Air Plan Approval; WA; Smoke Management Plan Update, 17481-17486 [2023-05462]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
of the ambient air quality standards for
particulates or if NCDAQ observes
excess fugitive dust emissions from the
facility beyond the property boundary
for six minutes in any one hour using
Reference Method 22 in 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A–7. Pursuant to paragraph
(g), the Director must approve the plan
if, among other things, the methods
used to control fugitive dust emissions
prevent fugitive dust emissions from
causing or contributing to a violation of
the ambient air quality standards for
particulates. Paragraph (g) also includes
non-substantive wording changes.
EPA has preliminarily determined
that the changes to the regulations above
are consistent with CAA requirements,
including the requirement that they
would not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or any other
applicable CAA requirement. Therefore,
EPA is proposing approval of the
changes to these regulations.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final rule regulatory text
that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
15A NCAC Subchapter 02D .0540,
Particulates from Fugitive Dust
Emission Sources, state effective on
September 1, 2019, as discussed in
sections I. and II. of this preamble. EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ Section of this
preamble for more information).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
September 10, 2021, SIP revision to
incorporate various changes to Rule 02D
.0540, Particulates from Fugitive Dust
Emission Sources. EPA is proposing to
approve these changes for the reasons
discussed above.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the
CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17481
Dated: March 3, 2023.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2023–05238 Filed 3–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0731, FRL–10545–
01–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; WA; Smoke
Management Plan Update
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
Washington State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions submitted on August 10,
2022. The submitted revisions
incorporate the most recent updates to
Washington’s Smoke Management Plan
and reflect state legislative and
regulatory changes. The revisions
include earlier notification of burn
decisions, revise the burn approval
criteria to better align with state law,
remove the prohibition against summer
weekend burning; and allow previously
prohibited burning in urban growth
areas subject to an approval process that
requires consideration of the impact of
the approval on air quality. EPA is
proposing to approve the revisions
based our determination that the
revisions are consistent with Clean Air
Act requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2022–0731 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
17482
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randall Ruddick, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA
98101, at (206) 553–1999, or
ruddick.randall@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA. This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is
arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
I. Background
II. Washington’s Smoke Management Plan
III. Evaluation of Washington’s SIP Submittal
IV. EPA’s Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background
Each state has a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) containing the control
measures and strategies to attain and
maintain the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) established
by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for the criteria pollutants (carbon
monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, particulate matter, sulfur
dioxide). The SIP contains such
elements as air pollution control
regulations, emission inventories,
attainment demonstrations, and
enforcement mechanisms.
Washington adopted a Smoke
Management Plan as part of the
Washington SIP to reduce emissions
that contribute to visibility impairment.
Wildfire has had a serious impact on
Washington during the past decade with
many large-scale wildfires impacting air
quality. Prescribed fires 1 have been
increasingly used as a land management
tool to reduce the likelihood of
catastrophic wildfires by reducing the
buildup of unwanted fuels and
strengthening an area’s ecosystems. This
controlled application of fire to
wildland fuels, is done under specific
environmental conditions and protocols
that typically call for a prescribed fire to
be confined to a predetermined area and
limit the fire to an intensity and scale
required to attain planned forestland
1 Prescribed fires, also known as prescribed
burns, refer to the controlled application of fire by
a team of fire experts under specified weather
conditions to restore health to ecosystems that
depend on fire.
Source: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/
prescribed-fire.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
management objectives. The State
anticipates increasing the application of
prescribed fire in response to the
increasing threat of wildfires in
Washington. The state intends to
balance the need to increase the use of
prescribed fire as a forest management
tool while minimizing smoke impacts
through the implementation of policies
and processes outlined in Washington’s
Smoke Management Plan (SMP).
EPA first approved Washington’s SMP
into the Washington SIP in 1987 (52 FR
16243, May 4, 1987) as part of
Washington’s visibility protection plan.
Washington updated and EPA approved
the SMP in 1998 (1998 SMP) and 2003
respectively (68 FR 34821, June 11,
2003). In 2016, the Washington State
Legislature provided funding to update
the 1998 SMP and the Legislature made
changes to statutes affecting the SMP in
2019 and 2021. After revising rules to
reflect the updated legislation,
Washington updated the SMP to reflect
the statutory and regulatory changes. On
August 10, 2022, following a state
public comment process, the
Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) submitted the
updated SMP, including the statutes
and regulations relied on in the Plan, to
EPA for approval (2022 SMP).
II. Washington’s Smoke Management
Plan
Washington’s SMP establishes a
program to allow silvicultural burning
on forestland while protecting air
quality. Although Ecology is the
primary delegated air quality agency for
the state and submitted the Washington
SMP to EPA for approval, Washington’s
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
has been and continues to be the state
agency with the responsibility for
regulating smoke from silvicultural
burning on forestland. See Revised Code
of Washington (RCW) 70A.15.5120 and
RCW 70A.15.5130. The Washington
SMP is therefore primarily implemented
by DNR with assistance from Ecology.
DNR oversees prescribed silvicultural
burning in Washington to improve fire
dependent ecosystems, mitigate wildfire
potential, decrease forest susceptibility
to insects or disease, and otherwise
enhance forest resiliency to fire. The
purpose of the SMP is to coordinate and
facilitate the statewide regulation of
prescribed, silvicultural (forestland)
burning on lands under the authority of
DNR, and on unimproved, federally
managed forestlands and participating
tribal lands. The SMP applies to all
persons, landowners, companies, state
and Federal land management agencies,
and others who conduct silvicultural
burning in Washington State. The SMP
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
does not apply to agricultural burning,
outdoor burning that occurs on
improved property, or tribal lands
described in Section VI of this
document.
For purposes of discussing the
Washington SMP, prescribed fires fall
into three main categories based on the
size of the burn: ‘‘rule burns,’’ ‘‘small
burns,’’ and ‘‘large burns.’’ The approval
process for burns under the SMP 2 also
varies based on whether the burn is a
‘‘multiple day burn’’ and whether the
burn is conducted in an urban growth
area.
‘‘Rule burns’’ are generally no more
than ten feet in diameter and are always
limited to one fire at a time. They
include burning of hand-built piles for
recreational purposes, as well as fuels
reduction, or other silvicultural
purposes. Rule burns may also be
restricted to no more than 4 feet in
diameter depending on time of year and
the county within which the burning
occurs.3 DNR has authority over rule
burns, but no written permit or sitespecific burn approval or decision is
required under either the 1998 SMP or
2022 SMP for rule burns, provided the
burns comply with minimum
requirements for all burns listed in
WAC 332–24–205 4 and the specific
provisions for rule burns in WAC 332–
24–211. No changes have been made to
WAC 332–24–211, since EPA approved
it into the Washington SIP in 2003. The
‘‘Scope’’ sections in both the 1998 SMP
and 2022 SMP state that the SMP does
not apply to burning done ‘‘by rule’’
(‘‘rule burns’’).
