Use of Salt Substitutes To Reduce the Sodium Content in Standardized Foods, 21148-21171 [2023-06456]
Download as PDF
21148
§ 73.30
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Georgia [Amended]
from the Sunday prior to the Masters
Golf Tournament through the Monday
after (and subsequent weather days if
required).
2. Section 73.30 is amended as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
R–3004A
Fort Gordon, GA [Amended]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat.
33°25′03″N, long. 82°12′15″W;
to lat. 33°23′48″N, long. 82°08′56″W;
to lat. 33°22′20″N, long. 82°08′33″W;
to lat. 33°21′33″N, long. 82°09′10″W;
to lat. 33°20′15″N, long. 82°10′57″W.,
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°16′11″W;
to lat. 33°18′23″N, long. 82°16′17″W;
to lat. 33°18′22″N, long. 82°16′39″W;
to lat. 33°17′29″N, long. 82°16′52″W;
to lat. 33°16′57″N, long. 82°17′39″W;
to lat. 33°16′56″N, long. 82°18′50″W;
to lat. 33°17′27″N, long. 82°21′19″W;
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°22′35″W;
to lat. 33°19′26″N, long. 82°22′15″W;
to lat. 33°22′37″N, long. 82°16′58″W;
to lat. 33°23′50″N, long. 82°14′03″W;
to the point of beginning.
Designated Altitudes. Surface to but
not including 2,500 feet MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM 24
hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Atlanta
ARTCC.
Using agency. U.S. Army,
Commanding Officer, Fort Gordon, GA.
Remarks. Aircraft activities must not
be conducted on national holidays or
from the Sunday prior to the Masters
Golf Tournament through the Monday
after (and subsequent weather days if
required).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
R–3004B Fort Gordon, GA [Amended]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat.
33°25′03″N, long. 82°12′15″W;
to lat. 33°23′48″N, long. 82°08′56″W;
to lat. 33°22′20″N, long. 82°08′33″W;
to lat. 33°21′33″N, long. 82°09′10″W;
to lat. 33°20′15″N, long. 82°10′57″W;
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°16′11″W;
to lat. 33°18′23″N, long. 82°16′17″W;
to lat. 33°18′22″N, long. 82°16′39″W;
to lat. 33°17′29″N, long. 82°16′52″W;
to lat. 33°16′57″N, long. 82°17′39″W;
to lat. 33°16′56″N, long. 82°18′50″W;
to lat. 33°17′27″N, long. 82°21′19″W;
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°22′35″W;
to lat. 33°19′26″N, long. 82°22′15″W;
to lat. 33°22′37″N, long. 82°16′58″W;
to lat. 33°23′50″N, long. 82°14′03″W;
to the point of beginning.
Designated Altitudes. 2,500 feet MSL
to but not including 10,000 feet MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM 24
hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Atlanta
ARTCC.
Using agency. U.S. Army,
Commanding Officer, Fort Gordon, GA.
Remarks. Aircraft activities must not
be conducted on national holidays or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
R–3004C Fort Gordon, GA [Amended]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat.
33°25′03″N, long. 82°12′15″W;
to lat. 33°23′48″N, long. 82°08′56″W;
to lat. 33°22′20″N, long. 82°08′33″W;
to lat. 33°21′33″N, long. 82°09′10″W;
to lat. 33°20′15″N, long. 82°10′57″W;
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°16′11″W;
to lat. 33°18′23″N, long. 82°16′17″W;
to lat. 33°18′22″N, long. 82°16′39″W;
to lat. 33°17′29″N, long. 82°16′52″W;
to lat. 33°16′57″N, long. 82°17′39″W;
to lat. 33°16′56″N, long. 82°18′50″W;
to lat. 33°17′27″N, long. 82°21′19″W;
to lat. 33°17′41″N, long. 82°22′35″W;
to lat. 33°19′26″N, long. 82°22′15″W;
to lat. 33°22′37″N, long. 82°16′58″W;
to lat. 33°23′50″N, long. 82°14′03″W;
to the point of beginning.
Designated Altitudes. 10,000 feet MSL
to 16,000 feet MSL.
Times of designation. By NOTAM 24
hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Atlanta
ARTCC.
Using agency. U.S. Army,
Commanding Officer, Fort Gordon, GA.
Remarks. Aircraft activities must not
be conducted on national holidays or
from the Sunday prior to the Masters
Golf Tournament through the Monday
after (and subsequent weather days if
required).
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4,
2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and
Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2023–07398 Filed 4–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 130, 131, 133, 136, 137,
139, 145, 150, 155, 156, 158, 161, 163,
166, 168, and 169
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–2226]
RIN 0910–AI72
Use of Salt Substitutes To Reduce the
Sodium Content in Standardized
Foods
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposing to amend our standard of
identity (SOI) regulations that specify
salt (sodium chloride) as a required or
optional ingredient to permit the use of
salt substitutes in standardized foods, to
reduce the sodium content. Reducing
sodium may help reduce the risk of
hypertension, a leading cause of heart
disease and stroke. The proposed rule,
if finalized, would help support a
healthier food supply by providing
flexibility to facilitate industry
innovation in the production of
standardized foods lower in sodium
while maintaining the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the foods.
DATES: Either electronic or written
comments on the proposed rule must be
submitted by August 8, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
August 8, 2023. Comments received by
mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/
paper submissions) will be considered
timely if they are received on or before
that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2022–N–2226 for ‘‘Use of Salt
Substitutes to Reduce the Sodium
Content in Standardized Foods.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Yeung, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–820), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
2371 or Carrol Bascus, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of
Regulations and Policy (HFS–024), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the
Proposed Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. Costs and Benefits
II. Table of Abbreviations/Acronyms
III. Background
A. Introduction
B. Need for the Regulation
C. FDA’s Current Regulatory Framework
IV. Legal Authority
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
A. Scope/Applicability
B. The Basic Nature and Essential
Characteristics of a Standardized Food
C. Definition of Salt Substitute
D. Amending Standard of Identity
Regulations To Permit Salt Substitutes
E. Update Incorporation by Reference
F. Technical Amendments
VI. Proposed Effective/Compliance Dates
VII. Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts
A. Economic Analysis of Impacts
B. Initial Small Entity Analysis
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
X. Federalism
XI. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
XII. References
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule, if finalized,
would amend FDA’s definitions and
standards of identity (SOI; the acronym
is used to refer to both the singular
‘‘standard of identity’’ and the plural
‘‘standards of identity’’) that specify salt
(sodium chloride) as a required or
optional ingredient. Foods for which
FDA has established a SOI are referred
to as ‘‘standardized’’ foods. The
amendments would permit the use of
safe and suitable salt substitutes to
replace some or all of the salt used in
the manufacture of standardized foods.
The proposed rule would not list
specific salt substitutes; instead, the
proposed rule would cover ingredients
or combinations of ingredients used as
salt substitutes by food manufacturers
currently or in the future. If finalized,
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21149
the proposed rule would support efforts
to reduce sodium content in
standardized foods and may help to
improve consumer dietary patterns by
reducing sodium consumption. On
average Americans consume 50% more
sodium than the recommended limit for
those aged 14 and older (Ref. 1).
Reducing sodium consumption may
help reduce the risk of hypertension, a
leading cause of heart disease and
stroke. The proposed rule would allow
food manufacturers the flexibility to use
salt substitutes and allow for innovation
in producing healthier standardized
foods. The proposed rule would
promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers by
accommodating their preferences for
lower sodium varieties of foods. This, in
turn, would make lower-sodium options
available to them.
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Proposed Rule
FDA is proposing to amend its SOI
that specify salt as a required or
optional ingredient to permit the use of
safe and suitable salt substitutes in
standardized foods, to reduce the
sodium content. We propose to amend
our regulation entitled ‘‘Food Standards:
General’’ (21 CFR part 130) to create a
new subpart C entitled ‘‘Flexibility in
Standardized Foods’’ and add a new
section entitled ‘‘Ingredient Flexibility
in Standardized Foods’’ to define salt
substitute. We also propose to amend 80
SOI to permit salt substitutes.
We also propose to update the
incorporation by reference (IBR)
information of several SOI to refer to the
most recent versions of the IBR
materials and to provide up-to-date
contact information for obtaining the
IBR materials. For example, the
proposed rule would update the
referenced methods of analysis to those
in the ‘‘Official Methods of Analysis of
AOAC INTERNATIONAL,’’ 21st Ed.
2019. We also propose to make
technical amendments to correct
inconsistencies and typographical errors
in some SOI regulations.
We tentatively conclude that the
proposed amendments are necessary to
modernize SOI to provide flexibility and
facilitate innovation in the production
of standardized foods with less sodium,
and to promote honesty and fair dealing
in the interest of consumers.
C. Legal Authority
We are proposing this rule consistent
with our authority in sections 201, 401,
402, 409, and 701 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 348, 371). We
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21150
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
discuss our legal authority in greater
detail in section IV.
D. Costs and Benefits
The proposed rule would amend SOI
that specify salt as a required or
optional ingredient, to permit the use of
salt substitutes. The proposed rule
would give manufacturers the flexibility
to use salt substitutes in standardized
foods, to reduce sodium content. If
finalized, the proposed rule would not
result in regulatory costs for firms. The
proposal would not require
manufacturers to replace salt with salt
substitutes. Instead, manufacturers
would have the option of using salt
substitutes to replace salt in
standardized foods. Should
manufacturers choose to use this
flexibility to reformulate some products
by substituting some salt with salt
substitutes, the primary benefits
realized would result from lower
sodium consumption by U.S. consumers
who choose to purchase and consume
the reformulated versions of such
products, and increased profit (producer
surplus) for manufacturers (or at least
no decrease in profits). The primary cost
of such voluntary market behavior
would include reformulation and
relabeling costs for the manufacturers.
II. Table of Abbreviations/Acronyms
Abbreviation/
acronym
What it means
CDRR .............
Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake
Code of Federal Regulations
Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act
Food and Drug Administration
FEDERAL REGISTER
Generally Recognized as
Safe
Incorporation by Reference
Milligram
Standard(s) of Identity
United States Code
CFR ................
FD&C Act .......
FDA ................
FR ..................
GRAS .............
IBR .................
mg ..................
SOI .................
U.S.C. ............
III. Background
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Introduction
As a public health agency, FDA seeks
to improve dietary patterns in the
United States to help reduce the burden
of diet-related chronic diseases and
advance health equity as nutritionrelated chronic diseases are experienced
disproportionately by certain racial and
ethnic minority groups, those living in
rural communities, and those with
lower socioeconomic status. We are
committed to accomplishing this, in
part, by creating a healthier food supply
for all. One way FDA is working
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
towards this goal is by helping to reduce
sodium across the food supply.
Americans consume, on average,
3,400 milligrams of sodium per day
(mg/day) (Ref. 1). This is nearly 50
percent more than the sodium Chronic
Disease Risk Reduction Intake (CDRR)
established by the National Academies
of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine,
which sets the limit for sodium for
individuals 14 years and older at 2,300
mg/day. This CDRR was adopted as a
recommendation by the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025
(Refs. 1 and 2). Reducing sodium intake
to below the CDRR level is expected to
help reduce the risk of chronic disease.
Excess sodium intake increases risk for
hypertension, commonly referred to as
high blood pressure, a leading cause of
heart disease and stroke and the first
and fifth leading cause of mortality in
2020 in the United States (Refs. 2–6).
Decreasing sodium intake is, therefore,
expected to reduce the rate of
hypertension. It has been estimated that
sufficient reductions in the population
average sodium intake could potentially
result in tens of thousands fewer cases
of heart disease and stroke and
associated mortality each year (Refs. 7–
9).
Reducing sodium in processed,
packaged and prepared foods will help
create a healthier food supply. A
healthier food supply has the potential
to contribute to better health outcomes
and reduce preventable death and
disease related to poor nutrition; many
of which are experienced at higher rates
by certain racial and ethnic groups (Ref.
10). For example, more than 4 in 10
American adults have hypertension and
that number increases to nearly 6 in 10
for non-Hispanic Black Americans (Ref.
11). African American women are
almost 60 percent more likely to have
hypertension when compared to nonHispanic white women, and African
American adults are 30% more likely
than non-Hispanic white Americans to
die from coronary heart disease (CHD)
(Refs. 12 and 13); further, American
Indians/Alaskan Natives are 50% more
like to be diagnosed with CHD than
non-Hispanic Whites (Ref. 13). The
proposed rule’s likely effect on
increasing the availability of lower
sodium products may contribute to
government-wide efforts to reduce
health disparities.
Reducing sodium in processed,
packaged and prepared food is a critical
step in helping to improve consumer
dietary patterns. More than 70 percent
of sodium consumed in the United
States comes from sodium added during
manufacturing and commercial food
preparation (Ref. 14). This makes it
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
challenging for consumers to reduce
their sodium consumption. Further,
because salt (sodium chloride) serves
various functions in processed,
packaged, and prepared foods, industry
must balance sodium reduction efforts
while manufacturing products that
maintain the properties of a certain food
and still meet the preferences of
consumers.
FDA is engaged in several efforts
aimed at encouraging gradual, efficient
reduction of overall sodium content in
processed, packaged and prepared food
products. We recently issued two
guidance documents for industry to
support voluntary industry efforts to
reduce sodium in the food supply and
facilitate industry innovation toward
creating healthier foods. The December
2020 guidance for industry entitled
‘‘The Use of an Alternate Name for
Potassium Chloride in Food Labeling’’
(Potassium Chloride guidance) (Ref. 15)
sets forth FDA’s enforcement discretion
policy with respect to declaring
potassium chloride as ‘‘potassium salt’’
in the ingredient statement in the
labeling of food products. In October
2021, we issued guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Voluntary Sodium Reduction
Goals: Target Mean and Upper Bound
Concentrations for Sodium in
Commercially Processed, Packaged, and
Prepared Foods’’ (Voluntary Sodium
Reduction Goals guidance) (Ref. 16).
The guidance document finalizes the
short-term (2.5 year) voluntary sodium
reduction targets in over 160 categories
of packaged and restaurant prepared
food. These short-term targets are based
on a reduction of average sodium intake
from current levels of 3,400 mg/day to
3,000 mg/day, and they serve as initial
benchmarks for a broad and gradual
reduction of sodium in the food supply
(Ref. 16 and 17). Through the two
guidance documents and this
rulemaking, our intent is to support the
gradual reduction of sodium across the
food supply.
Under our authority in section 401 of
the FD&C Act, FDA establishes SOI to
promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers. SOI are
established under the common or usual
name of a food. Such foods are said to
be ‘‘standardized.’’ SOI define the food
and typically provide the types of
ingredients that it must contain (i.e.,
mandatory ingredients) and that it may
contain (i.e., optional ingredients). They
sometimes specify the amount or
proportion of each ingredient. Many SOI
also designate methods of production.
We have over 250 SOI for a wide variety
of food products.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
B. Need for the Regulation
Salt substitutes are ingredients that
can help reduce sodium in processed,
packaged and prepared foods. Food
manufacturers wishing to reduce salt in
their products to accommodate
consumer preferences or for other
reasons sometimes use substitute
ingredients that provide similar taste
and other technical functions of salt in
foods. Most of our SOI that include salt
as a required or optional ingredient do
not permit the use of salt substitutes.
Therefore, food manufacturers are
currently precluded from using salt
substitutes in the production of these
standardized foods. However,
manufacturers may use salt substitutes
in the production of non-standardized
foods. Various stakeholders have
expressed concern that many SOI are
out of date and may impede innovation,
including the ability to produce
healthier foods (Ref. 18). Manufacturers
seeking to reduce sodium in
standardized foods are limited because
they are unable to produce foods using
salt substitutes and still conform to the
SOI. In this way, the SOI may become
a barrier to innovation.
Permitting the use of salt substitutes
is aligned with FDA’s goal to reduce
sodium across the food supply and our
work to reduce sodium consumption.
Research suggests that consumers
usually do not notice small reductions
in sodium and, over time, consumer
palates adjust to lower sodium levels
(Ref. 19). Through our work on the
Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals
guidance and the Potassium Chloride
guidance, we learned that stakeholders,
including industry, consumers,
consumer advocacy, scientific and
professional health organizations,
generally support allowing the use of
salt substitutes. In another public
engagement, some stakeholders
discussed modernizing SOI to allow the
use of salt substitutes using a
‘‘horizontal approach’’ (Ref. 18). A
horizontal approach to amending
standards is a change that could be
made across all, or broad categories of
SOI to provide flexibility and facilitate
innovation in the production of more
nutritious foods. We considered several
options for permitting salt substitutes in
standardized foods and evaluated how
to apply this change across multiple
SOI. The proposed rule, if finalized,
would adopt a horizontal approach to
amending the applicable SOI. The
proposed rule would permit the use of
salt substitutes in SOI that specify salt
as a required or optional ingredient, to
reduce sodium in the food. Because the
use of salt substitutes in these SOI is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
currently precluded, any use of salt
substitutes by manufacturers under the
rule would contribute to reduced
sodium intake to some degree.
Permitting the use of salt substitutes
in standardized foods would contribute
to our goal to reduce sodium across the
food supply. It would facilitate
voluntary industry efforts toward
sodium reduction by providing
flexibility and supporting innovation in
the production of healthier standardized
foods, which may help some consumers
to gradually reduce the sodium in their
diet and contribute to better health
outcomes. The proposed rule may have
the potential to contribute to
government-wide efforts to reduce
health disparities if the use of salt
substitutes helps populations
disproportionately affected by
hypertension to consume less sodium.
C. FDA’s Current Regulatory Framework
The FD&C Act gives us the authority
to establish definitions and standards
for foods with respect to identity,
quality, and fill of container (21 U.S.C.
341). SOI specify the permitted
ingredients, both mandatory and
optional, and sometimes describe the
amount or proportion of each
ingredient. Many SOI also prescribe a
method of production or formulation.
Foods for which FDA has established a
SOI must conform to the applicable
definition and standard. A food is
misbranded if it purports to be or is
represented as a food for which a SOI
has been established but fails to
conform to the definition and standard
(21 U.S.C. 343(g)).
SOI are codified in parts 130 to 169
(21 CFR parts 130 to 169). Part 130
outlines general provisions, including
the use of food additives in food
standards. Part 130 also includes the
general definition and SOI (i.e.,
§ 130.10). Parts 131 to 169 set forward
SOI for foods in 21 food product
categories.
We have long interpreted the term
‘‘salt’’ in the food standards in parts 131
to 169 to refer to sodium chloride. Salt
is specified as a required or optional
ingredient in 80 SOI across these parts.
Some SOI cross reference other SOI. For
example, in part 136 (21 CFR part 136),
salt is an optional ingredient in the SOI
for bread, rolls, and buns (§ 136.110)
which is referenced in several other
SOI, including: enriched bread, rolls,
and buns (§ 136.115), milk bread, rolls,
and buns (§ 136.130), raisin bread, rolls,
and buns (§ 136.160), and whole wheat
bread, rolls, and buns (§ 136.180). The
result of such cross referencing is that
salt is a required or an optional
ingredient in 140 SOI.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21151
Manufacturers of standardized foods
have few options for reducing the
sodium content of their products. If salt
is a required ingredient, they may
generally use less salt. If salt is an
optional ingredient, they may either use
no salt or less salt. However, they
cannot replace salt with another
ingredient unless the standard permits
the use of another ingredient. Most SOI
do not provide for a substitute for salt.
In some instances, we established
separate SOI for low sodium foods,
thereby allowing manufacturers to
reduce the amount of salt used and to
substitute other ingredients.
Manufacturers may also modify the
sodium content of standardized foods
under the general definition and SOI in
§ 130.10 (Requirements for foods named
by use of a nutrient content claim and
a standardized item), provided that
certain conditions are met.
Deviation from a SOI is permitted
under the general definition and SOI in
§ 130.10. The deviation must be due to
a modification described by an
expressed nutrient content claim
defined by regulation. Expressed
nutrient content claims for the sodium
content of foods (e.g., ‘‘low sodium’’) are
provided under § 101.61 (21 CFR
101.61) (Nutrient content claims for the
sodium content of foods). Thus, sodium
modifications to a standardized food are
permitted if the modification meets the
requirements for a nutrient content
claim under § 101.61. The modified
food becomes a new standardized food
under § 130.10 and is named with the
nutrient content claim and the name of
the standardized food from which it
deviates (e.g., ‘‘low sodium provolone
cheese’’). It may be impracticable for
manufacturers to reduce the sodium
content in standardized foods to the
extent required by a nutrient content
claim. For example, to meet the
requirements for a ‘‘reduced sodium’’
nutrient content claim, manufacturers
must decrease the sodium in the food by
at least 25 percent. Certain foods do not
retain the same characteristics when the
amount of sodium is reduced to this
degree, and therefore, the general
definition and SOI does not facilitate
the production of lower sodium
varieties. This proposed rule would
allow manufacturers to reduce the
sodium in standardized foods in
amounts less than the amounts
prescribed in § 101.61. This would
provide manufacturers greater flexibility
when reformulating standardized foods
to lower the sodium content.
Presently, three SOI specifically
permit the use of a salt substitute. The
SOI for low sodium cheddar cheese
(§ 133.116) and low sodium colby
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21152
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
cheese (§ 133.121) permit the use of a
salt substitute. The SOI for low sodium
colby cheese prohibits the use of salt
and permits the use of a salt substitute
that contains no sodium (§ 133.121(a)).
The SOI for margarine (§ 166.110)
specifically permits the use of
potassium chloride in the manufacture
of dietary margarine. Potassium
chloride, in some instances, can be used
as a partial substitute for sodium
chloride in food processing and
manufacturing.
If finalized, the proposed rule would
provide a new means for manufacturers
to reduce the sodium content of
standardized foods. Salt substitutes
would be permitted in any food for
which an SOI has been established and
that specifies salt as a required or an
optional ingredient. This would be
achieved without requiring the
minimum reductions in sodium content
under § 101.61 and renaming of food
products as is required for modifications
under § 130.10.
IV. Legal Authority
We are issuing this proposed rule
consistent with our authority in sections
201, 401, 402, 409, and 701of the FD&C
Act. Section 401 of the FD&C Act directs
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (Secretary) to issue regulations
fixing and establishing for any food a
reasonable definition and standard of
identity, standard of quality, or standard
of fill of container, whenever in the
judgment of the Secretary, such action
will promote honesty and fair dealing in
the interest of consumers. We
tentatively conclude that permitting the
use of salt substitutes to replace some or
all of the salt used in the production of
standardized foods would promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest
of consumers. Consumers desire more
nutritious and healthy food options,
such as lower sodium versions of foods.
This proposed rule, if finalized, would
allow for industry development and sale
of such foods while ensuring that
standardized foods meet consumer
expectations and preferences with
respect to lower-sodium varieties.
FDA has codified food standards in
parts 130 to 169. These regulations do
not provide either an authorization or
exemption from regulation as a food
additive under section 409 of the FD&C
Act. The FD&C Act defines ‘‘food
additive,’’ in relevant part, as any
substance, the intended use of which
results or may reasonably be expected to
result, directly or indirectly, in its
becoming a component of food, if such
substance is not generally recognized by
experts as safe under the conditions of
its intended use (section 201(s) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
FD&C Act). The definition of ‘‘food
additive’’ exempts any uses that are the
subject of prior sanction (section
201(s)(4) of the FD&C Act)). Food
additives are deemed unsafe except to
the extent that FDA approves their use
(section 409(a) of the FD&C Act). Food
is adulterated when it contains an
unapproved food additive (section
402(a)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act).
We also are issuing this proposed rule
under section 701(a) of the FD&C Act,
which authorizes FDA to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the FD&C Act. Regulations issued
under section 701(a) ‘‘must effectuate a
congressional objective expressed
elsewhere in the Act’’ (Association of
American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.
v. FDA, 226 F. Supp. 2d 204 (D.D.C.
2002) (citing Pharm. Mfrs. Ass’n. v.
FDA, 484 F. Supp. 1179, 1183 (D. Del.
1980))). Amending SOI to permit the use
of salt substitutes would effectuate the
congressional objective ‘‘to promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest
of consumers’’ expressed in section 401
of the FD&C Act. Permitting salt
substitutes in standardized foods under
this rule may help provide more options
to consumers while ensuring that the
foods maintain their basic nature and
essential characteristics. The proposed
amendments to the SOI for dairy
products under parts 131, 133, and 135
are issued under section 701(e) of the
FD&C Act.
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized,
would:
• Amend part 130 to add a new
subpart C entitled ‘‘Flexibility in
Standardized Foods.’’
• Add a new § 130.30 to provide for
‘‘Ingredient Flexibility in Standardized
Foods’’ and define ‘‘salt substitute’’ as a
safe and suitable ingredient (or
combination of ingredients) that is used
to replace some or all of the added salt
(sodium chloride), to reduce sodium in
the food, and that serves the functions
of salt in the food.
• Amend the 80 SOI that specify salt
as a required or an optional ingredient
to add regulatory text to permit the use
of salt substitute, as defined in proposed
§ 130.30.
• Update the IBR information of
several SOI to refer to the most recent
versions of the IBR materials and to
provide up-to-date contact information
for obtaining the IBR materials. The
proposed rule would also update the
referenced methods of analysis to those
in the ‘‘Official Methods of Analysis of
AOAC INTERNATIONAL,’’ 21st Ed.
2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Make technical amendments to
correct inconsistencies and
typographical errors in some SOI
regulations.
A. Scope/Applicability
The proposed rule, if finalized, would
amend SOI in parts 131 to 169.
Specifically, the proposed rule would
permit the use of salt substitutes in the
foods covered by 80 SOI that include
salt as a required or an optional
ingredient. The proposal would also
permit the use of salt substitutes in
foods covered by SOI that reference
some of the 80 SOI.
This rule does not propose to amend
the SOI for oysters (§ 161.130). The SOI
in § 161.130 provides for the optional
use of salt water in the shucking of
oysters. We understand that it is not
standard industry practice to constitute
a salt and water solution for this
process. Rather, seawater accessible at
the processing location is collected and
used in the shucking process. Because
salt is not an ingredient added by the
manufacturer, we are not proposing to
amend this SOI. We request comments
on this approach and our understanding
of current industry practice.
B. The Basic Nature and Essential
Characteristics of a Standardized Food
Proposed § 130.30(b) would require
that ingredients used as salt substitutes
do not change the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the
standardized food. FDA previously
discussed its understanding about the
basic nature of a food in a proposed rule
entitled ‘‘Food Standards; General
Principles and Food Standards
Modernization,’’ (70 FR 29214, May 20,
2005). The basic nature of a food is
generally what the food is. It concerns
the general attributes of the product. For
example, the basic nature of a particular
type of cheese is that it is a milk-derived
food of a certain form and consistency.
The essential characteristics of a food
may contribute to achieving the basic
nature of the food, but consumers may
not be aware of the essential
characteristics. The essential
characteristics of a food are those that
distinguish a food. Foods may be
distinguished by their ingredients,
compositional characteristics, physical
characteristics, or levels of certain
nutrients or the way they are
produced—all of which are the essential
characteristics of the food. For example,
the essential characteristics of a
particular type of cheese may include
the bacterial culture used, the
processing method, or the fat and
moisture content that contribute to the
unique characteristics of that cheese.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Use of salt substitutes that do not
change the basic nature and essential
characteristics of the standardized food
under this proposed rule is necessary to
ensure the availability of foods that
promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers, in accordance
with section 401 of the FD&C Act.
C. Definition of Salt Substitute
Under the FD&C Act, any substance
that is intentionally added to food is a
food additive that is subject to
premarket review and approval by FDA
unless that substance is excluded from
the definition of a food additive. These
excluded food substances include
substances that are generally
recognized, among qualified experts, as
having been adequately shown to be
safe under the conditions of its intended
use (‘‘generally recognized as safe’’ or
‘‘GRAS’’), or the substances are prior
sanctioned and excepted from the
definition of a food additive. FDA
considers salt a common food ingredient
that is GRAS for its intended use (21
CFR 182.1(a)). A salt substitute that is
added to a standardized food, to replace
some or all of the salt, must be an
approved food additive or GRAS for its
intended use. For example, potassium
chloride is a GRAS substance (21 CFR
184.1622).
