Classification of First-Class Package Service Product, 22489-22492 [2023-07722]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2023 / Notices 81–507) sets forth NSF’s mission and purpose: ‘‘To promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. . . .’’ The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support: • Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the engineering process; • Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research potential; • Science and engineering education programs at all levels and in all the various fields of science and engineering; • Programs that provide a source of information for policy formulation; and • Other activities to promote these ends. NSF’s core purpose resonates clearly in everything it does: promoting achievement and progress in science and engineering and enhancing the potential for research and education to contribute to the Nation. While NSF’s vision of the future and the mechanisms it uses to carry out its charges have evolved significantly over the last six decades, its ultimate mission remains the same. Use of the Information: The regular submission of proposals to the Foundation is part of the collection of information and is used to help NSF fulfill this responsibility by initiating and supporting merit-selected research and education projects in all the scientific and engineering disciplines. NSF receives more than 50,000 proposals annually for new projects, and makes approximately 11,000 new awards. NSF funding is primarily made through issuance of grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, other transactions and other arrangements awarded to approximately 3,000 institutions of higher education, non-profit organizations, tribal nations, for-profit organizations, and state and local governments. The awards are based mainly on merit evaluations of proposals submitted to the Foundation. The Foundation has a continuing commitment to monitor the operations of its information collection to identify and address excessive reporting burdens as well as to identify any real or apparent inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of the proposed principal investigator(s)/ project director(s) or the co-principal investigator(s)/co-project director(s). Burden on the Public: The Foundation estimates that an average of 120 hours is expended for each proposal submitted. An estimated 50,000 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Apr 12, 2023 Jkt 259001 proposals are expected during the course of one year for a total of 6,000,000 public burden hours annually. Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Dated: April 10, 2023. Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation. [FR Doc. 2023–07780 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION Sunshine Act Meetings TIME AND DATE: Agenda I. Call to Order II. FY2022 External Audit Discussion with BDO Auditors III. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session IV. Executive Session with BDO Auditors V. Special Topic VI. Executive Session: Report from CEO VII. Executive Session: Report from CFO VIII. Executive Session: General Counsel Report Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IX. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass Update X. Action Item Approval of Meeting Minutes XI. Action Item Approval of FY2022 External Audit XII. Action Item Cigna Special Delegation XIII. Action Item NW Compass: Strategy and Contracting Authority XIV. Discussion Item March 16 Audit Committee Report XV. Discussion Item Report from CIO XVI. Discussion Item IT Tech Support Contract—Request to Increase Contract Amount XVII. Capital Corporation Update and Grant Request for June XVIII. Discussion Item Investment Policy Review XIX. Discussion Item Expanded Spending Authority for Large Events XX. Management Program Background and Updates XXI. Adjournment PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: Everything except the Executive Session. PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Executive Session. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant, (202) 524–9940; Lthompson@nw.org. Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant. [FR Doc. 2023–07883 Filed 4–11–23; 11:15 am] 2 p.m., Thursday, April 20, 2023. PLACE: 1255 Union Street NE, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20002. STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Regular Board of Directors meeting. The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting: • Executive Session PO 00000 22489 BILLING CODE 7570–02–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. PI2023–3; Order No. 6479] Classification of First-Class Package Service Product Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is initiating a proceeding to explore commenters’ claims that the First-Class Package Service product may not be correctly classified as a Competitive product. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: July 26, 2023; Reply Comments are due: August 23, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 22490 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2023 / Notices users of the product, and small businesses are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3). telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: B. Historical Classification of First-Class Package Service Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Background III. Invitation for Comments IV. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction In Order No. 6384, the Commission stated it would initiate a proceeding to explore commenters’ claims that the First-Class Package Service (FCPS) product 1 may not be correctly classified as a Competitive product.2 The Commission establishes this docket to examine those claims. II. Background lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 A. Statutory Framework Under the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA),3 postal products are separated into two distinct classifications: Market Dominant and Competitive. 