Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Reports for Two Stocks of West Indian Manatee, 18572-18576 [2023-06505]
Download as PDF
18572
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
with Tribal Nations, HUD established its
first Tribal advisory committee.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
II. First Committee Meeting
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Office,
Office of Policy Development and Research,
Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–06462 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–6380–N–01]
Tribal Intergovernmental Advisory
Committee Meeting
Office of Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
first meeting of HUD’s Tribal
Intergovernmental Advisory Committee
(TIAC). HUD is launching the
committee to strengthen the nation-tonation relationship between HUD and
Tribal communities, coordinate policy
across all HUD programs, and advise on
the housing priorities of the American
Indian and Alaska Native peoples. The
establishment of this first ever
committee follows consistent
engagement between HUD and Tribes
across the county.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi J. Frechette, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Native American
Programs, Office of Public and Indian
Housing, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street
SW, Room 4108, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202–401–7914 (this
is not a toll-free number). HUD
welcomes and is prepared to receive
calls from individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing, as well as individuals
with speech or communication
disabilities. To learn more about how to
make an accessible telephone call,
please visit https://www.fcc.gov/
consumers/guides/telecommunicationsrelay-service-trs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Background
On March 31, 2022 (87 FR 18807),
HUD published a notice in the Federal
Register that announced the final
structure of the TIAC and requested the
submission of Tribal nominations to the
TIAC. On November 29, 2022, HUD
published a notice (87 FR 73317)
announcing the TIAC membership.
Thus, to strengthen HUD’s engagement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Mar 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
The first meeting will be held on
Wednesday, April 12, 2023, and
Thursday, April 13, 2023. On each day,
the session will begin at approximately
9 a.m., and adjourn at approximately
5:00 p.m. The meeting is scheduled to
take place at the HUD Headquarters
Building, 451 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410 in the
Departmental Conference Room. The
Committee will operate under the Tribal
government statutory exemption to the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) found in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) at 2
U.S.C. 1534(b). Accordingly,
participation in the meeting is limited to
TIAC members. Members of the public
may not formally participate in the
meeting or make statements during the
meeting.
Marcia L. Fudge,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–06469 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2022–0031;
FF04E00000–234–FXES11130400000]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock
Assessment Reports for Two Stocks of
West Indian Manatee
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; response
to comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended, we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, after consideration of
comments received from the public,
have revised the marine mammal stock
assessment reports (SAR) for two West
Indian manatee stocks, the Florida
manatee stock (Trichechus manatus
latirostris) and the Puerto Rico stock of
the Antillean manatee (Trichechus
manatus manatus). We now make both
final revised SARs available to the
public.
SUMMARY:
Document Availability: You
may obtain a copy of the stock
assessment reports for the Florida
manatee stock and Puerto Rico stock of
Antillean manatee by either of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for FWS–
R4–ES–2022–0031.
• Write to or call (during normal
business hours from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday) the appropriate
individual as described under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florida manatee stock: Lourdes Mena,
USFWS Florida Ecological Services
Field Office, 7915 Baymeadows Way,
Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL, by
telephone (904–731–3134), or by email
(Lourdes_Mena@fws.gov).
Puerto Rico manatee stock: Edwin
Mun˜iz, USFWS Caribbean Ecological
Services Field Office, P.O. Box 491,
Boquero´n, PR, by telephone (786–244–
0081), or by email (Edwin_Muniz@
fws.gov).
Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
announce the availability of the final
revised stock assessment reports (SARs)
for the Florida manatee stock
(Trichechus manatus latirostris) and the
Puerto Rico stock of the Antillean
manatee (Trichechus manatus
manatus).
Background
Under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act of 1972, as amended (MMPA; 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR
part 18, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) regulates the taking;
import; and, under certain conditions,
possession; transportation; purchasing;
selling; and offering for sale, purchase,
or export, of marine mammals. One of
the goals of the MMPA is to ensure that
stocks of marine mammals occurring in
waters under U.S. jurisdiction do not
experience a level of human-caused
mortality and serious injury that is
likely to cause the stock to be reduced
below its optimum sustainable
population level (OSP). The OSP is
defined under the MMPA as the number
of animals which will result in the
maximum productivity of the
population or the species, keeping in
mind the carrying capacity of the habitat
and the health of the ecosystem of
which they form a constituent element
(16 U.S.C. 1362(9)).
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
To help accomplish the goal of
maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA
requires the Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to
prepare a SAR for each marine mammal
stock that occurs in waters under U.S.
jurisdiction. A SAR must be based on
the best scientific information available;
therefore, we prepare it in consultation
with an independent Scientific Review
Group (SRG) established under section
117(d) of the MMPA. Each SAR must
include:
1. A description of the stock and its
geographic range;
2. A minimum population estimate,
current and maximum net productivity
rate, and current population trend;
3. An estimate of the annual humancaused mortality and serious injury by
source and, for a strategic stock, other
factors that may be causing a decline or
impeding recovery of the stock;
4. A description of commercial fishery
interactions;
5. A categorization of the status of the
stock; and
6. An estimate of the potential
biological removal (PBR) level.
The MMPA defines the PBR as ‘‘the
maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may
be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach
or maintain its OSP’’ (16 U.S.C.
1362(20)). The PBR is the product of the
minimum population estimate of the
stock (Nmin); one-half the maximum
theoretical or estimated net productivity
rate of the stock at a small population
size (Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of
between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended
to compensate for uncertainty and
unknown estimation errors. This can be
written as:
PBR = (Nmin)(1⁄2 of the Rmax)(Fr)
Section 117 of the MMPA also
requires the Service and the NMFS to
review the SARs (a) at least annually for
stocks that are specified as strategic
stocks, (b) at least annually for stocks for
which significant new information is
available, and (c) at least once every 3
years for all other stocks. If our review
of the status of a stock indicates that it
has changed or may be more accurately
determined, then the SAR must be
revised accordingly.