The proposed rule would amend
§ 130.30(c)(1) to define salt substitute as
a safe and suitable ingredient (see
§ 130.3(d)) or combination of
ingredients that is used to replace some
or all of the added salt (sodium
chloride), to reduce the sodium in the
food, and that serves the functions of
salt in the food. We are proposing to
define salt substitute broadly to provide
flexibility and facilitate innovation in
the future without the need for
additional rulemaking. Thus, the
proposed rule would not list specific
salt substitutes; instead, the proposed
rule would cover ingredients or
combinations of ingredients currently
used as salt substitutes and ingredients
or combinations of ingredients that may
be used as salt substitutes in the future,
as a result of advances in food science
and technological changes.
Salt is a required or optional
ingredient in a wide range of
standardized foods. The proposed rule
also would allow manufacturers the
flexibility to explore new ways to
replace salt and reduce the sodium
content of standardized foods while
preserving the basic nature and essential
characteristics of the food.
We recognize that salt serves various
functions in standardized foods. For
example, depending on the food, salt
may be important for taste, microbial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
safety, and other functions. The
proposed definition would require that
the salt substitute be used to replace
some or all of the added salt, to reduce
the sodium in the food, and serve the
functions of salt in the food. This would
ensure that the salt substitute performs
a similar function to salt in the
standardized food, while helping to
reduce the sodium content. The extent
to which salt can be replaced depends
on the ability of the salt substitute to
replicate the functions of salt in the food
without compromising the food’s safety
and nutritional quality. The proposed
rule would not establish a minimum
replacement level for salt. It would not
prescribe the sodium content of the
foods or any parameters pertaining to
the production of the food.
Manufacturers would determine the
level of salt replacement appropriate for
the particular standardized food.
Our intent is to provide
manufacturers flexibility and facilitate
sodium reduction across the food
supply while not changing the basic
nature and essential characteristics or
adversely affecting the nutritional
quality and safety of standardized foods.
To accomplish this, proposed
§ 130.30(c)(1) would limit the definition
of salt substitute and therefore the use
of salt substitutes to an ingredient or a
combination of ingredients that serve
the functions that salt served in the
particular standardized food. The
ingredient or combination of ingredients
may include substances intended to
mitigate the impact of removing salt and
are needed to maintain the basic nature
and essential characteristics of the food.
Some manufacturers are currently
using salt substitutes to reduce sodium
in foods in the marketplace. Scientific
articles and reports have used several
examples of salt substitutes when
discussing sodium reduction efforts
(Ref. 19, 20, 21). The use of potassium
chloride is one example of a safe and
suitable ingredient discussed in the
scientific literature that, in some
instances, serves as a partial substitute
for sodium chloride in food processing
and manufacturing (Ref. 15). Other
examples of ingredients listed in the
scientific literature include herbs and
spices, yeast extracts, monosodium
glutamate, amino acids, and dairy
extracts (Ref. 19). The food industry is
pursuing sodium reduction efforts,
including the use of salt substitutes
(e.g., in products marketed as ‘‘low’’ or
‘‘reduced’’ sodium), in a variety of
foods, including in canned fish and
soups (Ref. 21). We request data and
information on the types of salt
substitutes currently being used in the
U.S. market to support sodium
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21153
reduction and on potential salt
substitutes that may be used as a result
of the new flexibility provided in this
proposed rule.
D. Amending Standard of Identity
Regulations to Permit Salt Substitutes
We propose to amend our regulations
to permit the use of salt substitutes in
SOI that specify salt as a required or an
optional ingredient. Foods for which
FDA has established a SOI must
conform to the applicable standard.
Consequently, without these
amendments, most standardized foods
cannot be modified to replace salt with
salt substitutes unless salt can be
reduced in sufficient quantity to meet a
nutrient content claim under § 101.61
(see section III.C). As stated previously,
amending 80 applicable SOI to permit
the use of salt substitutes is necessary to
give manufacturers the most flexibility
to use salt substitutes in standardized
foods. The proposed rule would permit
the use of salt, salt substitute or a
combination of the two in applicable
standardized foods. Salt substitutes
used would be declared on the label in
accordance with section 403(i)(2) of the
FD&C Act.
Where salt is permitted in our SOI,
the use is not described uniformly in the
provisions of the standards. This is
largely due to the standards having been
established with different structural
formats. The lack of uniformity is also
due to the use of salt differing across
different standardized foods. In some
foods, salt is a mandatory ingredient,
and in other foods, salt is an optional
ingredient. For some foods, salt is
permitted at a specific point in the
manufacturing process, whereas salt is
permitted in other foods without regard
to manufacturing time. These
differences mean that different
amendatory language in the individual
standards is necessary to permit the use
of salt substitutes. To address this, we
propose four types of revisions to the
current regulatory text in the applicable
SOI.
In particular, there are differences in
how the use of salt is prescribed in
certain SOI for cheeses and related
cheese products in part 133 (21 CFR
part 133). For example, several SOI for
cheeses use terms such as ‘‘salted,’’
‘‘salting,’’ ‘‘brine,’’ or ‘‘salt solution,’’ to
prescribe the application of salt in the
cheesemaking process. For additional
clarity, the proposed amendments for
cheeses and related cheese products are
grouped and discussed separately from
other SOI.
There are 4 types of revisions to the
applicable SOI in this proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21154
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
The third and fourth types only apply
to SOI in part 133.
• Type 1: When the current text of the
SOI lists ‘‘salt’’ as an optional
ingredient, the proposed rule would
amend the SOI to state, ‘‘salt or salt
substitute.’’
• Type 2: When the current text of the
SOI provides for the use of ‘‘salt’’ in a
paragraph, the proposed rule would
amend the SOI to state, ‘‘salt or salt
substitute.’’
• Type 3: When the current text of the
SOI uses terms such as ‘‘salted,’’ ‘‘salted
with dry salt or brine,’’ or ‘‘salting,’’ to
provide for use of salt in the food, but
does not specify salt as an ingredient,
the proposed rule would amend the
optional ingredient list to add ‘‘salt
substitute.’’
• Type 4: When the current text of the
SOI uses terms such as ‘‘salted,’’ or
‘‘salted in brine,’’ to provide for the use
of salt in the food, but does not provide
a list of optional ingredients, the
proposed rule would amend the SOI to
add a paragraph stating that, ‘‘During
the cheesemaking process, where the
curd is salted, salt substitute may be
used.’’
We summarize these changes in tables
1 and 2.
1. Amendments to SOI not in Part 133
We propose amendments to permit
the use of salt substitutes in 39 SOI for
products that are not cheeses or related
cheese products prescribed in part 133.
The amendments would occur through
two types of revisions to the current
regulatory text of the applicable SOI.
a. Type 1 revision for SOI not in part
133. Several SOI provide for the
addition of salt by listing it as an
ingredient (e.g., as an ‘‘optional
ingredient,’’ ‘‘other optional
ingredient,’’ or including salt in a list of
substances that could be added as a
seasoning or flavoring.) We propose to
amend these SOI to permit the addition
of a salt substitute in addition to, or in
place of, salt by replacing ‘‘salt’’ with
‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’ For example,
the SOI for acidified milk
(§ 131.111(e)(8)) lists ‘‘salt’’ under
‘‘other optional ingredients;’’ the
proposed rule would replace ‘‘salt’’ with
‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’ As another
example, the SOI for canned tuna (21
CFR 161.190) includes ‘‘salt’’ in a list of
seasoning or flavoring ingredients
(§ 161.190 (a)(6)(i)); the proposed rule
would replace ‘‘salt’’ with ‘‘salt or salt
substitute.’’
b. Type 2 revision for SOI not in part
133. Five SOI prescribe the use of salt
in paragraphs that describe the food,
rather than as part of an ingredient list.
We propose to amend these SOI to
permit the addition of a salt substitute
in addition to, or in place of, salt by
replacing ‘‘salt’’ with ‘‘salt or salt
substitute’’ in the regulatory text. For
example, the SOI for catsup (21 CFR
155.194) specifies the optional use of
salt by stating, ‘‘[t]he food may contain
salt’’; and the SOI for self-rising flour
(21 CFR 137.180) specifies that the food
‘‘is seasoned with salt.’’ In both
examples, we propose to replace ‘‘salt’’
with ‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’
Table 1 summarizes the amendments
to the SOI for foods other than cheeses
and related cheese products. We request
comment on whether there would be
safety concerns, technical infeasibilities,
or other issues that would prevent the
use of a salt substitute in any SOI listed
in table 1.
TABLE 1—AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS OF IDENTITY—FOODS OTHER THAN CHEESES AND RELATED
CHEESE PRODUCTS
CFR section
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 131.111
§ 131.112
§ 131.160
§ 131.162
§ 131.170
§ 136.110
§ 137.180
§ 137.270
§ 139.110
§ 139.150
§ 145.110
§ 145.130
§ 150.110
§ 155.120
Title
Paragraph
Type of revision
(e)(8)
(d)(8)
(b)(5)
(b)(4)
(e)(2)
(c)(4)
(a)
(a)
(a)(4)
(a)(2)
(a)(2)(iii)
(a)(5)
(c)(4)
(a)(3)(i)
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
2;
2;
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in other optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in other optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
paragraph that describes the food to add salt substitute.
paragraph that describes the food to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
(a)(3)(i)
(a)(2)(i)
(a)(2)(iv)
(a)(2)(i)
(a)(1)(iv)
(c)(4)(i)
(a)(3)(i)
(a)(1)
(a)(1)(iv)
(a)(1)
(a)(4)(i)
(a)(4)(i)
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
1;
1;
1;
1;
2;
1;
1;
2;
1;
2;
1;
1;
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
salt in optional ingredients to
salt in optional ingredients to
salt in optional ingredients to
salt in optional ingredients to
paragraph that describes the
salt in optional ingredients to
salt in optional ingredients to
paragraph that describes the
salt in optional ingredients to
paragraph that describes the
salt in optional ingredients to
salt in optional ingredients to
§ 161.190
Acidified milk .....................................
Cultured milk .....................................
Sour cream .......................................
Acidified sour cream .........................
Eggnog .............................................
Bread, rolls, and buns ......................
Self-rising flour ..................................
Self-rising white corn meal ...............
Macaroni products ............................
Noodle products ...............................
Canned applesauce ..........................
Canned figs ......................................
Fruit butter ........................................
Canned green beans and canned
wax beans.
Canned corn .....................................
Canned peas ....................................
Canned tomatoes .............................
Tomato concentrates ........................
Catsup ..............................................
Certain other canned vegetables .....
Canned mushrooms .........................
Tomato juice .....................................
Frozen peas ......................................
Canned oysters ................................
Canned Pacific salmon .....................
Canned wet pack shrimp in transparent or nontransparent containers.
Canned tuna .....................................
(a)(6)(i)
§ 163.111
§ 163.112
§ 163.123
§ 163.124
§ 163.130
§ 166.110
Chocolate liquor ................................
Breakfast cocoa ................................
Sweet chocolate ...............................
White chocolate ................................
Milk chocolate ...................................
Margarine ..........................................
(b)(6)
(b)(4)
(b)(3)
(b)(4)
(b)(3)
(b)(2)
Type 1; amends salt in seasoning and flavoring ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
§ 155.130
§ 155.170
§ 155.190
§ 155.191
§ 155.194
§ 155.200
§ 155.201
§ 156.145
§ 158.170
§ 161.145
§ 161.170
§ 161.173
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
food to add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
food to add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
food to add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
add salt substitute.
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
21155
TABLE 1—AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS OF IDENTITY—FOODS OTHER THAN CHEESES AND RELATED
CHEESE PRODUCTS—Continued
CFR section
§ 168.130
§ 168.140
§ 168.160
§ 168.180
§ 169.140
§ 169.150
Title
Paragraph
Cane sirup ........................................
Maple sirup .......................................
Sorghum sirup ..................................
Table sirup ........................................
Mayonnaise ......................................
Salad dressing ..................................
2. Amendments to SOI in Part 133
Type 1 and type 2 amendments are
also proposed for certain SOI for
cheeses and related cheese products. We
propose type 3 and type 4 amendments
for the several SOI in part 133 that
specify salt as an ingredient, using terms
such as ‘‘brine,’’ ‘‘salt brine,’’ ‘‘salt
solution,’’ ‘‘salted,’’ and ‘‘salting.’’
‘‘Brine,’’ ‘‘salt brine,’’ and ‘‘salt
solution’’ are solutions containing
sodium chloride and ‘‘salted’’ and
‘‘salting’’ in the manufacture of cheese
refer to the use of sodium chloride. The
proposed rule would provide
manufacturers of standardized cheeses
and related cheese products, the
flexibility to use salt substitutes to
replace some or all of the salt prescribed
in these processes.
We propose to permit the use of salt
substitutes in 41 SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products. Some SOI in
part 133 list salt under ‘‘optional
ingredients’’ or ‘‘other optional
ingredients,’’ while others vary in how
they prescribe the use of salt in the
paragraph that describes the cheese or
cheesemaking process. Because of these
differences, we propose four types of
revisions to the current regulatory text
of the applicable SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products.
a. Type 1 revision for SOI in part 133.
Several SOI for cheeses and related
cheese products provide for the addition
of salt by listing it as an ingredient (e.g.,
as an ‘‘optional ingredient’’ or ‘‘other
optional ingredient.’’) We propose to
amend these SOI to permit the addition
(b)(1)
(b)(1)
(b)(1)
(b)(7)
(d)(1)
(e)(1)
Type of revision
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
1;
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
amends
salt
salt
salt
salt
salt
salt
in
in
in
in
in
in
optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
other optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
other optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
of salt substitute in addition to, or in
place of, salt by replacing ‘‘salt’’ in the
list with ‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’ For
example, the SOI for cold-pack and club
cheese lists ‘‘salt’’ under ‘‘optional
ingredients’’ (§ 133.123(c)(3)). The
proposed rule would replace ‘‘salt’’ with
‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’
b. Type 2 revision for SOI in part 133.
Five SOI provide for the use of salt in
paragraphs that describe the cheese,
rather than as part of an ingredient list.
We propose to amend these SOI to
permit the addition of a salt substitute
in addition to, or in place of, salt by
replacing ‘‘salt’’ in the paragraphs with
‘‘salt or salt substitute.’’ For example,
the proposed rule would replace ‘‘salt’’
with ‘‘salt or salt substitute’’ in three
paragraphs of the SOI for dry curd
cottage cheese (§ 133.129(b)(1)(i)
through (iii)) and in one paragraph of
the SOI for sap sago cheese (§ 133.186
(a)(2)).
c. Type 3 revision for SOI in part 133.
Some SOI for cheeses and related cheese
products provide for the use of salt in
a paragraph that describes the
cheesemaking process, through terms
such as ‘‘salted,’’ ‘‘salted with dry salt
or brine,’’ or ‘‘salting,’’ and do not
specify salt in a list of ingredients (e.g.,
as an ‘‘other optional ingredient’’). We
propose to amend these SOI to permit
the addition of a salt substitute in
addition to, or in place of, salt by adding
‘‘salt substitute’’ as a new subparagraph
in the current list of other optional
ingredients. For example, the SOI for
cheddar cheese (§ 133.113(a)(3)) states
that ‘‘the curd is salted, stirred, further
drained, and pressed into forms,’’ but
does not list salt in the optional
ingredients in § 133.113(b)(3). The
proposed rule would amend
§ 133.113(b)(3) by adding a new
subparagraph, ‘‘salt substitute’’
(proposed § 133.113(b)(3)(vi)).
d. Type 4 revision for SOI in part 133.
Several SOI for cheeses and related
cheese products provide for the use of
salt in a paragraph that describes the
cheesemaking process through terms
such as ‘‘salted’’ or ‘‘salted in brine,’’
but do not include a list of ingredients
(e.g., ‘‘optional ingredient’’ or ‘‘other
optional ingredient’’) that could be
amended to add salt substitute. We
propose to amend these SOI to
explicitly permit the use of a salt
substitute in the cheesemaking process.
For example, the SOI for asiago fresh
and asiago soft cheese (§ 133.102(b))
provides that ‘‘the curd is salted in brine
and cured in a well-ventilated room,’’
but does not have an optional ingredient
list. The proposed rule would amend
this SOI by adding a new subparagraph
at § 133.102(c)(3) to state, ‘‘During the
cheesemaking process, where the curd
is salted, salt substitute may be used.’’
Table 2 summarizes the amendments
to the SOI for cheeses and related
cheese products. We request comment
on whether there would be safety
concerns, technical infeasibilities, or
other issues that would prevent the use
of salt substitute in any SOI listed in
table 2.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
TABLE 2—PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS OF IDENTITY—CHEESES AND RELATED CHEESE
PRODUCTS
CFR section
Title
Current paragraph
Revised or
added
paragraph
designation
§ 133.102 .......
(c) ...................
(c)(3) ..............
§ 133.106 .......
Asiago fresh and asiago soft
cheese.
Blue cheese ...........................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vii) ........
§ 133.108 .......
Brick cheese ..........................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(v) ..........
§ 133.111 .......
Caciocavallo siciliano cheese
(c) ...................
(c)(3) ..............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Type of revision
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21156
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS OF IDENTITY—CHEESES AND RELATED CHEESE
PRODUCTS—Continued
CFR section
Title
Current paragraph
Revised or
added
paragraph
designation
§ 133.113 .......
Cheddar cheese ....................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vi) .........
§ 133.118 .......
Colby cheese .........................
(c) ...................
(c)(4) ..............
§ 133.123 .......
Cold-pack and club cheese ...
(c)(3) ..............
N/A .................
§ 133.124 .......
Cold-pack cheese food ..........
(e)(3) ..............
N/A .................
§ 133.127 .......
Cook cheese, koch kaese .....
(b)(3)(v) ..........
N/A .................
§ 133.129 .......
Dry curd cottage cheese .......
(b)(1)(i)–(iii) ....
N/A .................
§ 133.133 .......
Cream cheese .......................
(b)(3)(i) ...........
N/A .................
§ 133.136 .......
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vi) .........
§ 133.138 .......
Washed curd and soaked
curd cheese.
Edam cheese .........................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(v) ..........
§ 133.141 .......
Gorgonzola cheese ................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vii) ........
§ 133.144 .......
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vi) .........
§ 133.147 .......
Granular and stirred curd
cheese.
Grated American cheese food
(c)(5) ..............
N/A .................
§ 133.148 .......
Hard grating cheeses ............
(c) ...................
(c)(1) and (2)
§ 133.149 .......
Gruyere cheese .....................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(iv) .........
§ 133.150 .......
Hard cheeses .........................
(c) ...................
(c)(3) ..............
§ 133.152 .......
Limburger cheese ..................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(iv) .........
§ 133.153 .......
(b)(3)(iii) .........
N/A .................
(b)(3)(iii) .........
N/A .................
(b)(3)(iii) .........
N/A .................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vi) .........
§ 133.162 .......
Monterey cheese and monterey jack cheese.
Mozzarella cheese and
scamorza cheese.
Low-moisture mozzarella and
scamorza cheese.
Muenster and munster
cheese.
Neufchatel cheese .................
(b)(3)(i) ...........
N/A .................
§ 133.164 .......
Nuworld cheese .....................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(iv) .........
§ 133.165 .......
Parmesan and reggiano
cheese.
Pasteurized process cheese ..
(c) ...................
(c)(3) ..............
(d)(4) ..............
N/A .................
(e)(4) Salt .......
N/A .................
(f)(5) Salt ........
N/A .................
§ 133.181 .......
Pasteurized process cheese
food.
Pasteurized process cheese
spread.
Provolone cheese ..................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vi) .........
§ 133.182 .......
Soft ripened cheeses .............
(b) ..................
N/A .................
§ 133.183 .......
Romano cheese .....................
(c) ...................
(c)(3) ..............
§ 133.184 .......
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(i) and (ii)
§ 133.185 .......
Roquefort cheese, sheep’s
milk blue-mold, and bluemold cheese from sheep’s
milk.
Samsoe cheese .....................
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(v) ..........
§ 133.186 .......
Sap sago cheese ...................
(a) ..................
N/A .................
§ 133.187 .......
Semisoft cheeses ..................
(b) ..................
N/A .................
§ 133.155 .......
§ 133.156 .......
§ 133.160 .......
§ 133.169 .......
§ 133.173 .......
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 133.179 .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Type of revision
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 2; amends paragraph that describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 1; amend salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in optional ingredients to add salt substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 2; amends paragraph that describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add new paragraph to list salt substitute.
Type 2; amends paragraph that describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Type 2; amends paragraph that describes the food to add
salt substitute.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
21157
TABLE 2—PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS OF IDENTITY—CHEESES AND RELATED CHEESE
PRODUCTS—Continued
CFR section
Title
Current paragraph
Revised or
added
paragraph
designation
§ 133.188 .......
Semisoft part-skim cheeses ...
(b) ..................
N/A .................
§ 133.189 .......
Skim milk cheese for manufacturing.
Spiced cheeses .....................
(d) ..................
(d)(1) and (2)
(b)(3)(iii) .........
N/A .................
Swiss and emmentaler
cheese.
(b)(3) ..............
(b)(3)(vii) ........
§ 133.190 .......
§ 133.195 .......
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Update Incorporation by Reference
Several of the 80 SOI that specify salt
as a required or optional ingredient
contain outdated references. We
propose to update the IBR paragraphs in
these SOI to refer to the most recent
versions of the IBR materials and to
provide up-to-date contact information
for obtaining the IBR materials. We
propose to add IBR paragraphs to
subparts A of parts 131, 137, 139, 150,
155, and 161. SOI in subparts B of these
parts would reference applicable IBR
paragraphs in subpart A. We also
propose to update the IBR paragraphs in
the SOI under parts 136, 145, and 166
which would not have IBR paragraphs
in subparts A of these parts. The revised
format is for administrative efficiency.
Specifically, the proposed rule would
update the IBR information for
§§ 131.111, 131.112, 131.160, 131.162,
131.170, 136.110, 137.180, 137.270,
139.110, 139.150, 145.110, 150.110,
155.120, 155.130, 155.170, 161.145,
161.173,161.190, and 166.110. These
SOI list methods of analysis that are
from the 13th or 15th editions of
‘‘Official Methods of Analysis of the
Association of Official Analytical
Chemists.’’ Additionally, § 155.170 lists
an incorrect section number for the
method for alcohol insoluble solids in
canned peas. We propose to update the
referenced methods of analysis to those
in the ‘‘Official Methods of Analysis of
AOAC INTERNATIONAL,’’ 21st Ed.
2019. These proposed changes will
ensure that the reference materials are
current, accessible, and meet Federal
requirements pertaining to IBR (see 1
CFR part 51).
• Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes; Table 1. Nominal
Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves
(USA Standard Series). The reference
lists the test sieve designations and their
nominal dimensions.
• AOAC Reference Table 909.04;
Correction Factors for Gasometric
Determination of Carbon Dioxide. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Type of revision
Type 2; amends paragraph that describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Type 4; amends SOI to add a new paragraph to permit salt
substitute.
Type 1; amends salt in other optional ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Type 3; amends other optional ingredients to add a new
paragraph to list salt substitute.
reference lists the correction factors of
carbon dioxide measurements for
different atmospheric conditions.
• AOAC Official Method 923.02A;
Reagent under Carbon Dioxide (Total) in
Baking Powders-Gasometric
Determination. The reference describes
the reagent used in measuring the
amount of carbon dioxide released from
a sample.
• AOAC Official Method 923.02B;
Apparatus under Carbon Dioxide (Total)
in Baking Powders-Gasometric
Determination. The reference describes
the apparatus used in measuring the
amount of carbon dioxide released from
a sample.
• AOAC Official method 926.07A;
Vacuum Oven Method, under Solids
(Total) and Loss on Drying (Moisture) in
Macaroni Products. The reference
provides method references for the
preparation of a sample and the total
solid determination of a sample.
• AOAC Official method 932.12;
Solids (Soluble) in Fruits and Fruit
Products. The reference provides a
method reference for measuring soluble
solids and the formula for calculating
the percentage of soluble solids in a
sample.
• AOAC Official method 932.14C; By
Means of Refractometer under Solids in
Syrups. The reference provides the
method for measuring the percentage of
soluble solids in a sample.
• AOAC Official method 935.36(a);
Solids (Total) in Bread. The reference
provides the method for measuring the
percentage of solids in a sample.
• AOAC Official method 938.06A;
Indirect Method, under Fat in Butter.
The reference provides the method for
measuring the percentage of fat in a
sample.
• AOAC Official method 938.10;
Solids (Alcohol-Insoluble) in Canned
Peas Gravimetric Method. The reference
provides the method for measuring the
percentage of alcohol-insoluble solids in
a sample.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• AOAC Official Method 945.48G;
under Evaporated Milk (Unsweetened).
The reference provides the method for
sample preparation and a method
reference for measuring the percentage
of milk fat in a sample.
• AOAC Official Method 947.05;
Acidity of Milk Titrimetric Method. The
reference provides the method for
measuring the percentage of lactic acid
in a sample.
• AOAC Official Method 989.05; Fat
in Milk-Modified Mojonnier Ether
Extraction method. The reference
provides the method for measuring the
percentage of milk fat in a sample.
• AOAC Official Method 990.21;
Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By Difference
between Total Solids and Fat Contents.
The reference provides method
references for measuring total solids and
fat contents of a sample and the formula
for calculating the percentage of nonfat
solid in a sample.
You may purchase a copy of the
material from AOAC International
(AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite
300, Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–
379–2622. You may inspect a copy at
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852, 240–402–7500, between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
F. Technical Amendments
We also propose to make technical
amendments to correct inconsistencies
and typographical errors in several of
the 80 SOI regulations that specify salt
as a required or optional ingredient. The
corrections are non-substantive. The
proposed rule would:
• Amend § 133.118(c)(2) to replace
‘‘143’’ with ‘‘145.’’
• Amend § 133.150(c)(2) to replace
‘‘143’’ with ‘‘145.’’
• Amend § 133.150(e)(1) to replace
‘‘unusual’’ with ‘‘usual.’’
• Amend § 133.182(c)(2) to replace
‘‘143’’ with ‘‘145.’’
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21158
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
• Amend § 133.184(b) to replace
‘‘Operational’’ with ‘‘Optional.’’
• Amend § 133.186(c) to replace
‘‘Nonmenclature’’ with
‘‘Nomenclature.’’
• Amend § 133.187(c)(2) to replace
‘‘143’’ with ‘‘145.’’
• Amend § 133.188(c)(2) to replace
‘‘143’’ with ‘‘145.’’
• Amend § 155.170(b)(1)(iii) to
replace ‘‘shrivelled’’ with ‘‘shriveled.’’
• Amend § 158.170(b)(1)(iii) to
replace ‘‘shrivelled’’ with ‘‘shriveled.’’
• Amend § 168.140(a) to replace
‘‘mapel’’ with ‘‘maple.’’
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
VI. Proposed Effective/Compliance
Dates
We propose that any final rule
resulting from this rulemaking be
effective 30 days after the final rule’s
date of publication in the Federal
Register insofar as it amends non-dairy
SOI. We believe that this effective date
is appropriate because it will provide
industry the flexibility to use salt
substitutes to reduce the sodium content
in standardized foods. Some
manufacturers are already exploring
ways to reduce sodium in standardized
foods, and this proposed rule, if
finalized, will assist in those efforts. For
the same reasons, FDA proposes that
any dairy SOI that may be amended
based on this proposal, unless stayed by
the filing of proper objections, will also
be effective 30 days after the final rule’s
date of publication in the Federal
Register.
