Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in 2008 8-Hour Ozone Extreme Area and Reasonable Further Progress Plan for Coachella Valley; California, 18314-18315 [2023-06344]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
18314
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 28, 2023 / Notices
which explain in detail the information
that the EPA will be collecting, are
available in the public docket for this
ICR. The docket can be viewed online
at www.regulations.gov or in person at
the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744.
For additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Abstract: In 1995, EPA promulgated
regulations at 40 CFR part 273 that
govern the collection and management
of widely generated hazardous wastes
known as ‘‘Universal Wastes’’.
Universal Wastes are generated in a
variety of non-industrial settings and are
present in non-hazardous waste
management systems. Examples of
Universal Wastes include certain
batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing
lamps, and thermostats. The part 273
regulations are designed to ensure
facilities collect these wastes and
properly manage them in an appropriate
hazardous waste management system.
EPA needs to collect notifications of
Universal Waste management to obtain
general information on these handlers
and to facilitate enforcement of the part
273 regulations. EPA promulgated
labeling and marking requirements and
accumulation time limits to ensure that
Universal Waste is being accumulated
responsibly. EPA needs to collect
information on illegal Universal Waste
shipments to enforce compliance with
applicable regulations. Finally, EPA
requires tracking of Universal Waste
shipments to help ensure that Universal
Waste is being properly treated,
recycled, or disposed.
In 2001, EPA promulgated regulations
in 40 CFR part 266 that provide
increased flexibility to facilities
managing wastes commonly known as
‘‘Mixed Waste.’’ Mixed Wastes are lowlevel mixed waste (LLMW) and
naturally occurring and/or acceleratorproduced radioactive material (NARM)
containing hazardous waste. These
wastes are also regulated by the Atomic
Energy Act. As long as specified
eligibility criteria and conditions are
met, LLMW and NARM are exempt from
the definition of hazardous waste as
defined in part 261. Although these
wastes are exempt from RCRA manifest,
transportation, and disposal
requirements, facilities must still
comply with the manifest,
transportation, and disposal
requirements under the NRC (or NRCAgreement State) regulations. Section
266.345(a) requires that generators or
treaters notify EPA or the Authorized
State that they are claiming the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Mar 27, 2023
Jkt 259001
Transportation and Disposal
Conditional Exemption prior to the
initial shipment of a waste to a LLRW
disposal facility.
In 1992, EPA finalized management
standards for used oils destined for
recycling. The Agency codified the used
oil management standards at 40 CFR
part 279. The regulations at 40 CFR part
279 establish, among other things,
streamlined procedures for notification,
testing, labeling, and recordkeeping.
They also establish a flexible selfimplementing approach for tracking offsite shipments that allow used oil
handlers to use standard business
practices (e.g., invoices, bill of lading).
In addition, part 279 sets standards for
the prevention and cleanup of releases
to the environment during storage and
transit. EPA believes these requirements
will minimize potential mismanagement
of used oils, while not discouraging
recycling. Used oil transporters must
comply with all applicable packaging,
labeling, and placarding requirements of
49 CFR parts 173, 178, and 179. In
addition, used oil transporters must
report discharges of used oil according
to existing 49 CFR part 171 and 33 CFR
part 153 requirements.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: Private
sector and State, local, or Tribal
governments.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR part 273), required
to obtain or retain a benefit (40 CFR
parts 266 and 279).
Estimated number of respondents:
27,127 (total).
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Total estimated burden: 530,478
hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.03(b)
Total estimated cost: $56,792,139 (per
year), which includes $950 in
annualized capital and $10,013,038 in
annualized operation & maintenance
costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease in the burden of 264,872 hours
in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is a
result of a significant downturn in the
number of Universal Waste handlers
(down to 25,343 from 131,898), likely
due in part to the effects of the COVID
pandemic.
Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–06392 Filed 3–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0182; FRL–10800–
01–R9]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets in 2008 8-Hour
Ozone Extreme Area and Reasonable
Further Progress Plan for Coachella
Valley; California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is notifying the public
that we have found motor vehicle
emissions budgets (‘‘budgets’’) for the
Coachella Valley adequate for
transportation conformity purposes.
Specifically, our finding relates to
budgets in the ‘‘Request to Reclassify
Coachella Valley for the 2008 8-hour
Ozone Standard and the Updated Motor
Vehicle Emission Budgets’’ (‘‘Coachella
Valley Extreme RFP Plan’’), submitted
to the EPA for inclusion in the
California state implementation plan
(SIP) by the California Air Resources
Board (CARB) on December 7, 2022.
