Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 21540-21543 [2023-07531]
Download as PDF
21540
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(23,160 Wh/gal) ÷ (244.75 Wh/mile) = 94.63
mile/gal (or, mpg)
[FR Doc. 2023–06869 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–0669; Project
Identifier MCAI–2022–01238–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2006–10–13, which applies to all Airbus
SAS Model A330–223, –321, –322, and
–323 airplanes. AD 2006–10–13 requires
repetitive inspections of the firewall of
the lower aft pylon fairing (LAPF), and
corrective actions if necessary. AD
2006–10–13 also provides an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. Since the FAA issued AD
2006–10–13, an updated LAPF was
designed, the installation of which
constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspection required by AD
2006–10–13. This proposed AD would
continue to require the actions specified
in AD 2006–10–13, provide new
optional terminating actions, and
change the applicability to exclude
certain airplanes, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Apr 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2023–0669; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For the AD identified in this NPRM,
you may contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2023–0669.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone 206–231–3229; email
vladimir.ulyanov@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2023–0669; Project Identifier
MCAI–2022–01238–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft
Section, FAA, International Validation
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone 206–231–
3229; email vladimir.ulyanov@faa.gov.
Any commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2006–10–13,
Amendment 39–14597 (71 FR 28250,
May 16, 2006) (AD 2006–10–13), for all
Airbus SAS Model A330–223, –321,
–322, and –323 airplanes. AD 2006–10–
13 was prompted by MCAI originated by
the Direction Ge´ne´rale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the former
airworthiness authority for France.
DGAC issued French airworthiness
directive F–2004–028 R2, dated October
26, 2005 (DGAC France AD F–2004–028
R2), to correct an unsafe condition
identified as cracking of the LAPF
firewall.
AD 2006–10–13 requires repetitive
detailed inspections for cracking of the
LAPF firewall, and corrective actions if
necessary. AD 2006–10–13 also
provides an optional terminating action
for the repetitive inspections. The FAA
issued AD 2006–10–13 to address
cracking of the LAPF firewall, which
could reduce the effectiveness of the
firewall and result in an uncontrolled
engine fire.
Actions Since AD 2006–10–13 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2006–10–
13, EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union superseded DGAC France AD F–
2004–028 R2 and issued EASA AD
2022–0190, dated September 14, 2022
(EASA AD 2022–0190) (referred to after
this as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe
condition on certain Airbus SAS Model
A330–223, A330–321, A330–322, and
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
A330–323 airplanes. The MCAI states
that since DGAC France AD F–2004–028
R2 was issued, Airbus designed an
updated LAPF, the installation of which
also constitutes terminating action for
the repetitive inspections required by
DGAC France AD F–2004–028 R2.
EASA AD 2022–0190 retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD F–
2004–028 R2, and includes reference to
an additional optional terminating
action modification. EASA AD 2022–
0190 also excludes airplanes on which
the optional terminating action was
embodied in production from its
applicability.
In AD 2006–10–13, the FAA included
requirements related to crack lengths
greater than 1.5 inches or to multiple
cracks with a combined length greater
than or equal to 1.5 inches, as well as
a requirement to repair before further
flight if a crack is greater than 1.5 inches
long or if multiple cracks are found with
a combined length of greater than 1.5
inches. AD 2006–10–13 also omitted a
requirement to stop-drill the crack or
cracks and apply sealant before further
flight for cracks that extended to greater
than 1.2 inches long but less than or
equal to 1.5 inches long. The FAA has
since determined that this AD should
match DGAC France AD F–2004–028 R2
and EASA AD 2022–1190 and require
actions (including stop-drilling any
cracks and applying sealant) based on
any crack length being less than or equal
to 30.48mm (1.2 inches) or greater than
or equal to 30.48mm (1.2 inches). The
FAA has determined that the stopdrilling and sealant application are
adequate to address any cracks and
maintain the fire safety and capability of
the firewall until the required LAPF
firewall repair is done as specified in
EASA AD 2022–1190. This proposed
AD would include a grace period for
airplanes to switch to the new proposed
requirements.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products. You may examine the MCAI
in the AD docket at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA–2023–0669.
21541
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2022–0190 described
previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not
explicitly restate the requirements of AD
2006–10–13, this proposed AD would
retain certain of the requirements of AD
2006–10–13. Those requirements are
referenced in EASA AD 2022–0190,
which, in turn, is referenced in
paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to
use some civil aviation authority (CAA)
ADs as the primary source of
information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. The FAA has been coordinating
this process with manufacturers and
CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to
incorporate EASA AD 2022–0190 by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2022–0190
in its entirety through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
EASA AD 2022–0190 does not mean
that operators need comply only with
that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in EASA AD 2022–0190.
