Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 13713-13715 [2023-04392]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph (b).
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a) through (i) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitation or revocation of certain
notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
§ 721.11715
Nonane, branched.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
nonane, branched (PMN P–21–125; CAS
No. 85408–10–2) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant
new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(1) and (3) through (5),
(a)(6)(v) and (vi), (b), and (c). When
determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as
required for § 721.63(a)(1) and (4),
engineering control measures (e.g.,
enclosure or confinement of the
operation, general and local ventilation)
or administrative control measures (e.g.,
workplace policies and procedures)
shall be considered and implemented to
prevent exposure, where feasible. For
purposes of § 721.63(a)(5), respirators
must provide a National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) assigned protection factor
(APF) of at least 50. For purposes of
§ 721.63(b), the concentration is set at
1.0%.
(A) As an alternative to the respirator
requirements in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section, a manufacturer or processor
may choose to follow the new chemical
exposure limit (NCEL) provision listed
in the TSCA Order for this substance.
The NCEL is 0.72 mg/m3 as an 8-hour
time weighted average. Persons who
wish to pursue NCELs as an alternative
to § 721.63 respirator requirements may
request to do so under § 721.30 Persons
whose § 721.30 requests to use the
NCELs approach are approved by EPA
will be required to follow NCELs
provisions comparable to those
contained in the corresponding TSCA
Order.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Hazard communication.
Requirements as specified in § 721.72(a)
through (f), and (g)(1), (3), and (5). For
purposes of § 721.72(e), the
concentration is set at 1.0%. For
purposes of § 721.72(g)(1), this
substance may cause: skin irritation; eye
irritation; reproductive toxicity; specific
target organ toxicity; aspiration hazard.
For purposes of § 721.72(g)(3), this
substance may be: toxic to aquatic life.
Alternative hazard and warning
statements that meet the criteria of the
Globally Harmonized System and OSHA
Hazard Communication Standard may
be used.
(iii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(k).
(iv) Release to water. Requirements as
specified in § 721.90(a)(1), (b)(1), and
(c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph (b).
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a) through (i) and (k) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitation or revocation of certain
notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
[FR Doc. 2023–04157 Filed 3–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
13713
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
architectural coating operations. We are
approving a local rule to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act). Approval of the
local rule as part of the California SIP
makes it federally enforceable.
DATES:
This rule is effective on April 5,
2023.
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0837. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0837; FRL–10294–
02–09]
Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
(VCAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
SUMMARY:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3204 or by
email at lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 15, 2022 (87 FR 68410),
the EPA proposed to approve the
following revised rule into the
California SIP.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule No.
VCAPCD ...........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Rule title
74.2
16:15 Mar 03, 2023
Revised
Architectural Coatings ..................................................................................
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
11/10/2020
Submitted
7/26/2021
13714
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
We proposed to approve this revised
rule because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA
requirements. More specifically, we
evaluated the revised rule and
determined that it remains enforceable,
that it implements reasonably available
control measure (RACM)-level controls,
and that it would not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment or reasonable further
progress (RFP) or any other requirement
of the CAA. Our November 15, 2022
proposed rule contains more
information on the rules and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
Pursuant to section 110(k)(3) of the
CAA, and for the reasons provided in
our November 15, 2022 proposed rule
and summarized above, the EPA is fully
approving the amended VCAPCD
architectural coatings rule into the
California SIP. Upon the effective date
of this final rule, the November 10, 2020
version of VCAPCD Rule 74.2 will
replace the previously approved version
of the rule in the California SIP.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of VCAPCD
Rule 74.2, ‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’
revised on November 10, 2020, which
regulates VOC emissions from
architectural coating operations. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve State choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Mar 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal. There is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goals of Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994)
of achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and indigenous peoples.
Lastly, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 5, 2023.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 23, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(381)(i)(C)(3) and
(c)(569)(i)(A)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Previously approved on July 6,
2011, in paragraph (c)(381)(i)(C)(2) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
13715
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(c)(569)(i)(A)(3) of this section, Rule
74.2, ‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’
amended on January 12, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
(569) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 74.2, ‘‘Architectural
Coatings,’’ revised on November 10,
2020.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–04392 Filed 3–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 22–420; RM–11937; DA 23–
146; FR ID 129129]
Television Broadcasting Services
Yuma, Arizona
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On December 12, 2022, the
Media Bureau, Video Division (Bureau)
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) in response to a petition for
rulemaking filed by Gray Television
Licensee, LLC (Petitioner or Gray),
which holds a construction permit for
channel 11 at Yuma, Arizona as the
winning bidder in Auction 112. Gray
requests the substitution of channel 27
for channel 11 at Yuma in the Table of
TV Allotments. For the reasons set forth
in the Report and Order referenced
below, the Bureau amends FCC
regulations to substitute channel 27 for
channel 11 at Yuma.
