Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes, 17682-17685 [2023-05705]

Download as PDF 17682 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations (ii) Induction of an engine into a shop solely for removal or replacement of the stage 1 fan disk; (iii) Induction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement of the turbine rear frame; (iv) Induction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement of the accessory gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both; and (v) Induction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement of the fan forward case. (4) A raw EGT trend data point above the smoothed average is a confirmed temperature reading over the rolling average of EGT readings that is not a result of EGT system error. You may take credit for the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD if they were performed before the effective date of this AD using GE Service Bulletin (SB) No. CF6–50 SB 72–1315, Initial Issue, dated June 3, 2011, or GE SB No. CF6–50 SB 72–1315, Revision 1, dated June 30, 2011. (l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39 19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD and email it to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2010–12–10, Amendment 39–16331 (75 FR 32649, June 9, 2010); AD 2011–02–07, Amendment 39–16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011); or AD 2011–18–01, Amendment 39– 16783 (76 FR 52213, August 22, 2011) are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD. (m) Related Information For more information about this AD, contact Sungmo Cho, Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238–7241; email: Sungmo.D.Cho@faa.gov. (n) Material Incorporated by Reference lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 None. Issued on February 17, 2023. Christina Underwood, Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2023–05472 Filed 3–23–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 16:01 Mar 23, 2023 Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2022–0679; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–01213–T; Amendment 39–22392; AD 2023–06–06] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: (k) Credit for Previous Actions VerDate Sep<11>2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Jkt 259001 The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL–600– 2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that new and more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate two aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective April 28, 2023. SUMMARY: AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA– 2022–0679; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chirayu A. Gupta, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Background The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes, Model CL–600– 2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL–600– 2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2022 (87 FR 36269). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF–2021–38, dated November 5, 2021 (TCCA AD CF– 2021–38), issued by Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada. TCCA AD CF–2021–38 states that a report was received of the emergency ram air valve part number GG670–95019–1 stuck in closed or partially open positions. An investigation revealed that the emergency ram air valve is failing due to corrosion of multiple subcomponents, which causes an increase in the breakaway torque that cannot be overcome by the valve actuator. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL–600– 2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on January 13, 2023 (88 FR 2279). The SNPRM was prompted by a determination that the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, must be revised to incorporate two AMM tasks. In addition, Transport Canada revised AD CF–2021–38, dated November 5, 2021, and issued Transport Canada AD CF– 2021–38R1, dated May 25, 2022 (TCCA AD CF–2021–38R1). In the SNPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate two AMM tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address in-service reports of emergency ram air valve part number (P/N) GG670–95019–1 stuck in closed or partially open positions, which, if not E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations corrected could result in a complete loss of outside air supply, leading to an increase in flight deck and cabin temperatures and a possible increased level of contaminated air (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or ozone). You may examine TCCA AD CF– 2021–38 and TCCA AD CF–2021–38R1 in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2022–0679. Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments The FAA received no comments on the SNPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the TCCA AD referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on this product. Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in the SNPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,158 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total cost per operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours × $85 per work-hour). Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:01 Mar 23, 2023 Jkt 259001 the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. 17683 2023–06–06 MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39– 22392; Docket No. FAA–2022–0679; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–01213–T. (a) Effective Date This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 2023. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to MHI RJ Aviation ULC airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this AD. (1) Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes. (2) Model CL–600–2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes. (3) Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes. (4) Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. (5) Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code: 21, Air conditioning. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a determination that the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, must be revised to incorporate two aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address in-service reports of emergency ram air valve part number (P/N) GG670–95019–1 stuck in closed or partially open positions, which, if not corrected could result in a complete loss of outside air supply, leading to an increase in flight deck and cabin temperatures and a possible increased level of contaminated air (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or ozone). The Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: (f) Compliance PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The initial compliance time for doing the task is at the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (ii) of this AD. Figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(1)—AMM Task for the Ram-Air Valve 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations (i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 1,800 flight hours since the last operational check of the ram air shutoff valve was performed as specified in AMM Task 21–52–04–710–801–A01, and for airplanes that have accumulated less than 1,800 flight hours from the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, or before accumulating 1,800 total flight hours, whichever occurs later. (ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 1,800 flight hours or more since the last operational check of the ram air shutoff valve was performed as specified in AMM Task 21–52–04–710–801–A01, and for airplanes that have accumulated 1,800 flight hours or more since the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness and for which no operational check of the valve has been performed: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD or before accumulating 3,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs later. (2) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in figure 2 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. The initial compliance time for doing the task is at the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD. Figure 2 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(2)—AMM Task for the Pack Discharge and Ram-Air Supply Ducts (i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 17,600 flight hours since the last detailed inspection of the pack discharge and ram air supply ducts was performed as specified in AMM Task 21–51–00–220–801– A01, and for airplanes that have accumulated less than 17,600 flight hours since the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, or before accumulating 17,600 total flight hours, whichever occurs later. (ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,600 flight hours or more since the last detailed inspection of the pack discharge and ram air supply ducts as specified in AMM Task 21–51–00–220–801–A01, and for airplanes that have accumulated 17,600 flight hours or more since the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness, and for which no detailed inspection of the pack discharge and ram air supply ducts has been performed: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD. required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals, may be used unless the actions and intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:01 Mar 23, 2023 Jkt 259001 After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been revised as PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 ER24MR23.001</GPH> (h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals (i) Other FAA AD Provisions ER24MR23.000</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 17684 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or MHI RJ Aviation ULC’s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature. (j) Additional Information (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF– 2021–38R1, dated May 25, 2022, for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2022–0679. