Final Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and Public Land Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin, California, 20869-20871 [2023-07321]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Notices
Designated Source of Supply: Alphapointe,
Kansas City, MO
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense
Commissary Agency
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
MR 11041—Gift Bag Set, Cellophane,
Christmas
Designated Source of Supply: Winston-Salem
Industries for the Blind, Inc, WinstonSalem, NC
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense
Commissary Agency
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
MR 876—Ergo Ice Cream Scoop
Designated Source of Supply: CINCINNATI
ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND
VISUALLY IMPAIRED, Cincinnati, OH
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense
Commissary Agency
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
4730–01–112–3240—Cabinet, Fitting Kit
Designated Source of Supply: The
Opportunity Center Easter Seal
Facility—The Ala ES Soc, Inc., Anniston,
AL
Contracting Activity: DLA LAND AND
MARITIME, COLUMBUS, OH
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023–07343 Filed 4–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[23–RI–L–03]
Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive
License With a Joint Ownership
Agreement
Department of The Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act
and implementing regulations, the
Department of the Air Force hereby
gives notice of its intent to grant an
exclusive license with a joint ownership
agreement to Raider Technology, an LLC
duly organized, validly existing, and in
good standing in the State of Ohio
having a place of business at 529 Garden
Road, Oakwood, Ohio 45419.
DATES: Written objections must be filed
no later than fifteen (15) calendar days
after the date of publication of this
Notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
Submit written objections to
Stephen Colenzo, AFRL/RI, 525 Brooks
Road, Rome, New York 13441; or Email:
stephen.colenzo@us.af.mil. Include
Docket No. 23–RI–L–02 in the subject
line of the message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Colenzo, AFRL/RI, 525 Brooks
Road, Rome, New York 13441; (315)
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Apr 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
330–7665 or Email: stephen.colenzo@
us.af.mil.
Abstract of Patent Application(s)
Method and apparatus for a frequency
diverse array. Radio frequency signals
are generated and applied to a power
divider network. A progressive
frequency shift is applied to all radio
frequency signals across all spatial
channels. Amplitude weighting signals
are applied for sidelobe control. Phase
control is included for channel
compensation and to provide nominal
beam steering. The progressive
frequency offsets generate a new term
which cause the antenna beam to focus
in different directions as a function of
range. Alternative embodiments
generate different waveforms to be
applied to each radiating element,
permitting the transmission of multiple
signals at the same time.
Intellectual Property
—WICKS ET AL, U.S. Patent No.
7,319,427, issued on 15 January 2008,
and entitled ‘‘Frequency Diverse
Array with Independent Modulation
of Frequency, Amplitude, and Phase.’’
The Department of the Air Force may
grant the prospective license unless a
timely objection is received that
sufficiently shows the grant of the
license would be inconsistent with the
Bayh-Dole Act or implementing
regulations. A competing application for
a patent license agreement, completed
in compliance with 37 CFR 404.8 and
received by the Air Force within the
period for timely objections, will be
treated as an objection and may be
considered as an alternative to the
proposed license.
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 209; 37 CFR 404.
Tommy W. Lee,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–07359 Filed 4–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement for Training and Public Land
Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin,
California
Department of the Army,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Department of the Army
announces the availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Training and Public Land
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20869
Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin,
California. In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the EIS analyzes the potential
environmental effects resulting from
modernization of training activities and
improvement of training facilities at the
National Training Center (NTC) at Fort
Irwin, California. The Army also is
issuing this notice to inform the public
that the EIS will serve as a Legislative
Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS)
to support the extension of the public
land withdrawal for portions of Fort
Irwin. The Army will execute a Record
of Decision (ROD) for the modernization
of training activities and improvement
of training facilities portion of the
proposed action no sooner than 30
calendar days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA’s) Notice of Availability
of the Final LEIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final LEIS may be
viewed at the following locations: (1)
Barstow Public Library, 304 East Buena
Vista Street, Barstow, CA 92311; (2) Fort
Irwin NTC Post Library, 2nd Street
Building 331, Fort Irwin, CA 92310; (3)
Fort Irwin Environmental Division
Directorate of Public Works, 5th Street
Building 381, Fort Irwin, CA 92310. The
Final LEIS also is available as an
electronic file on the Fort Irwin EIS
website: https://aec.army.mil/
index.php/irwin-nepa-meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fort
Irwin Public Affairs Office, Renita
Wickes at 760–380–4511, Monday
through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., or via email at
usarmy.irwin.ntc.mbx.ntc-eis-inforequest@army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Irwin
comprises approximately 753,537 acres
in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino
County in southern California. The NTC
at Fort Irwin provides combined arms
training for Brigade Combat Teams
(BCTs), including the Army’s Stryker
BCTs and Armored BCTs. Training also
is provided for Marine Corps, Navy, Air
Force, Army Reserve, National Guard
units, and law enforcement
organizations, as well as units stationed
at Fort Irwin. Fort Irwin is one of the
few places in the world where brigadesize units (5,000+ soldiers) can test their
combat readiness due to Fort Irwin’s
size, design, and terrain.
