Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Federal-State Food Regulatory Program Standards, 26320-26322 [2023-08971]
Download as PDF
26320
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2023 / Notices
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1—Continued
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average burden
per recordkeeping
Total hours
Recordkeeping, 21 U.S.C. 360b(1) and 514.80(e) 3 .....
79
1,575.14
124,436
14 .........................
1,742,104
Total .......................................................................
........................
........................
........................
..............................
1,742,136
1 There
2 This
3 This
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
estimate includes all recordkeeping by licensed medicated feed manufacturers under § 510.301.
estimate includes all recordkeeping by applicants of approved NADAs, ANADAs, and conditional NADAs under § 514.80(e).
Upon review of the information
collection, we have adjusted our
estimated burden to reflect an overall
increase of 136,029.75 hours and
1,677,019 responses/records, annually.
Dated: April 24, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–08999 Filed 4–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
Federal-State Food Regulatory Program
Standards
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2021–N–0341]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Federal-State Food
Regulatory Program Standards
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments
(including recommendations) on the
collection of information by May 30,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be submitted to https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function. The OMB
control number for this information
collection is 0910–0760. Also include
the FDA docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Showalter, Office of Operations,
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Apr 27, 2023
Jkt 259001
Food and Drug Administration, Three
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 240–994–7399, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
OMB Control Number 0910–0760—
Revision
This information collection supports
the FDA’s Animal Food (formerly Feed)
Regulatory Program Standards (AFRPS)
and Egg Regulatory Program Standards
(ERPS). In the United States, Federal
and State government agencies ensure
the safety of human and animal food.
FDA is responsible for ensuring that all
human and animal food moving in
interstate commerce, except those under
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
jurisdiction, are safe, wholesome, and
labeled properly. States are responsible
for conducting inspections and
regulatory activities that help ensure
human and animal food produced,
processed, and distributed within their
jurisdictions are safe and in compliance
with State laws and regulations. States
primarily perform inspections under
their own regulatory authority. Some
States conduct inspections of human
and animal food facilities under
contract with FDA. Because
jurisdictions may overlap, FDA and
States collaborate and share resources to
protect human and animal food.
The FDA Food Safety Modernization
Act calls for enhanced partnerships and
provides a legal mandate for developing
an Integrated Food Safety System
(IFSS). FDA is committed to
implementing an IFSS thereby
optimizing coordination of human and
animal food safety efforts with Federal,
State, local, tribal, and territorial
regulatory and public health agencies.
Model standards provide a consistent,
underlying foundation that is critical for
uniformity across State and Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agencies to ensure credibility of human
and animal food programs within the
IFSS. The AFRPS and ERPS provide a
uniform and consistent approach to
animal food and egg regulation in the
United States. Implementation is
voluntary.
The AFRPS and ERPS are the
frameworks that each State should use
to design, manage, and improve its
animal food or egg regulatory program.
Each standard has a purpose statement,
requirement summary, description of
program elements, projected outcomes,
and a list of required documentation.
When a state program voluntarily agrees
to implement the standards, it must
fully implement and maintain the
individual program elements and
documentation requirements in each
standard in order to fully implement the
standard. We invite you to visit our
website (https://www.fda.gov/federalstate-local-tribal-and-territorialofficials/national-integrated-food-safetysystem-ifss-programs-and-initiatives/
regulatory-programstandards#:∼:text=Regulatory%20
program%20standards%20establish
%20a,regulating%20human
%20and%20animal%20food) for more
information and to access the program
standards.
Both the AFRPS and ERPS packages
include forms, worksheets, and
templates to help the State program
assess and meet the program elements
in the standard. State programs are not
obligated to use the forms, worksheets,
and templates. Other manual or
automated forms, worksheets, and
templates may be used as long as the
pertinent data elements are present.
States submit the information collected
annually via email to the appropriate
FDA program manager. Records and
other documents specified in the AFRPS
and ERPS must be maintained in good
order by the state program and must be
available to verify the implementation
of each standard.
