Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West, FL, 27421-27423 [2023-09202]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Establishment of the Crystal Springs of
Napa Valley Viticultural Area.’’ See
Notice No. 221 at 88 FR 13072. In that
document, TTB proposed to establish
the approximately 4,000-acre ‘‘Crystal
Springs of Napa Valley’’ American
viticultural area (AVA) in Napa County,
California. The proposed AVA is located
entirely within the existing Napa Valley
AVA (27 CFR 9.23), which, in turn, is
entirely within the existing North Coast
AVA (27 CFR 9.30).
TTB published Notice No. 221 in
response to a petition submitted on
behalf of local vineyard owners and
winemakers. Within the proposed AVA,
there are approximately 30 commercial
vineyards which cover a total of
approximately 230 acres. The
distinguishing feature of the proposed
Crystal Springs of Napa Valley AVA is
its topography. Further details
concerning the proposed AVA are
available in Notice No. 221. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
TTB recently received a request from
the Napa Valley Vintners (NVV), a wine
industry trade association, to extend the
comment period for Notice No. 221 for
an additional 90 days. In its request,
NVV stated that in order to properly
evaluate and respond to Notice No. 221,
the group ‘‘needs further time to study
and map all vineyards using the Crystal
Springs designation in relationship to
the boundaries of the proposed AVA
and to report its findings to the NVV
Napa Name Protection Committee,
which reviews all nested AVAs, and
then to the NVV Board of Directors.’’
After reviewing the NVV request, TTB
has decided to extend the comment
period for Notice No. 221 for an
additional 60 days. TTB believes that an
additional 60 days is an adequate
extension of the comment period. If
needed, TTB will consider additional
requests to extend the comment period
as necessary for interested parties to
evaluate the vineyards using the Crystal
Springs designation. Therefore, TTB
will now accept public comments on
Notice No. 221 through June 30, 2023.
See the Public Participation section of
Notice No. 221 for details on how and
where to submit comments.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–09042 Filed 4–28–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 May 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0135]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West,
FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a safety zone to be enforced
in the event of hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters in the
Florida Keys. This action is necessary to
ensure the safety of the waters of the
Key West Captain of the Port (COTP)
zone Key West, FL. This proposed
rulemaking would establish actions to
be completed by industry and vessels in
the COTP zone prior to landfall of
hurricanes, tropical storms, and other
disasters threatening the Florida Keys.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 1, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2023–0135 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LTJG Hailye
Wilson, Sector Key West Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (305) 292–8768, email
Hailye.M.Wilson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Florida Keys has the potential to
be affected by hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters on a yearly
basis, especially between the months of
June and November. The Captain of the
Port (COTP) Key West proposes
establishing a safety zone to provide for
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27421
the safety of life during such storms and
events.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
protect mariners and port infrastructure
during extreme weather and other
natural disasters. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP Key West is proposing to
establish a safety zone to be enforced in
case of hurricanes, tropical storms, and
other disasters in Florida Keys. This
action is necessary to ensure the safety
of the waters of the COTP Key West.
This proposed rule would establish
actions to be completed by local
industry and vessels in the COTP zone
prior to landfall of hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters threatening
the Florida Keys. The proposed safety
zone would consist of all waters of the
territorial seas, in the Key West COTP
zone, as prescribed in 33 CFR 3.35–40.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the necessity to protect life
and port infrastructure during
hurricanes, tropical storms, and other
disasters. The absence of a safe harbor
in the Florida Keys precludes large
vessels from accessing adequate
facilities to weather a substantial storm
or natural disaster within the COTP
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
safety zone, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to remain in
port.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
27422
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 2023 / Proposed Rules
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 May 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone that would
prohibit entry in certain waters of the
Key West COTP Zone for the duration
needed to ensure safe transit of vessels
and industry post-hurricane, post-storm,
and post-emergency. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2023–0135 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click
on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a
‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The
option will notify you when comments
are posted, or a final rule is published.
We review all comments received, but
we will only post comments that
address the topic of the proposed rule.
We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 2023 / Proposed Rules
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T07–0135 to read as
follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 165.T07–0135 Safety Zone; Hurricanes,
Tropical Storms and Other Disasters in
Florida Keys.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable
waters within Sector Key West COTP
zone, Key West, Florida, as described in
33 CFR 3.35–40, during specified
conditions.
(b) Definitions.
