Reports Analysis Division Legal Question Resolution Program, 30741-30742 [2023-10111]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2023 / Notices
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9
Notice
Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act
requires that EPA make public its
comments on EISs issued by other
Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters
on EISs are available at: https://
cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/
action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20230062, Draft, USA, AK, Draft
Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement for the Public Law 106–65
Land Withdrawal Extension,
Comment Period Ends: 07/11/2023,
Contact: Grant Sattler 907–353–6701
EIS No. 20230063, Final, USFS, AK,
Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Facility
Improvements, Review Period Ends:
06/26/2023, Contact: Monique Nelson
907–209–4090
Amended Notice
EIS No. 20230005, Draft, BLM, ND,
North Dakota Resource Management
Plan Revision, Comment Period Ends:
05/22/2023, Contact: Kristine Braun
701–227–7725
Revision to FR Notice Published 01/
20/2023; Extending the Comment Period
from 04/20/2023 to 05/22/2023.
Dated: May 8, 2023.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023–10161 Filed 5–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2023–07]
Reports Analysis Division Legal
Question Resolution Program
Federal Election Commission.
Agency procedure.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Election
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) adopted a
program in 2011, which was last revised
in 2019, providing for a means by which
persons may have a legal question
considered by the Commission earlier in
both the report review process and the
audit process. Because the Commission
is separately adopting a new audit
process, it is revising the policy for the
legal question program to narrow its
scope to encompass only legal questions
arising from requests for corrective
action made by the Commission’s
Reports Analysis Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Selinkoff, Assistant General
Counsel, Policy Division, or Joshua
Blume, Attorney, 1050 First Street NE,
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 May 11, 2023
Jkt 259001
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1650
or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
1, 2011, the Commission adopted a
program providing for a means by
which persons may have a legal
question considered by the Commission
earlier in both the report review process
and the audit process (‘‘Legal Question
Resolution Program’’).1 Because the
Commission is separately adopting a
new audit process for committees that
do not receive public funds, effective
June 1, 2024, for audits that begin after
that date, the Commission will be
terminating the Legal Question
Resolution Program for legal questions
arising in the course of audits. The Legal
Question Resolution Program will
remain in full effect with respect to
audits commenced before June 1, 2024.
At the conclusion of the last audit to be
commenced before June 1, 2024, the
Legal Question Resolution Program will
no longer apply for any purpose. The
program announced here and set forth
below (‘‘RAD Legal Question Resolution
Program’’) will take effect on June 1,
2024, and will apply only to legal
questions arising from the Reports
Analysis Division’s (‘‘RAD’’) review
process.2
I. Procedures
Within 15 business days of a
determination by RAD that a person
remains obligated to take corrective
action to resolve an issue that has arisen
during the report review process, the
person may seek Commission
consideration if a material dispute on a
question of law exists with respect to
the recommended corrective action.3 A
‘‘determination’’ for purposes of
triggering the 15 business days is the
notification to the person of legal
guidance prepared by the Office of
General Counsel (‘‘OGC’’) at the request
of RAD recommending the corrective
action.
Any request for consideration by a
person during the report review process
shall be limited to questions of law on
1 76 FR 45798 (Aug. 1, 2011). The Commission
has revised the program three times since 2011, as
explained in the last revision. See Policy Statement
Regarding a Program for Requesting Consideration
of Legal Questions by the Commission, 84 FR 36602
(July 29, 2019).
2 This superseding RAD Legal Request Program
will not be available in the course of audits of
committees that receive public funding. Audits of
such committees are governed by extensive
regulations set forth in 11 CFR, subchapters E and
F that, in the Commission’s judgment, provide
sufficient opportunity to present legal questions to
the Commission.
3 Many disputes involving corrective action
requests hinge on questions of fact rather than
questions of law, and thus are not appropriate for
this procedure.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30741
material issues, when: (1) the legal issue
is novel, complex, or pertains to an
unsettled question of law; (2) there has
been intervening legislation,
rulemaking, or litigation since the
Commission last considered the issue;
or (3) the request to take corrective
action is contrary to or otherwise
inconsistent with prior Commission
matters dealing with the same issue.
The request must specify the question of
law at issue and why it is subject to
Commission consideration. It should
discuss, when appropriate, prior
Commission matters raising the same
issue, relevant court decisions, and any
other analysis of the issue that may
assist the Commission in its decision
making. The Commission will not
consider factual disputes under this
procedure, and any requests for
consideration other than on questions of
law on material issues will not be
granted.
All requests, including any extension
requests, must be received by the
Commission within 15 business days of
the determination of corrective action.
