Wojciech Lesniak: Final Debarment Order, 12381-12384 [2023-03958]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Notices
The FD&C Act itself provides for
misdemeanor liability under section
303(a)(1). Taken together, section
306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) and (c)(3) prescribes
the circumstances under which the
Agency will exercise its discretion to
debar individuals convicted of
misdemeanors under the FD&C Act.
Furthermore, in this case, the Agency
has made the appropriate findings and
considered the proper statutory criteria
in evaluating the appropriateness and
period of Thaxter’s debarment.
Accordingly, the Chief Scientist does
not agree that Thaxter’s debarment for 5
years violates his right to due process.
Thaxter next argues that debarring
him for 5 years would be ‘‘unreasonable
and would not comport with the basic
requirements of reasoned decisionmaking’’ unless FDA were to justify ‘‘the
radical departure from precedent that
debarring [him] would represent.’’ He
argues further that ‘‘it would be
arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to
law for FDA to [debar] a party that has
not taken action that poses a significant
threat to the integrity of the regulatory
system’’ or ‘‘not to hold a hearing to
support its position.’’
Based on Thaxter’s arguments and the
case law he cites, he appears to be
relying on the judicial standard for
review of Agency decision-making in
the APA at 5 U.S.C. 706(2), which
directs courts to ‘‘hold unlawful and set
aside agency action[s]’’ that are
‘‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of
discretion, or otherwise not in
accordance with law.’’ As the Supreme
Court has held, the question under that
standard is whether the Agency has
provided a reasonable explanation for
the substance its decision:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES
The APA’s arbitrary-and-capricious
standard requires that agency action be
reasonable and reasonably explained.
Judicial review under that standard is
deferential, and a court may not substitute its
own policy judgment for that of the agency.
A court simply ensures that the agency has
acted within a zone of reasonableness and, in
particular, has reasonably considered the
relevant issues and reasonably explained the
decision (FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project,
141 S. Ct. 1150, 1158, 209 L. Ed. 2d 287
(2021)).
In this matter, as reflected in the
lengthy discussion above, the Agency
has reasonably considered the relevant
issues and fully explained its decision
to debar Thaxter. Although Thaxter
points to other individuals who pled
guilty to misdemeanors based on
liability as RCOs and who have not been
debarred, he provides no details with
respect to those individuals’
convictions. Even assuming, however,
that those individuals were similarly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
situated to him, his bare assertion that
an Agency cannot choose to begin
pursuing debarment of individuals for
certain discrete categories of Federal
misdemeanor convictions because it has
not done so in the past is unfounded. As
discussed, the terms of section
306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) and (c)(3) of the FD&C
Act are clear, and the Agency has
exercised its discretion here in a manner
consistent with the permissive
debarment of many other individuals
convicted of Federal misdemeanors.
Accordingly, Thaxter’s argument that
debarring him is arbitrary, capricious,
and contrary to law lacks merit.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2023–03941 Filed 2–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–1046]
Wojciech Lesniak: Final Debarment
Order
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Therefore, the Chief Scientist, under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
Act and under authority delegated to
her by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs, finds that (1) Thaxter has been
convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
development or approval, including the
process for development or approval, of
a drug product or otherwise relating to
the regulation of a drug product under
the FD&C Act and (2) the type of
conduct which served as the basis for
the conviction undermines the process
for the regulation of drugs. FDA has
considered the applicable factors listed
in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act and
determined that a debarment of 5 years
is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings,
Thaxter is debarred for 5 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application under sections
505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES)
(see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B) and
(c)(2)(A)(iii) and 21 U.S.C. 321(dd)).
Any person with an approved or
pending drug product application, who
knowingly uses the services of Thaxter,
in any capacity during his period of
debarment, will be subject to civil
money penalties (section 307(a)(6) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If
Thaxter, during his period of
debarment, provides services in any
capacity to a person with an approved
or pending drug product application, he
will be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In
addition, FDA will not accept or review
any abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of
Thaxter during his period of debarment
(section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Frm 00075
Dated: February 21, 2023.
Namandje´ N. Bumpus,
Chief Scientist.
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
III. Findings and Order
PO 00000
12381
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring
Wojciech Lesniak for a period of 5 years
from importing or offering for import
any drug into the United States. FDA
bases this order on a finding that Mr.
