Partial Approval, Conditional Approval, and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Nevada; Infrastructure Requirements for Ozone, 32120-32125 [2023-10657]
Download as PDF
32120
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’ Due to the nature of the action
being taken, this action is expected to
have neutral to positive impact on the
air quality of the affected area. In
addition, there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal
of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of
color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 18, 2023. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final action does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action to determine that
the Allegheny County nonattainment
area attained the 2012 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by its attainment date may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. Amend § 52.2056 by adding
paragraph (p) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2056
Determinations of attainment.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) Based on air quality data for the
3-year period 2019 to 2021, EPA has
determined that the Allegheny County
nonattainment area attained the 2012
annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) by the applicable attainment
date of December 31, 2021. Therefore,
EPA has met the requirement pursuant
to Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 179(c)
and 188(b)(2) to determine, based on the
area’s air quality as of the attainment
date, whether the area attained the
standard. The Allegheny County PM2.5
nonattainment area is therefore not
subject to the consequences for failing to
attain, pursuant to CAA section 179(d).
[FR Doc. 2023–10728 Filed 5–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0957; FRL–10543–
02–R9]
Partial Approval, Conditional Approval,
and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality
State Implementation Plans; Nevada;
Infrastructure Requirements for Ozone
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving in part,
conditionally approving in part, and
disapproving in part a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Nevada
pursuant to the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) for the
implementation, maintenance, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
enforcement of the 2015 national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for ozone. As part of this action, we are
reclassifying a region of the State for
emergency episode planning purposes
with respect to ozone. Finally, we are
approving a regulatory revision into the
Nevada SIP.
DATES: This rule is effective June 20,
2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0957. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, Planning Section (AIR–2–
1), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, (415) 947–4126,
Law.Nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires
each state to submit to the EPA, within
three years after the promulgation of a
primary or secondary NAAQS or any
revision thereof, a SIP revision that
provides for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of such
NAAQS.
Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA contains
the infrastructure SIP requirements,
which generally relate to the
information, authorities, compliance
assurances, procedural requirements,
and control measures that constitute the
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
19MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘infrastructure’’ of a state’s air quality
management program. These
infrastructure SIP requirements (or
‘‘elements’’) required by section
110(a)(2) are as follows:
• Section 110(a)(2)(A): Emission
limits and other control measures.
• Section 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system.
• Section 110(a)(2)(C): Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new and modified
stationary sources.
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i): Interstate
pollution transport.
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate
pollution abatement and international
air pollution.
• Section 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate
resources and authority, conflict of
interest, and oversight of local and
regional government agencies.
• Section 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary
source monitoring and reporting.
• Section 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency
episodes.
• Section 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
• Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation
with government officials, public
notification, prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD), and visibility
protection.
• Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality
modeling and submittal of modeling
data.
• Section 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting
fees.
• Section 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/
participation by affected local entities.
Two elements identified in section
110(a)(2) are not governed by the threeyear submittal deadline of section
110(a)(1) and are therefore not
addressed in this action. These two
elements are: (i) section 110(a)(2)(C), to
the extent it refers to permit programs
required under part D (nonattainment
new source review (NSR)), and (ii)
section 110(a)(2)(I), pertaining to the
nonattainment planning requirements of
part D. As a result, this action does not
address requirements for the
nonattainment NSR portion of section
110(a)(2)(C) or the whole of section
110(a)(2)(I).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. NAAQS Addressed by This Final
Rule
On October 26, 2015, the EPA
promulgated a revised NAAQS for
ozone (‘‘the 2015 ozone NAAQS’’),
triggering a requirement for states to
submit infrastructure SIPs within three
years of promulgation of the revised
NAAQS. The 2015 ozone NAAQS
revised the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
by lowering the primary and secondary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
8-hour ozone standards from 75 parts
per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb.1
The Nevada Department of
Environmental Protection (NDEP) made
a submittal addressing the infrastructure
SIP requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS on September 28, 2018
(‘‘Nevada’s Infrastructure SIP
Submittal’’).2 It included separate
sections for Clark County 3 and Washoe
County.4 We refer to each individual
section as that agency’s or County’s
portion of the submittal. In accordance
with CAA section 110(k)(1)(B), the
infrastructure SIP became complete by
operation of law on March 28, 2019.
