Airworthiness Directives; Various Airplanes, Helicopters, and Engines, 37975-37985 [2023-12417]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
37975
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 112
Monday, June 12, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2022–0891; Project
Identifier AD–2022–00585–A,E,R;
Amendment 39–22432; AD 2023–09–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Various
Airplanes, Helicopters, and Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
turbocharged, reciprocating enginepowered airplanes and helicopters and
turbocharged, reciprocating engines
with a certain v-band coupling installed.
This AD was prompted by multiple
failures of spot-welded, multi-segment
v-band couplings at the tailpipe to the
turbocharger exhaust housing flange
(also referred to as ‘‘spot-welded, multisegment exhaust tailpipe v-band
SUMMARY:
coupling’’). This AD establishes a life
limit for the spot-welded, multi-segment
exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling and
requires repetitively inspecting the spotwelded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe
v-band coupling. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 17,
2023.
AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0891; or
in person at Docket Operations between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Teplik, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Central Certification Branch,
FAA, 1801 S Airport Road, Wichita, KS
67209; phone: (316) 946–4196; email:
thomas.teplik@faa.gov or Wichita-COS@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to turbocharged, reciprocating
engine-powered airplanes and
helicopters and turbocharged,
reciprocating engines with a certain vband coupling installed. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
July 27, 2022 (87 FR 45036). The NPRM
was prompted by multiple failures of
spot-welded, multi-segment v-band
couplings at the tailpipe to the
turbocharger exhaust housing flange. In
the NPRM, the FAA proposed to
establish a life limit for the spot-welded,
multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band
coupling and require repetitively
inspecting the spot-welded, multisegment exhaust tailpipe v-band
coupling.
Since the mid-1970s, failures of vband couplings that attach the exhaust
tailpipe to the turbocharger exhaust
outlet have resulted in a significant
number of incidents and accidents (fatal
and non-fatal) on both airplanes and
helicopters. Since 1974, National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
accident and incident investigations
have led to the issuance of 7 NTSB
Safety Recommendations concerning
exhaust systems and/or exhaust v-band
couplings; 20 FAA ADs to address the
unsafe condition with exhaust systems
and/or exhaust v-band couplings; and
10 FAA Special Airworthiness
Information Bulletins (SAIBs). Industry
has also taken action to raise awareness
of the concerns associated with v-band
coupling failures.
NTSB SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS AFFECTING V-BAND COUPLINGS
NTSB safety recommendation
A–90–166
A–90–165
A–90–164
A–88–151
A–88–150
A–88–147
A–74–099
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
Description
Exhaust system ...................................................
Exhaust system ...................................................
Exhaust system ...................................................
Exhaust system ...................................................
Exhaust system ...................................................
Exhaust system ...................................................
V-band engine exhaust clamp failures ................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
You may examine these NTSB Safety
Recommendations in the AD docket at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Make/model
Jkt 259001
Piper PA–32RT–300T, PA–32R–301T.
Piper PA–32RT–300T, PA–32R–301T.
Piper PA–32RT–300T, PA–32R–301T.
Piper PA–32RT–300T.
Piper PA–32RT–300T.
Piper PA–32RT–300T.
Textron (Cessna) turbocharged 300/400 series.
regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0891.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37976
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ADS ON V-BAND COUPLINGS
AD
Make/model
AD 2018–06–11, Amendment 39–
19231 (83 FR 13383, March 29,
2018).
AD 2014–23–03, Amendment 39–
18019 (79 FR 67340, November
13, 2014).
AD 2013–10–04, Amendment 39–
17457 (78 FR 35110, June 12,
2013; corrected September 5, 2013
(78 FR 54561)).
AD 2010–13–07, Amendment 39–
16338 (75 FR 35619, June 23,
2010; corrected July 26, 2010 (75
FR 43397)).
AD 2004–23–17, Amendment 39–
13872 (69 FR 67809, November
22, 2004).
AD 2001–08–08, Amendment 39–
12185 (66 FR 20192, April 20,
2001).
Textron Aviation Inc. Model A36TC and B36TC airplanes, all serial numbers, equipped with a
turbocharged engine; Textron Aviation Inc. Model S35, V35, V35A, and V35B airplanes, all serial
numbers, equipped with the Continental TSIO–520–D engine with AiResearch turbocharger during
manufacture; and Textron Aviation Inc. Model S35, V35, V35A, and V35B airplanes, all serial numbers, equipped with Standard Aero Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA1035WE.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA–31P airplanes, serial numbers 31P–1 through 31P–80 and 31P–7300110
through 31P–7730012.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA–31, PA–31–325, and PA–31–350 airplanes, all serial numbers.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA–32R–301T airplanes, serial numbers 3257001 through 3257311; and
Model PA–46–350P airplanes, serial numbers 4622001 through 4622200 and 4636001 through
4636341.
Mooney Airplane Company Inc. (currently Mooney International Corporation) Model M20M airplanes, serial numbers 27–0001 through 27–0321.
Raytheon Aircraft Company (previously The Beech Aircraft Corporation; currently Textron Aviation Inc.)
Model 35–C33A, E33A, E33C, F33A, F33C, S35, V35, V35A, V35B, 36, and A36 airplanes, all serial
numbers, with Tornado Alley Turbo, Inc. STC SA5223NM and STC SE5222NM incorporated and with
a Teledyne Continental engine equipped with a turbonormalizing system.
Commander Aircraft Company Model 114TC airplanes, serial numbers 20001 through 20027.
AD 2000–11–04, Amendment 39–
11752 (65 FR 34941, June 1, 2000).
AD 2000–01–16, Amendment 39–
Cessna Aircraft Company (currently Textron Aviation Inc.) Model T310P, T310Q, T310R, 320, 320A,
11514 (65 FR 2844, January 19,
320B, 320C, 320D, 320E, 320F, 320–1, 335, 340, 340A, 321 (Navy OE–2), 401, 401A, 401B, 402,
2000).
402A, 402B, 402C, 404, 411, 411A, 414, 414A, 421, 421A, 421B, and 421C airplanes, all serial numbers.
AD 91–21–01 R1, Amendment 39–
Textron Lycoming Model TIO–540–S1AD reciprocating engines installed on, but not limited to, Piper Air9470 (61 FR 29003, June 7, 1996;
craft, Inc. PA–32 series airplanes.
corrected September 6, 1996 (61
FR 47051)).
AD 81–23–03 R2, Amendment 39–
Cessna (currently Textron Aviation Inc.) Model P210N airplanes, serial numbers P21000001 through
4491 (47 FR 51101, November 12,
P21000811.
1982).
These ADs require v-band coupling
replacements (life limit) and/or
repetitive inspections, or changing the
type design of the v-band coupling. This
AD does not apply to airplanes that
have complied with one of these ADs.
You may examine these ADs in the AD
docket at regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2022–
0891.
SAIBS ON V-BAND COUPLINGS
SAIB
Subject
CE–18–21 .........
Exhaust Turbochargers; Announce the availability of the ‘‘Best Practices Guide for Maintaining Exhaust System Turbocharger
to Tailpipe V-band Couplings/Clamps.’’
Exhaust Turbocharger; V-band Couplings Used in Engine Exhaust Systems on Turbocharged Reciprocating Engine Powered
Aircraft.
Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings [for turbocharged, reciprocating engine-powered airplanes].
Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings [for Cessna Aircraft Company (currently Textron Aviation Inc.) Model T206H airplanes].
Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings [for Cessna Aircraft Company (currently Textron Aviation Inc.) Model T206H airplanes].
Engine Exhaust [for reciprocating engine-powered airplanes].
Engine Exhaust [for reciprocating engine-powered airplanes].
Turbocharged Engines [for turbocharged engine-powered airplanes].
Alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to AD 91–03–15, Amendment 39–6870 (56 FR 3025, January 28, 1991) for Mooney Aircraft Corporation Model M20M airplanes.
Exhaust System Components for reciprocating engine-powered airplanes.
Mooney Model M20M airplanes with turbocharged engines using V-band clamps.
CE–18–07 .........
CE–13–45 .........
CE–13–07R1 ....
CE–13–07 .........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
CE–10–33R1 ....
CE–10–33 .........
CE–09–11 .........
CE–05–13 .........
CE–04–22 .........
CE–03–46 .........
You may examine these SAIBs in the
AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2022–0891.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
In spite of these efforts, failures
continue to occur and the number of
significant safety events continues to
increase. As a result, the General
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GA–
JSC), which is comprised of both the
FAA and industry, developed a working
group to study v-band coupling failures
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37977
associated with turbocharged
reciprocating engine-powered aircraft
and develop recommended corrective
actions. This v-band coupling working
group was comprised of aviation
industry manufacturers, type/user
groups, and government entities. The
working group was tasked to examine
the turbocharger to tailpipe interface
and develop recommendations to
enhance the safety of the fleet.
The working group recommended
mandatory corrective actions that are
tailored to each specific coupling type
(spot-welded, riveted, or single piece),
thereby minimizing the impact to
owner/operators. The working group
recommended a mandatory coupling
replacement time (life limit) and annual
inspection. The working group also
recommended non-mandatory actions to
aid and educate maintenance personnel
in appropriate v-band coupling removal,
installation, and inspection practices.
Finally, the working group
recommended actions for new designs,
which incorporate lessons learned from
review of the in-service fleet. For new
designs incorporating a v-band coupling
immediately downstream of the
turbocharger exhaust discharge, the
working group recommended that a
replacement interval (500 hours for
spot-welded and 2,000 hours for riveted
and single-piece) be incorporated in the
Airworthiness Limitations sections of
the maintenance manual.
In January 2018, the working group
published a final report titled ‘‘Exhaust
System Turbocharger to Tailpipe V-
band Coupling/Clamp Working Group
Final Report’’ (final report). Appendix B
of the final report contains the Best
Practices Guide. The final report may be
found in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0891.
The final report concluded that the
common denominator in the incidents
and accidents reviewed is the spotwelded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe
v-band coupling (see Figure A). These
couplings come in either two or three
segment varieties. The segments are the
number of v-retainer segments, which
are attached to the outer band via spot
welds. Although multi-segment exhaust
tailpipe couplings can also be riveted,
the riveted couplings do not create an
unsafe condition.
The majority of the events studied by
the working group indicated fatigue
failure of spot-welded, multi-segment
exhaust tailpipe v-band couplings as a
result of stress corrosion cracking that
originated at or near a spot weld. This
is the same unsafe condition identified
in the other v-band coupling AD actions
previously referenced. The data studied
by the working group contained
evidence of pre-existing cracking of the
couplings, known embrittlement at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
ER12JN23.076</GPH>
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
37978
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
spot weld locations simply due to that
manufacturing method, and outer band
cupping on the multi-segment couplings
(which is the result of age, over-use, and
potential over-torqueing). The working
group also found that many of the
couplings had safety wire across the bolt
end. The safety wire could be helpful if
there was a bolt or nut failure
(extremely rare events) or the nut was
missing. However, the safety wire was
of no value when the failure was
transverse band cracking and total
separation at the spot weld. The data
studied by the working group indicated
many accidents were due to v-band
couplings that were of the multisegment, spot-welded design, when
used in a specific location (the tailpipe
to the turbocharger exhaust housing
flange on turbocharged reciprocating
engine-powered aircraft).
After the working group published the
final report, the FAA issued SAIB CE–
18–21, dated July 13, 2018. This SAIB
announced the availability of the Best
Practices Guide from the final report
and recommended the public apply the
best practices in the maintenance of
turbocharged reciprocating engine
powered aircraft. The FAA also assessed
the recommendations contained in the
final report and determined an unsafe
condition exists in turbocharged
reciprocating engine-powered aircraft
with a spot-welded, multi-segment vband coupling installed. Because these
v-band couplings are widely used by
many design approval holders on
various models (engines and aircraft),
several Aircraft Certification Office
Branches were involved in the decision
to propose a single AD. The FAA also
determined that the corrective actions
recommended in the final report were
appropriate to address this unsafe
condition.
This condition, if not addressed,
could lead to failure of the spot-welded,
multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band
coupling, leading to detachment of the
exhaust tailpipe from the turbocharger
and allowing high-temperature exhaust
gases to enter the engine compartment.
This could result in smoke in the
cockpit, in-flight fire, and loss of control
of the aircraft. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness
Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from 32
commenters. The commenters were
Aerostar Aircraft Corporation (Aerostar),
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), NTSB, Vulcanair S.p.A, and 28
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
individuals. The NTSB and four
individual commenters supported the
AD without change. Aerostar, EASA,
Vulcanair S.p.A., and 19 individual
commenters do not necessarily oppose
the NPRM but recommended certain
changes. Five individual commenters
oppose the proposal in its entirety. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
The FAA disagrees. The FAA Office
of Aviation Policy and Plans provides
the labor rate of $85 per work-hour used
when estimating the labor costs for
complying with AD requirements. The
estimate for the records review rate was
based on 1⁄2 hour at $85 per work-hour.
The FAA has not changed this AD as
a result of these comments.
A. Requests Regarding Withdrawing the
NPRM
Two individual commenters
requested changes regarding the
estimated costs in the NPRM for
removal and replacement of v-band
couplings. One of those commenters
stated that there could be a discrepancy
in the estimated costs per owner/
operator. This commenter stated that the
estimated figures did not appear to be
unduly expensive in the interest of
preventing a potential in-flight fire. The
FAA infers that this commenter is
requesting a revision to the estimated
costs for removal and replacement of a
v-band coupling based on the requested
review of the cost estimates.
