United States Standards for Soybeans, 19229-19233 [2023-06679]

Download as PDF 19229 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 88, No. 62 Friday, March 31, 2023 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. individuals or entities submitting the comments will be subject to public disclosure. The Food and Nutrition Service will make the comments publicly available on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Tina Namian, School Meals Policy Division— 4th floor, Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314; telephone: 703–305–2590. United States Standards for Soybeans FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service 7 CFR Parts 210, 215, 220, 225, and 226 RIN 0584–AE88 Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent With the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period. AGENCY: The USDA Food and Nutrition Service is extending the public comment period on the proposed rule, ‘‘Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent With the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans,’’ which published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2023. This action extends the public comment period from April 10, 2023, to May 10, 2023, to give the public additional time to review the proposed rule. DATES: The comment period of the proposed rule published February 7, 2023, at 88 FR 8050, is extended through May 10, 2023. To be assured of consideration, written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before May 10, 2023. ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition Service invites interested persons to submit comments on this proposed rule. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Send comments to School Meals Policy Division, Food and Nutrition Service, P.O. Box 9233, Reston, Virginia 20195. • All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the substance of the comments and the identity of the ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 259001 The Food and Nutrition Service is extending the public comment period on the proposed rule ‘‘Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent With the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans,’’ which published on February 7, 2023, at 88 FR 8050. This rulemaking proposes long-term school nutrition standards based on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, and feedback the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) received from child nutrition program stakeholders during a robust stakeholder engagement campaign. This action extends the public comment period to May 10, 2023, to give the public additional time to review the proposed rule. USDA is proposing a gradual multi-year approach to implementing the nutrition standards. The proposed rule indicates that USDA expects to issue a final rule in time for schools to plan for school year (SY) 2024–2025. However, the proposed rule would not require changes from current meal patterns to take effect in SY 2024–2025. As proposed, new requirements to the school meal patterns would not begin until SY 2025–2026, at the earliest. USDA encourages public comments on the proposed implementation timelines, in addition to the proposed changes to the child nutrition program’s regulatory text. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Cynthia Long, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2023–06666 Filed 3–30–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Parts 800 and 810 [Doc. No. AMS–FGIS–22–0083] Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to revise the United States Standards for Soybeans by removing soybeans of other colors (SBOC) as an official factor. In addition, AMS proposes to revise the table of Grade Limits and Breakpoints for Soybeans to reflect this change. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 1, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone: (202) 720–8286; Email: Barry.L.Gomoll@ usda.gov. Copies of the proposed U.S. Standards for Soybeans are available at https://www.regulations.gov. Copies of the current Standards are available at https://www.ams.usda/govgradesstandards/grain-standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., would amend regulations, at 7 CFR part 800 and part 810, issued under the United States Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71–87k), as amended (USGSA). Section 4 of the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to establish standards for grain regarding kind, class, quality, and condition. SUMMARY: Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This proposed action falls within a category of E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 31MRP1 19230 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted from review under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13175 This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175— Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have tribal implications. AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Executive Order 12988 This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed action is not intended to have retroactive effect. There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule. Background AMS regularly reviews grain standards to ensure their effectiveness in meeting the quality requirements of grain moving in the value chain. Under the current soybean standards, soybeans of other colors (SBOC) is a grade determining factor in the class Yellow Soybeans. As such, SBOC content is not typically a factor that determines the numerical grade for a sample. Damage or foreign material typically has the greatest impact on the numerical grade of a given soybean shipment. Until recently, yellow soybeans have shown phenotypic stability in seedcoat color; however, modern breeding technologies have produced varieties that have a higher tendency to demonstrate variations in seed coat color. Industry interactions (with producer groups, exporters, grain elevators, and grain processors) suggest that these varieties are gaining popularity with soybean growers and likely will be present in the value chain for the foreseeable future. Official inspection data shows a sharp rise in the amount of SBOC found in soybean samples over the past two years. In 2019 and 2020, only 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of all inspected soybean lots failed to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, as was typical in the years leading up to 2021. In 2021, 3.1% of all inspected soybean lots failed to meet the standard for U.S. