Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments; Sector Columbia River, WA and Sector North Bend, OR, 30898-30899 [2023-10195]
Download as PDF
30898
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 3
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0223]
Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments; Sector
Columbia River, WA and Sector North
Bend, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This rule makes nonsubstantive changes to Coast Guard
regulations in association with a change
in the Coast Guard’s internal
organization. The purpose of this rule is
to reflect the disestablishment of Sector
North Bend and reorganization of Sector
Columbia River. These changes will
have no substantive effect on the
regulated public.
DATES: This rule is effective May 15,
2023.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0223 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Katie Graichen,
District 13 Legal Office, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 206–220–7110, email
katherine.e.graichen@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
AOR Area of responsibility
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCMI Officer in Charge of Marine
Inspections
OFCO Operating Facility Change Order
SAR Search and rescue
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard implemented the
sector construct to consolidate earlier
organizational structures. Within the
Thirteenth Coast Guard District, Sector
Columbia River and Sector North Bend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
have not fully conformed to the
standard sector construct. In 2013, the
Coast Guard amended 33 CFR part 3 to
reflect changes in agency organization
by creating and defining Coast Guard
sectors that would ‘‘exercise specific
Search and Rescue Mission Coordinator
authority over a designated portion of
an encompassing sector’s area of
responsibility.’’ See 78 FR 39163 (2013).
Sector North Bend was one such sector,
receiving Search and Rescue (SAR)
Mission Coordinator authority over a
designated portion of Sector Columbia
River’s encompassing area of
responsibility. See 33 CFR 3.65–20.
To better align with the standard
sector structure and to improve internal
efficiencies, the Coast Guard is
reorganizing Sector Columbia River and
Sector North Bend. Specifically, Sector
North Bend is being disestablished, so
the regulation granting it special SAR
Mission Coordinator authority is no
longer applicable. The geographic
boundaries of Sector Columbia River are
not changing, but its office is moving
from Astoria, OR, to Portland, OR.
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) before
this final rule. The Coast Guard finds
that this rule is exempt from notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) because the
changes it makes are conforming
amendments involving agency
organization. The Coast Guard also finds
good cause exists under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) for not publishing an NPRM
because the changes will have no
substantive effect on the public, and
notice and comment are therefore
unnecessary. For the same reasons, the
Coast Guard finds good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the rule
effective fewer than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 14 U.S.C. 504(a)(2),
as delegated at 33 CFR 1.05–1(h), to
issue regulations necessary to
implement technical, organizational,
and conforming amendments and
corrections to rules, regulations, and
notices.
Operating Facility Change Order
(OFCO) No. 034–22 announced the
reorganization of Sector Columbia River
and disestablishment of Sector North
Bend. These conforming amendments
update the regulation that describes
Sector Columbia River so that it
contains current information and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
removes the regulation that describes
Sector North Bend.
Under 14 U.S.C. 504(a)(2), the
Commandant of the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish and prescribe the
purpose of Coast Guard Shore
establishments. And under 33 CFR
1.05–1(h), the Chief of the Coast Guard’s
Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law has been delegated
authority to issue technical,
organizational, and conforming
amendments and corrections to
regulations to reflect changes
introduced by OFCO No. 034–22.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
OFCO No. 034–22 announced the
reorganization of Sector Columbia River
and disestablishment of Sector North
Bend and this rule reflects that
organizational change in part 3 of Title
33 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
OFCO No. 034–22 did not change Sector
Columbia River’s Area of Responsibility
(AOR) but it relocated its office location.
Part 3 of 33 CFR describes the location
of U.S. Coast Guard districts, sectors,
and Captain of the Port (COTP) and
Officer in Charge of Marine Inspections
(OCMI) zones. This rule amends § 3.65–
15 to update the location of Sector
Columbia River’s office to Portland, OR.
This rule also removes § 3.65–20
because it is no longer necessary after
the disestablishment of Sector North
Bend. Sector North Bend’s SAR Mission
Coordinator authority specified in
§ 3.65–20 need not be addressed in
§ 3.65–15. Sector Columbia River
encompasses the AOR of Sector North
Bend and, in conformity with other
sector regulations in 33 CFR part 3, SAR
Mission Coordinator authority need not
be specified in § 3.65–15.
Accordingly, this rule does not
change Sector Columbia River’s sector,
OCMI, or COTP zone boundary lines,
nor does it substantively impact existing
regulated navigation area, safety zone,
or security zone regulation, or any naval
vessel protection zones. This rule does,
however, revise § 3.01–1 to reflect that
after the disestablishment of Sector
North Bend, only one sector remains
with specified SAR Mission Coordinator
authority.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders.