(1) Designated Representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the COTP Key West, in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(2) Port Condition WHISKEY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
gale force winds (39–54 mph/34–47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force
storm are predicted to make landfall at
the port within 72 hours.
(3) Port Condition X–RAY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
gale force winds (39–54 mph/34–47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force
storm are predicted to make landfall at
the port within 48 hours.
(4) Port Condition YANKEE means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained gale force winds (39–54 mph/
34–47 knots) from a tropical or
hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 24
hours.
(5) Port Condition ZULU means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained gale force winds (39–54 mph/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 May 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
34–47 knots) from a tropical or
hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 12
hours.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Port Condition WHISKEY. All
vessel and port facilities must exercise
due diligence in preparation for
potential storm impacts. Ports and
waterfront facilities must begin
removing all debris and securing
potential flying hazards. Oceangoing
vessels 300 gross tons (GT) and above
must make plans to depart no later than
the setting of Port Condition Yankee
unless authorized by the COTP. Vessels
wishing to remain in port are required
to submit an application to the COTP
prior to setting Port Condition X-Ray.
(2) Port Condition X–RAY. All vessels
and port facilities must ensure that
potential flying debris is removed or
secured. Hazardous materials/pollution
hazards must be secured in a safe
manner and away from waterfront areas.
Vessels over 300GT without an approval
to remain in port must depart prior to
the setting of Port Condition YANKEE.
Vessels with the COTP’s permission to
remain in port must implement their
pre-approved mooring arrangement.
Terminal operators must prepare to
terminate all cargo operations. The
COTP may require additional
precautions to ensure the safety of the
ports and waterways.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected
ports are closed to inbound vessel
traffic. All oceangoing vessels greater
than 300 Gross Tons must have
departed designated ports within the
Sector Key West COTP zone. Terminal
operators must terminate all cargo
operations not associated with storm
preparations. Cargo operations
associated with storm preparations
include moving cargo within or off the
port for securing purposes, port/facility
equipment preparations, and similar
activities, but do not include moving
cargo onto the port or vessel loading/
discharging operations unless
specifically authorized by the COTP. All
facilities must continue to operate in
accordance with approved Facility
Security Plans and comply with the
requirements of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act (MTSA).
(4) Port Condition ZULU. The port is
closed to all vessel traffic except unless
specifically authorized by the COTP.
Cargo operations are suspended,
including bunkering and lightering.
Waivers may be granted unless Cargo of
Particular Hazard or Certain Dangerous
Cargo is involved.
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other
Disasters. Any natural or other disasters
that are anticipated to affect the Sector
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27423
Key West COTP zone will result in the
prohibition of facility operations and
vessel traffic transiting or remaining in
the affected port.
(6) Safety Zones Notice. Coast Guard
Sector Key West will attempt to notify
the maritime community of periods
during which these safety zones will be
in effect via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or by on-scene designated
representatives.
(7) Regulated Area Notice. The Coast
Guard will provide notice of the
regulated area via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or by on-scene designated
representatives.
(8) Exception. This regulation does
not apply to authorized law
enforcement agencies operating within
the regulated area.
Dated: April 18, 2023.
Jason D. Ingram,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Key West.
