Ocean Justice Strategy, 37518-37520 [2023-12271]
Download as PDF
37518
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
priority to review and improve the
Monkfish RSA program.
After the lunch break, the Council
will receive an update on a joint New
England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council action to reduce
Atlantic sturgeon bycatch in large-mesh
monkfish and dogfish gillnet fisheries.
As part of this discussion, the Council
will approve the range of alternatives for
Monkfish Framework Adjustment 15,
which will contain the proposed
sturgeon measures. Next, the Council
will receive a presentation from the
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
(NFWF) on its competitive grant
funding programs, including the
Electronic Monitoring and Reporting
Program and the New England Gear
Innovation Fund, which is a new
program that seeks to address issues
related to right whale fishing gear
entanglements. The Council will close
out the day with a discussion on the
East Coast Climate Change Scenario
Planning initiative. The Council will: (1)
review findings from the February 2023
East Coast Climate Change Scenario
Planning Summit; (2) receive Northeast
Region Coordinating Council (NRCC)
feedback on the summit findings; and
(3) discuss the findings and next steps.
Thursday, June 29, 2023
The Council will begin the third day
of its meeting by hearing from the
Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management
(EBFM) Committee. The Council will
receive: (1) the final report on the
prototype management strategy
evaluation (pMSE) for EBFM and the
Georges Bank example Fishery
Ecosystem Plan (eFEP); and (2)
suggestions from a subpanel of the SSC
intended to help improve the results of
the pMSE’s model scenarios. The
Council also will receive an update on
planning for upcoming deep-dive public
information workshops on EBFM. The
Scallop Committee then will present
three items related to the Atlantic Sea
Scallop Research Set-Aside (RSA)
Program for Council consideration: (1)
approval of longer-term RSA survey
awards; (2) adoption of survey guiding
principles; and (3) approval of 2024–
2025 RSA priorities. The Council also
will initiate action for fishing year 2024
specifications, 2025 defaults, and other
measures. Another important scalloprelated item will be covered under the
next agenda item, the Habitat
Committee report.
After the lunch break, the first item
under the Habitat Committee report will
focus on the Northern Edge of Georges
Bank. The discussion will include an
update and proposed timeline for action
to potentially authorize scallop fishery
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
access to the habitat management area at
the top of Closed Area II on Georges
Bank. The habitat report also will
include a work plan update on the
Essential Fish Habitat Review, followed
by a Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management (BOEM) update on the
Gulf of Maine offshore wind call area
and other wind developments. The Risk
Policy Working Group will report next
with an update on its efforts to address
the terms of reference for revising the
Council’s Risk Policy. The Council then
will receive a series of reports related to
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species,
which will cover: (1) the NOAA
Fisheries HMS Management Division’s
presentation on (a) the proposed rule for
Amendment 15 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS Fishery Management
Plan; (b) the advance notice of proposed
rulemaking on electronic reporting; and
(c) scoping for Amendment 16 shark
issues; (2) the HMS Advisory Panel
report on the May 2023 meeting; and (3)
the Advisory Committee to the U.S.
Section to the International Commission
on the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
(ICCAT) report on its April meeting.
Finally, the Council will close out the
meeting with other business.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained on this agenda may come
before the Council for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Council
action will be restricted to those issues
specifically listed in this notice and any
issues arising after publication of this
notice that require emergency action
under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, provided the public
has been notified of the Council’s intent
to take final action to address the
emergency. The public also should be
aware that the meeting will be recorded.
Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy
of the recording is available upon
request.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Thomas A. Nies (see ADDRESSES) at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 5, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–12276 Filed 6–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
[CEQ–2023–0004]
Ocean Justice Strategy
Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ).
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) and Office
of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP), on behalf of the Ocean Policy
Committee (OPC), request input from all
interested parties to inform the
development of an Ocean Justice
Strategy. The Ocean Justice Strategy will
describe the vision, goals, and highlevel objectives for coordinating and
guiding ocean justice activities across
the Federal Government. It may also
serve as a reference for Tribal,
Territorial, State, and local
governments, regional management
bodies, and non-governmental groups.
The Ocean Justice Strategy will propose
equitable and just practices to advance
safety, health, and prosperity for
communities residing near the ocean,
the coasts, and the Great Lakes and for
the whole country, now and for future
generations. It builds on current BidenHarris Administration activities and
commitments aimed to advance
environmental justice. Through this
Request for Information (RFI), the Ocean
Policy Committee seeks public input on
what the vision and goals of the Ocean
Justice Strategy should be and how the
Federal Government can advance just
and equitable access to, and
management and use of, the ocean, the
coasts, and the Great Lakes.