The other individual commenter
encouraged the FAA to increase the
estimated cost in the NPRM for
replacement of a v-band coupling and
provided a cost of over $700 for the
Piper Model PA–28R–201 airplane vband coupling. The FAA infers that the
commenter is referring to the estimated
parts cost of $400 for a single-engine
aircraft.
The FAA acknowledges that there
may be discrepancies in the estimated
costs among owners/operators for
removing and replacing a v-band
coupling. The FAA’s estimated number
of work-hours were based on the actions
required in AD 2018–06–11 and the
parts costs were based on current
pricing. Additional labor and parts costs
were added for twin-engine aircraft. In
the NPRM, the FAA estimated costs in
single-engine and twin-engine aircraft.
The FAA disagrees that the cost of the
v-band coupling needs to be increased.
The estimated v-band coupling cost of
$400 for a single-engine aircraft was
based on a sampling of a range of parts
costs for different aircraft. The FAA
determined that $400 was an accurate
parts cost for a single-engine aircraft.
The FAA has not changed this AD as
a result of these comments.
Three individual commenters stated
that current inspections are adequate
and implied that they opposed the
NPRM. Two other individual
commenters stated that they opposed
the NPRM. One of the commentors
implied current inspections were
sufficient and stated inspections of the
v-band clamp at each oil change and oncondition replacement would be
enough. One of the commenters who
opposed the NPRM in its entirety also
requested that information regarding
exhaust couplers be added to FAA
Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13–1B,
Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and
Practices—Aircraft Inspection and
Repair, dated September 8, 1998 (AC
43.13–1B). The FAA infers that these
commenters are requesting that the
NPRM be withdrawn.
The FAA disagrees. This AD requires
specific inspections that are not
included in current inspections. The
accident and incident failure data and
existing ADs that are included in
paragraphs (d) (1) through (10) of this
AD demonstrate that a 500-hour time-inservice (TIS) life limit is appropriate for
this type of multi-segment coupling.
Regarding the request to revise AC
43.13–1B, that change is outside the
scope of this AD and actions in an
advisory circular provide guidance but
are not mandatory.
The FAA has not changed this AD as
a result of these comments.
B. Requests Regarding Estimated Costs
1. Increase Work-Hour Rate
Three individual commenters
requested that the FAA increase the cost
per work-hour specified in the NPRM.
These commenters stated that $85 per
work-hour is too low and does not
reflect the true rate charged by their
local maintenance facilities, which
ranges from $100 to $140 per workhour. One of these commenters also
reported that the estimated records
review rate of $42.50 was not supported
by industry practice and should be
increased.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Increase V-Band Coupling Removal
and Replacement Costs
C. Requests Regarding Life Limit
1. Clarification of Mitigation for
Installation of a V-Band Coupling That
Exceeds 500-Hours TIS
EASA suggested that there should be
a mitigation of risk in place if a v-band
coupling having 500 or more hours TIS
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
as of the effective date of the final rule
is installed on an aircraft. EASA noted
that paragraph (l)(1) of the proposed AD
would allow the installation of a used
v-band coupling of any age (i.e., more
than 500 hours TIS) within the first two
years after the effective date of the final
rule. EASA asked if requiring the
repetitive inspections specified in
paragraph (i)(2) of the proposed AD
would mitigate this risk or,
alternatively, if there should be a
prohibition of the installation of a vband coupling that has accumulated 500
or more hours TIS as of the effective
date of the final rule.
The FAA does not agree. The FAA
provides mitigation for the risk
associated with installing a v-band
coupling having 500 or more hours TIS
by requiring inspections every 6 months
or every 100 hours TIS, whichever
occurs first, for two years after the
effective date of this AD. The
inspections and inspection criteria are
the same for the v-band couplings
regardless of the inspection time
interval. Paragraph (i)(2) of this AD was
provided to allow compliance with the
requirements of this AD with regards to
hardware availability.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
2. Justification for 500-Hour TIS Life
Limit
An anonymous commenter requested
justification for the v-band coupling
500-hour TIS life limit specified in the
NPRM and stated that the 500-hour TIS
life limit seemed low. In regards to the
study of accident rates where failure of
the v-band coupling was determined to
be at fault, the commenter asked how
many hours the v-band coupling had
accumulated since its initial
installation. The commenter also
inquired about the failure rate of higher
grade material v-band couplings and
asked if higher grade v-band coupling
material would have an effect on the
failure rate.
The FAA determined the 500-hour
TIS v-band coupling replacement time
is necessary to correct the unsafe
condition. The FAA based this
determination on past precedence of
some of the existing ADs that are
included in paragraphs (d)(1) through
(10) of this AD. The v-band couplings
addressed in this AD are of similar steel
material. The FAA has an obligation to
issue an AD to address an unsafe
condition. This AD addresses the unsafe
condition through repetitive inspections
and replacements. The FAA would
consider any future design
improvements as an AMOC following
the procedures outlined in paragraph (n)
of this AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
3. Replacement of V-Band Coupling
Solely Based on Hours TIS
Two commenters did not agree with
the replacement of the v-band coupling
based solely on flight hours (v-band
coupling hours TIS). One commenter
asserted the inspections specified in the
proposed AD were adequate to uncover
defects that would require replacing a vband coupling and stated if a v-band
clamp continuously passes inspection,
there is no reason to discard it based on
TIS. The other commenter stated that vband couplings on its helicopters are
already inspected for cracking, and the
surrounding area is inspected for signs
of cracking or soot, as part of pre-flight
inspections. This commenter also stated
that Enstrom Helicopter Corporation
issued Service Directive Bulletin 0122
(Enstrom SDB 0122) that addresses
inspections for cracks.
The FAA disagrees with removing the
requirement in paragraph (i) of this AD
to replace a v-band coupling before it
accumulates 500 hours TIS and instead
allowing on-condition replacement
based upon inspection results. The
accident/incident failure rate and
existing ADs that are included in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this
AD demonstrate that a 500-hour TIS life
limit is appropriate for this type of
multi-segment v-band coupling.
Regarding Enstrom SDB 0122, the FAA
has not issued an AD that mandates
using that service information.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to these comments.
D. Requests Regarding V-Band
Coupling Serialization
Two individual commenters
recommended serialization of the vband coupling.
One of those commenters stated it
would be difficult to determine the total
hours TIS unless these parts are
serialized. The other commenter
recommended serialization by vibroetching the tailpipe v-band coupling to
differentiate it from v-band couplings in
other locations of an aircraft.
The FAA disagrees that determination
of a v-band coupling’s hours TIS cannot
be done without serialization either by
vibro-etching or other means. Existing
ADs that are included in paragraphs
(d)(1) through (10) of this AD, regarding
a v-band coupling with life limits have
not required serialization. Once the
hours TIS of a v-band coupling is
established, subsequent maintenance
actions will be based on hours TIS.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to these comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37979
E. Requests Regarding V-Band Coupling:
Type Design and Manufacturing
One individual commenter stated that
instead of being spot-welded, the rings
(v-band couplings) should be solid state
welded. This commenter researched
spot-welded couplings that revealed if
the heat and pressure on the metal prior
to the spot-weld is not consistent, the
spot-weld will fail. Another individual
commenter stated that spot-welds are
good in tension and not in shear. The
commenter further explained that as the
v-band coupling is tightened, the spotweld is in shear, and that adding
dynamic loads reduces the spot-weld’s
life even further. This commenter
suggested that a different type of
attachment be used such as a braze joint
or a laser weld.
Regarding the type design changes, an
individual commenter asked if the
installation of a riveted clamp would
terminate the 500-hour TIS replacement
schedule. Another individual
commenter recommended using the vband coupling information in Navair
Technical Manual 1–1A–8,
‘‘Engineering Manual Series Aircraft
and Missile Repair, Structural
Hardware,’’ which is used by the
military, and adding this information to
AC 43.13–1B. Another individual
commenter stated that additional
information on v-band couplings can be
found in military specifications
MS27116C, ‘‘Coupling, Clamp, Grooved,
V Band 1.750 To 14.250 Flange OD
(Minus 320 Deg. To Plus 1500 Deg. F),’’
and MIL–DTL–27536C, ‘‘Coupling,
Clamp, Grooved, V-Band.’’ A different
individual commenter suggested that by
allowing a small [tungsten inert gas] TIG
weld on the edges of the clamp, the
concern regarding the spot welds
holding would be addressed. An
additional individual commenter
referenced an unspecified photo linked
to the NPRM and said it was not
representative of current v-band
coupling design.
An individual commenter stated that
during manufacturing, the single spotwelds might be placed too close to the
trunnions, thereby causing failure
points. This commenter suggested using
a total of four spot-welds instead of two
spot-welds. The FAA infers that the
commenter is requesting a change to the
manufacturing of the v-band coupling.
The FAA has determined that
inspections, in combination with life
limits, are sufficient to mitigate the risk.
The FAA would consider any future
design improvements as an AMOC
request following the procedures
outlined in paragraph (n) of this AD.
Regarding the proposed revision to AC
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37980
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
43.13–1B, that change is outside the
scope of this AD and actions in an
advisory circular are recommendations,
not mandatory.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to these comments.
F. Request for Clarification Regarding
the Number/Percentage of In-Flight
Smoke and/or Fire Events
An individual commenter requested
clarification regarding the number or
percentage of in-flight smoke and/or fire
events related to the NPRM.
The FAA does not have data
indicating the specific number or
percentage of incidents/accidents in
which the v-band coupling failure
caused a smoke event or an in-flight fire.
At least one fatal accident and two nonfatal accidents involving a v-band
coupling failure had occurrences of a
fire. Smoke or fire could occur due to
a separation of the v-band coupling or
loss of the tailpipe because of the hot
exhaust gases impinging on surrounding
surfaces. This information was included
in the FAA’s determination that an
unsafe condition existed to justify
issuing this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD as
a result of this comment.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
G. Requests Regarding Applicability
1. Remove Airplanes With STC
SA4976NM Installed
Aerostar explained that airplanes with
STC SA4976NM installed have
eliminated the v-band coupling at the
tailpipe to turbocharger connections and
are not affected by the unsafe condition
described in the proposed AD. Aerostar
stated that STC SA4976NM was
approved as an AMOC for the repetitive
inspections required by AD 90–01–02,
Amendment 39–6517, January 5, 1990
(issued as a priority letter), that required
repetitive dismantling inspections of the
exhaust tailpipe assembly at intervals
not to exceed 50-hours TIS. The FAA
infers that Aerostar requested a change
to the Applicability in the proposed AD
to remove airplanes with STC
SA4976NM installed.
The FAA agrees. The installation of
STC SA4976NM on Aerostar Model PA–
600, –601, –601P, –602P and –700P
airplanes eliminates the v-band
coupling at the tailpipe to turbocharger
connection. Paragraph (d),
Applicability, of this AD was revised to
add STC SA4976NM to the list of
airplanes excepted from the
applicability.
2. Remove Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B
From the Applicability
Vulcanair requested that Vulcanair
S.p.A Model P.68B airplanes be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
removed from the Applicability Table in
paragraph (d) of the proposed AD. The
commenter stated Vulcanair S.p.A
Model P.68B airplanes are equipped
with two normally aspirated
reciprocating engines.
The FAA agrees and revised Table 1
to paragraph (d) of this AD to remove
Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B airplanes.
FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet A31EU
lists the Model P.68B airplane as
equipped with two Lycoming IO–360–
A1B or Lycoming IO–360–A1B6
engines, which are normally aspirated.
If the airplane is modified after
certification by an STC, parts
manufacturer approval, or field
approval, with a turbocharged
reciprocating engine with a spotwelded, multi-segment v-band coupling
installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger
exhaust housing flange, this AD is
applicable.
3. Add Textron Aviation Inc. Model
T182 and TR182 Airplanes Equipped
With Lycoming O–540–L3C5D Engines
An individual commenter asked why
Model T182 and TR182 airplanes
equipped with Lycoming O–540–L3C5D
engines were not included in the
applicability of the proposed AD. The
FAA infers that this commenter is
requesting that these airplane and
engine combinations be added to the
applicability of the proposed AD.
The FAA agrees that these airplane
models are affected by the requirements
of this AD but a change to this AD is not
necessary because Table 1 to paragraph
(d) of this AD already includes Model
T182 and TR182 airplanes.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
4. Add Mooney Model M20F Airplanes
With Aftermarket Installation
An individual commenter asked if
Model M20F airplanes with an
aftermarket RayJay normalizing
turbocharger are included in the
applicability of the proposed AD. The
FAA infers that this commenter is
requesting that the applicability of the
proposed AD be revised to include these
airplane models.
The FAA disagrees with adding the
Mooney Model M20F airplanes
equipped with an aftermarket RayJay
normalizing turbocharger to the
applicability of this AD because the
FAA could not determine the STC that
was being referred to. However, based
on the way the final rule is written with
language of ‘‘as installed, but not
limited to the following aircraft’’, this
AD would still apply to all
turbocharged, reciprocating enginepowered airplanes and helicopters and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
turbocharged, reciprocating engines
with a spot-welded, multi-segment vband coupling installed at the tailpipe
to turbocharger exhaust housing flange,
except for airplanes that are in
compliance with an AD listed in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this
AD or have STC SA4976NM installed.
