Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to U.S. Navy Construction at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, 19502-19542 [2023-06300]
Download as PDF
19502
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
and Level B harassment of marine
mammals incidental to the Navy’s
construction activities related to the
multifunctional expansion and
modification of Dry Dock 1 at the
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery,
Maine. Please see the Background
section below for definitions of
harassment.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 217
[Docket No. 230321–0081]
RIN 0648–BL78
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to U.S. Navy Construction at
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery,
Maine
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; notification of
issuance of Letter of Authorization.
AGENCY:
NMFS, upon request from the
U.S. Navy (Navy), hereby issues
regulations to govern the unintentional
taking of marine mammals incidental to
construction at the Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard in Kittery, Maine, over the
course of 5 years (2023–2028). These
regulations, which allow for the
issuance of a Letter of Authorization
(LOA) for the incidental take of marine
mammals during the described activities
and specified timeframes, prescribe the
permissible methods of taking and other
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on marine mammal
species or stocks and their habitat, as
well as requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
DATES: Effective from April 1, 2023,
through March 31, 2028.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Navy’s
application and any supporting
documents, as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may
be obtained online at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
incidental-take-authorization-us-navyconstruction-portsmouth-navalshipyard-kittery-maine-0. In case of
problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reny Tyson Moore, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, ITP.tyson.moore@
noaa.gov, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
SUMMARY:
Purpose and Need for Regulatory
Action
We received an application from the
Navy requesting 5-year regulations and
authorization to take multiple species of
marine mammals. This rule establishes
a framework under the authority of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) to allow
for the authorization of take by Level A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
Legal Authority for the Action
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A)) directs the
Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region for up to 5 years if,
after notice and public comment, the
agency makes certain findings and
issues regulations that set forth
permissible methods of taking pursuant
to that activity and other means of
effecting the ‘‘least practicable adverse
impact’’ on the affected species or
stocks and their habitat (see the
discussion below in the Mitigation
section), as well as monitoring and
reporting requirements. Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA and the
implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
216, subpart I provide the legal basis for
issuing this rule containing 5 year
regulations, and for any subsequent
Letters of Authorization (LOAs). As
directed by this legal authority, this rule
contains mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements.
Summary of Major Provisions Within
the Regulations
Following is a summary of the major
provisions of this rule regarding the
Navy’s construction activities. These
measures include:
• Required monitoring of the in-water
construction areas to detect the presence
of marine mammals before beginning inwater construction activities;
• Shutdown of in-water construction
activities under certain circumstances to
avoid injury of marine mammals;
• Soft start for impact pile driving to
allow marine mammals the opportunity
to leave the area prior to beginning
impact pile driving at full power; and
• Implementation of a bubble curtain
during rock hammering and down-thehole (DTH) cluster drilling to reduce
underwater noise impacts.
Background
The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of
marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and
(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
proposed or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
incidental take authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s) and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of the species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to in shorthand as
‘‘mitigation’’); and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of the takings are set forth.
The definitions of all applicable MMPA
statutory terms cited above are included
in the relevant sections below.
Summary of Request
On May 9, 2022, NMFS received a
request from the Navy for authorization
to take marine mammals incidental to
construction activities related to the
multifunctional expansion and
modification of Dry Dock 1 at
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery,
Maine. We provided comments on the
application, and the Navy submitted
revised versions and responses to our
comments on July 5, 2022, August 15,
2022, August 19, 2022, and August 25,
2022, with the latter version deemed
adequate and complete. On September
1, 2022, we published a notice of receipt
of the Navy’s application in the Federal
Register (87 FR 53731), requesting
comments and information related to
the request. During the 30-day comment
period, we received two supportive
letters from private citizens.
On October 19 and 25, 2022, NMFS
was notified by the Navy of project
modifications and shifting Fleet
submarine schedules that required the
resequencing of certain activities
associated with the construction at Dry
Dock 1 in order to accommodate the
modifications and meet the new vessel
docking demands. On October 31, 2022,
the Navy submitted an addendum to its
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
application describing these changes.
We published a notice of the proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register on
January 18, 2023 (88 FR 3146)
incorporating these changes and
requested comments and information
from the public. Please see Comments
and Responses below. The regulations
are valid for 5 years, from April 1, 2023
through March 31, 2028, and authorize
the Navy to take five species of marine
mammals by Level A and Level B
harassment incidental to construction
activities related to the multifunctional
expansion and modification of Dry Dock
1 at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in
Kittery, Maine. Neither the Navy nor
NMFS expect serious injury or mortality
to result from this activity.
NMFS previously issued five IHAs to
the Navy for waterfront improvement
work at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard:
in 2016 (81 FR 85525, November 28,
2016), 2018 (83 FR 3318, January 24,
2018), 2019 (84 FR 24476, May 28,
2019), a renewal of the 2019 IHA (86 FR
14598, March 17, 2021), and in 2022 (87
FR 19886, April 6, 2022). The most
recent IHA (87 FR 19886) provided
authorization to take marine mammals
during the first year of the construction
project described in this final rule. As
required, the applicant provided
monitoring reports (available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentaltake-authorizations-constructionactivities) which confirm that the
applicant has implemented the required
mitigation and monitoring, and which
also shows that no impacts of a scale or
nature not previously analyzed or
authorized have occurred as a result of
the activities conducted.
Description of the Specified Activity
Overview
Multifunctional Expansion of Dry
Dock 1 (P–381) is one of three projects
that support the overall expansion and
modification of Dry Dock 1, located in
the western extent of the Portsmouth
Naval Shipyard. The two additional
projects, construction of a super flood
basin (P–310) and extension of portal
crane rail and utilities (P–1074), are
currently under construction. In-water
work associated with these projects was
completed under the aforementioned
separate IHAs issued by NMFS. The
projects have been phased to support
Navy mission schedules. P–381 will be
constructed within the same footprint of
the super flood basin over an
approximate 7-year period, during
which 5 years of in-water work will
occur. An IHA was issued by NMFS for
the first year of P–381 construction
activities between April 1, 2022 and
March 31, 2023 (87 FR 19866, April 6,
2022). This request is associated with
the remaining 4 years of P–381 in-water
construction activities planned to occur
from April 1, 2023 through March 31,
2028, as well as for additional in-water
construction activities associated with
the removal of emergency repair
components of the super flood basin
that will occur during the period of
effectiveness for the regulations.
Although the in-water construction
described in this rule is anticipated to
be completed by December 2026,
unanticipated schedule delays could
result in the Navy conducting
construction activity over the full 5
years.
The purpose of the Navy’s project (P–
381) is to modify the super flood basin
to create two additional dry docking
positions (Dry Dock 1 North and Dry
Dock 1 West) in front of the existing Dry
Dock 1 East. The Navy’s specified
activity also includes emergency repairs
of the P–310 super flood basin.
Construction activities will include the
excavation and/or installation of 1,118
holes, 198 shafts, and 580 sheet piles via
impact and vibratory pile driving,
hydraulic rock hammering, rotary
drilling, and mono and cluster DTH.
The construction activities are expected
to require approximately 2,498 days if
the activities are considered
independently over the 5-year period.
However, the actual construction
19503
duration is expected to be within 4
years as many of the construction
activities will occur concurrently.
Dates and Duration
The in-water construction activities
associated with this rule are anticipated
to begin in April 2023 and proceed to
December 2026 (4 years); however, the
incidental take authorization is valid for
5 years in the event of unexpected
scheduled delays. In-water construction
activities will occur consecutively over
a 4-year period. The Navy plans to
conduct all in-water work activities
with expected potential for incidental
harassment of marine mammals during
daylight hours.
Table 1 provides the estimated
schedule and production rates for P–381
construction activities. Many of the
activities included in Table 1 will span
across multiple construction years and/
or will occur concurrently. Because of
mission requirements and operational
schedules at the dry docking positions
and berths, this schedule is subject to
change. In-water construction activities
for P–381 will occur consecutively over
a 4-year period. Note, for the purposes
of this analysis, the construction years
are identified as years 2 through 5; Year
1 of the Navy’s construction activities is
currently ongoing in association with a
previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886,
April 6, 2022). Vibratory pile driving
and extraction is assumed to occur for
141 days. Impact pile driving will occur
for 34 days. DTH excavation (monohammer and cluster drill) will occur for
1,446 days. Rotary drilling will occur for
238 days (assuming that casings and
sockets for cluster drills will be set,
excavated, and removed in a single day).
Rock hammering will occur for 277
days. Note that pile driving days are not
necessarily consecutive, and certain
activities may occur at the same time,
decreasing the total number of actual inwater construction days. The contractor
could be working in more than one area
of the berths at a time.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
TABLE 1—IN-WATER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Total amount and
estimated dates
(construction years *)
Activity
ID
Activity
A1 1 .......
Center Wall—Install Foundation Support Piles.
Drill 18 shafts Apr 23 3 to
Aug 23 (2).
A2 1 .......
A3 1 .......
A4 1 .......
R 1 .........
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install Temporary
Cofferdam.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Install 48 sheet piles Apr
23 3 to May 23 (2).
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Daily production
rate
Total
production
days
Activity component
Method
Install 102-inch diameter outer casing.
Pre-drill 102-inch diameter socket.
Remove 102-inch outer
casing.
Drill 78-inch diameter
shaft.
28-inch wide Z-shaped
sheets.
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 1 hour/day
4 18
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
4 18
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
6.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
8 sheets/day 5 minutes
and 300 blows/pile.
4 18
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Impact with initial vibratory set.
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
4 117
46
19504
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—IN-WATER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES—Continued
Total amount and
estimated dates
(construction years *)
Activity
ID
Activity
1 ...........
Berth 11—Remove Shutter
Panels.
Berth 1—Remove Sheet
Piles.
Berth 1—Remove Granite
Block Quay Wall.
Berth 1—Top of Wall Removal for Waler Installation.
Berth 1—Install southeast
corner Support of Excavation (SOE).
Berth 11—Mechanical Rock
Removal at Basin Floor.
Berth 11 Face—Mechanical
Rock Removal at Basin
Floor.
Install Temporary Cofferdam
Extension.
Remove 112 panels Apr 23 3
to May 23 (2).
Remove 168 sheet piles Apr
23 3 to Jun 24 (2, 3).
2,800 cubic yards (cy) Apr
23 3 to Jun 24 (2, 3).
320 linear feet (lf) Apr 23 3 to
Jun 24 (2, 3).
Gantry Crane Support Piles
at Berth 1 West.
2 ...........
3 ...........
4 ...........
5 ...........
6 ...........
7 ...........
8 ...........
9a .........
Method
Daily production
rate
Concrete shutter panels
5 hours/day ...................
4 56
25-inch-wide Z-shaped
Hydraulic rock hammering.
Vibratory extraction ......
4 piles/day ....................
4 42
Removal of granite
blocks.
Mechanical concrete removal.
Hydraulic rock hammering.
Hydraulic rock hammering.
2.5 hours/day ................
4 47
10 hours/day .................
4 74
Install 28 sheet piles Apr 23
to Jul 23 (2).
28-inch-wide Z-shaped
Impact with initial vibratory set.
48
700 cy Apr 23 3 to Aug 23
(2).
Drill 924 relief holes Apr 23 3
to Aug 23 (2).
Excavate Bedrock ........
Hydraulic rock hammering.
DTH mono-hammer ......
4 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile and 300 blows/
pile.
12 hours/day .................
Install 14 sheet piles Apr 23
to Jun 23 (2).
28-inch-wide Z-shaped
Impact with initial vibratory set.
Drill 16 shafts Apr 23 to Aug
23 (2).
Set 102-inch diameter
casing.
Pre-drill 102-inch rock
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing.
72-inch diameter shafts
9b .........
9c ..........
9d .........
10 2
.......
11 .........
12 .........
Berth 1—Mechanical Rock
Removal at Basin Floor.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Drill Tremie Tie
Downs.
Center Wall—Install Tie-In to
Existing West Closure
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 North—Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
23 3
4–6 inch diameter holes
4 35
Rotary drill ....................
4 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile and 300 blows/
pile.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
16
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
16
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
13 cy/day 12 hours/day
16
Cluster drill DTH ...........
300 cy Apr
to Sep 23
(2).
Drill 50 rock anchors Apr
23 3 to Oct 23 (2).
Excavate Bedrock ........
Install 15 sheet piles Apr 23
to Dec 23 (2).
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Impact with initial vibratory set.
Drill 20 shafts May 23 to Nov
24 (2, 3).
Set 102-inch diameter
casing.
Pre-drill 102-inch rock
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing.
84-inch diameter shafts
Remove 20 piles May 23 to
Nov 24 (2, 3).
84-inch diameter drill
piles.
Rotary drill ....................
Drill 18 shafts May 23 to Nov
24 (2, 3).
Set 84-inch casing ........
9-inch diameter holes ...
27 holes/day 22 min/
hole.
3 4 60
Hydraulic rock hammering.
DTH mono-hammer ......
2 holes/day 5 hours/
hole.
4
80
5 25
4 25
Rotary drill ....................
4 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile and 300 blows/
pile.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
20
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
20
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
3.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 day/pile 15 minutes/
pile.
20
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
18
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
18
15c ........
Pre-drill 84-inch rock
socket.
Remove 84-inch casing
Rotary drill ....................
18
15d .......
78-inch diameter shaft ..
Cluster drill DTH ...........
135
Drill 20 shafts Jun 23 to Nov
24 (2, 3).
Set 102-inch diameter
casing.
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
7.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
20
Rotary drill ....................
150
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
7.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
20
Drill 23 shafts Jun 23 to Nov
24 (Const. years 2, 3).
Pre-drill 102-inch rock
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing.
Drill 78-inch diameter
shaft.
Set 126-inch diameter
Casing.
Pre-drill 126-inch rock
socket.
Remove 126-inch casing.
Drill 108-inch diameter
shafts.
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
23
Rotary drill ....................
23
28-inch-wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
1 casing/day 60 minutes/casing.
8.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
13a .......
13b .......
13c ........
13d .......
14 .........
15a .......
Dry Dock 1 North—Remove
Temporary Work Trestle
Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North—Install
Leveling Piles (Diving
Board Shafts).
15b .......
16a .......
Wall Support Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 North (Berth 11
Face and Head Wall).
16b .......
16c ........
16d .......
17a .......
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Total
production
days
Activity component
Foundation (Floor) Shafts for
Dry Dock 1 North (Foundation Support Piles).
17b .......
17c ........
17d .......
18 .........
19 .........
Berth 11 End Wall—Remove
Temporary Guide Wall.
Remove Berth 1 southeast
corner SOE.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Remove 60 sheet piles Jul
23 to Aug 23 (2, 3).
Remove 28 sheet piles Jul
23 to Sep 23 (2).
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Vibratory extraction ......
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
4
70
20
20
23
196
5 10
45
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
19505
TABLE 1—IN-WATER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES—Continued
Total amount and
estimated dates
(construction years *)
Activity
ID
Activity
20 2 .......
Removal of Berth 1 Emergency Repair Sheet Piles.
Removal of Berth 1 Emergency Repair Tremie Concrete.
Center Wall Foundation—
Drill in Monolith Tie Downs.
Center Wall—Remove Tie-In
to Existing West Closure
Wall (Dry Dock 1 North) 4.
Center Wall East—Sheet
Pile Tie-In to Existing Wall.
Remove 108 sheet piles Apr
23 3 to Jul 23 (2).
500 cy Apr 23 3 to Aug 23
(2).
Remove Tie-In to West Closure Wall (Dry Dock 1
West).
Remove Center Wall East—
Sheet Pile Tie-In to Existing Wall (Dry Dock 1
West).
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Remove Temporary Cofferdam.
Remove Temporary
Cofferdam Extension.
Dry Dock 1 West—Install
Temporary Work Trestle
Piles.
21 2
.......
22 .........
23 .........
24 .........
25 .........
26 .........
27 .........
28 .........
29a .......
Daily production
rate
28-inch-wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
Mechanical concrete removal.
Hydraulic rock hammering.
6 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
4 hours/day ...................
Install 72 rock anchors Aug
23 to May 24 (2, 3).
Remove 16 sheet piles 6 Aug
23 to Aug 24 (2, 3).
9-inch diameter holes ...
DTH mono-hammer ......
28-inch-wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
Install 23 sheet piles Aug 23
to Oct 24 (2, 3).
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Impact with initial vibratory set.
Remove 15 sheet pile Dec
23 to Dec 24 (2, 3).
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
Remove 23 sheet piles Dec
23 to Dec 24 (2, 3).
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
5 12
Remove 96 sheet piles Jan
24 to Sep 24 (Const.
years 2, 3).
Remove 14 sheet piles Jan
24 to Sep 24 (2, 3).
Drill 20 shafts Apr 24 to Feb
26 (3, 4).
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
12
28-inch wide Z-shaped
Vibratory extraction ......
Set 102-inch diameter
casing.
Rotary drill ....................
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
20
Pre-drill 102-inch rock
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing.
84-inch diameter shafts
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
20
Rotary drill ....................
20
Remove 20 piles Apr 24 to
Feb 26 (3, 4).
84-inch diameter piles ..
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
3.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 day/pile 15 minutes/
pile.
Drill 22 shafts Jun 24 to Feb
26 (3, 4).
Set 102-inch diameter
casing.
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
22
Pre-drill 102-inch rock
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing.
78-inch diameter shaft ..
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
22
Rotary drill ....................
22
165
Set 126-inch casing ......
Rotary drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
7.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
Pre-drill 126-inch rock
socket.
Remove 126-inch casing.
Drill 108-inch diameter
shaft.
Set 84-inch casing ........
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
23
Rotary drill ....................
23
196
Rotary Drill ....................
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
8.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
1 shaft/day 1 hours/day
Pre-drill 84-inch rock
socket.
Remove 84-inch casing
Rotary drill ....................
1 shaft/day 9 hours/day
18
Rotary drill ....................
18
Drill 78-inch diameter
shaft.
9-inch diameter holes ...
Cluster drill DTH ...........
9-inch diameter hole .....
DTH mono-hammer ......
1 casing/day 15 minutes/casing.
7.5 days/shaft 10 hours/
day.
2 holes/day 5 hours/
hole.
2 holes/day 5 hours/
hole.
.......................................
.......................................
29b .......
29c ........
29d .......
30 .........
31a .......
Dry Dock 1 West—Remove
Temporary Work Trestle
Piles.
Wall Support Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 West (Berth 1
Face).
31b .......
31c ........
31d .......
32a .......
Foundation (Floor) Shafts for
Dry Dock 1 West (Foundation Support Piles).
Drill 23 shafts Jun 24 to Feb
26 (3, 4).
32b .......
32c ........
32d .......
33a .......
Dry Dock 1 West—Install
Leveling Piles (Diving
Board Shafts).
Drill 18 shafts Jun 24 to Feb
26 (3, 4).
33b .......
33c ........
33d .......
34 .........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
35 .........
Dry Dock 1 North—Tie
Downs.
Dry Dock 1 West—Install Tie
Downs.
Total excavated holes/drilled shafts/
sheet piles.
Total
production
days
Method
Install 36 rock anchors Jul
24 to Jul 25 (3, 4).
Install 36 rock anchors Dec
25 to Dec 26 (4, 5).
1,118/198/580 ......................
Activity component
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Cluster drill DTH ...........
Cluster drill DTH ...........
DTH mono-hammer ......
2 holes/day 5 hours/
hole.
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
2 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile and 300 blows/
pile.
8 piles/day 5 minutes/
pile.
.......................................
18
15
36
53
12
53
2
70
20
23
18
135
18
18
2,498
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; potential marine mammal takes incidental to Year 1 of the
Navy’s construction activities were authorized under a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
1 These activities were not included in the original application made available for public review during the Notice of Receipt comment period (NOR; 87 FR 53731),
but have been added due to changes needed in the construction schedule.
2 These activities were included in the original application, but the amount of activity has been modified due to changes needed in the construction schedule.
3 These activities began in construction year 1.
4 These activities began in year 1. Only the number of production days occurring in construction years 2 through 6 are presented.
5 Additional production days are included to account for equipment repositioning.
6 Sheet piles were installed in construction year 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19506
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Specific Geographic Region
The shipyard is located in the
Piscataqua River in Kittery, Maine. The
Piscataqua River originates at the
boundary of Dover, New Hampshire,
and Eliot, Maine (Figure 1). The river
flows in a southeasterly direction for
2,093 meters (m) (13 miles (mi)) before
entering Portsmouth Harbor and
emptying into the Atlantic Ocean. The
lower Piscataqua River is part of the
Great Bay Estuary system and varies in
width and depth. Many large and small
islands break up the straight-line flow of
the river as it continues toward the
Atlantic Ocean. Seavey Island, the
location of the specified activities, is
located in the lower Piscataqua River
approximately 500 m, 1,640 feet (ft)
from its southwest bank, 200 m (656 ft)
from its north bank, and approximately
4 kilometers (km) (2.5 mi) from the
mouth of the river.
Water depths in the project area range
from 6.4 m (21 ft) to 11.9 m (39 ft) at
Berths 11, 12, and 13. Water depths in
the lower Piscataqua River near the
project area range from 4.6 m (15 ft) in
the shallowest areas to 21 m (69 ft) in
the deepest areas. The river is
approximately 914 m (3,300 ft) wide
near the project area, measured from the
Kittery shoreline north of Wattlebury
Island to the Portsmouth shoreline west
of Peirce Island. The furthest direct line
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
of sight from the project area is 1,287 m
(0.8 mi) to the southeast and 418 m
(0.26 mi) to the northwest.
The nearshore environment of the
Shipyard is characterized by a mix of
hard bottom, gravel, soft sediments, rock
outcrops, and rocky shoreline associated
with fast tidal currents near the
installation. The nearshore areas
surrounding Seavey Island are
predominately hard bottom (65 percent
of benthic habitat) and gravel (26
percent) habitat, with only 9 percent
soft bottom sediments within the
surveyed area around Seavey Island
(Tetra Tech, 2016). Much of the
shoreline in the project area is
composed of hard shores (rocky
intertidal). In general, rocky intertidal
areas consist of bedrock that alternates
between marine and terrestrial habitats,
depending on the tide. Rocky intertidal
areas consist of ‘‘bedrock, stones, or
boulders that singly or in combination
cover 75 percent or more of an area that
is covered less than 30 percent by
vegetation’’ (Federal Geographic Data
Committee, 2013).
The lower Piscataqua River is home to
Portsmouth Harbor and is used by
commercial, recreational, and military
vessels. Between 150 and 250
commercial shipping vessels transit the
lower Piscataqua River each year
(Magnusson et al., 2012). Commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
fishing vessels are also very common in
the river year-round, as are recreational
vessels, which are more common in the
warmer summer months. The shipyard
is a dynamic industrial facility situated
on an island with a narrow separation
of waterways between the installation
and the communities of Kittery and
Portsmouth (Figure 2). The predominant
noise sources from Shipyard industrial
operations consist of dry dock cranes;
passing vessels; and industrial
equipment (e.g., forklifts, loaders, rigs,
vacuums, fans, dust collectors, blower
belts, heating, air conditioning, and
ventilation (HVAC) units, water pumps,
and exhaust tubes and lids). Other
components such as construction, vessel
ground support equipment for
maintenance purposes, vessel traffic
across the Piscataqua River, and vehicle
traffic on the shipyard’s bridges and on
local roads in Kittery and Portsmouth
produce noise, but such noise generally
represents a transitory contribution to
the average noise level environment
(Blue Ridge Research and Consulting
(BRRC), 2015; ESS Group, 2015).
Ambient sound levels recorded at the
shipyard are considered typical of a
large outdoor industrial facility and vary
widely in space and time (ESS Group,
2015).
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19507
ER31MR23.000
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
ER31MR23.001
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
19508
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Detailed Description of the Specified
Activity
The Navy’s P–381 project will modify
the super flood basin to create two
additional dry docking positions (Dry
Dock 1 North and Dry Dock 1 West) in
front of the existing Dry Dock 1 East.
The super flood basin provides the
starting point for the P–381 work.
Several steps are required to convert the
super flood basin to a dry dock with two
positions fully capable of supporting the
maintenance of submarines while
maintaining access to the existing
interior dry dock (Dry Dock 1 East). The
dry dock positions (including the center
wall) will be constructed using large
precast segments (referred to as
monoliths) that require both sidewall
and base support. The monoliths will be
manufactured offsite and transported to
the construction site. Segments will be
floated and/or lifted into place to create
the center wall, followed by Dry Dock
1 North, and finally Dry Dock 1 West.
Once the monoliths are set and grouted
in place, the respective dry docks can be
dewatered allowing the remaining
interior construction to be performed in
dry conditions.
P–381 years 2 through 5 (i.e., the time
period of the Navy’s specified activity
for this rule) construction activities will
complete bedrock removal and the
preparation of the walls and floors of
the super flood basin to support the
placement of the monoliths and the
construction of the two dry dock
positions. Most of the in-water
construction will occur behind the
existing super flood basin walls that
will act as a barrier to sound and will
contain underwater noise to within a
small portion of the Piscataqua River.
However, the west closure wall will be
removed in order to install the Dry Dock
1 North entrance structure and caisson.
In addition, the caissons may not always
be in place throughout in-water
construction. As such, the analyses
presented herein conservatively assume
the west closure wall, as well as the
future caissons, will not be present
throughout in-water construction
activities.
The Navy’s request also considers
emergency repairs of the P–310 super
flood basin. During P–310 super flood
testing in January 2022, excessive
exfiltration (i.e., transport of material
outside of the basin) was observed along
Berths 1 and 2 and between the west
closure wall and super flood basin
entrance structure. Emergency structural
repairs were required to reduce
excessive transport of material through
the berths and west closure wall/
entrance structure and prevent further
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
damage. As a result, 216 28-inch Zshaped sheet piles were installed along
the Berth 1 face. After installation, these
sheet piles were cut off approximately 3
m (10 ft) above the mudline and
concrete was tremie placed behind them
to plug any gaps in the existing
structure that contributed to the
exfiltration. The removal of these 216
Berth 1 emergency repair piles and
excess tremie concrete (approximately
382 cubic meters, 500 cubic yards (cy))
will be completed during this LOA
period and are accounted for in the
Navy’s request. Similarly, 10 28-inch
wide, Z-shaped sheet piles were
installed between the super flood basin
entrance structure and the west closure
wall, cut off approximately 3 m (10 ft)
above the mudline, and had concrete
tremie placed behind them. These 10
sheet piles will be removed during the
P–381 year 1 IHA period (covered under
the IHA issued by NMFS for the first
year of P–381 construction activities; 87
FR 19866, April 6, 2022).
Several additional preparatory
activities (e.g., torch cutting, dredging,
etc.) will not create noise expected to
result in harassment of marine
mammals. Noise created during
dredging of sediment and demolition
debris (e.g., bedrock, granite blocks,
concrete) is unlikely to exceed that
generated by other normal shipyard
activities and is not expected to result
in incidental take of marine mammals.
Activities such as grouting (i.e., pouring
of concrete) and torch cutting are not
noisy by design and will not result in
incidental take of marine mammals.
These activities are not addressed in the
analyses of noise producing actions in
the Navy’s request, and are not
considered by NMFS in our analysis,
but are included in the work
descriptions to clarify the construction
progression.
P–381 In-Water Construction Activities
The work remaining for P–381 can be
generally grouped into five categories
for ease of explanation: temporary
structures, mechanical bedrock removal,
continued demolition of super flood
basin wall components, center wall tiedowns, and dry dock foundation and
gantry crane support. Each category
involves one or more activities expected
to generate noise that could result in
injury or harassment of marine
mammals. Some of these activities are a
continuation of work started in year 1,
which were covered under a separate
IHA issued by NMFS on April 6, 2022
(87 FR 19886).
Temporary Structures—Several
temporary structures will be installed
and removed to facilitate the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19509
construction of the dry docks. The
conversion of the existing west closure
wall to the Dry Dock 1 North entrance
requires reinforcement of the section of
the west closure wall that will become
the new dry dock entrance. The existing
west closure wall structure will be
surrounded by a temporary cofferdam.
The cofferdam will be constructed with
48 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles.
The sheet piles will be installed using
an initial vibratory set followed by
driving with impact hammers to refusal.
The temporary guide wall along the
Berth 11 end wall installed during year
1 (60 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet
piles) will be removed with a vibratory
hammer. An extension to the temporary
cofferdam around the Dry Dock 1
entrance structure installed during P–
381 year 1 will also be constructed. The
extension will consist of 14 28-inch
wide, Z-shaped sheet piles. The
extension and the cofferdam (96 28-inch
wide, Z-shaped sheet piles) will be
removed in 2024 using a vibratory
hammer.
A temporary work trestle will be
constructed to support the excavation of
large shafts within the individual dry
docking positions. The trestle will be
installed in Dry Dock 1 North first and
then relocated to Dry Dock 1 West. The
trestle system will be supported by 4 84inch steel pipe piles and will be
relocated five times within each dry
dock. As a result, the piles will be
installed and removed 20 times in Dry
Dock 1 North and 20 times in Dry Dock
1 West. The piles will be installed with
a cluster drill consisting of multiple
DTH hammers and removed with a
rotary drill. Before the cluster drill will
be deployed, a 102-inch casing will be
set into bedrock and a 5-ft (1.5-m) deep
rock socket will be excavated with a
rotary drill (see Figure 1–4 in the Navy’s
application). The socket will be filled
with concrete and a second, 84-inch
casing will be installed inside the larger
casing and set in the concrete. No
drilling will be required to install the
second casing. The outer casing will
then be removed with a rotary drill. The
84-inch diameter cluster drill will
operate independently inside the
second casing to excavate the shaft.
Once the shaft is drilled the inner casing
will be removed by torch cutting.
A temporary tie-in consisting of 15
28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles will
be installed between the center wall
foundation and the west closure wall at
Dry Dock 1 West. Twenty-three 28-inch
wide, Z-shaped sheet piles will also be
installed on the easterly end of Dry
Dock 1 West to provide a similar
temporary tie-in to the center wall
foundation near the entrance to Dry
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
19510
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Dock 1 East. The sheet piles will be
installed using an initial vibratory set
followed by driving with impact
hammers. These tie-ins will be removed
using a vibratory hammer along with the
Dry Dock 1 North tie-in to the west
closure wall (16 28-inch wide, Z-shaped
sheet piles) that was installed under the
P–381 year 1 IHA (87 FR 19886).
To support excavation activities along
Berth 1, 28 28-inch wide, Z-shaped
sheet piles will be installed at the
southeast corner of the berth using a
combination of vibratory and impact
hammers. These piles will be removed
using a vibratory hammer.
Mechanical Bedrock Removal—
Mechanical removal of bedrock will be
completed by the end of 2023 using
various methods appropriate for the
removal location and as needed to avoid
damage to adjacent structures. Bedrock
removal will occur along the Berth 11
face and abutment and along Berth 1.
Bedrock will be removed by breaking
it up with a hydraulic hammer (i.e., hoe
ram or breaker). To protect adjacent
structures during mechanical bedrock
removal, 924 4–6-inch diameter relief
holes will be drilled using a DTH monohammer. A total of approximately 918
cubic meters (1,200 cy) of bedrock are
anticipated to be removed.
Demolition of Super Flood Basin Wall
Components—Demolition of existing
wall components will include the
removal of shutter panels, granite quay
walls, sheet piles, and concrete making
up the super flood basin. Demolition of
existing wall structures will be
conducted using a rock hammer.
Specifically, the remaining sections of
the existing concrete shutter panels
making up the face of Berth 11 (112
panels), portions of the granite block
quay wall (2,141 cm, 2,800 cy) at Berth
1, and the remaining existing sheet pile
wall at Berth 1 (168 25-inch wide, Zshaped sheet piles) will be removed.
The installation of a structural
support waler (steel beam) at Berth 1
will also be completed. To complete the
installation of the waler, about 98 m
(320 linear ft) of concrete wall will be
demolished using a hydraulic rock
hammer.
Center Wall Tie-downs—Additional
work in the center wall area will involve
the installation of support tie downs for
future tremie concrete work. The tie
downs require the placement of a total
of 194 rock anchors requiring 9-inch
diameter holes. The rock anchors will
be installed using a DTH mono-hammer.
Dry Dock and Gantry Crane
Support—The location of the future
center wall requires reinforcement to
allow placement of the large pre-cast
monolith structures forming the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
separation between the two new dry
docking positions. Specifically, the floor
of the existing basin must be able to
provide an adequate foundation for the
pre-cast monoliths that will make up the
dry dock interiors and center wall. The
basin floor will be reinforced by
excavating 18 78-inch diameter shafts
throughout the footprint of the center
wall that will be filled with concrete to
create the structural support piles for
the center wall. The shafts will be
excavated using a cluster drill
consisting of multiple DTH monohammers. Before the cluster drill is
deployed, a 102-inch diameter casing
will be set into bedrock and a 1.5 m (5
ft) deep rock socket will be excavated
using a 102-inch diameter rotary drill
(see Figure 1–4 of the Navy’s
application). The rock socket will be
filled with concrete and a second, 78inch diameter casing will be installed
inside the 102-inch casing and set in the
concrete. No drilling is required to
install the second casing. The 102-inch
diameter outer casing will then be
removed with a rotary drill.
The future Dry Dock 1 North and Dry
Dock 1 West require significant
structural reinforcement to provide an
adequate foundation for the installation
of the large pre-cast monolith structures
forming the dry dock interior.
Reinforcement of the individual dry
dock foundations and walls will begin
first at Dry Dock 1 North and, once
completed, continue at Dry Dock 1
West. Twenty 78-inch diameter shafts
will be excavated along the Berth 11
face and head wall to support the walls
of Dry Dock 1 North. Along the floor of
Dry Dock 1 North, 23 108-inch diameter
shafts will be excavated for the
installation of the foundation support
piles and 18 78-inch diameter shafts
will be excavated for the installation of
leveling piles (i.e., diving board shafts).
The dry dock foundation and wall
support pile and leveling pile shafts will
be filled with concrete to create the
support piles for the dry dock walls and
floors. The shafts will be excavated
using a cluster drill consisting of
multiple DTH hammers in the same
manner as previously described for the
temporary work trestle piles. Once the
wall and foundation support piles and
leveling piles for Dry Dock 1 North have
been installed, foundation and wall
support piles and leveling piles will be
installed for Dry Dock 1 West. Twentytwo 78-inch diameter shafts will be
excavated along the Berth 1 face to
support the walls of Dry Dock 1 West.
Twenty-three 108-inch diameter shafts
will be excavated along the floor of Dry
Dock 1 West for the installation of
foundation support piles and 18 78-inch
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
shafts will be excavated for the
installation of leveling piles (i.e., diving
board shafts). The casing sizes and
rotary drill sizes for each shaft are
specified in Table 1.
The large concrete monolithic
sections used to create the dry docks
and the center wall separation will be
placed using a gantry crane. The gantry
crane system will be structurally
supported by the installation of 16 72inch diameter shafts installed along the
western extent of the Berth 1 face. The
shafts will be installed using a DTH
cluster drill as described for the
temporary work trestle piles. The casing
sizes and rotary drill sizes for the gantry
crane support shafts are specified in
Table 1.
P–310
Emergency Repairs
Testing of the super flood basin on
January 5, 2022 resulted in excess
exfiltration through Berths 1 and 2,
prompting the need for emergency
repairs along Berth 1 as well as between
the super flood basin entrance structure
and the west closure wall. Emergency
repairs consisted of the installation of
sheet piles and the tremie pouring of
concrete to fill in gaps along the
structure walls and floor. Installation of
emergency repairs at Berth 1 and the
installation and removal of emergency
repairs at the west closure wall and
entrance structure occurred before the
period described in the Navy’s LOA
application. Only the removal of Berth
1 emergency repair components will
occur during the requested LOA period.
The removal of the 216 28-inch wide,
Z-shaped sheet piles along the Berth 1
face will be completed through direct
pulling via barge-mounted crane or by
vibratory hammer. Specific methods
will be determined by the contractor
based on resistance to extraction from
the seabed. Direct pulling via crane is
not anticipated to generate harmful
levels of underwater sound. If required,
the use of the vibratory hammer to
extract the installed sheet piles will be
limited to an initial effort to break the
sheets loose, allowing them to be
directly pulled out. As a conservative
measure, vibratory extraction of these
sheet piles is assumed for all analyses.
The removal of 765 cubic meters
(1,000 cy) of tremie concrete is
anticipated to require use of a hydraulic
rock hammer to break up material into
smaller pieces. Smaller pieces will then
be retrieved via excavator bucket for
offsite disposal. The Navy estimates
daily active use of the rock hammer for
the removal of concrete from emergency
repairs to be 4 hours per day.
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Means and Methods for Noise Producing
Activities
Only 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet
piles will be installed or removed with
pile-driving equipment during P–381
construction. The installation of 28-inch
wide, Z-shaped steel sheet piles will be
installed initially using vibratory means
and then finished with impact
hammers, if necessary. Impact hammers
will also be used to push obstructions
out of the way and where sediment
conditions do not permit the efficient
use of vibratory hammers. Pile removal
activities will use cranes and vibratory
hammers exclusively.
The removal of bedrock and concrete
and the demolition of concrete shutter
panels at Berth 11 and granite blocks
and sheet piles at Berth 1 during P–381
construction will be by mechanical
means. These features will be
demolished using a hydraulic rock
hammer (i.e., hoe ram). The type/size of
rock hammers used will be determined
by the contractor selected to perform the
work.
Two methods of rock excavation will
be used during P–381 construction;
DTH excavation and rotary drilling.
During P–381 construction, rotary
drilling will be used to set the casings
and pre-drill rock sockets for DTH
cluster drills. DTH excavation using
mono-hammers will be used to create
shafts for rock anchors and tie downs
and for the excavation of relief holes
during mechanical bedrock removal. For
the largest shafts (greater than 42-inches
in diameter), DTH excavation will use a
cluster drill. A cluster drill uses
multiple mono-hammers within a single
bit to efficiently break up bedrock and
create large diameter holes (see Figure
1–5 in the Navy’s application).
Concurrent Activities
In order to maintain project
schedules, it is likely that multiple
19511
pieces of equipment will operate at the
same time within the basin. No ancillary
activities are anticipated during the
construction period that will require
unimpeded access to the super flood
basin. Therefore, it is anticipated that
there will be space available within the
project area for additional construction
equipment. A maximum of 13 pieces of
equipment could potentially operate in
the project area at a single time. While
this is an unlikely scenario, it could
occur for a very brief period.
Construction equipment will be staged
along the perimeter of the super flood
basin (Berth 11, Berth 1 and head wall)
as well on multiple barges within the
super flood basin. Table 2 provides a
summary of possible equipment
combinations that could be used
simultaneously over the course of the
construction period.
TABLE 2—SUMMARY OF MULTIPLE EQUIPMENT SCENARIOS
Year
Quantity
2023 ........................
Equipment
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
8
10
13
8
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2024 ........................
2025 ........................
Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), Impact Hammer (1).
Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (1).
Rock Hammer (1), Vibratory Hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (1), Rotary Drill (1).
Rock Hammer (1), Vibratory Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (1), Cluster Drill (2).
Cluster Drill (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), Mono-hammer DTH (1), Rotary Drill (1).
Rock Hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (1), Cluster Drill (2).
Rock Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill (1), Rotary Drill (1).
Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (1), Rotary Drill (2).
Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill (2).
Rock Hammer (3), Vibratory Hammer (2), Impact hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill (2).
Rock Hammer (5), Cluster Drill (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), Impact Hammer (1), Mono-hammer DTH (3).
Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill (2).
Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1), Vibratory hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1).
Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Cluster Drill (1), Rotary Drill (1), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Rotary Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Cluster Drill (1), Rotary Drill (1), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Rotary Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
Rotary Drill (2).
Cluster Drill (2).
Source: 381 Constructors, 2022.
Mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures are described in detail later in
this document (please see Mitigation
and Monitoring and Reporting).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS’ proposed
rulemaking to the Navy was published
in the Federal Register on January 18,
2023 (88 FR 3146). That proposed rule
described, in detail, the Navy’s
activities, the marine mammal species
that may be affected by the activities,
and the anticipated effects on marine
mammals. In that proposed rule, we
requested public input on the request
for authorization described therein, our
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
analyses, the proposed authorization,
and any other aspect of the notice of
proposed rulemaking, and requested
that interested persons submit relevant
information, suggestions, and
comments. This proposed rule was
available for a 30-day public comment
period.
During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS received no comments.
Changes From the Proposed IHA to
Final IHA
No public comments were received
during the comment period; however,
NMFS made a few minor clarifications
and corrections in this final rule. In the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sections of the documents that refer to
the use of a bubble curtain, it was
established that the bubble curtain will
be used in cases where the Level A
harassment zone extends to the full
region of influence (ROI). To clarify this
further, NMFS adds that this refers to all
rock hammering and DTH cluster
drilling. In addition, for bubble curtains,
NMFS clarified that the air flow to the
bubblers will be balanced across the
entrance openings to the super flood
basin, rather than the piles. Finally,
NMFS removed the mitigation condition
requiring that protected species
observers (PSOs) work in shifts lasting
no longer than 4 hours (hrs) with at least
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19512
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
a 1-hr break between shifts and limiting
PSO duties to no more than 12 hrs in
a 24-hr period. This is not a required
condition for the Navy for these
construction activities, rather it is
related to other activity types, such as
offshore seismic surveys, but was
accidentally included. That said, NMFS
communicated to the Navy that
observers should be given adequate
breaks and work in shifts to reduce
observer fatigue to ensure their ability to
best monitor for marine mammals.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of Specified Activities
Sections 3 and 4 of the application
summarize available information
regarding status and trends, distribution
and habitat preferences, and behavior
and life history of the potentially
affected species. NMFS fully considered
all of this information, and we refer the
reader to these descriptions, referenced
here, instead of reprinting the
information. Additional information
regarding population trends and threats
may be found in NMFS’ Stock
Assessment Reports (SARs;
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessments) and more
general information about these species
(e.g., physical and behavioral
descriptions) may be found on NMFS’
website (https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species).
Table 3 lists all species or stocks for
which take is expected and authorized
for this activity, and summarizes
information related to the population or
stock, including regulatory status under
the MMPA and Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and potential biological removal
(PBR), where known. PBR is defined by
the MMPA as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (as
described in NMFS’ SARs). While no
serious injury or mortality is expected to
occur, PBR and annual serious injury
and mortality from anthropogenic
sources are included here as gross
indicators of the status of the species or
stocks and other threats.
Marine mammal abundance estimates
presented in this document represent
the total number of individuals that
make up a given stock or the total
number estimated within a particular
study or survey area. NMFS’ stock
abundance estimates for most species
represent the total estimate of
individuals within the geographic area,
if known, that comprises that stock. For
some species, this geographic area may
extend beyond U.S. waters. All stocks
managed under the MMPA in this
region are assessed in NMFS’ U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico SARs. All
values presented in Table 3 are the most
recent available at the time of
publication (including from the 2022
draft SARs) and are available online at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessments).
TABLE 3—SPECIES LIKELY IMPACTED BY THE SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
Common name
Scientific name
ESA/
MMPA
status;
strategic
(Y/N) 1
MMPA stock
Stock abundance Nbest,
(CV, Nmin, most recent abundance
survey) 2
PBR
Annual
M/SI 3
Order Cetartiodactyla—Superfamily Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
Family Phocoenidae (porpoises):
Harbor Porpoise .............
Phocoena .............................
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy
-; N
95,543 (0.31; 74,034; 2016) .........
851
164
61,336 (0.08, 57,637; 2018) .........
27,300 4 (0.22; 22,785; 2016) .......
7,600,000 (unk,7,100.000, 2019)
593,500 .........................................
1,729
1,389
426,000
Unknown
339
4,453
178,573
1,680
Order Carnivora—Superfamily Pinnipedia
Family Phocidae (earless
seals):
Harbor seal .....................
Gray seal ........................
Harp seal ........................
Hooded seal ...................
Phoca vitulina ......................
Halichoerus grypus ..............
Pagophilus groenlandicus ...
Cystophora cristata ..............
