Safety Zone; Lucius Spar Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Keathley Canyon Block 875, Gulf of Mexico, 21468-21470 [2023-07585]

Download as PDF 21468 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations costs. Requests for reimbursement must be based on actual cost. If the defense counsel is provided by contract, then the reimbursement amount can be based on the invoiced cost to the participating Tribe. (f) Court expenses such as judge and court staff time; postage for summoning jurors; jury fees; witness costs; and competency evaluation or other mental health evaluations ordered by the court. Requests for reimbursement must be based on actual costs attributed to STCJ cases. (g) Community supervision/re-entry expenses such as probation, parole, or other staff time; electronic or other monitoring fees; chemical dependency testing; batterer or sex offender evaluation and treatment; and presentence investigation costs. Requests for reimbursement must be based on actual costs attributed to STCJ cases. (h) Indirect costs based on a current federally approved indirect cost rate agreement. (i) Other costs incurred in, relating to, or associated with exercising STCJ. Participating Tribes requesting reimbursement for costs in this category must demonstrate that the cost is incurred in, relating to, or associated with exercise of STCJ. § 90.37 Ineligible expenses. Participating Tribes are not permitted to request reimbursement for the following: (a) Planning: Expenses associated with planning to exercise STCJ, such as code drafting. (b) Training, including costs for training criminal justice personnel, court personnel, or others. (c) Any expenses not incurred in, relating to, or associated with exercising STCJ. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 § 90.38 Collection of expenses from offenders. If a participating Tribe recoups expenses related to exercise of STCJ from the convicted offenders prior to receiving reimbursement for such expenses, then the recouped funds shall be used prior to seeking reimbursement through the Tribal Reimbursement Program. If a participating Tribe recoups expenses related to exercise of STCJ from the convicted offenders subsequent to receiving reimbursement for such expenses, such funds must be used toward exercise of STCJ. § 90.39 Expenses documentation. Documentation of expenses retained on file by participating Tribes pursuant to sections 90.34 and 90.35 must be adequate for an audit. At a minimum, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Apr 10, 2023 Jkt 259001 participating Tribes must retain the general accounting ledger and all supporting documents, including invoices, sales receipts, or other proof of expenses incurred for those expenses reimbursed by the Tribal Reimbursement Program. Such records must be retained for a period of three years from the end of the calendar year during which the participating Tribe sought reimbursement. All financial records pertinent to the Tribal Reimbursement Program, including the general accounting ledger and all supporting documents, are subject to agency review during the calendar year in which reimbursement is sought, during any audit, and for the three-year retention period. § 90.40 Other sources of funding. If there are other sources of federal funding available to pay for a particular cost associated with the exercise of STCJ, participating Tribes must expend funds from those sources before seeking reimbursement from this program. Examples include existing Department of Justice grant funds, Medicare/ Medicaid, and Bureau of Indian Affairs funding. § 90.41 Denial of specific expenses for reimbursement. If reimbursement of specific expenses is denied, the participating Tribe may request review of the denial via a letter to the OVW Director stating the reason why the denied expense was eligible for reimbursement. OVW must receive the letter within 30 calendar days of the denial. The OVW Director will review the letter and notify the participating Tribe of a final decision within 30 days of receipt of the letter. § 90.42 Corrective action. Reimbursement requests later found not to meet statutory, regulatory, or other program requirements may result in a corrective action plan and/or recovery/recoupment. Participating Tribes that fail to submit the required summary of eligible expenses under §§ 90.34 and 90.35, respond to requests for information during monitoring or auditing, or follow a corrective action plan or return funds expended on ineligible expenses will be deemed ineligible for additional Tribal Reimbursement Program funds, in the PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Dated: March 31, 2023. Allison Randall, Acting Director. [FR Doc. 2023–07519 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 147 [Docket Number USCG–2021–0474] RIN 1625–AA87 Safety Zone; Lucius Spar Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Keathley Canyon Block 875, Gulf of Mexico Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the Lucius Spar, located in Keathley Canyon Block 875 on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The purpose of this rule is to protect the facility from all vessel traffic operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways that are not providing service to or working with the facility. Establishing a safety zone around the facility will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, collisions, security breaches, oil spills, releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and the environment. SUMMARY: DATES: This rule is effective April 11, 2023. Monitoring and audit. Tribes receiving reimbursement of expenses under the Tribal Reimbursement Program will be subject to regular monitoring and audits to ensure that expenses are properly documented and are allocable to the exercise of STCJ. § 90.43 same or another calendar year, until such deficiencies are remedied. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021– 0474 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ ADDRESSES: If you have questions on this rule, call or email LCDR David Newcomb, District Eight OCS, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504–671–2106, David.T.Newcomb@ uscg.mil. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking OCS Outer Continental Shelf E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM 11APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History Anadarko Petroleum Corporation requested that the Coast Guard establish a safety zone around its facility. There are safety concerns for both the personnel aboard the facility and the environment that arise when a safety zone is not established. In response, on October 23, 2022, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Lucius Spar Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Keathley Canyon Block 875, Gulf of Mexico. There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this safety zone. During this comment period that ended on November 23, 2022, we received 1 comment. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 14 U.S.C. 85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, and 33 CFR 1.05–1, 147.1, and 147.10, which collectively permit the establishment of safety zones for facilities located on the OCS for the purpose of protecting life and property on the facilities, and the marine environment in the safety zones. The Coast Guard has determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect the facility from all vessels operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways that are not providing services to or working with the facility. Navigation in the vicinity of the safety zone consists of large commercial shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area also includes an extensive system of fairways. The purpose of the rule is to significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills, and releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and the environment. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Rule As noted above, we received 1 comment on our NPRM published on November 23, 2022. The commenter asked to specify the horizontal datum (NAD 27, NAD 83, etc.) for the latitude and longitude position in the rule. We have done so. In this rule, as in all OCS Safety Zone rules, we use the NAD 83 horizontal datum. This rule established a safety zone on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Apr 10, 2023 Jkt 259001 Keathley Canyon 875. The area or the safety zone is 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility, which is located at 26°7′55.0632″ N, 92°2′24.2982″ W (NAD 83). The deepwater area is waters of 304.8 meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of the United States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. No vessel, except those attending the facility, or those less than 100 feet in length and not engaged in towing will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive Orders related to rulemaking, and we considered the First Amendment rights of protestors. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action determination is based on the location of the Lucius Spar, on the OCS, and its distance from both land and safety fairways. Vessels traversing waters near the safety zone will be able to safely travel around the zone using alternate routes. Exceptions to this rule include vessels measuring less than 100 feet in length overall and not engaged in towing. The Eighth Coast Guard District Commander, or a designated representative, will consider requests to transit through the safety zone on a case-by-case basis. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 21469 small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule affects your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM 11APR1 21470 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Rules and Regulations have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves establishing a safety zone around an offshore deepwater facility. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination, prepared and signed before October 31, 2022 are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Apr 10, 2023 Jkt 259001 jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147 Coast Guard Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water). 33 CFR Part 147 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 147 as follows: [Docket Number USCG–2021–0476] RIN 1625–AA00 PART 147—SAFETY ZONES Safety Zone; Heidelberg Spar Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Green Canyon Block 860, Gulf of Mexico 1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows: AGENCY: Authority: 14 U.S.C. 554; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. SUMMARY: ■ ■ 2. Add § 147.873 to read as follows: § 147.873 Safety Zone; Lucius Spar, Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Keathley Canyon 875. (a) Description. The Lucius Spar in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Keathley Canyon 875. The facility is located at: 26°7′55.0632″ N, 92°2′24.2982″ W (NAD 83) and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure’s outer edge is a safety zone. (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except for the following: (1) An attending vessel, as defined in 147.20 (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative. (c) Requests for permission. Persons or vessels requiring authorization to enter the safety zone must request permission from the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Commander or designated representative. Dated: April 4, 2023. Richard Timme, RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard District Eight. [FR Doc. 2023–07585 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am] Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the Heidelberg Spar, located in Green Canyon Block 860 on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The purpose of this rule is to protect the facility from all vessel traffic operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways that are not providing service to or working with the facility. Establishing a safety zone around the facility will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, collisions, security breaches, oil spills, releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and the environment. DATES: This rule is effective May 11, 2023. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021– 0476 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ ADDRESSES: If you have questions on this rule, call or email LCDR David Newcomb, District Eight OCS, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504–671–2106, David.T.Newcomb@ uscg.mil. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking OCS Outer Continental Shelf § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History BILLING CODE 9110–04–P PO 00000 ACTION: Anadarko Petroleum Company requested that the Coast Guard establish a safety zone around its facility. There are safety concerns for both the personnel aboard the facility and the Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM 11APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21468-21470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07585]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 147