Fort Irwin’s mission is to train visiting
Army units and joint, interagency, and
multinational partners to fight and win
in a complex world. Fort Irwin must
also take care of soldiers, civilians, and
family members. To achieve this
mission, NTC designs and executes
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
20870
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Notices
training exercises that prepare brigadelevel units for operational deployments.
The capacity is needed at NTC to
conduct up to 12 BCT training rotations
per year.
The Final LEIS analyzes the potential
effects from the modernization of
training, the improvement of training
infrastructure, and the extension of the
existing public land withdrawal.
Training changes are required to
support new training doctrine that
focuses on large Army formations
operating against near-peer adversaries.
Improvements need to be made to
infrastructure in order to adjust training
to reflect evolving weapon systems
capabilities and new mission
requirements.
Approximately 110,000 acres of Fort
Irwin training land is public land that
has been withdrawn from all types of
appropriation and reserved for military
purposes under Public Law 107–107
(2001). This public land withdrawal
terminates on December 28, 2026. The
Army has identified a continuing
military need for the land beyond the
termination date and intends to request
that the U.S. Congress extend the
withdrawal for at least 25 years, or in
the alternative, for an indefinite period
until there is no longer a military need
for the land. The U.S. Army proposed
action is to implement changes to
training activities and training
infrastructure at Fort Irwin. These
actions would be undertaken to meet
current doctrinal standards, including
the National Defense Strategy, Army
Regulation (AR) 350–1, Army Training
and Leader Development; AR 350–52,
Training Support System; AR 350–50,
Combat Training Center Program; and
AR 200–1, Environmental Protection
and Enhancement. Actions proposed
include the establishment of, and
improvements to, training infrastructure
such as trail networks, communications
systems, radar systems, training areas,
urban training sites, air operations
infrastructure, and live-fire ranges.
The Final LEIS analyzes a range of
Proposed Mission Change Alternatives,
a No Mission Change Alternative, a
Withdrawal Extension Alternative, and
a No Withdrawal Extension Alternative.
• Mission Change Alternatives: The
Mission Change Alternatives represent
different magnitudes of change in
training and training infrastructure. For
Fort Irwin’s Western Training Area, the
Final LEIS considers a range of medium
to heavy-intensity training alternatives.
• No Mission Change Alternative: The
No Mission Change Alternative would
continue military training at the current
level and would result in no
modernization of training or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Apr 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
improvement of training infrastructure
at Fort Irwin. The Army is the decision
maker regarding the mission change
alternatives.
• No Withdrawal Extension
Alternative: The No Withdrawal
Extension Alternative would result in
portions of the installation land
returning to the public domain.
Upon an application by the Army, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will
file in the Federal Register a separate
notice of withdrawal extension
application. The Final EIS will be
submitted to the U.S. Congress as an
LEIS to support the legislative request
for extension of this withdrawal and
reservation.
All military activities under
consideration would be conducted
within the existing boundaries of the
installation, to include the withdrawn
land. The Final LEIS evaluates the
potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative environmental and
socioeconomic effects of the proposed
action. Adverse effects would be
minimized to the greatest extent
possible through the implementation of
specified avoidance, minimization, and
mitigation measures.
The resource areas and effects
analyzed in the Final LEIS include air
quality, transportation, noise, water
resources, geological resources,
biological resources, cultural resources,
utilities, land use, recreation, health and
safety, hazardous materials, and waste.
