International Dairy Foods Association: Response to the Objections and Requests for a Public Hearing on the Final Rule To Revoke the Standards for Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and Amend the Standard for Yogurt, 22907-22910 [2023-07723]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and
effective September 15, 2022, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW AR D Rogers, AR [Amended]
Rogers Executive Airport-Carter Field, AR
(Lat. 36°22′21″ N, long. 94°06′25″ W)
Razorback VOR
(Lat. 36°14′47″ N, long. 94°07′17″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface up to but not including 3,900 feet
MSL within a 4-mile radius of Rogers
Executive Airport-Carter Field and within 2.2
miles each side of the 005° radial of the
Razorback VOR extending from the 4-mile
radius to 6.0 miles south of the airport
excluding that airspace west of a line (lat.
36°24′09″ N, long. 94°10′51″ W and lat.
36°18′53″ N, long. 94°08′55″ W), and
excluding the Class C airspace associated
with the Northwest Arkansas Regional
airport. This Class D airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
ASW AR D Springdale, AR [Amended]
Springdale Municipal Airport, AR
(Lat. 36°10′35″ N, long. 94°07′09″ W)
Razorback VOR
(Lat. 36°14′47″ N, long. 94°07′17″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,900 feet MSL
within a 4.1-mile radius of Springdale
Municipal Airport and within 1.3 miles each
side of the 358° and 178° radials of the
Razorback VORTAC extending from the 4.1mile radius to 4.6 miles north of the airport.
This Class D airspace area is effective during
the specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.
Paragraph 6002
Class E Surface Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW AR E2 Rogers, AR [Amended]
Rogers Executive Airport—Carter Field, AR
(Lat. 36°22′21″ N, long. 94°06′25″ W)
Razorback VOR
(Lat. 36°14′47″ N, long. 94°07′17″ W)
That airspace extending upwards from the
surface within a 4-mile radius of Rogers
Executive Airport—Carter Field and within
2.2 miles on each side of the 005° radial of
the Razorback VOR extending from the 4mile radius to 6.0 miles south of the airport,
excluding that airspace west of a line (lat.
36°24′09″ N, long. 94°10′51″ W and lat.
36°18′53″ N, long. 94°08′55″ W). This Class
E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Air Missions. The effective date
and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Chart Supplement.
ASW AR E2 Springdale, AR [Amended]
Springdale Municipal Airport, AR
(Lat. 36°10′35″ N, long. 94°07′09″ W)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
Razorback VORTAC
(Lat. 36°14′47″ N, long. 94°07′17″ W)
That airspace extending upwards from the
surface within a 4.1-mile radius of
Springdale Municipal Airport and within 1.3
miles on each side of the 358° and 178°
radials of the Razorback VORTAC extending
from the 4.1-mile radius to 4.6 miles north
of the airport. This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
ASW AR E2 Bentonville, AR [Amended]
Bentonville Municipal Airport/Louise M.
Thaden Field, AR
(Lat. 36°20′43″ N, long. 94°13′10″ W)
Razorback VOR
(Lat. 36°14′47″ N, long. 94°07′17″ W)
That airspace extending upwards from the
surface within a 3.9-mile radius of
Bentonville Municipal Airport/Louise M.
Thaden Field and within 2.2 miles each side
of the 322° radial of the Razorback VOR
extending from the 3.9-mile radius to 6 miles
southeast of the airport excluding that
airspace east of a line (lat. 36°24′09″ N, long.
94°10′51″ W and lat. 36°18′53″ N, long.
94°08′55″ W). This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April
10, 2023.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
22907
Order JO 7400.11 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
The FAA published a final rule in the
Federal Register (88 FR 19823; April 4,
2023), establishing Class E airspace at
Delph, IN. Subsequent to publication,
the FAA identified that the final rule
was published with the incorrect
Airspace Docket number. This action
corrects this error by replacing the
incorrect docket number, 22–AGL–31,
with the correct one, 20–AGL–31.
Correction to Final Rule
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me,
Establishment of Class E Airspace:
Delphi, IN, published in the Federal
Register on April 4, 2023 (88 FR 19823),
is corrected as follows:
§ 71.1
[Amended]
On page 19823, column 2, line 50,
amend to read, ‘‘Docket No. 20–AGL–
31]’’.