DATES: Responses are due by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on July 24, 2023.
Submissions received after the deadline
will not be taken into consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number CEQ–
2023–0004, using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: Responding to this RFI is
voluntary. You may respond to some or
all of the questions in this RFI. We
request that you submit only one
response, and that your submission not
exceed 2,500 words. For any
submissions that are over 2,500 words,
please consider including an executive
summary of 2,500 words or fewer. Your
submission should clearly indicate
which question(s) you are addressing.
Your response should include the name
of the person(s) or organization(s)
submitting it. If your response refers to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
studies, research, or other empirical
data that are not widely published,
include copies of or electronic links to
the referenced materials.
Comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. Do
not submit any information you
consider to be private information,
privileged or confidential commercial or
financial information, or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
De’Marcus Robinson, Ocean Policy
Fellow, 202–395–5750 or
De’Marcus.R.Robinson@ceq.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
From the air we breathe to the food
we eat, the ocean touches every aspect
of our lives.1 Coastlines are home to
approximately 40 percent of the U.S.
population,2 and as it sustains and
connects us, the ocean is woven into our
cultures and communities. All people—
regardless of race, background, income,
ability, Tribal affiliation, or ZIP Code—
should have equitable access to the
benefits provided by the ocean, such as
well-paying jobs, healthy and plentiful
food, wetlands that protect from
damaging storms, space for cultural and
religious practices, multiple sources of
energy, recreation, transportation, and
trade. But even as many communities in
the United States have thrived in recent
decades, many other communities have
been left behind. Communities do not
share equitably in the benefits provided
by the ocean or equitably bear the
burden of the negative impacts of
human activities associated with the
ocean: climate change, sea level rise and
coastal flooding, increased storm
intensity, pollution, overfishing, loss of
habitat biodiversity, and other threats.
Communities with environmental
justice concerns face entrenched
disparities that are often the legacy of
racial discrimination and
marginalization, redlining, exclusionary
zoning, and other discriminatory
decisions or patterns. Examples of such
decisions and patterns include the
inequitable placement of polluting
infrastructure, such as ports and
landfills, and inadequate responses to
natural hazards, such as storms and
typhoons. Communities with a
1 ‘‘Ocean’’ includes the open ocean, coasts,
estuaries, the U.S. Arctic, the Great Lakes, and
oceans and coasts surrounding the U.S. Territories.
2 Office for Coastal Management, Economics and
Demographics (2023), https://coast.noaa.gov/states/
fast-facts/economics-and-demographics.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
significant proportion of people who are
Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native
American, Asian American, Native
Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander may be
disproportionately impacted by these
issues, as well as communities with a
significant proportion of people who
experience persistent poverty or other
forms of social inequality. Communities
experiencing environmental injustices
also include geographically dispersed
and mobile populations, such as
migrant fishers or those who have been
displaced by environmental hazards or
inequitable development practices.
Environmental injustices may also be
cumulative and convergent as people
face multiple climate and social
challenges over time.
The Federal Government is dedicated
to building upon and strengthening its
commitment to deliver environmental
justice to all communities across
America. Restoring and protecting a
healthy environment wherever people
live, play, work, learn, grow, and
worship is of the utmost importance to
the Biden-Harris Administration. All
communities deserve a healthy and
resilient ocean, and opportunities to
pursue traditional and cultural practices
and participate in a sustainable blue
economy where good jobs, skills
training, and economic benefits are
shared.
The Ocean Policy Committee, a
Congressionally mandated, Cabinetlevel interagency committee charged
with coordinating Federal ocean
policy,3 will develop an Ocean Justice
Strategy in consultation with Federally
recognized Tribes and input from
Territorial, State, and local
governments, Indigenous communities,
the private sector, and the public. The
Ocean Justice Strategy will aim to
identify barriers and opportunities to
fully integrate environmental justice
principles into ocean-related activities
of the Federal Government.
The Ocean Justice Strategy will: (1)
assess how the Federal Government
should define ocean justice; (2) describe
barriers to and opportunities for ocean
justice; (3) describe how ocean justice
should apply to the scientific enterprise
of knowledge building, including the
appropriate consideration, inclusion,
and application of Indigenous
Knowledge; 4 (4) describe how ocean
justice should apply to access to and
3 National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Ocean Policy Committee (2023),
https://www.noaa.gov/interagency-ocean-policy.
