Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 6X Airplane; Flight Envelope Protection, Icing and Non-Icing Conditions; High-Incidence Protection, 32951-32956 [2023-10971]
Download as PDF
32951
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 99
Tuesday, May 23, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 1710
[Docket No. RUS–22–ELECTRIC–0057]
RIN 0572–AC60
Electric Program Coverage Ratios
Clarification and Modifications
Rural Utilities Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation.
AGENCY:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS or Agency), an agency in the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Rural Development Mission
area, published a final rule with
comment in the Federal Register on
March 1, 2023, to modify its coverage
ratio requirements, add an additional set
of ratios, update definitions, and add
definitions. Through this action, RUS is
confirming the final rule as it was
published as no public comments were
received.
DATES: The final rule published March
1, 2023, at 88 FR 12806, is confirmed as
of May 30, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Bartholomew, Rural Utilities
Service Electric Program, Rural
Development, United States Department
of Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 1560, Washington,
DC 20250; 704–544–4612,
mark.bartholomew@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Rural
Development is a mission area within
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) comprising the Rural Utilities
Service, Rural Housing Service, and
Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
Rural Development’s mission is to
increase economic opportunity and
improve the quality of life for all rural
Americans. Rural Development meets
its mission by providing loans, loan
guarantees, grants, and technical
assistance through numerous programs
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
aimed at creating and improving
housing, business, and infrastructure
throughout rural America.
The RUS Electric Program provides
funding to maintain, expand, upgrade,
and modernize America’s rural electric
infrastructure. The loans and loan
guarantees finance the construction or
improvement of electric distribution,
transmission, and generation facilities
in rural areas. In an effort by the RUS
Electric Program to administer its
program in an efficient and effective
manner while improving its customer
service and experience, and in response
to requests from the RUS Electric
Program borrowers, the Electric Program
undertook a systematic review of
regulations and procedures in place to
administer its program. In addition to
this final rule, the Electric Program has
completed two other streamlining
efforts to date.
The final rule that published March 1,
2023 (88 FR 12806), included a 60-day
comment period that ended on May 1,
2023. The Agency has not received any
comments on the final rule.
With no comments on this rule, the
Agency confirms the final rule without
change.
Andrew Berke.
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–10637 Filed 5–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0629; Special
Conditions No. 25–803–SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 6X Airplane; Flight
Envelope Protection, Icing and NonIcing Conditions; High-Incidence
Protection
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Dassault Aviation
(Dassault) Model Falcon 6X airplane.
This airplane will have novel or
unusual design features associated with
flight-envelope protections, in icing and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
non-icing conditions, that use highincidence protection to automatically
advance throttles when the airplane
angle of attack (AoA) reaches a
predetermined value. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Dassault on May 23, 2023. Send
comments on or before July 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2021–0629 using
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: Except for Confidential
Business Information (CBI) as described
in the following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information:
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
is commercial or financial information
that is both customarily and actually
treated as private by its owner. Under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
(5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments
responsive to these special conditions
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
32952
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these special
conditions. Send submissions
containing CBI to the Information
Contact below. Comments the FAA
receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the
public docket for these special
conditions.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any
time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Brown, Performance and Environment
Unit, AIR–621A, Technical Policy
Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S Airport
Rd., Wichita, KS 67209–2190; telephone
and fax 405–666–1050; email
troy.a.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
substance of these special conditions
has been published in the Federal
Register for public comment in several
prior instances with no substantive
comments received. Therefore, the FAA
finds, pursuant to § 11.38(b), that new
comments are unlikely, and notice and
comment prior to this publication are
unnecessary.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these
special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On July 1, 2012, Dassault Aviation
applied for a type certificate for its new
Model Falcon 5X airplane. However,
Dassault has decided not to release an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
airplane under the model designation
Falcon 5X, instead choosing to change
that model designation to Falcon 6X.
In February of 2018, due to engine
supplier issues, Dassault extended the
type certificate application date for its
Model Falcon 5X airplane under new
Model Falcon 6X. This airplane is a
twin-engine business jet with seating for
19 passengers, and has a maximum
takeoff weight of 77,460 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Dassault must show that the Model
Falcon 6X airplane meets the applicable
provisions of part 25, as amended by
amendments 25–1 through 25–146.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Dassault Model Falcon 6X
airplane because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Dassault Model Falcon
6X airplane must comply with the fuelvent and exhaust-emission requirements
of 14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Dassault Model Falcon 6X
airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
A high-incidence protection system
that replaces the stall warning system
during normal operating conditions,
prohibits the airplane from stalling,
limits the angle of attack at which the
airplane can be flown during normal
low speed operation, and cannot be
overridden by the flight crew. The
application of this angle-of-attack limit
impacts the stall speed determination,
the stall characteristics and stallwarning demonstration, and the
longitudinal handling characteristics.
The current airworthiness standards do
not contain adequate safety standards
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for the unique features of the highincidence protection system.
Discussion
The high-incidence protection system
prevents the airplane from stalling at
low speeds and, therefore, a stallwarning system is not needed during
normal flight conditions. However,
during failure conditions, which are not
shown to be extremely improbable, the
requirements of §§ 25.203 and 25.207
apply, although slightly modified. If
there are failures not shown to be
extremely improbable, the flight
characteristics at the AoA for CLmax must
be suitable in the traditional sense, and
stall warning must be provided in a
conventional manner.
These special conditions address this
novel or unusual design feature on the
Dassault Model Falcon 6X and contain
the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Dassault
Model Falcon 6X airplane. Should
Dassault apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 6X airplanes.