Service information required by EASA
AD 2022–0190 for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2023–0669 after the
FAA final rule is published.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2022–0190 specifies
procedures for repetitively inspecting
each LAPF firewall for cracks, and
performing corrective actions, including
stop-drilling the crack and applying
sealants, and repairing the LAPF
firewall. EASA AD 2022–0190 also
specifies terminating actions for the
repetitive inspections, including
modifying and reidentifying the LAPF
or replacing the LAPF with an LAPF
having part number 72A100–713. This
material is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, it has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA
is issuing this NPRM after determining
that the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 41
airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
Proposed AD Requirements in This
NPRM
This proposed AD would retain
certain requirements of AD 2006–10–13.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Retained actions from AD 2006–10–13 .........
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 .............
$0
$595
$24,395
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
14 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,190 .................................................................................................................
$120,000
$121,190
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR OPTIONAL ACTIONS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21542
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
the results of any required or optional
actions. The FAA has no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these on-condition actions:
ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ......................................................................................................................
$120,000
$120,595
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Apr 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2006–10–13, Amendment 39–
14597 (71 FR 28250, May 16, 2006); and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
■
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2023–0669;
Project Identifier MCAI–2022–01238–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by May 26,
2023.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2006–10–13,
Amendment 39–14597 (71 FR 28250, May 16,
2006) (AD 2006–10–13).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model
A330–223, A330–321, A330–322, and A330–
323 airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD 2022–0190, dated
September 14, 2022 (EASA AD 2022–0190).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 54, Nacelles/pylons.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking of the lower aft pylon fairing (LAPF)
firewall, and by the development of an
optional terminating replacement. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address this cracking,
which could reduce the effectiveness of the
firewall and result in an uncontrolled engine
fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and
(i) of this AD: Comply with all required
actions and compliance times specified in,
and in accordance with, EASA AD 2022–
0190.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022–0190
(1) Where EASA AD 2022–0190 refers to
‘‘28 February 2004 [the effective date of
DGAC France AD F–2004–028 at original
issue],’’ this AD requires using June 20, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006–10–13).
(2) For any airplane on which a crack has
been found and a stop-drill of the crack and
sealant application has not been done as
specified in paragraph (4.1) of EASA AD
2022–0190 as of the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, accomplish the actions specified in
paragraph (4.1) of EASA AD 2022–0190.
(3) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2022–
0190 specifies a crack length, replace the text
‘‘up to 30.48 mm’’ with ‘‘less than or equal
to 30.48 mm (1.2 inches)’’
(4) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2022–0190.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2022–0190 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (ii)
AMOCs approved previously for AD 2006–
10–13 in FAA Letters ANM–116–17–235 and
AIR–676–20–117 are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding provisions of EASA AD
2022–0190 that are required by paragraph (g)
of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS’s
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(k) Additional Information
SUMMARY:
For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
206–231–3229; email vladimir.ulyanov@
faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2022–0190, dated September 14,
2022.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2022–0190, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA AD
on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on April 5, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–07531 Filed 4–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Apr 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–0667; Project
Identifier MCAI–2022–00735–A]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2022–19–03, which applies to all Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC–12, PC–
12/45, PC–12/47, and PC–12/47E
airplanes. AD 2022–19–03 requires
incorporating new revisions to the
airworthiness limitation section (ALS)
of the existing airplane maintenance
manual (AMM) or Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to
establish a 5-year life limit for certain
main landing gear (MLG) actuator
bottom attachment bolts and new life
limits for the rudder bellcrank. Since
the FAA issued AD 2022–19–03, the
FAA has determined that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are
necessary. This proposed AD would
require revising the ALS section of the
existing AMM or ICA for your airplane,
as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which is proposed for incorporation by
reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this NPRM by May 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2023–0667; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21543
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For material that is proposed for
IBR in this NPRM, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999
000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu;
website: easa.europa.eu. You may find
this material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO
64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, MO 64106; phone: (816)
329–4059; email: doug.rudolph@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2023–0667; Project Identifier
MCAI–2022–00735–A’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend the proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21540-21543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07531]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2023-0669; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01238-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2006-10-13, which applies to all Airbus SAS Model A330-223, -321, -322,
and -323 airplanes. AD 2006-10-13 requires repetitive inspections of
the firewall of the lower aft pylon fairing (LAPF), and corrective
actions if necessary. AD 2006-10-13 also provides an optional
terminating action for the repetitive inspections. Since the FAA issued
AD 2006-10-13, an updated LAPF was designed, the installation of which
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection required
by AD 2006-10-13. This proposed AD would continue to require the
actions specified in AD 2006-10-13, provide new optional terminating
actions, and change the applicability to exclude certain airplanes, as
specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which
is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 26,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0669; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For the AD identified in this NPRM, you may contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find
this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0669.
You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone 206-231-3229; email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2023-0669; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-01238-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; telephone 206-231-3229; email [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2006-10-13, Amendment 39-14597 (71 FR 28250, May
16, 2006) (AD 2006-10-13), for all Airbus SAS Model A330-223, -321, -
322, and -323 airplanes. AD 2006-10-13 was prompted by MCAI originated
by the Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the former airworthiness authority for France. DGAC issued
French airworthiness directive F-2004-028 R2, dated October 26, 2005
(DGAC France AD F-2004-028 R2), to correct an unsafe condition
identified as cracking of the LAPF firewall.