[FR Doc. 2023–07831 Filed 4–13–23; 8:45 am]
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 10,
2023.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[FR Doc. 2023–07836 Filed 4–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
14 CFR Part 71
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1117; Airspace
Docket No. 20–AGL–31]
21 CFR Part 131
[Docket No. FDA–2000–P–0126 (Formerly
Docket No. 2000P–0658)]
RIN 2120–AA66
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Delphi, IN
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This action corrects a
typographic error in the final rule
published in the Federal Register on
April 4, 2023, establishing Class E
airspace at Delphi, IN.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, June
15, 2023. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
International Dairy Foods Association:
Response to the Objections and
Requests for a Public Hearing on the
Final Rule To Revoke the Standards for
Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and
Amend the Standard for Yogurt
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final order; response to
objections and denial of public hearing
requests; removal of administrative stay;
final amendment.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) published
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
22908
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
a final rule entitled ‘‘Milk and Cream
Products and Yogurt Products; Final
Rule To Revoke the Standards for
Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and
To Amend the Standard for Yogurt,’’ on
June 11, 2021 (the 2021 final rule). The
International Dairy Foods Association
(IDFA) objected to the final rule’s
provision that yogurt have either a
titratable acidity of not less than 0.7
percent, expressed as lactic acid, or a
pH of 4.6 or lower before the addition
of bulky flavoring ingredients. We are
denying IDFA’s request for a public
hearing with respect to this objection
and are issuing a final order to modify
the final rule’s provision with respect to
both pH and titratable acidity.
DATES: This order is effective April 14,
2023. The administrative stay is lifted
April 14, 2023. The compliance date is
May 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections
and requests for a hearing on new
provisions added by this response to
objections as follows. Please note that
late, untimely filed objections will not
be considered. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
May 15, 2023. Objections received by
mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/
paper submissions) will be considered
timely if they are received on or before
that date.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Objections submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
objection will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an objection
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the objection as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper objections
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your objection, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2000–P–0126 for ‘‘International Dairy
Foods Association: Response to the
Objections and Denial of the Requests
for a Public Hearing on the Final Rule
To Revoke the Standards for Lowfat
Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and To
Amend the Standard for Yogurt.’’
Received objections, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
objections only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Krause, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–820), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
2371, or Holli Kubicki, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of
Regulations and Policy (HFS–024), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
341) directs the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (Secretary) to issue
regulations fixing and establishing for
any food a reasonable definition and
standard of identity whenever, in the
judgment of the Secretary, such action
will promote honesty and fair dealing in
the interest of consumers. Under section
701(e)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
371(e)(1)), any action for the
amendment or repeal of any definition
and standard of identity under section
401 of the FD&C Act for any dairy
product (e.g., yogurt) must begin with a
proposal made either by FDA under our
own initiative or by petition of any
interested persons.
In the Federal Register of June 11,
2021 (86 FR 31117), we issued a final
rule (the 2021 final rule) amending the
definition and standard of identity for
yogurt ((§ 131.200) (21 CFR 131.200))
and revoking the definitions and
standards of identity for lowfat yogurt
(21 CFR 131.203) and nonfat yogurt (21
CFR 131.206). This action was in
response, in part, to a citizen petition
submitted by the National Yogurt
Association. The final rule modernized
the yogurt standard to allow for
technological advances while promoting
honesty and fair dealing in the interest
of consumers.
The preamble to the final rule stated
that the effective date of the final rule
would be July 12, 2021, except as to any
provisions that may be stayed by the
filing of proper objections (86 FR 31117
at 31136). Pursuant to section 701(e) of
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
the FD&C Act, the final rule notified
persons who would be adversely
affected by the final rule that they could
file objections, specifying with
particularity the provisions of the final
rule deemed objectionable, stating the
grounds therefor, and requesting a
public hearing upon such objections.
We gave interested persons until July
12, 2021, to file objections and request
a hearing on the final rule.
The IDFA timely filed objections and
requested a hearing with respect to
several provisions in the final rule (see
Objections and Request for Hearings
submitted by Michael Dykes, DVM
(IDFA objection), President and Chief
Executive Officer, IDFA, dated July 12,
2021, to the Dockets Management Staff,
Food and Drug Administration
(Comment ID FDA–2000–P–0126–0109).
