Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH, 32709-32713 [2023-10731]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
insurance as of the assessment period
preceding the final short fall assessment
period; minus
(B) The $5 billion deduction;
provided, however, that an institution’s
final shortfall special assessment base
cannot be negative.
(ii) The final shortfall special
assessment base for an insured
depository institution that has one or
more affiliated insured depository
institutions shall equal:
(A) The institution’s uninsured
deposits, as described in paragraph (h)
of this section, adjusted for mergers,
consolidation, and termination of
insurance as of the assessment period
preceding the final shortfall assessment
period; minus
(B) The institution’s portion of the $5
billion deduction, determined according
to paragraph (i) of this section;
provided, however, that an institution’s
final shortfall special assessment base
cannot be negative.
(5) Calculation of final shortfall
special assessment. An insured
depository institution’s final shortfall
special assessment shall be calculated
by multiplying the final shortfall special
assessment rate by the institution’s final
shortfall special assessment base as
defined in paragraph (l)(4) of this
section.
(6) One-time final special assessment.
The one-time final shortfall special
assessment shall be collected on a onetime quarterly basis after final losses to
the Deposit Insurance Fund are
determined after termination of the
receiverships to which the March 12,
2023, systemic risk determination
applied.
(7) Payment, invoicing, and mergers.
Paragraphs (d), (e), and (k) of this
section are applicable to the one-time
shortfall special assessment.
(m) Request for revisions. An insured
depository institution may submit a
written request for revision of the
computation of any special assessment
or shortfall special assessment pursuant
to this part consistent with § 327.3(f).
(n) Special assessment collection in
excess of losses. Any special
assessments collected under this section
that exceed the losses to the Deposit
Insurance Fund, as of termination of the
receiverships to which the March 12,
2023, systemic risk determination
applied, shall be placed in the Deposit
Insurance Fund.
(o) Rule of construction. Nothing in
this section shall prevent the FDIC from
imposing additional special assessments
as required to recover current or future
losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund
resulting from any systemic risk
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
determination under 12 U.S.C.
1823(c)(4)(G).
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on May 11, 2023.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–10447 Filed 5–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2023–0188]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
create a new operating schedule to
govern all movable bridges over the
Cuyahoga River. The Coast Guard is also
proposing new rules that will assist
mariners signal for and anticipate bridge
openings. Mariners have raised
concerns to the Ninth Coast Guard
District Commander regarding the safety
and consistency of moveable bridge
operations on the Cuyahoga River.
These additions are proposed in
response to those concerns. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and relate material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2023–0188 using Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email If you have questions
on this temporary final rule, call or
email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone 216–902–
6085, email Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
PO 00000
Code of Federal Regulations
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32709
CRSTF Cuyahoga River Safety Task Force
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IGLD85 International Great Lakes Datum of
1985
LWD Low Water Datum Based on IGLD85
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PAWSA Ports And Waterway Safety
Assessment
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Cuyahoga River is over 100-miles
in length and empties into Lake Erie at
Cleveland, Ohio, but only the last 7miles of the river are considered
navigable for interstate commerce
purposes. The Cuyahoga River system
consists of the Cuyahoga River and the
Old River Channel, the original outflow
channel of the Cuyahoga River. The
Cuyahoga River has multiple sharp
bends that make visibility down river
impossible and is designated as an
American Heritage River by Executive
Order 13061.
Twenty-four bridges cross the
Cuyahoga River. These bridges
accommodate small powered and nonpowered recreational vessels, along with
large commercial vessels of up to 700
feet in length.
The Cuyahoga River is considered one
of the major industrial centers in the
Great Lakes and handles several
commodities for domestic and
international commerce, including steel,
heavy machinery, dry and liquid bulk
products, and salt.
The United States and Canadian Coast
Guard conduct fall and spring icebreaking operations in the Cuyahoga
River, depending on shipping schedules
and weather conditions.
Heavy recreational traffic is
concentrated in the Old River and on
the Cuyahoga River up to mile 2.42
during the summer.