39 U.S.C. 3621, 3631, 3642. Section 3642 of title 39 governs the addition of products to, removal of products from, or transfer of products (or components of a product) between the Market Dominant and Competitive product lists.4 The Commission may consider a change to a product’s classification upon request of the Postal Service, upon request of users of the mail, or upon its own initiative. 39 U.S.C. 3642(a). There is nothing to prevent transfer of only part of a product between product lists. 39 U.S.C. 3642(c). The criteria for assigning a product to either the Market Dominant or Competitive product list are described in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b). These criteria include an assessment of the Postal Service’s market power, whether or not the product is covered by the postal monopoly, the availability and nature of private sector competitors, the views of users of the product, and the likely impact on small businesses. Id. The market power criteria are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1), the postal monopoly criteria are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(2), and the considerations related to private sector competitors, 1 As defined in section 2125 of the Mail Classification Schedule (MCS), available at https:// www.prc.gov/mail-classification-schedule. 2 Docket No. CP2023–42, Order Approving Price Adjustments for Competitive Products, December 22, 2022, at 11 (Order No. 6384). 3 Public Law 109–435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006). 4 39 U.S.C. 3642. The implementing regulations for this section appear in 39 CFR part 3040. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Apr 12, 2023 Jkt 259001 Until April 2011, the First-Class Mail Parcels (FCMP) product appeared on the Market Dominant list and included four price categories: Commercial Plus, Commercial Base, Retail Single-Piece, and Keys and Identification Devices.5 On February 24, 2011, the Postal Service filed a request with the Commission to transfer the Commercial Plus and Commercial Base categories to the Competitive product list and to provisionally rename them ‘‘Lightweight Commercial Parcels.’’ 6 The Lightweight Commercial Parcels product was proposed to be identical to the Commercial categories of FCMP, except that items classified as ‘‘letters’’ would be prohibited. Docket No. MC2011–22, Notice at 2. The Postal Service did not request transfer of the Retail Single-Piece or Keys and Identification Devices subcategories at that time. The transfer was unopposed. Order No. 710 at 3–5. On April 6, 2011, the Commission granted the Postal Service’s transfer request. On August 12, 2011, the Postal Service requested to change the provisional Lightweight Commercial Packages name to Commercial FirstClass Package Service.7 The Postal Service also requested to remove the letter prohibition from the Commercial Plus price category, as Commercial Plus prices were more than six times the price of a 1-ounce Single-Piece FirstClass Mail Letter and thus not subject to the postal monopoly. Docket No. MC2011–28, Notice at 2. On August 31, 2011, the Commission granted the Postal Service’s requests.8 On November 14, 2014, the Postal Service proposed to transfer the remaining two price categories of FCMP: Retail Single-Piece and Keys and Identification Devices to the Competitive product list.9 The Postal Service noted that some large 5 Docket No. MC2011–22, Order Adding Lightweight Commercial Parcels to the Competitive Product List, April 6, 2011, at 2 (Order No. 710). 6 Docket No. MC2011–22, Request of the United States Postal Service Under Section 3642, February 24, 2011, at 1 (Docket No. MC2011–22, Notice). 7 Docket No. MC2011–28, Notice of Minor Classification Change, August 12, 2011, at 1 (Docket No. MC2011–28, Notice). 8 Docket No. MC2011–28, Order Regarding Commercial First-Class Package Service, August 31, 2011, at 8 (Order No. 835). 9 Docket No. MC2015–7, Request of the United States Postal Service to Transfer First-Class Mail Parcels to the Competitive Product List, November 14, 2014, at 1 (Docket No. MC2015–7, Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 commercial mailers used both Retail Single-Piece FCMP and Commercial FCPS, suggesting that the products served a single market. Docket No. MC2015–7, Notice, Attachment B at 3. The Postal Service further stated that the new combined FCPS product would compete in the 2–3-day air and ground parcel markets and would not have a dominant share of those markets. Id. at 4. On August 26, 2015, the Commission denied the Postal Service’s transfer request on the grounds that the Postal Service had not presented sufficient evidence for the Commission to determine the market in which Retail Single-Piece FCMP operated.10 The Postal Service filed a petition for review of Order No. 2686 with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit). On December 6, 2016, the D.C. Circuit granted the petition for review and remanded Order No. 2686 to the Commission for further proceedings.11 The D.C. Circuit noted that the Postal Service had supplied the same type of market share data that the Commission previously relied upon when approving previous transfer requests. U.S. Postal Serv., 842 F.3d at 1273. The D.C. Circuit explained that by rejecting that data as insufficient, the Commission had changed the nature of proof required to demonstrate a lack of market power compared to the previous transfer dockets but had neither acknowledged