Special Conditions Part I: Stall
Protection and Scheduled Operating
Speeds
Foreword
In the following paragraphs, ‘‘in icing
conditions’’ means with the ice
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
These special conditions address
novel or unusual design features of the
Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane and
use terminology that does not appear in
14 CFR part 25. For the purpose of these
special conditions, the following terms
describe certain aspects of these novel
or unusual design feature:
(1) High-Incidence Protection System
A system that operates directly and
automatically on the airplane’s flight
controls to limit the maximum angle of
attack (AoA) that can be attained to a
value below that at which an
aerodynamic stall would occur.
(2) Alpha-Limit
The maximum AoA at which the
airplane stabilizes with the highincidence protection system operating
and the longitudinal control held on its
aft stop.
(3) Vmin
The minimum steady flight speed in
the airplane configuration under
consideration with the high-incidence
protection system operating. See section
(c) of these special conditions.
(4) Vmin1g
Vmin corrected to 1-g conditions. See
section (c)(3). of these special
conditions. It is the minimum calibrated
airspeed at which the airplane can
develop a lift force normal to the flight
path equal to its weight, while at an
AoA not greater than that determined
for Vmin.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(b) Capability and Reliability of the
High-Incidence Protection System
The applicant must establish the
capability and reliability of the high
incidence protection system. The
applicant may establish this capability
and reliability by flight test, simulation,
or analysis as appropriate. The
capability and reliability required are:
(1) It must not be possible during
pilot-induced maneuvers to encounter a
stall and handling characteristics must
be acceptable, as required by section (e)
of these Special Conditions.
(2) The airplane must be protected
against stalling due to the effects of
wind-shears and gusts at low speeds as
required by section (f) of these Special
Conditions.
(3) The ability of the high-incidence
protection system to accommodate any
reduction in stalling incidence must be
verified in icing conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
(c) Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed
In lieu of § 25.103, the following
requirements apply:
(1) The minimum steady flight speed,
Vmin, is the final, stabilized, calibrated
airspeed obtained when the airplane is
decelerated until the longitudinal
control is on its stop in such a way that
the entry rate does not exceed 1 knot per
second.
(2) The minimum steady flight speed,
Vmin, must be determined in icing and
non-icing conditions with:
(i) The high-incidence protection
system operating normally.
(ii) Idle thrust and automatic thrust
system (if applicable) inhibited;
(iii) All combinations of flaps setting
and landing gear position for which Vmin
is required to be determined;
(iv) The weight used when reference
stall speed, VSR, is being used as a factor
to determine compliance with a
required performance standard;
(v) The most unfavorable center of
gravity allowable; and
(vi) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(3) The 1-g minimum steady-flight
speed, Vmin1g, is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which the
airplane can develop a lift force (normal
to the flight path) equal to its weight,
while at an angle of attack not greater
than that at which the minimum steady
flight speed of section (c)(1) was
determined. It must be determined in
icing and non-icing conditions.
(4) The reference stall speed, VSR, is
a calibrated airspeed defined by the
applicant. VSR may not be less than a 1g
stall speed. VSR must be determined in
non-icing conditions and expressed as:
Where:
Calibrated airspeed obtained when the load
factor-corrected lift coefficient
is first a maximum during the maneuver
prescribed in section (c)(5)(viii) of this
paragraph,
nzw = Load factor normal to the flight path
at VCLmax,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
W = Airplane gross weight,
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
(5) VCLmax is determined in non-icing
conditions with:
(i) Engines idling, or, if that resultant
thrust causes an appreciable decrease in
stall speed, not more than zero thrust at
the stall speed;
(ii) The airplane in other respects
(such as flaps and landing gear) in the
condition existing in the test or
performance standard in which VSR is
being used;
(iii) The weight used when VSR is
being used as a factor to determine
compliance with a required
performance standard;
(iv) The center of gravity position that
results in the highest value of reference
stall speed;
(v) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system, but not less than
1.13 VSR and not greater than 1.3 VSR;
(vi) Reserved.
(vii) The high-incidence protection
system adjusted, at the option of the
applicant, to allow higher incidence
than is possible with the normal
production system; and
(viii) Starting from the stabilized trim
condition, apply the longitudinal
control to decelerate the airplane so that
the speed reduction does not exceed 1
knot per second.
(d) Stall Warning
In lieu of § 25.207, the following
requirements apply:
(1) Normal Operation
If the design meets all conditions of
Part 1, section (b) of these special
conditions, then the airplane need not
provide stall warning during normal
operation. The conditions of section (b)
provide an equivalent level of safety to
§ 25.207, Stall Warning, so the provision
of an additional, unique warning device
is not required.
(2) High-Incidence Protection System
Failure
For any failure of the high-incidence
protection system that the applicant
cannot show to be extremely
improbable, and that results in the
capability of the system no longer
satisfying conditions (b)(1), (b)(2), and
(b)(3), the design must provide stall
warning that protects against
encountering unacceptable
characteristics and against encountering
stall.
(i) This stall warning, with the flaps
and landing gear in any normal
position, must be clear and distinctive
to the pilot and meet the requirements
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY23.018
(a) Definitions
(4) The high-incidence protection
system must be provided in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift
devices that is likely to be used in flight
following system failures.
(5) The reliability of the system and
the effects of failures must be acceptable
in accordance with § 25.1309.
ER23MY23.017
accretions (relative to the relevant flight
phase) as defined in 14 CFR part 25,
Amendment 121, appendix C.
32953
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
32954
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
specified in conditions (d)(2)(iv) and
(d)(2)(v) below.
(ii) The design must also provide this
stall warning in each abnormal
configuration of the high lift devices
that is likely to be used in flight
following system failures.