These ADs are available in the AD
docket at regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2022–
0891. These v-band couplings are
installed on, but not limited to, the
products listed in Table 1 to paragraph
(d) of this AD. This AD would apply
regardless of whether the turbocharger
is installed as part of the type certificate,
or under an STC, parts manufacture
approval, or field approval. Outside of
type certification, it is the responsibility
of the owner working with a licensed
mechanic to determine if the
configuration of the aircraft includes the
spot-welded multi segment v-band
coupling installed at the tailpipe to the
turbocharger exhaust housing.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
5. Add Turbine Helicopters With
V-Band Clamps
An individual commenter asked if the
NPRM needed to address v-band
couplings installed on turbine
helicopters. The FAA infers that the
commenter requested to add turbine
helicopters to the applicability of the
proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees. The use of the vband couplings on turbine helicopters is
not addressed in this AD. This AD
addresses the unsafe condition for spotwelded, multi-segment v-band coupling
installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger
exhaust housing flange for
turbocharged, reciprocating enginepowered airplanes and helicopters and
turbocharged, reciprocating engines.
The vibratory environment for turbine
engines on helicopters is different and
as such is not part of the identified
unsafe condition.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
6. No Justification for Mooney Model
M20K Airplanes
An individual commenter stated that
there is not enough information to
justify an AD for a Mooney Model M20K
airplane. The commenter cited FAA
SAIB CE–18–07, ‘‘Exhaust
Turbocharger; V-band Couplings Used
in Exhaust Systems on Turbocharged
Reciprocating Engine Powered
Aircraft,’’ dated December 14, 2017
(SAIB CE–18–07), which states the
‘‘concern [was] not considered an
unsafe condition that would warrant AD
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
action.’’ The commenter also stated that
a review of the FAA’s Aviation Safety
Information Analysis and Sharing
System and the NTSB’s Accident
Database could not find any serious
incidents involving defective v-band
couplings on Mooney Model M20K
airplanes. The commenter supported an
inspection regime and includes it in the
pre-flight check and does an unspecified
inspection of the v-band coupling at
each oil change when the turbo is easily
accessible. The commenter explained
that there is a difference between ‘‘big
block’’ 520–550 cubic-inch engines and
smaller 360 turbocharged engines, and
that the NTSB safety recommendations
referred to in the NPRM refer to the ‘‘big
block’’ engines. The commenter also
pointed out that all of the ADs specified
in the proposed AD apply to larger
displacement turbocharged
reciprocating engines.
The FAA disagrees that there is not
enough justification to include Mooney
Model M20K airplanes in the
applicability of this AD. When SAIB
CE–18–07 was issued, the FAA was still
evaluating this issue and had not
determined that there was an unsafe
condition warranting AD action. The vband couplings that are the subject of
this AD are used on both larger and
smaller engines, and the inspections
proposed in the NPRM are not part of
current inspection criteria. The
accident/incident failure data and
existing AD actions demonstrate that a
500-hour TIS life limit is appropriate for
this type of multi-segment coupling and
that an unsafe condition exists.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
H. Requests Regarding Inspections
1. Revise Paragraph (j) of the Proposed
AD To Separate Compliance Times
From Inspection Procedures
EASA requested that paragraph (j) of
the proposed AD, ‘‘Inspections Without
Removal of the V-Band Coupling,’’ be
separated into two paragraphs with one
paragraph containing the requirement
for an annual inspection with references
to both an inspection with the v-band
coupling removed and an inspection
with the v-band coupling installed, and
the other paragraph containing the
inspection procedure. The commenter
stated that having the inspection
timeline and the inspection procedures
in the same paragraph may cause
confusion.
The FAA agrees that having the
inspection compliance times and
inspection procedures in the same
paragraph could cause confusion. The
FAA added paragraph (j), ‘‘V-band
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
Coupling Inspections,’’ in this AD to
specify only the inspection compliance
times and re-designated the subsequent
paragraphs accordingly. Paragraph (i)(2)
of this AD still provides an alternative
to initially removing the v-band
coupling from service by doing the
inspections required by paragraphs
(k)(1) through (7) or (l) of this AD.
2. Remove Paragraph (j) of the Proposed
AD
EASA requested that paragraph (j) of
the proposed AD, ‘‘Inspections Without
Removal of the V-Band Coupling,’’ be
removed because it is not possible to do
a thorough inspection with the v-band
coupling installed.
The FAA disagrees. The procedures
that the FAA included for the
inspection of an installed v-band
coupling were tested and it was
determined that these procedures are
adequate to verify the condition of the
v-band coupling. If any of the inspection
criteria for an installed v-band coupling
are not met, the v-band coupling is
required to either be replaced or
undergo additional inspections with the
v-band coupling removed. These
procedures have been used with success
in existing ADs that are included in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this
AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
3. Request To Revise Paragraph (j)(3) of
the Proposed AD
An individual commenter requested
that paragraph (j)(3) of the proposed AD
be moved to paragraph (k) of the
proposed AD. The commenter stated
that it could not be determined if the vsegments are loose with respect to the
outer band with the outer band T-bolt
torqued to specification. The commenter
requested this inspection be moved to
paragraph (j) after the v-band coupling
is removed.
The FAA disagrees with moving this
inspection from paragraph (j)(3) of the
proposed AD to paragraph (k) of this
AD. Looseness of the v-band coupling
may occur if the coupling is not
properly installed. Looseness of the
outer band may occur if the outer band
has separated from the v-band retainer
segment or if the spot weld attachment
is in the process of failing or has failed.
Therefore, this inspection must be done
without removing the v-band coupling.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
4. Include a Non-Destructive Inspection
An individual commenter requested
the FAA consider adding a requirement
for a non-destructive inspection (NDI).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37981
The commenter stated the clamps are
constantly stressed even in the absence
of heat cycling.
The FAA disagrees with adding a
requirement for an NDI to this AD. Due
to the various v-band couplings, an NDI
would have to be determined by the vband coupling manufacturer and the
FAA has determined that the visual
inspections along with replacements
will mitigate the unsafe condition.
However, additional inspections are
acceptable as long as they do not
conflict with the visual inspection
requirements, replacement, and life
limit requirements of this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
5. Insufficient Justification for
Paragraph (j) of the Proposed AD
An individual commenter believed
that there is not enough data to justify
an AD, specifically for paragraph (j) of
the proposed AD regarding repetitive
inspections of v-band couplings. The
commenter cited multiple examples
where root cause analysis was
determined in other AD actions. The
commenter stated that the FAA has not
made a determination of what the root
cause is for the proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees that there is no
root cause for this AD. The FAA issues
an AD when an unsafe condition is
found. The unsafe condition addressed
by this AD is fatigue failure of spotwelded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe
v-band couplings as a result of stress
corrosion cracking that originated at or
near a spot weld. As stated in the
Background, the data studied by the
working group contained evidence of
pre-existing cracking of the couplings,
known embrittlement at the spot weld
locations simply due to that
manufacturing method, and outer band
cupping on the multi-segment couplings
(which is the result of age, over-use, and
potential over-torqueing). These are the
root causes of the unsafe condition.
Current inspection procedures are
inadequate to detect these cracks in a
timely manner. Accordingly, the FAA is
mandating inspection procedures and a
life limit to protect the fleet. The life
limit and inspections directly address
the unsafe condition, have been used in
previous ADs, and therefore are
appropriate for this type of multisegment coupling.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
regard to this comment.
I. Request To Use Generic Terms in
Paragraph (k) of the Proposed AD
EASA suggested that generic terms be
used in paragraph (k)(1)(i) of the
proposed AD, such as ‘‘fine abrasive
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37982
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
cloth and mineral spirits’’ instead of
‘‘crocus cloth and mineral spirits or
Stoddard solvent’’ because the current
terminology in the proposed AD might
not be recognized outside of the United
States.
The FAA partially agrees. The term
‘‘crocus cloth’’ is a general term and not
specific. The term ‘‘Stoddard solvent’’
refers to the original developer of the
solvent. This AD already includes the
term ‘‘mineral spirts.’’ The FAA revised
paragraph (l)(1)(i) of this AD to include
‘‘crocus cloth or fine abrasive cloth and
mineral spirits or Stoddard solvent.’’
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered any comments received, and
determined that air safety requires
adopting this AD as proposed.
Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products. Except for changes described
previously, this AD is adopted as
proposed in the NPRM. None of the
changes will increase the economic
burden on any operator.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects up to 41,058 airplanes,
helicopters, and engines (products of
U.S. registry). The FAA has no way of
determining the number of these
products that could have an affected
spot-welded, multi-segment v-band
coupling installed. The FAA’s estimated
cost on U.S. operators reflects the
maximum possible cost based on the
41,058 products of U.S. registry. Based
on this, the FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this AD:
The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Parts
cost
Action
Labor cost
Aircraft records review ....................................
Removal of the coupling from service and replacement (single-engine aircraft).
Removal of the couplings from service and
replacement (twin-engine aircraft).
Inspection of the coupling without removal
(single-engine aircraft).
Inspection of the couplings without removal
(twin-engine aircraft).
0.5 work hour × $85 = $42.50
2 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $170.
4 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $340.
0.5 work-hour × $85 per hour
= $42.50.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour =
$85.
Number
of U.S.
products
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
N/A
$400
$42.50 ....................................
$570 .......................................
41,058
31,248
$1,744,965.
$17,811,360.
800
$1,140 ....................................
9,810
$11,183,400.
N/A
$42.50 per inspection cycle ...
31,248
N/A
$85 per inspection cycle ........
9,810
$1,328,040 per inspection
cycle.
$833,850 per inspection
cycle.
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection of the coupling, including removal and reinstallation (single-engine aircraft) .............
1.5 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$127.50.
3 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$255.
Inspection of the couplings, including removal and reinstallation (twin-engine aircraft) ..............
This AD provides operators the option
of performing an inspection with the
coupling removed from the aircraft
instead of an inspection of the coupling
without removing it from the aircraft. In
some cases, an inspection with the
coupling removed may be required.
A coupling may need to be removed
from service before it reaches its 500hour TIS life limit if it does not meet all
of the inspection criteria at each
inspection. The FAA has no way of
determining the number of products
that may need to remove the coupling
from service before reaching its 500hour TIS life limit.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
Parts cost
Cost per
product
N/A
$127.50
N/A
255
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
The Amendment
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2023–09–09 Various Airplanes,
Helicopters, and Engines: Amendment
39 22432; Docket No. FAA–2022–0891;
Project Identifier AD–2022–00585–
A,E,R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective July 17, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Definitions
(1) For purposes of this AD, a ‘‘v-band
coupling’’ means a spot-welded, multisegment v-band coupling installed at the
tailpipe to turbocharger exhaust housing
flange.
(2) For purposes of this AD, ‘‘new’’ means
zero hours time-in-service (TIS).
(d) Applicability
This AD applies to all turbocharged,
reciprocating engine-powered airplanes and
helicopters and turbocharged, reciprocating
engines, certificated in any category, with a
spot-welded, multi-segment v-band coupling
installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger
exhaust housing flange, except for airplanes
that are in compliance with an AD listed in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this AD, or
have the supplemental type certificate (STC)
listed in paragraph (d)(11) of this AD
installed. These v-band couplings are
installed on, but not limited to, the products
listed in Table 1 to paragraph (d) of this AD.
(1) AD 2018–06–11, Amendment 39–19231
(83 FR 13383, March 29, 2018).
(2) AD 2014–23–03, Amendment 39–18019
(79 FR 67340, November 13, 2014).
37983
(3) AD 2013–10–04, Amendment 39–17457
(78 FR 35110, June 12, 2013; corrected
September 5, 2013 (78 FR 54561)).
(4) AD 2010–13–07, Amendment 39–16338
(75 FR 35619, June 23, 2010; corrected July
26, 2010 (75 FR 43397)).
(5) AD 2004–23–17, Amendment 39–13872
(69 FR 67809, November 22, 2004).
(6) AD 2001–08–08, Amendment 39–12185
(66 FR 20192, April 20, 2001).
(7) AD 2000–11–04, Amendment 39–11752
(65 FR 34941, June 1, 2000).
(8) AD 2000–01–16, Amendment 39–11514
(65 FR 2844, January 19, 2000).
(9) AD 91–21–01 R1, Amendment 39–9470
(61 FR 29003, June 7, 1996; corrected
September 6, 1996 (61 FR 47051)).
(10) AD 81–23–03 R2, Amendment 39–
4491 (47 FR 51101, November 12, 1982).
(11) STC Number SA4976NM for Type
Certificate Number: A17WE, Make: Aerostar,
Model: PA–60–600, –601, –601P, –602P, and
–700P.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—APPLICABILITY INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING AIRPLANES,
HELICOPTERS, AND ENGINES WHEN TURBOCHARGED
Type certificate holder
Model
Aerostar Aircraft Corporation .........................................
B–N Group Ltd. (formerly Pilatus Britten-Norman Limited).
Cirrus Design Corporation ..............................................
Commander Aircraft Corporation (formerly CPAC, Inc.;
Commander Aircraft Company; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation; Gulfstream American Corporation; and Rockwell International, Commander Aircraft
Division).
Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc. (formerly
Continental Motors, Inc., and Teledyne Continental
Motors).
Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A .......................
Daher Aerospace (formerly SOCATA and SOCATA—
Groupe AEROSPATIALE).
Diamond Aircraft Industries Inc. (formerly Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH).
The Enstrom Helicopter Corporation ..............................
Helio Aircraft LLC ...........................................................
Helio Alaska, Inc ............................................................
The King’s Engineering Fellowship (formerly EvangelAir).
Lycoming Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming) ............
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Maule Aerospace Technology, Inc. (formerly Maule Aircraft Corporation).
Merlyn Products, Inc ......................................................
Mooney International Corporation (formerly Mooney
Aviation Company, Inc.; Mooney Airplane Company,
Inc.; Mooney Aircraft Corporation; Aerostar Aircraft
Corporation of Texas; and Mooney Aircraft Inc.).