Section 701(e)(2) of the FD&C Act
provides that, until final action is taken
by the Secretary, the filing of objections
operates to stay the effectiveness of
those provisions to which the objections
are made.
In the Federal Register of March 23,
2022 (87 FR 16394) we issued a final
rule providing clarification on which
provisions of the 2021 final rule were
stayed and which requirements of the
previous final rule that we issued in
1981 (46 FR 9924) (1981 final rule) are
in effect pending final action under
section 701(e) of the FD&C Act. In the
Federal Register of December 15, 2022
(87 FR 76559), we published a final rule
(2022 final rule) denying IDFA’s
requests for a hearing with respect to all
but one of their objections. The 2022
final rule provided modifications to
certain provisions in the final rule and
announced that the stay of effectiveness
of provisions for which hearings were
denied was lifted. We did not address
IDFA’s objection and request for a
hearing on the provision in § 131.200(a)
that yogurt have either a titratable
acidity of not less than 0.7 percent,
expressed as lactic acid, or a pH of 4.6
or lower before the addition of bulky
flavoring ingredients (hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘the acidity
requirement’’). We addressed this
objection and request for a hearing in a
proposed order, which we sent to IDFA
under § 12.24(d) (21 CFR 12.24(d)) and
posted to the docket for public review
(Document ID FDA–2000–P–0126–
0129). FDA regulations provide that
after the Commissioner serves a
proposed order denying a hearing, a
person has 30 days after receipt of the
proposed order to demonstrate that the
submission justifies a hearing
(§ 12.24(d)). FDA did not receive any
response to the proposed order, and we
are now issuing a final order denying
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
IDFA’s request for a hearing on the
acidity requirement and amending the
2021 final rule with respect to this
requirement.
II. Objection and Request for a Hearing
on the Acidity Requirement
The acidity requirement in
§ 131.200(a) of the 2021 final rule is
comprised of two options: yogurt must
either have a minimum titratable acidity
of 0.7 percent or a maximum pH of 4.6
before bulky flavoring ingredients are
added. IDFA objected to both of these
options, asserting that they are not
practical and do not reflect consumer
taste preferences or current industry
practice for yogurt manufacturing. IDFA
stated that the requirement will not
promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers. IDFA asserted
that the requirement should be a
titratable acidity of not less than 0.6
percent, expressed as lactic acid,
measured in the white mass of the
yogurt, or a pH of 4.6 or lower measured
in the finished product within 24 hours
after filling. IDFA requested a hearing
on the following issues: (1) whether a
requirement that titratable acidity or pH
be reached prior to the addition of bulky
flavors in the manufacturing process is
consistent with the basic nature and
essential characteristics of yogurt; (2)
whether a requirement that prohibits
yogurt from being filled at a pH of 4.8
or less and reaching a pH of 4.6 or
below within 24 hours after filling is
consistent with the basic nature and
essential characteristics of yogurt; and
(3) whether a minimum titratable
acidity requirement of 0.7 percent is in
the interest of consumers and necessary
to maintaining the basic nature and
essential characteristics of yogurt.
We are denying IDFA’s request for a
hearing with respect to both the
titratable acidity minimum and pH
maximum under § 12.24(b)(1). We are
modifying the 2021 final rule with
respect to the pH maximum in
accordance with IDFA’s request, and we
are modifying the 2021 final rule to
eliminate the option of complying with
a minimum titratable acidity.
