zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
limited duration of the security zone.
This zone impacts a small, designated
area of the Northwest Harbor for 5
hours.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
38750
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone lasting only 5 hours that
will prohibit entry within certain
navigable waters of the Patapsco River.
It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T05–0467 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0467 Security Zone; Northwest
Harbor, Baltimore, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All navigable waters of
Northwest Harbor, encompassed by a
line connecting the following points
beginning at 39°16′21.32″ N,
076°35′4.81″ W, thence to 39°16′33.74″
N, 076°34′54.59″ W, thence to
39°16′26.98″ N, 076°34′43.79″ W, thence
to 39°16′26.18″ N, 076°34′40.62″ W,
thence to 39°16′11.42″ N, 076°34′46.56″
W, thence to 39°16′10.56″ N,
076°34′50.20″ W, and thence along the
shore line back to the beginning point,
located at Baltimore, MD. These
coordinates are based on WGS 84.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Captain of the Port (COTP) means the
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region (COTP) in the enforcement of the
security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by telephone number
410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
Those in the security zone must comply
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. until 1 p.m.
on June 24, 2023.
Dated: June 8, 2023.
David E. O’Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–12707 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0192]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Delaware Bay, Lower
Township, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters of the Delaware
Bay, in Lower Township, NJ. The safety
zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by a
fireworks display. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector
Delaware Bay.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:15 to
10 p.m. on July 3, 2023, or a rain date
of July 5, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0192 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Dylan Caikowski,
Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (215) 271–4814, email
SecDelBayWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On February 18, 2023, Lower
Township, New Jersey, notified the
Coast Guard that it will be conducting
a fireworks display from 9:30 to 9:50
p.m. on July 3, 2023, or a rain date of
July 5, 2023, to celebrate Independence
Day. The fireworks are to be launched
from a barge in the Delaware Bay
approximately 350 yards west of North
Cape May Beach, in Lower Township,
NJ. In response, on April 5, 2023, the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
Safety Zone; Delaware Bay, Lower
Township, NJ. There we stated why we
issued the NPRM and invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action
related to this fireworks display. During
the comment period that ended May 5,
2023, we received no comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because there is insufficient time to
allow for 30 days after publication. This
rule needs to be in force by July 3, 2023,
to ensure the safety of spectators and the
general public from hazards associated
with a barge-based fireworks display.
Hazards include accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and
falling hot embers or other debris.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP
has determined that potential hazards
associated with barge-based fireworks
display will be a safety concern for
anyone within 300 yards of the
fireworks barge. The purpose of this rule
is to ensure safety of vessels and the
navigable waters in the safety zone
before, during, and after a barge-based
fireworks display.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published
April 5, 2023. There are no changes in
the regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone from 9:15 to 10 p.m. on July
3, 2023, or a rain date of July 5, 2023.
The safety zone will cover all navigable
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38751
waters within 300 yards of a barge in the
Delaware Bay located at approximate
position latitude 38°59′7.08″ N,
longitude 074°57′49.47″ W. The
duration of the zone is intended to
ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled 9:30 p.m. to 9:50
p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the following factors: (1)
although persons and vessels may not
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone without
authorization from the COTP or a
designated representative, they may
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement period; (2) persons and
vessels will still be able to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area if authorized by the
COTP; and (3) the Coast Guard will
provide advance notification of the
safety zone to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38749-38751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0467]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone, Baltimore Harbor, MD.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for
navigable waters within Baltimore Northwest Harbor, across the West
channel, in the vicinity of North Locust Point Marine Terminal. The
security zone is needed to protect distinguished guests and attendees
during the commission of the USS CARL M. LEVIN (DDG 120). Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. until 1 p.m. on June 24,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0467 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email BM1 Michael Klopp, Sector Maryland-NCR, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard: telephone 410-576-2674, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The U.S. Navy informed the Coast Guard that the Commissioning of
the USS CARL M. LEVIN (DDG 120) will be held on June 24, 2023, in
Baltimore Harbor, MD. The commissioning will be in close proximity to
navigable waterways within the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National
Capital Region's Area of Responsibility, as set forth in 33 CFR 3.25-
15. On May 30, 2023, the U. S. Navy requested that a security zone be
established to be in effect before, during and after the commissioning
ceremony.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to
public interest to delay the effective date of this rule. Immediate
action is needed to mitigate potential terrorist acts and to enhance
public and maritime safety and security. The Coast Guard is unable to
publish an NPRM in time to publish a final rule due to the short time
period between May 30, 2023, when the event planners notified the Coast
Guard of the security posture for the event, and June 24, 2023, when
the security zone must be in effect Delaying the effective date to
publish an NPRM would be contrary to the security zone's intended
objectives of mitigating potential terrorist acts and enhancing public
and maritime safety and security. It is therefore impracticable to
publish an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action to restrict
vessel traffic is needed to protect life, property and the environment,
and delaying the effective date would frustrate the security zone's
intended objectives of mitigating potential terrorist acts and
enhancing public and maritime safety and security when the event takes
place.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard may issue security zone regulations under authority
in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-
National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that the commissioning of
a U.S. Naval Warship presents a potential target for terrorist attack,
sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or other causes of
similar nature. This rule is needed to protect distinguished guests and
attendants of the commissioning ceremony of the USS CARL M. LEVIN (DDG
120) as well as personnel in and around the commissioning site,
navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from 8 a.m. until 1 p.m. on
June 24, 2023. The security zone will cover all navigable waters from
North Locust Point Marine Terminal across West Channel Harbor to the
yacht basin Oasis Marina in Northwest Harbor, MD. The duration of the
zone is intended to protect personnel in and around the commissioning
site, navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the security zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and limited duration of the security zone. This zone impacts
a small, designated area of the Northwest Harbor for 5 hours.
[[Page 38750]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
security zone lasting only 5 hours that will prohibit entry within
certain navigable waters of the Patapsco River. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0467 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0467 Security Zone; Northwest Harbor, Baltimore, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable
waters of Northwest Harbor, encompassed by a line connecting the
following points beginning at 39[deg]16'21.32'' N, 076[deg]35'4.81'' W,
thence to 39[deg]16'33.74'' N, 076[deg]34'54.59'' W, thence to
39[deg]16'26.98'' N, 076[deg]34'43.79'' W, thence to 39[deg]16'26.18''
N, 076[deg]34'40.62'' W, thence to 39[deg]16'11.42'' N,
076[deg]34'46.56'' W, thence to 39[deg]16'10.56'' N, 076[deg]34'50.20''
W, and thence along the shore line back to the beginning point, located
at Baltimore, MD. These coordinates are based on WGS 84.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal,
State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) in the enforcement of the
security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the security zone must comply
[[Page 38751]]
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
until 1 p.m. on June 24, 2023.
Dated: June 8, 2023.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2023-12707 Filed 6-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P