Reconsideration of Prior Interment and Memorialization Decisions, 12296-12300 [2023-03942]
Download as PDF
12296
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
21 as set forth below:
PART 21—VOCATIONAL
REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION
Subpart D—Administration of
Educational Assistance Programs
1. The authority citation for part 21,
subpart D continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141 note, ch. 1606;
38 U.S.C. 501(a), chs. 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,
and as noted in specific sections.
■
2. Add § 21.4259A to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 21.4259A
Bar to approval.
(a) Beginning on August 1, 2019, a
State approving agency, or the Secretary
when acting in the role of the State
approving agency, shall disapprove a
program of education provided by an
educational institution that has in effect
a policy that is inconsistent with any of
the following:
(1) A policy that permits any covered
individual to attend or participate in the
program of education during the period
beginning on the date on which the
individual provides to the educational
institution any verifiable and
authoritative VA document
demonstrating entitlement to
educational assistance under 38 U.S.C.
chapter 31 or chapter 33 (such as a
decision or notice of decision on
entitlement, letter from VA, updated
award letter from VA, print-out of
eligibility (statement of benefits) from eBenefits, or Statement of Benefits from
the Post-9/11 GI Bill Benefits tool) and
ending on the earlier of the following
dates:
(i) The date on which payment from
VA is made to the institution.
(ii) The date that is 90 days after the
date on which the educational
institution certifies tuition and fees
following receipt of the verifiable and
authoritative VA document proving
entitlement to educational assistance
under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 or chapter
33.
(2) A policy that ensures an
educational institution will not impose
any penalty, including the assessment of
late fees, the denial of access to classes,
libraries, or other institutional facilities,
or the requirement that a covered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:44 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
individual borrow additional funds, on
any covered individual because of the
individual’s inability to meet his or her
financial obligations to the institution
due to the delayed disbursement of a
payment to be provided by VA under 38
U.S.C. chapter 31 or chapter 33.
(b) For purposes of this section, a
covered individual is any individual
who is entitled to educational assistance
under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 or chapter
33.
(c) The Secretary (or designee) may
waive such requirements of paragraph
(a) of this section as the Secretary (or
designee) considers appropriate.
(d) It shall not be inconsistent with a
policy described in paragraph (a) of this
section for an educational institution:
(1) To require a covered individual to
take the following additional actions:
(i) Submit any verifiable and
authoritative VA document to prove
entitlement to educational assistance
under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 or chapter
33 not later than the first day of a
program of education for which the
individual has indicated the individual
wishes to use the individual’s
entitlement to educational assistance.
(ii) Submit a written request to use
such entitlement.
(iii) Provide additional information
necessary to the proper certification of
enrollment by the educational
institution. If an educational institution
intends to require additional
information necessary for proper
certification of enrollment, any such
requirement must be included in the
school’s published catalog and also
must be approved by the State
approving agency, or the Secretary
when acting in the role of the State
approving agency, as being necessary for
proper certification and not overly
burdensome to submit.
(2) In a case in which a covered
individual is unable to meet a financial
obligation to an educational institution
due to the delayed disbursement of a
payment to be provided by VA under 38
U.S.C. chapter 31 or chapter 33 and the
amount of such disbursement is less
than the educational institution
anticipated, to require additional
payment of or impose a fee for the
amount that is the difference between
the amount of the financial obligation
and the amount of the disbursement.
(i) Such additional payment may
include the amount of a financial
obligation associated with charges for
which VA does not pay benefits (e.g.,
room and board, any portion of tuition
for which a claimant does not qualify).
(ii) An educational institution may
utilize its standard debt collection
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
policies for these amounts, including
the assessment of late fees.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3697(e))
[FR Doc. 2023–03964 Filed 2–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900–AR37
Reconsideration of Prior Interment and
Memorialization Decisions
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations to implement VA’s authority
to reconsider a prior decision to inter or
honor the memory of a person in a VA
national cemetery. As of December 20,
2013, VA was authorized to reconsider
a prior decision to inter or memorialize
an individual who was convicted of a
Federal or State capital crime or tier III
sex offense. In addition, VA was
authorized to reconsider a prior
decision to inter or memorialize an
individual who committed a Federal or
State capital crime but was not
convicted of such crime because that
individual was not available for trial
due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution. This proposed rule would
implement review criteria and
procedures for reconsideration of prior
interment or memorialization decisions.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post the comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following
website as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. VA will not post
on Regulations.gov public comments
that make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the
commenter will take actions to harm the
individual. VA encourages individuals
not to submit duplicative comments. We
will post acceptable comments from
multiple unique commenters even if the
content is identical or nearly identical
to other comments. Any public
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
comment received after the comment
period’s closing date is considered late
and will not be considered in the final
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Artis Parker, Executive Director, Office
of Field Programs, National Cemetery
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420. Telephone:
(314) 416–6304 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 5,
2012, the National Cemetery
Administration (NCA) found Michael
LaShawn Anderson eligible for burial at
Fort Custer National Cemetery and
buried him on June 7, 2012. On July 27,
2012, NCA was informed by a
concerned individual that before Mr.
Anderson died, he shot and killed Ms.
Alicia Koehl before he killed himself. At
that time, VA had no authority to
reconsider burial decisions for eligible
individuals, which were considered
permanent and final.
On December 20, 2013, the Alicia
Dawn Koehl Respect for National
Cemeteries Act (the ‘‘Act’’), Public Law
113–65, was enacted, which specifically
authorized VA to disinter the remains of
Michael LaShawn Anderson from Fort
Custer National Cemetery. VA was
required to notify Mr. Anderson’s next
of kin of record of the impending
disinterment of his remains and, upon
disinterment, relinquish the remains to
the next of kin of record or arrange for
an appropriate disposition of remains if
the next of kin of record is unavailable.
