United States Standards for Soybeans, 19229-19233 [2023-06679]
Download as PDF
19229
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 62
Friday, March 31, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be subject to public
disclosure. The Food and Nutrition
Service will make the comments
publicly available on the internet via
https://www.regulations.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Tina
Namian, School Meals Policy Division—
4th floor, Food and Nutrition Service,
1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA
22314; telephone: 703–305–2590.
United States Standards for Soybeans
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 210, 215, 220, 225, and 226
RIN 0584–AE88
Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to
Meal Patterns Consistent With the 2020
Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
The USDA Food and
Nutrition Service is extending the
public comment period on the proposed
rule, ‘‘Child Nutrition Programs:
Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent
With the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans,’’ which published in the
Federal Register on February 7, 2023.
This action extends the public comment
period from April 10, 2023, to May 10,
2023, to give the public additional time
to review the proposed rule.
DATES: The comment period of the
proposed rule published February 7,
2023, at 88 FR 8050, is extended
through May 10, 2023. To be assured of
consideration, written comments on this
proposed rule must be received on or
before May 10, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition
Service invites interested persons to
submit comments on this proposed rule.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Send comments to School
Meals Policy Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, P.O. Box 9233,
Reston, Virginia 20195.
• All comments submitted in
response to this proposed rule will be
included in the record and will be made
available to the public. Please be
advised that the substance of the
comments and the identity of the
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Food
and Nutrition Service is extending the
public comment period on the proposed
rule ‘‘Child Nutrition Programs:
Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent
With the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans,’’ which published on
February 7, 2023, at 88 FR 8050. This
rulemaking proposes long-term school
nutrition standards based on the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025,
and feedback the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) received from child
nutrition program stakeholders during a
robust stakeholder engagement
campaign. This action extends the
public comment period to May 10, 2023,
to give the public additional time to
review the proposed rule. USDA is
proposing a gradual multi-year
approach to implementing the nutrition
standards. The proposed rule indicates
that USDA expects to issue a final rule
in time for schools to plan for school
year (SY) 2024–2025. However, the
proposed rule would not require
changes from current meal patterns to
take effect in SY 2024–2025. As
proposed, new requirements to the
school meal patterns would not begin
until SY 2025–2026, at the earliest.
USDA encourages public comments on
the proposed implementation timelines,
in addition to the proposed changes to
the child nutrition program’s regulatory
text.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Cynthia Long,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06666 Filed 3–30–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 800 and 810
[Doc. No. AMS–FGIS–22–0083]
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) proposes to revise the
United States Standards for Soybeans by
removing soybeans of other colors
(SBOC) as an official factor. In addition,
AMS proposes to revise the table of
Grade Limits and Breakpoints for
Soybeans to reflect this change.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone:
(202) 720–8286; Email: Barry.L.Gomoll@
usda.gov. Copies of the proposed U.S.
Standards for Soybeans are available at
https://www.regulations.gov. Copies of
the current Standards are available at
https://www.ams.usda/govgradesstandards/grain-standards.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq., would amend regulations, at
7 CFR part 800 and part 810, issued
under the United States Grain Standards
Act (7 U.S.C. 71–87k), as amended
(USGSA). Section 4 of the USGSA (7
U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the Secretary of
Agriculture the authority to establish
standards for grain regarding kind, class,
quality, and condition.
SUMMARY:
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866 and 13563. Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This proposed
action falls within a category of
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
31MRP1
19230
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules
regulatory actions that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13175—
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether
their rulemaking actions would have
tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this
proposed rule is unlikely to have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed action is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
There are no administrative procedures
that must be exhausted prior to any
judicial challenge to the provisions of
this rule.
Background
AMS regularly reviews grain
standards to ensure their effectiveness
in meeting the quality requirements of
grain moving in the value chain. Under
the current soybean standards, soybeans
of other colors (SBOC) is a grade
determining factor in the class Yellow
Soybeans. As such, SBOC content is not
typically a factor that determines the
numerical grade for a sample. Damage
or foreign material typically has the
greatest impact on the numerical grade
of a given soybean shipment.