Western
Western
Western
Western
North
North
North
North
Atlantic
Atlantic
Atlantic
Atlantic
........
........
........
........
-;
-;
-;
-;
N
N
N
N
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
1 Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the
ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or
which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically
designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
2 NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments. CV is coefficient of variation; Nmin is the minimum estimate of stock abundance. In some cases, CV is not applicable (N.A.).
3 These values, found in NMFS’s SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g., commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated
mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
4 This abundance value and the associated PBR value reflect the US population only. Estimated abundance for the entire Western North Atlantic stock, including
animals in Canada, is 451,600. The annual M/SI estimate is for the entire stock.
As indicated above, all five species
(with five managed stocks) in Table 3
temporally and spatially co-occur with
the activity to the degree that take is
reasonably likely to occur.
A detailed description of the species
likely to be affected by the Navy’s
construction activities, including brief
introductions to the species and
relevant stocks as well as available
information regarding population trends
and threats, and information regarding
local occurrence, were provided in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
Federal Register notice for the proposed
rule (88 FR 3146, January 18, 2023).
Since that time, we are not aware of any
changes in the status of these species
and stocks; therefore, detailed
descriptions are not provided here.
Please refer to that Federal Register
notice for these descriptions. Please also
refer to the NMFS website (https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species) for
generalized species accounts.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Marine Mammal Hearing
Hearing is the most important sensory
modality for marine mammals
underwater, and exposure to
anthropogenic sound can have
deleterious effects. To appropriately
assess the potential effects of exposure
to sound, it is necessary to understand
the frequency ranges marine mammals
are able to hear. Not all marine mammal
species have equal hearing capabilities
(e.g., Richardson et al., 1995; Wartzok
and Ketten, 1999; Au and Hastings,
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
2008). To reflect this, Southall et al.
(2007, 2019) recommended that marine
mammals be divided into hearing
groups based on directly measured
(behavioral or auditory evoked potential
techniques) or estimated hearing ranges
(behavioral response data, anatomical
modeling, etc.). Note that no direct
measurements of hearing ability have
been successfully completed for
mysticetes (i.e., low-frequency
cetaceans). Subsequently, NMFS (2018a)
described generalized hearing ranges for
these marine mammal hearing groups.
Generalized hearing ranges were chosen
based on the approximately 65 decibel
(dB) threshold from the normalized
composite audiograms, with the
19513
exception for lower limits for lowfrequency cetaceans where the lower
bound was deemed to be biologically
implausible and the lower bound from
Southall et al. (2007) retained. Marine
mammal hearing groups and their
associated hearing ranges are provided
in Table 4.
TABLE 4—MARINE MAMMAL HEARING GROUPS
[NMFS, 2018a]
Hearing group
Generalized hearing
range *
Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) .........................................................................................................................
Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) ..............................................
High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L.
australis).
Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) .......................................................................................................................
Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) ..................................................................................................
7 Hz to 35 kHz.
150 Hz to 160 kHz.
275 Hz to 160 kHz.
50 Hz to 86 kHz.
60 Hz to 39 kHz.
* Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite (i.e., all species within the group), where individual species’
hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ∼65 dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram,
with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).
The pinniped functional hearing
group was modified from Southall et al.
(2007) on the basis of data indicating
that phocid species have consistently
demonstrated an extended frequency
range of hearing compared to otariids,
especially in the higher frequency range
(Hemila¨ et al., 2006; Kastelein et al.,
2009; Reichmuth and Holt, 2013).
For more detail concerning these
groups and associated frequency ranges,
please see NMFS (2018a) for a review of
available information.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
The effects of underwater noise from
the Navy’s construction activities have
the potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammals in the
vicinity of the project area. The notice
of the proposed rulemaking (88 FR
3146, January 18, 2023) included a
discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine
mammals and the potential effects of
underwater noise from the Navy’s
construction activities on marine
mammals and their habitat. That
information and analysis is referenced
in this final rule and is not repeated
here; please refer to the notice of the
proposed rulemaking (88 FR 3146,
January 18, 2023).
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of
the number of incidental takes
authorized under the rule, which will
inform both NMFS’ consideration of
‘‘small numbers’’ and NMFS’ negligible
impact determinations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
As described previously, no serious
injury or mortality is anticipated or
authorized for this activity. Harassment
is the only type of take expected to
result from these activities. Except with
respect to certain activities not pertinent
here, section 3(18) of the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as any act of pursuit,
torment, or annoyance, which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level
A harassment); or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (Level B harassment).
Authorized takes will primarily be by
Level B harassment, as use of the
acoustic sources (i.e., impact and
vibratory pile installation and removal,
rotary drilling, DTH, and rock
hammering) has the potential to result
in disruption of behavioral patterns for
individual marine mammals. There is
also some potential for auditory injury
(Level A harassment) to result, primarily
for high frequency species and/or
phocids because predicted auditory
injury zones are larger than for midfrequency species and/or otariids. The
requirements pertaining to mitigation
and monitoring are expected to
minimize the severity of the taking to
the extent practicable. Below we
describe how the authorized take
numbers are estimated.
For acoustic impacts, generally
speaking, we estimate take by
considering: (1) acoustic thresholds
above which NMFS believes the best
available science indicates marine
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
mammals will be behaviorally harassed
or incur some degree of permanent
hearing impairment; (2) the area or
volume of water that will be ensonified
above these levels in a day; (3) the
density or occurrence of marine
mammals within these ensonified areas;
and, (4) the number of days of activities.
We note that while these factors can
contribute to a basic calculation to
provide an initial prediction of potential
takes, additional information that can
qualitatively inform take estimates is
also sometimes available (e.g., previous
monitoring results or average group
size). Below, we describe the factors
considered here in more detail and
present the estimated take numbers.
Acoustic Thresholds
NMFS recommends the use of
acoustic thresholds that identify the
received level of underwater sound
above which exposed marine mammals
would be reasonably expected to be
behaviorally harassed (equated to Level
B harassment) or to incur PTS of some
degree (equated to Level A harassment).
Level B Harassment—Though
significantly driven by received level,
the onset of behavioral disturbance from
anthropogenic noise exposure is also
informed to varying degrees by other
factors related to the source or exposure
context (e.g., frequency, predictability,
duty cycle, duration of the exposure,
signal-to-noise ratio, distance to the
source), the environment (e.g.,
bathymetry, other noises in the area,
predators in the area), and the receiving
animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography, life stage,
depth) and can be difficult to predict
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19514
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(e.g., Southall et al., 2007, 2021; Ellison
et al., 2012). Based on what the
available science indicates and the
practical need to use a threshold based
on a metric that is both predictable and
measurable for most activities, NMFS
typically uses a generalized acoustic
threshold based on received level to
estimate the onset of behavioral
harassment. NMFS generally predicts
that marine mammals are likely to be
behaviorally harassed in a manner
considered to be Level B harassment
when exposed to underwater
anthropogenic noise above root-meansquared pressure received levels (RMS
SPL) of 120 dB (referenced to 1
micropascal (re 1 mPa)) for continuous
(e.g., vibratory pile-driving, drilling) and
above RMS SPL 160 dB re 1 mPa for nonexplosive impulsive (e.g., seismic
airguns) or intermittent (e.g., scientific
sonar) sources. Generally speaking,
Level B harassment take estimates based
on these behavioral harassment
thresholds are expected to include any
likely takes by TTS as, in most cases,
the likelihood of TTS occurs at
distances from the source less than
those at which behavioral harassment is
likely. TTS of a sufficient degree can
manifest as behavioral harassment, as
reduced hearing sensitivity and the
potential reduced opportunities to
detect important signals (conspecific
communication, predators, prey) may
result in changes in behavior patterns
that would not otherwise occur.
The Navy’s activities include the use
of continuous (vibratory pile driving/
removal, rotary drilling) and
intermittent (impact pile driving, rock
hammering) sources, and therefore the
RMS SPL thresholds of 120 and 160 dB
re 1 mPa, respectively, are applicable.
DTH systems have both continuous and
intermittent components as discussed in
the Description of Sound Sources
section in the proposed rule (88 FR
3146, January 18, 2023). When
evaluating Level B harassment, NMFS
recommends treating DTH as a
continuous source and applying the
RMS SPL thresholds of 120 dB re 1 mPa
(see NMFS recommended guidance on
DTH systems at https://
media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2022-11/
PUBLIC%20DTH%20Basic
%20Guidance_November%202022.pdf;
NMFS, 2022).
Level A harassment—NMFS’
Technical Guidance for Assessing the
Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on
Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0)
(NMFS, 2018a) identifies dual criteria to
assess auditory injury (Level A
harassment) to five different marine
mammal groups (based on hearing
sensitivity) as a result of exposure to
noise from two different types of
sources (impulsive or non-impulsive).
The Navy’s activities include the use of
impulsive (impact pile driving, rock
hammering, DTH) and non-impulsive
(vibratory pile driving/removal, rotary
drilling, DTH) sources.
These thresholds are provided in the
table below. The references, analysis,
and methodology used in the
development of the thresholds are
described in NMFS’ 2018 Technical
Guidance, which may be accessed at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-acoustic-technical-guidance.
TABLE 5—THRESHOLDS IDENTIFYING THE ONSET OF PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT
PTS onset acoustic thresholds *
(received level)
Hearing group
Impulsive
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans ......................................
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans ......................................
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans .....................................
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) .............................
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) .............................
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
1:
3:
5:
7:
9:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
219
230
202
218
232
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
Non-impulsive
LE,LF,24h: 183 dB .........................
LE,MF,24h: 185 dB ........................
LE,HF,24h: 155 dB ........................
LE,PW,24h: 185 dB .......................
LE,OW,24h: 203 dB .......................
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
2: LE,LF,24h: 199 dB.
4: LE,MF,24h: 198 dB.
6: LE,HF,24h: 173 dB.
8: LE,PW,24h: 201 dB.
10: LE,OW,24h: 219 dB.
* Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should
also be considered.
Note: Peak sound pressure (Lpk) has a reference value of 1 μPa, and cumulative sound exposure level (LE) has a reference value of 1μPa2s.
In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI, 2013). However, peak sound pressure
is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript ‘‘flat’’ is being
included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated
with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF
cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level
thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways (i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for
action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and
environmental parameters of the activity
that are used in estimating the area
ensonified above the acoustic
thresholds, including source levels and
transmission loss coefficient.
The sound field in the project area is
the existing background noise plus
additional construction noise from the
project. Marine mammals are expected
to be affected via sound generated by
the primary components of the project
(i.e., impact pile driving, vibratory pile
driving, vibratory pile removal, rotary
drilling, rock hammering, and DTH).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
Sound Source Levels—The intensity
of pile driving sounds is greatly
influenced by factors such as the type of
piles, hammers, and the physical
environment (e.g., sediment type) in
which the activity takes place. The Navy
evaluated sound source level (SL)
measurements available for certain pile
types and sizes from similar
environments from other Navy pile
driving projects, including from past
projects conducted at the Shipyard, and
used them as proxy SLs to determine
reasonable SLs likely to result from the
pile driving and drilling activities in
their application. Projects reviewed
were those most similar to the specified
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
activity in terms of drilling and rock
hammering activities, type and size of
piles installed, method of pile
installation, and substrate conditions.
Some of the proxy source levels used
are expected to be more conservative as
compared to what may be realized by
the actual pile driving to take place, as
the values are from larger pile sizes. In
some instances, for reasons described
below, NMFS relied on alternative
proxy SLs in our evaluation of the
impacts of the Navy’s activities on
marine mammals (Table 6). Note that
the source levels in Table 6 represent
the SPL referenced at a distance of 10
m from the source.
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
19515
TABLE 6—SUMMARY OF UNATTENUATED IN-WATER PILE DRIVING SOURCE LEVELS
Peak
SPL
(dB re
1
μPa)
Pile type
Installation method
Pile diameter
Casing/Socket .....................................................
Rotary Drill .........................................................
Shaft ....................................................................
DTH Cluster Drill ................................................
126-inch .......................
102-inch .......................
84-inch .........................
108-inch .......................
NA
NA
NA
NA
84-inch .........................
NA ....
78-inch .........................
NA ....
72-inch .........................
NA ....
9-inch ...........................
4 to 6-inch ....................
1 28-inch .......................
28-inch 2 .......................
25-inch 3 .......................
NA ................................
172 ...
170 ...
211 ...
NA ....
NA ....
197 ...
Rock anchor ........................................................
Relief hole ...........................................................
Z-shaped Sheet ..................................................
Bedrock and concrete demolition .......................
DTH mono-hammer ...........................................
DTH mono-hammer ...........................................
Impact ................................................................
Vibratory .............................................................
Vibratory .............................................................
Rock Hammer 4 ..................................................
....
....
....
....
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa)
154 (169 at 1 m) ......
154 (169 at 1 m) ......
154 (169 at 1 m) ......
201.6 5 (Level A) .......
174 6 (Level B) ..........
196.7 5 (Level A) .......
174 6(Level B) ...........
195.2 5 (Level A) .......
174 6 (Level B) ..........
193.7 5 (Level A) .......
174 6 (Level B) ..........
167 ...........................
6 156 .........................
196 ...........................
167 ...........................
167 ...........................
186 4 .........................
SELss
(dB re
1
μPa2
sec)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
181
NA
146
144
181
167
167
4 171
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
1 An appropriate proxy value for impact driving 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles is not available, so a value for 30-inch steel pipe piles was used as a proxy
value (NAVFAC SW, 2020 [p. A–4]).
2 An appropriate proxy value for vibratory pile driving 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles is not available, so a value for 30-inch steel pipe piles was used as a
proxy value (Navy, 2015 [p. 14]).
3 An appropriate proxy value for vibratory pile driving 25-inch sheet piles is not available, so the value for 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles was used as a proxy.
4 Escude, 2012.
5 RMS SPL values were derived from regression and extrapolation calculations of existing data by NMFS.
6SPLs vary from those proposed in the Navy’s application as the NMFS DTH recommended guidance updated the source level proxy it recommends for some DTH
systems after the Navy’s application was deemed adequate and complete (NMFS, 2022).
Notes: All SPLs are unattenuated and represent the SPL referenced at a distance of 10 m from the source; NA = Not applicable; single strike SEL are the proxy
source levels for impact pile driving used to calculate distances to PTS; dB re 1 μPa = decibels (dB) referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, measures underwater
SPL.; dB re 1 μPa2-sec = dB referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal squared per second, measures underwater SEL.
With regards to the proxy values
summarized in Table 6, very little
information is available regarding
source levels for in-water rotary drilling
activities. As a conservative measure
and to be consistent with previously
issued IHAs for similar projects in the
region, a proxy of 154 dB RMS is used
for all rotary drilling activities (Dazey,
2012).
NMFS recommends treating DTH
systems as both impulsive and
continuous, non-impulsive sound
source types simultaneously. Thus,
impulsive thresholds are used to
evaluate Level A harassment, and the
continuous threshold is used to evaluate
Level B harassment. The Navy
consulted with NMFS to obtain the
appropriate proxy values for DTH
mono- and cluster-hammers. With
regards to DTH mono-hammers, NMFS
recommended proxy levels for Level A
harassment based on available data
regarding DTH systems of similar sized
piles and holes (Table 6) (Denes et al.,
2019; Guan and Miner, 2020; Reyff and
Heyvaert, 2019; Reyff, 2020; Heyvaert
and Reyff, 2021). No hydroacoustic data
exist for cluster DTH systems; therefore,
NMFS recommends proxy values based
off of regression and extrapolation
calculations of existing data for monohammers until hydroacoustic data on
DTH cluster drills be obtained (NMFS,
2022). Because of the high number of
hammers and strikes for this system,
DTH cluster drills are treated as a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
continuous sound source for the time
component of Level A harassment (i.e.,
for the entire duration DTH cluster
drills are operational, they are
considered to be producing strikes,
rather than indicating the number of
strikes per second, which is unknown),
but still used the impulsive thresholds.
At the time of the Navy’s application
submission, NMFS recommended that
the RMS SPL at 10 m should be 167 dB
when evaluating Level B harassment
(Heyvaert and Reyff, 2021 as cited in
NMFS, 2021b) for all DTH pile/hole
sizes. However, since that time, NMFS
has received additional clarifying
information regarding DTH data
presented in Reyff and Heyvaert (2019)
and Reyff (2020) that allows for different
RMS SPL at 10 m to be recommended
for piles/holes of varying diameters
(NMFS, 2022). Therefore, the following
proxy RMS SPLs at 10 m are used to
evaluate Level B harassment from this
sound source in this analysis (Table 6):
156 dB RMS for the 4 to 6 inch mono
hammers (Reyff and Heyvaert, 2019;
Reyff, 2020), 167 dB RMS for the 9 inch
mono-hammers (Heyvaert and Reyff,
2021), and 174 dB RMS for all DTH
cluster drills greater or equal to 74
inches (Reyff and Heyvaert, 2019; Reyff,
2020). See Footnote 6 in Table 6.
Rock hammering is analyzed as an
impulsive noise source. For purposes of
this analysis, it is assumed that the
hammer will have a maximum strike
rate of 460 strikes per minute and will
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
operate for a maximum duration of 15
minutes before needing to reposition or
stop to check progress. Therefore, noise
impacts for rock hammering activities
are assessed using the number of blows
per 15-minute interval (6,900 blows)
and the number of 15-minute intervals
anticipated over the course of the day
based on the durations provided in
Tables 1, 7, and 8. As with rotary
drilling, very little information is
available regarding source levels
associated with nearshore rock
hammering. In previous IHAs related to
the Shipyard, NMFS relied on
preliminary measurements from the
Tappan Zee Bridge replacement project
(Reyff, 2018a, 2018b) as well as data
from a WSDOT concrete pier demolition
project (Escude, 2012) to inform proxy
SLs for rock hammering. However, a few
discrepancies in the preliminary data of
the Tappan Zee Bridge reports have
been identified resulting from NMFS’
further inspection into the report’s data.
Therefore, the SLs reported only from
the Escude (2012) concrete pier
demolition project are used as proxy
values for rock hammering activities
associated with P–381 (Table 6).
Level B Harassment Zones—
Transmission loss (TL) is the decrease
in acoustic intensity as an acoustic
pressure wave propagates out from a
source. TL parameters vary with
frequency, temperature, sea conditions,
current, source and receiver depth,
water depth, water chemistry, and
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19516
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
bottom composition and topography.
The general formula for underwater TL
is:
TL = B * log10 (R1/R2),
Where:
B = transmission loss coefficient (assumed to
be 15)
R1 = the distance of the modeled SPL from
the driven pile, and
R2 = the distance from the driven pile of the
initial measurement.
This formula neglects loss due to
scattering and absorption, which is
assumed to be zero here. The degree to
which underwater sound propagates
away from a sound source is dependent
on a variety of factors, most notably the
water bathymetry and presence or
absence of reflective or absorptive
conditions including in-water structures
and sediments. The recommended TL
coefficient for most nearshore
environments is the practical spreading
value of 15. This value results in an
expected propagation environment that
would lie between spherical and
cylindrical spreading loss conditions,
which is the most appropriate
assumption for the Navy’s activities in
the absence of specific modelling. All
Level B harassment isopleths are
reported in Tables 7 and 8 considering
RMS SLs.
Level A Harassment Zones—The
ensonified area associated with Level A
harassment is more technically
challenging to predict due to the need
to account for a duration component.
Therefore, NMFS developed an optional
User Spreadsheet tool to accompany the
Technical Guidance (NMFS, 2018a) that
can be used to relatively simply predict
an isopleth distance for use in
conjunction with marine mammal
density or occurrence to help predict
potential takes. We note that because of
some of the assumptions included in the
methods underlying this optional tool,
we anticipate that the resulting isopleth
estimates are typically going to be
overestimates of some degree, which
may result in an overestimate of
potential take by Level A harassment.
However, this optional tool offers the
best way to estimate isopleth distances
when more sophisticated modeling
methods are not available or practical.
For stationary sources (such as from
impact and vibratory pile driving,
drilling, DTH, and rock hammering), the
optional User Spreadsheet tool predicts
the distance at which, if a marine
mammal remained at that distance for
the duration of the activity, it would be
expected to incur PTS. Inputs used in
the User Spreadsheet can be found in
Appendix A of the Navy’s application,
Appendix A of the Navy’s addendum,
and the resulting isopleths are reported
in Tables 7 and 8.
TABLE 7—CALCULATED DISTANCE AND AREAS OF LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT FOR IMPULSIVE NOISE
[DTH, impact pile driving, hydraulic rock hammering]
Level A harassment 2
Activity
ID
Year 1/activity
1 ............
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
3 ............
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
4 ............
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
6 ............
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
10 ..........
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
21 ..........
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
7 ............
2 DTH Monohammer.
11 ..........
2 DTH Monohammer.
22 ..........
2–3 DTH Monohammer.
34 ..........
3–4 DTH Monohammer.
4–5 DTH Monohammer.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
35 ..........
R ...........
5 ............
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
8 ............
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Duration, count,
size, and or rate
Purpose
Shutter Panel Demolition (112 panels).
Removal of Granite
Quay Wall (2,800
cy).
Berth 1 Top of Wall
Demolition for
Waler Install (320
lf).
Mechanical Rock
Removal (700 cy)
at Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
Mechanical Rock
Removal (300 cy)
at Berth 1 Basin
Floor.
Removal of Emergency Repair
Concrete (500
cy) at Berth 1.
Relief Holes at
Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
Dry Dock 1 North
entrance Rock
Anchors.
Center Wall Foundation Rock Anchors.
Dry Dock 1 North
Rock Anchors.
Dry Dock 1 West
Rock Anchors.
Dry Dock 1 North
Entrance Temporary Cofferdam.
Berth 1 Support of
Excavation.
Temporary
Cofferdam Extension.
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
Total
production
days
High frequency
cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Level B harassment
Phocid pinnipeds
All species
56
5,034.5 m/0.417417
km2.
2,261.9 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
47
3,171.6 m/0.417417
km2.
1,424.9 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
74
7,991.8 m/0.417417
km2.
3,590.5 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
12 hours/day (48
intervals/day at
15 min each).
60
9,024.7 m/0.417417
km2.
4,054.5 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
12 hours/day (48
intervals/day at
15 min each).
25
9,024.7 m/0.417417
km2.
4,054.5 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
4 hours/day (16 intervals/day at 15
min each).
15
4,388.6 m/0.417417
km2.
1,949.2 m/0.417417 km2 ....
541.17 m/0.277858
km2.
924 4–6 inch holes
27 holes/day.
35
178.9 m/0.047675 km2
80.4 m/0.014413 km2 .........
2,512 m/0. 417417
km2.
50 9-inch holes 2
holes/day.
25
244.8 m/0.073751 km2
110 m/0.022912 km2 ..........
13,594 m/0.417417
km2.
72 9-inch holes 2
holes/day.
36
244.8 m/0.073751 km2
110 m/0.022912 km2 ..........
13,594 m/0.417417
km2.
36 9-inch holes 2
holes/day.
36 9-inch holes 2
holes/day.
48 28-inch Zshaped sheets 8
sheets/day.
28 28-inch Zshaped sheets 4
piles/day.
14 28-inch Zshaped sheets 4
piles/day.
18
244.8 m/0.073751 km2
110 m/0.022912 km2 ..........
18
244.8 m/0.073751 km2
110 m/0.022912 km2 ..........
6
1,568.6 m/0.417417
km2.
704.7 m/0.364953 km2 .......
13,594 m/0.417417
km2.
13,594 m/0.
417417 km2.
2,512 m/0.417417
km2.
8
988.2 m/0.403411 km2
444.0 m/0.201158 km2 .......
2,512 m/0.417417
km2.
4
988.2 m/0.403411 km2
444.0 m/0.201158 km2 .......
2,512 m/0.417417
km2.
5 hours/day (20 intervals/day at 15
each).
2.5 hours/day (10
intervals/day at
15 min each).
10 hours/day (40
intervals/day at
15 min each).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
19517
TABLE 7—CALCULATED DISTANCE AND AREAS OF LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT FOR IMPULSIVE NOISE—
Continued
[DTH, impact pile driving, hydraulic rock hammering]
Level A harassment 2
Activity
ID
Year 1/activity
12 ..........
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
24 ..........
2–3 Impact Pile
Driving.
A4 ..........
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
9d ..........
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
13d ........
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
15d ........
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
16d ........
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
17d ........
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
29d ........
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
31d ........
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
32d ........
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
33d ........
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
Total
production
days
Duration, count,
size, and or rate
Purpose
Center Wall Tie-in
to West Closure
Wall.
Center Wall East
Tie-in to Existing
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 North
Entrance Foundation Support
Piles.
Gantry Crane Support Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North
Temporary Work
Trestle.
Dry Dock 1 North
Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
Wall Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 North.
Foundation Shafts
for Dry Dock 1
North.
Dry Dock 1 West
Temporary Work
Trestle.
Wall Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 West.
Foundation Shafts
for Dry Dock 1
West.
Dry Dock 1 West
Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
15 28-inch Zshaped sheets 4
piles/day.
23 28-inch Zshaped sheets 2
piles/day.
18 78-inch shafts
10 hours/day 6.5
days/shaft.
16 72-inch shafts
10 hours/day 5
days/shaft.
20 84-inch shafts
10 hours/day 3.5
days/shaft.
18 78-inch shafts
10 hours/day 7.5
days/shaft.
20 78-inch shafts
10 hours/day 7.5
days/shaft.
23 108-inch shafts
10 hours/day 8.5
days/shaft.
20 84-inch shafts
10 hours/day 3.5
days/shaft.
22 78-inch shafts
10 hours/day 7.5
days/shaft.
23 108-inch shafts
10 hours/day 8.5
days/pile.
18 78-inch shafts
10 hours/day 7.5
days/pile.
Level B harassment
High frequency
cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Phocid pinnipeds
4
988.2 m/0.403411 km2
444.0 m/0.201158 km2 .......
2,512 m/0.417417
km2.
12
622.5 m/0.334747 km2
279.7 m/0.090757 km2 .......
2,512 m/0.417417
km2.
117
84,380.4 m/0.417417
km2.
37,909.7 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
80
67,025.7 m/0.417417
km2.
30,112.8 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
70
106,228.6 m/0.417417
km2.
47,725.5 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
135
84,380.4 m/0.417417
km2.
37,909.7 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
150
84,380.4 m/0.417417
km2.
37,909.7 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
196
225,376.2 m/0.417417
km2.
101,255.2 m/0.417417 km2
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
70
106,228.6 m/0.417417
km2.
47,725.5 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
165
84,380.4 m/0.417417
km2.
37,909.7 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
196
225,376.2 m/0.417417
km2.
101,255.2 m/0.417417 km2
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
135
84,380.4 m/0.417417
km2.
37,909.7 m/0.417417 km2 ..
39,811 m/0.417417
km2.
All species
1 Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
2 To determine underwater harassment zone size, ensonified areas from the source were clipped along the shoreline using Geographical Information Systems
(GIS).
TABLE 8—CALCULATED DISTANCE AND AREAS OF LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT FOR NON-IMPULSIVE NOISE
[Rotary drilling and vibratory pile driving/extracting]
Level A harassment 2
Activity
ID
Year 1/
activity
R .........
2 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2 Vibratory
Extraction.
2 Vibratory
Extraction.
2 Vibratory
Extraction.
2 ..........
5 ..........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
8 ..........
12 ........
18 ........
19 ........
20 ........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Level B harassment
Duration, count, size,
and or rate
Total
production
days
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Temporary
Cofferdam.
Remove Berth 1 Sheet
Piles.
48 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 sheets/day.
6
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
168 25-inch Z-shaped
sheets 4 piles/day.
42
12.2 m/0.000454 km2
5.0 m/0.000078 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Install Berth 1 Support
of Excavation.
28 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 4 piles/day.
8
12.2 m/0.000454 km2
5.0 m/0.000078 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Install Temporary
Cofferdam Extension.
14 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 4 piles/day.
4
12.2 m/0.000454 km2
5.0 m/0.000078 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Center Wall Tie-In to
Existing West Closure
Wall.
Berth 11 End Wall Temporary Guide Wall.
Remove Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Remove Berth 1 Emergency Repairs.
15 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 4 piles/day.
4
12.2 m/0.000454 km2
5.0 m/0.000078 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
60 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 piles/day.
28 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 piles/day.
108 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 6 piles/day.
10
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
5
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
18
16.0 m/0.000733 km2
6.6 m/0.000136 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Purpose
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
High frequency
cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Sfmt 4700
Phocid pinnipeds
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
All species
19518
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 8—CALCULATED DISTANCE AND AREAS OF LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT FOR NON-IMPULSIVE NOISE—
Continued
[Rotary drilling and vibratory pile driving/extracting]
Level A harassment 2
Activity
ID
23 ........
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
24 ........
2–3 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
25 ........
26 ........
27 ........
28 ........
A1 .......
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Rotary
Drill.
A2 .......
2 Rotary
Drill.
A3 .......
2 Rotary
Drill.
9a ........
2 Rotary
Drill.
2 Rotary
Drill.
9b ........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Year 1/
activity
9c ........
2 Rotary
Drill.
13a ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
13b ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
13c ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
14 ........
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
15a ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
15b ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
15c ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
16a ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
16b ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
16c ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
17a ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Purpose
Duration, count, size,
and or rate
Total
production
days
High frequency
cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Phocid pinnipeds
Level B harassment
All species
16 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 piles/day.
3
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
23 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 2 piles/day.
12
7.7 m/0.000185 km2
3.2 m/0.000032 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Dry Dock 1 West Re15 28-inch Z-shaped
move Center Wall
sheets 8 piles/day.
Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Remove Center Wall
23 28-inch Z-shaped
Tie-in to Existing Wall.
sheets 8 piles/day.
3
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
12
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Dry Dock 1 North-Remove Center Wall
Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in
to Existing Wall.
Remove Temporary
Cofferdam.
96 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 piles/day.
12
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Remove Temporary
Cofferdam Extension.
14 28-inch Z-shaped
sheets 8 piles/day.
2
19.4 m/0.001041 km2
8.0 m/0.0002 km2
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Foundation
Support Piles—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Foundation
Support Piles—PreDrill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Foundation
Support Piles—Remove Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support—
Install Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support—
Pre-Drill Socket.
18 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
18
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
18
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.41747 km2.
18 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
18
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
16 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
16 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
16 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
20 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
16
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
16
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
16
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
20 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1
casing//day.
20
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20 84-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
18 84-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
20
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18 84-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
18 84-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
20 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
18
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
Gantry Crane Support—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle—
Remove Outer Casing.
Remove Dry Dock 1
North Temporary
Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Remove
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall
Shafts—Install Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall
Shafts—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall
Shafts—Remove
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation Shafts—Install
Outer Casing.
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
20 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
20 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
23 126-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
19519
TABLE 8—CALCULATED DISTANCE AND AREAS OF LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT FOR NON-IMPULSIVE NOISE—
Continued
[Rotary drilling and vibratory pile driving/extracting]
Level A harassment 2
Activity
ID
Year 1/
activity
17b ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
17c ......
2–3 Rotary
Drill.
29a ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
29b ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
29c ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
30 ........
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
31a ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
31b ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
31c ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
32a ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
32b ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
32c ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
33a ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
33b ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
33c ......
3–4 Rotary
Drill.
Duration, count, size,
and or rate
Purpose
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation Shafts Pre-Drill
Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work Trestle—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work Trestle—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work Trestle—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Temporary
Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall
Shafts—Install Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall
Shafts—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall
Shafts—Remove
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation Shafts—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation Shafts Pre-Drill
Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Remove
Outer Casing.
Total
production
days
High frequency
cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Phocid pinnipeds
Level B harassment
All species
23
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
20 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
20
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
20 84-inch borings 15
minutes/pile 1 pile/
day.
22 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
20
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
22
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
22 102-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
22 102-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
23 126-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
22
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
22
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23 126-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
23 126-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
18 84-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
23
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18
2.1 m/0.000014 km2
1.3 m/0.000005 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18 84-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
18 84-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
18
8.9 m/0.000248 km2
5.4 m/0.000091 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
18
0.8 m/0.000002 km2
0.5 m/0.000001 km2
1,848 m/0.417417 km2.
23 126-inch borings 9
hours/day 1 socket/
day.
23 126-inch borings 15
minutes/casing 1 casing/day.
20 102-inch borings 1
hour/day 1 casing/day.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
1 Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
2 To determine underwater harassment zone size, ensonified areas from the source were clipped along the shoreline using Geographical Information Systems
(GIS).
The calculated maximum distances
corresponding to the underwater marine
mammal harassment zones from
impulsive (impact pile driving, rock
hammering, DTH) and non-impulsive
(vibratory pile driving, rotary drilling)
noise and the area of the harassment
zone within the ROI are summarized in
Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Sound
source locations were chosen to model
the greatest possible affected areas;
typically, these locations will be at the
riverward end of the super flood basin.
The calculated distances do not take the
land masses into consideration, but the
ensonified areas do. Neither consider
the reduction that will be achieved by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
the required use of a bubble curtain and
therefore all take estimates are
considered conservative. Refer to
Figures 6–1 through 6–20 of the Navy’s
application for visual representations of
the calculated maximum distances
corresponding to the underwater marine
mammal harassment zones from
impulsive (impact pile driving, rock
hammering, DTH) and non-impulsive
(vibratory pile driving, rotary drilling)
noise and the corresponding area of the
harassment zone within the ROI.
Calculated distances to Level A
harassment and Level B harassment
thresholds are large, especially for DTH
and rock hammering activities.
However, in most cases the full distance
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of sound propagation will not be
reached due to the presence of land
masses and anthropogenic structures
that will prevent the noise from
reaching nearly the full extent of the
harassment isopleths. Refer to Figure 1–
3 in the Navy’s application for the ROI,
which illustrates that the land masses
preclude the sound from traveling more
than approximately 870 m (3,000 ft)
from the source, at most. Areas
encompassed within the threshold
(harassment zones) were calculated by
using a Geographical Information
System (GIS) to clip the maximum
calculated distances to the extent of the
ROI (see Figure 2).
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19520
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Concurrent Activities—Simultaneous
use of pile drivers, hammers, and drills
could result in increased SPLs and
harassment zone sizes given the
proximity of the component sites and
the rules of decibel addition (see Table
9 below). Due to the relatively small size
of the ROI, the use of a single DTH
cluster drill or rock hammer will
ensonify the entire ROI to the Level A
(PTS Onset) harassment thresholds
(refer to Table 7). Therefore, when this
equipment is operated in conjunction
with other noise-generating equipment,
there will be no change in the size of the
harassment zone. The entire ROI will
remain ensonified to the Level A
harassment thresholds for the duration
of the activity and there will be no Level
B harassment zone. However, when
DTH cluster drills or rock hammers are
not in use, increased SPLs and
harassment zone sizes within the ROI
could result. Due to the substantial
amount of rock hammering and DTH
excavation required for the construction
of the multifunctional expansion of Dry
Dock 1, the only scenarios identified in
which cluster drills and/or rock
hammers will not be in operation will
be at the end of the project (construction
years 3 and 4) when two rotary drills or
two rotary drills and a DTH monohammer (9-inch) could be used
simultaneously (refer to Table 2).
When two noise sources have
overlapping sound fields, there is
potential for higher sound levels than
for non-overlapping sources because the
isopleth of one sound source
encompasses the sound source of
another isopleth. In such instances, the
sources are considered additive and
combined using the rules of decibel
addition, presented in Table 9 below
(NMFS, 2021d; WSDOT, 2020).
TABLE 9—ADJUSTMENTS FOR SOUND EXPOSURE LEVEL CRITERION
Difference in sound
level
(at specified
meters)
Source types
Non-impulsive, continuous/Non-impulsive, continuous, OR
0 or 1 dB ...............
2 or 3 dB ...............
Impulsive source (multiple strikes per
second)/Impulsive source (multiple
strikes per second.
4 to 9 dB ................
10 dB or more .......
Adjustments to specifications for Level A harassment RMS/SELss* calculations
Add 3 dB
of piles
Add 2 dB
of piles
Add 1 dB
of piles
to the highest sound level (at specified meters) AND adjust number
per day to account for overlap (space and time).
to the highest sound level (at specified meters) AND adjust number
per day to account for overlap (space and time).
to the highest sound level (at specified meters) AND adjust number
per day to account for overlap (space and time).
Add 0 dB to the highest sound level (at specified meters) AND adjust number
of piles per day to account for overlap (space and time).
* RMS level for vibratory pile driving/rotary hammer and single strike SEL (SELss) level for DTH/rock hammer.
For simultaneous usage of three or
more continuous sound sources, the
three overlapping sources with the
highest SLs are identified. Of the three
highest SLs, the lower two are combined
using the above rules, then the
combination of the lower two is
combined with the highest of the three.
For example, with overlapping isopleths
from 24-, 36-, and 42-inch diameter steel
pipe piles with sound source levels of
161, 167, and 168 dB RMS respectively,
the 24- and 36-inch would be added
together; given that 167–161 = 6 dB,
then 1 dB is added to the highest of the
two sound source levels (167 dB), for a
combined noise level of 168 dB. Next,
the newly calculated 168 dB is added to
the 42-inch steel pile with sound source
levels of 168 dB. Since 168¥168 = 0 dB,
3 dB is added to the highest value, or
171 dB in total for the combination of
24-, 36-, and 42-inch steel pipe piles
(NMFS, 2021d). By using this method,
revised proxy SPLs were determined for
the use of two 102-inch diameter rotary
drills and the use of two 108-inch rotary
drills and one 9-inch DTH monohammer. The revised proxy values are
presented in Table 10 and the resulting
harassment zones are summarized in
Table 11 (visually depicted in Figures
6–21 and 6–22 in the Navy’s
application).
TABLE 10—REVISED PROXY VALUES FOR SIMULTANEOUS USE OF NON-IMPULSIVE SOURCES
Source A
Source B
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa)
Equipment
Rotary Drill ......................................................
Two Rotary Drills ............................................
154
157
Equipment
Rotary Drill .....................................................
DTH Mono-Hammer .......................................
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa)
Revised proxy
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa)
154
167
157
167
TABLE 11—LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT ZONES RESULTING FROM CONCURRENT ACTIVITIES
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Level A harassment
Multiple source scenario
2 Rotary Drills (9 hrs) ..............................
2 Rotary Drills (9 hrs) and 1 DTH MonoHammer (5 hrs).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
Level B harassment
High frequency cetaceans
(harbor porpoise)
Phocid pinnipeds
23.6 m/0.001514 km2 ................
74.2 m/0.012773 km2 ................
9.7 m/0.000294 km2 ..................
30.5 m/0.002489 km2 ................
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
All species
2,929 m/0.417417 km2.
13,594 m/0.417417 km2.
31MRR3
19521
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Marine Mammal Occurrence and Take
Estimation
In this section we provide information
about the occurrence of marine
mammals, including density or other
relevant information, that inform the
take calculations. We also describe how
the information provided above is
synthesized to produce a quantitative
estimate of the take that is reasonably
likely to occur.
Potential exposures to impact and
vibratory pile driving, rotary drilling,
DTH, and rock hammering noise for
each acoustic threshold were estimated
using marine mammal density estimates
(N) from the Navy Marine Species
Density Database (NMSDD; Navy, 2017)
or from monitoring reports from the
Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements and
P–310 construction projects.
Specifically, where monitoring data
specific to the project area were
available, they were used, and the
NMSDD data were used when there
were no monitoring data available. The
take estimate was determined using the
following equation: take estimate = N *
days of activity * area of harassment. A
10 m shutdown zone designed to
prevent animal interactions with
equipment was subtracted from the
Level A harassment zone, and the area
of the Level A harassment zone was
subtracted from the Level B harassment
zone to avoid double counting of takes
during these take calculations. Days of
construction were conservatively based
on relatively slow daily production
rates. The pile type, size, and
installation method that produce the
largest zone of influence were used to
estimate exposure of marine mammals
to noise impacts. In instances where an
activity will ensonify the entire ROI to
the Level A harassment threshold, all
potential takes are assumed to be by
Level A harassment.
Because some construction activities
will occur over more than 1
construction year, the number of takes
per year were determined by the percent
duration of each construction activity
occurring each year (calculated by
months). For example, if an activity
were to occur for 6 months, with 3
months occurring in year 2 and 3
months occurring in year 3, then 50
percent of the takes were assigned to
year 2 and 50 percent to year 3. In
instances where only one take was
calculated but activities spanned more
than 1 construction year, one take was
authorized for each construction year.
Table 12 summarizes the calculated
duration percentages for each activity
that were used to divide take numbers
by year.
TABLE 12—DIVISION OF TAKES BY CONSTRUCTION YEAR
Activity ID
(A1,2,3,4) Center Wall—Install
Foundation Support Piles.
(R) Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—
Install Temporary Cofferdam.
(1) Berth 11—Remove Shutter
Panels.
(2) Berth 1—Remove Sheet Piles
(3) Berth 1—Remove Granite
Block Quay Wall.
(4) Berth 1—Top of Wall Removal
for Waler Installation.
(5) Berth 1—Install southeast corner SOE.
(6) Berth 11—Mechanical Rock
Removal at Basin Floor.
(7) Berth 11 Face—Mechanical
Rock Removal at Basin Floor.
(8) Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
(9a, b, c, d) Gantry crane Support
Piles at Berth 1 West.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
(10) Berth 1—Mechanical Rock
Removal at Basin Floor.
(11) Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—
Drill Tremie Tie Downs.
(12) Center Wall—Install Tie-In to
Existing West Closure Wall.
(13a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 North—
Temporary Piles.
Year 4 1
% takes
Year 5 1
% takes
Drill 18 shafts Apr 23 to Aug 23 ..
Install 102-inch diameter outer
casing.
Pre-drill 102-inch outer casing .....
Remove 102-inch outer casing ....
Drill 79-inch diameter shaft ..........
28-inch wide Z-shaped sheets ....
100
0
0
0
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Concrete shutter panels ..............
100
0
0
0
25-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
80
20
0
0
Removal of granite blocks ...........
80
20
0
0
320 lf Apr 23 to Jun 24 ................
Mechanical concrete removal ......
80
20
0
0
Install 28 sheet piles Apr 23 to
Jul 23.
700 cy Apr 23 to Aug 23 .............
28-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
100
0
0
0
Excavate Bedrock ........................
100
0
0
0
Drill 924 relief holes Apr 23 to
Aug 23.
Install 14 sheet piles Apr 23 to
Jun 23.
Drill 16 shafts Apr 23 to Aug 23 ..
4–6 inch diameter holes ..............
100
0
0
0
28-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
100
0
0
0
Set 102-inch diameter casing ......
Pre-drill 102-inch rock socket ......
Remove 102-inch casing .............
72-inch diameter shafts ...............
Excavate Bedrock ........................
100
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9-inch diameter holes ..................
100
0
0
0
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
100
0
0
0
Set 102-inch diameter casing ......
60
40
0
0
Pre-drill 102-inch rock socket ......
Remove 102-inch casing .............
84-inch diameter shafts ...............
84-inch diameter drill piles ...........
60
60
60
60
40
40
40
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Set 84-inch casing .......................
Pre-drill 84-inch rock socket ........
Remove 84-inch casing ...............
78-inch diameter shaft .................
Set 102-inch diameter casing ......
Pre-drill 102-inch rock socket ......
Remove 102-inch casing .............
Drill 78-inch diameter shaft ..........
Set 126-inch diameter Casing .....
Pre-drill 126-inch rock socket ......
Remove 126-inch casing .............
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Install 48 sheet piles Apr 23 to
May 23.
Remove 112 panels Apr 23 to
Apr 23.
Remove 168 sheet piles Apr 23
to Jun 24.
2,800 cy Apr 23 to Jun 24 ...........
500 cy Apr 23 to Sep 23 .............
Drill 50 rock anchors Apr 23 to
Oct 23.
Install 15 sheet piles Apr 23 to
Dec 23.
Drill 20 shafts May 23 to Nov 24
Remove 20 piles May 23 to Nov
24.
Drill 18 shafts May 23—Nov 24 ..
(16a, b, c, d) Wall Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 North.