In addition, the Act amended 38
U.S.C. 2411 to authorize VA to
reconsider prior decisions to inter or
memorialize individuals who were
convicted of a Federal capital crime, a
State capital crime, or a Federal or State
tier III sex offense, in which the
conviction was final. VA may also
reconsider prior decisions to inter or
memorialize individuals who were later
found to have committed a Federal or
State capital crime but were not
convicted due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution. The term ‘‘Federal capital
crime’’ is defined at section 2411(f)(1) to
mean ‘‘an offense under Federal law for
which a sentence of imprisonment for
life or the death penalty may be
imposed.’’ The term ‘‘State capital
crime’’ is defined at section 2411(f)(2) to
mean, ‘‘under State law, the willful,
deliberate, or premeditated unlawful
killing of another human being for
which a sentence of imprisonment for
life or the death penalty may be
imposed.’’ The term ‘‘tier III sex
offense’’ is defined at section 2411(b)(4)
to mean ‘‘a Federal or State crime
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:44 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
causing the person to be a tier III sex
offender for purposes of the Sex
Offender Registration and Notification
Act’’ (now found at 34 U.S.C. 20901 et
seq.). An individual who was convicted
of a Federal or State tier III sex offense
must also have been sentenced to a
minimum of life imprisonment. VA’s
reconsideration authority applies to any
interment or memorialization in a VA
national cemetery after the date of the
Act’s enactment on December 20, 2013.
VA proposes to add new 38 CFR
38.622 to implement this statutory
reconsideration authority. Section
38.622(a) would provide general
information about the reconsideration
authority and designate the Under
Secretary for Memorial Affairs (USMA)
as the appropriate Federal official who
may reconsider prior interment and
memorialization decisions. This level of
decision-making authority for
reconsideration purposes would be
consistent with existing authority for
cases involving application of the
section 2411 bar for interment and
memorialization at national cemeteries.
See 38 CFR 38.617 (referring to ‘‘the
affected cemetery director, or the
[USMA], or his or her designee’’ to make
determinations involving the section
2411 bar); 38.618 (requiring the USMA
to make a finding of whether a deceased
individual committed a Federal or State
capital crime for which he or she was
not convicted due to death or flight).
Proposed § 38.622(b) and (c) would
describe instances that may result in
reconsideration of prior interment and
memorialization decisions under
criteria defined in 38 U.S.C.
2411(d)(2)(A). In the analysis that
follows, we explain each circumstance
in which VA would reconsider a prior
interment or memorialization decision
and include references to the applicable
statutory provision that imposes the bar
to benefits. We propose, to the extent
practicable, to continue to apply
existing standards and procedures
relating to the bar to interment and
memorialization benefits under section
2411 to implement the reconsideration
authority to maintain clarity and
consistency in VA’s decision-making.
Basis for Application of the
Reconsideration Authority
Proposed § 38.622(b) would describe
two scenarios where reconsideration of
a prior interment or memorialization
decision may be established by a
Federal or State criminal conviction.
Under proposed § 38.622(b)(1), VA may
reconsider a prior interment decision if
VA receives written notification (38
U.S.C. 2411(a)(2), (d)(1), (e)(1)(A)) from
the United States Attorney General or an
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12297
appropriate State official of a final
conviction of a person interred or
memorialized in a national cemetery
who was convicted of a Federal capital
crime (38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1)), a State
capital crime (38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(2)), or
a Federal or State tier III sex offense
meeting the requirements of 38 U.S.C.
2411(b)(4).
Under proposed § 38.622(b)(2), VA
may reconsider a prior interment or
memorialization decision if VA has not
received notification described in
§ 38.622(b)(1), but VA has reason to
believe that a person interred or
memorialized in a national cemetery
may have been convicted of a Federal or
State capital crime meeting the
requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1) or
(2), respectively, or may have been
convicted of a Federal or State tier III
sex offense meeting the requirements of
38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(4). These proposed
provisions for reconsidering a prior
interment or memorialization decision
correspond to the two bases for applying
the section 2411 bar to decedents
convicted of a Federal or State capital
crime or sex offense.
In proposed § 38.622(c), VA may
reconsider a prior interment or
memorialization decision when a
cemetery director, after completing an
official inquiry, determines that there
appears to be clear and convincing
evidence that a person interred or
memorialized in a national cemetery
committed a Federal or State capital
crime but was not convicted due to
death or flight to avoid prosecution (38
U.S.C. 2411(b)(3) and (c)). In such a
case, the cemetery director would
recommend that the USMA reconsider
VA’s decision to inter or memorialize
the decedent. This proposed provision
for reconsideration of prior interment or
memorialization decisions would
correspond to application of the
statutory bar to benefits for decedents
who avoided prosecution and
conviction of a Federal or State capital
crime due to death or flight.
When a cemetery director forwards a
case to the USMA for decision, for one
of the three circumstances described in
§ 38.622(b)(1), (b)(2), or (c), and the
USMA decides to reconsider VA’s prior
interment or memorialization decision,
the USMA must provide written
notification as proposed in § 38.622(d).
Procedural Guidance for
Reconsideration of Prior Interment and
Memorialization Decisions—Conviction
Under proposed § 38.622(d)(1), if VA
learns that the deceased was convicted
of a Federal or State capital crime or
sexual offense, either based on
notification of the conviction
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
12298
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS
(§ 38.622(b)(1)) or after an inquiry
(§ 38.622(b)(2)), and if the USMA
decides to disinter or remove a
memorial headstone or marker, NCA
would provide a copy of the written
notice of the USMA’s reversal decision
to the decedent’s next of kin or other
person authorized to arrange for the
interment or memorialization of the
decedent (i.e., personal representative)
(38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(2)(A)(i)). The
USMA’s written notice of decision
would be in accordance with 38 U.S.C.
5104 (Decisions and notices of
decisions) and include the following
information: (1) identification of the
issues adjudicated; (2) a summary of the
evidence considered by the USMA; (3)
a summary of the applicable laws and
regulations; (4) identification of findings
favorable to the claimant; (5)
identification of elements leading to the
decision to disinter; (6) an explanation
of how to obtain or access evidence
used in making the decision; and (7) an
explanation of appeal rights, which
includes the notice of the opportunity to
file a notice of disagreement with the
decision of the USMA within 60 days
from the date of the notice (38 U.S.C.
2411(d)(2)(B) and (3)(A)).