Until recently, yellow soybeans have
shown phenotypic stability in seedcoat
color; however, modern breeding
technologies have produced varieties
that have a higher tendency to
demonstrate variations in seed coat
color. Industry interactions (with
producer groups, exporters, grain
elevators, and grain processors) suggest
that these varieties are gaining
popularity with soybean growers and
likely will be present in the value chain
for the foreseeable future.
Official inspection data shows a sharp
rise in the amount of SBOC found in
soybean samples over the past two
years. In 2019 and 2020, only 0.4% and
0.2%, respectively, of all inspected
soybean lots failed to meet the standard
for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, as was
typical in the years leading up to 2021.
In 2021, 3.1% of all inspected soybean
lots failed to meet the standard for U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, followed by
8.8% of lots inspected so far in 2022.
The figures for 2022 also show an
uneven distribution based on mode of
conveyance, with 17.7% of container lot
inspections failing to meet the standard
versus 5.3% of shiplot inspections.
The increase in SBOC over the past
two years has made it more difficult for
shippers of U.S. soybeans to meet
contract grade requirements, based
solely on the factor of SBOC. Although
research shows that SBOC do not
impact the intrinsic quality of soybeans,
such soybeans, present at certain levels,
still influence the final grade of
soybeans because of the current soybean
grade standards.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Grain Inspection Advisory
Committee recommended, at its June
2022 meeting in Kansas City, MO, that
the Federal Grain Inspection Service
conduct a study to determine whether
the presence of higher SBOC has any
impact on the oil and protein content of
soybeans. The results of the study show
no significant correlation between SBOC
and protein and oil content.1
Additionally, based on visual analysis,
the color variation in the seedcoat does
not extend into the cotyledon. Since
most commercial crushing operations
remove the hull before crushing, this is
not likely to affect the color of the
finished product.
Several producer and exporter groups
have reached out to AMS to request that
the soybean standards be reviewed to
address the marketing challenges
introduced by the higher presence of
SBOC in U.S. soybeans. The groups
requested that consideration be given,
and provision be made, for those
soybean processors who may desire
soybeans with yellow seedcoats. In such
instances, applicants for service would
maintain the ability to request that
soybeans be inspected for SBOC.
This proposed rule would remove
SBOC as a criterion for determining the
grade of U.S. Yellow soybeans (e.g., U.S.
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, etc.). It also would
retain SBOC as a class-determining
criterion in the class ‘‘Yellow
soybeans.’’ Official inspectors would
only determine SBOC if needed to meet
the definition of ‘‘Yellow soybeans’’ or
at the request of an applicant for service.
Accordingly, official certificates for
Yellow soybeans would not show SBOC
content unless requested by the
applicant for service. Any sample of
soybeans containing more than 10.0
percent of SBOC would continue to be
graded as the class Mixed soybeans.
1 https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/
media/FGISSBOCStudy.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A 30-day comment period is provided
for interested persons to submit
comments on the proposed revised
Grade Standards. Copies of the
proposed revised standards are at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Implementation Period
The USGSA requires that changes to
the grain standards may not be made
effective within one calendar year of
their promulgation ‘‘unless in the
judgment of the Secretary, the public
health, interest, or safety require that
they become effective sooner’’ (7 U.S.C.
76(b)(1)). This provision was put into
place to allow industry participants
adequate time to make adjustments and
transition to new standards. However,
in this case, the soybeans that are more
likely to exhibit discolored seedcoats
and trigger higher determinations of
SBOC in soybean samples are already
present in the supply chain.
Additionally, based on AMS research
showing that the color variation does
not materially affect the end use of the
soybeans, AMS does not foresee any
deleterious effects to farmers or
merchandisers by making the rule
effective sooner. AMS believes that
implementing this proposed rule
effective September 1, 2023, would be
in service of public interest. AMS
invites all interested parties to comment
on whether this change is necessary to
implement effective September 1, 2023.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has
considered the impact of this proposed
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial
Regulatory Flexibility analysis. The
purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory
actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions in order that small
businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened.