(iii) The design may furnish this stall
warning either through the inherent
aerodynamic qualities of the airplane or
by a device that will give clearly
distinguishable indications under
expected conditions of flight. However,
a visual stall warning device that
requires the attention of the crew within
the flight deck is not acceptable by
itself. If a warning device is used, it
must provide a warning in each of the
airplane configurations prescribed in
condition (d)(2)(i) above and for the
conditions prescribed below in
conditions (d)(2)(iv) and (d)(2)(v) below.
(iv) In non-icing conditions, stall
warning must provide sufficient margin
to prevent encountering unacceptable
characteristics and encountering stall in
the following conditions:
(A) In power-off straight deceleration
not exceeding 1 knot per second to a
speed 5 knots or 5 percent calibrated
airspeed (CAS), whichever is greater,
below the warning onset.
(B) In turning flight, stall deceleration
at entry rates up to 3 knots per second
when recovery is initiated not less than
1 second after the warning onset.
(v) In icing conditions, stall warning
must provide sufficient margin to
prevent encountering unacceptable
characteristics and encountering stall, in
power off straight and turning flight
decelerations not exceeding 1 knot per
second, when the pilot starts a recovery
maneuver not less than three seconds
after the onset of stall warning.
(vi) An airplane is considered stalled
when the behavior of the airplane gives
the pilot a clear and distinctive
indication of an acceptable nature that
the airplane is stalled. Acceptable
indications of a stall, occurring either
individually or in combination are:
(A) A nose-down pitch that cannot be
readily arrested;
(B) Buffeting, of a magnitude and
severity that is strong and effective
deterrent to further speed reduction; or
(C) The pitch control reaches the aft
stop and no further increase in pitch
attitude occurs when the control is held
full aft for a short time before recovery
is initiated.
(vii) An aircraft exhibits unacceptable
characteristics during straight or turning
flight decelerations if it is not always
possible to produce and to correct roll
and yaw by unreversed use of aileron
and rudder controls, or abnormal noseup pitching occurs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
(e) Handling Characteristics at High
Incidence
In lieu of both § 25.201 and § 25.203,
the following apply:
(1) High-Incidence Handling
Demonstrations
In lieu of § 25.201: the following
apply:
(i) Maneuvers to the limit of the
longitudinal control, in nose-up pitch,
must be demonstrated in straight flight
and in 30-degree banked turns with:
(A) The high-incidence protection
system operating normally;
(B) Initial power conditions of:
(1) Power off; and
(2) The power necessary to maintain
level flight at 1.5 VSR1, where VSR1 is the
reference stall speed with flaps in
approach position, the landing gear
retracted, and maximum landing
weight;
(C) None;
(D) Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions;
(E) Representative weights within the
range for which certification is
requested; and
(F) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(ii) The following procedures must be
used to show compliance in non-icing
and icing conditions:
(A) Starting at a speed sufficiently
above the minimum steady flight speed
to ensure that a steady rate of speed
reduction can be established, apply the
longitudinal control so that the speed
reduction does not exceed 1 knot per
second until the control reaches the
stop.
(B) The longitudinal control must be
maintained at the stop until the airplane
has reached a stabilized flight condition
and must then be recovered by normal
recovery techniques.
(C) Maneuvers with increased
deceleration rates:
(1) In non-icing conditions, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to the maximum rate
achievable.
(2) In icing conditions, with the antiice system working normally, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to 3 knots per second.
(D) Maneuvers with ice accretion
prior to operation of the normal anti-ice
system: With the ice accretion prior to
operation of the normal anti-ice system,
the requirement must also be met in
deceleration at 1 knot per second up to
full back stick.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Characteristics in High-Incidence
Maneuvers
In lieu of § 25.203, the following
apply in icing and non-icing conditions:
(i) Throughout maneuvers with a rate
of deceleration of not more than 1 knot
per second, both in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns, the airplane’s
characteristics must be as follows:
(A) There must not be any abnormal
nose-up pitching.
(B) There must not be any
uncommanded nose-down pitching,
which would be indicative of stall.
However reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence
at Alpha limit as the longitudinal
control reaches the stop would be
acceptable.
(C) There must not be any
uncommanded lateral or directional
motion and the pilot must retain good
lateral and directional control, by
conventional use of the controls,
throughout the maneuver.
(D) The airplane must not exhibit
buffeting of a magnitude and severity
that would act as a deterrent from
completing the maneuver specified in
(e)(1)(i).
(ii) In maneuvers with increased rates
of deceleration, some degradation of
characteristics is acceptable, associated
with a transient excursion beyond the
stabilized Alpha-limit. However, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous
characteristics or characteristics that
would deter the pilot from holding the
longitudinal control on the stop for a
period of time appropriate to the
maneuver.
(iii) It must always be possible to
reduce incidence by conventional use of
the controls.
(iv) The rate at which the airplane can
be maneuvered from trim speeds
associated with scheduled operating
speeds, such as V2 and VREF up to
Alpha-limit, must not be unduly
damped or be significantly slower than
can be achieved on conventionally
controlled transport airplanes.
(3) Characteristics Up to Maximum Lift
Angle of Attack
(i) In non-icing conditions:
Maneuvers with a rate of deceleration
of not more than 1 knot per second up
to the AoA at which VCLmax was
obtained, as defined in section (c) of
these special conditions, must be
demonstrated in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns in the following
configurations:
(A) The high-incidence protection
deactivated or adjusted, at the option of
the applicant, to allow higher incidence
than is possible with the normal
production system;
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(B) Automatic thrust increase system
inhibited (if applicable);
(C) Engines idling;
(D) Flaps and landing gear in any
likely combination of positions; and
(E) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(ii) In icing conditions:
Maneuvers with a rate of deceleration
of not more than 1 knot per second up
to the maximum AoA reached during
maneuvers from section (e)(1)(ii)(C)(2)
must be demonstrated in straight flight
with:
(A) The high-incidence protection
deactivated or adjusted, at the option of
the applicant, to allow higher incidence
than is possible with the normal
production system;
(B) Automatic thrust increase system
inhibited (if applicable);
(C) Engines idling;
(D) Flaps and landing gear in any
likely combination of positions; and
(E) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(iii) During the maneuvers used to
show compliance with sections (e)(3)(i)
and (e)(3)(ii) above, the airplane must
not exhibit dangerous characteristics
and it must always be possible to reduce
AoA by conventional use of the
controls. The pilot must retain good
lateral and directional control, by
conventional use of the controls,
throughout the maneuver.
