Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers, 10619-10635 [2023-03498]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
NA Measure 9: Implement Nighttime
Optimized Profile Descent Procedures—
Disapproved for Purposes of Part 150.
NA Measure 10: Implement Nighttime
Unlimited Climb Procedures—
Disapproved for Purposes of Part 150.
NA Measure 11: Implement Nighttime
‘‘New Jersey Turnpike’’ Departure
Procedures for Runways 4L and 4R—
Disapproved for Purposes of part 150.
NA Measure 12: Implement Nighttime
‘‘New Jersey Turnpike’’ Departure
Procedures for Runways 22L and 22R—
No Action Required at This Time. This
measure relates to flight procedures
under Title 49 U.S.C. 47504(b). In
accordance with 14 CFR part 150.35(a),
additional coordination will be
occurring with the Air Traffic
Organization and a Supplemental
Record of Approval with FAA’s final
decision on this proposed measure will
be issued on or before August 14, 2023.
NA Measure 13: Continue Existing
Mandatory Departure Noise Limit—No
Action.
Land Use (LU) Measure 1: SoundInsulate Eligible Dwelling Units—
Approved.
LU Measure 2: Sound-Insulate
Eligible Non-Residential Noise-Sensitive
Structures—Approved.
LU Measure 3: Port Authority
Assistance with Establishing an Airport
Noise Overlay Zone—Approved.
Program Management (PM) Measure
1: Maintain Noise Office—Approved.
PM Measure 2: Maintain Noise and
Operations Management System—
Approved.
PM Measure 3: Maintain Public Flight
Tracking Portal—Approved.
PM Measure 4: Maintain Noise
Complaint Management System—
Approved.
PM Measure 5: Maintain Noise Office
website—Approved.
PM Measure 6: Continue Community
Outreach Activities—Approved.
PM Measure 7: Establish a
Community Planners Forum—
Approved.
PM Measure 8: Establish and Manage
a Fly Quiet Program—Approved as
Voluntary.
PM Measure 9: Make Aircraft Noise
Contours Available in a Geographic
Information System (GIS)—Approved.
PM Measure 10: Update the Noise
Exposure Map—Approved.
PM Measure 11: Update the Noise
Compatibility Program—Approved.
PM Measure 12: The Port Authority to
Coordinate with the FAA on
Development and Implementation of
NextGen Procedures—Approved.
These determinations are set forth in
detail in the Record of Approval signed
by the FAA Airports Eastern Division
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
Director on February 15, 2023. The
Record of Approval, as well as other
evaluation materials and the documents
comprising the submittal, are available
for review at the FAA office listed
above. The Record of Approval also will
be available on the internet on the
FAA’s website at https://www.faa.gov/
airports/environmental/airport_noise/
part_150/states/ and the Port Authority
of New York and New Jersey’s website
at https://panynjpart150.com/EWR_
documents.asp.
Issued in Jamaica, NY on February 15,
2023.
David A. Fish,
Director, Airports Division, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–03518 Filed 2–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. 2022–0023]
Waiver of Buy America Requirements
for Electric Vehicle Chargers
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) is establishing
a temporary public interest waiver to
waive Buy America requirements for
steel, iron, manufactured products, and
construction materials in electric
vehicle (EV) chargers. This short-term,
temporary waiver enables EV charger
acquisition and installation to
immediately proceed while also
ensuring the application of Buy America
to EV chargers by the phasing out of the
waiver over time. On the effective date
of this waiver, it will apply to all EV
chargers manufactured by July 1, 2024,
whose final assembly occurs in the
United States, and whose installation
has begun by October 1, 2024.
Beginning with EV chargers
manufactured on July 1, 2024, FHWA
will phase out coverage under this
waiver for those previously covered EV
chargers where the cost of components
manufactured in the United States does
not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components. This second phase will
therefore apply to all EV chargers that
are manufactured on or after July 1,
2024, whose final assembly occurs in
the United States, and for which the
cost of components manufactured in the
United States is at least 55 percent of
the cost of all components. For all
phases, EV charger housing components
that are predominantly steel and iron
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10619
are excluded from the waiver and must
meet current FHWA Buy America
requirements. As of the effective date of
this waiver, FHWA is also removing EV
chargers from its existing general
applicability waiver for manufactured
products.
DATES: The temporary waiver is
effective starting on March 23, 2023.
Comments may be submitted to
FHWA’s website via the link to this
waiver on https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
construction/contracts/waivers.cfm by
February 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this notice, please
contact Mr. Brian Hogge, FHWA Office
of Infrastructure, 202–366–1562, or via
email at Brian.Hogge@dot.gov. For legal
questions, please contact Mr. David
Serody, FHWA Office of Chief Counsel,
202–366–4241, or via email at
David.Serody@dot.gov. Office hours for
FHWA are from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Priorities of the Administration
The Biden-Harris Administration has
laid out a bold vision for making
transformative transportation
investments to support job growth and
reshape the U.S. transportation system,
strengthen the U.S. economy and
competitiveness, and support a
sustainable energy and climate future.
In January 2021, President Biden issued
Executive Order (E.O.) 14008, titled
‘‘Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home
and Abroad’’ (86 FR 7619, Feb. 1, 2021).
This E.O. states that the U.S. faces ‘‘a
climate crisis that threatens our people
and communities, public health and
economy, and starkly, our ability to live
on planet Earth.’’ The President directed
the Federal Government ‘‘to organize
and deploy the full capacity of its
agencies to combat the climate crisis to
implement a governmentwide approach
that reduces climate pollution in every
sector of the economy,’’ including
through the ‘‘deployment of clean
energy technologies and infrastructure.’’
The President has set the ambitious goal
of building a national network of
500,000 EV chargers by 2030.1
On November 15, 2021, the President
signed into law the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the
1 White House Fact Sheet: Biden Administration
Advances Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
(Apr. 22, 2021), available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statementsreleases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-bidenadministration-advances-electric-vehicle-charginginfrastructure/.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
10620
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
(IIJA) (Pub. L. 117–58). The BIL makes
the most transformative investment in
EV charging in U.S. history, including
$5 billion over 5 years that will be made
available under the new National
Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI)
Formula Program.2 As outlined in
statute, the purpose of the NEVI
Formula Program is to ‘‘provide funding
to States to strategically deploy EV
charging infrastructure and to establish
an interconnected network to facilitate
data collection, access, and reliability.’’