nor explained its change in course. Id. The D.C. Circuit noted that the previous transfers were not materially different from the proposed transfer and concluded that the Commission was obliged to ‘‘forthrightly distinguish or outrightly reject’’ its precedent established in the previous transfer orders when deciding to change course. Id. at 1274. As the Commission had not done so in Order No. 2686, the D.C. Circuit remanded the case to the Commission for further proceedings. Id. Following the D.C. Circuit’s remand, the Postal Service updated its original proposal and provided additional information in response to a Chairman’s Information Request.12 Based on this data and other updates occurring in the interim between the original proposed transfer and the 10 Docket No. MC2015–7, Order Denying Transfer of First-Class Mail Parcels to the Competitive Product Category, August 26, 2015, at 1 (Order No. 2686). 11 U.S. Postal Serv. v. Postal Regul. Comm’n, 842 F.3d 1271 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (per curiam). 12 Docket No. MC2015–7, Order Conditionally Approving Transfer, July 20, 2017, at 2–3 (Order No. 4009); see Docket No. MC2015–7, Response of the United States Postal Service to Chairman’s Information Request No. 2, June 26, 2017 (Docket No. MC2015–7, Response to CHIR No. 2). E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2023 / Notices updated proposal, the Commission found that the Postal Service did not possess power over the market for Retail Single-Piece FCMP or the combined FCPS product and approved the transfer. Id. at 32–34, 40. The Commission observed that the market share of the combined FCPS product had decreased since FY 2013, and that price increases to the Retail Single-Piece FCMP product had coincided with decreased volume. Id. at 31, 33. The Commission further determined that transfer of the product would not violate the postal monopoly. Id. at 34–35. Finally, the Commission concluded that the transfer was justified in consideration of the factors set forth in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3). Id. at 37. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 C. Recent Developments Regarding First-Class Package Service On June 17, 2021, the Postal Service filed a request for an advisory opinion on its proposal to revise the service standards for FCPS, effective October 1, 2021.13 Specifically, the Postal Service sought to lengthen the service standards by 1 to 2 additional days for approximately 31.2 percent of FCPS volume and to shorten the service standards by 1 day for approximately 4.8 percent of FCPS volume.14 The Commission concluded, among other things, that the Postal Service’s stated goals appeared reasonable and that the proposed changes should have a positive impact on the Postal Service’s ability to meet its performance targets. Docket No. N2021–2, Advisory Opinion at 3. However, the Commission also noted certain concerns with the Postal Service’s modeling of cost savings, transportation efficiencies, and network operations. Id. at 3–4. On July 13, 2022, the Postal Service filed with the Commission a request to expand the FCPS product up to 70 pounds, with corresponding changes to the size (dimension) limitations and pricing tiers.15 However, the Postal Service later informed the Commission that the changes would be postponed to such time in calendar year 2023 as management deemed appropriate.16 13 Docket No. N2021–2, United States Postal Service Request for an Advisory Opinion on Changes in the Nature of Postal Services, June 17, 2021, at 1 (Docket No. N2021–2, Request). 14 Docket No. N2021–2, Advisory Opinion on the Service Standard Changes Associated with FirstClass Package Service, September 29, 2021, at 1–2 (Docket No. N2021–2, Advisory Opinion). 15 Docket No. MC2022–82, USPS Notice of Changes in Classifications of General Applicability for Competitive Products, July 13, 2022, at 1–2 (Docket No. MC2022–82, Notice). 16 Docket Nos. MC2022–81 and MC2022–82, USPS Notice of Revised Effective Date, Pursuant to Governors’ Decision 22–4, August 16, 2022, at 1– 2. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Apr 12, 2023 Jkt 259001 On October 28, 2022, the Commission approved the Postal Service’s proposed classification changes.17 The Commission determined that the Postal Service’s request to remove USPS Retail Ground from the Competitive product list satisfied the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3642 and the Commission’s regulations. Order No. 6318 at 13. The Commission determined that the proposed changes would likely have a positive effect on users of FCPS and small businesses and would not likely have a material effect on competitors. Id. at 18. On November 14, 2022, the Commission established Docket No. CP2023–42 to consider the Postal Service’s notice concerning changes in rates and classifications of general applicability for Competitive products, which were scheduled to take effect on January 22, 2023.18 In its notice, the Postal Service proposed a 6.9 percent average price increase for Retail FCPS and an 8.0 percent average price increase for Commercial FCPS. Order No. 6327 at 3. On December 22, 2022, the Commission approved the Postal Service’s proposed rate changes. Order No. 6384 at 1. In so doing, the Commission concluded that the commenters’ claims that the Commission erred in transferring FCPS to the Competitive product list were beyond the scope of the proceeding. Id. at 10. The Commission further noted that the increase in FCPS prices and recent changes to FCPS service standards cited by the commenters did not, on their own, establish that the Postal Service took such actions without risk of losing significant business to competitors. Id. (citing 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1)). The Commission stated that it would ‘‘explore commenters’ claims that FCPS may not be correctly classified as a Competitive product’’ in a separate proceeding. Id. at 11. On February 10, 2023, the Postal Service filed a notice of rate adjustment for Competitive products in which it proposed rates of general applicability for the expanded FCPS product, up to 70 pounds, effective July 9, 2023.19 In 17 Docket Nos. MC2022–81 and MC 2022–82, Order Removing USPS Retail Ground from the Competitive Product List and Approving Competitive Classification Changes to First-Class Package Service and Parcel Select, October 28, 2022, at 1 (Order No. 6318). 