A. Denial of Request for a Hearing on
Maximum pH Option
With respect to the maximum pH
option, IDFA objected to requiring the
pH to be reached prior to the addition
of bulky flavoring ingredients and
requiring the pH of 4.6 in the white
mass of the yogurt prior to filling. IDFA
explained that modifications made to
the Grade ‘‘A’’ Pasteurized Milk
Ordinance (PMO) in 2007 exempted
yogurt from certain cooling
requirements based on an initial pH of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22909
4.8 or below at filling and with the
product reaching a pH of 4.6 or below
within 24 hours of filling. (The PMO is
a model regulation intended to help
States and municipalities initiate and
maintain effective programs for the
prevention of milk-borne disease. State
and local milk control agencies can
adopt the PMO.) IDFA stated that bulky
flavoring ingredients such as fruits and
fruit preparations are added before
achieving the target pH (pH 4.6) and
prior to filling. Before accepting this
change in the PMO, FDA and the
National Conference on Interstate Milk
Shipments reviewed pathogen challenge
study data regarding this manufacturing
practice and concluded that exempting
yogurt from the cooling requirements of
the PMO is safe when this specific
practice is followed. In its objection,
IDFA also asserted that such products
(manufactured with an initial pH of 4.8
or below at filling and with the product
reaching a pH of 4.6 or below within 24
hours of filling) have been on the market
for many years and accepted by
consumers without deviating from the
basic nature and essential
characteristics of yogurt and
maintaining honesty and fair dealing in
the interest of consumer.
We agree that the key safety control
measure for finished yogurt is pH and,
secondarily, temperature control (i.e.,
refrigeration). Also, the pH process
described in the PMO for yogurt
contains other factors that contribute to
preventing growth of different kinds of
microorganisms. For example, the
relatively rapid pH drop during
fermentation (and the final pH
achieved) is the primary control
measure for pathogenic sporeformers in
yogurt. Microbiological safety by acids
relies on the pH value of the food, and
pH is a parameter that is easily
measurable. The pH values that inhibit
growth of microbial pathogens are
generally well-known by food safety
professionals and easily found in the
scientific literature.
Based on all available information,
including the information presented in
the objections from IDFA, FDA is
amending the yogurt standard regarding
the acidity requirement in § 131.200(a).
We are revising § 131.200(a) as
requested by IDFA, and consistent with
the PMO, to require a pH of 4.6 or lower
measured on the finished product
within 24 hours after filling. The
finished product refers to the yogurt
white mass after the addition of bulky
flavors. If a bulky flavor (e.g., fruit
pieces) added to yogurt increases the
pH, the pH must be 4.6 or lower after
the product has had time to equilibrate.
This requirement will ensure the safety
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
22910
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
of yogurt, while maintaining its basic
nature and essential characteristics.
This amendment is consistent with
IDFA’s proposed modification to the
maximum pH option. Therefore, we are
denying IDFA’s request for a hearing
with respect to the maximum pH option
under § 12.24(b)(1) because there is not
a genuine and substantial issue of fact
for resolution at a hearing.
B. Denial of Request for a Hearing on
the Minimum Titratable Acidity Option
IDFA objected to the minimum
titratable acidity of 0.7 percent and
requested that we modify the 2021 final
rule to provide for a minimum titratable
acidity of 0.6 percent. IDFA explained
that a minimum titratable acidity of 0.6
percent is necessary to produce certain
low calorie yogurt products that meet
consumer expectations of a delicate and
less tart yogurt taste that is not too
acidic or sour. IDFA stated that if a
titratable acidity requirement of 0.7
percent is imposed, some manufacturers
may need to adjust formulations and
add sugars to counteract the acidity and
deliver a product that meets consumer
expectations and preferences. IDFA
emphasized that a minimum titratable
acidity of 0.6 percent would provide
manufacturers with needed flexibility.
Because we are modifying the
maximum pH option consistent with the
pH specifications in the PMO, which
States have adopted, manufacturers are
already required to comply with the
maximum pH option. Therefore, the
minimum titratable acidity option in the
2021 final rule, whether set at 0.7
percent or 0.6 percent, is superfluous
and would not provide flexibility to
manufacturers. So long as
manufacturers comply with the
maximum pH option, they may
manufacture yogurt with a titratable
acidity of 0.6 percent and can
accommodate consumer expectations
and preferences without reformulating
their products. We note that the
maximum pH option we are finalizing
has been in effect in States for several
years and, by itself, appears sufficient to
ensure the safety of yogurt products.
With the elimination of the titratable
acidity option, we are also removing
§ 131.200(e)(1)(iii) Methods of analysis,
Titratable acidity and the corresponding
method incorporated by reference in
§ 131.200(i)(1)(i).
We are denying IDFA’s request for a
hearing on whether a minimum
titratable acidity requirement of 0.7
percent is in the interest of consumers
and necessary to maintaining the basic
nature and essential characteristics of
yogurt. Given our modification to the
maximum pH option, a minimum
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
titratable acidity option is unnecessary,
and we do not believe there is a genuine
and substantial issue of fact for
resolution at a hearing (§ 12.24(b)(1)).