VII. Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866, Executive Order 13563, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct us to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has determined that this
proposed rule is a significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866 Section 3(f)(1).1
1 We note that this Executive Order 12866 applies
only to the non-dairy SOI portions of this
rulemaking; the dairy SOI covered by this
rulemaking are ‘‘regulations or rules issued in
accordance with the formal rulemaking provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556, 557’’ (see 21 U.S.C. 701(e)(1)) and
therefore excluded by section (d)(1) of Executive
Order (E.O.) 12866.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of a rule on small entities. We
do not anticipate the proposed rule
would generate regulatory impacts on
small entities. As with any voluntary
market behavior, larger firms may have
certain advantages over small firms in
some areas, while smaller firms may
have advantages in other areas. As a
result, we propose to certify that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires us to
prepare a written statement, which
includes an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits, before proposing
‘‘any rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year.’’ The current threshold after
adjustment for inflation is $165 million,
using the most current (2021) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic
Product. The proposed rule would not
result in a mandated expenditure in any
year that meets or exceeds this amount.
The proposed rule would permit, but
not require, manufacturers to use salt
substitutes to replace salt where salt is
a required or optional ingredient in
standardized foods. If finalized, the
benefits of this rule would be additional
flexibility in the manufacture of
standardized foods and the potential for
reduced salt consumption by consumers
which may contribute to better health
outcomes. We have no information to
suggest the use of currently available
salt substitutes would lead to improved
product characteristics (e.g., shelf life)
or would lead to reduced production
costs and potentially lower prices. We
request comment on such potential
benefits of reformulation for
manufacturers and on how many
standardized foods manufacturers might
choose to reformulate, either in the
relatively near or longer-run future.
The proposed rule, if finalized, would
not impose requirements resulting in
regulatory costs on firms or consumers.
Manufacturers would have the option of
using salt substitutes. There are no
regulatory implications for not reading
the rule or deciding not to use salt
substitutes. Should manufacturers
choose to use this flexibility to
reformulate some products by
substituting some salt with salt
substitutes, the primary benefits
realized would result from lower
sodium consumption on average by U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumers, assuming they choose to
purchase and consume the reformulated
versions of such products, and
increased profit (producer surplus) for
manufacturers, assuming they find
offering reformulated versions of such
products consistent with maximizing
firm profits. The primary costs of such
voluntary market behavior would be
reformulation and relabeling costs for
manufacturers. We currently lack data
to estimate any net social benefits from
voluntary market behavior relating to
future use of salt substitutes made
possible by this rule, but cite some
published analyses below related to
meeting voluntary sodium reduction
targets that could partially be addressed
via the flexibility provided by this rule.
We request public comment on possible
producer response (e.g., how many
manufacturers may choose to take
voluntary action in response to this rule,
what share of standardized food
products may get reformulated) and on
possible consumer willingness to
purchase and consume such products
with various types of salt substitutes at
various levels, which would allow us to
provide a range of net social benefit
estimates when this rule is finalized.
A. Economic Analysis of Impacts
1. Background
There are 80 SOI that specify salt as
a mandatory or optional ingredient.
Some of these standards are referenced
by other SOI, resulting in salt as an
ingredient in 140 SOI. The salt in the
foods covered by these 140 SOI may
serve a variety of functions such as
taste, texture, moisture control, and
microbial safety. FDA has a public
health interest in reducing sodium
across the food supply. Therefore, we
propose to give manufacturers the
flexibility to use salt substitutes in
standardized foods where salt is a
required or optional ingredient, to
reduce the sodium content. While there
may be potential data sources (e.g., IRI,
Label Insight, Mintel, NHANES,
Syndigo) that could provide market or
consumption share (e.g., contribution of
sodium and/or caloric intake) for foods
covered by these 140 SOI, FDA does not
currently have sufficient estimates to
further extrapolate impacts at this time.
We request public comment on
additional potential data sources for
estimates of market share and/or caloric
and/or sodium consumption share of
the products included in these SOI.
We request comment on potential
regulatory alternatives including
allowing the use of only specified salt
substitutes, at only specified levels of
substitution, for only specified
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
purposes, for only specified products, in
conjunction with only specified
ancillary formulation changes, or with
specified labeling requirements. More
generally, we request comments on
potential regulatory approaches to
reducing salt in food or the dietary
intake of salt that do not involve
allowing the use of salt substitutes in
standardized foods.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2. Benefits of the Proposed Rule
The benefit of this proposed rule is
that manufacturers would have
additional flexibility in producing
standardized foods covered by 140 SOI,
which may lead to social benefits in the
form of increased consumer satisfaction
(consumer surplus), increased profits
(producer surplus), or both. In addition,
a change in voluntary market behavior
relating to patterns of food
consumption, or to use a potassiumbased salt as a salt substitute and
consumers who would benefit from
increasing their potassium intake
choose to consume those products,
those consumers may experience
positive health effects.
Salt is a relatively inexpensive
ingredient, and we would not expect
manufacturers to begin using salt
substitutes based on cost cutting
considerations alone at this time. To
explore the possibility of manufacturers
voluntarily replacing salt with salt
substitutes to improve the healthfulness
of their standardized foods, one would
need to identify the costs and level of
potential substitution, and extent of
consumer acceptance of salt substitutes
at differing levels in different
standardized foods in order to estimate
the number of manufacturers who
would decide to use salt substitutes. We
currently lack data on these potential
industry responses and request public
comment from manufactures, suppliers,
and consumers on the extent to which
the additional flexibility provided by
this rule would be used by
manufacturers, hence also desired or
tolerated by consumers, and viable in
the supply chain.
As discussed in the preamble of this
rule, on average, Americans consume
approximately 3,400 milligrams of
sodium per day (mg/day), which is
nearly 50 percent more than the
recommended daily limit on sodium
intake for individuals 14 years and older
(Refs. 1 and 2). Excess sodium intake
increases the risk for hypertension, or
high blood pressure, a leading cause of
heart disease and stroke (Refs. 2–6).
Decreasing sodium consumption is
expected to reduce hypertension and
potentially result in fewer cases of heart
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
disease and stroke (Refs. 7–9 2). More
than 70 percent of sodium consumed in
the U.S. comes from sodium added
during manufacturing and commercial
food preparation (Ref. 14). The health
benefits from reducing sodium
consumption are expected to be higher
for populations that currently have
higher sodium consumption or that are
more sensitive to any given level of
sodium consumption than other
populations. Hence, there may be
potential health equity effects to any
regulation that generates or facilitates
reduced intake of sodium. In order to
estimate such health benefits, we would
need data and information on the
complex pathway between allowing
manufactures to use salt substitutes, the
extent to which manufactures will
develop products of interest to those at
highest risk of hypertension, the likely
demographic patterns of consumers
purchasing those new products, and
eventually, the extent of the reduction
in sodium uptake among those at most
risk of hypertension.
In the absence of necessary data to
fully estimate the impacts of this rule,
we refer to published literature on the
health benefits of sodium reduction
targets to provide broader context of
potential impacts of this rule. A 2018
study by Pearson-Stuttard, et al. looked
at the health and economic effects of
FDA’s 2016 draft voluntary sodium
reduction guidance (Refs. 8 and 22) and
estimated benefits of meeting sodium
reduction targets in the form of medical
cost savings and consumer health
improvements, net of producer
reformulation costs and some
government administrative and
monitoring costs. Over a 20-year period,
the authors of the study find net social
benefits from only consumer health
effects to be roughly $12 billion
(uncertainty range of $0 billion to $28
billion) under what it described as the
most pessimistic scenario relating to
potential sodium reduction among the
three presented (Ref. 8). This roughly
$12 billion net benefit arises from
roughly $19 billion in estimated health
cost savings (benefits) and just over $7
billion of estimated reformulation,
administrative and monitoring costs.3
2 These studies may be sensitive to assumptions
regarding consumer response. If some consumers
experience disutility associated with the
reformulated product and adjust their consumption
pattern accordingly, this could partially offset some
of the estimated health benefits.
3 These results may be sensitive to assumptions
regarding consumer response to product
reformulation. For example, benefits might be lower
if some consumers experience disutility associated
with the reformulated product and adjust their
consumption pattern accordingly, which could
partially offset the estimated health benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21159
Since these benefit estimates are not
comprehensive, we would need
additional data on possible producer
and consumer response to fully assess
health benefits. Moreover, benefits
might be higher or lower than what
would be indicated by estimates that
focus on the subset of effects tracked by
Pearson-Stuttard et al. Benefits might be
higher if firms were to realize additional
profits or producer surplus from any
product reformulation (since we assume
firms would use salt substitutes only if
profits would remain the same or
increase). Benefits might also be higher
due to possible changes in consumer
surplus from consumers willing to buy
reformulated products whose valuation
includes factors beyond medical cost
savings or health state utility. Benefits
might be lower if some consumers
experience disutility associated with the
reformulated product and adjust their
consumption pattern accordingly,
which could partially offset the
estimated health benefits presented
above.
In addition, as mentioned above, we
currently lack data to determine how
much, if any, of the aggregate effects
that Pearson-Stuttard et al. attribute to
broader voluntary sodium reduction
efforts could be directly connected to
the flexibility provided by this rule. The
rule does not cover all foods analyzed
in the Pearson-Stuttard, et al. scenarios,
which included many non-standardized
foods. With comprehensive data on the
share of foods affected by this rule, we
could estimate health benefits across
only such products as a subset of the
Pearson-Stuttard, et al. estimate. We
request such data and also data on
possible consumer and producer
response to the flexibility provided by
this rule.
3. Costs of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized would
not impose regulatory costs on
manufacturers or consumers. There
would be no regulatory requirements or
regulatory penalties relative to the
baseline of taking no regulatory action.
Manufacturers would be required to use
safe and suitable ingredients regardless
of the amount or type of salt substitutes
they choose to use. The flexibility
provided by this rule creates parity for
use of existing salt substitutes in both
standardized and non-standardized
foods (see section V.C. for discussion of
examples of current salt substitutes in
use) and such uses are already required
to be disclosed and labeled. It is
presented above. Ref. 9, for instance, indicates that
its cost-effectiveness results are highly sensitive to
such issues.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
21160
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
possible that a change in voluntary
market behavior relating to food
consumption may generate health costs.
For example, to the extent
manufacturers choose to use potassium
chloride as a salt substitute and
consumers choose to consume those
products, consumers who may need to
limit their potassium intake may see
negative health effects that should be
accounted for in cost estimates. We
request comments on evidence that
could contribute to a more thorough
assessment (including possible
quantification) of such costs. The
agency will continue to monitor the use
of salt substitutes in the U.S. food
supply.
The economic rationale for food
standards involves reducing consumers’
search costs; in particular, their ability
to infer certain product characteristics
from representation as certain
standardized foods. The proposed rule
may affect product characteristics by
allowing manufacturers to use salt
substitutes that replace any one or any
combination of the functions of added
salt. However, the proposed rule would
preclude ingredient substitutions that
change the basic nature and essential
characteristics of a standardized food.
The basic nature of a food concerns the
general attributes of the product that is
offered for sale to consumers. The
essential characteristics of a food may
contribute to achieving the basic nature
of the food, but consumers may not be
aware of the essential characteristics.
Use of safe and suitable salt substitutes
that do not change the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the
standardized food ensures that products
on the market retain their general
attributes. For purposes of this analysis,
we assume products that retain their
general attributes will also retain
consistency with consumer beliefs and
expectations relating to those products
and that the use of salt substitutes will
therefore not generate consumer
dissatisfaction relating to the identity of
the standardized food. To the extent that
this assumption may not be accurate, we
request comment on the degree to which
consumers may be willing to purchase
and consume such products after salt
substitutes are used.
If finalized, manufacturers may
choose to take advantage of the
flexibility provided in this proposed
rule. As discussed above, the primary
potential costs of that voluntary market
behavior would arise from producers
choosing to use the flexibility afforded
to them to reformulate some products
such as reformulation, consumer testing,
labeling, and possibly marketing costs.
Pearson-Stuttard, et al., estimate that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
reformulation costs (using the FDA
model, Ref. 23) corresponding to the
draft voluntary short term sodium
reduction targets could range from $2.7
to $15 billion over a 20-year time period
and that these costs would comprise
roughly 95 percent of the costs related
to reaching short term sodium reduction
targets (Ref. 8). Producers may
voluntarily choose to reformulate some
products in response to this rule’s
added flexibility and the magnitude of
such costs would depend on the number
of products reformulated. The more
firms choose to reformulate using salt
substitutes given the flexibility provided
by this rule, the greater the share of
sodium reduction efforts (and associated
reformulation costs) that could be
attributed to this rule. Regardless of
what amount of reformulation
producers voluntarily choose to
undertake, they will only do so if their
private benefits in the form of increased
revenue are at least as much as their
private costs. We request comment on
the number of manufacturers who may
choose to reformulate standardized food
products and the extent to which
manufacturers may choose to
reformulate those products given this
new flexibility. We also request
comment on all other considerations
relating to manufacturers’ voluntary
market decision to use salt substitutes
including cost of reformulation, ability
to source substitute ingredients,
expected impact on sales, profits, and
consumer acceptance or lack of
acceptance.
B. Initial Small Entity Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. If finalized, we do not expect
the proposed rule would generate
impacts on small entities. The rule
would not impose regulatory costs on
small entities. There would be no
regulatory requirements or regulatory
penalties relative to the baseline of
taking no regulatory action. We have no
basis to suppose or estimate any other
impacts on small entities. As a result,
we propose to certify that the proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This analysis,
as well as other sections in this
document, serves as the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, as
required under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
This analysis is also available in the
docket for this proposed rule (Ref. 24)
and at https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reports/economic-impact-analyses-fdaregulations.
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.32(a) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this
proposed rule contains no collection of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is
not required.
X. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. We
have determined that the proposed rule
does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
conclude that the rule does not contain
policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
Order and, consequently, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
XI. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13175. We
have tentatively determined that the
rule does not contain policies that
would have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. We
invite comments from tribal officials on
any potential impact on Indian tribes
from this proposed action.
XII. References
The following references marked with
an asterisk (*) are on display with the
Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES) and are available for
viewing by interested persons between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday; they are also available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. References
without asterisks are not on public
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
display at https://www.regulations.gov
because they have copyright restriction.
Some may be available at the website
address, if listed. References without
asterisks are available for viewing only
at the Dockets Management Staff. FDA
has verified the website addresses, as of
the date this document publishes in the
Federal Register, but websites are
subject to change over time.
1. * U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services. ‘‘Dietary Guidelines for
Americans, 2020–2025.’’ 9th Edition.
December 2020. Available at https://
www.dietaryguidelines.gov; accessed
February 23, 2022.
2. National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering and Medicine. ‘‘Dietary
Reference Intakes for Sodium and
Potassium’’ (March 2019). Washington,
DC: The National Academies Press.
3. Sacks, F. M., L. P. Svetkey, W. M. Vollmer,
L. J. Appel, et al., ‘‘Effects on Blood
Pressure of Reduced Dietary Sodium and
the Dietary Approaches to Stop
Hypertension (DASH) diet.’’ DASH—
Sodium Collaborative Research Group.
New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;
344(1): pp 3–10.
4. Graudal, N. A., T. Hubeck-Graudal, and G.
Ju¨rgens, ‘‘Effects of Low-Sodium Diet vs.
High-Sodium Diet on Blood Pressure,
Renin, Aldosterone, Catecholamines,
Cholesterol, and Triglyceride (Cochrane
Review).’’ American Journal of
Hypertension. 2012; 25(1): pp. 1–15.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
22068710, accessed December 9, 2020.
5. Eckel, R. H., J. M. Jakicic, J. D. Ard, J. M.
de Jesus, et al., ‘‘2013 AHA/ACC
Guideline on Lifestyle Management to
Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of
the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines.’’ Journal of the
American College of Cardiology. 2014;
63(25 Pt B): pp. 2960–84. https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
24239922; accessed December 9, 2020.
6. * Murphy, S. L., K. D. Kochanek, J. Q. Xu,
and E. Arias, ‘‘Mortality in the United
States, 2020.’’ NCHS Data Brief, no 427.
Hyattsville, MD: National Center for
Health Statistics. 2021; https://
www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/
db427.htm; accessed Feb 23, 2022.
7. Coxson, P. G., N. R. Cook, M. Joffres, Y.
Hong, et al., ‘‘Mortality Benefits From
U.S. Population-Wide Reduction in
Sodium Consumption: Projections From
3 Modeling Approaches.’’ Hypertension.
2013; 61(3): pp. 564–570.
8. Pearson-Stuttard, J., C. Kypridemos, B,
Collins, D. Mozaffarian, et al.,
‘‘Estimating the Health and Economic
Effects of the Proposed U.S. Food and
Drug Administration Voluntary Sodium
Reformulation: Microsimulation CostEffectiveness Analysis.’’ PLoS Medicine.
2018; 15(4): pp. 1–18.
9. Smith-Spangler C. M., J. L. Juusola, E. A.
Enns, D. K. Owens, and A. M. Garber,
‘‘Population Strategies to Decrease
Sodium Intake and the Burden of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Cardiovascular Disease: A CostEffectiveness Analysis.’’ Annals of
Internal Medicine. 2010; 152(8): pp. 481–
487.
10. Micha, R., J. L. Pen˜alvo, F. Cudhea, F.
Imamura, et al., ‘‘Association Between
Dietary Factors and Mortality from Heart
Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in
the United States.’’ Journal of the
American Medical Association. 2017;
317(9): pp. 912–924.
11. * Ostchega, Y., C.D. Fryar, T. Nwankwo,
and D.T. Nguyen, ‘‘Hypertension
Prevalence Among Adults Aged 18 and
Over: United States, 2017–2018.’’ NCHS
Data Brief, no 364. Hyattsville, MD:
National Center for Health Statistics.
2020; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/
products/databriefs/db364.htm; accessed
March 21, 2023.
12. * Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, ‘‘Deaths: Final Data for
2018’’ National Vital Statistics Report.
2021; 69 (13). Table 10: p. 52. Available
at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/
nvsr69/nvsr69-13-508.pdf; accessed
December 20, 2022.
13. * Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, ‘‘Summary of Health
Statistics’’ National Health Interview
Survey. 2018; Table A–1a. Available at
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/shs/
tables.htm; accessed December 20, 2022.
14. Harnack, L.J., M. E. Cogswell, J. M.
Shikany, C. D. Gardner, et al., ‘‘Sources
of Sodium in U.S. Adults from 3
Geographic Regions.’’ Circulation. 2017;
135: pp. 1775–1783.
15. * FDA, ‘‘The Use of an Alternate Name for
Potassium Chloride in Food Labeling:
Guidance for Industry.’’ December 2020.
Available at https://www.fda.gov/media/
125081/download (Docket number FDA–
2019–D–0892), accessed February 23,
2022.
16. * FDA, ‘‘Voluntary Sodium Reduction
Goals: Target Mean and Upper Bound
Concentrations for Sodium in
Commercially Processed, Packaged, and
Prepared Foods: Guidance for Industry.’’
October 2021. Available at https://
www.fda.gov/media/98264/download
(Docket number FDA–2014–D–0055),
accessed February 23, 2022.
17. Mayne, S. T., R. A. McKinnon, and J.
Woodcock, ‘‘Reducing Sodium Intake in
the U.S. Healthier Lives, Healthier
Future.’’ Journal of the American
Medical Association. 2021; 326(17): pp.
1675–1676.
18. * FDA, ‘‘Horizontal Approaches to Food
Standards of Identity Modernization;
Public Meeting; Request for Comments.’’
September 27, 2019; transcript available
at https://www.fda.gov/food/workshopsmeetings-webinars-food-and-dietarysupplements/public-meeting-horizontalapproaches-food-standards-identitymodernization-09272019-09272019.
19. Institute of Medicine. ‘‘Strategies to
Reduce Sodium Intake in the United
States’’ (2010). Washington, DC: The
National Academies Press.
20. Do¨tsch, M., J. Busch, M. Batenburg, G.
Liem, et al., ‘‘Strategies to Reduce
Sodium Consumption: A Food Industry
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21161
Perspective.’’ Critical Reviews in Food
Science and Nutrition. 2009; 49(10): pp.
841–851.
21. Taylor, C., M. Doyle, D. Webb, ‘‘The
Safety of Sodium Reduction in the Food
Supply: A Cross-Discipline Balancing
Act—Workshop Proceedings.’’ Critical
Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.
2018; 58(10): pp. 1650–1659.
22. * FDA, ‘‘Voluntary Sodium Reduction
Goals: Target Mean and Upper Bound
Concentrations for Sodium in
Commercially Processed, Packaged, and
Prepared Foods: Guidance for Industry.
Draft Guidance.’’ June 2016.
23. Muth, M. K., S. Bradley, J. Brophy, K.
Capogrossi, S. Karns, and C. Viator.
Reformulation cost model. Contract No.
HHSF–223–2011–10005B, Task Order
20. Final report. Research Triangle Park
(NC): RTI International; 2015.
24. * FDA, ‘‘Use of Salt Substitutes to Reduce
the Sodium Content in Standardized
Foods’’ Preliminary Regulatory Impact
Analysis, Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act Analysis. Available at https://
www.fda.gov/about-fda/reports/
economic-impact-analyses-fdaregulations.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 130
Food additives, Food grades and
standards.
21 CFR Part 131
Dairy products, Food grades and
standards, Incorporation by reference,
Milk.
21 CFR Part 133
Dairy products, Food grades and
standards, Food labeling.
21 CFR Part 136
Bakery products, Food grades and
standards, Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Part 137
Foods, Food grades and standards,
Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Part 139
Food grades and standards,
Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Parts 145 and 150
Food grades and standards, Fruits,
Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Part 155
Food grades and standards,
Incorporation by reference, Vegetables.
21 CFR Part 156
Food grades and standards, Vegetable
juices.
21 CFR Part 158
Food grades and standards, Frozen
foods, Vegetables.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21162
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
21 CFR Part 161
Food grades and standards, Frozen
foods, Incorporation by reference,
Seafood.
21 CFR Part 163
Cacao products, Food grades and
standards.
21 CFR Part 166
Food grades and standards, Food
labeling, Incorporation by reference,
Margarine.
21 CFR Part 168
Food grades and standards, Sugar.
21 CFR Part 169
Food grades and standards, Oils and
fats, Spices and flavorings.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, we propose that 21
CFR parts 130, 131, 133, 136, 137, 139,
145, 150, 155, 156, 158, 161, 163, 166,
168, and 169 be amended as follows:
PART 130—FOOD STANDARDS:
GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 130
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 336, 341, 343,
371.
■
*
2. Add subpart C to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Flexibility in Standardized
Foods
§ 130.30 Ingredient flexibility in
standardized foods.
§ 131.111
(a) The definitions listed in this
section apply to parts 131 through 169
of this chapter.
(b) The ingredients used as substitutes
must not change the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the food.
(c) Definitions.
(1) Salt substitute means a safe and
suitable ingredient (or combination of
ingredients) that is used to replace some
or all of the added salt (sodium
chloride), to reduce sodium in the food,
and that serves the functions of salt in
the food.
(2) [Reserved]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
PART 131—MILK AND CREAM
3. The authority citation for part 131
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
■
4. Add § 131.10 to read as follows:
§ 131.10
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622:
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 945.48G,
under Evaporated Milk (Unsweetened);
IBR §§ 131.160(c); 131.162(c).
(2) AOAC Official Method 947.05,
Acidity of Milk Titrimetric Method; IBR
§§ 131.111(f); 131.112(e); 131.160(c);
131.162(c).
(3) AOAC Official Method 989.05, Fat
in Milk Modified Mojonnier Ether
Extraction Method; IBR §§ 131.111(f);
131.112(e); 131.170(f).
(4) AOAC Official Method 990.21,
Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By Difference
between Total Solids and Fat Contents;
IBR §§ 131.111(f); 131.112(e); 131.170(f).
(b) [Reserved]
■ 5. In § 131.111, revise paragraphs
(e)(8) and (f) to read as follows:
Acidified milk.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(8) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Methods of analysis. Referenced
methods are from ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis’’ (incorporated by reference,
see § 131.10):
(1) Milkfat content—As determined
by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk
Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content—
Calculated by subtracting the milkfat
content from the total solids content
using the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in
Milk By Difference between Total Solids
and Fat Contents.
(3) Titratable acidity—As determined
by the methods prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk
Titrimetric Method or by an equivalent
potentiometric method.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6. In § 131.112, revise paragraphs
(d)(8) and (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 131.112
Cultured milk.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(8) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Methods of analysis. Referenced
methods are from ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis’’ (incorporated by reference,
see § 131.10):
(1) Milkfat content—As determined
by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk
Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content—
Calculated by subtracting the milkfat
content from the total solids content
using the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in
Milk By Difference between Total Solids
and Fat Contents.
(3) Titratable acidity—As determined
by the methods prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk
Titrimetric Method or by an equivalent
potentiometric method.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 131.160, revise paragraphs
(b)(5) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 131.160
Sour cream.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Methods of analysis. Referenced
methods are from ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis’’ (incorporated by reference,
see § 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content—AOAC Official
Method 945.48G, under Evaporated
Milk (Unsweetened).
(2) Titratable acidity—AOAC Official
Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk
Titrimetric Method.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 131.162, revise paragraphs
(b)(4) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 131.162
Acidified sour cream.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Methods of analysis. Referenced
methods are from ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis’’ (incorporated by reference,
see § 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content—AOAC Official
Method 945.48G, under Evaporated
Milk (Unsweetened).
(2) Titratable acidity—AOAC Official
Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk
Titrimetric Method.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
9. In § 131.170, revise paragraphs
(e)(2) and (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 131.170
Eggnog.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Methods of analysis. Referenced
methods are from ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis’’ (incorporated by reference,
see § 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content—As determined
by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk
Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content—
Calculated by subtracting the milkfat
content from the total solids content
using the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in
Milk By Difference between Total Solids
and Fat Contents.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 133—CHEESES AND RELATED
CHEESE PRODUCTS
10. The authority citation for part 133
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
11. In § 133.102, add paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
■
§ 133.102
cheese.
Asiago fresh and asiago soft
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 133.106, add
paragraph(b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
Blue cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. In § 133.108, add paragraph
(b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
§ 133.108
Brick cheese.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Caciocavallo siciliano cheese.
*
*
(c) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. In § 133.118, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (c)(2) and add
paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
§ 133.118
Colby cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been
pasteurized if it has been held at a
temperature of not less than 145 °F for
a period of not less than 30 minutes, or
for a time and at a temperature
equivalent thereto in phosphatase
destruction. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 17. In § 133.123, revise paragraph
(c)(3) to read as follows:
§ 133.123
Cold-pack and club cheese.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. In § 133.124, revise paragraph
(e)(3) to read as follows:
§ 133.124
Cold-pack cheese food.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. In § 133.127, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Cook cheese, koch kaese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. In § 133.111, add paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
*
Cheddar cheese.
*
§ 133.127
*
§ 133.111
§ 133.113
*
*
§ 133.106
(3) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. In § 133.113, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. In § 133.129, revise paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii) to read as
follows:
§ 133.129
Dry curd cottage cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Harmless lactic-acid-producing
bacteria, with or without rennet and/or
other safe and suitable milk-clotting
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21163
enzyme that produces equivalent curd
formation, are added and it is held until
it becomes coagulated. The coagulated
mass may be cut; it may be warmed; it
may be stirred; it is then drained. The
curd may be washed with water and
further drained; it may be pressed,
chilled, worked, seasoned with salt or
salt substitute; or
(ii) Food grade phosphoric acid, lactic
acid, citric acid, or hydrochloric acid,
with or without rennet and/or other safe
and suitable milk-clotting enzyme that
produces equivalent curd formation, is
added in such amount as to reach a pH
of between 4.5 and 4.7; coagulation to
a firm curd is achieved while heating to
a maximum of 120 °F without agitation
during a continuous process. The
coagulated mass may be cut; it may be
warmed; it may be stirred; it is then
drained. The curd is washed with water,
stirred, and further drained. It may be
pressed, chilled, worked, seasoned with
salt or salt substitute.