C. EPA’s Proposal
1. Approvals and Partial Approvals
(a) Infrastructure SIP Requirements
On January 11, 2023, we proposed to
approve and partially approve Nevada’s
Infrastructure SIP Submittal for the
requirements of the following sections
of the CAA: 5 6
• 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and
other control measures.
• 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality
monitoring/data system.
• 110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Program for
enforcement of control measures (full
approval), and regulation of new
stationary sources (approval for Clark
County only) and minor sources (full
approval).
• 110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below):
Interstate Pollution Transport.
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part)—
interference with PSD (prong 3)
(approval for Clark County only).
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part)—interstate
pollution abatement (approval for Clark
County only) and international air
pollution (full approval).
1 80
FR 65292 (October 26, 2015).
NDEP submitted Nevada’s
Infrastructure SIP Submittal electronically on
September 28, 2018, the submittal letter is dated
October 1, 2018, from Greg Lovato, Administrator,
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, to
Mike Stoker, Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA
Region IX, RE: ‘‘The Nevada State Implementation
Plan for the 2015 Primary and Secondary Ozone
NAAQS.’’
3 Letter dated September 12, 2018, from Marci
Henson, Director, Clark County Department of Air
Quality, to Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection, RE: ‘‘Clark
County Portion of the Nevada Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.’’
4 Letter dated August 28, 2018, from Charlene
Albee, Director, Washoe County Health District Air
Quality Management Division, to Greg Lovato,
Administrator, Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection, Subject: ‘‘2015 Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan (SIP).’’
5 88 FR 1537 (January 11, 2023).
6 All approvals are full approvals for NDEP, Clark
County, and Washoe County except where noted
otherwise.
2 Although
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32121
• 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources
and authority, conflict of interest, and
oversight of local governments and
regional agencies.
• 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source
monitoring and reporting.
• 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
• 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
• 110(a)(2)(J) (in part): Consultation
with government officials, public
notification (conditional approval for
NDEP and Washoe County, full
approval for Clark County), and PSD
and visibility protection (full approval
for Clark County only).
• 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling
and submission of modeling data.
• 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
• 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/
participation by affected local entities.
(b) Proposed Approval of a State
Provision Into the Nevada SIP
As part of our proposed action on
Nevada’s Infrastructure SIP Submittal,
we proposed to approve a state
regulation into the Nevada SIP.
Specifically, we proposed to approve
into the SIP a new version of Nevada
Administrative Code (NAC) 445B.22097,
which revises the 8-hour ozone standard
in the Nevada standards table from
0.075 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm)
to be consistent with the 2015 ozone
NAAQS and deletes the ‘‘National
Standards’’ and ‘‘Method’’ columns
because both are for reference only and
are often out-of-date compared to the
referenced federal regulations.
2. Conditional Approvals
The EPA proposed to conditionally
approve portions of the NDEP and
Washoe County Infrastructure SIP
Submittals addressing the public
notification requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS based on commitments from
NDEP and Washoe County to adopt and
submit specific enforceable measures to
address the deficiencies identified in
our proposed rulemaking.7
7 Letter dated September 9, 2022, from Greg
Lovato, Administrator, Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection, to Martha Guzman,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region IX, Re:
‘‘Request for Conditional Approval of Nevada’s
Infrastructure State Implementation Plan for the
2012 PM2.5 and 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.’’ and Letter dated September 2,
2022, from Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection to Martha
Guzman, Regional Admin, Re: Nevada’s
Infrastructure State Implementation Plan for the
2012 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
dated September 9, 2022 that enclosed the letter
from Francisco Vega, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, Washoe County Health
Division to Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection and Martha
Guzman, EPA, Re: ‘‘Request for Conditional
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
Continued
19MYR1
32122
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
3. Partial Disapprovals
The EPA proposed to partially
disapprove Nevada’s Infrastructure SIP
Submittal with respect to the following
infrastructure SIP requirements:
• 110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Regulation of
new and modified stationary sources
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
• 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part):
interference with PSD (prong 3)
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
• 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part): interstate
pollution abatement (disapproval for
NDEP and Washoe County).
• 110(a)(2)(J) (in part): PSD
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
Although the NDEP and Washoe
County portions of the SIP remain
deficient with respect to PSD
requirements, the EPA noted that the
proposed disapproval, if finalized,
would have no Federal Implementation
Plan (FIP) consequences, as both
agencies already implement the Federal
PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21 for all
regulated NSR pollutants, pursuant to
delegation agreements with the EPA.