A strategic stock is defined in the
MMPA as a marine mammal stock for
which the level of direct human-caused
mortality exceeds the PBR level; which,
based on the best available scientific
information, is declining and is likely to
be listed as a threatened species under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
within the foreseeable future; or which
is listed as a threatened or endangered
species under the ESA, or is designated
as depleted under the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362(19)).
Stock Assessment Report History for
Two Stocks of West Indian Manatee
The SARs for the Florida and Puerto
Rico stocks of the West Indian manatee
were last revised in 2014. Because the
West Indian manatee is listed as a
threatened species under the ESA, both
stocks are considered strategic.
Therefore, the Service reviews the stock
assessment annually. If, based on our
annual review, we determine that new
information (such as new abundance
estimates) indicates that a revision is
warranted, we will propose a revision.
18573
In 2020, based on new information that
had become available, the Service
initiated revision of the SARs, and once
completed, presented them for review to
the SRG. Subsequent to that review, the
Service published a notice in the
Federal Register informing the public of
the availability of these draft revised
SARs and seeking public comment (87
FR 47445, August 3, 2022). These final
revised SARs incorporate the comments
and suggestions provided to the Service
by the SRG and the public, as
appropriate.
Summary of Revised Stock Assessment
Reports for Two Stocks of West Indian
Manatee
The following table summarizes some
of the information contained in the
revised SARs for the Florida and Puerto
Rico stocks of the West Indian manatee,
which includes the stocks’ Nmin, Rmax,
Fr, PBR, annual estimated humancaused mortality and serious injury, and
status.
In March 2021, the Service declared
an Unusual Mortality Event (UME)
along the Atlantic coast of Florida for
the Florida stock. The event, which
began in December 2020 and is ongoing,
is associated with phytoplankton
blooms and seagrass loss in the Indian
River Lagoon. The effect of the UME on
population size and trend is not known
at this time but will be assessed in the
future based on new abundance
estimates that are being developed and
additional population modeling. We are
working closely with our conservation
partners to monitor and address the
UME. No UME has been declared for the
Puerto Rico stock.
SUMMARY—REVISED STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORTS FOR THE FLORIDA AND PUERTO RICO STOCKS OF WEST INDIAN
MANATEE
West Indian manatee stock
Nmin
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Florida manatees ........................................
Antillean manatees (Puerto Rico) ...............
8,237
319
Response to Public Comments
We received comments on the draft
SAR for the Florida stock from the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) and the Center for
Biological Diversity. No comments were
submitted on the draft SAR for the
Puerto Rico stock. We present
substantive issues raised in those
comments that are pertinent to the SAR
for the Florida stock, edited for brevity,
along with our responses below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Mar 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
Rmax
Fr
0.062
0.04
PBR
0.5
0.4
Comments Specific to the Stock
Assessment Report for the Florida Stock
Comment 1: The population estimate
of 8,810 Florida manatees, established
from Hostetler et al. (2018), is likely a
gross overestimate of the number of
Florida manatees remaining in the wild
today. As the SAR recognizes, the
ongoing Unusual Mortality Event (UME)
is not incorporated into this estimate.
Though efforts are underway to produce
an updated abundance estimate, this
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
127.67
2.55
Annual estimated
human-caused
mortality
(5-year average)
144.8 (Years 2014–2018)
4 (Years 2015–2019) .......
Stock
status
Strategic
Strategic
SAR should, at a minimum, incorporate
the known deaths from the UME area
attributable to starvation.
Response: The draft SAR discussed
the basis for the population estimate,
acknowledged the ongoing UME, and
reported the preliminary data on the
number of deaths that have occurred
since the UME began. As discussed in
the draft SAR, we noted that the effect
on the overall population size was
currently unknown. We have updated
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
18574
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
the final revised SAR to include more
recent preliminary data on the number
of deaths in the UME area and
additional discussion about the possible
population-level effects of the UME. We
also clarified the reasons why we have
not incorporated the UME deaths into
the population estimate. The final
revised SAR maintains that the 2018
population estimate, which is a point
estimate and a 95 percent confidence
interval (7,520–10,280), is the best
scientific information available. It also
notes that the UME is primarily
affecting one of the four management
units (the Atlantic Coast unit) and that
manatees in the other three units are
generally exhibiting positive population
growth.
Comment 2: The Service should
publish a revised SAR when the
updated abundance estimate, including
total mortality from the ongoing UME, is
published.
Response: The draft SAR discussed
that the FWC was in the process of
collecting new aerial survey data to be
used to produce an updated abundance
estimate. We have updated the SAR to
note that surveys of the East Coast of
Florida were flown in December 2022
and that we still expect an updated
abundance estimate to be available in
2023 or 2024.
Comment 3: The SAR relies on
productivity rates that do not account
for recent threats to the Florida manatee,
including the ongoing UME and
degradation of seagrass habitat across
the State. Not only are the adult survival
rates significantly impacted by the death
of nearly 2,000 Florida manatees in
2021 and 2022 combined, but starvation
stressors have likely impacted
reproductivity rates as well. The death
of large numbers of female manatees—
at least 415 identified in 2021 alone—
also exacerbates reproductivity concerns
by decreasing calving rates and
orphaning existing calves.
Response: The survival and
reproductive rates reported in the draft
SAR are the best scientific information
available. The draft SAR acknowledged
the ongoing UME but stated the effects
of the UME were currently unknown.