‘‘Small burns’’ require site-specific
written permits and are defined under
the 2022 SMP as fires that will consume
less than 100 tons of forest debris 5 in a
24-hour period. The size threshold is
extended to 300 tons in ‘‘low-risk
areas.’’ ‘‘Low risk areas’’ are generally
remote areas and are defined by DNR
using the criteria described in Appendix
10 of the 2022 SMP. Burners intending
to conduct small burns are required to
2 Commonly referred to as ‘‘Go/No-Go’’ and ‘‘Go/
No-Go Decision’’ in the 2022 SMP.
3 Size limits, including seasonal and county
specific limitations, are described in Washington
Administrative Code 332–24–211.
4 WAC 332–24–205 applies to ‘‘all burning
regulated by the department’’ and WAC 332–24–
211 Specific rules for small fires not requiring a
written burning permit. WAC 332–24–211 clarifies
that the requirements contained therein are ‘‘[i]n
addition to WAC 332–24–205’’ and sets forth the
diameter and seasonal restrictions for so called
‘‘rule burns.’’
5 ‘‘Forest debris’’ includes forest slash, chips, and
any other vegetative residue resulting from
activities on forestland. This definition is from
RCW 76.04.005(9), which is included in Appendix
7 of the 2022 SMP.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
obtain a site-specific written permit.6
DNR conditions such permits based on
the proposed locations and may include
specific instructions in the permits,
such as limits on wind directions under
which the burns may be conducted.
Burners are required to follow all
conditions in their burn permits. Prior
to igniting a small burn, the burner must
also call 1–800–323 BURN and follow
the instructions that apply for the day
and location of the burn being
conducted. Burners cannot ignite small
burns if an air quality episode is
declared, or conditions of impaired air
have been declared by Ecology or the
local clean air authority as provided
under RCW 70A.15.5140 and WAC 332–
24–205(5). DNR may also suspend small
burns on private and state lands due to
high fire danger (Federal officials
manage fire danger on Federal lands). In
contrast to large burns, small burns
conducted outside of urban growth
areas do not require a site-specific burn
decision just prior to the burn. Small
burns within urban growth areas are not
treated the same as other small burns
but instead must undergo the same
permitting process as large burns.
‘‘Large burns’’ are defined as fires that
will consume 100 tons or more in a 24hour period (300 tons or more in low
risk areas). Like small burns, large burns
require site-specific permits; burners
must follow all conditions in their burn
permits; ignition is prohibited if an air
quality episode is declared or
conditions of impaired air have been
declared by Ecology or the local clear air
authority as provided under RCW
70A.15.5140 and WAC 332–24–205(5);
and DNR may suspend large burns on
private and state lands due to high fire
danger (Federal officials manage fire
danger on Federal lands). The
distinction here from small burns
outside of UGA’s is that prior to igniting
a large burn outside of UGA’s, the
burner must contact DNR directly and
request authorization to ignite the large
burn on a particular day. The SMP
identifies eight specific burn approval
criteria to be met before DNR decides
whether ignition will be authorized for
large burns (and small burns inside
urban growth areas) and tasks DNR
wildland fire management division
managers with assessing the potential
for smoke intrusions. To inform
decisions, DNR utilizes numerous tools
as well as site- and temporal-specific
considerations, including, but not
6 WAC 332–24–201(4) requires a written permit
for all burning other than ‘‘rule burns’’ which are
outside the scope of the SMP. ‘‘Rule Burns’’ must
meet all general rules in WAC 332–24–205 as well
as specific additional conditions in WAC 332–24–
211.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
limited to, current and forecasted
weather conditions, air quality, fuel
moisture, firing techniques, and
availability of suppression forces.
‘‘Multiple day burns’’ are subject to
the same approval criteria used to
approve large burns, regardless of burn
size. Additional information and actions
are required from burners before DNR
will approve a multiple day burn. Those
additional requirements are in the SMP
in the Approval Process for Multiple
Day Burns section and include, but are
not limited to, notifying DNR at least
three months before the proposed start
of the burn, providing a rationale for
why the burn cannot be accomplished
in single day increments, providing
communication and public notification
plans, obtaining spot forecasts for each
day of the burn, identifying what
monitoring resources will be utilized,
and participating in daily coordination
calls.
Although the 2022 SMP burn
approval criteria prohibit authorizing
burns that would cause an exceedance
of air quality standards, DNR’s goal as
stated in the SMP is based on levels
below the 35 mg/m3 24-hour NAAQS for
PM2.5.7 This is a new element of the
2022 SMP. Under the 2022 SMP, DNR
now considers exceeding a PM2.5 level
of 20.5 mg/m3 (on a 3-hour rolling
average) a smoke ‘‘intrusion’’ and
unacceptable for purposes of the SMP.8
The 2022 SMP sets forth new
procedures to avoid, detect, and
respond to smoke intrusions. These
procedures include, but are not limited
to:
• Incorporating consideration of
potential intrusions when making burn
decisions;
• Using available resources such as
monitors and webcams to assess the
level of smoke in potentially impacted
communities;
• Reporting and documenting where
and when smoke intrusions occur;
• Issuing health advisories as needed
and collaborating with Ecology,
Washington Department of Health, and
local clean air authorities;
• Requiring burners to submit
intrusion reports when DNR determines
one has occurred; and
• Sharing all data and final intrusion
reports with applicable partners and
regulators, including Ecology, local
clean air authorities, state and local
health departments, and EPA.
In the 2022 SMP, DNR commits to
reviewing the SMP every five years and
7 PM
is fine inhalable particles, with diameters
that are generally 2.5 micrometers and smaller.
8 See 2022 SMP, page 11, Smoke Intrusions
caused by any silvicultural burning section, which
is included in the docket for this action.
PO 00000
2.5
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17483
revising the plan or procedures as
necessary as a result of that review. The
SMP specifies that plan revisions will
adopt the same review procedures used
for the original adoption. The EPA notes
that any revision to the SMP would not
be part of the Washington SIP unless
submitted to and approved by the EPA
as provided in 42 U.S.C. 7410.
III. Evaluation of Washington’s SIP
Submittal
As with its previous SMP,
Washington’s 2022 SMP submittal
includes an extensive discussion of how
the state implements its smoke
management program as well as the
statutes and regulations that apply to
prescribed burning on forest land in
Washington. Washington states that it
revised its SMP to better regulate
burning while reducing fuel loading,
restore forest ecosystems, and reduce
the risk of catastrophic wildfire while
continuing to protect air quality. The
revisions include changes to both the
main body of the SMP as well as state
statutes and regulations that apply to
prescribed burning and are included in
Appendix 7 of the submittal.9
The bulk of revisions in the 2022 SMP
are non-substantive from a SIP
approvability perspective and include
reorganizing the order of SMP sections
and content; updating wording for
consistency and more current
vernacular; and updating citations to
reflect recodification of applicable
statutes and rules. Washington also
revised the SMP to add or clarify
recordkeeping, reporting, and
notification requirements for prescribed
fires that may later qualify as an
‘‘exceptional event’’ under 40 CFR
50.14. This is also a non-substantive
change to Washington’s SMP because
EPA is not approving or disapproving
this SMP as meeting the requirements of
EPA’s exceptional event guidance.10
The 2022 SMP also contains several
substantive revisions to the SMP. Those
revisions affect burn decision timing,
burn approval criteria, summer
weekend burning, and burning in urban
growth areas. Washington included in
the submittal information to
demonstrate that these revisions to the
SMP will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment or reasonable further
progress or any other applicable
requirement of Title I of the CAA. See
42 U.S.C. 7410(l). The most relevant
9 The 1998 SMP included the applicable statutes
and regulations in Appendix 15.
