Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model 777 Series Airplanes; Passenger Seats With Pretensioner Restraint Systems, 30262-30264 [2023-10071]
Download as PDF
30262
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 91 / Thursday, May 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(1) Designation of officials with the
authority to approve and set pay under
this paragraph;
(2) Whether use of this authority is
discretionary or mandatory;
(3) The factors the designated officials
may or must consider in determining
the rate at which to set the applicant’s
pay, which must include how pay has
been set for other administrative law
judges; and
(4) Documentation and recordkeeping
requirements sufficient to allow
reconstruction of the action.
(g) With prior OPM approval, an
agency may offer a higher than
minimum rate, up to the maximum rate
F, to an administrative law judge
applicant or a former administrative law
judge with superior qualifications who
is eligible for appointment to a position
at AL–3. An agency request to OPM
must include:
(1) A description of the superior
qualifications (as defined in § 930.202)
of the applicant or former
administrative law judge;
(2) How pay has been set for
administrative law judges who had
similar qualifications (based on the
level, type, or quality of the applicant’s
or former administrative law judge’s
skills or competencies or other qualities
and experiences) and who have been
newly appointed to positions that are
similar to the administrative law judge’s
position (based on the position’s
occupational series, organization,
geographic location, or other jobrelevant factors), if applicable; and
(3) The proposed rate of basic pay and
a justification for that rate, except an
agency may not consider an applicant’s
or former administrative law judge’s
salary history (i.e., existing salary or
prior salary).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–09564 Filed 5–10–23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1740; Notice No. 25–
23–01–SC]
Special Conditions: The Boeing
Company Model 777 Series Airplanes;
Passenger Seats With Pretensioner
Restraint Systems
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
This action proposes special
conditions for Boeing Company (Boeing)
Model 777 series airplanes. These
airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature when compared to the
state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. This design feature
is pretensioner restraint systems
installed on passenger seats. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
June 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2022–1740 using
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
• Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any
time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Lennon, Cabin Safety, AIR–
624, Technical Policy Branch, Policy
and Standards Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 South 216th
Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3209; email
shannon.lennon@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposed special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments, and will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring delay. The FAA may
change these special conditions based
on the comments received.
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or
financial information that is customarily
treated as private, that you actually treat
as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these special
conditions. Send submissions
containing CBI to the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below. Comments the
FAA receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the
public docket for these special
conditions.
Background
On September 30, 2021, Boeing
applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. T00001SE for Boeing
Model 777 series airplanes. These
airplanes, currently approved under
Type Certificate No. T00001SE, are
twin-engine, transport-category
airplanes with maximum seating for 495
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 91 / Thursday, May 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
passengers and a maximum takeoff
weight of 775,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, Boeing must show that Model
777 series airplanes meet the applicable
provisions of the regulations listed in
Type Certificate No. T00001SE, or the
applicable regulations in effect on the
date of application for the change,
except for earlier amendments as agreed
upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, Boeing Model 777 series
airplanes must comply with the fuelvent and exhaust-emission requirements
of 14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Boeing Model 777 series airplanes
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature:
Forward-facing seats incorporating a
shoulder harness with pretensioner
device, otherwise known as a
pretensioner restraint system, which is
intended to protect the occupants from
head injuries.
Discussion
Boeing will install, in Model 777
series airplanes, forward-facing seats
that incorporate a shoulder harness with
a pretensioner system, for head-injury
protection, at each seat place.
Shoulder harnesses have been widely
used on flight-attendant seats, flightdeck seats, in business jets, and in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
general-aviation airplanes to reduce
occupant head injury in the event of an
emergency landing. Special conditions,
pertinent regulations, and published
guidance relate to other restraint
systems. However, the use of
pretensioners in the restraint system on
transport-airplane seats is a novel
design.
The pretensioner restraint system
utilizes a retractor that eliminates slack
in the shoulder harness and pulls the
occupant back into the seat prior to
impact. This has the effect of reducing
forward translation of the occupant,
reducing head arc, and reducing loads
in the shoulder harness.
Pretensioner technology involves a
step-change in loading experienced by
the occupant for impacts below and
above that at which the device deploys,
because activation of the shoulder
harness, at the point at which the
pretensioner engages, interrupts uppertorso excursion. Such excursion could
result in the head-injury criteria (HIC)
being higher at an intermediate impact
condition than that resulting from the
maximum impact condition
corresponding to the test conditions
specified in § 25.562. See condition 1 in
these special conditions.