4. Reclassification
We proposed to retain the Priority I
classification for the Las Vegas Intrastate
Air Quality Control Regions (AQCR) and
Priority III classification for the Nevada
Intrastate AQCR. We proposed to
reclassify the Northwest Nevada
Intrastate AQCR from Priority III to
Priority I for ozone. Priority I regions are
required to have SIP-approved
emergency episode plans, which are
also called ‘‘contingency plans.’’
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
5. Deferred Action
The EPA did not propose action on
the interstate transport visibility
requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II),
which is also called Prong 4 of the
interstate transport requirements. On
August 12, 2022, NDEP withdrew the
Prong 4 element in the Nevada’s
Infrastructure SIP Submittal and
submitted a revised Prong 4 element
with the State’s Regional Haze Plan for
the 2nd Planning Period.8 The EPA
intends to act on the revised Prong 4
element when we act on Nevada’s
Approval of Nevada’s Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 and 2015
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.’’
8 See letter dated August 12, 2022, from Greg
Lovato, Administrator, Nevada Department of
Environmental Protection, to Martha Guzman,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, Subject:
‘‘The Nevada State Implementation Plan for the
Regional Haze Rule for the Second Planning Period;
Withdrawal and Replacement of Elements of the
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2015 Ozone NAAQS
Infrastructure SIPs.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
Regional Haze Plan for the 2nd Planning
Period and is therefore not acting on the
requirement as part of this action.
Additionally, the EPA did not
propose action on the following CAA
requirements because they are
addressed in separate rulemakings: 9
• 110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below):
Interstate Pollution Transport.
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant
contribution to a nonattainment area
(prong 1).
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant
contribution to a maintenance area
(prong 2).
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period that
ended on February 10, 2023. During this
period, the EPA received one
anonymous comment. The full text of
the comment is available in the docket
for this rulemaking.
The comment recommended that the
federal government take immediate
action to clean the air and suggested
that the state of Utah has failed to clean
the air in valley areas like Salt Lake and
the Uinta Basin. Additionally, the
comment states there is a water crisis
and the federal government needs to
take leadership. After reviewing the
comment, the EPA has determined that
the comment fails to raise issues
germane to our proposed finding that
the State of Nevada largely meets the
infrastructure SIP requirements of
section 110(a)(2) of the Act, which only
evaluated the State’s ability to
implement, maintain, and enforce the
2015 Ozone NAAQS. Therefore, we
have determined that this comment
does not necessitate a response, and the
EPA will not provide a specific response
to the comment in this document.
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals, Conditional
Approvals, and Partial Disapprovals
Under CAA section 110(a), we are
partially approving and partially
disapproving Nevada’s Infrastructure
SIP submittal for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS. Specifically, we are fully
approving the submittal for the
requirements of CAA sections:
• 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and
other control measures.
• 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality
monitoring/data system.
• 110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Program for
enforcement of control measures (full
approval), and regulation of new
stationary sources (approval for Clark
9 88
PO 00000
FR 9336 (February 13, 2023).
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
County only) and minor sources (full
approval).
• 110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below):
Interstate Pollution Transport.
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part)—
interference with PSD (prong 3)
(approval for Clark County only).
Æ 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part)—interstate
pollution abatement (approval for Clark
County only) and international air
pollution (full approval).
• 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources
and authority, conflict of interest, and
oversight of local governments and
regional agencies.
• 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source
monitoring and reporting.
• 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
• 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
• 110(a)(2)(J) (in part): Consultation
with government officials, public
notification (conditional approval for
NDEP and Washoe County, full
approval for Clark County), and PSD
and visibility protection (full approval
for Clark County only).
• 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling
and submission of modeling data.
• 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
• 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/
participation by affected local entities.
The EPA is taking final action to
conditionally approve the NDEP and
Washoe County portions of Nevada’s
Infrastructure SIP Submittal addressing
the public notification requirements of
CAA section 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015
Ozone NAAQS.
We are taking final action to
disapprove Nevada’s Infrastructure SIP
Submittal with respect to the following
infrastructure SIP requirements:
• 110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Regulation of
new and modified stationary sources
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
• 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part):
interference with PSD (prong 3)
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
• 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part): interstate
pollution abatement (disapproval for
NDEP and Washoe County).
• 110(a)(2)(J) (in part): PSD
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe
County).