18 Docket No. CP2023–42, Notice and Order Concerning Changes in Rates and Classifications of General Applicability for Competitive Products, November 14, 2022, at 1 (Order No. 6327). 19 Docket No. CP2023–113, USPS Notice of Changes in Rates and Classifications of General Applicability for First-Class Package Service, PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22491 addition, the Postal Service proposed renaming the enhanced and expanded product ‘‘USPS Ground Advantage.’’ Docket No. CP2023–113, Notice at 1. The Postal Service also stated that Certificate of Mailing and Certified Mail would be removed from the list of optional features for USPS Ground Advantage, and that it was submitting two additional minor corrections to the MCS. Id. at 4. Those proposed changes are currently pending before the Commission in Docket Nos. CP2023– 113 and CP2023–114. III. Invitation for Comments The Commission invites interested persons to comment on whether FCPS, as currently defined, is properly classified as a Competitive product. Specifically, the Commission invites comments, as well as supporting evidence and analysis, regarding the relevant market(s) in which FCPS operates and the Postal Service’s market power in such market(s), that could either call into question or support the Commission’s previous determination that the Postal Service could not effectively set the price of FCPS substantially above costs, raise prices significantly, decrease quality, or decrease output, without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar products.20 In addition, in light of the Postal Service’s proposed expansion and enhancement of FCPS and its proposed renaming to USPS Ground Advantage, commenters questioning the Competitive classification of FCPS should also discuss whether any portion of the proposed USPS Ground Advantage product should be classified as Market Dominant and provide supporting analysis addressing the criteria set out in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b) and prior Commission decisions applying section 3642(b). Comments are due on July 26, 2023. Any reply comments are due on August 23, 2023. Materials filed in this docket will be available for review on the Commission’s website at https:// www.prc.gov. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth R. Moeller will serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this docket. February 10, 2023, at 2–3 (Docket No. CP2023–113, Notice). 20 Order No. 4009 at 33 (citing 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1)). E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 22492 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2023 / Notices By the Commission. Mallory Richards, Attorney-Advisor. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 108 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–126, CP2023–129. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2023–07722 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Sarah Sullivan, Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2023–07813 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of required notice: April 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on April 3, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 111 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–129, CP2023–132. SUMMARY: Sarah Sullivan, Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2023–07825 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of required notice: April 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. Jkt 259001 DATES: Date of required notice: April 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on April 4, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 113 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–131, CP2023–134. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sarah Sullivan, Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2023–07817 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of required notice: April 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 109 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–127, CP2023–130. SUMMARY: Sarah Sullivan, Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. BILLING CODE 7710–12–P SUMMARY: 17:56 Apr 12, 2023 Product Change—Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement [FR Doc. 2023–07821 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 POSTAL SERVICE Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Product Change—Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement AGENCY: ACTION: Postal ServiceTM. Notice. The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. SUMMARY: DATES: Date of required notice: April 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on April 4, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 112 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–130, CP2023–133. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sarah Sullivan, Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal SUMMARY: POSTAL SERVICE [FR Doc. 2023–07816 Filed 4–12–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1