The ideal triangular maximumseverity pulse is defined in Advisory
Circular (AC) 25.562–1B, ‘‘Dynamic
Evaluation of Seat Restraint Systems
and Occupant Protection on Transport
Airplanes.’’ For the evaluation and
testing of less-severe pulses for purposes
of assessing the effectiveness of the
pretensioner setting, a similar triangular
pulse should be used with acceleration,
rise time, and velocity change scaled
accordingly. The magnitude of the
required pulse should not deviate below
the ideal pulse by more than 0.5g until
1.33 t1 is reached, where t1 represents
the time interval between 0 and t1 on
the referenced pulse shape, as shown in
AC 25.562–1B. This is an acceptable
method of compliance to the test
requirements of the special conditions.
Additionally, the pretensioner might
not provide protection, after actuation,
during secondary impacts. Therefore,
the case where a small impact is
followed by a large impact should be
addressed. If the minimum deceleration
severity at which the pretensioner is set
to deploy is unnecessarily low, the
protection offered by the pretensioner
may be lost by the time a second, larger
impact occurs.
Conditions 1 through 4 ensure that
the pretensioner system activates when
intended, to provide the necessary
protection of occupants. This includes
protection of a range of occupants under
various accident conditions. Conditions
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30263
5 through 10 address maintenance and
reliability of the pretensioner system,
including any outside influences on the
mechanism, to ensure it functions as
intended.
The proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions are applicable to the
model for which they are issued. Should
the type certificate for that model be
amended later to include any other
model that incorporates the same novel
or unusual design feature, or should any
other model already included on the
same type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would apply to the other model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain
novel or unusual design feature on one
model series of airplanes. It is not a rule
of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, and 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Boeing
Model 777 series airplanes.
In addition to the requirements of
§ 25.562, forward-facing passenger seats
with pretensioner restraint systems
must meet the following:
(1) Head Injury Criteria (HIC)
The HIC value must not exceed 1000
at any condition at which the
pretensioner does or does not deploy,
up to the maximum severity pulse that
corresponds to the test conditions
specified in § 25.562. Tests must be
performed to demonstrate this, taking
into account any necessary tolerances
for deployment.
When an airbag device is present in
addition to the pretensioner restraint
system, and the anthropomorphic test
device (ATD) has no apparent contact
with the seat/structure but has contact
with an airbag, a HIC unlimited scored
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
30264
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 91 / Thursday, May 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
in excess of 1000 is acceptable,
provided the HIC15 score (calculated in
accordance with 49 CFR 571.208) for
that contact is less than 700.
ATD head contact with the seat or
other structure, through the airbag, or
contact subsequent to contact with the
airbag, requires a HIC value that does
not exceed 1000.
(2) Protection During Secondary
Impacts
The pretensioner activation setting
must be demonstrated to maximize the
probability of the protection being
available when needed, considering
secondary impacts.
(3) Protection of Occupants Other Than
50th Percentile
Protection of occupants for a range of
stature from a 2-year-old child to a 95th
percentile male must be shown. For
shoulder harnesses that include
pretensioners, protection of occupants
other than a 50th percentile male may
be shown by test or analysis. In
addition, the pretensioner must not
introduce a hazard to passengers due to
the following seating configurations:
(a) The seat occupant is holding an
infant.
(b) The seat occupant is a child in a
child-restraint device.
(c) The seat occupant is a pregnant
woman.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(4) Occupants Adopting the Brace
Position
Occupants in the traditional brace
position when the pretensioner activates
must not experience adverse effects
from the pretensioner activation.
(5) Inadvertent Pretensioner Actuation
(a) The probability of inadvertent
pretensioner actuation must be shown
to be extremely remote (i.e., average
probability per flight hour of less than
10¥7).
(b) The system must be shown not to
be susceptible to inadvertent
pretensioner actuation as a result of
wear and tear, nor inertia loads resulting
from in-flight or ground maneuvers
likely to be experienced in service.
(c) The seated occupant must not be
seriously injured as a result of
inadvertent pretensioner actuation.
(d) Inadvertent pretensioner actuation
must not cause a hazard to the airplane,
nor cause serious injury to anyone who
may be positioned close to the retractor
or belt (e.g., seated in an adjacent seat
or standing adjacent to the seat).
(6) Availability of the Pretensioner
Function Prior to Flight
The design must provide means for a
crewmember to verify the availability of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
the pretensioner function prior to each
flight, or the probability of failure of the
pretensioner function must be
demonstrated to be extremely remote
(i.e., average probability per flight hour
of less than 10¥7) between inspection
intervals.
(7) Incorrect Seat Belt Orientation
The system design must ensure that
any incorrect orientation (twisting) of
the seat belt does not compromise the
pretensioner protection function.