Piper Aircraft, Inc. (formerly The New Piper Aircraft,
Inc.).
Revo, Incorporated (formerly Global Amphibians, LLC;
Consolidated Aeronautics, Inc.; Lake Aircraft Corporation; and Colonial Aircraft Company).
Scott’s-Bell 47, Inc. (formerly Bell Helicopter Textron
Inc.).
Siam Hiller Holdings, Inc. (formerly Rogerson Hiller
Corporation; Hiller Helicopters; Rogerson Aircraft
Corporation; Hiller Aviation; Heli-Parts, Inc.; Fairchild
Industries, Inc.; and Hiller Aircraft Corporation).
SST FLUGTECHNIK GmbH (formerly Extra
Flugzeugproduktions-und Vertriebs-GmbH and Extra
Flugzeugbau GmbH Flugplatz).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
PA–60–600 (Aerostar 600), PA–60–601 (Aerostar 601), PA–60–601P (Aerostar 601P), PA–60–602P
(Aerostar 602P), and PA–60–700P (Aerostar 700P).
BN–2, BN–2A, BN–2A–6, BN–2A–8, and BN–2A–9.
SR22, SR22T.
112TC, 112TCA, and 114TC.
LTSIO–360–E, LTSIO–360–EB, LTSIO–360–KB, LTSIO–360–RB; TSIO–360–E, TSIO–360–EB, TSIO–360–
F, TSIO–360–FB, TSIO–360–KB, TSIO–360–LB, TSIO–360–MB, TSIO–360–RB, TSIO–360–SB; TSIO–
520–BE, TSIO–520–L, TSIO–520–LB, TSIO–520–T, TSIO–520–WB; TSIO–550–A, TSIO–550–B, TSIO–
550–C, TSIO–550–E, TSIO–550–G, TSIO–550–J, TSIO–550–K, TSIO–550–N; TSIOF–550–D, TSIOF–
550–J, IO–520–B, IO–520–BA, IO–520–BB, IO–520–D, IO–550–B, IO–550–E, and IO–550–N.
P2012 Traveller.
TB 21.
DA 40.
F–28C, F–28C–2, F–28C–2R, F–28F, F–28F–R, 280C, 280F, and 280FX.
500.
H–295 (USAF U–10D) and H–395 (USAF L–28A or U–10B).
4500–300 and 4500–300 Series II.
IO–540–AA1A5, IO–540–AG1A5, IO–540–S1A5, TIO–540–AE2A, TIO–540–AH1A, TIO–540–J2BD, TO–
360–C1A6D, TO–360–E1A6D, LTO–360–A1A6D, LTO–360–E1A6D, and LTIO–540–J2BD.
M–5–210TC.
IO–540–MX1.
M20J, M20K, M20M, M20TN, and M20V.
PA–23, PA–23–160, PA–23–235, PA–23–250, PA–23–250 (Navy UO–1), PA–E23–250, PA–24–250, PA–
24–260, PA–24–400, PA–28–201T, PA–28R–201T, PA–28RT–201T, PA–30, PA–31, PA–31–325, PA–
31–350, PA–31P, PA–31P–350, PA–32–260, PA–32R–300, PA–32RT–300T, PA–32R–301(SP), PA–32–
301T, PA–32R–301T, PA–34–200, PA–34–200T, PA–34–220T, PA–39, PA–44–180T, PA–46–310P, and
PA–46–350P.
Lake Model LA–4, Lake Model LA–4A, Lake Model LA–4–200, and Lake Model 250.
47G–3B, 47G–3B–1, 47G–3B–2, and 47G–3B–2A.
UH–12L and UH–12L4.
EA 400.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37984
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—APPLICABILITY INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING AIRPLANES,
HELICOPTERS, AND ENGINES WHEN TURBOCHARGED—Continued
Type certificate holder
Model
Textron Aviation Inc. (formerly Beechcraft Corporation,
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, Raytheon Aircraft
Company, and Beech Aircraft Corporation).
Textron Aviation Inc. (formerly Cessna Aircraft Company).
35–33, 35–A33, 35–B33, 35–C33, 35–C33A, E33, E33A, E33C, F33, F33A, F33C, H35, J35, K35, M35,
N35, P35, S35, V35, V35A, V35B, 36, A36, A36TC, B36TC, D55, E55, 56TC (Turbo Baron), A56TC
(Turbo Baron), 58, G58, 60 (Duke), A60 (Duke), B60 (Duke), 95, 95–C55, B95, B95A, D95A, and E95.
185, 185A, 185B, 185C, 185D, 185E, A185E, A185F, A188, A188A, A188B, A188C, T182, T182T, TR182,
T188C, 206, P206, P206A, P206B, P206C, P206D, P206E, T206H, TP206A, TP206B, TP206C, TP206D,
TP206E, TU206A, TU206B, TU206C, TU206D, TU206E, TU206F, TU206G, U206, U206A, U206B,
U206C, U206D, U206E, U206F, U206G, T207, T207A, 210, 210A, 210B, 210C, 210–5 (205), 210–5A
(205A), P210N, T210G, T210H, T210J, T210K, T210L, T210M, T210N, T240, T303, 310, 310B, 310C,
310D, 310E (USAF U–3B), 310F, 310G, 310H, 310I, 310J, T310P, T310Q, T310R, 320, 320A, 320B,
320C, 320D, 320E, 320F, 320–1, 321, 335, 340, 340A, LC40–550FG, LC41–550FG, LC42–550FG,
FT337E, FT337F, FT337GP, FT337HP, P337H, T337B, T337C, T337D, T337E, T337F, T337G, T337H,
T337H–SP, 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 402C, 404, 411, 411A, 414, 414A, 421, 421A, 421B,
421C.
A500.
Triton Aerospace LLC (formerly Triton America LLC;
AAI Acquisition, Inc.; and Adam Aircraft).
Twin Commander Aircraft LLC (formerly Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation; Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation; Gulfstream American Corporation;
Rockwell-Standard & Associates; and Aero Design
and Engineering Company, also known as Aero
Commander Aircraft).
Vulcanair S.p.A. (formerly Partenavia Costruzioni
Aeronautiche S.p.A.).
(e) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 8100, Exhaust Turbine System (Recip).
(f) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple failures
of spot-welded, multi-segment v-band
couplings installed at the tailpipe to
turbocharger exhaust housing flange. The
FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure of
the spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust
tailpipe v-band coupling. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could lead to
detachment of the exhaust tailpipe from the
turbocharger and allow high-temperature
exhaust gases to enter the engine
compartment. This could result in smoke in
the cockpit, in-flight fire, and loss of control
of the aircraft.
(g) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(h) Review of the Maintenance Records
Within 50 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD, review the aircraft maintenance
records to determine the number of hours TIS
accumulated on each v-band coupling.
(i) V-Band Coupling Life Limit
(1) Within the compliance times specified
in paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (ii) or (i)(2) of this
AD, remove the v-band coupling from service
and install a new v-band coupling. Apply
correct torque as necessary to the v-band
coupling nut.
(i) If the v-band coupling has accumulated
less than 500 hours TIS: Initially remove the
v-band coupling from service before it
accumulates 500 hours TIS or within 50
hours TIS after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later. Thereafter, remove
the v-band coupling from service before it
accumulates 500 hours TIS.
(ii) If the v-band coupling has accumulated
500 or more hours TIS or if the hours TIS of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
500, 500A, 500B, 500S, 500U, 560A, 560E, and 685.
P.68C–TC, and P.68TC ‘‘Observer‘‘.
the v-band coupling cannot be determined:
Initially remove the v-band coupling from
service within 50 hours TIS after the effective
date of this AD. Thereafter, remove the vband coupling from service before it
accumulates 500 hours TIS.
(2) As an alternative to initially removing
the v-band coupling from service as required
by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, you may
perform the inspections required by
paragraphs (k)(1) through (7) or (l) of this AD.
Do the initial inspections at the time the vband coupling would have been removed
from service and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 6 months or 100 hours TIS,
whichever occurs first, for a period not to
exceed 2 years after the effective date of this
AD. If the v-band coupling fails to meet any
inspection criteria in paragraphs (k)(1)
through (7) or (l) of this AD, it must be
removed from service before further flight.
Removing the v-band coupling from service
and installing a new v-band coupling does
not terminate the requirement to do these
repetitive inspections.
Note 1 to paragraph (i): Instructions for
installing a v-band coupling can be found in
Appendix B: Best Practices Guide, paragraph
3.1, of the ‘‘Exhaust System Turbocharger to
Tailpipe V-band Coupling/Clamp Working
Group Final Report,’’ dated January 2018.
(j) V-Band Coupling Inspections
At the next annual inspection after the
effective date of this AD or within the next
12 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12
months, visually inspect the v-band coupling
as required by paragraphs (k)(1) through (7)
of this AD. Removing the v-band coupling
from service and installing a new v-band
coupling does not terminate the requirement
to do these repetitive inspections.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(k) Inspections Without Removal of the VBand Coupling
(1) Inspect the v-band coupling and area
around the v-band coupling for exhaust
stains, sooting, and discoloration. If any of
those conditions are found, remove the
coupling and, instead of the inspections in
paragraphs (k)(2) through (7) of this AD, do
the inspections in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(2) Inspect the v-band coupling outer band
for cracks, paying particular attention to the
spot weld areas. If there is a crack, before
further flight, remove the v-band coupling
from service and install a new v-band
coupling.
(3) Inspect the v-band coupling for
looseness and for separation of the outer
band from the v-retainer segments at all spot
welds. If there is any looseness or separation
of the outer band from any retainer segment,
before further flight, remove the v-band
coupling from service and install a new vband coupling.
(4) Inspect the v-band coupling outer band
for cupping, bowing, and crowning as
depicted in figure 1 to paragraph (l)(1)(iii) of
this AD. If there is any cupping, bowing, or
crowning, before further flight, remove the
coupling and, instead of the inspections in
paragraphs (k)(5) through (7) of this AD, do
the inspections in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(5) Inspect the area of the v-band coupling,
including the outer band, opposite the t-bolt
for damage and distortion. If there is any
damage or distortion, before further flight,
remove the v-band coupling from service and
install a new v-band coupling.
(6) Using a mirror, inspect the v-band
coupling to determine whether there is a
space between the two v-retainer coupling
segments next to the t-bolt. If there is no
space between the two v-retainer coupling
segments next to the t-bolt, before further
flight, remove the v-band coupling from
service and install a new v-band coupling.
(7) Determine whether the v-band coupling
nut is properly torqued and apply correct
torque as necessary.
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
37985
(l) Inspections With the Spot-Welded, MultiSegment Exhaust Tailpipe V-Band Coupling
Removed
(1) Remove the v-band coupling and do the
inspections in paragraphs (l)(1) and (2) of this
AD if required by paragraph (k)(1) or (4) of
this AD or as an alternative to the inspections
required by paragraph (k) of this AD.
Removing the v-band coupling from service
and installing a new v-band coupling does
not terminate the requirement to repeat the
inspections in paragraph (k) or (l) of this AD.
(i) Using crocus cloth or fine abrasive cloth
and mineral spirits or Stoddard solvent,
clean the outer band of the v-band coupling.
Pay particular attention to the spot weld
areas on the v-band coupling. If there is
corrosion that cannot be removed by cleaning
or if there is pitting, before further flight,
remove the v-band coupling from service and
install a new v-band coupling.
(ii) Using a 10X magnifying glass, visually
inspect the outer band for cracks, paying
particular attention to the spot weld areas. If
there is a crack, before further flight, remove
the v-band coupling from service and install
a new v-band coupling.
(iii) Visually inspect the flatness of the
outer band using a straight edge. Lay the
straight edge across the width of the outer
band as depicted in figure 1 to paragraph
(l)(1)(iii) of this AD. If the gap between the
outer band and the straight edge exceeds
0.062 inch, before further flight, remove the
v-band coupling from service and install a
new v-band coupling.
(iv) With the t-bolt in the 12 o’clock
position, visually inspect the attachment of
the outer band to the v-retainer coupling
segments for gaps between the outer band
and the v-retainer coupling segments from
the 1 o’clock through 11 o’clock positions. If
there are any gaps between the outer band
and the v-retainer coupling segments, before
further flight, remove the v-band coupling
from service and install a new v-band
coupling.
Note 2 to paragraph (l)(1)(iv): You may use
backlighting to see gaps.
(v) Visually inspect the bend radii of the
v-retainer coupling segments, throughout the
length of the segment, as depicted in figure
1 to paragraph (l)(1)(iii) of this AD, for cracks.
If there are any cracks, before further flight,
remove the v-band coupling from service and
install a new v-band coupling.
(vi) Visually inspect the outer band
opposite the t-bolt for damage (distortion,
creases, bulging, or cracks) caused by
excessive spreading of the coupling during
installation or removal. If there is any
damage, before further flight, remove the vband coupling from service and install a new
v-band coupling.
(2) If the v-band coupling passes all of the
inspections in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through
(vi) of this AD, it may be re-installed.
(i) Apply correct torque as necessary to the
v-band coupling nut.
(ii) Inspect the v-band coupling to
determine whether there is space between
the two v-retainer coupling segments next to
the t-bolt. If there is no space between the
two v-retainer coupling segments next to the
t-bolt, before further flight, remove the v-
band coupling from service and install a new
v-band coupling.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jun 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
(m) Installation Prohibitions
(1) From the effective date of this AD until
two years after the effective date of this AD,
do not install a v-band coupling that has
accumulated more than zero hours TIS on
any turbocharged airplane, helicopter, or
engine, unless it has passed all inspections
required by paragraph (k) or (l) of this AD.