As stated earlier in this proposed rule,
modern breeding technologies have
produced varieties that have a higher
tendency to demonstrate variations in
seed coat color. Official inspection data
shows a sharp rise in the presence of
soybeans that demonstrate these color
variations, as well as impacts to the
grade of U.S. soybeans. For instance,
soybean discoloration can cause
soybeans to be downgraded, which can
potentially reduce the price of soybeans
to producers, or even cause the
soybeans to be rejected by some
purchasers.
It is estimated that these modern
soybean varieties are being adopted
rapidly and could have market share as
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
31MRP1
19231
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules
high as 30 to 50 percent of the soybean
seed market according to industry
sources.2 This rapid rate of adoption
indicates that soybean producers see
benefits exceeding costs in the
production of soybean from this new
seed breed. The proposed rule would
eliminate color as an official factor that
affects the grade of soybeans.
The proposed rule has been initiated
at the request of industry, which
recognizes the costs associated with
lower grades and discounting. Reduced
discounting due to the removal of the
color requirement represents a benefit to
producers. Costs of the rule primarily
accrue to the government and would
mainly involve the cost to the federal
government for changing the standards
electronically and in printed material.
The 2017 Agricultural Census
(Census) reports soybean production,
and classifies producers by income
class, acreage, and other factors. The
Small Business Administration (SBA)
determines the cutoff level between
large and small firms. The most recent
SBA guidance has a size cutoff of $2.25
million for soybean producers. This
classification is not specified in the
Census, however, using current
production and market data in
combination with Census data, we can
approximate the proportion of
producers affected.
The Economic Research Service (ERS)
reports that in 2021 soybean prices were
$13.25 per bushel, and the per acre
production was 51.4 bushels per acre.
Therefore, the per acre revenue is $681.
To be considered a large soybean
producer, it would take $2,250,000/$681
or 3,304 acres. According to the Census,
there were a total of 303,191 soybean
producers, 1,624 of which were farms
exceeding 3,000 acres. Thus, 0.5 percent
of all soybean farms could be
considered large.
However, to determine the impact of
the rule on small farms, we must look
at production of producers with less
than 3,000 acres. Again from the
Census, a total of 4.356 billion bushels
were produced, with 0.332 billion
bushels produced on farms of 3,000 or
more acres, or 7.6 percent of production.
Therefore, 92.4 percent of total
production in 2017 came from small
farms, according to the SBA definition.
The ERS reports that in 2021, 4.435
billion bushels of soybeans were
produced in the U.S., with a carryover
inventory of 0.257 billion bushels, for a
total of 4.692 billion bushels available.
Assuming the same production
proportions between small and large
farms as in the 2017 Census would yield
a total of 4.334 billion bushels produced
by farms of less than 3,000 acres.
AMS has data on the share of
soybeans that are graded based on color
for each of the four grade categories.
Table 1 shows the distribution for an
average over the 2010–2020 period.
Individual years’ data varies little from
the overall average. However, data from
2022 shows a sharp decline in the share
of soybeans with the highest grade, and
an increase in the lower grade levels.
The last line in the table shows the
difference between the two, indicating a
significant change in grading based on
color since the introduction of the new
seeds.
TABLE 1—SHARE OF SOYBEANS GRADED BASED ON COLOR BY GRADE LEVEL *
% #1
SBOC
Category
2010–2020 Average ........................................................................................
2022 .................................................................................................................
Difference .........................................................................................................
% #2
SBOC
99.60
83.12
16.48
% #3
SBOC
0.24
11.42
11.18
% #4
SBOC
0.11
4.98
4.87
0.05
0.48
0.43
* SBOC = Soybeans of other colors.
The price impact on graded soybeans
is less significant than Table 1 might
suggest, as there is typically little price
difference between grades #1 and #2.
However, grades #3 and #4 are
discounted by 1.5 cents and 3.5 cents,
respectively. The total impact on small
farm revenues is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2—CALCULATION OF DISCOUNTS FOR SBOC UNDER CURRENT GRADE STANDARDS
Share
(percent)
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Grade
Production
(Bu.)
Discount
(per Bu.)
Affected bushels
Total discount
#3 ..........
#4 ..........
4.87
0.43
4,334,091,811
4,334,091,811
211,018,410
18,587,862
$0.015
0.035
$3,165,276
650,575
Total
...............................