See BIL, Division J, Title VIII, Highway
Infrastructure Program heading,
Paragraph (2). This purpose would be
satisfied by creating a convenient,
affordable, reliable, and equitable
network of EV chargers throughout the
country. The BIL also includes many
additional funding and financing
programs with eligibilities for EV
charging infrastructure, including
formula, discretionary, other allocated,
and innovative finance programs.3
These historic investments across the
Federal Government in EV charging
under BIL will put the U.S. on a path
to meeting the President’s goal for EV
charging infrastructure and ensuring a
convenient, reliable, affordable, and
equitable charging experience for all
users.
At the same time as the
Administration seeks to ensure
successful and timely delivery of EV
infrastructure projects, the
Administration also seeks to maximize
the use of American made products and
materials. In January 2021, President
Biden issued E.O. 14005, titled
‘‘Ensuring the Future is Made in All of
America by All of America’s Workers’’
(86 FR 7475, Jan. 28, 2021). This E.O.
states that the U.S. Government
‘‘should, consistent with applicable law,
use terms and conditions of Federal
financial assistance awards and Federal
procurements to maximize the use of
goods, products, and materials
produced in, and services offered in, the
United States.’’ The FHWA is
committed to ensuring strong and
effective Buy America implementation
consistent with E.O. 14005.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. FHWA Buy America Requirements
The FHWA’s existing Buy America
requirements for steel, iron, and
2 See https://highways.dot.gov/newsroom/
president-biden-usdot-and-usdoe-announce-5billion-over-five-years-national-ev-charging.
3 Federal Funding is Available For Electric
Vehicle Charging Infrastructure On the National
Highway System, FHWA (April 22, 2022), available
at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
environmentalternative_fuel_corridors/resources/
ev_funding_report_2022.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
manufactured products are set forth at
23 U.S.C. 313 and 23 CFR 635.410. The
FHWA also has a standing waiver under
23 U.S.C. 313(b), the Manufactured
Products General Waiver, which has
been in effect since 1983 and covers
manufactured products that are not
predominantly steel and iron and are
funded under title 23, U.S.C.4 See 48 FR
53099 (Nov. 25, 1983). Thus, FHWA’s
current Buy America requirements
apply to FHWA-funded projects and
require that all steel and iron that are
permanently incorporated into a project
must be produced in the United States
unless a waiver is granted, including
predominantly steel and iron
components of a manufactured product.
As applied to products other than iron
and steel, the term ‘‘produced’’ in 23
U.S.C. 313 includes physical final
assembly and manufacturing processes.
This requirement applies to the
obligation of funds authorized to carry
out title 23, U.S.C. In addition, for all
predominantly steel or iron materials,
products, or components to be used in
projects that involve the obligation of
title 23, U.S.C. funds, all manufacturing
processes, including application of
coating, must occur in the U.S. Coating
includes all processes which protect or
enhance the value of the material to
which the coating is applied. In
addition, under 23 U.S.C. 313(h), the
Buy America requirements apply to all
contracts that are eligible for FHWA
assistance regardless of the funding
source if any contract within the scope
of a determination under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
involves an obligation of Federal funds.
The BIL also includes new Build
America, Buy America (‘‘BABA’’)
provisions to strengthen domestic
manufacturing, which expand the
coverage and application of Buy
America preferences in Federal
financial assistance programs for
infrastructure. BIL, div. G sections
70901–27. The BABA applies those
requirements to obligations made after
May 14, 2022. BIL section 70914(a).
However, BABA’s domestic content
procurement preferences only apply to
the extent that a domestic content
procurement preference, as described in
section 70914, does not already apply to
iron, steel, manufactured products, and
construction materials. BIL section
70917(a)–(b). Where they do apply,
BABA requires that funds for a Federal
financial assistance program for
infrastructure may not be obligated for
4 As explained in Section III.A below, while the
Manufactured Products General Waiver continues
to remain in effect, FHWA is removing EV chargers,
as defined below, from its coverage.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a project unless all of the iron, steel,
manufactured products, and
construction materials used in the
project are produced in the United
States. BIL section 70914(a). Under
BABA, iron or steel products are
considered to be produced in the United
States if all manufacturing processes,
from the initial melting stage through
the application of coatings, occurred in
the United States. BIL section
70912(6)(A). Manufactured products are
considered to be produced in the United
States if (i) the manufactured product
was manufactured in the United States;
and (ii) the cost of the components of
the manufactured product that are
mined, produced, or manufactured in
the United States is greater than 55
percent of the total cost of all
components of the manufactured
product, unless another standard for
determining the minimum amount of
domestic content of the manufactured
product has been established under
applicable law or regulation. BIL section
70912(6)(B). Finally, under BABA, a
construction material is considered to
be produced in the United States if all
manufacturing processes for the
construction material occurred in the
United States. BIL section 70912(6)(C).
By statute at 23 U.S.C. 313, FHWA
has domestic content preferences for
steel, iron, and manufactured products,
so the requirements under 23 U.S.C. 313
apply to steel, iron, and manufactured
products instead of the requirements
under BABA. As FHWA’s existing Buy
America requirement does not
specifically cover construction
materials, other than to the extent that
such materials would already be
considered iron, steel, or manufactured
products, the Buy America preferences
under section 70914 of BABA apply for
construction materials. For the purpose
of this notice, ‘‘Buy America
requirements’’ refers to FHWA’s existing
requirements for steel, iron, and
manufactured products under 23 U.S.C.
313 and requirements for construction
materials under section 70914 of BABA.
The BABA further required the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) to
issue guidance to assist in applying
BABA’s requirements. BIL section
70915. On April 18, 2022, OMB issued
memorandum M–22–11, ‘‘Initial
Implementation Guidance on
Application of Buy America Preference
in Federal Financial Assistance
Programs for Infrastructure’’
(‘‘Implementation Guidance’’). Section
VII(b) of the Implementation Guidance
states that ‘‘Federal agencies may wish
to consider issuing a limited number of
general applicability public interest
waivers in the interest of efficiency and
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
to ease burdens for recipients.’’
Implementation Guidance at p. 10.
Under 23 U.S.C. 313(b) and section
70914(b) of BABA, FHWA may consider
a Buy America waiver when either (i)
the application of the requirements
under 23 U.S.C. 313(b) and section
70914 of BABA would be inconsistent
with the public interest; or (ii) when
products are not produced in the United
States in sufficient and reasonably
available quantities of a satisfactory
quality.5 This waiver is being issued on
the basis of its consistency with the
public interest.