(2) As of two years after the effective date
of this AD, do not install a v-band coupling
that has accumulated more than zero and less
than 500 hours TIS on any turbocharged
airplane, helicopter, or engine, unless it has
passed all inspections required by paragraph
(k) or (l) of this AD.
(3) As of two years after the effective date
of this AD, do not install a v-band coupling
that has accumulated 500 or more hours TIS
on any turbocharged airplane, helicopter, or
engine.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Operational Safety
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the Operational Safety
Branch, send it to the attention of Tom
Teplik, add this AD number AD 2023–09–09
to the subject line, and email to: AMOC@
faa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Thomas Teplik, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Central Certification Branch, FAA,
1801 S Airport Road, Wichita, KS 67209;
phone: (316) 946–4196; email:
thomas.teplik@faa.gov or Wichita-COS@
faa.gov.
(2) The ‘‘Exhaust System Turbocharger to
Tailpipe V-band Coupling/Clamp Working
Group Final Report,’’ dated January 2018,
may be found in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA–2022–0891.
(p) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued on May 9, 2023.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–12417 Filed 6–9–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
ER12JN23.077</GPH>
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 112 (Monday, June 12, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37975-37985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12417]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2023 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 37975]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2022-0891; Project Identifier AD-2022-00585-A,E,R;
Amendment 39-22432; AD 2023-09-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Various Airplanes, Helicopters, and
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
turbocharged, reciprocating engine-powered airplanes and helicopters
and turbocharged, reciprocating engines with a certain v-band coupling
installed. This AD was prompted by multiple failures of spot-welded,
multi-segment v-band couplings at the tailpipe to the turbocharger
exhaust housing flange (also referred to as ``spot-welded, multi-
segment exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling''). This AD establishes a life
limit for the spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band
coupling and requires repetitively inspecting the spot-welded, multi-
segment exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0891; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Teplik, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Central Certification Branch, FAA, 1801 S Airport Road,
Wichita, KS 67209; phone: (316) 946-4196; email: [email protected]
or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to turbocharged,
reciprocating engine-powered airplanes and helicopters and
turbocharged, reciprocating engines with a certain v-band coupling
installed. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 27, 2022
(87 FR 45036). The NPRM was prompted by multiple failures of spot-
welded, multi-segment v-band couplings at the tailpipe to the
turbocharger exhaust housing flange. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to
establish a life limit for the spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust
tailpipe v-band coupling and require repetitively inspecting the spot-
welded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling.
Since the mid-1970s, failures of v-band couplings that attach the
exhaust tailpipe to the turbocharger exhaust outlet have resulted in a
significant number of incidents and accidents (fatal and non-fatal) on
both airplanes and helicopters. Since 1974, National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) accident and incident investigations have led to
the issuance of 7 NTSB Safety Recommendations concerning exhaust
systems and/or exhaust v-band couplings; 20 FAA ADs to address the
unsafe condition with exhaust systems and/or exhaust v-band couplings;
and 10 FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletins (SAIBs).
Industry has also taken action to raise awareness of the concerns
associated with v-band coupling failures.
NTSB Safety Recommendations Affecting V-Band Couplings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NTSB safety recommendation Description Make/model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-90-166...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T,
PA-32R-301T.
A-90-165...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T,
PA-32R-301T.
A-90-164...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T,
PA-32R-301T.
A-88-151...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T.
A-88-150...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T.
A-88-147...................... Exhaust system... Piper PA-32RT-300T.
A-74-099...................... V-band engine Textron (Cessna)
exhaust clamp turbocharged 300/400
failures. series.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You may examine these NTSB Safety Recommendations in the AD docket
at regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0891.
[[Page 37976]]
ADs on V-Band Couplings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD Make/model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD 2018-06-11, Amendment 39-19231 Textron Aviation Inc. Model A36TC
(83 FR 13383, March 29, 2018). and B36TC airplanes, all serial
numbers, equipped with a
turbocharged engine; Textron
Aviation Inc. Model S35, V35,
V35A, and V35B airplanes, all
serial numbers, equipped with the
Continental TSIO-520-D engine with
AiResearch turbocharger during
manufacture; and Textron Aviation
Inc. Model S35, V35, V35A, and
V35B airplanes, all serial
numbers, equipped with Standard
Aero Supplemental Type Certificate
(STC) SA1035WE.
AD 2014-23-03, Amendment 39-18019 Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA-31P
(79 FR 67340, November 13, 2014). airplanes, serial numbers 31P-1
through 31P-80 and 31P-7300110
through 31P-7730012.
AD 2013-10-04, Amendment 39-17457 Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA-31,
(78 FR 35110, June 12, 2013; PA-31-325, and PA-31-350
corrected September 5, 2013 (78 FR airplanes, all serial numbers.
54561)).
AD 2010-13-07, Amendment 39-16338 Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA-32R-
(75 FR 35619, June 23, 2010; 301T airplanes, serial numbers
corrected July 26, 2010 (75 FR 3257001 through 3257311; and Model
43397)). PA-46-350P airplanes, serial
numbers 4622001 through 4622200
and 4636001 through 4636341.
AD 2004-23-17, Amendment 39-13872 Mooney Airplane Company Inc.
(69 FR 67809, November 22, 2004). (currently Mooney International
Corporation) Model M20M airplanes,
serial numbers 27-0001 through 27-
0321.
AD 2001-08-08, Amendment 39-12185 Raytheon Aircraft Company
(66 FR 20192, April 20, 2001). (previously The Beech Aircraft
Corporation; currently Textron
Aviation Inc.) Model 35-C33A,
E33A, E33C, F33A, F33C, S35, V35,
V35A, V35B, 36, and A36 airplanes,
all serial numbers, with Tornado
Alley Turbo, Inc. STC SA5223NM and
STC SE5222NM incorporated and with
a Teledyne Continental engine
equipped with a turbonormalizing
system.
AD 2000-11-04, Amendment 39-11752 Commander Aircraft Company Model
(65 FR 34941, June 1, 2000). 114TC airplanes, serial numbers
20001 through 20027.
AD 2000-01-16, Amendment 39-11514 Cessna Aircraft Company (currently
(65 FR 2844, January 19, 2000). Textron Aviation Inc.) Model
T310P, T310Q, T310R, 320, 320A,
320B, 320C, 320D, 320E, 320F, 320-
1, 335, 340, 340A, 321 (Navy OE-
2), 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A,
402B, 402C, 404, 411, 411A, 414,
414A, 421, 421A, 421B, and 421C
airplanes, all serial numbers.
AD 91-21-01 R1, Amendment 39-9470 Textron Lycoming Model TIO-540-S1AD
(61 FR 29003, June 7, 1996; reciprocating engines installed
corrected September 6, 1996 (61 FR on, but not limited to, Piper
47051)). Aircraft, Inc. PA-32 series
airplanes.
AD 81-23-03 R2, Amendment 39-4491 Cessna (currently Textron Aviation
(47 FR 51101, November 12, 1982). Inc.) Model P210N airplanes,
serial numbers P21000001 through
P21000811.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These ADs require v-band coupling replacements (life limit) and/or
repetitive inspections, or changing the type design of the v-band
coupling. This AD does not apply to airplanes that have complied with
one of these ADs. You may examine these ADs in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0891.
SAIBs on V-Band Couplings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAIB Subject
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CE-18-21................. Exhaust Turbochargers; Announce the
availability of the ``Best Practices Guide
for Maintaining Exhaust System Turbocharger
to Tailpipe V-band Couplings/Clamps.''
CE-18-07................. Exhaust Turbocharger; V-band Couplings Used
in Engine Exhaust Systems on Turbocharged
Reciprocating Engine Powered Aircraft.
CE-13-45................. Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings
[for turbocharged, reciprocating engine-
powered airplanes].
CE-13-07R1............... Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings
[for Cessna Aircraft Company (currently
Textron Aviation Inc.) Model T206H
airplanes].
CE-13-07................. Engine Exhaust; Tailpipe V-band Couplings
[for Cessna Aircraft Company (currently
Textron Aviation Inc.) Model T206H
airplanes].
CE-10-33R1............... Engine Exhaust [for reciprocating engine-
powered airplanes].
CE-10-33................. Engine Exhaust [for reciprocating engine-
powered airplanes].
CE-09-11................. Turbocharged Engines [for turbocharged engine-
powered airplanes].
CE-05-13................. Alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to AD
91-03-15, Amendment 39-6870 (56 FR 3025,
January 28, 1991) for Mooney Aircraft
Corporation Model M20M airplanes.
CE-04-22................. Exhaust System Components for reciprocating
engine-powered airplanes.
CE-03-46................. Mooney Model M20M airplanes with turbocharged
engines using V-band clamps.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You may examine these SAIBs in the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0891.
In spite of these efforts, failures continue to occur and the
number of significant safety events continues to increase. As a result,
the General Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GA-JSC), which is
comprised of both the FAA and industry, developed a working group to
study v-band coupling failures
[[Page 37977]]
associated with turbocharged reciprocating engine-powered aircraft and
develop recommended corrective actions. This v-band coupling working
group was comprised of aviation industry manufacturers, type/user
groups, and government entities. The working group was tasked to
examine the turbocharger to tailpipe interface and develop
recommendations to enhance the safety of the fleet.
The working group recommended mandatory corrective actions that are
tailored to each specific coupling type (spot-welded, riveted, or
single piece), thereby minimizing the impact to owner/operators. The
working group recommended a mandatory coupling replacement time (life
limit) and annual inspection. The working group also recommended non-
mandatory actions to aid and educate maintenance personnel in
appropriate v-band coupling removal, installation, and inspection
practices. Finally, the working group recommended actions for new
designs, which incorporate lessons learned from review of the in-
service fleet. For new designs incorporating a v-band coupling
immediately downstream of the turbocharger exhaust discharge, the
working group recommended that a replacement interval (500 hours for
spot-welded and 2,000 hours for riveted and single-piece) be
incorporated in the Airworthiness Limitations sections of the
maintenance manual.
In January 2018, the working group published a final report titled
``Exhaust System Turbocharger to Tailpipe V-band Coupling/Clamp Working
Group Final Report'' (final report). Appendix B of the final report
contains the Best Practices Guide. The final report may be found in the
AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2022-0891.
The final report concluded that the common denominator in the
incidents and accidents reviewed is the spot-welded, multi-segment
exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling (see Figure A). These couplings come
in either two or three segment varieties. The segments are the number
of v-retainer segments, which are attached to the outer band via spot
welds. Although multi-segment exhaust tailpipe couplings can also be
riveted, the riveted couplings do not create an unsafe condition.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR12JN23.076
The majority of the events studied by the working group indicated
fatigue failure of spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band
couplings as a result of stress corrosion cracking that originated at
or near a spot weld. This is the same unsafe condition identified in
the other v-band coupling AD actions previously referenced. The data
studied by the working group contained evidence of pre-existing
cracking of the couplings, known embrittlement at the
[[Page 37978]]
spot weld locations simply due to that manufacturing method, and outer
band cupping on the multi-segment couplings (which is the result of
age, over-use, and potential over-torqueing). The working group also
found that many of the couplings had safety wire across the bolt end.
The safety wire could be helpful if there was a bolt or nut failure
(extremely rare events) or the nut was missing. However, the safety
wire was of no value when the failure was transverse band cracking and
total separation at the spot weld. The data studied by the working
group indicated many accidents were due to v-band couplings that were
of the multi-segment, spot-welded design, when used in a specific
location (the tailpipe to the turbocharger exhaust housing flange on
turbocharged reciprocating engine-powered aircraft).
After the working group published the final report, the FAA issued
SAIB CE-18-21, dated July 13, 2018. This SAIB announced the
availability of the Best Practices Guide from the final report and
recommended the public apply the best practices in the maintenance of
turbocharged reciprocating engine powered aircraft. The FAA also
assessed the recommendations contained in the final report and
determined an unsafe condition exists in turbocharged reciprocating
engine-powered aircraft with a spot-welded, multi-segment v-band
coupling installed. Because these v-band couplings are widely used by
many design approval holders on various models (engines and aircraft),
several Aircraft Certification Office Branches were involved in the
decision to propose a single AD. The FAA also determined that the
corrective actions recommended in the final report were appropriate to
address this unsafe condition.
This condition, if not addressed, could lead to failure of the
spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band coupling, leading to
detachment of the exhaust tailpipe from the turbocharger and allowing
high-temperature exhaust gases to enter the engine compartment. This
could result in smoke in the cockpit, in-flight fire, and loss of
control of the aircraft. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from 32 commenters. The commenters were
Aerostar Aircraft Corporation (Aerostar), European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA), NTSB, Vulcanair S.p.A, and 28 individuals. The
NTSB and four individual commenters supported the AD without change.
Aerostar, EASA, Vulcanair S.p.A., and 19 individual commenters do not
necessarily oppose the NPRM but recommended certain changes. Five
individual commenters oppose the proposal in its entirety. The
following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.
A. Requests Regarding Withdrawing the NPRM
Three individual commenters stated that current inspections are
adequate and implied that they opposed the NPRM. Two other individual
commenters stated that they opposed the NPRM. One of the commentors
implied current inspections were sufficient and stated inspections of
the v-band clamp at each oil change and on-condition replacement would
be enough. One of the commenters who opposed the NPRM in its entirety
also requested that information regarding exhaust couplers be added to
FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13-1B, Acceptable Methods, Techniques,
and Practices--Aircraft Inspection and Repair, dated September 8, 1998
(AC 43.13-1B). The FAA infers that these commenters are requesting that
the NPRM be withdrawn.