DATES: Effective March 6, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202)
418–1647 or Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed rule was published at 87 FR
76434 on December 13, 2022. The
Petitioner filed comments in support of
the petition reaffirming its commitment
to apply for channel 27. No other
comments were filed.
The Bureau believes the public
interest would be served by substituting
channel 27 for channel 11 at Yuma,
Arizona since grant of the proposed
channel substitution will provide a
robust signal for over-the-air reception
while avoiding the well-documented
indoor reception issues with digital
VHF stations which the Commission has
recognized. The proposal complies with
all relevant technical requirements for
amendment of the Table of TV
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Mar 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
Allotments, including the interference
protection requirements of section
73.616 of the Commission’s rules, and
the petition further demonstrates that
the proposed channel 27 facility will
provide full principal community
coverage to Yuma, Arizona.
Additionally, no change in transmitting
location is proposed from that specified
in the current construction permit.
This is a synopsis of the
Commission’s Report and Order, MB
Docket No. 22–420; RM–11937; DA 23–
146, adopted February 23, 2023, and
released February 24, 2023. The full text
of this document is available for
download at https://www.fcc.gov/edocs.
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty).
This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, do not apply to this proceeding.
The Commission will send a copy of
this Report and Order in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff Media Bureau.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as
follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303,
307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339.
2. In § 73.622(j), amend the Table of
TV Allotments, under Arizona, by
revising the entry for Yuma to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 73.622 Digital television table of
allotments.
*
*
*
(j) * * *
*
*
Community
*
*
Channel No.
*
*
*
ARIZONA
*
*
*
Yuma .....................................
*
*
*
13, 27
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–04387 Filed 3–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
47 CFR Part 300
[Docket Number 221130–0254]
RIN 0660–AA38
Manual of Regulations and Procedures
for Federal Radio Frequency
Management
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration (NTIA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) is making
certain changes to its regulations
relating to the public availability of the
Manual of Regulations and Procedures
for Federal Radio Frequency
Management (NTIA Manual). NTIA has
the authority, delegated by the
president, to assign frequencies to radio
stations or classes of radio stations
belonging to and operated by the United
States. NTIA’s manual reflects this
authority and provides for the
coordination of Executive branch
agencies’ spectrum management and
coordination. Specifically, NTIA is
releasing a new edition of the NTIA
Manual, with which Federal agencies
must comply when requesting use of
radio frequency spectrum.
DATES: Effective: March 6, 2023. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of March 6, 2023.
ADDRESSES: A reference copy of the
NTIA Manual, including all revisions in
effect, is available in the Office of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13713-13715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0837; FRL-10294-02-09]
Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from architectural coating operations. We are
approving a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). Approval of the local rule as part of
the California SIP makes it federally enforceable.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 5, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0837. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3204 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 15, 2022 (87 FR 68410), the EPA proposed to approve the
following revised rule into the California SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD............................ 74.2 Architectural Coatings...... 11/10/2020 7/26/2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13714]]
We proposed to approve this revised rule because we determined that
it complies with the relevant CAA requirements. More specifically, we
evaluated the revised rule and determined that it remains enforceable,
that it implements reasonably available control measure (RACM)-level
controls, and that it would not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress (RFP)
or any other requirement of the CAA. Our November 15, 2022 proposed
rule contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
Pursuant to section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, and for the reasons
provided in our November 15, 2022 proposed rule and summarized above,
the EPA is fully approving the amended VCAPCD architectural coatings
rule into the California SIP. Upon the effective date of this final
rule, the November 10, 2020 version of VCAPCD Rule 74.2 will replace
the previously approved version of the rule in the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of VCAPCD
Rule 74.2, ``Architectural Coatings,'' revised on November 10, 2020,
which regulates VOC emissions from architectural coating operations.
The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the State did not evaluate environmental justice
considerations as part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in
the record inconsistent with the stated goals of Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) of achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income populations, and indigenous peoples.
Lastly, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 23, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(381)(i)(C)(3) and
(c)(569)(i)(A)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Previously approved on July 6, 2011, in paragraph
(c)(381)(i)(C)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph
[[Page 13715]]
(c)(569)(i)(A)(3) of this section, Rule 74.2, ``Architectural
Coatings,'' amended on January 12, 2010.
* * * * *
(569) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 74.2, ``Architectural Coatings,'' revised on November 10,
2020.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-04392 Filed 3-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P