Agencies

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22489-22492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07722]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. PI2023-3; Order No. 6479]


Classification of First-Class Package Service Product

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is initiating a proceeding to explore 
commenters' claims that the First-Class Package Service product may not 
be correctly classified as a Competitive product. This notice informs 
the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other 
administrative steps.

DATES: Comments are due: July 26, 2023; Reply Comments are due: August 
23, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments 
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section by

[[Page 22490]]

telephone for advice on filing alternatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Invitation for Comments
IV. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    In Order No. 6384, the Commission stated it would initiate a 
proceeding to explore commenters' claims that the First-Class Package 
Service (FCPS) product \1\ may not be correctly classified as a 
Competitive product.\2\ The Commission establishes this docket to 
examine those claims.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ As defined in section 2125 of the Mail Classification 
Schedule (MCS), available at https://www.prc.gov/mail-classification-schedule.
    \2\ Docket No. CP2023-42, Order Approving Price Adjustments for 
Competitive Products, December 22, 2022, at 11 (Order No. 6384).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Background

A. Statutory Framework

    Under the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA),\3\ 
postal products are separated into two distinct classifications: Market 
Dominant and Competitive. 39 U.S.C. 3621, 3631, 3642. Section 3642 of 
title 39 governs the addition of products to, removal of products from, 
or transfer of products (or components of a product) between the Market 
Dominant and Competitive product lists.\4\ The Commission may consider 
a change to a product's classification upon request of the Postal 
Service, upon request of users of the mail, or upon its own initiative. 
39 U.S.C. 3642(a). There is nothing to prevent transfer of only part of 
a product between product lists. 39 U.S.C. 3642(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Public Law 109-435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006).
    \4\ 39 U.S.C. 3642. The implementing regulations for this 
section appear in 39 CFR part 3040.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The criteria for assigning a product to either the Market Dominant 
or Competitive product list are described in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b). These 
criteria include an assessment of the Postal Service's market power, 
whether or not the product is covered by the postal monopoly, the 
availability and nature of private sector competitors, the views of 
users of the product, and the likely impact on small businesses. Id. 
The market power criteria are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1), the 
postal monopoly criteria are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(2), and the 
considerations related to private sector competitors, users of the 
product, and small businesses are specified in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3).