Lesniak engaged in a pattern of
importing or offering for import
misbranded drugs (i.e., in an amount,
frequency, or dosage that is inconsistent
with his personal or household use) that
are not designated in an authorized
electronic data interchange system as
products regulated by FDA. Mr. Lesniak
was given notice of the proposed
debarment and was given an
opportunity to request a hearing to show
why he should not be debarred. As of
November 21, 2022 (30 days after
receipt of the notice), Mr. Lesniak had
not responded. Mr. Lesniak’s failure to
respond and request a hearing
constitutes a waiver of his right to a
hearing concerning this matter.
DATES: This order is applicable February
27, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Any application by Mr.
Lesniak for termination of debarment
under section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 335a(d)(1)) may be submitted
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
D Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
An application submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
application will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
application does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
12382
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
application, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
D If you want to submit an application
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the application as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
D Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
D For a written/paper application
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your application, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked, and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All applications must
include the Docket No. FDA–2022–N–
1046. Received applications will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
D Confidential Submissions—To
submit an application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
application only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of your application.
The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your application and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852 between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Publicly available submissions may be
seen in the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaime Espinosa (ELEM–4144), Division
of Enforcement, Office of Strategic
Planning and Operational Policy, Office
of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug
Administration, 240–402–8743, or
debarments@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(1)(D)) permits
debarment of an individual from
importing or offering for import any
drug into the United States if the FDA
finds, as required by section
306(b)(3)(D) of the FD&C Act, that the
individual has engaged in a pattern of
importing or offering for import
misbranded drugs (i.e. in an amount,
frequency, or dosage that is inconsistent
with personal or household use by the
importer), that are not designated in an
entry in an authorized electronic data
interchange system as products
regulated by FDA.
After an investigation, FDA
discovered that Mr. Lesniak has engaged
in numerous instances of importing or
offering for import misbranded drugs;
all the parcels containing the
misbranded drugs serving as the basis
for this action, described in further
detail below, were intercepted by FDA
at either the Miami or the Newark
International Mail Facilities (IMF) and
were addressed to Mr. Lesniak at an
address connected to him.
On or about June 28, 2019, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by FDA at the
Newark IMF and which was addressed
to him. This parcel contained multiple
products. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel
was 280 tablets of BAYER ASPIRIN C
(Acidum acetylsalicylicum 400
milligram (mg) + Acidum Ascorbicum
240 mg) and was refused entry on
August 15, 2019, because the product’s
required label or labeling appeared to
not be in English, in violation of 21
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR. 201.15(c)(1). FDA also determined
that another product contained in this
parcel was 360 tablets of APAP
(paracetamolum 500 mg) tabletki
powlekane. The product was refused
entry on August 15, 2019, because the
product’s required label or labeling
appeared to not be in English, in
violation of 21 CFR. 201.15(c)(1). FDA
also determined that another product
contained in this parcel was 300 tablets
of APAP EXTRA (Paracetamolum 500
mg + Caffeinum 65 mg). The product
was refused entry on August 15, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). The
product was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C
Act. FDA also determined that another
product contained in this parcel was
156 tablets of ALTACET TABLETKI
(Aluminii Acetas Tartas 1 gram (g)). The
product was refused entry on August 15,
2019, because the product’s required
label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). All the products in this
parcel were misbranded drugs pursuant
to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act.
On or about July 02, 2019, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by FDA at the
Newark IMF and which was addressed
to him. This parcel contained multiple
products. The FDA determined that one
of the products contained in this parcel
was 600 g of MASC CYNKOWA (Zinc
Oxidi urguentum) 10%. The product
was refused entry on August 22, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
because the product appeared to be an
over-the-counter drug without required
labeling. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel
was 960 tablets of NO–SPA (Drotaverini
hydrochloridum 40 mg). The product
was refused entry on August 22, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
because the product appeared to be an
over-the-counter drug without required
labeling. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel
was 80 tablets of RANIGAST MAX
(Ranitidinum 150 mg). The product was
refused entry on August 22, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
because the product appeared to be an
over-the-counter drug without required
labeling. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel
was 3 packages of OROFAR TOTAL
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Notices
ACTION (Benzoxonii chloridum +
Lidocaini Hydrochloridum (2.5 mg + 1,5
mg/milliliters (ml))). The product was
refused entry on August 22, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
because the product appeared to be an
over-the-counter drug without required
labeling. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel
was 10 packages of MASC
ICHTIOLOWA (Ammonii
Bituminosulfonatis Unguentum FP
10%). The product was refused entry on
August 22, 2019, because the product’s
required label or labeling appeared to
not be in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and because the product
appeared to be an over-the-counter drug
without required labeling. All of the
products in this parcel were misbranded
drugs pursuant to section 502(c) of the
FD&C Act.