All vertical clearances over the
Cuyahoga River and Old River Channel
are based on IGLD85. Two bridges cross
the Old River Channel:
1. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile
0.89, is a single leaf bascule bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 170feet and a vertical clearance of 6-feet in
the closed position and an unlimited
clearance in the open position. This
bridge is maintained in the open
position.
2. The Willow Avenue Bridge, mile
1.02, is a vertical lift bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 150feet and a vertical clearance of 12-feet in
the closed position and 98 feet in the
open position.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
32710
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Twenty-two bridges cross the
Cuyahoga River:
1. The Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.76, also known as ‘‘The
Iron Curtain’’ or ‘‘NS1’’ is a vertical lift
bridge that provides a horizontal
clearance of 250-feet and a vertical
clearance of 8-feet in the closed position
and 98-feet in the open position.
2. The Main Avenue Viaduct, mile
1.01, is a fixed bridge with a horizontal
clearance of 218-feet and a vertical
clearance of 92-feet, but 97-feet is
available in the center 182-feet of the
span.
3. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile
1.28, is a single leaf bascule bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 229feet and a vertical clearance of 8-feet in
the closed position and an unlimited
clearance in the open position. This
bridge is normally maintained in the
open position.
4. The Center Street Bridge, mile 1.28,
is a bob-tail swing bridge that provides
a horizontal clearance of 113-feet and a
vertical clearance of 17-feet in the
closed position and an unlimited
clearance in the open positions.
5. The Detroit-Superior Viaduct, mile
1.42, is a fixed bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 113-feet and a
vertical clearance of 98-feet.
6. The Union Terminal Viaduct, mile
1.89, is a fixed bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a
vertical clearance of 98-feet.
7. The Columbus Road Bridge, mile
1.93, is a vertical lift bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 220feet and a vertical clearance of 17-feet in
the closed position and 98-feet in the
open position.
8. The Flats Industrial Railroad
Bridge, mile 2.24, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of
200-feet and a vertical clearance of 8feet in the closed position and 97-feet in
the open position.
9. The City of Cleveland Railroad
Bridge, mile 2.42, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of
200-feet and a vertical clearance of 23feet in the closed position and 98-feet in
the open position.
10. The Carter Road Bridge, mile 2.43,
is a vertical lift bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 201-feet and a
vertical clearance of 22-feet in the
closed position and 97-feet in the open
position.
11. The Eagle Avenue Bridge, mile
2.80, is a vertical lift bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 187feet and a vertical clearance of 15-feet in
the closed position and 97-feet in the
open position. This bridge has been
maintained in the open position for over
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
15 years and plans are being made for
its complete removal by winter of 2025.
12. The Hope Memorial Bridge, mile
3.14, is a fixed bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 178-feet and a
vertical clearance of 96-feet.
13. The Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge also known as ‘‘NS2’’ or ‘‘Nickle
Plate’’ or ‘‘The Trestle Bridge’’, mile
3.34, is a vertical lift bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 200feet and a vertical clearance of 64-feet in
the closed position and 97-feet in the
open position.
14. The Inner Belt Freeway Bridge,
mile 3.42, is a fixed bridge that provides
a horizontal clearance of 230-feet and a
vertical clearance of 93-feet.
15. The West 3rd Street Bridge, mile
3.42, is a vertical lift bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 200feet and a vertical clearance of 10-feet in
the closed position and 97-feet in the
open position.
16. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile
4.75, is a single leaf bascule bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 110feet and a vertical clearance of 10-feet in
the closed position and an unlimited
clearance in the open position. This
bridge is normally maintained in the
open position, except when trains cross
the river.
17. The I–490 Bridge, mile 4.79, is a
fixed bridge that provides a horizontal
clearance of 110-feet and a vertical
clearance of 101-feet.
18. An Overhead Conveyor Bridge,
mile 5.35, is a fixed bridge that provides
a horizontal clearance of 210-feet and a
vertical clearance of 99-feet.
19. The Cleveland Cliffs Railroad
Bridge #1, mile 5.42, is a single leaf
bascule bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 129-feet and a
vertical clearance of 15-feet in the
closed position and an unlimited
clearance in the open position.