Resources may be affected by changing
the scope or increasing the geographical
area of military training activities within
the current Fort Irwin boundaries. The
analysis also considers the potential for
cumulative environmental effects.
Both the Mission Change Alternatives
and the No Mission Change Alternative
would result in unavoidable
environmental effects.
• No Mission Change Alternative:
Under the No Mission Change
Alternative, there would be less-thansignificant effects on all evaluated
resources. The mission change
alternatives would result in minor to
moderate adverse effects that would be
in addition to the effects of the No
Mission Change Alternative; however,
none of the effects would be significant.
• Withdrawal Extension Alternative:
The environmental effects from the
Withdrawal Extension Alternative
would be comparable to those discussed
for the mission change alternatives.
• No Withdrawal Extension
Alternative: While the effects of the No
Withdrawal Extension Alternative are
uncertain, because of the unknown
future uses of these areas if Army
training is not conducted on the land, it
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is expected that the No Withdrawal
Extension Alternative would result in
negligible effects on resources compared
to the effects of the Withdrawal
Extension Alternative.
Fort Irwin met its obligations to
consult under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
concurrently with this NEPA process
through the development of a
Programmatic Agreement in
consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Office, the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, other
government agencies, Native American
Tribes, and the public. The
Programmatic Agreement was
completed on December 15, 2022 and is
provided as an appendix to the Draft
LEIS.
Fort Irwin has completed consultation
under section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service regarding the
proposed activities. The biological
opinion (BO) that resulted from this
consultation was issued by the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service on December 13,
2021, and concludes that the proposed
actions are not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of endangered or
threatened species. Consultation
identified appropriate measures that are
specified in the BO and that will be
implemented by Fort Irwin to avoid or
minimize effects of the activities. Fort
Irwin will comply with the ESA and
implement the measures that are
specified in the BO. The BO is provided
as an appendix to the Draft LEIS.
The Department of the Army
considered all comments received on
the Draft LEIS when preparing the Final
LEIS. Based on the analysis in the Final
LEIS, the Army’s preferred alternative
consists of: the full Mission Change
Alternative with Alternative 4 applied
to the Western Training Area; and a
request that Congress extend the land
withdrawal for 25 years, or for an
indefinite period until there is no longer
a military need for the land.
Federal, State, and local agencies,
Native Americans, Native American
organizations, and the public were
invited to be involved in the public
comment process for the Draft LEIS by
submitting written comments. The Draft
LEIS was published on May 21, 2021,
and the comment period closed on July
6, 2021. The NEPA Process included
two public meetings conducted
telephonically on June 9, 2021.
Responses to comments on the Draft EIS
are included in an appendix to the Final
EIS.
The BLM will organize public
participation following the publication
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Notices
of its notice of application for extension
of the public land withdrawal.
James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–07321 Filed 4–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Activation Energy; DOE’s National
Laboratories as Catalysts of Regional
Innovation; Extension of Comment
Period
Office of Science, Office of
Technology Transitions, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI);
extension of public comment period.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) Office of Science and the Office
of Technology Transitions published a
request for information (RFI) on January
27, 2023, inviting interested parties to
provide input on place-based
innovation opportunities that support
the DOE mission. DOE received requests
for an extension of the public comment
period for an additional 30 days. DOE
reviewed the requests and is granting a
30-day extension of the public comment
period to allow comments to be
submitted until April 28, 2023.
DATES: The comment period for the RFI
published on January 27, 2023 (88 FR
5323), is extended. Responses to this
RFI must be received by April 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: DOE is using the
www.regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments in response to this RFI are
therefore to be submitted electronically
through www.regulations.gov, via the
web form accessed by following the
‘‘Submit a Formal Comment’’ link near
the top right of the Federal Register web
page for this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information may
be submitted to Charles.Russomanno@
hq.doe.gov, (202) 378–7815,
Susannah.Howieson@science.doe.gov,
(202) 253–1997, Erik.Hadland@
science.doe.gov, (240) 425, 8125, or
Margaux.Murali@hq.doe.gov, (202) 586–
3698.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DOE’s
Office of Science and Office of
Technology Transitions published an
RFI in the Federal Register on January
27, 2023, (87 FR 5323), inviting
interested parties to provide input on
place-based innovation opportunities
that support the DOE mission. DOE
received requests from DOE National
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Apr 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Laboratories for an extension of the
public comment. DOE grants an
extension to the comment period from
March 28, 2023, to April 28, 2023, to
allow more time for the Labs to engage
with regional stakeholders and for the
Labs and stakeholders to submit full and
comprehensive responses to the RFI.
