Safety Zone; Vito Floating Production System, Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block 939, Gulf of Mexico, 21472-21474 [2023-07589]
Download as PDF
21472
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a safety zone around an
offshore deepwater facility. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination,
prepared and signed before October 31,
2022, are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
■
16:10 Apr 10, 2023
■
2. Add § 147.877 to read as follows:
§ 147.877 Safety Zone, Heidelberg Spar,
Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Green
Canyon 860.
(a) Description. The Heidelberg Spar
in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico at Green Canyon. The facility is
located at: 27°6′41.0394″ N,
90°45′50.3994″ W (NAD 83) and the area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from
each point on the facility structure’s
outer edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except for the
following:
(1) An attending vessel, as defined in
§ 147.20;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length
overall not engaged in towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
(c) Requests for permission. Persons
or vessels requiring authorization to
enter the safety zone must request
permission from the Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative. If permission
is granted, all persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Commander or designated
representative.
Dated: April 4, 2023.
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast
Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2023–07593 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0313]
RIN 1625–AA00
G. Protest Activities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 554; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Jkt 259001
Safety Zone; Vito Floating Production
System, Outer Continental Shelf
Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block 939,
Gulf of Mexico
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone around the
Vito Floating Production System (FPS),
located in Mississippi Canyon Block
939 on the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The
purpose of this rule is to protect the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
facility from all vessel traffic operating
outside the normal shipping channels
and fairways that are not providing
service to or working with the facility.
Establishing a safety zone around the
facility will significantly reduce the
threat of allisions, collisions, security
breaches, oil spills, releases of natural
gas, and thereby protect the safety of
life, property, and the environment.
DATES: This rule is effective May 11,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–
2022–0313 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FPS Floating Production System
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Shell Oil requested that the Coast
Guard establish a safety zone around its
facility. There are safety concerns for
both the personnel aboard the facility
and the environment that arise when a
safety zone is not established. In
response, on October 23, 2022, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Vito Floating Production System, Outer
Continental Shelf Facility, Mississippi
Canyon Block 939, Gulf of Mexico.
There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action related to
this safety zone. During this comment
period that ended on November 23,
2022, we received 2 comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 14 U.S.C. 85, 43
U.S.C. 1333, Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, and 33
CFR 1.05–1, 147.1, and 147.10, which
collectively permit the establishment of
safety zones for facilities located on the
OCS for the purpose of protecting life
and property on the facilities, and the
marine environment in the safety zones.
The Coast Guard has determined that a
safety zone is necessary to protect the
facility from all vessels operating
outside the normal shipping channels
and fairways that are not providing
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
services to or working with the facility.
Navigation in the vicinity of the safety
zone consists of large commercial
shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise
ships, tugs with tows and the occasional
recreational vessel. The deepwater area
also includes an extensive system of
fairways. The purpose of the rule is to
significantly reduce the threat of
allisions, oil spills, and releases of
natural gas, and thereby protect the
safety of life, property, and the
environment.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 2
comments on our NPRM published on
November 23, 2022. The first
commenter was wholly in support of the
establishment of a safety zone. The
second commenter asked to specify the
horizontal datum (NAD 27, NAD 83,
etc.) for the latitude and longitude
position in the rule. We have done so.
In this rule, as in all OCS Safety Zone
rules, we use the NAD 83 horizontal
datum.
This rule established a safety zone on
the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at
Mississippi Canyon 939. The area or the
safety zone is 500 meters (1640.4 feet)
from each point on the facility, which
is located 28°01′32.325″ N,
89°12′33.254″ W (NAD 83).The
deepwater area is waters of 304.8 meters
(1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to
the limits of the Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial
sea of the United States and extending
to a distance up to 200 nautical miles
from the baseline from which the
breadth of the sea is measured. No
vessel, except those attending the
facility, or those less than 100 feet in
length and not engaged in towing will
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking,
and we considered the First
Amendment rights of protestors. Below
we summarize our analyses based on a
number of these statutes or executive
orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the location of the Vito FPS,
on the OCS, and its distance from both
land and safety fairways. Vessels
traversing waters near the safety zone
will be able to safely travel around the
zone using alternate routes. Exceptions
to this rule include vessels measuring
less than 100 feet in length overall and
not engaged in towing. The Eighth Coast
Guard District Commander, or a
designated representative, will consider
requests to transit through the safety
zone on a case-by-case basis.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
affects your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21473
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
21474
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a safety zone around an
offshore deepwater facility. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination,
prepared and signed before October 31,
2022 are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 147 as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 00170.1.
2. Add § 147.879 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 147.879 Safety Zone; Vito Floating
Production System, Outer Continental Shelf
Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block 939, Gulf
of Mexico
(a) Description. The Vito FPS is in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at
Mississippi Canyon Block 939. The
facility is located at 28°01′32.325″ N,
89°12′33.254″ W, (NAD 83) and the area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from
each point on the facility structure’s
outer edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except for the
following:
(1) An attending vessel, as defined in
147.20;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length
overall not engaged in towing; or
Jkt 259001
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0475]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Horn Mountain Spar
Outer Continental Shelf Facility,
Mississippi Canyon Block 127, Gulf of
Mexico
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters around the Horn
Mountain Spar, located in Mississippi
Canyon Block 127 on the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of
Mexico. The purpose of this rule is to
protect the facility from all vessel traffic
operating outside the normal shipping
channels and fairways that are not
providing service to or working with the
facility. Establishing a safety zone
around the facility will significantly
reduce the threat of allisions, collisions,
security breaches, oil spills, releases of
natural gas, and thereby protect the
safety of life, property, and the
environment.
