Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability: Updates to HUD's Section 504 Regulations, 24938-24944 [2023-08464]
Download as PDF
24938
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Designations and Reporting Points,
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1 annually. This document proposes
to amend the current version of that
order, FAA Order JO 7400.11G,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and
effective September 15, 2022. These
updates would subsequently be
published in the next update to FAA
Order JO 7400.11. FAA Order JO
7400.11G is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The Proposal
The FAA proposes an amendment to
14 CFR part 71 to amend Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for Cross City
Airport, Cross City, FL, to accommodate
area navigation (RNAV) global
positioning system (GPS) standard
instrument approach procedures
(SIAPs) serving this airport. This
amendment supports a new instrument
approach at this airport. The existing
radius would be increased to 7 miles
(previously 6.8-miles), and the southern
extension would be eliminated. This
action would also update the airport’s
geographic coordinates to coincide with
FAA’s database. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations in the area.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore: (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11G,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and
effective September 15, 2022, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASO FL E5 Cross City, FL [Amended]
Cross City Airport, FL
(Lat. 29°38′08″ N, long. 83°06′17″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of Cross City Airport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April
17, 2023.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2023–08536 Filed 4–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 8 and 9
[Docket No. FR–6257–A–01]
RIN 2529–AB03
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Disability: Updates to HUD’s Section
504 Regulations
Office of Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity, Department of
Housing and Urban Development
(HUD).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
ACTION:
This advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) seeks
the public’s input on changes that the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD or the Department)
is considering to its implementing
regulations for Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504)
for federally assisted and HUD
conducted programs and activities.
Section 504 prohibits discrimination on
the basis of disability in all programs
and activities receiving Federal
financial assistance and in programs
and activities conducted by executive
agencies. After this ANPRM is
published, the Department intends to
draft a Notice of a Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) that would propose the
adoption of an updated Federal
accessibility standard for purposes of
compliance with HUD’s Section 504
regulations. In addition, the Department
intends for this NPRM to propose
revisions to HUD’s Section 504
regulations to clarify recipients’
obligations, including how to account
for advances in accessible design,
information and communication
technology, and assistive technologies
that have become available since HUD’s
Section 504 regulations were originally
published in 1988.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comment Due Date: July 24,
2023.
There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All
submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Comments may be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make comments immediately available
to the public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov website can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that website to
submit comments electronically.
2. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
7th Street SW, Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Note: To receive consideration as a public
comment, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. HUD will make all properly
submitted comments and
communications available for public
inspection and copying between 8 a.m.
and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above
address. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, you must
schedule an appointment in advance to
review the public comments by calling
the Regulations Division at 202–708–
3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
HUD welcomes and is prepared to
receive calls from individuals who are
deaf or hard of hearing, as well as
individuals with speech or
communication disabilities. To learn
more about how to make an accessible
telephone call, please visit https://
www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of all comments submitted are
available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Gioletti, Senior Policy Advisor,
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room
5100, Washington, DC 20410, telephone
405–609–8561 (this is not a toll-free
number). HUD welcomes and is
prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, as well as individuals with
speech or communication disabilities
who would like to submit comments. To
learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 504 provides that ‘‘no
otherwise qualified individual with a
disability in the United States shall,
solely by reason of her or his disability,
be excluded from the participation in,
be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance or under any
program or activity conducted by any
executive agency.’’ 29 U.S.C. 794(a).
Through Section 504, Congress requires
the head of each executive agency to
promulgate regulations to implement
the statute. Id. In 1988, HUD issued its
Section 504 regulations for federally
assisted programs and activities at 24
CFR part 8 and for federally conducted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
programs and activities 1 at 24 CFR part
9.2
All recipients and subrecipients of
Federal financial assistance from the
Department (HUD recipients) must
comply with Section 504 and 24 CFR
part 8. HUD’s Section 504 requirements
apply broadly to any recipient of
Federal financial assistance from the
Department, including any State or its
political subdivision, any
instrumentality of a State or its political
subdivision, any public or private
agency, institution, organization, or
other entity, or any person that receives
Federal financial assistance directly or
through another recipient, including
any successor, assignee, or transferee of
a recipient, but excluding the ultimate
beneficiary of the assistance. 24 CFR 8.3
and 8.50(a). In addition, HUD has
enforced Section 504 requirements
against Tribal entities that receive
Federal financial assistance from HUD.
Federal financial assistance is also
defined broadly as any assistance
provided or otherwise made available
by the Department through any grant,
loan, contract, or any other arrangement
in the form of funds, services, or
property interest, excluding assistance
through direct Federal procurement
contracts or payments made under those
contracts or any other contract of
insurance or guaranty. 24 CFR 8.3.
HUD’s Section 504 regulations at 24
CFR part 8 cover all programs and
activities of recipients of funds from
HUD, including, for example, eligibility
criteria, application processes, site
selection, admission to and continued
participation in programs, tenancy,
service delivery, and accessibility of
programs and facilities. The regulations
contain general prohibitions against
discrimination and offer examples of
discriminatory actions that either
directly or indirectly result in
discrimination against otherwise
qualified individuals with disabilities.
24 CFR 8.4(a) and (b). Among other
requirements, HUD’s Section 504
regulations include an integration
mandate, requiring recipients to
1 The statutory text of Section 504 explains that
‘‘program or activity’’ means ‘‘all of the operations
of’’ entities, under the statute, that receive Federal
financial assistance. 29 U.S.C. 794(b). The term
‘‘programs and activities’’ is intended to cover the
same types of operations that are covered under
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
2 For purposes of federally conducted programs
and activities new construction and alterations
must comply with the standard set by HUD under
the Architectural Barriers Act, 42 U.S.C. 4151–4157.
Under HUD’s current regulations, the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards are the
architectural standards that are applicable to both
federally assisted and federally conducted programs
and activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24939
administer programs and activities in
the most integrated setting appropriate
to the needs of qualified individuals
with disabilities; reasonable
accommodation requirements, which
require recipients to adjust, modify, or
make exceptions to policies or practices
and structural modifications to facilities
that may be necessary for an individual
with a disability to equally participate
in or benefit from programs and
activities without discrimination; and
the requirement to distribute accessible
dwelling units throughout assisted
projects and sites. 24 CFR 8.4(d), 8.20,
8.24(a), 8.26, and 8.33. Recipients must
also take appropriate steps to ensure
effective communication with
applicants, beneficiaries, and members
of the public who have disabilities. 24
CFR 8.6.
Recipients of Federal financial
assistance from HUD must ensure that
their programs and activities are readily
accessible to and usable by individuals
with disabilities. 24 CFR 8.20. This
includes physical accessibility
requirements for newly constructed and
altered multifamily housing projects
and non-housing facilities. This
requirement also includes alterations to
existing facilities that are necessary to
comply with program accessibility
requirements for all facilities. 24 CFR
8.20–8.25. Providers of existing assisted
housing must operate such housing so,
when viewed in its entirety, it is readily
accessible to and usable by individuals
with a disability. HUD recipients must
comply with HUD’s Section 504
regulations that incorporate the
applicable Federal accessibility
standard 3 adopted by the Department
for purposes of Section 504 compliance.
The Uniform Federal Accessibility
Standards (UFAS) is currently the
Department’s Section 504 Federal
accessibility standard for compliance
with HUD’s Section 504 requirements.
24 CFR 8.32. However, in 2014, HUD
published a Notice, commonly referred
to as HUD’s ‘‘Deeming Notice,’’ allowing
HUD recipients to use the U.S.
Department of Justice’s (DOJ)
accessibility standard under Title II of
the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA)—referred to as the 2010 ADA
Standards for Accessible Design (2010
ADA Standards)—with identified
exceptions, as an alternative
3 HUD uses the term ‘‘Federal accessibility
standard’’ to refer to the architectural standard with
which recipients of Federal financial assistance
from HUD must comply under its Section 504
regulation. Under HUD’s existing Section 504
regulation, HUD recipients may use one of two
Federal accessibility standards—the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards or HUD’s Deeming
Notice, as more fully explained below.
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
24940
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
accessibility standard in lieu of UFAS
for purposes of Section 504 compliance.
79 FR 29671 (May 23, 2014). HUD
provided this flexibility through the
Deeming Notice because of a recognition
that many facilities are designed,
constructed, or altered by entities that
are subject to HUD’s Section 504
regulations, which are also subject to
Title II and/or Title III of the ADA and,
therefore, are also required to comply
with the 2010 ADA Standards. This
option exists until HUD formally revises
its Section 504 regulations to adopt an
updated accessibility standard.
