Air Plan Approval; ID; State Board Composition, 34091-34093 [2023-11261]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
applicable standards to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and
reduce burden as set forth in sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order
12988 (Feb. 5, 1996).
I. Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children): This rulemaking does not
concern an environmental risk to health
or safety that may disproportionately
affect children under Executive Order
13045 (Apr. 21, 1997).
J. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property): This rulemaking will
not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications
under Executive Order 12630 (Mar. 15,
1988).
K. Congressional Review Act: Under
the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the USPTO
will submit a report containing the final
rule and other required information to
the United States Senate, the United
States House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the Government
Accountability Office. The changes in
this rulemaking are not expected to
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, a
major increase in costs or prices, or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
Therefore, this rulemaking is not
expected to result in a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995: The changes set forth in this
rulemaking do not involve a Federal
intergovernmental mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
of $100 million (as adjusted) or more in
any one year, or a Federal private sector
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by the private sector of
$100 million (as adjusted) or more in
any one year, and will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions are necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995. See 2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
M. National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969: This rulemaking will not have
any effect on the quality of the
environment and is thus categorically
excluded from review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969. See 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
N. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995: The
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) are not applicable because this
rulemaking does not contain provisions
that involve the use of technical
standards.
O. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
This final rule does not impact
information collection requirements that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information has a currently valid OMB
control number.
P. E-Government Act Compliance:
The USPTO is committed to compliance
with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other
information technologies, to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Biologics, Courts, Freedom
of information, Incorporation by
reference, Inventions and patents,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
and under the authority contained in 35
U.S.C. 2, as amended, the USPTO
amends 37 CFR part 1 as follows:
34091
‘‘Sequence Listing XML’’ contains the
information of the nucleotide and/or
amino acid sequence(s) disclosed in the
patent application using the symbols
and format in accordance with the
requirements of §§ 1.832 through 1.834.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 1.839, revise paragraph (b)(1) to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.839
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) WIPO Standard ST.26. WIPO
Handbook on Intellectual Property
Information and Documentation,
Standard ST.26: Recommended
Standard for the Presentation of
Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence
Listings Using XML (eXtensible Markup
Language) including Annexes I–VII,
version 1.6, approved November 25,
2022; IBR approved for §§ 1.831 through
1.834.
*
*
*
*
*
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2023–11365 Filed 5–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0753, FRL–10190–
02–R10]
PART 1—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PATENT CASES
Air Plan Approval; ID; State Board
Composition
■
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
AGENCY:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2), unless
otherwise noted.
SUMMARY:
2. In § 1.831, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.831 Requirements for patent
applications filed on or after July 1, 2022,
having nucleotide and/or amino acid
sequence disclosures.
(a) Patent applications disclosing a
nucleotide and/or amino acid
sequence(s) by enumeration of its
residues, as defined in paragraph (b) of
this section, must contain, as a separate
part of the disclosure, a computer
readable Sequence Listing in XML
format (a ‘‘Sequence Listing XML’’).
Disclosed nucleotide or amino acid
sequences that do not meet the
definition in paragraph (b) of this
section must not be included in the
‘‘Sequence Listing XML.’’ The
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to
the Idaho State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted on August 9, 2022. The
revision was submitted to meet the state
board composition requirements of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0753. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
34092
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall (15–H13), EPA Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, (Suite 155), Seattle,
WA 98101, (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it means the
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On August 9, 2022, Idaho submitted
a SIP revision to meet the state board
composition requirements of Clean Air
Act section 128(a)(1). On February 17,
2023, we proposed to approve the
submitted SIP revision (88 FR 10256).
The reasons for our proposed approval
are included in the proposal and will
not be restated here. The public
comment period closed on March 20,
2023. We received one anonymous
comment in support of our proposed
action, therefore we are finalizing our
action as proposed.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving and
incorporating by reference a revision to
the Idaho SIP submitted on August 9,
2022. Upon the effective date of this
action, the Idaho SIP will include Idaho
Code section 39–107(1)(a), state
effective July 1, 2022. This provision
establishes the composition
requirements for the Idaho Board of
Environmental Quality.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation
by reference of the Idaho statutory
provision described in section II of this
preamble and set forth in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 in this
document. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the Clean Air
Act as of the effective date of the final
rule of the EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.1
INFORMATION CONTACT
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
1 62
PO 00000
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The air agency did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the Clean Air
Act and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require
such an evaluation. The EPA did not
perform an EJ analysis and did not
consider EJ in this action. Due to the
nature of this action, it is expected to
have a neutral to positive impact on the
air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of Executive Order
12898 of achieving environmental
justice for people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 25, 2023.