The final revised SAR retains these
same conclusions; however, we
recognize that the effects of the UME on
survival and reproductive rates on the
population stock as a whole are still
being assessed, and we anticipate
additional information on the effects of
the UME in the future. Estimates of
reproductive rates (and survival rates)
are most often obtained and tracked
using long-term longitudinal studies of
known identifiable manatees. Therefore,
it likely will be several years before data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Mar 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
are available from the UME area that can
be used for this purpose. The Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission is working on an Integrated
Population Model (IPM) for the Atlantic
Coast management unit that will
provide additional insight into the
effects of the UME on population size
and other important metrics, including
adult survival and reproductive rates.
The IPM will use the new abundance
estimates that are currently being
developed, so it will likely be 2024 or
later before the IPM results will be
available. Even if available information
indicated reduced reproduction in the
area of the UME, this information would
not affect the maximum theoretical net
productivity rate, which is what is used
in the calculation of Potential Biological
Removal (PBR).
Comment 4: The ongoing UME
underscores the numerous threats of
habitat destruction facing the Florida
manatee, which should be adequately
reflected in the SAR. Seagrasses on
which manatees depend are
increasingly being destroyed. Warm
water refugia where manatees
overwinter are threatened. Coastal
development also threatens manatee
habitat.
Response: The draft SAR discussed all
sources of human-caused mortality and
serious injury, as well as the ongoing
UME and all other causes of mortality.
The Habitat Issues section contains
discussions of the importance of warm
water sites and available forage, and
current and future threats. The final
revised SAR includes updated and
additional discussion about the ongoing
UME, and it meets all of the
informational requirements of the
MMPA section 117.
Comment 5: While the 2022 SAR for
the Florida manatee stock provides a
cursory overview of these harms, the
population estimate of 8,810 is an
unacceptable starting point for recovery
discussions. Section 117 of the MMPA
requires the Service to prepare a SAR to
help accomplish the goal of maintaining
marine mammal stocks at their optimum
sustainable population levels. SARs
must be based on the best scientific
information available, and there exists
ample information to incorporate deaths
from the ongoing UME. Moreover, the
Service should immediately revise the
SAR when the forthcoming abundance
estimate is released, as it will provide
substantial new information regarding
the Florida manatee stock. This new
information will be critical when
developing ongoing strategy for manatee
conservation, including determining
potential biological removal levels.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Response: As mentioned above, this
final revised SAR contains the best
scientific information available and
meets the informational requirements of
the MMPA. To the extent the
commenter is referring to conservation
strategies and other documents for the
manatee, which are governed by
different legal authorities and standards,
such as the ESA, these comments are
beyond the scope of this action. In
addition, the MMPA requires the annual
review of stock assessments for strategic
stocks, which includes the manatee.
During the Service’s annual review, if
we determine that new information
(such as new abundance estimates)
indicate that a revision is warranted, we
will propose a revision. This final
revised SAR includes additional
discussion about possible populationlevel effects of the UME.
Comment 6: While Slone et al. 2017
serves as a recent source of information
to support the page 2 statement that
manatee movements outside of Florida
appear to be increasing, we recommend
citing accessible publications such as
Pabody et al. 2009 and Hieb et al. 2017.
Response: Pabody, et al. 2009 was
already included in the draft SAR. We
have added a citation to Hieb et al. 2017
in this final revised SAR.
Comment 7: Regarding Florida
manatee regional management units on
page 2 (and illustrated on page 3), the
border for the Atlantic Coast unit and
Upper St. Johns River unit should be
described as the Clay–Putnam Counties
line as opposed to Palatka.
Response: We did not make the
suggested change because the
commenter did not provide a citation
supporting this change. The boundary
described in the SAR is the same
boundary referenced in the 2001 Florida
Manatee Recovery Plan and FWC’s Final
Biological Status Review of the Florida
Manatee (Haubold et al., 2006).
Comment 8: If addressing
implementing regulations, we
recommend reference to the Florida
Manatee Sanctuary Act (Ch.
379.2431(2), Florida Statute) as this
regulatory and conservation authority
provides for the management actions as
defined in the 2007 FWC Manatee
Management Plan.
Response: Although the Florida
Manatee Sanctuary Act was referenced
in the draft SAR in the Status of Stock
section, we added another reference as
suggested in the Stock Definition and
Geographic Range section of the final
revised SAR.
Comment 9: The minimum
population estimate (Nmin) for the
Florida manatee stock is calculated
using the equation for Minimum
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
Population Estimate provided in NMFS
(2016): Nmin = N/exp (0.842 × [ln(1+[CV
(N)]2)]1/2). We recommend including an
explanation of what the Minimum
Population Estimate implies. For
example, the Minimum Population
Estimate provides a conservative
estimate of the 20th percentile of the
population distribution.
Response: The recommended
explanation is an accurate statement,
but we did not add additional
information to the final revised SAR in
response to this comment because we
do not believe most readers need the
SAR to provide that detailed of an
explanation. Readers wanting a more
thorough understanding of the basis for
the equation for the minimum
population estimate or what it signifies
can refer to the cited source for more
information.
Comment 10: The most recent adultsurvival-rate analysis for the Florida
manatee identifies mean adult survival
rates of over 97 percent. It should be
noted that these are baseline rates and
do not include episodic factors affecting
survival, including events such as red
tide and significant periods of cold
temperature.
Response: As with Comment 9, the
recommended additional information is
an accurate statement, but we did not
add more explanation to the final
revised SAR in response to this
comment because we do not believe
most readers need the SAR to provide
that detailed of an explanation. The
SAR notes that the reported rates are
baseline mean adult survival and
reproductive rates that were based on
data collected over a 20+ year period.