Procedural Guidance for
Reconsideration of Prior Interment and
Memorialization Decisions—Death or
Flight
Proposed § 38.622(d)(2) would outline
the process that VA would follow for
cases where the cemetery director
determines that there appears to be clear
and convincing evidence that the
decedent avoided being convicted for a
Federal or State capital crime due to
death or flight. In these instances, if the
USMA decides to reconsider the
interment or memorialization decision,
the USMA would provide the
decedent’s next of kin or other person
authorized to arrange for the interment
or memorialization of the decedent (i.e.,
personal representative) with written
notice that VA has reason to believe that
the decedent may have committed a
Federal or State capital crime and the
USMA is reconsidering VA’s prior
decision to inter or memorialize the
decedent. This notice would also
provide the next of kin or personal
representative with procedural options
should they disagree. The notice of
procedural options would inform the
decedent’s next of kin or personal
representative that they may, within 15
days of receipt of notice: request a
hearing on the matter; submit a written
statement, with or without supporting
documentation, for inclusion in the
record; or waive a hearing and
submission of a written statement. If a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:44 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
hearing is requested, the District
Executive Director would conduct the
hearing.
The purpose of the hearing would be
to permit the personal representative of
the deceased to present evidence
concerning whether the deceased
committed a crime that would render
the deceased ineligible for interment or
memorialization in a national cemetery.
Testimony at the hearing would be
presented under oath, and the personal
representative would have the right to
representation by counsel and the right
to call witnesses. The VA official
conducting the hearing would have the
authority to administer oaths. The
hearing would be conducted in an
informal manner and court rules of
evidence would not apply. The hearing
would be recorded on audiotape and,
unless the personal representative
waives transcription, a transcript of the
hearing would be produced and
included in the record. After the
completion of the procedural options
period (including hearing, if requested),
the USMA would then decide whether
there is clear and convincing evidence
that the decedent committed a Federal
or State capital crime for which the
decedent was not convicted due to the
decedent’s unavailability for trial due to
death or flight to avoid prosecution.
If the USMA decides that clear and
convincing evidence does not exist,
NCA would notify the next of kin or
personal representative that the
decedent may remain interred or that
the decedent’s memorial headstone or
marker may remain in the national
cemetery. If the USMA decides that
clear and convincing evidence does
exist, and the USMA further decides to
disinter the remains or remove the
memorialization, NCA would provide
written notice of the decision to the
decedent’s next of kin or personal
representative in accordance with 38
U.S.C. 5104 that includes notice of
appellate rights in accordance with 38
CFR 19.25, following the same
notification of decision process in cases
of Federal or State capital crime or
sexual offense convictions (38 U.S.C.
2411(d)(2)(B) and (3)(A)) in proposed
§ 38.622(d)(1).
Appeal of Decision To Disinter or
Remove Memorialization
Proposed § 38.622(d)(3) references VA
actions after receiving a notice of
disagreement from the next of kin or
personal representative. As mentioned
above, a notification of decision letter
from NCA would include an
opportunity to file a notice of
disagreement with the decision within
60 days of the date of the notice (38
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. 2411(d)(3)(A)). Once the notice of
disagreement is reviewed and the
appellate process is completed, if the
Board of Veterans’ Appeals overturns
the USMA’s decision to disinter the
decedent or remove the decedent’s
memorial headstone or marker, NCA
would notify the next of kin or personal
representative that the decedent may
remain interred or memorialized.
However, if the USMA’s decision to
disinter the decedent or remove the
decedent’s memorial headstone or
marker is affirmed at the completion of
the appellate process, the cemetery
director would provide written
notification to the decedent’s next of kin
or personal representative of this
decision.
Disinterment and Removal of
Memorialization
Proposed § 38.622(e) would describe
VA actions when the decision to
disinter or remove a memorial
headstone or marker becomes final
given the next of kin’s or personal
representative’s failure to timely appeal
the decision or by final disposition of
the appeal. VA would take the following
actions as applicable: disinter the
remains and provide for reinterment or
other appropriate disposition of remains
in a place other than a Veterans
cemetery (which includes but is not
limited to a VA national cemetery or
State or Tribal Veterans Cemetery) or
remove the memorial headstone or
marker placed to honor the memory of
the deceased (38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(4)).
In the case of disinterment, the
cemetery director would contact the
next of kin or other person authorized
to arrange for the deceased’s interment
or memorialization (i.e., personal
representative) to coordinate the transfer
of remains from the national cemetery to
another location. The next of kin or
personal representative would have 30
days to respond to this notification. If
the next of kin or personal
representative responds to the notice
within the 30-day period, VA would
attempt to coordinate a date and time
for the disinterment and release of the
decedent’s remains to the next of kin or
personal representative. VA would
perform the disinterment. However, the
decedent’s next of kin or personal
representative would have to bear the
responsibility and cost of transporting
remains from the cemetery, in
compliance with applicable state laws
concerning the disinterment and
transport of remains from the national
cemetery, as well as costs associated
with subsequent disposition of the
remains.
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
If the next of kin or personal
representative does not respond to the
notice within the 30-day period,
declines to accept the decedent’s
remains, or does not appear at the
agreed upon time and place to accept
the remains, VA would determine a
suitable cemetery for the disposition of
the decedent’s remains and would make
all necessary arrangements to disinter,
transport, reinter, and mark the grave of
the decedent with a non-government
headstone or marker in accordance with
sec. 2411(d)(4)(A) within a reasonable
time frame. VA would then notify the
next of kin or personal representative of
the date and time on which the
disinterment was performed and the
new location of the decedent’s remains.
In the case of a memorial headstone
or marker, the cemetery director would
remove the headstone or marker from
the cemetery, dispose of it in
accordance with NCA policy, and notify
the next of kin or personal
representative of the date on which this
action was taken.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule directly affects the
individuals and establishments that may
be involved with the transfer of remains
process (e.g., next of kin or personal
representative of the decedent and
funeral homes). However, based on the
anticipated aggregate number of cases
involving disinterment or removal of
memorialization headstones or markers,
the VA does not consider the economic
impact to be significant to small entities.
Since the 2013 enactment of the
reconsideration authority in 38 U.S.C.