C. Summary of FHWA’s Proposed
Waiver of Buy America Requirements
for EV Chargers
In order to ensure delivery and
meaningful results on EV charging
projects using Federal-aid highway
funds throughout the U.S., FHWA
issued a Notice of Proposed Waiver of
Buy America Requirements for Electric
Vehicle Chargers on August 31, 2022, at
87 FR 53539. The FHWA proposed a
waiver of Buy America requirements
with respect to steel, iron, manufactured
products, and construction materials for
EV chargers on FHWA-assisted
infrastructure projects, on the basis that
applying the domestic content
preferences for these materials would be
inconsistent with the public interest. 87
FR 53539. In doing so, FHWA also
proposed removing EV chargers from
the Manufactured Products General
Waiver to allow for the uniform
implementation of all Buy America
requirements applicable to an EV
charger. Through this proposed waiver,
FHWA sought to treat EV chargers as
manufactured products subject to their
own, separate waiver. FHWA structured
the proposed waiver to partially phase
out over a specified timeframe to a
domestic content threshold that is
generally consistent with how
manufactured products are covered
under section 70914 of BABA. In
proposing this waiver, FHWA
considered information gathered from a
November 24, 2021, Request for
Information (RFI), published
collectively by DOT and the U.S.
Department of Energy. 86 FR 67115
(Nov. 24, 2021). In line with FHWA
policy, Section 123 of Division A of
Public Law 111–117, and Section 117 of
Public Law 110–244, FHWA also
included a link to the proposed waiver
on its website.6
5 Section 70914(b)(3) of BABA also provides a
cost-based condition for a waiver, which FHWA’s
regulation addresses at 23 CFR 635.410(b)(3)
through alternate bid procedures.
6 See https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/
contracts/waivers.cfm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
For the proposed waiver, FHWA
proposed that the term ‘‘EV charger’’
include EV chargers and associated
payment systems, distribution systems,
telecommunications and networking
equipment, energy storage systems, and
other supporting equipment and
systems that are (i) in the immediate
vicinity of a charger or group of chargers
and (ii) essential to the function or
operation of a charger or group of
chargers. The FHWA proposed the term
‘‘charger’’ exclude parking areas
adjacent to the EV chargers and lanes for
vehicle ingress and egress.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA
proposed to initially apply a complete
waiver to EV chargers and all
components of EV chargers that are
installed in a project during calendar
year 2022. The FHWA proposed to
consider an EV charger as being
‘‘installed in a project’’ when the EV
charger is permanently incorporated
into or affixed to a Federal-aid funded
infrastructure project. Following the
initial proposed phase in calendar year
2022, FHWA proposed to partially
phase-out the waiver in two steps
during calendar year 2023. Beginning on
January 1, 2023, FHWA proposed to
remove from the waiver EV chargers
whose final assembly does not occur in
the United States. Beginning on July 1,
2023, FHWA proposed to additionally
remove from the waiver EV chargers for
which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 25 percent of the cost of all
components. Beginning on January 1,
2024, and thereafter, FHWA proposed to
remove from the waiver EV chargers for
which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components. The final waiver, which
would be applicable only if final
assembly occurred in the U.S. and the
cost of components manufactured in the
U.S. exceeded 55 percent of the cost of
all components, was proposed as
remaining in place until terminated by
FHWA.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA
proposed that the cost of components
that are purchased when they are
incorporated into an EV charger be
determined by including the acquisition
costs (including transportation costs to
the place of incorporation into the end
product) and any applicable duty
(regardless of whether a duty-free
certificate of entry is issued). The
FHWA proposed that the cost of
manufactured components include all
costs associated with the manufacture of
the component (including
transportation costs and quality testing),
and allocable overhead costs, but FHWA
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10621
proposed to exclude profits and any
labor costs associated with the
manufacture of the end product. The
FHWA proposed that costs include costs
incurred specifically for the contract;
benefit both the contract and other work
and can be distributed to each in
reasonable proportion to the benefits
received; or are necessary to the overall
operation of the business, even if a
direct relationship to any particular cost
objective cannot be shown.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA
requested comments on all aspects of
the proposed waiver, including the
definition of ‘‘EV charger;’’ the phases of
the proposed schedule set forth in the
proposed waiver; alternative dates and
supporting information for alternative
dates if applicable; whether there
should be four phases as proposed; how
many chargers would be fully compliant
with BABA requirements at each phase
of the proposed waiver and by the end
of the 5-year NEVI Program and how
many would not be compliant at each
phase; the reliability of chargers; the
cost completeness of chargers;
production rates and capacity of
chargers; the timing of delivery upon
the order or purchase of chargers;
whether industry expects its production
rates and capacity for chargers to be
consistent with the proposed schedule;
how the proposed schedule or
alternative dates impact installation
schedules in the field; whether to
establish different phase-out schedules
for Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC)
chargers and Alternating-Current Level
1 (ACL1) and Level 2 (ACL2) chargers;
the proposed meaning of cost of
component; whether to use the
installation date of the EV charger or
some other date to determine which
phase a given charger would be covered
by; whether and how to apply FHWA’s
existing Buy America requirement for
iron and steel to any specific
predominantly steel and iron EV charger
components; and the reliable
availability of such steel and iron
components which are capable of
complying with FHWA’s existing Buy
America policy.
II. Summary of Major Changes
Reflected in the Final Waiver
In light of the comments received on
the proposed waiver demonstrating the
inability of EV charger manufacturers to
produce a steady and reliable supply of
EV chargers, FHWA is making several
changes to the timeline in the final
waiver for multiple reasons described in
further detail below, including to allow
manufacturers additional time to
domestically source components for
their EV chargers:
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
10622
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. FHWA is eliminating the proposed
first phase in the proposed waiver,
which would have applied a complete
waiver of Buy America requirements to
EV chargers and all components of EV
chargers.7
2. The start date of the second phase
of the proposed waiver (the first phase
of the final waiver), which removes
from the waiver EV chargers whose final
assembly process does not occur in the
U.S., will now occur on the effective
date of this waiver instead of January 1,
2023, and the end date of this phase has
been extended to June 30, 2024.8 In
addition, during this phase, any housing
components that are predominantly
steel and iron must comply with
existing FHWA Buy America steel and
iron requirements, meaning that if
predominantly iron and steel housing is
used for the EV charger, the housing
must be entirely manufactured in the
United States according to FHWA
standards.