As set forth in the AFRPS and ERPS,
the state program is expected to review
and update its improvement plan on an
annual basis. The state program
completes an evaluation of its
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
26321
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2023 / Notices
implementation status annually
following the baseline evaluation by
reviewing and updating the selfassessment worksheets and required
documentation for each standard. The
evaluation is needed to determine if
each standard’s requirements are, or
remain, fully met, partially met, or not
met. The State program revises the
improvement plan based upon this
evaluation.
In collaboration with the State
Governments, FDA recently completed a
revision of the animal food program
standards that incorporated the most
current knowledge and lessons learned
in the application of the 2020 AFRPS by
State partners and program assessment
by FDA. In an effort to improve program
effectiveness, understanding and clarity,
changes to the AFRPS include those to
program definitions, all 11 program
standards, appendices, and assessment
worksheets that may be used by the
States who have adopted the AFRPS.
Such changes include updates to
terminology, most notably replacing the
term ‘‘animal feed’’ with ‘‘animal food,’’
consistent with the terminology of the
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act,
and minor editorial changes. Other
changes include streamlining both the
standards and appendices to be less
prescriptive in nature and focus more
on capturing information needs. This
process results in an overall reduction
of 11 appendices (most of which
provided more program specific
guidance or examples and therefore are
not expected to change the burden) and
a reformatting of the remaining
appendices to be more uniform,
succinct, and tabular in structure. The
revised program standards are the result
of external collaboration and
coordination between FDA, the
Association of American Feed Control
Officials and state governments in
which we consider any formal
comments received on the 2020 edition
of the program standards.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents are state departments of
agriculture or health enrolled in the
AFRPS or ERPS (State Governments).
In the Federal Register of November
3, 2022 (87 FR 66307), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. We received and
considered three comments. Two
comments questioned the value of
transitioning from the term ‘‘animal
feed’’ to ‘‘animal food,’’ expressing
concern for potential confusion unless
other entities including member states
also changed their terminology. The
term ‘‘food’’ is defined in section 201(f)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 321(f)) (the FD&C Act) as
‘‘articles used for food or drink for man
or other animals.’’ Section 201(w) of the
FD&C Act defines ‘‘animal feed’’ more
specifically as, ‘‘an article which is
intended for use for food for animals
other than man and which is intended
for use as a substantial source of
nutrients in the diet of the animal, and
is not limited to a mixture intended to
be the sole ration of the animal.’’ We
believe the term ‘‘animal feed’’ is a
useful distinction in some
circumstances, but that ‘‘food’’ or
‘‘animal food’’ more accurately
describes the regulated market.
One comment addressed public
access to government data and the
Federal policy development process,
among other topics, all of which we
consider to be outside the scope of this
information collection. Respondents to
this information collection maintain
records and provide procedures and
other documentation to demonstrate a
standardized animal feed regulatory
program. Another comment questioned
the practical utility of the AFRPS,
suggesting that FDA should implement
‘‘a program that encourages uniform
enforcement of laws/regulations across
all 50 States.’’ We believe the AFRPS is
the best way to achieve that goal.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
State, local, Territorial, and/or Tribal Governments; submission of data elements to FDA consistent with AFRPS
State, local, Territorial, and/or Tribal Governments; submission of data elements to FDA consistent with ERPS
Total ..............................................................................
1 There
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents; activity
Average
burden per
response
Total annual
responses
Total hours
25
1
25
569
14,225
2
1
2
569
1,138
........................
........................
........................
........................
15,363
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
Type of respondents; activity
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
State, local, Territorial, and/or Tribal Governments;
records maintenance for data elements consistent with
AFRPS ..............................................................................
State, local, Territorial, and/or Tribal Governments;
records maintenance for data elements consistent with
ERPS ................................................................................
Total ..............................................................................
1 There
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
25
11
275
40
11,000
2
10
20
40
800
........................
........................
........................
........................
11,800
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
No change in burden is expected to be
incurred with the implementation of the
revised AFRPS. However, based on a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:21 Apr 27, 2023
Jkt 259001
review of the information collection
since our last submission, the estimated
burden for the information collection
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reflects an overall adjustment increase
of 188 responses and a corresponding
increase of 2,817 burden hours. We
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
26322
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2023 / Notices
adjusted the number of respondents to
the information collection associated
with the AFRPS to reflect a reduction in
enrollment since our last evaluation.