(f) Atmospheric Disturbances
Operation of the high-incidence
protection system must not adversely
affect aircraft control during expected
levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor
impede the application of recovery
procedures in case of wind-shear. This
must be demonstrated in non-icing and
icing conditions.
(g) Proof of Compliance
In lieu of § 25.21(b), the design must
meet the following requirement:
(b) The flying qualities must be
evaluated at the most unfavorable
center-of-gravity (CG) position.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(h) Sections 25.145(a), 25.145(b)(6), and
25.1323(d)
The design must meet the following
modified requirements:
• Section 25.145(a) ‘‘Vmin’’ in lieu of
‘‘stall identification’’
• Section 25.145(b)(6) ‘‘Vmin’’ in lieu of
VSW
• Section 25.1323(d) ‘‘From 1.23 VSR to
Vmin. . .,’’ in lieu of ‘‘1.23 VSR to stall
warning speed. . .,’’ and ‘‘speeds
below Vmin. . .’’ in lieu of ‘‘speeds
below stall warning. . .’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
Special Conditions Part II: Credit for
Robust Envelope Protection in Icing
Conditions
(a) In lieu of § 25.21(g)(1), the
following requirement applies: § 25.21,
Proof of compliance:
(g) The requirements of this subpart
associated with icing conditions apply
only if certification for flight in icing
conditions is desired. If certification for
flight in icing conditions is desired, the
following requirements also apply (see
AC 25–25):
(1) Each requirement of this subpart,
except §§ 25.121(a), 25.123(c),
25.143(b)(1) and (b)(2), 25.149,
25.201(c)(2), 25.207(c) and (d), and
25.251(b) through (e), must be met in
icing conditions. Compliance must be
shown using the ice accretions defined
in appendix C, assuming normal
operation of the airplane and its ice
protection system in accordance with
the operating limitations and operating
procedures established by the applicant
and provided in the Airplane Flight
Manual.
(b) In lieu of § 25.103, define the stall
speed as provided in Special Conditions
Part I, section (c).
(c) In lieu of § 25.105(a)(2)(i), the
following applies:
Section 25.105, Take-off:
(2) In icing conditions, if in the
configuration of § 25.121(b) with the
‘‘Take-off Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C:
(i) the V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the takeoff configuration,
or
(d) In lieu of § 25.107(c) and (g), the
following apply, with additional
sections (c′) and (g′):
Section 25.107, Take-Off Speeds:
(c) In non-icing conditions V2, in
terms of calibrated airspeed, must be
selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by
§ 25.121(b) but may not be less than—
(1) V2min;
(2) VR plus the speed increment
attained (in accordance with
§ 25.111(c)(2)) before reaching a height
of 35 feet above the takeoff surface; and
(3) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(c′) in icing conditions with the ‘‘takeoff ice’’ accretion defined in part 25,
appendix C, V2 may not be less than—
(1) the V2 speed determined in nonicing conditions; and
(2) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(g) In non-icing conditions, VFTO, in
terms of calibrated airspeed, must be
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32955
selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by
§ 25.121(c), but may not be less than—
(1) 1.18 VSR; and
(2) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(g′) in icing conditions with the ‘‘Final
take-off ice’’ accretion defined in part
25, appendix C, VFTO may not be less
than—
(1) the VFTO speed determined in nonicing conditions.
(2) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(e) In lieu of §§ 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A),
25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A), and 25.121(d)(2)(ii),
the following apply:
Section 25.121, Climb: One-Engine
Inoperative:
In lieu of § 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A):
(A) The V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the take-off
configuration; or
In lieu of § 25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A):
(A) The VFTO speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the en-route
configuration; or
In lieu of § 25.121(d)(2)(ii):
(d)(2) The requirements of subparagraph (d)(1) of this paragraph must
be met:
(ii) In icing conditions with the
approach ice accretion defined in part
25, appendix C, in a configuration
corresponding to the normal all-enginesoperating procedure in which Vmin1g for
this configuration does not exceed
110% of the Vmin1g for the related allengines-operating landing configuration
in icing, with a climb speed established
with normal landing procedures, but not
more than 1.VSR (VSR determined in
non-icing conditions).
(f) In lieu of § 25.123(b)(2)(i), the
following requirements apply:
Section 25.123, En-route flight paths.
(i) The minimum en-route speed
scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability
specified in § 25.143(h) for the en-route
configuration; or
(g) In lieu of § 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B),
replace with the following requirements
and remove § 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(C):
Section 25.125, Landing.
(B) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) with the landing ice
accretion defined in part 25, appendix
C.
(C) [removed].
(h) In lieu of § 25.143(j)(1), the
following applies:
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
32956
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Section 25.143, General.
(1) The airplane is controllable in a
pull-up maneuver up to 1.5g load factor
or lower if limited by AoA protection.
(i) In lieu of § 25.207, Stall warning,
change to read as the requirements
defined in Part I Special Conditions,
section (d).
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May
18, 2023.
