Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 18019-18023 [2023-06364]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
08 was added to the maintenance or
inspection program, or within 21,250 total
flight hours after the most recent inspection
was performed as specified in AWL No. 47–
AWL–08, whichever occurs later.
(13) For AWL No. 47–AWL–10, ‘‘NGS—
Thermal Switch,’’ at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (g)(13)(i) or (ii) of this
AD.
(i) For airplanes that did not have any
version of AWL No. 47–AWL–10 in their
maintenance or inspection program before
the effective date of this AD: Within 54,000
total flight hours since issuance of the
original airworthiness certificate or original
export certificate of airworthiness, or within
4 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) For airplanes not identified in
paragraph (g)(13)(i) of this AD: Within 54,000
total flight hours since AWL No. 47–AWL–
10 was added to the maintenance or
inspection program, or within 54,000 total
flight hours after the most recent inspection
was performed as specified in AWL No. 47–
AWL–10, whichever occurs later.
(h) Additional Acceptable Wire Types and
Sleeving
As an option, during accomplishment of
the actions required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, the alternative materials specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD are
acceptable.
(1) Where AWL No. 28–AWL–08 identifies
wire types BMS 13–48, BMS 13–58, and BMS
13–60, the following wire types, as
applicable, are acceptable: MIL–W–22759/16,
SAE AS22759/16 (M22759/16), MIL–W–
22759/32, SAE AS22759/32 (M22759/32),
MIL–W–22759/34, SAE AS22759/34
(M22759/34), MIL–W–22759/41, SAE
AS22759/41 (M22759/41), MIL–W–22759/86,
SAE AS22759/86 (M22759/86), MIL–W–
22759/87, SAE AS22759/87 (M22759/87),
MIL–W–22759/92, and SAE AS22759/92
(M22759/92); and MIL–C–27500 and NEMA
WC 27500 cables constructed from these
military or SAE specification wire types.
(2) Where AWL No. 28–AWL–08 identifies
TFE–2X Standard wall for wire sleeving, the
following sleeving materials are acceptable:
Roundit 2000NX and Varglas Type HO, HP,
or HM, as applicable.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or
Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs)
After the existing maintenance or
inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the
actions, intervals, and CDCCLs are approved
as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(j) Terminating Actions
(1) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates all
requirements of AD 2008–10–06 R1.
(2) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates paragraph
(g)(2) of AD 2008–18–09 for Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F airplanes only.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
(3) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates paragraph
(h)(1) of AD 2010–13–12 for Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F airplanes only.
(4) Accomplishing the actions required by
this AD terminates paragraph (j) of AD 2010–
14–08.
(5) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates paragraph
(l) of AD 2011–06–03 for Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F airplanes only.
(6) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates paragraph
(h)(1) of AD 2014–15–14 for Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F airplanes only.
(7) Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates paragraph
(h) of AD 2016–19–03 for Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F airplanes only.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Section B,
Airworthiness Limitations—Systems, of
Section 9, AWLs and CMRs, of Boeing 747–
400 MPD Document, D621U400–9, dated
September 2021.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Samuel Dorsey, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone: (206) 231–3415; email:
Samuel.J.Dorsey@faa.gov.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18019
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), of Boeing 747–400
Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document, D621U400–9, dated April 2022.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600
Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal
Beach, CA 90740–5600; phone: (562) 797–
1717; website: myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(206) 231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on February 10, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06044 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–0440; Project
Identifier AD–2023–00245–T; Amendment
39–22396; AD 2023–06–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 737–8, –8200,
and –9 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report indicating that
certain engine anti-ice (EAI) exhaust
duct fasteners were inadequately
torqued. This AD requires an inspection
or records review to determine the serial
number of each engine inlet; and if any
affected engine inlet is found, an
inspection of the EAI exhaust duct
fasteners to determine the gap spacing
and if all fasteners are installed,
applicable related investigative and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
18020
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
corrective actions, and part marking.
This AD also limits the installation of
affected parts. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 11,
2023.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 11, 2023.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by May 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2023–
0440; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For service information identified
in this final rule, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57,
Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; telephone
562–797–1717; website
myboeingfleet.com.
• You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA–2023–0440.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Dorsey, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206–231–
3415; email: Samuel.j.dorsey@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
this final rule. Send your comments to
an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include Docket No. FAA–2023–0440
and Project Identifier AD–2023–00245–
T at the beginning of your comments.