Also, since the publication of the 60-day
notice, we adjusted the number of
respondents to the information
collection to reflect a reduction in ERPS
enrollment. In addition, based on the
Agency’s experience over the past 3
years, we added reporting burden and
adjusted the recordkeeping burden
estimates associated with the AFRPS
and ERPS, resulting in an increase in
responses and burden hours.
Dated: April 24, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–08971 Filed 4–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2020–N–2226]
Cheese Slice Products Deviating From
Identity Standard; Temporary Permit
for Market Testing
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
announcing that a temporary permit has
been issued to Bongards Creameries (the
applicant) to market test several
pasteurized standardized cheeses that
deviate from the standards of identity
for cheese products. The temporary
permit will allow the applicant to
evaluate commercial viability of the
products and to collect data on
consumer acceptance of the products.
DATES: This permit is effective for 15
months, beginning on the date the
applicant introduces or causes
introduction of the test products into
interstate commerce, but not later than
July 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marjan Morravej, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–820), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Drive, College Park, MD 20740, 240–
402–2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
giving notice that we have issued a
temporary permit to Bongards
Creameries. We are issuing the
temporary permit in accordance with 21
CFR 130.17, which addresses temporary
permits for interstate shipments of
experimental packs of food varying from
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Apr 27, 2023
Jkt 259001
the requirements of standards of
identity issued under section 401 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 341).
The permit covers interstate
marketing test of several pasteurized
standardized cheeses. The test products
deviate from the standards of identity
for cheese products under 21 CFR
133.167, 133.169, 133.170, 133.171,
133.173, 133.174, 133.175, 133.179, and
133.180. The permit would allow the
manufacture of cheese products using
extra virgin olive oil, which is not
permitted under the standards of
identity for these cheese products, as
the slice anti-sticking agent. Consumers
can distinguish this deviation in
manufacturing from standardized
cheese through the ingredient list,
wherein the ‘‘olive oil’’ ingredient
would be declared as such according to
its common or usual name followed by
a means (e.g., an asterisk and footnote)
to indicate to the consumer that the
ingredient is not found in regular cheese
consistent with 21 CFR part 133.
The purpose of the temporary permit
is to allow the applicant to market test
the products throughout the United
States. The permit will allow the
applicant to evaluate commercial
viability of the products and to collect
data on consumer acceptance of the
products.
The permit provides for the temporary
marketing of a maximum of 20 million
pounds (9.09 million kilograms) of the
test products. Bongards Creameries will
manufacture the test products at its
facilities located at 13200 County Rd.
51, Bongards, MN 55368, and 3001
Hwy. 45 Bypass W, Humboldt, TN
38343.
Bongards Creameries will produce,
market test, and distribute the test
products in any combination of cheese
slices including Pasteurized Process
American, Cheddar, Pepper Jack, Swiss,
Mozzarella, and Provolone, throughout
the United States.
Each ingredient used in the food must
be declared on the labels as required by
21 CFR part 101. The permit is effective
for 15 months, beginning on the date the
applicant introduces or causes the
introduction of the test products into
interstate commerce, but not later than
July 27, 2023.
Dated: April 24, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–08962 Filed 4–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Advisory Committee on
Seniors and Disasters
Administration for Strategic
Preparedness and Response (ASPR),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Advisory
Committee on Seniors and Disasters
(NACSD or the Committee) is required
by section 2811B of the PHS Act as
amended by the Pandemic and All
Hazards Preparedness and Advancing
Innovation Act (PAHPAIA) and
governed by the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA). The NACSD shall evaluate
issues and programs and provide
findings, advice, and recommendations
to the Secretary of HHS and ASPR to
support and enhance all-hazards public
health and medical preparedness,
response, and recovery aimed at
meeting the needs of older adults. The
Secretary of HHS has delegated
authority to operate the NACSD to
ASPR.