Readers wanting a more thorough
understanding of how the rates are
calculated can refer to the cited source
for more information.
Comment 11: We request additional
research citations for this chapter:
Reinert et al. 2017: Entanglement in and
ingestion of fishing gear and other
marine debris by Florida manatees, and
Bassett et al. 2020: Quantifying
sublethal Florida manatee-watercraft
interactions by examining scars on
manatee carcasses.
Response: We added a citation to
Bassett et al. 2020 in the final revised
SAR and in the References. Reinert et al.
2017 was already cited in the draft SAR,
but we added an additional citation to
it in the suggested section.
Comment 12: Manatee mortality data
are available and verified through
December 2020 with preliminary
mortality data available through 2021
and much of 2022. We recommend
inclusion of this recent data within this
chapter, including the associated tables,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Mar 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
or explanation of why the SAR does not
report this data.
Response: We added additional
discussion in the SAR to address this
comment and explain the data range
used in the tables. The data summarized
in the tables and discussed in the SAR
are based on confirmed mortality data.
Preliminary data are not included
because these data are subject to change
as to cause of death and other attributes.
In discussions of the ongoing UME, the
reported total number of deaths does
include preliminary data (to provide
context on the scale of the event), but
no assessments of these data have been
made as to cause of death. The mortality
and rescue data summarized in the SAR
include data through 2018, the last full
year for which confirmed mortality data
were available from the FWC at the time
this report was prepared and submitted
to the Atlantic SRG for peer review.
After peer review, FWC provided
confirmed mortality data covering all of
2019 and 2020. Due to both the timing
of when these data became available
and to changes FWC made to their data
collection protocols, these data are
discussed but are not included in the
tables.
Comment 13: Manatee mortality
should include a description of other
cause of death (COD) categories,
including Verified Not Necropsied and
Undetermined. Reported data on
human-related COD is likely an
underestimate as there may be cases of
human-related death that were not
quantified if a carcass was not
recovered, necropsied, or a COD was
unable to be determined. We
recommend including two columns in
table 4 to distinguish between Other and
Undetermined COD categories as
opposed to ‘‘Other.’’
Response: Descriptions of other
causes of death were included in the
draft SAR, as was a citation to the FWC
website that describes all the categories;
however, we have added additional
explanation and discussion in the final
revised SAR, particularly for the
Verified Not Necropsied (VNN)
category. The draft SAR explained that
the cause of some deaths cannot be
determined and that the true number of
deaths (total or in any given category) is
not known because the number of
carcasses that are not found or reported
is unknown. We did not split the
‘‘Other’’ category as suggested given the
focus of the SAR is on human-related
deaths; no human-related deaths are
included in the VNN and Undetermined
categories that comprise the ‘‘Other’’
category used in the SAR.
Comment 14: The statement referring
to carrying-capacity and cited as
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18575
Provancha et al. 2012 does not consider
the thermal quality of warm-water sites.
We recommend further discussion on
insufficient or non-dependable warm
water as a limiting factor in addition to
physical constraints such as vegetation.
Response: Warm-water issues were
discussed in the draft SAR in sufficient
detail, consistent with the requirements
of the MMPA. Readers wanting a more
thorough understanding of potential
carrying capacity issues can refer to the
cited sources for more information.
Comment 15: We recommend
including additional citations on red
tide effects on manatees: Walsh et al.
2015: Sublethal red tide toxin exposure
in free-ranging manatees (Trichechus
manatus) affects the immune system
through reduced lymphocyte
proliferation responses, inflammation,
and oxidative stress, and Flewelling et
al. 2005: Red tides and marine mammal
mortalities.
Response: We added citations to both
papers in the final revised SAR.
Comment 16: From information
reported by the St. Johns River Water
Management District, and based on 2021
aerial survey seagrass data, the Indian
River Lagoon has lost approximately 75
percent of seagrass acreage since 2009
with 40 percent loss of seagrass acreage
from 2019 through 2021.
Response: We did not revise the
information contained in the draft SAR
because the commenter did not provide
a supporting citation. Although the
information included in the SAR is not
the same as the above comment, the
source we cited is recent (2022) and
from the same agency referred to in the
comment, and both descriptions support
the same finding: that significant
seagrass losses have occurred in this
area.
References
In accordance with section 117(b)(1)
of the MMPA, we include in this notice
a list of the sources of information or
published reports upon which we based
the revised SAR. The Service consulted
technical reports, conference
proceedings, refereed journal
publications, and scientific studies
prepared or issued by Federal agencies,
nongovernmental organizations, and
individuals with expertise in the fields
of marine mammal biology and ecology,
population dynamics, modeling, and
commercial fishing practices. These
agencies and organizations include the
Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, the Puerto Rico
Department of Natural and
Environmental Resources, the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources, the
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
18576
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, Hubbs Sea World Research
Institute, the Gulf and Caribbean
Fisheries Institute, the Caribbean
Stranding Network, and Mote Marine
Laboratory. In addition, the Service
consulted publications such as the
Journal of Wildlife Management, Marine
Mammal Science, Marine Pollution
Bulletin, Marine Technology Society
Journal, Wildlife Monographs, Gulf and
Caribbean Research, Journal of Zoo and
Wildlife Medicine, Molecular Ecology,
and Molecular Ecology Notes, as well as
other refereed journal literature,
technical reports, and data sources in
the development of these SARs. A
complete list of citations to the
scientific literature relied on for each of
these SARs is available on the Federal
eRulemaking portal (https://
www.regulations.gov) under Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2022–0031 or upon
request from the Florida Ecological
Services Field Office or Caribbean
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).