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 259001 No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, followed by 8.8% of lots inspected so far in 2022. The figures for 2022 also show an uneven distribution based on mode of conveyance, with 17.7% of container lot inspections failing to meet the standard versus 5.3% of shiplot inspections. The increase in SBOC over the past two years has made it more difficult for shippers of U.S. soybeans to meet contract grade requirements, based solely on the factor of SBOC. Although research shows that SBOC do not impact the intrinsic quality of soybeans, such soybeans, present at certain levels, still influence the final grade of soybeans because of the current soybean grade standards. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection Advisory Committee recommended, at its June 2022 meeting in Kansas City, MO, that the Federal Grain Inspection Service conduct a study to determine whether the presence of higher SBOC has any impact on the oil and protein content of soybeans. The results of the study show no significant correlation between SBOC and protein and oil content.1 Additionally, based on visual analysis, the color variation in the seedcoat does not extend into the cotyledon. Since most commercial crushing operations remove the hull before crushing, this is not likely to affect the color of the finished product. Several producer and exporter groups have reached out to AMS to request that the soybean standards be reviewed to address the marketing challenges introduced by the higher presence of SBOC in U.S. soybeans. The groups requested that consideration be given, and provision be made, for those soybean processors who may desire soybeans with yellow seedcoats. In such instances, applicants for service would maintain the ability to request that soybeans be inspected for SBOC. This proposed rule would remove SBOC as a criterion for determining the grade of U.S. Yellow soybeans (e.g., U.S. No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, etc.). It also would retain SBOC as a class-determining criterion in the class ‘‘Yellow soybeans.’’ Official inspectors would only determine SBOC if needed to meet the definition of ‘‘Yellow soybeans’’ or at the request of an applicant for service. Accordingly, official certificates for Yellow soybeans would not show SBOC content unless requested by the applicant for service. Any sample of soybeans containing more than 10.0 percent of SBOC would continue to be graded as the class Mixed soybeans. 1 https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ media/FGISSBOCStudy.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons to submit comments on the proposed revised Grade Standards. Copies of the proposed revised standards are at https://www.regulations.gov. Implementation Period The USGSA requires that changes to the grain standards may not be made effective within one calendar year of their promulgation ‘‘unless in the judgment of the Secretary, the public health, interest, or safety require that they become effective sooner’’ (7 U.S.C. 76(b)(1)). This provision was put into place to allow industry participants adequate time to make adjustments and transition to new standards. However, in this case, the soybeans that are more likely to exhibit discolored seedcoats and trigger higher determinations of SBOC in soybean samples are already present in the supply chain. Additionally, based on AMS research showing that the color variation does not materially affect the end use of the soybeans, AMS does not foresee any deleterious effects to farmers or merchandisers by making the rule effective sooner. AMS believes that implementing this proposed rule effective September 1, 2023, would be in service of public interest. AMS invites all interested parties to comment on whether this change is necessary to implement effective September 1, 2023. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial Regulatory Flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. As stated earlier in this proposed rule, modern breeding technologies have produced varieties that have a higher tendency to demonstrate variations in seed coat color. Official inspection data shows a sharp rise in the presence of soybeans that demonstrate these color variations, as well as impacts to the grade of U.S. soybeans. For instance, soybean discoloration can cause soybeans to be downgraded, which can potentially reduce the price of soybeans to producers, or even cause the soybeans to be rejected by some purchasers. It is estimated that these modern soybean varieties are being adopted rapidly and could have market share as E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 31MRP1 19231 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules high as 30 to 50 percent of the soybean seed market according to industry sources.2 This rapid rate of adoption indicates that soybean producers see benefits exceeding costs in the production of soybean from this new seed breed. The proposed rule would eliminate color as an official factor that affects the grade of soybeans. The proposed rule has been initiated at the request of industry, which recognizes the costs associated with lower grades and discounting. Reduced discounting due to the removal of the color requirement represents a benefit to producers. Costs of the rule primarily accrue to the government and would mainly involve the cost to the federal government for changing the standards electronically and in printed material. The 2017 Agricultural Census (Census) reports soybean production, and classifies producers by income class, acreage, and other factors. The Small Business Administration (SBA) determines the cutoff level between large and small firms. The most recent SBA guidance has a size cutoff of $2.25 million for soybean producers. This classification is not specified in the Census, however, using current production and market data in combination with Census data, we can approximate the proportion of producers affected. The Economic Research Service (ERS) reports that in 2021 soybean prices were $13.25 per bushel, and the per acre production