[FR Doc. 2023–09202 Filed 5–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Part 2500
RIN 3045–AA83
AmeriCorps Statement of Organization
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (CNCS), which
operates as AmeriCorps, is proposing a
rule to provide general information to
the public about its structure and
purpose, as required by the
Administrative Procedure Act. While
AmeriCorps already provides
information about its organizational
structure on its public-facing website
(americorps.gov), this rule would
comply with the statutory requirement
that specifically requires agencies to
publish in the Federal Register their
descriptions of organization. This rule
will also increase transparency
regarding AmeriCorps’ operations by
mapping out its existing program
regulations, thereby providing an
overview of the Agency’s programs.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted by July 3, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send your
comments electronically through the
Federal government’s one-stop
rulemaking website at
www.regulations.gov. You may also
send your comments to Elizabeth Appel,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27421-27423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09202]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0135]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a safety zone to be
enforced in the event of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other
disasters in the Florida Keys. This action is necessary to ensure the
safety of the waters of the Key West Captain of the Port (COTP) zone
Key West, FL. This proposed rulemaking would establish actions to be
completed by industry and vessels in the COTP zone prior to landfall of
hurricanes, tropical storms, and other disasters threatening the
Florida Keys. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 1, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0135 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LTJG Hailye Wilson, Sector Key West
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (305) 292-8768,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Florida Keys has the potential to be affected by hurricanes,
tropical storms, and other disasters on a yearly basis, especially
between the months of June and November. The Captain of the Port (COTP)
Key West proposes establishing a safety zone to provide for the safety
of life during such storms and events.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect mariners and port
infrastructure during extreme weather and other natural disasters. The
Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP Key West is proposing to establish a safety zone to be
enforced in case of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other disasters in
Florida Keys. This action is necessary to ensure the safety of the
waters of the COTP Key West. This proposed rule would establish actions
to be completed by local industry and vessels in the COTP zone prior to
landfall of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other disasters
threatening the Florida Keys. The proposed safety zone would consist of
all waters of the territorial seas, in the Key West COTP zone, as
prescribed in 33 CFR 3.35-40. The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the necessity to
protect life and port infrastructure during hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters. The absence of a safe harbor in the
Florida Keys precludes large vessels from accessing adequate facilities
to weather a substantial storm or natural disaster within the COTP
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the safety zone, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to remain in port.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,
[[Page 27422]]
requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone that would prohibit entry in certain waters of the Key West COTP
Zone for the duration needed to ensure safe transit of vessels and
industry post-hurricane, post-storm, and post-emergency. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0135 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy
[[Page 27423]]
and submissions to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's
eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T07-0135 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0135 Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical Storms and Other
Disasters in Florida Keys.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable waters within Sector Key West
COTP zone, Key West, Florida, as described in 33 CFR 3.35-40, during
specified conditions.
(b) Definitions.
(1) Designated Representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers
designated by or assisting the COTP Key West, in the enforcement of the
regulated areas.
(2) Port Condition WHISKEY means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/34-47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make
landfall at the port within 72 hours.
(3) Port Condition X-RAY means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/34-47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make
landfall at the port within 48 hours.
(4) Port Condition YANKEE means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/
34-47 knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 24 hours.
(5) Port Condition ZULU means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/
34-47 knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 12 hours.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Port Condition WHISKEY. All vessel and port facilities must
exercise due diligence in preparation for potential storm impacts.
Ports and waterfront facilities must begin removing all debris and
securing potential flying hazards. Oceangoing vessels 300 gross tons
(GT) and above must make plans to depart no later than the setting of
Port Condition Yankee unless authorized by the COTP. Vessels wishing to
remain in port are required to submit an application to the COTP prior
to setting Port Condition X-Ray.
(2) Port Condition X-RAY. All vessels and port facilities must
ensure that potential flying debris is removed or secured. Hazardous
materials/pollution hazards must be secured in a safe manner and away
from waterfront areas. Vessels over 300GT without an approval to remain
in port must depart prior to the setting of Port Condition YANKEE.
Vessels with the COTP's permission to remain in port must implement
their pre-approved mooring arrangement. Terminal operators must prepare
to terminate all cargo operations. The COTP may require additional
precautions to ensure the safety of the ports and waterways.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected ports are closed to inbound
vessel traffic. All oceangoing vessels greater than 300 Gross Tons must
have departed designated ports within the Sector Key West COTP zone.
Terminal operators must terminate all cargo operations not associated
with storm preparations. Cargo operations associated with storm
preparations include moving cargo within or off the port for securing
purposes, port/facility equipment preparations, and similar activities,
but do not include moving cargo onto the port or vessel loading/
discharging operations unless specifically authorized by the COTP. All
facilities must continue to operate in accordance with approved
Facility Security Plans and comply with the requirements of the
Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA).
(4) Port Condition ZULU. The port is closed to all vessel traffic
except unless specifically authorized by the COTP. Cargo operations are
suspended, including bunkering and lightering. Waivers may be granted
unless Cargo of Particular Hazard or Certain Dangerous Cargo is
involved.
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other Disasters. Any natural or
other disasters that are anticipated to affect the Sector Key West COTP
zone will result in the prohibition of facility operations and vessel
traffic transiting or remaining in the affected port.
(6) Safety Zones Notice. Coast Guard Sector Key West will attempt
to notify the maritime community of periods during which these safety
zones will be in effect via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(7) Regulated Area Notice. The Coast Guard will provide notice of
the regulated area via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(8) Exception. This regulation does not apply to authorized law
enforcement agencies operating within the regulated area.
Dated: April 18, 2023.
Jason D. Ingram,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Key West.
[FR Doc. 2023-09202 Filed 5-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P