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0474]
RIN 1625-AA87


Safety Zone; Lucius Spar Outer Continental Shelf Facility, 
Keathley Canyon Block 875, Gulf of Mexico

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the 
Lucius Spar, located in Keathley Canyon Block 875 on the Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The purpose of this rule 
is to protect the facility from all vessel traffic operating outside 
the normal shipping channels and fairways that are not providing 
service to or working with the facility. Establishing a safety zone 
around the facility will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, 
collisions, security breaches, oil spills, releases of natural gas, and 
thereby protect the safety of life, property, and the environment.

DATES: This rule is effective April 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0474 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LCDR David Newcomb, District Eight OCS, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 504-671-2106, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf

[[Page 21469]]

Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    Anadarko Petroleum Corporation requested that the Coast Guard 
establish a safety zone around its facility. There are safety concerns 
for both the personnel aboard the facility and the environment that 
arise when a safety zone is not established. In response, on October 
23, 2022, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Lucius Spar Outer Continental Shelf 
Facility, Keathley Canyon Block 875, Gulf of Mexico. There we stated 
why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory 
action related to this safety zone. During this comment period that 
ended on November 23, 2022, we received 1 comment.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 14 U.S.C. 
85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1, and 33 CFR 1.05-1, 147.1, and 147.10, which collectively permit 
the establishment of safety zones for facilities located on the OCS for 
the purpose of protecting life and property on the facilities, and the 
marine environment in the safety zones. The Coast Guard has determined 
that a safety zone is necessary to protect the facility from all 
vessels operating outside the normal shipping channels and fairways 
that are not providing services to or working with the facility. 
Navigation in the vicinity of the safety zone consists of large 
commercial shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with 
tows and the occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area also 
includes an extensive system of fairways. The purpose of the rule is to 
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills, and releases 
of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and 
the environment.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Rule

    As noted above, we received 1 comment on our NPRM published on 
November 23, 2022. The commenter asked to specify the horizontal datum 
(NAD 27, NAD 83, etc.) for the latitude and longitude position in the 
rule. We have done so. In this rule, as in all OCS Safety Zone rules, 
we use the NAD 83 horizontal datum.
    This rule established a safety zone on the Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS) in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Keathley Canyon 
875. The area or the safety zone is 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each 
point on the facility, which is located at 26[deg]7'55.0632'' N, 
92[deg]2'24.2982'' W (NAD 83). The deepwater area is waters of 304.8 
meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of the 
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of the 
United States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles from 
the baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. No vessel, 
except those attending the facility, or those less than 100 feet in 
length and not engaged in towing will be permitted to enter the safety 
zone without obtaining permission from Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 
District or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking, and we considered the First 
Amendment rights of protestors. Below we summarize our analyses based 
on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the location of 
the Lucius Spar, on the OCS, and its distance from both land and safety 
fairways. Vessels traversing waters near the safety zone will be able 
to safely travel around the zone using alternate routes. Exceptions to 
this rule include vessels measuring less than 100 feet in length 
overall and not engaged in towing. The Eighth Coast Guard District 
Commander, or a designated representative, will consider requests to 
transit through the safety zone on a case-by-case basis.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule affects your small 
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and

[[Page 21470]]

have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves establishing a safety zone around an 
offshore deepwater facility. Normally such actions are categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of 
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis 
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination, prepared and signed 
before October 31, 2022 are available in the docket where indicated 
under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147

    Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 147 as follows:

PART 147--SAFETY ZONES

0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 554; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  147.873 to read as follows:


Sec.  147.873  Safety Zone; Lucius Spar, Outer Continental Shelf 
Facility, Keathley Canyon 875.

    (a) Description. The Lucius Spar in the deepwater area of the Gulf 
of Mexico at Keathley Canyon 875. The facility is located at: 
26[deg]7'55.0632'' N, 92[deg]2'24.2982'' W (NAD 83) and the area within 
500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure's 
outer edge is a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone 
except for the following:
    (1) An attending vessel, as defined in 147.20
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in 
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 
District or a designated representative.
    (c) Requests for permission. Persons or vessels requiring 
authorization to enter the safety zone must request permission from the 
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative. 
If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the 
instructions of the Commander or designated representative.

    Dated: April 4, 2023.
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2023-07585 Filed 4-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.