.................................................
229,606,272
...............................
3,815,851
Using the difference in grading shares
between the 2010–2020 average, and
applying the share to production by
small farms, shows that a total of nearly
230 million bushels of soybeans we
discounted in 2022, and the total
discount was $3.8 million. While we do
not know the exact market share of the
genetically modified soybeans in 2022,
if we assume it was 30 percent, then an
increase in market share of each
additional 10 percent would be
approximately $1,272,000.
The total value of discounts due to
color represents a benefit to small
producers from removing the color
standard. Given that the majority of
producers are considered small entities
and the majority of production comes
from small farms, AMS believes the
impacts of the proposed changes to the
standards would not be
2 Green, Jerry M., ‘‘The rise and future of
glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops’’, Pest
Management Science, 2018, Volume 74, pp. 1035–
1039.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
disproportionate or unduly burdensome
to small producers.
Inspection Plan Tolerances
To reflect the removal of SBOC as an
official factor, AMS proposes to revise
the tables pertaining to soybean grade
limits in section 800.86 of the
regulations. Shiplots and unit trains are
inspected in accordance with a
statistically based inspection plan (55
FR 24030; June 13, 1990). Inspection
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
31MRP1
19232
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules
tolerances, commonly referred to as
breakpoints, are used to determine
acceptable quality. AMS’s proposal to
remove SBOC as an official factor
necessitates removing soybean SBOC
breakpoints from the Grade Limits and
Breakpoints for Soybeans table.
However, because SBOC would still be
used to determine class in Yellow
soybeans, the Breakpoints for Soybean
Special Grades and Factors table will
remain unchanged. Under this proposal,
that breakpoint would only apply to
determining the class of a sample of
soybeans. Inspection plan breakpoints
would not apply to SBOC when an
applicant requests that it be inspected
on an official criteria basis.
Proposed AMS Action
AMS proposes to revise 7 CFR 810,
Subpart J, United States Standards for
Soybeans. It is proposed that SBOC be
eliminated as a grading factor but be
retained in the standards as part of the
definition of the class Yellow soybeans.
AMS also proposes to revise 7 CFR
800.86, Inspection of shiplot, unit train,
and lash barge grain in single lots,
paragraph (c)(2) by removing SBOC
from table 17.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 800
Administrative practice and
procedure, Conflict of interests, Exports,
Freedom of information, Grains,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 810
Exports, Grain.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
the Agricultural Marketing Service
proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 800 and
810 as follows:
PART 800—GENERAL REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 800
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k.
2. Amend § 800.86 by revising Table
17 to paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train,
and lash barge grain in single lots.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
*
*
TABLE 17 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(2)—GRADE LIMITS (GL) AND BREAKPOINTS (BP) FOR SOYBEANS
Maximum limits of—
Damaged kernels
Grade
Heat damaged
(percent)
GL
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
No.
No.
No.
No.
1 ........................................................................................
2 ........................................................................................
3 1 ......................................................................................
4 2 ......................................................................................
1 Soybeans
2 Soybeans
*
*
*
GL
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.9
BP
2.0
3.0
5.0
8.0
GL
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.5
BP
1.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
Splits
(percent)
GL
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
BP
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1.6
2.2
2.5
2.7
which are purple mottled or stained shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
which are materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4.
*
*
PART 810—OFFICIAL UNITED STATES
STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
3. The authority citation for part 810
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k.
4. Amend § 810.1602 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) and removing
paragraph (g). The revisions read as
follows.
■
§ 810.1602
BP
0.2
0.5
1.0
3.0
Foreign material
(percent)
Total
(percent)
Definition of other terms.
(a) * * *
(1) Yellow soybeans. Soybeans that
have yellow or green seed coats and
which, in cross section, are yellow or
have a yellow tinge, and may include
not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans
of other colors. Soybeans of other colors
are soybeans that have black or
bicolored seedcoats, as well as soybeans
that have green seedcoats and are green
in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will
have seed coats of two colors, one of
which is brown or black, and the brown
or black color covers 50 percent of the
seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is
not considered a part of the seed coat for
this determination.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Revise § 810.1603 to read as
follows:
■
§ 810.1603
Basis of determination.
