60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Study of Childcare in Public Housing; OMB Control No.: 2528-XXX, 15061-15063 [2023-04950]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2023 / Notices
transition plan to HUD. It is the PHA’s
responsibility to be able to end all MTW
activities that it has implemented
through its MTW Supplement to the
PHA Plan upon expiration of this MTW
ACC Amendment. The transition plan
shall describe plans for phasing out
such activities. The plan may also
include any proposals of authorizations/
features of the ACC Amendment and the
MTW Operations Notice that the PHA
wishes to continue beyond the
expiration of the MTW ACC
Amendment. The PHA shall specify the
proposed duration and shall provide
justification for extension of such
authorization/features. HUD will review
and respond to timely-submitted
transition plans from the PHA in writing
within 75-days or they are deemed
approved. Only authorizations/features
specifically approved for extension shall
continue beyond the term of the MTW
ACC Amendment. The extended
features shall remain in effect only for
the duration and in the manner
specified in the approved transition
plan and be subject to any necessary
ACC Amendments as required by HUD.
Section 7. Termination and Default.
(A) If the PHA violates or fails to
comply with any requirement or
provision of the ACC, including this
amendment, HUD is authorized to take
any corrective or remedial action
described in this Section 7 for PHA
default or any other right or remedy
existing under applicable law, or
available at equity. HUD will give the
PHA written notice of any default,
which shall identify with specificity the
measures, which the PHA must take to
cure the default and provide a specific
time frame for the PHA to cure the
default, taking into consideration the
nature of the default. The PHA will have
the opportunity to cure such default
within the specified period after the
date of said notice, or to demonstrate
within 10 days after the date of said
notice, by submitting substantial
evidence satisfactory to HUD, that it is
not in default. However, in cases
involving clear and apparent fraud,
serious criminal behavior, or emergency
conditions that pose an imminent threat
to life, health, or safety, if HUD, in its
sole discretion, determines that
immediate action is necessary it may
institute the remedies under Section
7(B) of this MTW ACC Amendment
without giving the PHA the opportunity
to cure.
(B) If the PHA is in default of this
MTW ACC Amendment and/or the
MTW Operations Notice and the default
transition plan will be due one year prior to the end
of the extension(s).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Mar 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
has not been cured, HUD may,
undertake any one or all remedies
available by law, including but not
limited to the following:
i. Require additional reporting by the
PHA on the deficient areas and the steps
being taken to address the deficiencies;
ii. Require the PHA to prepare and
follow a HUD-approved schedule of
actions and/or a management plan for
properly completing the activities
approved under this MTW ACC
Amendment;
iii. Suspend the MTW waiver
authorization for the affected activities;
iv. Require reimbursement by the
PHA to HUD for amounts used in
violation of this MTW ACC
Amendment;
v. Terminate this MTW ACC
Amendment and require the PHA to
transition out of MTW;
vi. Restrict a PHA’s ability to use its
MTW funding flexibly; and/or
vii. Take any other corrective or
remedial action legally available.
(C) The PHA may choose to terminate
this MTW ACC Amendment at any time.
Upon HUD’s receipt of written
notification from the PHA and a copy of
a resolution approving termination from
its governing board, termination will be
effective. The PHA will then begin to
transition out of MTW and will work
with HUD to establish an orderly phaseout of MTW activities, consistent with
Section 6 of this MTW ACC
Amendment.
(D) Nothing contained in this ACC
Amendment shall prohibit or limit HUD
from the exercise of any other right or
remedy existing under any ACC or
available under applicable law. HUD’s
exercise or non-exercise of any right or
remedy under this amendment shall not
be construed as a waiver of HUD’s right
to exercise that or any other right or
remedy at any time.
Section 8. Notwithstanding any
provision set forth in this MTW ACC
Amendment, any future law that
conflicts with any provision of this ACC
Amendment, as determined by HUD,
shall not be deemed to be a breach of
this ACC Amendment. Nor shall HUD’s
execution of any future law be deemed
a breach of this ACC Amendment. Any
future laws affecting the PHA’s funding,
even if that future law causes a decrease
in the PHA’s funding, shall not be
deemed a breach of this ACC
Amendment. No future law or HUD’s
execution thereof shall serve as a basis
for a breach of contract claim in any
court.
Section 9. If any clause, or portion of
a clause, in this Agreement is
considered invalid under the rule of
law, it shall be regarded as stricken
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15061
while the remainder of this Agreement
shall continue to be in full effect.
