Notice of EB-5 Regional Center Integrity Fund Fee, 13141-13145 [2023-04295]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 2023 / Notices
Notice is
hereby given that, in a letter dated
January 9, 2023, the President issued an
emergency declaration under the
authority of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121–5207
(the Stafford Act), as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I have determined that the emergency
conditions in certain areas of the State of
California resulting from severe winter
storms, flooding, and mudslides beginning
on January 8, 2023, and continuing, are of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant
an emergency declaration under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (‘‘the
Stafford Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such
an emergency exists in the State of California.
You are authorized to provide appropriate
assistance for required emergency measures,
authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act,
to save lives and to protect property and
public health and safety, and to lessen or
avert the threat of a catastrophe in the
designated areas. Specifically, you are
authorized to provide assistance for
emergency protective measures (Category B),
limited to direct Federal assistance, under
the Public Assistance program.
Consistent with the requirement that
Federal assistance be supplemental, any
Federal funds provided under the Stafford
Act for Public Assistance will be limited to
75 percent of the total eligible costs. In order
to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available
for these purposes such amounts as you find
necessary for Federal emergency assistance
and administrative expenses.
Further, you are authorized to make
changes to this declaration for the approved
assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, Department of Homeland
Security, under Executive Order 12148,
as amended, Andrew F. Grant, of FEMA
is appointed to act as the Federal
Coordinating Officer for this declared
emergency.
The following areas of the State of
California have been designated as
adversely affected by this declared
emergency:
El Dorado, Los Angeles, Mariposa,
Mendocino, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Placer,
Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San
Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma,
Stanislaus, and Ventura Counties for
emergency protective measures (Category B),
limited to direct federal assistance, under the
Public Assistance program.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Mar 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
13141
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
number above via TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–877–889–5627 (TTY/TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
A. EB–5 Reform and Integrity Act of
2022
On March 15, 2022, the President
signed into law the EB–5 Reform and
Integrity Act of 2022 (the 2022 Act), Div.
BB of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2022, Public Law 117–103. Among
other things, the 2022 Act immediately
repealed the former authorizing
statutory provisions under the
Departments of Commerce, Justice, and
State, the Judiciary, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act 1993,
Public Law 102–395, 106 Stat. 1828,
§ 610, and added new authorizing
provisions to the Immigration and
Nationality Act, substantially reforming
the Regional Center Program effective
May 14, 2022. The reformed Regional
Center Program is authorized through
September 30, 2027.
The Regional Center Program makes
visas available to qualified immigrants
(and the eligible spouses and children of
such immigrants) who pool their
investments with other qualified
immigrants in a ‘‘regional center’’ in the
United States. See INA section
203(b)(5)(E), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(E).
USCIS designates regional centers based
on a proposal for the promotion of
economic growth, including prospective
job creation and increased domestic
capital investment in their requested
geographic region. Id.
[FR Doc. 2023–04287 Filed 3–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[CIS No. 2725–22; DHS Docket No. USCIS–
2023–0001]
RIN 1615–ZB97
Notice of EB–5 Regional Center
Integrity Fund Fee
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of integrity fund fee.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) is
announcing a fee to be collected by
USCIS. The EB–5 Reform and Integrity
Act of 2022 (the 2022 Act) requires
USCIS to establish a special fund to be
known as the EB–5 Integrity Fund to be
primarily used by USCIS in the
administration of the Regional Center
Program. USCIS must collect a fee of
$20,000 or $10,000, depending on
certain factors established by the 2022
Act, to finance the EB–5 Integrity Fund
from each designated regional center.
This notice explains how regional
centers should determine the amount of
the fee and provides the process for how
it is to be paid.
DATES: The first fee payment of the fees
announced in this notice must be paid
beginning on March 2, 2023 and before
April 3, 2023. For fiscal year 2024 and
each year thereafter, the fees must be
paid between October 1st and October
31st of the same year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles L. Nimick, Chief, Business and
Foreign Workers Division, Office of
Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department
of Homeland Security, 5900 Capital
Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD
20588–0009, telephone (240) 721–3000
(this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with hearing or speech
impairments may access the telephone
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Table of Abbreviations
DHS—Department of Homeland Security
INA—Immigration and Nationality Act
USCIS—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
I. Background and Authority
B. EB–5 Integrity Fund
The 2022 Act establishes a special
fund to be known as the EB–5 Integrity
Fund (the Fund). INA section
203(b)(5)(J), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J). The
fund is to be used by DHS for the
following:
(1) Conducting investigations based
outside of the United States, including
monitoring and investigating programrelated events and promotional
activities and ensuring that an alien
investor’s funds associated with the
alien’s investment were obtained from a
lawful source and through lawful
means;
(2) Detecting and investigating fraud
or other crimes;
(3) Determining whether regional
centers, new commercial enterprises,
job-creating entities, and alien investors
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
13142
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 2023 / Notices
(and their alien spouses and alien
children) comply with U.S. immigration
laws;
(4) Conducting audits and site visits;
and
(5) For other purposes as the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) determines necessary.
INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(iii), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J)(iii).
II. Integrity Fund Fee
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
A. Annual Fee.
The 2022 Act requires the Fund to be
financed through the collection of an
annual fee paid by and collected from
designated regional centers (Integrity
Fund Fee).1 INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii),
8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii). USCIS
recognizes that the 2022 Act required it
to collect the first fee by October 1, 2022
and impose penalties for fees not paid
by October 31, 2022. USCIS is working
to implement the statutory mandates as
soon as practicable. While that work is
ongoing, and in an effort to implement
the plain terms of the 2022 Act as
quickly as possible, USCIS will begin
collecting the fee for fiscal year 2023,
which under the 2022 Act would have
been due on October 1, 2022, on March
2, 2023. USCIS will accept payment of
the fee, as required by the statute, for 30
days. For fiscal year 2024 and each year
thereafter, such fees are required to be
paid between October 1st and October
31st of the same year. Id.