On or about July 02, 2019, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import another
parcel intercepted and processed by the
FDA at the Newark IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that
one of the products contained in this
parcel was 530 tablets of RANIGAST
MAX (Ranitidinum 150mg). The
product was refused entry on August 23,
2019, because the product’s required
label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one
of the products contained in this parcel
was 25 packages of LIOTON 1000 ZEL
(Heparinum Natricum). The product
was refused entry on August 23, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). FDA
determined that one of the products
contained in this parcel was 10
packages of MASC ICHTIOLOWA
(Ammonii bituminosulfonatis
unguentum FP). The product was
refused entry on August 23, 2019,
because the product’s required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). FDA
determined that one of the products
contained in this parcel was 20
packages of OPOKAN ACTIGEL
(100mg/ml, zel Naproxenum). The
product was refused entry on August 23,
2019, because the product’s required
label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one
of the products contained in this parcel
was 3 packages of ALTACEL ZEL
(Aluminii Acetotartras 10mg/g). The
product was refused entry on August 23,
2019, because the product’s required
label or labeling appeared to not be in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). All the products in this
parcel were misbranded drugs pursuant
to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act.
On or about January 4, 2022, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import another
parcel intercepted and processed by
FDA at the Miami IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that
one of the products contained in this
parcel was 4 boxes of DIOHESPAN
MAX and was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C
Act because the product’s required label
or labeling was not in English in
violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1) and the
drug was not included in a list required
by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 4
boxes of NEO–ANGIN and was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section
502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product’s required label or labeling was
not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and the drug was not
included in a list required by section
510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined
that another one of the products
contained in this parcel was 10 boxes of
FURAGINUM and was a misbranded
drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the
FD&C Act because the product’s
required label or labeling was not in
English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and the drug was not
included in a list required by section
510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined
that another one of the products
contained in this parcel was 10 boxes of
ALTACET and was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C
Act because the product’s required label
or labeling was not in English, in
violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and the
drug was not included in a list required
by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 17
boxes of RUTINOSCORBIN and was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section
502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product’s required label or labeling was
not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and it was determined the
drug is not included in a list required
by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 10
boxes of ESPUMISAN MAX and was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section
502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product’s required label or labeling was
not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and it was determined the
drug is not included in a list required
by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12383
products contained in this parcel was 18
boxes of RAPHACHOLIN FORTE and
was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product’s required label or labeling
was not in English, in violation of 21
CFR 201.15(c)(1), and it was determined
the drug is not included in a list
required by section 510(j) of the FD&C
Act. FDA determined that another one
of the products contained in this parcel
was 20 boxes of WEGIEL LECZNICZY
and was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product’s required label or labeling
was not in English, in violation of 21
CFR 201.15(c)(1), and it was determined
the drug is not included in a list
required by section 510(j) of the FD&C
Act. FDA determined that another one
of the products contained in this parcel
was 41 boxes of GRIPEX MAX and was
a misbranded drug pursuant to section
502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product’s required label or labeling was
not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and it was determined the
drug was not included in a list required
by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. All
the products in this parcel were
destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 16, 2022, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by the FDA at
the Miami IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that
the product contained in this parcel was
42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and
was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product’s required label or labeling
was not in English, in violation of 21
CFR 201.15(c)(1). The product was
destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 16, 2022, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import another
parcel intercepted and processed by the
FDA at the Miami IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that
the product contained in this parcel was
42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and
was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product’s required label or labeling
was not in English, in violation of 21
CFR 201.15(c)(1). The product was
destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 18, 2022, Mr.
Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by the FDA at
the Miami IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that
the product contained in this parcel was
42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and
was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product’s required label or labeling
was not in English, in violation of 21
CFR 201.15(c)(1), and it was determined
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
12384
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES
the drug was not included in a list
required by section 510(j) of the FD&C
Act. The product was refused entry on
March 22, 2022.
As a result of this pattern of importing
or offering for import misbranded drugs
(i.e. in an amount, frequency, or dosage
that is inconsistent with his personal or
household use) that are not designated
in an authorized electronic data
interchange system as products
regulated by FDA, in accordance with
section 306(b)(3)(D) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 335a(b)(3)(D)), FDA sent Mr.