Drill 20 shafts Jun 23 to Nov 24 ..
(17a, b, c, d) Foundation Shafts
for Dry Dock 1 North.
Drill 23 shafts Jun 23 to Nov 24 ..
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Year 3 1
% takes
Activity component
(14) Dry Dock 1 North—Remove
Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
(15a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 North—
Install Leveling Piles (Diving
Board Shafts).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Year 2 1
% takes
Total amount and estimated
dates
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19522
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 12—DIVISION OF TAKES BY CONSTRUCTION YEAR—Continued
Activity ID
Total amount and estimated
dates
(18) Berth 11 End Wall—Remove
Temporary Guide Wall.
(19) Remove Berth 1 southeast
corner SOE.
(20) Removal of Berth 1 Emergency Repair Sheet Piles.
(21) Removal of Berth 1 Emergency Repair Tremie Concrete.
(22) Center wall foundation—Drill
in monolith Tie Downs.
(23) Center Wall—Remove tie-in
to existing west closure wall
(Dry Dock 1 North).
(24) Center wall East—sheet pile
tie-in to Existing Wall.
(25) Remove tie-in to West Closure Wall (Dry Dock 1 West).
(26) Remove Center wall East—
sheet pile tie-in to Existing Wall
(Dry Dock 1 West).
(27) Dry Dock 1 north entrance—
Remove Temporary Cofferdam.
(28) Remove Temporary
Cofferdam Extension.
(29a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 West—
Install Temporary Piles.
Remove 60 sheet piles Jul 23 to
Aug 23.
Remove 28 sheet piles Jul 23 to
Sep 23.
Remove 216 sheet piles Aug 23
to Mar 24.
765 cubic meters (1,000 cy) Aug
23 to Mar 24.
Install 72 rock anchors Aug 23 to
May 24.
Remove 16 sheet piles Aug 23 to
Aug 24.
(30) Dry Dock 1 West—Remove
Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
(31a, b, c, d) Wall Shafts for Dry
Dock 1 West.
Remove 20 piles Apr 24 to Feb
26.
Drill 22 shafts Jun 24 to Feb 26 ..
(32a, b, c, d) Foundation Shafts
for Dry Dock 1 West.
Drill 23 shafts Jun 24 to Feb 26 ..
(33a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 West—
Install Leveling Piles (Diving
Board Shafts).
Drill 18 shafts Jun 24 to Feb 26 ..
(34) Dry Dock 1 North—Tie
Downs.
(35) Dry Dock 1 West—Install Tie
Downs.
Install 36 rock anchors Jul 24 to
Jul 25.
Install 36 rock anchors Dec 25 to
Dec 26.
Activity component
Year 2 1
% takes
Year 4 1
% takes
Year 3 1
% takes
Year 5 1
% takes
Drill 108-inch diameter shafts ......
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
60
100
40
0
0
0
0
0
28-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
100
0
0
0
28-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
100
0
0
0
Mechanical concrete removal ......
100
0
0
0
9-inch diameter holes ..................
80
20
0
0
28-inch-wide Z-shaped ................
60
40
0
0
Install 23 sheet piles Aug 23 to
Oct 24.
Remove 15 sheet pile Dec 23 to
Dec 24.
Remove 23 sheet piles Dec 23 to
Dec 24.
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
50
50
0
0
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
30
70
0
0
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
30
70
0
0
Remove 96 sheet piles Jan 24 to
Sep 24.
Remove 14 sheet piles Jan 24 to
Sep 24.
Drill 20 shafts Apr 24 to Feb 26 ..
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
33
66
0
0
28-inch wide Z-shaped ................
33
66
0
0
Set 102-inch diameter casing ......
Pre-drill 102-inch rock socket ......
Remove 102-inch casing .............
84-inch diameter shafts ...............
84-inch diameter piles .................
0
0
0
0
0
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
Set 102-inch diameter casing ......
Pre-drill 102-inch rock socket ......
Remove 102-inch casing .............
78-inch diameter shaft .................
Set 126-inch casing .....................
Pre-drill 126-inch rock socket ......
Remove 126-inch casing .............
Drill 108-inch diameter shaft ........
Set 84-inch casing .......................
Pre-drill 84-inch rock socket ........
Remove 84-inch casing ...............
Drill 78-inch diameter shaft ..........
9-inch diameter holes ..................
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
70
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9-inch diameter hole ....................
0
0
30
70
* Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
We describe how the information
provided above is brought together to
produce a quantitative take estimate in
the species sections below. A summary
of authorized take is available in Table
16.
Harbor Porpoise
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Harbor porpoises are expected to be
present in the project area from April to
December. Based on density data from
the NMSDD, their presence is highest in
spring, decreases in summer, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
slightly increases in fall. During
construction monitoring in the project
area, there were three harbor porpoise
observations between April and
December of 2017; two harbor porpoise
observations in early August of 2018;
and one harbor porpoise observation in
2020 (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019;
NAVFAC, 2021). There were no harbor
porpoise observations in the project area
in 2021 (NAVFAC, 2022). Given that
monitoring data specific to the project
area are available, the more general
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
NMSDD data were not used to
determine species density in the project
area. Instead, the Navy used observation
data from the 2017 and 2018
construction monitoring for the Berth 11
Waterfront Improvements Project and
determined that the density of harbor
porpoise for the largest harassment zone
was equal to 0.04/km2. Estimated take
was calculated with this density
estimate multiplied by the harassment
zone multiplied by the days for each
activity (see Table 13).
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
13 .......
12 .......
11 .......
10 .......
9 .........
8 .........
7 .........
6 .........
5 .........
4 .........
3 .........
2 .........
1 .........
R .........
A .........
Activity
ID
2–3 Rotary Drill
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2 DTH Monohammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2–3 Rotary Drill
2 Rotary Drill ....
2 Rotary Drill ....
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2 DTH Monohammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Rotary Drill ....
2 Rotary Drill ....
2 Rotary Drill ....
2 Rotary Drill ....
Year/activity
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance
Rock Anchors.
Center Wall Tie-In to Existing
West Closure Wall.
Center Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary
Work Trestle—Install Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary
Work Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Mechanical Rock Removal (300
cy) at Berth 1 Basin Floor.
Gantry Crane Support—Install
Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Gantry Crane Support—Remove
Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support Piles ......
Relief Holes at Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
Install Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
Temporary Cofferdam Extension
Mechanical Rock Removal (700
cy) at Berth 11 Basin Floor.
Install Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Berth 1 Support of Excavation ..
Berth 1 Top of Wall Demolition
for Waler Install (320 lf).
Removal of Granite Quay Wall
(2,800 cy).
Remove Berth 1 Sheet Piles .....
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install Temporary Cofferdam.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install Temporary Cofferdam.
Shutter Panel Demolition (112
panels).
Purpose
0.04
16
0.04
20
20
4
0.04
0.04
4
25
25
80
16
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
16
4
0.04
0.04
4
35
0.04
0.04
60
8
0.04
0.04
8
74
47
42
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
56
6
0.04
0.04
6
117
18
18
18
Total
production
days
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
Density
0.000248
0.000014
0.403411
0.000454
0.073751
0.417417
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.403411
0.000454
0.047675
0.417417
0.403411
0.000454
0.417417
0.417417
0.000454
0.417417
0.417417
0.0014041
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
Level A
harassment
zone
(km2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
12
0
1
12
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
Year 2
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 4
Take by Level A harassment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 5
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.277858
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.277858
0.417417
0.417417
0.277858
0.277858
0.417417
0.277858
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
Level B
harassment
zone
(km2)
TABLE 13—ESTIMATED TAKE OF HARBOR PORPOISE BY PROJECT ACTIVITY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 2
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 4
Take by Level B harassment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 5
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
19523
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
26 .......
28 .......
27 .......
25 .......
2–3 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2–3 Impact Pile
Driving.
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
2–3 DTH Cluster Drill.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2–3 DTH Monohammer.
2–3 Vibratory
Extraction.
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 DTH Cluster Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 DTH Cluster Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 Rotary Drill
24 .......
23 .......
22 .......
21 .......
20 .......
19 .......
18 .......
17 .......
16 .......
15 .......
2–3 Rotary Drill
2–3 Rotary Drill
14 .......
2–3 Rotary Drill
Year/activity
2–3 DTH Cluster Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill
Activity
ID
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Remove Temporary Cofferdam
Extension.
Center Wall Foundation Rock
Anchors.
Dry Dock 1 North-Remove Center Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing Wall.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Center Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Remove Center Wall Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
Remove Temporary Cofferdam
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary
Work Trestle—Remove Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary
Work Trestle.
Remove Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling
Piles—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling
Piles—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling
Piles—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles
(Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—
Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1
North.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock
1 North.
Berth 11 End Wall Temporary
Guide Wall.
Remove Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Remove Berth 1 Emergency
Repairs.
Removal of Emergency Repair
Concrete (500 cy) at Berth 1.
Purpose
0.04
0.04
0.04
2
12
12
3
12
0.04
0.04
12
3
36
15
18
5
10
196
23
23
23
150
20
20
20
135
18
18
18
20
70
20
Total
production
days
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
Density
0.001041
0.001041
0.001041
0.001041
0.334747
0.000185
0.001041
0.073751
0.417417
0.000733
0.001041
0.001041
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.000002
0.417417
0.000002
Level A
harassment
zone
(km2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
12
0
0
Year 2
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
Year 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 4
Take by Level A harassment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 5
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.277858
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
Level B
harassment
zone
(km2)
TABLE 13—ESTIMATED TAKE OF HARBOR PORPOISE BY PROJECT ACTIVITY—Continued
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 4
Take by Level B harassment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year 5
19524
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
..........................
3–4 DTH Cluster Drill.
3–4 DTH Monohammer.
4–5 DTH Monohammer.
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 DTH Cluster Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 DTH Cluster Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
....................................................
Dry Dock 1 West Rock Anchors
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock
1 West.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling
Piles—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling
Piles—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling
Piles—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles
(Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1 North Rock Anchors
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary
Work Trestle—Install Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary
Work Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary
Work Trestle—Remove Outer
Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary
Work Trestle.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—
Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1 West
................
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
..................
18
18
135
18
18
18
196
23
23
23
165
22
22
22
20
70
20
20
20
....................
0.073751
0.073751
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
0.000002
0.417417
0.000002
0.000248
0.000014
29
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
....................
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
0.417417
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously
issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
1 In instances where only 1 take was calculated but activities spanned more than 1 construction year, 1 take was requested by the Navy for each construction year.
2 1 take by Level B harassment was added to construction year 3 to account for average group size of harbor porpoises (see https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/harbor-porpoise#:∼:text=The%20harbor%20
porpoise%20is%20a,estuaries%2C%20harbors%2C%20and%20fjords).
** No additional takes are expected to result from the simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer in construction years 3 and 4 and the simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills in construction year 4.
Total
35 .......
34 .......
33 .......
32 .......
31 .......
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
30 .......
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 Rotary Drill
3–4 DTH Cluster Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill
29 .......
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19525
19526
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Although no construction activity is
currently planned for the final year of
the LOA period (construction year 6),
potential schedule slips may occur as a
result of equipment failure, inclement
weather, or other unforeseen events.
However, potential takes that could
occur during year 6 as a result of delays
to activities scheduled for years 2–5 are
accounted for through the analyses for
those years, and no additional take is
authorized.
Harbor Seal
Harbor seals may be present yearround in the project vicinity, with
consistent densities throughout the year.
Harbor seals are the most common
pinniped in the Piscataqua River near
the Shipyard. Sightings of this species
were recorded during monthly surveys
conducted in 2017 and 2018 (NAVFAC
Mid-Atlantic, 2018, 2019b) as well as
during Berth 11 and P–310 construction
monitoring in 2017, 2018, 2020 and
2021 (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019;
NAVFAC, 2021, 2022), and therefore
density estimates from these efforts
were considered in the analysis. Based
on observations recorded during the
Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements (199
observations of harbor seals during year
1 and 249 observations of harbor seals
during year 2 [448 total] over 322 days)
and P–310 project construction
monitoring (721 observations of harbor
seals during year 1 and 451 observations
of harbor seals during year 2 [1,172
total] over 349 days), harbor seal density
was estimated to be 3.0/km2 in the
project area (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019;
NAVFAC, 2021, 2022).
Takes by Level A harassment were
calculated for harbor seals where the
density of animals (3 harbor seals/km2)
was multiplied by the harassment zone
and the number of days per construction
activity. This method was deemed to be
inappropriate by the Navy for
calculating takes by Level B harassment
for harbor seals as it produced take
numbers that were lower than the
number of harbor seals that has been
previously observed in the Navy’s
monitoring reports. Therefore, the Navy
proposed (and NMFS concurred) to
increase the estimated take by Level B
harassment to more accurately reflect
harbor seal observations in the
monitoring reports, by using the value
of three harbor seals observed a day
multiplied by the total number of
construction days (i.e., 349 days),
resulting in 1,047 takes per year by
Level B harassment. This method is
consistent with the methodology used to
estimate takes by Level B harassment in
IHA issued by NMFS for the first year
of P–381 construction activities (87 FR
19866, April 6, 2022).
Additional takes by Level B
harassment may occur during the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills
and a DTH mono-hammer in
construction years 3 and 4 and the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills in
construction year 4. The simultaneous
use of 2 rotary drills will result in 28
additional takes by Level B harassment
of harbor seals. The simultaneous use of
2 rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer
will result in 22 additional takes by
Level B harassment of harbor seals.
Note, the use of cluster drills and rock
hammers in construction years 2 and 3
result in the entire ROI being ensonified
to Level A harassment thresholds;
therefore, there will be no change to the
size of the harassment zones from
concurrent construction activities
during these years and thus no need to
authorize additional takes. To account
for concurrent activities in construction
years 3 and 4, the Navy requested to add
additional takes by Level B harassment
to the estimated take numbers (22
harbor seal in construction year 3 and
50 harbor seal in construction year 4).
Therefore the Navy requests and NMFS
authorizes 1,047 takes by Level B
harassment for harbor seals in
construction year 2, 1,069 takes by Level
B harassment for harbor seals in
construction year 3, 1,097 takes by Level
B harassment for harbor seals in
construction year 4, and 1,047 takes by
Level B takes for harbor seals in
construction year 5 (note the division of
takes over the construction years is
summarized in Table 12).
Take by Level A harassment of harbor
seals is shown in Table 14 below. Note
that where the Level A harassment zone
is as large as the Level B harassment
zone and fills the entire potentially
ensonified area, the enumerated takes in
the Level A harassment column may be
in the form of Level A harassment and/
or Level B harassment, but are
authorized as takes by Level A
harassment. The authorized takes by
Level B harassment are not included in
Table 14 as they were calculated by a
different method (i.e., by using the value
of three harbor seals observed per day
multiplied by the total number of
construction days; i.e., 349 days).
TABLE 14—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF HARBOR SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Year/
activity
Purpose
A .....................
2 Rotary Drill ........
Center Wall—Install Foundation Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation Support Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install
Temporary Cofferdam.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install
Temporary Cofferdam.
Shutter Panel Demolition (112 panels).
Remove Berth 1 Sheet Piles .............
3
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
117
0.417417
147
147
0
0
0
3
6
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
6
0.364953
7
7
0
0
0
3
56
0.417417
70
70
0
0
0
3
42
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
Removal of Granite Quay Wall (2,800
cy).
Berth 1 Top of Wall Demolition for
Waler Install (320 lf).
Install Berth 1 Support of Excavation
3
47
0.417417
59
47
12
0
0
3
74
0.417417
93
74
19
0
0
3
8
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
Berth 1 Support of Excavation ...........
3
8
0..201158
5
5
0
0
0
2 Rotary Drill ........
2 Rotary Drill ........
2 DTH Cluster Drill
R .....................
1 .....................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Total
production
days
Activity
ID
2 .....................
3 .....................
4 .....................
5 .....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile Driving.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile Driving.
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Density
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
Year
2
Total
31MRR3
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
19527
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 14—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF HARBOR SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY—Continued
Activity
ID
Year/
activity
6 .....................
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2 DTH Mono-hammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile Driving.
2 Rotary Drill ........
7 .....................
8 .....................
9 .....................
2 Rotary Drill ........
2 Rotary Drill ........
10 ...................
11 ...................
12 ...................
13 ...................
2 DTH Cluster Drill
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2 DTH Mono-hammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile Driving.
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
14 ...................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
15 ...................
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
16 ...................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
17 ...................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
2–3 Rotary Drill ....
18 ...................
19 ...................
20 ...................
21 ...................
22 ...................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
23 ...................
24 ...................
25 ...................
26 ...................
27 ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2–3 DTH Monohammer.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2–3 Impact Pile
Driving.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Purpose
Density
Total
production
days
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Year
2
Total
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Mechanical Rock Removal (700 cy)
at Berth 11 Basin Floor.
Relief Holes at Berth 11 Basin Floor
3
60
0.417417
75
75
0
0
0
3
35
0.014413
1
1
0
0
0
Install Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
Temporary Cofferdam Extension .......
3
4
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
0.201158
2
2
0
0
0
Gantry Crane Support—Install Outer
Casing.
Gantry Crane Support—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Gantry Crane Support—Remove
Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support Piles ...............
Mechanical Rock Removal (300 cy)
at Berth 1 Basin Floor.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Rock Anchors.
Center Wall Tie-In to Existing West
Closure Wall.
Center Wall Tie-in to West Closure
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North TemporaryWork
Trestle.
Remove Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles (Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—PreDrill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1 North ......
3
16
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
16
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
16
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
80
25
0.417417
0.417417
100
31
100
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
25
0.022912
2
2
0
0
0
3
4
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
0.201158
2
2
0
0
0
3
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
70
0.417417
88
53
35
0
0
3
20
0.000002
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
135
0.417417
169
101
68
0
0
3
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
150
0.417417
188
113
75
0
0
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock 1
North.
Berth 11 End Wall Temporary Guide
Wall.
Remove Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Remove Berth 1 Emergency Repairs
3
23
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
23
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
23
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
196
0.417417
245
147
98
0
0
3
10
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000136
0
0
0
0
0
Removal of Emergency Repair Concrete (500 cy) at Berth 1.
Center Wall Foundation Rock Anchors.
Dry Dock 1 North—Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing
Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Remove Center Wall Tie-in to Existing Wall.
Remove Temporary Cofferdam .........
3
15
0.417417
19
19
0
0
0
3
36
0.022912
2
1
1
0
0
3
3
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
12
0.000032
0
0
0
0
0
3
12
0.090757
3
2
1
0
0
3
3
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
12
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
12
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19528
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 14—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF HARBOR SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY—Continued
Activity
ID
Year/
activity
Purpose
28 ...................
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
Remove Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Temporary
Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—Install
Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—PreDrill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1 West .......
29 ...................
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
30 ...................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
31 ...................
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
32 ...................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
33 ...................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
3–4 Rotary Drill ....
34 ...................
35 ...................
Total ........
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 DTH Monohammer.
4–5 DTH Monohammer.
..............................
Density
Total
production
days
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Year
2
Total
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
3
2
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
70
0.417417
88
0
44
44
0
3
20
0.000002
0
0
0
0
0
3
22
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
22
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
22
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
165
0.417417
206
0
103
103
0
3
23
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
23
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
23
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
3
196
0.417417
245
0
122
123
0
3
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
3
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock 1
West.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles (Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1North Rock Anchors ........
3
135
0.417417
169
0
84
85
0
3
18
0.022912
1
0
1
0
0
Dry Dock 1 West Rock Anchors ........
3
18
0.022912
1
0
0
0
1
............................................................
............
....................
....................
2,018
999
663
355
1
* Note:
for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
Although no construction activity is
currently planned for the final year of
the LOA period (construction year 6),
potential schedule slips may occur as a
result of equipment failure, inclement
weather, or other unforeseen events.
However, potential takes that could
occur during year 6 as a result of delays
to activities scheduled for years 2–5 are
accounted for through the analyses for
those years, and no additional take is
authorized.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Gray Seal
Gray seals may be present year-round
in the project vicinity, with consistent
densities throughout the year. Gray seals
are less common in the Piscataqua River
than the harbor seal. A total of nine
sightings of gray seals were recorded
during P–310 construction monitoring
(NAVFAC, 2021, 2022). Density
estimates of gray seals were based on
the Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements
(24 observations of gray seals during
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
year 1 and 12 observations of gray seals
during year 2 [36 total] over 322 days)
and P–310 project construction
monitoring (47 observations of gray
seals during year 1 and 21 observations
of gray seals during year 2 [68 total] over
349 days) and was estimated to be 0.2/
km2 (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019;
NAVFAC, 2021, 2022). These data were
preferred in this analysis over the more
general density data from the NMSDD.
Takes by Level A harassment were
calculated for gray seals where the
density of animals (0.2 gray seals/km2)
was multiplied by the harassment zone
and the number of days per construction
activity. This method was deemed to be
inappropriate by the Navy for
calculating takes by Level B harassment
for gray seals as it produced take that
were fewer than the number of gray
seals that has been previously observed
in the Navy’s monitoring reports.
Therefore, the Navy proposed (and
NMFS concurred), to increase the take
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
by Level B harassment to more
accurately reflect gray seal observations
in the monitoring reports, by using the
value of 0.2 gray seals a day multiplied
by the total number of construction days
(i.e., 349 days) resulting in 70 takes by
Level B harassment authorized per year.
This method is consistent with the
methodology used to estimate takes by
Level B harassment in IHA issued by
NMFS for the first year of P–381
construction activities (87 FR 19866;
April 6, 2022).
Additional takes by Level B
harassment may occur during the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills
and a DTH mono-hammer in
construction years 3 and 4 and the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills in
construction year 4. The simultaneous
use of two rotary drills will result in two
additional Level B takes of gray seals.
The simultaneous use of two rotary
drills and a DTH mono-hammer will
result in one additional Level B take of
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19529
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
gray seals. Note, the use of cluster drills
and rock hammers in construction years
2 and 3 result in the entire ROI being
ensonified to Level A harassment
thresholds; therefore, there will be no
change to the size of the harassment
zones from concurrent construction
activities during these years and thus no
need to request additional takes. To
account for concurrent activities in
construction years 3 and 4, the Navy
requested additional takes by Level B
harassment to the take numbers (one
gray seal in construction year 3 and
three gray seals in construction year 4).
Therefore the Navy requests and NMFS
authorizes 70 takes by Level B takes for
gray seals in construction year 2, 71
takes by Level B harassment for gray
seals in construction year 3, 73 takes by
Level B harassment for gray seals in
construction year 4, and 70 takes by
Level B harassment for gray seals in
construction year 5 (note the division of
takes over the construction years is
summarized in Table 12).
Take by Level A harassment of gray
seals is shown in Table 15 below. Note
that where the Level A harassment zone
is as large as the Level B harassment
zone and fills the entire potentially
ensonified area, the enumerated takes in
the Level A harassment column may be
in the form of Level A harassment and/
or Level B harassment, but will be
authorized as takes by Level A
harassment. The authorized takes by
Level B harassment are not included in
Table 15 as they were calculated by a
different method (i.e., by using the value
of 0.2 gray seals observed a day
multiplied by the total number of
construction days; i.e., 349 days).
TABLE 15—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF GRAY SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY
Activity ID
A ...................
Year/activity
2 Rotary Drill ......
2 Rotary Drill ......
2 Rotary Drill ......
R ...................
1 ....................
2 ....................
3 ....................
4 ....................
5 ....................
6 ....................
7 ....................
8 ....................
9 ....................
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2–3 Hydraulic
Rock Hammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2 DTH Monohammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2 Rotary Drill ......
2 Rotary Drill ......
2 Rotary Drill ......
10 ..................
11 ..................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
12 ..................
13 ..................
2 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2 DTH Monohammer.
2 Vibratory Pile
Driving.
2 Impact Pile
Driving.
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
14 ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Purpose
Total
production
days
Density
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Center Wall—Install Foundation
Support Piles.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install
Temporary Cofferdam.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance—Install
Temporary Cofferdam.
Shutter Panel Demolition (112
panels).
Remove Berth 1 Sheet Piles .........
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Total
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
0.2
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
117
0.417417
10
10
0
0
0
0.2
6
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
6
0.364953
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
56
0.417417
5
5
0
0
0
0.2
42
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
47
0.417417
4
3
1
0
0
0.2
74
0.417417
6
5
1
0
0
0.2
8
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
8
0.201158
0
0
0
0
0
Mechanical Rock Removal (700
cy) at Berth 11 Basin Floor.
Relief Holes at Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
Install Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
Temporary Cofferdam Extension ...
0.2
60
0.417417
5
5
0
0
0
0.2
35
0.014413
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
4
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
4
0.201158
0
0
0
0
0
Gantry Crane Support—Install
Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support—Pre-Drill
Socket.
Gantry Crane Support—Remove
Outer Casing.
Gantry Crane Support Piles ...........
0.2
16
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
16
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
16
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
80
0.417417
7
7
0
0
0
0.2
25
0.417417
2
2
0
0
0
0.2
25
0.022912
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
4
0.000078
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
4
0.201158
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
70
0.417417
6
4
2
0
0
0.2
20
0.000002
0
0
0
0
0
Removal of Granite Quay Wall
(2,800 cy).
Berth 1 Top of Wall Demolition for
Waler Install (320 lf).
Install Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Berth 1 Support of Excavation .......
Mechanical Rock Removal (300
cy) at Berth 1 Basin Floor.
Dry Dock 1 North Entrance Rock
Anchors.
Center Wall Tie- In to Existing
West Closure Wall.
Center Wall Tie-in to West Closure
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work
Trestle.
Remove Dry Dock 1 North Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19530
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 15—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF GRAY SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY—Continued
Activity ID
15 ..................
Year/activity
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
16 ..................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
17 ..................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
2–3 Rotary Drill ..
18 ..................
19 ..................
20 ..................
21 ..................
22 ..................
23 ..................
24 ..................
25 ..................
26 ..................
27 ..................
28 ..................
29 ..................
2–3 DTH Cluster
Drill.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Vibratory Extraction.
2 Hydraulic Rock
Hammer.
2–3 DTH Monohammer.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory
Pile Driving.
2–3 Impact Pile
Driving.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
2–3 Vibratory Extraction.
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
30 ..................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
31 ..................
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
32 ..................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
33 ..................
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Purpose
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles
(Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 North Wall Shafts—
Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1 North ..
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 North Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock 1
North.
Berth 11 End Wall Temporary
Guide Wall.
Remove Berth 1 Support of Excavation.
Remove Berth 1 Emergency Repairs.
Removal of Emergency Repair
Concrete (500 cy) at Berth 1.
Center Wall Foundation Rock Anchors.
Dry Dock North-Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing
Wall.
Center Wall East Tie-in to Existing
Wall.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to West Closure Wall.
Remove Center Wall Tie-in to Existing Wall.
Remove Temporary Cofferdam .....
Remove Temporary Cofferdam Extension.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle—Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Temporary Work
Trestle.
Dry Dock 1 West Remove Temporary Work Trestle Piles.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Dry Dock 1 West Wall Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Wall Shafts for Dry Dock 1 West ...
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill Sockets.
Dry Dock 1 West Foundation
Shafts—Remove Outer Casing.
Foundation Shafts for Dry Dock 1
West.
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Install Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles—
Pre-Drill Socket.
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Total
production
days
Density
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Total
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
0.2
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
135
0.417417
11
7
4
0
0
0.2
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
150
0.417417
13
8
5
0
0
0.2
23
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
23
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
23
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
196
0.417417
16
10
6
0
0
0.2
10
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
5
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000136
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
15
0.417417
1
1
0
0
0
0.2
36
0.022912
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
3
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
12
0.000032
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
12
0.090757
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
3
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
12
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
12
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
2
0.0002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
20
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
70
0.417417
6
0
3
3
0
0.2
20
0.000002
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
22
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
22
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
22
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
165
0.417417
14
0
7
7
0
0.2
23
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
23
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
23
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
196
0.417417
16
0
8
8
0
0.2
18
0.000005
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
18
0.000091
0
0
0
0
0
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19531
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 15—ESTIMATED TAKE BY LEVEL A HARASSMENT OF GRAY SEAL BY PROJECT ACTIVITY—Continued
Activity ID
Year/activity
Purpose
3–4 Rotary Drill ..
34 ..................
35 ..................
Total ......
3–4 DTH Cluster
Drill.
3–4 DTH Monohammer.
4–5 DTH Monohammer.
............................
Total
production
days
Density
Dry Dock 1 North Leveling Piles—
Remove Outer Casing.
Dry Dock 1 West Leveling Piles
(Diving Board Shafts).
Dry Dock 1 North Rock Anchors ...
Level A
harassment
zone
(km 2)
Take by Level A harassment
Total
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
0.2
18
0.000001
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
135
0.417417
11
0
6
5
0
0.2
18
0.022912
0
0
0
0
0
Dry Dock 1 West Rock Anchors ....
0.2
18
0.022912
0
0
0
0
0
........................................................
....................
....................
....................
133
67
43
23
0
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy’s construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
Although no construction activity is
currently planned for the final year of
the LOA period (construction year 6),
potential schedule slips may occur as a
result of equipment failure, inclement
weather, or other unforeseen events.
However, potential takes that could
occur during year 6 as a result of delays
to activities scheduled for years 2–5 are
accounted for through the analyses for
those years, and no additional take is
authorized.
Hooded Seal
Hooded seals may be present in the
project vicinity from January through
May, though their exact seasonal
densities are unknown. In general,
hooded seals are much rarer than the
harbor seal and gray seal in the
Piscataqua River. NMFS authorized one
take by Level B harassment per month
from January to May of a hooded seal for
the Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements
Construction project (NMFS, 2018b) and
for P–310 (Super Flood Basin) (NMFS,
2016; NMFS, 2019; NMFS, 2021c). To
date, the monitoring for those projects
and for the density surveys have not
recorded a sighting of hooded seal in the
project area (Cianbro, 2018; NAVFAC
Mid-Atlantic, 2018, 2019b; Navy 2019;
NAVFAC, 2021, 2022). In order to guard
against the potential for unauthorized
take, the Navy again requested one take
by Level B harassment of hooded seal
per month (between the months of
January and May) for each construction
year. Therefore NMFS authorizes five
takes by Level B harassment per year.
Given the size of the shutdown zones in
relation to the Level A harassment
isopleths (see the Mitigation section
below), NMFS also authorizes five takes
by Level A harassment per year to
safeguard against unauthorized take of
hooded seals that may occur unnoticed
in the Level A harassment zone for
sufficient duration to incur PTS.
Harp Seal
In general, harp seals are much rarer
than the harbor seal and gray seal in the
Piscataqua River. Harp seals were not
observed during marine mammal
monitoring or survey events that took
place in 2017, 2018, or 2021 (Cianbro,
2018; NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, 2018,
2019b; Navy, 2019; NAVFAC, 2021,
2022); however, two harp seals (n=2)
were observed in the River in 2020
(Stantec, 2020), and another harp seal
was observed in 2016 (NAVFAC MidAtlantic, 2016; NMFS, 2016). As above
for hooded seals, NMFS is authorizing
one take by Level B harassment of harp
seal per month of construction (between
the months of January and May) for each
construction year as was authorized by
NMFS for the Berth 11 Waterfront
Improvements Project (NMFS, 2018b)
and for P–310 (Super Flood Basin)
construction activities (NMFS, 2019,
2021a). Harp seals may occur in the area
from January through May. Anticipating
one Level B harassment harp seal take
per month for 5 months per year during
in-water construction will guard against
potential unauthorized take of this
species. Given the size of the shutdown
zones in relation to the Level A
harassment isopleths (see the Mitigation
section below), NMFS also authorizes
five takes by Level A harassment per
year to safeguard against unauthorized
take of harp seals that may occur
unnoticed in the Level A harassment
zone for sufficient duration to incur
PTS.
Table 16 below summarizes the
authorized take for all the species
described above as a percentage of stock
abundance.
TABLE 16—AUTHORIZED TAKE AS A PERCENTAGE OF STOCK ABUNDANCE
Construction year
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
2—Apr 2023–Mar
2024.
3—Apr 2024–Mar
2025.
4—Apr 2025–Mar
2026.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Authorized
take by
Level A
harassment
Authorized
take by
Level B
harassment
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
13
3
16
0.02
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
Hooded seal ...........
Harbor porpoise ......
Western North Atlantic (61,336) ..............
Western North Atlantic (451,600) ............
Western North Atlantic (7.6 million) .........
Western North Atlantic (593,500) ............
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
999
67
5
5
10
1,047
70
5
5
2
2,046
137
10
10
12
3.33
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
Hooded seal ...........
Harbor porpoise ......
Western North Atlantic (61,336) ..............
Western North Atlantic (451,600) ............
Western North Atlantic (7.6 million) .........
Western North Atlantic (593,500) ............
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
663
43
5
5
6
1,069
71
5
5
0
1,732
114
10
10
6
2.82
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
Species
Stock (NEST)
Harbor porpoise ......
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Total
authorized
take
Percent
of stock
19532
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 16—AUTHORIZED TAKE AS A PERCENTAGE OF STOCK ABUNDANCE—Continued
Construction year
5—Apr 2026–Mar
2027.
6—Apr 2027–Mar
2028.
Total Authorized
Take 1.
Authorized
take by
Level A
harassment
Authorized
take by
Level B
harassment
Western North Atlantic (61,336) ..............
Western North Atlantic (451,600) ............
Western North Atlantic (7.6 million) .........
Western North Atlantic (593,500) ............
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
355
23
5
5
0
1,097
73
5
5
0
1,452
96
10
10
0
2.37
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
0
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
Hooded seal ...........
Harbor porpoise ......
Western North Atlantic (61,336) ..............
Western North Atlantic (451,600) ............
Western North Atlantic (7.6 million) .........
Western North Atlantic (593,500) ............
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
1
0
5
5
0
1,047
70
5
5
0
1,048
70
10
10
0
1.71
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
Hooded seal ...........
Harbor porpoise ......
Western North Atlantic (61,336) ..............
Western North Atlantic (451,600) ............
Western North Atlantic (7.6 million) .........
Western North Atlantic (593,500) ............
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy (95,543) ......
0
0
0
0
29
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
34
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
NA
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
Hooded seal ...........
Western
Western
Western
Western
2,018
133
25
25
4,260
284
25
25
6,278
438
50
50
NA
NA
NA
NA
Species
Stock (NEST)
Harbor seal .............
Gray seal ................
Harp seal ................
≤Hooded seal .........
Harbor porpoise ......
North
North
North
North
Atlantic
Atlantic
Atlantic
Atlantic
(61,336) ..............
(451,600) ............
(7.6 million) .........
(593,500) ............
Total
authorized
take
Percent
of stock
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
1 The total authorized take does not include take that may occur in year 6 as a result of schedule delays, as these potential takes are already
accounted for in previous years.
Mitigation
In order to issue an LOA under
section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to the
activity, and other means of effecting
the least practicable impact on the
species or stock and its habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
the species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses (latter not applicable
for this action). NMFS regulations
require applicants for incidental take
authorizations to include information
about the availability and feasibility
(economic and technological) of
equipment, methods, and manner of
conducting the activity or other means
of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or
stocks, and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or
may not be appropriate to ensure the
least practicable adverse impact on
species or stocks and their habitat, as
well as subsistence uses where
applicable, NMFS considers two
primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is
expected to reduce impacts to marine
mammals, marine mammal species or
stocks, and their habitat. This considers
the nature of the potential adverse
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
impact being mitigated (likelihood,
scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be
effective if implemented (probability of
accomplishing the mitigating result if
implemented as planned), the
likelihood of effective implementation
(probability implemented as planned),
and;
(2) The practicability of the measures
for applicant implementation, which
may consider such things as cost,
impact on operations.
The following mitigation measures
apply to the Navy’s in-water
construction activities.
General
In-water construction activities must
be halted upon observation of either a
species for which incidental take is not
authorized or a species for which
incidental take has been authorized but
the authorized number of takes has been
met, entering or within the harassment
zone. If such circumstances recur, the
Navy will consult with NMFS
concerning the potential need for an
additional take authorization.
Coordination
The Navy shall conduct briefings
between construction supervisors and
crews, the marine mammal monitoring
team, and Navy staff prior to the start of
in-water construction activities and
when new personnel join the work, to
ensure that responsibilities,
communication procedures, marine
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
mammal monitoring protocols, and
operational procedures are clearly
understood.
Soft Start
The Navy shall use soft start
techniques when impact pile driving.
The objective of a soft start is to provide
a warning and/or give animals in close
proximity to pile-driving a chance to
leave the area prior to an impact driver
operating at full capacity, thereby
exposing fewer animals to loud
underwater and airborne sounds. Soft
start requires contractors to provide an
initial set of strikes from the impact
hammer at reduced energy, followed by
a 30-second waiting period, then two
subsequent reduced-energy strike sets.
Note the number of strikes will vary at
reduced energy because raising the
hammer at less than full power and then
releasing it results in the hammer
‘‘bouncing’’ as it strikes the pile,
resulting in multiple ‘‘strikes.’’ A soft
start will be implemented at the start of
each day’s impact pile driving and at
any time following cessation of impact
pile driving for a period of 30 minutes
or longer. Soft start is not applicable to
other in-water construction activities.
Bubble Curtain
During construction of the
multifunctional expansion of Dry Dock
1, portions of the west closure wall and/
or the super flood basin caisson gate
may not be in place. A bubble curtain
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19533
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
will be installed across the entrance
openings to mitigate underwater noise
impacts outside of the basin for those
activities where Level A harassment
thresholds are achieved across the entire
ROI (i.e., cluster drill and hydraulic rock
hammering (Table 7)). A bubble curtain
similar to the one employed during P–
310 blasting activities and proposed for
use during P–381 year 1 construction
will be used to minimize potential
impacts outside of the basin.
Hydroacoustic monitoring will be
conducted inside of the bubble curtain
to measure construction generated noise
levels. Should the results of the
recordings inside the bubble curtain
show that the source levels do not result
in the Level A harassment thresholds
being achieved across the entire ROI by
the activity occurring, upon review of
the data by NMFS, the Navy may
discontinue use of the bubble curtain for
those activities that are not actually
exceeding thresholds. The bubble
curtain must adhere to the following
restrictions:
• The bubble curtain must distribute
air bubbles across 100 percent of the
entrance openings for the full depth of
the water column;
• The lowest bubble ring must be in
contact with the substrate for the full
extent of the curtain, and the weights
attached to the bottom of the curtain
must ensure 100 percent substrate
contact. No parts of the curtain or other
objects shall prevent full substrate
contact; and
• Air flow to the bubblers must be
balanced around the entrance openings
to the superflood basin.
Avoiding Direct Physical Interaction
During all in-water construction
activities, in order to prevent injury
from physical interaction with
construction equipment, a shutdown
zone of 10 m (33 ft) will be
implemented. If a marine mammal
comes within 10 m (33 ft) of such
activity, operations shall cease and
vessels will reduce speed to the
minimum level required to maintain
steerage and safe working conditions. If
human safety is at risk, the in-water
activity will be allowed to continue
until it is safe to stop.
Shutdown Zones
The Navy shall establish shutdown
zones for all in-water construction
activities. The purpose of a shutdown
zone is generally to define an area
within which shutdown of the activity
would occur upon sighting of a marine
mammal (or in anticipation of an animal
entering the defined area). Shutdown
zones will vary based on the activity
type and marine mammal hearing group
(Table 17). The shutdown zone
distances for rock hammering, impact
pile-driving of sheet piles, and DTH
excavation (200 m (656 ft) for harbor
porpoise and 50 m (164 ft) for seals) are
consistent with those implemented for
the same activities for P–381 year 1
construction activities (NMFS, 2022a;
87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022). NMFS has
determined that these shutdown zones
represent the largest area that can
practicably be monitored.
TABLE 17—PILE DRIVING SHUTDOWN ZONE AND MONITORING ZONES DURING PROJECT ACTIVITIES
Shutdown zone
(m)
LOA year
Harbor
porpoise
2 ...................................
2 ...................................
2 ...................................
2/3 ................................
2/3 ................................
2 ...................................
2 ...................................
2/3 ................................
2 ...................................
2/3/4/5 ..........................
2/3/4 .............................
2/3/4 .............................
2/3/4 .............................
2/3/4 .............................
Monitoring
zone 1
(km2)
Activity, size, and component
Rock Hammering 2 ................................................................................
Impact Pile Driving—8 sheet piles per day ...........................................
Impact Pile Driving—4 sheet piles per day ...........................................
Impact Pile Driving—2 sheet piles per day ...........................................
Vibratory Pile Driving/Extraction—8 sheet piles per day ......................
Vibratory Pile Driving/Extraction—6 sheet piles per day ......................
Vibratory Pile Driving/Extraction—4 sheet piles per day ......................
Vibratory Pile Driving/Extraction—2 sheet piles per day ......................
DTH mono-hammer 4–6 inch relief holes .............................................
DTH mono-hammer 9-inch rock anchors for tie-downs ........................
Rotary Drilling—1 hour to set casings ..................................................
Rotary drilling—9 hours to drill socket ..................................................
Rotary Drilling—15 minutes to remove casings and temporary work
trestle piles.
Cluster Drilling 2 .....................................................................................
Seals
200
200
200
200
20
20
15
10
180
200
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
ROI.3
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
ROI.4
200
50
ROI.3 4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
1 In instances where the harassment zone is larger than the region of influence (ROI), the entire ROI is indicated as the limit of monitoring (see
Figure 1–3 in the Navy’s application).
2 Activities will employ a bubble curtain to reduce underwater noise impacts outside of the basin.
3 The entire ROI will be ensonified to the Level A threshold.
4 The entire ROI will be ensonified to the Level B threshold.
The Navy must delay or shutdown inwater construction activities should a
marine mammal approach or enter the
appropriate shutdown zone. The Navy
may resume activities after one of the
following conditions have been met: (1)
the animal is observed exiting the
shutdown zone; (2) the animal is
thought to have exited the shutdown
zone based on a determination of its
course, speed, and movement relative to
the pile driving location; or (3) the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
shutdown zone has been clear from any
additional sightings for 15 minutes.
Protected Species Observers
The Navy shall employ at least three
protected species observers (PSOs) to
monitor marine mammal presence in
the action area during all in-water
construction activities. Additional PSOs
may be added if warranted by site
conditions (rough seas, rain) and the
level of marine mammal activity. All
PSOs will be approved by NMFS and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the Navy prior to starting work as a
PSO. PSOs must track marine mammals
observed anywhere within their visual
range relative to in-water construction
activities, and estimate the amount of
time a marine mammal spends within
the Level A or Level B harassment zones
while construction activities are
underway.
Monitoring must take place from 30
minutes prior to initiation of pile
driving or drilling activity (i.e., pre-start
clearance monitoring) through 30
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19534
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
minutes post-completion of pile driving
or drilling activity. Pre-start clearance
monitoring must be conducted for 30
minutes to ensure that the shutdown
zones indicated in Table 17 are clear of
marine mammals, and pile driving or
drilling may commence when observers
have declared the shutdown zone clear
of marine mammals. Monitoring must
occur throughout the time required to
drive/drill a pile. If work ceases for
more than 30 minutes, the pre-start
clearance monitoring of the shutdown
zones must commence. A determination
that the shutdown zone is clear must be
made during a period of good visibility
(i.e., the entire shutdown zone and
surrounding waters must be visible to
the naked eye).
The placement of PSOs during all pile
driving and drilling activities (described
in the Monitoring and Reporting
section) must ensure that the entire
shutdown zone and Level A harassment
zone is visible during pile driving and
drilling. Should environmental
conditions deteriorate such that marine
mammals within the entire shutdown
zone or Level A harassment zone will
not be visible (e.g., fog, heavy rain), inwater construction activities must be
delayed until the PSO is confident
marine mammals within the shutdown
zone or Level A harassment zone could
be detected. However, if work on a pile
has already begun, work is allowed to
continue until that pile is installed.
