Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Amendment 23 to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan, 28456-28458 [2023-09456]
Download as PDF
28456
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—EPA-APPROVED LOUISIANA SDWA § 1422 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
STATUTES AND REGULATIONS FOR WELL CLASSES I, III, IV, V AND VI
State citation
Title/subject
Louisiana Revised Statutes Annotated
sections 30:1; 30:4; 30:6; 30:18; 30:22–
23, and 30:1101 to 30:1111.
Underground Injection Control Program
Regulations for Class I, III, IV, and V
wells, (Statewide Order No. 29–N–1).
Louisiana
Administrative
Code
43:XIX.Chapters 1–5 (Statewide Order
No. 29–B).
Louisiana
Administrative
Code
43:XVIII.Chapter 3 (Statewide Order
No. 29)..
Louisiana
Administrative
Code
43:XVIII.Chapter 36 (Statewide Order
No. 29–N–6).
Minerals, Oil, and Gas and Environmental Quality.
1975 and Supp.
1982.
June 25, 1984.
Class I, III, IV and V Injection
Wells.
February 20, 1982 ...
June 25, 1984.
Drilling for and Producing of Oil
and Gas in the State of Louisiana.
Hydrocarbon Storage Wells in
Salt Dome Cavities.
August 26, 1974 ......
June 25, 1984.
July 20, 1977 ...........
June 25, 1984.
Class VI Injection Wells ..............
January 2021 ...........
[DATE OF FINAL RULE PUBLICATION
IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.]
(b) * * *
(3) Memorandum of Agreement
Addendum 3 between the State of
Louisiana and EPA, Region VI for the
UIC Class VI Program, signed by the
EPA Regional Administrator on March
3, 2023.
(4) Letter from Governor of Louisiana
to Regional Administrator, EPA Region
VI, March 4, 2021.
(c) * * *
(4) Attorney General’s Statement
‘‘Attorney General’s Statement to
Accompany Louisiana’s Underground
Injection Control Program Class VI
Primacy Application,’’ signed by the
Attorney General for the State of
Louisiana, February 10, 2021.
(d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of the
application or amendment thereto, and
the Program Description and any other
materials submitted as part of the
program revision application or
amendment thereto.
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Availability of proposed fishery
management plan amendment; request
for comments.
[FR Doc. 2023–09302 Filed 5–3–23; 8:45 am]
DATES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
RIN 0648–BL45
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
State effective date
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States;
Amendment 23 to the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council has submitted the
Black Sea Bass Commercial State
Allocation Amendment (Amendment
23) to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and
Black Sea Bass Fishery Management
Plan to NMFS. Amendment 23 proposes
to establish commercial state-by-state
allocations for black sea bass in the
Federal fishery management plan and
regulations, change the trigger for the inseason closure accountability measures
and change the state-overage payback.
Amendment 23 is intended to address
the allocation-related impacts of the
significant changes in the distribution of
black sea bass that have occurred since
the original allocations were
implemented.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
July 3, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2023–0041 by the following
method:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
NOAA–NMFS–2023–0041 in the Search
box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA approval date
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Copies of Amendment 23, including
the Environmental Assessment, the
Regulatory Impact Review, and the
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/
RIR/RFA) prepared in support of this
action are available from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800
North State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
The supporting documents are also
accessible via the internet at: https://
www.mafmc.org/actions/bsbcommercial-allocation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Keiley, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9116, or Emily.Keiley@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires that
each Regional Fishery Management
Council transmit any amendment it
prepares to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial
approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving
an amendment and associated
regulations deemed necessary by the
Council to implement the amendment,
immediately publish notification in the
Federal Register that the amendment is
available for public review and
comment. The Mid-Atlantic Council
transmitted its final version of
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Amendment 23 to the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) to
NMFS for review on September 14,
2022. On April 13, 2023, the Council
submitted Amendment 23 proposed rule
regulations they deemed to be necessary
and appropriate as specified in section
303(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Amendment 23 considers changes to
the management of the commercial
black sea bass fishery. Specifically, this
amendment proposes to establish the
commercial black sea bass state-by-state
allocations in the Federal FMP and
regulations, while also making changes
to those state allocations (previously
managed only under the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission’s FMP),
proposes a change to the Federal inseason closure regulations for the
commercial black sea bass fishery, and
proposes a change to the provisions that
apply when a quota overage occurs to
incorporate the potential for a state-level
overage. The intended purpose of the
proposed state allocation changes is to
provide fair and equitable access to the
commercial black sea bass fishery
among states in the management unit,
taking into consideration the historical
dependence of the states on the fishery,
as well as changes in abundance and
stock distribution over time. The
purpose of the change to the in-season
closure trigger is to continue to prevent
commercial annual catch limit (ACL)
overages while minimizing potential
negative socioeconomic impacts of
Federal in-season closures on states that
have not fully harvested their
allocations.