Suzanne A. Masterson,
Acting Manager, Technical Policy Branch,
Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–10971 Filed 5–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–1049; Project
Identifier AD–2023–00591–R; Amendment
39–22441; AD 2023–10–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo
S.p.a. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Emergency Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2023–07–51, which applied to all
Leonardo S.p.a. Model AB139 and
AW139 helicopters and which was
previously sent to all known U.S.
owners and operators of those
helicopters. Emergency AD 2023–07–51
required inspecting for a gap between
the main rotor (M/R) pitch link upper
rod end assembly bearing and the pitch
control lever assembly and, depending
on the results, replacing or reidentifying the M/R pitch link upper rod
end assembly. Emergency AD 2023–07–
51 also prohibited installing an affected
M/R pitch link upper rod end assembly.
Since the FAA issued Emergency AD
2023–07–51, it has been determined that
a gap between the M/R pitch link upper
rod end assembly bearing and the pitch
control lever assembly that is within a
certain dimension tolerance is
acceptable. This AD continues to
require the actions in Emergency AD
2023–07–51, as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which is incorporated by reference
in this AD, but allows a gap of less than
0.5 mm. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 May 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
This AD is effective June 7, 2023.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 7, 2023.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by July 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2023–1049; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is
listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For EASA material that is
incorporated by reference in this final
rule, contact EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also
available at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2023–1049.
Other Related Service Information:
For Leonardo Helicopters service
information that is identified in this
final rule, contact Leonardo S.p.A.,
Emanuele Bufano, Head of
Airworthiness, Viale G. Agusta 520,
21017 C Costa di Samarate (Va) Italy;
telephone (+39) 0331–225074; fax (+39)
0331–229046; or at
customerportal.leonardocompany.com/
en-US/. You may also view this service
information at the FAA contact
information under Material
Incorporated by Reference above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
McCully, Program Manager,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
International Validation Branch, FAA,
1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone (404) 474–5548;
email william.mccully@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this final rule. Send your comments to
an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2023–1049;
Project Identifier AD–2023–00591–R’’ at
the beginning of your comments. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this final rule because of those
comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this AD contain
commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private,
that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this AD,
it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket
of this AD. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Dan McCully, Program
Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
(404) 474–5548; email william.mccully@
faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued Emergency AD 2023–
07–51 on March 31, 2023, to address an
unsafe condition on all Leonardo S.p.a.
Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32951-32956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10971]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0629; Special Conditions No. 25-803-SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 6X Airplane;
Flight Envelope Protection, Icing and Non-Icing Conditions; High-
Incidence Protection
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Dassault Aviation
(Dassault) Model Falcon 6X airplane. This airplane will have novel or
unusual design features associated with flight-envelope protections, in
icing and non-icing conditions, that use high-incidence protection to
automatically advance throttles when the airplane angle of attack (AoA)
reaches a predetermined value. The applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Dassault on May 23, 2023. Send
comments on or before July 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2021-0629 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as
described in the following paragraph, and other information as
described in title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the
FAA will post all comments received without change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special conditions.
Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated
[[Page 32952]]
as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it is important that you
clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page
of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat
such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed in the public docket of these
special conditions. Send submissions containing CBI to the Information
Contact below. Comments the FAA receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket for these
special conditions.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy Brown, Performance and
Environment Unit, AIR-621A, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and
Standards Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1801 S Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209-2190; telephone
and fax 405-666-1050; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The substance of these special conditions
has been published in the Federal Register for public comment in
several prior instances with no substantive comments received.
Therefore, the FAA finds, pursuant to Sec. 11.38(b), that new comments
are unlikely, and notice and comment prior to this publication are
unnecessary.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On July 1, 2012, Dassault Aviation applied for a type certificate
for its new Model Falcon 5X airplane. However, Dassault has decided not
to release an airplane under the model designation Falcon 5X, instead
choosing to change that model designation to Falcon 6X.
In February of 2018, due to engine supplier issues, Dassault
extended the type certificate application date for its Model Falcon 5X
airplane under new Model Falcon 6X. This airplane is a twin-engine
business jet with seating for 19 passengers, and has a maximum takeoff
weight of 77,460 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault must show that the
Model Falcon 6X airplane meets the applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by amendments 25-1 through 25-146.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design features:
A high-incidence protection system that replaces the stall warning
system during normal operating conditions, prohibits the airplane from
stalling, limits the angle of attack at which the airplane can be flown
during normal low speed operation, and cannot be overridden by the
flight crew. The application of this angle-of-attack limit impacts the
stall speed determination, the stall characteristics and stall-warning
demonstration, and the longitudinal handling characteristics. The
current airworthiness standards do not contain adequate safety
standards for the unique features of the high-incidence protection
system.
Discussion
The high-incidence protection system prevents the airplane from
stalling at low speeds and, therefore, a stall-warning system is not
needed during normal flight conditions. However, during failure
conditions, which are not shown to be extremely improbable, the
requirements of Sec. Sec. 25.203 and 25.207 apply, although slightly
modified. If there are failures not shown to be extremely improbable,
the flight characteristics at the AoA for CLmax must be
suitable in the traditional sense, and stall warning must be provided
in a conventional manner.
These special conditions address this novel or unusual design
feature on the Dassault Model Falcon 6X and contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane. Should Dassault apply at a later
date for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 6X
airplanes.
Special Conditions Part I: Stall Protection and Scheduled Operating
Speeds
Foreword
In the following paragraphs, ``in icing conditions'' means with the
ice
[[Page 32953]]
accretions (relative to the relevant flight phase) as defined in 14 CFR
part 25, Amendment 121, appendix C.