In consideration of the foregoing
covenants, the parties do hereby execute
this MTW ACC Amendment:
PHA
lllllllllllllllllll
By: llllllllllllllll
Its: lllllllllllllllll
Date: llllllllllllllll
United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development
lllllllllllllllllll
By: llllllllllllllll
Its: lllllllllllllllll
Date: llllllllllllllll
[FR Doc. 2023–04954 Filed 3–9–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7075–N–01]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Study of Childcare in
Public Housing; OMB Control No.:
2528–XXX
Office of Policy Development
and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments Due Date: May 9,
2023.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection can be sent
within 60 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov or www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 60-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Interested persons are
also invited to submit comments
regarding this proposal by name and/or
OMB Control Number and can be sent
to: Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
15062
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–5535
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
Guido at Anna.Guido@hud.gov,
telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a
toll-free number. HUD welcomes and is
prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, as well as individuals with
speech or communication disabilities.
To learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Study
of Childcare in Public Housing Data
Collection.
OMB Approval Number: 2528–New.
Type of Request (i.e., new, revision or
extension of currently approved
collection): New Collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
purpose of this proposed information
collection is to interview key
stakeholders and HUD assisted families
to support the Study of Childcare in
Public Housing. This is a multi-site
study including six Public Housing
Authorities (PHAs) in three states.
Individual interviews will be
conducted with key stakeholders and
PHA residents in each of the six sites.1
These interviews are key to our
understanding of the Early Care and
Education (ECE) needs, preferences, and
use of families in PHA-owned housing.
Furthermore, these interviews will help
us better understand the barriers and
facilitators to operating co-located PHA
and ECE programs.
Stakeholder interviews: Within each
site, a key set of stakeholders will be
identified through the landscape scan.
Key stakeholders will include those
involved in the operations of either a
1 Interviews with state-level stakeholders will
primarily be conducted virtually. Interviews with
site-level stakeholders and families will primarily
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Mar 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
PHA, an ECE program, or a co-located
ECE program in PHA housing in a given
community. Within each site, we
anticipate conducting up to 16
stakeholder interviews with a mix of
virtual or in-person interviews,
depending on the preferences of the
stakeholders and local public health
guidelines.2 Potential stakeholders may
include: PHA directors, PHA resident
advisory board members, PHA
supportive service staff, Head Start
grantee directors, Pre-K directors, child
care resource and referral centers, state
child care subsidy office directors, and
state Head Start Collaboration Office
directors.
We anticipate conducting semistructured interviews with key
stakeholders. Interview questions will
address, but not be limited to, the
following topics: (1) Whether there is a
co-located ECE; (2) If there is a colocated ECE, processes for licensure and
quality rating assessments (if
applicable); (3) Facilitators and
challenges with operating co-located
ECE (as applicable); (4) How local ECE
policies effect the colocation of ECE and
PHAs; (5) How PHAs support families
in accessing ECE; (6) Proximity of ECE
programs to PHA (e.g., whether the
program is in a child care desert or
location with many options available);
and (7) Characteristics of local ECE
programs (e.g., cost, capacity, licensure
status, ages served, home- or centerbased, and hours of operation).
PHA resident interviews: In-depth
interviews are critical to understanding
sensitive topics that people might be
reluctant to discuss in a group. Given
our previous experience with qualitative
data collection in various housing
programs and contexts, we anticipate
that individual interviews will allow us
to better understand the specific needs
and experiences of families. We plan to
work closely with resident advisory
boards and key stakeholders in each site
to identify the best process for recruiting
families to participate in the study.
Recruitment strategies will be
responsive to local contexts and
sensitive to families’ preferences. We
anticipate recruiting families with
diverse needs and experiences,
including variation in child age,
employment status, and childcare
arrangements. We will work with the
resident advisory board, as applicable,
to vet interview questions prior to data
collection.
We anticipate conducting semistructured interviews with residents.
Interview questions will address, but
not be limited to, the following topics:
(1) ECE needs, preferences, and use; (2)
What families look for in terms of the
quality of care; (3) Facilitators and
barriers to accessing ECE (e.g., cost,
location, etc.), (4) Interest and use of colocated ECE programs; and (5) Support
received from PHAs in accessing ECE.
This Federal Register Notice provides
an opportunity to comment on the data
collection instruments and associated
materials to be administered to the
participants in the Study of Childcare in
Public Housing.