Motivation
DOE is exploring opportunities to
strengthen place-based innovation
activities leveraging the DOE National
Laboratories and Sites.1
Background
Federally funded research and
development (R&D) has catalyzed
innovation that has driven economic
growth in the form of new businesses,
more jobs, increased wages, higher
standards of living, and environmental
sustainability. However, growth has
been primarily localized in certain
United States (U.S.) metropolitan
regions that have become flourishing
innovation ecosystems.2 Elements of a
thriving innovation ecosystem include,
but are not limited to: 3
1 DOE Laboratories and sites are Ames
Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, Bettis
and Knolls Atomic Power Laboratories, Brookhaven
National Laboratory, Fermi National Accelerator
Kansas City National Security Campus, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, Los Alamos National
Laboratory, National Energy Technology Laboratory
and Albany Research Center, National Renewable
Energy Laboratory, Nevada National Security Site,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Pantex Plant, Princeton
Plasma Physics Laboratory, Savannah River
National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory,
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Thomas
Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, and Y–12
National Security Complex.
2 Gruber, J., & Johnson, S. (2019). Jump-starting
America: How breakthrough science can revive
economic growth and the American dream;
Atkinson, R., Muro, M., & Whiton, J. (2019). The
Case for Growth Centers. The Brookings Institution
& Information Technology and Innovation
Foundation.
3 Kauffman F Bell-Masterson, Jordan and
Stangler, Dane, Measuring an Entrepreneurial
Ecosystem (March 2015). Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580336 or https://
dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580336; Evolution of the
Industrial Innovation Ecosystem of Resource-Based
Cities (RBCs): A Case Study of Shanxi Province,
China, Jun Yao, Huajing Li 1,*, Di Shang and
Luyang Ding, 2021., https://www.mdpi.com/20711050/13/20/11350/pdf; MIT’s Stakeholder
Framework for Building and Accelerating
Innovation Ecosystems, Budden, P, Murray, F.,
2019, https://innovation.mit.edu/assets/MITStakeholder-Framework_InnovationEcosystems.pdf; An MIT Framework for Innovation
Ecosystem Policy, Budden, P, Murray, F, 2018,
https://innovation.mit.edu/assets/FrameworkEcosystem-Policy_Oct18.pdf; Kauffman Foundation,
Universities and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems,
https://www.kauffmanfellows.org/journal_posts/
universities-and-entrepreneurial-ecosystemsstanford-silicon-valley-success; ‘‘What are the key
components of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a
developing economy? A longitudinal empirical
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20871
• Talent: An educated and skilled
workforce, as well as training programs
to create and sustain this talent.
• Infrastructure: For research,
commercial, industrial, and residential
purposes—inclusive of physical spaces/
facilities, utilities, transportation
(including quality roadways and ready
access to airports), and other features
required for residential, industrial, and
commercial purposes.
• Technology: Accessible scientific
and technical knowledge throughout the
research, development, demonstration,
and deployment (RDD&D) continuum
for commercialization and
manufacturing.
• Capital: Access to financial
resources (i.e., venture capital, private
equity, angel investors, etc.) and
technical resources (i.e., scientific and
manufacturing equipment).
• Social Capital: Local networking to
incentivize and support the existence,
development, and growth of innovation
programs and companies.
• Policy: Local and regional policies
and incentives that support innovationdriven enterprises, economic
development, and planning within a
regional innovation center.
• Collaboration with Industry:
Mutually beneficial partnerships
between public and private sectors to
facilitate the exchange of knowledge,
accelerate the commercialization of
technologies, promote workforce
development, and increase awareness of
promising research, as well as provide
directions for new research needs.
• Community: Structure that supports
the development, accessibility,
inclusivity, environmental
sustainability, and engagement with the
local community in an equitable way.