10 See EPA’s 2019 Exceptional Events Guidance:
Prescribed Fire on Wildland that May Influence
Ozone and Particulate Matter Concentrations, page
20.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
17484
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
pollutants for Washington’s analysis of
visibility and interference with NAAQS
attainment are PM2.5, PM10, and ozone
due to the nature of prescribed fire
emissions and because EPA revised the
PM2.5 and ozone NAAQS resulting in
more stringent standards (78 FR 3085,
January 15, 2013, and 80 FR 65292,
October 26, 2015) since EPA last
approved Washington’s SMP.11 The
substantive changes to the 2022 SMP
and the demonstration supporting the
changes are discussed below.
Burn Decision Timing
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Under the current approved 1998
SMP, ‘‘large burns’’ require that DNR
issue a site-specific smoke management
decision (permission to ignite) the
morning of the day the fire is to be
ignited. Under the 2022 SMP, if a burner
submits a request to DNR by noon the
‘‘day prior’’ to the planned ignition,
DNR must issue a decision by 4:00 p.m.
that same day—about 15 hours earlier
than what would be expected under the
1998 SMP. The result of this change is
reliance on products, primarily
meteorological forecasts and models
that are produced earlier and, due to
advances in science and technology, are
more reliable than what would have
been available when the 1998 SMP was
created.
Washington’s demonstration included
a technical analysis 12 of forecast models
used for day of versus day prior to
ignition in the 2022 SMP. The technical
analysis of the revised protocols shows
no appreciable loss in forecast accuracy
and indicates DNR would likely make
the same operational burn decision
regardless of whether the decision is
rendered by 4:30 p.m. on the day prior
to ignition or 8:00 a.m. on the day of
ignition. The analysis also shows that,
in the season when most burn decisions
are made (fall), model runs the day prior
to a burn have slightly smaller wind
speed forecast errors than the day-ofburn model runs (wind speed is a
significant factor for burn decisions).
11 Washington states, and EPA agrees, that
attainment and maintenance related to criteria
pollutants other than PM and ozone are unlikely to
be impacted by the changes to Washington’s SMP.
There are no nonattainment areas in Washington
except for one sulfur dioxide nonattainment area
that is small in area and encompasses an aluminum
smelter facility and the area immediately adjacent
to this facility. No discernible sulfur contributions
to that area are expected to result from prescribed
fire due to the low levels of sulfur in the woody
biomass being burned.
12 For more information see Appendix 1 of
Washington’s 2022 Smoke Management Plan
Demonstration, 7.Appendix b.3 Appendices 14wTOC.pdf, which is included in the docket for this
action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
This lends confidence that a status-quo
or better burn decision will be made.
In addition, this burn decision timing
change is not a complete departure from
the procedure under the 1998 SMP.
Burners seeking day prior burn decision
approval under the 2022 SMP must
submit their request by noon the day
prior to ignition. Failure to do so may
result in a burn decision on the day of
ignition, instead of by 4:30 p.m. on the
day prior to ignition. Burners may still
request a burn decision on the planned
day of ignition.
More importantly, there are
protections in the burn approval process
in the 2022 SMP based on air quality on
the morning of ignition.13 Specifically,
the 2022 SMP states that on the day of
the burn ‘‘If the burn was approved, the
Smoke Management Section will verify
weather conditions have not changed so
much as to result in a violation of the
Approval Criteria, by 7:30 a.m. If
weather conditions have unexpectedly
changed burners will be notified and
advised that they may have to
extinguish, and therefore are advised to
not burn that location.’’ This 2022 SMP
weather verification requirement
applies to large burns and all burns in
urban growth areas, regardless of size.
For these reasons, including the
technical demonstration supporting this
change, we are proposing to find that
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by
changes to the burn decision timing.
Burn Approval Criteria
As under the 1998 SMP, the 2022
SMP has eight approval criteria. All
eight were updated to include state or
Federal air quality regulation citations,
which improve clarity for both
regulators and the regulated community
as compared to the 1998 SMP, which
did not include citations. There are no
substantive changes to approval criteria
3, 4, 6, and 7. Washington revised
approval criteria 2 to reflect the specific
statutory language authorizing the
condition and the corresponding
citation.14
The most substantive changes are to
approval criteria 1, 5, and 8. Under the
1998 SMP, approval criteria 1
considered whether there was a
likelihood of an ‘‘intrusion’’ of visible
smoke, whereas under the 2022 SMP,
this criterion was revised to the
likelihood of an exceedance of state air
13 See Appendix 1, Section 1.C. of the 2022 SMP
which is included in the docket for this action.
14 For a detailed analysis of the 1998 comparison
to the 2022 approval criteria, see Appendix 3 of
Washington’s 2022 Smoke Management Plan
Demonstration which is included in the docket for
this action.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
quality standards, which include the
NAAQS, based on the requirement in
RCW 70A.15.5140. The 2022 SMP also
includes a new requirement for DNR
and burners to monitor for and address
intrusions of smoke due to silvicultural
burning above 22.5 ug/m3 of PM2.5, a
level significantly below the 35 ug/m3
PM2.5 NAAQS exceedance level. With
this new requirement, combined with
the revision to rely on the NAAQS
exceedance level, criteria 1 is more
protective in the 2022 SMP than the
1998 SMP. Approval criteria 5,
previously a non-air quality specific
reference to endangered species
protections already in Washington
State’s Forest Practices Rule and
Regulations, now prohibits burning in
areas where Federal or State air quality
standards are exceeded for any criteria
pollutant, with limited exceptions for
silvicultural burning to improve or
maintain fire dependent ecosystems for
rare plants or animals in specified areas.
This is more protective than the existing
criteria. Approval criteria 8 was revised
by replacing language regarding smoke
dispersion thresholds with criteria
based on whether a declared stage of
impaired air quality has been called or
is likely to be called in the next 24
hours, based on coordination among
DNR, Ecology, and local air agencies.15
DNR still evaluates smoke dispersion
under the 2022 SMP when assessing
meteorological data, forecasting models,
and permitting data to evaluate whether
approval criteria 1, 2, and 3 have been
met.16 For these reasons, we are
proposing to find that attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS are unlikely
to be affected by the revisions to the
eight approval criteria.