Hourly Cost per Response: Key
stakeholders include: PHA directors,
PHA resident advisory board members,
PHA supportive service staff, Head Start
grantee directors, Pre-K directors,
childcare resource and referral centers,
state child care subsidy office directors,
and state Head Start Collaboration
Office directors. Mean Hourly Wage
rates are estimated using
approximations from the U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS): 3
• Education/Child Care
Administrators—$47.73
• Education/Child Care Administrators
(Pre School)—$25.87
• Child, Family, School Social
Workers—$26.39
• Mean = (47.73 + 25.87 + 26.39)/3 =
$33.33
• Loaded Mean (+30%) = $43.33
Respondents (i.e., affected public):
Public Housing residents and key
stakeholders who may include: PHA
directors, PHA resident advisory board
members, PHA supportive service staff,
Head Start grantee directors, Pre-K
directors, child care resource and
referral centers, state child care subsidy
office directors, and state Head Start
Collaboration Office directors. All
respondents shall be adults.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 96
key stakeholder respondents (16 per
PHA * 6 PHAs) and 108 PHA resident
respondents (18 per PHA * 6 PHAs).
Frequency of Response: Once.
Average Hours per Response:
Completion the 96 Key Stakeholder
Interviews is expected to take on
average 50 minutes or 0.83 hours, with
the consent form taking an additional 10
minutes or .17 hours per respondent.
Completion of the 108 PHA Resident
Interviews is expected to take on
average 50 minutes or 0.83 hours, with
be held in person, depending on public health
guidelines at the time of data collection.
2 We anticipate one to two interviews per
stakeholder group.
3 BLS table with wages: https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes_nat.htm#top.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
15063
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2023 / Notices
the consent form taking an additional 10
minutes or .17 hours per respondent.
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 204
hours.
ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
response
Responses
per annum
Burden hour
per response
Annual
burden hours
Hourly cost
per response
Cost
Adult Head of Household
Key Stakeholders Interviews .........................
Key Stakeholders Consent Form .................
PHA Residents Interviews .........................
PHA Resident Consent
Form .........................
Total ......................
96
1
1
0.83
80
$43.33
$3,466.40
96
1
1
.17
16
43.33
693.28
108
1
1
0.83
90
10.62
955.80
108
1
1
.17
18
10.62
191.16
........................
........................
........................
........................
204
........................
5,306.64
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected, and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Fish and Wildlife Service
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Todd M. Richardson,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy
Development and Research.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
[FR Doc. 2023–04950 Filed 3–9–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Mar 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–NCTC–2023–0007;
FXGO16610900600–234–FF09X35000; OMB
Control Number 1018–0176]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Native Youth Climate
Adaptation Leadership Congress
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), are proposing to renew an
information collection with revisions.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before May 9,
2023.
SUMMARY:
Send your comments on the
information collection request (ICR) by
one of the following methods (please
reference 1018–0176 in the subject line
of your comments):
• Internet (preferred): https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS–HQ–NCTC–2023–
0007.
• Email: Info_Coll@fws.gov.
• U.S. mail: Service Information
Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, MS: PRB (JAO/3W), Falls Church,
VA 22041–3803.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madonna L. Baucum, Service
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, by email at Info_Coll@fws.gov,
or by telephone at (703) 358–2503.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations
at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information
collections require approval under the
PRA. We may not conduct or sponsor
and you are not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
As part of our continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burdens, we invite the public and other
Federal agencies to comment on new,
proposed, revised, and continuing
collections of information. This helps us
assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand our
information collection requirements and
provide the requested data in the
desired format.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following:
(1) Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether or not the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15061-15063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7075-N-01]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Study of
Childcare in Public Housing; OMB Control No.: 2528-XXX
AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: May 9, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection can be sent within 60 days of publication of
this notice to [email protected] or www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 60-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments regarding this proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and
can be sent to: Anna Guido, Reports Management Officer, REE, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 8210,
Washington, DC
[[Page 15062]]
20410-5000; telephone 202-402-5535 (this is not a toll-free number) or
email at [email protected] for a copy of the proposed forms or other
available information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna Guido at
[email protected], telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free
number. HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals
who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or
communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs. Copies of available
documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Study of Childcare in Public
Housing Data Collection.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request (i.e., new, revision or extension of currently
approved collection): New Collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The
purpose of this proposed information collection is to interview key
stakeholders and HUD assisted families to support the Study of
Childcare in Public Housing. This is a multi-site study including six
Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) in three states.