2411, VA has made only 7
reconsideration decisions in total.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:44 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cemeteries, Claims, Grants
programs, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 7, 2023, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 38 CFR part 38 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 38—NATIONAL CEMETERIES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
1. The authority citation for part 38
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306,
2400, 2402, 2403, 2404, 2407, 2408, 2411,
7105.
■
2. Add § 38.622 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12299
§ 38.622 Reconsideration of prior
interment and memorialization decisions.
(a) General. (1) The Under Secretary
for Memorial Affairs (USMA) is the
appropriate Federal official who may
reconsider a prior decision to inter the
remains or honor the memory of a
person in a national cemetery.
(2) This section sets out the evaluative
criteria and procedures for VA to
reconsider prior interment and
memorialization decisions for decedents
who are subsequently found to have
committed or to have been convicted of
certain criminal acts that would prohibit
them from receiving benefits to which
they are otherwise entitled.
(b) Capital Crime or Sex Offense
Conviction. (1) Upon written
notification from the United States
Attorney General or an appropriate State
official that a person interred or
memorialized in a national cemetery
after December 20, 2013, was convicted
of a Federal or State capital crime and
whose conviction meets the
requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1) or
(2), respectively, or was convicted of a
Federal or State tier III sex offense and
meets the requirements of 38 U.S.C.
2411(b)(4), the USMA may, upon
reconsideration, decide to disinter the
remains or remove the memorial
headstone or marker of such person
from the cemetery.
(2) If VA has not initially received
notification referred to in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, but a cemetery
director has reason to believe that a
person interred or memorialized in a
national cemetery after December 20,
2013, may have been convicted of a
Federal or State capital crime meeting
the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1)
or (2), respectively, or may have been
convicted of a Federal or State tier III
sex offense meeting the requirements of
38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(4), the cemetery
director will initiate an inquiry to the
United States Attorney General or
appropriate State official for
confirmation and provide the results of
such inquiry to the USMA in cases
where a conviction is confirmed, which
will initiate a reconsideration. The
USMA will render a decision on
disinterment or memorial headstone or
marker removal after reviewing the
results of the inquiry submitted by the
cemetery director.
(c) Avoidance of Capital Crime
Conviction Due to Death or Flight. (1) If
a cemetery director has reason to believe
that a person interred or memorialized
in a national cemetery after December
20, 2013, may have committed a Federal
or State capital crime but avoided
conviction of such crime by reason of
unavailability for trial due to death or
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS
12300
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 / Proposed Rules
flight to avoid prosecution, the cemetery
director will initiate an official inquiry
seeking information from Federal, State,
or local law enforcement officials, or
other sources of potentially relevant
information.
(2) If, after conducting the inquiry, the
cemetery director determines that there
appears to be clear and convincing
evidence that the decedent committed a
Federal or State capital crime for which
the decedent was not convicted because
the decedent was unavailable for trial
due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution, the cemetery director will
provide this information to the USMA
who will decide whether to reconsider
the prior decision to inter or
memorialize the decedent. If the USMA
decides to reconsider the prior
interment or memorialization decision,
the USMA will provide notice of
procedural options and follow the
procedures in paragraph (d)(2).
(d) VA Notice of Decision. (1) For
cases involving a Federal or State
capital crime or a tier III sexual offense
conviction, where the USMA decides to
disinter or remove a memorial
headstone or marker, NCA will provide
written notice of that decision to the
decedent’s next of kin or personal
representative. The written notice of
decision will be in accordance with 38
U.S.C. 5104 and will include a notice of
appellate rights in accordance with 38
CFR 19.25. This notice of appellate
rights will include notice of the
opportunity to file a notice of
disagreement with the decision of the
USMA within 60 days from the date of
the decision notice.
(2) In cases in which a cemetery
director has reason to believe that a
person interred or memorialized in a
national cemetery after December 20,
2013, may have committed a Federal or
State capital crime, as described in 38
U.S.C. 2411(f)(1) and (2), but avoided
conviction of such crime by reason of
unavailability for trial due to death or
flight to avoid prosecution, should the
USMA decide to reconsider the prior
interment or memorialization, prior to
rendering written notice of final
decision, VA will follow the following
process:
(i) NCA will provide a notice of
procedural options, which will inform
the decedent’s next of kin or personal
representative that VA is reconsidering
the prior interment or memorialization
of the decedent and that they may,
within 15 days of receipt of notice:
request a hearing on the matter; submit
a written statement, with or without
supporting documentation, for inclusion
in the record; or waive a hearing and
submission of a written statement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:44 Feb 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
(ii) If a hearing is requested, the
District Executive Director will conduct
the hearing. The purpose of the hearing
is to permit the personal representative
of the deceased to present evidence
concerning whether the deceased
committed a crime that would render
the deceased ineligible for interment or
memorialization in a national cemetery.
Testimony at the hearing will be
presented under oath, and the personal
representative will have the right to
representation by counsel and the right
to call witnesses. The VA official
conducting the hearing will have the
authority to administer oaths. The
hearing will be conducted in an
informal manner and court rules of
evidence will not apply. The hearing
will be recorded on audiotape and,
unless the personal representative
waives transcription, a transcript of the
hearing will be produced and included
in the record.
(iii) Following a hearing or the timely
submission of a written statement, or in
the event a hearing is waived or no
hearing is requested and no written
statement is submitted within the time
specified, the USMA will decide
whether there is clear and convincing
evidence that the decedent committed a
Federal or State capital crime for which
the decedent was not convicted due to
the decedent’s unavailability for trial
due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution. If the USMA decides that
clear and convincing evidence does not
exist, the USMA will notify the next of
kin or personal representative that the
decedent may remain interred or that
the decedent’s memorial headstone or
marker may remain in the national
cemetery. If the USMA decides that
clear and convincing evidence exists,
the USMA will provide written notice of
the decision to disinter the decedent or
remove the decedent’s memorial
headstone or marker. The written notice
of decision will be in accordance with
38 U.S.C. 5104 and will include a notice
of appellate rights in accordance with
38 CFR 19.25. This notice of appellate
rights will include notice of the
opportunity to file a notice of
disagreement with the decision of the
USMA within 60 days from the date of
the notice.