4 OSTP & CEQ, Guidance for Federal Departments
and Agencies on Indigenous Knowledge (2022),
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/
2022/12/OSTP-CEQ-IK-Guidance.pdf [hereinafter
IK Guidance].
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37519
management of the ocean, coasts, and
Great Lakes; and (5) describe how ocean
justice will be implemented by the
Federal Government to build on and
expand the work of Tribal, Territorial,
State, and local governments,
Indigenous communities, the private
sector, and the public.
At the Federal level, the Ocean Justice
Strategy will take into account all
relevant Biden-Harris Administration
actions and reports, including:
Executive Order 13985 of January 20,
2021 (Advancing Racial Equity and
Support for Underserved Communities
Through the Federal Government),5
Executive Order 14008 of January 27,
2021 (Tackling the Climate Crisis at
Home and Abroad),6 Executive Order
14091 of February 16, 2023 (Further
Advancing Racial Equity and Support
for Underserved Communities Through
the Federal Government),7 Executive
Order 14096 of April 21, 2023
(Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment
to Environmental Justice for All),8 the
Ocean Climate Action Plan,9 the
National Nature Assessment,10
Opportunities to Accelerate NatureBased Solutions,11 the America the
Beautiful initiative,12 and Guidance for
Federal Departments and Agencies on
Indigenous Knowledge.13
Questions To Inform Development of
the Strategy
You may provide information on as
many topics below as you choose.
Clearly indicate in your submission
which questions you are addressing.
The OPC is seeking input from the
public on the following:
• Definitions. What is ocean justice?
How do you define ocean justice in the
context of your community and your
work?
• Barriers to Ocean Justice. What are
the barriers to realizing ocean justice?
What key challenges do you face in
achieving ocean justice? What ocean
5 86
FR 7009 (Jan. 25, 2021).
FR 7619 (Jan. 27, 2021).
7 88 FR 10825 (Feb. 22, 2023).
8 88 FR 25251 (Apr. 26, 2023).
9 OPC, Ocean Climate Action Plan (2023), https://
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/
Ocean-Climate-Action-Plan_Final.pdf.
10 U.S. Global Change Research Program, National
Nature Assessment, https://www.globalchange.gov/
nna.
11 CEQ, OSTP & the White House Office of
Domestic Climate Policy, Opportunities for
Accelerating Nature-Based Solutions: A Roadmap
for Climate Progress (2022), https://
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/
Nature-Based-Solutions-Roadmap.pdf.
12 U.S. Department of the Interior, America the
Beautiful, https://www.doi.gov/priorities/americathe-beautiful.
13 IK Guidance, supra note 5.
6 86
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
37520
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
justice challenges do you see as central
to Federal Government action?
• Opportunities for Ocean Justice.
What elements, activities, and
components should the Ocean Justice
Strategy include? What injustices
related to the ocean should the Federal
Government better address? What
successful regional or local efforts to
remedy past harms or advance ocean
justice should be applied nationwide?
What examples do you have of instances
when the Federal Government made a
just decision related to the ocean, and
how might that be scaled up or
broadened? What does ocean justice in
Federal actions and decision-making
look like in practice?
• Research and Knowledge Gaps.
What are the research and knowledge
gaps that we need to address for the
Federal Government to create and
advance an effective Ocean Justice
Strategy and take equitable and
ambitious action?
• Tools and Practices. How can the
Federal Government harness existing
environmental justice tools and
practices, such as the Climate and
Economic Justice Screening Tool
(CEJST),14 EJ Screen,15 and
EnviroAtlas,16 to answer questions
about justice in ocean policy? What new
tools and practices are necessary to
advance ocean justice?
• Partnerships and Collaboration.
What ocean justice solutions can or
should be led by non-Federal entities?
Where and how can the Federal
Government partner with Tribal,
Territorial, State, and local
governments, as well as external
stakeholders across regions and sectors,
to effectively remedy past harms and
advance ocean justice?
• Additional Considerations. What
else would you like considered in the
development of the Ocean Justice
Strategy?
Please note that this Federal Register
notice is designed to complement
existing Federal activities in this space.