(iii) Food grade acids as provided in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, DGlucono-delta-lactone with or without
rennet, and/or other safe and suitable
milk clotting enzyme that produces
equivalent curd formation, are added in
such amounts as to reach a final pH
value in the range of 4.5–4.8, and it is
held until it becomes coagulated. The
coagulated mass may be cut; it may be
warmed; it may be stirred; it is then
drained. The curd is then washed with
water, and further drained. It may be
pressed, chilled, worked, and seasoned
with salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. In § 133.133, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
§ 133.133
Cream cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. In § 133.136, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 133.136
cheese.
Washed curd and soaked curd
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 133.138, add paragraph
(b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
§ 133.138
Edam cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21164
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
temperature of not less than 145 °F for
a period of not less than 30 minutes, or
for a time and at a temperature
equivalent thereto in phosphatase
destruction. * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) The specific common or usual
name of such hard cheese, if any such
name has become generally recognized
therefor; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 30. In § 133.152, add paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
24. In § 133.141, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
■
§ 133.141
Gorgonzola cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. In § 133.144, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 133.144
cheese.
Granular and stirred curd
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 26. In § 133.147, revise paragraph
(c)(5) to read as follows:
§ 133.147
§ 133.152
Grated American cheese food.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 27. In § 133.148, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 133.148
Hard grating cheeses.
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) For the purposes of this section,
the word ‘‘milk’’ means cow’s milk or
goat’s milk or sheep’s milk or mixtures
of two or all of these. Such milk may be
adjusted by separating part of the fat
therefrom or (in the case of cow’s milk)
by adding one or more of the following:
Cream, skim milk, concentrated skim
milk, nonfat dry milk; (in the case of
goat’s milk) the corresponding products
from goat’s milk; (in the case of sheep’s
milk) the corresponding products from
sheep’s milk; water in a quantity
sufficient to reconstitute any such
concentrated or dried products used.
(2) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. In § 133.149, add paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
Gruyere cheese.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 29. In § 133.150, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (c)(2), add
paragraph (c)(3), and revise paragraph
(e)(1) to read as follows:
§ 133.150
Hard cheeses.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been
pasteurized if it has been held at a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. In § 133.153, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 133.153 Monterey cheese and Monterey
jack cheese.
*
*
§ 133.149
Limburger cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 32. In § 133.155, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 36. In § 133.164, add paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
§ 133.164
Nuworld cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 37. In § 133.165, add paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 133.165
Parmesan and reggiano cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 38. In § 133.169, revise paragraph
(d)(4) to read as follows:
§ 133.169
Pasteurized process cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. In § 133.173, revise paragraph
(e)(4) to read as follows:
§ 133.173
food.
Pasteurized process cheese
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
§ 133.155 Mozzarella cheese and scamorza
cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. In § 133.179, revise paragraph
*
*
*
*
*
(f)(5) to read as follows:
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
§ 133.179 Pasteurized process cheese
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
spread.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
■ 33. In § 133.156, revise paragraph
(f)
*
*
*
(b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
§ 133.156 Low-moisture mozzarella and
*
*
*
*
*
scamorza cheese.
■ 41. In § 133.181, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
§ 133.181 Provolone cheese.
(3) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
(b)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
■ 34. In § 133.160, add paragraph
(vi) Salt substitute.
(b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
§ 133.160 Muenster and munster cheese.
■ 42. In § 133.182, revise the tenth
sentence in paragraph (b) and revise
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
(3) * * *
§ 133.182 Soft ripened cheeses.
(vi) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may
■ 35. In § 133.162, revise paragraph
be added during the procedure. * * *
(b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
§ 133.162 Neufchatel cheese.
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
pasteurized if it has been held at a
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
temperature of not less than 145 °F for
a period of not less than 30 minutes, or
for a time and at a temperature
equivalent thereto in phosphatase
destruction.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 43. In § 133.183, add paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
(c) Nomenclature. The name of the
food is ‘‘sap sago cheese.’’
*
*
*
*
*
■ 47. In § 133.187, revise the tenth
sentence of paragraph (b) and the first
sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 133.183
*
Romano cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 44. In § 133.184, revise paragraphs (b)
introductory text and (b)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 133.184 Roquefort cheese, sheep’s milk
blue-mold, and blue-mold cheese from
sheep’s milk.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Optional Ingredients. The
following safe and suitable ingredients
may be used:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Other optional ingredients.
(i) Enzymes of animal, plant, or
microbial origin, used in curing or
flavor development.
(ii) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 45. In § 133.185, add paragraph
(b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
§ 133.185
Samsoe cheese.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 46. In § 133.186, revise paragraphs
(a)(2) and (c) to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 133.186
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may
be added during the procedure. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been
pasteurized if it has been held at a
temperature of not less than 145 °F for
a period of not less than 30 minutes, or
for a time and at a temperature
equivalent thereto in phosphatase
destruction. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 48. In § 133.188, revise the tenth
sentence in paragraph (b) and the first
sentence in paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 133.188
Semisoft part-skim cheeses.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may
be added during the procedure. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been
pasteurized if it has been held at a
temperature of not less than 145 °F for
a period of not less than 30 minutes, or
for a time and at a temperature
equivalent thereto in phosphatase
destruction. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 49. In § 133.189, revise paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
*
(a) * * *
(2) One or more of the dairy
ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section is allowed to become
sour, and is heated to boiling
temperature, with stirring. Sufficient
sour whey is added to precipitate the
casein. The curd is removed, spread out
in boxes, and pressed, and while under
pressure is allowed to drain and
ferment. It is ripened for not less than
5 weeks. The ripened curd is dried and
ground; salt or salt substitute and dried
clover of the species Melilotus coerulea
are added. The mixture is shaped into
truncated cones and ripened. The
optional ingredient in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section may be added during this
procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Semisoft cheeses.
§ 133.189 Skim milk cheese for
manufacturing.
Sap sago cheese.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
§ 133.187
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) For the purposes of this section,
‘‘skim milk’’ means cow’s milk from
which the milk fat has been separated.
(2) During the cheesemaking process,
where the curd is salted, salt substitute
may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 50. In § 133.190, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 133.190
Spiced cheeses.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 51. In § 133.195, add paragraph
(b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
§ 133.195
*
PO 00000
*
Swiss and emmentaler cheese.
*
Frm 00052
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
21165
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 136—BAKERY PRODUCTS
52. The authority citation for part 136
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
53. In § 136.110, revise paragraphs
(c)(4) and (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 136.110
Bread, rolls, and buns.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Total solids are determined by the
method prescribed in AOAC Official
Method 935.36(a), Solids (Total) in
Bread, except that if the baked unit
weighs 454 grams (1 pound) or more,
one entire unit is used for the
determination; if the baked unit weighs
less than 454 grams, enough units to
weigh 454 grams or more are used.
AOAC Official Method 935.36(a), Solids
(Total) in Bread, ‘‘Official Methods of
Analysis,’’ 21st Ed. (2019), is
incorporated by reference into this
section with the approval of the Director
of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. This material is also available
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2275
Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville,
MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–2622.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 137—CEREAL FLOURS AND
RELATED PRODUCTS
54. The authority citation for part 137
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
55. Add subpart A, consisting of
§§ 137.1 through 137.100, to read as
follows:
■
Subpart A—General Provisions.
Sec.
137.10 Incorporation by reference.
137.20 through 137.100 [Reserved]
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21166
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Subpart A—General Provisions.
§ 137.10
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622:
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 923.02A,
Reagent; IBR §§ 137.180(c); 137.270(b).
(2) AOAC Official Method 923.02B,
Apparatus, under Carbon Dioxide
(Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric
Determination; IBR §§ 137.180(c);
137.270(b).
(3) Reference Table 909.04, Correction
Factors for Gasometric Determination of
Carbon Dioxide; IBR §§ 137.180(c);
137.270(b).
(b) [Reserved]
§§ 137.20 through 137.100
[Reserved]
56. In § 137.180, revise paragraphs (a),
(c) introductory text, and (c)(1) to read
as follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 137.180
Self-rising flour.
(a) Description. Self-rising flour, selfrising white flour, self-rising wheat
flour, is an intimate mixture of flour,
sodium bicarbonate, and one or more of
the acid-reacting substances
monocalcium phosphate, sodium acid
pyrophosphate, and sodium aluminum
phosphate. It is seasoned with salt or
salt substitute. When it is tested by the
method prescribed in paragraph (c) of
this section, not less than 0.5 percent of
carbon dioxide is evolved. The acidreacting substance is added in sufficient
quantity to neutralize the sodium
bicarbonate. The combined weight of
such acid-reacting substance and
sodium bicarbonate is not more than 4.5
parts to each 100 parts of flour used.
Subject to the conditions and
restrictions prescribed by § 137.105(a),
the bleaching ingredients specified in
such section may be added as optional
ingredients. If the flour used in making
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
the self-rising flour is bleached, the
optional bleaching ingredient used
therein (see § 137.105(a)) is also an
optional ingredient of the self-rising
flour.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Method of analysis. Follow the
method prescribed in AOAC Official
Method 923.02A, Reagent, and 923.02B,
Apparatus, under Carbon Dioxide
(Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric
Determination (incorporated by
reference, see § 137.10): Instead of using
AOAC Official Method 923.02C,
Determination, use the following
procedure:
(1) Weigh 17 grams of the official
sample into flask A, add 15–20 glass
beads (4–6 mm. diameter), and connect
this flask with the apparatus (fig.
923.02). Open stopcock C and by means
of the leveling bulb E bring the
displacement solution to the 25 cc.
graduation above the zero mark. (This
25 cc. is a partial allowance for the
volume of acid to be used in the
decomposition.) Allow the apparatus to
stand 1–2 minutes to ensure that the
temperature and pressure within the
apparatus are the same as those of the
room. Close the stopcock, lower the
leveling bulb somewhat to reduce the
pressure within the apparatus, and
slowly run into the decomposition flask
from burette F 45 cc. of sulfuric acid (1
+ 5). To prevent the liberated carbon
dioxide from escaping through the acid
burette into the air, keep the
displacement solution in the leveling
bulb at all times during the
decomposition at a lower level than that
in the gas-measuring tube. Rotate and
then vigorously agitate the
decomposition flask for 3 minutes to
mix the contents intimately. Allow to
stand for 10 minutes to bring to
equilibrium. Equalize the pressure in
the measuring tube by means of the
leveling bulb and read the volume of gas
from the zero point on the tube. Deduct
20 cc. from this reading (this 20 cc.
together with previous allowance of 25
cc. compensates for the 45 cc. acid used
in the decomposition). Observe the
temperature of the air surrounding the
apparatus and also the barometric
pressure and multiply the number of
milliliters of gas evolved by the factor
given in Reference Table 909.04,
‘‘Correction Factors for Gasometric
Determination of Carbon Dioxide’’,
incorporated by reference, see § 137.10)
for the temperature and pressure
observed. Divide the corrected reading
by 100 to obtain the apparent percent by
weight of carbon dioxide in the official
sample.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57. In § 137.270, revise paragraphs (a),
(b) introductory text, and (b)(1) to read
as follows:
■
§ 137.270
Self-rising white corn meal.
(a) Description. Self-rising white corn
meal is an intimate mixture of white
corn meal, sodium bicarbonate, and one
or both of the acid-reacting substances
monocalcium phosphate and sodium
aluminum phosphate. It is seasoned
with salt or salt substitute. When it is
tested by the method prescribed in
paragraph (b) of this section, not less
than 0.5 percent of carbon dioxide is
evolved. The acid-reacting substance is
added in sufficient quantity to
neutralize the sodium bicarbonate. The
combined weight of such acid-reacting
substance and sodium bicarbonate is not
more than 4.5 parts to each 100 parts of
white corn meal used.
(b) Method of analysis. Follow the
method prescribed in AOAC Official
Method 923.02A, Reagent, and 923.02B,
Apparatus, under Carbon Dioxide
(Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric
Determination (incorporated by
reference, see § 137.10): Instead of using
AOAC Official Method 923.02C,
Determination, use the following
procedure:
(1) Weigh 17 grams of the official
sample into flask A, add 15–20 glass
beads (4–6 mm. diameter), and connect
this flask with the apparatus (fig.
923.02). Open stopcock C and by means
of the leveling bulk E bring the
displacement solution to the 25 cc.
graduation above the zero mark. (This
25 cc. is a partial allowance for the
volume of acid to be used in the
decomposition.) Allow the apparatus to
stand 1–2 minutes to ensure that the
temperature and pressure within the
apparatus are the same as those of the
room. Close the stopcock, lower the
leveling bulb somewhat to reduce the
pressure within the apparatus, and
slowly run into the decomposition flask
from burette F 45 cc. of sulfuric acid (1
+ 5). To prevent the liberated carbon
dioxide from escaping through the acid
burette into the air, keep the
displacement solution in the leveling
bulb at all times during the
decomposition at a lower level than that
in the gas-measuring tube. Rotate and
then vigorously agitate the
decomposition flask for 3 minutes to
mix the contents intimately. Allow to
stand for 10 minutes to bring to
equilibrium. Equalize the pressure in
the measuring tube by means of the
leveling bulb and read the volume of gas
from the zero point on the tube. Deduct
20 cc. from this reading (this 20 cc.
together with previous allowance of 25
cc. compensates for the 45 cc. acid used
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
in the decomposition). Observe the
temperature of the air surrounding the
apparatus and also the barometric
pressure and multiply the number of
milliliters of gas evolved by the factor
given in the Reference Table 909.04,
‘‘Correction Factors for Gasometric
Determination of Carbon Dioxide’’
(incorporated by reference, see § 137.10)
for the temperature and pressure
observed. Divide the corrected reading
by 100 to obtain the apparent percent by
weight of carbon dioxide in the official
sample.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 139.110
PART 139—MACARONI AND NOODLE
PRODUCTS
§ 139.150
58. The authority citation for part 139
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
59. Add subpart A, consisting of
§§ 1397.10 through 139.100, to read as
follows:
■
Subpart A—General Provisions.
Sec.
139.10 Incorporation by reference.
139.20 through 139.100 [Reserved]
Subpart A—General Provisions.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 139.10
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 926.07A,
Vacuum Oven Method, under Solids
(Total) and Loss on Drying (Moisture) in
Macaroni Products; IBR §§ 139.110(a);
139.150(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(b) [Reserved]
§§ 139.20 through 139.100
[Reserved]
60. In § 139.110, revise paragraphs
(a)(4) and (5) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Macaroni products.
(a) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute, in a quantity
that seasons the food.
(5) Gum gluten, in such quantity that
the protein content of the finished food
is not more than 13 percent by weight.
The finished macaroni product contains
not less than 87 percent of total solids
as determined by AOAC Official
Method 926.07A(incorporated by
reference, see § 139.10).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 61. In § 139.150, revise paragraphs
(a)(2) and (4) to read as follows:
Noodle products.
(a) * * *
(2) Salt or salt substitute, in a quantity
that seasons the food.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Concentrated glyceryl
monostearate (containing not less than
90 percent monoester) in a quantity not
exceeding 3 percent by weight of the
finished food. The finished noodle
product contains not less than 87
percent of total solids as determined by
AOAC Official Method
926.07A(incorporated by reference, see
§ 139.10). The total solids of noodle
products contains not less than 5.5
percent by weight of the solids of egg,
or egg yolk.
*
*
*
*
*
62. The authority citation for part 145
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
63. In § 145.110, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2)(iii) to read as follows:
■
§ 145.110
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Canned figs.
(a) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 150—FRUIT BUTTERS, JELLIES,
PRESERVES, AND RELATED
PRODUCTS
65. The authority citation for part 150
continues to read as follows:
■
Canned applesauce.
(a) * * *
(1) Definition. Canned applesauce is
the food prepared from comminuted or
chopped apples (Malus domestica
Borkhausen), which may or may not be
peeled and cored, and which may have
added thereto one or more of the
optional ingredients specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The
apple ingredient is heated and, in
accordance with good manufacturing
practices, bruised apple particles, peel,
seed, core material, carpel tissue, and
other coarse, hard, or extraneous
materials are removed. The food is
sealed in containers. It is so processed
by heat, either before or after sealing, as
to prevent spoilage. The soluble solids
content, measured by refractometer and
expressed as percent sucrose (degrees
Brix) with correction for temperature to
the equivalent at 20 °C (68 °F), is not
PO 00000
less than 9 percent (exclusive of the
solids of any added optional nutritive
carbohydrate sweeteners) as determined
by AOAC Official Method 932.12 but
without correction for invert sugar or
other substances. AOAC Official
Method 932.12, ‘‘Solids (Soluble) in
Fruits and Fruit Products,’’ in ‘‘Official
Methods of Analysis of AOAC
INTERNATIONAL,’’ 21st Ed. (2019), is
incorporated by reference into this
section with the approval of the Director
of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51,. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact the FDA at FDA’s Dockets
Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240–
402–7500. For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. This material is available from
AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2275
Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville,
MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–2622.
(2) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 64. In § 145.130, revise paragraph
(a)(5) to read as follows:
§ 145.130
PART 145—CANNED FRUITS
21167
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
66. Add subpart A, consisting of
§§ 150.10 through 150.100, to read as
follows:
■
Subpart A—General Provisions.
Sec.
150.10 Incorporation by reference.
150.20 through 150.100 [Reserved]
Subpart A—General Provisions.
§ 150.10
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21168
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 932.12,
Solids (Soluble) in Fruits and Fruit
Products; IBR § 150.110(d).
(2) AOAC Official Method 932.14C,
By Means of Refractometer, under
Solids in Syrups; IBR § 150.110(d).
(b) [Reserved]
§§ 150.20 through 150.100
[Reserved]
67. In § 150.110, revise paragraphs
(c)(4), (d)(3), and (d)(5) to read as
follows:
■
§ 150.110
Fruit butter.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) The soluble solids content of the
finished fruit butter is not less than 43
percent, as determined by AOAC
Official Method 932.12 (incorporated by
reference, see § 150.10).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The weight of fruit juice or diluted
fruit juice or concentrated fruit juice
(optional ingredient, paragraph (c)(6) of
this section) from a fruit specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section is the
weight of such juice, as determined by
the method prescribed in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, except that the
percent of soluble solids is determined
by AOAC Official Method 932.14C,
under Solids in Syrups (incorporated by
reference, see § 150.10); the weight of
diluted concentrated juice from any
other fruits is the original weight of the
juice before it was diluted or
concentrated.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 155—CANNED VEGETABLES
68. The authority citation for part 155
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379(e).
69. Add § 155.10 to subpart A to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
§ 155.10
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) Table 1, ‘‘Nominal Dimensions of
Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard
Series),’’ under the heading ‘‘Definition
of Terms and Explanatory Notes’’; IBR
§§ 155.120(b); 155.130(b).
(2) AOAC Official Method 938.10,
Solids (Alcohol-Insoluble) in Canned
Peas Gravimetric Method; IBR
§ 155.170(b).
(b) [Reserved]
■ 70. In § 155.120, revise paragraphs
(a)(3)(i) and (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 155.120 Canned green beans and canned
wax beans.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Determine the gross weight of the
container. Open and distribute the
contents of the container over the
meshes of a U.S. No. 8 circular sieve
with openings of 2.36 mm (0.0937 in),
which has been previously weighed.
The diameter of the sieve is 20.3 cm (8
in) if the quantity of contents of the
container is less than 1.36 kg (3 lbs) and
30.5 cm (12 in) if such quantity is 1.36
kg (3 lbs) or more. The bottom of the
sieve is woven-wire cloth that complies
with the specifications of such cloth set
forth in ‘‘Official Methods of Analysis’’,
Table 1, ‘‘Nominal Dimensions of
Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard
Series),’’ under the heading ‘‘Definition
of Terms and Explanatory Notes,’’
(incorporated by reference, see
§ 155.10). Without shifting the material
on the sieve, incline the sieve 17° to 20°
to facilitate drainage. Two minutes after
drainage begins, weigh the sieve and the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
drained material. Record in grams
(ounces) the weight so found, less the
weight of the sieve, as the drained
weight. Dry and weigh the empty
container and subtract this weight from
the gross weight to obtain the net
weight. Calculate the percent of drained
liquid in the net weight.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 71. In § 155.130, revise paragraphs
(a)(3)(i) and (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 155.130
Canned corn.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Determine the gross weight of the
container. Open and distribute the
contents of the container over the
meshes of a U.S. No. 8 circular sieve,
which has previously been weighed.
The diameter of the sieve is 20.3 cm. (8
in) if the quantity of the contents of the
container is less than 1.36 kg. (3 lbs),
and 30.5 cm. (12 in) if such quantity is
1.36 kg. (3 lbs) or more. The bottom of
the sieve is woven-wire cloth that
complies with the specifications for
such sieve set forth in ‘‘Official Methods
of Analysis’’, Table 1, ‘‘Nominal
Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves
(USA Standard Series),’’ under the
heading ‘‘Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 155.10). Without
shifting the material on the sieve, so
incline the sieve at approximately 17° to
20° angle to facilitate drainage. Two
minutes from the time drainage begins,
weigh the sieve and the drained
material. Record, in grams (ounces), the
weight so found, less the weight of the
sieve, as the drained weight. Dry and
weigh the empty container and subtract
this weight from the gross weight to
obtain the net weight. Calculate the
percent of drained liquid in the net
weight.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 72. In § 155.170, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(i), and paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and
(vi) to read as follows:
§ 155.170
Canned peas.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Seriously blemished peas. Not
more than 1 percent of the drained
weight is seriously blemished peas, i.e.,
peas that are hard, shriveled, spotted,
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
discolored, or otherwise blemished to
an extent that the appearance or eating
quality is seriously affected.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Alcohol-insoluble solids. The
alcohol-insoluble solids of smooth-skin
or substantially smooth-skin peas, such
as Alaska-type peas or hybrids having
similar characteristics, may not be more
than 23.5 percent and, of sweet green
wrinkled varieties or hybrids having
similar characteristics, not more than 21
percent based on the procedure set forth
in tAOAC Official Method
938.10(incorporated by reference, see
§ 155.10).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 73. In § 155.190, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
§ 155.190
Canned tomatoes.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 74. In § 155.191, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 155.191
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute (sodium
chloride formed during acid
neutralization shall be considered
added salt).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 75. In § 155.194, revise paragraph
(a)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 155.194
Catsup.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) The liquid obtained from the
residue from partial extraction of juice
from such tomatoes. Such liquid is
strained so as to exclude skins, seeds,
and other coarse or hard substances in
accordance with current good
manufacturing practice. Prior to
straining, food-grade hydrochloric acid
may be added to the tomato material in
an amount to obtain a pH no lower than
2.0. Such acid is then neutralized with
food-grade sodium hydroxide so that the
treated tomato material is restored to a
pH of 4.2 ± 0.2. The final composition
of the food may be adjusted by
concentration and/or by the addition of
water. The food may contain salt or salt
substitute (sodium chloride formed
during acid neutralization shall be
considered added salt) and is seasoned
with ingredients as specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The food
is preserved by heat sterilization
(canning), refrigeration, or freezing.
When sealed in a container to be held
at ambient temperatures, it is so
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
processed by heat, before or after
sealing, as to prevent spoilage.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 76. In § 155.200, revise paragraph
(c)(4)(i) to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371.
§ 155.200 Certain other canned
vegetables.
§ 158.170
81. In § 158.170, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(iii) to read as
follows:
■
Frozen peas.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Not more than 2 percent by
weight seriously blemished peas, i.e.,
peas that are hard, shriveled, spotted,
discolored or otherwise blemished to an
extent that the appearance or eating
quality is seriously affected.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 156—VEGETABLE JUICES
PART 161—FISH AND SHELLFISH
■
78. The authority citation for part 156
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
79. In § 156.145, revise paragraph
(a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 156.145
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA’s Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, visitn
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC),
2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300,
Rockville, MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–
2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st
Ed. (2019);
(1) Table 1, ‘‘Nominal Dimensions of
Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard
Series),’’ under the heading ‘‘Definition
of Terms and Explanatory Notes’’; IBR
§§ 161.145(c); 161.173(c); 161.190(a)(7).
(2) [Reserved]
(b) [Reserved]
■ 84. In § 161.145, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (c)(3) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 77. In § 155.201, revise paragraph
(a)(3)(i) to read as follows:
§ 155.201
Canned mushrooms.
■
Tomato concentrates.
21169
Tomato juice.
(a) * * *
(1) Definition. Tomato juice is the
food intended for direct consumption,
obtained from the unfermented liquid
extracted from mature tomatoes of the
red or reddish varieties of Lycopersicum
esculentum P. Mill, with or without
scalding followed by draining. In the
extraction of such liquid, heat may be
applied by any method which does not
add water thereto. Such juice is strained
free from peel, seeds, and other coarse
or hard substances, but contains finely
divided insoluble solids from the flesh
of the tomato in accordance with
current good manufacturing practice.
Such juice may be homogenized, may be
seasoned with salt or salt substitute, and
may be acidified with any safe and
suitable organic acid. The juice may
have been concentrated and later
reconstituted with water and/or tomato
juice to a tomato soluble solids content
of not less than 5.0 percent by weight
as determined by the method prescribed
in § 156.3(b). The food is preserved by
heat sterilization (canning),
refrigeration, or freezing. When sealed
in a container to be held at ambient
temperatures, it is so processed by heat,
before or after sealing, as to prevent
spoilage.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 158—FROZEN VEGETABLES
80. The authority citation for part 158
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
82. The authority citation for part 161
continues to read as follows:
83. Add § 161.10 to read as follows:
§ 161.10
§ 161.145
Incorporation by reference.
Canned oysters.
(a) * * *
(1) Canned oysters is the food
prepared from one or any mixture of
two or all of the forms of oysters
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
21170
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, and a packing medium of water,
or the watery liquid draining from
oysters before or during processing, or a
mixture of such liquid and water. The
food may be seasoned with salt or salt
substitute. It is sealed in containers and
so processed by heat as to prevent
spoilage.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Drained weight is determined by
the following method: Keep the
unopened canned oyster container at a
temperature of not less than 68 °F or
more than 95 °F for at least 12 hours
immediately preceding the
determination. After opening, tilt the
container so as to distribute its contents
evenly over the meshes of a circular
sieve that has been previously weighed.