B. Historical Classification of First-Class Package Service

    Until April 2011, the First-Class Mail Parcels (FCMP) product 
appeared on the Market Dominant list and included four price 
categories: Commercial Plus, Commercial Base, Retail Single-Piece, and 
Keys and Identification Devices.\5\ On February 24, 2011, the Postal 
Service filed a request with the Commission to transfer the Commercial 
Plus and Commercial Base categories to the Competitive product list and 
to provisionally rename them ``Lightweight Commercial Parcels.'' \6\ 
The Lightweight Commercial Parcels product was proposed to be identical 
to the Commercial categories of FCMP, except that items classified as 
``letters'' would be prohibited. Docket No. MC2011-22, Notice at 2. The 
Postal Service did not request transfer of the Retail Single-Piece or 
Keys and Identification Devices subcategories at that time. The 
transfer was unopposed. Order No. 710 at 3-5. On April 6, 2011, the 
Commission granted the Postal Service's transfer request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Docket No. MC2011-22, Order Adding Lightweight Commercial 
Parcels to the Competitive Product List, April 6, 2011, at 2 (Order 
No. 710).
    \6\ Docket No. MC2011-22, Request of the United States Postal 
Service Under Section 3642, February 24, 2011, at 1 (Docket No. 
MC2011-22, Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 12, 2011, the Postal Service requested to change the 
provisional Lightweight Commercial Packages name to Commercial First-
Class Package Service.\7\ The Postal Service also requested to remove 
the letter prohibition from the Commercial Plus price category, as 
Commercial Plus prices were more than six times the price of a 1-ounce 
Single-Piece First-Class Mail Letter and thus not subject to the postal 
monopoly. Docket No. MC2011-28, Notice at 2. On August 31, 2011, the 
Commission granted the Postal Service's requests.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Docket No. MC2011-28, Notice of Minor Classification Change, 
August 12, 2011, at 1 (Docket No. MC2011-28, Notice).
    \8\ Docket No. MC2011-28, Order Regarding Commercial First-Class 
Package Service, August 31, 2011, at 8 (Order No. 835).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 14, 2014, the Postal Service proposed to transfer the 
remaining two price categories of FCMP: Retail Single-Piece and Keys 
and Identification Devices to the Competitive product list.\9\ The 
Postal Service noted that some large commercial mailers used both 
Retail Single-Piece FCMP and Commercial FCPS, suggesting that the 
products served a single market. Docket No. MC2015-7, Notice, 
Attachment B at 3. The Postal Service further stated that the new 
combined FCPS product would compete in the 2-3-day air and ground 
parcel markets and would not have a dominant share of those markets. 
Id. at 4. On August 26, 2015, the Commission denied the Postal 
Service's transfer request on the grounds that the Postal Service had 
not presented sufficient evidence for the Commission to determine the 
market in which Retail Single-Piece FCMP operated.\10\ The Postal 
Service filed a petition for review of Order No. 2686 with the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. 
Circuit). On December 6, 2016, the D.C. Circuit granted the petition 
for review and remanded Order No. 2686 to the Commission for further 
proceedings.\11\ The D.C. Circuit noted that the Postal Service had 
supplied the same type of market share data that the Commission 
previously relied upon when approving previous transfer requests. U.S. 
Postal Serv., 842 F.3d at 1273. The D.C. Circuit explained that by 
rejecting that data as insufficient, the Commission had changed the 
nature of proof required to demonstrate a lack of market power compared 
to the previous transfer dockets but had neither acknowledged nor 
explained its change in course. Id. The D.C. Circuit noted that the 
previous transfers were not materially different from the proposed 
transfer and concluded that the Commission was obliged to 
``forthrightly distinguish or outrightly reject'' its precedent 
established in the previous transfer orders when deciding to change 
course. Id. at 1274. As the Commission had not done so in Order No. 
2686, the D.C. Circuit remanded the case to the Commission for further 
proceedings. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Docket No. MC2015-7, Request of the United States Postal 
Service to Transfer First-Class Mail Parcels to the Competitive 
Product List, November 14, 2014, at 1 (Docket No. MC2015-7, Notice).
    \10\ Docket No. MC2015-7, Order Denying Transfer of First-Class 
Mail Parcels to the Competitive Product Category, August 26, 2015, 
at 1 (Order No. 2686).
    \11\ U.S. Postal Serv. v. Postal Regul. Comm'n, 842 F.3d 1271 
(D.C. Cir. 2016) (per curiam).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following the D.C. Circuit's remand, the Postal Service updated its 
original proposal and provided additional information in response to a 
Chairman's Information Request.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Docket No. MC2015-7, Order Conditionally Approving 
Transfer, July 20, 2017, at 2-3 (Order No. 4009); see Docket No. 
MC2015-7, Response of the United States Postal Service to Chairman's 
Information Request No. 2, June 26, 2017 (Docket No. MC2015-7, 
Response to CHIR No. 2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on this data and other updates occurring in the interim 
between the original proposed transfer and the