The FAA disagrees. This AD requires specific inspections that are
not included in current inspections. The accident and incident failure
data and existing ADs that are included in paragraphs (d) (1) through
(10) of this AD demonstrate that a 500-hour time-in-service (TIS) life
limit is appropriate for this type of multi-segment coupling. Regarding
the request to revise AC 43.13-1B, that change is outside the scope of
this AD and actions in an advisory circular provide guidance but are
not mandatory.
The FAA has not changed this AD as a result of these comments.
B. Requests Regarding Estimated Costs
1. Increase Work-Hour Rate
Three individual commenters requested that the FAA increase the
cost per work-hour specified in the NPRM. These commenters stated that
$85 per work-hour is too low and does not reflect the true rate charged
by their local maintenance facilities, which ranges from $100 to $140
per work-hour. One of these commenters also reported that the estimated
records review rate of $42.50 was not supported by industry practice
and should be increased.
The FAA disagrees. The FAA Office of Aviation Policy and Plans
provides the labor rate of $85 per work-hour used when estimating the
labor costs for complying with AD requirements. The estimate for the
records review rate was based on \1/2\ hour at $85 per work-hour.
The FAA has not changed this AD as a result of these comments.
2. Increase V-Band Coupling Removal and Replacement Costs
Two individual commenters requested changes regarding the estimated
costs in the NPRM for removal and replacement of v-band couplings. One
of those commenters stated that there could be a discrepancy in the
estimated costs per owner/operator. This commenter stated that the
estimated figures did not appear to be unduly expensive in the interest
of preventing a potential in-flight fire. The FAA infers that this
commenter is requesting a revision to the estimated costs for removal
and replacement of a v-band coupling based on the requested review of
the cost estimates.
The other individual commenter encouraged the FAA to increase the
estimated cost in the NPRM for replacement of a v-band coupling and
provided a cost of over $700 for the Piper Model PA-28R-201 airplane v-
band coupling. The FAA infers that the commenter is referring to the
estimated parts cost of $400 for a single-engine aircraft.
The FAA acknowledges that there may be discrepancies in the
estimated costs among owners/operators for removing and replacing a v-
band coupling. The FAA's estimated number of work-hours were based on
the actions required in AD 2018-06-11 and the parts costs were based on
current pricing. Additional labor and parts costs were added for twin-
engine aircraft. In the NPRM, the FAA estimated costs in single-engine
and twin-engine aircraft. The FAA disagrees that the cost of the v-band
coupling needs to be increased. The estimated v-band coupling cost of
$400 for a single-engine aircraft was based on a sampling of a range of
parts costs for different aircraft. The FAA determined that $400 was an
accurate parts cost for a single-engine aircraft.
The FAA has not changed this AD as a result of these comments.
C. Requests Regarding Life Limit
1. Clarification of Mitigation for Installation of a V-Band Coupling
That Exceeds 500-Hours TIS
EASA suggested that there should be a mitigation of risk in place
if a v-band coupling having 500 or more hours TIS
[[Page 37979]]
as of the effective date of the final rule is installed on an aircraft.
EASA noted that paragraph (l)(1) of the proposed AD would allow the
installation of a used v-band coupling of any age (i.e., more than 500
hours TIS) within the first two years after the effective date of the
final rule. EASA asked if requiring the repetitive inspections
specified in paragraph (i)(2) of the proposed AD would mitigate this
risk or, alternatively, if there should be a prohibition of the
installation of a v-band coupling that has accumulated 500 or more
hours TIS as of the effective date of the final rule.
The FAA does not agree. The FAA provides mitigation for the risk
associated with installing a v-band coupling having 500 or more hours
TIS by requiring inspections every 6 months or every 100 hours TIS,
whichever occurs first, for two years after the effective date of this
AD. The inspections and inspection criteria are the same for the v-band
couplings regardless of the inspection time interval. Paragraph (i)(2)
of this AD was provided to allow compliance with the requirements of
this AD with regards to hardware availability.
2. Justification for 500-Hour TIS Life Limit
An anonymous commenter requested justification for the v-band
coupling 500-hour TIS life limit specified in the NPRM and stated that
the 500-hour TIS life limit seemed low. In regards to the study of
accident rates where failure of the v-band coupling was determined to
be at fault, the commenter asked how many hours the v-band coupling had
accumulated since its initial installation. The commenter also inquired
about the failure rate of higher grade material v-band couplings and
asked if higher grade v-band coupling material would have an effect on
the failure rate.
The FAA determined the 500-hour TIS v-band coupling replacement
time is necessary to correct the unsafe condition. The FAA based this
determination on past precedence of some of the existing ADs that are
included in paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this AD. The v-band
couplings addressed in this AD are of similar steel material. The FAA
has an obligation to issue an AD to address an unsafe condition. This
AD addresses the unsafe condition through repetitive inspections and
replacements. The FAA would consider any future design improvements as
an AMOC following the procedures outlined in paragraph (n) of this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
3. Replacement of V-Band Coupling Solely Based on Hours TIS
Two commenters did not agree with the replacement of the v-band
coupling based solely on flight hours (v-band coupling hours TIS). One
commenter asserted the inspections specified in the proposed AD were
adequate to uncover defects that would require replacing a v-band
coupling and stated if a v-band clamp continuously passes inspection,
there is no reason to discard it based on TIS. The other commenter
stated that v-band couplings on its helicopters are already inspected
for cracking, and the surrounding area is inspected for signs of
cracking or soot, as part of pre-flight inspections. This commenter
also stated that Enstrom Helicopter Corporation issued Service
Directive Bulletin 0122 (Enstrom SDB 0122) that addresses inspections
for cracks.
The FAA disagrees with removing the requirement in paragraph (i) of
this AD to replace a v-band coupling before it accumulates 500 hours
TIS and instead allowing on-condition replacement based upon inspection
results. The accident/incident failure rate and existing ADs that are
included in paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this AD demonstrate that
a 500-hour TIS life limit is appropriate for this type of multi-segment
v-band coupling. Regarding Enstrom SDB 0122, the FAA has not issued an
AD that mandates using that service information.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to these comments.
D. Requests Regarding V-Band Coupling Serialization
Two individual commenters recommended serialization of the v-band
coupling.
One of those commenters stated it would be difficult to determine
the total hours TIS unless these parts are serialized. The other
commenter recommended serialization by vibro-etching the tailpipe v-
band coupling to differentiate it from v-band couplings in other
locations of an aircraft.
The FAA disagrees that determination of a v-band coupling's hours
TIS cannot be done without serialization either by vibro-etching or
other means. Existing ADs that are included in paragraphs (d)(1)
through (10) of this AD, regarding a v-band coupling with life limits
have not required serialization. Once the hours TIS of a v-band
coupling is established, subsequent maintenance actions will be based
on hours TIS.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to these comments.
E. Requests Regarding V-Band Coupling: Type Design and Manufacturing
One individual commenter stated that instead of being spot-welded,
the rings (v-band couplings) should be solid state welded. This
commenter researched spot-welded couplings that revealed if the heat
and pressure on the metal prior to the spot-weld is not consistent, the
spot-weld will fail. Another individual commenter stated that spot-
welds are good in tension and not in shear. The commenter further
explained that as the v-band coupling is tightened, the spot-weld is in
shear, and that adding dynamic loads reduces the spot-weld's life even
further. This commenter suggested that a different type of attachment
be used such as a braze joint or a laser weld.
Regarding the type design changes, an individual commenter asked if
the installation of a riveted clamp would terminate the 500-hour TIS
replacement schedule. Another individual commenter recommended using
the v-band coupling information in Navair Technical Manual 1-1A-8,
``Engineering Manual Series Aircraft and Missile Repair, Structural
Hardware,'' which is used by the military, and adding this information
to AC 43.13-1B. Another individual commenter stated that additional
information on v-band couplings can be found in military specifications
MS27116C, ``Coupling, Clamp, Grooved, V Band 1.750 To 14.250 Flange OD
(Minus 320 Deg. To Plus 1500 Deg. F),'' and MIL-DTL-27536C, ``Coupling,
Clamp, Grooved, V-Band.'' A different individual commenter suggested
that by allowing a small [tungsten inert gas] TIG weld on the edges of
the clamp, the concern regarding the spot welds holding would be
addressed. An additional individual commenter referenced an unspecified
photo linked to the NPRM and said it was not representative of current
v-band coupling design.
An individual commenter stated that during manufacturing, the
single spot-welds might be placed too close to the trunnions, thereby
causing failure points. This commenter suggested using a total of four
spot-welds instead of two spot-welds. The FAA infers that the commenter
is requesting a change to the manufacturing of the v-band coupling.
The FAA has determined that inspections, in combination with life
limits, are sufficient to mitigate the risk. The FAA would consider any
future design improvements as an AMOC request following the procedures
outlined in paragraph (n) of this AD. Regarding the proposed revision
to AC
[[Page 37980]]
43.13-1B, that change is outside the scope of this AD and actions in an
advisory circular are recommendations, not mandatory.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to these comments.
F. Request for Clarification Regarding the Number/Percentage of In-
Flight Smoke and/or Fire Events
An individual commenter requested clarification regarding the
number or percentage of in-flight smoke and/or fire events related to
the NPRM.
The FAA does not have data indicating the specific number or
percentage of incidents/accidents in which the v-band coupling failure
caused a smoke event or an in-flight fire. At least one fatal accident
and two non-fatal accidents involving a v-band coupling failure had
occurrences of a fire. Smoke or fire could occur due to a separation of
the v-band coupling or loss of the tailpipe because of the hot exhaust
gases impinging on surrounding surfaces. This information was included
in the FAA's determination that an unsafe condition existed to justify
issuing this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD as a result of this comment.
G. Requests Regarding Applicability
1. Remove Airplanes With STC SA4976NM Installed
Aerostar explained that airplanes with STC SA4976NM installed have
eliminated the v-band coupling at the tailpipe to turbocharger
connections and are not affected by the unsafe condition described in
the proposed AD. Aerostar stated that STC SA4976NM was approved as an
AMOC for the repetitive inspections required by AD 90-01-02, Amendment
39-6517, January 5, 1990 (issued as a priority letter), that required
repetitive dismantling inspections of the exhaust tailpipe assembly at
intervals not to exceed 50-hours TIS. The FAA infers that Aerostar
requested a change to the Applicability in the proposed AD to remove
airplanes with STC SA4976NM installed.
The FAA agrees. The installation of STC SA4976NM on Aerostar Model
PA-600, -601, -601P, -602P and -700P airplanes eliminates the v-band
coupling at the tailpipe to turbocharger connection. Paragraph (d),
Applicability, of this AD was revised to add STC SA4976NM to the list
of airplanes excepted from the applicability.
2. Remove Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B From the Applicability
Vulcanair requested that Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B airplanes be
removed from the Applicability Table in paragraph (d) of the proposed
AD. The commenter stated Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B airplanes are
equipped with two normally aspirated reciprocating engines.
The FAA agrees and revised Table 1 to paragraph (d) of this AD to
remove Vulcanair S.p.A Model P.68B airplanes. FAA Type Certificate Data
Sheet A31EU lists the Model P.68B airplane as equipped with two
Lycoming IO-360-A1B or Lycoming IO-360-A1B6 engines, which are normally
aspirated. If the airplane is modified after certification by an STC,
parts manufacturer approval, or field approval, with a turbocharged
reciprocating engine with a spot-welded, multi-segment v-band coupling
installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger exhaust housing flange, this
AD is applicable.
3. Add Textron Aviation Inc. Model T182 and TR182 Airplanes Equipped
With Lycoming O-540-L3C5D Engines
An individual commenter asked why Model T182 and TR182 airplanes
equipped with Lycoming O-540-L3C5D engines were not included in the
applicability of the proposed AD. The FAA infers that this commenter is
requesting that these airplane and engine combinations be added to the
applicability of the proposed AD.
The FAA agrees that these airplane models are affected by the
requirements of this AD but a change to this AD is not necessary
because Table 1 to paragraph (d) of this AD already includes Model T182
and TR182 airplanes.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
4. Add Mooney Model M20F Airplanes With Aftermarket Installation
An individual commenter asked if Model M20F airplanes with an
aftermarket RayJay normalizing turbocharger are included in the
applicability of the proposed AD. The FAA infers that this commenter is
requesting that the applicability of the proposed AD be revised to
include these airplane models.
The FAA disagrees with adding the Mooney Model M20F airplanes
equipped with an aftermarket RayJay normalizing turbocharger to the
applicability of this AD because the FAA could not determine the STC
that was being referred to. However, based on the way the final rule is
written with language of ``as installed, but not limited to the
following aircraft'', this AD would still apply to all turbocharged,
reciprocating engine-powered airplanes and helicopters and
turbocharged, reciprocating engines with a spot-welded, multi-segment
v-band coupling installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger exhaust
housing flange, except for airplanes that are in compliance with an AD
listed in paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this AD or have STC
SA4976NM installed. These ADs are available in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0891.