SUMMARY:
The NACSD will conduct a
public meeting (virtual) on May 25,
2023, to discuss, finalize, and vote on an
initial set of recommendations to the
HHS Secretary and ASPR regarding
challenges, opportunities, and priorities
for national public health and medical
preparedness, response, and recovery,
specific to the needs of older adults in
disasters. A more detailed agenda and
meeting registration link will be
available on the NACSD meeting
website located at: https://www.phe.gov/
NACSD.
ADDRESSES: Members of the public may
attend the meeting via a toll-free phone
number or Zoom teleconference, which
requires pre-registration. The meeting
link to pre-register will be posted on
https://www.phe.gov/nacsd. Members of
the public may provide written
comments or submit questions for
consideration to the NACSD at any time
via email to NACSD@hhs.gov. Members
of the public are also encouraged to
provide comments after the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Maxine Kellman, NACSD Designated
Federal Officer, Administration for
Strategic Preparedness and Response
(ASPR), Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), Washington,
DC; 202–260–0447, NACSD@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
NACSD invites those who are involved
in or represent a relevant industry,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26320-26322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0341]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Federal-State Food
Regulatory Program Standards
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments (including recommendations) on the
collection of information by May 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be submitted to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under Review--Open for Public
Comments'' or by using the search function. The OMB control number for
this information collection is 0910-0760. Also include the FDA docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Showalter, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 240-994-7399,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Federal-State Food Regulatory Program Standards
OMB Control Number 0910-0760--Revision
This information collection supports the FDA's Animal Food
(formerly Feed) Regulatory Program Standards (AFRPS) and Egg Regulatory
Program Standards (ERPS). In the United States, Federal and State
government agencies ensure the safety of human and animal food. FDA is
responsible for ensuring that all human and animal food moving in
interstate commerce, except those under the U.S. Department of
Agriculture jurisdiction, are safe, wholesome, and labeled properly.
States are responsible for conducting inspections and regulatory
activities that help ensure human and animal food produced, processed,
and distributed within their jurisdictions are safe and in compliance
with State laws and regulations. States primarily perform inspections
under their own regulatory authority. Some States conduct inspections
of human and animal food facilities under contract with FDA. Because
jurisdictions may overlap, FDA and States collaborate and share
resources to protect human and animal food.
The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act calls for enhanced
partnerships and provides a legal mandate for developing an Integrated
Food Safety System (IFSS). FDA is committed to implementing an IFSS
thereby optimizing coordination of human and animal food safety efforts
with Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial regulatory and
public health agencies. Model standards provide a consistent,
underlying foundation that is critical for uniformity across State and
Federal agencies to ensure credibility of human and animal food
programs within the IFSS. The AFRPS and ERPS provide a uniform and
consistent approach to animal food and egg regulation in the United
States. Implementation is voluntary.
The AFRPS and ERPS are the frameworks that each State should use to
design, manage, and improve its animal food or egg regulatory program.
Each standard has a purpose statement, requirement summary, description
of program elements, projected outcomes, and a list of required
documentation. When a state program voluntarily agrees to implement the
standards, it must fully implement and maintain the individual program
elements and documentation requirements in each standard in order to
fully implement the standard. We invite you to visit our website
(https://www.fda.gov/federal-state-local-tribal-and-territorial-
officials/national-integrated-food-safety-system-ifss-programs-and-
initiatives/regulatory-program-
standards#:~:text=Regulatory%20program%20standards%20establish%20a,regul
ating%20human%20and%20animal%20food) for more information and to access
the program standards.
Both the AFRPS and ERPS packages include forms, worksheets, and
templates to help the State program assess and meet the program
elements in the standard. State programs are not obligated to use the
forms, worksheets, and templates. Other manual or automated forms,
worksheets, and templates may be used as long as the pertinent data
elements are present. States submit the information collected annually
via email to the appropriate FDA program manager. Records and other
documents specified in the AFRPS and ERPS must be maintained in good
order by the state program and must be available to verify the
implementation of each standard.