The most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this final rule because of those
comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this AD contain
commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private,
that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this AD,
it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket
of this AD. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Samuel Dorsey,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone: 206–231–3415; email:
Samuel.j.dorsey@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will
be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
Background
The FAA has received a report
indicating that during a pre-flight check,
the flightcrew discovered a bolt
protruding through a drain hole at the
bottom of the engine inlet near the EAI
exhaust vent. Boeing determined that
some of the fasteners for EAI exhaust
ducts were installed at the factory with
inadequate torque due to the use of a
prohibited yoke-style torque wrench
adapter at a significant angle. When
used at a sufficiently large angle, which
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is expected due to the restricted access
in the area of the EAI exhaust duct, this
adapter will produce a significant
under-torque of the installed fasteners.
Inadequately-torqued fasteners may
loosen over time due to engine
vibration, eventually causing the
fastener to drop into the inlet inner
barrel.
The EAI system injects hightemperature bleed air from the engine
into the interior of the inlet lip to
prevent the formation of icing on the
exterior of the inlet lip. This EAI
exhaust air then exits the rear of the
inlet lip through the EAI exhaust duct,
which passes through the inlet inner
barrel prior to exhausting air overboard.
The composite construction of the inlet
inner barrel structure is susceptible to
heat damage at the temperatures of the
EAI exhaust air should a leak occur.
These inadequately torqued (loose or
missing) fasteners for the EAI exhaust
duct could allow EAI exhaust air to
escape from the EAI exhaust duct via
two scenarios. In the first scenario, the
loose or missing fasteners allow the EAI
exhaust duct to vibrate excessively,
which, when combined with the
redistribution of structural loads onto
the other fasteners, may lead to fatigue
cracking of the EAI exhaust duct. This
fatigue cracking would ultimately
progress to a rupture of the EAI exhaust
duct. In the second scenario, the loose
or missing fasteners may allow EAI
exhaust air to escape from a limited
location. This escaping air may impinge
directly on the inner barrel structure,
depending on which specific fasteners
are loose or missing. In both scenarios,
EAI exhaust air enters the inlet inner
barrel causing heat damage, which will
compromise the structural integrity of
the inlet, eventually leading to inlet
failure and separation under normal
flight loads.
Failure and separation of the inlet
will lead to failure of the corresponding
engine due to airflow disruption and
ingestion of debris, and likely to failure
and separation of the associated fan
cowl. Damage to the engine and engine
nacelle could result in a loss of engine
thrust, increased nacelle drag, and
disruption of airflow over the wing,
which may excessively reduce the
controllability and climb performance of
the airplane; and damage from debris
departing the engine and nacelle, which
could impact the fuselage and
empennage, could result in personal
injury to passengers and loss of control
of the airplane.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
FAA’s Determination
The FAA is issuing this AD because
the agency has determined the unsafe
condition described previously is likely
to exist or develop in other products of
the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service
Letter 737–SL–71–081–A, Revision A,
dated March 3, 2023. (Attachments I
and II of this document are dated March
2, 2023.) The service information
specifies procedures for an inspection to
determine the serial number of each
engine inlet, and if any affected engine
inlet is found, an inspection of the EAI
exhaust duct fasteners to determine the
gap spacing and if all fasteners are
installed, applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, and
part-marking the engine inlet. Related
investigative actions include an
inspection of the fasteners for proper
torque, general visual and high
frequency eddy current inspections of
the EAI exhaust duct flange and fastener
holes for cracking, and visual
inspections of the inner barrel for
thermal exposure (i.e., heat damage).
Corrective actions include re-torque of
fasteners, repairing or replacing EAI
exhaust ducts, repairing thermal
exposure, and replacing the engine
inlet. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
AD Requirements
This AD requires accomplishing the
actions identified as ‘‘(RC)’’ (required
for compliance) in the Work
Instructions of Boeing Service Letter
737–SL–71–081–A, Revision A, dated
March 3, 2023, described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between this AD and the Service
Information,’’ and except for any
differences identified as exceptions in
the regulatory text of this AD.
For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2023–0440.
Differences Between This AD and the
Service Information
Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–
081–A, Revision A, dated March 3,
2023, specifies that the actions must be
done on all airplanes. However,
airplanes produced after a certain
production line number were verified to
have properly torqued EAI exhaust duct
fasteners. Therefore, paragraph (g) of
this AD only applies to airplanes with
an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of the AD. The parts
installation limitation specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD applies to all
airplanes.
Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–
081–A, Revision A, dated March 3,
2023, includes an inspection to verify
the serial number of the inlet. This AD
also allows a review of airplane
maintenance records in lieu of the
inspection to verify the serial number of
the inlet if the serial number of the inlet
can be conclusively determined from
that review.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this AD to be an
interim action. The FAA is investigating
if design changes may be needed to
prevent a future common-cause failure
of the EAI exhaust duct. If final action
is later identified, the FAA might
consider further rulemaking then.
Justification for Immediate Adoption
and Determination of the Effective Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies
to dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency,
for ‘‘good cause,’’ finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under this section, an agency,
upon finding good cause, may issue a
final rule without providing notice and
seeking comment prior to issuance.
Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules
effective in less than thirty days, upon
a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
18021
AD without providing an opportunity
for public comments prior to adoption.
The FAA has found that the risk to the
flying public justifies forgoing notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because loose or missing fasteners
for the EAI exhaust duct might allow
EAI exhaust air to enter the inlet interior
causing heat damage, which could
compromise the structural integrity of
the inlet, eventually leading to inlet
failure and separation under normal
flight loads. Failure and separation of
the inlet will lead to failure of the
corresponding engine due to airflow
disruption and ingestion of debris and
likely failure and separation of the
associated fan cowl. Damage to the
engine and engine nacelle could result
in a loss of engine thrust, increased
nacelle drag, and disruption of airflow
over the wing which may excessively
reduce the controllability and climb
performance of the airplane; and
damage from debris departing the
engine and nacelle, which could impact
the fuselage and empennage, could
result in personal injury to passengers
and loss of control of the airplane.
Accordingly, notice and opportunity for
prior public comment are impracticable
and contrary to the public interest
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good
cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
for making this amendment effective in
less than 30 days, for the same reasons
the FAA found good cause to forgo
notice and comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when
an agency finds good cause pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without
prior notice and comment. Because the
FAA has determined that it has good
cause to adopt this rule without notice
and comment, RFA analysis is not
required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 330 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this AD:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per
product
Labor cost
Inspection or records review to determine serial number of engine inlet.
Inspection of fastener gaps and to determine
if all fasteners are installed, and engine
inlet part-marking.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
$0
$85
$28,050
2 work-hour × $85 per hour = $170 per inlet
(2 inlets per airplane).
0
340
112,200
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
18022
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
the results of the inspection to of
fastener gaps and to determine if all
fasteners are installed. The FAA has no
way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these actions:
ON-CONDITION COSTS *
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Inspection of the fasteners for proper torque
EAI exhaust duct inspection ........................
EAI exhaust duct replacement .....................
Inner barrel thermal exposure inspection ....
Inlet replacement ..........................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inlet
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inlet
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inlet
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inlet
12 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,020 per
inlet.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inlet
$0 ...................................
0 .....................................
10,000 per inlet ..............
0 .....................................
1,741,000 per inlet .........
$85 per inlet.
85 per inlet.
10,085 per inlet.
85 per inlet.
1,742,020 per inlet.
0 .....................................
85 per inlet.
Re-torquing ...................................................
Cost per product
* For repair of the EAI exhaust duct and repairing thermal exposure, the FAA has no definitive data on which to base the cost estimate for
those actions.
The FAA has included all known
costs in its cost estimate. According to
the manufacturer, however, some or all
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2023–06–10 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–22396; Docket No.
FAA–2023–0440; Project Identifier AD–
2023–00245–T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective April 11, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–8, –8200, and –9
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30, Ice and Rain Protection;
71, Powerplant.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report
indicating that certain engine anti-ice (EAI)
exhaust duct fasteners were inadequately
torqued during installation at the factory. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address loose or
missing fasteners for the EAI exhaust duct
that may allow EAI exhaust air to enter the
inlet inner barrel causing heat damage that
will compromise the structural integrity of
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the inlet, eventually leading to inlet failure
and separation under normal flight loads.