was 51.4 bushels per acre. Therefore, the per acre revenue is $681. To be considered a large soybean producer, it would take $2,250,000/$681 or 3,304 acres. According to the Census, there were a total of 303,191 soybean producers, 1,624 of which were farms exceeding 3,000 acres. Thus, 0.5 percent of all soybean farms could be considered large. However, to determine the impact of the rule on small farms, we must look at production of producers with less than 3,000 acres. Again from the Census, a total of 4.356 billion bushels were produced, with 0.332 billion bushels produced on farms of 3,000 or more acres, or 7.6 percent of production. Therefore, 92.4 percent of total production in 2017 came from small farms, according to the SBA definition. The ERS reports that in 2021, 4.435 billion bushels of soybeans were produced in the U.S., with a carryover inventory of 0.257 billion bushels, for a total of 4.692 billion bushels available. Assuming the same production proportions between small and large farms as in the 2017 Census would yield a total of 4.334 billion bushels produced by farms of less than 3,000 acres. AMS has data on the share of soybeans that are graded based on color for each of the four grade categories. Table 1 shows the distribution for an average over the 2010–2020 period. Individual years’ data varies little from the overall average. However, data from 2022 shows a sharp decline in the share of soybeans with the highest grade, and an increase in the lower grade levels. The last line in the table shows the difference between the two, indicating a significant change in grading based on color since the introduction of the new seeds. TABLE 1—SHARE OF SOYBEANS GRADED BASED ON COLOR BY GRADE LEVEL * % #1 SBOC Category 2010–2020 Average ........................................................................................ 2022 ................................................................................................................. Difference ......................................................................................................... % #2 SBOC 99.60 83.12 16.48 % #3 SBOC 0.24 11.42 11.18 % #4 SBOC 0.11 4.98 4.87 0.05 0.48 0.43 * SBOC = Soybeans of other colors. The price impact on graded soybeans is less significant than Table 1 might suggest, as there is typically little price difference between grades #1 and #2. However, grades #3 and #4 are discounted by 1.5 cents and 3.5 cents, respectively. The total impact on small farm revenues is shown in Table 2. TABLE 2—CALCULATION OF DISCOUNTS FOR SBOC UNDER CURRENT GRADE STANDARDS Share (percent) ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Grade Production (Bu.) Discount (per Bu.) Affected bushels Total discount #3 .......... #4 .......... 4.87 0.43 4,334,091,811 4,334,091,811 211,018,410 18,587,862 $0.015 0.035 $3,165,276 650,575 Total ............................... ................................................. 229,606,272 ............................... 3,815,851 Using the difference in grading shares between the 2010–2020 average, and applying the share to production by small farms, shows that a total of nearly 230 million bushels of soybeans we discounted in 2022, and the total discount was $3.8 million. While we do not know the exact market share of the genetically modified soybeans in 2022, if we assume it was 30 percent, then an increase in market share of each additional 10 percent would be approximately $1,272,000. The total value of discounts due to color represents a benefit to small producers from removing the color standard. Given that the majority of producers are considered small entities and the majority of production comes from small farms, AMS believes the impacts of the proposed changes to the standards would not be 2 Green, Jerry M., ‘‘The rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops’’, Pest Management Science, 2018, Volume 74, pp. 1035– 1039. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 disproportionate or unduly burdensome to small producers. Inspection Plan Tolerances To reflect the removal of SBOC as an official factor, AMS proposes to revise the tables pertaining to soybean grade limits in section 800.86 of the regulations. Shiplots and unit trains are inspected in accordance with a statistically based inspection plan (55 FR 24030; June 13, 1990). Inspection E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 31MRP1 19232 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules tolerances, commonly referred to as breakpoints, are used to determine acceptable quality. AMS’s proposal to remove SBOC as an official factor necessitates removing soybean SBOC breakpoints from the Grade Limits and Breakpoints for Soybeans table. However, because SBOC would still be used to determine class in Yellow soybeans, the Breakpoints for Soybean Special Grades and Factors table will remain unchanged. Under this proposal, that breakpoint would only apply to determining the class of a sample of soybeans. Inspection plan breakpoints would not apply to SBOC when an applicant requests that it be inspected on an official criteria basis. Proposed AMS Action AMS proposes to revise 7 CFR 810, Subpart J, United States Standards for Soybeans. It is proposed that SBOC be eliminated as a grading factor but be retained in the standards as part of the definition of the class Yellow soybeans. AMS also proposes to revise 7 CFR 800.86, Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain in single lots, paragraph (c)(2) by removing SBOC from table 17. List of Subjects 7 CFR Part 800 Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests, Exports, Freedom of information, Grains, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 7 CFR Part 810 Exports, Grain. For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 800 and 810 as follows: PART 800—GENERAL REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 800 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k. 2. Amend § 800.86 by revising Table 17 to paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows: ■ § 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain in single lots. * * * (c) * * * (2) * * * * * TABLE 17 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(2)—GRADE LIMITS (GL) AND BREAKPOINTS (BP) FOR SOYBEANS Maximum limits of— Damaged kernels Grade Heat damaged (percent) GL U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. No. No. No. No. 1 ........................................................................................ 