Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA, 20774-20776 [2023-07223]
Download as PDF
20774
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting 6 hours, each day of the
event, that would prohibit entry within
a small portion of the Back River. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
RIN 1625–AA87
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Security Zone; San Francisco Bay,
Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
Jkt 259001
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0114]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
16:44 Apr 06, 2023
[FR Doc. 2023–07365 Filed 4–6–23; 8:45 am]
33 CFR Part 165
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: April 3, 2023.
J.A. Stockwell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Virginia.
Coast Guard
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
2. Add § 165.517 to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all navigable waters from
the shoreline of the Back River
contained within the following points:
37°5′34.32″ N, 076°20′47.13″ W;
37°5′38.05″ N, 076°20′36.49″ W;
37°5′30.53″ N, 076°20′31.86″ W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not be present in, or
enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section when it is
subject to enforcement unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF–FM Channel 16.
Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced annually on the third
or fourth Friday through Sunday in
April or the first or second Friday
through Sunday in May from 10 a.m. to
4 p.m. each day during the event.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
■
§ 165.517 Safety Zone; Back River,
Hampton, VA; Air Show.
The Coast Guard is amending
the established security zone extending
50 yards into the navigable waters of the
Oakland Estuary, Alameda, California,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
surrounding the Coast Guard Island
Pier. This security zone change will
now include the entire perimeter of
Coast Guard Island and 50 yards on
either side of the Coast Guard Island
causeway (Dennison Street Bridge). This
action is necessary to provide for the
continued security of the military
service members on board vessels
moored at the pier, as well as all
military members and government
property on Coast Guard Island. This
security zone will prohibit all persons
and vessels from entering, transiting
through, or anchoring within a portion
of the Oakland Estuary surrounding
Coast Guard Island, and prohibit all
persons and vessels from loitering
within 50 yards of the Coast Guard
Island causeway, unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port (COTP) or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective April 7,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0114 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT William Harris, Sector San
Francisco Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
415–399–7443, email SFWaterways@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Captain of the Port (COTP) San
Francisco identified a need to amend
the existing security zone to address the
security concerns to the military base on
Coast Guard Island and the Coast Guard
Island causeway. Over the past three
years, Coast Guard Island has had over
20 security incidents. Additionally, the
Coast Guard no longer uses the Security
barrier around the pier and this
rulemaking accounts for that change. In
response, on February 15, 2023, the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
‘‘Security Zone; San Francisco Bay,
Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA’’ (88 FR
10063). There we stated why we issued
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
the NPRM and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action related to
this security zone. During the comment
period that ended March 20, 2023, we
received 3 comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
needed to respond to the potential
security hazards associated with
security incidents on Coast Guard
Island.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and
70124. The Captain of the Port Sector
San Francisco (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with
future security incidents necessitate
changes to the existing regulation.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 3
comments on our NPRM published
February 15, 2023. The first comment
requested a chart graphic be added to
the docket representing the area
encompassed by the proposed expanded
security zone, which we addressed by
publishing the chart graphic to the
docket on February 27, 2023. The
second comment received was not
within the scope of the regulation. The
final comment was in support of the
proposed expanded security zone. There
is one change in the regulatory text of
this rule from the proposed rule in the
NPRM. The Coast Guard added a
sentence to paragraph (b)(2) clarifying
that vessels must make direct passage
through the security zone for the Coast
Guard Island Causeway in addition to
not loitering. This addition clarifies that
vessels and persons may enter the Coast
Guard Island Causeway security zone if
they are making direct passage through
the area.