If an in-water construction activity is
delayed or halted due to the presence of
a marine mammal, the activity may not
commence or resume until either the
animal has voluntarily exited and been
visually confirmed beyond the
shutdown zone indicated in Table 17 or
15 minutes have passed without redetection of the animal. If in-water
construction activities cease for more
than 30 minutes, the pre-activity
monitoring of the shutdown zone must
commence.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s planned measures, NMFS
has determined that the mitigation
measures provide the means of effecting
the least practicable impact on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an LOA for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(A) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
The MMPA implementing regulations at
50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that
requests for authorizations must include
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
the suggested means of accomplishing
the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge
of the species and of the level of taking
or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be
present while conducting the activities.
Effective reporting is critical both to
compliance as well as ensuring that the
most value is obtained from the required
monitoring.
Under the MMPA implementing
regulations, monitoring and reporting
requirements prescribed by NMFS
should contribute to improved
understanding of one or more of the
following:
• Occurrence of marine mammal
species or stocks in the area in which
take is anticipated (e.g., presence,
abundance, distribution, density);
• Nature, scope, or context of likely
marine mammal exposure to potential
stressors/impacts (individual or
cumulative, acute or chronic), through
better understanding of: (1) action or
environment (e.g., source
characterization, propagation, ambient
noise); (2) affected species (e.g., life
history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the
activity; or (4) biological or behavioral
context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or
feeding areas);
• Individual marine mammal
responses (behavioral or physiological)
to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or
cumulative), other stressors, or
cumulative impacts from multiple
stressors;
• How anticipated responses to
stressors impact either: (1) long-term
fitness and survival of individual
marine mammals; or (2) populations,
species, or stocks;
• Effects on marine mammal habitat
(e.g., marine mammal prey species,
acoustic habitat, or other important
physical components of marine
mammal habitat); and,
• Mitigation and monitoring
effectiveness.
The Navy shall submit a Marine
Mammal Monitoring Plan to NMFS for
approval in advance of the start of the
construction covered by this rule. The
plan will incorporate all monitoring and
mitigation measures and reporting
requirements of the incidental take
regulations.
Monitoring Zones
The Navy shall conduct monitoring to
include the entire ROI, which includes
the area within the Level B harassment
zones (areas where SPLs are equal to or
exceed the 160 dB RMS threshold for
impact driving and hydraulic rock
hammering, and the 120 dB RMS
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
threshold during vibratory pile driving,
rotary drilling, and DTH) (see Table 7
and 8). These monitoring zones provide
utility for monitoring conducted for
mitigation purposes (i.e., shutdown
zone monitoring) by establishing
monitoring protocols for areas adjacent
to the shutdown zones. Monitoring of
these zones enables observers to be
aware of and communicate the presence
of marine mammals in the project area,
but outside the shutdown zone, and
thus prepare for potential shutdowns of
activity.
Protected Species Observer (PSO)
Monitoring Requirements and Locations
PSOs shall be responsible for
monitoring the shutdown zones, the
monitoring zones and the pre-clearance
zones, as well as effectively
documenting takes by Level A and B
harassment. As described in more detail
in the Marine Mammal Monitoring
Reporting section below, they shall also
(1) document the frequency at which
marine mammals are present in the
project area, (2) document behavior and
group composition, (3) record all
construction activities, and (4)
document observed reactions (changes
in behavior or movement) of marine
mammals during each sighting. The
PSOs shall monitor for marine mammals
during all in-water construction
activities associated with the project.
The Navy shall monitor the project area
to the extent possible based on the
required number of PSOs, required
monitoring locations, and
environmental conditions. Visual
monitoring shall be conducted by three
PSOs. It is assumed that three PSOs
shall be located on boats, docks, or piers
sufficient to monitor the respective ROIs
given the abundance of suitable vantage
points (see Figure 11–1 of the Navy’s
application). The PSOs must record all
observations of marine mammals,
regardless of distance from the in-water
construction activity.
Monitoring of in-water construction
activities shall be conducted by
qualified, PSOs. The Navy shall adhere
to the following conditions when
selecting PSOs:
D PSOs must be independent (i.e., not
construction personnel) and have no
other assigned tasks during monitoring
periods;
D At least one PSO must have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activities
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization;
D Other PSOs may substitute other
relevant experience, education (degree
in biological science or related field), or
training;
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
D Where a team of three PSOs are
required, a lead observer or monitoring
coordinator shall be designated. The
lead observer must have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization; and
D PSOs must be approved by NMFS
prior to beginning any activity subject to
this rule.
The Navy will ensure that the PSOs
have the following additional
qualifications:
D Visual acuity in both eyes
(correction is permissible) sufficient for
discernment of moving targets at the
water’s surface with ability to estimate
target size and distance; use of
binoculars may be necessary to correctly
identify the target;
D Experience and ability to conduct
field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols;
D Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals,
including the identification of
behaviors;
D Sufficient training, orientation, or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations;
D Writing skills sufficient to prepare a
report of observations including but not
limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and
times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times,
and reason for implementation of
mitigation (or why mitigation was not
implemented when required); and
marine mammal behavior; and
D Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real-time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
Hydroacoustic Monitoring
The Navy shall conduct a sound
source verification (SSV) study effort to
measure SPLs from in-water
construction activities not previously
monitored as part of P–310 or as part of
P–381 year 1 construction. The Navy
will collect and evaluate acoustic sound
record levels for the rock excavation
(rotary drilling or DTH excavation)
activities conducted up to a maximum
limit of 10 piles/holes. One hydrophone
will be placed at locations 10 m (33 ft)
from the noise source and a second
hydrophone will be placed at a
representative monitoring location at an
intermediate distance between the
cetacean and phocid shutdown zones.
These locations will be adhered to as
practicable given safety considerations
and levels of activity in the basin. For
the 10 rock excavation (rotary drilling or
DTH excavation) events acoustically
measured, 100 percent of the data will
be analyzed.
19535
At a minimum, the methodology
includes:
D For underwater recordings, a
stationary hydrophone system with the
ability to measure SPLs will be placed
in accordance with NMFS’ most recent
guidance for the collection of source
levels (NMFS, 2012).
D Hydroacoustic monitoring will be
conducted for each type of activity not
previously monitored under P–310 or
the P–381 year 1 IHA up to a maximum
limit of 10 piles/holes (Table 18).
Monitoring will occur from the same
locations approved by NMFS for P–310
construction activities. The resulting
data set will be analyzed to examine and
confirm sound pressure levels and rates
of TL for each separate in-water
construction activity. With NMFS
concurrence, these measurements may
be used to recalculate the limits of
shutdown and Level A and Level B
harassment zones, as appropriate.
Hydrophones will be placed in the same
manner as for P–310 construction
activities. Locations of hydroacoustic
recordings will be collected via global
positioning system. A depth sounder
and/or weighted tape measure will be
used to determine the depth of the
water. The hydrophone will be attached
to a-weighted nylon cord or chain to
maintain a constant depth and distance
from the pile/drill/hammer location.
The nylon cord or chain will be
attached to a float or tied to a static line.
TABLE 18—HYDROACOUSTIC MONITORING SUMMARY
Number
installed/
removed
Pile type/shaft size
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
126-inch shaft ...............................................................
84-inch shaft .................................................................
108-inch shaft ...............................................................
84-inch shaft .................................................................
72-inch shaft .................................................................
D Each hydrophone will be calibrated
at the start of each action and will be
checked frequently to the applicable
standards of the hydrophone
manufacturer.
D For each monitored location, a
single hydrophone will be suspended
midway in the water column in order to
evaluate site-specific attenuation and
propagation characteristics that may be
present throughout the water column.
D Environmental data will be
collected, including but not limited to,
the following: wind speed and
direction, air temperature, humidity,
surface water temperature, water depth,
wave height, weather conditions, and
other factors that could contribute to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
138
148
46
40
16
Method of install/removal
Rotary Drill ....................................................................
Rotary Drill ....................................................................
DTH Cluster Drill ..........................................................
DTH Cluster Drill ..........................................................
DTH Cluster Drill ..........................................................
influencing the airborne and underwater
sound levels (e.g., aircraft, boats, etc.).
D The chief inspector will supply the
acoustics specialist with the substrate
composition, hammer/drill model and
size, hammer/drill energy settings,
depth of drilling, and boring rates and
any changes to those settings during the
monitoring.
D For acoustically monitored
construction activities, data from the
continuous monitoring locations will be
post-processed to obtain the following
sound measures:
Æ Maximum peak sound pressure
level recorded for all activities,
expressed in dB re 1 mPa. This
maximum value will originate from the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Number
monitored
10
10
10
10
10
phase of drilling/hammering during
which drill/hammer energy was also at
maximum (referred to as Level 4).
Æ From all activities occurring during
the Level 4 phase these additional
measures will be made, as appropriate:
D Mean, median, minimum, and
maximum RMS sound pressure level in
(dB re 1 mPa);
D Mean duration of a pile strike
(based on the 90 percent energy
criterion);
D Number of hammer strikes;
D Mean, median, minimum, and
maximum single strike SEL (dB re mPa2
sec);
Æ Median integration time used to
calculate SPL RMS (for vibration
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19536
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
monitoring, the time period selected is
1-second intervals. For impulsive
monitoring, the time period is 90
percent of the energy pulse duration).
Æ A frequency spectrum (power
spectral density) (dB re mPa2 per Hz)
based on all strikes with similar sound.
Spectral resolution will be 1 Hz, and the
spectrum will cover nominal range from
7 Hz to 20 kHz.
Æ Finally, the cumulative SEL will be
computed from all the strikes associated
with each pile occurring during all
phases, i.e., soft start, Level 1, to Level
4. This measure is defined as the sum
of all single strike SEL values. The sum
is taken of the antilog, with log10 taken
of result to express (dB re mPa2 sec).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Marine Mammal Monitoring Reporting
The Navy shall submit annual draft
reports to NMFS for each construction
year within 90 calendar days of the
completion of marine mammal
monitoring as well as a draft 5-year
comprehensive summary report at the
end of the project. The report(s) will
detail the monitoring protocol and
summarize the data recorded during
monitoring. Annual reports will also
include results from acoustic
monitoring (see below). Final annual
report(s) (each portion of the project and
comprehensive) must be prepared and
submitted to NMFS within 30 days
following resolution of any NMFS
comments on the draft reports. If no
comments are received from NMFS
within 30 days of receipt of the draft
report, the report shall be considered
final. If comments are received, a final
report addressing NMFS comments
must be submitted within 30 days after
receipt of comments.
A draft 5-year comprehensive
summary report shall be submitted to
NMFS 90 days after the expiration of the
regulations. The draft report will
synthesize the data recorded during
hydroacoustic and marine mammal
monitoring. NMFS will provide
comments within 30 days after receiving
this draft report, and the Navy will
address the comments and submit
revisions within 30 days of receipt. If no
comment is received from NMFS within
30 days, the draft report will be
considered as final.
All draft and final marine mammal
monitoring reports must be submitted to
PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov
and ITP.tyson.moore@noaa.gov. The
report must contain the following
informational elements, at minimum,
(and be included in the Marine Mammal
Monitoring Plan), including:
D Dates and times (begin and end) of
all marine mammal monitoring;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
D Construction activities occurring
during each daily observation period,
including:
Æ How many and what type of piles/
shafts were driven and by what method
(e.g., impact, vibratory, rotary drilling,
rock hammering, mono- or clusterDTH); and
Æ Total duration of driving time for
each pile/hole (vibratory driving, rotary
drilling) and number of strikes for each
pile/hole (impact driving, hydraulic
rock hammering); and
Æ For DTH excavation, the duration
of operation for both impulsive and
non-pulse components, as well as the
strike rate.
D PSO locations during marine
mammal monitoring;
D Environmental conditions during
monitoring periods (at beginning and
end of PSO shift and whenever
conditions change significantly),
including Beaufort sea state and any
other relevant weather conditions
including cloud cover, fog, sun glare,
and overall visibility to the horizon, and
estimated observable distance;
D Upon observation of a marine
mammal, the following information:
Æ PSO who sighted the animal and
PSO location and activity at time of
sighting;
Æ Time of sighting;
Æ Identification of the animal (e.g.,
genus/species, lowest possible
taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO
confidence in identification, and the
composition of the group if there is a
mix of species;
Æ Distance and bearing of each
marine mammal observed relative to the
in-water construction activity for each
sighting (if the in-water construction
was occurring at time of sighting);
Æ Estimated number of animals
(minimum/maximum/best);
Æ Estimated number of animals by
cohort (adults, juveniles, neonates,
group composition, etc.;
Æ Animal’s closest point of approach
and estimated time spent within each
harassment zone; and
Æ Description of any marine mammal
behavioral observations (e.g., observed
behaviors such as feeding or traveling),
including an assessment of behavioral
responses to the activity (e.g., no
response or changes in behavioral state
such as ceasing feeding, changing
direction, flushing, or breaching);
D Number of marine mammals
detected within the harassment zones,
by species;
D Detailed information about
implementation of any mitigation (e.g.,
shutdowns and delays), a description of
specific actions that ensued, and
resulting changes in behavior of the
animal, if any; and
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
D All PSO datasheets and/or raw
sightings data.
The draft and final reports must also
contain the informational elements
described in the Hydroacoustic
Monitoring Plan which, at minimum,
must include:
D Hydrophone equipment and
methods: recording device, sampling
rate, distance (m) from the pile where
recordings were made; depth of water
and recording device(s);
D Type and size of pile being driven,
substrate type, method of driving during
recordings (e.g., hammer model and
energy), and total pile driving duration;
D Whether a sound attenuation device
is used and, if so, a detailed description
of the device used and the duration of
its use per pile;
D For impact pile driving and/or DTH
excavation (DTH mono-hammer and
cluster drill) (per pile): Number of
strikes and strike rate; depth of substrate
to penetrate; pulse duration and mean,
median, and maximum sound levels (dB
re: 1 mPa): root mean square sound
pressure level (SPLrms); cumulative
sound exposure level (SELcum), peak
sound pressure level (SPLpeak), and
single-strike sound exposure level
(SELs-s);
D For vibratory driving/removal and/
or DTH excavation (DTH mono-hammer
and cluster drill) (per pile): Duration of
driving per pile; mean, median, and
maximum sound levels (dB re: 1 mPa):
root mean square sound pressure level
(SPLrms), cumulative sound exposure
level (SELcum) (and timeframe over
which the sound is averaged);
D One-third octave band spectrum
and power spectral density plot; and
D General Daily Site Conditions;
Æ Date and time of activities;
Æ Water conditions (e.g., sea state,
tidal state); and
Æ Weather conditions (e.g., percent
cover, visibility).
Reporting of Injured or Dead Marine
Mammals
In the event that personnel involved
in the construction activities discover
an injured or dead marine mammal, the
Navy shall report the incident to NMFS
Office of Protected Resources (OPR)
(PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov),
NMFS (301–427–8401) and to the
Greater Atlantic Region New England/
Mid-Atlantic Stranding Coordinator
(866–755–6622) as soon as feasible. The
incident report must include the
following information:
D Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the first discovery (and
updated location information if known
and applicable);
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
D Species identification (if known) or
description of the animal(s) involved;
D Condition of the animal(s)
(including carcass condition if the
animal is dead);
D Observed behaviors of the
animal(s), if alive;
D If available, photographs or video
footage of the animal(s); and
D General circumstances under which
the animal was discovered.
If the death or injury was clearly
caused by the specified activity, the
Navy must immediately cease the
specified activities until NMFS OPR is
able to review the circumstances of the
incident and determine what, if any,
additional measures are appropriate to
ensure compliance with the terms of
this rule. The Navy shall not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS
that they can continue.
Negligible Impact Analysis and
Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact
as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival
(50 CFR 216.103). A negligible impact
finding is based on the lack of likely
adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of takes alone is not enough information
on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to
considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ‘‘taken’’
through harassment, NMFS considers
other factors, such as the likely nature
of any impacts or responses (e.g.,
intensity, duration), the context of any
impacts or responses (e.g., critical
reproductive time or location, foraging
impacts affecting energetics), as well as
effects on habitat, and the likely
effectiveness of the mitigation. We also
assess the number, intensity, and
context of estimated takes by evaluating
this information relative to population
status. Consistent with the 1989
preamble for NMFS’ implementing
regulations (54 FR 40338, September 29,
1989), the impacts from other past and
ongoing anthropogenic activities are
incorporated into this analysis via their
impacts on the baseline (e.g., as
reflected in the regulatory status of the
species, population size and growth rate
where known, ongoing sources of
human-caused mortality, or ambient
noise levels).
To avoid repetition, this introductory
discussion of our analysis applies to all
the species listed in Table 3, given that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
many of the anticipated effects of this
project on different marine mammal
stocks are expected to be relatively
similar in nature. Where there are
meaningful differences between species
or stocks, or groups of species, in
anticipated individual responses to
activities, impact of expected take on
the population due to differences in
population status, or impacts on habitat,
they are described independently in the
analysis below.
Construction activities associated
with the project, as outlined previously,
have the potential to disturb or displace
marine mammals. Specifically, the
specified activities may result in take, in
the form of Level A and Level B
harassment from underwater sounds
generated by pile driving activities,
rotary drilling, rock hammering, and
DTH. Potential takes could occur if
marine mammals are present in zones
ensonified above the thresholds for
Level A and Level B harassment,
identified above, while activities are
underway.
The Navy’s activities and associated
impacts will occur within a limited,
confined area of the stocks’ range. Most
of the work will occur behind the
existing super flood basin walls that
will act as a barrier to sound and will
contain underwater noise to within a
small portion of the Piscataqua River.
The implementation of a soft start and
a bubble curtain during some activities,
along with other mitigation and
monitoring measures already described,
are expected to minimize the effects of
the expected takes on the affected
individuals. In addition, NMFS does not
anticipate that serious injury or
mortality will occur as a result of the
Navy’s construction activities given the
nature of the activity, even in the
absence of required mitigation.
Exposures to elevated sound levels
produced during pile driving and
drilling may cause behavioral
disturbance of some individuals. Effects
on individuals that are taken by Level
B harassment, as enumerated in the
Estimated Take section, on the basis of
reports in the literature as well as
monitoring from other similar activities,
will likely be limited to reactions such
as increased swimming speeds,
increased surfacing time, or decreased
foraging (if such activity were occurring)
(e.g., Thorson and Reyff, 2006). Marine
mammals within the Level B
harassment zones may not show any
visual cues they are disturbed by
activities or they could become alert,
avoid the area, leave the area, or display
other mild responses that are not
observable such as changes in
vocalization patterns or increased haul
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19537
out time (Thorson and Reyff, 2006). Data
from recent observations of harbor seals
in the project area support the
assumption that behavioral responses to
the Navy’s activities may be mild in
nature (Navy, 2022). The Navy has
observed 116 harbor seals in the project
since January 20, 2022. This includes
observations at the conclusion of P–310
construction (January to February 2022)
and the start of P–381 construction (May
2022 through October 16, 2022). Fortyeight of these observations occurred
during periods with active construction,
and the most common behavior
recorded (n=28; 58.3 percent) was no
response. The other common behaviors
noted for these observations were
swimming or milling (n=18; 37.5
percent), with notably lower
observations of retreat/flush behaviors
(n=1, 2.1 percent) (Navy, 2022).
Additionally, some of the species
present in the region will only be
present temporarily based on seasonal
patterns or during transit between other
habitats. These temporarily present
species will be exposed to even smaller
periods of noise-generating activity,
further decreasing the impacts. Most
likely, individual animals will simply
move away from the sound source and
be temporarily displaced from the area,
although even this reaction has been
observed primarily only in association
with impact pile driving. The activities
analyzed here are similar to numerous
other construction activities conducted
along both Atlantic and Pacific coasts,
which have taken place with no known
long-term adverse consequences from
behavioral harassment. These reactions
and behavioral changes are expected to
subside quickly when the exposures
cease. The intensity of Level B
harassment events will be minimized
through use of mitigation measures
described herein, including the soft
starts and the use of the bubble curtain,
which was not quantitatively factored
into the take estimates. The Navy will
use at least three PSOs stationed
strategically to increase detectability of
marine mammals during in-water
construction activities and removal,
enabling a high rate of success in
implementation of shutdowns to avoid
or minimize injury for most species.
Further, given the absence of any major
rookeries and only one isolated
pinniped haulout site at Hicks Rocks
approximately 2.4 km (1.5 mi) from the
project area, we assume that takes by
Level B harassment will have a
negligible short-term effect on
individuals and will not result in
population-level impacts.
Due to the levels and durations of
likely exposure, animals that experience
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
19538
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
PTS will likely only receive slight PTS,
i.e., minor degradation of hearing
capabilities within regions of hearing
that align most completely with the
frequency range of the energy produced
by the Navy’s activities (i.e., the lowfrequency region below 2 kHz), not
severe hearing impairment or
impairment in the reigns of greatest
hearing sensitivity. If hearing
impairment does occur, it is most likely
that the affected animal will lose a few
dBs in its hearing sensitivity, which in
most cases is not likely to meaningfully
affect its ability to forage and
communicate with conspecifics. Data do
not suggest that a single instance in
which an animal accrues PTS (or TTS)
and is subject to behavioral disturbance
would result in impacts to reproduction
or survival. If PTS were to occur, it will
be at a lower level likely to accrue to a
relatively small portion of the
population by being a stationary activity
in one particular location.
The project is also not expected to
have significant adverse effects on any
marine mammal habitat. The project
activities will not modify existing
marine mammal habitat since the
project will occur within the same
footprint as existing marine
infrastructure. Impacts to the immediate
substrate are anticipated, but these will
be limited to minor, temporary
suspension of sediments, which could
impact water quality and visibility for a
short amount of time, but which will
not be expected to have any effects on
individual marine mammals. The
nearshore and intertidal habitat where
the project will occur is an area of
consistent vessel traffic from Navy and
non-Navy vessels, and some local
individuals will likely be somewhat
habituated to the level of activity in the
area, further reducing the likelihood of
more severe impacts. The closest
pinniped haulout used by harbor and
gray seals is Hicks Rocks, located
approximately 2.4 km (1.5 mi) away on
the opposite side of the island and not
within the ensonified area. There are no
other biologically important areas for
marine mammals near the project area.
In addition, impacts to marine
mammal prey species are expected to be
minor and temporary. Overall, the area
impacted by the project is very small
compared to the available surrounding
habitat, and does not include habitat of
particular importance. The most likely
impact to prey will be temporary
behavioral avoidance of the immediate
area. During construction activities, it is
expected that some fish and marine
mammals will temporarily leave the
area of disturbance, thus impacting
marine mammals’ foraging
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
opportunities in a limited portion of the
foraging range. But, because of the
relatively small area of the habitat that
may be affected, the impacts to marine
mammal habitat are not expected to
cause significant or long-term negative
consequences.
In summary and as described above,
the following factors primarily support
our determination that the impacts
resulting from this activity are not
expected to adversely affect any of the
species or stocks through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival:
D No serious injury or mortality is
anticipated or authorized;
D Level A harassment is expected to
be of a lower degree that would not
impact the fitness of any animals;
D Anticipated incidents of Level B
harassment consist of, at worst,
temporary modifications in behavior;
D The required mitigation measures
(i.e., soft starts, bubble curtain,
shutdown zones) are expected to be
effective in reducing the effects of the
specified activity;
D Minimal impacts to marine
mammal habitat/prey are expected;
D There is one pinniped haulout in
the vicinity of the project area (Hicks
Rocks), but it is on the opposite side of
Seavey Island and not within the
ensonified area; and
D There are no known biologically
important areas in the vicinity of the
project.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
monitoring and mitigation measures,
NMFS finds that the total marine
mammal take from the Navy’s activities
will have a negligible impact on all
affected marine mammal species or
stocks.
Small Numbers
As noted previously, only small
numbers of incidental take may be
authorized under sections 101(a)(5)(A)
and (D) of the MMPA for specified
activities other than military readiness
activities. The MMPA does not define
small numbers and so, in practice,
where estimated numbers are available,
NMFS compares the number of
individuals taken to the most
appropriate estimation of abundance of
the relevant species or stock in our
determination of whether an
authorization is limited to small
numbers of marine mammals. When the
predicted number of individuals to be
taken is fewer than one-third of the
species or stock abundance, the take is
considered to be of small numbers.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Additionally, other qualitative factors
may be considered in the analysis, such
as the temporal or spatial scale of the
activities.
The maximum annual amount of take
NMFS has authorized is below one-third
of the estimated stock abundance for all
five species (see Table 16). The number
of animals authorized to be taken from
these stocks is considered small relative
to the relevant stock’s abundances even
if each estimated take occurred to a new
individual, which is an unlikely
scenario.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the Navy’s activities
(including the mitigation and
monitoring measures) and the
anticipated take of marine mammals,
NMFS finds that small numbers of
marine mammals will be taken relative
to the population size of the affected
species or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis
and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of the affected marine mammal stocks or
species implicated by this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
the total taking of affected species or
stocks will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
such species or stocks for taking for
subsistence purposes.
Adaptive Management
The regulations governing the take of
marine mammals incidental to Navy
construction activities will contain an
adaptive management component. The
reporting requirements associated with
this rule are designed to provide NMFS
with monitoring data from completed
projects to allow consideration of
whether any changes are appropriate.
The use of adaptive management allows
NMFS to consider new information
from different sources to determine
(with input from the Navy regarding
practicability) on an annual or biennial
basis if mitigation or monitoring
measures should be modified (including
additions or deletions). Mitigation
measures could be modified if new data
suggests that such modifications will
have a reasonable likelihood of reducing
adverse effects to marine mammals and
if the measures are practicable.
The following are some of the
possible sources of applicable data to be
considered through the adaptive
management process: (1) Results from
monitoring reports, as required by
MMPA authorizations; (2) results from
general marine mammal and sound
research; and (3) any information which
reveals that marine mammals may have
been taken in a manner, extent, or
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
number not authorized by these
regulations or subsequent LOAs.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS must review the
proposed action (i.e., the promulgation
of regulations and subsequent issuance
of LOAs) with respect to potential
impacts on the human environment.
This action is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion B4 (incidental
take authorizations with no anticipated
serious injury or mortality) of the
Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have
the potential for significant impacts on
the quality of the human environment
and for which we have not identified
any extraordinary circumstances that
would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
determined that the action qualifies to
be categorically excluded from further
review under NEPA.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal
agency ensure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
LOAs, NMFS consults internally
whenever we propose to authorize take
for endangered or threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed
species is authorized or expected to
result from this activity. Therefore,
NMFS has determined that formal
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
is not required for this action.
Classification
Pursuant to the procedures
established to implement Executive
Order 12866, the Office of Management
and Budget has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage that this action will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The Navy is the sole entity that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
will be subject to the requirements in
these regulations, and the Navy is not a
small governmental jurisdiction, small
organization, or small business, as
defined by the RFA. Because of this
certification, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
This rule does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
because the applicant is a Federal
agency.
Waiver of Delay in Effective Date
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries has determined that there is
good cause under the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C 553(d)(3)) to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of the measures contained in the
final rule. The Navy is the only entity
subject to these regulations, and it has
informed NMFS that it requests that this
final rule take effect by April 1, 2023,
when the IHA previously issued by
NMFS to govern the taking of marine
mammals incidental to U.S. Navy
construction of the multifunctional
expansion of Dry Dock 1 at Portsmouth
Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine (87 FR
19886, April 6, 2022) expires. Any delay
in promulgating the final rule could
result in a delay to the project schedule
that would extend the completion of the
project and cause further risks to the
Navy Fleet boat schedule. In addition,
in-water work at Dry Dock 1 is critical
to timely completion of the overall
project. Delaying the completion of
ongoing work will have increased risk
on other mission critical work, as some
of the construction components cannot
begin until others are started or in some
cases completed. Moreover, the
contractor is onsite and currently
working under an existing IHA (87 FR
19886, April 6, 2022), therefore, the
Navy is ready to operate under the LOA
immediately. For these reasons, the
Assistant Administrator finds good
cause to waive the 30-day delay in the
effective date. In addition, the rule
allows authorization of incidental take
of marine mammals that would
otherwise be prohibited under the
statute. Therefore, by granting an
exception to the Navy, the rule will
relieve restrictions under the MMPA,
which provides a separate basis for
waiving the 30-day effective date for the
rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 217
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians,
Labeling, Marine mammals, Penalties,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19539
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seafood, Transportation.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
NMFS amends 50 CFR part 217 as
follows:
PART 217—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKING AND
IMPORTING OF MARINE MAMMALS
1. The authority citation for part 217
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., unless
otherwise noted.
2. Add Subpart N to part 217 to read
as follows:
■
Subpart N—Taking and Importing
Marine Mammals Incidental to U.S.
Navy Construction at Portsmouth
Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine.
Sec.
217.130 Specified activity and geographical
region.
217.131 Effective dates.
217.132 Permissible methods of taking.
217.133 Prohibitions.
217.134 Mitigation requirements.
217.135 Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
217.136 Letters of Authorization.
217.137 Renewals and modifications of
Letters of Authorization.
217.138 [Reserved]
217.139 [Reserved]
§ 217.130 Specified activity and
geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply
only to taking of marine mammals by
the U.S. Navy (Navy) and those persons
it authorizes or funds to conduct
activities that occur incidental to
construction activities related to the
multifunctional expansion and
modification of Dry Dock 1 in the areas
outlined in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) The taking of marine mammals by
the Navy may be authorized in a Letter
of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs
at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery,
Maine.
§ 217.131
Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are
effective for a period of 5 years from the
date of issuance.
§ 217.132
Permissible methods of taking.
Under an LOA issued pursuant to
§ 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.136,
the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter
‘‘Navy’’) may incidentally, but not
intentionally, take marine mammals
within the area described in
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
19540
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
§ 217.130(b) by harassment associated
with construction activities related to
the multifunctional expansion and
modification of Dry Dock 1, provided
the activity is in compliance with all
terms, conditions, and requirements of
the regulations in this subpart and the
applicable LOA.
§ 217.133
Prohibitions.
(a) Except for the takings
contemplated in § 217.132 and
authorized by a LOA issued under
§ 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.136,
it is unlawful for any person to do any
of the following in connection with the
activities described in § 217.130:
(1) Violate, or fail to comply with, the
terms, conditions, and requirements of
this subpart or a LOA issued under
§ 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.136;
(2) Take any marine mammal not
specified in such LOA;
(3) Take any marine mammal
specified in such LOA in any manner
other than as specified;
(4) Take a marine mammal specified
in such LOA if NMFS determines such
taking results in more than a negligible
impact on the species or stocks of such
marine mammal; or
(5) Take a marine mammal specified
in such LOA after NMFS determines
such taking results in an unmitigable
adverse impact on the species or stock
of such marine mammal for taking for
subsistence uses.
(b) [Reserved]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
§ 217.134
Mitigation requirements.
(a) When conducting the activities
identified in § 217.130(a), the mitigation
measures contained in this subpart and
any LOA issued under § 216.106 of this
chapter and § 217.136 must be
implemented. These mitigation
measures include:
(1) A copy of any issued LOA must be
in the possession of the Navy, its
designees, and work crew personnel
operating under the authority of the
issued LOA at all times that activities
subject to this LOA are being conducted.
(2) Should environmental conditions
deteriorate such that marine mammals
within the entire shutdown zone would
not be visible (e.g., fog, heavy rain,
night), the Navy shall delay pile driving
and drilling until observers are
confident marine mammals within the
shutdown zone could be detected.
(3) The Navy must ensure that
construction supervisors and crews, the
monitoring team, and relevant Navy
staff are trained prior to the start of
construction activity subject to this rule,
so that responsibilities, communication
procedures, monitoring protocols, and
operational procedures are clearly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
understood. New personnel joining
during the project will be trained prior
to commencing work.
(4) The Navy, construction
supervisors and crews, protected
species observers (PSOs), and relevant
Navy staff must avoid direct physical
interaction with marine mammals
during construction activity. If a marine
mammal comes within 10 m of such
activity, operations will cease and
vessels will reduce speed to the
minimum level required to maintain
steerage and safe working conditions, as
necessary, to avoid direct physical
interaction.
(5) The Navy must monitor the project
area to the maximum extent possible
based on the required number of PSOs,
required monitoring locations, and
environmental conditions as described
in this rule and the NMFS-approved
Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan.
(6) Monitoring must take place from
30 minutes prior to initiation of pile
driving or drilling activity (i.e., pre-start
clearance monitoring) through 30
minutes post-completion of pile driving
or drilling activity.
(7) For all pile driving and drilling
activities, the Navy must implement
shutdown zones with radial distances as
identified in a LOA issued under
§ 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.136.
If a marine mammal comes within or
approaches the shutdown zone, such
operations must cease.
(8) In the event of a delay or
shutdown of activity resulting from
marine mammals in the shutdown zone,
animals must be allowed to remain in
the shutdown zone (i.e., must leave of
their own volition) and their behavior
must be monitored and documented. If
a marine mammal is observed within
the shutdown zone, pile driving or
drilling activities may not commence or
resume until at least one of the
following conditions has been met:
(i) The animal has been observed
exiting the shutdown zone;
(ii) The animal is thought to have
exited the shutdown zone based on a
determination of its course, speed, and
movement relative to the pile driving
location; or
(iii) The shutdown zone has been
clear from any additional sightings for
fifteen minutes.
(9) If pile driving or drilling
construction activities cease for more
than 30 minutes, the pre-activity
monitoring of the shutdown zone must
commence.
(10) The Navy must conduct
monitoring to include the entire region
of influence, which includes the area
within the Level A and Level B
harassment zones with radial distances
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
as identified in a LOA issued under
§ 216.106 of this chapter and § 217.136.
(11) The Navy must use soft start
techniques when impact pile driving.
Soft start requires contractors to provide
an initial set of strikes from the hammer
at reduced energy, followed by a 30second waiting period, then two
subsequent reduced-energy strike sets.
A soft start will be implemented at the
start of each day’s impact pile driving
and at any time following cessation of
impact pile driving for a period of 30
minutes or longer.
(12) The Navy must install a bubble
curtain across the entrance openings
during DTH cluster drill and hydraulic
rock hammering activities. The bubble
curtain must adhere to the following
restrictions:
(i) The bubble curtain must distribute
air bubbles across 100 percent of the
entrance openings for the full depth of
the water column;
(ii) The lowest bubble ring must be in
contact with the substrate for the full
extent of the curtain, and the weights
attached to the bottom of the curtain
must ensure 100 percent substrate
contact. No parts of the curtain or other
objects shall prevent full substrate
contact; and
(iii) Air flow to the bubblers must be
balanced across the entrance openings
to the super flood basin.
(iv) The Navy shall require that
construction contractors train personnel
in the proper balancing of air flow to the
bubblers and corrections to the
attenuation device to meet the
performance standards. This shall occur
prior to the initiation of in-water
construction activities.
(13) The bubble curtain may be
discontinued for certain activities
should the results of hydroacoustic
recordings inside the bubble curtain
show that the source levels from those
activities do not result in the Level A
harassment thresholds being achieved
across the entire region of influence,
upon review of the data by NMFS.
(14) Pile driving and drilling activity
must be halted upon observation of
either a species entering or within the
harassment zone for which incidental
take is not authorized, or a species for
which incidental take has been
authorized but the authorized number of
takes has been met.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 217.135 Requirements for monitoring
and reporting.
(a) Marine Mammal monitoring must
be conducted in accordance with the
conditions in this section and the
Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan. The
Navy must submit a Marine Mammal
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Monitoring Plan to NMFS for approval
in advance of construction.
(b) Monitoring must be conducted by
qualified PSOs in accordance with the
following conditions:
(1) PSOs must be independent (i.e.,
not construction personnel) and have no
other assigned tasks during monitoring
periods.
(2) At least one PSO must have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization.
(3) Other PSOs may substitute
relevant experience, education (degree
in biological science or related field), or
training for prior experience performing
the duties of a PSO during construction
activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued
incidental take authorization.
(4) Where a team of three PSOs are
required, a lead observer or monitoring
coordinator shall be designated. The
lead observer must have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization; and
(5) One PSO must be designated as
lead PSO or monitoring coordinator.
The lead PSO must have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization.
(6) PSOs must work in shifts to reduce
fatigue and ensure their ability to
monitor for marine mammals.
(7) PSOs must be approved by NMFS
prior to beginning any activity subject to
this LOA.
(c) For all pile driving activities, a
minimum of three PSOs must be
stationed on boats, docks, or piers
sufficient to monitor the harassment and
shutdown zones, and as described in the
Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan.
(d) PSOs must record all observations
of marine mammals, regardless of
distance from the pile/hole being
driven/drilled or the construction
activity taking place (i.e., DTH, rotary
drilling, rock hammering), as well as
additional data indicated in the
reporting requirements.
(e) The Navy must conduct
hydroacoustic data collection (sound
source verification and propagation
loss) as described in a LOA and in
accordance with a hydroacoustic
monitoring plan that must be approved
by NMFS in advance of construction.
This plan shall include acoustic
monitoring inside the bubble curtain to
measure construction generated noise
levels.
(f) The harassment and/or shutdown
zones may be modified with NMFS’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
approval following NMFS’ acceptance
of an acoustic monitoring report.
(g) The Navy must submit a draft
monitoring report to NMFS within 90
work days of the completion of required
monitoring for each portion of the
project as well as a comprehensive
summary report at the end of the
project. The reports will detail the
monitoring protocol and summarize the
data recorded during monitoring. Final
annual reports (each portion of the
project and comprehensive) must be
prepared and submitted within 30 days
following resolution of any NMFS
comments on the draft report. If no
comments are received from NMFS
within 30 days of receipt of the draft
report, the report must be considered
final. If comments are received, a final
report addressing NMFS comments
must be submitted within 30 days after
receipt of comments.
(h) All draft and final monitoring
reports must be submitted to
PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov
and ITP.tyson.moore@noaa.gov.
(i) The reports must at minimum
contain the informational elements
described as follows (as well as any
additional information described in the
Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan),
including:
(1) Dates and times (begin and end) of
all marine mammal monitoring.
(2) Construction activities occurring
during each daily observation period,
including:
(i) The number and type of piles that
were driven or removed and by what
method (i.e., impact, vibratory, DTH,
rotary drilling, rock hammering.
(ii) The total duration of driving time
for each pile/hole (vibratory driving,
rotary drilling) and number of strikes for
each pile/hole (impact driving,
hydraulic rock hammering).
(iii) For DTH, the duration of
operation for both impulsive and nonpulse components as well as the strike
rate.
(3) PSO locations during marine
mammal monitoring.
(4) Environmental conditions during
monitoring periods (at beginning and
end of PSO shift and whenever
conditions change significantly),
including Beaufort sea state and any
other relevant weather conditions
including cloud cover, fog, sun glare,
and overall visibility to the horizon, and
estimated observable distance (if less
than the harassment zone distance);
(5) Upon observation of a marine
mammal, the following information:
(i) Name of PSO who sighted the
animal(s) and PSO location, as well as
the activity at the time of the sighting;
(ii) Time of sighting;
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19541
(iii) Identification of the animal (e.g.,
genus/species, lowest possible
taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO
confidence in identification, and the
composition of the group if there is a
mix of species;
(iv) Distances and bearings of each
marine mammal observed in relation to
the pile being driven or drilled for each
sighting (if pile driving or drilling was
occurring at time of sighting).
(v) Estimated number of animals
(min/max/best estimate);
(vi) Estimated number of animals by
cohort (adults, juveniles, neonates,
group composition, etc.);
(vii) Animal’s closest point of
approach and estimated time spent
within the harassment zone;
(viii) Description of any marine
mammal behavioral observations (e.g.,
observed behaviors such as feeding or
traveling), including an assessment of
behavioral responses to the activity (e.g.,
no response or changes in behavioral
state such as ceasing feeding, changing
direction, flushing, or breaching);
(6) Number of marine mammals
detected within the harassment zones,
by species;
(7) Detailed information about any
implementation of any mitigation (e.g.,
shutdowns and delays), a description of
specific actions that ensued, and
resulting changes in the behavior of the
animal, if any; and
(j) The Holder will submit all PSO
datasheets and/or raw sightings data
with the draft reports.
(k) The Navy must report the
hydroacoustic data collected as required
by a LOA issued under § 216.106 of this
chapter and § 217.136 and as described
in the Acoustic Monitoring Plan, which
at a minimum, must include:
(1) Hydrophone equipment and
methods: recording device, sampling
rate, distance (m) from the pile where
recordings were made; depth of water
and recording device(s);
(2) Type and size of pile being driven,
substrate type, method of driving during
recordings (e.g., hammer model and
energy), and total pile driving duration;
(3) Whether a sound attenuation
device is used and, if so, a detailed
description of the device used and the
duration of its use per pile;
(4) For impact pile driving and/or
DTH excavation (DTH mono-hammer
and cluster drill) (per pile/hole):
Number of strikes and strike rate; depth
of substrate to penetrate; pulse duration
and mean, median, and maximum
sound levels (dB re: 1 mPa): root mean
square sound pressure level (SPLrms);
cumulative sound exposure level
(SELcum), peak sound pressure level
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES3
19542
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(SPLpeak), and single-strike sound
exposure level (SELss);
(5) For vibratory driving/removal,
rotary drilling, and/or DTH excavation
(DTH mono-hammer and cluster drill)
(per pile/hole): Duration of driving per
pile; mean, median, and maximum
sound levels (dB re: 1 mPa): root mean
square sound pressure level (SPLrms),
cumulative sound exposure level
(SELcum) (and timeframe over which
the sound is averaged);
(6) One-third octave band spectrum
and power spectral density plot; and
(7) General Daily Site Conditions,
including the date and time of activities,
and environmental data such as wind
speed and direction, air temperature,
humidity, surface water temperature,
tidal state, water depth, wave height,
weather conditions, and other factors
that could contribute to influencing the
airborne and underwater sound levels
(e.g., aircraft, boats, etc.).
(l) In the event that personnel
involved in the construction activities
discover an injured or dead marine
mammal, the Navy must report incident
to the Office of Protected Resources
(OPR), NMFS
(PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov
and ITP.tyson.moore@noaa.gov) and to
the Greater Atlantic Region New
England/Mid-Atlantic Regional
Stranding Coordinator (978–282–8478
or 978–281–9291) as soon as feasible. If
the death or injury was clearly caused
by the specified activity, the Navy must
immediately cease the specified
activities until NMFS OPR is able to
review the circumstances of the incident
and determine what, if any, additional
measures are appropriate to ensure
compliance with the terms of this rule
and the LOA issued under § 216.106 of
this chapter and § 217.136. The Navy
will not resume their activities until
notified by NMFS. The report must
include the following information:
(1) Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the first discovery (and
updated location information if known
and applicable);
(2) Species identification (if known)
or description of the animal(s) involved;
(3) Condition of the animal(s)
(including carcass condition if the
animal is dead);
(4) Observed behaviors of the
animal(s), if alive;
(5) If available, photographs or video
footage of the animal(s); and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Mar 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
(6) General circumstances under
which the animal was discovered.
§ 217.136
Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine
mammals pursuant to this subpart, the
Navy must apply for and obtain an LOA.
(b) An LOA, unless suspended or
revoked, may be effective for a period of
time not to exceed the expiration date
of these regulations.
(c) If an LOA expires prior to the
expiration date of these regulations, the
Navy may apply for and obtain a
renewal of the LOA.
(d) In the event of projected changes
to the activity or to mitigation and
monitoring measures required by an
LOA, the Navy must apply for and
obtain a modification of the LOA as
described in § 217.137.
(e) The LOA will set forth the
following information:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact (i.e.,
mitigation) on the species, its habitat,
and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses; and
(3) Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
(f) Issuance of the LOA will be based
on a determination that the level of
taking will be consistent with the
findings made for the total taking
allowable under these regulations.
(g) Notice of issuance or denial of an
LOA will be published in the Federal
Register within 30 days of a
determination.
§ 217.137 Renewals and modifications of
Letters of Authorization.
(a) An LOA issued under § 216.106 of
this chapter and § 217.136 for the
activity identified in § 217.130(a) may
be renewed or modified upon request by
the applicant, provided that:
(1) The proposed specified activity
and mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures, as well as the
anticipated impacts, are the same as
those described and analyzed for these
regulations; and
(2) NMFS determines that the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures required by the previous LOA
under these regulations were
implemented.