(a) Definitions
These special conditions address novel or unusual design features
of the Dassault Model Falcon 6X airplane and use terminology that does
not appear in 14 CFR part 25. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following terms describe certain aspects of these novel
or unusual design feature:
(1) High-Incidence Protection System
A system that operates directly and automatically on the airplane's
flight controls to limit the maximum angle of attack (AoA) that can be
attained to a value below that at which an aerodynamic stall would
occur.
(2) Alpha-Limit
The maximum AoA at which the airplane stabilizes with the high-
incidence protection system operating and the longitudinal control held
on its aft stop.
(3) Vmin
The minimum steady flight speed in the airplane configuration under
consideration with the high-incidence protection system operating. See
section (c) of these special conditions.
(4) Vmin1g
Vmin corrected to 1-g conditions. See section (c)(3). of
these special conditions. It is the minimum calibrated airspeed at
which the airplane can develop a lift force normal to the flight path
equal to its weight, while at an AoA not greater than that determined
for Vmin.
(b) Capability and Reliability of the High-Incidence Protection System
The applicant must establish the capability and reliability of the
high incidence protection system. The applicant may establish this
capability and reliability by flight test, simulation, or analysis as
appropriate. The capability and reliability required are:
(1) It must not be possible during pilot-induced maneuvers to
encounter a stall and handling characteristics must be acceptable, as
required by section (e) of these Special Conditions.
(2) The airplane must be protected against stalling due to the
effects of wind-shears and gusts at low speeds as required by section
(f) of these Special Conditions.
(3) The ability of the high-incidence protection system to
accommodate any reduction in stalling incidence must be verified in
icing conditions.
(4) The high-incidence protection system must be provided in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift devices that is likely to be
used in flight following system failures.
(5) The reliability of the system and the effects of failures must
be acceptable in accordance with Sec. 25.1309.
(c) Minimum Steady Flight Speed and Reference Stall Speed
In lieu of Sec. 25.103, the following requirements apply:
(1) The minimum steady flight speed, Vmin, is the final,
stabilized, calibrated airspeed obtained when the airplane is
decelerated until the longitudinal control is on its stop in such a way
that the entry rate does not exceed 1 knot per second.
(2) The minimum steady flight speed, Vmin, must be
determined in icing and non-icing conditions with:
(i) The high-incidence protection system operating normally.
(ii) Idle thrust and automatic thrust system (if applicable)
inhibited;
(iii) All combinations of flaps setting and landing gear position
for which Vmin is required to be determined;
(iv) The weight used when reference stall speed, VSR, is
being used as a factor to determine compliance with a required
performance standard;
(v) The most unfavorable center of gravity allowable; and
(vi) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed achievable
by the automatic trim system.
(3) The 1-g minimum steady-flight speed, Vmin1g, is the
minimum calibrated airspeed at which the airplane can develop a lift
force (normal to the flight path) equal to its weight, while at an
angle of attack not greater than that at which the minimum steady
flight speed of section (c)(1) was determined. It must be determined in
icing and non-icing conditions.
(4) The reference stall speed, VSR, is a calibrated
airspeed defined by the applicant. VSR may not be less than
a 1g stall speed. VSR must be determined in non-icing
conditions and expressed as:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY23.017
Where:
Calibrated airspeed obtained when the load factor-corrected lift
coefficient
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY23.018
is first a maximum during the maneuver prescribed in section
(c)(5)(viii) of this paragraph,
nzw = Load factor normal to the flight path at
VCLmax,
W = Airplane gross weight,
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
(5) VCLmax is determined in non-icing conditions with:
(i) Engines idling, or, if that resultant thrust causes an
appreciable decrease in stall speed, not more than zero thrust at the
stall speed;
(ii) The airplane in other respects (such as flaps and landing
gear) in the condition existing in the test or performance standard in
which VSR is being used;
(iii) The weight used when VSR is being used as a factor
to determine compliance with a required performance standard;
(iv) The center of gravity position that results in the highest
value of reference stall speed;
(v) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed achievable
by the automatic trim system, but not less than 1.13 VSR and
not greater than 1.3 VSR;
(vi) Reserved.
(vii) The high-incidence protection system adjusted, at the option
of the applicant, to allow higher incidence than is possible with the
normal production system; and
(viii) Starting from the stabilized trim condition, apply the
longitudinal control to decelerate the airplane so that the speed
reduction does not exceed 1 knot per second.
(d) Stall Warning
In lieu of Sec. 25.207, the following requirements apply:
(1) Normal Operation
If the design meets all conditions of Part 1, section (b) of these
special conditions, then the airplane need not provide stall warning
during normal operation. The conditions of section (b) provide an
equivalent level of safety to Sec. 25.207, Stall Warning, so the
provision of an additional, unique warning device is not required.
(2) High-Incidence Protection System Failure
For any failure of the high-incidence protection system that the
applicant cannot show to be extremely improbable, and that results in
the capability of the system no longer satisfying conditions (b)(1),
(b)(2), and (b)(3), the design must provide stall warning that protects
against encountering unacceptable characteristics and against
encountering stall.
(i) This stall warning, with the flaps and landing gear in any
normal position, must be clear and distinctive to the pilot and meet
the requirements
[[Page 32954]]
specified in conditions (d)(2)(iv) and (d)(2)(v) below.
(ii) The design must also provide this stall warning in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift devices that is likely to be
used in flight following system failures.
(iii) The design may furnish this stall warning either through the
inherent aerodynamic qualities of the airplane or by a device that will
give clearly distinguishable indications under expected conditions of
flight. However, a visual stall warning device that requires the
attention of the crew within the flight deck is not acceptable by
itself. If a warning device is used, it must provide a warning in each
of the airplane configurations prescribed in condition (d)(2)(i) above
and for the conditions prescribed below in conditions (d)(2)(iv) and
(d)(2)(v) below.