These v-band couplings are installed on, but not limited to, the
products listed in Table 1 to paragraph (d) of this AD. This AD would
apply regardless of whether the turbocharger is installed as part of
the type certificate, or under an STC, parts manufacture approval, or
field approval. Outside of type certification, it is the responsibility
of the owner working with a licensed mechanic to determine if the
configuration of the aircraft includes the spot-welded multi segment v-
band coupling installed at the tailpipe to the turbocharger exhaust
housing.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
5. Add Turbine Helicopters With V-Band Clamps
An individual commenter asked if the NPRM needed to address v-band
couplings installed on turbine helicopters. The FAA infers that the
commenter requested to add turbine helicopters to the applicability of
the proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees. The use of the v-band couplings on turbine
helicopters is not addressed in this AD. This AD addresses the unsafe
condition for spot-welded, multi-segment v-band coupling installed at
the tailpipe to turbocharger exhaust housing flange for turbocharged,
reciprocating engine-powered airplanes and helicopters and
turbocharged, reciprocating engines. The vibratory environment for
turbine engines on helicopters is different and as such is not part of
the identified unsafe condition.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
6. No Justification for Mooney Model M20K Airplanes
An individual commenter stated that there is not enough information
to justify an AD for a Mooney Model M20K airplane. The commenter cited
FAA SAIB CE-18-07, ``Exhaust Turbocharger; V-band Couplings Used in
Exhaust Systems on Turbocharged Reciprocating Engine Powered
Aircraft,'' dated December 14, 2017 (SAIB CE-18-07), which states the
``concern [was] not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant
AD
[[Page 37981]]
action.'' The commenter also stated that a review of the FAA's Aviation
Safety Information Analysis and Sharing System and the NTSB's Accident
Database could not find any serious incidents involving defective v-
band couplings on Mooney Model M20K airplanes. The commenter supported
an inspection regime and includes it in the pre-flight check and does
an unspecified inspection of the v-band coupling at each oil change
when the turbo is easily accessible. The commenter explained that there
is a difference between ``big block'' 520-550 cubic-inch engines and
smaller 360 turbocharged engines, and that the NTSB safety
recommendations referred to in the NPRM refer to the ``big block''
engines. The commenter also pointed out that all of the ADs specified
in the proposed AD apply to larger displacement turbocharged
reciprocating engines.
The FAA disagrees that there is not enough justification to include
Mooney Model M20K airplanes in the applicability of this AD. When SAIB
CE-18-07 was issued, the FAA was still evaluating this issue and had
not determined that there was an unsafe condition warranting AD action.
The v-band couplings that are the subject of this AD are used on both
larger and smaller engines, and the inspections proposed in the NPRM
are not part of current inspection criteria. The accident/incident
failure data and existing AD actions demonstrate that a 500-hour TIS
life limit is appropriate for this type of multi-segment coupling and
that an unsafe condition exists.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
H. Requests Regarding Inspections
1. Revise Paragraph (j) of the Proposed AD To Separate Compliance Times
From Inspection Procedures
EASA requested that paragraph (j) of the proposed AD, ``Inspections
Without Removal of the V-Band Coupling,'' be separated into two
paragraphs with one paragraph containing the requirement for an annual
inspection with references to both an inspection with the v-band
coupling removed and an inspection with the v-band coupling installed,
and the other paragraph containing the inspection procedure. The
commenter stated that having the inspection timeline and the inspection
procedures in the same paragraph may cause confusion.
The FAA agrees that having the inspection compliance times and
inspection procedures in the same paragraph could cause confusion. The
FAA added paragraph (j), ``V-band Coupling Inspections,'' in this AD to
specify only the inspection compliance times and re-designated the
subsequent paragraphs accordingly. Paragraph (i)(2) of this AD still
provides an alternative to initially removing the v-band coupling from
service by doing the inspections required by paragraphs (k)(1) through
(7) or (l) of this AD.
2. Remove Paragraph (j) of the Proposed AD
EASA requested that paragraph (j) of the proposed AD, ``Inspections
Without Removal of the V-Band Coupling,'' be removed because it is not
possible to do a thorough inspection with the v-band coupling
installed.
The FAA disagrees. The procedures that the FAA included for the
inspection of an installed v-band coupling were tested and it was
determined that these procedures are adequate to verify the condition
of the v-band coupling. If any of the inspection criteria for an
installed v-band coupling are not met, the v-band coupling is required
to either be replaced or undergo additional inspections with the v-band
coupling removed. These procedures have been used with success in
existing ADs that are included in paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of
this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
3. Request To Revise Paragraph (j)(3) of the Proposed AD
An individual commenter requested that paragraph (j)(3) of the
proposed AD be moved to paragraph (k) of the proposed AD. The commenter
stated that it could not be determined if the v-segments are loose with
respect to the outer band with the outer band T-bolt torqued to
specification. The commenter requested this inspection be moved to
paragraph (j) after the v-band coupling is removed.
The FAA disagrees with moving this inspection from paragraph (j)(3)
of the proposed AD to paragraph (k) of this AD. Looseness of the v-band
coupling may occur if the coupling is not properly installed. Looseness
of the outer band may occur if the outer band has separated from the v-
band retainer segment or if the spot weld attachment is in the process
of failing or has failed. Therefore, this inspection must be done
without removing the v-band coupling.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
4. Include a Non-Destructive Inspection
An individual commenter requested the FAA consider adding a
requirement for a non-destructive inspection (NDI). The commenter
stated the clamps are constantly stressed even in the absence of heat
cycling.
The FAA disagrees with adding a requirement for an NDI to this AD.
Due to the various v-band couplings, an NDI would have to be determined
by the v-band coupling manufacturer and the FAA has determined that the
visual inspections along with replacements will mitigate the unsafe
condition. However, additional inspections are acceptable as long as
they do not conflict with the visual inspection requirements,
replacement, and life limit requirements of this AD.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
5. Insufficient Justification for Paragraph (j) of the Proposed AD
An individual commenter believed that there is not enough data to
justify an AD, specifically for paragraph (j) of the proposed AD
regarding repetitive inspections of v-band couplings. The commenter
cited multiple examples where root cause analysis was determined in
other AD actions. The commenter stated that the FAA has not made a
determination of what the root cause is for the proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees that there is no root cause for this AD. The FAA
issues an AD when an unsafe condition is found. The unsafe condition
addressed by this AD is fatigue failure of spot-welded, multi-segment
exhaust tailpipe v-band couplings as a result of stress corrosion
cracking that originated at or near a spot weld. As stated in the
Background, the data studied by the working group contained evidence of
pre-existing cracking of the couplings, known embrittlement at the spot
weld locations simply due to that manufacturing method, and outer band
cupping on the multi-segment couplings (which is the result of age,
over-use, and potential over-torqueing). These are the root causes of
the unsafe condition. Current inspection procedures are inadequate to
detect these cracks in a timely manner. Accordingly, the FAA is
mandating inspection procedures and a life limit to protect the fleet.
The life limit and inspections directly address the unsafe condition,
have been used in previous ADs, and therefore are appropriate for this
type of multi-segment coupling.
The FAA has not changed this AD in regard to this comment.
I. Request To Use Generic Terms in Paragraph (k) of the Proposed AD
EASA suggested that generic terms be used in paragraph (k)(1)(i) of
the proposed AD, such as ``fine abrasive
[[Page 37982]]
cloth and mineral spirits'' instead of ``crocus cloth and mineral
spirits or Stoddard solvent'' because the current terminology in the
proposed AD might not be recognized outside of the United States.
The FAA partially agrees. The term ``crocus cloth'' is a general
term and not specific. The term ``Stoddard solvent'' refers to the
original developer of the solvent. This AD already includes the term
``mineral spirts.'' The FAA revised paragraph (l)(1)(i) of this AD to
include ``crocus cloth or fine abrasive cloth and mineral spirits or
Stoddard solvent.''
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Except for changes described previously,
this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will
increase the economic burden on any operator.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects up to 41,058 airplanes,
helicopters, and engines (products of U.S. registry). The FAA has no
way of determining the number of these products that could have an
affected spot-welded, multi-segment v-band coupling installed. The
FAA's estimated cost on U.S. operators reflects the maximum possible
cost based on the 41,058 products of U.S. registry. Based on this, the
FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number
Action Labor cost Parts Cost per product of U.S. Cost on U.S.
cost products operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aircraft records review......... 0.5 work hour x N/A $42.50............ 41,058 $1,744,965.
$85 = $42.50.
Removal of the coupling from 2 work-hours x $85 $400 $570.............. 31,248 $17,811,360.
service and replacement (single- per hour = $170.
engine aircraft).
Removal of the couplings from 4 work-hours x $85 800 $1,140............ 9,810 $11,183,400.
service and replacement (twin- per hour = $340.
engine aircraft).
Inspection of the coupling 0.5 work-hour x N/A $42.50 per 31,248 $1,328,040 per
without removal (single-engine $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
aircraft). $42.50.
Inspection of the couplings 1 work-hour x $85 N/A $85 per inspection 9,810 $833,850 per
without removal (twin-engine per hour = $85. cycle. inspection cycle.
aircraft).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of the coupling, including removal and 1.5 work-hours x $85 per N/A $127.50
reinstallation (single-engine aircraft). hour = $127.50.
Inspection of the couplings, including removal and 3 work-hours x $85 per N/A 255
reinstallation (twin-engine aircraft). hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This AD provides operators the option of performing an inspection
with the coupling removed from the aircraft instead of an inspection of
the coupling without removing it from the aircraft. In some cases, an
inspection with the coupling removed may be required.
A coupling may need to be removed from service before it reaches
its 500-hour TIS life limit if it does not meet all of the inspection
criteria at each inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the
number of products that may need to remove the coupling from service
before reaching its 500-hour TIS life limit.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 37983]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2023-09-09 Various Airplanes, Helicopters, and Engines: Amendment 39
22432; Docket No. FAA-2022-0891; Project Identifier AD-2022-00585-
A,E,R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 17, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Definitions
(1) For purposes of this AD, a ``v-band coupling'' means a spot-
welded, multi-segment v-band coupling installed at the tailpipe to
turbocharger exhaust housing flange.
(2) For purposes of this AD, ``new'' means zero hours time-in-
service (TIS).
(d) Applicability
This AD applies to all turbocharged, reciprocating engine-
powered airplanes and helicopters and turbocharged, reciprocating
engines, certificated in any category, with a spot-welded, multi-
segment v-band coupling installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger
exhaust housing flange, except for airplanes that are in compliance
with an AD listed in paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this AD, or
have the supplemental type certificate (STC) listed in paragraph
(d)(11) of this AD installed. These v-band couplings are installed
on, but not limited to, the products listed in Table 1 to paragraph
(d) of this AD.
(1) AD 2018-06-11, Amendment 39-19231 (83 FR 13383, March 29,
2018).
(2) AD 2014-23-03, Amendment 39-18019 (79 FR 67340, November 13,
2014).
(3) AD 2013-10-04, Amendment 39-17457 (78 FR 35110, June 12,
2013; corrected September 5, 2013 (78 FR 54561)).
(4) AD 2010-13-07, Amendment 39-16338 (75 FR 35619, June 23,
2010; corrected July 26, 2010 (75 FR 43397)).
(5) AD 2004-23-17, Amendment 39-13872 (69 FR 67809, November 22,
2004).
(6) AD 2001-08-08, Amendment 39-12185 (66 FR 20192, April 20,
2001).
(7) AD 2000-11-04, Amendment 39-11752 (65 FR 34941, June 1,
2000).
(8) AD 2000-01-16, Amendment 39-11514 (65 FR 2844, January 19,
2000).
(9) AD 91-21-01 R1, Amendment 39-9470 (61 FR 29003, June 7,
1996; corrected September 6, 1996 (61 FR 47051)).
(10) AD 81-23-03 R2, Amendment 39-4491 (47 FR 51101, November
12, 1982).
(11) STC Number SA4976NM for Type Certificate Number: A17WE,
Make: Aerostar, Model: PA-60-600, -601, -601P, -602P, and -700P.
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)--Applicability Includes, But Is Not Limited to,
the Following Airplanes, Helicopters, and Engines When Turbocharged
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type certificate holder Model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerostar Aircraft Corporation PA-60-600 (Aerostar 600), PA-60-601
(Aerostar 601), PA-60-601P (Aerostar
601P), PA-60-602P (Aerostar 602P), and
PA-60-700P (Aerostar 700P).
B-N Group Ltd. (formerly BN-2, BN-2A, BN-2A-6, BN-2A-8, and BN-2A-
Pilatus Britten-Norman 9.
Limited).
Cirrus Design Corporation.... SR22, SR22T.
Commander Aircraft 112TC, 112TCA, and 114TC.
Corporation (formerly CPAC,
Inc.; Commander Aircraft
Company; Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation;
Gulfstream American
Corporation; and Rockwell
International, Commander
Aircraft Division).
Continental Aerospace LTSIO-360-E, LTSIO-360-EB, LTSIO-360-KB,
Technologies, Inc. (formerly LTSIO-360-RB; TSIO-360-E, TSIO-360-EB,
Continental Motors, Inc., TSIO-360-F, TSIO-360-FB, TSIO-360-KB,
and Teledyne Continental TSIO-360-LB, TSIO-360-MB, TSIO-360-RB,
Motors). TSIO-360-SB; TSIO-520-BE, TSIO-520-L,
TSIO-520-LB, TSIO-520-T, TSIO-520-WB;
TSIO-550-A, TSIO-550-B, TSIO-550-C, TSIO-
550-E, TSIO-550-G, TSIO-550-J, TSIO-550-
K, TSIO-550-N; TSIOF-550-D, TSIOF-550-J,
IO-520-B, IO-520-BA, IO-520-BB, IO-520-
D, IO-550-B, IO-550-E, and IO-550-N.
Costruzioni Aeronautiche P2012 Traveller.
Tecnam S.P.A.
Daher Aerospace (formerly TB 21.
SOCATA and SOCATA--Groupe
AEROSPATIALE).
Diamond Aircraft Industries DA 40.
Inc. (formerly Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH).