This rule amends the established
security zone at Coast Guard Island, 33
CFR 165.1190, to cover all navigable
waters of the Oakland Estuary beginning
at 37°46′42.5″ N, 122°14′51.4″ W; thence
to 37°46′46.6″ N, 122°14′59.7″ W; thence
to 37°46′51.8″ N, 122°15′7.4″ W; thence
to 37°46′56.3″ N, 122°15′12.1″ W; thence
to 37°47′2.2″ N, 122°15′16.4″ W; thence
to 37°47′8″ N, 122°15′16.6″ W; thence to
37°47′10″ N, 122°15′12.8″ W; thence to
37°47′10.1″ N, 122°15′5.7″ W; thence to
37°47′7.8″ N, 122°15′0.1″ W; thence to
37°47′5.2″ N, 122°14′53.7″ W; thence to
37°47′2.1″ N, 122°14′49.5″ W; thence to
37°46′58.9″ N, 122°14′46.2″ W; thence to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
37°46′57.1″ N, 122°14′44.6″ W; thence to
37°46′52.9″ N, 122°14′42.6″ W; thence to
37°46′50.2″ N, 122°14′42.9″ W; thence to
37°46′47.9″ N, 122°14′43.6″ W; thence to
37°46′42.3″ N, 122°14′44.1″ W; thence to
the beginning, and all navigable waters
of the Oakland Estuary 50 yards on
either side of a line beginning at
37°46′48.1″ N, 122°14′45.8″ W; thence to
37°46′46.1″ N, 122°14′41.5″ W; thence to
37°46′45.4″ N, 122°14′36.6″ W.
No vessel or person will be permitted
to enter the security zone surrounding
Coast Guard Island, and no vessel or
person will be permitted to loiter in the
zone surrounding the causeway bridge,
unless authorized by the COTP. Vessel
operators and persons will be able to
transit the waters surrounding the
causeway bridge without COTP
permission, but they will not be allowed
to loiter in those waters without the
COTP permission.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and location of the
security zone. The effect of this rule will
not be significant because vessel traffic
will still be permitted to transit around
Coast Guard Island, and this rule will
encompass only a small portion of the
waterway.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20775
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
20776
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
■
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone covering all navigable
waters of the Oakland Estuary, which
will exclude vessels from entering the
regulated area unless authorized by the
COTP. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60a of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Revise § 165.1190 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.1190 Security Zone; San Francisco
Bay, Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA.
(a) Locations. The following areas are
security zones:
(1) Coast Guard Island. All waters of
the Oakland Estuary, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points
beginning at 37°46′42.5″ N, 122°14′51.4″
W; thence to 37°46′46.6″ N, 122°14′59.7″
W; thence to 37°46′51.8″ N, 122°15′7.4″
W; thence to 37°46′56.3″ N, 122°15′12.1″
W; thence to 37°47′2.2″ N, 122°15′16.4″
W; thence to 37°47′8″ N, 122°15′16.6″
W; thence to 37°47′10″ N, 122°15′12.8″
W; thence to 37°47′10.1″ N, 122°15′5.7″
W; thence to 37°47′7.8″ N, 122°15′0.1″
W; thence to 37°47′5.2″ N, 122°14′53.7″
W; thence to 37°47′2.1″ N, 122°14′49.5″
W; thence to 37°46′58.9″ N, 122°14′46.2″
W; thence to 37°46′57.1″ N, 122°14′44.6″
W; thence to 37°46′52.9″ N, 122°14′42.6″
W; thence to 37°46′50.2″ N, 122°14′42.9″
W; thence to 37°46′47.9″ N, 122°14′43.6″
W; thence to 37°46′42.3″ N, 122°14′44.1″
W; and back to the beginning point.
These coordinates are based on North
American Datum (NAD) 83.
(2) Coast Guard Island Causeway. All
waters of the Oakland Estuary, from
surface to bottom, 50 yards on either
side of a line beginning at 37°46′48.1″ N,
122°14′45.8″ W; thence to 37°46′46.1″ N,
122°14′41.5″ W; thence to 37°46′45.4″ N,
122°14′36.6″ W. These coordinates are
based on NAD 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP). The security
zone described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section is closed to all vessel traffic,
except as may be permitted by the
COTP. To seek permission to enter the
security zone in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, contact the COTP by VHF
Marine Radio channel 16 or through the
24-hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547. Those in the security
zone must comply with all lawful orders
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or directions given to them by the
COTP.