Under section 304(a)(3) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Secretary of
Commerce may disapprove, or partially
approve an amendment submitted by
the Council if it is determined to be
inconsistent with a provision of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act or other
applicable law. The sections below
describe the factors we are considering
in making the decision to approve,
disapprove, or partially approve
Amendment 23. The final decision on
Amendment 23 will be announced to
the Mid-Atlantic Council within 30 days
of the end of the comment period for
this notification of availability.
Proposed Measures
Council Management of State
Allocations
This amendment considers whether
the state allocations should remain only
in the Commission’s Interstate FMP, or
if they should be included in both the
Council and Commission’s FMPs. The
stated purposes are to provide fair and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
equitable access to the commercial black
sea bass fishery among states in the
management unit, taking into
consideration the historical dependence
of the states on the fishery, as well as
changes in abundance and stock
distribution over time; to allow the
Council and Commission to determine
which management measures are most
appropriate for joint management in
both FMPs; and to help prevent
commercial ACL overages while
minimizing potential negative
socioeconomic impacts of Federal inseason closures on states that have not
fully harvested their allocations. Under
the Council’s preferred alternative, the
state allocations would be added to the
Federal FMP. If approved, this change
would mean that future changes to the
allocations must be considered through
a joint action of the Council and
Commission. This change would also
shift an administrative burden and cost
of monitoring state quotas and
processing state quota transfers to the
Regional Office, similar to what is done
for Atlantic bluefish and summer
flounder. We are considering
disapproving the addition of the state
allocations to the Federal FMP, and
specifically invite public comment on
this. A summary of our rationale is
provided below.
Adding the state allocations to the
Federal FMP would unnecessarily
increase the administrative burden on,
and cost to, state agencies and NMFS,
and create additional inefficiencies,
with no clear direct benefit to either the
government, the resource, or the
fisheries. This is contrary to the
direction of National Standard 5 to
consider efficiency in the utilization of
fishery resources and National Standard
7’s direction to minimize costs and
avoid unnecessary duplication. National
Standard 7 guidelines, in particular,
state that ‘‘[m]anagement measures
should not impose unnecessary burdens
on the economy, on individuals, on
private or public organizations, or on
Federal, state, or local governments.’’
The Commission has been successfully
managing the black sea bass state
commercial quotas since their inception
in 2003, while NMFS monitors
commercial landings coastwide and
tracks total landings against the
coastwide quotas. Under the current
Commission process, state-to-state quota
transfers are processed efficiently
without the added administrative
burden of the Federal process, which,
for summer flounder and bluefish,
requires significantly more time and
resources and reduces flexibilities for
states, including the need to publish
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28457
state quota transfers in the Federal
Register before they can be effective. In
addition to the increased administrative
burden, shifting the allocations into the
Federal FMP encumbers the
management process such that both the
Council and Board must agree on any
future changes to the allocations.
Currently, Commission management
of this stock includes members from all
states and its process will continue to
allow equity in representation when
making future changes to state
allocations. Management by the MidAtlantic Council has representation
from the states from New York to North
Carolina, but does not include
membership from the northern states,
such as Connecticut, Rhode Island, and
Massachusetts, that also have a strong
interest in the black sea bass fishery.
Given climate change and the
northward expansion of the black sea
bass stock, this inequity in
representation on the Council creates
challenges when making decisions
regarding future potential allocation
changes, by providing the states with
seats on the Council a disproportionate
role in the decision-making process. The
absence of northern states in the
Council’s membership has important
implications for addressing National
Standard requirements. For example,
while the threshold decision of whether
to include the state commercial quotas
in the Federal FMP is not an allocation
of fishing privileges, it is not clear how
this action will provide for National
Standard 4’s requirement of fair and
equitable allocations and National
Standard 8’s mandate to provide for the
sustained participation of all fishing
communities along with minimizing
adverse economic impacts on such
communities to the extent practicable.