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Chirayu A. Gupta, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; email 9-avs-nyacocos@faa.gov. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference None. Issued on March 15, 2023. Christina Underwood, Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2023–05705 Filed 3–23–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2022–0814; Project Identifier AD–2022–00205–A; Amendment 39–22397; AD 2023–06–11] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland Inc.) Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 AGENCY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Viking Air Limited (type certificate previously held by Bombardier Inc. and de SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:01 Mar 23, 2023 Jkt 259001 Havilland Inc.) Model DHC–2 Mk. I airplanes with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) No. SA01324CH installed. This AD was prompted by a report of damage in the main wing spar. This AD requires inspecting the wing structure for damage (drill starts, corrosion, cracks, and improperly installed fasteners), repairing damage, and reporting the inspection results if necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective April 28, 2023. ADDRESSES: AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0814; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Eichor, Aviation Safety Engineer, Chicago ACO Branch, FAA, 2300 E Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; phone: (847) 294–7141; email: tim.d.eichor@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to Viking Air Limited (type certificate previously held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland Inc.) Model DHC–2 Mk. I airplanes with STC No. SA01324CH installed. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 8, 2022 (87 FR 40749). The NPRM was prompted by a report that during an annual inspection of a Viking Air Limited Model DHC–2 Mk. I airplane, a gap was noted between the doubler and wing near station 42.5, requiring partial removal of the doubler and removal of the sealant between the doubler and the wing skin. Further inspection of the internal wing structure of that area with a borescope found damage in the forward spar caused by a drill during initial installation of the doubler. The doubler was installed as part of Wipaire, Inc. (Wipaire), STC No. SA01324CH. Inspection of the rest of the operator’s fleet of airplanes with STC No. SA01324CH installed found a total of 7 out of 28 wings with drill start damage in the same area. Later inspections on PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 17685 these same airplanes on the outboard end of the doubler installation revealed improperly installed fasteners. As only a small fraction of the affected fleet has been inspected, the possible extent of damage in the field is unknown. Accordingly, the FAA determined that in addition to inspecting for drill starts and improperly installed fasteners, inspecting for corrosion and cracks is necessary. Damage of the main structural members of the wing could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane and could result in loss of control of the airplane. Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments The FAA received comments from Wipaire. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA’s response to each comment. Request Regarding Changing the Unsafe Condition Wipaire requested that the unsafe condition statement in the Background section and paragraph (e) of the proposed AD be changed from ‘‘Damage of the main structural members of the wing could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane and could result in loss of control of the airplane’’ and suggested the wording ‘‘This condition, if not addressed, could have a slight adverse effect on the structural integrity of the airplane.’’ Wipaire stated that although the unsafe condition statement in the NPRM is technically correct, it is misleading to operators affected by the proposed AD. Wipaire noted that a structural analysis performed and approved by an FAA Designated Engineering Representative (DER) showed that this type of damage at this location had no appreciable effect on the overall strength of the spar. Wipaire explained that the doubler is installed inboard of the wing strut on the upper section of the wing and in this configuration the spar is predominately loaded compression so crack growth would be slow and detectable. The FAA disagrees with the commenter’s request. As only a small fraction of the affected fleet has been inspected, the extent of damage in the field is unknown. Accordingly, it is not accurate to say that the damage of the main structural members of the wing will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the wing, resulting in both the loss of the wing and loss of control of the airplane. No change was made to this AD regarding this issue. E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17682-17685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0679; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01213-T; 
Amendment 39-22392; AD 2023-06-06]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate 
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 
702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, 
Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-
2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25 
(Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This AD was prompted by a 
determination that new and more restrictive airworthiness limitations 
are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or 
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate two aircraft 
maintenance manual (AMM) tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address 
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov 
under Docket No. FAA-2022-0679; or in person at Docket Operations 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the mandatory 
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and 
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department 
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground 
Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chirayu A. Gupta, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart 
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all MHI RJ Aviation ULC 
Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes, Model 
CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 
(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet 
Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) 
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2022 
(87 FR 36269). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2021-38, dated November 
5, 2021 (TCCA AD CF-2021-38), issued by Transport Canada, which is the 
aviation authority for Canada. TCCA AD CF-2021-38 states that a report 
was received of the emergency ram air valve part number GG670-95019-1 
stuck in closed or partially open positions. An investigation revealed 
that the emergency ram air valve is failing due to corrosion of 
multiple sub-components, which causes an increase in the breakaway 
torque that cannot be overcome by the valve actuator.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the existing 
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or 
more restrictive airworthiness limitations.
    The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) 
to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all MHI RJ 
Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) 
airplanes, Model CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes, Model 
CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional 
Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register 
on January 13, 2023 (88 FR 2279). The SNPRM was prompted by a 
determination that the existing maintenance or inspection program, as 
applicable, must be revised to incorporate two AMM tasks. In addition, 
Transport Canada revised AD CF-2021-38, dated November 5, 2021, and 
issued Transport Canada AD CF-2021-38R1, dated May 25, 2022 (TCCA AD 
CF-2021-38R1). In the SNPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the 
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to 
incorporate two AMM tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address in-
service reports of emergency ram air valve part number (P/N) GG670-
95019-1 stuck in closed or partially open positions, which, if not