Although the NDEP and Washoe
County portions of the SIP remain
deficient with respect to PSD
requirements, this final disapproval
action has no FIP consequences, as both
agencies implement the Federal PSD
program at 40 CFR 52.21 for all
regulated NSR pollutants, pursuant to
delegation agreements with the EPA.
B. Approval of an Updated Nevada
State-Wide Provision
In this final action, the EPA is also
approving into the Nevada SIP revisions
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
19MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
to the Nevada Administrative Code
(NAC). The EPA is approving a new
version of NAC 445B.22097, which
revises the 8-hour ozone standard in the
Nevada standards table from 0.075 to
0.070 parts per million (ppm) to be
consistent with the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
The updated provisions strengthen the
SIP or clarify certain terms in the SIP,
as discussed in our proposed
rulemaking, and meet the requirements
of CAA sections 110(a)(2), 110(l), and
193. Therefore, the EPA is approving the
submitted revised rule into the Nevada
SIP as proposed.
C. Reclassification and Exemption of
AQCRs for Emergency Episode Planning
This final rule retains the
classification of the Las Vegas Intrastate
AQCRs as Priority I and the
classification of the Nevada Intrastate
AQCR as Priority III for emergency
episodes. This rule reclassifies the
Northwest Nevada Intrastate AQCR to
Priority I.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference as described
in Section III.B. and set forth below in
the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents available
through https://www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and Executive Order
14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because this action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities beyond those imposed by state
law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector, will result from this
action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32123
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to review state choices,
and approve those choices if they meet
the minimum criteria of the Act.
Accordingly, this final action is
approving in part, conditionally
approving in part, and disapproving in
part a state implementation plan as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
The State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
19MYR1
32124
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
action. Due to the nature of the action
being taken here, this action is expected
to have a neutral to positive impact on
the air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 15, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 18, 2023.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. Amend § 52.1470 as follows:
a. In paragraph (c), amend table 1 by:
i. Under the table heading ‘‘Nevada
Administrative Code, Chapter 445B, Air
Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada
Administrative Code, Chapter 445, Air
Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Air
Quality Regulations—General
Provisions’’, revise the entry for
‘‘445B.22097’’.
■ b. In paragraph (e), in the table under
the heading ‘‘AIR QUALITY
■
■
■
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE
STATE OF NEVADA’’, add the entries
‘‘The Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection Portion of the Nevada State
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS: Demonstration of Adequacy,
excluding the cover letter; the part
addressing the requirements of CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and Appendices’’,
‘‘The Clark County Portion of the State
Implementation Plan to meet the Ozone
Infrastructure SIP Requirement of Clean
Air Act Section 110(a)(2), excluding the
cover letter to NDEP; the part of the
submittal addressing the requirements
of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and
Attachment A’’, and ‘‘The Washoe
County Portion of the Nevada State
Implementation Plan to Meet the Ozone
Infrastructure SIP Requirements of
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2),
excluding the cover letter to NDEP, the
part of the submittal addressing the
requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I),
and all Attachments and Appendices.’’
after the entry ‘‘The Washoe County
Portion of the Nevada State
Implementation Plan to Meet the PM2.5
Infrastructure SIP Requirements of
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2),
excluding the cover letter to NDEP and
all Attachments and Appendices’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 52.1470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NEVADA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State citation
Title/subject
State effective date
EPA approval date
Additional explanation
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445B, Air Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445, Air Controls, Air Pollution;
Nevada Air Quality Regulations—General Provisions
*
445B.22097 ................
*
Standards of quality
for ambient air.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
05/16/2018 ................. [INSERT Federal Register CITATION], 05/19/2023.
*
*
*
*
*
Most recently approved version
was submitted on 12/11/15.
*
*
*
(e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Name of SIP provision
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
AIR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA 1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
19MYR1
Additional explanation
32125
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES—Continued
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
The Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection Portion of the Nevada
State Implementation Plan for the
2015 Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration
of Adequacy, excluding the cover letter; the part addressing the requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and
Appendices.
The Clark County Portion of the State
Implementation Plan to meet the
Ozone Infrastructure SIP Requirement of Clean Air Act Section
110(a)(2), excluding the cover letter
to NDEP; the part of the submittal
addressing the requirements of CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and Attachment A.
The Washoe County Portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan to
Meet the Ozone Infrastructure SIP
Requirements of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2), excluding the cover
letter to NDEP the part of the submittal addressing the requirements of
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), and all Attachments and Appendices.