2 ........................................................................................ 3 1 ...................................................................................... 4 2 ...................................................................................... 1 Soybeans 2 Soybeans * * * GL 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 BP 2.0 3.0 5.0 8.0 GL 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 BP 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 Splits (percent) GL 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 BP 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 1.6 2.2 2.5 2.7 which are purple mottled or stained shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3. which are materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4. * * PART 810—OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN 3. The authority citation for part 810 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k. 4. Amend § 810.1602 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and removing paragraph (g). The revisions read as follows. ■ § 810.1602 BP 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.0 Foreign material (percent) Total (percent) Definition of other terms. (a) * * * (1) Yellow soybeans. Soybeans that have yellow or green seed coats and which, in cross section, are yellow or have a yellow tinge, and may include not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans of other colors. Soybeans of other colors are soybeans that have black or bicolored seedcoats, as well as soybeans that have green seedcoats and are green in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will have seed coats of two colors, one of which is brown or black, and the brown or black color covers 50 percent of the seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is not considered a part of the seed coat for this determination. * * * * * 5. Revise § 810.1603 to read as follows: ■ § 810.1603 Basis of determination. Each determination of class, heatdamaged kernels, damaged kernels, and splits is made on the basis of the grain when free from foreign material. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole. ■ 6. Revise § 810.1604 to read as follows: § 810.1604 Grades and grade requirements for soybeans. Grades U.S. Nos. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Grading factors 1 2 3 4 Maximum percent limits of: Damaged kernels: Heat (part of total) .................................................................................... Total ................................................................................................... Foreign material ............................................................................................... Splits ................................................................................................................ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 0.2 2.0 1.0 10.0 E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 0.5 3.0 2.0 20.0 31MRP1 1.0 5.0 3.0 30.0 3.0 8.0 5.0 40.0 19233 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Proposed Rules Grades U.S. Nos. Grading factors 1 2 3 4 Maximum count limits of: Other materials: Animal filth ................................................................................................ Castor beans ............................................................................................ Crotalaria seeds ....................................................................................... Glass ......................................................................................................... Stones 1 ..................................................................................................... Unknown foreign substance ..................................................................... 9 1 2 0 3 3 9 1 2 0 3 3 9 1 2 0 3 3 9 1 2 0 3 3 Total 2 ................................................................................................. 10 10 10 10 U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that: (a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or (b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or (c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. 1 In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight. 2 Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign substances. The weight of stones is not applicable for total other material. * * * * * Melissa Bailey, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2023–06679 Filed 3–30–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0910; FRL–10564– 01–R9] Air Quality Implementation Plan; CA; El Dorado County Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the El Dorado County Air Quality Management District (EDCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). In this action, we are proposing to approve a rule submitted by the EDCAQMD governing the issuance of permits for stationary sources, focusing on the preconstruction review and permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’). ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 1, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2022–0910 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Cassar, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415)–947–4164; or by email to cassar.camille@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Is there any other version of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? II. The EPA’s Evaluation A. What is the background for this action? B. How is the EPA evaluating this rule? C. Does this rule meet the evaluation criteria? III. Proposed Action and Public Comment IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal, including the date on which it was adopted by the District and the date on which it was submitted to the EPA by the California Air Resources Board (CARB or ‘‘the State’’). TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE Rule No. Rule title Adopted Rule 523–1 ..... Federal Non-Attainment New Source Review ......................... December 7, 2021 .................. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Mar 30, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM Submitted 31MRP1 March 9, 2022.