20. The Wheeling & Lake Erie
Railroad Bridge, mile 5.47, is a vertical
lift bridge that provides a horizontal
clearance of 200-feet and a vertical
clearance of 28-feet in the closed
position and 97-feet in the open
position.
21. The Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 6.07, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 27feet and a vertical clearance of 14-feet.
22. The Cleveland Cliffs Railroad
Bridge #2, mile 6.09, is a fixed bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of
59-feet and a vertical clearance of 14feet.
The newly constructed Voinovich
Pedestrian Bridge, at the mouth of North
Coast Harbor, provides a horizontal
clearance of 130-feet and a vertical
clearance of 6-feet at center diminishing
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to 4-feet at channel edges with an
unlimited clearance in the open
position.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
For 20 years, the Coast Guard has
awarded winter operating deviations to
all of the moveable highway bridges
over the Cuyahoga River from midDecember to the end of March, allowing
the bridges to open on signal if a 12hour advance notice of arrival was
received. We propose to make a
permanent all-seasons rule for all
movable bridges, except for the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76,
that, from December 15 through March
31 of each year each bridge will require
a 12-hours advance notice for openings.
As already required under § 117.55,
each bridge will be required to display
a sign with the bridge name, river mile,
and that from December 15 through
March 31 the bridge requires a 12-hour
advance notice. The signage will also
include the correct number to provide
the advance notice. We propose that the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
0.76, be exempted from the winter 12hour advance notice and will be
required to open on signal all year.
Freighters need to pass through the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
0.76, to gain refuge from high winds and
waves, and a 12-hour delay would be
considered unreasonable.
During the 2018 PAWSA that is
available on the https://navcen.uscg.gov
site by visiting Cuyahoga_River_
PAWSA_18_Dec_2018.pdf (uscg.gov) we
learned that ‘‘when the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, is
closed, all inbound and out bound
vessel traffic is halted. Congestion
builds on both sides of the bridge as
vessel operators wait for the bridge to
open. Mariners drift and maneuver to
maintain position, which increases the
risk of collision.’’ The PAWSA proposed
a better means of communications
between recreation and commercial
vessels. These recommendations
included: the posting of telephone
number at the bridge that would be
answered by the tender or dispatcher,
posting of a countdown clock, and
requiring a radiotelephone at the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
0.76. The recommendations sought to
alleviate congestion, prevent possible
collisions, and improve the flow of
commerce.
We reviewed complaints from
mariners concerning the operation of
the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge,
mile 0.76, and discovered from 2019
through 2022 a total of 291 complaints
were received; 115 of the reports
involved delays. For comparison, during
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
the same period, the Coast Guard
received two complaints against the
Willow Street Bridge, mile 1.02, and one
complaint against the Norfolk Southern
Railroad Bridge, mile 3.34. Most
complaints cite as the perceived cause
of delay, communication difficulties
with the drawtender, or in the cases of
Norfolk Southern, communication
difficulties with the train dispatchers.
In the PAWSA discussions related to
reducing congestion near the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76 and
improving the overall experience for
recreational vessels, it was
recommended that the Norfolk Southern
Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, install an
LED display (countdown clock) on both
sides of the Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.76, that would
communicate the estimated wait time
until the bridge lifts. These clocks were
in use when the former owner of the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
0.76 operated the crossing. The Coast
Guard is proposing the railroad
reestablish the use of those clocks or
install modern clock faces to
communicate the time until next
opening.