Given that black sea bass has already
become an important commercial and
recreational species for fishermen in
northern states, it is important that the
management body with the authority to
change state allocations is inclusive of
the states with an interest in the fishery.
Continued northward expansion of the
stock is expected due to climate change,
which is expected to exacerbate the
already challenging allocation
deliberations of the Council and
Commission. Adding the state
allocations to the Federal FMP and thus
giving the Mid-Atlantic Council
jurisdiction over these state allocations
without northern states as Council
members, while the Commission does
include these states, creates
management challenges—including
potentially inadequate consideration of
northern states’ fisheries, or even
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
28458
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
different allocation decisions from each
body. This could make the management
of this stock less adaptable to future
changes in distribution of both the
resource and the fisheries that rely on it,
implicating concerns regarding
variations and contingencies as
articulated by National Standard 6.
Commercial State Allocation Scheme
This joint action considered changes
to the distribution of commercial black
sea bass quota among the states. Because
the state commercial allocations are not
currently a part of the Federal FMP, the
Commission considered and
implemented a new allocation formula
in its FMP. The Council is
recommending we adopt the same
allocation scheme in the Federal FMP.
This new allocation does not specify
fixed-allocation percentages, but defines
a process for calculating allocations that
is partially based on biomass
distribution. The allocations would be
modified through the specifications
process each time new biomass
distribution information is available.
Specifically, the state allocation
percentages will be calculated using the
following steps:
(1) Connecticut’s baseline allocation
was increased from 1 to 3 percent, and
New York’s baseline allocation was
increased from 7 to 8 percent;
(2) Seventy-five percent of the
coastwide quota is then allocated
according to the new baseline
allocations (i.e., the original allocations
implemented by Amendment 13 to the
Interstate FMP in 2003 would be
modified to account for the initial
increases to Connecticut and New
York);
(3) Twenty-five percent of the quota is
allocated to three regions based on the
most recent regional biomass
distribution information. The three
regions are: Maine-New York, New
Jersey, and Delaware-North Carolina;
and,
(4) The regional allocations are
distributed among states within a region
in proportion to their baseline
allocations, except Maine and New
Hampshire would each receive 1
percent of the northern region quota.
While we are considering
disapproving the inclusion of these
revised allocations in the Federal FMP
due to the unnecessary increase in
administrative burden and
inefficiencies, and the lack of northern
states as members of the Council as
described above, we are supportive of
the revised approach that was
developed by the Council and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
Commission as it includes consideration
of the distribution of the black sea bass
stock, and the ability to revise
allocations as the stock shifts. As noted,
the Commission has already
implemented this process for the
development of the 2023 commercial
quotas and this process will continue to
serve as the basis for state-by-state
allocations regardless of NMFS’s final
decision with respect to promulgating
the proposed state allocations in Federal
regulations.
Federal Commercial In-Season Closure
Trigger
Currently, the Federal FMP requires a
commercial coastwide in-season closure
for all federally permitted vessels and
dealers, regardless of state, once the
coastwide quota is projected to be
landed. This amendment considers
changing this trigger, so that the closure
would occur once landings are projected
to exceed the coastwide quota plus an
additional buffer of up to 5 percent. The
Council and Board would agree to the
appropriate buffer for the upcoming
year through the specifications process.
The Council’s Monitoring Committee
and the Commission’s Technical
Committee would provide advice on the
appropriate buffer based on
considerations such as stock status, the
quota level, and recent fishery trends.
We are proposing to approve this
change to the in-season closure trigger.
Overages and State Payback
Requirements
Under the Commission FMP, overages
of state-specific quotas are only required
to be paid back by a state when the
coastwide quota has been exceeded. If
the state allocations are included in the
Federal FMP the Council and Board’s
preferred alternative is to maintain this
payback provision. In years when the
annual landings do not exceed the
coastwide quota, no state-level or
coastwide paybacks would be required.
If the annual coastwide quota is
exceeded, states with quota overages
will be required to pay back those
overages in the following year. All black
sea bass landed for sale in a state shall
be applied against that state’s annual
commercial quota, regardless of where
the black sea bass were harvested. Any
landings in excess of the commercial
quota in any state, inclusive of any
state-to-state transfers, will be deducted
from that state’s annual quota for the
following year in the final rule that
establishes the annual state-by-state
quotas. The overage deduction will be
based on landings for the current year
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
through October 31, and on landings for
the previous calendar year that were not
included when the overage deduction
was made in the final rule that
established the annual quota for the
current year. Should NMFS disapprove
establishing the state-by-state allocation
in Federal regulations, as explained
above, this provision would also be
disapproved as moot in the Federal
FMP, though it would continue to apply
through the Commission process.
