Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice, 12939-12941 [2023-04174]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2023 / Notices example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product, VERZENIO (abemaciclib). VERZENIO is indicated: • in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy and • as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with HR-positive, HER2negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received a patent term restoration application for VERZENIO (U.S. Patent No. 7,855,211) from Eli Lilly and Company, and the USPTO requested FDA’s assistance in determining this patent’s eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated May 13, 2019, FDA advised the USPTO that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of VERZENIO represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for VERZENIO is 2,907 days. Of this time, 2,760 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 147 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: October 15, 2009. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on October 15, 2009. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505 of the FD&C Act: May 5, 2017. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the new drug application (NDA) for VERZENIO (NDA 208716) was initially submitted on May 5, 2017. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Feb 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 3. The date the application was approved: September 28, 2017. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 208716 was approved on September 28, 2017. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 652 days of patent term extension. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1427] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. III. Petitions ACTION: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must comply with all the requirements of § 60.30, including but not limited to: must be timely (see DATES), must be filed in accordance with § 10.20, must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a true and complete copy of the petition has been served upon the patent applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Dated: February 24, 2023. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2023–04177 Filed 2–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P PO 00000 12939 Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Submit written comments (including recommendations) on the collection of information by March 31, 2023. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be submitted to https:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. The OMB control number for this information collection is 0910–0466. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Showalter, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 240–994–7399, PRAStaff@ fda.hhs.gov. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice—21 CFR Part 120 OMB Control Number 0910–0466— Extension This information collection supports regulations in part 120 (21 CFR part 120) which mandate the application of HACCP procedures to the processing of fruit and vegetable juices. HACCP is a Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 12940 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2023 / Notices preventative system of hazard control designed to help ensure the safety of foods. The regulations were issued under FDA’s statutory authority to regulate food safety under section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4)). Under section 402(a)(4) of the FD&C Act, a food is adulterated if it is prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health. The Agency also has authority under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) to issue and enforce regulations to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from one State, territory, or possession to another, or from outside the United States into this country. Under section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)), FDA is authorized to issue regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act. Under HACCP, processors of fruit and vegetable juices establish and follow a preplanned sequence of operations and observations (the HACCP plan) designed to avoid or eliminate one or more specific food hazards, and thereby ensure that their products are safe, wholesome, and not adulterated, in compliance with section 402 of the FD&C Act. Information development and recordkeeping are essential parts of any HACCP system. The information collection requirements are narrowly tailored to focus on the development of appropriate controls and document those aspects of processing that are critical to food safety. In an effort to reduce burden and assist respondents, our website (https:// www.fda.gov/food/hazard-analysiscritical-control-point-haccp/juicehaccp) offers guidance for industry, training and education, and background information to assist the food industry in developing and implementing a juice HACCP. Included in this information are guidance documents entitled ‘‘Juice HACCP and the FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act’’ (December 2021) (available at: https://www.fda.gov/ regulatory-information/search-fdaguidance-documents/guidanceindustry-juice-haccp-and-fda-foodsafety-modernization-act) and ‘‘Juice HACCP Hazards and Controls Guidance—First Edition’’ (March 2004) (available at: https://www.fda.gov/ regulatory-information/search-fdaguidance-documents/guidanceindustry-juice-hazard-analysis-criticalcontrol-point-hazards-and-controlsguidance-first). All Agency guidance documents are issued in accordance with our good guidance practice regulations in 21 CFR 10.115, which provide for public comment at any time In the Federal Register of October 7, 2022 (87 FR 61087), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1 Number of recordkeepers ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES 21 CFR section; activity Number of records per recordkeeper Total annual records Average burden per recordkeeping Total hours 120.6(c) and 120.12(a)(1) and (b); require written monitoring and correction records for Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures. 120.7, 120.10(a), and 120.12(a)(2), (b)–(c); require written hazard analysis of food hazards. 120.8(b)(7) and 120.12(a)(4)(i) and (b); require a recordkeeping system that documents monitoring of the critical control points and other measurements as prescribed in the HACCP plan. 120.10(c) and 120.12(a)(4)(ii) and (b); require that all corrective actions taken in response to a deviation from a critical limit be documented. 