3. The third phase of the proposed
waiver, which would have removed
from the waiver EV chargers for which
the cost of components manufactured in
the U.S. does not exceed 25 percent of
the cost of all components, has been
eliminated in the final waiver.9
4. The start date of the fourth phase
of the proposed waiver (the second
phase of the final waiver), which
removes from the waiver EV chargers for
which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components, has been extended from
beginning on January 1, 2024, as in the
proposed waiver, to beginning on July 1,
2024.10 In addition, any housing
components that are predominantly
steel and iron must continue to comply
with FHWA Buy America steel and iron
requirements, meaning that the housing
must be entirely manufactured in the
United States according to FHWA
standards. The cost of predominantly
steel and iron EV charger housing will
also count towards determining whether
55 percent of the cost of all components
are manufactured in the U.S.
5. As required under section 70914(d)
of BABA, FHWA is clarifying that it will
revisit this waiver and determine
whether there is continued need for it
within 5 years from the effective date of
this notice. The FHWA will also publish
RFIs every 6 months until the start of
7 Throughout this notice, this phase will be
referred to as the ‘‘complete waiver’’ phase.
8 Throughout this notice, this phase will be
referred to as the ‘‘final assembly phase.’’
9 Throughout this notice, this phase will be
referred to as the ‘‘25 percent phase.’’
10 Throughout this notice, this phase will be
referred to as the ‘‘55 percent phase.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
the 55 percent phase to acquire
information about the state of the EV
charging industry.
6. The proposed waiver also used the
installation date of the EV charger to
determine which phase of the waiver
would apply to any given EV charger.
The final waiver instead uses the date
on which an EV charger is
manufactured, which is defined in
further detail below in Section III.C.
However, any EV chargers
manufactured before June 30, 2024, (the
end of the final assembly phase) will
need to begin installation by October 1,
2024, to be covered by this waiver.
7. The FHWA also has simplified and
narrowed the definition of ‘‘EV charger’’
in a manner that will maximize the use
of domestic goods, products, and
materials. The proposed waiver defined
‘‘EV charger’’ to include EV chargers
and associated payment systems,
distribution systems,
telecommunications and networking
equipment, energy storage systems, and
other supporting equipment and
systems: (i) in the immediate vicinity of
a charger or group of chargers; and (ii)
essential to the function or operation of
a charger or group of chargers. The
definition of ‘‘EV charger’’ as used in
this final waiver only refers to the selfcontained EV charging unit; it does not
include associated equipment.
The reasons for these changes are
discussed in more detail in the next
section.
III. Response to Comments Received
The FHWA received 92 comments
and 1 supplemental comment from 89
different commenters, including
automobile manufacturers, EV charger
manufacturers, EV charger installers,
members of the steel and aluminum
industries, labor organizations, private
associations, public associations, local
public agencies, State departments of
transportation (State DOT), and several
individuals. While several commenters
raised objections to the waiver as
proposed, most commenters were in
favor of some version of a waiver of
applicable Buy America requirements.
The FHWA discusses the main
objections to the proposed waiver and
major categories of comments below.
In accordance with section 70916(c)
of BIL, FHWA consulted with the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology’s Hollings Manufacturing
Extension Partnership before issuing
this waiver.
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Applicability of FHWA’s
Manufactured Products General Waiver
to EV Chargers
The proposed waiver suggested
removing EV chargers from FHWA’s
Manufactured Products General Waiver.
By doing so, the manufactured product
content in EV chargers would be subject
to the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 313,
with this waiver serving to provide a
phased approach to exempt certain
chargers from these requirements over
time. The FHWA stated that continuing
to apply the Manufactured Products
General Waiver to EV chargers would be
inconsistent with the objectives of
BABA and is not supported by currently
available information on domestic
manufacturing capabilities. Removing
EV chargers from the Manufactured
Products General Waiver and issuing
this final waiver allows all aspects of EV
chargers to be covered by a single
waiver and thus Buy Americacompliant. The FHWA believes that
individuals who take advantage of this
waiver can avoid confusion and know
the domestic content procurement
preferences applicable to EV chargers.
The FHWA did not receive
substantive comments objecting to this
approach and is therefore removing EV
chargers, as defined in this waiver, from
FHWA’s existing Manufactured
Products General Waiver.
B. Opposition to the Proposed Waiver
Eight commenters, (the Steel
Manufactures Association (SMA),
United Steelworkers, Nucor
Corporation, Aluminum Extruders Fair
Trade Committee (AEFTC), American
Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Alliance
for American Manufacturing (AAM),
BorgWarner, Inc., and the American
Federation of Labor and Congress of
Industrial Organizations) expressed that
they did not support the proposed
waiver, presenting various objections
that are summarized below:
Indefinite Duration of Proposed
Waiver: SMA and the Nucor
Corporation criticized the proposed
waiver as being of an indefinite
duration, arguing that this was contrary
to OMB’s Implementation Guidance,
which stated that waivers should be
time-limited. United Steelworkers also
noted that FHWA’s Manufactured
Products General Waiver remains in
place after almost 40 years and was
concerned that FHWA would similarly
fail to narrow the proposed waiver after
its initialization.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees
that the waiver is not, and should not
be, indefinite and, as clarified in more
detail below, will review the waiver
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
(including by providing an opportunity
for public notice and comment) within
5 years of its issuance, and will
discontinue the waiver if it is found to
no longer be in the public interest at
that time, in accordance with section
70914(d) of BABA. The FHWA will also
monitor the domestic supply of EV
chargers throughout the course of this
waiver and may choose to discontinue
this waiver or make changes to the
timeline described below if FHWA finds
that there is a sufficient domestic
supply of EV chargers available.
Specifically, as further explained below,
this waiver will only feature two phases:
a final assembly phase and, after a
phase-out period, a 55 percent phase.
During the final assembly phase, FHWA
will conduct biannual RFIs to assess
industry progress on producing a
charger that would be covered by the 55
percent phase and whether the EV
charger industry is on track to meet the
timeline set out in this waiver. Based on
information received during these RFIs,
FHWA may determine during the final
assembly phase that domestic
manufacturing capacity is able to
produce a sufficient amount of chargers
to meet the demand of recipients that
would exist under the 55 percent phase.
If this occurs, FHWA may discontinue
the final assembly phase and proceed
immediately to the 55 percent phase by
phasing out from this waiver’s coverage
EV chargers for which the cost of
components manufactured in the U.S.
does not exceed 55 percent of the cost
of all components.