Place-based innovation initiatives can
be used to cultivate innovation
ecosystems in regions that have yet to
realize benefits from the innovation
renaissance of the past few decades.
Building on existing research
institutions, industrial infrastructure,
concentrations of workforce skills, and
connections to regional philanthropic
and other civil society institutions, DOE
can contribute to supporting localized
economic growth models which will
promote new regional innovation
ecosystems. DOE seeks to stimulate
innovation in regions surrounding the
National Laboratories and Sites by:
• Providing key RDD&D to accelerate
commercialization of breakthrough
technologies;
• Driving development in the
industrial and technology sectors of the
study on technology business incubators in China’’,
Xiangfei Yuana, Haijing Haob, Chenghua Guan,
Alex Pentland, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.08131.
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20869-20871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07321]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and
Public Land Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin, California
AGENCY: Department of the Army, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Training and Public Land
Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin, California. In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the EIS analyzes the
potential environmental effects resulting from modernization of
training activities and improvement of training facilities at the
National Training Center (NTC) at Fort Irwin, California. The Army also
is issuing this notice to inform the public that the EIS will serve as
a Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS) to support the
extension of the public land withdrawal for portions of Fort Irwin. The
Army will execute a Record of Decision (ROD) for the modernization of
training activities and improvement of training facilities portion of
the proposed action no sooner than 30 calendar days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Notice of Availability of the Final LEIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final LEIS may be viewed at the following locations: (1)
Barstow Public Library, 304 East Buena Vista Street, Barstow, CA 92311;
(2) Fort Irwin NTC Post Library, 2nd Street Building 331, Fort Irwin,
CA 92310; (3) Fort Irwin Environmental Division Directorate of Public
Works, 5th Street Building 381, Fort Irwin, CA 92310. The Final LEIS
also is available as an electronic file on the Fort Irwin EIS website:
https://aec.army.mil/index.php/irwin-nepa-meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fort Irwin Public Affairs Office,
Renita Wickes at 760-380-4511, Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., or via email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Irwin comprises approximately 753,537
acres in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County in southern
California. The NTC at Fort Irwin provides combined arms training for
Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs), including the Army's Stryker BCTs and
Armored BCTs. Training also is provided for Marine Corps, Navy, Air
Force, Army Reserve, National Guard units, and law enforcement
organizations, as well as units stationed at Fort Irwin. Fort Irwin is
one of the few places in the world where brigade-size units (5,000+
soldiers) can test their combat readiness due to Fort Irwin's size,
design, and terrain.
Fort Irwin's mission is to train visiting Army units and joint,
interagency, and multinational partners to fight and win in a complex
world. Fort Irwin must also take care of soldiers, civilians, and
family members. To achieve this mission, NTC designs and executes
[[Page 20870]]
training exercises that prepare brigade-level units for operational
deployments. The capacity is needed at NTC to conduct up to 12 BCT
training rotations per year.
The Final LEIS analyzes the potential effects from the
modernization of training, the improvement of training infrastructure,
and the extension of the existing public land withdrawal. Training
changes are required to support new training doctrine that focuses on
large Army formations operating against near-peer adversaries.
Improvements need to be made to infrastructure in order to adjust
training to reflect evolving weapon systems capabilities and new
mission requirements.
Approximately 110,000 acres of Fort Irwin training land is public
land that has been withdrawn from all types of appropriation and
reserved for military purposes under Public Law 107-107 (2001). This
public land withdrawal terminates on December 28, 2026. The Army has
identified a continuing military need for the land beyond the
termination date and intends to request that the U.S. Congress extend
the withdrawal for at least 25 years, or in the alternative, for an
indefinite period until there is no longer a military need for the
land. The U.S. Army proposed action is to implement changes to training
activities and training infrastructure at Fort Irwin. These actions
would be undertaken to meet current doctrinal standards, including the
National Defense Strategy, Army Regulation (AR) 350-1, Army Training
and Leader Development; AR 350-52, Training Support System; AR 350-50,
Combat Training Center Program; and AR 200-1, Environmental Protection
and Enhancement. Actions proposed include the establishment of, and
improvements to, training infrastructure such as trail networks,
communications systems, radar systems, training areas, urban training
sites, air operations infrastructure, and live-fire ranges.