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19229-19233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Parts 800 and 810

[Doc. No. AMS-FGIS-22-0083]


United States Standards for Soybeans

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to revise 
the United States Standards for Soybeans by removing soybeans of other 
colors (SBOC) as an official factor. In addition, AMS proposes to 
revise the table of Grade Limits and Breakpoints for Soybeans to 
reflect this change.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 1, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone: 
(202) 720-8286; Email: [email protected]. Copies of the proposed 
U.S. Standards for Soybeans are available at https://www.regulations.gov. Copies of the current Standards are available at 
https://www.ams.usda/govgrades-standards/grain-standards.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
551 et seq., would amend regulations, at 7 CFR part 800 and part 810, 
issued under the United States Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71-87k), 
as amended (USGSA). Section 4 of the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the 
Secretary of Agriculture the authority to establish standards for grain 
regarding kind, class, quality, and condition.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive 
Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct 
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory 
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory 
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, 
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, 
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, 
and promoting flexibility. This proposed action falls within a category 
of

[[Page 19230]]

regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 13175

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which 
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would 
have tribal implications.
    AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to have 
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed action is not intended to have 
retroactive effect. There are no administrative procedures that must be 
exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this 
rule.

Background

    AMS regularly reviews grain standards to ensure their effectiveness 
in meeting the quality requirements of grain moving in the value chain. 
Under the current soybean standards, soybeans of other colors (SBOC) is 
a grade determining factor in the class Yellow Soybeans. As such, SBOC 
content is not typically a factor that determines the numerical grade 
for a sample. Damage or foreign material typically has the greatest 
impact on the numerical grade of a given soybean shipment.
    Until recently, yellow soybeans have shown phenotypic stability in 
seedcoat color; however, modern breeding technologies have produced 
varieties that have a higher tendency to demonstrate variations in seed 
coat color. Industry interactions (with producer groups, exporters, 
grain elevators, and grain processors) suggest that these varieties are 
gaining popularity with soybean growers and likely will be present in 
the value chain for the foreseeable future.
    Official inspection data shows a sharp rise in the amount of SBOC 
found in soybean samples over the past two years. In 2019 and 2020, 
only 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of all inspected soybean lots failed 
to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, as was typical in 
the years leading up to 2021. In 2021, 3.1% of all inspected soybean 
lots failed to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, 
followed by 8.8% of lots inspected so far in 2022. The figures for 2022 
also show an uneven distribution based on mode of conveyance, with 
17.7% of container lot inspections failing to meet the standard versus 
5.3% of shiplot inspections.
    The increase in SBOC over the past two years has made it more 
difficult for shippers of U.S. soybeans to meet contract grade 
requirements, based solely on the factor of SBOC. Although research 
shows that SBOC do not impact the intrinsic quality of soybeans, such 
soybeans, present at certain levels, still influence the final grade of 
soybeans because of the current soybean grade standards.
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection Advisory 
Committee recommended, at its June 2022 meeting in Kansas City, MO, 
that the Federal Grain Inspection Service conduct a study to determine 
whether the presence of higher SBOC has any impact on the oil and 
protein content of soybeans. The results of the study show no 
significant correlation between SBOC and protein and oil content.\1\ 
Additionally, based on visual analysis, the color variation in the 
seedcoat does not extend into the cotyledon. Since most commercial 
crushing operations remove the hull before crushing, this is not likely 
to affect the color of the finished product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/FGISSBOCStudy.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Several producer and exporter groups have reached out to AMS to 
request that the soybean standards be reviewed to address the marketing 
challenges introduced by the higher presence of SBOC in U.S. soybeans. 
The groups requested that consideration be given, and provision be 
made, for those soybean processors who may desire soybeans with yellow 
seedcoats. In such instances, applicants for service would maintain the 
ability to request that soybeans be inspected for SBOC.
    This proposed rule would remove SBOC as a criterion for determining 
the grade of U.S. Yellow soybeans (e.g., U.S. No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, 
etc.). It also would retain SBOC as a class-determining criterion in 
the class ``Yellow soybeans.'' Official inspectors would only determine 
SBOC if needed to meet the definition of ``Yellow soybeans'' or at the 
request of an applicant for service. Accordingly, official certificates 
for Yellow soybeans would not show SBOC content unless requested by the 
applicant for service. Any sample of soybeans containing more than 10.0 
percent of SBOC would continue to be graded as the class Mixed 
soybeans.
    A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons to 
submit comments on the proposed revised Grade Standards. Copies of the 
proposed revised standards are at https://www.regulations.gov.