(3) Action following receipt of a
notice of disagreement with reversal of
an interment or memorialization
decision under this section will be in
accordance with 38 CFR part 19.
(e) Disinterment or Removal of
Memorialization. A decision to disinter
the remains or remove a memorial
headstone or marker becomes final
either by failure of the next of kin or
personal representative to appeal the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
decision or by final disposition of the
appeal. In such cases, the cemetery
director shall take the following actions:
(1) In the case of disinterment, the
cemetery director will contact the next
of kin or personal representative to
coordinate the transfer of remains from
the national cemetery to another
location. The next of kin or personal
representative will have 30 days to
respond to the cemetery director.
(i) If the next of kin or personal
representative responds to the notice
within the 30-day period, the cemetery
director will coordinate a date and time
for the disinterment and release of the
decedent’s remains to the next of kin or
personal representative for transport
from the national cemetery to a place
determined by the next of kin or
personal representative. The cemetery
director will perform the disinterment.
The next of kin or personal
representative will bear responsibility
and cost for transportation of the
remains from the cemetery, including
compliance with applicable state laws
concerning the disinterment and
transport of remains from the national
cemetery, and any costs associated with
the subsequent disposition of remains.
(ii) If the next of kin or personal
representative does not respond to the
notice within the 30-day period,
indicates refusal to accept the
decedent’s remains, or fails to appear,
the cemetery director will determine a
suitable cemetery for the disposition of
the decedent’s remains and, at
government expense, will make all
necessary arrangements to disinter,
transport, reinter, and mark the grave of
the decedent with a non-government
headstone or marker within a reasonable
time frame. The non-government
headstone or marker will include the
decedent’s name, date of birth, and date
of death. The cemetery director will
then notify the next of kin or personal
representative of the date and time on
which the disinterment was performed
and the new location of the decedent’s
remains.
(2) In the case of a memorial
headstone or marker, the cemetery
director will remove the headstone or
marker from the cemetery and notify the
next of kin or personal representative of
the date on which this action was taken.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512, 2411)
[FR Doc. 2023–03942 Filed 2–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12296-12300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03942]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900-AR37
Reconsideration of Prior Interment and Memorialization Decisions
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations to implement VA's authority to reconsider a prior decision
to inter or honor the memory of a person in a VA national cemetery. As
of December 20, 2013, VA was authorized to reconsider a prior decision
to inter or memorialize an individual who was convicted of a Federal or
State capital crime or tier III sex offense. In addition, VA was
authorized to reconsider a prior decision to inter or memorialize an
individual who committed a Federal or State capital crime but was not
convicted of such crime because that individual was not available for
trial due to death or flight to avoid prosecution. This proposed rule
would implement review criteria and procedures for reconsideration of
prior interment or memorialization decisions.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments received before the close of the
comment period will be available at www.regulations.gov for public
viewing, inspection, or copying, including any personally identifiable
or confidential business information that is included in a comment. We
post the comments received before the close of the comment period on
the following website as soon as possible after they have been
received: https://www.regulations.gov. VA will not post on
Regulations.gov public comments that make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the commenter will take actions to harm
the individual. VA encourages individuals not to submit duplicative
comments. We will post acceptable comments from multiple unique
commenters even if the content is identical or nearly identical to
other comments. Any public
[[Page 12297]]
comment received after the comment period's closing date is considered
late and will not be considered in the final rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Artis Parker, Executive Director,
Office of Field Programs, National Cemetery Administration, Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420.
Telephone: (314) 416-6304 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 5, 2012, the National Cemetery
Administration (NCA) found Michael LaShawn Anderson eligible for burial
at Fort Custer National Cemetery and buried him on June 7, 2012. On
July 27, 2012, NCA was informed by a concerned individual that before
Mr. Anderson died, he shot and killed Ms. Alicia Koehl before he killed
himself. At that time, VA had no authority to reconsider burial
decisions for eligible individuals, which were considered permanent and
final.
On December 20, 2013, the Alicia Dawn Koehl Respect for National
Cemeteries Act (the ``Act''), Public Law 113-65, was enacted, which
specifically authorized VA to disinter the remains of Michael LaShawn
Anderson from Fort Custer National Cemetery. VA was required to notify
Mr. Anderson's next of kin of record of the impending disinterment of
his remains and, upon disinterment, relinquish the remains to the next
of kin of record or arrange for an appropriate disposition of remains
if the next of kin of record is unavailable.
In addition, the Act amended 38 U.S.C. 2411 to authorize VA to
reconsider prior decisions to inter or memorialize individuals who were
convicted of a Federal capital crime, a State capital crime, or a
Federal or State tier III sex offense, in which the conviction was
final. VA may also reconsider prior decisions to inter or memorialize
individuals who were later found to have committed a Federal or State
capital crime but were not convicted due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution. The term ``Federal capital crime'' is defined at section
2411(f)(1) to mean ``an offense under Federal law for which a sentence
of imprisonment for life or the death penalty may be imposed.'' The
term ``State capital crime'' is defined at section 2411(f)(2) to mean,
``under State law, the willful, deliberate, or premeditated unlawful
killing of another human being for which a sentence of imprisonment for
life or the death penalty may be imposed.'' The term ``tier III sex
offense'' is defined at section 2411(b)(4) to mean ``a Federal or State
crime causing the person to be a tier III sex offender for purposes of
the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act'' (now found at 34
U.S.C. 20901 et seq.). An individual who was convicted of a Federal or
State tier III sex offense must also have been sentenced to a minimum
of life imprisonment. VA's reconsideration authority applies to any
interment or memorialization in a VA national cemetery after the date
of the Act's enactment on December 20, 2013.