HUD recipients must also ensure that
designated accessible dwelling units are
dispersed throughout projects and sites,
are available in a sufficient range of
bedroom sizes and amenities, and are
tenanted to maximize the utilization of
such units by individuals who need the
accessibility features of the units. 24
CFR 8.26 and 8.27.
HUD’s existing Section 504
regulations also set forth a compliance
and enforcement mechanism. 24 CFR
8.50 through 8.58. HUD’s Office of Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO)
investigates individual complaints
alleging disability-related
discrimination and conducts
compliance reviews of recipients of
HUD assistance to determine whether
they are complying with these
requirements. 24 CFR 8.56(a). The
regulations set out the procedures used
when FHEO finds noncompliance with
Section 504 requirements. 24 CFR 8.56,
8.57, and 8.58.
II. The Need To Update HUD’s Section
504 Regulations and Section 504
Federal Accessibility Standard for HUD
Programs and Activities
The Department’s Section 504
regulations, as a whole, have not been
significantly updated since their initial
publication in 1988. Since that time,
HUD has continued to find widespread
discrimination on the basis of disability
in HUD-assisted programs and activities
and an ongoing need for affordable,
accessible, and integrated housing
opportunities for individuals with
disabilities who are eligible for the
programs and activities administered by
recipients of Federal financial assistance
from HUD. As the agency with primary
responsibility for administering the
Nation’s federally assisted housing
programs, HUD has a responsibility to
ensure that its Section 504 regulations
account for these needs.
In fiscal year 2020, HUD received four
hundred and sixty-one (461) complaints
from individuals and organizations
alleging disability discrimination under
Section 504. In fiscal year 2021, HUD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
received five hundred and ninety-seven
(597) complaints from individuals and
organizations alleging disability
discrimination under Section 504. In
fiscal year 2022, HUD received five
hundred and eighty-two (582)
complaints from individuals and
organizations alleging disability
discrimination under Section 504. To
date, in fiscal year 2023, HUD has
received two hundred and two (202)
complaints from individuals and
organizations alleging disability
discrimination under Section 504.
Section 504 complaints are the most
common type of civil rights related
complaint 4 received with respect to the
administration of HUD programs and
account for more than half of such
complaints.
HUD-initiated Section 504
compliance reviews also underscore
ongoing discrimination faced by
individuals with disabilities. Significant
noncompliance has been found with
respect to physical accessibility
requirements within public housing and
other HUD-assisted affordable housing
programs. Compliance reviews have
demonstrated that newly constructed
and substantially altered multifamily
housing developments frequently do not
meet the accessibility requirements
under UFAS. Furthermore, compliance
reviews often reveal that HUD-assisted
programs and activities do not meet
other Section 504 requirements such as
the provision of reasonable
accommodations, establishment and
maintenance of grievance procedures,
ensuring effective communication,
appropriate tenanting policies to ensure
maximum use of accessible housing by
individuals with disabilities, occupancy
preferences, or physical dispersal of
accessible units. Designated accessible
units are often not appropriately
tenanted by individuals who have a
disability-related need for the
accessibility features of the unit. Other
examples of common violations include
the imposition of inappropriate
disability verification requirements, the
imposition of requirements beyond
what is required in a lease, the failure
to protect the confidentiality of
applicants’ or tenants’ disability-related
information, discrimination against
individuals with intellectual and
developmental disabilities and
behavioral health conditions, and
policies for the admission of elderly
4 Civil rights authorities include Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Section 109 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, and the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
residents that exclude persons with a
disability.
In the over thirty years since HUD
implemented its Section 504
regulations, the percentage of the U.S.
population who are individuals with
disabilities has continued to increase
and diversify. In addition, as a larger
share of the population increases in age,
HUD will continue to play a critical role
in providing affordable housing
opportunities to allow older adults to
age in place. This is particularly
important given the significant
population of older adults with
disabilities, who will require accessible
and affordable housing to age in place.
Likewise, the mobility devices, personal
aids, and other forms of assistive
technology available for use by
individuals with disabilities have also
diversified. The characteristics of
equipment that individuals with
disabilities use have changed in ways
that impact the design and usability of
living space and methods of
communication.
Significant advances have also
occurred in building practices since
1988. Various accessibility codes have
been developed and additional features
and elements have been researched
based on study of how persons use, or
cannot use, facilities because of
inaccessible design and construction.
Many design features that make the
home more usable and accessible have
become readily available and widely
used in residential construction, such as
additional or modified environmental
controls, security hardware, cabinetry,
and plumbing fixtures. Also, housing
models have continued to emerge that
focus on identifying and mitigating
barriers to accessibility and safety
hazards in the home to promote healthy
aging and enhance health outcomes for
older adults. In addition, the severe lack
of affordable housing has caused
communities across the country to
explore new and innovative approaches
to providing housing. Examples of
emerging single family and multifamily
housing include tiny homes, portable
homes, manufactured or prefabricated
homes, 3D printed homes, townhomes,
multifamily with townhome facades,
and even housing developed using
shipping containers and other preexisting structures. The Department
seeks to respond to these
environmental, societal, and
technological changes in its revised
rule.
The United States is also experiencing
an immediate and increasing need for
affordable, accessible, and integrated
housing opportunities. In particular,
since the Supreme Court’s Olmstead
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
decision in 1999, there have been
increased efforts to assist individuals in
transitioning from institutional and
other segregated settings into integrated,
community-based settings.5 As a result
of Olmstead enforcement and
implementation efforts by public
entities, there is a crucial need for
affordable and integrated housing where
individuals with disabilities are able to
live and interact with individuals
without disabilities.6 Individuals with
disabilities cannot be subject to
discrimination in their housing search.
HUD is considering how to more
effectively address these significant and
emerging issues and seeks public
comment as it updates its Section 504
regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
III. Request for Public Comments
The Department seeks input from the
public, including individuals with
disabilities, HUD recipients, such as
public housing agencies, States, or local
governments, Tribes, housing providers,
and social service providers, before
proposing regulatory text for comment.
The Department is posing overarching
questions and areas for particular
comment below regarding effective
communication, program accessibility,
adopting an updated Federal
accessibility standard, and enforcement
mechanisms. The Department is also
considering clarifying certain
subsections of the regulations and
providing further examples to enhance
compliance.
When providing responsive
comments, the Department requests that
commenters indicate the specific
question number that corresponds with
the responsive comments. If providing
comments not associated with a
question number, please label the
comment as such or identify the
comment by the existing regulatory
provision to which it relates. The
Department also welcomes general
comments on any aspect of its Section
504 regulations or how the Department
can improve the administration of its
federally assisted and federally
conducted programs to ensure its own
compliance with Section 504.
Question for Comment 1: The
Department anticipates revising the
definition of ‘‘individual with
disabilities’’ consistent with the ADA
5 Olmstead refers to the 1999 Supreme Court
decision, Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999),
wherein the Supreme Court affirmed that the
unjustified segregation of individuals with
disabilities is a form of discrimination prohibited
by Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
6 See HUD’s Statement on the Role of Housing in
Accomplishing the Goals of Olmstead, https://
www.hud.gov/sites/documents/OLMSTEADGUID
NC060413.PDF.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
Amendments Act of 2008 7 and DOJ’s
Title II ADA regulations. The ADA
Amendments Act of 2008 revised the
definition of ‘‘individual with
disabilities’’ for purposes of the ADA
and made conforming amendments to
Section 504. In view of the ADA
Amendments Act of 2008’s change to
the definition of disability, the
Department is also considering whether
the other definitions, currently provided
at 24 CFR 8.3 should be revised to
clarify how the term ‘‘disability’’ is used
in connection with certain HUD
programs, which have statutory
authorizations to serve specific
populations. The Department seeks
general comments on updating its
definitions contained at 24 CFR 8.3.
Question for Comment 2: HUD’s
Section 504 regulations at 24 CFR 8.4
contain general prohibitions on
discrimination and include examples of
discriminatory application processes,
admissions policies, and service
provision, as well as physical
inaccessibility, eligibility, and site
selection, that would either directly or
indirectly result in discrimination
against otherwise qualified individuals
with disabilities. 24 CFR 8.4(a) and (b).