Upon the effective date of this notice of
adequacy, the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) and
the U.S. Department of Transportation
must use these budgets in future
transportation conformity analyses.
DATES: This finding is effective April 12,
2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karina O’Connor, Planning Section
(ARD–2–1), Air and Radiation Division,
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105; (775) 434–
8176 or oconnor.karina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
This notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. By letter dated March 17,
2023, EPA Region IX notified CARB that
the budgets in the Coachella Valley Plan
for the reasonable further progress (RFP)
years of 2023, 2026, 2029, and 2031 are
adequate for transportation conformity
purposes.1 The finding is available at
the EPA’s conformity website.2
We announced the availability of the
Coachella Valley Extreme RFP Plan and
related RFP motor vehicle emissions
budgets on the EPA’s transportation
SUMMARY:
1 Letter dated March17, 2023, from Elizabeth
Adams, Director, Air and Radiation Division, EPA
Region IX, to Steven S. Cliff, Executive Officer,
CARB.
2 https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-trans
portation/conformity-adequacy-review-region-9.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 28, 2023 / Notices
conformity website on December 21,
2022 and requested comments by
January 20, 2023. We received no
comments in response to the adequacy
review posting. The motor vehicle
emissions budgets that we have found
adequate are provided in the following
table:
ADEQUATE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS
BUDGETS
FOR
THE
COACHELLA VALLEY FOR THE 2008
8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
[tpd]
VOC
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
2023
2026
2029
2031
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
NOX
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.2
6.0
5.8
5.8
5.7
Transportation conformity is required
by Clean Air Act section 176(c). The
EPA’s conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, transportation
improvement programs, and
transportation projects conform to a
state’s SIP and establishes the criteria
and procedures for determining whether
or not they conform. Conformity to a SIP
means that transportation activities will
not produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria we use to determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emissions
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4), promulgated on August 15,
1997.3 We further described our process
for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in our final rule
dated July 1, 2004,4 and we used the
information in these resources in
making our adequacy determination.
Please note that an adequacy review is
separate from the EPA’s completeness
review and does not prejudge the EPA’s
ultimate action on the SIP submittal.
Even if we find a budget adequate, the
SIP submittal could later be
disapproved. Pursuant to 40 CFR
93.104(e), SCAG and the U.S.
Department of Transportation will need
to demonstrate conformity to the new
budgets within two years of the effective
date of this notice.5 For demonstrating
conformity to the new budgets, the onroad motor vehicle emissions from
implementation of the transportation
plan or program for the area should be
3 62
FR 43780, 43781–43783.
FR 40004, 40038–40047.
5 See 73 FR 4420 (January 24, 2008).
4 69
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Mar 27, 2023
Jkt 259001
Dated: March 22, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023–06344 Filed 3–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Ozone
precursor
Year
projected consistent with the budgets,
i.e., by taking the emissions results
derived from CARB’s EMFAC model
(short for EMission FACtor) and then
rounding the emissions up to the
nearest tenth of a ton per day.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Notice, request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) invites
comment on a proposal to extend for
three years, with revision, the Financial
Statements for Holding Companies (FR
Y–9 Reports; OMB No. 7100–0128).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by FR Y–9 reports, by any of
the following methods:
• Agency Website: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
foia/proposedregs.aspx.
• Email: regs.comments@
federalreserve.gov. Include the OMB
number or FR number in the subject line
of the message.
• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Federal Reserve Board of
Governors, Attn: Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board, Mailstop M–
4775, 2001 C St. NW, Washington, DC
20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s website at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/
proposedregs.aspx as submitted, unless
modified for technical reasons or to
remove personally identifiable
information at the commenter’s request.
Accordingly, comments will not be
edited to remove any confidential
business information, identifying
information, or contact information.
Public comments may also be viewed
electronically or in paper in Room M–
4365A, 2001 C St. NW, Washington, DC
20551, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on
weekdays, except for Federal holidays.
For security reasons, the Board requires
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18315
that visitors make an appointment to
inspect comments. You may do so by
calling (202) 452–3684. Upon arrival,
visitors will be required to present valid
government-issued photo identification
and to submit to security screening in
order to inspect and photocopy
comments.