(b) For LOA modification or renewal
requests by the applicant that include
changes to the activity or the mitigation,
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
monitoring, or reporting that do not
change the findings made for the
regulations or result in no more than a
minor change in the total estimated
number of takes (or distribution by
species or years), NMFS may publish a
notice of proposed LOA in the Federal
Register, including the associated
analysis of the change, and solicit
public comment before issuing the LOA.
(c) A LOA issued under § 216.106 of
this chapter and § 217.136 for the
activity identified in § 217.130(a) may
be modified by NMFS under the
following circumstances:
(1) NMFS may modify (including
augment) the existing mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting measures (after
consulting with Navy regarding the
practicability of the modifications) if
doing so creates a reasonable likelihood
of more effectively accomplishing the
goals of the mitigation and monitoring
set forth in the preamble for these
regulations;
(i) Possible sources of data that could
contribute to the decision to modify the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting
measures in a LOA:
(A) Results from Navy’s monitoring
from previous years;
(B) Results from other marine
mammal and/or sound research or
studies; and
(C) Any information that reveals
marine mammals may have been taken
in a manner, extent or number not
authorized by these regulations or
subsequent LOAs; and
(ii) If, through adaptive management,
the modifications to the mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting measures are
substantial, NMFS will publish a notice
of proposed LOA in the Federal
Register and solicit public comment;
(2) If NMFS determines that an
emergency exists that poses a significant
risk to the well-being of the species or
stocks of marine mammals specified in
a LOA issued pursuant to § 216.106 of
this chapter and § 217.136, a LOA may
be modified without prior public notice
or opportunity for public comment.
Notification would be published in the
Federal Register within 30 days of the
action.
§ 217.138–217.139
[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2023–06300 Filed 3–30–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\31MRR3.SGM
31MRR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19502-19542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06300]
[[Page 19501]]
Vol. 88
Friday,
No. 62
March 31, 2023
Part IV
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 217
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental
to U.S. Navy Construction at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine;
Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2023 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 19502]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 217
[Docket No. 230321-0081]
RIN 0648-BL78
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to U.S. Navy Construction at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard,
Kittery, Maine
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; notification of issuance of Letter of
Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon request from the U.S. Navy (Navy), hereby issues
regulations to govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals
incidental to construction at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery,
Maine, over the course of 5 years (2023-2028). These regulations, which
allow for the issuance of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for the
incidental take of marine mammals during the described activities and
specified timeframes, prescribe the permissible methods of taking and
other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on marine
mammal species or stocks and their habitat, as well as requirements
pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking.
DATES: Effective from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2028.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Navy's application and any supporting
documents, as well as a list of the references cited in this document,
may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-us-navy-construction-portsmouth-naval-shipyard-kittery-maine-0. In case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reny Tyson Moore, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, [email protected], (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Regulatory Action
We received an application from the Navy requesting 5-year
regulations and authorization to take multiple species of marine
mammals. This rule establishes a framework under the authority of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) to allow for the authorization of take by
Level A and Level B harassment of marine mammals incidental to the
Navy's construction activities related to the multifunctional expansion
and modification of Dry Dock 1 at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in
Kittery, Maine. Please see the Background section below for definitions
of harassment.
Legal Authority for the Action
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A)) directs
the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region for up to 5 years if,
after notice and public comment, the agency makes certain findings and
issues regulations that set forth permissible methods of taking
pursuant to that activity and other means of effecting the ``least
practicable adverse impact'' on the affected species or stocks and
their habitat (see the discussion below in the Mitigation section), as
well as monitoring and reporting requirements. Section 101(a)(5)(A) of
the MMPA and the implementing regulations at 50 CFR part 216, subpart I
provide the legal basis for issuing this rule containing 5 year
regulations, and for any subsequent Letters of Authorization (LOAs). As
directed by this legal authority, this rule contains mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements.
Summary of Major Provisions Within the Regulations
Following is a summary of the major provisions of this rule
regarding the Navy's construction activities. These measures include:
Required monitoring of the in-water construction areas to
detect the presence of marine mammals before beginning in-water
construction activities;
Shutdown of in-water construction activities under certain
circumstances to avoid injury of marine mammals;
Soft start for impact pile driving to allow marine mammals
the opportunity to leave the area prior to beginning impact pile
driving at full power; and
Implementation of a bubble curtain during rock hammering
and down-the-hole (DTH) cluster drilling to reduce underwater noise
impacts.
Background
The MMPA prohibits the ``take'' of marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361
et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations
are proposed or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed incidental take authorization is provided to the public for
review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses
(where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of the species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as
``mitigation''); and requirements pertaining to the mitigation,
monitoring and reporting of the takings are set forth. The definitions
of all applicable MMPA statutory terms cited above are included in the
relevant sections below.
Summary of Request
On May 9, 2022, NMFS received a request from the Navy for
authorization to take marine mammals incidental to construction
activities related to the multifunctional expansion and modification of
Dry Dock 1 at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine. We provided
comments on the application, and the Navy submitted revised versions
and responses to our comments on July 5, 2022, August 15, 2022, August
19, 2022, and August 25, 2022, with the latter version deemed adequate
and complete. On September 1, 2022, we published a notice of receipt of
the Navy's application in the Federal Register (87 FR 53731),
requesting comments and information related to the request. During the
30-day comment period, we received two supportive letters from private
citizens.
On October 19 and 25, 2022, NMFS was notified by the Navy of
project modifications and shifting Fleet submarine schedules that
required the resequencing of certain activities associated with the
construction at Dry Dock 1 in order to accommodate the modifications
and meet the new vessel docking demands. On October 31, 2022, the Navy
submitted an addendum to its
[[Page 19503]]
application describing these changes. We published a notice of the
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023 (88 FR
3146) incorporating these changes and requested comments and
information from the public. Please see Comments and Responses below.
The regulations are valid for 5 years, from April 1, 2023 through March
31, 2028, and authorize the Navy to take five species of marine mammals
by Level A and Level B harassment incidental to construction activities
related to the multifunctional expansion and modification of Dry Dock 1
at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine. Neither the Navy
nor NMFS expect serious injury or mortality to result from this
activity.
NMFS previously issued five IHAs to the Navy for waterfront
improvement work at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard: in 2016 (81 FR
85525, November 28, 2016), 2018 (83 FR 3318, January 24, 2018), 2019
(84 FR 24476, May 28, 2019), a renewal of the 2019 IHA (86 FR 14598,
March 17, 2021), and in 2022 (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022). The most
recent IHA (87 FR 19886) provided authorization to take marine mammals
during the first year of the construction project described in this
final rule. As required, the applicant provided monitoring reports
(available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-construction-activities)
which confirm that the applicant has implemented the required
mitigation and monitoring, and which also shows that no impacts of a
scale or nature not previously analyzed or authorized have occurred as
a result of the activities conducted.
Description of the Specified Activity
Overview
Multifunctional Expansion of Dry Dock 1 (P-381) is one of three
projects that support the overall expansion and modification of Dry
Dock 1, located in the western extent of the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.
The two additional projects, construction of a super flood basin (P-
310) and extension of portal crane rail and utilities (P-1074), are
currently under construction. In-water work associated with these
projects was completed under the aforementioned separate IHAs issued by
NMFS. The projects have been phased to support Navy mission schedules.
P-381 will be constructed within the same footprint of the super flood
basin over an approximate 7-year period, during which 5 years of in-
water work will occur. An IHA was issued by NMFS for the first year of
P-381 construction activities between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023
(87 FR 19866, April 6, 2022). This request is associated with the
remaining 4 years of P-381 in-water construction activities planned to
occur from April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2028, as well as for
additional in-water construction activities associated with the removal
of emergency repair components of the super flood basin that will occur
during the period of effectiveness for the regulations. Although the
in-water construction described in this rule is anticipated to be
completed by December 2026, unanticipated schedule delays could result
in the Navy conducting construction activity over the full 5 years.
The purpose of the Navy's project (P-381) is to modify the super
flood basin to create two additional dry docking positions (Dry Dock 1
North and Dry Dock 1 West) in front of the existing Dry Dock 1 East.
The Navy's specified activity also includes emergency repairs of the P-
310 super flood basin. Construction activities will include the
excavation and/or installation of 1,118 holes, 198 shafts, and 580
sheet piles via impact and vibratory pile driving, hydraulic rock
hammering, rotary drilling, and mono and cluster DTH. The construction
activities are expected to require approximately 2,498 days if the
activities are considered independently over the 5-year period.
However, the actual construction duration is expected to be within 4
years as many of the construction activities will occur concurrently.
Dates and Duration
The in-water construction activities associated with this rule are
anticipated to begin in April 2023 and proceed to December 2026 (4
years); however, the incidental take authorization is valid for 5 years
in the event of unexpected scheduled delays. In-water construction
activities will occur consecutively over a 4-year period. The Navy
plans to conduct all in-water work activities with expected potential
for incidental harassment of marine mammals during daylight hours.
Table 1 provides the estimated schedule and production rates for P-
381 construction activities. Many of the activities included in Table 1
will span across multiple construction years and/or will occur
concurrently. Because of mission requirements and operational schedules
at the dry docking positions and berths, this schedule is subject to
change. In-water construction activities for P-381 will occur
consecutively over a 4-year period. Note, for the purposes of this
analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5;
Year 1 of the Navy's construction activities is currently ongoing in
association with a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
Vibratory pile driving and extraction is assumed to occur for 141 days.
Impact pile driving will occur for 34 days. DTH excavation (mono-hammer
and cluster drill) will occur for 1,446 days. Rotary drilling will
occur for 238 days (assuming that casings and sockets for cluster
drills will be set, excavated, and removed in a single day). Rock
hammering will occur for 277 days. Note that pile driving days are not
necessarily consecutive, and certain activities may occur at the same
time, decreasing the total number of actual in-water construction days.
The contractor could be working in more than one area of the berths at
a time.
Table 1--In-Water Construction Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount and
Activity estimated dates Activity Daily production Total
ID Activity (construction component Method rate production
years *) days
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A1 \1\.... Center Wall-- Drill 18 shafts Install 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 \4\ 18
Install Apr 23 \3\ to diameter outer hour/day.
Foundation Aug 23 (2). casing.
Support Piles.
A2 \1\.... Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 \4\ 18
inch diameter hours/day.
socket.
A3 \1\.... Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 \4\ 18
outer casing. minutes/casing.
A4 \1\.... Drill 78-inch Cluster drill 6.5 days/shaft \4\ 117
diameter shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
R \1\..... Dry Dock 1 North Install 48 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Impact with 8 sheets/day 5 \4\ 6
Entrance--Insta piles Apr 23 shaped sheets. initial minutes and 300
ll Temporary \3\ to May 23 vibratory set. blows/pile.
Cofferdam. (2).
[[Page 19504]]
1......... Berth 11--Remove Remove 112 Concrete shutter Hydraulic rock 5 hours/day..... \4\ 56
Shutter Panels. panels Apr 23 panels. hammering.
\3\ to May 23
(2).
2......... Berth 1--Remove Remove 168 sheet 25-inch-wide Z- Vibratory 4 piles/day..... \4\ 42
Sheet Piles. piles Apr 23 shaped. extraction.
\3\ to Jun 24
(2, 3).
3......... Berth 1--Remove 2,800 cubic Removal of Hydraulic rock 2.5 hours/day... \4\ 47
Granite Block yards (cy) Apr granite blocks. hammering.
Quay Wall. 23 \3\ to Jun
24 (2, 3).
4......... Berth 1--Top of 320 linear feet Mechanical Hydraulic rock 10 hours/day.... \4\ 74
Wall Removal (lf) Apr 23 \3\ concrete hammering.
for Waler to Jun 24 (2, removal.
Installation. 3).
5......... Berth 1--Install Install 28 sheet 28-inch-wide Z- Impact with 4 piles/day 5 \4\ 8
southeast piles Apr 23 to shaped. initial minutes/pile
corner Support Jul 23 (2). vibratory set. and 300 blows/
of Excavation pile.
(SOE).
6......... Berth 11-- 700 cy Apr 23 Excavate Bedrock Hydraulic rock 12 hours/day.... \3\ \4\ 60
Mechanical Rock \3\ to Aug 23 hammering.
Removal at (2).
Basin Floor.
7......... Berth 11 Face-- Drill 924 relief 4-6 inch DTH mono-hammer. 27 holes/day 22 \4\ 35
Mechanical Rock holes Apr 23 diameter holes. min/hole.
Removal at \3\ to Aug 23
Basin Floor. (2).
8......... Install Install 14 sheet 28-inch-wide Z- Impact with 4 piles/day 5 4
Temporary piles Apr 23 to shaped. initial minutes/pile
Cofferdam Jun 23 (2). vibratory set. and 300 blows/
Extension. pile.
9a........ Gantry Crane Drill 16 shafts Set 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 16
Support Piles Apr 23 to Aug diameter casing. hours/day.
at Berth 1 West. 23 (2).
9b........ Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 16
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
9c........ Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 16
casing. minutes/casing.
9d........ 72-inch diameter Cluster drill 5 days/shaft 10 80
shafts. DTH. hours/day.
10 \2\.... Berth 1-- 300 cy Apr 23 Excavate Bedrock Hydraulic rock 13 cy/day 12 \5\ 25
Mechanical Rock \3\ to Sep 23 hammering. hours/day.
Removal at (2).
Basin Floor.
11........ Dry Dock 1 North Drill 50 rock 9-inch diameter DTH mono-hammer. 2 holes/day 5 \4\ 25
Entrance--Drill anchors Apr 23 holes. hours/hole.
Tremie Tie \3\ to Oct 23
Downs. (2).
12........ Center Wall-- Install 15 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Impact with 4 piles/day 5 4
Install Tie-In piles Apr 23 to shaped. initial minutes/pile
to Existing Dec 23 (2). vibratory set. and 300 blows/
West Closure pile.
Wall.
13a....... Dry Dock 1 Drill 20 shafts Set 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 20
North--Temporar May 23 to Nov diameter casing. hours/day.
y Work Trestle 24 (2, 3).
Piles.
13b....... Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 20
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
13c....... Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 20
casing. minutes/casing.
13d....... 84-inch diameter Cluster drill 3.5 days/shaft 70
shafts. DTH. 10 hours/day.
14........ Dry Dock 1 Remove 20 piles 84-inch diameter Rotary drill.... 1 day/pile 15 20
North--Remove May 23 to Nov drill piles. minutes/pile.
Temporary Work 24 (2, 3).
Trestle Piles.
15a....... Dry Dock 1 Drill 18 shafts Set 84-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 18
North--Install May 23 to Nov casing. hours/day.
Leveling Piles 24 (2, 3).
(Diving Board
Shafts).
15b....... Pre-drill 84- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 18
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
15c....... Remove 84-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 18
casing. minutes/casing.
15d....... 78-inch diameter Cluster drill 7.5 days/shaft 135
shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
16a....... Wall Support Drill 20 shafts Set 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 20
Shafts for Dry Jun 23 to Nov diameter casing. hours/day.
Dock 1 North 24 (2, 3).
(Berth 11 Face
and Head Wall).
16b....... Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 20
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
16c....... Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 20
casing. minutes/casing.
16d....... Drill 78-inch Cluster drill 7.5 days/shaft 150
diameter shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
17a....... Foundation Drill 23 shafts Set 126-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 23
(Floor) Shafts Jun 23 to Nov diameter Casing. hours/day.
for Dry Dock 1 24 (Const.
North years 2, 3).
(Foundation
Support Piles).
17b....... Pre-drill 126- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 23
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
17c....... Remove 126-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 60 23
casing. minutes/casing.
17d....... Drill 108-inch Cluster drill 8.5 days/shaft 196
diameter shafts. DTH. 10 hours/day.
18........ Berth 11 End Remove 60 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 \5\ 10
Wall--Remove piles Jul 23 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
Temporary Guide Aug 23 (2, 3).
Wall.
19........ Remove Berth 1 Remove 28 sheet 28-inch-wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 \4\ 5
southeast piles Jul 23 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
corner SOE. Sep 23 (2).
[[Page 19505]]
20 \2\.... Removal of Berth Remove 108 sheet 28-inch-wide Z- Vibratory 6 piles/day 5 18
1 Emergency piles Apr 23 shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
Repair Sheet \3\ to Jul 23
Piles. (2).
21 \2\.... Removal of Berth 500 cy Apr 23 Mechanical Hydraulic rock 4 hours/day..... 15
1 Emergency \3\ to Aug 23 concrete hammering.
Repair Tremie (2). removal.
Concrete.
22........ Center Wall Install 72 rock 9-inch diameter DTH mono-hammer. 2 holes/day 5 36
Foundation--Dri anchors Aug 23 holes. hours/hole.
ll in Monolith to May 24 (2,
Tie Downs. 3).
23........ Center Wall-- Remove 16 sheet 28-inch-wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 \5\ 3
Remove Tie-In piles \6\ Aug shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
to Existing 23 to Aug 24
West Closure (2, 3).
Wall (Dry Dock
1 North) \4\.
24........ Center Wall Install 23 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Impact with 2 piles/day 5 12
East--Sheet piles Aug 23 to shaped. initial minutes/pile
Pile Tie-In to Oct 24 (2, 3). vibratory set. and 300 blows/
Existing Wall. pile.
25........ Remove Tie-In to Remove 15 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 \5\ 3
West Closure pile Dec 23 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
Wall (Dry Dock Dec 24 (2, 3).
1 West).
26........ Remove Center Remove 23 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 \5\ 12
Wall East-- piles Dec 23 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
Sheet Pile Tie- Dec 24 (2, 3).
In to Existing
Wall (Dry Dock
1 West).
27........ Dry Dock 1 North Remove 96 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 12
Entrance--Remov piles Jan 24 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
e Temporary Sep 24 (Const.
Cofferdam. years 2, 3).
28........ Remove Temporary Remove 14 sheet 28-inch wide Z- Vibratory 8 piles/day 5 2
Cofferdam piles Jan 24 to shaped. extraction. minutes/pile.
Extension. Sep 24 (2, 3).
29a....... Dry Dock 1 West-- Drill 20 shafts Set 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 20
Install Apr 24 to Feb diameter casing. hours/day.
Temporary Work 26 (3, 4).
Trestle Piles.
29b....... Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 20
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
29c....... Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 20
casing. minutes/casing.
29d....... 84-inch diameter Cluster drill 3.5 days/shaft 70
shafts. DTH. 10 hours/day.
30........ Dry Dock 1 West-- Remove 20 piles 84-inch diameter Rotary drill.... 1 day/pile 15 20
Remove Apr 24 to Feb piles. minutes/pile.
Temporary Work 26 (3, 4).
Trestle Piles.
31a....... Wall Support Drill 22 shafts Set 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 22
Shafts for Dry Jun 24 to Feb diameter casing. hours/day.
Dock 1 West 26 (3, 4).
(Berth 1 Face).
31b....... Pre-drill 102- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 22
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
31c....... Remove 102-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 22
casing. minutes/casing.
31d....... 78-inch diameter Cluster drill 7.5 days/shaft 165
shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
32a....... Foundation Drill 23 shafts Set 126-inch Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 23
(Floor) Shafts Jun 24 to Feb casing. hours/day.
for Dry Dock 1 26 (3, 4).
West
(Foundation
Support Piles).
32b....... Pre-drill 126- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 23
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
32c....... Remove 126-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 23
casing. minutes/casing.
32d....... Drill 108-inch Cluster drill 8.5 days/shaft 196
diameter shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
33a....... Dry Dock 1 West-- Drill 18 shafts Set 84-inch Rotary Drill.... 1 shaft/day 1 18
Install Jun 24 to Feb casing. hours/day.
Leveling Piles 26 (3, 4).
(Diving Board
Shafts).
33b....... Pre-drill 84- Rotary drill.... 1 shaft/day 9 18
inch rock hours/day.
socket.
33c....... Remove 84-inch Rotary drill.... 1 casing/day 15 18
casing. minutes/casing.
33d....... Drill 78-inch Cluster drill 7.5 days/shaft 135
diameter shaft. DTH. 10 hours/day.
34........ Dry Dock 1 Install 36 rock 9-inch diameter DTH mono-hammer. 2 holes/day 5 18
North--Tie anchors Jul 24 holes. hours/hole.
Downs. to Jul 25 (3,
4).
35........ Dry Dock 1 West-- Install 36 rock 9-inch diameter DTH mono-hammer. 2 holes/day 5 18
Install Tie anchors Dec 25 hole. hours/hole.
Downs. to Dec 26 (4,
5).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total excavated holes/ 1,118/198/580... ................ ................ ................ 2,498
drilled shafts/sheet piles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; potential
marine mammal takes incidental to Year 1 of the Navy's construction activities were authorized under a
previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
\1\ These activities were not included in the original application made available for public review during the
Notice of Receipt comment period (NOR; 87 FR 53731), but have been added due to changes needed in the
construction schedule.
\2\ These activities were included in the original application, but the amount of activity has been modified due
to changes needed in the construction schedule.
\3\ These activities began in construction year 1.
\4\ These activities began in year 1. Only the number of production days occurring in construction years 2
through 6 are presented.
\5\ Additional production days are included to account for equipment repositioning.
\6\ Sheet piles were installed in construction year 1.
[[Page 19506]]
Specific Geographic Region
The shipyard is located in the Piscataqua River in Kittery, Maine.
The Piscataqua River originates at the boundary of Dover, New
Hampshire, and Eliot, Maine (Figure 1). The river flows in a
southeasterly direction for 2,093 meters (m) (13 miles (mi)) before
entering Portsmouth Harbor and emptying into the Atlantic Ocean. The
lower Piscataqua River is part of the Great Bay Estuary system and
varies in width and depth. Many large and small islands break up the
straight-line flow of the river as it continues toward the Atlantic
Ocean. Seavey Island, the location of the specified activities, is
located in the lower Piscataqua River approximately 500 m, 1,640 feet
(ft) from its southwest bank, 200 m (656 ft) from its north bank, and
approximately 4 kilometers (km) (2.5 mi) from the mouth of the river.
Water depths in the project area range from 6.4 m (21 ft) to 11.9 m
(39 ft) at Berths 11, 12, and 13. Water depths in the lower Piscataqua
River near the project area range from 4.6 m (15 ft) in the shallowest
areas to 21 m (69 ft) in the deepest areas. The river is approximately
914 m (3,300 ft) wide near the project area, measured from the Kittery
shoreline north of Wattlebury Island to the Portsmouth shoreline west
of Peirce Island. The furthest direct line of sight from the project
area is 1,287 m (0.8 mi) to the southeast and 418 m (0.26 mi) to the
northwest.
The nearshore environment of the Shipyard is characterized by a mix
of hard bottom, gravel, soft sediments, rock outcrops, and rocky
shoreline associated with fast tidal currents near the installation.
The nearshore areas surrounding Seavey Island are predominately hard
bottom (65 percent of benthic habitat) and gravel (26 percent) habitat,
with only 9 percent soft bottom sediments within the surveyed area
around Seavey Island (Tetra Tech, 2016). Much of the shoreline in the
project area is composed of hard shores (rocky intertidal). In general,
rocky intertidal areas consist of bedrock that alternates between
marine and terrestrial habitats, depending on the tide. Rocky
intertidal areas consist of ``bedrock, stones, or boulders that singly
or in combination cover 75 percent or more of an area that is covered
less than 30 percent by vegetation'' (Federal Geographic Data
Committee, 2013).
The lower Piscataqua River is home to Portsmouth Harbor and is used
by commercial, recreational, and military vessels. Between 150 and 250
commercial shipping vessels transit the lower Piscataqua River each
year (Magnusson et al., 2012). Commercial fishing vessels are also very
common in the river year-round, as are recreational vessels, which are
more common in the warmer summer months. The shipyard is a dynamic
industrial facility situated on an island with a narrow separation of
waterways between the installation and the communities of Kittery and
Portsmouth (Figure 2). The predominant noise sources from Shipyard
industrial operations consist of dry dock cranes; passing vessels; and
industrial equipment (e.g., forklifts, loaders, rigs, vacuums, fans,
dust collectors, blower belts, heating, air conditioning, and
ventilation (HVAC) units, water pumps, and exhaust tubes and lids).
Other components such as construction, vessel ground support equipment
for maintenance purposes, vessel traffic across the Piscataqua River,
and vehicle traffic on the shipyard's bridges and on local roads in
Kittery and Portsmouth produce noise, but such noise generally
represents a transitory contribution to the average noise level
environment (Blue Ridge Research and Consulting (BRRC), 2015; ESS
Group, 2015). Ambient sound levels recorded at the shipyard are
considered typical of a large outdoor industrial facility and vary
widely in space and time (ESS Group, 2015).
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[[Page 19507]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR31MR23.000
[[Page 19508]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR31MR23.001
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C
[[Page 19509]]
Detailed Description of the Specified Activity
The Navy's P-381 project will modify the super flood basin to
create two additional dry docking positions (Dry Dock 1 North and Dry
Dock 1 West) in front of the existing Dry Dock 1 East. The super flood
basin provides the starting point for the P-381 work. Several steps are
required to convert the super flood basin to a dry dock with two
positions fully capable of supporting the maintenance of submarines
while maintaining access to the existing interior dry dock (Dry Dock 1
East). The dry dock positions (including the center wall) will be
constructed using large precast segments (referred to as monoliths)
that require both sidewall and base support. The monoliths will be
manufactured offsite and transported to the construction site. Segments
will be floated and/or lifted into place to create the center wall,
followed by Dry Dock 1 North, and finally Dry Dock 1 West. Once the
monoliths are set and grouted in place, the respective dry docks can be
dewatered allowing the remaining interior construction to be performed
in dry conditions.
P-381 years 2 through 5 (i.e., the time period of the Navy's
specified activity for this rule) construction activities will complete
bedrock removal and the preparation of the walls and floors of the
super flood basin to support the placement of the monoliths and the
construction of the two dry dock positions. Most of the in-water
construction will occur behind the existing super flood basin walls
that will act as a barrier to sound and will contain underwater noise
to within a small portion of the Piscataqua River. However, the west
closure wall will be removed in order to install the Dry Dock 1 North
entrance structure and caisson. In addition, the caissons may not
always be in place throughout in-water construction. As such, the
analyses presented herein conservatively assume the west closure wall,
as well as the future caissons, will not be present throughout in-water
construction activities.
The Navy's request also considers emergency repairs of the P-310
super flood basin. During P-310 super flood testing in January 2022,
excessive exfiltration (i.e., transport of material outside of the
basin) was observed along Berths 1 and 2 and between the west closure
wall and super flood basin entrance structure. Emergency structural
repairs were required to reduce excessive transport of material through
the berths and west closure wall/entrance structure and prevent further
damage. As a result, 216 28-inch Z-shaped sheet piles were installed
along the Berth 1 face. After installation, these sheet piles were cut
off approximately 3 m (10 ft) above the mudline and concrete was tremie
placed behind them to plug any gaps in the existing structure that
contributed to the exfiltration. The removal of these 216 Berth 1
emergency repair piles and excess tremie concrete (approximately 382
cubic meters, 500 cubic yards (cy)) will be completed during this LOA
period and are accounted for in the Navy's request. Similarly, 10 28-
inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles were installed between the super flood
basin entrance structure and the west closure wall, cut off
approximately 3 m (10 ft) above the mudline, and had concrete tremie
placed behind them. These 10 sheet piles will be removed during the P-
381 year 1 IHA period (covered under the IHA issued by NMFS for the
first year of P-381 construction activities; 87 FR 19866, April 6,
2022).
Several additional preparatory activities (e.g., torch cutting,
dredging, etc.) will not create noise expected to result in harassment
of marine mammals. Noise created during dredging of sediment and
demolition debris (e.g., bedrock, granite blocks, concrete) is unlikely
to exceed that generated by other normal shipyard activities and is not
expected to result in incidental take of marine mammals. Activities
such as grouting (i.e., pouring of concrete) and torch cutting are not
noisy by design and will not result in incidental take of marine
mammals. These activities are not addressed in the analyses of noise
producing actions in the Navy's request, and are not considered by NMFS
in our analysis, but are included in the work descriptions to clarify
the construction progression.
P-381 In-Water Construction Activities
The work remaining for P-381 can be generally grouped into five
categories for ease of explanation: temporary structures, mechanical
bedrock removal, continued demolition of super flood basin wall
components, center wall tie-downs, and dry dock foundation and gantry
crane support. Each category involves one or more activities expected
to generate noise that could result in injury or harassment of marine
mammals. Some of these activities are a continuation of work started in
year 1, which were covered under a separate IHA issued by NMFS on April
6, 2022 (87 FR 19886).
Temporary Structures--Several temporary structures will be
installed and removed to facilitate the construction of the dry docks.
The conversion of the existing west closure wall to the Dry Dock 1
North entrance requires reinforcement of the section of the west
closure wall that will become the new dry dock entrance. The existing
west closure wall structure will be surrounded by a temporary
cofferdam. The cofferdam will be constructed with 48 28-inch wide, Z-
shaped sheet piles. The sheet piles will be installed using an initial
vibratory set followed by driving with impact hammers to refusal.
The temporary guide wall along the Berth 11 end wall installed
during year 1 (60 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles) will be removed
with a vibratory hammer. An extension to the temporary cofferdam around
the Dry Dock 1 entrance structure installed during P-381 year 1 will
also be constructed. The extension will consist of 14 28-inch wide, Z-
shaped sheet piles. The extension and the cofferdam (96 28-inch wide,
Z-shaped sheet piles) will be removed in 2024 using a vibratory hammer.
A temporary work trestle will be constructed to support the
excavation of large shafts within the individual dry docking positions.
The trestle will be installed in Dry Dock 1 North first and then
relocated to Dry Dock 1 West. The trestle system will be supported by 4
84-inch steel pipe piles and will be relocated five times within each
dry dock. As a result, the piles will be installed and removed 20 times
in Dry Dock 1 North and 20 times in Dry Dock 1 West. The piles will be
installed with a cluster drill consisting of multiple DTH hammers and
removed with a rotary drill. Before the cluster drill will be deployed,
a 102-inch casing will be set into bedrock and a 5-ft (1.5-m) deep rock
socket will be excavated with a rotary drill (see Figure 1-4 in the
Navy's application). The socket will be filled with concrete and a
second, 84-inch casing will be installed inside the larger casing and
set in the concrete. No drilling will be required to install the second
casing. The outer casing will then be removed with a rotary drill. The
84-inch diameter cluster drill will operate independently inside the
second casing to excavate the shaft. Once the shaft is drilled the
inner casing will be removed by torch cutting.
A temporary tie-in consisting of 15 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet
piles will be installed between the center wall foundation and the west
closure wall at Dry Dock 1 West. Twenty-three 28-inch wide, Z-shaped
sheet piles will also be installed on the easterly end of Dry Dock 1
West to provide a similar temporary tie-in to the center wall
foundation near the entrance to Dry
[[Page 19510]]
Dock 1 East. The sheet piles will be installed using an initial
vibratory set followed by driving with impact hammers. These tie-ins
will be removed using a vibratory hammer along with the Dry Dock 1
North tie-in to the west closure wall (16 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet
piles) that was installed under the P-381 year 1 IHA (87 FR 19886).
To support excavation activities along Berth 1, 28 28-inch wide, Z-
shaped sheet piles will be installed at the southeast corner of the
berth using a combination of vibratory and impact hammers. These piles
will be removed using a vibratory hammer.
Mechanical Bedrock Removal--Mechanical removal of bedrock will be
completed by the end of 2023 using various methods appropriate for the
removal location and as needed to avoid damage to adjacent structures.
Bedrock removal will occur along the Berth 11 face and abutment and
along Berth 1.
Bedrock will be removed by breaking it up with a hydraulic hammer
(i.e., hoe ram or breaker). To protect adjacent structures during
mechanical bedrock removal, 924 4-6-inch diameter relief holes will be
drilled using a DTH mono-hammer. A total of approximately 918 cubic
meters (1,200 cy) of bedrock are anticipated to be removed.
Demolition of Super Flood Basin Wall Components--Demolition of
existing wall components will include the removal of shutter panels,
granite quay walls, sheet piles, and concrete making up the super flood
basin. Demolition of existing wall structures will be conducted using a
rock hammer. Specifically, the remaining sections of the existing
concrete shutter panels making up the face of Berth 11 (112 panels),
portions of the granite block quay wall (2,141 cm, 2,800 cy) at Berth
1, and the remaining existing sheet pile wall at Berth 1 (168 25-inch
wide, Z-shaped sheet piles) will be removed.
The installation of a structural support waler (steel beam) at
Berth 1 will also be completed. To complete the installation of the
waler, about 98 m (320 linear ft) of concrete wall will be demolished
using a hydraulic rock hammer.
Center Wall Tie-downs--Additional work in the center wall area will
involve the installation of support tie downs for future tremie
concrete work. The tie downs require the placement of a total of 194
rock anchors requiring 9-inch diameter holes. The rock anchors will be
installed using a DTH mono-hammer.
Dry Dock and Gantry Crane Support--The location of the future
center wall requires reinforcement to allow placement of the large pre-
cast monolith structures forming the separation between the two new dry
docking positions. Specifically, the floor of the existing basin must
be able to provide an adequate foundation for the pre-cast monoliths
that will make up the dry dock interiors and center wall. The basin
floor will be reinforced by excavating 18 78-inch diameter shafts
throughout the footprint of the center wall that will be filled with
concrete to create the structural support piles for the center wall.
The shafts will be excavated using a cluster drill consisting of
multiple DTH mono-hammers. Before the cluster drill is deployed, a 102-
inch diameter casing will be set into bedrock and a 1.5 m (5 ft) deep
rock socket will be excavated using a 102-inch diameter rotary drill
(see Figure 1-4 of the Navy's application). The rock socket will be
filled with concrete and a second, 78-inch diameter casing will be
installed inside the 102-inch casing and set in the concrete. No
drilling is required to install the second casing. The 102-inch
diameter outer casing will then be removed with a rotary drill.
The future Dry Dock 1 North and Dry Dock 1 West require significant
structural reinforcement to provide an adequate foundation for the
installation of the large pre-cast monolith structures forming the dry
dock interior. Reinforcement of the individual dry dock foundations and
walls will begin first at Dry Dock 1 North and, once completed,
continue at Dry Dock 1 West. Twenty 78-inch diameter shafts will be
excavated along the Berth 11 face and head wall to support the walls of
Dry Dock 1 North. Along the floor of Dry Dock 1 North, 23 108-inch
diameter shafts will be excavated for the installation of the
foundation support piles and 18 78-inch diameter shafts will be
excavated for the installation of leveling piles (i.e., diving board
shafts).
The dry dock foundation and wall support pile and leveling pile
shafts will be filled with concrete to create the support piles for the
dry dock walls and floors. The shafts will be excavated using a cluster
drill consisting of multiple DTH hammers in the same manner as
previously described for the temporary work trestle piles. Once the
wall and foundation support piles and leveling piles for Dry Dock 1
North have been installed, foundation and wall support piles and
leveling piles will be installed for Dry Dock 1 West. Twenty-two 78-
inch diameter shafts will be excavated along the Berth 1 face to
support the walls of Dry Dock 1 West. Twenty-three 108-inch diameter
shafts will be excavated along the floor of Dry Dock 1 West for the
installation of foundation support piles and 18 78-inch shafts will be
excavated for the installation of leveling piles (i.e., diving board
shafts). The casing sizes and rotary drill sizes for each shaft are
specified in Table 1.
The large concrete monolithic sections used to create the dry docks
and the center wall separation will be placed using a gantry crane. The
gantry crane system will be structurally supported by the installation
of 16 72-inch diameter shafts installed along the western extent of the
Berth 1 face. The shafts will be installed using a DTH cluster drill as
described for the temporary work trestle piles. The casing sizes and
rotary drill sizes for the gantry crane support shafts are specified in
Table 1.
P-310 Emergency Repairs
Testing of the super flood basin on January 5, 2022 resulted in
excess exfiltration through Berths 1 and 2, prompting the need for
emergency repairs along Berth 1 as well as between the super flood
basin entrance structure and the west closure wall. Emergency repairs
consisted of the installation of sheet piles and the tremie pouring of
concrete to fill in gaps along the structure walls and floor.
Installation of emergency repairs at Berth 1 and the installation and
removal of emergency repairs at the west closure wall and entrance
structure occurred before the period described in the Navy's LOA
application. Only the removal of Berth 1 emergency repair components
will occur during the requested LOA period.
The removal of the 216 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles along the
Berth 1 face will be completed through direct pulling via barge-mounted
crane or by vibratory hammer. Specific methods will be determined by
the contractor based on resistance to extraction from the seabed.
Direct pulling via crane is not anticipated to generate harmful levels
of underwater sound. If required, the use of the vibratory hammer to
extract the installed sheet piles will be limited to an initial effort
to break the sheets loose, allowing them to be directly pulled out. As
a conservative measure, vibratory extraction of these sheet piles is
assumed for all analyses.
The removal of 765 cubic meters (1,000 cy) of tremie concrete is
anticipated to require use of a hydraulic rock hammer to break up
material into smaller pieces. Smaller pieces will then be retrieved via
excavator bucket for offsite disposal. The Navy estimates daily active
use of the rock hammer for the removal of concrete from emergency
repairs to be 4 hours per day.
[[Page 19511]]
Means and Methods for Noise Producing Activities
Only 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles will be installed or
removed with pile-driving equipment during P-381 construction. The
installation of 28-inch wide, Z-shaped steel sheet piles will be
installed initially using vibratory means and then finished with impact
hammers, if necessary. Impact hammers will also be used to push
obstructions out of the way and where sediment conditions do not permit
the efficient use of vibratory hammers. Pile removal activities will
use cranes and vibratory hammers exclusively.
The removal of bedrock and concrete and the demolition of concrete
shutter panels at Berth 11 and granite blocks and sheet piles at Berth
1 during P-381 construction will be by mechanical means. These features
will be demolished using a hydraulic rock hammer (i.e., hoe ram). The
type/size of rock hammers used will be determined by the contractor
selected to perform the work.
Two methods of rock excavation will be used during P-381
construction; DTH excavation and rotary drilling. During P-381
construction, rotary drilling will be used to set the casings and pre-
drill rock sockets for DTH cluster drills. DTH excavation using mono-
hammers will be used to create shafts for rock anchors and tie downs
and for the excavation of relief holes during mechanical bedrock
removal. For the largest shafts (greater than 42-inches in diameter),
DTH excavation will use a cluster drill. A cluster drill uses multiple
mono-hammers within a single bit to efficiently break up bedrock and
create large diameter holes (see Figure 1-5 in the Navy's application).
Concurrent Activities
In order to maintain project schedules, it is likely that multiple
pieces of equipment will operate at the same time within the basin. No
ancillary activities are anticipated during the construction period
that will require unimpeded access to the super flood basin. Therefore,
it is anticipated that there will be space available within the project
area for additional construction equipment. A maximum of 13 pieces of
equipment could potentially operate in the project area at a single
time. While this is an unlikely scenario, it could occur for a very
brief period. Construction equipment will be staged along the perimeter
of the super flood basin (Berth 11, Berth 1 and head wall) as well on
multiple barges within the super flood basin. Table 2 provides a
summary of possible equipment combinations that could be used
simultaneously over the course of the construction period.
Table 2--Summary of Multiple Equipment Scenarios
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Quantity Equipment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2023................................... 5 Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), Impact Hammer
(1).
5 Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), Impact Hammer
(1), DTH Mono-hammer (1).
5 Rock Hammer (1), Vibratory Hammer (1), Impact Hammer
(1), DTH Mono-hammer (1), Rotary Drill (1).
5 Rock Hammer (1), Vibratory Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer
(1), Cluster Drill (2).
5 Cluster Drill (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), Mono-hammer
DTH (1), Rotary Drill (1).
5 Rock Hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer
(1), Cluster Drill (2).
6 Rock Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill
(1), Rotary Drill (1).
6 Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (1), DTH Mono-hammer
(1), Rotary Drill (2).
8 Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer
(2), Cluster Drill (2).
10 Rock Hammer (3), Vibratory Hammer (2), Impact hammer
(1), DTH Mono-hammer (2), Cluster Drill (2).
13 Rock Hammer (5), Cluster Drill (2), Vibratory Hammer
(2), Impact Hammer (1), Mono-hammer DTH (3).
2024................................... 8 Rock Hammer (2), Vibratory Hammer (2), DTH Mono-hammer
(2), Cluster Drill (2).
5 Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1), Vibratory
hammer (1), Impact Hammer (1).
3 Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
3 Cluster Drill (1), Rotary Drill (1), DTH mono-hammer
(1).
3 Rotary Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
2025................................... 3 Cluster Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
3 Cluster Drill (1), Rotary Drill (1), DTH mono-hammer
(1).
3 Rotary Drill (2), DTH mono-hammer (1).
2 Rotary Drill (2).
2 Cluster Drill (2).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 381 Constructors, 2022.
Mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures are described in
detail later in this document (please see Mitigation and Monitoring and
Reporting).
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS' proposed rulemaking to the Navy was published in
the Federal Register on January 18, 2023 (88 FR 3146). That proposed
rule described, in detail, the Navy's activities, the marine mammal
species that may be affected by the activities, and the anticipated
effects on marine mammals. In that proposed rule, we requested public
input on the request for authorization described therein, our analyses,
the proposed authorization, and any other aspect of the notice of
proposed rulemaking, and requested that interested persons submit
relevant information, suggestions, and comments. This proposed rule was
available for a 30-day public comment period.
During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS received no comments.
Changes From the Proposed IHA to Final IHA
No public comments were received during the comment period;
however, NMFS made a few minor clarifications and corrections in this
final rule. In the sections of the documents that refer to the use of a
bubble curtain, it was established that the bubble curtain will be used
in cases where the Level A harassment zone extends to the full region
of influence (ROI). To clarify this further, NMFS adds that this refers
to all rock hammering and DTH cluster drilling. In addition, for bubble
curtains, NMFS clarified that the air flow to the bubblers will be
balanced across the entrance openings to the super flood basin, rather
than the piles. Finally, NMFS removed the mitigation condition
requiring that protected species observers (PSOs) work in shifts
lasting no longer than 4 hours (hrs) with at least
[[Page 19512]]
a 1-hr break between shifts and limiting PSO duties to no more than 12
hrs in a 24-hr period. This is not a required condition for the Navy
for these construction activities, rather it is related to other
activity types, such as offshore seismic surveys, but was accidentally
included. That said, NMFS communicated to the Navy that observers
should be given adequate breaks and work in shifts to reduce observer
fatigue to ensure their ability to best monitor for marine mammals.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities
Sections 3 and 4 of the application summarize available information
regarding status and trends, distribution and habitat preferences, and
behavior and life history of the potentially affected species. NMFS
fully considered all of this information, and we refer the reader to
these descriptions, referenced here, instead of reprinting the
information. Additional information regarding population trends and
threats may be found in NMFS' Stock Assessment Reports (SARs;
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments) and more general information about these species
(e.g., physical and behavioral descriptions) may be found on NMFS'
website (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species).
Table 3 lists all species or stocks for which take is expected and
authorized for this activity, and summarizes information related to the
population or stock, including regulatory status under the MMPA and
Endangered Species Act (ESA) and potential biological removal (PBR),
where known. PBR is defined by the MMPA as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (as described in NMFS' SARs). While no
serious injury or mortality is expected to occur, PBR and annual
serious injury and mortality from anthropogenic sources are included
here as gross indicators of the status of the species or stocks and
other threats.
Marine mammal abundance estimates presented in this document
represent the total number of individuals that make up a given stock or
the total number estimated within a particular study or survey area.
NMFS' stock abundance estimates for most species represent the total
estimate of individuals within the geographic area, if known, that
comprises that stock. For some species, this geographic area may extend
beyond U.S. waters. All stocks managed under the MMPA in this region
are assessed in NMFS' U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico SARs. All values
presented in Table 3 are the most recent available at the time of
publication (including from the 2022 draft SARs) and are available
online at: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments).