The unsafe condition, if not addressed, will
lead to failure of the corresponding engine
due to airflow disruption and ingestion of
debris and likely failure and separation of the
associated fan cowl. Damage to the engine
and engine nacelle could result in a loss of
engine thrust, increased nacelle drag, and
disruption of airflow over the wing, which
may excessively reduce the controllability
and climb performance of the airplane; and
damage from debris departing the engine and
nacelle, which could impact the fuselage and
empennage, could result in personal injury to
passengers and loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
For airplanes with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued on or
before the effective date of the AD: Except as
specified by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the
applicable times specified in the ‘‘Suggested
Operator Action’’ section of Boeing Service
Letter 737–SL–71–081–A, Revision A, dated
March 3, 2023, do all applicable actions
identified as ‘‘RC’’ (required for compliance)
in, and in accordance with, the Work
Instructions of Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–
71–081–A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023.
Perform all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) Where the ‘‘Suggested Operator Action’’
section of Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–
081–A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
specifies doing ‘‘the following actions within
the given time from the publication of this
service letter,’’ this AD requires
accomplishing the actions within the
specified compliance times after ‘‘the
effective date of this AD.’’
(2) Where the ‘‘Suggested Operator Action’’
section of Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–
081–A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
specifies ‘‘corrective actions,’’ for this AD,
those actions include ‘‘corrective and related
investigative actions.’’
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(3) A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of the inspection
to verify the serial number of the inlet
specified in step A.1. of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–
71–081–A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
if the serial number of the inlet can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(4) Where Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–
71–081–A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
specifies contacting Boeing for repair or
further instructions: This AD requires doing
the repair and applicable instructions before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(5) Where the Work Instructions of Boeing
Service Letter 737–SL–71–081–A, Revision
A, dated March 3, 2023, refers to the
structural repair manual, replace the text
‘‘737–8/8200/9 Structural Repair Manual
(SRM) 51–40–04, Revision 18/9/15,’’ with
‘‘737–8 Structural Repair Manual (SRM) 51–
40–04, Revision 18 or 19; 737–8200 SRM 51–
40–04, Revision 9 or 10; or 737–9 SRM 51–
40–04, Revision 15 or 16.’’
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an engine inlet assembly
with a serial number listed in Attachment I
of Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–081–A,
Revision A, dated March 3, 2023, on any
airplane unless all applicable actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD have
been done for that inlet.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service
Letter 737–SL–71–081, dated February 20,
2023, provided the conditions specified in
paragraphs (j)(1) and (2) of this AD are met.
(1) An inspection or records review has
been done to verify the inlet serial number
is not included in the additional serial
numbers identified in Attachment I of Boeing
Service Letter 737–SL–71–081–A, Revision
A, dated March 3, 2023; and the serial
number of the inlet can be conclusively
determined from that inspection or review.
(2) Where the Work Instructions of Boeing
Service Letter 737–SL–71–081, dated
February 20, 2023, refer to the structural
repair manual (SRM) to apply torque, the
applicable SRM identified in paragraph
(j)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this AD was used to
apply the torque.
(i) Boeing 737–8 SRM 51–40–04, Revision
18, dated November 10, 2022; or Revision 19,
dated March 10, 2023.
(ii) Boeing 737–8200 SRM 51–40–04,
Revision 9, dated November 10, 2022; or
Revision 10, dated March 10, 2023.
(iii) Boeing 737–9 SRM 51–40–04, Revision
15, dated November 10, 2022; or Revision 16,
dated March 10, 2023.
(k) Special Flight Permit
(1) Special flight permits, as described in
14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199, may be issued to
move the airplane to a maintenance facility
prior to performing the required inspections.
(2) If, during the inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, only one engine is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
found with an inlet having any crack or
thermal damage: Special flight permits, as
described in 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199, may
be issued to operate the airplane to a location
where the requirements of this AD can be
accomplished provided the conditions
specified in paragraph (k)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
AD, as applicable, are met.
(i) The EAI is deactivated on the affected
engine in accordance with the operator’s
existing Minimum Equipment List.
(ii) For any inlet with any thermal
exposure (i.e., heat damage) on the inner
barrel, The Boeing Company Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) is
contacted to obtain concurrence for issuance
of a special flight permit and The Boeing
Company ODA concurs. Operators must
comply with any flight limitations provided
by The Boeing Company ODA. The
concurrence with any limitations must
specifically refer to this AD.
(3) If, during the inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, both engines are
found with inlets having any crack or
thermal exposure: Special flight permits, as
described in 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199, are
not allowed.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
ODA that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18023
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Samuel Dorsey, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone: 206–231–3415; email:
Samuel.j.dorsey@faa.gov.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Letter 737–SL–71–081–
A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023.