The Final LEIS analyzes a range of Proposed Mission Change
Alternatives, a No Mission Change Alternative, a Withdrawal Extension
Alternative, and a No Withdrawal Extension Alternative.
Mission Change Alternatives: The Mission Change
Alternatives represent different magnitudes of change in training and
training infrastructure. For Fort Irwin's Western Training Area, the
Final LEIS considers a range of medium to heavy-intensity training
alternatives.
No Mission Change Alternative: The No Mission Change
Alternative would continue military training at the current level and
would result in no modernization of training or improvement of training
infrastructure at Fort Irwin. The Army is the decision maker regarding
the mission change alternatives.
No Withdrawal Extension Alternative: The No Withdrawal
Extension Alternative would result in portions of the installation land
returning to the public domain.
Upon an application by the Army, the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) will file in the Federal Register a separate notice of withdrawal
extension application. The Final EIS will be submitted to the U.S.
Congress as an LEIS to support the legislative request for extension of
this withdrawal and reservation.
All military activities under consideration would be conducted
within the existing boundaries of the installation, to include the
withdrawn land. The Final LEIS evaluates the potential direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental and socioeconomic effects of the
proposed action. Adverse effects would be minimized to the greatest
extent possible through the implementation of specified avoidance,
minimization, and mitigation measures.
The resource areas and effects analyzed in the Final LEIS include
air quality, transportation, noise, water resources, geological
resources, biological resources, cultural resources, utilities, land
use, recreation, health and safety, hazardous materials, and waste.
Resources may be affected by changing the scope or increasing the
geographical area of military training activities within the current
Fort Irwin boundaries. The analysis also considers the potential for
cumulative environmental effects.
Both the Mission Change Alternatives and the No Mission Change
Alternative would result in unavoidable environmental effects.
No Mission Change Alternative: Under the No Mission Change
Alternative, there would be less-than-significant effects on all
evaluated resources. The mission change alternatives would result in
minor to moderate adverse effects that would be in addition to the
effects of the No Mission Change Alternative; however, none of the
effects would be significant.
Withdrawal Extension Alternative: The environmental
effects from the Withdrawal Extension Alternative would be comparable
to those discussed for the mission change alternatives.
No Withdrawal Extension Alternative: While the effects of
the No Withdrawal Extension Alternative are uncertain, because of the
unknown future uses of these areas if Army training is not conducted on
the land, it is expected that the No Withdrawal Extension Alternative
would result in negligible effects on resources compared to the effects
of the Withdrawal Extension Alternative.
Fort Irwin met its obligations to consult under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act concurrently with this NEPA process
through the development of a Programmatic Agreement in consultation
with the State Historic Preservation Office, the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation, other government agencies, Native American
Tribes, and the public. The Programmatic Agreement was completed on
December 15, 2022 and is provided as an appendix to the Draft LEIS.
Fort Irwin has completed consultation under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
regarding the proposed activities. The biological opinion (BO) that
resulted from this consultation was issued by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service on December 13, 2021, and concludes that the proposed
actions are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of
endangered or threatened species. Consultation identified appropriate
measures that are specified in the BO and that will be implemented by
Fort Irwin to avoid or minimize effects of the activities. Fort Irwin
will comply with the ESA and implement the measures that are specified
in the BO. The BO is provided as an appendix to the Draft LEIS.
The Department of the Army considered all comments received on the
Draft LEIS when preparing the Final LEIS. Based on the analysis in the
Final LEIS, the Army's preferred alternative consists of: the full
Mission Change Alternative with Alternative 4 applied to the Western
Training Area; and a request that Congress extend the land withdrawal
for 25 years, or for an indefinite period until there is no longer a
military need for the land.
Federal, State, and local agencies, Native Americans, Native
American organizations, and the public were invited to be involved in
the public comment process for the Draft LEIS by submitting written
comments. The Draft LEIS was published on May 21, 2021, and the comment
period closed on July 6, 2021. The NEPA Process included two public
meetings conducted telephonically on June 9, 2021. Responses to
comments on the Draft EIS are included in an appendix to the Final EIS.
The BLM will organize public participation following the
publication
[[Page 20871]]
of its notice of application for extension of the public land
withdrawal.
James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-07321 Filed 4-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711-02-P