Air Plan Approval; NC; Transportation Conformity, 18423-18426 [2023-06425]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Rules and Regulations 10.0 Calibration and Standardization 10.1 Spectrophotometer Calibration. Prepare a stock solution of 10 mg/mL formaldehyde. Prepare a series of calibration standards from the stock solution corresponding to 0.0, 0.5, 1.5, 3.5, 5.0, and 7.5 mg/mL formaldehyde. Mix 2.0 ml of each calibration standard with 2.0 mL of acetyl acetone reagent in screw cap vials, thoroughly mix the solution, and place the vials in a water bath (or heating block) at 60 °C for 10 minutes. Remove the vials and allow to cool to room temperature. Transfer each solution to a cuvette and measure the absorbance at 412 nm using the spectrophotometer. Develop a calibration curve (response vs. concentration) from the analytical results of these standards. The acceptance criteria for the spectrophotometer calibration is a correlation coefficient of 0.99 or higher. If this criterion is not met, the calibration procedures should be repeated. 12.0 * b = the intercept of the calibration curve at zero concentration. * 0769. All documents in the docket are listed on the regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that, if possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone number is (404) 562–9222 Ms. Sheckler can also be reached via electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: * * * BILLING CODE 6560–50–C ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2021–0769; FRL–10576– 02–R4] Air Plan Approval; NC; Transportation Conformity Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Air Quality (DAQ) on September 24, 2021. The SIP revisions replace previously approved memoranda of agreement (MOAs) with thirteen updated MOAs outlining transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation, conflict resolution, public participation, and enforceability of certain transportation-related control and mitigation measures. EPA is approving North Carolina’s September 24, 2021, SIP revisions as they are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This rule is effective April 28, 2023. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification EPA–R04–OAR–2021– SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 * * * * 10.3 Calibration Checks. Calibration checks consisting of analyzing a mid-range standard separately prepared with each batch of samples. The calibration check standard must be prepared independent of the calibration stock solution. The result of the check standard must be within 10 percent of the theoretical value to be acceptable. If the acceptance criteria are not met, the standard must be reanalyzed. If still unacceptable, a new calibration curve must be prepared using freshly prepared standards. * * * * * I. Background As described in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on February 7, 2023 (88 FR 7903), CAA section 176(c)(4)(E) and 40 CFR PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Calculations and Data Analysis 12.1 Nomenclature * * * * * * * * * * Kc = spectrophotometer calibration factor, slope of the least square regression line, absorbance/(mg/mL) (Note: Most spreadsheets are capable of calculating a least squares line, including slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient). * * * * * 12.6 Mass of Formaldehyde in Liquid Sample 51.390(b) require states to develop conformity SIPs that address three specific provisions of federal regulations. First, EPA’s transportation conformity rule requires states to develop their own processes and procedures which meet the criteria in 40 CFR 93.105 for interagency consultation and resolution of conflicts among the federal, state, and local agencies. The SIP revision must include processes and procedures to be followed by the metropolitan planning organization (MPO), state Department of Transportation (DOT), and the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) in consultation with the state and local air quality agencies and EPA before making conformity determinations. The conformity SIP revision must also include processes and procedures for the state and local air quality agencies and EPA to coordinate the development of applicable SIPs with MPOs, state DOTs and the USDOT. States may choose to develop, in place of regulations, an MOA which establishes the roles and procedures for transportation conformity. The MOA includes the detailed consultation procedures developed for that particular area. The MOAs are enforceable through the signature of all the transportation and air quality agencies, including the USDOT’s Federal Highway Administration, USDOT’s Federal Transit Administration, and EPA. North Carolina’s September 24, 2021, conformity SIP revisions add new interagency partners and MPOs, establish new procedures for interagency consultation, dispute resolution, public participation and enforceability of certain transportation- E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM 29MRR1 ER29MR23.019</GPH> * [FR Doc. 2023–04956 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 18423 18424 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Rules and Regulations related control measures and mitigation measures, and supersede the MOAs incorporated into the SIP on December 26, 2013. The list of MPOs for which North Carolina has established MOAs in the September 24, 2021, submission, include Burlington-Graham MPO, Cabarrus-Rowan MPO, Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization, Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro MPO, Gaston-ClevelandLincoln MPO, Greater Hickory MPO, Greensboro Urban Area MPO, High Point Urban Area MPO, North Carolina Capital Area MPO, Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO, the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (NPS), and Rural Area (NC DOT). Table 1, below, identifies the applicable national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for which each planning agency is required to implement transportation conformity, and therefore, establish interagency consultation procedures. As stated above, the MOAs are the documents which establish each area’s interagency consultation procedures. TABLE 1—MOA ADMINISTRATORS AND THE APPLICABLE NAAQS FOR TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY MOA administrator Applicable NAAQS Burlington-Graham MPO ..................................... Cabarrus-Rowan MPO ........................................ Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO .................... Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO .......................... Greater Hickory MPO .......................................... Greensboro Urban Area MPO ............................ High Point Urban Area MPO ............................... North Carolina Capital Area MPO ....................... Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO .......................... Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area MPO .......... Rural (counties not covered by MPO, administered by NC DOT) 1. Great Smoky Mountains National Park (administered by NPS). 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. 1997 8-hour ozone, 2008 8-hour ozone, and 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 1971 carbon monoxide (CO), 1997 8-hour ozone, and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 1971 1997 1997 1997 1971 1971 1997 1971 1997 CO and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 8-hour ozone and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. annual PM2.5 NAAQS. annual PM2.5 NAAQS. CO and 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. CO and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 8-hour ozone NAAQS. CO and 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 1 Person County is the only county subject to transportation conformity requirements per the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS that does not have an MPO responsible for it. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 In the February 7, 2023, NPRM, EPA proposed to approve updated MOAs for thirteen counties in North Carolina. The changes to the MOAs provide for updates to roles and responsibilities as they relate to transportation conformity. The details of North Carolina’s submission and the rationale for EPA’s action are explained further in the February 7, 2023, NPRM. Comments on the February 7, 2023, NPRM were due on or before March 9, 2023. No adverse comments were received. enforceability of certain transportationrelated control and mitigation measures. This action also establishes consultation procedures and mitigation measures in the State of North Carolina. EPA is approving these actions because are consistent with section 110 and 176 of the CAA and will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. II. Final Actions III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the North Carolina SIP. Specifically, EPA is approving the replacement of previously approved MOAs with thirteen updated MOAs for the Burlington-Graham MPO, CabarrusRowan MPO, Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization, Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO, Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO, Greater Hickory MPO, Greensboro Urban Area MPO, High Point Urban Area MPO, North Carolina Capital Area MPO, Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO, the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (NPS), and Rural Area (NC DOT); outlining transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation; conflict resolution; public participation; and Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, these actions: • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 • Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Are certified as not having significant economic impacts on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Are not economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM 29MRR1 18425 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Rules and Regulations methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing these actions and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. These actions are not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 30, 2023. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of these actions for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. These actions may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 22, 2023. Daniel Blackman, Regional Administrator, Region 4. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II—North Carolina 2. In § 52.1770, amend the table in paragraph (e) by adding entries for the following at the end of the table: ■ a. Burlington-Graham Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ b. Cabarrus-Rowan Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ c. Charlotte Regional Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ d. Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ e. Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ f. Greater Hickory Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ g. Greensboro Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ h. High Point Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ i. North Carolina Capital Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ j. Rocky Mount Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ k. Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ l. Rural (counties not covered by MPO, administered by North Carolina DOT) Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement; ■ m. Great Smoky Mountains National Park (administered by NPS) Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. The additions read as follows: ■ § 52.1770 * Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS State effective date ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Provision * * * Burlington-Graham Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Cabarrus-Rowan Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Charlotte Regional Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Greater Hickory Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Greensboro Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. High Point Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. North Carolina Capital Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Rocky Mount Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 EPA approval date * Federal Register citation 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 * * [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/20/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM 29MRR1 Explanation * 18426 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS—Continued State effective date Provision Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Rural (counties not covered by MPO, administered by North Carolina DOT) Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. Great Smoky Mountains National Park (administered by NPS) Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement. [FR Doc. 2023–06425 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R08–OAR–2022–0612; FRL–10300– 02–R8] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Colorado; Revisions to Code of Colorado Regulations; Regulation Number 3 Correction In rule document 2023–06120, appearing on pages 18054–18056 in the issue of Monday, March 27, 2023, make the following correction: § 52.320 [Corrected] On page 18056, in the table, in the fourth column, in the ninth row, ‘‘3/2/ 2023’’ should read ‘‘3/27/2023’’. ■ [FR Doc. C1–2023–06120 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099–10–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0719, FRL–10254– 02–R10] Air Plan Approval; ID; Incorporation by Reference Updates The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to the Idaho State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on May 4, 2022. The submission updates the incorporation by reference of the national ambient air quality standards and related planning and monitoring requirements into the Idaho air quality rules as of July 1, 2021. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 Federal Register citation 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/27/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 1/30/2023 3/29/2023 [Insert Federal Register citation]. Idaho undertakes such updates regularly to ensure the state air quality rules and the federally enforceable Idaho SIP remain consistent with EPA air quality regulations over time. DATES: This final rule is effective April 28, 2023. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0719. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available at https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall (15–H13), EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue (Suite 155), Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553–6357, hall.kristin@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it refers to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA approval date I. Background On May 4, 2022, Idaho submitted updates to the SIP to incorporate the national ambient air quality standards and other Federal regulations by reference as of July 1, 2021. The SIP revision, state effective March 24, 2022, includes specific air quality regulations codified in the Idaho Rules for the PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Explanation Control of Air Pollution (IDAPA 58.01.01). On December 19, 2022, the EPA proposed to approve the submitted SIP revision (87 FR 77544). The reasons for our proposed approval are included in the proposal and will not be restated here. The public comment period closed on January 18, 2023. We received no public comments. Therefore, we are finalizing the action as proposed. II. Final Action The EPA is approving and incorporating by reference revisions to the Idaho SIP submitted on May 4, 2022. Upon the effective date of this action, the Idaho SIP will include IDAPA 58.01.01.107 Incorporation by Reference, subsection 03, paragraphs a through e, state effective March 24, 2022. This provision incorporates the national ambient air quality standards and related planning and monitoring requirements as of July 1, 2021. III. Incorporation by Reference In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference of Idaho regulatory provisions described in section II of this preamble and set forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through https:// www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the Clean Air Act as of the effective date of the final rule of the EPA’s approval, and will be E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM 29MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18423-18426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2021-0769; FRL-10576-02-R4]