III. Conclusions
For the reasons explained above, we
are denying IDFA’s request for a hearing
with respect to both the maximum pH
option and the minimum titratable
acidity option under § 12.24(b)(1). We
are modifying the acidity requirement in
§ 131.200(a) in the 2021 final rule to
eliminate the minimum titratable
acidity option and require that yogurt
have a pH of 4.6 or lower measured on
the finished product within 24 hours
after filling.
This final order is being issued after
following the process provided under
§ 12.24(d). Objections to or requests for
hearing on the modification and
revocation may be submitted under 21
CFR 12.20 through 12.22 in accordance
with 21 CFR 12.26. The stay of
effectiveness with respect to the acidity
requirement is lifted upon publication
of this final order in the Federal
Register.
The following reference is on display
at the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES) and is available for viewing
by interested persons between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it
is also available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the website addresses, as of the date this
document publishes in the Federal
Register, but websites are subject to
change over time.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Food and
Drug Administration. Grade ‘‘A’’
Pasteurized Milk Ordinance. 2019.
Available at: https://ncims.org/wp-content/
uploads/2020/07/2019-PMO.pdf (last
accessed February 6, 2023).
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 131
Cream, Food grades and standards,
Milk, Yogurt.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 131 is
amended as follows:
PART 131—MILK AND CREAM
1. The authority citation for part 131
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
2. In § 131.200:
a. Revise the fourth sentence of
paragraph (a);
■
■
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
§ 131.200
Yogurt.
(a) * * * Yogurt contains not less
than 3.25 percent milkfat, except as
provided for in paragraph (g) of this
section, and not less than 8.25 percent
milk solids not fat and has a pH of 4.6
or lower measured on the finished
product within 24 hours after filling.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 6, 2023.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2023–07723 Filed 4–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
30 CFR Part 553
[Docket ID: BOEM–2023–0002]
IV. Reference
PO 00000
b. Remove paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and
(i)(1)(i); and
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (i)(1)(ii) and
(iii) as paragraphs (i)(1)(i) and (ii).
The revision reads as follows:
■
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1010–AE18
Oil Spill Financial Responsibility
Adjustment of the Limit of Liability for
Offshore Facilities
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management issues this final rule to
adjust the offshore facility limit of
liability for damages under the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) to reflect
the increase in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) since 2016. This rule
increases the OPA offshore facility limit
of liability for damages from
$137,659,500 to $167,806,900. In
addition to damages, responsible parties
continue to be liable for all removal
costs associated with any oil spill or
discharge.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective on May 15,
2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the inflation
adjustment methodology or amount
should be directed to Martin Heinze,
Economics Division, BOEM, at
martin.heinze@boem.gov or at 703–787–
1010. Questions regarding the timing of
this adjustment or the applicability of
the regulations should be directed to
Anna Atkinson, Office of Regulations,
BOEM, at anna.atkinson@boem.gov or
at (703) 787–1025.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22907-22910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07723]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 131
[Docket No. FDA-2000-P-0126 (Formerly Docket No. 2000P-0658)]
International Dairy Foods Association: Response to the Objections
and Requests for a Public Hearing on the Final Rule To Revoke the
Standards for Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and Amend the Standard
for Yogurt
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order; response to objections and denial of public
hearing requests; removal of administrative stay; final amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) published
[[Page 22908]]
a final rule entitled ``Milk and Cream Products and Yogurt Products;
Final Rule To Revoke the Standards for Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt
and To Amend the Standard for Yogurt,'' on June 11, 2021 (the 2021
final rule). The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) objected
to the final rule's provision that yogurt have either a titratable
acidity of not less than 0.7 percent, expressed as lactic acid, or a pH
of 4.6 or lower before the addition of bulky flavoring ingredients. We
are denying IDFA's request for a public hearing with respect to this
objection and are issuing a final order to modify the final rule's
provision with respect to both pH and titratable acidity.
DATES: This order is effective April 14, 2023. The administrative stay
is lifted April 14, 2023. The compliance date is May 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections and requests for a hearing on new
provisions added by this response to objections as follows. Please note
that late, untimely filed objections will not be considered. The
https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of May 15, 2023.