The Enstrom Helicopter F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-28F, F-28F-R,
Corporation. 280C, 280F, and 280FX.
Helio Aircraft LLC........... 500.
Helio Alaska, Inc............ H-295 (USAF U-10D) and H-395 (USAF L-28A
or U-10B).
The King's Engineering 4500-300 and 4500-300 Series II.
Fellowship (formerly Evangel-
Air).
Lycoming Engines (formerly IO-540-AA1A5, IO-540-AG1A5, IO-540-S1A5,
Textron Lycoming). TIO-540-AE2A, TIO-540-AH1A, TIO-540-
J2BD, TO-360-C1A6D, TO-360-E1A6D, LTO-
360-A1A6D, LTO-360-E1A6D, and LTIO-540-
J2BD.
Maule Aerospace Technology, M-5-210TC.
Inc. (formerly Maule
Aircraft Corporation).
Merlyn Products, Inc......... IO-540-MX1.
Mooney International M20J, M20K, M20M, M20TN, and M20V.
Corporation (formerly Mooney
Aviation Company, Inc.;
Mooney Airplane Company,
Inc.; Mooney Aircraft
Corporation; Aerostar
Aircraft Corporation of
Texas; and Mooney Aircraft
Inc.).
Piper Aircraft, Inc. PA-23, PA-23-160, PA-23-235, PA-23-250,
(formerly The New Piper PA-23-250 (Navy UO-1), PA-E23-250, PA-24-
Aircraft, Inc.). 250, PA-24-260, PA-24-400, PA-28-201T,
PA-28R-201T, PA-28RT-201T, PA-30, PA-31,
PA-31-325, PA-31-350, PA-31P, PA-31P-
350, PA-32-260, PA-32R-300, PA-32RT-
300T, PA-32R-301(SP), PA-32-301T, PA-32R-
301T, PA-34-200, PA-34-200T, PA-34-220T,
PA-39, PA-44-180T, PA-46-310P, and PA-46-
350P.
Revo, Incorporated (formerly Lake Model LA-4, Lake Model LA-4A, Lake
Global Amphibians, LLC; Model LA-4-200, and Lake Model 250.
Consolidated Aeronautics,
Inc.; Lake Aircraft
Corporation; and Colonial
Aircraft Company).
Scott's-Bell 47, Inc. 47G-3B, 47G-3B-1, 47G-3B-2, and 47G-3B-
(formerly Bell Helicopter 2A.
Textron Inc.).
Siam Hiller Holdings, Inc. UH-12L and UH-12L4.
(formerly Rogerson Hiller
Corporation; Hiller
Helicopters; Rogerson
Aircraft Corporation; Hiller
Aviation; Heli-Parts, Inc.;
Fairchild Industries, Inc.;
and Hiller Aircraft
Corporation).
SST FLUGTECHNIK GmbH EA 400.
(formerly Extra
Flugzeugproduktions-und
Vertriebs-GmbH and Extra
Flugzeugbau GmbH Flugplatz).
[[Page 37984]]
Textron Aviation Inc. 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, 35-C33A,
(formerly Beechcraft E33, E33A, E33C, F33, F33A, F33C, H35,
Corporation, Hawker J35, K35, M35, N35, P35, S35, V35, V35A,
Beechcraft Corporation, V35B, 36, A36, A36TC, B36TC, D55, E55,
Raytheon Aircraft Company, 56TC (Turbo Baron), A56TC (Turbo Baron),
and Beech Aircraft 58, G58, 60 (Duke), A60 (Duke), B60
Corporation). (Duke), 95, 95-C55, B95, B95A, D95A, and
E95.
Textron Aviation Inc. 185, 185A, 185B, 185C, 185D, 185E, A185E,
(formerly Cessna Aircraft A185F, A188, A188A, A188B, A188C, T182,
Company). T182T, TR182, T188C, 206, P206, P206A,
P206B, P206C, P206D, P206E, T206H,
TP206A, TP206B, TP206C, TP206D, TP206E,
TU206A, TU206B, TU206C, TU206D, TU206E,
TU206F, TU206G, U206, U206A, U206B,
U206C, U206D, U206E, U206F, U206G, T207,
T207A, 210, 210A, 210B, 210C, 210-5
(205), 210-5A (205A), P210N, T210G,
T210H, T210J, T210K, T210L, T210M,
T210N, T240, T303, 310, 310B, 310C,
310D, 310E (USAF U-3B), 310F, 310G,
310H, 310I, 310J, T310P, T310Q, T310R,
320, 320A, 320B, 320C, 320D, 320E, 320F,
320-1, 321, 335, 340, 340A, LC40-550FG,
LC41-550FG, LC42-550FG, FT337E, FT337F,
FT337GP, FT337HP, P337H, T337B, T337C,
T337D, T337E, T337F, T337G, T337H, T337H-
SP, 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B,
402C, 404, 411, 411A, 414, 414A, 421,
421A, 421B, 421C.
Triton Aerospace LLC A500.
(formerly Triton America
LLC; AAI Acquisition, Inc.;
and Adam Aircraft).
Twin Commander Aircraft LLC 500, 500A, 500B, 500S, 500U, 560A, 560E,
(formerly Twin Commander and 685.
Aircraft Corporation;
Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation; Gulfstream
American Corporation;
Rockwell-Standard &
Associates; and Aero Design
and Engineering Company,
also known as Aero Commander
Aircraft).
Vulcanair S.p.A. (formerly P.68C-TC, and P.68TC ``Observer``.
Partenavia Costruzioni
Aeronautiche S.p.A.).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 8100, Exhaust
Turbine System (Recip).
(f) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple failures of spot-welded, multi-
segment v-band couplings installed at the tailpipe to turbocharger
exhaust housing flange. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the spot-welded, multi-segment exhaust tailpipe v-band
coupling. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to
detachment of the exhaust tailpipe from the turbocharger and allow
high-temperature exhaust gases to enter the engine compartment. This
could result in smoke in the cockpit, in-flight fire, and loss of
control of the aircraft.
(g) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(h) Review of the Maintenance Records
Within 50 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, review
the aircraft maintenance records to determine the number of hours
TIS accumulated on each v-band coupling.
(i) V-Band Coupling Life Limit
(1) Within the compliance times specified in paragraph (i)(1)(i)
or (ii) or (i)(2) of this AD, remove the v-band coupling from
service and install a new v-band coupling. Apply correct torque as
necessary to the v-band coupling nut.
(i) If the v-band coupling has accumulated less than 500 hours
TIS: Initially remove the v-band coupling from service before it
accumulates 500 hours TIS or within 50 hours TIS after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later. Thereafter, remove the v-
band coupling from service before it accumulates 500 hours TIS.
(ii) If the v-band coupling has accumulated 500 or more hours
TIS or if the hours TIS of the v-band coupling cannot be determined:
Initially remove the v-band coupling from service within 50 hours
TIS after the effective date of this AD. Thereafter, remove the v-
band coupling from service before it accumulates 500 hours TIS.
(2) As an alternative to initially removing the v-band coupling
from service as required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, you may
perform the inspections required by paragraphs (k)(1) through (7) or
(l) of this AD. Do the initial inspections at the time the v-band
coupling would have been removed from service and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 6 months or 100 hours TIS, whichever occurs
first, for a period not to exceed 2 years after the effective date
of this AD. If the v-band coupling fails to meet any inspection
criteria in paragraphs (k)(1) through (7) or (l) of this AD, it must
be removed from service before further flight. Removing the v-band
coupling from service and installing a new v-band coupling does not
terminate the requirement to do these repetitive inspections.
Note 1 to paragraph (i): Instructions for installing a v-band
coupling can be found in Appendix B: Best Practices Guide, paragraph
3.1, of the ``Exhaust System Turbocharger to Tailpipe V-band
Coupling/Clamp Working Group Final Report,'' dated January 2018.
(j) V-Band Coupling Inspections
At the next annual inspection after the effective date of this
AD or within the next 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, and repetitively thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 12 months, visually inspect the v-band coupling as
required by paragraphs (k)(1) through (7) of this AD. Removing the
v-band coupling from service and installing a new v-band coupling
does not terminate the requirement to do these repetitive
inspections.
(k) Inspections Without Removal of the V-Band Coupling
(1) Inspect the v-band coupling and area around the v-band
coupling for exhaust stains, sooting, and discoloration. If any of
those conditions are found, remove the coupling and, instead of the
inspections in paragraphs (k)(2) through (7) of this AD, do the
inspections in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(2) Inspect the v-band coupling outer band for cracks, paying
particular attention to the spot weld areas. If there is a crack,
before further flight, remove the v-band coupling from service and
install a new v-band coupling.
(3) Inspect the v-band coupling for looseness and for separation
of the outer band from the v-retainer segments at all spot welds. If
there is any looseness or separation of the outer band from any
retainer segment, before further flight, remove the v-band coupling
from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(4) Inspect the v-band coupling outer band for cupping, bowing,
and crowning as depicted in figure 1 to paragraph (l)(1)(iii) of
this AD. If there is any cupping, bowing, or crowning, before
further flight, remove the coupling and, instead of the inspections
in paragraphs (k)(5) through (7) of this AD, do the inspections in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(5) Inspect the area of the v-band coupling, including the outer
band, opposite the t-bolt for damage and distortion. If there is any
damage or distortion, before further flight, remove the v-band
coupling from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(6) Using a mirror, inspect the v-band coupling to determine
whether there is a space between the two v-retainer coupling
segments next to the t-bolt. If there is no space between the two v-
retainer coupling segments next to the t-bolt, before further
flight, remove the v-band coupling from service and install a new v-
band coupling.
(7) Determine whether the v-band coupling nut is properly
torqued and apply correct torque as necessary.
[[Page 37985]]
(l) Inspections With the Spot-Welded, Multi-Segment Exhaust Tailpipe V-
Band Coupling Removed
(1) Remove the v-band coupling and do the inspections in
paragraphs (l)(1) and (2) of this AD if required by paragraph (k)(1)
or (4) of this AD or as an alternative to the inspections required
by paragraph (k) of this AD. Removing the v-band coupling from
service and installing a new v-band coupling does not terminate the
requirement to repeat the inspections in paragraph (k) or (l) of
this AD.
(i) Using crocus cloth or fine abrasive cloth and mineral
spirits or Stoddard solvent, clean the outer band of the v-band
coupling. Pay particular attention to the spot weld areas on the v-
band coupling. If there is corrosion that cannot be removed by
cleaning or if there is pitting, before further flight, remove the
v-band coupling from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(ii) Using a 10X magnifying glass, visually inspect the outer
band for cracks, paying particular attention to the spot weld areas.
If there is a crack, before further flight, remove the v-band
coupling from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(iii) Visually inspect the flatness of the outer band using a
straight edge. Lay the straight edge across the width of the outer
band as depicted in figure 1 to paragraph (l)(1)(iii) of this AD. If
the gap between the outer band and the straight edge exceeds 0.062
inch, before further flight, remove the v-band coupling from service
and install a new v-band coupling.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR12JN23.077
(iv) With the t-bolt in the 12 o'clock position, visually
inspect the attachment of the outer band to the v-retainer coupling
segments for gaps between the outer band and the v-retainer coupling
segments from the 1 o'clock through 11 o'clock positions. If there
are any gaps between the outer band and the v-retainer coupling
segments, before further flight, remove the v-band coupling from
service and install a new v-band coupling.
Note 2 to paragraph (l)(1)(iv): You may use backlighting to see
gaps.
(v) Visually inspect the bend radii of the v-retainer coupling
segments, throughout the length of the segment, as depicted in
figure 1 to paragraph (l)(1)(iii) of this AD, for cracks. If there
are any cracks, before further flight, remove the v-band coupling
from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(vi) Visually inspect the outer band opposite the t-bolt for
damage (distortion, creases, bulging, or cracks) caused by excessive
spreading of the coupling during installation or removal. If there
is any damage, before further flight, remove the v-band coupling
from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(2) If the v-band coupling passes all of the inspections in
paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (vi) of this AD, it may be re-
installed.
(i) Apply correct torque as necessary to the v-band coupling
nut.
(ii) Inspect the v-band coupling to determine whether there is
space between the two v-retainer coupling segments next to the t-
bolt. If there is no space between the two v-retainer coupling
segments next to the t-bolt, before further flight, remove the v-
band coupling from service and install a new v-band coupling.
(m) Installation Prohibitions
(1) From the effective date of this AD until two years after the
effective date of this AD, do not install a v-band coupling that has
accumulated more than zero hours TIS on any turbocharged airplane,
helicopter, or engine, unless it has passed all inspections required
by paragraph (k) or (l) of this AD.
(2) As of two years after the effective date of this AD, do not
install a v-band coupling that has accumulated more than zero and
less than 500 hours TIS on any turbocharged airplane, helicopter, or
engine, unless it has passed all inspections required by paragraph
(k) or (l) of this AD.
(3) As of two years after the effective date of this AD, do not
install a v-band coupling that has accumulated 500 or more hours TIS
on any turbocharged airplane, helicopter, or engine.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the Operational Safety Branch, send it to
the attention of Tom Teplik, add this AD number AD 2023-09-09 to the
subject line, and email to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Thomas Teplik,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Central Certification Branch, FAA, 1801 S
Airport Road, Wichita, KS 67209; phone: (316) 946-4196; email:
[email protected] or [email protected].
(2) The ``Exhaust System Turbocharger to Tailpipe V-band
Coupling/Clamp Working Group Final Report,'' dated January 2018, may
be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0891.
(p) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued on May 9, 2023.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-12417 Filed 6-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