DATES: This rule is effective May 11,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0475 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
16:10 Apr 10, 2023
[FR Doc. 2023–07589 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast
Guard District Eight.
AGENCY:
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
■
(3) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
(c) Requests for permission. Persons
or vessels requiring authorization to
enter the safety zone must request
permission from the Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative. If permission
is granted, all persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Commander or designated
representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
email LCDR David Newcomb, District
Eight OCS, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
504–671–2106, David.T.Newcomb@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
requested that the Coast Guard establish
a safety zone around its facility. There
are safety concerns for both the
personnel aboard the facility and the
environment that arise when a safety
zone is not established. In response, on
October 23, 2022, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Horn Mountain Spar Outer Continental
Shelf Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block
127, Gulf of Mexico. There we stated
why we issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this safety zone. During
this comment period that ended on
November 23, 2022, we received 1
comment
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 14 U.S.C. 85, 43
U.S.C. 1333, Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, and 33
CFR 1.05–1, 147.1, and 147.10, which
collectively permit the establishment of
safety zones for facilities located on the
OCS for the purpose of protecting life
and property on the facilities, and the
marine environment in the safety zones.
The Coast Guard has determined that a
safety zone is necessary to protect the
facility from all vessels operating
outside the normal shipping channels
and fairways that are not providing
services to or working with the facility.
Navigation in the vicinity of the safety
zone consists of large commercial
shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise
ships, tugs with tows and the occasional
recreational vessel. The deepwater area
also includes an extensive system of
fairways. The purpose of the rule is to
significantly reduce the threat of
allisions, oil spills, and releases of
natural gas, and thereby protect the
safety of life, property, and the
environment.
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21472-21474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0313]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Vito Floating Production System, Outer Continental
Shelf Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block 939, Gulf of Mexico
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the Vito
Floating Production System (FPS), located in Mississippi Canyon Block
939 on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The
purpose of this rule is to protect the facility from all vessel traffic
operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways that are
not providing service to or working with the facility. Establishing a
safety zone around the facility will significantly reduce the threat of
allisions, collisions, security breaches, oil spills, releases of
natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and the
environment.
DATES: This rule is effective May 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0313 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FPS Floating Production System
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
Shell Oil requested that the Coast Guard establish a safety zone
around its facility. There are safety concerns for both the personnel
aboard the facility and the environment that arise when a safety zone
is not established. In response, on October 23, 2022, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Vito Floating Production System, Outer Continental Shelf Facility,
Mississippi Canyon Block 939, Gulf of Mexico. There we stated why we
issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action
related to this safety zone. During this comment period that ended on
November 23, 2022, we received 2 comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 14 U.S.C.
85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, and 33 CFR 1.05-1, 147.1, and 147.10, which collectively permit
the establishment of safety zones for facilities located on the OCS for
the purpose of protecting life and property on the facilities, and the
marine environment in the safety zones. The Coast Guard has determined
that a safety zone is necessary to protect the facility from all
vessels operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways
that are not providing
[[Page 21473]]
services to or working with the facility. Navigation in the vicinity of
the safety zone consists of large commercial shipping vessels, fishing
vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the occasional recreational
vessel. The deepwater area also includes an extensive system of
fairways. The purpose of the rule is to significantly reduce the threat
of allisions, oil spills, and releases of natural gas, and thereby
protect the safety of life, property, and the environment.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Rule
As noted above, we received 2 comments on our NPRM published on
November 23, 2022. The first commenter was wholly in support of the
establishment of a safety zone. The second commenter asked to specify
the horizontal datum (NAD 27, NAD 83, etc.) for the latitude and
longitude position in the rule. We have done so. In this rule, as in
all OCS Safety Zone rules, we use the NAD 83 horizontal datum.
This rule established a safety zone on the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Mississippi Canyon
939. The area or the safety zone is 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each
point on the facility, which is located 28[deg]01'32.325'' N,
89[deg]12'33.254'' W (NAD 83).The deepwater area is waters of 304.8
meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of the
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of the
United States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles from
the baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. No vessel,
except those attending the facility, or those less than 100 feet in
length and not engaged in towing will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking, and we considered the First
Amendment rights of protestors. Below we summarize our analyses based
on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the location of
the Vito FPS, on the OCS, and its distance from both land and safety
fairways. Vessels traversing waters near the safety zone will be able
to safely travel around the zone using alternate routes. Exceptions to
this rule include vessels measuring less than 100 feet in length
overall and not engaged in towing. The Eighth Coast Guard District
Commander, or a designated representative, will consider requests to
transit through the safety zone on a case-by-case basis.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule affects your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
[[Page 21474]]
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves establishing a safety zone around an
offshore deepwater facility. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination, prepared and signed
before October 31, 2022 are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 147.879 to read as follows:
Sec. 147.879 Safety Zone; Vito Floating Production System, Outer
Continental Shelf Facility, Mississippi Canyon Block 939, Gulf of
Mexico
(a) Description. The Vito FPS is in the deepwater area of the Gulf
of Mexico at Mississippi Canyon Block 939. The facility is located at
28[deg]01'32.325'' N, 89[deg]12'33.254'' W, (NAD 83) and the area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility
structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except for the following:
(1) An attending vessel, as defined in 147.20;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
(c) Requests for permission. Persons or vessels requiring
authorization to enter the safety zone must request permission from the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative.
If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Commander or designated representative.
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2023-07589 Filed 4-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P