Objections received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely if they are received on or
before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Objections submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your objection will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information,
your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business
information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you
include your name, contact information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the objection as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper objections submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your objection, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2000-P-0126 for ``International Dairy Foods Association: Response
to the Objections and Denial of the Requests for a Public Hearing on
the Final Rule To Revoke the Standards for Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat
Yogurt and To Amend the Standard for Yogurt.'' Received objections,
those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-
402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit an objection with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your objections only as a written/paper submission.
You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note
that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' We
will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information,
in our consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Krause, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2371, or Holli Kubicki,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Regulations and
Policy (HFS-024), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 341) directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services
(Secretary) to issue regulations fixing and establishing for any food a
reasonable definition and standard of identity whenever, in the
judgment of the Secretary, such action will promote honesty and fair
dealing in the interest of consumers. Under section 701(e)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(e)(1)), any action for the amendment or repeal
of any definition and standard of identity under section 401 of the
FD&C Act for any dairy product (e.g., yogurt) must begin with a
proposal made either by FDA under our own initiative or by petition of
any interested persons.
In the Federal Register of June 11, 2021 (86 FR 31117), we issued a
final rule (the 2021 final rule) amending the definition and standard
of identity for yogurt ((Sec. 131.200) (21 CFR 131.200)) and revoking
the definitions and standards of identity for lowfat yogurt (21 CFR
131.203) and nonfat yogurt (21 CFR 131.206). This action was in
response, in part, to a citizen petition submitted by the National
Yogurt Association. The final rule modernized the yogurt standard to
allow for technological advances while promoting honesty and fair
dealing in the interest of consumers.
The preamble to the final rule stated that the effective date of
the final rule would be July 12, 2021, except as to any provisions that
may be stayed by the filing of proper objections (86 FR 31117 at
31136). Pursuant to section 701(e) of
[[Page 22909]]
the FD&C Act, the final rule notified persons who would be adversely
affected by the final rule that they could file objections, specifying
with particularity the provisions of the final rule deemed
objectionable, stating the grounds therefor, and requesting a public
hearing upon such objections. We gave interested persons until July 12,
2021, to file objections and request a hearing on the final rule.
The IDFA timely filed objections and requested a hearing with
respect to several provisions in the final rule (see Objections and
Request for Hearings submitted by Michael Dykes, DVM (IDFA objection),
President and Chief Executive Officer, IDFA, dated July 12, 2021, to
the Dockets Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration (Comment ID
FDA-2000-P-0126-0109). Section 701(e)(2) of the FD&C Act provides that,
until final action is taken by the Secretary, the filing of objections
operates to stay the effectiveness of those provisions to which the
objections are made.
In the Federal Register of March 23, 2022 (87 FR 16394) we issued a
final rule providing clarification on which provisions of the 2021
final rule were stayed and which requirements of the previous final
rule that we issued in 1981 (46 FR 9924) (1981 final rule) are in
effect pending final action under section 701(e) of the FD&C Act. In
the Federal Register of December 15, 2022 (87 FR 76559), we published a
final rule (2022 final rule) denying IDFA's requests for a hearing with
respect to all but one of their objections. The 2022 final rule
provided modifications to certain provisions in the final rule and
announced that the stay of effectiveness of provisions for which
hearings were denied was lifted. We did not address IDFA's objection
and request for a hearing on the provision in Sec. 131.200(a) that
yogurt have either a titratable acidity of not less than 0.7 percent,
expressed as lactic acid, or a pH of 4.6 or lower before the addition
of bulky flavoring ingredients (hereinafter referred to as ``the
acidity requirement''). We addressed this objection and request for a
hearing in a proposed order, which we sent to IDFA under Sec. 12.24(d)
(21 CFR 12.24(d)) and posted to the docket for public review (Document
ID FDA-2000-P-0126-0129). FDA regulations provide that after the
Commissioner serves a proposed order denying a hearing, a person has 30
days after receipt of the proposed order to demonstrate that the
submission justifies a hearing (Sec. 12.24(d)). FDA did not receive
any response to the proposed order, and we are now issuing a final
order denying IDFA's request for a hearing on the acidity requirement
and amending the 2021 final rule with respect to this requirement.