Air Plan Approval; NC; Transportation Conformity

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of North 
Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environmental 
Quality (DEQ), Division of Air Quality (DAQ) on September 24, 2021. The 
SIP revisions replace previously approved memoranda of agreement (MOAs) 
with thirteen updated MOAs outlining transportation conformity criteria 
and procedures related to interagency consultation, conflict 
resolution, public participation, and enforceability of certain 
transportation-related control and mitigation measures. EPA is 
approving North Carolina's September 24, 2021, SIP revisions as they 
are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA 
or Act).

DATES: This rule is effective April 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
Identification EPA-R04-OAR-2021-0769. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, 
some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential 
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and 
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 
30303-8960. EPA requests that, if possible, you contact the person 
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your 
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday 
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and 
Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is 
(404) 562-9222 Ms. Sheckler can also be reached via electronic mail at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    As described in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on 
February 7, 2023 (88 FR 7903), CAA section 176(c)(4)(E) and 40 CFR 
51.390(b) require states to develop conformity SIPs that address three 
specific provisions of federal regulations. First, EPA's transportation 
conformity rule requires states to develop their own processes and 
procedures which meet the criteria in 40 CFR 93.105 for interagency 
consultation and resolution of conflicts among the federal, state, and 
local agencies. The SIP revision must include processes and procedures 
to be followed by the metropolitan planning organization (MPO), state 
Department of Transportation (DOT), and the United States Department of 
Transportation (USDOT) in consultation with the state and local air 
quality agencies and EPA before making conformity determinations. The 
conformity SIP revision must also include processes and procedures for 
the state and local air quality agencies and EPA to coordinate the 
development of applicable SIPs with MPOs, state DOTs and the USDOT.
    States may choose to develop, in place of regulations, an MOA which 
establishes the roles and procedures for transportation conformity. The 
MOA includes the detailed consultation procedures developed for that 
particular area. The MOAs are enforceable through the signature of all 
the transportation and air quality agencies, including the USDOT's 
Federal Highway Administration, USDOT's Federal Transit Administration, 
and EPA.
    North Carolina's September 24, 2021, conformity SIP revisions add 
new interagency partners and MPOs, establish new procedures for 
interagency consultation, dispute resolution, public participation and 
enforceability of certain transportation-

[[Page 18424]]

related control measures and mitigation measures, and supersede the 
MOAs incorporated into the SIP on December 26, 2013. The list of MPOs 
for which North Carolina has established MOAs in the September 24, 
2021, submission, include Burlington-Graham MPO, Cabarrus-Rowan MPO, 
Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization, Durham-Chapel 
Hill-Carrboro MPO, Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO, Greater Hickory MPO, 
Greensboro Urban Area MPO, High Point Urban Area MPO, North Carolina 
Capital Area MPO, Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO, the Great Smoky Mountains 
National Park (NPS), and Rural Area (NC DOT).
    Table 1, below, identifies the applicable national ambient air 
quality standards (NAAQS) for which each planning agency is required to 
implement transportation conformity, and therefore, establish 
interagency consultation procedures. As stated above, the MOAs are the 
documents which establish each area's interagency consultation 
procedures.