*
EPA approval date
*
9/28/18 .................
*
*
*
[INSERT Federal Register
NDEP ‘‘Infrastructure’’ SIP
CITATION], 05/19/2023.
for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS.
Clark County ........
9/28/18 .................
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], 05/19/2023.
Clark County ‘‘Infrastructure’’
SIP for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS.
Washoe County ....
9/28/18 .................
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], 05/19/2023.
Washoe County ‘‘Infrastructure’’ SIP for the 2015
Ozone NAAQS.
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.1472 is amended by
revising paragraph (k) to read as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 52.1472
40 CFR Part 180
Approval status.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The
SIP submittal from October 1, 2018, is
disapproved for Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and
2) for the NDEP, Clark County, and
Washoe County portions of the Nevada
SIP submission. The Nevada state
implementation plan (SIP) submittal on
October 1, 2018 is partially disapproved
for the prevention of significant
deterioration-related portions of Clean
Air Act (CAA) elements 110(a)(2)(C),
(D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J) for the NDEP
and Washoe County portions of the
Nevada SIP. CAA element 110(a)(2)(J)
for public notification is conditionally
approved for NDEP and Washoe County.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–10657 Filed 5–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 May 18, 2023
Additional explanation
*
State-wide within
NDEP jurisdiction.
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
State submittal
date
Jkt 259001
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0594; FRL–10970–01–
OCSPP]
Various Fragrance Components in
Pesticide Formulations; Tolerance
Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of various
fragrance components listed in Unit II of
this document when they are used as
inert ingredients in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, and foodprocessing equipment and utensils
when the end-use concentration does
not exceed 100 parts per million (ppm).
Verto Solutions, on behalf of The Clorox
Company, submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting the
establishment of exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
for residues of these various fragrance
components, when used in accordance
with the terms of the exemptions.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
19, 2023. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 18, 2023 and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0594, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room and the OPP
docket is (202) 566–1744. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services,
docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
E:\FR\FM\19MYR1.SGM
19MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32120-32125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10657]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0957; FRL-10543-02-R9]
Partial Approval, Conditional Approval, and Partial Disapproval
of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Nevada; Infrastructure
Requirements for Ozone
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving in
part, conditionally approving in part, and disapproving in part a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Nevada
pursuant to the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') for
the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2015 national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. As part of this
action, we are reclassifying a region of the State for emergency
episode planning purposes with respect to ozone. Finally, we are
approving a regulatory revision into the Nevada SIP.
DATES: This rule is effective June 20, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0957. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, Planning Section (AIR-2-
1), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947-4126,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires each state to submit to the
EPA, within three years after the promulgation of a primary or
secondary NAAQS or any revision thereof, a SIP revision that provides
for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS.
Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA contains the infrastructure SIP
requirements, which generally relate to the information, authorities,
compliance assurances, procedural requirements, and control measures
that constitute the
[[Page 32121]]
``infrastructure'' of a state's air quality management program. These
infrastructure SIP requirements (or ``elements'') required by section
110(a)(2) are as follows:
Section 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control
measures.
Section 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data
system.
Section 110(a)(2)(C): Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new and modified stationary sources.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i): Interstate pollution transport.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate pollution abatement
and international air pollution.
Section 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority,
conflict of interest, and oversight of local and regional government
agencies.
Section 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and
reporting.
Section 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
Section 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with government
officials, public notification, prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD), and visibility protection.
Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and submittal
of modeling data.
Section 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
Section 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by
affected local entities.
Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed by
the three-year submittal deadline of section 110(a)(1) and are
therefore not addressed in this action. These two elements are: (i)
section 110(a)(2)(C), to the extent it refers to permit programs
required under part D (nonattainment new source review (NSR)), and (ii)
section 110(a)(2)(I), pertaining to the nonattainment planning
requirements of part D. As a result, this action does not address
requirements for the nonattainment NSR portion of section 110(a)(2)(C)
or the whole of section 110(a)(2)(I).