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
34093
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Subpart N—Idaho
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
2. In § 52.670:
a. The table in paragraph (c) is
amended by adding the entry ‘‘Idaho
Code section 39–107(1)(a)’’ at the end of
the table; and
■ b. The table in paragraph (e) is
amended by removing entry ‘‘Idaho
State Board SIP Revision; Executive
Order 2013–06; dated June 26, 2013’’.
The addition reads as follows:
■
■
Dated: May 17, 2023.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
§ 52.670
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
*
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED IDAHO REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
EPA approval
date
*
Explanations
*
*
State Statutes
*
Idaho Code section 39–
107(1)(a).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Board—Composition—Officers—Compensation—Powers—Subpoena—Depositions—Review—Rules.
*
[FR Doc. 2023–11261 Filed 5–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0261; FRL–10932–
01–R9]
Finding of Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan Submissions for
the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; California; Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
find that California has failed to submit
state implementation plan (SIP)
elements required under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) to implement the
2012 national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
7/1/2022
*
*
5/26/2023 [Insert Federal Register Citation].
*
To satisfy the requirements of CAA section
128(a)(1) and CAA
section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for all
criteria pollutants.
matter (PM2.5) in the Los Angeles-South
Coast Air Basin (‘‘South Coast’’).
California was required to submit by
June 9, 2022, a SIP submission that
meets the Serious area plan
requirements for a base year emissions
inventory and best available control
measures (BACM). The State submitted
the required SIP elements, but
subsequently withdrew its submission.
If the EPA has not affirmatively found
that the State has submitted a complete
SIP to correct these deficiencies within
18 months of this finding, the offset
sanction will apply in the area. If within
six additional months the EPA has still
not affirmatively determined that the
State has submitted a complete SIP to
correct the deficiencies, the highway
funding sanction will apply in the area.
No later than two years after the EPA
makes this finding, if the State has not
submitted and the EPA has not
approved each of the required SIP
elements, the EPA must promulgate a
federal implementation plan (FIP) to
address the remaining requirements.
ADDRESSES:
The effective date of this action
is June 26, 2023.
Ginger Vagenas, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–0261. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
a disability who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34091-34093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0753, FRL-10190-02-R10]
Air Plan Approval; ID; State Board Composition
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
revision to the Idaho State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
August 9, 2022. The revision was submitted to meet the state board
composition requirements of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0753. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
[[Page 34092]]
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall (15-H13), EPA Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, (Suite 155), Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-6357,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' is used, it means the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On August 9, 2022, Idaho submitted a SIP revision to meet the state
board composition requirements of Clean Air Act section 128(a)(1). On
February 17, 2023, we proposed to approve the submitted SIP revision
(88 FR 10256). The reasons for our proposed approval are included in
the proposal and will not be restated here. The public comment period
closed on March 20, 2023. We received one anonymous comment in support
of our proposed action, therefore we are finalizing our action as
proposed.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving and incorporating by reference a revision to
the Idaho SIP submitted on August 9, 2022. Upon the effective date of
this action, the Idaho SIP will include Idaho Code section 39-
107(1)(a), state effective July 1, 2022. This provision establishes the
composition requirements for the Idaho Board of Environmental Quality.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Idaho statutory provision described in section II of this preamble and
set forth in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 in this document. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that
plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the
Clean Air Act as of the effective date of the final rule of the EPA's
approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to
the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The air agency did not evaluate environmental justice
considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the Clean Air Act and
applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such
an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not
consider EJ in this action. Due to the nature of this action, it is
expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the
stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of achieving environmental justice
for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and it will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 25, 2023.
[[Page 34093]]
Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this
final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes
of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 17, 2023.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670:
0
a. The table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding the entry ``Idaho
Code section 39-107(1)(a)'' at the end of the table; and
0
b. The table in paragraph (e) is amended by removing entry ``Idaho
State Board SIP Revision; Executive Order 2013-06; dated June 26,
2013''.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Idaho Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanations
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Idaho Code section 39-107(1)(a). Board--Composition--Offi 7/1/2022 5/26/2023 [Insert To satisfy the
cers--Compensation--Pow Federal Register requirements of
ers--Subpoena--Depositi Citation]. CAA section
ons--Review--Rules. 128(a)(1) and CAA
section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii)
for all criteria
pollutants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-11261 Filed 5-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