 Table 1--MOA Administrators and the Applicable NAAQS for Transportation
                               Conformity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         MOA administrator                    Applicable NAAQS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burlington-Graham MPO.............  1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 annual
                                     fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
                                     NAAQS.
Cabarrus-Rowan MPO................  1997 8-hour ozone, 2008 8-hour
                                     ozone, and 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Charlotte Regional Transportation   1971 carbon monoxide (CO), 1997 8-
 Planning Organization.              hour ozone, and 2008 8-hour ozone
                                     NAAQS.
Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO...  1971 CO and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO......  1997 8-hour ozone and 2008 8-hour
                                     ozone NAAQS.
Greater Hickory MPO...............  1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
Greensboro Urban Area MPO.........  1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
High Point Urban Area MPO.........  1971 CO and 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
North Carolina Capital Area MPO...  1971 CO and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO........  1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area    1971 CO and 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
 MPO.
Rural (counties not covered by      1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
 MPO, administered by NC DOT) \1\.
Great Smoky Mountains National      1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
 Park (administered by NPS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Person County is the only county subject to transportation
  conformity requirements per the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS that does not
  have an MPO responsible for it.

    In the February 7, 2023, NPRM, EPA proposed to approve updated MOAs 
for thirteen counties in North Carolina. The changes to the MOAs 
provide for updates to roles and responsibilities as they relate to 
transportation conformity. The details of North Carolina's submission 
and the rationale for EPA's action are explained further in the 
February 7, 2023, NPRM. Comments on the February 7, 2023, NPRM were due 
on or before March 9, 2023. No adverse comments were received.

II. Final Actions

    EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the North Carolina 
SIP. Specifically, EPA is approving the replacement of previously 
approved MOAs with thirteen updated MOAs for the Burlington-Graham MPO, 
Cabarrus-Rowan MPO, Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning 
Organization, Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO, Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln 
MPO, Greater Hickory MPO, Greensboro Urban Area MPO, High Point Urban 
Area MPO, North Carolina Capital Area MPO, Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO, 
the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (NPS), and Rural Area (NC DOT); 
outlining transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to 
interagency consultation; conflict resolution; public participation; 
and enforceability of certain transportation-related control and 
mitigation measures. This action also establishes consultation 
procedures and mitigation measures in the State of North Carolina. EPA 
is approving these actions because are consistent with section 110 and 
176 of the CAA and will not interfere with any applicable requirement 
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other 
applicable requirement of the CAA.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely 
approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose 
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that 
reason, these actions:
     Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Do not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Are certified as not having significant economic impacts 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Do not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Are not economically significant regulatory actions based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Are not significant regulatory actions subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible

[[Page 18425]]

methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does 
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing these actions and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. These actions are not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by May 30, 2023. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of these actions for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. These actions may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 22, 2023.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 
52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart II--North Carolina

0
2. In Sec.  52.1770, amend the table in paragraph (e) by adding entries 
for the following at the end of the table:
0
a. Burlington-Graham Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum 
of Agreement;
0
b. Cabarrus-Rowan Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of 
Agreement;
0
c. Charlotte Regional Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum 
of Agreement;
0
d. Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
e. Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
f. Greater Hickory Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of 
Agreement;
0
g. Greensboro Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
h. High Point Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
i. North Carolina Capital Area Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
j. Rocky Mount Urban Area Interagency Transportation Conformity 
Memorandum of Agreement;
0
k. Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area Interagency Transportation 
Conformity Memorandum of Agreement;
0
l. Rural (counties not covered by MPO, administered by North Carolina 
DOT) Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement;
0
m. Great Smoky Mountains National Park (administered by NPS) 
Interagency Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Agreement.
    The additions read as follows:


Sec.  52.1770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                              EPA-Approved North Carolina Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        State       EPA approval     Federal Register
            Provision              effective date       date             citation              Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Burlington-Graham Interagency           1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
Cabarrus-Rowan Interagency              1/20/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
Charlotte Regional Interagency          1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro             1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Interagency Transportation                                         Register citation].
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.
Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln                1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Interagency Transportation                                         Register citation].
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.
Greater Hickory Interagency             1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
Greensboro Urban Area Interagency       1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
High Point Urban Area Interagency       1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Transportation Conformity                                          Register citation].
 Memorandum of Agreement.
North Carolina Capital Area             1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Interagency Transportation                                         Register citation].
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.
Rocky Mount Urban Area                  1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Interagency Transportation                                         Register citation].
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.

[[Page 18426]]

 
Winston-Salem-Forsyth Urban Area        1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Interagency Transportation                                         Register citation].
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.
Rural (counties not covered by          1/27/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 MPO, administered by North                                         Register citation].
 Carolina DOT) Interagency
 Transportation Conformity
 Memorandum of Agreement.
Great Smoky Mountains National          1/30/2023       3/29/2023  [Insert Federal
 Park (administered by NPS)                                         Register citation].
 Interagency Transportation
 Conformity Memorandum of
 Agreement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-06425 Filed 3-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.