The diameter of the sieve is 8 inches if
the quantity of the contents of the
container is less than 3 pounds and 12
inches if such quantity is 3 pounds or
more. The bottom of the sieve is wovenwire cloth that complies with the
specifications for such cloth set forth
under ‘‘2.36 mm (No. 8)’’ in ‘‘Official
Methods of Analysis,’’ Table 1,
‘‘Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test
Sieves (USA Standard Series),’’ under
the heading ‘‘Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes,’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 161.10). Without
shifting the material on the sieve, so
incline the sieve as to facilitate
drainage. Two minutes from the time
drainage begins, weigh the sieve and the
drained oysters. The weight so found,
less the weight of the sieve, shall be
considered to be the drained weight of
the oysters.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 85. In § 161.170, revise paragraph
(a)(4)(i) to read as follows:
§ 161.170
Canned Pacific salmon.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 86. In § 161.173, revise paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) and (c)(1) to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 161.173 Canned wet pack shrimp in
transparent or nontransparent containers.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) The standard of fill of transparent
or nontransparent containers for canned
wet pack shrimp is a fill such that the
cut-out weight of shrimp taken from
each container is not less than 60
percent of the weight of the water
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
required to fill the container. The
weight of the water required to fill the
container is determined by the general
method provided in § 130.12(a) of this
chapter. Cut-out weight is determined
by the following method: Keep the
unopened canned shrimp container at a
temperature of not less than 68 °F nor
more than 75 °F for at least 12 hours
immediately preceding the
determination. After opening, distribute
the shrimp evenly over the meshes of a
circular sieve that has been previously
weighed. The diameter of the sieve is
20.3 centimeters (8 inches) if the
quantity of the contents of the container
is less than 1.36 kilograms (3 pounds),
and 30.5 centimeters (12 inches) if such
quantity is 1.36 kilograms (3 pounds) or
more. The bottom of the sieve is wovenwire cloth that complies with the
specifications for such cloth set forth as
a 2.36 mm (No. 8) sieve in ‘‘Official
Methods of Analysis’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 161.10), Table 1,
‘‘Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test
Sieves (USA Standard Series), under the
heading ‘‘Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 161.10) Without shifting
the material on the sieve, incline the
sieve at an angle of approximately 17°
to 20° to facilitate drainage. Allow the
shrimp to drain for 2 minutes, measured
from the moment the product is poured
onto the sieve. Weigh the sieve and the
drained shrimp. The weight so found,
less the weight of the sieve, shall be
considered to be the cut-out weight of
the shrimp.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 87. In § 161.190, revise paragraphs
(a)(6)(i) and (a)(7) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 161.190
Canned tuna.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) For determination of the color
designations specified in paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, the following
method shall be used: Recombine the
separations of pressed cake resulting
from the method prescribed in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section. Pass the
combined portions through a sieve fitted
with woven-wire cloth of 1⁄4-inch mesh
complying with the specifications for
such cloth set forth in ‘‘Official Methods
of Analysis’’, Table 1, ‘‘Nominal
Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves
(USA Standard Series),’’ under the
heading ‘‘Definitions of Terms and
Explanatory Notes’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 161.10) Mix the sieved
material and place a sufficient quantity
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
into a 307 × 113 size container (bearing
a top seam and having a false bottom
approximately 1⁄2-inch deep and painted
flat black inside and outside) so that
after tamping and smoothing the surface
of the sample the material will be 1⁄8inch to 1⁄4-inch below the top of the
container. Within 10 minutes after
sieving through the 1⁄4-inch mesh
woven-wire cloth, determine the
Munsell value of sample surface.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 163—CACAO PRODUCTS
88. The authority citation for part 163
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 341, 343,
348, 371, 379e.
89. In § 163.111, revise paragraph
(b)(6) to read as follows:
■
§ 163.111
Chocolate liquor.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 90. In § 163.112, revise paragraph
(b)(4) to read as follows:
§ 163.112
Breakfast cocoa.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 91. In § 163.123, revise paragraph
(b)(3) to read as follows:
§ 163.123
Sweet chocolate.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Spices, natural and artificial
flavorings, ground whole nut meats,
ground coffee, dried malted cereal
extract, salt or salt substitute, and other
seasonings that do not either singly or
in combination impart a flavor that
imitates the flavor of chocolate, milk, or
butter;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 92. In § 163.124, revise paragraph
(b)(4) to read as follows:
§ 163.124
White chocolate.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Spices, natural and artificial
flavorings, ground whole nut meats,
ground coffee, dried malted cereal
extract, salt or salt substitute, and other
seasonings that do not either singly or
in combination impart a flavor that
imitates the flavor of chocolate, milk, or
butter;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 93. In § 163.130, revise paragraph
(b)(3) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2023 / Proposed Rules
§ 163.130
Milk chocolate.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Spices, natural and artificial
flavorings, ground whole nut meats,
ground coffee, dried malted cereal
extract, salt or salt substitute, and other
seasonings that do not either singly or
in combination impart a flavor that
imitates the flavor of chocolate, milk, or
butter;
PART 166—MARGARINE
94. The authority citation for part 166
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 347,
348, 371, 379e.
95. In § 166.110, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 166.110
Margarine.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(a) Description. Margarine (or
oleomargarine) is the food in plastic
form or liquid emulsion, containing not
less than 80 percent fat determined by
the method prescribed in AOAC Official
Method 938.06A. AOAC Official
Method 938.06A, ‘‘Indirect Method,
under Fat in Butter,’’ found in ‘‘Official
Methods of Analysis of AOAC
INTERNATIONAL,’’ 21st Ed. (2019), is
incorporated by reference into this
section with the approval of the Director
of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA).
Contact the FDA at FDA’s Dockets
Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240–
402–7500. For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. This material is available from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Apr 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
21171
AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2275
Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville,
MD 20850–3250, 1–800–379–2622.
Margarine contains only safe and
suitable ingredients, as defined in
§ 130.3(d) of this chapter. It is produced
from one or more of the optional
ingredients in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, and one or more of the optional
ingredients in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, to which may be added one or
more of the optional ingredients in
paragraph (b) of this section. Margarine
contains vitamin A as provided for in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Salt (sodium chloride) or salt
substitute; potassium chloride for
dietary margarine or oleomargarine.
*
*
*
*
*
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
■ 99. In § 168.160, revise paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
PART 168—SWEETENERS AND
TABLE SIRUPS
■
96. The authority citation for part 168
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348,
371, 379e.
■
97. In § 168.130, revise paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 169.140
■
■
§ 168.130
Cane sirup.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 98. In § 168.140, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (a) and paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 168.140
Maple sirup.
(a) Maple sirup is the liquid food
derived by concentration and heat
treatment of the sap of the maple tree
(Acer) or by solution in water of maple
sugar (maple concrete) made from such
sap. * * *
(b) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
*
§ 168.160
Sorghum sirup.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 100. In § 168.180, revise paragraph
(b)(7) to read as follows:
§ 168.180
Table sirup.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(7) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 169—FOOD DRESSINGS AND
FLAVORINGS
101. The authority citation for part
169 continues to read as follows:
102. In § 169.140, revise paragraph
(d)(1) to read as follows:
Mayonnaise.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 103. In § 169.150, revise paragraph
(e)(1) to read as follows:
§ 169.150
Salad dressing.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 23, 2023.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2023–06456 Filed 4–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21148-21171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06456]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 130, 131, 133, 136, 137, 139, 145, 150, 155, 156, 158,
161, 163, 166, 168, and 169
[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-2226]
RIN 0910-AI72
Use of Salt Substitutes To Reduce the Sodium Content in
Standardized Foods
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is proposing to
amend our standard of identity (SOI) regulations that specify salt
(sodium chloride) as a required or optional ingredient to permit the
use of salt substitutes in standardized foods, to reduce the sodium
content. Reducing sodium may help reduce the risk of hypertension, a
leading cause of heart disease and stroke. The proposed rule, if
finalized, would help support a healthier food supply by providing
flexibility to facilitate industry innovation in the production of
standardized foods lower in sodium while maintaining the basic nature
and essential characteristics of the foods.
DATES: Either electronic or written comments on the proposed rule must
be submitted by August 8, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of August 8, 2023. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are received on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets
[[Page 21149]]
Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2022-N-2226 for ``Use of Salt Substitutes to Reduce the Sodium
Content in Standardized Foods.'' Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' We will review
this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for
public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name
and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide
this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this information as ``confidential.''
Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except
in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law.
For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets,
see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Yeung, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2371 or Carrol Bascus,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Regulations and
Policy (HFS-024), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Proposed Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. Costs and Benefits
II. Table of Abbreviations/Acronyms
III. Background
A. Introduction
B. Need for the Regulation
C. FDA's Current Regulatory Framework
IV. Legal Authority
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
A. Scope/Applicability
B. The Basic Nature and Essential Characteristics of a
Standardized Food
C. Definition of Salt Substitute
D. Amending Standard of Identity Regulations To Permit Salt
Substitutes
E. Update Incorporation by Reference
F. Technical Amendments
VI. Proposed Effective/Compliance Dates
VII. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Impacts
A. Economic Analysis of Impacts
B. Initial Small Entity Analysis
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
X. Federalism
XI. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
XII. References
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule, if finalized, would amend FDA's definitions and
standards of identity (SOI; the acronym is used to refer to both the
singular ``standard of identity'' and the plural ``standards of
identity'') that specify salt (sodium chloride) as a required or
optional ingredient. Foods for which FDA has established a SOI are
referred to as ``standardized'' foods. The amendments would permit the
use of safe and suitable salt substitutes to replace some or all of the
salt used in the manufacture of standardized foods. The proposed rule
would not list specific salt substitutes; instead, the proposed rule
would cover ingredients or combinations of ingredients used as salt
substitutes by food manufacturers currently or in the future. If
finalized, the proposed rule would support efforts to reduce sodium
content in standardized foods and may help to improve consumer dietary
patterns by reducing sodium consumption. On average Americans consume
50% more sodium than the recommended limit for those aged 14 and older
(Ref. 1). Reducing sodium consumption may help reduce the risk of
hypertension, a leading cause of heart disease and stroke. The proposed
rule would allow food manufacturers the flexibility to use salt
substitutes and allow for innovation in producing healthier
standardized foods. The proposed rule would promote honesty and fair
dealing in the interest of consumers by accommodating their preferences
for lower sodium varieties of foods. This, in turn, would make lower-
sodium options available to them.
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Proposed Rule
FDA is proposing to amend its SOI that specify salt as a required
or optional ingredient to permit the use of safe and suitable salt
substitutes in standardized foods, to reduce the sodium content. We
propose to amend our regulation entitled ``Food Standards: General''
(21 CFR part 130) to create a new subpart C entitled ``Flexibility in
Standardized Foods'' and add a new section entitled ``Ingredient
Flexibility in Standardized Foods'' to define salt substitute. We also
propose to amend 80 SOI to permit salt substitutes.
We also propose to update the incorporation by reference (IBR)
information of several SOI to refer to the most recent versions of the
IBR materials and to provide up-to-date contact information for
obtaining the IBR materials. For example, the proposed rule would
update the referenced methods of analysis to those in the ``Official
Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL,'' 21st Ed. 2019. We also
propose to make technical amendments to correct inconsistencies and
typographical errors in some SOI regulations.
We tentatively conclude that the proposed amendments are necessary
to modernize SOI to provide flexibility and facilitate innovation in
the production of standardized foods with less sodium, and to promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers.
C. Legal Authority
We are proposing this rule consistent with our authority in
sections 201, 401, 402, 409, and 701 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 348, 371). We
[[Page 21150]]
discuss our legal authority in greater detail in section IV.
D. Costs and Benefits
The proposed rule would amend SOI that specify salt as a required
or optional ingredient, to permit the use of salt substitutes. The
proposed rule would give manufacturers the flexibility to use salt
substitutes in standardized foods, to reduce sodium content. If
finalized, the proposed rule would not result in regulatory costs for
firms. The proposal would not require manufacturers to replace salt
with salt substitutes. Instead, manufacturers would have the option of
using salt substitutes to replace salt in standardized foods. Should
manufacturers choose to use this flexibility to reformulate some
products by substituting some salt with salt substitutes, the primary
benefits realized would result from lower sodium consumption by U.S.
consumers who choose to purchase and consume the reformulated versions
of such products, and increased profit (producer surplus) for
manufacturers (or at least no decrease in profits). The primary cost of
such voluntary market behavior would include reformulation and
relabeling costs for the manufacturers.
II. Table of Abbreviations/Acronyms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abbreviation/acronym What it means
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDRR................................... Chronic Disease Risk Reduction
Intake
CFR.................................... Code of Federal Regulations
FD&C Act............................... Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act
FDA.................................... Food and Drug Administration
FR..................................... Federal Register
GRAS................................... Generally Recognized as Safe
IBR.................................... Incorporation by Reference
mg..................................... Milligram
SOI.................................... Standard(s) of Identity
U.S.C.................................. United States Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Background
A. Introduction
As a public health agency, FDA seeks to improve dietary patterns in
the United States to help reduce the burden of diet-related chronic
diseases and advance health equity as nutrition-related chronic
diseases are experienced disproportionately by certain racial and
ethnic minority groups, those living in rural communities, and those
with lower socioeconomic status. We are committed to accomplishing
this, in part, by creating a healthier food supply for all. One way FDA
is working towards this goal is by helping to reduce sodium across the
food supply.
Americans consume, on average, 3,400 milligrams of sodium per day
(mg/day) (Ref. 1). This is nearly 50 percent more than the sodium
Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake (CDRR) established by the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, which sets
the limit for sodium for individuals 14 years and older at 2,300 mg/
day. This CDRR was adopted as a recommendation by the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 (Refs. 1 and 2). Reducing sodium
intake to below the CDRR level is expected to help reduce the risk of
chronic disease. Excess sodium intake increases risk for hypertension,
commonly referred to as high blood pressure, a leading cause of heart
disease and stroke and the first and fifth leading cause of mortality
in 2020 in the United States (Refs. 2-6). Decreasing sodium intake is,
therefore, expected to reduce the rate of hypertension. It has been
estimated that sufficient reductions in the population average sodium
intake could potentially result in tens of thousands fewer cases of
heart disease and stroke and associated mortality each year (Refs. 7-
9).
Reducing sodium in processed, packaged and prepared foods will help
create a healthier food supply. A healthier food supply has the
potential to contribute to better health outcomes and reduce
preventable death and disease related to poor nutrition; many of which
are experienced at higher rates by certain racial and ethnic groups
(Ref. 10). For example, more than 4 in 10 American adults have
hypertension and that number increases to nearly 6 in 10 for non-
Hispanic Black Americans (Ref. 11). African American women are almost
60 percent more likely to have hypertension when compared to non-
Hispanic white women, and African American adults are 30% more likely
than non-Hispanic white Americans to die from coronary heart disease
(CHD) (Refs. 12 and 13); further, American Indians/Alaskan Natives are
50% more like to be diagnosed with CHD than non-Hispanic Whites (Ref.
13). The proposed rule's likely effect on increasing the availability
of lower sodium products may contribute to government-wide efforts to
reduce health disparities.
Reducing sodium in processed, packaged and prepared food is a
critical step in helping to improve consumer dietary patterns. More
than 70 percent of sodium consumed in the United States comes from
sodium added during manufacturing and commercial food preparation (Ref.
14). This makes it challenging for consumers to reduce their sodium
consumption. Further, because salt (sodium chloride) serves various
functions in processed, packaged, and prepared foods, industry must
balance sodium reduction efforts while manufacturing products that
maintain the properties of a certain food and still meet the
preferences of consumers.
FDA is engaged in several efforts aimed at encouraging gradual,
efficient reduction of overall sodium content in processed, packaged
and prepared food products. We recently issued two guidance documents
for industry to support voluntary industry efforts to reduce sodium in
the food supply and facilitate industry innovation toward creating
healthier foods. The December 2020 guidance for industry entitled ``The
Use of an Alternate Name for Potassium Chloride in Food Labeling''
(Potassium Chloride guidance) (Ref. 15) sets forth FDA's enforcement
discretion policy with respect to declaring potassium chloride as
``potassium salt'' in the ingredient statement in the labeling of food
products. In October 2021, we issued guidance for industry entitled
``Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals: Target Mean and Upper Bound
Concentrations for Sodium in Commercially Processed, Packaged, and
Prepared Foods'' (Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals guidance) (Ref. 16).
The guidance document finalizes the short-term (2.5 year) voluntary
sodium reduction targets in over 160 categories of packaged and
restaurant prepared food. These short-term targets are based on a
reduction of average sodium intake from current levels of 3,400 mg/day
to 3,000 mg/day, and they serve as initial benchmarks for a broad and
gradual reduction of sodium in the food supply (Ref. 16 and 17).
Through the two guidance documents and this rulemaking, our intent is
to support the gradual reduction of sodium across the food supply.
Under our authority in section 401 of the FD&C Act, FDA establishes
SOI to promote honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers.
SOI are established under the common or usual name of a food. Such
foods are said to be ``standardized.'' SOI define the food and
typically provide the types of ingredients that it must contain (i.e.,
mandatory ingredients) and that it may contain (i.e., optional
ingredients). They sometimes specify the amount or proportion of each
ingredient. Many SOI also designate methods of production. We have over
250 SOI for a wide variety of food products.
[[Page 21151]]
B. Need for the Regulation
Salt substitutes are ingredients that can help reduce sodium in
processed, packaged and prepared foods. Food manufacturers wishing to
reduce salt in their products to accommodate consumer preferences or
for other reasons sometimes use substitute ingredients that provide
similar taste and other technical functions of salt in foods. Most of
our SOI that include salt as a required or optional ingredient do not
permit the use of salt substitutes. Therefore, food manufacturers are
currently precluded from using salt substitutes in the production of
these standardized foods. However, manufacturers may use salt
substitutes in the production of non-standardized foods. Various
stakeholders have expressed concern that many SOI are out of date and
may impede innovation, including the ability to produce healthier foods
(Ref. 18). Manufacturers seeking to reduce sodium in standardized foods
are limited because they are unable to produce foods using salt
substitutes and still conform to the SOI. In this way, the SOI may
become a barrier to innovation.
Permitting the use of salt substitutes is aligned with FDA's goal
to reduce sodium across the food supply and our work to reduce sodium
consumption. Research suggests that consumers usually do not notice
small reductions in sodium and, over time, consumer palates adjust to
lower sodium levels (Ref. 19). Through our work on the Voluntary Sodium
Reduction Goals guidance and the Potassium Chloride guidance, we
learned that stakeholders, including industry, consumers, consumer
advocacy, scientific and professional health organizations, generally
support allowing the use of salt substitutes. In another public
engagement, some stakeholders discussed modernizing SOI to allow the
use of salt substitutes using a ``horizontal approach'' (Ref. 18). A
horizontal approach to amending standards is a change that could be
made across all, or broad categories of SOI to provide flexibility and
facilitate innovation in the production of more nutritious foods. We
considered several options for permitting salt substitutes in
standardized foods and evaluated how to apply this change across
multiple SOI. The proposed rule, if finalized, would adopt a horizontal
approach to amending the applicable SOI. The proposed rule would permit
the use of salt substitutes in SOI that specify salt as a required or
optional ingredient, to reduce sodium in the food. Because the use of
salt substitutes in these SOI is currently precluded, any use of salt
substitutes by manufacturers under the rule would contribute to reduced
sodium intake to some degree.
Permitting the use of salt substitutes in standardized foods would
contribute to our goal to reduce sodium across the food supply. It
would facilitate voluntary industry efforts toward sodium reduction by
providing flexibility and supporting innovation in the production of
healthier standardized foods, which may help some consumers to
gradually reduce the sodium in their diet and contribute to better
health outcomes. The proposed rule may have the potential to contribute
to government-wide efforts to reduce health disparities if the use of
salt substitutes helps populations disproportionately affected by
hypertension to consume less sodium.
C. FDA's Current Regulatory Framework
The FD&C Act gives us the authority to establish definitions and
standards for foods with respect to identity, quality, and fill of
container (21 U.S.C. 341). SOI specify the permitted ingredients, both
mandatory and optional, and sometimes describe the amount or proportion
of each ingredient. Many SOI also prescribe a method of production or
formulation. Foods for which FDA has established a SOI must conform to
the applicable definition and standard. A food is misbranded if it
purports to be or is represented as a food for which a SOI has been
established but fails to conform to the definition and standard (21
U.S.C. 343(g)).
SOI are codified in parts 130 to 169 (21 CFR parts 130 to 169).
Part 130 outlines general provisions, including the use of food
additives in food standards. Part 130 also includes the general
definition and SOI (i.e., Sec. 130.10). Parts 131 to 169 set forward
SOI for foods in 21 food product categories.
We have long interpreted the term ``salt'' in the food standards in
parts 131 to 169 to refer to sodium chloride. Salt is specified as a
required or optional ingredient in 80 SOI across these parts. Some SOI
cross reference other SOI. For example, in part 136 (21 CFR part 136),
salt is an optional ingredient in the SOI for bread, rolls, and buns
(Sec. 136.110) which is referenced in several other SOI, including:
enriched bread, rolls, and buns (Sec. 136.115), milk bread, rolls, and
buns (Sec. 136.130), raisin bread, rolls, and buns (Sec. 136.160),
and whole wheat bread, rolls, and buns (Sec. 136.180). The result of
such cross referencing is that salt is a required or an optional
ingredient in 140 SOI.
Manufacturers of standardized foods have few options for reducing
the sodium content of their products. If salt is a required ingredient,
they may generally use less salt. If salt is an optional ingredient,
they may either use no salt or less salt. However, they cannot replace
salt with another ingredient unless the standard permits the use of
another ingredient. Most SOI do not provide for a substitute for salt.
In some instances, we established separate SOI for low sodium foods,
thereby allowing manufacturers to reduce the amount of salt used and to
substitute other ingredients. Manufacturers may also modify the sodium
content of standardized foods under the general definition and SOI in
Sec. 130.10 (Requirements for foods named by use of a nutrient content
claim and a standardized item), provided that certain conditions are
met.
Deviation from a SOI is permitted under the general definition and
SOI in Sec. 130.10. The deviation must be due to a modification
described by an expressed nutrient content claim defined by regulation.
Expressed nutrient content claims for the sodium content of foods
(e.g., ``low sodium'') are provided under Sec. 101.61 (21 CFR 101.61)
(Nutrient content claims for the sodium content of foods). Thus, sodium
modifications to a standardized food are permitted if the modification
meets the requirements for a nutrient content claim under Sec. 101.61.
The modified food becomes a new standardized food under Sec. 130.10
and is named with the nutrient content claim and the name of the
standardized food from which it deviates (e.g., ``low sodium provolone
cheese''). It may be impracticable for manufacturers to reduce the
sodium content in standardized foods to the extent required by a
nutrient content claim. For example, to meet the requirements for a
``reduced sodium'' nutrient content claim, manufacturers must decrease
the sodium in the food by at least 25 percent. Certain foods do not
retain the same characteristics when the amount of sodium is reduced to
this degree, and therefore, the general definition and SOI does not
facilitate the production of lower sodium varieties. This proposed rule
would allow manufacturers to reduce the sodium in standardized foods in
amounts less than the amounts prescribed in Sec. 101.61. This would
provide manufacturers greater flexibility when reformulating
standardized foods to lower the sodium content.
Presently, three SOI specifically permit the use of a salt
substitute. The SOI for low sodium cheddar cheese (Sec. 133.116) and
low sodium colby
[[Page 21152]]
cheese (Sec. 133.121) permit the use of a salt substitute. The SOI for
low sodium colby cheese prohibits the use of salt and permits the use
of a salt substitute that contains no sodium (Sec. 133.121(a)). The
SOI for margarine (Sec. 166.110) specifically permits the use of
potassium chloride in the manufacture of dietary margarine. Potassium
chloride, in some instances, can be used as a partial substitute for
sodium chloride in food processing and manufacturing.
If finalized, the proposed rule would provide a new means for
manufacturers to reduce the sodium content of standardized foods. Salt
substitutes would be permitted in any food for which an SOI has been
established and that specifies salt as a required or an optional
ingredient. This would be achieved without requiring the minimum
reductions in sodium content under Sec. 101.61 and renaming of food
products as is required for modifications under Sec. 130.10.
IV. Legal Authority
We are issuing this proposed rule consistent with our authority in
sections 201, 401, 402, 409, and 701of the FD&C Act. Section 401 of the
FD&C Act directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary)
to issue regulations fixing and establishing for any food a reasonable
definition and standard of identity, standard of quality, or standard
of fill of container, whenever in the judgment of the Secretary, such
action will promote honesty and fair dealing in the interest of
consumers. We tentatively conclude that permitting the use of salt
substitutes to replace some or all of the salt used in the production
of standardized foods would promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers. Consumers desire more nutritious and healthy
food options, such as lower sodium versions of foods. This proposed
rule, if finalized, would allow for industry development and sale of
such foods while ensuring that standardized foods meet consumer
expectations and preferences with respect to lower-sodium varieties.
FDA has codified food standards in parts 130 to 169. These
regulations do not provide either an authorization or exemption from
regulation as a food additive under section 409 of the FD&C Act. The
FD&C Act defines ``food additive,'' in relevant part, as any substance,
the intended use of which results or may reasonably be expected to
result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component of food, if
such substance is not generally recognized by experts as safe under the
conditions of its intended use (section 201(s) of the FD&C Act). The
definition of ``food additive'' exempts any uses that are the subject
of prior sanction (section 201(s)(4) of the FD&C Act)). Food additives
are deemed unsafe except to the extent that FDA approves their use
(section 409(a) of the FD&C Act). Food is adulterated when it contains
an unapproved food additive (section 402(a)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act).
We also are issuing this proposed rule under section 701(a) of the
FD&C Act, which authorizes FDA to issue regulations for the efficient
enforcement of the FD&C Act. Regulations issued under section 701(a)
``must effectuate a congressional objective expressed elsewhere in the
Act'' (Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. v. FDA,
226 F. Supp. 2d 204 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Pharm. Mfrs. Ass'n. v. FDA,
484 F. Supp. 1179, 1183 (D. Del. 1980))). Amending SOI to permit the
use of salt substitutes would effectuate the congressional objective
``to promote honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers''
expressed in section 401 of the FD&C Act. Permitting salt substitutes
in standardized foods under this rule may help provide more options to
consumers while ensuring that the foods maintain their basic nature and
essential characteristics. The proposed amendments to the SOI for dairy
products under parts 131, 133, and 135 are issued under section 701(e)
of the FD&C Act.
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized, would:
Amend part 130 to add a new subpart C entitled
``Flexibility in Standardized Foods.''
Add a new Sec. 130.30 to provide for ``Ingredient
Flexibility in Standardized Foods'' and define ``salt substitute'' as a
safe and suitable ingredient (or combination of ingredients) that is
used to replace some or all of the added salt (sodium chloride), to
reduce sodium in the food, and that serves the functions of salt in the
food.
Amend the 80 SOI that specify salt as a required or an
optional ingredient to add regulatory text to permit the use of salt
substitute, as defined in proposed Sec. 130.30.
Update the IBR information of several SOI to refer to the
most recent versions of the IBR materials and to provide up-to-date
contact information for obtaining the IBR materials. The proposed rule
would also update the referenced methods of analysis to those in the
``Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL,'' 21st Ed. 2019.
Make technical amendments to correct inconsistencies and
typographical errors in some SOI regulations.
A. Scope/Applicability
The proposed rule, if finalized, would amend SOI in parts 131 to
169. Specifically, the proposed rule would permit the use of salt
substitutes in the foods covered by 80 SOI that include salt as a
required or an optional ingredient. The proposal would also permit the
use of salt substitutes in foods covered by SOI that reference some of
the 80 SOI.
This rule does not propose to amend the SOI for oysters (Sec.
161.130). The SOI in Sec. 161.130 provides for the optional use of
salt water in the shucking of oysters. We understand that it is not
standard industry practice to constitute a salt and water solution for
this process. Rather, seawater accessible at the processing location is
collected and used in the shucking process. Because salt is not an
ingredient added by the manufacturer, we are not proposing to amend
this SOI. We request comments on this approach and our understanding of
current industry practice.
B. The Basic Nature and Essential Characteristics of a Standardized
Food
Proposed Sec. 130.30(b) would require that ingredients used as
salt substitutes do not change the basic nature and essential
characteristics of the standardized food. FDA previously discussed its
understanding about the basic nature of a food in a proposed rule
entitled ``Food Standards; General Principles and Food Standards
Modernization,'' (70 FR 29214, May 20, 2005). The basic nature of a
food is generally what the food is. It concerns the general attributes
of the product. For example, the basic nature of a particular type of
cheese is that it is a milk-derived food of a certain form and
consistency. The essential characteristics of a food may contribute to
achieving the basic nature of the food, but consumers may not be aware
of the essential characteristics. The essential characteristics of a
food are those that distinguish a food. Foods may be distinguished by
their ingredients, compositional characteristics, physical
characteristics, or levels of certain nutrients or the way they are
produced--all of which are the essential characteristics of the food.
For example, the essential characteristics of a particular type of
cheese may include the bacterial culture used, the processing method,
or the fat and moisture content that contribute to the unique
characteristics of that cheese.
[[Page 21153]]
Use of salt substitutes that do not change the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the standardized food under this proposed
rule is necessary to ensure the availability of foods that promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers, in accordance
with section 401 of the FD&C Act.