Summer Weekend Burning
The 1998 SMP contains a statewide
prohibition on large burns from
midnight Thursday through midnight
Sunday between June 15 and October 1
and on the holidays of July Fourth and
Labor Day. This prohibition is
commonly referred to as the ‘‘summer
weekend burning prohibition.’’ The
summer weekend burning prohibition
only applies to large burns under the
1998 SMP. Moreover, all prescribed
burns are, and will continue to be,
severely limited for much of the period
covered by the 1998 SMP summer
weekend burning prohibition regardless
of size. This is because prescribed burns
during this period are frequently limited
due to high occurrences of inconducive
15 Ibid.
16 Ibid.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
weather, fuel conditions, preparedness
levels and other safety constraints.17
Although the 2022 SMP does not
retain the summer weekend burning
prohibition, air quality protections are
in place for the newly allowed burning
because removing the prohibition only
affects large burns, which require sitespecific DNR smoke management
decisions before ignition may occur.18
The 2022 SMP requires DNR’s smoke
management decisions to be protective
of air quality through the inclusion of
the Approval Criteria for Large Burns
and All Burns within UGAs. For these
reasons, we are proposing to find that
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by
removal of the summer weekend
burning prohibition.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Burning in Urban Growth Areas
In 2019, the Washington State
Legislature amended state law 19 to
allow previously prohibited prescribed
burning in urban growth areas. Unlike
the summer weekend prohibition, the
newly allowed burning is not burn size
specific. The 2022 SMP includes
allowances for prescribed ‘‘Urban
Growth Area (UGA) Burns’’ and defines
them as any ‘‘fire that takes place
wholly or in part within a UGA as
defined by the county.’’ 20 Regardless of
consumable tonnage, urban growth area
burns require a site-specific DNR smoke
management decision, a documented
test fire and a spot weather forecast.21
This site-specific decision follows the
same approval criteria used for making
site-specific decisions for large burns.
The criteria include requirements that
approval to ignite be denied if there is
a likelihood of an air quality standard
exceedance, as well as other air quality
considerations.22 For these reasons, we
are proposing to find that attainment
17 See Appendix 2 of Washington’s 2022 Smoke
Management Plan Demonstration, which is
included in the docket for this action in 7.Appendix
b.3 Appendices 1–4 wTOC.pdf.
18 See the subsection ‘‘Large burns and all burns
in Urban Growth Areas’’ of the General Burning
Requirements section in the 2022 SMP, which is
included in the docket for this action in 5.
Appendix B.2.DNR SMP with Cover.pdf.
19 The Washington Legislature amended RCW
70.94.6514, subsequently recodified as RCW
70A.15.5020.
20 As defined in the General Burning
Requirements section in the 2022 SMP, which is
included in the docket for this action in 5.
Appendix B.2.DNR SMP with Cover.pdf.
21 See the subsection ‘‘Urban Growth Area (UGA)
Burns’’ of the General Burning Requirements
section in the 2022 SMP, which is included in the
docket for this action in 5. Appendix B.2.DNR SMP
with Cover.pdf.
22 EPA also notes that these burns would be
subject to the limitations on ‘‘intrusion’’ of smoke
exceeding a PM2.5 level of 20.5 mg/m3 (on a 3-hour
rolling average), discussed in more detail above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
and maintenance of the NAAQS are
unlikely to be affected by the newly
allowed urban growth area burning.
Regional Haze and Visibility
As discussed above, the 1998 SMP
that is currently approved in the
Washington SIP was approved as part of
Washington’s regional haze and
visibility protection plan. 68 FR 34821
(June 11, 2003). EPA has recognized that
prescribed fires conducted for the
purpose of ecosystem health and public
safety in accordance with basic smoke
management practices are generally
consistent with the goal of making
reasonable progress toward natural
visibility in mandatory class I areas
because prescribed fires are most often
conducted to improve ecosystem health
and to reduce the risk of catastrophic
wildfires, both of which can result in
net beneficial impacts on visibility.23
EPA proposes to find that none of the
substantive changes to Washington’s
SMP discussed above interfere with
reasonable progress towards natural
visibility in mandatory class I areas, as
laid out in Washington’s regional haze
and visibility SIP. As under the 1998
SMP, approval to burn will be denied if
burning will not protect the public
welfare, preserve visibility, protect
scenic, aesthetic, historic, and cultural
values, and prevent air pollution
problems that interfere with the
enjoyment of life, property, or cultural
attractions or if burning will not comply
with the Federal Clean Air Act
regarding visibility protection of Federal
Class I Areas.
IV. EPA’s Proposed Action
We have reviewed the submitted SIP
revisions and propose to find that the
revisions meet the requirements of the
CAA for approval. Based on our review
of Washington’s demonstration, we
propose to conclude that the revisions
to Washington’s SIP will not interfere
with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment, reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. Under CAA
section 110(k), EPA is proposing to
approve, and incorporate by reference,
into the Washington SIP at 40 CFR part
52, subpart WW the following statutes
and regulations in Appendix 7 to the
2022 SMP that provide the authority for
implementation and enforcement of the
plan, as well as the permits that
authorize burning under the 2022 SMP:
23 See additional discussion in Protection of
Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State
Plans, 82 FR 3078 (January 10, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17485
• RCW 52.12.103, Burning Permits—
Issuance—Contents (state effective
March 27, 1984);
• RCW 52.12.104, Burning Permits—
Duties of permittee (state effective
March 27, 1984);
• RCW 76.04.005, Definitions. (1)
‘‘Additional fire hazard’’ (5)
‘‘Department protected lands’’ (9)
‘‘Forest debris’’ (11) ‘‘Forestland’’ (12)
‘‘Forestland owner,’’ ‘‘owner of
forestland,’’ ‘‘landowner,’’ or ‘‘owner’’
(13) ‘‘Forest material’’ (15) ‘‘Landowner
operation’’ (18) ‘‘Participating
landowner’’ (20) ‘‘Slash’’ (21) ‘‘Slash
burning’’ (23) ‘‘Unimproved lands’’
(state effective July 24, 2015);
• RCW 76.04.205, Burning Permits—
Civil Penalty (state effective July 25,
2021);
• RCW 70A.15.1030, Definitions. (21)
‘‘Silvicultural burning’’ (state effective
June 11, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5000, Definition of
‘‘outdoor burning’’ (state effective July
26, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5010, (2) Outdoor
burning—Fires prohibited—Exceptions
(state effective June 11, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5020, Outdoor
burning—Areas where prohibited—
Exceptions—Use for management of
storm or flood-related debris—
Silvicultural burning, except (3) (state
effective June 11, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5120, Burning permits
for abating or prevention of forest fire
hazards, management of ecosystems,
instruction on silvicultural operations—
Issuance—Fees (state effective June 11,
2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5130, Silvicultural
forest burning—Reduce statewide
emissions—Exemption—Monitoring
program (state effective July 28, 2019);
• RCW 70A.15.5140, Burning permits
for abating or prevention of forest fire
hazards, management of ecosystems,
instruction on silvicultural operations—
Conditions for issuance and use of
permits—Air quality standards to be
met—Alternate methods to lessen forest
debris (state effective June 11, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5150, Cooperation
between department of natural
resources and state, local, or regional air
pollution authorities—Withholding of
permits (state effective June 11, 2020);
• RCW 70A.15.5190, Outdoor
burning allowed for managing storm or
flood related debris (state effective June
11, 2020);
• WAC 332–24–201, Burning Permit
Program—Requirements and Exceptions
(state effective June 30, 1992);
• WAC 332–24–205, General rules—
minimum requirements for all burning,
except (13) (state effective November 22,
2019);
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
17486
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2023 / Proposed Rules
• WAC 332–24–211, Specific rules for
small fires not requiring a written
burning permit (solely for the purpose
of establishing the size threshold for
burns covered by the Smoke
Management Plan) (state effective June
30, 1992);
• WAC 332–24–217, Burning
permit—penalty (state effective June 30,
1992);
• WAC 332–24–221, Specific rules for
burning that requires a written burning
permit (state effective February 1, 2012).