[[Page 22491]]

updated proposal, the Commission found that the Postal Service did not 
possess power over the market for Retail Single-Piece FCMP or the 
combined FCPS product and approved the transfer. Id. at 32-34, 40. The 
Commission observed that the market share of the combined FCPS product 
had decreased since FY 2013, and that price increases to the Retail 
Single-Piece FCMP product had coincided with decreased volume. Id. at 
31, 33. The Commission further determined that transfer of the product 
would not violate the postal monopoly. Id. at 34-35. Finally, the 
Commission concluded that the transfer was justified in consideration 
of the factors set forth in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3). Id. at 37.

C. Recent Developments Regarding First-Class Package Service

    On June 17, 2021, the Postal Service filed a request for an 
advisory opinion on its proposal to revise the service standards for 
FCPS, effective October 1, 2021.\13\ Specifically, the Postal Service 
sought to lengthen the service standards by 1 to 2 additional days for 
approximately 31.2 percent of FCPS volume and to shorten the service 
standards by 1 day for approximately 4.8 percent of FCPS volume.\14\ 
The Commission concluded, among other things, that the Postal Service's 
stated goals appeared reasonable and that the proposed changes should 
have a positive impact on the Postal Service's ability to meet its 
performance targets. Docket No. N2021-2, Advisory Opinion at 3. 
However, the Commission also noted certain concerns with the Postal 
Service's modeling of cost savings, transportation efficiencies, and 
network operations. Id. at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Docket No. N2021-2, United States Postal Service Request 
for an Advisory Opinion on Changes in the Nature of Postal Services, 
June 17, 2021, at 1 (Docket No. N2021-2, Request).
    \14\ Docket No. N2021-2, Advisory Opinion on the Service 
Standard Changes Associated with First-Class Package Service, 
September 29, 2021, at 1-2 (Docket No. N2021-2, Advisory Opinion).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 13, 2022, the Postal Service filed with the Commission a 
request to expand the FCPS product up to 70 pounds, with corresponding 
changes to the size (dimension) limitations and pricing tiers.\15\ 
However, the Postal Service later informed the Commission that the 
changes would be postponed to such time in calendar year 2023 as 
management deemed appropriate.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Docket No. MC2022-82, USPS Notice of Changes in 
Classifications of General Applicability for Competitive Products, 
July 13, 2022, at 1-2 (Docket No. MC2022-82, Notice).
    \16\ Docket Nos. MC2022-81 and MC2022-82, USPS Notice of Revised 
Effective Date, Pursuant to Governors' Decision 22-4, August 16, 
2022, at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 28, 2022, the Commission approved the Postal Service's 
proposed classification changes.\17\ The Commission determined that the 
Postal Service's request to remove USPS Retail Ground from the 
Competitive product list satisfied the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3642 
and the Commission's regulations. Order No. 6318 at 13. The Commission 
determined that the proposed changes would likely have a positive 
effect on users of FCPS and small businesses and would not likely have 
a material effect on competitors. Id. at 18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Docket Nos. MC2022-81 and MC 2022-82, Order Removing USPS 
Retail Ground from the Competitive Product List and Approving 
Competitive Classification Changes to First-Class Package Service 
and Parcel Select, October 28, 2022, at 1 (Order No. 6318).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 14, 2022, the Commission established Docket No. CP2023-
42 to consider the Postal Service's notice concerning changes in rates 
and classifications of general applicability for Competitive products, 
which were scheduled to take effect on January 22, 2023.\18\ In its 
notice, the Postal Service proposed a 6.9 percent average price 