Table 3--Species Likely Impacted by the Specified Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock abundance Nbest,
ESA/MMPA status; (CV, Nmin, most recent Annual M/
Common name Scientific name MMPA stock strategic (Y/N) abundance survey) \2\ PBR SI \3\
\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Cetartiodactyla--Superfamily Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Phocoenidae (porpoises):
Harbor Porpoise................. Phocoena............... Gulf of Maine/Bay of -; N 95,543 (0.31; 74,034; 851 164
Fundy. 2016).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Carnivora--Superfamily Pinnipedia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Phocidae (earless seals):
Harbor seal..................... Phoca vitulina......... Western North Atlantic. -; N 61,336 (0.08, 57,637; 1,729 339
2018).
Gray seal....................... Halichoerus grypus..... Western North Atlantic. -; N 27,300 \4\ (0.22; 1,389 4,453
22,785; 2016).
Harp seal....................... Pagophilus Western North Atlantic. -; N 7,600,000 426,000 178,573
groenlandicus. (unk,7,100.000, 2019).
Hooded seal..................... Cystophora cristata.... Western North Atlantic. -; N 593,500............... Unknown 1,680
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed
under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality
exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed
under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
\2\ NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments assessments. CV is coefficient of variation; Nmin is the minimum estimate of stock abundance. In some cases, CV is not applicable (N.A.).
\3\ These values, found in NMFS's SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g.,
commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV
associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
\4\ This abundance value and the associated PBR value reflect the US population only. Estimated abundance for the entire Western North Atlantic stock,
including animals in Canada, is 451,600. The annual M/SI estimate is for the entire stock.
As indicated above, all five species (with five managed stocks) in
Table 3 temporally and spatially co-occur with the activity to the
degree that take is reasonably likely to occur.
A detailed description of the species likely to be affected by the
Navy's construction activities, including brief introductions to the
species and relevant stocks as well as available information regarding
population trends and threats, and information regarding local
occurrence, were provided in the Federal Register notice for the
proposed rule (88 FR 3146, January 18, 2023). Since that time, we are
not aware of any changes in the status of these species and stocks;
therefore, detailed descriptions are not provided here. Please refer to
that Federal Register notice for these descriptions. Please also refer
to the NMFS website (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species) for
generalized species accounts.
Marine Mammal Hearing
Hearing is the most important sensory modality for marine mammals
underwater, and exposure to anthropogenic sound can have deleterious
effects. To appropriately assess the potential effects of exposure to
sound, it is necessary to understand the frequency ranges marine
mammals are able to hear. Not all marine mammal species have equal
hearing capabilities (e.g., Richardson et al., 1995; Wartzok and
Ketten, 1999; Au and Hastings,
[[Page 19513]]
2008). To reflect this, Southall et al. (2007, 2019) recommended that
marine mammals be divided into hearing groups based on directly
measured (behavioral or auditory evoked potential techniques) or
estimated hearing ranges (behavioral response data, anatomical
modeling, etc.). Note that no direct measurements of hearing ability
have been successfully completed for mysticetes (i.e., low-frequency
cetaceans). Subsequently, NMFS (2018a) described generalized hearing
ranges for these marine mammal hearing groups. Generalized hearing
ranges were chosen based on the approximately 65 decibel (dB) threshold
from the normalized composite audiograms, with the exception for lower
limits for low-frequency cetaceans where the lower bound was deemed to
be biologically implausible and the lower bound from Southall et al.
(2007) retained. Marine mammal hearing groups and their associated
hearing ranges are provided in Table 4.
Table 4--Marine Mammal Hearing Groups
[NMFS, 2018a]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
whales).
Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
(dolphins, toothed whales, beaked
whales, bottlenose whales).
High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins,
Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus
cruciger & L. australis).
Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
(true seals).
Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
(sea lions and fur seals).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a
composite (i.e., all species within the group), where individual
species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized
hearing range chosen based on ~65 dB threshold from normalized
composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF
cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).
The pinniped functional hearing group was modified from Southall et
al. (2007) on the basis of data indicating that phocid species have
consistently demonstrated an extended frequency range of hearing
compared to otariids, especially in the higher frequency range
(Hemil[auml] et al., 2006; Kastelein et al., 2009; Reichmuth and Holt,
2013).
For more detail concerning these groups and associated frequency
ranges, please see NMFS (2018a) for a review of available information.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals and Their
Habitat
The effects of underwater noise from the Navy's construction
activities have the potential to result in behavioral harassment of
marine mammals in the vicinity of the project area. The notice of the
proposed rulemaking (88 FR 3146, January 18, 2023) included a
discussion of the effects of anthropogenic noise on marine mammals and
the potential effects of underwater noise from the Navy's construction
activities on marine mammals and their habitat. That information and
analysis is referenced in this final rule and is not repeated here;
please refer to the notice of the proposed rulemaking (88 FR 3146,
January 18, 2023).
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of the number of incidental takes
authorized under the rule, which will inform both NMFS' consideration
of ``small numbers'' and NMFS' negligible impact determinations.
As described previously, no serious injury or mortality is
anticipated or authorized for this activity. Harassment is the only
type of take expected to result from these activities. Except with
respect to certain activities not pertinent here, section 3(18) of the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance, which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (Level B harassment).
Authorized takes will primarily be by Level B harassment, as use of
the acoustic sources (i.e., impact and vibratory pile installation and
removal, rotary drilling, DTH, and rock hammering) has the potential to
result in disruption of behavioral patterns for individual marine
mammals. There is also some potential for auditory injury (Level A
harassment) to result, primarily for high frequency species and/or
phocids because predicted auditory injury zones are larger than for
mid-frequency species and/or otariids. The requirements pertaining to
mitigation and monitoring are expected to minimize the severity of the
taking to the extent practicable. Below we describe how the authorized
take numbers are estimated.
For acoustic impacts, generally speaking, we estimate take by
considering: (1) acoustic thresholds above which NMFS believes the best
available science indicates marine mammals will be behaviorally
harassed or incur some degree of permanent hearing impairment; (2) the
area or volume of water that will be ensonified above these levels in a
day; (3) the density or occurrence of marine mammals within these
ensonified areas; and, (4) the number of days of activities. We note
that while these factors can contribute to a basic calculation to
provide an initial prediction of potential takes, additional
information that can qualitatively inform take estimates is also
sometimes available (e.g., previous monitoring results or average group
size). Below, we describe the factors considered here in more detail
and present the estimated take numbers.
Acoustic Thresholds
NMFS recommends the use of acoustic thresholds that identify the
received level of underwater sound above which exposed marine mammals
would be reasonably expected to be behaviorally harassed (equated to
Level B harassment) or to incur PTS of some degree (equated to Level A
harassment).
Level B Harassment--Though significantly driven by received level,
the onset of behavioral disturbance from anthropogenic noise exposure
is also informed to varying degrees by other factors related to the
source or exposure context (e.g., frequency, predictability, duty
cycle, duration of the exposure, signal-to-noise ratio, distance to the
source), the environment (e.g., bathymetry, other noises in the area,
predators in the area), and the receiving animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography, life stage, depth) and can be difficult to
predict
[[Page 19514]]
(e.g., Southall et al., 2007, 2021; Ellison et al., 2012). Based on
what the available science indicates and the practical need to use a
threshold based on a metric that is both predictable and measurable for
most activities, NMFS typically uses a generalized acoustic threshold
based on received level to estimate the onset of behavioral harassment.
NMFS generally predicts that marine mammals are likely to be
behaviorally harassed in a manner considered to be Level B harassment
when exposed to underwater anthropogenic noise above root-mean-squared
pressure received levels (RMS SPL) of 120 dB (referenced to 1
micropascal (re 1 [mu]Pa)) for continuous (e.g., vibratory pile-
driving, drilling) and above RMS SPL 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa for non-
explosive impulsive (e.g., seismic airguns) or intermittent (e.g.,
scientific sonar) sources. Generally speaking, Level B harassment take
estimates based on these behavioral harassment thresholds are expected
to include any likely takes by TTS as, in most cases, the likelihood of
TTS occurs at distances from the source less than those at which
behavioral harassment is likely. TTS of a sufficient degree can
manifest as behavioral harassment, as reduced hearing sensitivity and
the potential reduced opportunities to detect important signals
(conspecific communication, predators, prey) may result in changes in
behavior patterns that would not otherwise occur.
The Navy's activities include the use of continuous (vibratory pile
driving/removal, rotary drilling) and intermittent (impact pile
driving, rock hammering) sources, and therefore the RMS SPL thresholds
of 120 and 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa, respectively, are applicable. DTH
systems have both continuous and intermittent components as discussed
in the Description of Sound Sources section in the proposed rule (88 FR
3146, January 18, 2023). When evaluating Level B harassment, NMFS
recommends treating DTH as a continuous source and applying the RMS SPL
thresholds of 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (see NMFS recommended guidance on DTH
systems at https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2022-11/PUBLIC%20DTH%20Basic%20Guidance_November%202022.pdf; NMFS, 2022).
Level A harassment--NMFS' Technical Guidance for Assessing the
Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0)
(NMFS, 2018a) identifies dual criteria to assess auditory injury (Level
A harassment) to five different marine mammal groups (based on hearing
sensitivity) as a result of exposure to noise from two different types
of sources (impulsive or non-impulsive). The Navy's activities include
the use of impulsive (impact pile driving, rock hammering, DTH) and
non-impulsive (vibratory pile driving/removal, rotary drilling, DTH)
sources.
These thresholds are provided in the table below. The references,
analysis, and methodology used in the development of the thresholds are
described in NMFS' 2018 Technical Guidance, which may be accessed at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-acoustic-technical-guidance.
Table 5--Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PTS onset acoustic thresholds * (received level)
Hearing group ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impulsive Non-impulsive
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans........... Cell 1: Lpk,flat: 219 dB; Cell 2: LE,LF,24h: 199 dB.
LE,LF,24h: 183 dB.
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans........... Cell 3: Lpk,flat: 230 dB; Cell 4: LE,MF,24h: 198 dB.
LE,MF,24h: 185 dB.
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans.......... Cell 5: Lpk,flat: 202 dB; Cell 6: LE,HF,24h: 173 dB.
LE,HF,24h: 155 dB.
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater)..... Cell 7: Lpk,flat: 218 dB; Cell 8: LE,PW,24h: 201 dB.
LE,PW,24h: 185 dB.
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater).... Cell 9: Lpk,flat: 232 dB; Cell 10: LE,OW,24h: 219 dB.
LE,OW,24h: 203 dB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for
calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level
thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should also be considered.
Note: Peak sound pressure (Lpk) has a reference value of 1 [mu]Pa, and cumulative sound exposure level (LE) has
a reference value of 1[mu]Pa\2\s. In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National
Standards Institute standards (ANSI, 2013). However, peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating
frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript ``flat'' is
being included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized
hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the
designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and
that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be
exceeded in a multitude of ways (i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it
is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be
exceeded.
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and environmental parameters of the
activity that are used in estimating the area ensonified above the
acoustic thresholds, including source levels and transmission loss
coefficient.
The sound field in the project area is the existing background
noise plus additional construction noise from the project. Marine
mammals are expected to be affected via sound generated by the primary
components of the project (i.e., impact pile driving, vibratory pile
driving, vibratory pile removal, rotary drilling, rock hammering, and
DTH).
Sound Source Levels--The intensity of pile driving sounds is
greatly influenced by factors such as the type of piles, hammers, and
the physical environment (e.g., sediment type) in which the activity
takes place. The Navy evaluated sound source level (SL) measurements
available for certain pile types and sizes from similar environments
from other Navy pile driving projects, including from past projects
conducted at the Shipyard, and used them as proxy SLs to determine
reasonable SLs likely to result from the pile driving and drilling
activities in their application. Projects reviewed were those most
similar to the specified activity in terms of drilling and rock
hammering activities, type and size of piles installed, method of pile
installation, and substrate conditions. Some of the proxy source levels
used are expected to be more conservative as compared to what may be
realized by the actual pile driving to take place, as the values are
from larger pile sizes. In some instances, for reasons described below,
NMFS relied on alternative proxy SLs in our evaluation of the impacts
of the Navy's activities on marine mammals (Table 6). Note that the
source levels in Table 6 represent the SPL referenced at a distance of
10 m from the source.
[[Page 19515]]
Table 6--Summary of Unattenuated In-Water Pile Driving Source Levels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELss (dB
Installation Peak SPL RMS SPL (dB re 1 re 1
Pile type method Pile diameter (dB re 1 [mu]Pa) [mu]Pa\2\
[mu]Pa) sec)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Casing/Socket................ Rotary Drill.... 126-inch........ NA...... 154 (169 at 1 m)....... NA
102-inch........ NA...... 154 (169 at 1 m)....... NA
84-inch......... NA...... 154 (169 at 1 m)....... NA
Shaft........................ DTH Cluster 108-inch........ NA...... 201.6 \5\ (Level A).... NA
Drill. 174 \6\ (Level B)......
84-inch......... NA...... 196.7 \5\ (Level A).... NA
174 \6\(Level B).......
78-inch......... NA...... 195.2 \5\ (Level A).... 181
174 \6\ (Level B)......
72-inch......... NA...... 193.7 \5\ (Level A).... NA
174 \6\ (Level B)......
Rock anchor.................. DTH mono-hammer. 9-inch.......... 172..... 167.................... 146
Relief hole.................. DTH mono-hammer. 4 to 6-inch..... 170..... \6\ 156................ 144
Z-shaped Sheet............... Impact.......... \1\ 28-inch..... 211..... 196.................... 181
Vibratory....... 28-inch \2\..... NA...... 167.................... 167
Vibratory....... 25-inch \3\..... NA...... 167.................... 167
Bedrock and concrete Rock Hammer \4\. NA.............. 197..... 186 \4\................ \4\ 171
demolition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An appropriate proxy value for impact driving 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles is not available, so a
value for 30-inch steel pipe piles was used as a proxy value (NAVFAC SW, 2020 [p. A-4]).
\2\ An appropriate proxy value for vibratory pile driving 28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles is not available,
so a value for 30-inch steel pipe piles was used as a proxy value (Navy, 2015 [p. 14]).
\3\ An appropriate proxy value for vibratory pile driving 25-inch sheet piles is not available, so the value for
28-inch wide, Z-shaped sheet piles was used as a proxy.
\4\ Escude, 2012.
\5\ RMS SPL values were derived from regression and extrapolation calculations of existing data by NMFS.
\6\SPLs vary from those proposed in the Navy's application as the NMFS DTH recommended guidance updated the
source level proxy it recommends for some DTH systems after the Navy's application was deemed adequate and
complete (NMFS, 2022).
Notes: All SPLs are unattenuated and represent the SPL referenced at a distance of 10 m from the source; NA =
Not applicable; single strike SEL are the proxy source levels for impact pile driving used to calculate
distances to PTS; dB re 1 [mu]Pa = decibels (dB) referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, measures
underwater SPL.; dB re 1 [mu]Pa\2\-sec = dB referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal squared per second,
measures underwater SEL.
With regards to the proxy values summarized in Table 6, very little
information is available regarding source levels for in-water rotary
drilling activities. As a conservative measure and to be consistent
with previously issued IHAs for similar projects in the region, a proxy
of 154 dB RMS is used for all rotary drilling activities (Dazey, 2012).
NMFS recommends treating DTH systems as both impulsive and
continuous, non-impulsive sound source types simultaneously. Thus,
impulsive thresholds are used to evaluate Level A harassment, and the
continuous threshold is used to evaluate Level B harassment. The Navy
consulted with NMFS to obtain the appropriate proxy values for DTH
mono- and cluster-hammers. With regards to DTH mono-hammers, NMFS
recommended proxy levels for Level A harassment based on available data
regarding DTH systems of similar sized piles and holes (Table 6) (Denes
et al., 2019; Guan and Miner, 2020; Reyff and Heyvaert, 2019; Reyff,
2020; Heyvaert and Reyff, 2021). No hydroacoustic data exist for
cluster DTH systems; therefore, NMFS recommends proxy values based off
of regression and extrapolation calculations of existing data for mono-
hammers until hydroacoustic data on DTH cluster drills be obtained
(NMFS, 2022). Because of the high number of hammers and strikes for
this system, DTH cluster drills are treated as a continuous sound
source for the time component of Level A harassment (i.e., for the
entire duration DTH cluster drills are operational, they are considered
to be producing strikes, rather than indicating the number of strikes
per second, which is unknown), but still used the impulsive thresholds.
At the time of the Navy's application submission, NMFS recommended
that the RMS SPL at 10 m should be 167 dB when evaluating Level B
harassment (Heyvaert and Reyff, 2021 as cited in NMFS, 2021b) for all
DTH pile/hole sizes. However, since that time, NMFS has received
additional clarifying information regarding DTH data presented in Reyff
and Heyvaert (2019) and Reyff (2020) that allows for different RMS SPL
at 10 m to be recommended for piles/holes of varying diameters (NMFS,
2022). Therefore, the following proxy RMS SPLs at 10 m are used to
evaluate Level B harassment from this sound source in this analysis
(Table 6): 156 dB RMS for the 4 to 6 inch mono hammers (Reyff and
Heyvaert, 2019; Reyff, 2020), 167 dB RMS for the 9 inch mono-hammers
(Heyvaert and Reyff, 2021), and 174 dB RMS for all DTH cluster drills
greater or equal to 74 inches (Reyff and Heyvaert, 2019; Reyff, 2020).
See Footnote 6 in Table 6.
Rock hammering is analyzed as an impulsive noise source. For
purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the hammer will have a
maximum strike rate of 460 strikes per minute and will operate for a
maximum duration of 15 minutes before needing to reposition or stop to
check progress. Therefore, noise impacts for rock hammering activities
are assessed using the number of blows per 15-minute interval (6,900
blows) and the number of 15-minute intervals anticipated over the
course of the day based on the durations provided in Tables 1, 7, and
8. As with rotary drilling, very little information is available
regarding source levels associated with nearshore rock hammering. In
previous IHAs related to the Shipyard, NMFS relied on preliminary
measurements from the Tappan Zee Bridge replacement project (Reyff,
2018a, 2018b) as well as data from a WSDOT concrete pier demolition
project (Escude, 2012) to inform proxy SLs for rock hammering. However,
a few discrepancies in the preliminary data of the Tappan Zee Bridge
reports have been identified resulting from NMFS' further inspection
into the report's data. Therefore, the SLs reported only from the
Escude (2012) concrete pier demolition project are used as proxy values
for rock hammering activities associated with P-381 (Table 6).
Level B Harassment Zones--Transmission loss (TL) is the decrease in
acoustic intensity as an acoustic pressure wave propagates out from a
source. TL parameters vary with frequency, temperature, sea conditions,
current, source and receiver depth, water depth, water chemistry, and
[[Page 19516]]
bottom composition and topography. The general formula for underwater
TL is:
TL = B * log10 (R1/R2),
Where:
B = transmission loss coefficient (assumed to be 15)
R1 = the distance of the modeled SPL from the driven pile, and
R2 = the distance from the driven pile of the initial measurement.
This formula neglects loss due to scattering and absorption, which
is assumed to be zero here. The degree to which underwater sound
propagates away from a sound source is dependent on a variety of
factors, most notably the water bathymetry and presence or absence of
reflective or absorptive conditions including in-water structures and
sediments. The recommended TL coefficient for most nearshore
environments is the practical spreading value of 15. This value results
in an expected propagation environment that would lie between spherical
and cylindrical spreading loss conditions, which is the most
appropriate assumption for the Navy's activities in the absence of
specific modelling. All Level B harassment isopleths are reported in
Tables 7 and 8 considering RMS SLs.
Level A Harassment Zones--The ensonified area associated with Level
A harassment is more technically challenging to predict due to the need
to account for a duration component. Therefore, NMFS developed an
optional User Spreadsheet tool to accompany the Technical Guidance
(NMFS, 2018a) that can be used to relatively simply predict an isopleth
distance for use in conjunction with marine mammal density or
occurrence to help predict potential takes. We note that because of
some of the assumptions included in the methods underlying this
optional tool, we anticipate that the resulting isopleth estimates are
typically going to be overestimates of some degree, which may result in
an overestimate of potential take by Level A harassment. However, this
optional tool offers the best way to estimate isopleth distances when
more sophisticated modeling methods are not available or practical. For
stationary sources (such as from impact and vibratory pile driving,
drilling, DTH, and rock hammering), the optional User Spreadsheet tool
predicts the distance at which, if a marine mammal remained at that
distance for the duration of the activity, it would be expected to
incur PTS. Inputs used in the User Spreadsheet can be found in Appendix
A of the Navy's application, Appendix A of the Navy's addendum, and the
resulting isopleths are reported in Tables 7 and 8.
Table 7--Calculated Distance and Areas of Level A and Level B Harassment for Impulsive Noise
[DTH, impact pile driving, hydraulic rock hammering]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A harassment \2\ Level B harassment
Total --------------------------------------------------------------
Activity ID Year \1\/activity Purpose Duration, count, production High frequency
size, and or rate days cetaceans (harbor Phocid pinnipeds All species
porpoise)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............ 2 Hydraulic Rock Shutter Panel 5 hours/day (20 56 5,034.5 m/0.417417 2,261.9 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Demolition (112 intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
panels). 15 each).
3............ 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Removal of Granite 2.5 hours/day (10 47 3,171.6 m/0.417417 1,424.9 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Quay Wall (2,800 intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
cy). 15 min each).
4............ 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Berth 1 Top of Wall 10 hours/day (40 74 7,991.8 m/0.417417 3,590.5 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Demolition for intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Waler Install (320 15 min each).
lf).
6............ 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 12 hours/day (48 60 9,024.7 m/0.417417 4,054.5 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Removal (700 cy) intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
at Berth 11 Basin 15 min each).
Floor.
10........... 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 12 hours/day (48 25 9,024.7 m/0.417417 4,054.5 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Removal (300 cy) intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
at Berth 1 Basin 15 min each).
Floor.
21........... 2 Hydraulic Rock Removal of 4 hours/day (16 15 4,388.6 m/0.417417 1,949.2 m/0.417417 541.17 m/0.277858
Hammer. Emergency Repair intervals/day at km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Concrete (500 cy) 15 min each).
at Berth 1.
7............ 2 DTH Mono-hammer... Relief Holes at 924 4-6 inch holes 35 178.9 m/0.047675 80.4 m/0.014413 2,512 m/0. 417417
Berth 11 Basin 27 holes/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Floor.
11........... 2 DTH Mono-hammer... Dry Dock 1 North 50 9-inch holes 2 25 244.8 m/0.073751 110 m/0.022912 13,594 m/0.417417
entrance Rock holes/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Anchors.
22........... 2-3 DTH Mono-hammer. Center Wall 72 9-inch holes 2 36 244.8 m/0.073751 110 m/0.022912 13,594 m/0.417417
Foundation Rock holes/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Anchors.
34........... 3-4 DTH Mono-hammer. Dry Dock 1 North 36 9-inch holes 2 18 244.8 m/0.073751 110 m/0.022912 13,594 m/0.417417
Rock Anchors. holes/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
35........... 4-5 DTH Mono-hammer. Dry Dock 1 West 36 9-inch holes 2 18 244.8 m/0.073751 110 m/0.022912 13,594 m/0. 417417
Rock Anchors. holes/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
R............ 2 Impact Pile Dry Dock 1 North 48 28-inch Z-shaped 6 1,568.6 m/0.417417 704.7 m/0.364953 2,512 m/0.417417
Driving. Entrance Temporary sheets 8 sheets/ km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Cofferdam. day.
5............ 2 Impact Pile Berth 1 Support of 28 28-inch Z-shaped 8 988.2 m/0.403411 444.0 m/0.201158 2,512 m/0.417417
Driving. Excavation. sheets 4 piles/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
8............ 2 Impact Pile Temporary Cofferdam 14 28-inch Z-shaped 4 988.2 m/0.403411 444.0 m/0.201158 2,512 m/0.417417
Driving. Extension. sheets 4 piles/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
[[Page 19517]]
12........... 2 Impact Pile Center Wall Tie-in 15 28-inch Z-shaped 4 988.2 m/0.403411 444.0 m/0.201158 2,512 m/0.417417
Driving. to West Closure sheets 4 piles/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Wall.
24........... 2-3 Impact Pile Center Wall East 23 28-inch Z-shaped 12 622.5 m/0.334747 279.7 m/0.090757 2,512 m/0.417417
Driving. Tie-in to Existing sheets 2 piles/day. km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Wall.
A4........... 2 DTH Cluster Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 18 78-inch shafts 117 84,380.4 m/0.417417 37,909.7 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Entrance 10 hours/day 6.5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Foundation Support days/shaft.
Piles.
9d........... 2 DTH Cluster Drill. Gantry Crane 16 72-inch shafts 80 67,025.7 m/0.417417 30,112.8 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Support Piles. 10 hours/day 5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
days/shaft.
13d.......... 2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 20 84-inch shafts 70 106,228.6 m/ 47,725.5 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Temporary Work 10 hours/day 3.5 0.417417 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Trestle. days/shaft.
15d.......... 2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 18 78-inch shafts 135 84,380.4 m/0.417417 37,909.7 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Leveling Piles 10 hours/day 7.5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
(Diving Board days/shaft.
Shafts).
16d.......... 2-3 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for Dry 20 78-inch shafts 150 84,380.4 m/0.417417 37,909.7 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Dock 1 North. 10 hours/day 7.5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
days/shaft.
17d.......... 2-3 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 23 108-inch shafts 196 225,376.2 m/ 101,255.2 m/ 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. for Dry Dock 1 10 hours/day 8.5 0.417417 km\2\. 0.417417 km\2\. km\2\.
North. days/shaft.
29d.......... 3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 20 84-inch shafts 70 106,228.6 m/ 47,725.5 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Temporary Work 10 hours/day 3.5 0.417417 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
Trestle. days/shaft.
31d.......... 3-4 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for Dry 22 78-inch shafts 165 84,380.4 m/0.417417 37,909.7 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Dock 1 West. 10 hours/day 7.5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
days/shaft.
32d.......... 3-4 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 23 108-inch shafts 196 225,376.2 m/ 101,255.2 m/ 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. for Dry Dock 1 10 hours/day 8.5 0.417417 km\2\. 0.417417 km\2\. km\2\.
West. days/pile.
33d.......... 3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 18 78-inch shafts 135 84,380.4 m/0.417417 37,909.7 m/0.417417 39,811 m/0.417417
Drill. Leveling Piles 10 hours/day 7.5 km\2\. km\2\. km\2\.
(Diving Board days/pile.
Shafts).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the
Navy's construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
\2\ To determine underwater harassment zone size, ensonified areas from the source were clipped along the shoreline using Geographical Information
Systems (GIS).
Table 8--Calculated Distance and Areas of Level A and Level B Harassment for Non-Impulsive Noise
[Rotary drilling and vibratory pile driving/extracting]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A harassment \2\ Level B harassment
Duration, count, Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activity Year \1\/ Purpose size, and or production High frequency
ID activity rate days cetaceans (harbor Phocid pinnipeds All species
porpoise)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R........ 2 Vibratory Pile Dry Dock 1 North 48 28-inch Z- 6 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Driving. Entrance shaped sheets 8
Temporary sheets/day.
Cofferdam.
2........ 2-3 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 168 25-inch Z- 42 12.2 m/0.000454 km\2\ 5.0 m/0.000078 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Sheet Piles. shaped sheets 4
piles/day.
5........ 2 Vibratory Pile Install Berth 1 28 28-inch Z- 8 12.2 m/0.000454 km\2\ 5.0 m/0.000078 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Driving. Support of shaped sheets 4
Excavation. piles/day.
8........ 2 Vibratory Pile Install 14 28-inch Z- 4 12.2 m/0.000454 km\2\ 5.0 m/0.000078 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Driving. Temporary shaped sheets 4
Cofferdam piles/day.
Extension.
12....... 2 Vibratory Pile Center Wall Tie- 15 28-inch Z- 4 12.2 m/0.000454 km\2\ 5.0 m/0.000078 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Driving. In to Existing shaped sheets 4
West Closure piles/day.
Wall.
18....... 2 Vibratory Berth 11 End 60 28-inch Z- 10 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Wall Temporary shaped sheets 8
Guide Wall. piles/day.
19....... 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 28 28-inch Z- 5 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Support of shaped sheets 8
Excavation. piles/day.
20....... 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 108 28-inch Z- 18 16.0 m/0.000733 km\2\ 6.6 m/0.000136 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Emergency shaped sheets 6
Repairs. piles/day.
[[Page 19518]]
23....... 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 North- 16 28-inch Z- 3 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Remove Center shaped sheets 8
Wall Tie-in to piles/day.
West Closure
Wall.
24....... 2-3 Vibratory Center Wall East 23 28-inch Z- 12 7.7 m/0.000185 km\2\ 3.2 m/0.000032 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Pile Driving. Tie-in to shaped sheets 2
Existing Wall. piles/day.
25....... 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 West 15 28-inch Z- 3 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Remove Center shaped sheets 8
Wall Tie-in to piles/day.
West Closure
Wall.
26....... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Center 23 28-inch Z- 12 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Wall Tie-in to shaped sheets 8
Existing Wall. piles/day.
27....... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 96 28-inch Z- 12 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Cofferdam. shaped sheets 8
piles/day.
28....... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 14 28-inch Z- 2 19.4 m/0.001041 km\2\ 8.0 m/0.0002 km\2\ 13,594 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Extraction. Cofferdam shaped sheets 8
Extension. piles/day.
A1....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 18 102-inch 18 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Entrance borings 1 hour/
Foundation day 1 casing/
Support Piles-- day.
Install Outer
Casing.
A2....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 18 102-inch 18 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.41747 km\2\.
Entrance borings 9 hours/
Foundation day 1 socket/
Support Piles-- day.
Pre-Drill
Socket.
A3....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 18 102-inch 18 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Entrance borings 15
Foundation minutes/casing
Support Piles-- 1 casing/day.
Remove Outer
Casing.
9a....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Gantry Crane 16 102-inch 16 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Support--Instal borings 1 hour/
l Outer Casing. day 1 casing/
day.
9b....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Gantry Crane 16 102-inch 16 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Support--Pre- borings 9 hours/
Drill Socket. day 1 socket/
day.
9c....... 2 Rotary Drill.. Gantry Crane 16 102-inch 16 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Support--Remove borings 15
Outer Casing. minutes/casing
1 casing/day.
13a...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 1 hour/
Trestle--Instal day 1 casing/
l Outer Casing. day.
13b...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 9 hours/
Trestle--Pre- day 1 socket/
Drill Socket. day.
13c...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 15
Trestle--Remove minutes/casing
Outer Casing. 1 casing//day.
14....... 2-3 Rotary Drill Remove Dry Dock 20 84-inch 20 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
1 North borings 15
Temporary Work minutes/casing
Trestle Piles. 1 casing/day.
15a...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 18 84-inch 18 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 1 hour/
Install Outer day 1 casing/
Casing. day.
15b...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 18 84-inch 18 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 9 hours/
Pre-Drill day 1 socket/
Socket. day.
15c...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 18 84-inch 18 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 15
Remove Outer minutes/casing
Casing. 1 casing/day.
16a...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 1 hour/
Install Outer day 1 casing/
Casing. day.
16b...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 9 hours/
Pre-Drill day 1 socket/
Socket. day.
16c...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 20 102-inch 20 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 15
Remove Outer minutes/casing
Casing. 1 casing/day.
17a...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 23 126-inch 23 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 1 hour/
Shafts--Install day 1 casing/
Outer Casing. day.
[[Page 19519]]
17b...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 23 126-inch 23 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 9 hours/
Shafts Pre- day 1 socket/
Drill Sockets. day.
17c...... 2-3 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 23 126-inch 23 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 15
Shafts--Remove minutes/casing
Outer Casing. 1 casing/day.
29a...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 20 102-inch 20 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 1 hour/
Trestle--Instal day 1 casing/
l Outer Casing. day.
29b...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 20 102-inch 20 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 9 hours/
Trestle--Pre- day 1 socket/
Drill Socket. day.
29c...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 20 102-inch 20 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Temporary Work borings 15
Trestle--Remove minutes/casing
Outer Casing. 1 casing/day.
30....... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 20 84-inch 20 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Remove borings 15
Temporary Work minutes/pile 1
Trestle Piles. pile/day.
31a...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 22 102-inch 22 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 1 hour/
Install Outer day 1 casing/
Casing. day.
31b...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 22 102-inch 22 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 9 hours/
Pre-Drill day 1 socket/
Socket. day.
31c...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 22 102-inch 22 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Wall Shafts-- borings 15
Remove Outer minutes/casing
Casing. 1 casing/day.
32a...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 23 126-inch 23 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 1 hour/
Shafts--Install day 1 casing/
Outer Casing. day.
32b...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 23 126-inch 23 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 9 hours/
Shafts Pre- day 1 socket/
Drill Sockets. day.
32c...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 23 126-inch 23 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Foundation borings 15
Shafts--Remove minutes/casing
Outer Casing. 1 casing/day.
33a...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 18 84-inch 18 2.1 m/0.000014 km\2\ 1.3 m/0.000005 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 1 hour/
Install Outer day 1 casing/
Casing. day.
33b...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 West 18 84-inch 18 8.9 m/0.000248 km\2\ 5.4 m/0.000091 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 9 hours/
Pre-Drill day 1 socket/
Socket. day.
33c...... 3-4 Rotary Drill Dry Dock 1 North 18 84-inch 18 0.8 m/0.000002 km\2\ 0.5 m/0.000001 km\2\ 1,848 m/0.417417 km\2\.
Leveling Piles-- borings 15
Remove Outer minutes/casing
Casing. 1 casing/day.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the
Navy's construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
\2\ To determine underwater harassment zone size, ensonified areas from the source were clipped along the shoreline using Geographical Information
Systems (GIS).
The calculated maximum distances corresponding to the underwater
marine mammal harassment zones from impulsive (impact pile driving,
rock hammering, DTH) and non-impulsive (vibratory pile driving, rotary
drilling) noise and the area of the harassment zone within the ROI are
summarized in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Sound source locations were
chosen to model the greatest possible affected areas; typically, these
locations will be at the riverward end of the super flood basin. The
calculated distances do not take the land masses into consideration,
but the ensonified areas do. Neither consider the reduction that will
be achieved by the required use of a bubble curtain and therefore all
take estimates are considered conservative. Refer to Figures 6-1
through 6-20 of the Navy's application for visual representations of
the calculated maximum distances corresponding to the underwater marine
mammal harassment zones from impulsive (impact pile driving, rock
hammering, DTH) and non-impulsive (vibratory pile driving, rotary
drilling) noise and the corresponding area of the harassment zone
within the ROI.
Calculated distances to Level A harassment and Level B harassment
thresholds are large, especially for DTH and rock hammering activities.
However, in most cases the full distance of sound propagation will not
be reached due to the presence of land masses and anthropogenic
structures that will prevent the noise from reaching nearly the full
extent of the harassment isopleths. Refer to Figure 1-3 in the Navy's
application for the ROI, which illustrates that the land masses
preclude the sound from traveling more than approximately 870 m (3,000
ft) from the source, at most. Areas encompassed within the threshold
(harassment zones) were calculated by using a Geographical Information
System (GIS) to clip the maximum calculated distances to the extent of
the ROI (see Figure 2).
[[Page 19520]]
Concurrent Activities--Simultaneous use of pile drivers, hammers,
and drills could result in increased SPLs and harassment zone sizes
given the proximity of the component sites and the rules of decibel
addition (see Table 9 below). Due to the relatively small size of the
ROI, the use of a single DTH cluster drill or rock hammer will ensonify
the entire ROI to the Level A (PTS Onset) harassment thresholds (refer
to Table 7). Therefore, when this equipment is operated in conjunction
with other noise-generating equipment, there will be no change in the
size of the harassment zone. The entire ROI will remain ensonified to
the Level A harassment thresholds for the duration of the activity and
there will be no Level B harassment zone. However, when DTH cluster
drills or rock hammers are not in use, increased SPLs and harassment
zone sizes within the ROI could result. Due to the substantial amount
of rock hammering and DTH excavation required for the construction of
the multifunctional expansion of Dry Dock 1, the only scenarios
identified in which cluster drills and/or rock hammers will not be in
operation will be at the end of the project (construction years 3 and
4) when two rotary drills or two rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer
(9-inch) could be used simultaneously (refer to Table 2).
When two noise sources have overlapping sound fields, there is
potential for higher sound levels than for non-overlapping sources
because the isopleth of one sound source encompasses the sound source
of another isopleth. In such instances, the sources are considered
additive and combined using the rules of decibel addition, presented in
Table 9 below (NMFS, 2021d; WSDOT, 2020).
Table 9--Adjustments for Sound Exposure Level Criterion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustments to
Difference in specifications for
Source types sound level (at Level A harassment
specified meters) RMS/SELss*
calculations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-impulsive, continuous/Non- 0 or 1 dB........ Add 3 dB to the
impulsive, continuous, OR highest sound level
(at specified
meters) AND adjust
number of piles per
day to account for
overlap (space and
time).
2 or 3 dB........ Add 2 dB to the
highest sound level
(at specified
meters) AND adjust
number of piles per
day to account for
overlap (space and
time).
Impulsive source (multiple 4 to 9 dB........ Add 1 dB to the
strikes per second)/Impulsive highest sound level
source (multiple strikes per (at specified
second. meters) AND adjust
number of piles per
day to account for
overlap (space and
time).
10 dB or more.... Add 0 dB to the
highest sound level
(at specified
meters) AND adjust
number of piles per
day to account for
overlap (space and
time).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* RMS level for vibratory pile driving/rotary hammer and single strike
SEL (SELss) level for DTH/rock hammer.
For simultaneous usage of three or more continuous sound sources,
the three overlapping sources with the highest SLs are identified. Of
the three highest SLs, the lower two are combined using the above
rules, then the combination of the lower two is combined with the
highest of the three. For example, with overlapping isopleths from 24-,
36-, and 42-inch diameter steel pipe piles with sound source levels of
161, 167, and 168 dB RMS respectively, the 24- and 36-inch would be
added together; given that 167-161 = 6 dB, then 1 dB is added to the
highest of the two sound source levels (167 dB), for a combined noise
level of 168 dB. Next, the newly calculated 168 dB is added to the 42-
inch steel pile with sound source levels of 168 dB. Since 168-168 = 0
dB, 3 dB is added to the highest value, or 171 dB in total for the
combination of 24-, 36-, and 42-inch steel pipe piles (NMFS, 2021d). By
using this method, revised proxy SPLs were determined for the use of
two 102-inch diameter rotary drills and the use of two 108-inch rotary
drills and one 9-inch DTH mono-hammer. The revised proxy values are
presented in Table 10 and the resulting harassment zones are summarized
in Table 11 (visually depicted in Figures 6-21 and 6-22 in the Navy's
application).
Table 10--Revised Proxy Values for Simultaneous Use of Non-Impulsive Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source A Source B
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised proxy
RMS SPL (dB re RMS SPL (dB re RMS SPL (dB re
Equipment 1 [micro]Pa) Equipment 1 [micro]Pa) 1 [micro]Pa)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rotary Drill.......................... 154 Rotary Drill............ 154 157
Two Rotary Drills..................... 157 DTH Mono-Hammer......... 167 167
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 11--Level A and Level B Harassment Zones Resulting From Concurrent Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A harassment Level B harassment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple source scenario High frequency
cetaceans (harbor Phocid pinnipeds All species
porpoise)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Rotary Drills (9 hrs).............. 23.6 m/0.001514 km\2\.. 9.7 m/0.000294 km\2\... 2,929 m/0.417417 km\2\.
2 Rotary Drills (9 hrs) and 1 DTH 74.2 m/0.012773 km\2\.. 30.5 m/0.002489 km\2\.. 13,594 m/0.417417
Mono-Hammer (5 hrs). km\2\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19521]]
Marine Mammal Occurrence and Take Estimation
In this section we provide information about the occurrence of
marine mammals, including density or other relevant information, that
inform the take calculations. We also describe how the information
provided above is synthesized to produce a quantitative estimate of the
take that is reasonably likely to occur.
Potential exposures to impact and vibratory pile driving, rotary
drilling, DTH, and rock hammering noise for each acoustic threshold
were estimated using marine mammal density estimates (N) from the Navy
Marine Species Density Database (NMSDD; Navy, 2017) or from monitoring
reports from the Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements and P-310
construction projects. Specifically, where monitoring data specific to
the project area were available, they were used, and the NMSDD data
were used when there were no monitoring data available. The take
estimate was determined using the following equation: take estimate = N
* days of activity * area of harassment. A 10 m shutdown zone designed
to prevent animal interactions with equipment was subtracted from the
Level A harassment zone, and the area of the Level A harassment zone
was subtracted from the Level B harassment zone to avoid double
counting of takes during these take calculations. Days of construction
were conservatively based on relatively slow daily production rates.
The pile type, size, and installation method that produce the largest
zone of influence were used to estimate exposure of marine mammals to
noise impacts. In instances where an activity will ensonify the entire
ROI to the Level A harassment threshold, all potential takes are
assumed to be by Level A harassment.
Because some construction activities will occur over more than 1
construction year, the number of takes per year were determined by the
percent duration of each construction activity occurring each year
(calculated by months). For example, if an activity were to occur for 6
months, with 3 months occurring in year 2 and 3 months occurring in
year 3, then 50 percent of the takes were assigned to year 2 and 50
percent to year 3. In instances where only one take was calculated but
activities spanned more than 1 construction year, one take was
authorized for each construction year. Table 12 summarizes the
calculated duration percentages for each activity that were used to
divide take numbers by year.
Table 12--Division of Takes by Construction Year
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount and estimated Year 2 \1\ Year 3 \1\ Year 4 \1\ Year 5 \1\
Activity ID dates Activity component % takes % takes % takes % takes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A1,2,3,4) Center Wall--Install Drill 18 shafts Apr 23 to Aug Install 102-inch diameter 100 0 0 0
Foundation Support Piles. 23. outer casing.
Pre-drill 102-inch outer 100 0 0 0
casing.
Remove 102-inch outer casing. 100 0 0 0
Drill 79-inch diameter shaft. 100 0 0 0
(R) Dry Dock 1 North Entrance--Install Install 48 sheet piles Apr 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped sheets. 100 0 0 0
Temporary Cofferdam. to May 23.
(1) Berth 11--Remove Shutter Panels... Remove 112 panels Apr 23 to Concrete shutter panels...... 100 0 0 0
Apr 23.
(2) Berth 1--Remove Sheet Piles....... Remove 168 sheet piles Apr 23 25-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 80 20 0 0
to Jun 24.
(3) Berth 1--Remove Granite Block Quay 2,800 cy Apr 23 to Jun 24.... Removal of granite blocks.... 80 20 0 0
Wall.
(4) Berth 1--Top of Wall Removal for 320 lf Apr 23 to Jun 24...... Mechanical concrete removal.. 80 20 0 0
Waler Installation.
(5) Berth 1--Install southeast corner Install 28 sheet piles Apr 23 28-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
SOE. to Jul 23.
(6) Berth 11--Mechanical Rock Removal 700 cy Apr 23 to Aug 23...... Excavate Bedrock............. 100 0 0 0
at Basin Floor.
(7) Berth 11 Face--Mechanical Rock Drill 924 relief holes Apr 23 4-6 inch diameter holes...... 100 0 0 0
Removal at Basin Floor. to Aug 23.
(8) Temporary Cofferdam Extension..... Install 14 sheet piles Apr 23 28-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
to Jun 23.
(9a, b, c, d) Gantry crane Support Drill 16 shafts Apr 23 to Aug Set 102-inch diameter casing. 100 0 0 0
Piles at Berth 1 West. 23. Pre-drill 102-inch rock 100 0 0 0
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing....... 100 0 0 0
72-inch diameter shafts...... 100 0 0 0
(10) Berth 1--Mechanical Rock Removal 500 cy Apr 23 to Sep 23...... Excavate Bedrock............. 100 0 0 0
at Basin Floor.