120.11(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(2) and 120.12 (a)(5) and (b); require records showing that process monitoring instruments are properly calibrated and that end-product or in-process testing is performed in accordance with written procedures. 120.11(b)–(c) and 120.12(a)(5) and (b); require that every processor record the validation that the HACCP plan is adequate to control food hazards that are likely to occur. 120.11(c) and 120.12(a)(5) and (b); require documentation of revalidation of the hazard analysis upon any changes that might affect the original hazard analysis (applies when a firm does not have a HACCP plan because the original hazard analysis did not reveal hazards likely to occur). 120.14(a)(2), (c)–(d), and 120.12(b); require that importers of fruit or vegetable juices, or their products used as ingredients in beverages, have written procedures to ensure that the food is processed in accordance with our regulations in part 120. 120.8(a)–(b) and 120.12(a)(3), (b)–(c); require written HACCP plan. 1,875 365 684,375 0.1 (6 minutes) .... 68,438 2,300 1.1 2,530 20 ........................ 50,600 1,450 14,600 21,170,000 0.01 (1 minute) .... 211,700 1,840 12 22,080 0.1 (6 minutes) .... 2,208 1,840 52 95,680 0.1 (6 minutes) .... 9,568 1,840 1 1,840 4 .......................... 7,360 1,840 1 1,840 4 .......................... 7,360 308 1 308 4 .......................... 1,232 1,560 1.1 1,716 60 ........................ 102,960 Total .................................................................................... .................... ........................ ........................ .............................. 461,426 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Table 1 provides our estimate for the next 3 years for the total annual VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Feb 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 recordkeeping burden of our regulations in part 120. Based on our experience PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 with the information collection over the past 3 years, our burden estimate E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2023 / Notices remains unchanged since our last review of the information collection. Dated: February 24, 2023. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2023–04174 Filed 2–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2021–D–1047] Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products; International Council for Harmonisation; Guidance for Industry; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice of availability. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products.’’ The guidance was prepared under the auspices of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The guidance provides clarification on continuous manufacturing (CM) concepts and describes scientific approaches and regulatory considerations specific to CM of drug substances and drug products. The guidance is intended to provide scientific and regulatory considerations for the development, implementation, operation, and life-cycle management of CM. The guidance replaces the draft guidance entitled ‘‘Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products’’ issued on October 14, 2021. This guidance also replaces the draft guidance entitled ‘‘Quality Considerations for Continuous Manufacturing’’ issued on February 27, 2019. DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal Register on March 1, 2023. ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances at any time as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: Electronic Submissions Submit electronic comments in the following way: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Feb 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to https:// www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else’s Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov. • If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). Written/Paper Submissions Submit written/paper submissions as follows: • Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for Written/Paper Submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. • For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’ Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA– 2021–D–1047 for ‘‘Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products.’’ Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240–402–7500. • Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states ‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12941 redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA’s posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500. You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)). Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993– 0002, or the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993– 0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. The guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1– 800–835–4709 or 240–402–8010. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the guidance: Sau Lee, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 4182, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2905; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240– 402–7911. E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12939-12941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1427]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Hazard Analysis and 
Critical Control Point Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing 
and Importing of Juice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is 
announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Submit written comments (including recommendations) on the 
collection of information by March 31, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be submitted to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information 
collection by selecting ``Currently under Review--Open for Public 
Comments'' or by using the search function. The OMB control number for 
this information collection is 0910-0466. Also include the FDA docket 
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Showalter, Office of 
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 240-994-7399, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance.