As set forth in the AFRPS and ERPS, the state program is expected
to review and update its improvement plan on an annual basis. The state
program completes an evaluation of its
[[Page 26321]]
implementation status annually following the baseline evaluation by
reviewing and updating the self-assessment worksheets and required
documentation for each standard. The evaluation is needed to determine
if each standard's requirements are, or remain, fully met, partially
met, or not met. The State program revises the improvement plan based
upon this evaluation.
In collaboration with the State Governments, FDA recently completed
a revision of the animal food program standards that incorporated the
most current knowledge and lessons learned in the application of the
2020 AFRPS by State partners and program assessment by FDA. In an
effort to improve program effectiveness, understanding and clarity,
changes to the AFRPS include those to program definitions, all 11
program standards, appendices, and assessment worksheets that may be
used by the States who have adopted the AFRPS. Such changes include
updates to terminology, most notably replacing the term ``animal feed''
with ``animal food,'' consistent with the terminology of the FDA Food
Safety Modernization Act, and minor editorial changes. Other changes
include streamlining both the standards and appendices to be less
prescriptive in nature and focus more on capturing information needs.
This process results in an overall reduction of 11 appendices (most of
which provided more program specific guidance or examples and therefore
are not expected to change the burden) and a reformatting of the
remaining appendices to be more uniform, succinct, and tabular in
structure. The revised program standards are the result of external
collaboration and coordination between FDA, the Association of American
Feed Control Officials and state governments in which we consider any
formal comments received on the 2020 edition of the program standards.
Description of Respondents: Respondents are state departments of
agriculture or health enrolled in the AFRPS or ERPS (State
Governments).
In the Federal Register of November 3, 2022 (87 FR 66307), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. We received and considered three comments.
Two comments questioned the value of transitioning from the term
``animal feed'' to ``animal food,'' expressing concern for potential
confusion unless other entities including member states also changed
their terminology. The term ``food'' is defined in section 201(f) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(f)) (the FD&C
Act) as ``articles used for food or drink for man or other animals.''
Section 201(w) of the FD&C Act defines ``animal feed'' more
specifically as, ``an article which is intended for use for food for
animals other than man and which is intended for use as a substantial
source of nutrients in the diet of the animal, and is not limited to a
mixture intended to be the sole ration of the animal.'' We believe the
term ``animal feed'' is a useful distinction in some circumstances, but
that ``food'' or ``animal food'' more accurately describes the
regulated market.
One comment addressed public access to government data and the
Federal policy development process, among other topics, all of which we
consider to be outside the scope of this information collection.
Respondents to this information collection maintain records and provide
procedures and other documentation to demonstrate a standardized animal
feed regulatory program. Another comment questioned the practical
utility of the AFRPS, suggesting that FDA should implement ``a program
that encourages uniform enforcement of laws/regulations across all 50
States.'' We believe the AFRPS is the best way to achieve that goal.
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Type of respondents; activity Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local, Territorial, and/ 25 1 25 569 14,225
or Tribal Governments;
submission of data elements to
FDA consistent with AFRPS......
State, local, Territorial, and/ 2 1 2 569 1,138
or Tribal Governments;
submission of data elements to
FDA consistent with ERPS.......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 15,363
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondents; activity Number of records per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local, Territorial, and/ 25 11 275 40 11,000
or Tribal Governments; records
maintenance for data elements
consistent with AFRPS..........
State, local, Territorial, and/ 2 10 20 40 800
or Tribal Governments; records
maintenance for data elements
consistent with ERPS...........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 11,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
No change in burden is expected to be incurred with the
implementation of the revised AFRPS. However, based on a review of the
information collection since our last submission, the estimated burden
for the information collection reflects an overall adjustment increase
of 188 responses and a corresponding increase of 2,817 burden hours. We
[[Page 26322]]
adjusted the number of respondents to the information collection
associated with the AFRPS to reflect a reduction in enrollment since
our last evaluation. Also, since the publication of the 60-day notice,
we adjusted the number of respondents to the information collection to
reflect a reduction in ERPS enrollment. In addition, based on the
Agency's experience over the past 3 years, we added reporting burden
and adjusted the recordkeeping burden estimates associated with the
AFRPS and ERPS, resulting in an increase in responses and burden hours.
Dated: April 24, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-08971 Filed 4-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P