(11) Dry Dock 1 North Entrance--Drill Drill 50 rock anchors Apr 23 9-inch diameter holes........ 100 0 0 0
Tremie Tie Downs. to Oct 23.
(12) Center Wall--Install Tie-In to Install 15 sheet piles Apr 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
Existing West Closure Wall. to Dec 23.
(13a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 North-- Drill 20 shafts May 23 to Nov Set 102-inch diameter casing. 60 40 0 0
Temporary Piles. 24.
Pre-drill 102-inch rock 60 40 0 0
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing....... 60 40 0 0
84-inch diameter shafts...... 60 40 0 0
(14) Dry Dock 1 North--Remove Remove 20 piles May 23 to Nov 84-inch diameter drill piles. 60 40 0 0
Temporary Work Trestle Piles. 24.
(15a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 North-- Drill 18 shafts May 23--Nov Set 84-inch casing........... 60 40 0 0
Install Leveling Piles (Diving Board 24. Pre-drill 84-inch rock socket 60 40 0 0
Shafts). Remove 84-inch casing........ 60 40 0 0
78-inch diameter shaft....... 60 40 0 0
(16a, b, c, d) Wall Shafts for Dry Drill 20 shafts Jun 23 to Nov Set 102-inch diameter casing. 60 40 0 0
Dock 1 North. 24. Pre-drill 102-inch rock 60 40 0 0
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing....... 60 40 0 0
Drill 78-inch diameter shaft. 60 40 0 0
(17a, b, c, d) Foundation Shafts for Drill 23 shafts Jun 23 to Nov Set 126-inch diameter Casing. 60 40 0 0
Dry Dock 1 North. 24. Pre-drill 126-inch rock 60 40 0 0
socket.
Remove 126-inch casing....... 60 40 0 0
[[Page 19522]]
Drill 108-inch diameter 60 40 0 0
shafts.
(18) Berth 11 End Wall--Remove Remove 60 sheet piles Jul 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
Temporary Guide Wall. to Aug 23.
(19) Remove Berth 1 southeast corner Remove 28 sheet piles Jul 23 28-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
SOE. to Sep 23.
(20) Removal of Berth 1 Emergency Remove 216 sheet piles Aug 23 28-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 100 0 0 0
Repair Sheet Piles. to Mar 24.
(21) Removal of Berth 1 Emergency 765 cubic meters (1,000 cy) Mechanical concrete removal.. 100 0 0 0
Repair Tremie Concrete. Aug 23 to Mar 24.
(22) Center wall foundation--Drill in Install 72 rock anchors Aug 9-inch diameter holes........ 80 20 0 0
monolith Tie Downs. 23 to May 24.
(23) Center Wall--Remove tie-in to Remove 16 sheet piles Aug 23 28-inch-wide Z-shaped........ 60 40 0 0
existing west closure wall (Dry Dock to Aug 24.
1 North).
(24) Center wall East--sheet pile tie- Install 23 sheet piles Aug 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 50 50 0 0
in to Existing Wall. to Oct 24.
(25) Remove tie-in to West Closure Remove 15 sheet pile Dec 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 30 70 0 0
Wall (Dry Dock 1 West). to Dec 24.
(26) Remove Center wall East--sheet Remove 23 sheet piles Dec 23 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 30 70 0 0
pile tie-in to Existing Wall (Dry to Dec 24.
Dock 1 West).
(27) Dry Dock 1 north entrance--Remove Remove 96 sheet piles Jan 24 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 33 66 0 0
Temporary Cofferdam. to Sep 24.
(28) Remove Temporary Cofferdam Remove 14 sheet piles Jan 24 28-inch wide Z-shaped........ 33 66 0 0
Extension. to Sep 24.
(29a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 West-- Drill 20 shafts Apr 24 to Feb Set 102-inch diameter casing. 0 50 50 0
Install Temporary Piles. 26. Pre-drill 102-inch rock 0 50 50 0
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing....... 0 50 50 0
84-inch diameter shafts...... 0 50 50 0
(30) Dry Dock 1 West--Remove Temporary Remove 20 piles Apr 24 to Feb 84-inch diameter piles....... 0 50 50 0
Work Trestle Piles. 26.
(31a, b, c, d) Wall Shafts for Dry Drill 22 shafts Jun 24 to Feb Set 102-inch diameter casing. 0 50 50 0
Dock 1 West. 26. Pre-drill 102-inch rock 0 50 50 0
socket.
Remove 102-inch casing....... 0 50 50 0
78-inch diameter shaft....... 0 50 50 0
(32a, b, c, d) Foundation Shafts for Drill 23 shafts Jun 24 to Feb Set 126-inch casing.......... 0 50 50 0
Dry Dock 1 West. 26. Pre-drill 126-inch rock 0 50 50 0
socket.
Remove 126-inch casing....... 0 50 50 0
Drill 108-inch diameter shaft 0 50 50 0
(33a, b, c, d) Dry Dock 1 West-- Drill 18 shafts Jun 24 to Feb Set 84-inch casing........... 0 50 50 0
Install Leveling Piles (Diving Board 26. Pre-drill 84-inch rock socket 0 50 50 0
Shafts). Remove 84-inch casing........ 0 50 50 0
Drill 78-inch diameter shaft. 0 50 50 0
(34) Dry Dock 1 North--Tie Downs...... Install 36 rock anchors Jul 9-inch diameter holes........ 0 70 30 0
24 to Jul 25.
(35) Dry Dock 1 West--Install Tie Install 36 rock anchors Dec 9-inch diameter hole......... 0 0 30 70
Downs. 25 to Dec 26.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note, for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the
Navy's construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
We describe how the information provided above is brought together
to produce a quantitative take estimate in the species sections below.
A summary of authorized take is available in Table 16.
Harbor Porpoise
Harbor porpoises are expected to be present in the project area
from April to December. Based on density data from the NMSDD, their
presence is highest in spring, decreases in summer, and slightly
increases in fall. During construction monitoring in the project area,
there were three harbor porpoise observations between April and
December of 2017; two harbor porpoise observations in early August of
2018; and one harbor porpoise observation in 2020 (Cianbro, 2018; Navy,
2019; NAVFAC, 2021). There were no harbor porpoise observations in the
project area in 2021 (NAVFAC, 2022). Given that monitoring data
specific to the project area are available, the more general NMSDD data
were not used to determine species density in the project area.
Instead, the Navy used observation data from the 2017 and 2018
construction monitoring for the Berth 11 Waterfront Improvements
Project and determined that the density of harbor porpoise for the
largest harassment zone was equal to 0.04/km\2\. Estimated take was
calculated with this density estimate multiplied by the harassment zone
multiplied by the days for each activity (see Table 13).
[[Page 19523]]
Table 13--Estimated Take of Harbor Porpoise by Project Activity
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A Take by Level A harassment Level B Take by Level B harassment
Total harassment --------------------------------------------- harassment --------------------------------------------
Activity ID Year/activity Purpose Density production zone zone
days (km\2\) Total Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 (km\2\) Total Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........... 2 Rotary Drill..... Center Wall-- 0.04 18 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill..... Center Wall-- 0.04 18 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill..... Center Wall-- 0.04 18 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 DTH Cluster Drill Center Wall-- 0.04 117 0.417417 2 2 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
R........... 2 Vibratory Pile Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 6 0.0014041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Install
Temporary
Cofferdam.
2 Impact Pile Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 6 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Install
Temporary
Cofferdam.
1........... 2 Hydraulic Rock Shutter Panel 0.04 56 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Demolition (112
panels).
2........... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.04 42 0.000454 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 \1\ 2 1 1 0 0
Extraction. Sheet Piles.
3........... 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Removal of Granite 0.04 47 0.417417 \1\ 2 1 1 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Quay Wall (2,800
cy).
4........... 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Berth 1 Top of 0.04 74 0.417417 \1\ 2 1 1 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Wall Demolition
for Waler Install
(320 lf).
5........... 2 Vibratory Pile Install Berth 1 0.04 8 0.000454 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Support of
Excavation.
2 Impact Pile Berth 1 Support of 0.04 8 0.403411 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Excavation.
6........... 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 0.04 60 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (700 cy)
at Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
7........... 2 DTH Mono-hammer.. Relief Holes at 0.04 35 0.047675 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0
Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
8........... 2 Vibratory Pile Install Temporary 0.04 4 0.000454 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
2 Impact Pile Temporary 0.04 4 0.403411 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
9........... 2 Rotary Drill..... Gantry Crane 0.04 16 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Install
Outer Casing.
2 Rotary Drill..... Gantry Crane 0.04 16 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2 Rotary Drill..... Gantry Crane 0.04 16 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Remove
Outer Casing.
2 DTH Cluster Drill Gantry Crane 0.04 80 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Support Piles.
10.......... 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 0.04 25 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (300 cy)
at Berth 1 Basin
Floor.
11.......... 2 DTH Mono-hammer.. Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 25 0.073751 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Entrance Rock
Anchors.
12.......... 2 Vibratory Pile Center Wall Tie-In 0.04 4 0.000454 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. to Existing West
Closure Wall.
2 Impact Pile Center Wall Tie-in 0.04 4 0.403411 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. to West Closure
Wall.
13.......... 2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
[[Page 19524]]
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 70 0.417417 \1\ 2 1 1 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Temporary Work
Trestle.
14.......... 2-3 Rotary Drill... Remove Dry Dock 1 0.04 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
North Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
15.......... 2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 135 0.417417 2 1 1 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
16.......... 2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 0.04 150 0.417417 3 2 1 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 North.
17.......... 2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 23 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 23 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
2-3 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 23 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 0.04 196 0.417417 3 2 1 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
North.
18.......... 2 Vibratory Berth 11 End Wall 0.04 10 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Temporary Guide
Wall.
19.......... 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.04 5 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Support of
Excavation.
20.......... 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.04 18 0.000733 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0
Extraction. Emergency Repairs.
21.......... 2 Hydraulic Rock Removal of 0.04 15 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0 0.277858 0 0 0 0 0
Hammer. Emergency Repair
Concrete (500 cy)
at Berth 1.
22.......... 2-3 DTH Mono-hammer Center Wall 0.04 36 0.073751 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation Rock
Anchors.
23.......... 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 North- 0.04 3 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure Wall.
24.......... 2-3 Vibratory Pile Center Wall East 0.04 12 0.000185 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
2-3 Impact Pile Center Wall East 0.04 12 0.334747 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
25.......... 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 3 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure Wall.
26.......... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Center Wall 0.04 12 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
27.......... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 0.04 12 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam.
28.......... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 0.04 2 0.001041 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam
Extension.
[[Page 19525]]
29.......... 3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 20 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 20 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 70 0.417417 \1\ 2 0 1 1 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Temporary Work
Trestle.
30.......... 3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Remove Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
31.......... 3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 22 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 22 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 22 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 0.04 165 0.417417 3 0 1 2 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 West.
32.......... 3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 23 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 23 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 23 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 0.04 196 0.417417 3 0 1 2 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
West.
33.......... 3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.000014 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 18 0.000248 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill... Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 135 0.417417 2 0 1 1 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
34.......... 3-4 DTH Mono-hammer Dry Dock 1 North 0.04 18 0.073751 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Rock Anchors.
35.......... 4-5 DTH Mono-hammer Dry Dock 1 West 0.04 18 0.073751 0 0 0 0 0 0.417417 0 0 0 0 0
Rock Anchors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..... ................... .................. ......... .......... ........... 29 13 10 6 0 ........... 4 3 \2\ 2 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the Navy's construction activities were
authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
\1\ In instances where only 1 take was calculated but activities spanned more than 1 construction year, 1 take was requested by the Navy for each construction year.
\2\ 1 take by Level B harassment was added to construction year 3 to account for average group size of harbor porpoises (see https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/harbor-
porpoise#:~:text=The%20harbor%20porpoise%20is%20a,estuaries%2C%20harbors%2C%20and%20fjords).
** No additional takes are expected to result from the simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer in construction years 3 and 4 and the simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills in
construction year 4.
[[Page 19526]]
Although no construction activity is currently planned for the
final year of the LOA period (construction year 6), potential schedule
slips may occur as a result of equipment failure, inclement weather, or
other unforeseen events. However, potential takes that could occur
during year 6 as a result of delays to activities scheduled for years
2-5 are accounted for through the analyses for those years, and no
additional take is authorized.
Harbor Seal
Harbor seals may be present year-round in the project vicinity,
with consistent densities throughout the year. Harbor seals are the
most common pinniped in the Piscataqua River near the Shipyard.
Sightings of this species were recorded during monthly surveys
conducted in 2017 and 2018 (NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, 2018, 2019b) as well
as during Berth 11 and P-310 construction monitoring in 2017, 2018,
2020 and 2021 (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019; NAVFAC, 2021, 2022), and
therefore density estimates from these efforts were considered in the
analysis. Based on observations recorded during the Berth 11 Waterfront
Improvements (199 observations of harbor seals during year 1 and 249
observations of harbor seals during year 2 [448 total] over 322 days)
and P-310 project construction monitoring (721 observations of harbor
seals during year 1 and 451 observations of harbor seals during year 2
[1,172 total] over 349 days), harbor seal density was estimated to be
3.0/km\2\ in the project area (Cianbro, 2018; Navy, 2019; NAVFAC, 2021,
2022).
Takes by Level A harassment were calculated for harbor seals where
the density of animals (3 harbor seals/km\2\) was multiplied by the
harassment zone and the number of days per construction activity. This
method was deemed to be inappropriate by the Navy for calculating takes
by Level B harassment for harbor seals as it produced take numbers that
were lower than the number of harbor seals that has been previously
observed in the Navy's monitoring reports. Therefore, the Navy proposed
(and NMFS concurred) to increase the estimated take by Level B
harassment to more accurately reflect harbor seal observations in the
monitoring reports, by using the value of three harbor seals observed a
day multiplied by the total number of construction days (i.e., 349
days), resulting in 1,047 takes per year by Level B harassment. This
method is consistent with the methodology used to estimate takes by
Level B harassment in IHA issued by NMFS for the first year of P-381
construction activities (87 FR 19866, April 6, 2022).
Additional takes by Level B harassment may occur during the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer in
construction years 3 and 4 and the simultaneous use of two rotary
drills in construction year 4. The simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills
will result in 28 additional takes by Level B harassment of harbor
seals. The simultaneous use of 2 rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer
will result in 22 additional takes by Level B harassment of harbor
seals. Note, the use of cluster drills and rock hammers in construction
years 2 and 3 result in the entire ROI being ensonified to Level A
harassment thresholds; therefore, there will be no change to the size
of the harassment zones from concurrent construction activities during
these years and thus no need to authorize additional takes. To account
for concurrent activities in construction years 3 and 4, the Navy
requested to add additional takes by Level B harassment to the
estimated take numbers (22 harbor seal in construction year 3 and 50
harbor seal in construction year 4). Therefore the Navy requests and
NMFS authorizes 1,047 takes by Level B harassment for harbor seals in
construction year 2, 1,069 takes by Level B harassment for harbor seals
in construction year 3, 1,097 takes by Level B harassment for harbor
seals in construction year 4, and 1,047 takes by Level B takes for
harbor seals in construction year 5 (note the division of takes over
the construction years is summarized in Table 12).
Take by Level A harassment of harbor seals is shown in Table 14
below. Note that where the Level A harassment zone is as large as the
Level B harassment zone and fills the entire potentially ensonified
area, the enumerated takes in the Level A harassment column may be in
the form of Level A harassment and/or Level B harassment, but are
authorized as takes by Level A harassment. The authorized takes by
Level B harassment are not included in Table 14 as they were calculated
by a different method (i.e., by using the value of three harbor seals
observed per day multiplied by the total number of construction days;
i.e., 349 days).
Table 14--Estimated Take by Level A Harassment of Harbor Seal by Project Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A Take by Level A harassment
Total harassment --------------------------------------------
Activity ID Year/ activity Purpose Density production zone (km
days \2\) Total Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A............................... 2 Rotary Drill.... Center Wall-- 3 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill.... Center Wall-- 3 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill.... Center Wall-- 3 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 DTH Cluster Center Wall-- 3 117 0.417417 147 147 0 0 0
Drill. Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
R............................... 2 Vibratory Pile Dry Dock 1 North 3 6 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Install
Temporary
Cofferdam.
2 Impact Pile Dry Dock 1 North 3 6 0.364953 7 7 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Install
Temporary
Cofferdam.
1............................... 2 Hydraulic Rock Shutter Panel 3 56 0.417417 70 70 0 0 0
Hammer. Demolition (112
panels).
2............................... 2-3 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 3 42 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Sheet Piles.
3............................... 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Removal of Granite 3 47 0.417417 59 47 12 0 0
Hammer. Quay Wall (2,800
cy).
4............................... 2-3 Hydraulic Rock Berth 1 Top of 3 74 0.417417 93 74 19 0 0
Hammer. Wall Demolition
for Waler Install
(320 lf).
5............................... 2 Vibratory Pile Install Berth 1 3 8 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Support of
Excavation.
2 Impact Pile Berth 1 Support of 3 8 0..201158 5 5 0 0 0
Driving. Excavation.
[[Page 19527]]
6............................... 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 3 60 0.417417 75 75 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (700 cy)
at Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
7............................... 2 DTH Mono-hammer. Relief Holes at 3 35 0.014413 1 1 0 0 0
Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
8............................... 2 Vibratory Pile Install Temporary 3 4 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
2 Impact Pile Temporary 3 4 0.201158 2 2 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
9............................... 2 Rotary Drill.... Gantry Crane 3 16 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Install
Outer Casing.
2 Rotary Drill.... Gantry Crane 3 16 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2 Rotary Drill.... Gantry Crane 3 16 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Remove
Outer Casing.
2 DTH Cluster Gantry Crane 3 80 0.417417 100 100 0 0 0
Drill. Support Piles.
10.............................. 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 3 25 0.417417 31 31 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (300 cy)
at Berth 1 Basin
Floor.
11.............................. 2 DTH Mono-hammer. Dry Dock 1 North 3 25 0.022912 2 2 0 0 0
Entrance Rock
Anchors.
12.............................. 2 Vibratory Pile Center Wall Tie-In 3 4 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. to Existing West
Closure Wall.
2 Impact Pile Center Wall Tie-in 3 4 0.201158 2 2 0 0 0
Driving. to West Closure
Wall.
13.............................. 2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 3 70 0.417417 88 53 35 0 0
Drill. TemporaryWork
Trestle.
14.............................. 2-3 Rotary Drill.. Remove Dry Dock 1 3 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0
North Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
15.............................. 2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 3 135 0.417417 169 101 68 0 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
16.............................. 2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 3 150 0.417417 188 113 75 0 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 North.
17.............................. 2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 23 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 23 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
2-3 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 23 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 3 196 0.417417 245 147 98 0 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
North.
18.............................. 2 Vibratory Berth 11 End Wall 3 10 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Temporary Guide
Wall.
19.............................. 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 3 5 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Support of
Excavation.
20.............................. 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 3 18 0.000136 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Emergency Repairs.
21.............................. 2 Hydraulic Rock Removal of 3 15 0.417417 19 19 0 0 0
Hammer. Emergency Repair
Concrete (500 cy)
at Berth 1.
22.............................. 2-3 DTH Mono- Center Wall 3 36 0.022912 2 1 1 0 0
hammer. Foundation Rock
Anchors.
23.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 North-- 3 3 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure Wall.
24.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Pile Center Wall East 3 12 0.000032 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
2-3 Impact Pile Center Wall East 3 12 0.090757 3 2 1 0 0
Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
25.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 West 3 3 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure Wall.
26.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Remove Center Wall 3 12 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
27.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 3 12 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam.
[[Page 19528]]
28.............................. 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 3 2 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam
Extension.
29.............................. 3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 3 70 0.417417 88 0 44 44 0
Drill. Temporary Work
Trestle.
30.............................. 3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0
Remove Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
31.............................. 3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 22 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 22 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 22 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 3 165 0.417417 206 0 103 103 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 West.
32.............................. 3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 23 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 23 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation Shafts
Pre-Drill Sockets.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 23 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 3 196 0.417417 245 0 122 123 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
West.
33.............................. 3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 West 3 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill.. Dry Dock 1 North 3 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 3 135 0.417417 169 0 84 85 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
34.............................. 3-4 DTH Mono- Dry Dock 1North 3 18 0.022912 1 0 1 0 0
hammer. Rock Anchors.
35.............................. 4-5 DTH Mono- Dry Dock 1 West 3 18 0.022912 1 0 0 0 1
hammer. Rock Anchors.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .................. .................. ....... ........... ........... 2,018 999 663 355 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the
Navy's construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
Although no construction activity is currently planned for the
final year of the LOA period (construction year 6), potential schedule
slips may occur as a result of equipment failure, inclement weather, or
other unforeseen events. However, potential takes that could occur
during year 6 as a result of delays to activities scheduled for years
2-5 are accounted for through the analyses for those years, and no
additional take is authorized.
Gray Seal
Gray seals may be present year-round in the project vicinity, with
consistent densities throughout the year. Gray seals are less common in
the Piscataqua River than the harbor seal. A total of nine sightings of
gray seals were recorded during P-310 construction monitoring (NAVFAC,
2021, 2022). Density estimates of gray seals were based on the Berth 11
Waterfront Improvements (24 observations of gray seals during year 1
and 12 observations of gray seals during year 2 [36 total] over 322
days) and P-310 project construction monitoring (47 observations of
gray seals during year 1 and 21 observations of gray seals during year
2 [68 total] over 349 days) and was estimated to be 0.2/km\2\ (Cianbro,
2018; Navy, 2019; NAVFAC, 2021, 2022). These data were preferred in
this analysis over the more general density data from the NMSDD.
Takes by Level A harassment were calculated for gray seals where
the density of animals (0.2 gray seals/km\2\) was multiplied by the
harassment zone and the number of days per construction activity. This
method was deemed to be inappropriate by the Navy for calculating takes
by Level B harassment for gray seals as it produced take that were
fewer than the number of gray seals that has been previously observed
in the Navy's monitoring reports. Therefore, the Navy proposed (and
NMFS concurred), to increase the take by Level B harassment to more
accurately reflect gray seal observations in the monitoring reports, by
using the value of 0.2 gray seals a day multiplied by the total number
of construction days (i.e., 349 days) resulting in 70 takes by Level B
harassment authorized per year. This method is consistent with the
methodology used to estimate takes by Level B harassment in IHA issued
by NMFS for the first year of P-381 construction activities (87 FR
19866; April 6, 2022).
Additional takes by Level B harassment may occur during the
simultaneous use of two rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer in
construction years 3 and 4 and the simultaneous use of two rotary
drills in construction year 4. The simultaneous use of two rotary
drills will result in two additional Level B takes of gray seals. The
simultaneous use of two rotary drills and a DTH mono-hammer will result
in one additional Level B take of
[[Page 19529]]
gray seals. Note, the use of cluster drills and rock hammers in
construction years 2 and 3 result in the entire ROI being ensonified to
Level A harassment thresholds; therefore, there will be no change to
the size of the harassment zones from concurrent construction
activities during these years and thus no need to request additional
takes. To account for concurrent activities in construction years 3 and
4, the Navy requested additional takes by Level B harassment to the
take numbers (one gray seal in construction year 3 and three gray seals
in construction year 4). Therefore the Navy requests and NMFS
authorizes 70 takes by Level B takes for gray seals in construction
year 2, 71 takes by Level B harassment for gray seals in construction
year 3, 73 takes by Level B harassment for gray seals in construction
year 4, and 70 takes by Level B harassment for gray seals in
construction year 5 (note the division of takes over the construction
years is summarized in Table 12).
Take by Level A harassment of gray seals is shown in Table 15
below. Note that where the Level A harassment zone is as large as the
Level B harassment zone and fills the entire potentially ensonified
area, the enumerated takes in the Level A harassment column may be in
the form of Level A harassment and/or Level B harassment, but will be
authorized as takes by Level A harassment. The authorized takes by
Level B harassment are not included in Table 15 as they were calculated
by a different method (i.e., by using the value of 0.2 gray seals
observed a day multiplied by the total number of construction days;
i.e., 349 days).
Table 15--Estimated Take by Level A Harassment of Gray Seal by Project Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A Take by Level A harassment
Total harassment --------------------------------------------
Activity ID Year/activity Purpose Density production zone (km
days \2\) Total Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A............................. 2 Rotary Drill... Center Wall-- 0.2 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill... Center Wall-- 0.2 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 Rotary Drill... Center Wall-- 0.2 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
2 DTH Cluster Center Wall-- 0.2 117 0.417417 10 10 0 0 0
Drill. Install
Foundation
Support Piles.
R............................. 2 Vibratory Pile Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 6 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Instal
l Temporary
Cofferdam.
2 Impact Pile Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 6 0.364953 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Entrance--Instal
l Temporary
Cofferdam.
1............................. 2 Hydraulic Rock Shutter Panel 0.2 56 0.417417 5 5 0 0 0
Hammer. Demolition (112
panels).
2............................. 2-3 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.2 42 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Sheet Piles.
3............................. 2-3 Hydraulic Removal of 0.2 47 0.417417 4 3 1 0 0
Rock Hammer. Granite Quay
Wall (2,800 cy).
4............................. 2-3 Hydraulic Berth 1 Top of 0.2 74 0.417417 6 5 1 0 0
Rock Hammer. Wall Demolition
for Waler
Install (320 lf).
5............................. 2 Vibratory Pile Install Berth 1 0.2 8 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Support of
Excavation.
2 Impact Pile Berth 1 Support 0.2 8 0.201158 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. of Excavation.
6............................. 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 0.2 60 0.417417 5 5 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (700 cy)
at Berth 11
Basin Floor.
7............................. 2 DTH Mono-hammer Relief Holes at 0.2 35 0.014413 0 0 0 0 0
Berth 11 Basin
Floor.
8............................. 2 Vibratory Pile Install Temporary 0.2 4 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
2 Impact Pile Temporary 0.2 4 0.201158 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Cofferdam
Extension.
9............................. 2 Rotary Drill... Gantry Crane 0.2 16 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Install
Outer Casing.
2 Rotary Drill... Gantry Crane 0.2 16 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2 Rotary Drill... Gantry Crane 0.2 16 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Support--Remove
Outer Casing.
2 DTH Cluster Gantry Crane 0.2 80 0.417417 7 7 0 0 0
Drill. Support Piles.
10............................ 2 Hydraulic Rock Mechanical Rock 0.2 25 0.417417 2 2 0 0 0
Hammer. Removal (300 cy)
at Berth 1 Basin
Floor.
11............................ 2 DTH Mono-hammer Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 25 0.022912 0 0 0 0 0
Entrance Rock
Anchors.
12............................ 2 Vibratory Pile Center Wall Tie- 0.2 4 0.000078 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. In to Existing
West Closure
Wall.
2 Impact Pile Center Wall Tie- 0.2 4 0.201158 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. in to West
Closure Wall.
13............................ 2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 70 0.417417 6 4 2 0 0
Drill. Temporary Work
Trestle.
14............................ 2-3 Rotary Drill. Remove Dry Dock 1 0.2 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0
North Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
[[Page 19530]]
15............................ 2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 135 0.417417 11 7 4 0 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
16............................ 2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 0.2 150 0.417417 13 8 5 0 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 North.
17............................ 2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 23 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 23 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill
Sockets.
2-3 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 23 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
2-3 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 0.2 196 0.417417 16 10 6 0 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
North.
18............................ 2 Vibratory Berth 11 End Wall 0.2 10 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Temporary Guide
Wall.
19............................ 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.2 5 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Support of
Excavation.
20............................ 2 Vibratory Remove Berth 1 0.2 18 0.000136 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Emergency
Repairs.
21............................ 2 Hydraulic Rock Removal of 0.2 15 0.417417 1 1 0 0 0
Hammer. Emergency Repair
Concrete (500
cy) at Berth 1.
22............................ 2-3 DTH Mono- Center Wall 0.2 36 0.022912 0 0 0 0 0
hammer. Foundation Rock
Anchors.
23............................ 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock North- 0.2 3 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure
Wall.
24............................ 2-3 Vibratory Center Wall East 0.2 12 0.000032 0 0 0 0 0
Pile Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
2-3 Impact Pile Center Wall East 0.2 12 0.090757 0 0 0 0 0
Driving. Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
25............................ 2-3 Vibratory Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 3 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Remove Center
Wall Tie-in to
West Closure
Wall.
26............................ 2-3 Vibratory Remove Center 0.2 12 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Wall Tie-in to
Existing Wall.
27............................ 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 0.2 12 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam.
28............................ 2-3 Vibratory Remove Temporary 0.2 2 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0
Extraction. Cofferdam
Extension.
29............................ 3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 20 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 20 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 20 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Work
Trestle--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 70 0.417417 6 0 3 3 0
Drill. Temporary Work
Trestle.
30............................ 3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 20 0.000002 0 0 0 0 0
Remove Temporary
Work Trestle
Piles.
31............................ 3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 22 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 22 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--Pre-
Drill Socket.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 22 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Wall Shafts--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Wall Shafts for 0.2 165 0.417417 14 0 7 7 0
Drill. Dry Dock 1 West.
32............................ 3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 23 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Install
Outer Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 23 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts Pre-Drill
Sockets.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 23 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Foundation
Shafts--Remove
Outer Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Foundation Shafts 0.2 196 0.417417 16 0 8 8 0
Drill. for Dry Dock 1
West.
33............................ 3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.000005 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Install Outer
Casing.
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 18 0.000091 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Pre-Drill Socket.
[[Page 19531]]
3-4 Rotary Drill. Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.000001 0 0 0 0 0
Leveling Piles--
Remove Outer
Casing.
3-4 DTH Cluster Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 135 0.417417 11 0 6 5 0
Drill. Leveling Piles
(Diving Board
Shafts).
34............................ 3-4 DTH Mono- Dry Dock 1 North 0.2 18 0.022912 0 0 0 0 0
hammer. Rock Anchors.
35............................ 4-5 DTH Mono- Dry Dock 1 West 0.2 18 0.022912 0 0 0 0 0
hammer. Rock Anchors.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................. ................. ........... ........... ........... 133 67 43 23 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: for the purposes of this analysis, the construction years are identified as years 2 through 5; takes for marine mammals during Year 1 of the
Navy's construction activities were authorized in a previously issued IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6, 2022).
Although no construction activity is currently planned for the
final year of the LOA period (construction year 6), potential schedule
slips may occur as a result of equipment failure, inclement weather, or
other unforeseen events. However, potential takes that could occur
during year 6 as a result of delays to activities scheduled for years
2-5 are accounted for through the analyses for those years, and no
additional take is authorized.
Hooded Seal
Hooded seals may be present in the project vicinity from January
through May, though their exact seasonal densities are unknown. In
general, hooded seals are much rarer than the harbor seal and gray seal
in the Piscataqua River. NMFS authorized one take by Level B harassment
per month from January to May of a hooded seal for the Berth 11
Waterfront Improvements Construction project (NMFS, 2018b) and for P-
310 (Super Flood Basin) (NMFS, 2016; NMFS, 2019; NMFS, 2021c). To date,
the monitoring for those projects and for the density surveys have not
recorded a sighting of hooded seal in the project area (Cianbro, 2018;
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, 2018, 2019b; Navy 2019; NAVFAC, 2021, 2022). In
order to guard against the potential for unauthorized take, the Navy
again requested one take by Level B harassment of hooded seal per month
(between the months of January and May) for each construction year.
Therefore NMFS authorizes five takes by Level B harassment per year.
Given the size of the shutdown zones in relation to the Level A
harassment isopleths (see the Mitigation section below), NMFS also
authorizes five takes by Level A harassment per year to safeguard
against unauthorized take of hooded seals that may occur unnoticed in
the Level A harassment zone for sufficient duration to incur PTS.
Harp Seal
In general, harp seals are much rarer than the harbor seal and gray
seal in the Piscataqua River. Harp seals were not observed during
marine mammal monitoring or survey events that took place in 2017,
2018, or 2021 (Cianbro, 2018; NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, 2018, 2019b; Navy,
2019; NAVFAC, 2021, 2022); however, two harp seals (n=2) were observed
in the River in 2020 (Stantec, 2020), and another harp seal was
observed in 2016 (NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, 2016; NMFS, 2016). As above for
hooded seals, NMFS is authorizing one take by Level B harassment of
harp seal per month of construction (between the months of January and
May) for each construction year as was authorized by NMFS for the Berth
11 Waterfront Improvements Project (NMFS, 2018b) and for P-310 (Super
Flood Basin) construction activities (NMFS, 2019, 2021a). Harp seals
may occur in the area from January through May. Anticipating one Level
B harassment harp seal take per month for 5 months per year during in-
water construction will guard against potential unauthorized take of
this species. Given the size of the shutdown zones in relation to the
Level A harassment isopleths (see the Mitigation section below), NMFS
also authorizes five takes by Level A harassment per year to safeguard
against unauthorized take of harp seals that may occur unnoticed in the
Level A harassment zone for sufficient duration to incur PTS.
Table 16 below summarizes the authorized take for all the species
described above as a percentage of stock abundance.
Table 16--Authorized Take as a Percentage of Stock Abundance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized Authorized
take by take by Total Percent
Construction year Species Stock (NEST) Level A Level B authorized of stock
harassment harassment take
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2--Apr 2023-Mar 2024.................... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 13 3 16 0.02
(95,543).
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 999 1,047 2,046 3.33
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 67 70 137 0.03
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 5 5 10 <0.01
million).
Hooded seal................ Western North Atlantic 5 5 10 <0.01
(593,500).
3--Apr 2024-Mar 2025.................... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 10 2 12 0.01
(95,543).
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 663 1,069 1,732 2.82
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 43 71 114 0.03
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 5 5 10 <0.01
million).
Hooded seal................ Western North Atlantic 5 5 10 <0.01
(593,500).
4--Apr 2025-Mar 2026.................... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 6 0 6 0.01
(95,543).
[[Page 19532]]
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 355 1,097 1,452 2.37
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 23 73 96 0.02
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 5 5 10 <0.01
million).
>Hooded seal............... Western North Atlantic 5 5 10 <0.01
(593,500).
5--Apr 2026-Mar 2027.................... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 0 0 0 0
(95,543).
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 1 1,047 1,048 1.71
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 0 70 70 0.02
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 5 5 10 <0.01
million).
Hooded seal................ Western North Atlantic 5 5 10 <0.01
(593,500).
6--Apr 2027-Mar 2028.................... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 0 0 0 <0.01
(95,543).
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 0 0 0 <0.01
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 0 0 0 <0.01
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 0 0 0 <0.01
million).
Hooded seal................ Western North Atlantic 0 0 0 <0.01
(593,500).
Total Authorized Take \1\............... Harbor porpoise............ Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy 29 5 34 NA
(95,543).
Harbor seal................ Western North Atlantic (61,336) 2,018 4,260 6,278 NA
Gray seal.................. Western North Atlantic 133 284 438 NA
(451,600).
Harp seal.................. Western North Atlantic (7.6 25 25 50 NA
million).
Hooded seal................ Western North Atlantic 25 25 50 NA
(593,500).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The total authorized take does not include take that may occur in year 6 as a result of schedule delays, as these potential takes are already
accounted for in previous years.
Mitigation
In order to issue an LOA under section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to the
activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable impact on
the species or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on
the availability of the species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses (latter not applicable for this action). NMFS
regulations require applicants for incidental take authorizations to
include information about the availability and feasibility (economic
and technological) of equipment, methods, and manner of conducting the
activity or other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or stocks, and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or may not be appropriate to
ensure the least practicable adverse impact on species or stocks and
their habitat, as well as subsistence uses where applicable, NMFS
considers two primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is expected to reduce impacts to
marine mammals, marine mammal species or stocks, and their habitat.
This considers the nature of the potential adverse impact being
mitigated (likelihood, scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be effective if implemented
(probability of accomplishing the mitigating result if implemented as
planned), the likelihood of effective implementation (probability
implemented as planned), and;
(2) The practicability of the measures for applicant
implementation, which may consider such things as cost, impact on
operations.
The following mitigation measures apply to the Navy's in-water
construction activities.
General
In-water construction activities must be halted upon observation of
either a species for which incidental take is not authorized or a
species for which incidental take has been authorized but the
authorized number of takes has been met, entering or within the
harassment zone. If such circumstances recur, the Navy will consult
with NMFS concerning the potential need for an additional take
authorization.
Coordination
The Navy shall conduct briefings between construction supervisors
and crews, the marine mammal monitoring team, and Navy staff prior to
the start of in-water construction activities and when new personnel
join the work, to ensure that responsibilities, communication
procedures, marine mammal monitoring protocols, and operational
procedures are clearly understood.
Soft Start
The Navy shall use soft start techniques when impact pile driving.
The objective of a soft start is to provide a warning and/or give
animals in close proximity to pile-driving a chance to leave the area
prior to an impact driver operating at full capacity, thereby exposing
fewer animals to loud underwater and airborne sounds. Soft start
requires contractors to provide an initial set of strikes from the
impact hammer at reduced energy, followed by a 30-second waiting
period, then two subsequent reduced-energy strike sets. Note the number
of strikes will vary at reduced energy because raising the hammer at
less than full power and then releasing it results in the hammer
``bouncing'' as it strikes the pile, resulting in multiple ``strikes.''
A soft start will be implemented at the start of each day's impact pile
driving and at any time following cessation of impact pile driving for
a period of 30 minutes or longer. Soft start is not applicable to other
in-water construction activities.
Bubble Curtain
During construction of the multifunctional expansion of Dry Dock 1,
portions of the west closure wall and/or the super flood basin caisson
gate may not be in place. A bubble curtain
[[Page 19533]]
will be installed across the entrance openings to mitigate underwater
noise impacts outside of the basin for those activities where Level A
harassment thresholds are achieved across the entire ROI (i.e., cluster
drill and hydraulic rock hammering (Table 7)). A bubble curtain similar
to the one employed during P-310 blasting activities and proposed for
use during P-381 year 1 construction will be used to minimize potential
impacts outside of the basin. Hydroacoustic monitoring will be
conducted inside of the bubble curtain to measure construction
generated noise levels. Should the results of the recordings inside the
bubble curtain show that the source levels do not result in the Level A
harassment thresholds being achieved across the entire ROI by the
activity occurring, upon review of the data by NMFS, the Navy may
discontinue use of the bubble curtain for those activities that are not
actually exceeding thresholds. The bubble curtain must adhere to the
following restrictions:
The bubble curtain must distribute air bubbles across 100
percent of the entrance openings for the full depth of the water
column;
The lowest bubble ring must be in contact with the
substrate for the full extent of the curtain, and the weights attached
to the bottom of the curtain must ensure 100 percent substrate contact.
No parts of the curtain or other objects shall prevent full substrate
contact; and
Air flow to the bubblers must be balanced around the
entrance openings to the superflood basin.
Avoiding Direct Physical Interaction
During all in-water construction activities, in order to prevent
injury from physical interaction with construction equipment, a
shutdown zone of 10 m (33 ft) will be implemented. If a marine mammal
comes within 10 m (33 ft) of such activity, operations shall cease and
vessels will reduce speed to the minimum level required to maintain
steerage and safe working conditions. If human safety is at risk, the
in-water activity will be allowed to continue until it is safe to stop.
Shutdown Zones
The Navy shall establish shutdown zones for all in-water
construction activities. The purpose of a shutdown zone is generally to
define an area within which shutdown of the activity would occur upon
sighting of a marine mammal (or in anticipation of an animal entering
the defined area). Shutdown zones will vary based on the activity type
and marine mammal hearing group (Table 17). The shutdown zone distances
for rock hammering, impact pile-driving of sheet piles, and DTH
excavation (200 m (656 ft) for harbor porpoise and 50 m (164 ft) for
seals) are consistent with those implemented for the same activities
for P-381 year 1 construction activities (NMFS, 2022a; 87 FR 19886,
April 6, 2022). NMFS has determined that these shutdown zones represent
the largest area that can practicably be monitored.
Table 17--Pile Driving Shutdown Zone and Monitoring Zones During Project Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shutdown zone (m)
-------------------------------- Monitoring zone
LOA year Activity, size, and component Harbor \1\ (km\2\)
porpoise Seals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2............................. Rock Hammering \2\............. 200 50 ROI.\3\
2............................. Impact Pile Driving--8 sheet 200 50 ROI.\4\
piles per day.
2............................. Impact Pile Driving--4 sheet 200 50 ROI.\4\
piles per day.
2/3........................... Impact Pile Driving--2 sheet 200 50 ROI.\4\
piles per day.
2/3........................... Vibratory Pile Driving/ 20 10 ROI.\4\
Extraction--8 sheet piles per
day.
2............................. Vibratory Pile Driving/ 20 10 ROI.\4\
Extraction--6 sheet piles per
day.
2............................. Vibratory Pile Driving/ 15 10 ROI.\4\
Extraction--4 sheet piles per
day.
2/3........................... Vibratory Pile Driving/ 10 10 ROI.\4\
Extraction--2 sheet piles per
day.
2............................. DTH mono-hammer 4-6 inch relief 180 50 ROI.\4\
holes.
2/3/4/5....................... DTH mono-hammer 9-inch rock 200 50 ROI.\4\
anchors for tie-downs.
2/3/4......................... Rotary Drilling--1 hour to set 10 10 ROI.\4\
casings.
2/3/4......................... Rotary drilling--9 hours to 10 10 ROI.\4\
drill socket.
2/3/4......................... Rotary Drilling--15 minutes to 10 10 ROI.\4\
remove casings and temporary
work trestle piles.
2/3/4......................... Cluster Drilling \2\........... 200 50 ROI.\3\ \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In instances where the harassment zone is larger than the region of influence (ROI), the entire ROI is
indicated as the limit of monitoring (see Figure 1-3 in the Navy's application).
\2\ Activities will employ a bubble curtain to reduce underwater noise impacts outside of the basin.
\3\ The entire ROI will be ensonified to the Level A threshold.
\4\ The entire ROI will be ensonified to the Level B threshold.
The Navy must delay or shutdown in-water construction activities
should a marine mammal approach or enter the appropriate shutdown zone.
The Navy may resume activities after one of the following conditions
have been met: (1) the animal is observed exiting the shutdown zone;
(2) the animal is thought to have exited the shutdown zone based on a
determination of its course, speed, and movement relative to the pile
driving location; or (3) the shutdown zone has been clear from any
additional sightings for 15 minutes.
Protected Species Observers
The Navy shall employ at least three protected species observers
(PSOs) to monitor marine mammal presence in the action area during all
in-water construction activities. Additional PSOs may be added if
warranted by site conditions (rough seas, rain) and the level of marine
mammal activity. All PSOs will be approved by NMFS and the Navy prior
to starting work as a PSO. PSOs must track marine mammals observed
anywhere within their visual range relative to in-water construction
activities, and estimate the amount of time a marine mammal spends
within the Level A or Level B harassment zones while construction
activities are underway.
Monitoring must take place from 30 minutes prior to initiation of
pile driving or drilling activity (i.e., pre-start clearance
monitoring) through 30
[[Page 19534]]
minutes post-completion of pile driving or drilling activity. Pre-start
clearance monitoring must be conducted for 30 minutes to ensure that
the shutdown zones indicated in Table 17 are clear of marine mammals,
and pile driving or drilling may commence when observers have declared
the shutdown zone clear of marine mammals. Monitoring must occur
throughout the time required to drive/drill a pile. If work ceases for
more than 30 minutes, the pre-start clearance monitoring of the
shutdown zones must commence. A determination that the shutdown zone is
clear must be made during a period of good visibility (i.e., the entire
shutdown zone and surrounding waters must be visible to the naked eye).
The placement of PSOs during all pile driving and drilling
activities (described in the Monitoring and Reporting section) must
ensure that the entire shutdown zone and Level A harassment zone is
visible during pile driving and drilling. Should environmental
conditions deteriorate such that marine mammals within the entire
shutdown zone or Level A harassment zone will not be visible (e.g.,
fog, heavy rain), in-water construction activities must be delayed
until the PSO is confident marine mammals within the shutdown zone or
Level A harassment zone could be detected. However, if work on a pile
has already begun, work is allowed to continue until that pile is
installed.
