Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets, 18076-18077 [2023-06231]
Download as PDF
18076
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 58
Monday, March 27, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton & Tobacco Program, AMS,
USDA, 3275 Appling Road, Room 11,
Memphis, TN 38133. Telephone: (901)
384–3000, Fax: (901) 384–3033, or
Email: darryl.earnest@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Background
Agricultural Marketing Service
The Secretary of Agriculture is
authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to
designate at least five bona fide spot
markets from which cotton price
information can be collected. A spot
market—also called the ‘‘cash market’’
or ‘‘physical market’’- is a market where
commodities are sold on the spot for
cash at current market prices and
delivered immediately. Updated
designations for these bona fide spot
markets and the determination of which
counties and states compose each of
these spot markets were most recently
published in the Federal Register on
April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25181). For each
of these bona fide spot markets, AMS’s
Cotton and Tobacco Program collects
market price information under the
United States Cotton Futures Act (7
U.S.C. 15b), the Cotton Statistics and
Estimates Act (7 U.S.C. 473b) and the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7
U.S.C. 1622(g)). This price information
is then used to calculate price
differences for cotton futures contracts.
The Cotton and Tobacco Program
(Program) received a request from the
American Cotton Shippers Association
(ACSA) and the National Cotton Council
of America (NCC), to evaluate the
structure of the cotton spot markets in
East and West Texas, Oklahoma, and
Kansas. The Program’s analysis of the
East Texas/Oklahoma market
determined that cotton grown in
Oklahoma and Kansas has similar
quality characteristics and was traded
under the same terms and conditions as
West Texas cotton. Further, the analysis
showed that there was not any
significant difference in the prices
reported to Cotton and Tobacco Market
News when comparing Oklahoma and
Kansas cotton to West Texas cotton. As
a result, ACSA and NCC requested that
cotton grown in Oklahoma and Kansas
be moved from the East Texas/
Oklahoma spot market to the West
Texas spot market. Revisions to the
regulations concerning bona fide spot
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. No. AMS–CN–22–0061]
RIN 0581–ZA33
Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot
Markets
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the regulation that defines two of the
seven spot designated spot markets and
change the names of the affected
markets. Specifically, cotton grown in
Oklahoma and Kansas would be moved
from the East Texas/Oklahoma spot
market to the West Texas spot market.
It also changes the names of these two
markets to describe the markets more
accurately.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
May 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments may be submitted to Darryl
Earnest electronically by Email:
darryl.earnest@usda.gov; by mail or
hand delivery to Cotton & Tobacco
Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Room 11, Memphis, TN 38133; or
via the internet at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the
record and will be made available for
public viewing at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Please be advised
that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will
be made public on the internet at the
address provided above.
DATES:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
market definitions are necessary to
assure consistency with the revised
Cotton Research and Promotion Act and
to allow for published spot quotes to
consider spot prices of cotton marketed
in Kansas and Oklahoma.
Corresponding changes to the names of
these two spot markets would be made
to describe the markets more accurately.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and,
therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities and has determined that
its implementation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are
an estimated 25,000 cotton growers in
the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS
cotton classing services annually, and
the majority of these cotton growers are
small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
Changes in cotton spot market
definitions as stated will not
significantly affect small businesses as
defined in the RFA because:
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(1) How spot prices are estimated are
not expected to be impacted by this
action;
(2) Business practices of the U.S.
cotton industry are not expected to
change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing
market news services will not be
significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for
by appropriated funds; therefore, users
are not charged fees for the provision of
the services.
West Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma
All counties in Kansas and Oklahoma,
all Texas counties not included in the
East Texas, South Texas, and Desert
Southwest Markets and the New Mexico
counties of Union, Quay, Curry,
Roosevelt, and Lea.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 27.94 Spot markets for contract
settlement purposes.
*
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320), which implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501), the information collection
requirements contained in the
provisions to be amended by this
proposed rule have been previously
approved by OMB and were assigned
OMB control number 0581–0009, Cotton
Classification and Market News Service.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
*
*
*
*
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement
of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE);
Southeastern; North and South Delta;
East Texas and South Texas; West
Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma; and
Desert Southwest.
*
*
*
*
*
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–06231 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS–2018–0007]
Commodity futures, Cotton.
RIN 0579–AE73
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
27 as follows:
Importation of Fresh Beef From
Paraguay
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PART 27—COTTON CLASSIFICATION
UNDER COTTON FUTURES
LEGISLATION
We are proposing to amend
the regulations governing the
importation of certain animals, meat,
and other animal products by allowing,
under certain conditions, the
importation of fresh (chilled or frozen)
beef from Paraguay. Based on the
evidence from a risk analysis, we have
determined that fresh beef can safely be
imported from Paraguay, provided
certain conditions are met. This action
would provide for the importation of
fresh beef from Paraguay into the United
States while continuing to protect the
United States against the introduction of
foot-and-mouth disease.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before May 26,
2023.
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 27 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7
U.S.C. 1622(g).
2. In § 27.93, the definitions of the
‘‘East Texas and Oklahoma,’’ and ‘‘West
Texas’’ markets are revised to read as
follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 27.93
*
*
Bona fide spot markets.