B. NAAQS Addressed by This Final Rule
On October 26, 2015, the EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for ozone
(``the 2015 ozone NAAQS''), triggering a requirement for states to
submit infrastructure SIPs within three years of promulgation of the
revised NAAQS. The 2015 ozone NAAQS revised the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
by lowering the primary and secondary 8-hour ozone standards from 75
parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) made a
submittal addressing the infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2015
ozone NAAQS on September 28, 2018 (``Nevada's Infrastructure SIP
Submittal'').\2\ It included separate sections for Clark County \3\ and
Washoe County.\4\ We refer to each individual section as that agency's
or County's portion of the submittal. In accordance with CAA section
110(k)(1)(B), the infrastructure SIP became complete by operation of
law on March 28, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Although NDEP submitted Nevada's Infrastructure SIP
Submittal electronically on September 28, 2018, the submittal letter
is dated October 1, 2018, from Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection, to Mike Stoker, Regional
Administrator, U.S. EPA Region IX, RE: ``The Nevada State
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Primary and Secondary Ozone
NAAQS.''
\3\ Letter dated September 12, 2018, from Marci Henson,
Director, Clark County Department of Air Quality, to Greg Lovato,
Administrator, Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, RE:
``Clark County Portion of the Nevada Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.''
\4\ Letter dated August 28, 2018, from Charlene Albee, Director,
Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division, to
Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection, Subject: ``2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. EPA's Proposal
1. Approvals and Partial Approvals
(a) Infrastructure SIP Requirements
On January 11, 2023, we proposed to approve and partially approve
Nevada's Infrastructure SIP Submittal for the requirements of the
following sections of the CAA: 5 6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 88 FR 1537 (January 11, 2023).
\6\ All approvals are full approvals for NDEP, Clark County, and
Washoe County except where noted otherwise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control measures.
110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data system.
110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Program for enforcement of control
measures (full approval), and regulation of new stationary sources
(approval for Clark County only) and minor sources (full approval).
110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below): Interstate Pollution
Transport.
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part)--interference with PSD (prong
3) (approval for Clark County only).
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part)--interstate pollution abatement
(approval for Clark County only) and international air pollution (full
approval).
110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority, conflict
of interest, and oversight of local governments and regional agencies.
110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and reporting.
110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
110(a)(2)(J) (in part): Consultation with government
officials, public notification (conditional approval for NDEP and
Washoe County, full approval for Clark County), and PSD and visibility
protection (full approval for Clark County only).
110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and submission of
modeling data.
110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by affected local
entities.
(b) Proposed Approval of a State Provision Into the Nevada SIP
As part of our proposed action on Nevada's Infrastructure SIP
Submittal, we proposed to approve a state regulation into the Nevada
SIP. Specifically, we proposed to approve into the SIP a new version of
Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 445B.22097, which revises the 8-hour
ozone standard in the Nevada standards table from 0.075 to 0.070 parts
per million (ppm) to be consistent with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and
deletes the ``National Standards'' and ``Method'' columns because both
are for reference only and are often out-of-date compared to the
referenced federal regulations.
2. Conditional Approvals
The EPA proposed to conditionally approve portions of the NDEP and
Washoe County Infrastructure SIP Submittals addressing the public
notification requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015
ozone NAAQS based on commitments from NDEP and Washoe County to adopt
and submit specific enforceable measures to address the deficiencies
identified in our proposed rulemaking.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Letter dated September 9, 2022, from Greg Lovato,
Administrator, Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, to
Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region IX, Re:
``Request for Conditional Approval of Nevada's Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 and 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards.'' and Letter dated September
2, 2022, from Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection to Martha Guzman, Regional Admin, Re:
Nevada's Infrastructure State Implementation Plan for the 2012
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard dated
September 9, 2022 that enclosed the letter from Francisco Vega,
Director, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County Health
Division to Greg Lovato, Administrator, Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection and Martha Guzman, EPA, Re: ``Request for
Conditional Approval of Nevada's Infrastructure State Implementation
Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 and 2015 Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32122]]
3. Partial Disapprovals
The EPA proposed to partially disapprove Nevada's Infrastructure
SIP Submittal with respect to the following infrastructure SIP
requirements:
110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Regulation of new and modified
stationary sources (disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part): interference with PSD
(prong 3) (disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part): interstate pollution abatement
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(J) (in part): PSD (disapproval for NDEP and
Washoe County).
Although the NDEP and Washoe County portions of the SIP remain
deficient with respect to PSD requirements, the EPA noted that the
proposed disapproval, if finalized, would have no Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) consequences, as both agencies already
implement the Federal PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21 for all regulated NSR
pollutants, pursuant to delegation agreements with the EPA.