If an in-water construction activity is delayed or halted due to
the presence of a marine mammal, the activity may not commence or
resume until either the animal has voluntarily exited and been visually
confirmed beyond the shutdown zone indicated in Table 17 or 15 minutes
have passed without re-detection of the animal. If in-water
construction activities cease for more than 30 minutes, the pre-
activity monitoring of the shutdown zone must commence.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's planned measures, NMFS
has determined that the mitigation measures provide the means of
effecting the least practicable impact on the affected species or
stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an LOA for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(A) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for
authorizations must include the suggested means of accomplishing the
necessary monitoring and reporting that will result in increased
knowledge of the species and of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are expected to be present while
conducting the activities. Effective reporting is critical both to
compliance as well as ensuring that the most value is obtained from the
required monitoring.
Under the MMPA implementing regulations, monitoring and reporting
requirements prescribed by NMFS should contribute to improved
understanding of one or more of the following:
Occurrence of marine mammal species or stocks in the area
in which take is anticipated (e.g., presence, abundance, distribution,
density);
Nature, scope, or context of likely marine mammal exposure
to potential stressors/impacts (individual or cumulative, acute or
chronic), through better understanding of: (1) action or environment
(e.g., source characterization, propagation, ambient noise); (2)
affected species (e.g., life history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the activity; or (4) biological or
behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or feeding areas);
Individual marine mammal responses (behavioral or
physiological) to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or cumulative),
other stressors, or cumulative impacts from multiple stressors;
How anticipated responses to stressors impact either: (1)
long-term fitness and survival of individual marine mammals; or (2)
populations, species, or stocks;
Effects on marine mammal habitat (e.g., marine mammal prey
species, acoustic habitat, or other important physical components of
marine mammal habitat); and,
Mitigation and monitoring effectiveness.
The Navy shall submit a Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan to NMFS for
approval in advance of the start of the construction covered by this
rule. The plan will incorporate all monitoring and mitigation measures
and reporting requirements of the incidental take regulations.
Monitoring Zones
The Navy shall conduct monitoring to include the entire ROI, which
includes the area within the Level B harassment zones (areas where SPLs
are equal to or exceed the 160 dB RMS threshold for impact driving and
hydraulic rock hammering, and the 120 dB RMS threshold during vibratory
pile driving, rotary drilling, and DTH) (see Table 7 and 8). These
monitoring zones provide utility for monitoring conducted for
mitigation purposes (i.e., shutdown zone monitoring) by establishing
monitoring protocols for areas adjacent to the shutdown zones.
Monitoring of these zones enables observers to be aware of and
communicate the presence of marine mammals in the project area, but
outside the shutdown zone, and thus prepare for potential shutdowns of
activity.
Protected Species Observer (PSO) Monitoring Requirements and Locations
PSOs shall be responsible for monitoring the shutdown zones, the
monitoring zones and the pre-clearance zones, as well as effectively
documenting takes by Level A and B harassment. As described in more
detail in the Marine Mammal Monitoring Reporting section below, they
shall also (1) document the frequency at which marine mammals are
present in the project area, (2) document behavior and group
composition, (3) record all construction activities, and (4) document
observed reactions (changes in behavior or movement) of marine mammals
during each sighting. The PSOs shall monitor for marine mammals during
all in-water construction activities associated with the project. The
Navy shall monitor the project area to the extent possible based on the
required number of PSOs, required monitoring locations, and
environmental conditions. Visual monitoring shall be conducted by three
PSOs. It is assumed that three PSOs shall be located on boats, docks,
or piers sufficient to monitor the respective ROIs given the abundance
of suitable vantage points (see Figure 11-1 of the Navy's application).
The PSOs must record all observations of marine mammals, regardless of
distance from the in-water construction activity.
Monitoring of in-water construction activities shall be conducted
by qualified, PSOs. The Navy shall adhere to the following conditions
when selecting PSOs:
[ssquf] PSOs must be independent (i.e., not construction personnel)
and have no other assigned tasks during monitoring periods;
[ssquf] At least one PSO must have prior experience performing the
duties of a PSO during construction activities pursuant to a NMFS-
issued incidental take authorization;
[ssquf] Other PSOs may substitute other relevant experience,
education (degree in biological science or related field), or training;
[[Page 19535]]
[ssquf] Where a team of three PSOs are required, a lead observer or
monitoring coordinator shall be designated. The lead observer must have
prior experience performing the duties of a PSO during construction
activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental take authorization; and
[ssquf] PSOs must be approved by NMFS prior to beginning any
activity subject to this rule.
The Navy will ensure that the PSOs have the following additional
qualifications:
[ssquf] Visual acuity in both eyes (correction is permissible)
sufficient for discernment of moving targets at the water's surface
with ability to estimate target size and distance; use of binoculars
may be necessary to correctly identify the target;
[ssquf] Experience and ability to conduct field observations and
collect data according to assigned protocols;
[ssquf] Experience or training in the field identification of
marine mammals, including the identification of behaviors;
[ssquf] Sufficient training, orientation, or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations;
[ssquf] Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of
observations including but not limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times, and reason for implementation
of mitigation (or why mitigation was not implemented when required);
and marine mammal behavior; and
[ssquf] Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real-time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
Hydroacoustic Monitoring
The Navy shall conduct a sound source verification (SSV) study
effort to measure SPLs from in-water construction activities not
previously monitored as part of P-310 or as part of P-381 year 1
construction. The Navy will collect and evaluate acoustic sound record
levels for the rock excavation (rotary drilling or DTH excavation)
activities conducted up to a maximum limit of 10 piles/holes. One
hydrophone will be placed at locations 10 m (33 ft) from the noise
source and a second hydrophone will be placed at a representative
monitoring location at an intermediate distance between the cetacean
and phocid shutdown zones. These locations will be adhered to as
practicable given safety considerations and levels of activity in the
basin. For the 10 rock excavation (rotary drilling or DTH excavation)
events acoustically measured, 100 percent of the data will be analyzed.
At a minimum, the methodology includes:
[ssquf] For underwater recordings, a stationary hydrophone system
with the ability to measure SPLs will be placed in accordance with
NMFS' most recent guidance for the collection of source levels (NMFS,
2012).
[ssquf] Hydroacoustic monitoring will be conducted for each type of
activity not previously monitored under P-310 or the P-381 year 1 IHA
up to a maximum limit of 10 piles/holes (Table 18). Monitoring will
occur from the same locations approved by NMFS for P-310 construction
activities. The resulting data set will be analyzed to examine and
confirm sound pressure levels and rates of TL for each separate in-
water construction activity. With NMFS concurrence, these measurements
may be used to recalculate the limits of shutdown and Level A and Level
B harassment zones, as appropriate. Hydrophones will be placed in the
same manner as for P-310 construction activities. Locations of
hydroacoustic recordings will be collected via global positioning
system. A depth sounder and/or weighted tape measure will be used to
determine the depth of the water. The hydrophone will be attached to a-
weighted nylon cord or chain to maintain a constant depth and distance
from the pile/drill/hammer location. The nylon cord or chain will be
attached to a float or tied to a static line.
Table 18--Hydroacoustic Monitoring Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number
Pile type/shaft size installed/ Method of install/removal Number
removed monitored
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
126-inch shaft................................ 138 Rotary Drill.................... 10
84-inch shaft................................. 148 Rotary Drill.................... 10
108-inch shaft................................ 46 DTH Cluster Drill............... 10
84-inch shaft................................. 40 DTH Cluster Drill............... 10
72-inch shaft................................. 16 DTH Cluster Drill............... 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ssquf] Each hydrophone will be calibrated at the start of each
action and will be checked frequently to the applicable standards of
the hydrophone manufacturer.
[ssquf] For each monitored location, a single hydrophone will be
suspended midway in the water column in order to evaluate site-specific
attenuation and propagation characteristics that may be present
throughout the water column.
[ssquf] Environmental data will be collected, including but not
limited to, the following: wind speed and direction, air temperature,
humidity, surface water temperature, water depth, wave height, weather
conditions, and other factors that could contribute to influencing the
airborne and underwater sound levels (e.g., aircraft, boats, etc.).
[ssquf] The chief inspector will supply the acoustics specialist
with the substrate composition, hammer/drill model and size, hammer/
drill energy settings, depth of drilling, and boring rates and any
changes to those settings during the monitoring.
[ssquf] For acoustically monitored construction activities, data
from the continuous monitoring locations will be post-processed to
obtain the following sound measures:
[cir] Maximum peak sound pressure level recorded for all
activities, expressed in dB re 1 [mu]Pa. This maximum value will
originate from the phase of drilling/hammering during which drill/
hammer energy was also at maximum (referred to as Level 4).
[cir] From all activities occurring during the Level 4 phase these
additional measures will be made, as appropriate:
[ssquf] Mean, median, minimum, and maximum RMS sound pressure level
in (dB re 1 [mu]Pa);
[ssquf] Mean duration of a pile strike (based on the 90 percent
energy criterion);
[ssquf] Number of hammer strikes;
[ssquf] Mean, median, minimum, and maximum single strike SEL (dB re
[mu]Pa\2\ sec);
[cir] Median integration time used to calculate SPL RMS (for
vibration
[[Page 19536]]
monitoring, the time period selected is 1-second intervals. For
impulsive monitoring, the time period is 90 percent of the energy pulse
duration).
[cir] A frequency spectrum (power spectral density) (dB re
[mu]Pa\2\ per Hz) based on all strikes with similar sound. Spectral
resolution will be 1 Hz, and the spectrum will cover nominal range from
7 Hz to 20 kHz.
[cir] Finally, the cumulative SEL will be computed from all the
strikes associated with each pile occurring during all phases, i.e.,
soft start, Level 1, to Level 4. This measure is defined as the sum of
all single strike SEL values. The sum is taken of the antilog, with
log10 taken of result to express (dB re [mu]Pa\2\ sec).
Marine Mammal Monitoring Reporting
The Navy shall submit annual draft reports to NMFS for each
construction year within 90 calendar days of the completion of marine
mammal monitoring as well as a draft 5-year comprehensive summary
report at the end of the project. The report(s) will detail the
monitoring protocol and summarize the data recorded during monitoring.
Annual reports will also include results from acoustic monitoring (see
below). Final annual report(s) (each portion of the project and
comprehensive) must be prepared and submitted to NMFS within 30 days
following resolution of any NMFS comments on the draft reports. If no
comments are received from NMFS within 30 days of receipt of the draft
report, the report shall be considered final. If comments are received,
a final report addressing NMFS comments must be submitted within 30
days after receipt of comments.
A draft 5-year comprehensive summary report shall be submitted to
NMFS 90 days after the expiration of the regulations. The draft report
will synthesize the data recorded during hydroacoustic and marine
mammal monitoring. NMFS will provide comments within 30 days after
receiving this draft report, and the Navy will address the comments and
submit revisions within 30 days of receipt. If no comment is received
from NMFS within 30 days, the draft report will be considered as final.
All draft and final marine mammal monitoring reports must be
submitted to [email protected] and
[email protected]. The report must contain the following
informational elements, at minimum, (and be included in the Marine
Mammal Monitoring Plan), including:
[ssquf] Dates and times (begin and end) of all marine mammal
monitoring;
[ssquf] Construction activities occurring during each daily
observation period, including:
[cir] How many and what type of piles/shafts were driven and by
what method (e.g., impact, vibratory, rotary drilling, rock hammering,
mono- or cluster-DTH); and
[cir] Total duration of driving time for each pile/hole (vibratory
driving, rotary drilling) and number of strikes for each pile/hole
(impact driving, hydraulic rock hammering); and
[cir] For DTH excavation, the duration of operation for both
impulsive and non-pulse components, as well as the strike rate.
[ssquf] PSO locations during marine mammal monitoring;
[ssquf] Environmental conditions during monitoring periods (at
beginning and end of PSO shift and whenever conditions change
significantly), including Beaufort sea state and any other relevant
weather conditions including cloud cover, fog, sun glare, and overall
visibility to the horizon, and estimated observable distance;
[ssquf] Upon observation of a marine mammal, the following
information:
[cir] PSO who sighted the animal and PSO location and activity at
time of sighting;
[cir] Time of sighting;
[cir] Identification of the animal (e.g., genus/species, lowest
possible taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO confidence in
identification, and the composition of the group if there is a mix of
species;
[cir] Distance and bearing of each marine mammal observed relative
to the in-water construction activity for each sighting (if the in-
water construction was occurring at time of sighting);
[cir] Estimated number of animals (minimum/maximum/best);
[cir] Estimated number of animals by cohort (adults, juveniles,
neonates, group composition, etc.;
[cir] Animal's closest point of approach and estimated time spent
within each harassment zone; and
[cir] Description of any marine mammal behavioral observations
(e.g., observed behaviors such as feeding or traveling), including an
assessment of behavioral responses to the activity (e.g., no response
or changes in behavioral state such as ceasing feeding, changing
direction, flushing, or breaching);
[ssquf] Number of marine mammals detected within the harassment
zones, by species;
[ssquf] Detailed information about implementation of any mitigation
(e.g., shutdowns and delays), a description of specific actions that
ensued, and resulting changes in behavior of the animal, if any; and
[ssquf] All PSO datasheets and/or raw sightings data.
The draft and final reports must also contain the informational
elements described in the Hydroacoustic Monitoring Plan which, at
minimum, must include:
[ssquf] Hydrophone equipment and methods: recording device,
sampling rate, distance (m) from the pile where recordings were made;
depth of water and recording device(s);
[ssquf] Type and size of pile being driven, substrate type, method
of driving during recordings (e.g., hammer model and energy), and total
pile driving duration;
[ssquf] Whether a sound attenuation device is used and, if so, a
detailed description of the device used and the duration of its use per
pile;
[ssquf] For impact pile driving and/or DTH excavation (DTH mono-
hammer and cluster drill) (per pile): Number of strikes and strike
rate; depth of substrate to penetrate; pulse duration and mean, median,
and maximum sound levels (dB re: 1 [micro]Pa): root mean square sound
pressure level (SPLrms); cumulative sound exposure level (SELcum), peak
sound pressure level (SPLpeak), and single-strike sound exposure level
(SELs-s);
[ssquf] For vibratory driving/removal and/or DTH excavation (DTH
mono-hammer and cluster drill) (per pile): Duration of driving per
pile; mean, median, and maximum sound levels (dB re: 1 [micro]Pa): root
mean square sound pressure level (SPLrms), cumulative sound exposure
level (SELcum) (and timeframe over which the sound is averaged);
[ssquf] One-third octave band spectrum and power spectral density
plot; and
[ssquf] General Daily Site Conditions;
[cir] Date and time of activities;
[cir] Water conditions (e.g., sea state, tidal state); and
[cir] Weather conditions (e.g., percent cover, visibility).
Reporting of Injured or Dead Marine Mammals
In the event that personnel involved in the construction activities
discover an injured or dead marine mammal, the Navy shall report the
incident to NMFS Office of Protected Resources (OPR)
([email protected]), NMFS (301-427-8401) and to the
Greater Atlantic Region New England/Mid-Atlantic Stranding Coordinator
(866-755-6622) as soon as feasible. The incident report must include
the following information:
[ssquf] Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the first
discovery (and updated location information if known and applicable);
[[Page 19537]]
[ssquf] Species identification (if known) or description of the
animal(s) involved;
[ssquf] Condition of the animal(s) (including carcass condition if
the animal is dead);
[ssquf] Observed behaviors of the animal(s), if alive;
[ssquf] If available, photographs or video footage of the
animal(s); and
[ssquf] General circumstances under which the animal was
discovered.
If the death or injury was clearly caused by the specified
activity, the Navy must immediately cease the specified activities
until NMFS OPR is able to review the circumstances of the incident and
determine what, if any, additional measures are appropriate to ensure
compliance with the terms of this rule. The Navy shall not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS that they can continue.
Negligible Impact Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (50 CFR 216.103). A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of takes alone is not enough
information on which to base an impact determination. In addition to
considering estimates of the number of marine mammals that might be
``taken'' through harassment, NMFS considers other factors, such as the
likely nature of any impacts or responses (e.g., intensity, duration),
the context of any impacts or responses (e.g., critical reproductive
time or location, foraging impacts affecting energetics), as well as
effects on habitat, and the likely effectiveness of the mitigation. We
also assess the number, intensity, and context of estimated takes by
evaluating this information relative to population status. Consistent
with the 1989 preamble for NMFS' implementing regulations (54 FR 40338,
September 29, 1989), the impacts from other past and ongoing
anthropogenic activities are incorporated into this analysis via their
impacts on the baseline (e.g., as reflected in the regulatory status of
the species, population size and growth rate where known, ongoing
sources of human-caused mortality, or ambient noise levels).
To avoid repetition, this introductory discussion of our analysis
applies to all the species listed in Table 3, given that many of the
anticipated effects of this project on different marine mammal stocks
are expected to be relatively similar in nature. Where there are
meaningful differences between species or stocks, or groups of species,
in anticipated individual responses to activities, impact of expected
take on the population due to differences in population status, or
impacts on habitat, they are described independently in the analysis
below.
Construction activities associated with the project, as outlined
previously, have the potential to disturb or displace marine mammals.
Specifically, the specified activities may result in take, in the form
of Level A and Level B harassment from underwater sounds generated by
pile driving activities, rotary drilling, rock hammering, and DTH.
Potential takes could occur if marine mammals are present in zones
ensonified above the thresholds for Level A and Level B harassment,
identified above, while activities are underway.
The Navy's activities and associated impacts will occur within a
limited, confined area of the stocks' range. Most of the work will
occur behind the existing super flood basin walls that will act as a
barrier to sound and will contain underwater noise to within a small
portion of the Piscataqua River. The implementation of a soft start and
a bubble curtain during some activities, along with other mitigation
and monitoring measures already described, are expected to minimize the
effects of the expected takes on the affected individuals. In addition,
NMFS does not anticipate that serious injury or mortality will occur as
a result of the Navy's construction activities given the nature of the
activity, even in the absence of required mitigation.
Exposures to elevated sound levels produced during pile driving and
drilling may cause behavioral disturbance of some individuals. Effects
on individuals that are taken by Level B harassment, as enumerated in
the Estimated Take section, on the basis of reports in the literature
as well as monitoring from other similar activities, will likely be
limited to reactions such as increased swimming speeds, increased
surfacing time, or decreased foraging (if such activity were occurring)
(e.g., Thorson and Reyff, 2006). Marine mammals within the Level B
harassment zones may not show any visual cues they are disturbed by
activities or they could become alert, avoid the area, leave the area,
or display other mild responses that are not observable such as changes
in vocalization patterns or increased haul out time (Thorson and Reyff,
2006). Data from recent observations of harbor seals in the project
area support the assumption that behavioral responses to the Navy's
activities may be mild in nature (Navy, 2022). The Navy has observed
116 harbor seals in the project since January 20, 2022. This includes
observations at the conclusion of P-310 construction (January to
February 2022) and the start of P-381 construction (May 2022 through
October 16, 2022). Forty-eight of these observations occurred during
periods with active construction, and the most common behavior recorded
(n=28; 58.3 percent) was no response. The other common behaviors noted
for these observations were swimming or milling (n=18; 37.5 percent),
with notably lower observations of retreat/flush behaviors (n=1, 2.1
percent) (Navy, 2022).
Additionally, some of the species present in the region will only
be present temporarily based on seasonal patterns or during transit
between other habitats. These temporarily present species will be
exposed to even smaller periods of noise-generating activity, further
decreasing the impacts. Most likely, individual animals will simply
move away from the sound source and be temporarily displaced from the
area, although even this reaction has been observed primarily only in
association with impact pile driving. The activities analyzed here are
similar to numerous other construction activities conducted along both
Atlantic and Pacific coasts, which have taken place with no known long-
term adverse consequences from behavioral harassment. These reactions
and behavioral changes are expected to subside quickly when the
exposures cease. The intensity of Level B harassment events will be
minimized through use of mitigation measures described herein,
including the soft starts and the use of the bubble curtain, which was
not quantitatively factored into the take estimates. The Navy will use
at least three PSOs stationed strategically to increase detectability
of marine mammals during in-water construction activities and removal,
enabling a high rate of success in implementation of shutdowns to avoid
or minimize injury for most species. Further, given the absence of any
major rookeries and only one isolated pinniped haulout site at Hicks
Rocks approximately 2.4 km (1.5 mi) from the project area, we assume
that takes by Level B harassment will have a negligible short-term
effect on individuals and will not result in population-level impacts.
Due to the levels and durations of likely exposure, animals that
experience
[[Page 19538]]
PTS will likely only receive slight PTS, i.e., minor degradation of
hearing capabilities within regions of hearing that align most
completely with the frequency range of the energy produced by the
Navy's activities (i.e., the low-frequency region below 2 kHz), not
severe hearing impairment or impairment in the reigns of greatest
hearing sensitivity. If hearing impairment does occur, it is most
likely that the affected animal will lose a few dBs in its hearing
sensitivity, which in most cases is not likely to meaningfully affect
its ability to forage and communicate with conspecifics. Data do not
suggest that a single instance in which an animal accrues PTS (or TTS)
and is subject to behavioral disturbance would result in impacts to
reproduction or survival. If PTS were to occur, it will be at a lower
level likely to accrue to a relatively small portion of the population
by being a stationary activity in one particular location.
The project is also not expected to have significant adverse
effects on any marine mammal habitat. The project activities will not
modify existing marine mammal habitat since the project will occur
within the same footprint as existing marine infrastructure. Impacts to
the immediate substrate are anticipated, but these will be limited to
minor, temporary suspension of sediments, which could impact water
quality and visibility for a short amount of time, but which will not
be expected to have any effects on individual marine mammals. The
nearshore and intertidal habitat where the project will occur is an
area of consistent vessel traffic from Navy and non-Navy vessels, and
some local individuals will likely be somewhat habituated to the level
of activity in the area, further reducing the likelihood of more severe
impacts. The closest pinniped haulout used by harbor and gray seals is
Hicks Rocks, located approximately 2.4 km (1.5 mi) away on the opposite
side of the island and not within the ensonified area. There are no
other biologically important areas for marine mammals near the project
area.
In addition, impacts to marine mammal prey species are expected to
be minor and temporary. Overall, the area impacted by the project is
very small compared to the available surrounding habitat, and does not
include habitat of particular importance. The most likely impact to
prey will be temporary behavioral avoidance of the immediate area.
During construction activities, it is expected that some fish and
marine mammals will temporarily leave the area of disturbance, thus
impacting marine mammals' foraging opportunities in a limited portion
of the foraging range. But, because of the relatively small area of the
habitat that may be affected, the impacts to marine mammal habitat are
not expected to cause significant or long-term negative consequences.
In summary and as described above, the following factors primarily
support our determination that the impacts resulting from this activity
are not expected to adversely affect any of the species or stocks
through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival:
[ssquf] No serious injury or mortality is anticipated or
authorized;
[ssquf] Level A harassment is expected to be of a lower degree that
would not impact the fitness of any animals;
[ssquf] Anticipated incidents of Level B harassment consist of, at
worst, temporary modifications in behavior;
[ssquf] The required mitigation measures (i.e., soft starts, bubble
curtain, shutdown zones) are expected to be effective in reducing the
effects of the specified activity;
[ssquf] Minimal impacts to marine mammal habitat/prey are expected;
[ssquf] There is one pinniped haulout in the vicinity of the
project area (Hicks Rocks), but it is on the opposite side of Seavey
Island and not within the ensonified area; and
[ssquf] There are no known biologically important areas in the
vicinity of the project.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the monitoring and mitigation
measures, NMFS finds that the total marine mammal take from the Navy's
activities will have a negligible impact on all affected marine mammal
species or stocks.
Small Numbers
As noted previously, only small numbers of incidental take may be
authorized under sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA for
specified activities other than military readiness activities. The MMPA
does not define small numbers and so, in practice, where estimated
numbers are available, NMFS compares the number of individuals taken to
the most appropriate estimation of abundance of the relevant species or
stock in our determination of whether an authorization is limited to
small numbers of marine mammals. When the predicted number of
individuals to be taken is fewer than one-third of the species or stock
abundance, the take is considered to be of small numbers. Additionally,
other qualitative factors may be considered in the analysis, such as
the temporal or spatial scale of the activities.
The maximum annual amount of take NMFS has authorized is below one-
third of the estimated stock abundance for all five species (see Table
16). The number of animals authorized to be taken from these stocks is
considered small relative to the relevant stock's abundances even if
each estimated take occurred to a new individual, which is an unlikely
scenario.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the Navy's activities
(including the mitigation and monitoring measures) and the anticipated
take of marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals
will be taken relative to the population size of the affected species
or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses of the affected marine
mammal stocks or species implicated by this action. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that the total taking of affected species or stocks will not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such species
or stocks for taking for subsistence purposes.
Adaptive Management
The regulations governing the take of marine mammals incidental to
Navy construction activities will contain an adaptive management
component. The reporting requirements associated with this rule are
designed to provide NMFS with monitoring data from completed projects
to allow consideration of whether any changes are appropriate. The use
of adaptive management allows NMFS to consider new information from
different sources to determine (with input from the Navy regarding
practicability) on an annual or biennial basis if mitigation or
monitoring measures should be modified (including additions or
deletions). Mitigation measures could be modified if new data suggests
that such modifications will have a reasonable likelihood of reducing
adverse effects to marine mammals and if the measures are practicable.
The following are some of the possible sources of applicable data
to be considered through the adaptive management process: (1) Results
from monitoring reports, as required by MMPA authorizations; (2)
results from general marine mammal and sound research; and (3) any
information which reveals that marine mammals may have been taken in a
manner, extent, or
[[Page 19539]]
number not authorized by these regulations or subsequent LOAs.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA;
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A,
NMFS must review the proposed action (i.e., the promulgation of
regulations and subsequent issuance of LOAs) with respect to potential
impacts on the human environment.
This action is consistent with categories of activities identified
in Categorical Exclusion B4 (incidental take authorizations with no
anticipated serious injury or mortality) of the Companion Manual for
NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, which do not individually or
cumulatively have the potential for significant impacts on the quality
of the human environment and for which we have not identified any
extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has determined that the action qualifies
to be categorically excluded from further review under NEPA.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal agency ensure that any
action it authorizes, funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated
critical habitat. To ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of LOAs,
NMFS consults internally whenever we propose to authorize take for
endangered or threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed species is authorized or expected
to result from this activity. Therefore, NMFS has determined that
formal consultation under section 7 of the ESA is not required for this
action.
Classification
Pursuant to the procedures established to implement Executive Order
12866, the Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration at the proposed rule stage that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Navy is the sole entity that will be subject to the
requirements in these regulations, and the Navy is not a small
governmental jurisdiction, small organization, or small business, as
defined by the RFA. Because of this certification, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
This rule does not contain a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) because
the applicant is a Federal agency.
Waiver of Delay in Effective Date
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries has determined that there
is good cause under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C
553(d)(3)) to waive the 30-day delay in the effective date of the
measures contained in the final rule. The Navy is the only entity
subject to these regulations, and it has informed NMFS that it requests
that this final rule take effect by April 1, 2023, when the IHA
previously issued by NMFS to govern the taking of marine mammals
incidental to U.S. Navy construction of the multifunctional expansion
of Dry Dock 1 at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine (87 FR
19886, April 6, 2022) expires. Any delay in promulgating the final rule
could result in a delay to the project schedule that would extend the
completion of the project and cause further risks to the Navy Fleet
boat schedule. In addition, in-water work at Dry Dock 1 is critical to
timely completion of the overall project. Delaying the completion of
ongoing work will have increased risk on other mission critical work,
as some of the construction components cannot begin until others are
started or in some cases completed. Moreover, the contractor is onsite
and currently working under an existing IHA (87 FR 19886, April 6,
2022), therefore, the Navy is ready to operate under the LOA
immediately. For these reasons, the Assistant Administrator finds good
cause to waive the 30-day delay in the effective date. In addition, the
rule allows authorization of incidental take of marine mammals that
would otherwise be prohibited under the statute. Therefore, by granting
an exception to the Navy, the rule will relieve restrictions under the
MMPA, which provides a separate basis for waiving the 30-day effective
date for the rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 217
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine mammals,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seafood,
Transportation.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part 217
as follows:
PART 217--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKING AND IMPORTING OF MARINE
MAMMALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 217 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Add Subpart N to part 217 to read as follows:
Subpart N--Taking and Importing Marine Mammals Incidental to U.S.
Navy Construction at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine.
Sec.
217.130 Specified activity and geographical region.
217.131 Effective dates.
217.132 Permissible methods of taking.
217.133 Prohibitions.
217.134 Mitigation requirements.
217.135 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
217.136 Letters of Authorization.
217.137 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization.
217.138 [Reserved]
217.139 [Reserved]
Sec. 217.130 Specified activity and geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply only to taking of marine
mammals by the U.S. Navy (Navy) and those persons it authorizes or
funds to conduct activities that occur incidental to construction
activities related to the multifunctional expansion and modification of
Dry Dock 1 in the areas outlined in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy may be authorized in a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs at Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard, Kittery, Maine.
Sec. 217.131 Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are effective for a period of 5 years
from the date of issuance.
Sec. 217.132 Permissible methods of taking.
Under an LOA issued pursuant to Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and
Sec. 217.136, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter ``Navy'') may
incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the
area described in
[[Page 19540]]
Sec. 217.130(b) by harassment associated with construction activities
related to the multifunctional expansion and modification of Dry Dock
1, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions,
and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the applicable
LOA.
Sec. 217.133 Prohibitions.
(a) Except for the takings contemplated in Sec. 217.132 and
authorized by a LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and
Sec. 217.136, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following
in connection with the activities described in Sec. 217.130:
(1) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and
requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of
this chapter and Sec. 217.136;
(2) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
(3) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner
other than as specified;
(4) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines
such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or
stocks of such marine mammal; or
(5) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA after NMFS
determines such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the
species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 217.134 Mitigation requirements.
(a) When conducting the activities identified in Sec. 217.130(a),
the mitigation measures contained in this subpart and any LOA issued
under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec. 217.136 must be
implemented. These mitigation measures include:
(1) A copy of any issued LOA must be in the possession of the Navy,
its designees, and work crew personnel operating under the authority of
the issued LOA at all times that activities subject to this LOA are
being conducted.
(2) Should environmental conditions deteriorate such that marine
mammals within the entire shutdown zone would not be visible (e.g.,
fog, heavy rain, night), the Navy shall delay pile driving and drilling
until observers are confident marine mammals within the shutdown zone
could be detected.
(3) The Navy must ensure that construction supervisors and crews,
the monitoring team, and relevant Navy staff are trained prior to the
start of construction activity subject to this rule, so that
responsibilities, communication procedures, monitoring protocols, and
operational procedures are clearly understood. New personnel joining
during the project will be trained prior to commencing work.
(4) The Navy, construction supervisors and crews, protected species
observers (PSOs), and relevant Navy staff must avoid direct physical
interaction with marine mammals during construction activity. If a
marine mammal comes within 10 m of such activity, operations will cease
and vessels will reduce speed to the minimum level required to maintain
steerage and safe working conditions, as necessary, to avoid direct
physical interaction.
(5) The Navy must monitor the project area to the maximum extent
possible based on the required number of PSOs, required monitoring
locations, and environmental conditions as described in this rule and
the NMFS-approved Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan.
(6) Monitoring must take place from 30 minutes prior to initiation
of pile driving or drilling activity (i.e., pre-start clearance
monitoring) through 30 minutes post-completion of pile driving or
drilling activity.
(7) For all pile driving and drilling activities, the Navy must
implement shutdown zones with radial distances as identified in a LOA
issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec. 217.136. If a
marine mammal comes within or approaches the shutdown zone, such
operations must cease.
(8) In the event of a delay or shutdown of activity resulting from
marine mammals in the shutdown zone, animals must be allowed to remain
in the shutdown zone (i.e., must leave of their own volition) and their
behavior must be monitored and documented. If a marine mammal is
observed within the shutdown zone, pile driving or drilling activities
may not commence or resume until at least one of the following
conditions has been met:
(i) The animal has been observed exiting the shutdown zone;
(ii) The animal is thought to have exited the shutdown zone based
on a determination of its course, speed, and movement relative to the
pile driving location; or
(iii) The shutdown zone has been clear from any additional
sightings for fifteen minutes.
(9) If pile driving or drilling construction activities cease for
more than 30 minutes, the pre-activity monitoring of the shutdown zone
must commence.
(10) The Navy must conduct monitoring to include the entire region
of influence, which includes the area within the Level A and Level B
harassment zones with radial distances as identified in a LOA issued
under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec. 217.136.
(11) The Navy must use soft start techniques when impact pile
driving. Soft start requires contractors to provide an initial set of
strikes from the hammer at reduced energy, followed by a 30-second
waiting period, then two subsequent reduced-energy strike sets. A soft
start will be implemented at the start of each day's impact pile
driving and at any time following cessation of impact pile driving for
a period of 30 minutes or longer.
(12) The Navy must install a bubble curtain across the entrance
openings during DTH cluster drill and hydraulic rock hammering
activities. The bubble curtain must adhere to the following
restrictions:
(i) The bubble curtain must distribute air bubbles across 100
percent of the entrance openings for the full depth of the water
column;
(ii) The lowest bubble ring must be in contact with the substrate
for the full extent of the curtain, and the weights attached to the
bottom of the curtain must ensure 100 percent substrate contact. No
parts of the curtain or other objects shall prevent full substrate
contact; and
(iii) Air flow to the bubblers must be balanced across the entrance
openings to the super flood basin.
(iv) The Navy shall require that construction contractors train
personnel in the proper balancing of air flow to the bubblers and
corrections to the attenuation device to meet the performance
standards. This shall occur prior to the initiation of in-water
construction activities.
(13) The bubble curtain may be discontinued for certain activities
should the results of hydroacoustic recordings inside the bubble
curtain show that the source levels from those activities do not result
in the Level A harassment thresholds being achieved across the entire
region of influence, upon review of the data by NMFS.
(14) Pile driving and drilling activity must be halted upon
observation of either a species entering or within the harassment zone
for which incidental take is not authorized, or a species for which
incidental take has been authorized but the authorized number of takes
has been met.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 217.135 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
(a) Marine Mammal monitoring must be conducted in accordance with
the conditions in this section and the Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan.
The Navy must submit a Marine Mammal
[[Page 19541]]
Monitoring Plan to NMFS for approval in advance of construction.
(b) Monitoring must be conducted by qualified PSOs in accordance
with the following conditions:
(1) PSOs must be independent (i.e., not construction personnel) and
have no other assigned tasks during monitoring periods.
(2) At least one PSO must have prior experience performing the
duties of a PSO during construction activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued
incidental take authorization.
(3) Other PSOs may substitute relevant experience, education
(degree in biological science or related field), or training for prior
experience performing the duties of a PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental take authorization.
(4) Where a team of three PSOs are required, a lead observer or
monitoring coordinator shall be designated. The lead observer must have
prior experience performing the duties of a PSO during construction
activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental take authorization; and
(5) One PSO must be designated as lead PSO or monitoring
coordinator. The lead PSO must have prior experience performing the
duties of a PSO during construction activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued
incidental take authorization.
(6) PSOs must work in shifts to reduce fatigue and ensure their
ability to monitor for marine mammals.
(7) PSOs must be approved by NMFS prior to beginning any activity
subject to this LOA.
(c) For all pile driving activities, a minimum of three PSOs must
be stationed on boats, docks, or piers sufficient to monitor the
harassment and shutdown zones, and as described in the Marine Mammal
Monitoring Plan.
(d) PSOs must record all observations of marine mammals, regardless
of distance from the pile/hole being driven/drilled or the construction
activity taking place (i.e., DTH, rotary drilling, rock hammering), as
well as additional data indicated in the reporting requirements.
(e) The Navy must conduct hydroacoustic data collection (sound
source verification and propagation loss) as described in a LOA and in
accordance with a hydroacoustic monitoring plan that must be approved
by NMFS in advance of construction. This plan shall include acoustic
monitoring inside the bubble curtain to measure construction generated
noise levels.
(f) The harassment and/or shutdown zones may be modified with NMFS'
approval following NMFS' acceptance of an acoustic monitoring report.
(g) The Navy must submit a draft monitoring report to NMFS within
90 work days of the completion of required monitoring for each portion
of the project as well as a comprehensive summary report at the end of
the project. The reports will detail the monitoring protocol and
summarize the data recorded during monitoring. Final annual reports
(each portion of the project and comprehensive) must be prepared and
submitted within 30 days following resolution of any NMFS comments on
the draft report. If no comments are received from NMFS within 30 days
of receipt of the draft report, the report must be considered final. If
comments are received, a final report addressing NMFS comments must be
submitted within 30 days after receipt of comments.
(h) All draft and final monitoring reports must be submitted to
[email protected] and [email protected].
(i) The reports must at minimum contain the informational elements
described as follows (as well as any additional information described
in the Marine Mammal Monitoring Plan), including:
(1) Dates and times (begin and end) of all marine mammal
monitoring.
(2) Construction activities occurring during each daily observation
period, including:
(i) The number and type of piles that were driven or removed and by
what method (i.e., impact, vibratory, DTH, rotary drilling, rock
hammering.
(ii) The total duration of driving time for each pile/hole
(vibratory driving, rotary drilling) and number of strikes for each
pile/hole (impact driving, hydraulic rock hammering).
(iii) For DTH, the duration of operation for both impulsive and
non-pulse components as well as the strike rate.
(3) PSO locations during marine mammal monitoring.
(4) Environmental conditions during monitoring periods (at
beginning and end of PSO shift and whenever conditions change
significantly), including Beaufort sea state and any other relevant
weather conditions including cloud cover, fog, sun glare, and overall
visibility to the horizon, and estimated observable distance (if less
than the harassment zone distance);
(5) Upon observation of a marine mammal, the following information:
(i) Name of PSO who sighted the animal(s) and PSO location, as well
as the activity at the time of the sighting;
(ii) Time of sighting;
(iii) Identification of the animal (e.g., genus/species, lowest
possible taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO confidence in
identification, and the composition of the group if there is a mix of
species;
(iv) Distances and bearings of each marine mammal observed in
relation to the pile being driven or drilled for each sighting (if pile
driving or drilling was occurring at time of sighting).
(v) Estimated number of animals (min/max/best estimate);
(vi) Estimated number of animals by cohort (adults, juveniles,
neonates, group composition, etc.);
(vii) Animal's closest point of approach and estimated time spent
within the harassment zone;
(viii) Description of any marine mammal behavioral observations
(e.g., observed behaviors such as feeding or traveling), including an
assessment of behavioral responses to the activity (e.g., no response
or changes in behavioral state such as ceasing feeding, changing
direction, flushing, or breaching);
(6) Number of marine mammals detected within the harassment zones,
by species;
(7) Detailed information about any implementation of any mitigation
(e.g., shutdowns and delays), a description of specific actions that
ensued, and resulting changes in the behavior of the animal, if any;
and
(j) The Holder will submit all PSO datasheets and/or raw sightings
data with the draft reports.
(k) The Navy must report the hydroacoustic data collected as
required by a LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec.
217.136 and as described in the Acoustic Monitoring Plan, which at a
minimum, must include:
(1) Hydrophone equipment and methods: recording device, sampling
rate, distance (m) from the pile where recordings were made; depth of
water and recording device(s);
(2) Type and size of pile being driven, substrate type, method of
driving during recordings (e.g., hammer model and energy), and total
pile driving duration;
(3) Whether a sound attenuation device is used and, if so, a
detailed description of the device used and the duration of its use per
pile;
(4) For impact pile driving and/or DTH excavation (DTH mono-hammer
and cluster drill) (per pile/hole): Number of strikes and strike rate;
depth of substrate to penetrate; pulse duration and mean, median, and
maximum sound levels (dB re: 1 [micro]Pa): root mean square sound
pressure level (SPLrms); cumulative sound exposure level (SELcum), peak
sound pressure level
[[Page 19542]]
(SPLpeak), and single-strike sound exposure level (SELss);
(5) For vibratory driving/removal, rotary drilling, and/or DTH
excavation (DTH mono-hammer and cluster drill) (per pile/hole):
Duration of driving per pile; mean, median, and maximum sound levels
(dB re: 1 [micro]Pa): root mean square sound pressure level (SPLrms),
cumulative sound exposure level (SELcum) (and timeframe over which the
sound is averaged);
(6) One-third octave band spectrum and power spectral density plot;
and
(7) General Daily Site Conditions, including the date and time of
activities, and environmental data such as wind speed and direction,
air temperature, humidity, surface water temperature, tidal state,
water depth, wave height, weather conditions, and other factors that
could contribute to influencing the airborne and underwater sound
levels (e.g., aircraft, boats, etc.).
(l) In the event that personnel involved in the construction
activities discover an injured or dead marine mammal, the Navy must
report incident to the Office of Protected Resources (OPR), NMFS
([email protected] and [email protected]) and to
the Greater Atlantic Region New England/Mid-Atlantic Regional Stranding
Coordinator (978-282-8478 or 978-281-9291) as soon as feasible. If the
death or injury was clearly caused by the specified activity, the Navy
must immediately cease the specified activities until NMFS OPR is able
to review the circumstances of the incident and determine what, if any,
additional measures are appropriate to ensure compliance with the terms
of this rule and the LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and
Sec. 217.136. The Navy will not resume their activities until notified
by NMFS. The report must include the following information:
(1) Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the first
discovery (and updated location information if known and applicable);
(2) Species identification (if known) or description of the
animal(s) involved;
(3) Condition of the animal(s) (including carcass condition if the
animal is dead);
(4) Observed behaviors of the animal(s), if alive;
(5) If available, photographs or video footage of the animal(s);
and
(6) General circumstances under which the animal was discovered.
Sec. 217.136 Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to this subpart,
the Navy must apply for and obtain an LOA.
(b) An LOA, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a
period of time not to exceed the expiration date of these regulations.
(c) If an LOA expires prior to the expiration date of these
regulations, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOA.
(d) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to
mitigation and monitoring measures required by an LOA, the Navy must
apply for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in Sec.
217.137.
(e) The LOA will set forth the following information:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (i.e.,
mitigation) on the species, its habitat, and on the availability of the
species for subsistence uses; and
(3) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
(f) Issuance of the LOA will be based on a determination that the
level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total
taking allowable under these regulations.
(g) Notice of issuance or denial of an LOA will be published in the
Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
Sec. 217.137 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization.
(a) An LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec.
217.136 for the activity identified in Sec. 217.130(a) may be renewed
or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that:
(1) The proposed specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as
those described and analyzed for these regulations; and
(2) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures required by the previous LOA under these regulations were
implemented.
(b) For LOA modification or renewal requests by the applicant that
include changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or
reporting that do not change the findings made for the regulations or
result in no more than a minor change in the total estimated number of
takes (or distribution by species or years), NMFS may publish a notice
of proposed LOA in the Federal Register, including the associated
analysis of the change, and solicit public comment before issuing the
LOA.
(c) A LOA issued under Sec. 216.106 of this chapter and Sec.
217.136 for the activity identified in Sec. 217.130(a) may be modified
by NMFS under the following circumstances:
(1) NMFS may modify (including augment) the existing mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting measures (after consulting with Navy regarding
the practicability of the modifications) if doing so creates a
reasonable likelihood of more effectively accomplishing the goals of
the mitigation and monitoring set forth in the preamble for these
regulations;
(i) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision
to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in a LOA:
(A) Results from Navy's monitoring from previous years;
(B) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or
studies; and
(C) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken
in a manner, extent or number not authorized by these regulations or
subsequent LOAs; and
(ii) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS
will publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment;
(2) If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that poses a
significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of marine
mammals specified in a LOA issued pursuant to Sec. 216.106 of this
chapter and Sec. 217.136, a LOA may be modified without prior public
notice or opportunity for public comment. Notification would be
published in the Federal Register within 30 days of the action.
Sec. 217.138-217.139 [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2023-06300 Filed 3-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P