Section 102 of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 and section 103 of the INA,
8 U.S.C. 1103, generally charge DHS
with the administration and
enforcement of the immigration and
naturalization laws of the United
States.2 The INA further authorizes DHS
to ‘‘establish such regulations; prescribe
such forms of bond, reports, entries, and
other papers; issue such instructions;
and perform such other acts as he deems
necessary for carrying out his authority
under the provisions of’’ the INA.3 In
the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
Congress also provided that DHS ‘‘shall
be responsible for . . . [e]stablishing
national immigration enforcement
policies and priorities.’’ 4 The Homeland
1 Beginning on October 1, 2022 and in accordance
with Form I–526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional
Center Investor, filing instructions on the USCIS
website, USCIS began collecting a $1,000 Integrity
Fund Fee with each new immigrant investor
petition filed by a regional center investor for the
Fund. INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(II), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(II).
2 Public Law 107–296, sec. 102(a)(3), 116 Stat.
2135, 2143 (codified at 6 U.S.C. 112(a)(3)); Public
Law 82–414, 66 Stat. 163 (as amended); INA sec.
103(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1).
3 INA sec. 103(a)(3), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(3).
4 Public Law 107–296, sec. 402(5), 116 Stat. 2135,
2178 (codified at 6 U.S.C. 202(5)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Mar 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
Security Act also provides that DHS, in
carrying out its authorities, must
‘‘ensure that the overall economic
security of the United States is not
diminished by efforts, activities, and
programs aimed at securing the
homeland.’’ 5
DHS is directed to set national
immigration enforcement policies and
priorities, and as such, is ultimately
accountable for appropriately using the
resources available to the Department as
a whole and for taking a comprehensive
view of the enforcement landscape.
The 2022 Act sets the standard annual
fee at $20,000 for each designated
regional center. However, for those with
‘‘20 or fewer total investors in its new
commercial enterprises’’ during the
preceding fiscal year (October 1–
September 30), the annual fee is
reduced to $10,000. Id.
At this time, given the statutory
mandate to collect the fees beginning on
October 1, 2022, and limited agency
resources, USCIS is utilizing its
discretion to set an enforcement policy
for how it will evaluate whether a
regional center has appropriately
counted the number of its total investors
and thus paid the correct fee. As a
general matter, USCIS adjudicators will
evaluate on a case-by-case basis how
many investors a regional center has in
any given fiscal year. However,
adjudicators will engage in that case-bycase analysis with the understanding
that, generally speaking, the number of
investors for purpose of calculating the
fee to be paid will be the total number
of EB–5 investors who have invested (or
are actively in the process of investing)
in all of the regional center’s new
commercial enterprises in the respective
fiscal year. This policy is drawn as
closely to the plain statutory language as
possible and is in line with the general
understanding of the term ‘‘investors’’
by EB–5 stakeholders.
Although ‘‘investor’’ is not
specifically defined for purposes of INA
section 203(b)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5), it
is used extensively throughout that
section to refer to noncitizens seeking
classification, or classified, under INA
section 203(b)(5) 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5) (i.e.
I–526 and I–526E petitioners). For
purposes of INA section 216A, ‘‘alien
investor’’ is defined as ‘‘an alien who
obtains the status of an alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence
(whether on a conditional basis or
otherwise)’’ under INA section
203(b)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5). See INA
216A(f)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1186b(f)(1).
USCIS recognizes that there is no
legal requirement that an investor
56
PO 00000
U.S.C. 111(b)(1)(F).
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
remain invested in an NCE within a
specific time period after they file their
Form I–829, Petition by Investor to
Remove Conditions on Permanent
Resident Status, and thus has
determined that the filing of the Form
I–829 generally would be an appropriate
demarcation for purposes of
determining the number of ‘‘total
investors in the preceding fiscal year.’’
Based on INA sections 203(b)(5) and
216A(f)(1), USCIS generally considers
an individual to be an investor from the
point of filing a petition for
classification (Form I–526, Immigrant
Petition by Alien Entrepreneur, or
Forms I–526E, Immigrant Petition by
Regional Center Investor) through the
point of filing a petition for removal of
conditions (Form I–829, Petition by
Investor to Remove Conditions on
Permanent Resident Status). This is also
the general understanding of the term
amongst EB–5 stakeholders.6 Thus,
subject to additional considerations
described below, USCIS intends to
estimate the approximate number of
total investors in a regional center in
any given fiscal year by subtracting the
number of Forms I–829 associated with
the regional center filed at any time on
or before September 30 of that fiscal
year (including filings from prior fiscal
years) from the total number of pending
and approved Forms I–526, Immigrant
Petition by Standalone Investor,
associated with the regional center (filed
on or before June 30, 2021) and Forms
I–526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional
Center Investor, (filed on or after June 1,
2022 (the date USCIS published the
form)) associated with the regional
center filed at any time on or before
September 30 of that same fiscal year
(including filings from prior fiscal
years). A Form I–829 that is filed
separately by a spouse or child of an
investor that obtained conditional
permanent resident status based on their
relationship to the investor and was not
included on the principal investor’s
Form I–829 may typically be excluded
from the total investor calculation. For
example, if a regional center had 30
associated Form I–526 petitions, 10
associated Form I–526E petitions and 20
associated Form I–829 petitions filed on
or before September 30, 2022, USCIS
generally would estimate that the
6 See, e.g., EB–5 Diligence, Answers to Common
EB–5 Visa Investor Questions (Apr. 26, 2021),
available at https://www.eb5diligence.com/articles/
common-eb-5-investor-questions (explaining that an
investor’s capital goes into an NCE, the ‘‘at risk’’’
requirement lasts the ‘‘duration of the immigrant
investor’s conditional residency’’, and if USCIS
denies the petition for ineligibility, ‘‘all the NCE’s
investors . . . would then have to start the
investment process all over with a new I–526 filing
and EB–5 investment.’’).
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 2023 / Notices
regional center has 20 total investors in
its new commercial enterprises for fiscal
year 2022 (FY22) for purposes of
calculating the applicable Integrity
Fund fee for fiscal year 2023 (FY23) and
would likely owe the reduced fee
amount of $10,000, subject to additional
considerations described below.