Individual interviews will be conducted with key stakeholders and
PHA residents in each of the six sites.\1\ These interviews are key to
our understanding of the Early Care and Education (ECE) needs,
preferences, and use of families in PHA-owned housing. Furthermore,
these interviews will help us better understand the barriers and
facilitators to operating co-located PHA and ECE programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Interviews with state-level stakeholders will primarily be
conducted virtually. Interviews with site-level stakeholders and
families will primarily be held in person, depending on public
health guidelines at the time of data collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stakeholder interviews: Within each site, a key set of stakeholders
will be identified through the landscape scan. Key stakeholders will
include those involved in the operations of either a PHA, an ECE
program, or a co-located ECE program in PHA housing in a given
community. Within each site, we anticipate conducting up to 16
stakeholder interviews with a mix of virtual or in-person interviews,
depending on the preferences of the stakeholders and local public
health guidelines.\2\ Potential stakeholders may include: PHA
directors, PHA resident advisory board members, PHA supportive service
staff, Head Start grantee directors, Pre-K directors, child care
resource and referral centers, state child care subsidy office
directors, and state Head Start Collaboration Office directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ We anticipate one to two interviews per stakeholder group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We anticipate conducting semi-structured interviews with key
stakeholders. Interview questions will address, but not be limited to,
the following topics: (1) Whether there is a co-located ECE; (2) If
there is a co-located ECE, processes for licensure and quality rating
assessments (if applicable); (3) Facilitators and challenges with
operating co-located ECE (as applicable); (4) How local ECE policies
effect the colocation of ECE and PHAs; (5) How PHAs support families in
accessing ECE; (6) Proximity of ECE programs to PHA (e.g., whether the
program is in a child care desert or location with many options
available); and (7) Characteristics of local ECE programs (e.g., cost,
capacity, licensure status, ages served, home- or center-based, and
hours of operation).
PHA resident interviews: In-depth interviews are critical to
understanding sensitive topics that people might be reluctant to
discuss in a group. Given our previous experience with qualitative data
collection in various housing programs and contexts, we anticipate that
individual interviews will allow us to better understand the specific
needs and experiences of families. We plan to work closely with
resident advisory boards and key stakeholders in each site to identify
the best process for recruiting families to participate in the study.
Recruitment strategies will be responsive to local contexts and
sensitive to families' preferences. We anticipate recruiting families
with diverse needs and experiences, including variation in child age,
employment status, and childcare arrangements. We will work with the
resident advisory board, as applicable, to vet interview questions
prior to data collection.
We anticipate conducting semi-structured interviews with residents.
Interview questions will address, but not be limited to, the following
topics: (1) ECE needs, preferences, and use; (2) What families look for
in terms of the quality of care; (3) Facilitators and barriers to
accessing ECE (e.g., cost, location, etc.), (4) Interest and use of co-
located ECE programs; and (5) Support received from PHAs in accessing
ECE.
This Federal Register Notice provides an opportunity to comment on
the data collection instruments and associated materials to be
administered to the participants in the Study of Childcare in Public
Housing.
Hourly Cost per Response: Key stakeholders include: PHA directors,
PHA resident advisory board members, PHA supportive service staff, Head
Start grantee directors, Pre-K directors, childcare resource and
referral centers, state child care subsidy office directors, and state
Head Start Collaboration Office directors. Mean Hourly Wage rates are
estimated using approximations from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS): \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ BLS table with wages: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#top.
Education/Child Care Administrators--$47.73
Education/Child Care Administrators (Pre School)--$25.87
Child, Family, School Social Workers--$26.39
Mean = (47.73 + 25.87 + 26.39)/3 = $33.33
Loaded Mean (+30%) = $43.33
Respondents (i.e., affected public): Public Housing residents and
key stakeholders who may include: PHA directors, PHA resident advisory
board members, PHA supportive service staff, Head Start grantee
directors, Pre-K directors, child care resource and referral centers,
state child care subsidy office directors, and state Head Start
Collaboration Office directors. All respondents shall be adults.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 96 key stakeholder respondents (16
per PHA * 6 PHAs) and 108 PHA resident respondents (18 per PHA * 6
PHAs).
Frequency of Response: Once.
Average Hours per Response: Completion the 96 Key Stakeholder
Interviews is expected to take on average 50 minutes or 0.83 hours,
with the consent form taking an additional 10 minutes or .17 hours per
respondent. Completion of the 108 PHA Resident Interviews is expected
to take on average 50 minutes or 0.83 hours, with
[[Page 15063]]
the consent form taking an additional 10 minutes or .17 hours per
respondent.
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 204 hours.
Annualized Burden Table
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Responses per Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost
Information collection respondents response annum per response hours per response Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adult Head of Household
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key Stakeholders Interviews............. 96 1 1 0.83 80 $43.33 $3,466.40
Key Stakeholders Consent Form........... 96 1 1 .17 16 43.33 693.28
PHA Residents Interviews................ 108 1 1 0.83 90 10.62 955.80
PHA Resident Consent Form............... 108 1 1 .17 18 10.62 191.16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 204 .............. 5,306.64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Todd M. Richardson,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. 2023-04950 Filed 3-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