Signing Authority
Martha Williams, Director of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, approved this
action on March 24, 2023, for
publication. On March 24, 2023, Martha
Williams authorized the undersigned to
sign the document electronically and
submit it to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication as an official
document of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
Madonna Baucum,
Chief, Policy and Regulations Branch, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06505 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2023–0039;
FXES11130400000–223–FF04EF4000]
Receipt of Incidental Take Permit
Application and Proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Sand Skink
and Blue-Tailed Mole Skink; Polk
County, FL; Categorical Exclusion
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Mar 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce receipt of
an application from JDT of Central
Florida (applicant) for an incidental take
permit (ITP) under the Endangered
Species Act. The applicant requests the
ITP to take the federally threatened sand
skink (Plestiodon reynoldsi) and the
federally threatened blue-tailed moleskink (Eumeces egregius lividus)
incidental to the construction of a
residential development in Polk County,
Florida. We request public comment on
the application, which includes the
applicant’s proposed habitat
conservation plan (HCP), and on the
Service’s preliminary determination that
the proposed permitting action may be
eligible for a categorical exclusion
pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations, the Department of the
Interior’s (DOI) NEPA regulations, and
the DOI Departmental Manual. To make
this preliminary determination, we
prepared a draft environmental action
statement and low-effect screening form,
both of which are also available for
public review. We invite comment from
the public and local, State, Tribal, and
Federal agencies.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before April 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
obtain copies of the documents online
in Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2023–0039;
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitting Comments: If you wish to
submit comments on any of the
documents, you may do so in writing by
one of the following methods:
• Online: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2023–0039;
• U.S. Mail: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: Docket No. FWS–R4–
ES–2023–0039; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfredo Begazo, by U.S. mail (see
ADDRESSES), by telephone at 772–469–
4234 or via email at afredo_begazo@
fws.gov. Individuals in the United States
who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing,
or have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
announce receipt of an application from
JDT of Central Florida (applicant) for an
incidental take permit (ITP) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The applicant requests the ITP to take
the federally listed sand skink
(Plestiodon reynoldsi) and blue-tailed
mole-skink (Eumeces egregius lividus)
(skinks) incidental to the construction
and operation of a residential
development in Polk County, Florida.
We request public comment on the
application, which includes the
applicant’s habitat conservation plan
(HCP), and on the Service’s preliminary
determination that this proposed ITP
qualifies as ‘‘low effect,’’ and may
qualify for a categorical exclusion
pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations (40 CFR 1501.4), the
Department of the Interior’s (DOI) NEPA
regulations (43 CFR 46), and the DOI’s
Departmental Manual (516 DM
8.5(C)(2)). To make this preliminary
determination, we prepared a draft
environmental action statement and
low-effect screening form, both of which
are also available for public review.
Proposed Project
The applicant requests a 5-year ITP to
take two skink species via the
conversion of approximately 1.53 acres
(ac) of occupied nesting, foraging, and
sheltering skink habitat incidental to the
construction and operation of a
residential development on a 14.34–ac
parcel in Section 13, Township 26
South, Range 27 East, Polk County,
Florida. The applicant proposes to
mitigate for take of the skinks by
purchasing credits equivalent to 3.06 ac
of skink-occupied habitat from a
Service-approved conservation bank.
The Service would require the applicant
to purchase the credits prior to engaging
in any construction phase of the project.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
available to the public. While you may
request that we withhold your personal
identifying information, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Our Preliminary Determination
The Service has made a preliminary
determination that the applicant’s
project—including the construction of
multiple single-family residences,
driveways, parking spaces, green areas,
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18572-18576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06505]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2022-0031; FF04E00000-234-FXES11130400000]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Reports for Two
Stocks of West Indian Manatee
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; response to comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, after consideration
of comments received from the public, have revised the marine mammal
stock assessment reports (SAR) for two West Indian manatee stocks, the
Florida manatee stock (Trichechus manatus latirostris) and the Puerto
Rico stock of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus). We
now make both final revised SARs available to the public.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain a copy of the stock
assessment reports for the Florida manatee stock and Puerto Rico stock
of Antillean manatee by either of the following methods:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Search for FWS-R4-
ES-2022-0031.
Write to or call (during normal business hours from 8 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday) the appropriate individual as
described under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florida manatee stock: Lourdes Mena, USFWS Florida Ecological
Services Field Office, 7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 200, Jacksonville,
FL, by telephone (904-731-3134), or by email ([email protected]).
Puerto Rico manatee stock: Edwin Mu[ntilde]iz, USFWS Caribbean
Ecological Services Field Office, P.O. Box 491, Boquer[oacute]n, PR, by
telephone (786-244-0081), or by email ([email protected]).
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in
the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We announce the availability of the final
revised stock assessment reports (SARs) for the Florida manatee stock
(Trichechus manatus latirostris) and the Puerto Rico stock of the
Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus).
Background
Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (MMPA;
16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and its implementing regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR part 18, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) regulates the taking; import; and, under certain
conditions, possession; transportation; purchasing; selling; and
offering for sale, purchase, or export, of marine mammals. One of the
goals of the MMPA is to ensure that stocks of marine mammals occurring
in waters under U.S. jurisdiction do not experience a level of human-
caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to cause the stock
to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population level (OSP). The
OSP is defined under the MMPA as the number of animals which will
result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species,
keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of
the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element (16 U.S.C.
1362(9)).