C. Definition of Salt Substitute
Under the FD&C Act, any substance that is intentionally added to
food is a food additive that is subject to premarket review and
approval by FDA unless that substance is excluded from the definition
of a food additive. These excluded food substances include substances
that are generally recognized, among qualified experts, as having been
adequately shown to be safe under the conditions of its intended use
(``generally recognized as safe'' or ``GRAS''), or the substances are
prior sanctioned and excepted from the definition of a food additive.
FDA considers salt a common food ingredient that is GRAS for its
intended use (21 CFR 182.1(a)). A salt substitute that is added to a
standardized food, to replace some or all of the salt, must be an
approved food additive or GRAS for its intended use. For example,
potassium chloride is a GRAS substance (21 CFR 184.1622).
The proposed rule would amend Sec. 130.30(c)(1) to define salt
substitute as a safe and suitable ingredient (see Sec. 130.3(d)) or
combination of ingredients that is used to replace some or all of the
added salt (sodium chloride), to reduce the sodium in the food, and
that serves the functions of salt in the food. We are proposing to
define salt substitute broadly to provide flexibility and facilitate
innovation in the future without the need for additional rulemaking.
Thus, the proposed rule would not list specific salt substitutes;
instead, the proposed rule would cover ingredients or combinations of
ingredients currently used as salt substitutes and ingredients or
combinations of ingredients that may be used as salt substitutes in the
future, as a result of advances in food science and technological
changes.
Salt is a required or optional ingredient in a wide range of
standardized foods. The proposed rule also would allow manufacturers
the flexibility to explore new ways to replace salt and reduce the
sodium content of standardized foods while preserving the basic nature
and essential characteristics of the food.
We recognize that salt serves various functions in standardized
foods. For example, depending on the food, salt may be important for
taste, microbial safety, and other functions. The proposed definition
would require that the salt substitute be used to replace some or all
of the added salt, to reduce the sodium in the food, and serve the
functions of salt in the food. This would ensure that the salt
substitute performs a similar function to salt in the standardized
food, while helping to reduce the sodium content. The extent to which
salt can be replaced depends on the ability of the salt substitute to
replicate the functions of salt in the food without compromising the
food's safety and nutritional quality. The proposed rule would not
establish a minimum replacement level for salt. It would not prescribe
the sodium content of the foods or any parameters pertaining to the
production of the food. Manufacturers would determine the level of salt
replacement appropriate for the particular standardized food.
Our intent is to provide manufacturers flexibility and facilitate
sodium reduction across the food supply while not changing the basic
nature and essential characteristics or adversely affecting the
nutritional quality and safety of standardized foods. To accomplish
this, proposed Sec. 130.30(c)(1) would limit the definition of salt
substitute and therefore the use of salt substitutes to an ingredient
or a combination of ingredients that serve the functions that salt
served in the particular standardized food. The ingredient or
combination of ingredients may include substances intended to mitigate
the impact of removing salt and are needed to maintain the basic nature
and essential characteristics of the food.
Some manufacturers are currently using salt substitutes to reduce
sodium in foods in the marketplace. Scientific articles and reports
have used several examples of salt substitutes when discussing sodium
reduction efforts (Ref. 19, 20, 21). The use of potassium chloride is
one example of a safe and suitable ingredient discussed in the
scientific literature that, in some instances, serves as a partial
substitute for sodium chloride in food processing and manufacturing
(Ref. 15). Other examples of ingredients listed in the scientific
literature include herbs and spices, yeast extracts, monosodium
glutamate, amino acids, and dairy extracts (Ref. 19). The food industry
is pursuing sodium reduction efforts, including the use of salt
substitutes (e.g., in products marketed as ``low'' or ``reduced''
sodium), in a variety of foods, including in canned fish and soups
(Ref. 21). We request data and information on the types of salt
substitutes currently being used in the U.S. market to support sodium
reduction and on potential salt substitutes that may be used as a
result of the new flexibility provided in this proposed rule.
D. Amending Standard of Identity Regulations to Permit Salt Substitutes
We propose to amend our regulations to permit the use of salt
substitutes in SOI that specify salt as a required or an optional
ingredient. Foods for which FDA has established a SOI must conform to
the applicable standard. Consequently, without these amendments, most
standardized foods cannot be modified to replace salt with salt
substitutes unless salt can be reduced in sufficient quantity to meet a
nutrient content claim under Sec. 101.61 (see section III.C). As
stated previously, amending 80 applicable SOI to permit the use of salt
substitutes is necessary to give manufacturers the most flexibility to
use salt substitutes in standardized foods. The proposed rule would
permit the use of salt, salt substitute or a combination of the two in
applicable standardized foods. Salt substitutes used would be declared
on the label in accordance with section 403(i)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Where salt is permitted in our SOI, the use is not described
uniformly in the provisions of the standards. This is largely due to
the standards having been established with different structural
formats. The lack of uniformity is also due to the use of salt
differing across different standardized foods. In some foods, salt is a
mandatory ingredient, and in other foods, salt is an optional
ingredient. For some foods, salt is permitted at a specific point in
the manufacturing process, whereas salt is permitted in other foods
without regard to manufacturing time. These differences mean that
different amendatory language in the individual standards is necessary
to permit the use of salt substitutes. To address this, we propose four
types of revisions to the current regulatory text in the applicable
SOI.
In particular, there are differences in how the use of salt is
prescribed in certain SOI for cheeses and related cheese products in
part 133 (21 CFR part 133). For example, several SOI for cheeses use
terms such as ``salted,'' ``salting,'' ``brine,'' or ``salt solution,''
to prescribe the application of salt in the cheesemaking process. For
additional clarity, the proposed amendments for cheeses and related
cheese products are grouped and discussed separately from other SOI.
There are 4 types of revisions to the applicable SOI in this
proposed rule.
[[Page 21154]]
The third and fourth types only apply to SOI in part 133.
Type 1: When the current text of the SOI lists ``salt'' as
an optional ingredient, the proposed rule would amend the SOI to state,
``salt or salt substitute.''
Type 2: When the current text of the SOI provides for the
use of ``salt'' in a paragraph, the proposed rule would amend the SOI
to state, ``salt or salt substitute.''
Type 3: When the current text of the SOI uses terms such
as ``salted,'' ``salted with dry salt or brine,'' or ``salting,'' to
provide for use of salt in the food, but does not specify salt as an
ingredient, the proposed rule would amend the optional ingredient list
to add ``salt substitute.''
Type 4: When the current text of the SOI uses terms such
as ``salted,'' or ``salted in brine,'' to provide for the use of salt
in the food, but does not provide a list of optional ingredients, the
proposed rule would amend the SOI to add a paragraph stating that,
``During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.''
We summarize these changes in tables 1 and 2.
1. Amendments to SOI not in Part 133
We propose amendments to permit the use of salt substitutes in 39
SOI for products that are not cheeses or related cheese products
prescribed in part 133. The amendments would occur through two types of
revisions to the current regulatory text of the applicable SOI.
a. Type 1 revision for SOI not in part 133. Several SOI provide for
the addition of salt by listing it as an ingredient (e.g., as an
``optional ingredient,'' ``other optional ingredient,'' or including
salt in a list of substances that could be added as a seasoning or
flavoring.) We propose to amend these SOI to permit the addition of a
salt substitute in addition to, or in place of, salt by replacing
``salt'' with ``salt or salt substitute.'' For example, the SOI for
acidified milk (Sec. 131.111(e)(8)) lists ``salt'' under ``other
optional ingredients;'' the proposed rule would replace ``salt'' with
``salt or salt substitute.'' As another example, the SOI for canned
tuna (21 CFR 161.190) includes ``salt'' in a list of seasoning or
flavoring ingredients (Sec. 161.190 (a)(6)(i)); the proposed rule
would replace ``salt'' with ``salt or salt substitute.''
b. Type 2 revision for SOI not in part 133. Five SOI prescribe the
use of salt in paragraphs that describe the food, rather than as part
of an ingredient list. We propose to amend these SOI to permit the
addition of a salt substitute in addition to, or in place of, salt by
replacing ``salt'' with ``salt or salt substitute'' in the regulatory
text. For example, the SOI for catsup (21 CFR 155.194) specifies the
optional use of salt by stating, ``[t]he food may contain salt''; and
the SOI for self-rising flour (21 CFR 137.180) specifies that the food
``is seasoned with salt.'' In both examples, we propose to replace
``salt'' with ``salt or salt substitute.''
Table 1 summarizes the amendments to the SOI for foods other than
cheeses and related cheese products. We request comment on whether
there would be safety concerns, technical infeasibilities, or other
issues that would prevent the use of a salt substitute in any SOI
listed in table 1.
Table 1--Amendments to Definitions and Standards of Identity--Foods Other Than Cheeses and Related Cheese
Products
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFR section Title Paragraph Type of revision
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 131.111 Acidified milk........... (e)(8) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 131.112 Cultured milk............ (d)(8) Type 1; amends salt in other
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 131.160 Sour cream............... (b)(5) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 131.162 Acidified sour cream..... (b)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 131.170 Eggnog................... (e)(2) Type 1; amends salt in other
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 136.110 Bread, rolls, and buns... (c)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 137.180 Self-rising flour........ (a) Type 2; amends paragraph that
describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 137.270 Self-rising white corn (a) Type 2; amends paragraph that
meal. describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 139.110 Macaroni products........ (a)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 139.150 Noodle products.......... (a)(2) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 145.110 Canned applesauce........ (a)(2)(iii) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 145.130 Canned figs.............. (a)(5) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 150.110 Fruit butter............. (c)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.120 Canned green beans and (a)(3)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
canned wax beans. optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.130 Canned corn.............. (a)(3)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.170 Canned peas.............. (a)(2)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.190 Canned tomatoes.......... (a)(2)(iv) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.191 Tomato concentrates...... (a)(2)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.194 Catsup................... (a)(1)(iv) Type 2; amends paragraph that
describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.200 Certain other canned (c)(4)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
vegetables. optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 155.201 Canned mushrooms......... (a)(3)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 156.145 Tomato juice............. (a)(1) Type 2; amends paragraph that
describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 158.170 Frozen peas.............. (a)(1)(iv) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 161.145 Canned oysters........... (a)(1) Type 2; amends paragraph that
describes the food to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 161.170 Canned Pacific salmon.... (a)(4)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 161.173 Canned wet pack shrimp in (a)(4)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
transparent or optional ingredients to add
nontransparent salt substitute.
containers.
Sec. 161.190 Canned tuna.............. (a)(6)(i) Type 1; amends salt in
seasoning and flavoring
ingredients to add salt
substitute.
Sec. 163.111 Chocolate liquor......... (b)(6) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 163.112 Breakfast cocoa.......... (b)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 163.123 Sweet chocolate.......... (b)(3) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 163.124 White chocolate.......... (b)(4) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 163.130 Milk chocolate........... (b)(3) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 166.110 Margarine................ (b)(2) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
[[Page 21155]]
Sec. 168.130 Cane sirup............... (b)(1) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 168.140 Maple sirup.............. (b)(1) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 168.160 Sorghum sirup............ (b)(1) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 168.180 Table sirup.............. (b)(7) Type 1; amends salt in
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 169.140 Mayonnaise............... (d)(1) Type 1; amends salt in other
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 169.150 Salad dressing........... (e)(1) Type 1; amends salt in other
optional ingredients to add
salt substitute.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Amendments to SOI in Part 133
Type 1 and type 2 amendments are also proposed for certain SOI for
cheeses and related cheese products. We propose type 3 and type 4
amendments for the several SOI in part 133 that specify salt as an
ingredient, using terms such as ``brine,'' ``salt brine,'' ``salt
solution,'' ``salted,'' and ``salting.'' ``Brine,'' ``salt brine,'' and
``salt solution'' are solutions containing sodium chloride and
``salted'' and ``salting'' in the manufacture of cheese refer to the
use of sodium chloride. The proposed rule would provide manufacturers
of standardized cheeses and related cheese products, the flexibility to
use salt substitutes to replace some or all of the salt prescribed in
these processes.
We propose to permit the use of salt substitutes in 41 SOI for
cheeses and related cheese products. Some SOI in part 133 list salt
under ``optional ingredients'' or ``other optional ingredients,'' while
others vary in how they prescribe the use of salt in the paragraph that
describes the cheese or cheesemaking process. Because of these
differences, we propose four types of revisions to the current
regulatory text of the applicable SOI for cheeses and related cheese
products.
a. Type 1 revision for SOI in part 133. Several SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products provide for the addition of salt by listing it
as an ingredient (e.g., as an ``optional ingredient'' or ``other
optional ingredient.'') We propose to amend these SOI to permit the
addition of salt substitute in addition to, or in place of, salt by
replacing ``salt'' in the list with ``salt or salt substitute.'' For
example, the SOI for cold-pack and club cheese lists ``salt'' under
``optional ingredients'' (Sec. 133.123(c)(3)). The proposed rule would
replace ``salt'' with ``salt or salt substitute.''
b. Type 2 revision for SOI in part 133. Five SOI provide for the
use of salt in paragraphs that describe the cheese, rather than as part
of an ingredient list. We propose to amend these SOI to permit the
addition of a salt substitute in addition to, or in place of, salt by
replacing ``salt'' in the paragraphs with ``salt or salt substitute.''
For example, the proposed rule would replace ``salt'' with ``salt or
salt substitute'' in three paragraphs of the SOI for dry curd cottage
cheese (Sec. 133.129(b)(1)(i) through (iii)) and in one paragraph of
the SOI for sap sago cheese (Sec. 133.186 (a)(2)).
c. Type 3 revision for SOI in part 133. Some SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products provide for the use of salt in a paragraph that
describes the cheesemaking process, through terms such as ``salted,''
``salted with dry salt or brine,'' or ``salting,'' and do not specify
salt in a list of ingredients (e.g., as an ``other optional
ingredient''). We propose to amend these SOI to permit the addition of
a salt substitute in addition to, or in place of, salt by adding ``salt
substitute'' as a new subparagraph in the current list of other
optional ingredients. For example, the SOI for cheddar cheese (Sec.
133.113(a)(3)) states that ``the curd is salted, stirred, further
drained, and pressed into forms,'' but does not list salt in the
optional ingredients in Sec. 133.113(b)(3). The proposed rule would
amend Sec. 133.113(b)(3) by adding a new subparagraph, ``salt
substitute'' (proposed Sec. 133.113(b)(3)(vi)).
d. Type 4 revision for SOI in part 133. Several SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products provide for the use of salt in a paragraph that
describes the cheesemaking process through terms such as ``salted'' or
``salted in brine,'' but do not include a list of ingredients (e.g.,
``optional ingredient'' or ``other optional ingredient'') that could be
amended to add salt substitute. We propose to amend these SOI to
explicitly permit the use of a salt substitute in the cheesemaking
process. For example, the SOI for asiago fresh and asiago soft cheese
(Sec. 133.102(b)) provides that ``the curd is salted in brine and
cured in a well-ventilated room,'' but does not have an optional
ingredient list. The proposed rule would amend this SOI by adding a new
subparagraph at Sec. 133.102(c)(3) to state, ``During the cheesemaking
process, where the curd is salted, salt substitute may be used.''
Table 2 summarizes the amendments to the SOI for cheeses and
related cheese products. We request comment on whether there would be
safety concerns, technical infeasibilities, or other issues that would
prevent the use of salt substitute in any SOI listed in table 2.
Table 2--Proposed Amendments to Definitions and Standards of Identity--Cheeses and Related Cheese Products
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised or added
CFR section Title Current paragraph paragraph Type of revision
designation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 133.102................. Asiago fresh and (c).............. (c)(3)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
asiago soft add a new paragraph
cheese. to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.106................. Blue cheese...... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vii)...... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.108................. Brick cheese..... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(v)........ Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.111................. Caciocavallo (c).............. (c)(3)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
siciliano cheese. add a new paragraph
to permit salt
substitute.
[[Page 21156]]
Sec. 133.113................. Cheddar cheese... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vi)....... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.118................. Colby cheese..... (c).............. (c)(4)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
add new paragraph to
permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.123................. Cold-pack and (c)(3)........... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
club cheese. optional ingredients
to add salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.124................. Cold-pack cheese (e)(3)........... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
food. other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.127................. Cook cheese, koch (b)(3)(v)........ N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
kaese. other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.129................. Dry curd cottage (b)(1)(i)-(iii).. N/A.............. Type 2; amends
cheese. paragraph that
describes the food to
add salt substitute.
Sec. 133.133................. Cream cheese..... (b)(3)(i)........ N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.136................. Washed curd and (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vi)....... Type 3; amends other
soaked curd optional ingredients
cheese. to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.138................. Edam cheese...... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(v)........ Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.141................. Gorgonzola cheese (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vii)...... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.144................. Granular and (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vi)....... Type 3; amends other
stirred curd optional ingredients
cheese. to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.147................. Grated American (c)(5)........... N/A.............. Type 1; amend salt in
cheese food. other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.148................. Hard grating (c).............. (c)(1) and (2)... Type 4; amends SOI to
cheeses. add a new paragraph
to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.149................. Gruyere cheese... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(iv)....... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.150................. Hard cheeses..... (c).............. (c)(3)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
add a new paragraph
to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.152................. Limburger cheese. (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(iv)....... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.153................. Monterey cheese (b)(3)(iii)...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
and monterey other optional
jack cheese. ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.155................. Mozzarella cheese (b)(3)(iii)...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
and scamorza other optional
cheese. ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.156................. Low-moisture (b)(3)(iii)...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
mozzarella and other optional
scamorza cheese. ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.160................. Muenster and (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vi)....... Type 3; amends other
munster cheese. optional ingredients
to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.162................. Neufchatel cheese (b)(3)(i)........ N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.164................. Nuworld cheese... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(iv)....... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.165................. Parmesan and (c).............. (c)(3)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
reggiano cheese. add a new paragraph
to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.169................. Pasteurized (d)(4)........... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
process cheese. optional ingredients
to add salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.173................. Pasteurized (e)(4) Salt...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
process cheese other optional
food. ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.179................. Pasteurized (f)(5) Salt...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
process cheese other optional
spread. ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.181................. Provolone cheese. (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vi)....... Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.182................. Soft ripened (b).............. N/A.............. Type 2; amends
cheeses. paragraph that
describes the food to
add salt substitute.
Sec. 133.183................. Romano cheese.... (c).............. (c)(3)........... Type 4; amends SOI to
add a new paragraph
to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.184................. Roquefort cheese, (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(i) and Type 3; amends other
sheep's milk (ii). optional ingredients
blue-mold, and to add new paragraph
blue-mold cheese to list salt
from sheep's substitute.
milk.
Sec. 133.185................. Samsoe cheese.... (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(v)........ Type 3; amends other
optional ingredients
to add new paragraph
to list salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.186................. Sap sago cheese.. (a).............. N/A.............. Type 2; amends
paragraph that
describes the food to
add salt substitute.
Sec. 133.187................. Semisoft cheeses. (b).............. N/A.............. Type 2; amends
paragraph that
describes the food to
add salt substitute.
[[Page 21157]]
Sec. 133.188................. Semisoft part- (b).............. N/A.............. Type 2; amends
skim cheeses. paragraph that
describes the food to
add salt substitute.
Sec. 133.189................. Skim milk cheese (d).............. (d)(1) and (2)... Type 4; amends SOI to
for add a new paragraph
manufacturing. to permit salt
substitute.
Sec. 133.190................. Spiced cheeses... (b)(3)(iii)...... N/A.............. Type 1; amends salt in
other optional
ingredients to add
salt substitute.
Sec. 133.195................. Swiss and (b)(3)........... (b)(3)(vii)...... Type 3; amends other
emmentaler optional ingredients
cheese. to add a new
paragraph to list
salt substitute.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Update Incorporation by Reference
Several of the 80 SOI that specify salt as a required or optional
ingredient contain outdated references. We propose to update the IBR
paragraphs in these SOI to refer to the most recent versions of the IBR
materials and to provide up-to-date contact information for obtaining
the IBR materials. We propose to add IBR paragraphs to subparts A of
parts 131, 137, 139, 150, 155, and 161. SOI in subparts B of these
parts would reference applicable IBR paragraphs in subpart A. We also
propose to update the IBR paragraphs in the SOI under parts 136, 145,
and 166 which would not have IBR paragraphs in subparts A of these
parts. The revised format is for administrative efficiency.
Specifically, the proposed rule would update the IBR information for
Sec. Sec. 131.111, 131.112, 131.160, 131.162, 131.170, 136.110,
137.180, 137.270, 139.110, 139.150, 145.110, 150.110, 155.120, 155.130,
155.170, 161.145, 161.173,161.190, and 166.110. These SOI list methods
of analysis that are from the 13th or 15th editions of ``Official
Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical
Chemists.'' Additionally, Sec. 155.170 lists an incorrect section
number for the method for alcohol insoluble solids in canned peas. We
propose to update the referenced methods of analysis to those in the
``Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL,'' 21st Ed. 2019.
These proposed changes will ensure that the reference materials are
current, accessible, and meet Federal requirements pertaining to IBR
(see 1 CFR part 51).
Definition of Terms and Explanatory Notes; Table 1.
Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard Series). The
reference lists the test sieve designations and their nominal
dimensions.
AOAC Reference Table 909.04; Correction Factors for
Gasometric Determination of Carbon Dioxide. The reference lists the
correction factors of carbon dioxide measurements for different
atmospheric conditions.
AOAC Official Method 923.02A; Reagent under Carbon Dioxide
(Total) in Baking Powders-Gasometric Determination. The reference
describes the reagent used in measuring the amount of carbon dioxide
released from a sample.
AOAC Official Method 923.02B; Apparatus under Carbon
Dioxide (Total) in Baking Powders-Gasometric Determination. The
reference describes the apparatus used in measuring the amount of
carbon dioxide released from a sample.
AOAC Official method 926.07A; Vacuum Oven Method, under
Solids (Total) and Loss on Drying (Moisture) in Macaroni Products. The
reference provides method references for the preparation of a sample
and the total solid determination of a sample.
AOAC Official method 932.12; Solids (Soluble) in Fruits
and Fruit Products. The reference provides a method reference for
measuring soluble solids and the formula for calculating the percentage
of soluble solids in a sample.
AOAC Official method 932.14C; By Means of Refractometer
under Solids in Syrups. The reference provides the method for measuring
the percentage of soluble solids in a sample.
AOAC Official method 935.36(a); Solids (Total) in Bread.
The reference provides the method for measuring the percentage of
solids in a sample.
AOAC Official method 938.06A; Indirect Method, under Fat
in Butter. The reference provides the method for measuring the
percentage of fat in a sample.
AOAC Official method 938.10; Solids (Alcohol-Insoluble) in
Canned Peas Gravimetric Method. The reference provides the method for
measuring the percentage of alcohol-insoluble solids in a sample.
AOAC Official Method 945.48G; under Evaporated Milk
(Unsweetened). The reference provides the method for sample preparation
and a method reference for measuring the percentage of milk fat in a
sample.
AOAC Official Method 947.05; Acidity of Milk Titrimetric
Method. The reference provides the method for measuring the percentage
of lactic acid in a sample.
AOAC Official Method 989.05; Fat in Milk-Modified
Mojonnier Ether Extraction method. The reference provides the method
for measuring the percentage of milk fat in a sample.
AOAC Official Method 990.21; Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By
Difference between Total Solids and Fat Contents. The reference
provides method references for measuring total solids and fat contents
of a sample and the formula for calculating the percentage of nonfat
solid in a sample.
You may purchase a copy of the material from AOAC International
(AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20850-3250, 1-
800-379-2622. You may inspect a copy at Dockets Management Staff (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
F. Technical Amendments
We also propose to make technical amendments to correct
inconsistencies and typographical errors in several of the 80 SOI
regulations that specify salt as a required or optional ingredient. The
corrections are non-substantive. The proposed rule would:
Amend Sec. 133.118(c)(2) to replace ``143'' with ``145.''
Amend Sec. 133.150(c)(2) to replace ``143'' with ``145.''
Amend Sec. 133.150(e)(1) to replace ``unusual'' with
``usual.''
Amend Sec. 133.182(c)(2) to replace ``143'' with ``145.''
[[Page 21158]]
Amend Sec. 133.184(b) to replace ``Operational'' with
``Optional.''
Amend Sec. 133.186(c) to replace ``Nonmenclature'' with
``Nomenclature.''
Amend Sec. 133.187(c)(2) to replace ``143'' with ``145.''
Amend Sec. 133.188(c)(2) to replace ``143'' with ``145.''
Amend Sec. 155.170(b)(1)(iii) to replace ``shrivelled''
with ``shriveled.''
Amend Sec. 158.170(b)(1)(iii) to replace ``shrivelled''
with ``shriveled.''
Amend Sec. 168.140(a) to replace ``mapel'' with
``maple.''
VI. Proposed Effective/Compliance Dates
We propose that any final rule resulting from this rulemaking be
effective 30 days after the final rule's date of publication in the
Federal Register insofar as it amends non-dairy SOI. We believe that
this effective date is appropriate because it will provide industry the
flexibility to use salt substitutes to reduce the sodium content in
standardized foods. Some manufacturers are already exploring ways to
reduce sodium in standardized foods, and this proposed rule, if
finalized, will assist in those efforts. For the same reasons, FDA
proposes that any dairy SOI that may be amended based on this proposal,
unless stayed by the filing of proper objections, will also be
effective 30 days after the final rule's date of publication in the
Federal Register.
VII. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct us to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity).
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this proposed rule is a significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866 Section 3(f)(1).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that this Executive Order 12866 applies only to the
non-dairy SOI portions of this rulemaking; the dairy SOI covered by
this rulemaking are ``regulations or rules issued in accordance with
the formal rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556, 557'' (see 21
U.S.C. 701(e)(1)) and therefore excluded by section (d)(1) of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small
entities. We do not anticipate the proposed rule would generate
regulatory impacts on small entities. As with any voluntary market
behavior, larger firms may have certain advantages over small firms in
some areas, while smaller firms may have advantages in other areas. As
a result, we propose to certify that the proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $165 million, using the most current (2021) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. The proposed rule would
not result in a mandated expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds
this amount.
The proposed rule would permit, but not require, manufacturers to
use salt substitutes to replace salt where salt is a required or
optional ingredient in standardized foods. If finalized, the benefits
of this rule would be additional flexibility in the manufacture of
standardized foods and the potential for reduced salt consumption by
consumers which may contribute to better health outcomes. We have no
information to suggest the use of currently available salt substitutes
would lead to improved product characteristics (e.g., shelf life) or
would lead to reduced production costs and potentially lower prices. We
request comment on such potential benefits of reformulation for
manufacturers and on how many standardized foods manufacturers might
choose to reformulate, either in the relatively near or longer-run
future.
The proposed rule, if finalized, would not impose requirements
resulting in regulatory costs on firms or consumers. Manufacturers
would have the option of using salt substitutes. There are no
regulatory implications for not reading the rule or deciding not to use
salt substitutes. Should manufacturers choose to use this flexibility
to reformulate some products by substituting some salt with salt
substitutes, the primary benefits realized would result from lower
sodium consumption on average by U.S. consumers, assuming they choose
to purchase and consume the reformulated versions of such products, and
increased profit (producer surplus) for manufacturers, assuming they
find offering reformulated versions of such products consistent with
maximizing firm profits. The primary costs of such voluntary market
behavior would be reformulation and relabeling costs for manufacturers.
We currently lack data to estimate any net social benefits from
voluntary market behavior relating to future use of salt substitutes
made possible by this rule, but cite some published analyses below
related to meeting voluntary sodium reduction targets that could
partially be addressed via the flexibility provided by this rule. We
request public comment on possible producer response (e.g., how many
manufacturers may choose to take voluntary action in response to this
rule, what share of standardized food products may get reformulated)
and on possible consumer willingness to purchase and consume such
products with various types of salt substitutes at various levels,
which would allow us to provide a range of net social benefit estimates
when this rule is finalized.
A. Economic Analysis of Impacts
1. Background
There are 80 SOI that specify salt as a mandatory or optional
ingredient. Some of these standards are referenced by other SOI,
resulting in salt as an ingredient in 140 SOI. The salt in the foods
covered by these 140 SOI may serve a variety of functions such as
taste, texture, moisture control, and microbial safety. FDA has a
public health interest in reducing sodium across the food supply.