VA proposes to add new 38 CFR 38.622 to implement this statutory
reconsideration authority. Section 38.622(a) would provide general
information about the reconsideration authority and designate the Under
Secretary for Memorial Affairs (USMA) as the appropriate Federal
official who may reconsider prior interment and memorialization
decisions. This level of decision-making authority for reconsideration
purposes would be consistent with existing authority for cases
involving application of the section 2411 bar for interment and
memorialization at national cemeteries. See 38 CFR 38.617 (referring to
``the affected cemetery director, or the [USMA], or his or her
designee'' to make determinations involving the section 2411 bar);
38.618 (requiring the USMA to make a finding of whether a deceased
individual committed a Federal or State capital crime for which he or
she was not convicted due to death or flight).
Proposed Sec. 38.622(b) and (c) would describe instances that may
result in reconsideration of prior interment and memorialization
decisions under criteria defined in 38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(2)(A). In the
analysis that follows, we explain each circumstance in which VA would
reconsider a prior interment or memorialization decision and include
references to the applicable statutory provision that imposes the bar
to benefits. We propose, to the extent practicable, to continue to
apply existing standards and procedures relating to the bar to
interment and memorialization benefits under section 2411 to implement
the reconsideration authority to maintain clarity and consistency in
VA's decision-making.
Basis for Application of the Reconsideration Authority
Proposed Sec. 38.622(b) would describe two scenarios where
reconsideration of a prior interment or memorialization decision may be
established by a Federal or State criminal conviction. Under proposed
Sec. 38.622(b)(1), VA may reconsider a prior interment decision if VA
receives written notification (38 U.S.C. 2411(a)(2), (d)(1), (e)(1)(A))
from the United States Attorney General or an appropriate State
official of a final conviction of a person interred or memorialized in
a national cemetery who was convicted of a Federal capital crime (38
U.S.C. 2411(b)(1)), a State capital crime (38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(2)), or a
Federal or State tier III sex offense meeting the requirements of 38
U.S.C. 2411(b)(4).
Under proposed Sec. 38.622(b)(2), VA may reconsider a prior
interment or memorialization decision if VA has not received
notification described in Sec. 38.622(b)(1), but VA has reason to
believe that a person interred or memorialized in a national cemetery
may have been convicted of a Federal or State capital crime meeting the
requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1) or (2), respectively, or may have
been convicted of a Federal or State tier III sex offense meeting the
requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(4). These proposed provisions for
reconsidering a prior interment or memorialization decision correspond
to the two bases for applying the section 2411 bar to decedents
convicted of a Federal or State capital crime or sex offense.
In proposed Sec. 38.622(c), VA may reconsider a prior interment or
memorialization decision when a cemetery director, after completing an
official inquiry, determines that there appears to be clear and
convincing evidence that a person interred or memorialized in a
national cemetery committed a Federal or State capital crime but was
not convicted due to death or flight to avoid prosecution (38 U.S.C.
2411(b)(3) and (c)). In such a case, the cemetery director would
recommend that the USMA reconsider VA's decision to inter or
memorialize the decedent. This proposed provision for reconsideration
of prior interment or memorialization decisions would correspond to
application of the statutory bar to benefits for decedents who avoided
prosecution and conviction of a Federal or State capital crime due to
death or flight.
When a cemetery director forwards a case to the USMA for decision,
for one of the three circumstances described in Sec. 38.622(b)(1),
(b)(2), or (c), and the USMA decides to reconsider VA's prior interment
or memorialization decision, the USMA must provide written notification
as proposed in Sec. 38.622(d).
Procedural Guidance for Reconsideration of Prior Interment and
Memorialization Decisions--Conviction
Under proposed Sec. 38.622(d)(1), if VA learns that the deceased
was convicted of a Federal or State capital crime or sexual offense,
either based on notification of the conviction
[[Page 12298]]
(Sec. 38.622(b)(1)) or after an inquiry (Sec. 38.622(b)(2)), and if
the USMA decides to disinter or remove a memorial headstone or marker,
NCA would provide a copy of the written notice of the USMA's reversal
decision to the decedent's next of kin or other person authorized to
arrange for the interment or memorialization of the decedent (i.e.,
personal representative) (38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(2)(A)(i)). The USMA's
written notice of decision would be in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5104
(Decisions and notices of decisions) and include the following
information: (1) identification of the issues adjudicated; (2) a
summary of the evidence considered by the USMA; (3) a summary of the
applicable laws and regulations; (4) identification of findings
favorable to the claimant; (5) identification of elements leading to
the decision to disinter; (6) an explanation of how to obtain or access
evidence used in making the decision; and (7) an explanation of appeal
rights, which includes the notice of the opportunity to file a notice
of disagreement with the decision of the USMA within 60 days from the
date of the notice (38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(2)(B) and (3)(A)).
Procedural Guidance for Reconsideration of Prior Interment and
Memorialization Decisions--Death or Flight
Proposed Sec. 38.622(d)(2) would outline the process that VA would
follow for cases where the cemetery director determines that there
appears to be clear and convincing evidence that the decedent avoided
being convicted for a Federal or State capital crime due to death or
flight. In these instances, if the USMA decides to reconsider the
interment or memorialization decision, the USMA would provide the
decedent's next of kin or other person authorized to arrange for the
interment or memorialization of the decedent (i.e., personal
representative) with written notice that VA has reason to believe that
the decedent may have committed a Federal or State capital crime and
the USMA is reconsidering VA's prior decision to inter or memorialize
the decedent. This notice would also provide the next of kin or
personal representative with procedural options should they disagree.
The notice of procedural options would inform the decedent's next of
kin or personal representative that they may, within 15 days of receipt
of notice: request a hearing on the matter; submit a written statement,
with or without supporting documentation, for inclusion in the record;
or waive a hearing and submission of a written statement. If a hearing
is requested, the District Executive Director would conduct the
hearing.
The purpose of the hearing would be to permit the personal
representative of the deceased to present evidence concerning whether
the deceased committed a crime that would render the deceased
ineligible for interment or memorialization in a national cemetery.
Testimony at the hearing would be presented under oath, and the
personal representative would have the right to representation by
counsel and the right to call witnesses. The VA official conducting the
hearing would have the authority to administer oaths. The hearing would
be conducted in an informal manner and court rules of evidence would
not apply. The hearing would be recorded on audiotape and, unless the
personal representative waives transcription, a transcript of the
hearing would be produced and included in the record. After the
completion of the procedural options period (including hearing, if
requested), the USMA would then decide whether there is clear and
convincing evidence that the decedent committed a Federal or State
capital crime for which the decedent was not convicted due to the
decedent's unavailability for trial due to death or flight to avoid
prosecution.