To improve public safety, reduce
vessel congestion at the bridge, and
improve communication between the
drawtender and the vessels, the Coast
Guard proposes to require the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, to
install and maintain signs visible from
the upriver and downriver sides of the
Under the proposal, all other movable
bridges over the Cuyahoga River, the
Old River, and at North Coast Harbor
would be allowed to operate with a 12hour advance notice from December
15th through March 31st and would be
required, in accordance with § 117.55,
to install and maintain signs visible
from the upriver and downriver sides of
the bridge. The size, type, and spacing
of characters must conform to the
standard alphabets for highway signs
and be visible to vessels approaching
the bridge from upriver or down river of
the bridge and be readable at a
minimum distance of 500 feet. The
information on the signs must provide
the name of the bridge and the river
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32711
bridge. The size, type, and spacing of
characters must conform to the standard
alphabets for highway signs and be
visible to vessels approaching the bridge
from upriver or down river of the bridge
and be readable at a minimum distance
of 500 feet. To improve communications
the Coast Guard will propose that the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
1.5, in addition to monitoring the
signals listed in 33 CFR 117.15, operate
and maintain a Radio Telephone as
required under 33 CFR 117.23 and
operate and maintain a telephone,
whose number will be maintained on
the appropriate signs at the bridge.
Suggested signage would appear like
this example:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
mile and include that the bridge opens
on signal except from December 15
through March 31 when the bridge
requires a 12-hour advance notice
followed by instructions how to provide
the advance notice.
Suggested signage would appear like
this example:
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
EP22MY23.004
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
32712
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still transit the bridge given advanced
notice.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
Tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1,
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
EP22MY23.005
BILLING CODE 9110–04–C
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f). The Coast Guard has determined
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2023–0188 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the ‘‘Search Results’’
column, and click on it. Then click on
the ‘‘Comment’’ option. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign up for email alerts, you
will be notified when comments are
posted, or a final rule is published of
any posting or updates to the docket.
We accept anonymous comments.
Comments we post to https://
www.regulations.gov will include any
personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
2.24; the City of Cleveland Railroad
Bridge, mile 2.42; the Carter Road
Bridge, mile 2.43; the Norfolk Southern
Railroad Bridge the West 3rd Street
Bridge, mile 3.42; the CSX Railroad
Bridge, mile 4.75; the Cleveland Cliffs
Railroad Bridge #1, mile 5.42; and the
Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Bridge.
(c) The Voinovich Pedestrian Bridge,
at the mouth of North Coast Harbor, will
open on signal except from December 15
through March 31 when the bridge will
open if a 12-hour advance notice is
provided.
Dated: May 15, 2023.
E.J. Doucette,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2023–10731 Filed 5–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
RIN 1625–AA00
■
■
2. Add § 117.848 to read as follows:
§ 117.848
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0364]
Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile
Marker 122–122.5, Rivesville, WV
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Cleveland Harbor.
(a) The Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.76, will open on signal.
(1) The bridge owner will maintain
and monitor a VHF–FM Marine Radio,
and telephone.
(2) The bridge will display a clock
that counts down the estimated time of
the next bridge opening that is visible to
vessels approaching from the upriver or
downriver side of the bridge.
(3) The bridge will also display a sign
readable from vessels approaching the
bridge from upriver or down river and
readable for 500 feet that states:
(i) The name of the bridge;
(ii) The river mile;
(iii) That the bridge is remotely
operated; and
(iv) The opening signal of the bridge
is one prolonged blast followed by one
short blast of the horn or VHF–FM
Marine Radio Channel 16, or by calling
the number posted by the owner.
(b) All remaining moveable vehicle
and railroad bridges on the Cuyahoga
River will open on signal, except from
December 15 through March 31 when
the bridges will open if a 12-hour
advance notice is provided. Said bridges
include: Willow Avenue Bridge at Mile
1.02; Center Street Bridge, mile 1.28; the
Columbus Road Bridge, mile 1.93; the
Flats Industrial Railroad Bridge, mile
PO 00000
32713
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
the Monongahela River at mile marker
122–122.5 from 10 p.m. through 10:30
p.m. This action is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on these navigable
waters during firework display on July
2, 2023. This proposed rulemaking
would prohibit persons and vessels
from being in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2023–0364 using the Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LTJG Eyobe
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32709-32713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10731]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2023-0188]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to create a new operating schedule to
govern all movable bridges over the Cuyahoga River. The Coast Guard is
also proposing new rules that will assist mariners signal for and
anticipate bridge openings. Mariners have raised concerns to the Ninth
Coast Guard District Commander regarding the safety and consistency of
moveable bridge operations on the Cuyahoga River. These additions are
proposed in response to those concerns. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and relate material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0188 using Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email If you have questions on this temporary final rule,
call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth
Coast Guard District; telephone 216-902-6085, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CRSTF Cuyahoga River Safety Task Force
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IGLD85 International Great Lakes Datum of 1985
LWD Low Water Datum Based on IGLD85
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PAWSA Ports And Waterway Safety Assessment
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Cuyahoga River is over 100-miles in length and empties into
Lake Erie at Cleveland, Ohio, but only the last 7-miles of the river
are considered navigable for interstate commerce purposes. The Cuyahoga
River system consists of the Cuyahoga River and the Old River Channel,
the original outflow channel of the Cuyahoga River. The Cuyahoga River
has multiple sharp bends that make visibility down river impossible and
is designated as an American Heritage River by Executive Order 13061.