(a) To what extent are individuals
with disabilities at serious risk of
entering institutional settings or being
unable to transition from institutional or
group home settings, including skilled
nursing facilities, correctional
institutions and inpatient rehabilitation
for substance misuse, settings because
they are unable to find affordable,
accessible, and integrated housing
opportunities in community-based
settings? Please describe any challenges
faced and solutions identified with
locating affordable, integrated, and
accessible housing, including issues
such as ensuring housing is available
when an individual is ready to
transition from an institutional setting,
coordinating housing and services,
identifying available housing programs
that individuals may be eligible for, the
referral and/or application process, the
use of preferences, the operation of
waitlists, insufficient accessible and
integrated housing opportunities, etc.
(b) Are there specific examples of
discrimination that individuals with
mental health or substance use
disabilities have experienced, or other
challenges faced by such individuals, in
securing affordable housing, such as
rental policies eligibility or exclusion
criteria, that meets disability-related
needs that HUD should consider
addressing in its Section 504
regulations?
7 Public
PO 00000
Law 110–325 (Sept. 25, 2008).
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24941
(c) Are there specific examples of
discrimination that individuals with
intellectual, cognitive, or developmental
disabilities have experienced, or other
challenges faced by such individuals, in
securing affordable housing that meets
the disability-related needs that HUD
should consider addressing in its
Section 504 regulations?
(d) Are there specific examples of
discrimination that individuals with
physical disabilities have experienced,
or other challenges faced by such
individuals, in securing affordable
housing that meets the disability-related
needs that HUD should consider
addressing in its Section 504
regulations?
Question for Comment 3: Recipients
must take appropriate steps to ensure
effective communication with
applicants, beneficiaries, and members
of the public who have disabilities and
are required to provide appropriate
auxiliary aids and services where
necessary to afford individuals with
disabilities an equal opportunity to
participate in, and enjoy the benefits of,
a program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance. Because of
technological advances, methods of
enabling effective communication have
significantly changed since HUD issued
its Section 504 regulations in 1988 and
recipients and individuals with
disabilities communicate in different
ways. What types of auxiliary aids and
services do individuals with disabilities
need in housing and community
development programs and activities?
What information should the
Department consider with respect to the
accessibility of recipients’ websites and
devices, mobile applications, etc.?
Question for Comment 4: Section 504
requires that newly constructed housing
and non-housing facilities be designed
and constructed to be readily accessible
to and usable by persons with
disabilities. HUD’s existing Section 504
regulations require that in new
construction multifamily housing
projects, currently a minimum of five (5)
percent of the total dwelling units in
each multifamily housing project (or at
least one unit, whichever is greater)
must be made accessible for persons
with mobility impairments. An
additional two (2) percent of the total
units (or at least one unit, whichever is
greater) must be made accessible for
persons with hearing or vision
impairments. In circumstances where
greater need is demonstrated, HUD may
prescribe higher percentages or
numbers. 24 CFR 8.20 through 8.22.
Physical accessibility requirements also
apply to any alterations of housing and
non-housing facilities. 24 CFR 8.21.
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
24942
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Additionally, recipients must operate
each housing and non-housing-related
program and activity receiving Federal
financial assistance so that the program
or activity, when viewed in its entirety,
is readily accessible to and usable by
individuals with disabilities. 24 CFR
8.20, 8.21, and 8.24. This may require
alterations to comply with program
accessibility obligations in older
facilities that were built before HUD’s
Section 504 regulations became
effective. This may also require
alterations in addition to and separate
from meeting the affirmative physical
accessibility requirements described
above.
(a) To what extent does the lack of
accessible units and other facilities in
assisted housing discourage
applications from eligible persons with
a disability? To what extent is the lack
of accessibility a barrier to the
participation in various HUD-assisted
housing programs by persons with a
disability? What challenges do
households face in finding available
affordable and accessible housing in
their respective communities? What
factors or sources of data should HUD
and its recipients use to determine the
level of need for accessible housing?
(b) Is there information that HUD
should consider to clarify, strengthen,
and encourage compliance by
recipients’ with program accessibility
obligations?
Question for Comment 5: Tenantbased housing choice voucher (HCV)
and other tenant-based rental assistance
programs are crucial to enable
individuals with disabilities to secure
affordable, accessible, and integrated
housing opportunities of their choice.
HUD’s regulation at 24 CFR 8.28
provides examples of specific
safeguards to ensure individuals with
disabilities have access to these
programs.
(a) What challenges exist in using an
HCV or other tenant-based rental
assistance in the private rental market to
secure a unit that meets a household’s
disability-related needs? For example, is
the process for households with
members with disabilities to seek an
extension of the search term due to the
lack of accessible housing effective or is
the process for seeking exception rent
under the exception payments standard
for accessible housing units effective,
and/or what other difficulties exist for
individuals with disabilities in securing
a suitable unit? Do households with
members with disabilities encounter
issues using HCVs or other tenant-based
rental assistance due to the need for
live-in caregivers? Is there information
that HUD should consider on various
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
methods or approaches that have proven
effective in helping individuals with
disabilities access these types of
programs in order to provide equal
access?
(b) Please provide details about the
availability of affordable accessible
units in different areas of the United
States (e.g., urban areas, suburban areas,
and rural areas, including
geographically isolated and remote
areas) in the private rental market and
any proven strategies that encourage
landlords to participate in the tenantbased HCV program.
Question for Comment 6: Most
entities are subject to more than one
Federal accessibility law and
architectural standard in the operation
of their housing services, programs, and
activities. For example, a public housing
agency receiving HUD funding and
operating public housing and voucher
programs may be subject to the design
and construction requirements of the
Fair Housing Act,8 Section 504 as a
recipient of Federal financial assistance,
and Title II of the ADA as a public
entity. This may require applying
multiple accessibility laws and
architectural standards, e.g., the Fair
Housing Act’s Accessibility Guidelines,
the 2010 ADA Standards under Title II
of the ADA, and HUD’s Section 504
accessibility standard. In addition, State
and local laws and building codes will
also apply. Most States and localities
now use the International Building Code
(IBC) and the accessibility standard it
references, the ICC A117.1 Standard for
Accessible and Usable Buildings and
Facilities.
The Department seeks input on ways
to harmonize, to the extent possible, the
requirements among the various
standards and achieve greater
consistency in the design and
construction of buildings and facilities
that are covered by multiple Federal
accessibility laws. The Department also
seeks to ensure, however, that
accessibility for persons with
disabilities is not reduced and
opportunities for modernization of
accessibility requirements are
considered.
The Department notes that recipients
of HUD funding must be aware of and
comply with the accessibility
requirements of all applicable laws,
including Section 504, the ADA, and the
Fair Housing Act. Compliance with one
of these statutes does not ensure
compliance with other Federal
disability nondiscrimination laws.
HUD’s adoption of an updated Section
504 Federal accessibility standard for
8 42
PO 00000
U.S.C. 3601 et seq.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purposes of compliance with its own
Section 504 regulations does not change
an entity’s obligation to comply with all
applicable laws.
What standards should the
Department consider for purposes of an
updated accessibility standard for its
recipients? HUD requests information to
assist the Department in determining
whether other specific guidelines
provide sufficient or insufficient
accessibility in the context of housing or
other residential facilities funded by
HUD. In addition, please provide
information on scoping and other
technical provisions the Department
should consider to further accessibility
for individuals with disabilities in the
context of housing.
Question for Comment 7: HUD’s
Deeming Notice allowed HUD recipients
to use the 2010 ADA Standards under
Title II of the ADA—with identified
exceptions, as an alternative
accessibility standard in lieu of UFAS
for purposes of Section 504 compliance.
The Deeming Notice identified eleven
(11) exceptions where UFAS provides
greater accessibility than the 2010 ADA
Standards and must continue to be
utilized.9 Are there other UFAS
provisions that HUD did not identify in
its Deeming Notice that should be
retained to further accessibility in HUDassisted programs?
Question for Comment 8: As the
Federal agency with primary
responsibility for administering the
Nation’s federally assisted housing
programs, the Department has a unique
role in considering how residential and
connected spaces (e.g., spaces for
laundry, mail, telecommunications,
office, maintenance, parking, recreation,
service, and community functions) must
be made accessible. HUD is looking at
the accessibility and usability of spaces
and elements within one’s own home
and connected spaces that will impact
daily living, which is different than
considering accessibility in places of
public accommodation or other settings.