The OPC will consider comments
submitted in response to its previous
request for information on the Ocean
Climate Action Plan 17 to inform the
14 CEQ, Climate and Economic Justice Screening
Tool, https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/.
15 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
EJScreen: Environmental Justice Screening and
Mapping Tool (2023), https://www.epa.gov/
ejscreen.
16 EPA, EnviroAtlas (2023), https://www.epa.gov/
enviroatlas.
17 87 FR 60228 (Oct 4, 2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
development of the Ocean Justice
Strategy.
Matthew Lee-Ashley,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2023–12271 Filed 6–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3325–F3–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[ARV–221004B–PL]
Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive
Patent License
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act
and implementing regulations, the
Department of the Air Force hereby
gives notice of its intent to grant an
exclusive patent license to Advanced
Cooling Technologies, Inc., having a
place of business at 1046 New Holland
Avenue, Lancaster, PA 17601.
DATES: Written objections must be filed
no later than fifteen (15) calendar days
after the date of publication of this
notice.
SUMMARY:
Submit written objections to
Sara Telano, AFRL/RDOX, 3550
Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB, NM
87117; Phone: (505) 853–3305; or Email:
sara.telano@us.af.mil. Include Docket
No. ARV–221004B–PL in the subject
line of the message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Telano, AFRL/RDOX, 3550 Aberdeen
Ave. SE, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117;
Phone: (505) 853–3305; or Email:
sara.telano@us.af.mil.
ADDRESSES:
Abstract of Patent Application(s)
A thermomodulating heat pipe is
provided including a heat pipe envelope
having a capillary wick extending
substantially continuously the full
length of the heat pipe and a void space
interior of the capillary wick. The heat
pipe envelope has a nominal evaporator
section, a nominal condenser section
where the nominal condenser section
includes an active condenser portion
and an inactive condenser portion, and
a reservoir section extending from the
inactive condenser portion. At a
nominal condition, a heat pipe fluid is
provided with a liquid phase filling the
capillary wick and a vapor phase filling
the void space of the nominal
evaporator section and the active
condenser portion, a non-condensable
gas filling the void space of at least the
reservoir section and the inactive
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
condenser portion. Depending on
thermal conditions, both prograde and
retrograde heat transfer are enabled.
Intellectual Property
U.S. Application No. 18/204,114, filed
on May 31, 2023, and entitled,
‘‘Thermomodulating Heat Pipe.’’
The Department of the Air Force may
grant the prospective license unless a
timely objection is received that
sufficiently shows the grant of the
license would be inconsistent with the
Bayh-Dole Act or implementing
regulations. A competing application for
a patent license agreement, completed
in compliance with 37 CFR 404.8 and
received by the Air Force within the
period for timely objections, will be
treated as an objection and may be
considered as an alternative to the
proposed license.
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 209; 37 CFR 404.
Tommy W. Lee,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–12210 Filed 6–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Record of Decision for the
Environmental Impact Statement
Sentinel (Ground Based Strategic
Deterrent) Program Deployment and
Minuteman III Decommissioning and
Disposal
Notice of availability of record
of decision.
ACTION:
On May 19, 2023, the
Department of the Air Force (DAF)
signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Environmental Impact Statement
Sentinel (Ground Based Strategic
Deterrent [GBSD]) Program Deployment
and Minuteman III Decommissioning
and Disposal.
ADDRESSES: Lt Col Rodney Ellison, Air
Force Global Strike Command, Air
Forces Strategic-Air Public Affairs, 245
Davis Ave. E, Suite 198, Barksdale AFB,
LA 71110, (318.456.1305),
rodney.ellison.4@us.af.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Air Force (DAF)
approved the three GBSD locations and
their subsequent sequencing (June
2020). Based on this decision, the DAF
will sequentially replace all land-based
Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic
missile in the United States with the
Sentinel system, including the motors,
interstages, propulsion system rocket
engine, and missile guidance set. All
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37518-37520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12271]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
[CEQ-2023-0004]
Ocean Justice Strategy
AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), on behalf of the Ocean Policy
Committee (OPC), request input from all interested parties to inform
the development of an Ocean Justice Strategy. The Ocean Justice
Strategy will describe the vision, goals, and high-level objectives for
coordinating and guiding ocean justice activities across the Federal
Government. It may also serve as a reference for Tribal, Territorial,
State, and local governments, regional management bodies, and non-
governmental groups. The Ocean Justice Strategy will propose equitable
and just practices to advance safety, health, and prosperity for
communities residing near the ocean, the coasts, and the Great Lakes
and for the whole country, now and for future generations. It builds on
current Biden-Harris Administration activities and commitments aimed to
advance environmental justice. Through this Request for Information
(RFI), the Ocean Policy Committee seeks public input on what the vision
and goals of the Ocean Justice Strategy should be and how the Federal
Government can advance just and equitable access to, and management and
use of, the ocean, the coasts, and the Great Lakes.