AD 2006-10-13 requires repetitive detailed inspections for cracking
of the LAPF firewall, and corrective actions if necessary. AD 2006-10-
13 also provides an optional terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. The FAA issued AD 2006-10-13 to address cracking of the
LAPF firewall, which could reduce the effectiveness of the firewall and
result in an uncontrolled engine fire.
Actions Since AD 2006-10-13 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2006-10-13, EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union superseded DGAC
France AD F-2004-028 R2 and issued EASA AD 2022-0190, dated September
14, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0190) (referred to after this as the MCAI), to
correct an unsafe condition on certain Airbus SAS Model A330-223, A330-
321, A330-322, and
[[Page 21541]]
A330-323 airplanes. The MCAI states that since DGAC France AD F-2004-
028 R2 was issued, Airbus designed an updated LAPF, the installation of
which also constitutes terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by DGAC France AD F-2004-028 R2. EASA AD 2022-0190
retains the requirements of DGAC France AD F-2004-028 R2, and includes
reference to an additional optional terminating action modification.
EASA AD 2022-0190 also excludes airplanes on which the optional
terminating action was embodied in production from its applicability.
In AD 2006-10-13, the FAA included requirements related to crack
lengths greater than 1.5 inches or to multiple cracks with a combined
length greater than or equal to 1.5 inches, as well as a requirement to
repair before further flight if a crack is greater than 1.5 inches long
or if multiple cracks are found with a combined length of greater than
1.5 inches. AD 2006-10-13 also omitted a requirement to stop-drill the
crack or cracks and apply sealant before further flight for cracks that
extended to greater than 1.2 inches long but less than or equal to 1.5
inches long. The FAA has since determined that this AD should match
DGAC France AD F-2004-028 R2 and EASA AD 2022-1190 and require actions
(including stop-drilling any cracks and applying sealant) based on any
crack length being less than or equal to 30.48mm (1.2 inches) or
greater than or equal to 30.48mm (1.2 inches). The FAA has determined
that the stop-drilling and sealant application are adequate to address
any cracks and maintain the fire safety and capability of the firewall
until the required LAPF firewall repair is done as specified in EASA AD
2022-1190. This proposed AD would include a grace period for airplanes
to switch to the new proposed requirements.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0669.
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 2006-10-13, this proposed AD would retain certain of
the requirements of AD 2006-10-13. Those requirements are referenced in
EASA AD 2022-0190, which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (g) of
this proposed AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2022-0190 specifies procedures for repetitively inspecting
each LAPF firewall for cracks, and performing corrective actions,
including stop-drilling the crack and applying sealants, and repairing
the LAPF firewall. EASA AD 2022-0190 also specifies terminating actions
for the repetitive inspections, including modifying and reidentifying
the LAPF or replacing the LAPF with an LAPF having part number 72A100-
713. This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM
This proposed AD would retain certain requirements of AD 2006-10-
13. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2022-0190 described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2022-0190 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2022-0190 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2022-0190 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-
0190. Service information required by EASA AD 2022-0190 for compliance
will be available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0669
after the FAA final rule is published.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 41 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions from AD 2006-10-13. 7 work-hours x $85 per $0 $595 $24,395
hour = $595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Costs for Optional Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,190. $120,000 $121,190
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 21542]]
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required or optional actions. The FAA has no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 work-hours x $85 per hour = $595.... $120,000 $120,595
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-10-13, Amendment 39-14597
(71 FR 28250, May 16, 2006); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2023-0669; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-
01238-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by May 26, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2006-10-13, Amendment 39-14597 (71 FR 28250,
May 16, 2006) (AD 2006-10-13).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A330-223, A330-321, A330-
322, and A330-323 airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2022-
0190, dated September 14, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0190).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/
pylons.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the lower aft
pylon fairing (LAPF) firewall, and by the development of an optional
terminating replacement. The FAA is issuing this AD to address this
cracking, which could reduce the effectiveness of the firewall and
result in an uncontrolled engine fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2022-0190.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0190
(1) Where EASA AD 2022-0190 refers to ``28 February 2004 [the
effective date of DGAC France AD F-2004-028 at original issue],''
this AD requires using June 20, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-
10-13).
(2) For any airplane on which a crack has been found and a stop-
drill of the crack and sealant application has not been done as
specified in paragraph (4.1) of EASA AD 2022-0190 as of the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (4.1) of
EASA AD 2022-0190.
(3) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2022-0190 specifies a crack
length, replace the text ``up to 30.48 mm'' with ``less than or
equal to 30.48 mm (1.2 inches)''
(4) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD
2022-0190.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2022-0190
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(j) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified
in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (ii) AMOCs approved
previously for AD 2006-10-13 in FAA Letters ANM-116-17-235 and AIR-
676-20-117 are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
EASA AD 2022-0190 that are required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
[[Page 21543]]
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Additional Information
For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International
Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone 206-231-3229; email [email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2022-0190,
dated September 14, 2022.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2022-0190, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 5, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-07531 Filed 4-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P