HUD is considering how the
development of various enhanced
9 (1) Section 35.151(a)(2) Exception for structural
impracticability; (2) Section 35.151(b) Alterations;
(3) Section 202.2 Additions; (4) Exception to
Section 202.4 Alterations Affecting Primary
Function Areas; (5) Section 203.8 General
Exceptions—Residential Facilities; (6) Employee
Work Areas: Sections 203.9 (General exception for
employee work areas), 206.2.8 (Circulation paths in
employee work areas), and the Exceptions to 403.5
(Clearances within employee work areas) and 405.8
(Handrails within employee work areas); (7)
Exception 2 to Section 206.2.1 Site Arrival Points;
(8) Exception to Section 206.2.2 Within a Site; (9)
Exception 1 to Section 206.2.3 Multi-Story
Buildings and Facilities; (10) Section 214—Scoping
of Washing Machines and Clothes Dryers; (11)
Exception to Section 215.1 Visible Alarms.
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
accessibility features can be
incorporated or incentivized into the
design and construction of affordable
housing developments.
Advances in the types of accessibility
features can assist individuals with
various types of disabilities obtain,
remain in, and receive the full benefits
of their housing. For example, for
individuals with mobility disabilities,
such features may include: power
operated or other keyless proximitybased entry at entrances and exits from
buildings and passageways through the
building; light weight or low resistance
doors; detachable shower-heads; smart,
remotely adjustable thermostats;
adjustable shelves in closets and
storage; full extension pull-out drawers,
shelves, and racks; roll-in showers;
avoiding swinging interior doors within
individual accessible dwelling units;
faucets with touch or motion sense
water controls; and reinforced ceilings
to accommodate a track and harness
system. For individuals who are blind
or have low vision, examples of such
features may include: audible elevator
indicators; innovative entry systems that
do not solely rely on an individual’s
ability to see in order to gain access;
controls with audio feedback as
opposed to or in addition to touch
screens; and enhanced lighting. For
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, examples of such features may
include: innovative entry systems that
do not solely rely on an individual’s
ability to hear in order to gain access;
doorbells with light alerts; activated
close captioning on televisions located
in public areas; and video phones or
other video connections for
communications.
In addition, specific accessibility
features assist individuals to remain in
their homes and to age in place, such as
vertical and angled grab bars to get up
and down from toilets and for stepping
in and out of bathing fixtures. Examples
to assist individuals who are blind or
have low vision include contrasting
surfaces, enhanced lighting, tactically
discernible controls, and elimination of
tripping hazards. Examples to assist
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing include innovative entry
systems, doorbells with light alerts, and
emergency alarms for fire and carbon
monoxide leaks that can accommodate
personal notification devices.
(a) What barriers do individuals with
disabilities face in public and common
use areas of housing and non-housing
facilities (e.g., building entrances,
building entry systems, recreation and
fitness facilities, mail and package
rooms, coworking facilities, parking
structures, laundry rooms)? What
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
accessibility features or advanced
technology can help overcome these
barriers?
(b) What accessibility features or
advanced technology should the
Department be aware of that improve
accessibility in designated accessible
units for individuals with mobility
disabilities?
(c) What accessibility features or
advanced technology should the
Department be aware of that improve
accessibility in designated accessible
units for individuals with vision and
hearing disabilities?
(d) Given the increasing aging
population, the Department is
considering its role in providing
affordable housing opportunities to this
population and how to enable
households to remain in their housing.
Are there specific accessibility features
that can help individuals to age in
place?
(e) There are alternative accessibility
provisions in accessibility standards
that address the more limited reach
ranges and need for lower seat heights
and dining surfaces for children with
disabilities that are different than
accessibility features configured for
adult use. The Department is interested
in any comments related to dimensions
for children.
(f) To what extent does the failure to
maintain accessible features, including
elevators and lifts, limit individuals
with disabilities access to affordable
housing?
Question for Comment 9: HUD is
considering how advances in the design
and construction field impact accessible
housing developments. There are
various types of single family and
multifamily housing, as well as a variety
of materials and structural components
to construct different types of housing,
such as shipping containers or other
emerging building components. In all
instances, federally assisted housing
must provide accessible housing
opportunities for beneficiaries with
disabilities.
(a) Are there specific emerging design
approaches, or specific construction
materials that HUD should consider?
(b) The Department is interested in
comments related to emerging design
approaches in disaster response,
mitigation, and recovery situations. Are
there specific design types or other
issues specifically within the context of
disaster relief that HUD should consider
addressing to ensure accessibility for
individuals with disabilities?
Question for Comment 10: A
reasonable accommodation is a change,
exception, or adjustment to a rule,
policy, practice, or service that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24943
necessary for a person with disabilities
to have an equal opportunity to use and
enjoy a dwelling, including public and
common use spaces, or to participate in
a HUD-assisted program or activity. For
purposes of Section 504, this also
includes recipients providing structural
changes to a unit or public or common
use area when they may be needed as
a reasonable accommodation. Generally,
the failure to provide reasonable
accommodation is a form of
discrimination under Section 504. HUD
anticipates further addressing the
concept of what constitutes a reasonable
accommodation in its Section 504
regulations. HUD is aware that it may be
useful to its recipients to understand the
broad array of the types of
accommodations that may be useful to
individuals with different types of
disabilities, such as individuals who are
blind or have low vision, individuals
who are deaf or hard of hearing,
individuals with intellectual, cognitive,
or developmental disabilities,
individuals with mental health
disabilities or substance use disabilities,
and individuals with mobility
disabilities. The Department is
interested in comments on these issues.
Question for Comment 11: HUD
undertakes two types of investigations
under its Section 504 regulations—
complaint-based investigations and
compliance reviews. Any person, or
their authorized representative, who
believes that they have been subjected
to discrimination by a recipient of HUD
financial assistance may file a Section
504 complaint with HUD. Similarly,
persons may file a complaint with HUD
on behalf of specific classes of
individuals who have been subjected to
discrimination by a recipient.
HUD may conduct periodic
compliance reviews of recipients that
include a review, including an on-site
review of recipients’ policies, practices,
and procedures, to determine whether
recipients are complying with HUD’s
Section 504 regulations. Recipients are
also subject to program compliance
reviews and monitoring procedures by
HUD in its oversight of program
requirements designed to further
compliance with HUD’s Section 504
regulations. 24 CFR 8.56. Are there any
clarifications or changes HUD should
consider in procedures for initiating and
conducting investigations and/or
enforcement mechanisms with respect
to individual complaints or compliance
reviews?
Question for Comment 12: HUD has
enforced Section 504 requirements
against Tribes and Tribal entities that
receive HUD Federal financial
assistance. While the Department
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
24944
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
recognizes Section 504 obligations are
consistent across all recipients of HUD
Federal financial assistance, the
Department also recognizes the unique
relationship between the Federal
Government and Tribes and seeks
comment from Tribes and Tribal entities
in accordance with HUD’s Governmentto-Government Tribal Consultation
Policy.
(a) Are there tribal specific
circumstances that HUD should
consider regarding Tribes and tribal
entities, particularly with respect to the
construction of accessible facilities?
(b) Are there unique types of
discrimination members of Tribes with
disabilities experience, particularly with
respect to non-Tribal grantees or other
entities covered by Section 504?
(c) Are there unique types of
discrimination members of Tribes with
disabilities experience with respect to
the provision of reasonable
accommodations, the provision of
appropriate auxiliary aids and services
necessary to ensure effective
communication, access to accessible
facilities, or accessing services and
programs in the most integrated setting
appropriate to the needs of members of
Tribes with disabilities?
Question for Comment 13: The
Department recognizes that individuals
with disabilities who are also members
of other protected class groups (e.g.,
race, color, national origin, sex
(including sexual orientation and
gender identity), familial status,
religion, age, etc.) may be uniquely
impacted by revisions to HUD’s Section
504 regulations and is interested in
receiving public comment on unique
considerations related to
intersectionality.
(a) Are there unique barriers or other
forms of discrimination in housing or
HUD assisted programs against
individuals with disabilities who are
also members of other specific protected
class groups?
(b) In particular, is there information
that HUD should consider regarding
how disability discrimination affects
persons of color, LGBTQ+ persons,
families with children, older adults, and
individuals with limited English
proficiency who also require
appropriate auxiliary aids and services
necessary to ensure effective
communication?
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Apr 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
regulatory action is significant and,
therefore, subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulations and Regulatory
Review) directs executive agencies to
analyze regulations that are ‘‘outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline,
expand, or repeal them in accordance
with what has been learned.’’ Executive
Order 13563 also directs that, where
relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives, and to the extent
permitted by law, agencies are to,
‘‘identify and consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public.’’