(2) Under the general security zone
regulations in subpart D of this part, you
may not loiter in the security zone
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP.
Vessels must make a direct passage
through the security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(c) Enforcement. The Captain of the
Port will enforce this security zone and
may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of this security zone by any
Federal, State, county, municipal, or
private agency.
Dated: March 30, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023–07223 Filed 4–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0202; FRL–10873–
03–R9]
Determination To Defer Sanctions;
California; Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making an interim final
determination that the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) has submitted
a rule and other materials on behalf of
the Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District (MDAQMD or
‘‘District’’) that correct deficiencies in
its Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) state
implementation plan (SIP) provisions
concerning reasonably available control
technology (RACT) ozone
nonattainment requirements for
controlling emissions of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from internal
combustion engines. This determination
is based on a proposed approval,
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, of MDAQMD’s Rule
1160 which regulates this source
category. The effect of this interim final
determination is that the imposition of
sanctions that were triggered by a
previous limited disapproval by the
EPA in 2021 is now deferred. If the EPA
finalizes its approval of MDAQMD’s
submission, relief from these sanctions
will become permanent.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20774-20776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07223]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0114]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending the established security zone
extending 50 yards into the navigable waters of the Oakland Estuary,
Alameda, California, surrounding the Coast Guard Island Pier. This
security zone change will now include the entire perimeter of Coast
Guard Island and 50 yards on either side of the Coast Guard Island
causeway (Dennison Street Bridge). This action is necessary to provide
for the continued security of the military service members on board
vessels moored at the pier, as well as all military members and
government property on Coast Guard Island. This security zone will
prohibit all persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, or
anchoring within a portion of the Oakland Estuary surrounding Coast
Guard Island, and prohibit all persons and vessels from loitering
within 50 yards of the Coast Guard Island causeway, unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective April 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0114 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT William Harris, Sector San Francisco Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 415-399-7443, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco identified a need to
amend the existing security zone to address the security concerns to
the military base on Coast Guard Island and the Coast Guard Island
causeway. Over the past three years, Coast Guard Island has had over 20
security incidents. Additionally, the Coast Guard no longer uses the
Security barrier around the pier and this rulemaking accounts for that
change. In response, on February 15, 2023, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Security Zone; San
Francisco Bay, Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA'' (88 FR 10063). There we
stated why we issued
[[Page 20775]]
the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related
to this security zone. During the comment period that ended March 20,
2023, we received 3 comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to respond to the potential security hazards associated with
security incidents on Coast Guard Island.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port Sector San Francisco (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards associated with future security
incidents necessitate changes to the existing regulation.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received 3 comments on our NPRM published
February 15, 2023. The first comment requested a chart graphic be added
to the docket representing the area encompassed by the proposed
expanded security zone, which we addressed by publishing the chart
graphic to the docket on February 27, 2023. The second comment received
was not within the scope of the regulation. The final comment was in
support of the proposed expanded security zone. There is one change in
the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
The Coast Guard added a sentence to paragraph (b)(2) clarifying that
vessels must make direct passage through the security zone for the
Coast Guard Island Causeway in addition to not loitering. This addition
clarifies that vessels and persons may enter the Coast Guard Island
Causeway security zone if they are making direct passage through the
area.