USCIS recognizes that there may be
alternative methods of calculating ‘‘total
investors’’ and has considered potential
reliance interests in arriving at this
interpretation. As this is an entirely new
statutorily created and mandated fee,
and USCIS thus has not previously
enforced this requirement, USCIS
believes that regional centers likely do
not have appreciable reliance interests
that favor a given interpretation. USCIS
emphasizes that the method of
approximating investors described
above is meant to be a general guide to
USCIS adjudicators in this calculation.
USCIS adjudicators retain discretion to
evaluate the Integrity Fund fee due and
the number of investors on a case-bycase basis, accounting for any other facts
or evidence in the record in the totality
of the circumstances, including any
evidence provided by a regional center
that believes it has greater or fewer total
investors.
USCIS considered alternative
methods of calculating when a
noncitizen generally would no longer be
deemed an ‘‘investor’’; however, those
options generally would either not
capture the entire population or involve
manual calculations that USCIS believes
would place an unreasonable burden on
the Agency’s limited resources as USCIS
works to implement the 2022 Act.
Additionally, those options might be
confusing and burdensome to the
investor or regional center populations.
For example, USCIS considered
generally counting only the Forms I–526
that were filed within two years of the
applicable period used for determining
the EB–5 Integrity Fund fee given the
expected two-year minimum timeframe
for the investment, or sustainment
period, under the 2022 Act. INA section
203(b)(5)(A)(i); 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(A)(i).
However, that would likely be
underinclusive given that many
investors are actively in the process of
investing (i.e. not yet fully invested)
when they file their Form I–526 petition
as permitted under applicable
requirements and, additionally, would
not align with the sustainment period
for those who filed prior to the 2022
Act, which runs approximately to the
point of the Form I–829 filing,
regardless of when they filed their Form
I–526 or made their investment. For
Form I–526 petitions filed after the 2022
Act, USCIS also considered generally
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Mar 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
counting only Form I–526 petitions
whose investments were still within the
two-year period of investment expected
under INA 203(b)(5)(A)(i); however,
manual verification of the time period of
investment for each regional center
investor, rather than conducting a
systems inquiry for total petition filings,
would exhaust valuable and significant
USCIS resources that the agency
believes, in the balance, are better
utilized in service of other adjudicatory
priorities. USCIS acknowledges the
practical limitations of determining how
many ‘‘total investors’’ may be in a new
commercial enterprise during any given
fiscal year to ensure that the correct fee
is paid. We believe the general method
we are announcing in this notice,
subject to case-by-case analysis, reflects
both a reasonable interpretation of the
statute and ensures that USCIS’ limited
resources are used most efficiently to
ensure compliance with the 2022 Act.
B. Fee Payment Process
Before April 3, 2023, and between
October 1 and October 31 of each
following year (FY 2024 onward), each
designated regional center must pay the
fee to USCIS online via the online form
hosted on Pay.gov at Pay.gov—EB5—
Annual Fee for Regional Center.
Payment of this fee must be made by an
authorized individual on behalf of a
regional center. Each designated
regional center must pay the fee with
either a valid credit or debit card or by
authorizing an ACH Debit transaction
where the regional center provides its
U.S. bank routing and checking account
numbers to have money debited directly
from its U.S. bank account. Please note
that the U.S. Department of Treasury
guidelines permit USCIS to accept a
maximum payment amount of $24,999
from one credit card in one day, and a
single obligation cannot be split into
multiple credit card payments over
multiple days in order to evade this
limit.7
The 2022 Act and this notice
represent the constructive notice to
designated regional centers of the
amount they owe and when it is due.
USCIS will also post information on its
website and issue a press release but
will not send an invoice to the regional
centers beyond this notice. Each
regional center is responsible for
determining their amount owed based
7 See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of
the Fiscal Service, Treasury Financial Manual,
Chapter 7000, section 7055.20, available at https://
tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1/p5/c700#:∼:
text=Federal%20entities
%20must%20limit%20their,are%20no%20
more%20than%20%2410%2C000.00 (last viewed
Oct. 12, 2022).
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13143
on the number of total investors and for
submitting the appropriate fee before
the due date. If a regional center is
required to provide evidence of
payment of this fee, USCIS will accept
proof that the fee is paid in the form of,
for example, a copy of the Pay.gov
payment confirmation email or a notice
or statement from the payer’s credit card
issuer or financial institution.
C. Late Fee
The 2022 Act requires DHS to impose
a reasonable penalty fee (to be paid to
USCIS and deposited into the Fund
when collected) on a regional center
that does not pay the annual Integrity
Fund fee within 30 days after the date
on which such fee is due. INA section
203(b)(5)(J)(iv), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J)(iv). USCIS must terminate
the designation of any regional center
that does not pay the fee within 90 days
after the date on which such fee is due.
Id.
DHS has decided, in exercising its
discretionary enforcement authority
articulated above, that USCIS will not
charge the late penalty in 2022 for the
following reasons: (1) the Fund and
Integrity Fund fee are new program
requirements; and (2) USCIS must
determine an amount that is a
‘‘reasonable’’ penalty to charge.
Therefore, DHS has decided and USCIS
is announcing that, as a matter of
discretionary enforcement policy, we
will not charge a late fee until we take
further action to set the amount of the
late fee, as well as the process for
collecting the late fee.
However, USCIS will, as authorized
by the 2022 Act, terminate the
designation of any regional center that
does not pay the full fee within 90 days
after the date on which such fee is due
(i.e., a regional center does not make
payment, or a regional center pays
$10,000 when it owes $20,000).
Termination will not be automatic and
USCIS will provide a notice of intent to
terminate and the opportunity for a
regional center to prove that the fee was
paid in the proper amount by the due
date before sending a notice of
termination. Again, USCIS recognizes
that the 2022 Act requires collection of
the fee on October 1, 2022 and
imposition of termination after 90-days.