Public Comment Instructions
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to
approve, partially approve, or
disapprove measures recommended by
the Council in an amendment based on
whether the measures are consistent
with the fishery management plan, plan
amendment, the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and its National Standards, and other
applicable law. As such, we are seeking
comment on whether measures in
Amendment 23 are consistent with the
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea
Bass FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and its National Standards, and other
applicable law. Public comments on this
amendment and its incorporated
documents may be submitted through
the end of the comment period stated in
this notification of availability.
A proposed rule to implement the
amendment, including draft regulatory
text, will also be published in the
Federal Register for public comment.
Public comments on the proposed rule
received before the end of the comment
period provided in this notification of
availability will be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision on the
amendment. All comments received by
July 3, 2023, whether specifically
directed to Amendment 23 or the
proposed rule for this amendment, will
be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision on the Commercial
State Allocation Amendment.
Comments received after that date will
not be considered in the decision to
approve or disapprove the amendment.
To be considered, comments must be
received by close of business on the last
day of the comment period.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 28, 2023.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–09456 Filed 5–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28456-28458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09456]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
RIN 0648-BL45
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Amendment 23
to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management
Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Availability of proposed fishery management plan amendment;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council has submitted the
Black Sea Bass Commercial State Allocation Amendment (Amendment 23) to
the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan
to NMFS. Amendment 23 proposes to establish commercial state-by-state
allocations for black sea bass in the Federal fishery management plan
and regulations, change the trigger for the in-season closure
accountability measures and change the state-overage payback. Amendment
23 is intended to address the allocation-related impacts of the
significant changes in the distribution of black sea bass that have
occurred since the original allocations were implemented.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 3, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2023-0041 by the following method:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter NOAA-NMFS-2023-0041 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Copies of Amendment 23, including the Environmental Assessment, the
Regulatory Impact Review, and the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/
RIR/RFA) prepared in support of this action are available from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 North State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
The supporting documents are also accessible via the internet at:
https://www.mafmc.org/actions/bsb-commercial-allocation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Keiley, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9116, or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires that each Regional Fishery Management
Council transmit any amendment it prepares to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving an amendment and associated
regulations deemed necessary by the Council to implement the amendment,
immediately publish notification in the Federal Register that the
amendment is available for public review and comment. The Mid-Atlantic
Council transmitted its final version of
[[Page 28457]]
Amendment 23 to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) to NMFS for review on September 14, 2022. On
April 13, 2023, the Council submitted Amendment 23 proposed rule
regulations they deemed to be necessary and appropriate as specified in
section 303(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Amendment 23 considers changes to the management of the commercial
black sea bass fishery. Specifically, this amendment proposes to
establish the commercial black sea bass state-by-state allocations in
the Federal FMP and regulations, while also making changes to those
state allocations (previously managed only under the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission's FMP), proposes a change to the Federal
in-season closure regulations for the commercial black sea bass
fishery, and proposes a change to the provisions that apply when a
quota overage occurs to incorporate the potential for a state-level
overage. The intended purpose of the proposed state allocation changes
is to provide fair and equitable access to the commercial black sea
bass fishery among states in the management unit, taking into
consideration the historical dependence of the states on the fishery,
as well as changes in abundance and stock distribution over time. The
purpose of the change to the in-season closure trigger is to continue
to prevent commercial annual catch limit (ACL) overages while
minimizing potential negative socioeconomic impacts of Federal in-
season closures on states that have not fully harvested their
allocations.
Under section 304(a)(3) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Secretary
of Commerce may disapprove, or partially approve an amendment submitted
by the Council if it is determined to be inconsistent with a provision
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act or other applicable law. The sections below
describe the factors we are considering in making the decision to
approve, disapprove, or partially approve Amendment 23. The final
decision on Amendment 23 will be announced to the Mid-Atlantic Council
within 30 days of the end of the comment period for this notification
of availability.