All requests must be directed to the
attention of the Commission Secretary
via email at LegalRequestProgram@
fec.gov.4 Upon receipt of a request, the
Commission Secretary shall forward a
copy of any request to each
Commissioner, the General Counsel,
and the Staff Director.
Any request for an extension of time
to file a RAD Legal Question Resolution
Program request will be considered on
a case-by-case basis and will only be
granted if good cause is shown, and the
Commission approves the extension
request by four or more affirmative votes
within five business days of receipt of
the extension request. Within five
business days of notification to the
Commissioners of a request for
consideration of a legal question, if two
or more Commissioners agree that the
Commission should consider the
request, OGC may, at that time, attempt
to resolve the matter informally over the
course of five business days. Within 15
business days from the date upon which
RAD and OGC conclude that the matter
cannot be resolved informally, or from
the expiration of the five-business day
period, whichever occurs first, OGC will
prepare and circulate a recommendation
in accordance with all applicable
Commission Directives. If the matter is
resolved informally, RAD and OGC will
notify the Commission that the matter
has been resolved and notify the
4 Requestors are advised that if they submit a
request, electronically or otherwise, to a different
address than designated in this Procedure, the
processing of the request may be delayed.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
30742
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2023 / Notices
Requestor in writing of the notification
to the Commission. Informal resolution
of a matter does not prevent the
Requestor from seeking Commission
consideration, in an additional or
subsequent determination, subject to the
requirements of this program.
After the recommendation is
circulated for a Commission vote, in the
event of an objection, the matter shall be
automatically placed on the next
meeting agenda consistent with the
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(g), and
applicable Commission regulations in
11 CFR part 2. However, if within 60
business days of the filing of a request
for consideration, the Commission has
not resolved the issue or provided
guidance on how to proceed with the
matter by the affirmative vote of four or
more Commissioners, RAD may proceed
with the matter. After the 60 business
days have elapsed, any requestor will be
provided a copy of OGC’s
recommendation memorandum and an
accompanying vote certification, or if no
such certification exists, a cover page
stating the disposition of the
memorandum. Confidential information
will be redacted as necessary.
After the request review process has
concluded, a copy of the request for
consideration, as well as the
recommendation memorandum and
accompanying vote certification or
disposition memorandum, will be
placed with the Committee’s filings on
the Commission’s website within 30
days. These materials will also be
placed on the Commission’s web page
dedicated to legal questions considered
by the Commission under this program.
This procedure is not intended to
circumvent or supplant the Advisory
Opinion process provided under 52
U.S.C. 30108 and 11 CFR part 112.
Accordingly, any legal issues that
qualify for consideration under the
Advisory Opinion process are not
appropriate for consideration under this
procedure.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Annual Review
No later than July 1 of each year, the
Office of Compliance and OGC shall
jointly prepare and distribute to the
Commission a written report containing
a summary of the requests made under
the program over the previous year and
a summary of the Commission’s
consideration of those requests and any
action taken thereon. The annual report
shall also include the Chief Compliance
Officer’s and the General Counsel’s
assessment of whether, and to what
extent, the program has promoted
efficiency and fairness in both the
Commission’s report review process, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 May 11, 2023
Jkt 259001
well as their recommendations, if any,
for modifications to the program.
On behalf of the Commission.
Dara S. Lindenbaum,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–10111 Filed 5–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2023–06]
Audit Process for Committees That Do
Not Receive Public Funds
Federal Election Commission.
Agency procedure.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Election
Commission is revising its procedures
for how it conducts audits of political
committees that do not receive public
funds.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dayna C. Brown, Assistant Staff
Director, Audit Division, or Jessica
Selinkoff, Assistant General Counsel,
Policy Division, 1050 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1200,
(202) 694–1650, or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971,
as amended, (the ‘‘Act’’) provides that
the Federal Election Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) ‘‘may conduct audits
. . . of any political committee required
to file a report under section 30104 [of
the Act].’’ 52 U.S.C. 30111(b).1 The
Commission previously set forth its
audit process for committees that do not
receive public funds, in part, in
Directives 69 and 70, Policy Statement
Regarding a Program for Requesting
Consideration of Legal Questions by the
Commission, 84 FR 36602 (Jul. 19, 2019)
(the ‘‘Legal Question Resolution
Program’’), and Procedural Rules for
Audit Hearing, 74 FR 33140 (Jul. 10,
2009), as amended, 74 FR 79535 (Aug.
7, 2009) (collectively, the ‘‘Previous
Procedural Documents’’).