increase for Retail FCPS and an 8.0 percent average price increase for 
Commercial FCPS. Order No. 6327 at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Docket No. CP2023-42, Notice and Order Concerning Changes 
in Rates and Classifications of General Applicability for 
Competitive Products, November 14, 2022, at 1 (Order No. 6327).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 22, 2022, the Commission approved the Postal Service's 
proposed rate changes. Order No. 6384 at 1. In so doing, the Commission 
concluded that the commenters' claims that the Commission erred in 
transferring FCPS to the Competitive product list were beyond the scope 
of the proceeding. Id. at 10. The Commission further noted that the 
increase in FCPS prices and recent changes to FCPS service standards 
cited by the commenters did not, on their own, establish that the 
Postal Service took such actions without risk of losing significant 
business to competitors. Id. (citing 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1)). The 
Commission stated that it would ``explore commenters' claims that FCPS 
may not be correctly classified as a Competitive product'' in a 
separate proceeding. Id. at 11.
    On February 10, 2023, the Postal Service filed a notice of rate 
adjustment for Competitive products in which it proposed rates of 
general applicability for the expanded FCPS product, up to 70 pounds, 
effective July 9, 2023.\19\ In addition, the Postal Service proposed 
renaming the enhanced and expanded product ``USPS Ground Advantage.'' 
Docket No. CP2023-113, Notice at 1. The Postal Service also stated that 
Certificate of Mailing and Certified Mail would be removed from the 
list of optional features for USPS Ground Advantage, and that it was 
submitting two additional minor corrections to the MCS. Id. at 4. Those 
proposed changes are currently pending before the Commission in Docket 
Nos. CP2023-113 and CP2023-114.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Docket No. CP2023-113, USPS Notice of Changes in Rates and 
Classifications of General Applicability for First-Class Package 
Service, February 10, 2023, at 2-3 (Docket No. CP2023-113, Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Invitation for Comments

    The Commission invites interested persons to comment on whether 
FCPS, as currently defined, is properly classified as a Competitive 
product. Specifically, the Commission invites comments, as well as 
supporting evidence and analysis, regarding the relevant market(s) in 
which FCPS operates and the Postal Service's market power in such 
market(s), that could either call into question or support the 
Commission's previous determination that the Postal Service could not 
effectively set the price of FCPS substantially above costs, raise 
prices significantly, decrease quality, or decrease output, without 
risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering 
similar products.\20\ In addition, in light of the Postal Service's 
proposed expansion and enhancement of FCPS and its proposed renaming to 
USPS Ground Advantage, commenters questioning the Competitive 
classification of FCPS should also discuss whether any portion of the 
proposed USPS Ground Advantage product should be classified as Market 
Dominant and provide supporting analysis addressing the criteria set 
out in 39 U.S.C. 3642(b) and prior Commission decisions applying 
section 3642(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Order No. 4009 at 33 (citing 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments are due on July 26, 2023. Any reply comments are due on 
August 23, 2023. Materials filed in this docket will be available for 
review on the Commission's website at https://www.prc.gov. Pursuant to 
39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth R. Moeller will serve as an officer of the 
Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the 
general public in this docket.


[[Page 22492]]


    By the Commission.
Mallory Richards,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2023-07722 Filed 4-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.