4. Reclassification
We proposed to retain the Priority I classification for the Las
Vegas Intrastate Air Quality Control Regions (AQCR) and Priority III
classification for the Nevada Intrastate AQCR. We proposed to
reclassify the Northwest Nevada Intrastate AQCR from Priority III to
Priority I for ozone. Priority I regions are required to have SIP-
approved emergency episode plans, which are also called ``contingency
plans.''
5. Deferred Action
The EPA did not propose action on the interstate transport
visibility requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), which is also called
Prong 4 of the interstate transport requirements. On August 12, 2022,
NDEP withdrew the Prong 4 element in the Nevada's Infrastructure SIP
Submittal and submitted a revised Prong 4 element with the State's
Regional Haze Plan for the 2nd Planning Period.\8\ The EPA intends to
act on the revised Prong 4 element when we act on Nevada's Regional
Haze Plan for the 2nd Planning Period and is therefore not acting on
the requirement as part of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See letter dated August 12, 2022, from Greg Lovato,
Administrator, Nevada Department of Environmental Protection, to
Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, Subject: ``The
Nevada State Implementation Plan for the Regional Haze Rule for the
Second Planning Period; Withdrawal and Replacement of Elements of
the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2015 Ozone NAAQS Infrastructure
SIPs.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the EPA did not propose action on the following CAA
requirements because they are addressed in separate rulemakings: \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 88 FR 9336 (February 13, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below): Interstate Pollution
Transport.
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--significant contribution to a
nonattainment area (prong 1).
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--significant contribution to a maintenance
area (prong 2).
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period
that ended on February 10, 2023. During this period, the EPA received
one anonymous comment. The full text of the comment is available in the
docket for this rulemaking.
The comment recommended that the federal government take immediate
action to clean the air and suggested that the state of Utah has failed
to clean the air in valley areas like Salt Lake and the Uinta Basin.
Additionally, the comment states there is a water crisis and the
federal government needs to take leadership. After reviewing the
comment, the EPA has determined that the comment fails to raise issues
germane to our proposed finding that the State of Nevada largely meets
the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the Act,
which only evaluated the State's ability to implement, maintain, and
enforce the 2015 Ozone NAAQS. Therefore, we have determined that this
comment does not necessitate a response, and the EPA will not provide a
specific response to the comment in this document.
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals, Conditional Approvals, and Partial Disapprovals
Under CAA section 110(a), we are partially approving and partially
disapproving Nevada's Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS. Specifically, we are fully approving the submittal for the
requirements of CAA sections:
110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control measures.
110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data system.
110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Program for enforcement of control
measures (full approval), and regulation of new stationary sources
(approval for Clark County only) and minor sources (full approval).
110(a)(2)(D) (in part, see below): Interstate Pollution
Transport.
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part)--interference with PSD (prong
3) (approval for Clark County only).
[cir] 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part)--interstate pollution abatement
(approval for Clark County only) and international air pollution (full
approval).
110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority, conflict
of interest, and oversight of local governments and regional agencies.
110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and reporting.
110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
110(a)(2)(J) (in part): Consultation with government
officials, public notification (conditional approval for NDEP and
Washoe County, full approval for Clark County), and PSD and visibility
protection (full approval for Clark County only).
110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and submission of
modeling data.
110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by affected local
entities.
The EPA is taking final action to conditionally approve the NDEP
and Washoe County portions of Nevada's Infrastructure SIP Submittal
addressing the public notification requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
We are taking final action to disapprove Nevada's Infrastructure
SIP Submittal with respect to the following infrastructure SIP
requirements:
110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Regulation of new and modified
stationary sources (disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (in part): interference with PSD
(prong 3) (disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part): interstate pollution abatement
(disapproval for NDEP and Washoe County).
110(a)(2)(J) (in part): PSD (disapproval for NDEP and
Washoe County).
Although the NDEP and Washoe County portions of the SIP remain
deficient with respect to PSD requirements, this final disapproval
action has no FIP consequences, as both agencies implement the Federal
PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21 for all regulated NSR pollutants, pursuant
to delegation agreements with the EPA.
B. Approval of an Updated Nevada State-Wide Provision
In this final action, the EPA is also approving into the Nevada SIP
revisions
[[Page 32123]]
to the Nevada Administrative Code (NAC). The EPA is approving a new
version of NAC 445B.22097, which revises the 8-hour ozone standard in
the Nevada standards table from 0.075 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm)
to be consistent with the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The updated provisions
strengthen the SIP or clarify certain terms in the SIP, as discussed in
our proposed rulemaking, and meet the requirements of CAA sections
110(a)(2), 110(l), and 193. Therefore, the EPA is approving the
submitted revised rule into the Nevada SIP as proposed.