[[Page 18573]]
To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA requires the Service and the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to prepare a SAR for each
marine mammal stock that occurs in waters under U.S. jurisdiction. A
SAR must be based on the best scientific information available;
therefore, we prepare it in consultation with an independent Scientific
Review Group (SRG) established under section 117(d) of the MMPA. Each
SAR must include:
1. A description of the stock and its geographic range;
2. A minimum population estimate, current and maximum net
productivity rate, and current population trend;
3. An estimate of the annual human-caused mortality and serious
injury by source and, for a strategic stock, other factors that may be
causing a decline or impeding recovery of the stock;
4. A description of commercial fishery interactions;
5. A categorization of the status of the stock; and
6. An estimate of the potential biological removal (PBR) level.
The MMPA defines the PBR as ``the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP'' (16
U.S.C. 1362(20)). The PBR is the product of the minimum population
estimate of the stock (Nmin); one-half the maximum
theoretical or estimated net productivity rate of the stock at a small
population size (Rmax); and a recovery factor
(Fr) of between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended to compensate
for uncertainty and unknown estimation errors. This can be written as:
PBR = (Nmin)(\1/2\ of the Rmax)(Fr)
Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to
review the SARs (a) at least annually for stocks that are specified as
strategic stocks, (b) at least annually for stocks for which
significant new information is available, and (c) at least once every 3
years for all other stocks. If our review of the status of a stock
indicates that it has changed or may be more accurately determined,
then the SAR must be revised accordingly.
A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock
for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the PBR
level; which, based on the best available scientific information, is
declining and is likely to be listed as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
within the foreseeable future; or which is listed as a threatened or
endangered species under the ESA, or is designated as depleted under
the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362(19)).
Stock Assessment Report History for Two Stocks of West Indian Manatee
The SARs for the Florida and Puerto Rico stocks of the West Indian
manatee were last revised in 2014. Because the West Indian manatee is
listed as a threatened species under the ESA, both stocks are
considered strategic. Therefore, the Service reviews the stock
assessment annually. If, based on our annual review, we determine that
new information (such as new abundance estimates) indicates that a
revision is warranted, we will propose a revision. In 2020, based on
new information that had become available, the Service initiated
revision of the SARs, and once completed, presented them for review to
the SRG. Subsequent to that review, the Service published a notice in
the Federal Register informing the public of the availability of these
draft revised SARs and seeking public comment (87 FR 47445, August 3,
2022). These final revised SARs incorporate the comments and
suggestions provided to the Service by the SRG and the public, as
appropriate.
Summary of Revised Stock Assessment Reports for Two Stocks of West
Indian Manatee
The following table summarizes some of the information contained in
the revised SARs for the Florida and Puerto Rico stocks of the West
Indian manatee, which includes the stocks' Nmin,
Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated human-caused
mortality and serious injury, and status.
In March 2021, the Service declared an Unusual Mortality Event
(UME) along the Atlantic coast of Florida for the Florida stock. The
event, which began in December 2020 and is ongoing, is associated with
phytoplankton blooms and seagrass loss in the Indian River Lagoon. The
effect of the UME on population size and trend is not known at this
time but will be assessed in the future based on new abundance
estimates that are being developed and additional population modeling.
We are working closely with our conservation partners to monitor and
address the UME. No UME has been declared for the Puerto Rico stock.
Summary--Revised Stock Assessment Reports for the Florida and Puerto Rico Stocks of West Indian Manatee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual estimated human-caused mortality
West Indian manatee stock Nmin Rmax Fr PBR (5-year average) Stock status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida manatees.................... 8,237 0.062 0.5 127.67 144.8 (Years 2014-2018)................. Strategic
Antillean manatees (Puerto Rico).... 319 0.04 0.4 2.55 4 (Years 2015-2019)..................... Strategic
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to Public Comments
We received comments on the draft SAR for the Florida stock from
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the
Center for Biological Diversity. No comments were submitted on the
draft SAR for the Puerto Rico stock. We present substantive issues
raised in those comments that are pertinent to the SAR for the Florida
stock, edited for brevity, along with our responses below.
Comments Specific to the Stock Assessment Report for the Florida Stock
Comment 1: The population estimate of 8,810 Florida manatees,
established from Hostetler et al. (2018), is likely a gross
overestimate of the number of Florida manatees remaining in the wild
today. As the SAR recognizes, the ongoing Unusual Mortality Event (UME)
is not incorporated into this estimate. Though efforts are underway to
produce an updated abundance estimate, this SAR should, at a minimum,
incorporate the known deaths from the UME area attributable to
starvation.
Response: The draft SAR discussed the basis for the population
estimate, acknowledged the ongoing UME, and reported the preliminary
data on the number of deaths that have occurred since the UME began. As
discussed in the draft SAR, we noted that the effect on the overall
population size was currently unknown. We have updated
[[Page 18574]]
the final revised SAR to include more recent preliminary data on the
number of deaths in the UME area and additional discussion about the
possible population-level effects of the UME. We also clarified the
reasons why we have not incorporated the UME deaths into the population
estimate. The final revised SAR maintains that the 2018 population
estimate, which is a point estimate and a 95 percent confidence
interval (7,520-10,280), is the best scientific information available.
It also notes that the UME is primarily affecting one of the four
management units (the Atlantic Coast unit) and that manatees in the
other three units are generally exhibiting positive population growth.
Comment 2: The Service should publish a revised SAR when the
updated abundance estimate, including total mortality from the ongoing
UME, is published.
Response: The draft SAR discussed that the FWC was in the process
of collecting new aerial survey data to be used to produce an updated
abundance estimate. We have updated the SAR to note that surveys of the
East Coast of Florida were flown in December 2022 and that we still
expect an updated abundance estimate to be available in 2023 or 2024.