In addition, the EPA is proposing to
approve, but not incorporate by
reference, into the Washington SIP at 40
CFR part 52, subpart WW the
Department of Natural Resources Smoke
Management Plan, state effective May
10, 2022 (including all Appendices to
such plan), as such plan applies to
silvicultural burning regulated by DNR.
We note that, as provided in 40 CFR
52.2476 of the Washington SIP, any
variance or exception to the 2022 SMP
granted by DNR or Ecology must be
submitted by Washington for approval
to EPA in accordance with the
requirements for revising SIPs in 40 CFR
51.104 and any such variance or
exception does not modify the
requirements of the federally approved
Washington SIP until approved by EPA
as a SIP revision.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final rule, regulatory text
that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the provisions described in Section IV
of this preamble. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at EPA Region
10 Office (please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
VI. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted
below and is also not approved to apply
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Washington’s SIP is approved to apply
on non-trust land within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA provided a consultation
opportunity to potentially affected tribes
in a letter dated May 24, 2022.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 13, 2023.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2023–05462 Filed 3–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0529; EPA–R05–
OAR–2022–0685; FRL–10638–01–R5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin;
Emissions Reporting and
Infrastructure SIP Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Wisconsin state
implementation plan (SIP) revising air
emissions reporting requirements
codified in Chapter 438 of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to
approve a related infrastructure
requirement under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2012 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) and 2015
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). The infrastructure
requirements are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
state’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2015–0529 or EPA–R05–OAR–
2022–0685 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
arra.sarah@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17481-17486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05462]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0731, FRL-10545-01-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; WA; Smoke Management Plan Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted
on August 10, 2022. The submitted revisions incorporate the most recent
updates to Washington's Smoke Management Plan and reflect state
legislative and regulatory changes. The revisions include earlier
notification of burn decisions, revise the burn approval criteria to
better align with state law, remove the prohibition against summer
weekend burning; and allow previously prohibited burning in urban
growth areas subject to an approval process that requires consideration
of the impact of the approval on air quality. EPA is proposing to
approve the revisions based our determination that the revisions are
consistent with Clean Air Act requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2022-0731 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For
[[Page 17482]]
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Ruddick, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-1999, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. This
Supplementary Information section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Washington's Smoke Management Plan
III. Evaluation of Washington's SIP Submittal
IV. EPA's Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background
Each state has a State Implementation Plan (SIP) containing the
control measures and strategies to attain and maintain the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) established by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for the criteria pollutants (carbon monoxide,
lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide). The
SIP contains such elements as air pollution control regulations,
emission inventories, attainment demonstrations, and enforcement
mechanisms.
Washington adopted a Smoke Management Plan as part of the
Washington SIP to reduce emissions that contribute to visibility
impairment. Wildfire has had a serious impact on Washington during the
past decade with many large-scale wildfires impacting air quality.
Prescribed fires \1\ have been increasingly used as a land management
tool to reduce the likelihood of catastrophic wildfires by reducing the
buildup of unwanted fuels and strengthening an area's ecosystems. This
controlled application of fire to wildland fuels, is done under
specific environmental conditions and protocols that typically call for
a prescribed fire to be confined to a predetermined area and limit the
fire to an intensity and scale required to attain planned forestland
management objectives. The State anticipates increasing the application
of prescribed fire in response to the increasing threat of wildfires in
Washington. The state intends to balance the need to increase the use
of prescribed fire as a forest management tool while minimizing smoke
impacts through the implementation of policies and processes outlined
in Washington's Smoke Management Plan (SMP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Prescribed fires, also known as prescribed burns, refer to
the controlled application of fire by a team of fire experts under
specified weather conditions to restore health to ecosystems that
depend on fire.
Source: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/prescribed-fire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA first approved Washington's SMP into the Washington SIP in 1987
(52 FR 16243, May 4, 1987) as part of Washington's visibility
protection plan. Washington updated and EPA approved the SMP in 1998
(1998 SMP) and 2003 respectively (68 FR 34821, June 11, 2003). In 2016,
the Washington State Legislature provided funding to update the 1998
SMP and the Legislature made changes to statutes affecting the SMP in
2019 and 2021. After revising rules to reflect the updated legislation,
Washington updated the SMP to reflect the statutory and regulatory
changes. On August 10, 2022, following a state public comment process,
the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted the
updated SMP, including the statutes and regulations relied on in the
Plan, to EPA for approval (2022 SMP).
II. Washington's Smoke Management Plan
Washington's SMP establishes a program to allow silvicultural
burning on forestland while protecting air quality. Although Ecology is
the primary delegated air quality agency for the state and submitted
the Washington SMP to EPA for approval, Washington's Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) has been and continues to be the state agency
with the responsibility for regulating smoke from silvicultural burning
on forestland. See Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70A.15.5120 and RCW
70A.15.5130. The Washington SMP is therefore primarily implemented by
DNR with assistance from Ecology.
DNR oversees prescribed silvicultural burning in Washington to
improve fire dependent ecosystems, mitigate wildfire potential,
decrease forest susceptibility to insects or disease, and otherwise
enhance forest resiliency to fire. The purpose of the SMP is to
coordinate and facilitate the statewide regulation of prescribed,
silvicultural (forestland) burning on lands under the authority of DNR,
and on unimproved, federally managed forestlands and participating
tribal lands. The SMP applies to all persons, landowners, companies,
state and Federal land management agencies, and others who conduct
silvicultural burning in Washington State. The SMP does not apply to
agricultural burning, outdoor burning that occurs on improved property,
or tribal lands described in Section VI of this document.
For purposes of discussing the Washington SMP, prescribed fires
fall into three main categories based on the size of the burn: ``rule
burns,'' ``small burns,'' and ``large burns.'' The approval process for
burns under the SMP \2\ also varies based on whether the burn is a
``multiple day burn'' and whether the burn is conducted in an urban
growth area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Commonly referred to as ``Go/No-Go'' and ``Go/No-Go
Decision'' in the 2022 SMP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Rule burns'' are generally no more than ten feet in diameter and
are always limited to one fire at a time. They include burning of hand-
built piles for recreational purposes, as well as fuels reduction, or
other silvicultural purposes. Rule burns may also be restricted to no
more than 4 feet in diameter depending on time of year and the county
within which the burning occurs.\3\ DNR has authority over rule burns,
but no written permit or site-specific burn approval or decision is
required under either the 1998 SMP or 2022 SMP for rule burns, provided
the burns comply with minimum requirements for all burns listed in WAC
332-24-205 \4\ and the specific provisions for rule burns in WAC 332-
24-211. No changes have been made to WAC 332-24-211, since EPA approved
it into the Washington SIP in 2003. The ``Scope'' sections in both the
1998 SMP and 2022 SMP state that the SMP does not apply to burning done
``by rule'' (``rule burns'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Size limits, including seasonal and county specific
limitations, are described in Washington Administrative Code 332-24-
211.