Congressional Intent of Domestic
Content Preferences: AISI and the Nucor
Corporation argued that the proposed
waiver was contrary to Congress’ intent
in establishing Buy America
requirements, as these commenters
believed that Congress intended Buy
America requirements to cover all items
made primarily of iron and steel. The
SMA, AAM, and Nucor Corporation
added that it is the Administration’s
policy to maximize the use of domestic
steel, iron, manufactured products, or
construction materials in federally
funded infrastructure, not to use foreign
items. Similarly, objecting commenters
argued that the waiver is contrary to
Congress’ intent in passing BABA,
noting the Congressional findings in
section 70911 of BABA and stating that
section 70914(a) required that FHWA
ensure that Buy America requirements
apply to iron, steel, manufactured
products, and construction materials.
The FHWA Response: FHWA
acknowledges that compliance with Buy
America is both an Administration
priority and required under Federal law.
Also, EV chargers purchased using
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
10623
funds from the NEVI Formula Program
established by Congress as part of BIL
are to be administered under title 23,
U.S.C.,11 including the Buy America
requirements under 23 U.S.C. 313. At
the same time, however, FHWA does
not believe that Congress envisioned
applying FHWA’s Buy America
requirement (now codified at 23 U.S.C.
313) to EV chargers when it first enacted
these requirements, starting in 1978
with the Surface Transportation
Assistance Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–599).
Rather, for the foreseeable future where
this waiver is necessary to encourage
domestic industry to ramp up
production of EV chargers, it furthers
Congressional intent for EV chargers
purchased through the NEVI Program to
more closely align with the
requirements of BABA, which, like the
NEVI Formula Program, was also
established in BIL.
Pursuant to its authority under Buy
America, FHWA believes it is in the
public interest, as well as more in
harmony with the Congressional intent
behind BABA and the BIL, to waive
certain Buy America requirements for a
temporary period when FHWA is not
convinced that manufacturers would be
able to meet demand for Buy Americacompliant EV chargers on FHWAfunded projects, which would threaten
the ability for those infrastructure
projects to be completed in a timely
manner. The FHWA believes it most
appropriate to carry out Congress’ intent
to timely complete EV charger
infrastructure projects and ensure that
the steel, iron, manufactured products,
and construction materials used in
infrastructure projects are produced in
the United States through a specially
tailored waiver that balances the need to
have a supply of EV chargers with the
need to ramp up domestic production
through a phased approach, which,
during the 55 percent phase, will cover
EV chargers in close alignment with the
BABA standards for manufactured
products. The FHWA also proposed and
intends to implement a final waiver
with a phased approach, which
provides an incentive for manufacturers
to shift toward domestic manufacturing
processes to comply with the narrowing
scope of the waiver.
Further, as discussed in more detail
below, FHWA plans to exclude the
housing, cabinet, or enclosure of an EV
charger (hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘housing’’) of EV chargers, if that
component is predominantly steel or
iron, from coverage under both phases
of this waiver. Doing so gives effect to
FHWA’s long-standing practice of
excluding predominantly steel and iron
components of manufactured products
from the Manufactured Products
General Waiver. This also seeks to
remove uncertainty among recipients 12
and the EV charger industry over which
components would need to comply with
FHWA’s existing requirements for iron
and steel. The FHWA believes that this
final waiver therefore is consistent with
the public interest and is justified
pursuant to section 70914(b)(1) of
BABA.
Presence of Buy America-Compliant
EV Chargers: The eight commenters that
objected to the proposed waiver also
disputed points made in the notice
justifying the proposed waiver and
claimed that this meant that there was
no public interest justification for the
proposed waiver. The Nucor
Corporation, AEFTC, and BorgWarner,
Inc., for example, stated that there are
existing EV chargers that are compliant
with FHWA’s Buy America
requirements and that a waiver would
disadvantage these manufacturers that
have already made significant
investments to be Buy Americacompliant. These commenters pointed
to companies that responded in the
2021 RFI by stating that their EV
chargers met FHWA’s Buy America
requirements for steel and iron as well
as other companies that have stated that
they can meet FHWA’s overall Buy
America requirements.
The FHWA Response: While FHWA
acknowledges the progress that some
companies have made in manufacturing
Buy America-compliant EV chargers,
FHWA is still uncertain whether these
companies can respond to the
immediate demand for EV chargers that
will result from programs under BIL,
such as the NEVI Formula program and
supply equipment that is certified as
fully Buy America-compliant. The
FHWA is also unsure if statements that
existing EV chargers are Buy Americacompliant are relying on the
Manufactured Products General Waiver
being available to cover non-domestic
components that are not predominantly
steel or iron. While some manufactures
may be able to domestically assemble
chargers at the present, FHWA is
concerned that many manufacturers
could not produce Buy Americacompliant chargers without the
Manufactured Products General Waiver
being in effect. The FHWA believes, as
noted above, that removing EV chargers
11 See BIL, Division J, Title VIII, Highway
Infrastructure Program heading, Paragraph 2,
twenty-fourth proviso.
12 When used in this notice, a recipient refers to
direct recipients of FHWA financial assistance,
subrecipients, and pass-through entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10624
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
from the Manufactured Products
General Waiver aligns with the goals of
Buy America requirements and seeks to
ensure that EV chargers are produced
with domestic manufactured
components. Finally, FHWA seeks to
reiterate that this waiver does not
prohibit the purchase of Buy Americacompliant EV chargers by a recipient if
such chargers are available; the
comments received, however, indicate a
limited supply of EV chargers that is
currently insufficient to ensure that EV
charger infrastructure projects are
delivered on time, which is the basis for
this waiver.
Existing Buy America Processes:
Similarly, commenters mentioned that
FHWA has long-standing and welldeveloped regulatory and administrative
rules related to the implementation and
enforcement of Buy America
requirements for steel and that suppliers
on FHWA projects have needed to
comply with these steel requirements
for decades. According to these
commenters, this history of compliance
meant that there should be no
uncertainty and no additional time
needed to comply with Buy America
steel requirements as applied to EV
chargers, contrary to what they argued
was depicted in the proposed waiver.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees
that there are steel suppliers who are
highly knowledgeable about FHWA’s
Buy America requirements as they
apply to steel. At the same time, EV
chargers that are currently on the market
may not have been designed to be
compliant with FHWA’s Buy America
requirements, especially considering
that they may have been designed with
the belief that they would be covered by
FHWA’s Manufactured Products
General Waiver. Further, they may
contain steel components obtained from
suppliers all over the world. The FHWA
believes that the presence of steel in an
EV charger does not mean that
recipients could comply with Buy
America requirements merely by
complying with existing Buy America
steel requirements. Further, it is not
clear to FHWA that EV chargers that are
currently available on the market use
Buy America compliant steel, or that
other aspects of the EV charger would
not render them noncompliant with Buy
America requirements without this
waiver going into effect. Again, FHWA
stresses that the purpose of this waiver
is to encourage manufacturers of EV
chargers to transition to a point where
they utilize components manufactured
in America, including those made out of
steel. As noted below, while the housing
of an EV charger is a specific component
that when made predominantly of iron
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
and steel does not need to be covered
by this waiver, this is not true for all
components of EV chargers.