The audit procedures set forth herein
will take effect June 1, 2024, and will
apply to all audits that begin after this
SUMMARY:
1 The Commission also has the statutory authority
to conduct an audit in instances which, based upon
a complaint, ‘‘the Commission determines by an
affirmative vote of 4 of its members, that it has
reason to believe that a person has committed, or
is about to commit, a violation’’ of the Act. 52
U.S.C. 30109(a)(2). The procedures set forth here do
not apply to audits conducted under 52 U.S.C.
30109 after finding reason to believe a violation has
occurred, which are instead governed by the Act’s
enforcement provisions. See generally 52 U.S.C.
30109; 11 CFR part 111; Guidebook for
Complainants and Respondents on the FEC
Enforcement Process, available at https://
www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/
respondent_guide.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
date. An audit begins when committees
receive an audit notification; 2 thus, any
committee that receives an audit
notification on or after June 1, 2024 will
be audited under these new audit
procedures. Audits that began before
these procedures went into effect—i.e.,
a committee received an audit
notification before June 1, 2024—will
continue to be conducted according to
the processes set forth in the Previous
Procedural Documents.
The Previous Procedural Documents
are hereby sunset as follows. Directive
70, The Legal Question Resolution
Program,3 and the Procedural Rules for
Audit Hearings will remain in full effect
with respect to audits commenced
before June 1, 2024.4 At the conclusion
of the last audit to be commenced before
June 1, 2024, Directive 70, the Legal
Question Resolution Program, and the
Procedural Rules for Audit Hearings
will no longer apply.
On January 9, 2023, the Commission
published a notice of public hearing and
request for public comments on its
policies and procedures regarding the
auditing of political committees that do
not receive public funds.5 On February
14, 2023, the Commission held a
hearing.6 In adopting the process set
forth below, the Commission took into
consideration the comments and
testimony received during that process.7
The goal of the new audit process is
to strike the appropriate balance, within
the constraints of the Act, among
efficiency, procedural protections for
audited committees, orderly
development of the law, transparency,
and the Commission’s statutory
authority to seek voluntary compliance
with the Act.
I. Revised Audit Process
A. Overview
The audit process begins with a
review of a committee’s reports by the
Commission’s Reports Analysis Division
(‘‘RAD’’). If RAD determines that a
committee’s reporting errors exceed
Commission-approved compliance
thresholds, RAD will refer the
2 See infra, Section I.C (explaining the audit
notification).
3 The Commission is publishing in the Federal
Register a new version of the Legal Question
Resolution Program that will not apply to questions
from audited committees.
4 Directive 69, which concerns, among other
things, staff deadlines in audits, is being amended.
5 Notice of Public Hearing and Request for Public
Comments, 88 FR 1228 (Jan. 9, 2023).
6 For the recording of the hearing, as well as
witness testimony, see https://www.fec.gov/
updates/february-14-2023-public-hearing/.
7 For a complete list of comments, see https://
www.fec.gov/legal-resources/policy-other-guidance/
.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30741-30742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10111]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2023-07]
Reports Analysis Division Legal Question Resolution Program
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Agency procedure.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission (``Commission'') adopted a
program in 2011, which was last revised in 2019, providing for a means
by which persons may have a legal question considered by the Commission
earlier in both the report review process and the audit process.
Because the Commission is separately adopting a new audit process, it
is revising the policy for the legal question program to narrow its
scope to encompass only legal questions arising from requests for
corrective action made by the Commission's Reports Analysis Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Selinkoff, Assistant General
Counsel, Policy Division, or Joshua Blume, Attorney, 1050 First Street
NE, Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 1, 2011, the Commission adopted a
program providing for a means by which persons may have a legal
question considered by the Commission earlier in both the report review
process and the audit process (``Legal Question Resolution
Program'').\1\ Because the Commission is separately adopting a new
audit process for committees that do not receive public funds,
effective June 1, 2024, for audits that begin after that date, the
Commission will be terminating the Legal Question Resolution Program
for legal questions arising in the course of audits. The Legal Question
Resolution Program will remain in full effect with respect to audits
commenced before June 1, 2024. At the conclusion of the last audit to
be commenced before June 1, 2024, the Legal Question Resolution Program
will no longer apply for any purpose. The program announced here and
set forth below (``RAD Legal Question Resolution Program'') will take
effect on June 1, 2024, and will apply only to legal questions arising
from the Reports Analysis Division's (``RAD'') review process.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 76 FR 45798 (Aug. 1, 2011). The Commission has revised the
program three times since 2011, as explained in the last revision.
See Policy Statement Regarding a Program for Requesting
Consideration of Legal Questions by the Commission, 84 FR 36602
(July 29, 2019).