HUD’s Section 504 regulations have
not been significantly updated since
originally published in 1988; whereas
significant advances in building
practices and assistive technologies
have been made during the preceding
decades. Additionally, since HUD’s
Section 504 regulations were first
published, the percentage of the U.S.
population with disabilities has
continued to increase and diversify and,
during this time, a larger share of the
population has increased in age. Given
these changes in the availability and
improvement of accessibility design and
technologies and the changes in the
makeup of the American population
that require or benefit from the
improvements in accessibility and
design and technologies, this ANPRM is
necessary to avoid HUD’s Section 504
regulations from becoming outmoded,
ineffective, and insufficient.
This ANPRM has been reviewed by
OMB. As a result of this review, OMB
determined that this ANPRM will likely
result in a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 but not an
‘‘economically significant’’ action.
Environmental Review
This ANPRM sets out
nondiscrimination standards.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3),
it is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347).
Demetria McCain,
Principal Deputy, Assistant Secretary for Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity.
[FR Doc. 2023–08464 Filed 4–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Parts 733 and 842
[Docket ID: OSM–2022–0009;
S1D1SSS08011000SX064A000201S180110;
S2D2S SS08011000SX064A0022XS501520]
RIN 1029–AC81
Ten-Day Notices and Corrective Action
for State Regulatory Program Issues
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE)
proposes to amend the regulations
related to notifying a State regulatory
authority of a possible violation of any
requirement of the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA). The proposed rule would also
amend the Federal regulations regarding
corrective actions for State regulatory
program issues. Together, the proposed
updates to these two areas of the Federal
regulations would amend the overall
‘‘ten-day notice’’ (TDN) process.
Although a final rule covering these
topics went into effect in 2020 (2020
TDN Rule), the rule has proven to delay
our consideration of some possible
SMCRA violations. In 2021, the
Department of the Interior undertook a
reexamination of the 2020 TDN Rule
and decided to engage in this
rulemaking effort. The primary goals of
this rulemaking are to reduce burdens
for citizens to engage in the TDN
process, establish procedures for
OSMRE to properly evaluate and
process citizen allegations about
possible SMCRA violations, clearly set
forth the regulatory requirements for the
TDN process, and continue to minimize
the duplication of inspections,
enforcement, and administration of
SMCRA. In addition, we will continue
to afford our State regulatory authority
partners due deference during the TDN
process to an extent that is appropriate
under SMCRA. The proposed rule
would ensure that possible SMCRA
violations are properly identified and
addressed in a timely fashion. When
OSMRE obtains adequate proof of an
imminent harm, OSMRE would
immediately conduct a Federal
inspection, outside of the TDN process,
as SMCRA requires. Overall, we believe
that this proposed rule would align
more closely than the 2020 TDN Rule
with SMCRA’s requirements.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24938-24944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08464]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 8 and 9
[Docket No. FR-6257-A-01]
RIN 2529-AB03
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability: Updates to HUD's
Section 504 Regulations
AGENCY: Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) seeks the
public's input on changes that the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD or the Department) is considering to its implementing
regulations for Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section
504) for federally assisted and HUD conducted programs and activities.
Section 504 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all
programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance and in
programs and activities conducted by executive agencies. After this
ANPRM is published, the Department intends to draft a Notice of a
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would propose the adoption of an
updated Federal accessibility standard for purposes of compliance with
HUD's Section 504 regulations. In addition, the Department intends for
this NPRM to propose revisions to HUD's Section 504 regulations to
clarify recipients' obligations, including how to account for advances
in accessible design, information and communication technology, and
assistive technologies that have become available since HUD's Section
504 regulations were originally published in 1988.
DATES: Comment Due Date: July 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: There are two methods for submitting public comments. All
submissions must refer to the above docket number and title.
1. Electronic Submission of Comments. Comments may be submitted
electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make comments immediately available
to the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov website can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that website to submit comments
electronically.
2. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451
[[Page 24939]]
7th Street SW, Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500.
Note: To receive consideration as a public comment, comments
must be submitted through one of the two methods specified above.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. HUD will make all properly
submitted comments and communications available for public inspection
and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above address.
Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, you must
schedule an appointment in advance to review the public comments by
calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-3055 (this is not a toll-
free number). HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals
with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to
make an accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs. Copies of all
comments submitted are available for inspection and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Gioletti, Senior Policy Advisor,
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 5100, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone 405-609-8561 (this is not a toll-free number). HUD welcomes
and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard
of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication
disabilities who would like to submit comments. To learn more about how
to make an accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 504 provides that ``no otherwise qualified individual with
a disability in the United States shall, solely by reason of her or his
disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity receiving Federal financial assistance or under any program or
activity conducted by any executive agency.'' 29 U.S.C. 794(a). Through
Section 504, Congress requires the head of each executive agency to
promulgate regulations to implement the statute. Id. In 1988, HUD
issued its Section 504 regulations for federally assisted programs and
activities at 24 CFR part 8 and for federally conducted programs and
activities \1\ at 24 CFR part 9.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The statutory text of Section 504 explains that ``program or
activity'' means ``all of the operations of'' entities, under the
statute, that receive Federal financial assistance. 29 U.S.C.
794(b). The term ``programs and activities'' is intended to cover
the same types of operations that are covered under Title II of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
\2\ For purposes of federally conducted programs and activities
new construction and alterations must comply with the standard set
by HUD under the Architectural Barriers Act, 42 U.S.C. 4151-4157.
Under HUD's current regulations, the Uniform Federal Accessibility
Standards are the architectural standards that are applicable to
both federally assisted and federally conducted programs and
activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All recipients and subrecipients of Federal financial assistance
from the Department (HUD recipients) must comply with Section 504 and
24 CFR part 8. HUD's Section 504 requirements apply broadly to any
recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department,
including any State or its political subdivision, any instrumentality
of a State or its political subdivision, any public or private agency,
institution, organization, or other entity, or any person that receives
Federal financial assistance directly or through another recipient,
including any successor, assignee, or transferee of a recipient, but
excluding the ultimate beneficiary of the assistance. 24 CFR 8.3 and
8.50(a). In addition, HUD has enforced Section 504 requirements against
Tribal entities that receive Federal financial assistance from HUD.
Federal financial assistance is also defined broadly as any assistance
provided or otherwise made available by the Department through any
grant, loan, contract, or any other arrangement in the form of funds,
services, or property interest, excluding assistance through direct
Federal procurement contracts or payments made under those contracts or
any other contract of insurance or guaranty. 24 CFR 8.3.
HUD's Section 504 regulations at 24 CFR part 8 cover all programs
and activities of recipients of funds from HUD, including, for example,
eligibility criteria, application processes, site selection, admission
to and continued participation in programs, tenancy, service delivery,
and accessibility of programs and facilities. The regulations contain
general prohibitions against discrimination and offer examples of
discriminatory actions that either directly or indirectly result in
discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with
disabilities. 24 CFR 8.4(a) and (b). Among other requirements, HUD's
Section 504 regulations include an integration mandate, requiring
recipients to administer programs and activities in the most integrated
setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with
disabilities; reasonable accommodation requirements, which require
recipients to adjust, modify, or make exceptions to policies or
practices and structural modifications to facilities that may be
necessary for an individual with a disability to equally participate in
or benefit from programs and activities without discrimination; and the
requirement to distribute accessible dwelling units throughout assisted
projects and sites. 24 CFR 8.4(d), 8.20, 8.24(a), 8.26, and 8.33.
Recipients must also take appropriate steps to ensure effective
communication with applicants, beneficiaries, and members of the public
who have disabilities. 24 CFR 8.6.
Recipients of Federal financial assistance from HUD must ensure
that their programs and activities are readily accessible to and usable
by individuals with disabilities. 24 CFR 8.20. This includes physical
accessibility requirements for newly constructed and altered
multifamily housing projects and non-housing facilities. This
requirement also includes alterations to existing facilities that are
necessary to comply with program accessibility requirements for all
facilities. 24 CFR 8.20-8.25. Providers of existing assisted housing
must operate such housing so, when viewed in its entirety, it is
readily accessible to and usable by individuals with a disability. HUD
recipients must comply with HUD's Section 504 regulations that
incorporate the applicable Federal accessibility standard \3\ adopted
by the Department for purposes of Section 504 compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ HUD uses the term ``Federal accessibility standard'' to
refer to the architectural standard with which recipients of Federal
financial assistance from HUD must comply under its Section 504
regulation. Under HUD's existing Section 504 regulation, HUD
recipients may use one of two Federal accessibility standards--the
Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards or HUD's Deeming Notice, as
more fully explained below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) is currently the
Department's Section 504 Federal accessibility standard for compliance
with HUD's Section 504 requirements. 24 CFR 8.32. However, in 2014, HUD
published a Notice, commonly referred to as HUD's ``Deeming Notice,''
allowing HUD recipients to use the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ)
accessibility standard under Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA)--referred to as the 2010 ADA Standards for
Accessible Design (2010 ADA Standards)--with identified exceptions, as
an alternative
[[Page 24940]]
accessibility standard in lieu of UFAS for purposes of Section 504
compliance. 79 FR 29671 (May 23, 2014). HUD provided this flexibility
through the Deeming Notice because of a recognition that many
facilities are designed, constructed, or altered by entities that are
subject to HUD's Section 504 regulations, which are also subject to
Title II and/or Title III of the ADA and, therefore, are also required
to comply with the 2010 ADA Standards. This option exists until HUD
formally revises its Section 504 regulations to adopt an updated
accessibility standard.