Implementation Period

    The USGSA requires that changes to the grain standards may not be 
made effective within one calendar year of their promulgation ``unless 
in the judgment of the Secretary, the public health, interest, or 
safety require that they become effective sooner'' (7 U.S.C. 76(b)(1)). 
This provision was put into place to allow industry participants 
adequate time to make adjustments and transition to new standards. 
However, in this case, the soybeans that are more likely to exhibit 
discolored seedcoats and trigger higher determinations of SBOC in 
soybean samples are already present in the supply chain. Additionally, 
based on AMS research showing that the color variation does not 
materially affect the end use of the soybeans, AMS does not foresee any 
deleterious effects to farmers or merchandisers by making the rule 
effective sooner. AMS believes that implementing this proposed rule 
effective September 1, 2023, would be in service of public interest. 
AMS invites all interested parties to comment on whether this change is 
necessary to implement effective September 1, 2023.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the 
impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
prepared this initial Regulatory Flexibility analysis. The purpose of 
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject 
to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or 
disproportionately burdened.
    As stated earlier in this proposed rule, modern breeding 
technologies have produced varieties that have a higher tendency to 
demonstrate variations in seed coat color. Official inspection data 
shows a sharp rise in the presence of soybeans that demonstrate these 
color variations, as well as impacts to the grade of U.S. soybeans. For 
instance, soybean discoloration can cause soybeans to be downgraded, 
which can potentially reduce the price of soybeans to producers, or 
even cause the soybeans to be rejected by some purchasers.
    It is estimated that these modern soybean varieties are being 
adopted rapidly and could have market share as

[[Page 19231]]