\2\ This superseding RAD Legal Request Program will not be
available in the course of audits of committees that receive public
funding. Audits of such committees are governed by extensive
regulations set forth in 11 CFR, subchapters E and F that, in the
Commission's judgment, provide sufficient opportunity to present
legal questions to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Procedures
Within 15 business days of a determination by RAD that a person
remains obligated to take corrective action to resolve an issue that
has arisen during the report review process, the person may seek
Commission consideration if a material dispute on a question of law
exists with respect to the recommended corrective action.\3\ A
``determination'' for purposes of triggering the 15 business days is
the notification to the person of legal guidance prepared by the Office
of General Counsel (``OGC'') at the request of RAD recommending the
corrective action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Many disputes involving corrective action requests hinge on
questions of fact rather than questions of law, and thus are not
appropriate for this procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any request for consideration by a person during the report review
process shall be limited to questions of law on material issues, when:
(1) the legal issue is novel, complex, or pertains to an unsettled
question of law; (2) there has been intervening legislation,
rulemaking, or litigation since the Commission last considered the
issue; or (3) the request to take corrective action is contrary to or
otherwise inconsistent with prior Commission matters dealing with the
same issue. The request must specify the question of law at issue and
why it is subject to Commission consideration. It should discuss, when
appropriate, prior Commission matters raising the same issue, relevant
court decisions, and any other analysis of the issue that may assist
the Commission in its decision making. The Commission will not consider
factual disputes under this procedure, and any requests for
consideration other than on questions of law on material issues will
not be granted.
All requests, including any extension requests, must be received by
the Commission within 15 business days of the determination of
corrective action. All requests must be directed to the attention of
the Commission Secretary via email at [email protected].\4\
Upon receipt of a request, the Commission Secretary shall forward a
copy of any request to each Commissioner, the General Counsel, and the
Staff Director.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Requestors are advised that if they submit a request,
electronically or otherwise, to a different address than designated
in this Procedure, the processing of the request may be delayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any request for an extension of time to file a RAD Legal Question
Resolution Program request will be considered on a case-by-case basis
and will only be granted if good cause is shown, and the Commission
approves the extension request by four or more affirmative votes within
five business days of receipt of the extension request. Within five
business days of notification to the Commissioners of a request for
consideration of a legal question, if two or more Commissioners agree
that the Commission should consider the request, OGC may, at that time,
attempt to resolve the matter informally over the course of five
business days. Within 15 business days from the date upon which RAD and
OGC conclude that the matter cannot be resolved informally, or from the
expiration of the five-business day period, whichever occurs first, OGC
will prepare and circulate a recommendation in accordance with all
applicable Commission Directives. If the matter is resolved informally,
RAD and OGC will notify the Commission that the matter has been
resolved and notify the
[[Page 30742]]
Requestor in writing of the notification to the Commission. Informal
resolution of a matter does not prevent the Requestor from seeking
Commission consideration, in an additional or subsequent determination,
subject to the requirements of this program.
After the recommendation is circulated for a Commission vote, in
the event of an objection, the matter shall be automatically placed on
the next meeting agenda consistent with the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C.
552b(g), and applicable Commission regulations in 11 CFR part 2.
However, if within 60 business days of the filing of a request for
consideration, the Commission has not resolved the issue or provided
guidance on how to proceed with the matter by the affirmative vote of
four or more Commissioners, RAD may proceed with the matter. After the
60 business days have elapsed, any requestor will be provided a copy of
OGC's recommendation memorandum and an accompanying vote certification,
or if no such certification exists, a cover page stating the
disposition of the memorandum. Confidential information will be
redacted as necessary.
After the request review process has concluded, a copy of the
request for consideration, as well as the recommendation memorandum and
accompanying vote certification or disposition memorandum, will be
placed with the Committee's filings on the Commission's website within
30 days. These materials will also be placed on the Commission's web
page dedicated to legal questions considered by the Commission under
this program.
This procedure is not intended to circumvent or supplant the
Advisory Opinion process provided under 52 U.S.C. 30108 and 11 CFR part
112. Accordingly, any legal issues that qualify for consideration under
the Advisory Opinion process are not appropriate for consideration
under this procedure.
II. Annual Review
No later than July 1 of each year, the Office of Compliance and OGC
shall jointly prepare and distribute to the Commission a written report
containing a summary of the requests made under the program over the
previous year and a summary of the Commission's consideration of those
requests and any action taken thereon. The annual report shall also
include the Chief Compliance Officer's and the General Counsel's
assessment of whether, and to what extent, the program has promoted
efficiency and fairness in both the Commission's report review process,
as well as their recommendations, if any, for modifications to the
program.
On behalf of the Commission.
Dara S. Lindenbaum,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-10111 Filed 5-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P