Proposed Measures
Council Management of State Allocations
This amendment considers whether the state allocations should
remain only in the Commission's Interstate FMP, or if they should be
included in both the Council and Commission's FMPs. The stated purposes
are to provide fair and equitable access to the commercial black sea
bass fishery among states in the management unit, taking into
consideration the historical dependence of the states on the fishery,
as well as changes in abundance and stock distribution over time; to
allow the Council and Commission to determine which management measures
are most appropriate for joint management in both FMPs; and to help
prevent commercial ACL overages while minimizing potential negative
socioeconomic impacts of Federal in-season closures on states that have
not fully harvested their allocations. Under the Council's preferred
alternative, the state allocations would be added to the Federal FMP.
If approved, this change would mean that future changes to the
allocations must be considered through a joint action of the Council
and Commission. This change would also shift an administrative burden
and cost of monitoring state quotas and processing state quota
transfers to the Regional Office, similar to what is done for Atlantic
bluefish and summer flounder. We are considering disapproving the
addition of the state allocations to the Federal FMP, and specifically
invite public comment on this. A summary of our rationale is provided
below.
Adding the state allocations to the Federal FMP would unnecessarily
increase the administrative burden on, and cost to, state agencies and
NMFS, and create additional inefficiencies, with no clear direct
benefit to either the government, the resource, or the fisheries. This
is contrary to the direction of National Standard 5 to consider
efficiency in the utilization of fishery resources and National
Standard 7's direction to minimize costs and avoid unnecessary
duplication. National Standard 7 guidelines, in particular, state that
``[m]anagement measures should not impose unnecessary burdens on the
economy, on individuals, on private or public organizations, or on
Federal, state, or local governments.'' The Commission has been
successfully managing the black sea bass state commercial quotas since
their inception in 2003, while NMFS monitors commercial landings
coastwide and tracks total landings against the coastwide quotas. Under
the current Commission process, state-to-state quota transfers are
processed efficiently without the added administrative burden of the
Federal process, which, for summer flounder and bluefish, requires
significantly more time and resources and reduces flexibilities for
states, including the need to publish state quota transfers in the
Federal Register before they can be effective. In addition to the
increased administrative burden, shifting the allocations into the
Federal FMP encumbers the management process such that both the Council
and Board must agree on any future changes to the allocations.
Currently, Commission management of this stock includes members
from all states and its process will continue to allow equity in
representation when making future changes to state allocations.
Management by the Mid-Atlantic Council has representation from the
states from New York to North Carolina, but does not include membership
from the northern states, such as Connecticut, Rhode Island, and
Massachusetts, that also have a strong interest in the black sea bass
fishery. Given climate change and the northward expansion of the black
sea bass stock, this inequity in representation on the Council creates
challenges when making decisions regarding future potential allocation
changes, by providing the states with seats on the Council a
disproportionate role in the decision-making process. The absence of
northern states in the Council's membership has important implications
for addressing National Standard requirements. For example, while the
threshold decision of whether to include the state commercial quotas in
the Federal FMP is not an allocation of fishing privileges, it is not
clear how this action will provide for National Standard 4's
requirement of fair and equitable allocations and National Standard 8's
mandate to provide for the sustained participation of all fishing
communities along with minimizing adverse economic impacts on such
communities to the extent practicable. Given that black sea bass has
already become an important commercial and recreational species for
fishermen in northern states, it is important that the management body
with the authority to change state allocations is inclusive of the
states with an interest in the fishery. Continued northward expansion
of the stock is expected due to climate change, which is expected to
exacerbate the already challenging allocation deliberations of the
Council and Commission. Adding the state allocations to the Federal FMP
and thus giving the Mid-Atlantic Council jurisdiction over these state
allocations without northern states as Council members, while the
Commission does include these states, creates management challenges--
including potentially inadequate consideration of northern states'
fisheries, or even
[[Page 28458]]
different allocation decisions from each body. This could make the
management of this stock less adaptable to future changes in
distribution of both the resource and the fisheries that rely on it,
implicating concerns regarding variations and contingencies as
articulated by National Standard 6.
Commercial State Allocation Scheme
This joint action considered changes to the distribution of
commercial black sea bass quota among the states. Because the state
commercial allocations are not currently a part of the Federal FMP, the
Commission considered and implemented a new allocation formula in its
FMP. The Council is recommending we adopt the same allocation scheme in
the Federal FMP.