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Procedures for the 
Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice--21 CFR Part 120

OMB Control Number 0910-0466--Extension

    This information collection supports regulations in part 120 (21 
CFR part 120) which mandate the application of HACCP procedures to the 
processing of fruit and vegetable juices. HACCP is a

[[Page 12940]]

preventative system of hazard control designed to help ensure the 
safety of foods. The regulations were issued under FDA's statutory 
authority to regulate food safety under section 402(a)(4) of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 
342(a)(4)). Under section 402(a)(4) of the FD&C Act, a food is 
adulterated if it is prepared, packed, or held under insanitary 
conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth or rendered 
injurious to health. The Agency also has authority under section 361 of 
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) to issue and enforce 
regulations to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of 
communicable diseases from one State, territory, or possession to 
another, or from outside the United States into this country. Under 
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)), FDA is authorized to 
issue regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
    Under HACCP, processors of fruit and vegetable juices establish and 
follow a preplanned sequence of operations and observations (the HACCP 
plan) designed to avoid or eliminate one or more specific food hazards, 
and thereby ensure that their products are safe, wholesome, and not 
adulterated, in compliance with section 402 of the FD&C Act. 
Information development and recordkeeping are essential parts of any 
HACCP system. The information collection requirements are narrowly 
tailored to focus on the development of appropriate controls and 
document those aspects of processing that are critical to food safety.
    In an effort to reduce burden and assist respondents, our website 
(https://www.fda.gov/food/hazard-analysis-critical-control-point-haccp/juice-haccp) offers guidance for industry, training and education, and 
background information to assist the food industry in developing and 
implementing a juice HACCP. Included in this information are guidance 
documents entitled ``Juice HACCP and the FDA Food Safety and 
Modernization Act'' (December 2021) (available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-juice-haccp-and-fda-food-safety-modernization-act) and ``Juice HACCP 
Hazards and Controls Guidance--First Edition'' (March 2004) (available 
at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-juice-hazard-analysis-critical-control-point-hazards-and-controls-guidance-first). All Agency guidance 
documents are issued in accordance with our good guidance practice 
regulations in 21 CFR 10.115, which provide for public comment at any 
time
    In the Federal Register of October 7, 2022 (87 FR 61087), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                               Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of
     21 CFR section; activity        Number of      records per    Total annual    Average burden per    Total
                                   recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records        recordkeeping       hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
120.6(c) and 120.12(a)(1) and             1,875              365         684,375  0.1 (6 minutes)....     68,438
 (b); require written monitoring
 and correction records for
 Sanitation Standard Operating
 Procedures.
120.7, 120.10(a), and                     2,300              1.1           2,530  20.................     50,600
 120.12(a)(2), (b)-(c); require
 written hazard analysis of food
 hazards.
120.8(b)(7) and 120.12(a)(4)(i)           1,450           14,600      21,170,000  0.01 (1 minute)....    211,700
 and (b); require a recordkeeping
 system that documents monitoring
 of the critical control points
 and other measurements as
 prescribed in the HACCP plan.
120.10(c) and 120.12(a)(4)(ii)            1,840               12          22,080  0.1 (6 minutes)....      2,208
 and (b); require that all
 corrective actions taken in
 response to a deviation from a
 critical limit be documented.
120.11(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(2) and           1,840               52          95,680  0.1 (6 minutes)....      9,568
 120.12 (a)(5) and (b); require
 records showing that process
 monitoring instruments are
 properly calibrated and that end-
 product or in-process testing is
 performed in accordance with
 written procedures.
120.11(b)-(c) and 120.12(a)(5)            1,840                1           1,840  4..................      7,360
 and (b); require that every
 processor record the validation
 that the HACCP plan is adequate
 to control food hazards that are
 likely to occur.
120.11(c) and 120.12(a)(5) and            1,840                1           1,840  4..................      7,360
 (b); require documentation of
 revalidation of the hazard
 analysis upon any changes that
 might affect the original hazard
 analysis (applies when a firm
 does not have a HACCP plan
 because the original hazard
 analysis did not reveal hazards
 likely to occur).
120.14(a)(2), (c)-(d), and                  308                1             308  4..................      1,232
 120.12(b); require that
 importers of fruit or vegetable
 juices, or their products used
 as ingredients in beverages,
 have written procedures to
 ensure that the food is
 processed in accordance with our
 regulations in part 120.
120.8(a)-(b) and 120.12(a)(3),            1,560              1.1           1,716  60.................    102,960
 (b)-(c); require written HACCP
 plan.
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total........................  .............  ..............  ..............  ...................    461,426
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Table 1 provides our estimate for the next 3 years for the total 
annual recordkeeping burden of our regulations in part 120. Based on 
our experience with the information collection over the past 3 years, 
our burden estimate

[[Page 12941]]

remains unchanged since our last review of the information collection.

    Dated: February 24, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-04174 Filed 2-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.