Therefore, we propose to give manufacturers the flexibility to use salt
substitutes in standardized foods where salt is a required or optional
ingredient, to reduce the sodium content. While there may be potential
data sources (e.g., IRI, Label Insight, Mintel, NHANES, Syndigo) that
could provide market or consumption share (e.g., contribution of sodium
and/or caloric intake) for foods covered by these 140 SOI, FDA does not
currently have sufficient estimates to further extrapolate impacts at
this time. We request public comment on additional potential data
sources for estimates of market share and/or caloric and/or sodium
consumption share of the products included in these SOI.
We request comment on potential regulatory alternatives including
allowing the use of only specified salt substitutes, at only specified
levels of substitution, for only specified
[[Page 21159]]
purposes, for only specified products, in conjunction with only
specified ancillary formulation changes, or with specified labeling
requirements. More generally, we request comments on potential
regulatory approaches to reducing salt in food or the dietary intake of
salt that do not involve allowing the use of salt substitutes in
standardized foods.
2. Benefits of the Proposed Rule
The benefit of this proposed rule is that manufacturers would have
additional flexibility in producing standardized foods covered by 140
SOI, which may lead to social benefits in the form of increased
consumer satisfaction (consumer surplus), increased profits (producer
surplus), or both. In addition, a change in voluntary market behavior
relating to patterns of food consumption, or to use a potassium-based
salt as a salt substitute and consumers who would benefit from
increasing their potassium intake choose to consume those products,
those consumers may experience positive health effects.
Salt is a relatively inexpensive ingredient, and we would not
expect manufacturers to begin using salt substitutes based on cost
cutting considerations alone at this time. To explore the possibility
of manufacturers voluntarily replacing salt with salt substitutes to
improve the healthfulness of their standardized foods, one would need
to identify the costs and level of potential substitution, and extent
of consumer acceptance of salt substitutes at differing levels in
different standardized foods in order to estimate the number of
manufacturers who would decide to use salt substitutes. We currently
lack data on these potential industry responses and request public
comment from manufactures, suppliers, and consumers on the extent to
which the additional flexibility provided by this rule would be used by
manufacturers, hence also desired or tolerated by consumers, and viable
in the supply chain.
As discussed in the preamble of this rule, on average, Americans
consume approximately 3,400 milligrams of sodium per day (mg/day),
which is nearly 50 percent more than the recommended daily limit on
sodium intake for individuals 14 years and older (Refs. 1 and 2).
Excess sodium intake increases the risk for hypertension, or high blood
pressure, a leading cause of heart disease and stroke (Refs. 2-6).
Decreasing sodium consumption is expected to reduce hypertension and
potentially result in fewer cases of heart disease and stroke (Refs. 7-
9 \2\). More than 70 percent of sodium consumed in the U.S. comes from
sodium added during manufacturing and commercial food preparation (Ref.
14). The health benefits from reducing sodium consumption are expected
to be higher for populations that currently have higher sodium
consumption or that are more sensitive to any given level of sodium
consumption than other populations. Hence, there may be potential
health equity effects to any regulation that generates or facilitates
reduced intake of sodium. In order to estimate such health benefits, we
would need data and information on the complex pathway between allowing
manufactures to use salt substitutes, the extent to which manufactures
will develop products of interest to those at highest risk of
hypertension, the likely demographic patterns of consumers purchasing
those new products, and eventually, the extent of the reduction in
sodium uptake among those at most risk of hypertension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ These studies may be sensitive to assumptions regarding
consumer response. If some consumers experience disutility
associated with the reformulated product and adjust their
consumption pattern accordingly, this could partially offset some of
the estimated health benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the absence of necessary data to fully estimate the impacts of
this rule, we refer to published literature on the health benefits of
sodium reduction targets to provide broader context of potential
impacts of this rule. A 2018 study by Pearson-Stuttard, et al. looked
at the health and economic effects of FDA's 2016 draft voluntary sodium
reduction guidance (Refs. 8 and 22) and estimated benefits of meeting
sodium reduction targets in the form of medical cost savings and
consumer health improvements, net of producer reformulation costs and
some government administrative and monitoring costs. Over a 20-year
period, the authors of the study find net social benefits from only
consumer health effects to be roughly $12 billion (uncertainty range of
$0 billion to $28 billion) under what it described as the most
pessimistic scenario relating to potential sodium reduction among the
three presented (Ref. 8). This roughly $12 billion net benefit arises
from roughly $19 billion in estimated health cost savings (benefits)
and just over $7 billion of estimated reformulation, administrative and
monitoring costs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ These results may be sensitive to assumptions regarding
consumer response to product reformulation. For example, benefits
might be lower if some consumers experience disutility associated
with the reformulated product and adjust their consumption pattern
accordingly, which could partially offset the estimated health
benefits presented above. Ref. 9, for instance, indicates that its
cost-effectiveness results are highly sensitive to such issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since these benefit estimates are not comprehensive, we would need
additional data on possible producer and consumer response to fully
assess health benefits. Moreover, benefits might be higher or lower
than what would be indicated by estimates that focus on the subset of
effects tracked by Pearson-Stuttard et al. Benefits might be higher if
firms were to realize additional profits or producer surplus from any
product reformulation (since we assume firms would use salt substitutes
only if profits would remain the same or increase). Benefits might also
be higher due to possible changes in consumer surplus from consumers
willing to buy reformulated products whose valuation includes factors
beyond medical cost savings or health state utility. Benefits might be
lower if some consumers experience disutility associated with the
reformulated product and adjust their consumption pattern accordingly,
which could partially offset the estimated health benefits presented
above.
In addition, as mentioned above, we currently lack data to
determine how much, if any, of the aggregate effects that Pearson-
Stuttard et al. attribute to broader voluntary sodium reduction efforts
could be directly connected to the flexibility provided by this rule.
The rule does not cover all foods analyzed in the Pearson-Stuttard, et
al. scenarios, which included many non-standardized foods. With
comprehensive data on the share of foods affected by this rule, we
could estimate health benefits across only such products as a subset of
the Pearson-Stuttard, et al. estimate. We request such data and also
data on possible consumer and producer response to the flexibility
provided by this rule.
3. Costs of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized would not impose regulatory costs
on manufacturers or consumers. There would be no regulatory
requirements or regulatory penalties relative to the baseline of taking
no regulatory action. Manufacturers would be required to use safe and
suitable ingredients regardless of the amount or type of salt
substitutes they choose to use. The flexibility provided by this rule
creates parity for use of existing salt substitutes in both
standardized and non-standardized foods (see section V.C. for
discussion of examples of current salt substitutes in use) and such
uses are already required to be disclosed and labeled. It is
[[Page 21160]]
possible that a change in voluntary market behavior relating to food
consumption may generate health costs. For example, to the extent
manufacturers choose to use potassium chloride as a salt substitute and
consumers choose to consume those products, consumers who may need to
limit their potassium intake may see negative health effects that
should be accounted for in cost estimates. We request comments on
evidence that could contribute to a more thorough assessment (including
possible quantification) of such costs. The agency will continue to
monitor the use of salt substitutes in the U.S. food supply.
The economic rationale for food standards involves reducing
consumers' search costs; in particular, their ability to infer certain
product characteristics from representation as certain standardized
foods. The proposed rule may affect product characteristics by allowing
manufacturers to use salt substitutes that replace any one or any
combination of the functions of added salt. However, the proposed rule
would preclude ingredient substitutions that change the basic nature
and essential characteristics of a standardized food. The basic nature
of a food concerns the general attributes of the product that is
offered for sale to consumers. The essential characteristics of a food
may contribute to achieving the basic nature of the food, but consumers
may not be aware of the essential characteristics. Use of safe and
suitable salt substitutes that do not change the basic nature and
essential characteristics of the standardized food ensures that
products on the market retain their general attributes. For purposes of
this analysis, we assume products that retain their general attributes
will also retain consistency with consumer beliefs and expectations
relating to those products and that the use of salt substitutes will
therefore not generate consumer dissatisfaction relating to the
identity of the standardized food. To the extent that this assumption
may not be accurate, we request comment on the degree to which
consumers may be willing to purchase and consume such products after
salt substitutes are used.
If finalized, manufacturers may choose to take advantage of the
flexibility provided in this proposed rule. As discussed above, the
primary potential costs of that voluntary market behavior would arise
from producers choosing to use the flexibility afforded to them to
reformulate some products such as reformulation, consumer testing,
labeling, and possibly marketing costs. Pearson-Stuttard, et al.,
estimate that reformulation costs (using the FDA model, Ref. 23)
corresponding to the draft voluntary short term sodium reduction
targets could range from $2.7 to $15 billion over a 20-year time period
and that these costs would comprise roughly 95 percent of the costs
related to reaching short term sodium reduction targets (Ref. 8).
Producers may voluntarily choose to reformulate some products in
response to this rule's added flexibility and the magnitude of such
costs would depend on the number of products reformulated. The more
firms choose to reformulate using salt substitutes given the
flexibility provided by this rule, the greater the share of sodium
reduction efforts (and associated reformulation costs) that could be
attributed to this rule. Regardless of what amount of reformulation
producers voluntarily choose to undertake, they will only do so if
their private benefits in the form of increased revenue are at least as
much as their private costs. We request comment on the number of
manufacturers who may choose to reformulate standardized food products
and the extent to which manufacturers may choose to reformulate those
products given this new flexibility. We also request comment on all
other considerations relating to manufacturers' voluntary market
decision to use salt substitutes including cost of reformulation,
ability to source substitute ingredients, expected impact on sales,
profits, and consumer acceptance or lack of acceptance.
B. Initial Small Entity Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. If finalized, we do not expect the proposed rule
would generate impacts on small entities. The rule would not impose
regulatory costs on small entities. There would be no regulatory
requirements or regulatory penalties relative to the baseline of taking
no regulatory action. We have no basis to suppose or estimate any other
impacts on small entities. As a result, we propose to certify that the
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This analysis, as well as other
sections in this document, serves as the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, as required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
This analysis is also available in the docket for this proposed
rule (Ref. 24) and at https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/reports/economic-impact-analyses-fda-regulations.
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(a) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this proposed rule contains no
collection of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not
required.
X. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. We have determined that
the proposed rule does not contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
we conclude that the rule does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in the Executive Order and,
consequently, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.
XI. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13175. We have tentatively
determined that the rule does not contain policies that would have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. We invite comments from tribal officials
on any potential impact on Indian tribes from this proposed action.
XII. References
The following references marked with an asterisk (*) are on display
with the Dockets Management Staff (see ADDRESSES) and are available for
viewing by interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday; they are also available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. References without asterisks are not on public
[[Page 21161]]
display at https://www.regulations.gov because they have copyright
restriction. Some may be available at the website address, if listed.
References without asterisks are available for viewing only at the
Dockets Management Staff. FDA has verified the website addresses, as of
the date this document publishes in the Federal Register, but websites
are subject to change over time.
1. * U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services. ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025.''
9th Edition. December 2020. Available at https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov; accessed February 23, 2022.
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.
``Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and Potassium'' (March 2019).
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
3. Sacks, F. M., L. P. Svetkey, W. M. Vollmer, L. J. Appel, et al.,
``Effects on Blood Pressure of Reduced Dietary Sodium and the
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet.'' DASH--Sodium
Collaborative Research Group. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;
344(1): pp 3-10.
4. Graudal, N. A., T. Hubeck-Graudal, and G. J[uuml]rgens, ``Effects
of Low-Sodium Diet vs. High-Sodium Diet on Blood Pressure, Renin,
Aldosterone, Catecholamines, Cholesterol, and Triglyceride (Cochrane
Review).'' American Journal of Hypertension. 2012; 25(1): pp. 1-15.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22068710, accessed December 9,
2020.
5. Eckel, R. H., J. M. Jakicic, J. D. Ard, J. M. de Jesus, et al.,
``2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce
Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.''
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 63(25 Pt B):
pp. 2960-84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24239922; accessed
December 9, 2020.
6. * Murphy, S. L., K. D. Kochanek, J. Q. Xu, and E. Arias,
``Mortality in the United States, 2020.'' NCHS Data Brief, no 427.
Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2021;
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db427.htm; accessed Feb
23, 2022.
7. Coxson, P. G., N. R. Cook, M. Joffres, Y. Hong, et al.,
``Mortality Benefits From U.S. Population-Wide Reduction in Sodium
Consumption: Projections From 3 Modeling Approaches.'' Hypertension.
2013; 61(3): pp. 564-570.
8. Pearson-Stuttard, J., C. Kypridemos, B, Collins, D. Mozaffarian,
et al., ``Estimating the Health and Economic Effects of the Proposed
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Voluntary Sodium Reformulation:
Microsimulation Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.'' PLoS Medicine. 2018;
15(4): pp. 1-18.
9. Smith-Spangler C. M., J. L. Juusola, E. A. Enns, D. K. Owens, and
A. M. Garber, ``Population Strategies to Decrease Sodium Intake and
the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness
Analysis.'' Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010; 152(8): pp. 481-487.
10. Micha, R., J. L. Pe[ntilde]alvo, F. Cudhea, F. Imamura, et al.,
``Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality from Heart
Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.'' Journal
of the American Medical Association. 2017; 317(9): pp. 912-924.
11. * Ostchega, Y., C.D. Fryar, T. Nwankwo, and D.T. Nguyen,
``Hypertension Prevalence Among Adults Aged 18 and Over: United
States, 2017-2018.'' NCHS Data Brief, no 364. Hyattsville, MD:
National Center for Health Statistics. 2020; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db364.htm; accessed March 21, 2023.
12. * Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ``Deaths: Final
Data for 2018'' National Vital Statistics Report. 2021; 69 (13).
Table 10: p. 52. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr69/nvsr69-13-508.pdf; accessed December 20, 2022.
13. * Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ``Summary of
Health Statistics'' National Health Interview Survey. 2018; Table A-
1a. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/shs/tables.htm;
accessed December 20, 2022.
14. Harnack, L.J., M. E. Cogswell, J. M. Shikany, C. D. Gardner, et
al., ``Sources of Sodium in U.S. Adults from 3 Geographic Regions.''
Circulation. 2017; 135: pp. 1775-1783.
15. * FDA, ``The Use of an Alternate Name for Potassium Chloride in
Food Labeling: Guidance for Industry.'' December 2020. Available at
https://www.fda.gov/media/125081/download (Docket number FDA-2019-D-
0892), accessed February 23, 2022.
16. * FDA, ``Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals: Target Mean and Upper
Bound Concentrations for Sodium in Commercially Processed, Packaged,
and Prepared Foods: Guidance for Industry.'' October 2021. Available
at https://www.fda.gov/media/98264/download (Docket number FDA-2014-
D-0055), accessed February 23, 2022.
17. Mayne, S. T., R. A. McKinnon, and J. Woodcock, ``Reducing Sodium
Intake in the U.S. Healthier Lives, Healthier Future.'' Journal of
the American Medical Association. 2021; 326(17): pp. 1675-1676.
18. * FDA, ``Horizontal Approaches to Food Standards of Identity
Modernization; Public Meeting; Request for Comments.'' September 27,
2019; transcript available at https://www.fda.gov/food/workshops-meetings-webinars-food-and-dietary-supplements/public-meeting-horizontal-approaches-food-standards-identity-modernization-09272019-09272019.
19. Institute of Medicine. ``Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in
the United States'' (2010). Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press.
20. D[ouml]tsch, M., J. Busch, M. Batenburg, G. Liem, et al.,
``Strategies to Reduce Sodium Consumption: A Food Industry
Perspective.'' Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2009;
49(10): pp. 841-851.
21. Taylor, C., M. Doyle, D. Webb, ``The Safety of Sodium Reduction
in the Food Supply: A Cross-Discipline Balancing Act--Workshop
Proceedings.'' Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2018;
58(10): pp. 1650-1659.
22. * FDA, ``Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals: Target Mean and Upper
Bound Concentrations for Sodium in Commercially Processed, Packaged,
and Prepared Foods: Guidance for Industry. Draft Guidance.'' June
2016.
23. Muth, M. K., S. Bradley, J. Brophy, K. Capogrossi, S. Karns, and
C. Viator. Reformulation cost model. Contract No. HHSF-223-2011-
10005B, Task Order 20. Final report. Research Triangle Park (NC):
RTI International; 2015.
24. * FDA, ``Use of Salt Substitutes to Reduce the Sodium Content in
Standardized Foods'' Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis, Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Analysis. Available at https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/reports/economic-impact-analyses-fda-regulations.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 130
Food additives, Food grades and standards.
21 CFR Part 131
Dairy products, Food grades and standards, Incorporation by
reference, Milk.
21 CFR Part 133
Dairy products, Food grades and standards, Food labeling.
21 CFR Part 136
Bakery products, Food grades and standards, Incorporation by
reference.
21 CFR Part 137
Foods, Food grades and standards, Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Part 139
Food grades and standards, Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Parts 145 and 150
Food grades and standards, Fruits, Incorporation by reference.
21 CFR Part 155
Food grades and standards, Incorporation by reference, Vegetables.
21 CFR Part 156
Food grades and standards, Vegetable juices.
21 CFR Part 158
Food grades and standards, Frozen foods, Vegetables.
[[Page 21162]]
21 CFR Part 161
Food grades and standards, Frozen foods, Incorporation by
reference, Seafood.
21 CFR Part 163
Cacao products, Food grades and standards.
21 CFR Part 166
Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Incorporation by
reference, Margarine.
21 CFR Part 168
Food grades and standards, Sugar.
21 CFR Part 169
Food grades and standards, Oils and fats, Spices and flavorings.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, we propose
that 21 CFR parts 130, 131, 133, 136, 137, 139, 145, 150, 155, 156,
158, 161, 163, 166, 168, and 169 be amended as follows:
PART 130--FOOD STANDARDS: GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 130 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 336, 341, 343, 371.
0
2. Add subpart C to read as follows:
* * * * *
Subpart C--Flexibility in Standardized Foods
Sec. 130.30 Ingredient flexibility in standardized foods.
(a) The definitions listed in this section apply to parts 131
through 169 of this chapter.
(b) The ingredients used as substitutes must not change the basic
nature and essential characteristics of the food.
(c) Definitions.
(1) Salt substitute means a safe and suitable ingredient (or
combination of ingredients) that is used to replace some or all of the
added salt (sodium chloride), to reduce sodium in the food, and that
serves the functions of salt in the food.
(2) [Reserved]
PART 131--MILK AND CREAM
0
3. The authority citation for part 131 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
4. Add Sec. 131.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 131.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. The material may be obtained from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD
20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622:
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 945.48G, under Evaporated Milk
(Unsweetened); IBR Sec. Sec. 131.160(c); 131.162(c).
(2) AOAC Official Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk Titrimetric
Method; IBR Sec. Sec. 131.111(f); 131.112(e); 131.160(c); 131.162(c).
(3) AOAC Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk Modified Mojonnier
Ether Extraction Method; IBR Sec. Sec. 131.111(f); 131.112(e);
131.170(f).
(4) AOAC Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By
Difference between Total Solids and Fat Contents; IBR Sec. Sec.
131.111(f); 131.112(e); 131.170(f).
(b) [Reserved]
0
5. In Sec. 131.111, revise paragraphs (e)(8) and (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 131.111 Acidified milk.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(8) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(f) Methods of analysis. Referenced methods are from ``Official
Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 131.10):
(1) Milkfat content--As determined by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content--Calculated by subtracting the
milkfat content from the total solids content using the method
prescribed in AOAC Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By
Difference between Total Solids and Fat Contents.
(3) Titratable acidity--As determined by the methods prescribed in
AOAC Official Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk Titrimetric Method or by
an equivalent potentiometric method.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 131.112, revise paragraphs (d)(8) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 131.112 Cultured milk.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(8) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(e) Methods of analysis. Referenced methods are from ``Official
Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 131.10):
(1) Milkfat content--As determined by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content--Calculated by subtracting the
milkfat content from the total solids content using the method
prescribed in AOAC Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By
Difference between Total Solids and Fat Contents.
(3) Titratable acidity--As determined by the methods prescribed in
AOAC Official Method 947.05, Acidity of Milk Titrimetric Method or by
an equivalent potentiometric method.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 131.160, revise paragraphs (b)(5) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 131.160 Sour cream.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(c) Methods of analysis. Referenced methods are from ``Official
Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content--AOAC Official Method 945.48G, under Evaporated
Milk (Unsweetened).
(2) Titratable acidity--AOAC Official Method 947.05, Acidity of
Milk Titrimetric Method.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 131.162, revise paragraphs (b)(4) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 131.162 Acidified sour cream.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(c) Methods of analysis. Referenced methods are from ``Official
Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content--AOAC Official Method 945.48G, under Evaporated
Milk (Unsweetened).
(2) Titratable acidity--AOAC Official Method 947.05, Acidity of
Milk Titrimetric Method.
* * * * *
[[Page 21163]]
0
9. In Sec. 131.170, revise paragraphs (e)(2) and (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 131.170 Eggnog.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(f) Methods of analysis. Referenced methods are from ``Official
Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 131.10).
(1) Milkfat content--As determined by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 989.05, Fat in Milk Modified Mojonnier Ether Extraction
Method.
(2) Milk solids not fat content--Calculated by subtracting the
milkfat content from the total solids content using the method
prescribed in AOAC Official Method 990.21, Solid-Not-Fat in Milk By
Difference between Total Solids and Fat Contents.
* * * * *
PART 133--CHEESES AND RELATED CHEESE PRODUCTS
0
10. The authority citation for part 133 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
11. In Sec. 133.102, add paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.102 Asiago fresh and asiago soft cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 133.106, add paragraph(b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.106 Blue cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 133.108, add paragraph (b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.108 Brick cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 133.111, add paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.111 Caciocavallo siciliano cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 133.113, add paragraph (b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.113 Cheddar cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
16. In Sec. 133.118, revise the first sentence of paragraph (c)(2) and
add paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.118 Colby cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been pasteurized if it has been
held at a temperature of not less than 145 [deg]F for a period of not
less than 30 minutes, or for a time and at a temperature equivalent
thereto in phosphatase destruction. * * *
* * * * *
(4) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
17. In Sec. 133.123, revise paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.123 Cold-pack and club cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
18. In Sec. 133.124, revise paragraph (e)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.124 Cold-pack cheese food.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
19. In Sec. 133.127, revise paragraph (b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.127 Cook cheese, koch kaese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
20. In Sec. 133.129, revise paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii)
to read as follows:
Sec. 133.129 Dry curd cottage cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Harmless lactic-acid-producing bacteria, with or without rennet
and/or other safe and suitable milk-clotting enzyme that produces
equivalent curd formation, are added and it is held until it becomes
coagulated. The coagulated mass may be cut; it may be warmed; it may be
stirred; it is then drained. The curd may be washed with water and
further drained; it may be pressed, chilled, worked, seasoned with salt
or salt substitute; or
(ii) Food grade phosphoric acid, lactic acid, citric acid, or
hydrochloric acid, with or without rennet and/or other safe and
suitable milk-clotting enzyme that produces equivalent curd formation,
is added in such amount as to reach a pH of between 4.5 and 4.7;
coagulation to a firm curd is achieved while heating to a maximum of
120 [deg]F without agitation during a continuous process. The
coagulated mass may be cut; it may be warmed; it may be stirred; it is
then drained. The curd is washed with water, stirred, and further
drained. It may be pressed, chilled, worked, seasoned with salt or salt
substitute.
(iii) Food grade acids as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this
section, D-Glucono-delta-lactone with or without rennet, and/or other
safe and suitable milk clotting enzyme that produces equivalent curd
formation, are added in such amounts as to reach a final pH value in
the range of 4.5-4.8, and it is held until it becomes coagulated. The
coagulated mass may be cut; it may be warmed; it may be stirred; it is
then drained. The curd is then washed with water, and further drained.
It may be pressed, chilled, worked, and seasoned with salt or salt
substitute.
* * * * *
0
21. In Sec. 133.133, revise paragraph (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.133 Cream cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 133.136, add paragraph (b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.136 Washed curd and soaked curd cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 133.138, add paragraph (b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.138 Edam cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
[[Page 21164]]
0
24. In Sec. 133.141, add paragraph (b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.141 Gorgonzola cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
25. In Sec. 133.144, add paragraph (b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.144 Granular and stirred curd cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
26. In Sec. 133.147, revise paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.147 Grated American cheese food.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
27. In Sec. 133.148, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.148 Hard grating cheeses.
* * * * *
(c)(1) For the purposes of this section, the word ``milk'' means
cow's milk or goat's milk or sheep's milk or mixtures of two or all of
these. Such milk may be adjusted by separating part of the fat
therefrom or (in the case of cow's milk) by adding one or more of the
following: Cream, skim milk, concentrated skim milk, nonfat dry milk;
(in the case of goat's milk) the corresponding products from goat's
milk; (in the case of sheep's milk) the corresponding products from
sheep's milk; water in a quantity sufficient to reconstitute any such
concentrated or dried products used.
(2) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
28. In Sec. 133.149, add paragraph (b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.149 Gruyere cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
29. In Sec. 133.150, revise the first sentence of paragraph (c)(2),
add paragraph (c)(3), and revise paragraph (e)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.150 Hard cheeses.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been pasteurized if it has been
held at a temperature of not less than 145 [deg]F for a period of not
less than 30 minutes, or for a time and at a temperature equivalent
thereto in phosphatase destruction. * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) The specific common or usual name of such hard cheese, if any
such name has become generally recognized therefor; or
* * * * *
0
30. In Sec. 133.152, add paragraph (b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.152 Limburger cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
31. In Sec. 133.153, revise paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.153 Monterey cheese and Monterey jack cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
32. In Sec. 133.155, revise paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.155 Mozzarella cheese and scamorza cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
33. In Sec. 133.156, revise paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.156 Low-moisture mozzarella and scamorza cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
34. In Sec. 133.160, add paragraph (b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.160 Muenster and munster cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
35. In Sec. 133.162, revise paragraph (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.162 Neufchatel cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
36. In Sec. 133.164, add paragraph (b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.164 Nuworld cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
37. In Sec. 133.165, add paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.165 Parmesan and reggiano cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
38. In Sec. 133.169, revise paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.169 Pasteurized process cheese.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
39. In Sec. 133.173, revise paragraph (e)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.173 Pasteurized process cheese food.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
40. In Sec. 133.179, revise paragraph (f)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.179 Pasteurized process cheese spread.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
41. In Sec. 133.181, add paragraph (b)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.181 Provolone cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
42. In Sec. 133.182, revise the tenth sentence in paragraph (b) and
revise paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.182 Soft ripened cheeses.
* * * * *
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may be added during the
procedure. * * *
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been pasteurized if it has been
held at a
[[Page 21165]]
temperature of not less than 145 [deg]F for a period of not less than
30 minutes, or for a time and at a temperature equivalent thereto in
phosphatase destruction.
* * * * *
0
43. In Sec. 133.183, add paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.183 Romano cheese.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
44. In Sec. 133.184, revise paragraphs (b) introductory text and
(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.184 Roquefort cheese, sheep's milk blue-mold, and blue-mold
cheese from sheep's milk.
* * * * *
(b) Optional Ingredients. The following safe and suitable
ingredients may be used:
* * * * *
(3) Other optional ingredients.
(i) Enzymes of animal, plant, or microbial origin, used in curing
or flavor development.
(ii) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
45. In Sec. 133.185, add paragraph (b)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.185 Samsoe cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
46. In Sec. 133.186, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 133.186 Sap sago cheese.
(a) * * *
(2) One or more of the dairy ingredients specified in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section is allowed to become sour, and is heated to
boiling temperature, with stirring. Sufficient sour whey is added to
precipitate the casein. The curd is removed, spread out in boxes, and
pressed, and while under pressure is allowed to drain and ferment. It
is ripened for not less than 5 weeks. The ripened curd is dried and
ground; salt or salt substitute and dried clover of the species
Melilotus coerulea are added. The mixture is shaped into truncated
cones and ripened. The optional ingredient in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section may be added during this procedure.