(8) Contamination Protection
The pretensioner mechanisms and
controls must be protected from external
contamination associated with that
which could occur on or around
passenger seating.
(9) Prevention of Hazards
The pretensioner system must not
induce a hazard to passengers in case of
fire, nor create a fire hazard, if activated.
(10) Functionality After Loss of Power
The system must function properly
after loss of normal airplane electrical
power and after a transverse separation
in the fuselage at the most critical
location. A separation at the location of
the system does not have to be
considered.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington on May
5, 2023.
Suzanne A. Masterson,
Acting Manager, Technical Policy Branch,
Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–10071 Filed 5–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–0939; Project
Identifier MCAI–2022–00743–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Canada Corp. Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. (P&WC)
Model PW307D engines. This proposed
AD was prompted by a root cause
analysis of an event involving an
uncontained failure of a high-pressure
turbine (HPT) 1st-stage disk, on an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
International Aero Engines AG Model
V2533–A5 engine, that resulted in highenergy debris penetrating the engine
cowling and an aborted takeoff. This
proposed AD would require removing
certain HPT 2nd-stage disks from
service and would also prohibit
installation of certain HPT 2nd-stage
disks on any affected engine. The FAA
is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this NPRM by June 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2023–0939; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Caufield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7146; email: barbara.caufield@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2023–0939; Project Identifier
MCAI–2022–00743–E’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30262-30264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10071]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2022-1740; Notice No. 25-23-01-SC]
Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model 777 Series
Airplanes; Passenger Seats With Pretensioner Restraint Systems
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for Boeing Company
(Boeing) Model 777 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel
or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category
airplanes. This design feature is pretensioner restraint systems
installed on passenger seats. The applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before June 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2022-1740 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be
read at https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Lennon, Cabin Safety, AIR-624,
Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3209; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the proposed special conditions,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments, and will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring delay. The FAA may change these special conditions
based on the comments received.
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the FAA will post all
comments received without change to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information you provide. The FAA will also post
a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about
these special conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552),
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to
these special conditions contain commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or responsive to these special
conditions, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the indicated comments will not be
placed in the public docket of these special conditions. Send
submissions containing CBI to the individual listed in the For Further
Information Contact section below. Comments the FAA receives, which are
not specifically designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket
for these special conditions.
Background
On September 30, 2021, Boeing applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. T00001SE for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes. These
airplanes, currently approved under Type Certificate No. T00001SE, are
twin-engine, transport-category airplanes with maximum seating for 495
[[Page 30263]]
passengers and a maximum takeoff weight of 775,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Boeing must show that Model
777 series airplanes meet the applicable provisions of the regulations
listed in Type Certificate No. T00001SE, or the applicable regulations
in effect on the date of application for the change, except for earlier
amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, Boeing Model 777 series airplanes must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Boeing Model 777 series airplanes will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature:
Forward-facing seats incorporating a shoulder harness with
pretensioner device, otherwise known as a pretensioner restraint
system, which is intended to protect the occupants from head injuries.
Discussion
Boeing will install, in Model 777 series airplanes, forward-facing
seats that incorporate a shoulder harness with a pretensioner system,
for head-injury protection, at each seat place.
Shoulder harnesses have been widely used on flight-attendant seats,
flight-deck seats, in business jets, and in general-aviation airplanes
to reduce occupant head injury in the event of an emergency landing.
Special conditions, pertinent regulations, and published guidance
relate to other restraint systems. However, the use of pretensioners in
the restraint system on transport-airplane seats is a novel design.
The pretensioner restraint system utilizes a retractor that
eliminates slack in the shoulder harness and pulls the occupant back
into the seat prior to impact. This has the effect of reducing forward
translation of the occupant, reducing head arc, and reducing loads in
the shoulder harness.
Pretensioner technology involves a step-change in loading
experienced by the occupant for impacts below and above that at which
the device deploys, because activation of the shoulder harness, at the
point at which the pretensioner engages, interrupts upper-torso
excursion. Such excursion could result in the head-injury criteria
(HIC) being higher at an intermediate impact condition than that
resulting from the maximum impact condition corresponding to the test
conditions specified in Sec. 25.562. See condition 1 in these special
conditions.
The ideal triangular maximum-severity pulse is defined in Advisory
Circular (AC) 25.562-1B, ``Dynamic Evaluation of Seat Restraint Systems
and Occupant Protection on Transport Airplanes.'' For the evaluation
and testing of less-severe pulses for purposes of assessing the
effectiveness of the pretensioner setting, a similar triangular pulse
should be used with acceleration, rise time, and velocity change scaled
accordingly. The magnitude of the required pulse should not deviate
below the ideal pulse by more than 0.5g until 1.33 t1 is reached, where
t1 represents the time interval between 0 and t1 on the referenced
pulse shape, as shown in AC 25.562-1B. This is an acceptable method of
compliance to the test requirements of the special conditions.