high as 30 to 50 percent of the soybean seed market according to 
industry sources.\2\ This rapid rate of adoption indicates that soybean 
producers see benefits exceeding costs in the production of soybean 
from this new seed breed. The proposed rule would eliminate color as an 
official factor that affects the grade of soybeans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Green, Jerry M., ``The rise and future of glyphosate and 
glyphosate-resistant crops'', Pest Management Science, 2018, Volume 
74, pp. 1035-1039.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule has been initiated at the request of industry, 
which recognizes the costs associated with lower grades and 
discounting. Reduced discounting due to the removal of the color 
requirement represents a benefit to producers. Costs of the rule 
primarily accrue to the government and would mainly involve the cost to 
the federal government for changing the standards electronically and in 
printed material.
    The 2017 Agricultural Census (Census) reports soybean production, 
and classifies producers by income class, acreage, and other factors. 
The Small Business Administration (SBA) determines the cutoff level 
between large and small firms. The most recent SBA guidance has a size 
cutoff of $2.25 million for soybean producers. This classification is 
not specified in the Census, however, using current production and 
market data in combination with Census data, we can approximate the 
proportion of producers affected.
    The Economic Research Service (ERS) reports that in 2021 soybean 
prices were $13.25 per bushel, and the per acre production was 51.4 
bushels per acre. Therefore, the per acre revenue is $681. To be 
considered a large soybean producer, it would take $2,250,000/$681 or 
3,304 acres. According to the Census, there were a total of 303,191 
soybean producers, 1,624 of which were farms exceeding 3,000 acres. 
Thus, 0.5 percent of all soybean farms could be considered large.
    However, to determine the impact of the rule on small farms, we 
must look at production of producers with less than 3,000 acres. Again 
from the Census, a total of 4.356 billion bushels were produced, with 
0.332 billion bushels produced on farms of 3,000 or more acres, or 7.6 
percent of production. Therefore, 92.4 percent of total production in 
2017 came from small farms, according to the SBA definition.
    The ERS reports that in 2021, 4.435 billion bushels of soybeans 
were produced in the U.S., with a carryover inventory of 0.257 billion 
bushels, for a total of 4.692 billion bushels available. Assuming the 
same production proportions between small and large farms as in the 
2017 Census would yield a total of 4.334 billion bushels produced by 
farms of less than 3,000 acres.
    AMS has data on the share of soybeans that are graded based on 
color for each of the four grade categories. Table 1 shows the 
distribution for an average over the 2010-2020 period. Individual 
years' data varies little from the overall average. However, data from 
2022 shows a sharp decline in the share of soybeans with the highest 
grade, and an increase in the lower grade levels. The last line in the 
table shows the difference between the two, indicating a significant 
change in grading based on color since the introduction of the new 
seeds.

                        Table 1--Share of Soybeans Graded Based on Color by Grade Level *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Category                         % #1 SBOC       % #2 SBOC       % #3 SBOC       % #4 SBOC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-2020 Average...............................           99.60            0.24            0.11            0.05
2022............................................           83.12           11.42            4.98            0.48
Difference......................................           16.48           11.18            4.87            0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* SBOC = Soybeans of other colors.

    The price impact on graded soybeans is less significant than Table 
1 might suggest, as there is typically little price difference between 
grades #1 and #2. However, grades #3 and #4 are discounted by 1.5 cents 
and 3.5 cents, respectively. The total impact on small farm revenues is 
shown in Table 2.

                    Table 2--Calculation of Discounts for SBOC Under Current Grade Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Share                                               Discount
             Grade               (percent)    Production (Bu.)    Affected bushels    (per Bu.)   Total discount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#3............................         4.87       4,334,091,811         211,018,410       $0.015      $3,165,276
#4............................         0.43       4,334,091,811          18,587,862        0.035         650,575
                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ...........  ..................         229,606,272  ...........       3,815,851
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Using the difference in grading shares between the 2010-2020 
average, and applying the share to production by small farms, shows 
that a total of nearly 230 million bushels of soybeans we discounted in 
2022, and the total discount was $3.8 million. While we do not know the 
exact market share of the genetically modified soybeans in 2022, if we 
assume it was 30 percent, then an increase in market share of each 
additional 10 percent would be approximately $1,272,000.
    The total value of discounts due to color represents a benefit to 
small producers from removing the color standard. Given that the 
majority of producers are considered small entities and the majority of 
production comes from small farms, AMS believes the impacts of the 
proposed changes to the standards would not be disproportionate or 
unduly burdensome to small producers.

Inspection Plan Tolerances

    To reflect the removal of SBOC as an official factor, AMS proposes 
to revise the tables pertaining to soybean grade limits in section 
800.86 of the regulations. Shiplots and unit trains are inspected in 
accordance with a statistically based inspection plan (55 FR 24030; 
June 13, 1990). Inspection

[[Page 19232]]

tolerances, commonly referred to as breakpoints, are used to determine 
acceptable quality. AMS's proposal to remove SBOC as an official factor 
necessitates removing soybean SBOC breakpoints from the Grade Limits 
and Breakpoints for Soybeans table. However, because SBOC would still 
be used to determine class in Yellow soybeans, the Breakpoints for 
Soybean Special Grades and Factors table will remain unchanged. Under 
this proposal, that breakpoint would only apply to determining the 
class of a sample of soybeans. Inspection plan breakpoints would not 
apply to SBOC when an applicant requests that it be inspected on an 
official criteria basis.