If the USMA decides that clear and convincing evidence does not
exist, NCA would notify the next of kin or personal representative that
the decedent may remain interred or that the decedent's memorial
headstone or marker may remain in the national cemetery. If the USMA
decides that clear and convincing evidence does exist, and the USMA
further decides to disinter the remains or remove the memorialization,
NCA would provide written notice of the decision to the decedent's next
of kin or personal representative in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5104
that includes notice of appellate rights in accordance with 38 CFR
19.25, following the same notification of decision process in cases of
Federal or State capital crime or sexual offense convictions (38 U.S.C.
2411(d)(2)(B) and (3)(A)) in proposed Sec. 38.622(d)(1).
Appeal of Decision To Disinter or Remove Memorialization
Proposed Sec. 38.622(d)(3) references VA actions after receiving a
notice of disagreement from the next of kin or personal representative.
As mentioned above, a notification of decision letter from NCA would
include an opportunity to file a notice of disagreement with the
decision within 60 days of the date of the notice (38 U.S.C.
2411(d)(3)(A)). Once the notice of disagreement is reviewed and the
appellate process is completed, if the Board of Veterans' Appeals
overturns the USMA's decision to disinter the decedent or remove the
decedent's memorial headstone or marker, NCA would notify the next of
kin or personal representative that the decedent may remain interred or
memorialized. However, if the USMA's decision to disinter the decedent
or remove the decedent's memorial headstone or marker is affirmed at
the completion of the appellate process, the cemetery director would
provide written notification to the decedent's next of kin or personal
representative of this decision.
Disinterment and Removal of Memorialization
Proposed Sec. 38.622(e) would describe VA actions when the
decision to disinter or remove a memorial headstone or marker becomes
final given the next of kin's or personal representative's failure to
timely appeal the decision or by final disposition of the appeal. VA
would take the following actions as applicable: disinter the remains
and provide for reinterment or other appropriate disposition of remains
in a place other than a Veterans cemetery (which includes but is not
limited to a VA national cemetery or State or Tribal Veterans Cemetery)
or remove the memorial headstone or marker placed to honor the memory
of the deceased (38 U.S.C. 2411(d)(4)).
In the case of disinterment, the cemetery director would contact
the next of kin or other person authorized to arrange for the
deceased's interment or memorialization (i.e., personal representative)
to coordinate the transfer of remains from the national cemetery to
another location. The next of kin or personal representative would have
30 days to respond to this notification. If the next of kin or personal
representative responds to the notice within the 30-day period, VA
would attempt to coordinate a date and time for the disinterment and
release of the decedent's remains to the next of kin or personal
representative. VA would perform the disinterment. However, the
decedent's next of kin or personal representative would have to bear
the responsibility and cost of transporting remains from the cemetery,
in compliance with applicable state laws concerning the disinterment
and transport of remains from the national cemetery, as well as costs
associated with subsequent disposition of the remains.
[[Page 12299]]
If the next of kin or personal representative does not respond to
the notice within the 30-day period, declines to accept the decedent's
remains, or does not appear at the agreed upon time and place to accept
the remains, VA would determine a suitable cemetery for the disposition
of the decedent's remains and would make all necessary arrangements to
disinter, transport, reinter, and mark the grave of the decedent with a
non-government headstone or marker in accordance with sec.
2411(d)(4)(A) within a reasonable time frame. VA would then notify the
next of kin or personal representative of the date and time on which
the disinterment was performed and the new location of the decedent's
remains.
In the case of a memorial headstone or marker, the cemetery
director would remove the headstone or marker from the cemetery,
dispose of it in accordance with NCA policy, and notify the next of kin
or personal representative of the date on which this action was taken.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule directly affects the individuals and
establishments that may be involved with the transfer of remains
process (e.g., next of kin or personal representative of the decedent
and funeral homes). However, based on the anticipated aggregate number
of cases involving disinterment or removal of memorialization
headstones or markers, the VA does not consider the economic impact to
be significant to small entities. Since the 2013 enactment of the
reconsideration authority in 38 U.S.C. 2411, VA has made only 7
reconsideration decisions in total. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking
can be found as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and procedure, Cemeteries, Claims, Grants
programs, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 7, 2023, and authorized the undersigned to sign
and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 38 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 38--NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
0
1. The authority citation for part 38 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306, 2400, 2402, 2403,
2404, 2407, 2408, 2411, 7105.
0
2. Add Sec. 38.622 to read as follows:
Sec. 38.622 Reconsideration of prior interment and memorialization
decisions.
(a) General. (1) The Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs (USMA) is
the appropriate Federal official who may reconsider a prior decision to
inter the remains or honor the memory of a person in a national
cemetery.
(2) This section sets out the evaluative criteria and procedures
for VA to reconsider prior interment and memorialization decisions for
decedents who are subsequently found to have committed or to have been
convicted of certain criminal acts that would prohibit them from
receiving benefits to which they are otherwise entitled.
(b) Capital Crime or Sex Offense Conviction. (1) Upon written
notification from the United States Attorney General or an appropriate
State official that a person interred or memorialized in a national
cemetery after December 20, 2013, was convicted of a Federal or State
capital crime and whose conviction meets the requirements of 38 U.S.C.
2411(b)(1) or (2), respectively, or was convicted of a Federal or State
tier III sex offense and meets the requirements of 38 U.S.C.
2411(b)(4), the USMA may, upon reconsideration, decide to disinter the
remains or remove the memorial headstone or marker of such person from
the cemetery.
(2) If VA has not initially received notification referred to in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, but a cemetery director has reason to
believe that a person interred or memorialized in a national cemetery
after December 20, 2013, may have been convicted of a Federal or State
capital crime meeting the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1) or (2),
respectively, or may have been convicted of a Federal or State tier III
sex offense meeting the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2411(b)(4), the
cemetery director will initiate an inquiry to the United States
Attorney General or appropriate State official for confirmation and
provide the results of such inquiry to the USMA in cases where a
conviction is confirmed, which will initiate a reconsideration. The
USMA will render a decision on disinterment or memorial headstone or
marker removal after reviewing the results of the inquiry submitted by
the cemetery director.