This rule amends the established security zone at Coast Guard
Island, 33 CFR 165.1190, to cover all navigable waters of the Oakland
Estuary beginning at 37[deg]46'42.5'' N, 122[deg]14'51.4'' W; thence to
37[deg]46'46.6'' N, 122[deg]14'59.7'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'51.8'' N,
122[deg]15'7.4'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'56.3'' N, 122[deg]15'12.1'' W;
thence to 37[deg]47'2.2'' N, 122[deg]15'16.4'' W; thence to
37[deg]47'8'' N, 122[deg]15'16.6'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'10'' N,
122[deg]15'12.8'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'10.1'' N, 122[deg]15'5.7'' W;
thence to 37[deg]47'7.8'' N, 122[deg]15'0.1'' W; thence to
37[deg]47'5.2'' N, 122[deg]14'53.7'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'2.1'' N,
122[deg]14'49.5'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'58.9'' N, 122[deg]14'46.2'' W;
thence to 37[deg]46'57.1'' N, 122[deg]14'44.6'' W; thence to
37[deg]46'52.9'' N, 122[deg]14'42.6'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'50.2'' N,
122[deg]14'42.9'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'47.9'' N, 122[deg]14'43.6'' W;
thence to 37[deg]46'42.3'' N, 122[deg]14'44.1'' W; thence to the
beginning, and all navigable waters of the Oakland Estuary 50 yards on
either side of a line beginning at 37[deg]46'48.1'' N,
122[deg]14'45.8'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'46.1'' N, 122[deg]14'41.5'' W;
thence to 37[deg]46'45.4'' N, 122[deg]14'36.6'' W.
No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zone
surrounding Coast Guard Island, and no vessel or person will be
permitted to loiter in the zone surrounding the causeway bridge, unless
authorized by the COTP. Vessel operators and persons will be able to
transit the waters surrounding the causeway bridge without COTP
permission, but they will not be allowed to loiter in those waters
without the COTP permission.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the security zone. The effect of this rule will not be
significant because vessel traffic will still be permitted to transit
around Coast Guard Island, and this rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial
[[Page 20776]]
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
security zone covering all navigable waters of the Oakland Estuary,
which will exclude vessels from entering the regulated area unless
authorized by the COTP. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.1190 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1190 Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, Oakland Estuary,
Alameda, CA.
(a) Locations. The following areas are security zones:
(1) Coast Guard Island. All waters of the Oakland Estuary, from
surface to bottom, encompassed by a line connecting the following
points beginning at 37[deg]46'42.5'' N, 122[deg]14'51.4'' W; thence to
37[deg]46'46.6'' N, 122[deg]14'59.7'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'51.8'' N,
122[deg]15'7.4'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'56.3'' N, 122[deg]15'12.1'' W;
thence to 37[deg]47'2.2'' N, 122[deg]15'16.4'' W; thence to
37[deg]47'8'' N, 122[deg]15'16.6'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'10'' N,
122[deg]15'12.8'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'10.1'' N, 122[deg]15'5.7'' W;
thence to 37[deg]47'7.8'' N, 122[deg]15'0.1'' W; thence to
37[deg]47'5.2'' N, 122[deg]14'53.7'' W; thence to 37[deg]47'2.1'' N,
122[deg]14'49.5'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'58.9'' N, 122[deg]14'46.2'' W;
thence to 37[deg]46'57.1'' N, 122[deg]14'44.6'' W; thence to
37[deg]46'52.9'' N, 122[deg]14'42.6'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'50.2'' N,
122[deg]14'42.9'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'47.9'' N, 122[deg]14'43.6'' W;
thence to 37[deg]46'42.3'' N, 122[deg]14'44.1'' W; and back to the
beginning point. These coordinates are based on North American Datum
(NAD) 83.
(2) Coast Guard Island Causeway. All waters of the Oakland Estuary,
from surface to bottom, 50 yards on either side of a line beginning at
37[deg]46'48.1'' N, 122[deg]14'45.8'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'46.1'' N,
122[deg]14'41.5'' W; thence to 37[deg]46'45.4'' N, 122[deg]14'36.6'' W.
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP). The security zone described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP. To seek permission to enter the security zone in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, contact the COTP by VHF Marine Radio
channel 16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415)
399-3547. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP.
(2) Under the general security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not loiter in the security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section unless authorized by the COTP. Vessels
must make a direct passage through the security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(c) Enforcement. The Captain of the Port will enforce this security
zone and may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of this security
zone by any Federal, State, county, municipal, or private agency.
Dated: March 30, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023-07223 Filed 4-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P