Additionally, the pretensioner might not provide protection, after
actuation, during secondary impacts. Therefore, the case where a small
impact is followed by a large impact should be addressed. If the
minimum deceleration severity at which the pretensioner is set to
deploy is unnecessarily low, the protection offered by the pretensioner
may be lost by the time a second, larger impact occurs.
Conditions 1 through 4 ensure that the pretensioner system
activates when intended, to provide the necessary protection of
occupants. This includes protection of a range of occupants under
various accident conditions. Conditions 5 through 10 address
maintenance and reliability of the pretensioner system, including any
outside influences on the mechanism, to ensure it functions as
intended.
The proposed special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed special conditions are
applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type
certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model
that incorporates the same novel or unusual design feature, or should
any other model already included on the same type certificate be
modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to the other model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, and
44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes.
In addition to the requirements of Sec. 25.562, forward-facing
passenger seats with pretensioner restraint systems must meet the
following:
(1) Head Injury Criteria (HIC)
The HIC value must not exceed 1000 at any condition at which the
pretensioner does or does not deploy, up to the maximum severity pulse
that corresponds to the test conditions specified in Sec. 25.562.
Tests must be performed to demonstrate this, taking into account any
necessary tolerances for deployment.
When an airbag device is present in addition to the pretensioner
restraint system, and the anthropomorphic test device (ATD) has no
apparent contact with the seat/structure but has contact with an
airbag, a HIC unlimited scored
[[Page 30264]]
in excess of 1000 is acceptable, provided the HIC15 score (calculated
in accordance with 49 CFR 571.208) for that contact is less than 700.
ATD head contact with the seat or other structure, through the
airbag, or contact subsequent to contact with the airbag, requires a
HIC value that does not exceed 1000.
(2) Protection During Secondary Impacts
The pretensioner activation setting must be demonstrated to
maximize the probability of the protection being available when needed,
considering secondary impacts.
(3) Protection of Occupants Other Than 50th Percentile
Protection of occupants for a range of stature from a 2-year-old
child to a 95th percentile male must be shown. For shoulder harnesses
that include pretensioners, protection of occupants other than a 50th
percentile male may be shown by test or analysis. In addition, the
pretensioner must not introduce a hazard to passengers due to the
following seating configurations:
(a) The seat occupant is holding an infant.
(b) The seat occupant is a child in a child-restraint device.
(c) The seat occupant is a pregnant woman.
(4) Occupants Adopting the Brace Position
Occupants in the traditional brace position when the pretensioner
activates must not experience adverse effects from the pretensioner
activation.
(5) Inadvertent Pretensioner Actuation
(a) The probability of inadvertent pretensioner actuation must be
shown to be extremely remote (i.e., average probability per flight hour
of less than 10-7).
(b) The system must be shown not to be susceptible to inadvertent
pretensioner actuation as a result of wear and tear, nor inertia loads
resulting from in-flight or ground maneuvers likely to be experienced
in service.
(c) The seated occupant must not be seriously injured as a result
of inadvertent pretensioner actuation.
(d) Inadvertent pretensioner actuation must not cause a hazard to
the airplane, nor cause serious injury to anyone who may be positioned
close to the retractor or belt (e.g., seated in an adjacent seat or
standing adjacent to the seat).
(6) Availability of the Pretensioner Function Prior to Flight
The design must provide means for a crewmember to verify the
availability of the pretensioner function prior to each flight, or the
probability of failure of the pretensioner function must be
demonstrated to be extremely remote (i.e., average probability per
flight hour of less than 10-7) between inspection intervals.
(7) Incorrect Seat Belt Orientation
The system design must ensure that any incorrect orientation
(twisting) of the seat belt does not compromise the pretensioner
protection function.
(8) Contamination Protection
The pretensioner mechanisms and controls must be protected from
external contamination associated with that which could occur on or
around passenger seating.
(9) Prevention of Hazards
The pretensioner system must not induce a hazard to passengers in
case of fire, nor create a fire hazard, if activated.
(10) Functionality After Loss of Power
The system must function properly after loss of normal airplane
electrical power and after a transverse separation in the fuselage at
the most critical location. A separation at the location of the system
does not have to be considered.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington on May 5, 2023.
Suzanne A. Masterson,
Acting Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-10071 Filed 5-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P