Lesniak, by certified mail on October 17,
2022, a notice proposing to debar him
for a 5-year period from importing or
offering for import any drug into the
United States. In proposing a debarment
period, FDA weighed the considerations
set forth in section 306(c)(3) of the
FD&C Act that it considered applicable
to Mr. Lesniak’s pattern of conduct and
concluded that his conduct warranted
the imposition of a five-year period of
debarment. The proposal informed Mr.
Lesniak of the proposed debarment and
offered him an opportunity to request a
hearing, providing 30 days from the date
of receipt of the letter in which to file
the request, and advised him that failure
to request a hearing constituted a waiver
of the opportunity for a hearing and of
any contentions concerning this action.
Mr. Lesniak received the proposal and
notice of opportunity for a hearing on
October 22, 2022. Mr. Lesniak failed to
request a hearing within the timeframe
prescribed by regulation and has,
therefore, waived his opportunity for a
hearing and waived any contentions
concerning his debarment. (21 CFR part
12).
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Human and
Animal Food Operations, under section
306(b)(3)(D) of the FD&C Act, under
authority delegated to the Assistant
Commissioner, finds that Mr. Wojciech
Lesniak has engaged in a pattern of
importing or offering for import
misbranded drugs (i.e. in an amount,
frequency, or dosage that is inconsistent
with his personal or household use) that
are not designated in an authorized
electronic data interchange system as
products regulated by FDA. FDA finds
that this pattern of conduct should be
accorded a debarment period of 5 years
as provided by section 306(c)(2)(A)(iii)
of the FD&C Act.
As a result of the foregoing finding,
Mr. Lesniak is debarred for a period of
5 years from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States,
effective (see DATES). Pursuant to section
301(cc) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
331(cc)), the importing or offering for
import into the United States of any
drug by, with the assistance of, or at the
direction of Mr. Lesniak is a prohibited
act.
Dated: February 22, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–03958 Filed 2–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2022–P–1013]
Determination That CHANTIX
(Varenicline Tartrate) Tablets, 0.5
Milligram and 1 Milligram, Has Not
Been Withdrawn From Sale for
Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) has
determined that CHANTIX (varenicline
tartrate) tablets, 0.5 milligram (mg) and
1 mg, has not been withdrawn from sale
for reasons of safety or effectiveness to
the extent that the drug can be
manufactured or formulated in a
manner that satisfies any applicable
acceptable intake limit for nitrosamine
impurities. This determination means
that FDA will not begin procedures to
withdraw approval of abbreviated new
drug applications (ANDAs) that refer to
this drug product, and it will allow FDA
to continue to approve ANDAs that refer
to the product as long as they meet
relevant legal and regulatory
requirements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Faranda, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6258,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–8767, David.Faranda@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
355(j)) allows the submission of an
ANDA to market a generic version of a
previously approved drug product. To
obtain approval, the ANDA applicant
must show, among other things, that the
generic drug product: (1) has the same
active ingredient(s), dosage form, route
of administration, strength, conditions
of use, and (with certain exceptions)
labeling as the listed drug, which is a
version of the drug that was previously
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approved, and (2) is bioequivalent to the
listed drug. ANDA applicants do not
have to repeat the extensive clinical
testing otherwise necessary to gain
approval of a new drug application
(NDA).
Section 505(j)(7) of the FD&C Act
requires FDA to publish a list of all
approved drugs. FDA publishes this list
as part of the ‘‘Approved Drug Products
With Therapeutic Equivalence
Evaluations,’’ which is known generally
as the ‘‘Orange Book.’’ Under FDA
regulations, drugs are removed from the
list if the Agency withdraws or
suspends approval of the drug’s NDA or
ANDA for reasons of safety or
effectiveness or if FDA determines that
the listed drug was withdrawn from sale
for reasons of safety or effectiveness (21
CFR 314.162).
A person may petition the Agency to
determine, or the Agency may
determine on its own initiative, whether
a listed drug has been withdrawn from
sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. This determination may
be made at any time after the drug has
been withdrawn from sale, but must be
made prior to approval of an ANDA that
refers to the listed drug (§ 314.161 (21
CFR 314.161)). FDA may not approve an
ANDA that does not refer to a listed
drug.
CHANTIX (varenicline tartrate)
tablets, 0.5 mg and 1 mg, is the subject
of NDA 021928, held by PF Prism CV
(c/o Pfizer Inc.), and initially approved
on May 10, 2006. CHANTIX is indicated
for use as an aid to smoking cessation
treatment.