(iv) In non-icing conditions, stall warning must provide sufficient
margin to prevent encountering unacceptable characteristics and
encountering stall in the following conditions:
(A) In power-off straight deceleration not exceeding 1 knot per
second to a speed 5 knots or 5 percent calibrated airspeed (CAS),
whichever is greater, below the warning onset.
(B) In turning flight, stall deceleration at entry rates up to 3
knots per second when recovery is initiated not less than 1 second
after the warning onset.
(v) In icing conditions, stall warning must provide sufficient
margin to prevent encountering unacceptable characteristics and
encountering stall, in power off straight and turning flight
decelerations not exceeding 1 knot per second, when the pilot starts a
recovery maneuver not less than three seconds after the onset of stall
warning.
(vi) An airplane is considered stalled when the behavior of the
airplane gives the pilot a clear and distinctive indication of an
acceptable nature that the airplane is stalled. Acceptable indications
of a stall, occurring either individually or in combination are:
(A) A nose-down pitch that cannot be readily arrested;
(B) Buffeting, of a magnitude and severity that is strong and
effective deterrent to further speed reduction; or
(C) The pitch control reaches the aft stop and no further increase
in pitch attitude occurs when the control is held full aft for a short
time before recovery is initiated.
(vii) An aircraft exhibits unacceptable characteristics during
straight or turning flight decelerations if it is not always possible
to produce and to correct roll and yaw by unreversed use of aileron and
rudder controls, or abnormal nose-up pitching occurs.
(e) Handling Characteristics at High Incidence
In lieu of both Sec. 25.201 and Sec. 25.203, the following apply:
(1) High-Incidence Handling Demonstrations
In lieu of Sec. 25.201: the following apply:
(i) Maneuvers to the limit of the longitudinal control, in nose-up
pitch, must be demonstrated in straight flight and in 30-degree banked
turns with:
(A) The high-incidence protection system operating normally;
(B) Initial power conditions of:
(1) Power off; and
(2) The power necessary to maintain level flight at 1.5
VSR1, where VSR1 is the reference stall speed
with flaps in approach position, the landing gear retracted, and
maximum landing weight;
(C) None;
(D) Flaps, landing gear, and deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions;
(E) Representative weights within the range for which certification
is requested; and
(F) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed achievable
by the automatic trim system.
(ii) The following procedures must be used to show compliance in
non-icing and icing conditions:
(A) Starting at a speed sufficiently above the minimum steady
flight speed to ensure that a steady rate of speed reduction can be
established, apply the longitudinal control so that the speed reduction
does not exceed 1 knot per second until the control reaches the stop.
(B) The longitudinal control must be maintained at the stop until
the airplane has reached a stabilized flight condition and must then be
recovered by normal recovery techniques.
(C) Maneuvers with increased deceleration rates:
(1) In non-icing conditions, the requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence limit, up to the maximum rate
achievable.
(2) In icing conditions, with the anti-ice system working normally,
the requirements must also be met with increased rates of entry to the
incidence limit, up to 3 knots per second.
(D) Maneuvers with ice accretion prior to operation of the normal
anti-ice system: With the ice accretion prior to operation of the
normal anti-ice system, the requirement must also be met in
deceleration at 1 knot per second up to full back stick.
(2) Characteristics in High-Incidence Maneuvers
In lieu of Sec. 25.203, the following apply in icing and non-icing
conditions:
(i) Throughout maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of not more
than 1 knot per second, both in straight flight and in 30-degree banked
turns, the airplane's characteristics must be as follows:
(A) There must not be any abnormal nose-up pitching.
(B) There must not be any uncommanded nose-down pitching, which
would be indicative of stall. However reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence at Alpha limit as the
longitudinal control reaches the stop would be acceptable.
(C) There must not be any uncommanded lateral or directional motion
and the pilot must retain good lateral and directional control, by
conventional use of the controls, throughout the maneuver.
(D) The airplane must not exhibit buffeting of a magnitude and
severity that would act as a deterrent from completing the maneuver
specified in (e)(1)(i).
(ii) In maneuvers with increased rates of deceleration, some
degradation of characteristics is acceptable, associated with a
transient excursion beyond the stabilized Alpha-limit. However, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous characteristics or characteristics
that would deter the pilot from holding the longitudinal control on the
stop for a period of time appropriate to the maneuver.
(iii) It must always be possible to reduce incidence by
conventional use of the controls.
(iv) The rate at which the airplane can be maneuvered from trim
speeds associated with scheduled operating speeds, such as
V2 and VREF up to Alpha-limit, must not be unduly
damped or be significantly slower than can be achieved on
conventionally controlled transport airplanes.
(3) Characteristics Up to Maximum Lift Angle of Attack
(i) In non-icing conditions:
Maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of not more than 1 knot per
second up to the AoA at which VCLmax was obtained, as
defined in section (c) of these special conditions, must be
demonstrated in straight flight and in 30-degree banked turns in the
following configurations:
(A) The high-incidence protection deactivated or adjusted, at the
option of the applicant, to allow higher incidence than is possible
with the normal production system;
[[Page 32955]]
(B) Automatic thrust increase system inhibited (if applicable);
(C) Engines idling;
(D) Flaps and landing gear in any likely combination of positions;
and
(E) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed achievable
by the automatic trim system.
(ii) In icing conditions:
Maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of not more than 1 knot per
second up to the maximum AoA reached during maneuvers from section
(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) must be demonstrated in straight flight with:
(A) The high-incidence protection deactivated or adjusted, at the
option of the applicant, to allow higher incidence than is possible
with the normal production system;
(B) Automatic thrust increase system inhibited (if applicable);
(C) Engines idling;
(D) Flaps and landing gear in any likely combination of positions;
and
(E) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed achievable
by the automatic trim system.