Proposed AMS Action

    AMS proposes to revise 7 CFR 810, Subpart J, United States 
Standards for Soybeans. It is proposed that SBOC be eliminated as a 
grading factor but be retained in the standards as part of the 
definition of the class Yellow soybeans. AMS also proposes to revise 7 
CFR 800.86, Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain in 
single lots, paragraph (c)(2) by removing SBOC from table 17.

List of Subjects

7 CFR Part 800

    Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests, 
Exports, Freedom of information, Grains, Intergovernmental relations, 
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

7 CFR Part 810

    Exports, Grain.

    For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing 
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 800 and 810 as follows:

PART 800--GENERAL REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 800 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.

0
2. Amend Sec.  800.86 by revising Table 17 to paragraph (c)(2) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  800.86  Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain 
in single lots.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *

                Table 17 to Paragraph (c)(2)--Grade Limits (GL) and Breakpoints (BP) for Soybeans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Maximum limits of--
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Damaged kernels           Foreign material  Splits (percent)
                                         ------------------------------------     (percent)    -----------------
                  Grade                     Heat damaged     Total (percent) ------------------
                                              (percent)    ------------------
                                         ------------------                      GL       BP       GL       BP
                                             GL       BP       GL       BP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. No. 1..............................      0.2      0.2      2.0      0.8      1.0      0.2     10.0      1.6
U.S. No. 2..............................      0.5      0.3      3.0      0.9      2.0      0.3     20.0      2.2
U.S. No. 3 \1\..........................      1.0      0.5      5.0      1.2      3.0      0.4     30.0      2.5
U.S. No. 4 \2\..........................      3.0      0.9      8.0      1.5      5.0      0.5     40.0      2.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Soybeans which are purple mottled or stained shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
\2\ Soybeans which are materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4.

* * * * *

PART 810--OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN

0
3. The authority citation for part 810 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 71-87k.

0
4. Amend Sec.  810.1602 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and removing 
paragraph (g). The revisions read as follows.


Sec.  810.1602  Definition of other terms.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Yellow soybeans. Soybeans that have yellow or green seed coats 
and which, in cross section, are yellow or have a yellow tinge, and may 
include not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans of other colors. 
Soybeans of other colors are soybeans that have black or bicolored 
seedcoats, as well as soybeans that have green seedcoats and are green 
in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will have seed coats of two 
colors, one of which is brown or black, and the brown or black color 
covers 50 percent of the seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is not 
considered a part of the seed coat for this determination.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec.  810.1603 to read as follows:


Sec.  810.1603  Basis of determination.

    Each determination of class, heat-damaged kernels, damaged kernels, 
and splits is made on the basis of the grain when free from foreign 
material. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the 
general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole.
0
6. Revise Sec.  810.1604 to read as follows:


Sec.  810.1604  Grades and grade requirements for soybeans.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Grades U.S. Nos.
                 Grading factors                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1               2               3               4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Maximum percent limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels:
    Heat (part of total)........................             0.2             0.5             1.0             3.0
        Total...................................             2.0             3.0             5.0             8.0
Foreign material................................             1.0             2.0             3.0             5.0
Splits..........................................            10.0            20.0            30.0            40.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19233]]

 
                                            Maximum count limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other materials:
    Animal filth................................               9               9               9               9
    Castor beans................................               1               1               1               1
    Crotalaria seeds............................               2               2               2               2
    Glass.......................................               0               0               0               0
    Stones \1\..................................               3               3               3               3
    Unknown foreign substance...................               3               3               3               3
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
        Total \2\...............................              10              10              10              10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that:
(a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or
(c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality.
\1\ In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight.
\2\ Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign
  substances. The weight of stones is not applicable for total other material.

* * * * *

Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06679 Filed 3-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.