Additionally, commenters may send a
copy of their comments to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Desk
Officer for the Federal Reserve Board,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to
(202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer—Nuha Elmaghrabi—Office of
the Chief Data Officer, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, nuha.elmaghrabi@frb.gov, (202)
452–3884.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
15, 1984, OMB delegated to the Board
authority under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) to approve and
assign OMB control numbers to
collections of information conducted or
sponsored by the Board. In exercising
this delegated authority, the Board is
directed to take every reasonable step to
solicit comment. In determining
whether to approve a collection of
information, the Board will consider all
comments received from the public and
other agencies.
During the comment period for this
proposal, a copy of the proposed PRA
OMB submission, including the draft
reporting form and instructions,
supporting statement (which contains
more detail about the information
collection and burden estimates than
this notice), and other documentation,
will be made available on the Board’s
public website at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
reportingforms/home/review or may be
requested from the agency clearance
officer, whose name appears above.
Final versions of these documents will
be made available at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, if
approved.
Request for Comment on Information
Collection Proposal
The Board invites public comment on
the following information collection,
which is being reviewed under
authority delegated by the OMB under
the PRA. Comments are invited on the
following:
a. Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18314-18315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06344]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0182; FRL-10800-01-R9]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in 2008 8-Hour
Ozone Extreme Area and Reasonable Further Progress Plan for Coachella
Valley; California
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the
public that we have found motor vehicle emissions budgets (``budgets'')
for the Coachella Valley adequate for transportation conformity
purposes. Specifically, our finding relates to budgets in the ``Request
to Reclassify Coachella Valley for the 2008 8-hour Ozone Standard and
the Updated Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets'' (``Coachella Valley
Extreme RFP Plan''), submitted to the EPA for inclusion in the
California state implementation plan (SIP) by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) on December 7, 2022. Upon the effective date of
this notice of adequacy, the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use
these budgets in future transportation conformity analyses.
DATES: This finding is effective April 12, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karina O'Connor, Planning Section
(ARD-2-1), Air and Radiation Division, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; (775) 434-8176 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to the EPA.
This notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. By letter dated March 17, 2023, EPA Region IX notified
CARB that the budgets in the Coachella Valley Plan for the reasonable
further progress (RFP) years of 2023, 2026, 2029, and 2031 are adequate
for transportation conformity purposes.\1\ The finding is available at
the EPA's conformity website.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Letter dated March17, 2023, from Elizabeth Adams, Director,
Air and Radiation Division, EPA Region IX, to Steven S. Cliff,
Executive Officer, CARB.
\2\ https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/conformity-adequacy-review-region-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We announced the availability of the Coachella Valley Extreme RFP
Plan and related RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets on the EPA's
transportation
[[Page 18315]]
conformity website on December 21, 2022 and requested comments by
January 20, 2023. We received no comments in response to the adequacy
review posting. The motor vehicle emissions budgets that we have found
adequate are provided in the following table:
Adequate Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the Coachella Valley for
the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
[tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ozone precursor
Year -----------------
VOC NOX
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2023.................................................. 2.7 6.0
2026.................................................. 2.5 5.8
2029.................................................. 2.3 5.8
2031.................................................. 2.2 5.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section
176(c). The EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans,
transportation improvement programs, and transportation projects
conform to a state's SIP and establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they conform. Conformity to a SIP means
that transportation activities will not produce new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria we use to determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emissions budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4), promulgated on August 15, 1997.\3\ We further
described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP
budgets in our final rule dated July 1, 2004,\4\ and we used the
information in these resources in making our adequacy determination.
Please note that an adequacy review is separate from the EPA's
completeness review and does not prejudge the EPA's ultimate action on
the SIP submittal. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP submittal
could later be disapproved. Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e), SCAG and the
U.S. Department of Transportation will need to demonstrate conformity
to the new budgets within two years of the effective date of this
notice.\5\ For demonstrating conformity to the new budgets, the on-road
motor vehicle emissions from implementation of the transportation plan
or program for the area should be projected consistent with the
budgets, i.e., by taking the emissions results derived from CARB's
EMFAC model (short for EMission FACtor) and then rounding the emissions
up to the nearest tenth of a ton per day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 62 FR 43780, 43781-43783.
\4\ 69 FR 40004, 40038-40047.
\5\ See 73 FR 4420 (January 24, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 22, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023-06344 Filed 3-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P