Because this notice published after
October 1, 2022, USCIS will maintain
the statutory 90-day termination period
and will not begin taking steps to
terminate a regional center until May
31, 2023. For all subsequent years,
USCIS will take steps to terminate the
regional center if the regional center
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
13144
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 2023 / Notices
does not pay the full fee by December
31st.8
III. Regulatory Requirements.
A. Administrative Procedure Act
DHS and USCIS are taking this action
without prior notice and opportunity for
comment because this document is a
general statement of policy supported
by its discretionary enforcement
authority and an interpretive rule. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A) (notice and comment
requirements do not apply to ‘‘general
statements of policy’’ and ‘‘interpretive
rules’’).
The Homeland Security Act
authorized the Secretary with
‘‘[e]stablishing national immigration
enforcement policies and priorities.’’ 9 In
accordance with these authorities, and
in attempting to quickly effectuate as
much of the 2022 Act’s statutory
requirements as possible, DHS is
exercising its discretionary authority to
explain how it will evaluate whether a
regional center has paid the correct fee,
and will not impose a reasonable
penalty fee on a regional center that
does not pay the annual Integrity Fund
fee within 30 days until it can pursue
additional rulemaking. The Supreme
Court explained in Heckler v. Chaney,
470 U.S. 821, 831–32 (1985), that ‘‘an
agency decision not to enforce often
involves a complicated balancing of a
number of factors which are peculiarly
within its expertise . . . we note that
when an agency refuses to act it
generally does not exercise its coercive
power over an individual’s liberty or
property rights.’’ DHS has balanced the
impact to the public of imposing a
‘‘reasonable penalty,’’ the timeliness of
complying with the statutory mandates,
and the agency delays in providing
notice to regional centers regarding how
to submit the fee. Ultimately, DHS
decided that the discretionary policy of
non-enforcement presented in this
Notice was the most equitable path
forward.
Alternatively, this agency action is an
interpretive rule. Whether a rule is
legislative or interpretive turns on ‘‘the
prior existence or non-existence of legal
duties and rights.’’ Am. Mining Congr. v.
Mine Safety & Health Admin., 995 F.2d
1106, 1110 (D.C. Cir. 1993). See, e.g.,
United Tech. Corp. v. EPA, 821 F.2d
714, 719–20 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (‘‘[W]hat
distinguishes interpretative from
legislative rules is the legal base upon
which the rule rests. If the rule is based
on specific statutory provisions, and its
validity stands or falls on the
correctness of the agency’s
interpretation of those provisions, it is
an interpretative rule. If, however, the
rule is based on an agency’s power to
exercise its judgment as to how best to
implement a general statutory mandate,
the rule is likely a legislative one.’’). By
law, USCIS is required to collect the
Integrity Fund Fee on an annual basis.
See INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J)(ii). The statutory provision
that requires the $20,000 and $10,000
fees contains little ambiguity for USCIS
to resolve or explain:
(I) ANNUAL FEE.—On October 1,
2022, and each October 1 thereafter, the
Secretary of Homeland Security shall
collect for the Fund an annual fee—
(aa) except as provided in item (bb),
of $20,000 from each regional center
designated under subparagraph (E); and
(bb) of $10,000 from each such
regional center with 20 or fewer total
investors in the preceding fiscal year in
its new commercial enterprises.
INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(I), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(I). To the extent that
there is minimal ambiguity regarding
the calculation of ‘‘total investors’’
because the statute does not explicitly
include a calculation, USCIS’s
interpretation is only intended to guide
adjudicators in the performance of their
duties and not remove their discretion
in making adjudicatory decisions. This
interpretation does not create any
substantive or procedural right or
benefit that is legally enforceable,
because the fees are explicitly provided
for in statute; but rather provides notice
to the public regarding this explicit
statutory fee requirement. USCIS
imposes no additional duties or rights,
beyond what the 2022 Act has already
imposed.
Therefore, USCIS is imposing this fee
without soliciting public comment prior
because this is a general statement of
policy and an interpretive rule exempt
from notice and comment procedures. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
B. Other Regulatory Requirements
Because this action is not subject to
the notice-and-comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, a final regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required. See 5 U.S.C.
604(a). In addition, this notice is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
804(2), and thus is not subject to a 60day delay in the rule becoming effective.
This action is not subject to the written
statement requirements of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). Nor does it require prior
consultation with State, local, and tribal
government officials as specified by
Executive Orders 13132 or 13175. This
notice also does not require an
Environmental Assessment (EA) or
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
See 40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2)(ii) and 1508.4.
This action does not affect the quality of
the human environment and fits within
Categorical Exclusion number A3(d) in
Dir. 023–01 Rev. 01, Appendix A, Table
1, for rules that interpret or amend an
existing regulation without changing its
environmental effect.
This notice does not require review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866. As
previously discussed, USCIS is required
to collect the Integrity Fund Fee.
Nonetheless, for illustrative purposes
Table 1 shows the total number and
aggregate amount of Integrity Fund Fees
that USCIS estimates it will receive in
2022.
TABLE 1—2022 PROJECTED INTEGRITY FUND FEES
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Size of RC
Number
Fee in $
Total in $
>20 investors ...............................................................................................................................
<= 20 investors ............................................................................................................................
246
384
$20,000
10,000
$4,920,000
3,840,000
Total ......................................................................................................................................
630
........................
8,760,000
8 The 2022 Act provides that DHS may increase
the annual Integrity Fund fee as necessary to ensure
that the Fund is sufficient to carry out its purposes.
INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(III), 8 U.S.C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Mar 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(III). DHS may increase the amount
of the Integrity Fund fees through future regulations
if the collections are inadequate.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9 Public Law 107–296, sec. 402(5), 116 Stat. 2135,
2178 (codified at 6 U.S.C. 202(5)).
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 41 / Thursday, March 2, 2023 / Notices
Finally, this notice and the Integrity
Fund Fees are not subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501–3521 (PRA). The PRA does not
preclude the imposition of a penalty on
an entity for failing to comply with a
collection of information that is
imposed on the entity by statute as is
the case with the Integrity Fund Fees.