* * * * *
(c) Nomenclature. The name of the food is ``sap sago cheese.''
* * * * *
0
47. In Sec. 133.187, revise the tenth sentence of paragraph (b) and
the first sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.187 Semisoft cheeses.
* * * * *
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may be added during the
procedure. * * *
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been pasteurized if it has been
held at a temperature of not less than 145 [deg]F for a period of not
less than 30 minutes, or for a time and at a temperature equivalent
thereto in phosphatase destruction. * * *
* * * * *
0
48. In Sec. 133.188, revise the tenth sentence in paragraph (b) and
the first sentence in paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.188 Semisoft part-skim cheeses.
* * * * *
(b) * * * Salt or salt substitute may be added during the
procedure. * * *
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Milk shall be deemed to have been pasteurized if it has been
held at a temperature of not less than 145 [deg]F for a period of not
less than 30 minutes, or for a time and at a temperature equivalent
thereto in phosphatase destruction. * * *
* * * * *
0
49. In Sec. 133.189, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.189 Skim milk cheese for manufacturing.
* * * * *
(d)(1) For the purposes of this section, ``skim milk'' means cow's
milk from which the milk fat has been separated.
(2) During the cheesemaking process, where the curd is salted, salt
substitute may be used.
* * * * *
0
50. In Sec. 133.190, revise paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.190 Spiced cheeses.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
51. In Sec. 133.195, add paragraph (b)(3)(vii) to read as follows:
Sec. 133.195 Swiss and emmentaler cheese.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Salt substitute.
* * * * *
PART 136--BAKERY PRODUCTS
0
52. The authority citation for part 136 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
53. In Sec. 136.110, revise paragraphs (c)(4) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 136.110 Bread, rolls, and buns.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(d) Total solids are determined by the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 935.36(a), Solids (Total) in Bread, except that if the
baked unit weighs 454 grams (1 pound) or more, one entire unit is used
for the determination; if the baked unit weighs less than 454 grams,
enough units to weigh 454 grams or more are used. AOAC Official Method
935.36(a), Solids (Total) in Bread, ``Official Methods of Analysis,''
21st Ed. (2019), is incorporated by reference into this section with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. This material is also available from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL, 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20850-
3250, 1-800-379-2622.
* * * * *
PART 137--CEREAL FLOURS AND RELATED PRODUCTS
0
54. The authority citation for part 137 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
55. Add subpart A, consisting of Sec. Sec. 137.1 through 137.100, to
read as follows:
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec.
137.10 Incorporation by reference.
137.20 through 137.100 [Reserved]
[[Page 21166]]
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec. 137.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. The material may be obtained from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD
20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622:
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 923.02A, Reagent; IBR Sec. Sec.
137.180(c); 137.270(b).
(2) AOAC Official Method 923.02B, Apparatus, under Carbon Dioxide
(Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric Determination; IBR Sec. Sec.
137.180(c); 137.270(b).
(3) Reference Table 909.04, Correction Factors for Gasometric
Determination of Carbon Dioxide; IBR Sec. Sec. 137.180(c); 137.270(b).
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. Sec. 137.20 through 137.100 [Reserved]
0
56. In Sec. 137.180, revise paragraphs (a), (c) introductory text, and
(c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 137.180 Self-rising flour.
(a) Description. Self-rising flour, self-rising white flour, self-
rising wheat flour, is an intimate mixture of flour, sodium
bicarbonate, and one or more of the acid-reacting substances
monocalcium phosphate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, and sodium aluminum
phosphate. It is seasoned with salt or salt substitute. When it is
tested by the method prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section, not
less than 0.5 percent of carbon dioxide is evolved. The acid-reacting
substance is added in sufficient quantity to neutralize the sodium
bicarbonate. The combined weight of such acid-reacting substance and
sodium bicarbonate is not more than 4.5 parts to each 100 parts of
flour used. Subject to the conditions and restrictions prescribed by
Sec. 137.105(a), the bleaching ingredients specified in such section
may be added as optional ingredients. If the flour used in making the
self-rising flour is bleached, the optional bleaching ingredient used
therein (see Sec. 137.105(a)) is also an optional ingredient of the
self-rising flour.
* * * * *
(c) Method of analysis. Follow the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 923.02A, Reagent, and 923.02B, Apparatus, under Carbon
Dioxide (Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric Determination
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 137.10): Instead of using AOAC
Official Method 923.02C, Determination, use the following procedure:
(1) Weigh 17 grams of the official sample into flask A, add 15-20
glass beads (4-6 mm. diameter), and connect this flask with the
apparatus (fig. 923.02). Open stopcock C and by means of the leveling
bulb E bring the displacement solution to the 25 cc. graduation above
the zero mark. (This 25 cc. is a partial allowance for the volume of
acid to be used in the decomposition.) Allow the apparatus to stand 1-2
minutes to ensure that the temperature and pressure within the
apparatus are the same as those of the room. Close the stopcock, lower
the leveling bulb somewhat to reduce the pressure within the apparatus,
and slowly run into the decomposition flask from burette F 45 cc. of
sulfuric acid (1 + 5). To prevent the liberated carbon dioxide from
escaping through the acid burette into the air, keep the displacement
solution in the leveling bulb at all times during the decomposition at
a lower level than that in the gas-measuring tube. Rotate and then
vigorously agitate the decomposition flask for 3 minutes to mix the
contents intimately. Allow to stand for 10 minutes to bring to
equilibrium. Equalize the pressure in the measuring tube by means of
the leveling bulb and read the volume of gas from the zero point on the
tube. Deduct 20 cc. from this reading (this 20 cc. together with
previous allowance of 25 cc. compensates for the 45 cc. acid used in
the decomposition). Observe the temperature of the air surrounding the
apparatus and also the barometric pressure and multiply the number of
milliliters of gas evolved by the factor given in Reference Table
909.04, ``Correction Factors for Gasometric Determination of Carbon
Dioxide'', incorporated by reference, see Sec. 137.10) for the
temperature and pressure observed. Divide the corrected reading by 100
to obtain the apparent percent by weight of carbon dioxide in the
official sample.
* * * * *
0
57. In Sec. 137.270, revise paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text, and
(b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 137.270 Self-rising white corn meal.
(a) Description. Self-rising white corn meal is an intimate mixture
of white corn meal, sodium bicarbonate, and one or both of the acid-
reacting substances monocalcium phosphate and sodium aluminum
phosphate. It is seasoned with salt or salt substitute. When it is
tested by the method prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, not
less than 0.5 percent of carbon dioxide is evolved. The acid-reacting
substance is added in sufficient quantity to neutralize the sodium
bicarbonate. The combined weight of such acid-reacting substance and
sodium bicarbonate is not more than 4.5 parts to each 100 parts of
white corn meal used.
(b) Method of analysis. Follow the method prescribed in AOAC
Official Method 923.02A, Reagent, and 923.02B, Apparatus, under Carbon
Dioxide (Total) in Baking Powders Gasometric Determination
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 137.10): Instead of using AOAC
Official Method 923.02C, Determination, use the following procedure:
(1) Weigh 17 grams of the official sample into flask A, add 15-20
glass beads (4-6 mm. diameter), and connect this flask with the
apparatus (fig. 923.02). Open stopcock C and by means of the leveling
bulk E bring the displacement solution to the 25 cc. graduation above
the zero mark. (This 25 cc. is a partial allowance for the volume of
acid to be used in the decomposition.) Allow the apparatus to stand 1-2
minutes to ensure that the temperature and pressure within the
apparatus are the same as those of the room. Close the stopcock, lower
the leveling bulb somewhat to reduce the pressure within the apparatus,
and slowly run into the decomposition flask from burette F 45 cc. of
sulfuric acid (1 + 5). To prevent the liberated carbon dioxide from
escaping through the acid burette into the air, keep the displacement
solution in the leveling bulb at all times during the decomposition at
a lower level than that in the gas-measuring tube. Rotate and then
vigorously agitate the decomposition flask for 3 minutes to mix the
contents intimately. Allow to stand for 10 minutes to bring to
equilibrium. Equalize the pressure in the measuring tube by means of
the leveling bulb and read the volume of gas from the zero point on the
tube. Deduct 20 cc. from this reading (this 20 cc. together with
previous allowance of 25 cc. compensates for the 45 cc. acid used
[[Page 21167]]
in the decomposition). Observe the temperature of the air surrounding
the apparatus and also the barometric pressure and multiply the number
of milliliters of gas evolved by the factor given in the Reference
Table 909.04, ``Correction Factors for Gasometric Determination of
Carbon Dioxide'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 137.10) for the
temperature and pressure observed. Divide the corrected reading by 100
to obtain the apparent percent by weight of carbon dioxide in the
official sample.
* * * * *
PART 139--MACARONI AND NOODLE PRODUCTS
0
58. The authority citation for part 139 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
59. Add subpart A, consisting of Sec. Sec. 1397.10 through 139.100, to
read as follows:
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec.
139.10 Incorporation by reference.
139.20 through 139.100 [Reserved]
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec. 139.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. The material may be obtained from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD
20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 926.07A, Vacuum Oven Method, under Solids
(Total) and Loss on Drying (Moisture) in Macaroni Products; IBR
Sec. Sec. 139.110(a); 139.150(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. Sec. 139.20 through 139.100 [Reserved]
0
60. In Sec. 139.110, revise paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 139.110 Macaroni products.
(a) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute, in a quantity that seasons the food.
(5) Gum gluten, in such quantity that the protein content of the
finished food is not more than 13 percent by weight. The finished
macaroni product contains not less than 87 percent of total solids as
determined by AOAC Official Method 926.07A(incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 139.10).
* * * * *
0
61. In Sec. 139.150, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 139.150 Noodle products.
(a) * * *
(2) Salt or salt substitute, in a quantity that seasons the food.
* * * * *
(4) Concentrated glyceryl monostearate (containing not less than 90
percent monoester) in a quantity not exceeding 3 percent by weight of
the finished food. The finished noodle product contains not less than
87 percent of total solids as determined by AOAC Official Method
926.07A(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 139.10). The total solids
of noodle products contains not less than 5.5 percent by weight of the
solids of egg, or egg yolk.
* * * * *
PART 145--CANNED FRUITS
0
62. The authority citation for part 145 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
63. In Sec. 145.110, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(iii) to read
as follows:
Sec. 145.110 Canned applesauce.
(a) * * *
(1) Definition. Canned applesauce is the food prepared from
comminuted or chopped apples (Malus domestica Borkhausen), which may or
may not be peeled and cored, and which may have added thereto one or
more of the optional ingredients specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section. The apple ingredient is heated and, in accordance with good
manufacturing practices, bruised apple particles, peel, seed, core
material, carpel tissue, and other coarse, hard, or extraneous
materials are removed. The food is sealed in containers. It is so
processed by heat, either before or after sealing, as to prevent
spoilage. The soluble solids content, measured by refractometer and
expressed as percent sucrose (degrees Brix) with correction for
temperature to the equivalent at 20 [deg]C (68 [deg]F), is not less
than 9 percent (exclusive of the solids of any added optional nutritive
carbohydrate sweeteners) as determined by AOAC Official Method 932.12
but without correction for invert sugar or other substances. AOAC
Official Method 932.12, ``Solids (Soluble) in Fruits and Fruit
Products,'' in ``Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL,''
21st Ed. (2019), is incorporated by reference into this section with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51,. All approved incorporation by reference
(IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact the FDA at FDA's Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. This material is available from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL, 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20850-
3250, 1-800-379-2622.
(2) * * *
(iii) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
64. In Sec. 145.130, revise paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 145.130 Canned figs.
(a) * * *
(5) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
PART 150--FRUIT BUTTERS, JELLIES, PRESERVES, AND RELATED PRODUCTS
0
65. The authority citation for part 150 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
66. Add subpart A, consisting of Sec. Sec. 150.10 through 150.100, to
read as follows:
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec.
150.10 Incorporation by reference.
150.20 through 150.100 [Reserved]
Subpart A--General Provisions.
Sec. 150.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration
[[Page 21168]]
(FDA) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected]. The material may be
obtained from AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite
300, Rockville, MD 20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) AOAC Official Method 932.12, Solids (Soluble) in Fruits and
Fruit Products; IBR Sec. 150.110(d).
(2) AOAC Official Method 932.14C, By Means of Refractometer, under
Solids in Syrups; IBR Sec. 150.110(d).
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. Sec. 150.20 through 150.100 [Reserved]
0
67. In Sec. 150.110, revise paragraphs (c)(4), (d)(3), and (d)(5) to
read as follows:
Sec. 150.110 Fruit butter.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) The soluble solids content of the finished fruit butter is not
less than 43 percent, as determined by AOAC Official Method 932.12
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 150.10).
* * * * *
(5) The weight of fruit juice or diluted fruit juice or
concentrated fruit juice (optional ingredient, paragraph (c)(6) of this
section) from a fruit specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is
the weight of such juice, as determined by the method prescribed in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section, except that the percent of soluble
solids is determined by AOAC Official Method 932.14C, under Solids in
Syrups (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 150.10); the weight of
diluted concentrated juice from any other fruits is the original weight
of the juice before it was diluted or concentrated.
* * * * *
PART 155--CANNED VEGETABLES
0
68. The authority citation for part 155 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379(e).
0
69. Add Sec. 155.10 to subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 155.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. The material may be obtained from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD
20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) Table 1, ``Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA
Standard Series),'' under the heading ``Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes''; IBR Sec. Sec. 155.120(b); 155.130(b).
(2) AOAC Official Method 938.10, Solids (Alcohol-Insoluble) in
Canned Peas Gravimetric Method; IBR Sec. 155.170(b).
(b) [Reserved]
0
70. In Sec. 155.120, revise paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (b)(2)(i) to read
as follows:
Sec. 155.120 Canned green beans and canned wax beans.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Determine the gross weight of the container. Open and
distribute the contents of the container over the meshes of a U.S. No.
8 circular sieve with openings of 2.36 mm (0.0937 in), which has been
previously weighed. The diameter of the sieve is 20.3 cm (8 in) if the
quantity of contents of the container is less than 1.36 kg (3 lbs) and
30.5 cm (12 in) if such quantity is 1.36 kg (3 lbs) or more. The bottom
of the sieve is woven-wire cloth that complies with the specifications
of such cloth set forth in ``Official Methods of Analysis'', Table 1,
``Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard Series),''
under the heading ``Definition of Terms and Explanatory Notes,''
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 155.10). Without shifting the
material on the sieve, incline the sieve 17[deg] to 20[deg] to
facilitate drainage. Two minutes after drainage begins, weigh the sieve
and the drained material. Record in grams (ounces) the weight so found,
less the weight of the sieve, as the drained weight. Dry and weigh the
empty container and subtract this weight from the gross weight to
obtain the net weight. Calculate the percent of drained liquid in the
net weight.
* * * * *
0
71. In Sec. 155.130, revise paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (b)(2)(i) to read
as follows:
Sec. 155.130 Canned corn.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Determine the gross weight of the container. Open and
distribute the contents of the container over the meshes of a U.S. No.
8 circular sieve, which has previously been weighed. The diameter of
the sieve is 20.3 cm. (8 in) if the quantity of the contents of the
container is less than 1.36 kg. (3 lbs), and 30.5 cm. (12 in) if such
quantity is 1.36 kg. (3 lbs) or more. The bottom of the sieve is woven-
wire cloth that complies with the specifications for such sieve set
forth in ``Official Methods of Analysis'', Table 1, ``Nominal
Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard Series),'' under the
heading ``Definition of Terms and Explanatory Notes'' (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 155.10). Without shifting the material on the
sieve, so incline the sieve at approximately 17[deg] to 20[deg] angle
to facilitate drainage. Two minutes from the time drainage begins,
weigh the sieve and the drained material. Record, in grams (ounces),
the weight so found, less the weight of the sieve, as the drained
weight. Dry and weigh the empty container and subtract this weight from
the gross weight to obtain the net weight. Calculate the percent of
drained liquid in the net weight.
* * * * *
0
72. In Sec. 155.170, revise paragraph (a)(2)(i), and paragraphs
(b)(1)(iii) and (vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.170 Canned peas.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * *
(iii) Seriously blemished peas. Not more than 1 percent of the
drained weight is seriously blemished peas, i.e., peas that are hard,
shriveled, spotted,
[[Page 21169]]
discolored, or otherwise blemished to an extent that the appearance or
eating quality is seriously affected.
* * * * *
(vi) Alcohol-insoluble solids. The alcohol-insoluble solids of
smooth-skin or substantially smooth-skin peas, such as Alaska-type peas
or hybrids having similar characteristics, may not be more than 23.5
percent and, of sweet green wrinkled varieties or hybrids having
similar characteristics, not more than 21 percent based on the
procedure set forth in tAOAC Official Method 938.10(incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 155.10).
* * * * *
0
73. In Sec. 155.190, revise paragraph (a)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.190 Canned tomatoes.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
74. In Sec. 155.191, revise paragraph (a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.191 Tomato concentrates.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute (sodium chloride formed during acid
neutralization shall be considered added salt).
* * * * *
0
75. In Sec. 155.194, revise paragraph (a)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.194 Catsup.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) The liquid obtained from the residue from partial extraction
of juice from such tomatoes. Such liquid is strained so as to exclude
skins, seeds, and other coarse or hard substances in accordance with
current good manufacturing practice. Prior to straining, food-grade
hydrochloric acid may be added to the tomato material in an amount to
obtain a pH no lower than 2.0. Such acid is then neutralized with food-
grade sodium hydroxide so that the treated tomato material is restored
to a pH of 4.2 0.2. The final composition of the food may
be adjusted by concentration and/or by the addition of water. The food
may contain salt or salt substitute (sodium chloride formed during acid
neutralization shall be considered added salt) and is seasoned with
ingredients as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The food
is preserved by heat sterilization (canning), refrigeration, or
freezing. When sealed in a container to be held at ambient
temperatures, it is so processed by heat, before or after sealing, as
to prevent spoilage.
* * * * *
0
76. In Sec. 155.200, revise paragraph (c)(4)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.200 Certain other canned vegetables.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
77. In Sec. 155.201, revise paragraph (a)(3)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.201 Canned mushrooms.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
PART 156--VEGETABLE JUICES
0
78. The authority citation for part 156 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371.
0
79. In Sec. 156.145, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 156.145 Tomato juice.
(a) * * *
(1) Definition. Tomato juice is the food intended for direct
consumption, obtained from the unfermented liquid extracted from mature
tomatoes of the red or reddish varieties of Lycopersicum esculentum P.
Mill, with or without scalding followed by draining. In the extraction
of such liquid, heat may be applied by any method which does not add
water thereto. Such juice is strained free from peel, seeds, and other
coarse or hard substances, but contains finely divided insoluble solids
from the flesh of the tomato in accordance with current good
manufacturing practice. Such juice may be homogenized, may be seasoned
with salt or salt substitute, and may be acidified with any safe and
suitable organic acid. The juice may have been concentrated and later
reconstituted with water and/or tomato juice to a tomato soluble solids
content of not less than 5.0 percent by weight as determined by the
method prescribed in Sec. 156.3(b). The food is preserved by heat
sterilization (canning), refrigeration, or freezing. When sealed in a
container to be held at ambient temperatures, it is so processed by
heat, before or after sealing, as to prevent spoilage.
* * * * *
PART 158--FROZEN VEGETABLES
0
80. The authority citation for part 158 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371.
0
81. In Sec. 158.170, revise paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(iii) to
read as follows:
Sec. 158.170 Frozen peas.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Not more than 2 percent by weight seriously blemished peas,
i.e., peas that are hard, shriveled, spotted, discolored or otherwise
blemished to an extent that the appearance or eating quality is
seriously affected.
* * * * *
PART 161--FISH AND SHELLFISH
0
82. The authority citation for part 161 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
83. Add Sec. 161.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 161.10 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact FDA's Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, visitn
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. The material may be obtained from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL (AOAC), 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD
20850-3250, 1-800-379-2622.
(a) Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. (2019);
(1) Table 1, ``Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA
Standard Series),'' under the heading ``Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes''; IBR Sec. Sec. 161.145(c); 161.173(c);
161.190(a)(7).
(2) [Reserved]
(b) [Reserved]
0
84. In Sec. 161.145, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 161.145 Canned oysters.
(a) * * *
(1) Canned oysters is the food prepared from one or any mixture of
two or all of the forms of oysters
[[Page 21170]]
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and a packing medium of
water, or the watery liquid draining from oysters before or during
processing, or a mixture of such liquid and water. The food may be
seasoned with salt or salt substitute. It is sealed in containers and
so processed by heat as to prevent spoilage.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Drained weight is determined by the following method: Keep the
unopened canned oyster container at a temperature of not less than 68
[deg]F or more than 95 [deg]F for at least 12 hours immediately
preceding the determination. After opening, tilt the container so as to
distribute its contents evenly over the meshes of a circular sieve that
has been previously weighed. The diameter of the sieve is 8 inches if
the quantity of the contents of the container is less than 3 pounds and
12 inches if such quantity is 3 pounds or more. The bottom of the sieve
is woven-wire cloth that complies with the specifications for such
cloth set forth under ``2.36 mm (No. 8)'' in ``Official Methods of
Analysis,'' Table 1, ``Nominal Dimensions of Standard Test Sieves (USA
Standard Series),'' under the heading ``Definition of Terms and
Explanatory Notes,'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 161.10).
Without shifting the material on the sieve, so incline the sieve as to
facilitate drainage. Two minutes from the time drainage begins, weigh
the sieve and the drained oysters. The weight so found, less the weight
of the sieve, shall be considered to be the drained weight of the
oysters.
* * * * *
0
85. In Sec. 161.170, revise paragraph (a)(4)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 161.170 Canned Pacific salmon.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
86. In Sec. 161.173, revise paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 161.173 Canned wet pack shrimp in transparent or nontransparent
containers.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) The standard of fill of transparent or nontransparent
containers for canned wet pack shrimp is a fill such that the cut-out
weight of shrimp taken from each container is not less than 60 percent
of the weight of the water required to fill the container. The weight
of the water required to fill the container is determined by the
general method provided in Sec. 130.12(a) of this chapter. Cut-out
weight is determined by the following method: Keep the unopened canned
shrimp container at a temperature of not less than 68 [deg]F nor more
than 75 [deg]F for at least 12 hours immediately preceding the
determination. After opening, distribute the shrimp evenly over the
meshes of a circular sieve that has been previously weighed. The
diameter of the sieve is 20.3 centimeters (8 inches) if the quantity of
the contents of the container is less than 1.36 kilograms (3 pounds),
and 30.5 centimeters (12 inches) if such quantity is 1.36 kilograms (3
pounds) or more. The bottom of the sieve is woven-wire cloth that
complies with the specifications for such cloth set forth as a 2.36 mm
(No. 8) sieve in ``Official Methods of Analysis'' (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 161.10), Table 1, ``Nominal Dimensions of Standard
Test Sieves (USA Standard Series), under the heading ``Definition of
Terms and Explanatory Notes'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
161.10) Without shifting the material on the sieve, incline the sieve
at an angle of approximately 17[deg] to 20[deg] to facilitate drainage.
Allow the shrimp to drain for 2 minutes, measured from the moment the
product is poured onto the sieve. Weigh the sieve and the drained
shrimp. The weight so found, less the weight of the sieve, shall be
considered to be the cut-out weight of the shrimp.
* * * * *
0
87. In Sec. 161.190, revise paragraphs (a)(6)(i) and (a)(7)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 161.190 Canned tuna.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
(7) For determination of the color designations specified in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the following method shall be used:
Recombine the separations of pressed cake resulting from the method
prescribed in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. Pass the combined
portions through a sieve fitted with woven-wire cloth of \1/4\-inch
mesh complying with the specifications for such cloth set forth in
``Official Methods of Analysis'', Table 1, ``Nominal Dimensions of
Standard Test Sieves (USA Standard Series),'' under the heading
``Definitions of Terms and Explanatory Notes'' (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 161.10) Mix the sieved material and place a
sufficient quantity into a 307 x 113 size container (bearing a top seam
and having a false bottom approximately \1/2\-inch deep and painted
flat black inside and outside) so that after tamping and smoothing the
surface of the sample the material will be \1/8\-inch to \1/4\-inch
below the top of the container. Within 10 minutes after sieving through
the \1/4\-inch mesh woven-wire cloth, determine the Munsell value of
sample surface.
* * * * *
PART 163--CACAO PRODUCTS
0
88. The authority citation for part 163 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
89. In Sec. 163.111, revise paragraph (b)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 163.111 Chocolate liquor.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
90. In Sec. 163.112, revise paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 163.112 Breakfast cocoa.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
91. In Sec. 163.123, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 163.123 Sweet chocolate.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Spices, natural and artificial flavorings, ground whole nut
meats, ground coffee, dried malted cereal extract, salt or salt
substitute, and other seasonings that do not either singly or in
combination impart a flavor that imitates the flavor of chocolate,
milk, or butter;
* * * * *
0
92. In Sec. 163.124, revise paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 163.124 White chocolate.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Spices, natural and artificial flavorings, ground whole nut
meats, ground coffee, dried malted cereal extract, salt or salt
substitute, and other seasonings that do not either singly or in
combination impart a flavor that imitates the flavor of chocolate,
milk, or butter;
* * * * *
0
93. In Sec. 163.130, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
[[Page 21171]]
Sec. 163.130 Milk chocolate.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Spices, natural and artificial flavorings, ground whole nut
meats, ground coffee, dried malted cereal extract, salt or salt
substitute, and other seasonings that do not either singly or in
combination impart a flavor that imitates the flavor of chocolate,
milk, or butter;
PART 166--MARGARINE
0
94. The authority citation for part 166 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 347, 348, 371, 379e.
0
95. In Sec. 166.110, revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 166.110 Margarine.
(a) Description. Margarine (or oleomargarine) is the food in
plastic form or liquid emulsion, containing not less than 80 percent
fat determined by the method prescribed in AOAC Official Method
938.06A. AOAC Official Method 938.06A, ``Indirect Method, under Fat in
Butter,'' found in ``Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC
INTERNATIONAL,'' 21st Ed. (2019), is incorporated by reference into
this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact the FDA at FDA's Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email
[email protected]. This material is available from AOAC
INTERNATIONAL, 2275 Research Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20850-
3250, 1-800-379-2622. Margarine contains only safe and suitable
ingredients, as defined in Sec. 130.3(d) of this chapter. It is
produced from one or more of the optional ingredients in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, and one or more of the optional ingredients in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, to which may be added one or more of
the optional ingredients in paragraph (b) of this section. Margarine
contains vitamin A as provided for in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Salt (sodium chloride) or salt substitute; potassium chloride
for dietary margarine or oleomargarine.
* * * * *
PART 168--SWEETENERS AND TABLE SIRUPS
0
96. The authority citation for part 168 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
97. In Sec. 168.130, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 168.130 Cane sirup.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
98. In Sec. 168.140, revise the first sentence of paragraph (a) and
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 168.140 Maple sirup.
(a) Maple sirup is the liquid food derived by concentration and
heat treatment of the sap of the maple tree (Acer) or by solution in
water of maple sugar (maple concrete) made from such sap. * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
99. In Sec. 168.160, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 168.160 Sorghum sirup.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
100. In Sec. 168.180, revise paragraph (b)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 168.180 Table sirup.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(7) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
PART 169--FOOD DRESSINGS AND FLAVORINGS
0
101. The authority citation for part 169 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 348, 371, 379e.
0
102. In Sec. 169.140, revise paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 169.140 Mayonnaise.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
0
103. In Sec. 169.150, revise paragraph (e)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 169.150 Salad dressing.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Salt or salt substitute.
* * * * *
Dated: March 23, 2023.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2023-06456 Filed 4-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P