PF Prism CV has voluntarily
discontinued marketing of CHANTIX
(varenicline tartrate) tablets, 0.5 mg and
1 mg. The levels of the N-nitrosovarenicline (NNV) impurity in Chantix
exceeded FDA’s acceptable intake
limit.1 FDA’s current understanding is
1 Nitrosamine impurities in the drug supply are
an important public health concern to which the
Agency is dedicating significant resources. As
explained in FDA’s Guidance for Industry, Control
of Nitrosamine Impurities in Human Drugs,
‘‘Nitrosamine compounds are potent genotoxic
agents in several animal species and some are
classified as probable or possible human
carcinogens by the International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC). They are referred to as
‘‘cohort of concern’’ compounds in the ICH
guidance for industry M7(R1) Assessment and
Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in
Pharmaceuticals To Limit Potential Carcinogenic
Risk (March 2018).’’ Many drug products have been
found to contain levels of nitrosamines that are
unacceptable or require further evaluation. FDA’s
current understanding is that nitrosamine levels in
affected drug products have different causes and
may be controlled using different strategies,
including formulation design (i.e., adding
antioxidants or adding pH adjusters that modify the
microenvironment to base or neutral pH) and
supplier qualification programs.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12381-12384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03958]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-1046]
Wojciech Lesniak: Final Debarment Order
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring
Wojciech Lesniak for a period of 5 years from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States. FDA bases this order on a
finding that Mr. Lesniak engaged in a pattern of importing or offering
for import misbranded drugs (i.e., in an amount, frequency, or dosage
that is inconsistent with his personal or household use) that are not
designated in an authorized electronic data interchange system as
products regulated by FDA. Mr. Lesniak was given notice of the proposed
debarment and was given an opportunity to request a hearing to show why
he should not be debarred. As of November 21, 2022 (30 days after
receipt of the notice), Mr. Lesniak had not responded. Mr. Lesniak's
failure to respond and request a hearing constitutes a waiver of his
right to a hearing concerning this matter.
DATES: This order is applicable February 27, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Any application by Mr. Lesniak for termination of debarment
under section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(d)(1)) may be
submitted as follows:
Electronic Submissions
[ssquf] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. An application
submitted electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because
your application will be made public, you are solely responsible for
ensuring that your application does not include any confidential
information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such
as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number,
or
[[Page 12382]]
confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process.
Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or
other information that identifies you in the body of your application,
that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
[ssquf] If you want to submit an application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the application as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
[ssquf] Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper submissions):
Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
[ssquf] For a written/paper application submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your application, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked, and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All applications must include the Docket No. FDA-
2022-N-1046. Received applications will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
[ssquf] Confidential Submissions--To submit an application with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your application only as a written/paper submission.
You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note
that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The
Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential
information, in its consideration of your application. The second copy,
which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked
out, will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made
publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet
and not in the body of your application and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to
the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852 between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Publicly
available submissions may be seen in the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaime Espinosa (ELEM-4144), Division
of Enforcement, Office of Strategic Planning and Operational Policy,
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 240-402-
8743, or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(1)(D))
permits debarment of an individual from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States if the FDA finds, as required by
section 306(b)(3)(D) of the FD&C Act, that the individual has engaged
in a pattern of importing or offering for import misbranded drugs (i.e.
in an amount, frequency, or dosage that is inconsistent with personal
or household use by the importer), that are not designated in an entry
in an authorized electronic data interchange system as products
regulated by FDA.
After an investigation, FDA discovered that Mr. Lesniak has engaged
in numerous instances of importing or offering for import misbranded
drugs; all the parcels containing the misbranded drugs serving as the
basis for this action, described in further detail below, were
intercepted by FDA at either the Miami or the Newark International Mail
Facilities (IMF) and were addressed to Mr. Lesniak at an address
connected to him.
On or about June 28, 2019, Mr. Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by FDA at the Newark IMF and which was
addressed to him. This parcel contained multiple products. FDA
determined that one of the products contained in this parcel was 280
tablets of BAYER ASPIRIN C (Acidum acetylsalicylicum 400 milligram (mg)
+ Acidum Ascorbicum 240 mg) and was refused entry on August 15, 2019,
because the product's required label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR. 201.15(c)(1). FDA also determined that
another product contained in this parcel was 360 tablets of APAP
(paracetamolum 500 mg) tabletki powlekane. The product was refused
entry on August 15, 2019, because the product's required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation of 21 CFR.