See 5 CFR 1320.6(e).
Ur M. Jaddou,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2023–04295 Filed 3–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[Docket No. BIA–2022–0005; 234A2100DD/
AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900; OMB
Control Number 1076–0122]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Data Elements for BureauFunded Schools
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) are
proposing to renew an information
collection with revisions.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before May 1,
2023.
SUMMARY:
To submit a comment,
please visit https://
www.regulations.gov/docket/BIA-20220005 or use the search field on https://
www.regulations.gov to find the ‘‘BIA–
2022–0005’’ docket. Please follow the
comment instructions on
Regulations.gov and reference the
applicable OMB Control Number within
your comment submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Mullen, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, by email at
comments@bia.gov or telephone at (202)
924–2650. Individuals in the United
States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may
dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to
access telecommunications relay
services. You may also view the ICR at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
Forward?SearchTarget=PRA&
textfield=1076-0122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) and 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Mar 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
information collections require approval
under the PRA. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
As part of our continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burdens, we invite the public and other
Federal agencies to comment on new,
proposed, revised, and continuing
collections of information. This helps us
assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand our
information collection requirements and
provide the requested data in the
desired format.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve the ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
OMB Control Number 1076–0122
Abstract: The Secretary of the Interior,
through the Bureau of Indian Education
(BIE), is required by the Snyder Act (25
U.S.C. 13), Indian Self-Determination
and Education Assistance Act of 1975
(25 U.S.C. 5301), Education
Amendments of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 2001),
Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13145
Elementary and Secondary School
Improvement Amendments of 1988 (20
U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), and Every Student
Succeeds Act (20 U.S.C. 6301) to
provide educational services to federally
recognized Indians and Alaska Natives.
In addition, 25 CFR 43, Maintenance
and Control of Student Records in
Bureau Schools, contain regulations
governing the maintenance, control, and
accessibility of student records.
BIE’s Student Enrollment Application
is utilized by schools operated or
funded by BIE. The information is
collected by school registrars to
determine the student’s eligibility for
enrollment in a bureau-operated school,
and if eligible, is shared with
appropriate school officials to identify
the student’s base and supplemental
educational and/or residential program
needs. The information is compiled into
a national database by the Bureau of
Indian Education to facilitate budget
requests and the allocation of
congressionally appropriated funds.
BIE’s Behavioral Health and Wellness
Program (BHWP) is focused on
providing indigenous focused,
evidence-based, and trauma-informed
behavioral health and wellness services/
resources for students and staff at all
Bureau-funded programs, departments,
and institutions including Bureau
operated schools, Tribally controlled
schools, post-secondary institutions,
and Tribal colleges and universities.
Proposed Revisions
BIE proposes a referral intake form to
facilitate virtual counseling and crisis
services. All data collected for the
BHWP will be utilized for establishing
the appropriate level of care, assessing
client safety, ensuring services are
individualized to meet the client’s
specific needs, and providing clients
with external referrals, as needed.
Title of Collection: Data Elements for
Bureau-Funded Schools.
OMB Control Number: 1076–0122.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals, Contract and Grant schools,
and Bureau-funded schools.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 49,000 per year, on
average.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 49,000 per year, on average.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: 15 to 30 minutes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 12,500 hours.
Frequency of Collection: Occasionally,
required to obtain a benefit.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13141-13145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04295]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
[CIS No. 2725-22; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2023-0001]
RIN 1615-ZB97
Notice of EB-5 Regional Center Integrity Fund Fee
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of integrity fund fee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is
announcing a fee to be collected by USCIS. The EB-5 Reform and
Integrity Act of 2022 (the 2022 Act) requires USCIS to establish a
special fund to be known as the EB-5 Integrity Fund to be primarily
used by USCIS in the administration of the Regional Center Program.
USCIS must collect a fee of $20,000 or $10,000, depending on certain
factors established by the 2022 Act, to finance the EB-5 Integrity Fund
from each designated regional center. This notice explains how regional
centers should determine the amount of the fee and provides the process
for how it is to be paid.
DATES: The first fee payment of the fees announced in this notice must
be paid beginning on March 2, 2023 and before April 3, 2023. For fiscal
year 2024 and each year thereafter, the fees must be paid between
October 1st and October 31st of the same year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles L. Nimick, Chief, Business and
Foreign Workers Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security,
5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, telephone
(240) 721-3000 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone number above via
TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-
877-889-5627 (TTY/TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Abbreviations
DHS--Department of Homeland Security
INA--Immigration and Nationality Act
USCIS--U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
I. Background and Authority
A. EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022
On March 15, 2022, the President signed into law the EB-5 Reform
and Integrity Act of 2022 (the 2022 Act), Div. BB of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law 117-103. Among other things, the
2022 Act immediately repealed the former authorizing statutory
provisions under the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the
Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act 1993, Public Law
102-395, 106 Stat. 1828, Sec. 610, and added new authorizing
provisions to the Immigration and Nationality Act, substantially
reforming the Regional Center Program effective May 14, 2022. The
reformed Regional Center Program is authorized through September 30,
2027.
The Regional Center Program makes visas available to qualified
immigrants (and the eligible spouses and children of such immigrants)
who pool their investments with other qualified immigrants in a
``regional center'' in the United States. See INA section 203(b)(5)(E),
8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(E). USCIS designates regional centers based on a
proposal for the promotion of economic growth, including prospective
job creation and increased domestic capital investment in their
requested geographic region. Id.
B. EB-5 Integrity Fund
The 2022 Act establishes a special fund to be known as the EB-5
Integrity Fund (the Fund). INA section 203(b)(5)(J), 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(J). The fund is to be used by DHS for the following:
(1) Conducting investigations based outside of the United States,
including monitoring and investigating program-related events and
promotional activities and ensuring that an alien investor's funds
associated with the alien's investment were obtained from a lawful
source and through lawful means;
(2) Detecting and investigating fraud or other crimes;
(3) Determining whether regional centers, new commercial
enterprises, job-creating entities, and alien investors
[[Page 13142]]
(and their alien spouses and alien children) comply with U.S.
immigration laws;
(4) Conducting audits and site visits; and
(5) For other purposes as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
determines necessary.
INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(iii), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(iii).
II. Integrity Fund Fee
A. Annual Fee.
The 2022 Act requires the Fund to be financed through the
collection of an annual fee paid by and collected from designated
regional centers (Integrity Fund Fee).\1\ INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii),
8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii). USCIS recognizes that the 2022 Act required
it to collect the first fee by October 1, 2022 and impose penalties for
fees not paid by October 31, 2022. USCIS is working to implement the
statutory mandates as soon as practicable. While that work is ongoing,
and in an effort to implement the plain terms of the 2022 Act as
quickly as possible, USCIS will begin collecting the fee for fiscal
year 2023, which under the 2022 Act would have been due on October 1,
2022, on March 2, 2023. USCIS will accept payment of the fee, as
required by the statute, for 30 days. For fiscal year 2024 and each
year thereafter, such fees are required to be paid between October 1st
and October 31st of the same year. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Beginning on October 1, 2022 and in accordance with Form I-
526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor, filing
instructions on the USCIS website, USCIS began collecting a $1,000
Integrity Fund Fee with each new immigrant investor petition filed
by a regional center investor for the Fund. INA section
203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(II), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and section 103 of
the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1103, generally charge DHS with the administration
and enforcement of the immigration and naturalization laws of the
United States.\2\ The INA further authorizes DHS to ``establish such
regulations; prescribe such forms of bond, reports, entries, and other
papers; issue such instructions; and perform such other acts as he
deems necessary for carrying out his authority under the provisions
of'' the INA.\3\ In the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Congress also
provided that DHS ``shall be responsible for . . . [e]stablishing
national immigration enforcement policies and priorities.'' \4\ The
Homeland Security Act also provides that DHS, in carrying out its
authorities, must ``ensure that the overall economic security of the
United States is not diminished by efforts, activities, and programs
aimed at securing the homeland.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Public Law 107-296, sec. 102(a)(3), 116 Stat. 2135, 2143
(codified at 6 U.S.C. 112(a)(3)); Public Law 82-414, 66 Stat. 163
(as amended); INA sec. 103(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1).
\3\ INA sec. 103(a)(3), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(3).
\4\ Public Law 107-296, sec. 402(5), 116 Stat. 2135, 2178
(codified at 6 U.S.C. 202(5)).
\5\ 6 U.S.C. 111(b)(1)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DHS is directed to set national immigration enforcement policies
and priorities, and as such, is ultimately accountable for
appropriately using the resources available to the Department as a
whole and for taking a comprehensive view of the enforcement landscape.
The 2022 Act sets the standard annual fee at $20,000 for each
designated regional center. However, for those with ``20 or fewer total
investors in its new commercial enterprises'' during the preceding
fiscal year (October 1-September 30), the annual fee is reduced to
$10,000. Id.
At this time, given the statutory mandate to collect the fees
beginning on October 1, 2022, and limited agency resources, USCIS is
utilizing its discretion to set an enforcement policy for how it will
evaluate whether a regional center has appropriately counted the number
of its total investors and thus paid the correct fee. As a general
matter, USCIS adjudicators will evaluate on a case-by-case basis how
many investors a regional center has in any given fiscal year. However,
adjudicators will engage in that case-by-case analysis with the
understanding that, generally speaking, the number of investors for
purpose of calculating the fee to be paid will be the total number of
EB-5 investors who have invested (or are actively in the process of
investing) in all of the regional center's new commercial enterprises
in the respective fiscal year. This policy is drawn as closely to the
plain statutory language as possible and is in line with the general
understanding of the term ``investors'' by EB-5 stakeholders.
Although ``investor'' is not specifically defined for purposes of
INA section 203(b)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5), it is used extensively
throughout that section to refer to noncitizens seeking classification,
or classified, under INA section 203(b)(5) 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5) (i.e. I-
526 and I-526E petitioners). For purposes of INA section 216A, ``alien
investor'' is defined as ``an alien who obtains the status of an alien
lawfully admitted for permanent residence (whether on a conditional
basis or otherwise)'' under INA section 203(b)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5).
See INA 216A(f)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1186b(f)(1).
USCIS recognizes that there is no legal requirement that an
investor remain invested in an NCE within a specific time period after
they file their Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions
on Permanent Resident Status, and thus has determined that the filing
of the Form I-829 generally would be an appropriate demarcation for
purposes of determining the number of ``total investors in the
preceding fiscal year.'' Based on INA sections 203(b)(5) and
216A(f)(1), USCIS generally considers an individual to be an investor
from the point of filing a petition for classification (Form I-526,
Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur, or Forms I-526E, Immigrant
Petition by Regional Center Investor) through the point of filing a
petition for removal of conditions (Form I-829, Petition by Investor to
Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status). This is also the
general understanding of the term amongst EB-5 stakeholders.\6\ Thus,
subject to additional considerations described below, USCIS intends to
estimate the approximate number of total investors in a regional center
in any given fiscal year by subtracting the number of Forms I-829
associated with the regional center filed at any time on or before
September 30 of that fiscal year (including filings from prior fiscal
years) from the total number of pending and approved Forms I-526,
Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor, associated with the regional
center (filed on or before June 30, 2021) and Forms I-526E, Immigrant
Petition by Regional Center Investor, (filed on or after June 1, 2022
(the date USCIS published the form)) associated with the regional
center filed at any time on or before September 30 of that same fiscal
year (including filings from prior fiscal years). A Form I-829 that is
filed separately by a spouse or child of an investor that obtained
conditional permanent resident status based on their relationship to
the investor and was not included on the principal investor's Form I-
829 may typically be excluded from the total investor calculation. For
example, if a regional center had 30 associated Form I-526 petitions,
10 associated Form I-526E petitions and 20 associated Form I-829
petitions filed on or before September 30, 2022, USCIS generally would
estimate that the
[[Page 13143]]
regional center has 20 total investors in its new commercial
enterprises for fiscal year 2022 (FY22) for purposes of calculating the
applicable Integrity Fund fee for fiscal year 2023 (FY23) and would
likely owe the reduced fee amount of $10,000, subject to additional
considerations described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., EB-5 Diligence, Answers to Common EB-5 Visa
Investor Questions (Apr. 26, 2021), available at https://www.eb5diligence.com/articles/common-eb-5-investor-questions
(explaining that an investor's capital goes into an NCE, the ``at
risk''' requirement lasts the ``duration of the immigrant investor's
conditional residency'', and if USCIS denies the petition for
ineligibility, ``all the NCE's investors . . . would then have to
start the investment process all over with a new I-526 filing and
EB-5 investment.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCIS recognizes that there may be alternative methods of
calculating ``total investors'' and has considered potential reliance
interests in arriving at this interpretation. As this is an entirely
new statutorily created and mandated fee, and USCIS thus has not
previously enforced this requirement, USCIS believes that regional
centers likely do not have appreciable reliance interests that favor a
given interpretation. USCIS emphasizes that the method of approximating
investors described above is meant to be a general guide to USCIS
adjudicators in this calculation. USCIS adjudicators retain discretion
to evaluate the Integrity Fund fee due and the number of investors on a
case-by-case basis, accounting for any other facts or evidence in the
record in the totality of the circumstances, including any evidence
provided by a regional center that believes it has greater or fewer
total investors.