This new allocation does not specify fixed-allocation percentages,
but defines a process for calculating allocations that is partially
based on biomass distribution. The allocations would be modified
through the specifications process each time new biomass distribution
information is available. Specifically, the state allocation
percentages will be calculated using the following steps:
(1) Connecticut's baseline allocation was increased from 1 to 3
percent, and New York's baseline allocation was increased from 7 to 8
percent;
(2) Seventy-five percent of the coastwide quota is then allocated
according to the new baseline allocations (i.e., the original
allocations implemented by Amendment 13 to the Interstate FMP in 2003
would be modified to account for the initial increases to Connecticut
and New York);
(3) Twenty-five percent of the quota is allocated to three regions
based on the most recent regional biomass distribution information. The
three regions are: Maine-New York, New Jersey, and Delaware-North
Carolina; and,
(4) The regional allocations are distributed among states within a
region in proportion to their baseline allocations, except Maine and
New Hampshire would each receive 1 percent of the northern region
quota.
While we are considering disapproving the inclusion of these
revised allocations in the Federal FMP due to the unnecessary increase
in administrative burden and inefficiencies, and the lack of northern
states as members of the Council as described above, we are supportive
of the revised approach that was developed by the Council and
Commission as it includes consideration of the distribution of the
black sea bass stock, and the ability to revise allocations as the
stock shifts. As noted, the Commission has already implemented this
process for the development of the 2023 commercial quotas and this
process will continue to serve as the basis for state-by-state
allocations regardless of NMFS's final decision with respect to
promulgating the proposed state allocations in Federal regulations.
Federal Commercial In-Season Closure Trigger
Currently, the Federal FMP requires a commercial coastwide in-
season closure for all federally permitted vessels and dealers,
regardless of state, once the coastwide quota is projected to be
landed. This amendment considers changing this trigger, so that the
closure would occur once landings are projected to exceed the coastwide
quota plus an additional buffer of up to 5 percent. The Council and
Board would agree to the appropriate buffer for the upcoming year
through the specifications process. The Council's Monitoring Committee
and the Commission's Technical Committee would provide advice on the
appropriate buffer based on considerations such as stock status, the
quota level, and recent fishery trends. We are proposing to approve
this change to the in-season closure trigger.
Overages and State Payback Requirements
Under the Commission FMP, overages of state-specific quotas are
only required to be paid back by a state when the coastwide quota has
been exceeded. If the state allocations are included in the Federal FMP
the Council and Board's preferred alternative is to maintain this
payback provision. In years when the annual landings do not exceed the
coastwide quota, no state-level or coastwide paybacks would be
required. If the annual coastwide quota is exceeded, states with quota
overages will be required to pay back those overages in the following
year. All black sea bass landed for sale in a state shall be applied
against that state's annual commercial quota, regardless of where the
black sea bass were harvested. Any landings in excess of the commercial
quota in any state, inclusive of any state-to-state transfers, will be
deducted from that state's annual quota for the following year in the
final rule that establishes the annual state-by-state quotas. The
overage deduction will be based on landings for the current year
through October 31, and on landings for the previous calendar year that
were not included when the overage deduction was made in the final rule
that established the annual quota for the current year. Should NMFS
disapprove establishing the state-by-state allocation in Federal
regulations, as explained above, this provision would also be
disapproved as moot in the Federal FMP, though it would continue to
apply through the Commission process.
Public Comment Instructions
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to approve, partially approve, or
disapprove measures recommended by the Council in an amendment based on
whether the measures are consistent with the fishery management plan,
plan amendment, the Magnuson-Stevens Act and its National Standards,
and other applicable law. As such, we are seeking comment on whether
measures in Amendment 23 are consistent with the Summer Flounder, Scup,
and Black Sea Bass FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act and its National
Standards, and other applicable law. Public comments on this amendment
and its incorporated documents may be submitted through the end of the
comment period stated in this notification of availability.
A proposed rule to implement the amendment, including draft
regulatory text, will also be published in the Federal Register for
public comment. Public comments on the proposed rule received before
the end of the comment period provided in this notification of
availability will be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on
the amendment. All comments received by July 3, 2023, whether
specifically directed to Amendment 23 or the proposed rule for this
amendment, will be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on
the Commercial State Allocation Amendment. Comments received after that
date will not be considered in the decision to approve or disapprove
the amendment. To be considered, comments must be received by close of
business on the last day of the comment period.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 28, 2023.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-09456 Filed 5-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P