201.15(c)(1). FDA also determined that another product contained in
this parcel was 300 tablets of APAP EXTRA (Paracetamolum 500 mg +
Caffeinum 65 mg). The product was refused entry on August 15, 2019,
because the product's required label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). The product was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act. FDA also
determined that another product contained in this parcel was 156
tablets of ALTACET TABLETKI (Aluminii Acetas Tartas 1 gram (g)). The
product was refused entry on August 15, 2019, because the product's
required label or labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). All the products in this parcel were misbranded
drugs pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act.
On or about July 02, 2019, Mr. Lesniak offered for import a parcel
intercepted and processed by FDA at the Newark IMF and which was
addressed to him. This parcel contained multiple products. The FDA
determined that one of the products contained in this parcel was 600 g
of MASC CYNKOWA (Zinc Oxidi urguentum) 10%. The product was refused
entry on August 22, 2019, because the product's required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and because the product appeared to be an over-the-
counter drug without required labeling. FDA determined that one of the
products contained in this parcel was 960 tablets of NO-SPA
(Drotaverini hydrochloridum 40 mg). The product was refused entry on
August 22, 2019, because the product's required label or labeling
appeared to not be in English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
because the product appeared to be an over-the-counter drug without
required labeling. FDA determined that one of the products contained in
this parcel was 80 tablets of RANIGAST MAX (Ranitidinum 150 mg). The
product was refused entry on August 22, 2019, because the product's
required label or labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and because the product appeared to be an over-
the-counter drug without required labeling. FDA determined that one of
the products contained in this parcel was 3 packages of OROFAR TOTAL
[[Page 12383]]
ACTION (Benzoxonii chloridum + Lidocaini Hydrochloridum (2.5 mg + 1,5
mg/milliliters (ml))). The product was refused entry on August 22,
2019, because the product's required label or labeling appeared to not
be in English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and because the
product appeared to be an over-the-counter drug without required
labeling. FDA determined that one of the products contained in this
parcel was 10 packages of MASC ICHTIOLOWA (Ammonii Bituminosulfonatis
Unguentum FP 10%). The product was refused entry on August 22, 2019,
because the product's required label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and because the product
appeared to be an over-the-counter drug without required labeling. All
of the products in this parcel were misbranded drugs pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act.
On or about July 02, 2019, Mr. Lesniak offered for import another
parcel intercepted and processed by the FDA at the Newark IMF and which
was addressed to him. FDA determined that one of the products contained
in this parcel was 530 tablets of RANIGAST MAX (Ranitidinum 150mg). The
product was refused entry on August 23, 2019, because the product's
required label or labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one of the products
contained in this parcel was 25 packages of LIOTON 1000 ZEL (Heparinum
Natricum). The product was refused entry on August 23, 2019, because
the product's required label or labeling appeared to not be in English,
in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one of the
products contained in this parcel was 10 packages of MASC ICHTIOLOWA
(Ammonii bituminosulfonatis unguentum FP). The product was refused
entry on August 23, 2019, because the product's required label or
labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one of the products contained in this
parcel was 20 packages of OPOKAN ACTIGEL (100mg/ml, zel Naproxenum).
The product was refused entry on August 23, 2019, because the product's
required label or labeling appeared to not be in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). FDA determined that one of the products
contained in this parcel was 3 packages of ALTACEL ZEL (Aluminii
Acetotartras 10mg/g). The product was refused entry on August 23, 2019,
because the product's required label or labeling appeared to not be in
English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). All the products in this
parcel were misbranded drugs pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C
Act.