DATES: Responses are due by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on July 24, 2023.
Submissions received after the deadline will not be taken into
consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number CEQ-
2023-0004, using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: Responding to this RFI is voluntary. You may respond
to some or all of the questions in this RFI. We request that you submit
only one response, and that your submission not exceed 2,500 words. For
any submissions that are over 2,500 words, please consider including an
executive summary of 2,500 words or fewer. Your submission should
clearly indicate which question(s) you are addressing. Your response
should include the name of the person(s) or organization(s) submitting
it. If your response refers to
[[Page 37519]]
studies, research, or other empirical data that are not widely
published, include copies of or electronic links to the referenced
materials.
Comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. Do
not submit any information you consider to be private information,
privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, or
other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: De'Marcus Robinson, Ocean Policy
Fellow, 202-395-5750 or De'[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
From the air we breathe to the food we eat, the ocean touches every
aspect of our lives.\1\ Coastlines are home to approximately 40 percent
of the U.S. population,\2\ and as it sustains and connects us, the
ocean is woven into our cultures and communities. All people--
regardless of race, background, income, ability, Tribal affiliation, or
ZIP Code--should have equitable access to the benefits provided by the
ocean, such as well-paying jobs, healthy and plentiful food, wetlands
that protect from damaging storms, space for cultural and religious
practices, multiple sources of energy, recreation, transportation, and
trade. But even as many communities in the United States have thrived
in recent decades, many other communities have been left behind.
Communities do not share equitably in the benefits provided by the
ocean or equitably bear the burden of the negative impacts of human
activities associated with the ocean: climate change, sea level rise
and coastal flooding, increased storm intensity, pollution,
overfishing, loss of habitat biodiversity, and other threats.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Ocean'' includes the open ocean, coasts, estuaries, the
U.S. Arctic, the Great Lakes, and oceans and coasts surrounding the
U.S. Territories.
\2\ Office for Coastal Management, Economics and Demographics
(2023), https://coast.noaa.gov/states/fast-facts/economics-and-demographics.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Communities with environmental justice concerns face entrenched
disparities that are often the legacy of racial discrimination and
marginalization, redlining, exclusionary zoning, and other
discriminatory decisions or patterns. Examples of such decisions and
patterns include the inequitable placement of polluting infrastructure,
such as ports and landfills, and inadequate responses to natural
hazards, such as storms and typhoons. Communities with a significant
proportion of people who are Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native
American, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander may be
disproportionately impacted by these issues, as well as communities
with a significant proportion of people who experience persistent
poverty or other forms of social inequality. Communities experiencing
environmental injustices also include geographically dispersed and
mobile populations, such as migrant fishers or those who have been
displaced by environmental hazards or inequitable development
practices. Environmental injustices may also be cumulative and
convergent as people face multiple climate and social challenges over
time.
The Federal Government is dedicated to building upon and
strengthening its commitment to deliver environmental justice to all
communities across America. Restoring and protecting a healthy
environment wherever people live, play, work, learn, grow, and worship
is of the utmost importance to the Biden-Harris Administration. All
communities deserve a healthy and resilient ocean, and opportunities to
pursue traditional and cultural practices and participate in a
sustainable blue economy where good jobs, skills training, and economic
benefits are shared.