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the finding that the
disestablishment of Sector North Bend
and reorganization will have no
substantive effect on the public.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
member of the public, including ‘‘small
entities.’’
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
16:11 May 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule consists only of
an organizational amendment. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L3 of Appendix
A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023–01–001–01, Rev. 1, Implementation
of the National Environmental Policy
Act.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 3
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Organizations and functions
(Government agencies).
PART 3—COAST GUARD AREAS,
DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE
INSPECTION ZONES, AND CAPTAIN
OF THE PORT ZONES
1. The authority citation for part 3
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 501, 504; Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1,
Revision No. 01.2.
§ 3.01–1
[Amended]
2. In § 3.01–1(d)(3) remove the words
‘‘Some specified sectors exercise’’ and
add, in their place, the words ‘‘A
specified sector exercises’’.
■
■
3. Revise § 3.65–15 to read as follows:
§ 3.65–15 Sector Columbia River Marine
Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port
Zone.
Sector Columbia River’s office is
located in Portland, OR. The boundaries
of Sector Columbia River’s Marine
Inspection and Captain of the Port
Zones start at the Washington coast at
latitude 47°32′00″ N, longitude
124°21′15″ W, proceeding along this
latitude east to latitude 47°32′00″ N,
longitude 123°18′00″ W; thence south to
latitude 46°55′00″ N, longitude
123°18′00″ W; thence east along this
latitude to the eastern Idaho state line;
thence southeast along the Idaho state
line to the intersection of the IdahoWyoming boundary; thence south along
the Idaho-Wyoming boundary to the
intersection of the Idaho-Utah-Wyoming
boundaries; thence west along the
southern border of Idaho to Oregon and
then west along the southern border of
Oregon to the coast at latitude 41°59′54″
N, longitude 124°12′42″ W; thence west
along the southern boundary of the
Thirteenth Coast Guard District, which
is described in § 3.65–10, to the
outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude
41°38′35″ N, 128°51′26″ W; thence north
along the outermost extent of the EEZ to
latitude 47°32′00″ N; thence east to the
point of origin.
§ 3.65–20
■
[Removed]
4. Remove § 3.65–20.
Dated: May 9, 2023.
Michael T. Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2023–10195 Filed 5–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 3 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
30899
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30898-30899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10195]
[[Page 30898]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 3
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0223]
Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments; Sector
Columbia River, WA and Sector North Bend, OR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes non-substantive changes to Coast Guard
regulations in association with a change in the Coast Guard's internal
organization. The purpose of this rule is to reflect the
disestablishment of Sector North Bend and reorganization of Sector
Columbia River. These changes will have no substantive effect on the
regulated public.
DATES: This rule is effective May 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0223 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Katie Graichen, District 13 Legal Office, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 206-220-7110, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
AOR Area of responsibility
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCMI Officer in Charge of Marine Inspections
OFCO Operating Facility Change Order
SAR Search and rescue
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard implemented the sector construct to consolidate
earlier organizational structures. Within the Thirteenth Coast Guard
District, Sector Columbia River and Sector North Bend have not fully
conformed to the standard sector construct. In 2013, the Coast Guard
amended 33 CFR part 3 to reflect changes in agency organization by
creating and defining Coast Guard sectors that would ``exercise
specific Search and Rescue Mission Coordinator authority over a
designated portion of an encompassing sector's area of
responsibility.'' See 78 FR 39163 (2013). Sector North Bend was one
such sector, receiving Search and Rescue (SAR) Mission Coordinator
authority over a designated portion of Sector Columbia River's
encompassing area of responsibility. See 33 CFR 3.65-20.
To better align with the standard sector structure and to improve
internal efficiencies, the Coast Guard is reorganizing Sector Columbia
River and Sector North Bend. Specifically, Sector North Bend is being
disestablished, so the regulation granting it special SAR Mission
Coordinator authority is no longer applicable. The geographic
boundaries of Sector Columbia River are not changing, but its office is
moving from Astoria, OR, to Portland, OR.
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) before
this final rule. The Coast Guard finds that this rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A)
because the changes it makes are conforming amendments involving agency
organization. The Coast Guard also finds good cause exists under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) for not publishing an NPRM because the changes will
have no substantive effect on the public, and notice and comment are
therefore unnecessary. For the same reasons, the Coast Guard finds good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the rule effective fewer than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 14 U.S.C.