On or about January 4, 2022, Mr. Lesniak offered for import another
parcel intercepted and processed by FDA at the Miami IMF and which was
addressed to him. FDA determined that one of the products contained in
this parcel was 4 boxes of DIOHESPAN MAX and was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's
required label or labeling was not in English in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1) and the drug was not included in a list required by
section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 4 boxes of NEO-ANGIN and was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product's required label or labeling was not in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and the drug was not included in a list
required by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined that another
one of the products contained in this parcel was 10 boxes of FURAGINUM
and was a misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act
because the product's required label or labeling was not in English, in
violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and the drug was not included in a
list required by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined that
another one of the products contained in this parcel was 10 boxes of
ALTACET and was a misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the
FD&C Act because the product's required label or labeling was not in
English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and the drug was not
included in a list required by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the products contained in this parcel
was 17 boxes of RUTINOSCORBIN and was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's required label or
labeling was not in English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
it was determined the drug is not included in a list required by
section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 10 boxes of ESPUMISAN MAX and was
a misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because
the product's required label or labeling was not in English, in
violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and it was determined the drug is not
included in a list required by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the products contained in this parcel
was 18 boxes of RAPHACHOLIN FORTE and was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's required label or
labeling was not in English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
it was determined the drug is not included in a list required by
section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA determined that another one of the
products contained in this parcel was 20 boxes of WEGIEL LECZNICZY and
was a misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act
because the product's required label or labeling was not in English, in
violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and it was determined the drug is not
included in a list required by section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. FDA
determined that another one of the products contained in this parcel
was 41 boxes of GRIPEX MAX and was a misbranded drug pursuant to
section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's required label or
labeling was not in English, in violation of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1), and
it was determined the drug was not included in a list required by
section 510(j) of the FD&C Act. All the products in this parcel were
destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 16, 2022, Mr. Lesniak offered for import a
parcel intercepted and processed by the FDA at the Miami IMF and which
was addressed to him. FDA determined that the product contained in this
parcel was 42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's
required label or labeling was not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1). The product was destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 16, 2022, Mr. Lesniak offered for import
another parcel intercepted and processed by the FDA at the Miami IMF
and which was addressed to him. FDA determined that the product
contained in this parcel was 42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and was a
misbranded drug pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the
product's required label or labeling was not in English, in violation
of 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1). The product was destroyed on March 11, 2022.
On or about February 18, 2022, Mr. Lesniak offered for import a
parcel intercepted and processed by the FDA at the Miami IMF and which
was addressed to him. FDA determined that the product contained in this
parcel was 42 boxes of FLEGAMINA CLASSIC and was a misbranded drug
pursuant to section 502(c) of the FD&C Act because the product's
required label or labeling was not in English, in violation of 21 CFR
201.15(c)(1), and it was determined
[[Page 12384]]
the drug was not included in a list required by section 510(j) of the
FD&C Act. The product was refused entry on March 22, 2022.
As a result of this pattern of importing or offering for import
misbranded drugs (i.e. in an amount, frequency, or dosage that is
inconsistent with his personal or household use) that are not
designated in an authorized electronic data interchange system as
products regulated by FDA, in accordance with section 306(b)(3)(D) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(3)(D)), FDA sent Mr. Lesniak, by
certified mail on October 17, 2022, a notice proposing to debar him for
a 5-year period from importing or offering for import any drug into the
United States. In proposing a debarment period, FDA weighed the
considerations set forth in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act that it
considered applicable to Mr. Lesniak's pattern of conduct and concluded
that his conduct warranted the imposition of a five-year period of
debarment. The proposal informed Mr. Lesniak of the proposed debarment
and offered him an opportunity to request a hearing, providing 30 days
from the date of receipt of the letter in which to file the request,
and advised him that failure to request a hearing constituted a waiver
of the opportunity for a hearing and of any contentions concerning this
action. Mr. Lesniak received the proposal and notice of opportunity for
a hearing on October 22, 2022. Mr. Lesniak failed to request a hearing
within the timeframe prescribed by regulation and has, therefore,
waived his opportunity for a hearing and waived any contentions
concerning his debarment. (21 CFR part 12).
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Human and Animal
Food Operations, under section 306(b)(3)(D) of the FD&C Act, under
authority delegated to the Assistant Commissioner, finds that Mr.
Wojciech Lesniak has engaged in a pattern of importing or offering for
import misbranded drugs (i.e. in an amount, frequency, or dosage that
is inconsistent with his personal or household use) that are not
designated in an authorized electronic data interchange system as
products regulated by FDA. FDA finds that this pattern of conduct
should be accorded a debarment period of 5 years as provided by section
306(c)(2)(A)(iii) of the FD&C Act.
As a result of the foregoing finding, Mr. Lesniak is debarred for a
period of 5 years from importing or offering for import any drug into
the United States, effective (see DATES). Pursuant to section 301(cc)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331(cc)), the importing or offering for
import into the United States of any drug by, with the assistance of,
or at the direction of Mr. Lesniak is a prohibited act.
Dated: February 22, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-03958 Filed 2-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P