(iii) During the maneuvers used to show compliance with sections
(e)(3)(i) and (e)(3)(ii) above, the airplane must not exhibit dangerous
characteristics and it must always be possible to reduce AoA by
conventional use of the controls. The pilot must retain good lateral
and directional control, by conventional use of the controls,
throughout the maneuver.
(f) Atmospheric Disturbances
Operation of the high-incidence protection system must not
adversely affect aircraft control during expected levels of atmospheric
disturbances, nor impede the application of recovery procedures in case
of wind-shear. This must be demonstrated in non-icing and icing
conditions.
(g) Proof of Compliance
In lieu of Sec. 25.21(b), the design must meet the following
requirement:
(b) The flying qualities must be evaluated at the most unfavorable
center-of-gravity (CG) position.
(h) Sections 25.145(a), 25.145(b)(6), and 25.1323(d)
The design must meet the following modified requirements:
Section 25.145(a) ``Vmin'' in lieu of ``stall
identification''
Section 25.145(b)(6) ``Vmin'' in lieu of
VSW
Section 25.1323(d) ``From 1.23 VSR to
Vmin. . .,'' in lieu of ``1.23 VSR to stall
warning speed. . .,'' and ``speeds below Vmin. . .'' in lieu
of ``speeds below stall warning. . .''.
Special Conditions Part II: Credit for Robust Envelope Protection in
Icing Conditions
(a) In lieu of Sec. 25.21(g)(1), the following requirement
applies: Sec. 25.21, Proof of compliance:
(g) The requirements of this subpart associated with icing
conditions apply only if certification for flight in icing conditions
is desired. If certification for flight in icing conditions is desired,
the following requirements also apply (see AC 25-25):
(1) Each requirement of this subpart, except Sec. Sec. 25.121(a),
25.123(c), 25.143(b)(1) and (b)(2), 25.149, 25.201(c)(2), 25.207(c) and
(d), and 25.251(b) through (e), must be met in icing conditions.
Compliance must be shown using the ice accretions defined in appendix
C, assuming normal operation of the airplane and its ice protection
system in accordance with the operating limitations and operating
procedures established by the applicant and provided in the Airplane
Flight Manual.
(b) In lieu of Sec. 25.103, define the stall speed as provided in
Special Conditions Part I, section (c).
(c) In lieu of Sec. 25.105(a)(2)(i), the following applies:
Section 25.105, Take-off:
(2) In icing conditions, if in the configuration of Sec. 25.121(b)
with the ``Take-off Ice'' accretion defined in appendix C:
(i) the V2 speed scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec. 25.143(h) for
the takeoff configuration, or
(d) In lieu of Sec. 25.107(c) and (g), the following apply, with
additional sections (c') and (g'):
Section 25.107, Take-Off Speeds:
(c) In non-icing conditions V2, in terms of calibrated
airspeed, must be selected by the applicant to provide at least the
gradient of climb required by Sec. 25.121(b) but may not be less
than--
(1) V2min;
(2) VR plus the speed increment attained (in accordance
with Sec. 25.111(c)(2)) before reaching a height of 35 feet above the
takeoff surface; and
(3) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(c') in icing conditions with the ``take-off ice'' accretion
defined in part 25, appendix C, V2 may not be less than--
(1) the V2 speed determined in non-icing conditions; and
(2) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(g) In non-icing conditions, VFTO, in terms of
calibrated airspeed, must be selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by Sec. 25.121(c), but may not be
less than--
(1) 1.18 VSR; and
(2) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(g') in icing conditions with the ``Final take-off ice'' accretion
defined in part 25, appendix C, VFTO may not be less than--
(1) the VFTO speed determined in non-icing conditions.
(2) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(e) In lieu of Sec. Sec. 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A), 25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A),
and 25.121(d)(2)(ii), the following apply:
Section 25.121, Climb: One-Engine Inoperative:
In lieu of Sec. 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A):
(A) The V2 speed scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec. 25.143(h) for
the take-off configuration; or
In lieu of Sec. 25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A):
(A) The VFTO speed scheduled in non-icing conditions
does not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec.
25.143(h) for the en-route configuration; or
In lieu of Sec. 25.121(d)(2)(ii):
(d)(2) The requirements of sub-paragraph (d)(1) of this paragraph
must be met:
(ii) In icing conditions with the approach ice accretion defined in
part 25, appendix C, in a configuration corresponding to the normal
all-engines-operating procedure in which Vmin1g for this
configuration does not exceed 110% of the Vmin1g for the
related all-engines-operating landing configuration in icing, with a
climb speed established with normal landing procedures, but not more
than 1.VSR (VSR determined in non-icing
conditions).
(f) In lieu of Sec. 25.123(b)(2)(i), the following requirements
apply:
Section 25.123, En-route flight paths.
(i) The minimum en-route speed scheduled in non-icing conditions
does not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec.
25.143(h) for the en-route configuration; or
(g) In lieu of Sec. 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B), replace with the
following requirements and remove Sec. 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(C):
Section 25.125, Landing.
(B) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h) with the landing ice accretion defined in part 25,
appendix C.
(C) [removed].
(h) In lieu of Sec. 25.143(j)(1), the following applies:
[[Page 32956]]
Section 25.143, General.
(1) The airplane is controllable in a pull-up maneuver up to 1.5g
load factor or lower if limited by AoA protection.
(i) In lieu of Sec. 25.207, Stall warning, change to read as the
requirements defined in Part I Special Conditions, section (d).
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 18, 2023.
Suzanne A. Masterson,
Acting Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-10971 Filed 5-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P