Each determination of class, heatdamaged kernels, damaged kernels, and
splits is made on the basis of the grain
when free from foreign material. Other
determinations not specifically
provided for under the general
provisions are made on the basis of the
grain as a whole.
■ 6. Revise § 810.1604 to read as
follows:
§ 810.1604 Grades and grade requirements
for soybeans.
Grades U.S. Nos.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Grading factors
1
2
3
4
Maximum percent limits of:
Damaged kernels:
Heat (part of total) ....................................................................................
Total ...................................................................................................
Foreign material ...............................................................................................
Splits ................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
0.2
2.0
1.0
10.0
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
0.5
3.0
2.0
20.0
31MRP1
1.0
5.0
3.0
30.0
3.0
8.0
5.0
40.0
19233
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Grades U.S. Nos.
Grading factors
1
2
3
4
Maximum count limits of:
Other materials:
Animal filth ................................................................................................
Castor beans ............................................................................................
Crotalaria seeds .......................................................................................
Glass .........................................................................................................
Stones 1 .....................................................................................................
Unknown foreign substance .....................................................................
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
Total 2 .................................................................................................
10
10
10
10
U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that:
(a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or
(c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality.
1 In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight.
2 Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign substances. The weight of
stones is not applicable for total other material.
*
*
*
*
*
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06679 Filed 3–30–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0910; FRL–10564–
01–R9]
Air Quality Implementation Plan; CA;
El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District; Stationary
Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the El Dorado County Air
Quality Management District
(EDCAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). In this
action, we are proposing to approve a
rule submitted by the EDCAQMD
governing the issuance of permits for
stationary sources, focusing on the
preconstruction review and permitting
of major sources and major
modifications under part D of title I of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final
action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 1, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2022–0910 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Camille Cassar, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105; by phone: (415)–947–4164; or by
email to cassar.camille@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Is there any other version of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation
A. What is the background for this action?
B. How is the EPA evaluating this rule?
C. Does this rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal, including the date on which it
was adopted by the District and the date
on which it was submitted to the EPA
by the California Air Resources Board
(CARB or ‘‘the State’’).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Rule No.
Rule title
Adopted
Rule 523–1 .....
Federal Non-Attainment New Source Review .........................
December 7, 2021 ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
Submitted
31MRP1
March 9, 2022.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19229-19233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06679]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 800 and 810
[Doc. No. AMS-FGIS-22-0083]
United States Standards for Soybeans
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to revise
the United States Standards for Soybeans by removing soybeans of other
colors (SBOC) as an official factor. In addition, AMS proposes to
revise the table of Grade Limits and Breakpoints for Soybeans to
reflect this change.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone:
(202) 720-8286; Email: [email protected]. Copies of the proposed
U.S. Standards for Soybeans are available at https://www.regulations.gov. Copies of the current Standards are available at
https://www.ams.usda/govgrades-standards/grain-standards.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq., would amend regulations, at 7 CFR part 800 and part 810,
issued under the United States Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71-87k),
as amended (USGSA). Section 4 of the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the
Secretary of Agriculture the authority to establish standards for grain
regarding kind, class, quality, and condition.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. This proposed action falls within a category
of
[[Page 19230]]
regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would
have tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed action is not intended to have
retroactive effect. There are no administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this
rule.
Background
AMS regularly reviews grain standards to ensure their effectiveness
in meeting the quality requirements of grain moving in the value chain.
Under the current soybean standards, soybeans of other colors (SBOC) is
a grade determining factor in the class Yellow Soybeans. As such, SBOC
content is not typically a factor that determines the numerical grade
for a sample. Damage or foreign material typically has the greatest
impact on the numerical grade of a given soybean shipment.
Until recently, yellow soybeans have shown phenotypic stability in
seedcoat color; however, modern breeding technologies have produced
varieties that have a higher tendency to demonstrate variations in seed
coat color. Industry interactions (with producer groups, exporters,
grain elevators, and grain processors) suggest that these varieties are
gaining popularity with soybean growers and likely will be present in
the value chain for the foreseeable future.