USCIS considered alternative methods of calculating when a
noncitizen generally would no longer be deemed an ``investor'';
however, those options generally would either not capture the entire
population or involve manual calculations that USCIS believes would
place an unreasonable burden on the Agency's limited resources as USCIS
works to implement the 2022 Act. Additionally, those options might be
confusing and burdensome to the investor or regional center
populations. For example, USCIS considered generally counting only the
Forms I-526 that were filed within two years of the applicable period
used for determining the EB-5 Integrity Fund fee given the expected
two-year minimum timeframe for the investment, or sustainment period,
under the 2022 Act. INA section 203(b)(5)(A)(i); 8 U.S.C.
1153(b)(5)(A)(i). However, that would likely be underinclusive given
that many investors are actively in the process of investing (i.e. not
yet fully invested) when they file their Form I-526 petition as
permitted under applicable requirements and, additionally, would not
align with the sustainment period for those who filed prior to the 2022
Act, which runs approximately to the point of the Form I-829 filing,
regardless of when they filed their Form I-526 or made their
investment. For Form I-526 petitions filed after the 2022 Act, USCIS
also considered generally counting only Form I-526 petitions whose
investments were still within the two-year period of investment
expected under INA 203(b)(5)(A)(i); however, manual verification of the
time period of investment for each regional center investor, rather
than conducting a systems inquiry for total petition filings, would
exhaust valuable and significant USCIS resources that the agency
believes, in the balance, are better utilized in service of other
adjudicatory priorities. USCIS acknowledges the practical limitations
of determining how many ``total investors'' may be in a new commercial
enterprise during any given fiscal year to ensure that the correct fee
is paid. We believe the general method we are announcing in this
notice, subject to case-by-case analysis, reflects both a reasonable
interpretation of the statute and ensures that USCIS' limited resources
are used most efficiently to ensure compliance with the 2022 Act.
B. Fee Payment Process
Before April 3, 2023, and between October 1 and October 31 of each
following year (FY 2024 onward), each designated regional center must
pay the fee to USCIS online via the online form hosted on Pay.gov at
Pay.gov--EB5--Annual Fee for Regional Center. Payment of this fee must
be made by an authorized individual on behalf of a regional center.
Each designated regional center must pay the fee with either a valid
credit or debit card or by authorizing an ACH Debit transaction where
the regional center provides its U.S. bank routing and checking account
numbers to have money debited directly from its U.S. bank account.
Please note that the U.S. Department of Treasury guidelines permit
USCIS to accept a maximum payment amount of $24,999 from one credit
card in one day, and a single obligation cannot be split into multiple
credit card payments over multiple days in order to evade this
limit.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, Treasury Financial Manual, Chapter 7000, section 7055.20,
available at https://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1/p5/
c700#:~:text=Federal%20entities%20must%20limit%20their,are%20no%20mor
e%20than%20%2410%2C000.00 (last viewed Oct. 12, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2022 Act and this notice represent the constructive notice to
designated regional centers of the amount they owe and when it is due.
USCIS will also post information on its website and issue a press
release but will not send an invoice to the regional centers beyond
this notice. Each regional center is responsible for determining their
amount owed based on the number of total investors and for submitting
the appropriate fee before the due date. If a regional center is
required to provide evidence of payment of this fee, USCIS will accept
proof that the fee is paid in the form of, for example, a copy of the
Pay.gov payment confirmation email or a notice or statement from the
payer's credit card issuer or financial institution.
C. Late Fee
The 2022 Act requires DHS to impose a reasonable penalty fee (to be
paid to USCIS and deposited into the Fund when collected) on a regional
center that does not pay the annual Integrity Fund fee within 30 days
after the date on which such fee is due. INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(iv),
8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(iv). USCIS must terminate the designation of any
regional center that does not pay the fee within 90 days after the date
on which such fee is due. Id.
DHS has decided, in exercising its discretionary enforcement
authority articulated above, that USCIS will not charge the late
penalty in 2022 for the following reasons: (1) the Fund and Integrity
Fund fee are new program requirements; and (2) USCIS must determine an
amount that is a ``reasonable'' penalty to charge. Therefore, DHS has
decided and USCIS is announcing that, as a matter of discretionary
enforcement policy, we will not charge a late fee until we take further
action to set the amount of the late fee, as well as the process for
collecting the late fee.