II. Objection and Request for a Hearing on the Acidity Requirement
The acidity requirement in Sec. 131.200(a) of the 2021 final rule
is comprised of two options: yogurt must either have a minimum
titratable acidity of 0.7 percent or a maximum pH of 4.6 before bulky
flavoring ingredients are added. IDFA objected to both of these
options, asserting that they are not practical and do not reflect
consumer taste preferences or current industry practice for yogurt
manufacturing. IDFA stated that the requirement will not promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers. IDFA asserted
that the requirement should be a titratable acidity of not less than
0.6 percent, expressed as lactic acid, measured in the white mass of
the yogurt, or a pH of 4.6 or lower measured in the finished product
within 24 hours after filling. IDFA requested a hearing on the
following issues: (1) whether a requirement that titratable acidity or
pH be reached prior to the addition of bulky flavors in the
manufacturing process is consistent with the basic nature and essential
characteristics of yogurt; (2) whether a requirement that prohibits
yogurt from being filled at a pH of 4.8 or less and reaching a pH of
4.6 or below within 24 hours after filling is consistent with the basic
nature and essential characteristics of yogurt; and (3) whether a
minimum titratable acidity requirement of 0.7 percent is in the
interest of consumers and necessary to maintaining the basic nature and
essential characteristics of yogurt.
We are denying IDFA's request for a hearing with respect to both
the titratable acidity minimum and pH maximum under Sec. 12.24(b)(1).
We are modifying the 2021 final rule with respect to the pH maximum in
accordance with IDFA's request, and we are modifying the 2021 final
rule to eliminate the option of complying with a minimum titratable
acidity.
A. Denial of Request for a Hearing on Maximum pH Option
With respect to the maximum pH option, IDFA objected to requiring
the pH to be reached prior to the addition of bulky flavoring
ingredients and requiring the pH of 4.6 in the white mass of the yogurt
prior to filling. IDFA explained that modifications made to the Grade
``A'' Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) in 2007 exempted yogurt from
certain cooling requirements based on an initial pH of 4.8 or below at
filling and with the product reaching a pH of 4.6 or below within 24
hours of filling. (The PMO is a model regulation intended to help
States and municipalities initiate and maintain effective programs for
the prevention of milk-borne disease. State and local milk control
agencies can adopt the PMO.) IDFA stated that bulky flavoring
ingredients such as fruits and fruit preparations are added before
achieving the target pH (pH 4.6) and prior to filling. Before accepting
this change in the PMO, FDA and the National Conference on Interstate
Milk Shipments reviewed pathogen challenge study data regarding this
manufacturing practice and concluded that exempting yogurt from the
cooling requirements of the PMO is safe when this specific practice is
followed. In its objection, IDFA also asserted that such products
(manufactured with an initial pH of 4.8 or below at filling and with
the product reaching a pH of 4.6 or below within 24 hours of filling)
have been on the market for many years and accepted by consumers
without deviating from the basic nature and essential characteristics
of yogurt and maintaining honesty and fair dealing in the interest of
consumer.
We agree that the key safety control measure for finished yogurt is
pH and, secondarily, temperature control (i.e., refrigeration). Also,
the pH process described in the PMO for yogurt contains other factors
that contribute to preventing growth of different kinds of
microorganisms. For example, the relatively rapid pH drop during
fermentation (and the final pH achieved) is the primary control measure
for pathogenic sporeformers in yogurt. Microbiological safety by acids
relies on the pH value of the food, and pH is a parameter that is
easily measurable. The pH values that inhibit growth of microbial
pathogens are generally well-known by food safety professionals and
easily found in the scientific literature.
Based on all available information, including the information
presented in the objections from IDFA, FDA is amending the yogurt
standard regarding the acidity requirement in Sec. 131.200(a). We are
revising Sec. 131.200(a) as requested by IDFA, and consistent with the
PMO, to require a pH of 4.6 or lower measured on the finished product
within 24 hours after filling. The finished product refers to the
yogurt white mass after the addition of bulky flavors. If a bulky
flavor (e.g., fruit pieces) added to yogurt increases the pH, the pH
must be 4.6 or lower after the product has had time to equilibrate.