Official inspection data shows a sharp rise in the amount of SBOC
found in soybean samples over the past two years. In 2019 and 2020,
only 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of all inspected soybean lots failed
to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, as was typical in
the years leading up to 2021. In 2021, 3.1% of all inspected soybean
lots failed to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans,
followed by 8.8% of lots inspected so far in 2022. The figures for 2022
also show an uneven distribution based on mode of conveyance, with
17.7% of container lot inspections failing to meet the standard versus
5.3% of shiplot inspections.
The increase in SBOC over the past two years has made it more
difficult for shippers of U.S. soybeans to meet contract grade
requirements, based solely on the factor of SBOC. Although research
shows that SBOC do not impact the intrinsic quality of soybeans, such
soybeans, present at certain levels, still influence the final grade of
soybeans because of the current soybean grade standards.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection Advisory
Committee recommended, at its June 2022 meeting in Kansas City, MO,
that the Federal Grain Inspection Service conduct a study to determine
whether the presence of higher SBOC has any impact on the oil and
protein content of soybeans. The results of the study show no
significant correlation between SBOC and protein and oil content.\1\
Additionally, based on visual analysis, the color variation in the
seedcoat does not extend into the cotyledon. Since most commercial
crushing operations remove the hull before crushing, this is not likely
to affect the color of the finished product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/FGISSBOCStudy.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several producer and exporter groups have reached out to AMS to
request that the soybean standards be reviewed to address the marketing
challenges introduced by the higher presence of SBOC in U.S. soybeans.
The groups requested that consideration be given, and provision be
made, for those soybean processors who may desire soybeans with yellow
seedcoats. In such instances, applicants for service would maintain the
ability to request that soybeans be inspected for SBOC.
This proposed rule would remove SBOC as a criterion for determining
the grade of U.S. Yellow soybeans (e.g., U.S. No. 1, No. 2, No. 3,
etc.). It also would retain SBOC as a class-determining criterion in
the class ``Yellow soybeans.'' Official inspectors would only determine
SBOC if needed to meet the definition of ``Yellow soybeans'' or at the
request of an applicant for service. Accordingly, official certificates
for Yellow soybeans would not show SBOC content unless requested by the
applicant for service. Any sample of soybeans containing more than 10.0
percent of SBOC would continue to be graded as the class Mixed
soybeans.
A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons to
submit comments on the proposed revised Grade Standards. Copies of the
proposed revised standards are at https://www.regulations.gov.
Implementation Period
The USGSA requires that changes to the grain standards may not be
made effective within one calendar year of their promulgation ``unless
in the judgment of the Secretary, the public health, interest, or
safety require that they become effective sooner'' (7 U.S.C. 76(b)(1)).
This provision was put into place to allow industry participants
adequate time to make adjustments and transition to new standards.
However, in this case, the soybeans that are more likely to exhibit
discolored seedcoats and trigger higher determinations of SBOC in
soybean samples are already present in the supply chain. Additionally,
based on AMS research showing that the color variation does not
materially affect the end use of the soybeans, AMS does not foresee any
deleterious effects to farmers or merchandisers by making the rule
effective sooner. AMS believes that implementing this proposed rule
effective September 1, 2023, would be in service of public interest.
AMS invites all interested parties to comment on whether this change is
necessary to implement effective September 1, 2023.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the
impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial Regulatory Flexibility analysis. The purpose of
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened.
As stated earlier in this proposed rule, modern breeding
technologies have produced varieties that have a higher tendency to
demonstrate variations in seed coat color. Official inspection data
shows a sharp rise in the presence of soybeans that demonstrate these
color variations, as well as impacts to the grade of U.S. soybeans. For
instance, soybean discoloration can cause soybeans to be downgraded,
which can potentially reduce the price of soybeans to producers, or
even cause the soybeans to be rejected by some purchasers.