\4\ WAC 332-24-205 applies to ``all burning regulated by the
department'' and WAC 332-24-211 Specific rules for small fires not
requiring a written burning permit. WAC 332-24-211 clarifies that
the requirements contained therein are ``[i]n addition to WAC 332-
24-205'' and sets forth the diameter and seasonal restrictions for
so called ``rule burns.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Small burns'' require site-specific written permits and are
defined under the 2022 SMP as fires that will consume less than 100
tons of forest debris \5\ in a 24-hour period. The size threshold is
extended to 300 tons in ``low-risk areas.'' ``Low risk areas'' are
generally remote areas and are defined by DNR using the criteria
described in Appendix 10 of the 2022 SMP. Burners intending to conduct
small burns are required to
[[Page 17483]]
obtain a site-specific written permit.\6\ DNR conditions such permits
based on the proposed locations and may include specific instructions
in the permits, such as limits on wind directions under which the burns
may be conducted. Burners are required to follow all conditions in
their burn permits. Prior to igniting a small burn, the burner must
also call 1-800-323 BURN and follow the instructions that apply for the
day and location of the burn being conducted. Burners cannot ignite
small burns if an air quality episode is declared, or conditions of
impaired air have been declared by Ecology or the local clean air
authority as provided under RCW 70A.15.5140 and WAC 332-24-205(5). DNR
may also suspend small burns on private and state lands due to high
fire danger (Federal officials manage fire danger on Federal lands). In
contrast to large burns, small burns conducted outside of urban growth
areas do not require a site-specific burn decision just prior to the
burn. Small burns within urban growth areas are not treated the same as
other small burns but instead must undergo the same permitting process
as large burns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``Forest debris'' includes forest slash, chips, and any
other vegetative residue resulting from activities on forestland.
This definition is from RCW 76.04.005(9), which is included in
Appendix 7 of the 2022 SMP.
\6\ WAC 332-24-201(4) requires a written permit for all burning
other than ``rule burns'' which are outside the scope of the SMP.
``Rule Burns'' must meet all general rules in WAC 332-24-205 as well
as specific additional conditions in WAC 332-24-211.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Large burns'' are defined as fires that will consume 100 tons or
more in a 24-hour period (300 tons or more in low risk areas). Like
small burns, large burns require site-specific permits; burners must
follow all conditions in their burn permits; ignition is prohibited if
an air quality episode is declared or conditions of impaired air have
been declared by Ecology or the local clear air authority as provided
under RCW 70A.15.5140 and WAC 332-24-205(5); and DNR may suspend large
burns on private and state lands due to high fire danger (Federal
officials manage fire danger on Federal lands). The distinction here
from small burns outside of UGA's is that prior to igniting a large
burn outside of UGA's, the burner must contact DNR directly and request
authorization to ignite the large burn on a particular day. The SMP
identifies eight specific burn approval criteria to be met before DNR
decides whether ignition will be authorized for large burns (and small
burns inside urban growth areas) and tasks DNR wildland fire management
division managers with assessing the potential for smoke intrusions. To
inform decisions, DNR utilizes numerous tools as well as site- and
temporal-specific considerations, including, but not limited to,
current and forecasted weather conditions, air quality, fuel moisture,
firing techniques, and availability of suppression forces.
``Multiple day burns'' are subject to the same approval criteria
used to approve large burns, regardless of burn size. Additional
information and actions are required from burners before DNR will
approve a multiple day burn. Those additional requirements are in the
SMP in the Approval Process for Multiple Day Burns section and include,
but are not limited to, notifying DNR at least three months before the
proposed start of the burn, providing a rationale for why the burn
cannot be accomplished in single day increments, providing
communication and public notification plans, obtaining spot forecasts
for each day of the burn, identifying what monitoring resources will be
utilized, and participating in daily coordination calls.
Although the 2022 SMP burn approval criteria prohibit authorizing
burns that would cause an exceedance of air quality standards, DNR's
goal as stated in the SMP is based on levels below the 35 [micro]g/m\3\
24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5.\7\ This is a new element of the
2022 SMP. Under the 2022 SMP, DNR now considers exceeding a
PM2.5 level of 20.5 [micro]g/m\3\ (on a 3-hour rolling
average) a smoke ``intrusion'' and unacceptable for purposes of the
SMP.\8\ The 2022 SMP sets forth new procedures to avoid, detect, and
respond to smoke intrusions. These procedures include, but are not
limited to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ PM2.5 is fine inhalable particles, with diameters
that are generally 2.5 micrometers and smaller.
\8\ See 2022 SMP, page 11, Smoke Intrusions caused by any
silvicultural burning section, which is included in the docket for
this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorporating consideration of potential intrusions when
making burn decisions;
Using available resources such as monitors and webcams to
assess the level of smoke in potentially impacted communities;
Reporting and documenting where and when smoke intrusions
occur;
Issuing health advisories as needed and collaborating with
Ecology, Washington Department of Health, and local clean air
authorities;
Requiring burners to submit intrusion reports when DNR
determines one has occurred; and
Sharing all data and final intrusion reports with
applicable partners and regulators, including Ecology, local clean air
authorities, state and local health departments, and EPA.
In the 2022 SMP, DNR commits to reviewing the SMP every five years
and revising the plan or procedures as necessary as a result of that
review. The SMP specifies that plan revisions will adopt the same
review procedures used for the original adoption. The EPA notes that
any revision to the SMP would not be part of the Washington SIP unless
submitted to and approved by the EPA as provided in 42 U.S.C. 7410.
III. Evaluation of Washington's SIP Submittal
As with its previous SMP, Washington's 2022 SMP submittal includes
an extensive discussion of how the state implements its smoke
management program as well as the statutes and regulations that apply
to prescribed burning on forest land in Washington. Washington states
that it revised its SMP to better regulate burning while reducing fuel
loading, restore forest ecosystems, and reduce the risk of catastrophic
wildfire while continuing to protect air quality. The revisions include
changes to both the main body of the SMP as well as state statutes and
regulations that apply to prescribed burning and are included in
Appendix 7 of the submittal.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The 1998 SMP included the applicable statutes and
regulations in Appendix 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The bulk of revisions in the 2022 SMP are non-substantive from a
SIP approvability perspective and include reorganizing the order of SMP
sections and content; updating wording for consistency and more current
vernacular; and updating citations to reflect recodification of
applicable statutes and rules. Washington also revised the SMP to add
or clarify recordkeeping, reporting, and notification requirements for
prescribed fires that may later qualify as an ``exceptional event''
under 40 CFR 50.14. This is also a non-substantive change to
Washington's SMP because EPA is not approving or disapproving this SMP
as meeting the requirements of EPA's exceptional event guidance.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See EPA's 2019 Exceptional Events Guidance: Prescribed Fire
on Wildland that May Influence Ozone and Particulate Matter
Concentrations, page 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2022 SMP also contains several substantive revisions to the
SMP. Those revisions affect burn decision timing, burn approval
criteria, summer weekend burning, and burning in urban growth areas.
Washington included in the submittal information to demonstrate that
these revisions to the SMP will not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress or any
other applicable requirement of Title I of the CAA. See 42 U.S.C.