Twenty-four bridges cross the Cuyahoga River. These bridges
accommodate small powered and non-powered recreational vessels, along
with large commercial vessels of up to 700 feet in length.
The Cuyahoga River is considered one of the major industrial
centers in the Great Lakes and handles several commodities for domestic
and international commerce, including steel, heavy machinery, dry and
liquid bulk products, and salt.
The United States and Canadian Coast Guard conduct fall and spring
ice-breaking operations in the Cuyahoga River, depending on shipping
schedules and weather conditions.
Heavy recreational traffic is concentrated in the Old River and on
the Cuyahoga River up to mile 2.42 during the summer.
All vertical clearances over the Cuyahoga River and Old River
Channel are based on IGLD85. Two bridges cross the Old River Channel:
1. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile 0.89, is a single leaf bascule
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 170-feet and a vertical
clearance of 6-feet in the closed position and an unlimited clearance
in the open position. This bridge is maintained in the open position.
2. The Willow Avenue Bridge, mile 1.02, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 150-feet and a vertical
clearance of 12-feet in the closed position and 98 feet in the open
position.
[[Page 32710]]
Twenty-two bridges cross the Cuyahoga River:
1. The Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, also known as
``The Iron Curtain'' or ``NS1'' is a vertical lift bridge that provides
a horizontal clearance of 250-feet and a vertical clearance of 8-feet
in the closed position and 98-feet in the open position.
2. The Main Avenue Viaduct, mile 1.01, is a fixed bridge with a
horizontal clearance of 218-feet and a vertical clearance of 92-feet,
but 97-feet is available in the center 182-feet of the span.
3. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile 1.28, is a single leaf bascule
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 229-feet and a vertical
clearance of 8-feet in the closed position and an unlimited clearance
in the open position. This bridge is normally maintained in the open
position.
4. The Center Street Bridge, mile 1.28, is a bob-tail swing bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 113-feet and a vertical
clearance of 17-feet in the closed position and an unlimited clearance
in the open positions.
5. The Detroit-Superior Viaduct, mile 1.42, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 113-feet and a vertical clearance of
98-feet.
6. The Union Terminal Viaduct, mile 1.89, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a vertical clearance of
98-feet.
7. The Columbus Road Bridge, mile 1.93, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 220-feet and a vertical
clearance of 17-feet in the closed position and 98-feet in the open
position.
8. The Flats Industrial Railroad Bridge, mile 2.24, is a vertical
lift bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a
vertical clearance of 8-feet in the closed position and 97-feet in the
open position.
9. The City of Cleveland Railroad Bridge, mile 2.42, is a vertical
lift bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a
vertical clearance of 23-feet in the closed position and 98-feet in the
open position.
10. The Carter Road Bridge, mile 2.43, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 201-feet and a vertical
clearance of 22-feet in the closed position and 97-feet in the open
position.
11. The Eagle Avenue Bridge, mile 2.80, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 187-feet and a vertical
clearance of 15-feet in the closed position and 97-feet in the open
position. This bridge has been maintained in the open position for over
15 years and plans are being made for its complete removal by winter of
2025.
12. The Hope Memorial Bridge, mile 3.14, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 178-feet and a vertical clearance of
96-feet.