Traceability of Steel Inputs: The
Nucor Corporation, SMA, and AISI also
argued that certifying that steel is Buy
America-compliant is not new or
difficult, contrary to how they claimed
it was presented as a justification for the
proposed waiver. These commenters
stated that there is nothing unique about
the steel used in EV chargers that would
make Buy America certification more
difficult, as mill test certificates for steel
inputs are routinely provided to
distributors and fabricators that these
commenters allege provide complete
traceability throughout the distribution
chain.
The FHWA Response: FHWA
understands that steel producers have
developed certain methods they use to
certify that their steel is Buy Americacompliant, but FHWA does not believe
that this affects the need for this waiver.
As set out in the proposed waiver, there
is a need to establish compliance and
certification processes focused
specifically on EV chargers. The FHWA
does not believe that just because there
are existing processes for certifying that
steel is Buy America-compliant
intrinsically means that there are
existing processes for certifying that the
EV charger and all of its components are
Buy America-compliant.
At the same time, as described in
more detail below, FHWA does believe
that these commenters make a valid
point for predominantly steel and iron
components of EV chargers that are
widely available from domestic
suppliers. This is one of the reasons
why FHWA is excluding the housing of
a charger if it is predominantly iron or
steel from coverage under this waiver.
The commenters’ point, however, does
not hold for other components that are
not predominantly iron or steel and for
which the ability for any small amount
of steel to be accurately traced in them
does not necessarily ensure that the EV
charger is Buy America-compliant.
Environmental Impacts of Foreign
Steel: The Nucor Corporation, SMA, and
AISI further claimed that foreign steel is
often produced and transported with
significantly higher greenhouse gas
emissions that would occur with
domestic production and transportation,
which they argued meant that allowing
for the use of foreign steel would be
counter to the environmental goals
undergirding the purchase and
installation of EV chargers.
The FHWA Response: Through this
waiver, FHWA seeks to incentivize
domestic manufacturers to ramp up
production and make needed
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investments to build and expand
domestic production in order to support
a sustainable energy and climate future.
The FHWA does not intend for
recipients of FHWA financial assistance
to continue to rely on components
manufactured overseas that might have
steel in them to the extent practical once
those components are manufactured and
available in the United States; this is the
intent behind the phase-out of chargers
for the 55 percent phase and potential
future phases. Further, while FHWA’s
existing Buy America requirements
would apply to any steel or iron
component of an EV charger, they
would not cover the charger itself. The
FHWA believes that this waiver, which,
after a phase out period, waives Buy
America requirements only for EV
chargers where final assembly occurs in
the U.S. and the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. exceeds 55
percent of the cost of all components,
which would align with BABA’s
requirements for manufactured
products, encourages recipients, their
contractors, and subcontractors to
utilize more domestic steel than under
FHWA’s existing Buy America
requirements.
C. Applicability Date of Waiver and
Waiver Phase-Out Periods
Thirty-three commenters
recommended a different date of
applicability than the installation date
used in the proposed waiver.13
Commenters noted that there may be a
significant difference in time between
when a product is manufactured and
when it is installed due to unforeseen
circumstances, such as permitting
delays, supply chain constraints, utility
interconnection delays, delivery delays,
prolonged adverse weather, potential
workforce shortages, and routine
certification and quality checks that
commercial operators perform on
industrial products before putting them
into service. Such circumstances could
result in EV chargers being
manufactured during one phase of the
proposed waiver (and consistent with
the requirements in place during that
phase) and installed in another,
13 Unlike the effective date, which is the date
where this waiver’s first phase would begin, the
date of applicability refers to the date on which an
event occurs that determines which phase of this
waiver would cover a specific EV charger. For
example, under this final waiver, an EV charger
with a date of applicability of July 20, 2023, would
need to have final assembly occur in the United
States to be covered by this waiver. An EV charger
with a date of applicability of July 20, 2024, on the
other hand, would need to have final assembly
occur in the United States and have at least 55
percent of the cost of all components manufactured
in the United States to be covered by this waiver.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
resulting in those chargers no longer
being covered by this waiver and risking
them not being Buy America-compliant.
These commenters stated that relying on
the installation date would prevent
recipients, their contractors,
subcontractors, and EV charger
manufacturers from knowing which
phase of the proposed waiver any given
EV charger might be covered by,
creating uncertainty and financial risk;
commenters warned that this could
discourage parties from moving forward
with purchase decisions until the start
of the 55 percent phase. The EV charger
manufacturers also noted that they
would not be able to certify with
certainty that their EV chargers were
covered by this waiver and therefore
Buy America-compliant, as they would
have no control over the date their
chargers were installed. Finally,
commenters pointed out that using the
date of installation would potentially
risk manufacturers either producing a
glut of EV chargers that could not be
used on FHWA-assisted projects or that
manufacturers would delay producing
chargers until those chargers would be
compliant with the 55 percent phase to
ensure their ability to be used in FHWAfunded projects.
In terms of alternatives, the most
common suggestion made by
commenters, including Wallbox, USA,
Inc. (Wallbox), PowerCharge, bp pulse
fleet, the Electric Vehicle Charging
Association (EVCA), Tesla, Inc. (Tesla),
the American Association of State
Highway Traffic Officials (AASHTO),
and the Associated General Contractors
of America (AGC), recommended that
FHWA use the manufacture date of the
EV charger as the date of applicability.
AASHTO noted that this would allow
EV charger manufacturers to sell and
install equipment that had been
manufactured prior to this waiver’s
effective date. The AGC commented that
using the manufacture date would
reduce the opportunity for external
factors to cause delays, as the
manufacture date occurs at the
beginning of the EV charger production
process. Wallbox stated that using the
date of final assembly as the date of
applicability could allow EV suppliers
to streamline reporting and enforcement
of Buy America requirements.