[[Page 17683]]

corrected could result in a complete loss of outside air supply, 
leading to an increase in flight deck and cabin temperatures and a 
possible increased level of contaminated air (carbon monoxide, carbon 
dioxide, or ozone).
    You may examine TCCA AD CF-2021-38 and TCCA AD CF-2021-38R1 in the 
AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0679.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the SNPRM or on the determination 
of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to 
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it 
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the TCCA AD 
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined 
that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the 
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on this product. 
Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in 
the SNPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any 
operator.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,158 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection 
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the 
agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator. 
Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program changes 
for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-operator 
estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore, the 
agency estimates the average total cost per operator to be $7,650 (90 
work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

2023-06-06 MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by 
Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-22392; Docket No. FAA-2022-0679; 
Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01213-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to MHI RJ Aviation ULC airplanes, certificated 
in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this 
AD.
    (1) Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) 
airplanes.
    (2) Model CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes.
    (3) Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes.
    (4) Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
    (5) Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code: 21, Air 
conditioning.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that the existing 
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, must be revised to 
incorporate two aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) tasks. The FAA is 
issuing this AD to address in-service reports of emergency ram air 
valve part number (P/N) GG670-95019-1 stuck in closed or partially 
open positions, which, if not corrected could result in a complete 
loss of outside air supply, leading to an increase in flight deck 
and cabin temperatures and a possible increased level of 
contaminated air (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or ozone).

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise 
the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to 
incorporate the information specified in figure 1 to the 
introductory text of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The initial 
compliance time for doing the task is at the applicable time 
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (ii) of this AD.

Figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(1)--AMM Task for 
the Ram-Air Valve

[[Page 17684]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MR23.000

    (i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 1,800 flight 
hours since the last operational check of the ram air shutoff valve 
was performed as specified in AMM Task 21-52-04-710-801-A01, and for 
airplanes that have accumulated less than 1,800 flight hours from 
the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or 
original export certificate of airworthiness: Within 90 days after 
the effective date of this AD, or before accumulating 1,800 total 
flight hours, whichever occurs later.
    (ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 1,800 flight hours or 
more since the last operational check of the ram air shutoff valve 
was performed as specified in AMM Task 21-52-04-710-801-A01, and for 
airplanes that have accumulated 1,800 flight hours or more since the 
date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or 
original export certificate of airworthiness and for which no 
operational check of the valve has been performed: Within 90 days 
after the effective date of this AD or before accumulating 3,000 
total flight hours, whichever occurs later.
    (2) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise 
the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to 
incorporate the information specified in figure 2 to the 
introductory text of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. The initial 
compliance time for doing the task is at the applicable time 
specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD.

Figure 2 to the introductory text of paragraph (g)(2)--AMM Task for 
the Pack Discharge and Ram-Air Supply Ducts
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MR23.001

    (i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 17,600 flight 
hours since the last detailed inspection of the pack discharge and 
ram air supply ducts was performed as specified in AMM Task 21-51-
00-220-801-A01, and for airplanes that have accumulated less than 
17,600 flight hours since the date of issuance of the original 
airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of 
airworthiness: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, 
or before accumulating 17,600 total flight hours, whichever occurs 
later.
    (ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,600 flight hours or 
more since the last detailed inspection of the pack discharge and 
ram air supply ducts as specified in AMM Task 21-51-00-220-801-A01, 
and for airplanes that have accumulated 17,600 flight hours or more 
since the date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate 
or original export certificate of airworthiness, and for which no 
detailed inspection of the pack discharge and ram air supply ducts 
has been performed: Within 90 days after the effective date of this 
AD.

(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been 
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative 
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals, may be used unless the 
actions and intervals are approved as an alternative method of 
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New 
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the

[[Page 17685]]

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight 
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to 
the manager of the certification office, send it to ATTN: Program 
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO 
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or MHI RJ 
Aviation ULC's TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved 
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2021-38R1, dated May 25, 
2022, for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found 
in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0679.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Chirayu A. 
Gupta, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New 
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 
telephone 516-228-7300; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued on March 15, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-05705 Filed 3-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.