7410(l). The most relevant
[[Page 17484]]
pollutants for Washington's analysis of visibility and interference
with NAAQS attainment are PM2.5, PM10, and ozone
due to the nature of prescribed fire emissions and because EPA revised
the PM2.5 and ozone NAAQS resulting in more stringent
standards (78 FR 3085, January 15, 2013, and 80 FR 65292, October 26,
2015) since EPA last approved Washington's SMP.\11\ The substantive
changes to the 2022 SMP and the demonstration supporting the changes
are discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Washington states, and EPA agrees, that attainment and
maintenance related to criteria pollutants other than PM and ozone
are unlikely to be impacted by the changes to Washington's SMP.
There are no nonattainment areas in Washington except for one sulfur
dioxide nonattainment area that is small in area and encompasses an
aluminum smelter facility and the area immediately adjacent to this
facility. No discernible sulfur contributions to that area are
expected to result from prescribed fire due to the low levels of
sulfur in the woody biomass being burned.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burn Decision Timing
Under the current approved 1998 SMP, ``large burns'' require that
DNR issue a site-specific smoke management decision (permission to
ignite) the morning of the day the fire is to be ignited. Under the
2022 SMP, if a burner submits a request to DNR by noon the ``day
prior'' to the planned ignition, DNR must issue a decision by 4:00 p.m.
that same day--about 15 hours earlier than what would be expected under
the 1998 SMP. The result of this change is reliance on products,
primarily meteorological forecasts and models that are produced earlier
and, due to advances in science and technology, are more reliable than
what would have been available when the 1998 SMP was created.
Washington's demonstration included a technical analysis \12\ of
forecast models used for day of versus day prior to ignition in the
2022 SMP. The technical analysis of the revised protocols shows no
appreciable loss in forecast accuracy and indicates DNR would likely
make the same operational burn decision regardless of whether the
decision is rendered by 4:30 p.m. on the day prior to ignition or 8:00
a.m. on the day of ignition. The analysis also shows that, in the
season when most burn decisions are made (fall), model runs the day
prior to a burn have slightly smaller wind speed forecast errors than
the day-of-burn model runs (wind speed is a significant factor for burn
decisions). This lends confidence that a status-quo or better burn
decision will be made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For more information see Appendix 1 of Washington's 2022
Smoke Management Plan Demonstration, 7.Appendix b.3 Appendices 1-
4wTOC.pdf, which is included in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, this burn decision timing change is not a complete
departure from the procedure under the 1998 SMP. Burners seeking day
prior burn decision approval under the 2022 SMP must submit their
request by noon the day prior to ignition. Failure to do so may result
in a burn decision on the day of ignition, instead of by 4:30 p.m. on
the day prior to ignition. Burners may still request a burn decision on
the planned day of ignition.
More importantly, there are protections in the burn approval
process in the 2022 SMP based on air quality on the morning of
ignition.\13\ Specifically, the 2022 SMP states that on the day of the
burn ``If the burn was approved, the Smoke Management Section will
verify weather conditions have not changed so much as to result in a
violation of the Approval Criteria, by 7:30 a.m. If weather conditions
have unexpectedly changed burners will be notified and advised that
they may have to extinguish, and therefore are advised to not burn that
location.'' This 2022 SMP weather verification requirement applies to
large burns and all burns in urban growth areas, regardless of size.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Appendix 1, Section 1.C. of the 2022 SMP which is
included in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, including the technical demonstration supporting
this change, we are proposing to find that attainment and maintenance
of the NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by changes to the burn
decision timing.
Burn Approval Criteria
As under the 1998 SMP, the 2022 SMP has eight approval criteria.
All eight were updated to include state or Federal air quality
regulation citations, which improve clarity for both regulators and the
regulated community as compared to the 1998 SMP, which did not include
citations. There are no substantive changes to approval criteria 3, 4,
6, and 7. Washington revised approval criteria 2 to reflect the
specific statutory language authorizing the condition and the
corresponding citation.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For a detailed analysis of the 1998 comparison to the 2022
approval criteria, see Appendix 3 of Washington's 2022 Smoke
Management Plan Demonstration which is included in the docket for
this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The most substantive changes are to approval criteria 1, 5, and 8.
Under the 1998 SMP, approval criteria 1 considered whether there was a
likelihood of an ``intrusion'' of visible smoke, whereas under the 2022
SMP, this criterion was revised to the likelihood of an exceedance of
state air quality standards, which include the NAAQS, based on the
requirement in RCW 70A.15.5140. The 2022 SMP also includes a new
requirement for DNR and burners to monitor for and address intrusions
of smoke due to silvicultural burning above 22.5 ug/m3 of
PM2.5, a level significantly below the 35 ug/m3
PM2.5 NAAQS exceedance level. With this new requirement,
combined with the revision to rely on the NAAQS exceedance level,
criteria 1 is more protective in the 2022 SMP than the 1998 SMP.
Approval criteria 5, previously a non-air quality specific reference to
endangered species protections already in Washington State's Forest
Practices Rule and Regulations, now prohibits burning in areas where
Federal or State air quality standards are exceeded for any criteria
pollutant, with limited exceptions for silvicultural burning to improve
or maintain fire dependent ecosystems for rare plants or animals in
specified areas. This is more protective than the existing criteria.
Approval criteria 8 was revised by replacing language regarding smoke
dispersion thresholds with criteria based on whether a declared stage
of impaired air quality has been called or is likely to be called in
the next 24 hours, based on coordination among DNR, Ecology, and local
air agencies.\15\ DNR still evaluates smoke dispersion under the 2022
SMP when assessing meteorological data, forecasting models, and
permitting data to evaluate whether approval criteria 1, 2, and 3 have
been met.\16\ For these reasons, we are proposing to find that
attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by
the revisions to the eight approval criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Ibid.
\16\ Ibid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer Weekend Burning
The 1998 SMP contains a statewide prohibition on large burns from
midnight Thursday through midnight Sunday between June 15 and October 1
and on the holidays of July Fourth and Labor Day. This prohibition is
commonly referred to as the ``summer weekend burning prohibition.'' The
summer weekend burning prohibition only applies to large burns under
the 1998 SMP. Moreover, all prescribed burns are, and will continue to
be, severely limited for much of the period covered by the 1998 SMP
summer weekend burning prohibition regardless of size. This is because
prescribed burns during this period are frequently limited due to high
occurrences of inconducive
[[Page 17485]]
weather, fuel conditions, preparedness levels and other safety
constraints.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Appendix 2 of Washington's 2022 Smoke Management Plan
Demonstration, which is included in the docket for this action in
7.Appendix b.3 Appendices 1-4 wTOC.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the 2022 SMP does not retain the summer weekend burning
prohibition, air quality protections are in place for the newly allowed
burning because removing the prohibition only affects large burns,
which require site-specific DNR smoke management decisions before
ignition may occur.\18\ The 2022 SMP requires DNR's smoke management
decisions to be protective of air quality through the inclusion of the
Approval Criteria for Large Burns and All Burns within UGAs. For these
reasons, we are proposing to find that attainment and maintenance of
the NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by removal of the summer weekend
burning prohibition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See the subsection ``Large burns and all burns in Urban
Growth Areas'' of the General Burning Requirements section in the
2022 SMP, which is included in the docket for this action in 5.
Appendix B.2.DNR SMP with Cover.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burning in Urban Growth Areas
In 2019, the Washington State Legislature amended state law \19\ to
allow previously prohibited prescribed burning in urban growth areas.