Note 1 to paragraph (n)(2)(i): Attachments
I and II of this document are dated March 2,
2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; website
myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on March 17, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06364 Filed 3–23–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1395 Airspace
Docket No. 22–ACE–10]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Multiple Air Traffic
Service (ATS) Routes and Revocation
of a VOR Federal Airway in the Vicinity
of Wolbach, NE
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18019-18023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06364]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2023-0440; Project Identifier AD-2023-00245-T;
Amendment 39-22396; AD 2023-06-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 737-8, -8200, and -9 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report indicating that certain engine anti-ice (EAI)
exhaust duct fasteners were inadequately torqued. This AD requires an
inspection or records review to determine the serial number of each
engine inlet; and if any affected engine inlet is found, an inspection
of the EAI exhaust duct fasteners to determine the gap spacing and if
all fasteners are installed, applicable related investigative and
[[Page 18020]]
corrective actions, and part marking. This AD also limits the
installation of affected parts. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 11, 2023.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 11,
2023.
The FAA must receive comments on this AD by May 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2023-0440; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0440.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Dorsey, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3415; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include Docket No. FAA-2023-0440 and Project Identifier AD-
2023-00245-T at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this final rule because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Samuel
Dorsey, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-
3415; email: [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA has received a report indicating that during a pre-flight
check, the flightcrew discovered a bolt protruding through a drain hole
at the bottom of the engine inlet near the EAI exhaust vent. Boeing
determined that some of the fasteners for EAI exhaust ducts were
installed at the factory with inadequate torque due to the use of a
prohibited yoke-style torque wrench adapter at a significant angle.
When used at a sufficiently large angle, which is expected due to the
restricted access in the area of the EAI exhaust duct, this adapter
will produce a significant under-torque of the installed fasteners.
Inadequately-torqued fasteners may loosen over time due to engine
vibration, eventually causing the fastener to drop into the inlet inner
barrel.
The EAI system injects high-temperature bleed air from the engine
into the interior of the inlet lip to prevent the formation of icing on
the exterior of the inlet lip. This EAI exhaust air then exits the rear
of the inlet lip through the EAI exhaust duct, which passes through the
inlet inner barrel prior to exhausting air overboard. The composite
construction of the inlet inner barrel structure is susceptible to heat
damage at the temperatures of the EAI exhaust air should a leak occur.
These inadequately torqued (loose or missing) fasteners for the EAI
exhaust duct could allow EAI exhaust air to escape from the EAI exhaust
duct via two scenarios. In the first scenario, the loose or missing
fasteners allow the EAI exhaust duct to vibrate excessively, which,
when combined with the redistribution of structural loads onto the
other fasteners, may lead to fatigue cracking of the EAI exhaust duct.
This fatigue cracking would ultimately progress to a rupture of the EAI
exhaust duct. In the second scenario, the loose or missing fasteners
may allow EAI exhaust air to escape from a limited location. This
escaping air may impinge directly on the inner barrel structure,
depending on which specific fasteners are loose or missing. In both
scenarios, EAI exhaust air enters the inlet inner barrel causing heat
damage, which will compromise the structural integrity of the inlet,
eventually leading to inlet failure and separation under normal flight
loads.
Failure and separation of the inlet will lead to failure of the
corresponding engine due to airflow disruption and ingestion of debris,
and likely to failure and separation of the associated fan cowl. Damage
to the engine and engine nacelle could result in a loss of engine
thrust, increased nacelle drag, and disruption of airflow over the
wing, which may excessively reduce the controllability and climb
performance of the airplane; and damage from debris departing the
engine and nacelle, which could impact the fuselage and empennage,
could result in personal injury to passengers and loss of control of
the airplane.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
[[Page 18021]]
FAA's Determination
The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency has determined the
unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in
other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A,
dated March 3, 2023. (Attachments I and II of this document are dated
March 2, 2023.) The service information specifies procedures for an
inspection to determine the serial number of each engine inlet, and if
any affected engine inlet is found, an inspection of the EAI exhaust
duct fasteners to determine the gap spacing and if all fasteners are
installed, applicable related investigative and corrective actions, and
part-marking the engine inlet. Related investigative actions include an
inspection of the fasteners for proper torque, general visual and high
frequency eddy current inspections of the EAI exhaust duct flange and
fastener holes for cracking, and visual inspections of the inner barrel
for thermal exposure (i.e., heat damage). Corrective actions include
re-torque of fasteners, repairing or replacing EAI exhaust ducts,
repairing thermal exposure, and replacing the engine inlet. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
AD Requirements
This AD requires accomplishing the actions identified as ``(RC)''
(required for compliance) in the Work Instructions of Boeing Service
Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023, described
previously, except as discussed under ``Differences Between this AD and
the Service Information,'' and except for any differences identified as
exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD.