HUD recipients must also ensure that designated accessible dwelling
units are dispersed throughout projects and sites, are available in a
sufficient range of bedroom sizes and amenities, and are tenanted to
maximize the utilization of such units by individuals who need the
accessibility features of the units. 24 CFR 8.26 and 8.27.
HUD's existing Section 504 regulations also set forth a compliance
and enforcement mechanism. 24 CFR 8.50 through 8.58. HUD's Office of
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) investigates individual
complaints alleging disability-related discrimination and conducts
compliance reviews of recipients of HUD assistance to determine whether
they are complying with these requirements. 24 CFR 8.56(a). The
regulations set out the procedures used when FHEO finds noncompliance
with Section 504 requirements. 24 CFR 8.56, 8.57, and 8.58.
II. The Need To Update HUD's Section 504 Regulations and Section 504
Federal Accessibility Standard for HUD Programs and Activities
The Department's Section 504 regulations, as a whole, have not been
significantly updated since their initial publication in 1988. Since
that time, HUD has continued to find widespread discrimination on the
basis of disability in HUD-assisted programs and activities and an
ongoing need for affordable, accessible, and integrated housing
opportunities for individuals with disabilities who are eligible for
the programs and activities administered by recipients of Federal
financial assistance from HUD. As the agency with primary
responsibility for administering the Nation's federally assisted
housing programs, HUD has a responsibility to ensure that its Section
504 regulations account for these needs.
In fiscal year 2020, HUD received four hundred and sixty-one (461)
complaints from individuals and organizations alleging disability
discrimination under Section 504. In fiscal year 2021, HUD received
five hundred and ninety-seven (597) complaints from individuals and
organizations alleging disability discrimination under Section 504. In
fiscal year 2022, HUD received five hundred and eighty-two (582)
complaints from individuals and organizations alleging disability
discrimination under Section 504. To date, in fiscal year 2023, HUD has
received two hundred and two (202) complaints from individuals and
organizations alleging disability discrimination under Section 504.
Section 504 complaints are the most common type of civil rights related
complaint \4\ received with respect to the administration of HUD
programs and account for more than half of such complaints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Civil rights authorities include Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD-initiated Section 504 compliance reviews also underscore
ongoing discrimination faced by individuals with disabilities.
Significant noncompliance has been found with respect to physical
accessibility requirements within public housing and other HUD-assisted
affordable housing programs. Compliance reviews have demonstrated that
newly constructed and substantially altered multifamily housing
developments frequently do not meet the accessibility requirements
under UFAS. Furthermore, compliance reviews often reveal that HUD-
assisted programs and activities do not meet other Section 504
requirements such as the provision of reasonable accommodations,
establishment and maintenance of grievance procedures, ensuring
effective communication, appropriate tenanting policies to ensure
maximum use of accessible housing by individuals with disabilities,
occupancy preferences, or physical dispersal of accessible units.
Designated accessible units are often not appropriately tenanted by
individuals who have a disability-related need for the accessibility
features of the unit. Other examples of common violations include the
imposition of inappropriate disability verification requirements, the
imposition of requirements beyond what is required in a lease, the
failure to protect the confidentiality of applicants' or tenants'
disability-related information, discrimination against individuals with
intellectual and developmental disabilities and behavioral health
conditions, and policies for the admission of elderly residents that
exclude persons with a disability.
In the over thirty years since HUD implemented its Section 504
regulations, the percentage of the U.S. population who are individuals
with disabilities has continued to increase and diversify. In addition,
as a larger share of the population increases in age, HUD will continue
to play a critical role in providing affordable housing opportunities
to allow older adults to age in place. This is particularly important
given the significant population of older adults with disabilities, who
will require accessible and affordable housing to age in place.
Likewise, the mobility devices, personal aids, and other forms of
assistive technology available for use by individuals with disabilities
have also diversified. The characteristics of equipment that
individuals with disabilities use have changed in ways that impact the
design and usability of living space and methods of communication.
Significant advances have also occurred in building practices since
1988. Various accessibility codes have been developed and additional
features and elements have been researched based on study of how
persons use, or cannot use, facilities because of inaccessible design
and construction. Many design features that make the home more usable
and accessible have become readily available and widely used in
residential construction, such as additional or modified environmental
controls, security hardware, cabinetry, and plumbing fixtures. Also,
housing models have continued to emerge that focus on identifying and
mitigating barriers to accessibility and safety hazards in the home to
promote healthy aging and enhance health outcomes for older adults. In
addition, the severe lack of affordable housing has caused communities
across the country to explore new and innovative approaches to
providing housing. Examples of emerging single family and multifamily
housing include tiny homes, portable homes, manufactured or
prefabricated homes, 3D printed homes, townhomes, multifamily with
townhome facades, and even housing developed using shipping containers
and other pre-existing structures. The Department seeks to respond to
these environmental, societal, and technological changes in its revised
rule.
The United States is also experiencing an immediate and increasing
need for affordable, accessible, and integrated housing opportunities.
In particular, since the Supreme Court's Olmstead
[[Page 24941]]
decision in 1999, there have been increased efforts to assist
individuals in transitioning from institutional and other segregated
settings into integrated, community-based settings.\5\ As a result of
Olmstead enforcement and implementation efforts by public entities,
there is a crucial need for affordable and integrated housing where
individuals with disabilities are able to live and interact with
individuals without disabilities.\6\ Individuals with disabilities
cannot be subject to discrimination in their housing search.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Olmstead refers to the 1999 Supreme Court decision, Olmstead
v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), wherein the Supreme Court affirmed
that the unjustified segregation of individuals with disabilities is
a form of discrimination prohibited by Title II of the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
\6\ See HUD's Statement on the Role of Housing in Accomplishing
the Goals of Olmstead, https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/OLMSTEADGUIDNC060413.PDF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD is considering how to more effectively address these
significant and emerging issues and seeks public comment as it updates
its Section 504 regulations.
III. Request for Public Comments
The Department seeks input from the public, including individuals
with disabilities, HUD recipients, such as public housing agencies,
States, or local governments, Tribes, housing providers, and social
service providers, before proposing regulatory text for comment. The
Department is posing overarching questions and areas for particular
comment below regarding effective communication, program accessibility,
adopting an updated Federal accessibility standard, and enforcement
mechanisms. The Department is also considering clarifying certain
subsections of the regulations and providing further examples to
enhance compliance.
When providing responsive comments, the Department requests that
commenters indicate the specific question number that corresponds with
the responsive comments. If providing comments not associated with a
question number, please label the comment as such or identify the
comment by the existing regulatory provision to which it relates. The
Department also welcomes general comments on any aspect of its Section
504 regulations or how the Department can improve the administration of
its federally assisted and federally conducted programs to ensure its
own compliance with Section 504.
Question for Comment 1: The Department anticipates revising the
definition of ``individual with disabilities'' consistent with the ADA
Amendments Act of 2008 \7\ and DOJ's Title II ADA regulations. The ADA
Amendments Act of 2008 revised the definition of ``individual with
disabilities'' for purposes of the ADA and made conforming amendments
to Section 504. In view of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008's change to
the definition of disability, the Department is also considering
whether the other definitions, currently provided at 24 CFR 8.3 should
be revised to clarify how the term ``disability'' is used in connection
with certain HUD programs, which have statutory authorizations to serve
specific populations. The Department seeks general comments on updating
its definitions contained at 24 CFR 8.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Public Law 110-325 (Sept. 25, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question for Comment 2: HUD's Section 504 regulations at 24 CFR 8.4
contain general prohibitions on discrimination and include examples of
discriminatory application processes, admissions policies, and service
provision, as well as physical inaccessibility, eligibility, and site
selection, that would either directly or indirectly result in
discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with
disabilities. 24 CFR 8.4(a) and (b).