(c) Avoidance of Capital Crime Conviction Due to Death or Flight.
(1) If a cemetery director has reason to believe that a person interred
or memorialized in a national cemetery after December 20, 2013, may
have committed a Federal or State capital crime but avoided conviction
of such crime by reason of unavailability for trial due to death or
[[Page 12300]]
flight to avoid prosecution, the cemetery director will initiate an
official inquiry seeking information from Federal, State, or local law
enforcement officials, or other sources of potentially relevant
information.
(2) If, after conducting the inquiry, the cemetery director
determines that there appears to be clear and convincing evidence that
the decedent committed a Federal or State capital crime for which the
decedent was not convicted because the decedent was unavailable for
trial due to death or flight to avoid prosecution, the cemetery
director will provide this information to the USMA who will decide
whether to reconsider the prior decision to inter or memorialize the
decedent. If the USMA decides to reconsider the prior interment or
memorialization decision, the USMA will provide notice of procedural
options and follow the procedures in paragraph (d)(2).
(d) VA Notice of Decision. (1) For cases involving a Federal or
State capital crime or a tier III sexual offense conviction, where the
USMA decides to disinter or remove a memorial headstone or marker, NCA
will provide written notice of that decision to the decedent's next of
kin or personal representative. The written notice of decision will be
in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5104 and will include a notice of
appellate rights in accordance with 38 CFR 19.25. This notice of
appellate rights will include notice of the opportunity to file a
notice of disagreement with the decision of the USMA within 60 days
from the date of the decision notice.
(2) In cases in which a cemetery director has reason to believe
that a person interred or memorialized in a national cemetery after
December 20, 2013, may have committed a Federal or State capital crime,
as described in 38 U.S.C. 2411(f)(1) and (2), but avoided conviction of
such crime by reason of unavailability for trial due to death or flight
to avoid prosecution, should the USMA decide to reconsider the prior
interment or memorialization, prior to rendering written notice of
final decision, VA will follow the following process:
(i) NCA will provide a notice of procedural options, which will
inform the decedent's next of kin or personal representative that VA is
reconsidering the prior interment or memorialization of the decedent
and that they may, within 15 days of receipt of notice: request a
hearing on the matter; submit a written statement, with or without
supporting documentation, for inclusion in the record; or waive a
hearing and submission of a written statement.
(ii) If a hearing is requested, the District Executive Director
will conduct the hearing. The purpose of the hearing is to permit the
personal representative of the deceased to present evidence concerning
whether the deceased committed a crime that would render the deceased
ineligible for interment or memorialization in a national cemetery.
Testimony at the hearing will be presented under oath, and the personal
representative will have the right to representation by counsel and the
right to call witnesses. The VA official conducting the hearing will
have the authority to administer oaths. The hearing will be conducted
in an informal manner and court rules of evidence will not apply. The
hearing will be recorded on audiotape and, unless the personal
representative waives transcription, a transcript of the hearing will
be produced and included in the record.
(iii) Following a hearing or the timely submission of a written
statement, or in the event a hearing is waived or no hearing is
requested and no written statement is submitted within the time
specified, the USMA will decide whether there is clear and convincing
evidence that the decedent committed a Federal or State capital crime
for which the decedent was not convicted due to the decedent's
unavailability for trial due to death or flight to avoid prosecution.
If the USMA decides that clear and convincing evidence does not exist,
the USMA will notify the next of kin or personal representative that
the decedent may remain interred or that the decedent's memorial
headstone or marker may remain in the national cemetery. If the USMA
decides that clear and convincing evidence exists, the USMA will
provide written notice of the decision to disinter the decedent or
remove the decedent's memorial headstone or marker. The written notice
of decision will be in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5104 and will include
a notice of appellate rights in accordance with 38 CFR 19.25. This
notice of appellate rights will include notice of the opportunity to
file a notice of disagreement with the decision of the USMA within 60
days from the date of the notice.
(3) Action following receipt of a notice of disagreement with
reversal of an interment or memorialization decision under this section
will be in accordance with 38 CFR part 19.
(e) Disinterment or Removal of Memorialization. A decision to
disinter the remains or remove a memorial headstone or marker becomes
final either by failure of the next of kin or personal representative
to appeal the decision or by final disposition of the appeal. In such
cases, the cemetery director shall take the following actions:
(1) In the case of disinterment, the cemetery director will contact
the next of kin or personal representative to coordinate the transfer
of remains from the national cemetery to another location. The next of
kin or personal representative will have 30 days to respond to the
cemetery director.
(i) If the next of kin or personal representative responds to the
notice within the 30-day period, the cemetery director will coordinate
a date and time for the disinterment and release of the decedent's
remains to the next of kin or personal representative for transport
from the national cemetery to a place determined by the next of kin or
personal representative. The cemetery director will perform the
disinterment. The next of kin or personal representative will bear
responsibility and cost for transportation of the remains from the
cemetery, including compliance with applicable state laws concerning
the disinterment and transport of remains from the national cemetery,
and any costs associated with the subsequent disposition of remains.
(ii) If the next of kin or personal representative does not respond
to the notice within the 30-day period, indicates refusal to accept the
decedent's remains, or fails to appear, the cemetery director will
determine a suitable cemetery for the disposition of the decedent's
remains and, at government expense, will make all necessary
arrangements to disinter, transport, reinter, and mark the grave of the
decedent with a non-government headstone or marker within a reasonable
time frame. The non-government headstone or marker will include the
decedent's name, date of birth, and date of death. The cemetery
director will then notify the next of kin or personal representative of
the date and time on which the disinterment was performed and the new
location of the decedent's remains.
(2) In the case of a memorial headstone or marker, the cemetery
director will remove the headstone or marker from the cemetery and
notify the next of kin or personal representative of the date on which
this action was taken.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512, 2411)
[FR Doc. 2023-03942 Filed 2-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P