For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0440.
Differences Between This AD and the Service Information
Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3,
2023, specifies that the actions must be done on all airplanes.
However, airplanes produced after a certain production line number were
verified to have properly torqued EAI exhaust duct fasteners.
Therefore, paragraph (g) of this AD only applies to airplanes with an
original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before the effective date of the AD. The
parts installation limitation specified in paragraph (i) of this AD
applies to all airplanes.
Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3,
2023, includes an inspection to verify the serial number of the inlet.
This AD also allows a review of airplane maintenance records in lieu of
the inspection to verify the serial number of the inlet if the serial
number of the inlet can be conclusively determined from that review.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. The FAA is
investigating if design changes may be needed to prevent a future
common-cause failure of the EAI exhaust duct. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking then.
Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective
Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and
comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking
comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days,
upon a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because loose or missing fasteners for the EAI exhaust duct might allow
EAI exhaust air to enter the inlet interior causing heat damage, which
could compromise the structural integrity of the inlet, eventually
leading to inlet failure and separation under normal flight loads.
Failure and separation of the inlet will lead to failure of the
corresponding engine due to airflow disruption and ingestion of debris
and likely failure and separation of the associated fan cowl. Damage to
the engine and engine nacelle could result in a loss of engine thrust,
increased nacelle drag, and disruption of airflow over the wing which
may excessively reduce the controllability and climb performance of the
airplane; and damage from debris departing the engine and nacelle,
which could impact the fuselage and empennage, could result in personal
injury to passengers and loss of control of the airplane. Accordingly,
notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days,
for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forgo notice and
comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment,
RFA analysis is not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 330 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection or records review to 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $28,050
determine serial number of engine hour = $85.
inlet.
Inspection of fastener gaps and to 2 work-hour x $85 per 0 340 112,200
determine if all fasteners are hour = $170 per inlet
installed, and engine inlet part- (2 inlets per airplane).
marking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 18022]]
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of the
inspection to of fastener gaps and to determine if all fasteners are
installed. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need these actions:
On-Condition Costs *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of the fasteners 1 work-hour x $0............................. $85 per inlet.
for proper torque. $85 per hour =
$85 per inlet.
EAI exhaust duct inspection.. 1 work-hour x 0.............................. 85 per inlet.
$85 per hour =
$85 per inlet.
EAI exhaust duct replacement. 1 work-hour x 10,000 per inlet............... 10,085 per inlet.
$85 per hour =
$85 per inlet.
Inner barrel thermal exposure 1 work-hour x 0.............................. 85 per inlet.
inspection. $85 per hour =
$85 per inlet.
Inlet replacement............ 12 work-hours x 1,741,000 per inlet............ 1,742,020 per inlet.
$85 per hour =
$1,020 per
inlet.
Re-torquing.................. 1 work-hour x 0.............................. 85 per inlet.
$85 per hour =
$85 per inlet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* For repair of the EAI exhaust duct and repairing thermal exposure, the FAA has no definitive data on which to
base the cost estimate for those actions.