However, USCIS will, as authorized by the 2022 Act, terminate the
designation of any regional center that does not pay the full fee
within 90 days after the date on which such fee is due (i.e., a
regional center does not make payment, or a regional center pays
$10,000 when it owes $20,000). Termination will not be automatic and
USCIS will provide a notice of intent to terminate and the opportunity
for a regional center to prove that the fee was paid in the proper
amount by the due date before sending a notice of termination. Again,
USCIS recognizes that the 2022 Act requires collection of the fee on
October 1, 2022 and imposition of termination after 90-days. Because
this notice published after October 1, 2022, USCIS will maintain the
statutory 90-day termination period and will not begin taking steps to
terminate a regional center until May 31, 2023. For all subsequent
years, USCIS will take steps to terminate the regional center if the
regional center
[[Page 13144]]
does not pay the full fee by December 31st.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The 2022 Act provides that DHS may increase the annual
Integrity Fund fee as necessary to ensure that the Fund is
sufficient to carry out its purposes. INA section
203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(III), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(III). DHS may
increase the amount of the Integrity Fund fees through future
regulations if the collections are inadequate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Regulatory Requirements.
A. Administrative Procedure Act
DHS and USCIS are taking this action without prior notice and
opportunity for comment because this document is a general statement of
policy supported by its discretionary enforcement authority and an
interpretive rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) (notice and comment requirements
do not apply to ``general statements of policy'' and ``interpretive
rules'').
The Homeland Security Act authorized the Secretary with
``[e]stablishing national immigration enforcement policies and
priorities.'' \9\ In accordance with these authorities, and in
attempting to quickly effectuate as much of the 2022 Act's statutory
requirements as possible, DHS is exercising its discretionary authority
to explain how it will evaluate whether a regional center has paid the
correct fee, and will not impose a reasonable penalty fee on a regional
center that does not pay the annual Integrity Fund fee within 30 days
until it can pursue additional rulemaking. The Supreme Court explained
in Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-32 (1985), that ``an agency
decision not to enforce often involves a complicated balancing of a
number of factors which are peculiarly within its expertise . . . we
note that when an agency refuses to act it generally does not exercise
its coercive power over an individual's liberty or property rights.''
DHS has balanced the impact to the public of imposing a ``reasonable
penalty,'' the timeliness of complying with the statutory mandates, and
the agency delays in providing notice to regional centers regarding how
to submit the fee. Ultimately, DHS decided that the discretionary
policy of non-enforcement presented in this Notice was the most
equitable path forward.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Public Law 107-296, sec. 402(5), 116 Stat. 2135, 2178
(codified at 6 U.S.C. 202(5)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternatively, this agency action is an interpretive rule. Whether
a rule is legislative or interpretive turns on ``the prior existence or
non-existence of legal duties and rights.'' Am. Mining Congr. v. Mine
Safety & Health Admin., 995 F.2d 1106, 1110 (D.C. Cir. 1993). See,
e.g., United Tech. Corp. v. EPA, 821 F.2d 714, 719-20 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
(``[W]hat distinguishes interpretative from legislative rules is the
legal base upon which the rule rests. If the rule is based on specific
statutory provisions, and its validity stands or falls on the
correctness of the agency's interpretation of those provisions, it is
an interpretative rule. If, however, the rule is based on an agency's
power to exercise its judgment as to how best to implement a general
statutory mandate, the rule is likely a legislative one.''). By law,
USCIS is required to collect the Integrity Fund Fee on an annual basis.
See INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii). The
statutory provision that requires the $20,000 and $10,000 fees contains
little ambiguity for USCIS to resolve or explain:
(I) ANNUAL FEE.--On October 1, 2022, and each October 1 thereafter,
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall collect for the Fund an annual
fee--
(aa) except as provided in item (bb), of $20,000 from each regional
center designated under subparagraph (E); and
(bb) of $10,000 from each such regional center with 20 or fewer
total investors in the preceding fiscal year in its new commercial
enterprises.
INA section 203(b)(5)(J)(ii)(I), 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(J)(ii)(I). To
the extent that there is minimal ambiguity regarding the calculation of
``total investors'' because the statute does not explicitly include a
calculation, USCIS's interpretation is only intended to guide
adjudicators in the performance of their duties and not remove their
discretion in making adjudicatory decisions. This interpretation does
not create any substantive or procedural right or benefit that is
legally enforceable, because the fees are explicitly provided for in
statute; but rather provides notice to the public regarding this
explicit statutory fee requirement. USCIS imposes no additional duties
or rights, beyond what the 2022 Act has already imposed.
Therefore, USCIS is imposing this fee without soliciting public
comment prior because this is a general statement of policy and an
interpretive rule exempt from notice and comment procedures. 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(A).
B. Other Regulatory Requirements
Because this action is not subject to the notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act, a final regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required. See 5 U.S.C. 604(a). In addition,
this notice is not a ``major rule'' as defined by the Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2), and thus is not subject to a 60-day delay
in the rule becoming effective. This action is not subject to the
written statement requirements of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require prior consultation
with State, local, and tribal government officials as specified by
Executive Orders 13132 or 13175. This notice also does not require an
Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
See 40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2)(ii) and 1508.4. This action does not affect the
quality of the human environment and fits within Categorical Exclusion
number A3(d) in Dir. 023-01 Rev. 01, Appendix A, Table 1, for rules
that interpret or amend an existing regulation without changing its
environmental effect.
This notice does not require review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866. As previously discussed,
USCIS is required to collect the Integrity Fund Fee. Nonetheless, for
illustrative purposes Table 1 shows the total number and aggregate
amount of Integrity Fund Fees that USCIS estimates it will receive in
2022.
Table 1--2022 Projected Integrity Fund Fees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size of RC Number Fee in $ Total in $
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>20 investors................................................... 246 $20,000 $4,920,000
<= 20 investors................................................. 384 10,000 3,840,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 630 .............. 8,760,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13145]]
Finally, this notice and the Integrity Fund Fees are not subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521 (PRA). The PRA does
not preclude the imposition of a penalty on an entity for failing to
comply with a collection of information that is imposed on the entity
by statute as is the case with the Integrity Fund Fees. See 5 CFR
1320.6(e).
Ur M. Jaddou,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-04295 Filed 3-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P