Unlike the summer weekend prohibition, the newly allowed burning is not
burn size specific. The 2022 SMP includes allowances for prescribed
``Urban Growth Area (UGA) Burns'' and defines them as any ``fire that
takes place wholly or in part within a UGA as defined by the county.''
\20\ Regardless of consumable tonnage, urban growth area burns require
a site-specific DNR smoke management decision, a documented test fire
and a spot weather forecast.\21\ This site-specific decision follows
the same approval criteria used for making site-specific decisions for
large burns. The criteria include requirements that approval to ignite
be denied if there is a likelihood of an air quality standard
exceedance, as well as other air quality considerations.\22\ For these
reasons, we are proposing to find that attainment and maintenance of
the NAAQS are unlikely to be affected by the newly allowed urban growth
area burning.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ The Washington Legislature amended RCW 70.94.6514,
subsequently recodified as RCW 70A.15.5020.
\20\ As defined in the General Burning Requirements section in
the 2022 SMP, which is included in the docket for this action in 5.
Appendix B.2.DNR SMP with Cover.pdf.
\21\ See the subsection ``Urban Growth Area (UGA) Burns'' of the
General Burning Requirements section in the 2022 SMP, which is
included in the docket for this action in 5. Appendix B.2.DNR SMP
with Cover.pdf.
\22\ EPA also notes that these burns would be subject to the
limitations on ``intrusion'' of smoke exceeding a PM2.5
level of 20.5 [micro]g/m\3\ (on a 3-hour rolling average), discussed
in more detail above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regional Haze and Visibility
As discussed above, the 1998 SMP that is currently approved in the
Washington SIP was approved as part of Washington's regional haze and
visibility protection plan. 68 FR 34821 (June 11, 2003). EPA has
recognized that prescribed fires conducted for the purpose of ecosystem
health and public safety in accordance with basic smoke management
practices are generally consistent with the goal of making reasonable
progress toward natural visibility in mandatory class I areas because
prescribed fires are most often conducted to improve ecosystem health
and to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires, both of which can
result in net beneficial impacts on visibility.\23\ EPA proposes to
find that none of the substantive changes to Washington's SMP discussed
above interfere with reasonable progress towards natural visibility in
mandatory class I areas, as laid out in Washington's regional haze and
visibility SIP. As under the 1998 SMP, approval to burn will be denied
if burning will not protect the public welfare, preserve visibility,
protect scenic, aesthetic, historic, and cultural values, and prevent
air pollution problems that interfere with the enjoyment of life,
property, or cultural attractions or if burning will not comply with
the Federal Clean Air Act regarding visibility protection of Federal
Class I Areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See additional discussion in Protection of Visibility:
Amendments to Requirements for State Plans, 82 FR 3078 (January 10,
2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. EPA's Proposed Action
We have reviewed the submitted SIP revisions and propose to find
that the revisions meet the requirements of the CAA for approval. Based
on our review of Washington's demonstration, we propose to conclude
that the revisions to Washington's SIP will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment, reasonable further
progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. Under CAA
section 110(k), EPA is proposing to approve, and incorporate by
reference, into the Washington SIP at 40 CFR part 52, subpart WW the
following statutes and regulations in Appendix 7 to the 2022 SMP that
provide the authority for implementation and enforcement of the plan,
as well as the permits that authorize burning under the 2022 SMP:
RCW 52.12.103, Burning Permits--Issuance--Contents (state
effective March 27, 1984);
RCW 52.12.104, Burning Permits--Duties of permittee (state
effective March 27, 1984);
RCW 76.04.005, Definitions. (1) ``Additional fire hazard''
(5) ``Department protected lands'' (9) ``Forest debris'' (11)
``Forestland'' (12) ``Forestland owner,'' ``owner of forestland,''
``landowner,'' or ``owner'' (13) ``Forest material'' (15) ``Landowner
operation'' (18) ``Participating landowner'' (20) ``Slash'' (21)
``Slash burning'' (23) ``Unimproved lands'' (state effective July 24,
2015);
RCW 76.04.205, Burning Permits--Civil Penalty (state
effective July 25, 2021);
RCW 70A.15.1030, Definitions. (21) ``Silvicultural
burning'' (state effective June 11, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5000, Definition of ``outdoor burning'' (state
effective July 26, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5010, (2) Outdoor burning--Fires prohibited--
Exceptions (state effective June 11, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5020, Outdoor burning--Areas where prohibited--
Exceptions--Use for management of storm or flood-related debris--
Silvicultural burning, except (3) (state effective June 11, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5120, Burning permits for abating or prevention
of forest fire hazards, management of ecosystems, instruction on
silvicultural operations--Issuance--Fees (state effective June 11,
2020);
RCW 70A.15.5130, Silvicultural forest burning--Reduce
statewide emissions--Exemption--Monitoring program (state effective
July 28, 2019);
RCW 70A.15.5140, Burning permits for abating or prevention
of forest fire hazards, management of ecosystems, instruction on
silvicultural operations--Conditions for issuance and use of permits--
Air quality standards to be met--Alternate methods to lessen forest
debris (state effective June 11, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5150, Cooperation between department of natural
resources and state, local, or regional air pollution authorities--
Withholding of permits (state effective June 11, 2020);
RCW 70A.15.5190, Outdoor burning allowed for managing
storm or flood related debris (state effective June 11, 2020);
WAC 332-24-201, Burning Permit Program--Requirements and
Exceptions (state effective June 30, 1992);
WAC 332-24-205, General rules--minimum requirements for
all burning, except (13) (state effective November 22, 2019);
[[Page 17486]]
WAC 332-24-211, Specific rules for small fires not
requiring a written burning permit (solely for the purpose of
establishing the size threshold for burns covered by the Smoke
Management Plan) (state effective June 30, 1992);
WAC 332-24-217, Burning permit--penalty (state effective
June 30, 1992);
WAC 332-24-221, Specific rules for burning that requires a
written burning permit (state effective February 1, 2012).
In addition, the EPA is proposing to approve, but not incorporate
by reference, into the Washington SIP at 40 CFR part 52, subpart WW the
Department of Natural Resources Smoke Management Plan, state effective
May 10, 2022 (including all Appendices to such plan), as such plan
applies to silvicultural burning regulated by DNR.
We note that, as provided in 40 CFR 52.2476 of the Washington SIP,
any variance or exception to the 2022 SMP granted by DNR or Ecology
must be submitted by Washington for approval to EPA in accordance with
the requirements for revising SIPs in 40 CFR 51.104 and any such
variance or exception does not modify the requirements of the federally
approved Washington SIP until approved by EPA as a SIP revision.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final rule,
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the provisions described in Section IV of this preamble. EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and at EPA Region 10
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted below and is also not approved
to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. Washington's SIP is approved to apply on non-trust land within the
exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as
the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement
Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and
local agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust
lands within the 1873 Survey Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA
provided a consultation opportunity to potentially affected tribes in a
letter dated May 24, 2022.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 13, 2023.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2023-05462 Filed 3-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P