Comment 3: The SAR relies on productivity rates that do not account
for recent threats to the Florida manatee, including the ongoing UME
and degradation of seagrass habitat across the State. Not only are the
adult survival rates significantly impacted by the death of nearly
2,000 Florida manatees in 2021 and 2022 combined, but starvation
stressors have likely impacted reproductivity rates as well. The death
of large numbers of female manatees--at least 415 identified in 2021
alone--also exacerbates reproductivity concerns by decreasing calving
rates and orphaning existing calves.
Response: The survival and reproductive rates reported in the draft
SAR are the best scientific information available. The draft SAR
acknowledged the ongoing UME but stated the effects of the UME were
currently unknown. The final revised SAR retains these same
conclusions; however, we recognize that the effects of the UME on
survival and reproductive rates on the population stock as a whole are
still being assessed, and we anticipate additional information on the
effects of the UME in the future. Estimates of reproductive rates (and
survival rates) are most often obtained and tracked using long-term
longitudinal studies of known identifiable manatees. Therefore, it
likely will be several years before data are available from the UME
area that can be used for this purpose. The Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission is working on an Integrated Population Model
(IPM) for the Atlantic Coast management unit that will provide
additional insight into the effects of the UME on population size and
other important metrics, including adult survival and reproductive
rates. The IPM will use the new abundance estimates that are currently
being developed, so it will likely be 2024 or later before the IPM
results will be available. Even if available information indicated
reduced reproduction in the area of the UME, this information would not
affect the maximum theoretical net productivity rate, which is what is
used in the calculation of Potential Biological Removal (PBR).
Comment 4: The ongoing UME underscores the numerous threats of
habitat destruction facing the Florida manatee, which should be
adequately reflected in the SAR. Seagrasses on which manatees depend
are increasingly being destroyed. Warm water refugia where manatees
overwinter are threatened. Coastal development also threatens manatee
habitat.
Response: The draft SAR discussed all sources of human-caused
mortality and serious injury, as well as the ongoing UME and all other
causes of mortality. The Habitat Issues section contains discussions of
the importance of warm water sites and available forage, and current
and future threats. The final revised SAR includes updated and
additional discussion about the ongoing UME, and it meets all of the
informational requirements of the MMPA section 117.
Comment 5: While the 2022 SAR for the Florida manatee stock
provides a cursory overview of these harms, the population estimate of
8,810 is an unacceptable starting point for recovery discussions.
Section 117 of the MMPA requires the Service to prepare a SAR to help
accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at their
optimum sustainable population levels. SARs must be based on the best
scientific information available, and there exists ample information to
incorporate deaths from the ongoing UME. Moreover, the Service should
immediately revise the SAR when the forthcoming abundance estimate is
released, as it will provide substantial new information regarding the
Florida manatee stock. This new information will be critical when
developing ongoing strategy for manatee conservation, including
determining potential biological removal levels.
Response: As mentioned above, this final revised SAR contains the
best scientific information available and meets the informational
requirements of the MMPA. To the extent the commenter is referring to
conservation strategies and other documents for the manatee, which are
governed by different legal authorities and standards, such as the ESA,
these comments are beyond the scope of this action. In addition, the
MMPA requires the annual review of stock assessments for strategic
stocks, which includes the manatee. During the Service's annual review,
if we determine that new information (such as new abundance estimates)
indicate that a revision is warranted, we will propose a revision. This
final revised SAR includes additional discussion about possible
population-level effects of the UME.
Comment 6: While Slone et al. 2017 serves as a recent source of
information to support the page 2 statement that manatee movements
outside of Florida appear to be increasing, we recommend citing
accessible publications such as Pabody et al. 2009 and Hieb et al.
2017.
Response: Pabody, et al. 2009 was already included in the draft
SAR. We have added a citation to Hieb et al. 2017 in this final revised
SAR.
Comment 7: Regarding Florida manatee regional management units on
page 2 (and illustrated on page 3), the border for the Atlantic Coast
unit and Upper St. Johns River unit should be described as the Clay-
Putnam Counties line as opposed to Palatka.
Response: We did not make the suggested change because the
commenter did not provide a citation supporting this change. The
boundary described in the SAR is the same boundary referenced in the
2001 Florida Manatee Recovery Plan and FWC's Final Biological Status
Review of the Florida Manatee (Haubold et al., 2006).
Comment 8: If addressing implementing regulations, we recommend
reference to the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act (Ch. 379.2431(2),
Florida Statute) as this regulatory and conservation authority provides
for the management actions as defined in the 2007 FWC Manatee
Management Plan.
Response: Although the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act was referenced
in the draft SAR in the Status of Stock section, we added another
reference as suggested in the Stock Definition and Geographic Range
section of the final revised SAR.
Comment 9: The minimum population estimate (Nmin) for
the Florida manatee stock is calculated using the equation for Minimum
[[Page 18575]]
Population Estimate provided in NMFS (2016): Nmin = N/exp
(0.842 x [ln(1+[CV (N)]\2\)]1/2). We recommend including an
explanation of what the Minimum Population Estimate implies. For
example, the Minimum Population Estimate provides a conservative
estimate of the 20th percentile of the population distribution.
Response: The recommended explanation is an accurate statement, but
we did not add additional information to the final revised SAR in
response to this comment because we do not believe most readers need
the SAR to provide that detailed of an explanation. Readers wanting a
more thorough understanding of the basis for the equation for the
minimum population estimate or what it signifies can refer to the cited
source for more information.
Comment 10: The most recent adult-survival-rate analysis for the
Florida manatee identifies mean adult survival rates of over 97
percent. It should be noted that these are baseline rates and do not
include episodic factors affecting survival, including events such as
red tide and significant periods of cold temperature.
Response: As with Comment 9, the recommended additional information
is an accurate statement, but we did not add more explanation to the
final revised SAR in response to this comment because we do not believe
most readers need the SAR to provide that detailed of an explanation.