*
*
*
East Texas and South Texas
Texas counties east of and including
Montague, Wise, Parker, Erath,
Comanche, Mills, San Saba, Mason,
Sutton, Edwards, Kinney, Maverick,
Webb, Zapata, Star and Hidalgo
counties.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:07 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18077
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter APHIS–
2018–0007 in the Search Field. Select
the Documents tab, then select the
Comment button in the list of
documents.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2018–0007, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at www.regulations.gov
or in our reading room, which is located
in room 1620 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Ingrid Kotowski, Import Risk Analyst,
Regionalization Evaluation Services, VS,
APHIS, 920 Main Campus Drive, Suite
200, Raleigh, NC 27606; (919) 855–7732;
email: AskRegionalization@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
prohibit or restrict the importation of
certain animals and animal products
into the United States to prevent the
introduction of various animal diseases,
including foot-and-mouth disease
(FMD), African swine fever, classical
swine fever, and swine vesicular
disease. These are dangerous and
destructive communicable diseases of
ruminants and swine. Under most
circumstances, § 94.1 of the regulations
prohibits the importation of live
ruminants and swine and fresh (chilled
or frozen) meat derived from ruminants
and swine originating in, or transiting
through, a region where FMD exists.
Section 94.11 restricts the importation
of ruminants and swine and their meat
and certain other products from regions
that are declared free of FMD but that
nonetheless present a disease risk
because of the regions’ proximity to or
trading relationships with regions
affected with FMD. Regions that the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) has declared free of
FMD and regions declared free of FMD
that are subject to the restrictions in
§ 94.11 are listed on the APHIS website
at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_
export/animals/animal_disease_
status.shtml.
The regulations do allow for certain
exceptions to the prohibitions contained
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18076-18077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06231]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 18076]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. No. AMS-CN-22-0061]
RIN 0581-ZA33
Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the regulation that defines two of the seven spot designated spot
markets and change the names of the affected markets. Specifically,
cotton grown in Oklahoma and Kansas would be moved from the East Texas/
Oklahoma spot market to the West Texas spot market. It also changes the
names of these two markets to describe the markets more accurately.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments may be submitted to Darryl
Earnest electronically by Email: [email protected]; by mail or
hand delivery to Cotton & Tobacco Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Room 11, Memphis, TN 38133; or via the internet at: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and can
be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in
response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will
be made available for public viewing at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the
address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton & Tobacco Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling Road, Room 11,
Memphis, TN 38133. Telephone: (901) 384-3000, Fax: (901) 384-3033, or
Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to designate at least five bona fide
spot markets from which cotton price information can be collected. A
spot market--also called the ``cash market'' or ``physical market''- is
a market where commodities are sold on the spot for cash at current
market prices and delivered immediately. Updated designations for these
bona fide spot markets and the determination of which counties and
states compose each of these spot markets were most recently published
in the Federal Register on April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25181). For each of
these bona fide spot markets, AMS's Cotton and Tobacco Program collects
market price information under the United States Cotton Futures Act (7
U.S.C. 15b), the Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act (7 U.S.C. 473b)
and the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622(g)). This
price information is then used to calculate price differences for
cotton futures contracts.
The Cotton and Tobacco Program (Program) received a request from
the American Cotton Shippers Association (ACSA) and the National Cotton
Council of America (NCC), to evaluate the structure of the cotton spot
markets in East and West Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. The Program's
analysis of the East Texas/Oklahoma market determined that cotton grown
in Oklahoma and Kansas has similar quality characteristics and was
traded under the same terms and conditions as West Texas cotton.
Further, the analysis showed that there was not any significant
difference in the prices reported to Cotton and Tobacco Market News
when comparing Oklahoma and Kansas cotton to West Texas cotton. As a
result, ACSA and NCC requested that cotton grown in Oklahoma and Kansas
be moved from the East Texas/Oklahoma spot market to the West Texas
spot market. Revisions to the regulations concerning bona fide spot
market definitions are necessary to assure consistency with the revised
Cotton Research and Promotion Act and to allow for published spot
quotes to consider spot prices of cotton marketed in Kansas and
Oklahoma. Corresponding changes to the names of these two spot markets
would be made to describe the markets more accurately.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not
have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to
any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has determined that its
implementation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are an estimated 25,000 cotton
growers in the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS cotton classing
services annually, and the majority of these cotton growers are small
businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
Changes in cotton spot market definitions as stated will not
significantly affect small businesses as defined in the RFA because:
[[Page 18077]]
(1) How spot prices are estimated are not expected to be impacted
by this action;
(2) Business practices of the U.S. cotton industry are not expected
to change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing market news services will not
be significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for by appropriated funds;
therefore, users are not charged fees for the provision of the
services.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320), which
implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501), the
information collection requirements contained in the provisions to be
amended by this proposed rule have been previously approved by OMB and
were assigned OMB control number 0581-0009, Cotton Classification and
Market News Service.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
Commodity futures, Cotton.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 27 as follows:
PART 27--COTTON CLASSIFICATION UNDER COTTON FUTURES LEGISLATION
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 27 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7 U.S.C. 1622(g).
0
2. In Sec. 27.93, the definitions of the ``East Texas and Oklahoma,''
and ``West Texas'' markets are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.93 Bona fide spot markets.
* * * * *
East Texas and South Texas
Texas counties east of and including Montague, Wise, Parker, Erath,
Comanche, Mills, San Saba, Mason, Sutton, Edwards, Kinney, Maverick,
Webb, Zapata, Star and Hidalgo counties.
* * * * *
West Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma
All counties in Kansas and Oklahoma, all Texas counties not
included in the East Texas, South Texas, and Desert Southwest Markets
and the New Mexico counties of Union, Quay, Curry, Roosevelt, and Lea.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.94 Spot markets for contract settlement purposes.
* * * * *
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE); Southeastern; North and South Delta;
East Texas and South Texas; West Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma; and
Desert Southwest.
* * * * *
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06231 Filed 3-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P