Eight commenters (including Revel
Transit (Revel), EVgo, Electrify America,
LLC (Electrify America), and FreeWire
Technologies (FreeWire)) recommended
that the date on which FHWA obligated
funds be used as the date of
applicability, arguing that it was more
predictable than the date of installation.
The Kansas Department of
Transportation (KDOT) commented that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
using the date of obligation would allow
recipients to move forward on EV
charging infrastructure projects with an
exact understanding of how this waiver
would apply to their projects; EVgo
similarly stated that this would ensure
applicants for FHWA financial
assistance would be aware of what
phase of this waiver would be
applicable to their project. The
Maryland Department of Transportation
(MDOT) stated that using the date of
obligation would allow vendors to
provide existing EV chargers for projects
to enable those projects to be
implemented as soon as possible.
Other commenters recommended
using the date on which an EV charger
is purchased as the date of applicability
for this waiver and its phases. Volta Inc.
(Volta) stated that the date a charger is
purchased is the date at which vendors
solidify pricing and orders with their
suppliers. Shell USA, Inc. (Shell)
commented that using the purchase date
as the date of applicability would enable
both the project applicant and their EV
charger vendor or supplier to ascertain
their ability to be covered under this
waiver and its phases with a high degree
of predictability.
Other suggestions for the date of
applicability included the date on
which a solicitation is released, the date
where the funding agreement between
the FHWA and awarded entity is
executed, the date on which the
submission of bids for the project is due,
the date that the EV charger is shipped
from the manufacturer, the date of
delivery of the EV charger, and to match
the phase of the waiver with funding
dedicated for specific fiscal years.
The FHWA Response: After reviewing
the comments, FHWA agrees that
relying on the date of installation to
determine the date of applicability is
impractical. Due to the current
unavailability of Buy Americacompliant EV chargers, as well as other
factors noted by commenters such as the
time to acquire proper permits and
approvals that might delay installation
after procurement of an EV charger,
recipients of FHWA financial assistance
who purchase EV chargers might not
know when those chargers will be
installed on their EV infrastructure
projects at the time of purchase. Using
the installation date as the date of
applicability could mean that those
recipients, their contractors, and
subcontractors would face uncertainty
over whether, by the time an EV charger
is installed, that EV charger would still
be covered by the phase of the waiver
existing when the charger was
purchased, which FHWA believes will
determine how that charger is
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10625
manufactured. The FHWA
acknowledges that uncertainty
surrounding when a procured EV
charger will be installed could result in
parties waiting to purchase EV chargers
until the 55 percent phase of this
waiver, which goes against the purpose
of this waiver in promoting the timely
delivery of EV infrastructure projects.
In considering alternative effective
dates, FHWA acknowledges that the
goal should be to provide certainty to
EV charger manufacturers and to those
purchasing EV chargers with Federalaid funds that the EV charger they will
manufacture, purchase, and install will
comply with this waiver. For that
reason, FHWA agrees with the plurality
of commenters suggesting an alternative
and believes that the most appropriate
date of applicability would be the date
on which an EV charger is
manufactured. The FHWA considers the
‘‘date of manufacture’’ to be the date on
which the EV charger, as defined further
below, has its final assembly occur and
is in an operational state. The
manufacturer will be in the best
position to know if their chargers
comply with this waiver, as they would
be the ones to ensure that the chargers
are domestically assembled or sourced.
A purchaser can therefore be confident
that, for example, if they enter into a
purchase order for a charger that is
domestically assembled to comply with
the final assembly phase of this waiver,
they will receive a charger compliant
with this waiver so long as the
manufacturer can manufacture a
domestically assembled charger by June
30, 2024. If a manufacturer cannot, a
purchaser can turn to another
manufacturer to receive a charger that
complies with this waiver.
To ensure the timely delivery of EV
charger infrastructure projects, for EV
chargers manufactured during this
waiver’s final assembly phase, FHWA
expects recipients will begin installation
of those EV chargers by October 1, 2024.
D. Timeline of Waiver
Removing Phases from the Waiver:
The most common category of comment
FHWA received on the proposed waiver
was with respect to the phase-out
timeline proposed. Of 89 unique
commenters, 48 recommended an
extension for the waiver. Of the other 41
commenters, 17 agreed with the need
for a waiver without mentioning
extending the proposed waiver’s
timelines, 5 had an unclear position, 3
did not mention extending the waiver’s
timeframes but instead requested that
the waiver have a flexible duration, 2
argued that the final waiver should not
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10626
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
have any phases, and the remaining 14
argued against a waiver entirely.14
The two commenters who argued that
the final waiver should not have any
phases, FreeWire and Broadband
Telecom Power, Inc. (BTC Power),
stated that the proposed phases were
unnecessary, added compliance tracking
challenges for the industry, and lacked
commensurate benefit for EV charging
projects. FreeWire also stated that they
assumed some EV charger
manufacturers would be able to more
readily source components domestically
than perform final assembly
domestically. Instead of phases, BTC
Power recommended that the waiver
start on its effective date with the 55
percent phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not
agree that a single-phase approach
would serve the public interest more
than a waiver where coverage of certain
chargers is gradually phased out
through phases. As noted below,
commenters raised many more concerns
with domestically sourcing components
than they did with ensuring that final
assembly of EV chargers occurs in the
United States, and FHWA believes that
EV charger manufacturers will be able to
assemble chargers domestically before
they are able to ensure that 55 percent
of components, by cost, are
manufactured in the United States. The
FHWA received no indication that there
were manufacturers who would have
more difficulty having final assembly of
their chargers occur in the United
States, beyond FreeWire’s assumption,
and FHWA does not believe the
hypothetical existence of such
companies justifies adding complexity
to the waiver.
The FHWA also believes that the
phased approach provides an incentive
to manufacturers to ramp up production
while, crucially, ensuring that there is a
steady supply of EV chargers available
that covered by this waiver and
therefore Buy America-compliant.