(a) To what extent are individuals with disabilities at serious
risk of entering institutional settings or being unable to transition
from institutional or group home settings, including skilled nursing
facilities, correctional institutions and inpatient rehabilitation for
substance misuse, settings because they are unable to find affordable,
accessible, and integrated housing opportunities in community-based
settings? Please describe any challenges faced and solutions identified
with locating affordable, integrated, and accessible housing, including
issues such as ensuring housing is available when an individual is
ready to transition from an institutional setting, coordinating housing
and services, identifying available housing programs that individuals
may be eligible for, the referral and/or application process, the use
of preferences, the operation of waitlists, insufficient accessible and
integrated housing opportunities, etc.
(b) Are there specific examples of discrimination that individuals
with mental health or substance use disabilities have experienced, or
other challenges faced by such individuals, in securing affordable
housing, such as rental policies eligibility or exclusion criteria,
that meets disability-related needs that HUD should consider addressing
in its Section 504 regulations?
(c) Are there specific examples of discrimination that individuals
with intellectual, cognitive, or developmental disabilities have
experienced, or other challenges faced by such individuals, in securing
affordable housing that meets the disability-related needs that HUD
should consider addressing in its Section 504 regulations?
(d) Are there specific examples of discrimination that individuals
with physical disabilities have experienced, or other challenges faced
by such individuals, in securing affordable housing that meets the
disability-related needs that HUD should consider addressing in its
Section 504 regulations?
Question for Comment 3: Recipients must take appropriate steps to
ensure effective communication with applicants, beneficiaries, and
members of the public who have disabilities and are required to provide
appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford
individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in,
and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance. Because of technological advances, methods of
enabling effective communication have significantly changed since HUD
issued its Section 504 regulations in 1988 and recipients and
individuals with disabilities communicate in different ways. What types
of auxiliary aids and services do individuals with disabilities need in
housing and community development programs and activities? What
information should the Department consider with respect to the
accessibility of recipients' websites and devices, mobile applications,
etc.?
Question for Comment 4: Section 504 requires that newly constructed
housing and non-housing facilities be designed and constructed to be
readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities. HUD's
existing Section 504 regulations require that in new construction
multifamily housing projects, currently a minimum of five (5) percent
of the total dwelling units in each multifamily housing project (or at
least one unit, whichever is greater) must be made accessible for
persons with mobility impairments. An additional two (2) percent of the
total units (or at least one unit, whichever is greater) must be made
accessible for persons with hearing or vision impairments. In
circumstances where greater need is demonstrated, HUD may prescribe
higher percentages or numbers. 24 CFR 8.20 through 8.22. Physical
accessibility requirements also apply to any alterations of housing and
non-housing facilities. 24 CFR 8.21.
[[Page 24942]]
Additionally, recipients must operate each housing and non-housing-
related program and activity receiving Federal financial assistance so
that the program or activity, when viewed in its entirety, is readily
accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. 24 CFR 8.20,
8.21, and 8.24. This may require alterations to comply with program
accessibility obligations in older facilities that were built before
HUD's Section 504 regulations became effective. This may also require
alterations in addition to and separate from meeting the affirmative
physical accessibility requirements described above.
(a) To what extent does the lack of accessible units and other
facilities in assisted housing discourage applications from eligible
persons with a disability? To what extent is the lack of accessibility
a barrier to the participation in various HUD-assisted housing programs
by persons with a disability? What challenges do households face in
finding available affordable and accessible housing in their respective
communities? What factors or sources of data should HUD and its
recipients use to determine the level of need for accessible housing?
(b) Is there information that HUD should consider to clarify,
strengthen, and encourage compliance by recipients' with program
accessibility obligations?
Question for Comment 5: Tenant-based housing choice voucher (HCV)
and other tenant-based rental assistance programs are crucial to enable
individuals with disabilities to secure affordable, accessible, and
integrated housing opportunities of their choice. HUD's regulation at
24 CFR 8.28 provides examples of specific safeguards to ensure
individuals with disabilities have access to these programs.
(a) What challenges exist in using an HCV or other tenant-based
rental assistance in the private rental market to secure a unit that
meets a household's disability-related needs? For example, is the
process for households with members with disabilities to seek an
extension of the search term due to the lack of accessible housing
effective or is the process for seeking exception rent under the
exception payments standard for accessible housing units effective,
and/or what other difficulties exist for individuals with disabilities
in securing a suitable unit? Do households with members with
disabilities encounter issues using HCVs or other tenant-based rental
assistance due to the need for live-in caregivers? Is there information
that HUD should consider on various methods or approaches that have
proven effective in helping individuals with disabilities access these
types of programs in order to provide equal access?
(b) Please provide details about the availability of affordable
accessible units in different areas of the United States (e.g., urban
areas, suburban areas, and rural areas, including geographically
isolated and remote areas) in the private rental market and any proven
strategies that encourage landlords to participate in the tenant-based
HCV program.
Question for Comment 6: Most entities are subject to more than one
Federal accessibility law and architectural standard in the operation
of their housing services, programs, and activities. For example, a
public housing agency receiving HUD funding and operating public
housing and voucher programs may be subject to the design and
construction requirements of the Fair Housing Act,\8\ Section 504 as a
recipient of Federal financial assistance, and Title II of the ADA as a
public entity. This may require applying multiple accessibility laws
and architectural standards, e.g., the Fair Housing Act's Accessibility
Guidelines, the 2010 ADA Standards under Title II of the ADA, and HUD's
Section 504 accessibility standard. In addition, State and local laws
and building codes will also apply. Most States and localities now use
the International Building Code (IBC) and the accessibility standard it
references, the ICC A117.1 Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings
and Facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department seeks input on ways to harmonize, to the extent
possible, the requirements among the various standards and achieve
greater consistency in the design and construction of buildings and
facilities that are covered by multiple Federal accessibility laws. The
Department also seeks to ensure, however, that accessibility for
persons with disabilities is not reduced and opportunities for
modernization of accessibility requirements are considered.
The Department notes that recipients of HUD funding must be aware
of and comply with the accessibility requirements of all applicable
laws, including Section 504, the ADA, and the Fair Housing Act.
Compliance with one of these statutes does not ensure compliance with
other Federal disability nondiscrimination laws. HUD's adoption of an
updated Section 504 Federal accessibility standard for purposes of
compliance with its own Section 504 regulations does not change an
entity's obligation to comply with all applicable laws.
What standards should the Department consider for purposes of an
updated accessibility standard for its recipients? HUD requests
information to assist the Department in determining whether other
specific guidelines provide sufficient or insufficient accessibility in
the context of housing or other residential facilities funded by HUD.
In addition, please provide information on scoping and other technical
provisions the Department should consider to further accessibility for
individuals with disabilities in the context of housing.
Question for Comment 7: HUD's Deeming Notice allowed HUD recipients
to use the 2010 ADA Standards under Title II of the ADA--with
identified exceptions, as an alternative accessibility standard in lieu
of UFAS for purposes of Section 504 compliance. The Deeming Notice
identified eleven (11) exceptions where UFAS provides greater
accessibility than the 2010 ADA Standards and must continue to be
utilized.\9\ Are there other UFAS provisions that HUD did not identify
in its Deeming Notice that should be retained to further accessibility
in HUD-assisted programs?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ (1) Section 35.151(a)(2) Exception for structural
impracticability; (2) Section 35.151(b) Alterations; (3) Section
202.2 Additions; (4) Exception to Section 202.4 Alterations
Affecting Primary Function Areas; (5) Section 203.8 General
Exceptions--Residential Facilities; (6) Employee Work Areas:
Sections 203.9 (General exception for employee work areas), 206.2.8
(Circulation paths in employee work areas), and the Exceptions to
403.5 (Clearances within employee work areas) and 405.8 (Handrails
within employee work areas); (7) Exception 2 to Section 206.2.1 Site
Arrival Points; (8) Exception to Section 206.2.2 Within a Site; (9)
Exception 1 to Section 206.2.3 Multi-Story Buildings and Facilities;
(10) Section 214--Scoping of Washing Machines and Clothes Dryers;
(11) Exception to Section 215.1 Visible Alarms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question for Comment 8: As the Federal agency with primary
responsibility for administering the Nation's federally assisted
housing programs, the Department has a unique role in considering how
residential and connected spaces (e.g., spaces for laundry, mail,
telecommunications, office, maintenance, parking, recreation, service,
and community functions) must be made accessible. HUD is looking at the
accessibility and usability of spaces and elements within one's own
home and connected spaces that will impact daily living, which is
different than considering accessibility in places of public
accommodation or other settings. HUD is considering how the development
of various enhanced
[[Page 24943]]
accessibility features can be incorporated or incentivized into the
design and construction of affordable housing developments.