13. The Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge also known as ``NS2'' or
``Nickle Plate'' or ``The Trestle Bridge'', mile 3.34, is a vertical
lift bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a
vertical clearance of 64-feet in the closed position and 97-feet in the
open position.
14. The Inner Belt Freeway Bridge, mile 3.42, is a fixed bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of 230-feet and a vertical
clearance of 93-feet.
15. The West 3rd Street Bridge, mile 3.42, is a vertical lift
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet and a vertical
clearance of 10-feet in the closed position and 97-feet in the open
position.
16. The CSX Railroad Bridge, mile 4.75, is a single leaf bascule
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 110-feet and a vertical
clearance of 10-feet in the closed position and an unlimited clearance
in the open position. This bridge is normally maintained in the open
position, except when trains cross the river.
17. The I-490 Bridge, mile 4.79, is a fixed bridge that provides a
horizontal clearance of 110-feet and a vertical clearance of 101-feet.
18. An Overhead Conveyor Bridge, mile 5.35, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 210-feet and a vertical clearance of
99-feet.
19. The Cleveland Cliffs Railroad Bridge #1, mile 5.42, is a single
leaf bascule bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 129-feet
and a vertical clearance of 15-feet in the closed position and an
unlimited clearance in the open position.
20. The Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Bridge, mile 5.47, is a
vertical lift bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 200-feet
and a vertical clearance of 28-feet in the closed position and 97-feet
in the open position.
21. The Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 6.07, is a fixed
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 27-feet and a vertical
clearance of 14-feet.
22. The Cleveland Cliffs Railroad Bridge #2, mile 6.09, is a fixed
bridge that provides a horizontal clearance of 59-feet and a vertical
clearance of 14-feet.
The newly constructed Voinovich Pedestrian Bridge, at the mouth of
North Coast Harbor, provides a horizontal clearance of 130-feet and a
vertical clearance of 6-feet at center diminishing to 4-feet at channel
edges with an unlimited clearance in the open position.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
For 20 years, the Coast Guard has awarded winter operating
deviations to all of the moveable highway bridges over the Cuyahoga
River from mid-December to the end of March, allowing the bridges to
open on signal if a 12-hour advance notice of arrival was received. We
propose to make a permanent all-seasons rule for all movable bridges,
except for the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, that, from
December 15 through March 31 of each year each bridge will require a
12-hours advance notice for openings. As already required under Sec.
117.55, each bridge will be required to display a sign with the bridge
name, river mile, and that from December 15 through March 31 the bridge
requires a 12-hour advance notice. The signage will also include the
correct number to provide the advance notice. We propose that the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, be exempted from the
winter 12-hour advance notice and will be required to open on signal
all year. Freighters need to pass through the Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.76, to gain refuge from high winds and waves, and a 12-
hour delay would be considered unreasonable.
During the 2018 PAWSA that is available on the https://navcen.uscg.gov site by visiting Cuyahoga_River_PAWSA_18_Dec_2018.pdf
(uscg.gov) we learned that ``when the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge,
mile 0.76, is closed, all inbound and out bound vessel traffic is
halted. Congestion builds on both sides of the bridge as vessel
operators wait for the bridge to open. Mariners drift and maneuver to
maintain position, which increases the risk of collision.'' The PAWSA
proposed a better means of communications between recreation and
commercial vessels. These recommendations included: the posting of
telephone number at the bridge that would be answered by the tender or
dispatcher, posting of a countdown clock, and requiring a
radiotelephone at the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76. The
recommendations sought to alleviate congestion, prevent possible
collisions, and improve the flow of commerce.
We reviewed complaints from mariners concerning the operation of
the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, and discovered from
2019 through 2022 a total of 291 complaints were received; 115 of the
reports involved delays. For comparison, during
[[Page 32711]]
the same period, the Coast Guard received two complaints against the
Willow Street Bridge, mile 1.02, and one complaint against the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 3.34. Most complaints cite as the
perceived cause of delay, communication difficulties with the
drawtender, or in the cases of Norfolk Southern, communication
difficulties with the train dispatchers.