The Ocean Policy Committee, a Congressionally mandated, Cabinet-
level interagency committee charged with coordinating Federal ocean
policy,\3\ will develop an Ocean Justice Strategy in consultation with
Federally recognized Tribes and input from Territorial, State, and
local governments, Indigenous communities, the private sector, and the
public. The Ocean Justice Strategy will aim to identify barriers and
opportunities to fully integrate environmental justice principles into
ocean-related activities of the Federal Government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Ocean
Policy Committee (2023), https://www.noaa.gov/interagency-ocean-policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ocean Justice Strategy will: (1) assess how the Federal
Government should define ocean justice; (2) describe barriers to and
opportunities for ocean justice; (3) describe how ocean justice should
apply to the scientific enterprise of knowledge building, including the
appropriate consideration, inclusion, and application of Indigenous
Knowledge; \4\ (4) describe how ocean justice should apply to access to
and management of the ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes; and (5) describe
how ocean justice will be implemented by the Federal Government to
build on and expand the work of Tribal, Territorial, State, and local
governments, Indigenous communities, the private sector, and the
public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ OSTP & CEQ, Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on
Indigenous Knowledge (2022), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/OSTP-CEQ-IK-Guidance.pdf [hereinafter IK Guidance].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the Federal level, the Ocean Justice Strategy will take into
account all relevant Biden-Harris Administration actions and reports,
including: Executive Order 13985 of January 20, 2021 (Advancing Racial
Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal
Government),\5\ Executive Order 14008 of January 27, 2021 (Tackling the
Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad),\6\ Executive Order 14091 of
February 16, 2023 (Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for
Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government),\7\ Executive
Order 14096 of April 21, 2023 (Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All),\8\ the Ocean Climate Action Plan,\9\
the National Nature Assessment,\10\ Opportunities to Accelerate Nature-
Based Solutions,\11\ the America the Beautiful initiative,\12\ and
Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Indigenous
Knowledge.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 86 FR 7009 (Jan. 25, 2021).
\6\ 86 FR 7619 (Jan. 27, 2021).
\7\ 88 FR 10825 (Feb. 22, 2023).
\8\ 88 FR 25251 (Apr. 26, 2023).
\9\ OPC, Ocean Climate Action Plan (2023), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Ocean-Climate-Action-Plan_Final.pdf.
\10\ U.S. Global Change Research Program, National Nature
Assessment, https://www.globalchange.gov/nna.
\11\ CEQ, OSTP & the White House Office of Domestic Climate
Policy, Opportunities for Accelerating Nature-Based Solutions: A
Roadmap for Climate Progress (2022), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Nature-Based-Solutions-Roadmap.pdf.
\12\ U.S. Department of the Interior, America the Beautiful,
https://www.doi.gov/priorities/america-the-beautiful.
\13\ IK Guidance, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions To Inform Development of the Strategy
You may provide information on as many topics below as you choose.
Clearly indicate in your submission which questions you are addressing.
The OPC is seeking input from the public on the following:
Definitions. What is ocean justice? How do you define
ocean justice in the context of your community and your work?
Barriers to Ocean Justice. What are the barriers to
realizing ocean justice? What key challenges do you face in achieving
ocean justice? What ocean
[[Page 37520]]
justice challenges do you see as central to Federal Government action?
Opportunities for Ocean Justice. What elements,
activities, and components should the Ocean Justice Strategy include?
What injustices related to the ocean should the Federal Government
better address? What successful regional or local efforts to remedy
past harms or advance ocean justice should be applied nationwide? What
examples do you have of instances when the Federal Government made a
just decision related to the ocean, and how might that be scaled up or
broadened? What does ocean justice in Federal actions and decision-
making look like in practice?
Research and Knowledge Gaps. What are the research and
knowledge gaps that we need to address for the Federal Government to
create and advance an effective Ocean Justice Strategy and take
equitable and ambitious action?
Tools and Practices. How can the Federal Government
harness existing environmental justice tools and practices, such as the
Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST),\14\ EJ Screen,\15\
and EnviroAtlas,\16\ to answer questions about justice in ocean policy?
What new tools and practices are necessary to advance ocean justice?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ CEQ, Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool, https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/.
\15\ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), EJScreen:
Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool (2023), https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen.
\16\ EPA, EnviroAtlas (2023), https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnerships and Collaboration. What ocean justice
solutions can or should be led by non-Federal entities? Where and how
can the Federal Government partner with Tribal, Territorial, State, and
local governments, as well as external stakeholders across regions and
sectors, to effectively remedy past harms and advance ocean justice?
Additional Considerations. What else would you like
considered in the development of the Ocean Justice Strategy?
Please note that this Federal Register notice is designed to
complement existing Federal activities in this space. The OPC will
consider comments submitted in response to its previous request for
information on the Ocean Climate Action Plan \17\ to inform the
development of the Ocean Justice Strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 87 FR 60228 (Oct 4, 2022).
Matthew Lee-Ashley,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2023-12271 Filed 6-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3325-F3-P