It is estimated that these modern soybean varieties are being
adopted rapidly and could have market share as
[[Page 19231]]
high as 30 to 50 percent of the soybean seed market according to
industry sources.\2\ This rapid rate of adoption indicates that soybean
producers see benefits exceeding costs in the production of soybean
from this new seed breed. The proposed rule would eliminate color as an
official factor that affects the grade of soybeans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Green, Jerry M., ``The rise and future of glyphosate and
glyphosate-resistant crops'', Pest Management Science, 2018, Volume
74, pp. 1035-1039.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule has been initiated at the request of industry,
which recognizes the costs associated with lower grades and
discounting. Reduced discounting due to the removal of the color
requirement represents a benefit to producers. Costs of the rule
primarily accrue to the government and would mainly involve the cost to
the federal government for changing the standards electronically and in
printed material.
The 2017 Agricultural Census (Census) reports soybean production,
and classifies producers by income class, acreage, and other factors.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) determines the cutoff level
between large and small firms. The most recent SBA guidance has a size
cutoff of $2.25 million for soybean producers. This classification is
not specified in the Census, however, using current production and
market data in combination with Census data, we can approximate the
proportion of producers affected.
The Economic Research Service (ERS) reports that in 2021 soybean
prices were $13.25 per bushel, and the per acre production was 51.4
bushels per acre. Therefore, the per acre revenue is $681. To be
considered a large soybean producer, it would take $2,250,000/$681 or
3,304 acres. According to the Census, there were a total of 303,191
soybean producers, 1,624 of which were farms exceeding 3,000 acres.
Thus, 0.5 percent of all soybean farms could be considered large.
However, to determine the impact of the rule on small farms, we
must look at production of producers with less than 3,000 acres. Again
from the Census, a total of 4.356 billion bushels were produced, with
0.332 billion bushels produced on farms of 3,000 or more acres, or 7.6
percent of production. Therefore, 92.4 percent of total production in
2017 came from small farms, according to the SBA definition.
The ERS reports that in 2021, 4.435 billion bushels of soybeans
were produced in the U.S., with a carryover inventory of 0.257 billion
bushels, for a total of 4.692 billion bushels available. Assuming the
same production proportions between small and large farms as in the
2017 Census would yield a total of 4.334 billion bushels produced by
farms of less than 3,000 acres.
AMS has data on the share of soybeans that are graded based on
color for each of the four grade categories. Table 1 shows the
distribution for an average over the 2010-2020 period. Individual
years' data varies little from the overall average. However, data from
2022 shows a sharp decline in the share of soybeans with the highest
grade, and an increase in the lower grade levels. The last line in the
table shows the difference between the two, indicating a significant
change in grading based on color since the introduction of the new
seeds.
Table 1--Share of Soybeans Graded Based on Color by Grade Level *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category % #1 SBOC % #2 SBOC % #3 SBOC % #4 SBOC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-2020 Average............................... 99.60 0.24 0.11 0.05
2022............................................ 83.12 11.42 4.98 0.48
Difference...................................... 16.48 11.18 4.87 0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* SBOC = Soybeans of other colors.
The price impact on graded soybeans is less significant than Table
1 might suggest, as there is typically little price difference between
grades #1 and #2. However, grades #3 and #4 are discounted by 1.5 cents
and 3.5 cents, respectively. The total impact on small farm revenues is
shown in Table 2.
Table 2--Calculation of Discounts for SBOC Under Current Grade Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share Discount
Grade (percent) Production (Bu.) Affected bushels (per Bu.) Total discount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#3............................ 4.87 4,334,091,811 211,018,410 $0.015 $3,165,276
#4............................ 0.43 4,334,091,811 18,587,862 0.035 650,575
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ........... .................. 229,606,272 ........... 3,815,851
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the difference in grading shares between the 2010-2020
average, and applying the share to production by small farms, shows
that a total of nearly 230 million bushels of soybeans we discounted in
2022, and the total discount was $3.8 million. While we do not know the
exact market share of the genetically modified soybeans in 2022, if we
assume it was 30 percent, then an increase in market share of each
additional 10 percent would be approximately $1,272,000.
The total value of discounts due to color represents a benefit to
small producers from removing the color standard. Given that the
majority of producers are considered small entities and the majority of
production comes from small farms, AMS believes the impacts of the
proposed changes to the standards would not be disproportionate or
unduly burdensome to small producers.