The SAR notes that the reported rates are baseline mean adult survival
and reproductive rates that were based on data collected over a 20+
year period. Readers wanting a more thorough understanding of how the
rates are calculated can refer to the cited source for more
information.
Comment 11: We request additional research citations for this
chapter: Reinert et al. 2017: Entanglement in and ingestion of fishing
gear and other marine debris by Florida manatees, and Bassett et al.
2020: Quantifying sublethal Florida manatee-watercraft interactions by
examining scars on manatee carcasses.
Response: We added a citation to Bassett et al. 2020 in the final
revised SAR and in the References. Reinert et al. 2017 was already
cited in the draft SAR, but we added an additional citation to it in
the suggested section.
Comment 12: Manatee mortality data are available and verified
through December 2020 with preliminary mortality data available through
2021 and much of 2022. We recommend inclusion of this recent data
within this chapter, including the associated tables, or explanation of
why the SAR does not report this data.
Response: We added additional discussion in the SAR to address this
comment and explain the data range used in the tables. The data
summarized in the tables and discussed in the SAR are based on
confirmed mortality data. Preliminary data are not included because
these data are subject to change as to cause of death and other
attributes. In discussions of the ongoing UME, the reported total
number of deaths does include preliminary data (to provide context on
the scale of the event), but no assessments of these data have been
made as to cause of death. The mortality and rescue data summarized in
the SAR include data through 2018, the last full year for which
confirmed mortality data were available from the FWC at the time this
report was prepared and submitted to the Atlantic SRG for peer review.
After peer review, FWC provided confirmed mortality data covering all
of 2019 and 2020. Due to both the timing of when these data became
available and to changes FWC made to their data collection protocols,
these data are discussed but are not included in the tables.
Comment 13: Manatee mortality should include a description of other
cause of death (COD) categories, including Verified Not Necropsied and
Undetermined. Reported data on human-related COD is likely an
underestimate as there may be cases of human-related death that were
not quantified if a carcass was not recovered, necropsied, or a COD was
unable to be determined. We recommend including two columns in table 4
to distinguish between Other and Undetermined COD categories as opposed
to ``Other.''
Response: Descriptions of other causes of death were included in
the draft SAR, as was a citation to the FWC website that describes all
the categories; however, we have added additional explanation and
discussion in the final revised SAR, particularly for the Verified Not
Necropsied (VNN) category. The draft SAR explained that the cause of
some deaths cannot be determined and that the true number of deaths
(total or in any given category) is not known because the number of
carcasses that are not found or reported is unknown. We did not split
the ``Other'' category as suggested given the focus of the SAR is on
human-related deaths; no human-related deaths are included in the VNN
and Undetermined categories that comprise the ``Other'' category used
in the SAR.
Comment 14: The statement referring to carrying-capacity and cited
as Provancha et al. 2012 does not consider the thermal quality of warm-
water sites. We recommend further discussion on insufficient or non-
dependable warm water as a limiting factor in addition to physical
constraints such as vegetation.
Response: Warm-water issues were discussed in the draft SAR in
sufficient detail, consistent with the requirements of the MMPA.
Readers wanting a more thorough understanding of potential carrying
capacity issues can refer to the cited sources for more information.
Comment 15: We recommend including additional citations on red tide
effects on manatees: Walsh et al. 2015: Sublethal red tide toxin
exposure in free-ranging manatees (Trichechus manatus) affects the
immune system through reduced lymphocyte proliferation responses,
inflammation, and oxidative stress, and Flewelling et al. 2005: Red
tides and marine mammal mortalities.
Response: We added citations to both papers in the final revised
SAR.
Comment 16: From information reported by the St. Johns River Water
Management District, and based on 2021 aerial survey seagrass data, the
Indian River Lagoon has lost approximately 75 percent of seagrass
acreage since 2009 with 40 percent loss of seagrass acreage from 2019
through 2021.
Response: We did not revise the information contained in the draft
SAR because the commenter did not provide a supporting citation.
Although the information included in the SAR is not the same as the
above comment, the source we cited is recent (2022) and from the same
agency referred to in the comment, and both descriptions support the
same finding: that significant seagrass losses have occurred in this
area.
References
In accordance with section 117(b)(1) of the MMPA, we include in
this notice a list of the sources of information or published reports
upon which we based the revised SAR. The Service consulted technical
reports, conference proceedings, refereed journal publications, and
scientific studies prepared or issued by Federal agencies,
nongovernmental organizations, and individuals with expertise in the
fields of marine mammal biology and ecology, population dynamics,
modeling, and commercial fishing practices. These agencies and
organizations include the Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Puerto Rico
Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources, the
[[Page 18576]]
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Hubbs Sea World
Research Institute, the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, the
Caribbean Stranding Network, and Mote Marine Laboratory. In addition,
the Service consulted publications such as the Journal of Wildlife
Management, Marine Mammal Science, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Marine
Technology Society Journal, Wildlife Monographs, Gulf and Caribbean
Research, Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, Molecular Ecology, and
Molecular Ecology Notes, as well as other refereed journal literature,
technical reports, and data sources in the development of these SARs. A
complete list of citations to the scientific literature relied on for
each of these SARs is available on the Federal eRulemaking portal
(https://www.regulations.gov) under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2022-0031 or
upon request from the Florida Ecological Services Field Office or
Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this action is the Marine Mammal Protection Act
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).
Signing Authority
Martha Williams, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
approved this action on March 24, 2023, for publication. On March 24,
2023, Martha Williams authorized the undersigned to sign the document
electronically and submit it to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication as an official document of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
Madonna Baucum,
Chief, Policy and Regulations Branch, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06505 Filed 3-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P