C. Reclassification and Exemption of AQCRs for Emergency Episode
Planning
This final rule retains the classification of the Las Vegas
Intrastate AQCRs as Priority I and the classification of the Nevada
Intrastate AQCR as Priority III for emergency episodes. This rule
reclassifies the Northwest Nevada Intrastate AQCR to Priority I.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference as described in Section III.B. and set forth
below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by state law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to review state choices,
and approve those choices if they meet the minimum criteria of the Act.
Accordingly, this final action is approving in part, conditionally
approving in part, and disapproving in part a state implementation plan
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did
not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this
[[Page 32124]]
action. Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action
is expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of
the affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the
stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people
of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 18, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 15, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD--Nevada
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.1470 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c), amend table 1 by:
0
i. Under the table heading ``Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445B,
Air Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445,
Air Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Air Quality Regulations--General
Provisions'', revise the entry for ``445B.22097''.
0
b. In paragraph (e), in the table under the heading ``AIR QUALITY
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA'', add the entries ``The
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Portion of the Nevada State
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration of
Adequacy, excluding the cover letter; the part addressing the
requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and Appendices'', ``The Clark
County Portion of the State Implementation Plan to meet the Ozone
Infrastructure SIP Requirement of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2),
excluding the cover letter to NDEP; the part of the submittal
addressing the requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and Attachment
A'', and ``The Washoe County Portion of the Nevada State Implementation
Plan to Meet the Ozone Infrastructure SIP Requirements of Clean Air Act
Section 110(a)(2), excluding the cover letter to NDEP, the part of the
submittal addressing the requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), and
all Attachments and Appendices.'' after the entry ``The Washoe County
Portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan to Meet the
PM2.5 Infrastructure SIP Requirements of Clean Air Act
Section 110(a)(2), excluding the cover letter to NDEP and all
Attachments and Appendices''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 1--EPA-Approved Nevada Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Additional
State citation Title/subject date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445B, Air Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Administrative Code, Chapter 445,
Air Controls, Air Pollution; Nevada Air Quality Regulations--General Provisions
* * * * * * *
445B.22097...................... Standards of 05/16/2018........ [INSERT Federal Most recently
quality for Register approved version
ambient air. CITATION], 05/19/ was submitted on
2023. 12/11/15.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Nevada Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or State submittal EPA approval date Additional
nonattainment area date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA \1\
[[Page 32125]]
* * * * * * *
The Nevada Division of State-wide within 9/28/18........... [INSERT Federal NDEP
Environmental Protection NDEP jurisdiction. Register ``Infrastructure'
Portion of the Nevada State CITATION], 05/19/ ' SIP for the
Implementation Plan for the 2023. 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
2015 Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration
of Adequacy, excluding the
cover letter; the part
addressing the requirements of
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and
Appendices.
The Clark County Portion of the Clark County...... 9/28/18........... [INSERT Federal Clark County
State Implementation Plan to Register ``Infrastructure'
meet the Ozone Infrastructure CITATION], 05/19/ ' SIP for the
SIP Requirement of Clean Air 2023. 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
Act Section 110(a)(2),
excluding the cover letter to
NDEP; the part of the submittal
addressing the requirements of
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); and
Attachment A.
The Washoe County Portion of the Washoe County..... 9/28/18........... [INSERT Federal Washoe County
Nevada State Implementation Register ``Infrastructure'
Plan to Meet the Ozone CITATION], 05/19/ ' SIP for the
Infrastructure SIP Requirements 2023. 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
of Clean Air Act Section
110(a)(2), excluding the cover
letter to NDEP the part of the
submittal addressing the
requirements of CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), and all
Attachments and Appendices.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Section 52.1472 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1472 Approval status.
* * * * *
(k) 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The SIP submittal from October 1,
2018, is disapproved for Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
(prongs 1 and 2) for the NDEP, Clark County, and Washoe County portions
of the Nevada SIP submission. The Nevada state implementation plan
(SIP) submittal on October 1, 2018 is partially disapproved for the
prevention of significant deterioration-related portions of Clean Air
Act (CAA) elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J) for the
NDEP and Washoe County portions of the Nevada SIP. CAA element
110(a)(2)(J) for public notification is conditionally approved for NDEP
and Washoe County.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-10657 Filed 5-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P