Inspection Plan Tolerances
To reflect the removal of SBOC as an official factor, AMS proposes
to revise the tables pertaining to soybean grade limits in section
800.86 of the regulations. Shiplots and unit trains are inspected in
accordance with a statistically based inspection plan (55 FR 24030;
June 13, 1990). Inspection
[[Page 19232]]
tolerances, commonly referred to as breakpoints, are used to determine
acceptable quality. AMS's proposal to remove SBOC as an official factor
necessitates removing soybean SBOC breakpoints from the Grade Limits
and Breakpoints for Soybeans table. However, because SBOC would still
be used to determine class in Yellow soybeans, the Breakpoints for
Soybean Special Grades and Factors table will remain unchanged. Under
this proposal, that breakpoint would only apply to determining the
class of a sample of soybeans. Inspection plan breakpoints would not
apply to SBOC when an applicant requests that it be inspected on an
official criteria basis.
Proposed AMS Action
AMS proposes to revise 7 CFR 810, Subpart J, United States
Standards for Soybeans. It is proposed that SBOC be eliminated as a
grading factor but be retained in the standards as part of the
definition of the class Yellow soybeans. AMS also proposes to revise 7
CFR 800.86, Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain in
single lots, paragraph (c)(2) by removing SBOC from table 17.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 800
Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests,
Exports, Freedom of information, Grains, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 810
Exports, Grain.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 800 and 810 as follows:
PART 800--GENERAL REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 800 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
2. Amend Sec. 800.86 by revising Table 17 to paragraph (c)(2) to read
as follows:
Sec. 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain
in single lots.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
Table 17 to Paragraph (c)(2)--Grade Limits (GL) and Breakpoints (BP) for Soybeans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum limits of--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels Foreign material Splits (percent)
------------------------------------ (percent) -----------------
Grade Heat damaged Total (percent) ------------------
(percent) ------------------
------------------ GL BP GL BP
GL BP GL BP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. No. 1.............................. 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.8 1.0 0.2 10.0 1.6
U.S. No. 2.............................. 0.5 0.3 3.0 0.9 2.0 0.3 20.0 2.2
U.S. No. 3 \1\.......................... 1.0 0.5 5.0 1.2 3.0 0.4 30.0 2.5
U.S. No. 4 \2\.......................... 3.0 0.9 8.0 1.5 5.0 0.5 40.0 2.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Soybeans which are purple mottled or stained shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
\2\ Soybeans which are materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4.
* * * * *
PART 810--OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
0
3. The authority citation for part 810 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
4. Amend Sec. 810.1602 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and removing
paragraph (g). The revisions read as follows.
Sec. 810.1602 Definition of other terms.
(a) * * *
(1) Yellow soybeans. Soybeans that have yellow or green seed coats
and which, in cross section, are yellow or have a yellow tinge, and may
include not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans of other colors.
Soybeans of other colors are soybeans that have black or bicolored
seedcoats, as well as soybeans that have green seedcoats and are green
in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will have seed coats of two
colors, one of which is brown or black, and the brown or black color
covers 50 percent of the seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is not
considered a part of the seed coat for this determination.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 810.1603 to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1603 Basis of determination.
Each determination of class, heat-damaged kernels, damaged kernels,
and splits is made on the basis of the grain when free from foreign
material. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the
general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole.
0
6. Revise Sec. 810.1604 to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1604 Grades and grade requirements for soybeans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grades U.S. Nos.
Grading factors ---------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum percent limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels:
Heat (part of total)........................ 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.0
Total................................... 2.0 3.0 5.0 8.0
Foreign material................................ 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0
Splits.......................................... 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19233]]
Maximum count limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other materials:
Animal filth................................ 9 9 9 9
Castor beans................................ 1 1 1 1
Crotalaria seeds............................ 2 2 2 2
Glass....................................... 0 0 0 0
Stones \1\.................................. 3 3 3 3
Unknown foreign substance................... 3 3 3 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total \2\............................... 10 10 10 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that:
(a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or
(c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality.
\1\ In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight.
\2\ Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign
substances. The weight of stones is not applicable for total other material.
* * * * *
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06679 Filed 3-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P