In the PAWSA discussions related to reducing congestion near the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76 and improving the overall
experience for recreational vessels, it was recommended that the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, install an LED display
(countdown clock) on both sides of the Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.76, that would communicate the estimated wait time until
the bridge lifts. These clocks were in use when the former owner of the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76 operated the crossing. The
Coast Guard is proposing the railroad reestablish the use of those
clocks or install modern clock faces to communicate the time until next
opening.
To improve public safety, reduce vessel congestion at the bridge,
and improve communication between the drawtender and the vessels, the
Coast Guard proposes to require the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge,
mile 0.76, to install and maintain signs visible from the upriver and
downriver sides of the bridge. The size, type, and spacing of
characters must conform to the standard alphabets for highway signs and
be visible to vessels approaching the bridge from upriver or down river
of the bridge and be readable at a minimum distance of 500 feet. To
improve communications the Coast Guard will propose that the Norfolk
Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 1.5, in addition to monitoring the
signals listed in 33 CFR 117.15, operate and maintain a Radio Telephone
as required under 33 CFR 117.23 and operate and maintain a telephone,
whose number will be maintained on the appropriate signs at the bridge.
Suggested signage would appear like this example:
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22MY23.004
Under the proposal, all other movable bridges over the Cuyahoga
River, the Old River, and at North Coast Harbor would be allowed to
operate with a 12-hour advance notice from December 15th through March
31st and would be required, in accordance with Sec. 117.55, to install
and maintain signs visible from the upriver and downriver sides of the
bridge. The size, type, and spacing of characters must conform to the
standard alphabets for highway signs and be visible to vessels
approaching the bridge from upriver or down river of the bridge and be
readable at a minimum distance of 500 feet. The information on the
signs must provide the name of the bridge and the river mile and
include that the bridge opens on signal except from December 15 through
March 31 when the bridge requires a 12-hour advance notice followed by
instructions how to provide the advance notice.
Suggested signage would appear like this example:
[[Page 32712]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22MY23.005
BILLING CODE 9110-04-C
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian Tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1,
[[Page 32713]]
associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321-4370f). The Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0188 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
``Search Results'' column, and click on it. Then click on the
``Comment'' option. If your material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted, or a
final rule is published of any posting or updates to the docket.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 117.848 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.848 Cleveland Harbor.
(a) The Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 0.76, will open on
signal.
(1) The bridge owner will maintain and monitor a VHF-FM Marine
Radio, and telephone.
(2) The bridge will display a clock that counts down the estimated
time of the next bridge opening that is visible to vessels approaching
from the upriver or downriver side of the bridge.
(3) The bridge will also display a sign readable from vessels
approaching the bridge from upriver or down river and readable for 500
feet that states:
(i) The name of the bridge;
(ii) The river mile;
(iii) That the bridge is remotely operated; and
(iv) The opening signal of the bridge is one prolonged blast
followed by one short blast of the horn or VHF-FM Marine Radio Channel
16, or by calling the number posted by the owner.
(b) All remaining moveable vehicle and railroad bridges on the
Cuyahoga River will open on signal, except from December 15 through
March 31 when the bridges will open if a 12-hour advance notice is
provided. Said bridges include: Willow Avenue Bridge at Mile 1.02;
Center Street Bridge, mile 1.28; the Columbus Road Bridge, mile 1.93;
the Flats Industrial Railroad Bridge, mile 2.24; the City of Cleveland
Railroad Bridge, mile 2.42; the Carter Road Bridge, mile 2.43; the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge the West 3rd Street Bridge, mile 3.42;
the CSX Railroad Bridge, mile 4.75; the Cleveland Cliffs Railroad
Bridge #1, mile 5.42; and the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Bridge.
(c) The Voinovich Pedestrian Bridge, at the mouth of North Coast
Harbor, will open on signal except from December 15 through March 31
when the bridge will open if a 12-hour advance notice is provided.
Dated: May 15, 2023.
E.J. Doucette,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Ninth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2023-10731 Filed 5-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P