504(a)(2), as delegated at 33 CFR 1.05-1(h), to issue regulations
necessary to implement technical, organizational, and conforming
amendments and corrections to rules, regulations, and notices.
Operating Facility Change Order (OFCO) No. 034-22 announced the
reorganization of Sector Columbia River and disestablishment of Sector
North Bend. These conforming amendments update the regulation that
describes Sector Columbia River so that it contains current information
and removes the regulation that describes Sector North Bend.
Under 14 U.S.C. 504(a)(2), the Commandant of the Coast Guard has
the authority to establish and prescribe the purpose of Coast Guard
Shore establishments. And under 33 CFR 1.05-1(h), the Chief of the
Coast Guard's Office of Regulations and Administrative Law has been
delegated authority to issue technical, organizational, and conforming
amendments and corrections to regulations to reflect changes introduced
by OFCO No. 034-22.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
OFCO No. 034-22 announced the reorganization of Sector Columbia
River and disestablishment of Sector North Bend and this rule reflects
that organizational change in part 3 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. OFCO No. 034-22 did not change Sector Columbia River's
Area of Responsibility (AOR) but it relocated its office location. Part
3 of 33 CFR describes the location of U.S. Coast Guard districts,
sectors, and Captain of the Port (COTP) and Officer in Charge of Marine
Inspections (OCMI) zones. This rule amends Sec. 3.65-15 to update the
location of Sector Columbia River's office to Portland, OR.
This rule also removes Sec. 3.65-20 because it is no longer
necessary after the disestablishment of Sector North Bend. Sector North
Bend's SAR Mission Coordinator authority specified in Sec. 3.65-20
need not be addressed in Sec. 3.65-15. Sector Columbia River
encompasses the AOR of Sector North Bend and, in conformity with other
sector regulations in 33 CFR part 3, SAR Mission Coordinator authority
need not be specified in Sec. 3.65-15.
Accordingly, this rule does not change Sector Columbia River's
sector, OCMI, or COTP zone boundary lines, nor does it substantively
impact existing regulated navigation area, safety zone, or security
zone regulation, or any naval vessel protection zones. This rule does,
however, revise Sec. 3.01-1 to reflect that after the disestablishment
of Sector North Bend, only one sector remains with specified SAR
Mission Coordinator authority.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.
[[Page 30899]]
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the finding that
the disestablishment of Sector North Bend and reorganization will have
no substantive effect on the public.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
For the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on any member of the public,
including ``small entities.''
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule consists only of
an organizational amendment. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L3 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1, Implementation of the National
Environmental Policy Act.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 3
Organizations and functions (Government agencies).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 3 as follows:
PART 3--COAST GUARD AREAS, DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE INSPECTION
ZONES, AND CAPTAIN OF THE PORT ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 501, 504; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No.
01.2.
Sec. 3.01-1 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 3.01-1(d)(3) remove the words ``Some specified sectors
exercise'' and add, in their place, the words ``A specified sector
exercises''.
0
3. Revise Sec. 3.65-15 to read as follows:
Sec. 3.65-15 Sector Columbia River Marine Inspection Zone and
Captain of the Port Zone.
Sector Columbia River's office is located in Portland, OR. The
boundaries of Sector Columbia River's Marine Inspection and Captain of
the Port Zones start at the Washington coast at latitude 47[deg]32'00''
N, longitude 124[deg]21'15'' W, proceeding along this latitude east to
latitude 47[deg]32'00'' N, longitude 123[deg]18'00'' W; thence south to
latitude 46[deg]55'00'' N, longitude 123[deg]18'00'' W; thence east
along this latitude to the eastern Idaho state line; thence southeast
along the Idaho state line to the intersection of the Idaho-Wyoming
boundary; thence south along the Idaho-Wyoming boundary to the
intersection of the Idaho-Utah-Wyoming boundaries; thence west along
the southern border of Idaho to Oregon and then west along the southern
border of Oregon to the coast at latitude 41[deg]59'54'' N, longitude
124[deg]12'42'' W; thence west along the southern boundary of the
Thirteenth Coast Guard District, which is described in Sec. 3.65-10,
to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 41[deg]38'35'' N,
128[deg]51'26'' W; thence north along the outermost extent of the EEZ
to latitude 47[deg]32'00'' N; thence east to the point of origin.
Sec. 3.65-20 [Removed]
0
4. Remove Sec. 3.65-20.
Dated: May 9, 2023.
Michael T. Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-10195 Filed 5-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P