The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact
on affected operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2023-06-10 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-22396; Docket No. FAA-
2023-0440; Project Identifier AD-2023-00245-T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 11, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-8, -8200,
and -9 airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30, Ice and Rain
Protection; 71, Powerplant.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report indicating that certain engine
anti-ice (EAI) exhaust duct fasteners were inadequately torqued
during installation at the factory. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address loose or missing fasteners for the EAI exhaust duct that may
allow EAI exhaust air to enter the inlet inner barrel causing heat
damage that will compromise the structural integrity of the inlet,
eventually leading to inlet failure and separation under normal
flight loads. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, will lead to
failure of the corresponding engine due to airflow disruption and
ingestion of debris and likely failure and separation of the
associated fan cowl. Damage to the engine and engine nacelle could
result in a loss of engine thrust, increased nacelle drag, and
disruption of airflow over the wing, which may excessively reduce
the controllability and climb performance of the airplane; and
damage from debris departing the engine and nacelle, which could
impact the fuselage and empennage, could result in personal injury
to passengers and loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of the AD: Except as specified by paragraph (h) of
this AD, at the applicable times specified in the ``Suggested
Operator Action'' section of Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A,
Revision A, dated March 3, 2023, do all applicable actions
identified as ``RC'' (required for compliance) in, and in accordance
with, the Work Instructions of Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-
A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023. Perform all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) Where the ``Suggested Operator Action'' section of Boeing
Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
specifies doing ``the following actions within the given time from
the publication of this service letter,'' this AD requires
accomplishing the actions within the specified compliance times
after ``the effective date of this AD.''
(2) Where the ``Suggested Operator Action'' section of Boeing
Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023,
specifies ``corrective actions,'' for this AD, those actions include
``corrective and related investigative actions.''
[[Page 18023]]
(3) A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of the inspection to verify the serial number of the inlet
specified in step A.1. of the Work Instructions of Boeing Service
Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023, if the
serial number of the inlet can be conclusively determined from that
review.
(4) Where Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A,
dated March 3, 2023, specifies contacting Boeing for repair or
further instructions: This AD requires doing the repair and
applicable instructions before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD.
(5) Where the Work Instructions of Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-
71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3, 2023, refers to the structural
repair manual, replace the text ``737-8/8200/9 Structural Repair
Manual (SRM) 51-40-04, Revision 18/9/15,'' with ``737-8 Structural
Repair Manual (SRM) 51-40-04, Revision 18 or 19; 737-8200 SRM 51-40-
04, Revision 9 or 10; or 737-9 SRM 51-40-04, Revision 15 or 16.''
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
engine inlet assembly with a serial number listed in Attachment I of
Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated March 3,
2023, on any airplane unless all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD have been done for that inlet.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081,
dated February 20, 2023, provided the conditions specified in
paragraphs (j)(1) and (2) of this AD are met.
(1) An inspection or records review has been done to verify the
inlet serial number is not included in the additional serial numbers
identified in Attachment I of Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A,
Revision A, dated March 3, 2023; and the serial number of the inlet
can be conclusively determined from that inspection or review.
(2) Where the Work Instructions of Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-
71-081, dated February 20, 2023, refer to the structural repair
manual (SRM) to apply torque, the applicable SRM identified in
paragraph (j)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this AD was used to apply the
torque.
(i) Boeing 737-8 SRM 51-40-04, Revision 18, dated November 10,
2022; or Revision 19, dated March 10, 2023.
(ii) Boeing 737-8200 SRM 51-40-04, Revision 9, dated November
10, 2022; or Revision 10, dated March 10, 2023.
(iii) Boeing 737-9 SRM 51-40-04, Revision 15, dated November 10,
2022; or Revision 16, dated March 10, 2023.
(k) Special Flight Permit
(1) Special flight permits, as described in 14 CFR 21.197 and
21.199, may be issued to move the airplane to a maintenance facility
prior to performing the required inspections.
(2) If, during the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, only one engine is found with an inlet having any crack or
thermal damage: Special flight permits, as described in 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199, may be issued to operate the airplane to a
location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished
provided the conditions specified in paragraph (k)(2)(i) and (ii) of
this AD, as applicable, are met.
(i) The EAI is deactivated on the affected engine in accordance
with the operator's existing Minimum Equipment List.
(ii) For any inlet with any thermal exposure (i.e., heat damage)
on the inner barrel, The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) is contacted to obtain concurrence for issuance
of a special flight permit and The Boeing Company ODA concurs.
Operators must comply with any flight limitations provided by The
Boeing Company ODA. The concurrence with any limitations must
specifically refer to this AD.
(3) If, during the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, both engines are found with inlets having any crack or thermal
exposure: Special flight permits, as described in 14 CFR 21.197 and
21.199, are not allowed.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company ODA that has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To
be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or
alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (ii) of
this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Samuel Dorsey,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3415;
email: [email protected].
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Letter 737-SL-71-081-A, Revision A, dated
March 3, 2023.
Note 1 to paragraph (n)(2)(i): Attachments I and II of this
document are dated March 2, 2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on March 17, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06364 Filed 3-23-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P