This requirement will ensure the safety
[[Page 22910]]
of yogurt, while maintaining its basic nature and essential
characteristics.
This amendment is consistent with IDFA's proposed modification to
the maximum pH option. Therefore, we are denying IDFA's request for a
hearing with respect to the maximum pH option under Sec. 12.24(b)(1)
because there is not a genuine and substantial issue of fact for
resolution at a hearing.
B. Denial of Request for a Hearing on the Minimum Titratable Acidity
Option
IDFA objected to the minimum titratable acidity of 0.7 percent and
requested that we modify the 2021 final rule to provide for a minimum
titratable acidity of 0.6 percent. IDFA explained that a minimum
titratable acidity of 0.6 percent is necessary to produce certain low
calorie yogurt products that meet consumer expectations of a delicate
and less tart yogurt taste that is not too acidic or sour. IDFA stated
that if a titratable acidity requirement of 0.7 percent is imposed,
some manufacturers may need to adjust formulations and add sugars to
counteract the acidity and deliver a product that meets consumer
expectations and preferences. IDFA emphasized that a minimum titratable
acidity of 0.6 percent would provide manufacturers with needed
flexibility.
Because we are modifying the maximum pH option consistent with the
pH specifications in the PMO, which States have adopted, manufacturers
are already required to comply with the maximum pH option. Therefore,
the minimum titratable acidity option in the 2021 final rule, whether
set at 0.7 percent or 0.6 percent, is superfluous and would not provide
flexibility to manufacturers. So long as manufacturers comply with the
maximum pH option, they may manufacture yogurt with a titratable
acidity of 0.6 percent and can accommodate consumer expectations and
preferences without reformulating their products. We note that the
maximum pH option we are finalizing has been in effect in States for
several years and, by itself, appears sufficient to ensure the safety
of yogurt products. With the elimination of the titratable acidity
option, we are also removing Sec. 131.200(e)(1)(iii) Methods of
analysis, Titratable acidity and the corresponding method incorporated
by reference in Sec. 131.200(i)(1)(i).
We are denying IDFA's request for a hearing on whether a minimum
titratable acidity requirement of 0.7 percent is in the interest of
consumers and necessary to maintaining the basic nature and essential
characteristics of yogurt. Given our modification to the maximum pH
option, a minimum titratable acidity option is unnecessary, and we do
not believe there is a genuine and substantial issue of fact for
resolution at a hearing (Sec. 12.24(b)(1)).
III. Conclusions
For the reasons explained above, we are denying IDFA's request for
a hearing with respect to both the maximum pH option and the minimum
titratable acidity option under Sec. 12.24(b)(1). We are modifying the
acidity requirement in Sec. 131.200(a) in the 2021 final rule to
eliminate the minimum titratable acidity option and require that yogurt
have a pH of 4.6 or lower measured on the finished product within 24
hours after filling.
This final order is being issued after following the process
provided under Sec. 12.24(d). Objections to or requests for hearing on
the modification and revocation may be submitted under 21 CFR 12.20
through 12.22 in accordance with 21 CFR 12.26. The stay of
effectiveness with respect to the acidity requirement is lifted upon
publication of this final order in the Federal Register.
IV. Reference
The following reference is on display at the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES) and is available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it is also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the website addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change over time.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Food and Drug Administration. Grade ``A'' Pasteurized Milk
Ordinance. 2019. Available at: https://ncims.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2019-PMO.pdf (last accessed February 6, 2023).
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 131
Cream, Food grades and standards, Milk, Yogurt.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
131 is amended as follows:
PART 131--MILK AND CREAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 131 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
2. In Sec. 131.200:
0
a. Revise the fourth sentence of paragraph (a);
0
b. Remove paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and (i)(1)(i); and
0
c. Redesignate paragraphs (i)(1)(ii) and (iii) as paragraphs (i)(1)(i)
and (ii).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 131.200 Yogurt.
(a) * * * Yogurt contains not less than 3.25 percent milkfat,
except as provided for in paragraph (g) of this section, and not less
than 8.25 percent milk solids not fat and has a pH of 4.6 or lower
measured on the finished product within 24 hours after filling. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: April 6, 2023.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2023-07723 Filed 4-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P