Advances in the types of accessibility features can assist
individuals with various types of disabilities obtain, remain in, and
receive the full benefits of their housing. For example, for
individuals with mobility disabilities, such features may include:
power operated or other keyless proximity-based entry at entrances and
exits from buildings and passageways through the building; light weight
or low resistance doors; detachable shower-heads; smart, remotely
adjustable thermostats; adjustable shelves in closets and storage; full
extension pull-out drawers, shelves, and racks; roll-in showers;
avoiding swinging interior doors within individual accessible dwelling
units; faucets with touch or motion sense water controls; and
reinforced ceilings to accommodate a track and harness system. For
individuals who are blind or have low vision, examples of such features
may include: audible elevator indicators; innovative entry systems that
do not solely rely on an individual's ability to see in order to gain
access; controls with audio feedback as opposed to or in addition to
touch screens; and enhanced lighting. For individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing, examples of such features may include: innovative
entry systems that do not solely rely on an individual's ability to
hear in order to gain access; doorbells with light alerts; activated
close captioning on televisions located in public areas; and video
phones or other video connections for communications.
In addition, specific accessibility features assist individuals to
remain in their homes and to age in place, such as vertical and angled
grab bars to get up and down from toilets and for stepping in and out
of bathing fixtures. Examples to assist individuals who are blind or
have low vision include contrasting surfaces, enhanced lighting,
tactically discernible controls, and elimination of tripping hazards.
Examples to assist individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing include
innovative entry systems, doorbells with light alerts, and emergency
alarms for fire and carbon monoxide leaks that can accommodate personal
notification devices.
(a) What barriers do individuals with disabilities face in public
and common use areas of housing and non-housing facilities (e.g.,
building entrances, building entry systems, recreation and fitness
facilities, mail and package rooms, coworking facilities, parking
structures, laundry rooms)? What accessibility features or advanced
technology can help overcome these barriers?
(b) What accessibility features or advanced technology should the
Department be aware of that improve accessibility in designated
accessible units for individuals with mobility disabilities?
(c) What accessibility features or advanced technology should the
Department be aware of that improve accessibility in designated
accessible units for individuals with vision and hearing disabilities?
(d) Given the increasing aging population, the Department is
considering its role in providing affordable housing opportunities to
this population and how to enable households to remain in their
housing. Are there specific accessibility features that can help
individuals to age in place?
(e) There are alternative accessibility provisions in accessibility
standards that address the more limited reach ranges and need for lower
seat heights and dining surfaces for children with disabilities that
are different than accessibility features configured for adult use. The
Department is interested in any comments related to dimensions for
children.
(f) To what extent does the failure to maintain accessible
features, including elevators and lifts, limit individuals with
disabilities access to affordable housing?
Question for Comment 9: HUD is considering how advances in the
design and construction field impact accessible housing developments.
There are various types of single family and multifamily housing, as
well as a variety of materials and structural components to construct
different types of housing, such as shipping containers or other
emerging building components. In all instances, federally assisted
housing must provide accessible housing opportunities for beneficiaries
with disabilities.
(a) Are there specific emerging design approaches, or specific
construction materials that HUD should consider?
(b) The Department is interested in comments related to emerging
design approaches in disaster response, mitigation, and recovery
situations. Are there specific design types or other issues
specifically within the context of disaster relief that HUD should
consider addressing to ensure accessibility for individuals with
disabilities?
Question for Comment 10: A reasonable accommodation is a change,
exception, or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service that
may be necessary for a person with disabilities to have an equal
opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling, including public and common
use spaces, or to participate in a HUD-assisted program or activity.
For purposes of Section 504, this also includes recipients providing
structural changes to a unit or public or common use area when they may
be needed as a reasonable accommodation. Generally, the failure to
provide reasonable accommodation is a form of discrimination under
Section 504. HUD anticipates further addressing the concept of what
constitutes a reasonable accommodation in its Section 504 regulations.
HUD is aware that it may be useful to its recipients to understand the
broad array of the types of accommodations that may be useful to
individuals with different types of disabilities, such as individuals
who are blind or have low vision, individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, individuals with intellectual, cognitive, or developmental
disabilities, individuals with mental health disabilities or substance
use disabilities, and individuals with mobility disabilities. The
Department is interested in comments on these issues.
Question for Comment 11: HUD undertakes two types of investigations
under its Section 504 regulations--complaint-based investigations and
compliance reviews. Any person, or their authorized representative, who
believes that they have been subjected to discrimination by a recipient
of HUD financial assistance may file a Section 504 complaint with HUD.
Similarly, persons may file a complaint with HUD on behalf of specific
classes of individuals who have been subjected to discrimination by a
recipient.
HUD may conduct periodic compliance reviews of recipients that
include a review, including an on-site review of recipients' policies,
practices, and procedures, to determine whether recipients are
complying with HUD's Section 504 regulations. Recipients are also
subject to program compliance reviews and monitoring procedures by HUD
in its oversight of program requirements designed to further compliance
with HUD's Section 504 regulations. 24 CFR 8.56. Are there any
clarifications or changes HUD should consider in procedures for
initiating and conducting investigations and/or enforcement mechanisms
with respect to individual complaints or compliance reviews?
Question for Comment 12: HUD has enforced Section 504 requirements
against Tribes and Tribal entities that receive HUD Federal financial
assistance. While the Department
[[Page 24944]]
recognizes Section 504 obligations are consistent across all recipients
of HUD Federal financial assistance, the Department also recognizes the
unique relationship between the Federal Government and Tribes and seeks
comment from Tribes and Tribal entities in accordance with HUD's
Government-to-Government Tribal Consultation Policy.
(a) Are there tribal specific circumstances that HUD should
consider regarding Tribes and tribal entities, particularly with
respect to the construction of accessible facilities?
(b) Are there unique types of discrimination members of Tribes with
disabilities experience, particularly with respect to non-Tribal
grantees or other entities covered by Section 504?
(c) Are there unique types of discrimination members of Tribes with
disabilities experience with respect to the provision of reasonable
accommodations, the provision of appropriate auxiliary aids and
services necessary to ensure effective communication, access to
accessible facilities, or accessing services and programs in the most
integrated setting appropriate to the needs of members of Tribes with
disabilities?
Question for Comment 13: The Department recognizes that individuals
with disabilities who are also members of other protected class groups
(e.g., race, color, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation
and gender identity), familial status, religion, age, etc.) may be
uniquely impacted by revisions to HUD's Section 504 regulations and is
interested in receiving public comment on unique considerations related
to intersectionality.
(a) Are there unique barriers or other forms of discrimination in
housing or HUD assisted programs against individuals with disabilities
who are also members of other specific protected class groups?
(b) In particular, is there information that HUD should consider
regarding how disability discrimination affects persons of color,
LGBTQ+ persons, families with children, older adults, and individuals
with limited English proficiency who also require appropriate auxiliary
aids and services necessary to ensure effective communication?
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a regulatory action is significant
and, therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the order.
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review)
directs executive agencies to analyze regulations that are ``outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been
learned.'' Executive Order 13563 also directs that, where relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives, and to the extent
permitted by law, agencies are to, ``identify and consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public.''
HUD's Section 504 regulations have not been significantly updated
since originally published in 1988; whereas significant advances in
building practices and assistive technologies have been made during the
preceding decades. Additionally, since HUD's Section 504 regulations
were first published, the percentage of the U.S. population with
disabilities has continued to increase and diversify and, during this
time, a larger share of the population has increased in age. Given
these changes in the availability and improvement of accessibility
design and technologies and the changes in the makeup of the American
population that require or benefit from the improvements in
accessibility and design and technologies, this ANPRM is necessary to
avoid HUD's Section 504 regulations from becoming outmoded,
ineffective, and insufficient.
This ANPRM has been reviewed by OMB. As a result of this review,
OMB determined that this ANPRM will likely result in a ``significant
regulatory action,'' as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 but not an ``economically significant'' action.
Environmental Review
This ANPRM sets out nondiscrimination standards. Accordingly, under
24 CFR 50.19(c)(3), it is categorically excluded from environmental
review under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4347).
Demetria McCain,
Principal Deputy, Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity.
[FR Doc. 2023-08464 Filed 4-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P