Having the waiver start at the 55 percent
phase, like BTC Power suggested, risks
having a limited supply of covered
chargers at this waiver’s effective date,
which may unnecessarily delay EV
charger infrastructure projects. Further,
this waiver does not require that EV
charger manufacturers create chargers
that comply with any given phase;
manufactures may choose to ignore this
waiver and produce otherwise Buy
America-compliant chargers. What this
waiver does is provide certainty to how
14 Eight of these 14 commenters were the
commenters mentioned in Section III.A. The
remaining six presented objections against the
waiver without providing substantive arguments as
to their reasoning.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
manufactures can achieve Buy America
compliance and sets steps for them to
reach a point where an EV charger
would be covered if the EV charger met
certain conditions similar to the
requirements imposed on a
manufactured product under BABA.
Extension of Waiver’s Time Periods:
Of the 48 commenters arguing for an
extension of the waiver, there were
various suggestions on how long that
extension should be. Some commenters,
such as AASHTO, argued for extending
the dates of the final assembly, 25
percent, and 55 percent phases by 2
years from what was in the proposed
waiver. Others, such as the Electric
Drive Transportation Association and
PowerCharge, recommended extended
those same dates by 1 year from what
was in the proposed waiver. Still others
recommended extending those dates by
6 months from what was in the
proposed waiver. Finally, many
commenters argued for modifying the
dates of the phase-out periods from the
proposed waiver in non-uniform
durations. Tesla, for example,
recommended keeping the start of the
final assembly phase on January 1, 2023,
but recommended delaying the start of
the 25 percent and 55 percent phases by
6 months. The Ford Motor Company
(Ford), Wallbox, and Blink Charging Co.
(Blink Charging) similarly
recommended keeping the start of the
final assembly phase at January 1, 2023,
but recommended delaying the start of
the 25 percent phase by 6 months and
the start of the 55 percent phase by 1
year. Finally, several commenters also
asked for FHWA to evaluate the
progress of the EV charger industry and
listen to feedback from recipients and
the EV charger industry to determine
whether phases should be subsequently
extended.
These 48 commenters routinely
mentioned that the proposed waiver’s
timeline was not achievable and that an
extension was necessary to ensure that
EV chargers which would be covered by
this waiver would be available. Some
commenters stated that EV charger
manufacturers would not be able to
domestically assemble EV chargers on
the proposed waiver’s timeframe. EVgo,
for instance, stated that domestically
assembled chargers would not be
available at sufficient scale by January 1,
2023, and Electrify America commented
that they thought domestic assembly of
150 kilowatt (kW) EV chargers would be
underway industry-wide only by the
latter half of 2023, with reliability
testing concluding and those chargers
being available for purchase in 2024.
EVgo further commented that it
conducts up to a yearlong ‘‘qualification
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
process’’ for new suppliers which
requires a nearly produced or produced
test unit.
Multiple members of the EV charging
industry argued in favor of extending
the proposed waiver’s timeframe,
generally due to concerns with sourcing
EV charger components domestically to
allow a charger to be covered under the
55 percent phase.15 The only EV charger
manufacturer who stated that they could
meet the proposed waiver’s timeframes
was ABB E-Mobility.
FreeWire requested an extension so
that recipients and the EV charger
industry could have time to complete a
thorough assessment of the cost of
components and to establish proper
certifications. FreeWire also stated that
FHWA was underestimating the
complexity and long-lead time it would
take to source components and that
ongoing supply chain disruptions
limited the availability of domestic
components. For these reasons,
FreeWire requested that all Buy
America requirements become effective
on July 1, 2024, one-and-a-half years
after the final assembly phase and 6
months after the 55 percent phase
would have started in the proposed
waiver.
SK Signet commented that while
domestic assembly might be achievable
in the near future, some components are
not available from domestic sources,
while other components were available
domestically but at vastly greater prices
than foreign components. SK Signet
recommended delaying the start of the
final assembly phase until July 1, 2023,
and the 55 percent phase until January
1, 2026.
Blink Charging stated that
establishing sufficient domestic
production, securing new suppliers, and
validating the safety of their products
takes time, which is amplified by the
ongoing equipment and materials
shortages and shipment delays
stemming from global supply chain
constraints. Blink Charging further
commented that these constraints are
particularly acute for DCFC components
and recommended a 1-year delay in
phase-out dates.
Wallbox stated that it would be ready
for final assembly in the U.S. shortly but
15 As noted above, several members of the EV
charging industry did not comment on the proposed
waiver’s timeframe, including Tritium, Siemens,
Enel X Way, TeraWatt, and FLO EV Charging.
ChargePoint commented that a blanket waiver for
ACL2 chargers should be extended until January 1,
2024, without making clear when subsequent
phases for these chargers would start; this point is
discussed in Section III.C further below. The bp
pulse fleet did not comment either way, stating that
it would rely on others to speak to the appropriate
schedule.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
that there were significant challenges
facing the industry in terms of the
procurement and sourcing of
components, which would be
exacerbated by the demand for
components caused by the NEVI
Formula Program. Wallbox suggested
having the final assembly phase start on
January 1, 2023, as proposed in the
waiver, with subsequent phase-out
periods each starting 1 year later.
Wallbox did not clearly indicate that
they could domestically assemble EV
chargers by January 1, 2023; however,
they hinted that they could and did not
recommend an extension to the
proposed waiver’s January 1, 2023, date.
Volta, on the other hand, commented
that they believed it possible to
domestically assemble EV chargers by
January 1, 2023, but thought that
starting the 55 percent phase on January
1, 2024, was unreasonable based on its
suppliers’ low confidence of being able
to produce an EV charger that could be
covered by the 55 percent phase.
Among other companies, WiTricity
stated that many EV charger
components are not manufactured in the
United States, which they stated would
only happen if chargers were
manufactured in sufficient volume to
generate adequate demand. Tesla added
that an extension to the timeline of the
proposed waiver would allow
manufactures time to fully assess their
supply chains, calculate domestic
content values, enter into new supply
agreements, and reorient their supply
chains.
Many State officials also argued in
favor of extending the proposed
waiver’s timeframe for the same reasons
mentioned by EV charger
manufacturers.16 The AASHTO
similarly claimed delays and increased
costs could result if EV charging
equipment providers were required to
shift component sourcing to domestic
suppliers, who may struggle with
availability due to limited quantities of
EV chargers and EV charger components
and high demand. The AASHTO also
commented that the practical ability for
the industry to source American-made
EV charger components would take
longer than the proposed timeframe
permitted.
State DOTs also requested the
proposed timeline be extended due to
the experience they have had in
16 The AASHTO, the National Association of
State Energy Officials, and a total of 18 State DOTs
submitted comments, with all but one State DOT,
the New Jersey Department of Transportation
(NJDOT), indicating that the proposed timeline is
not achievable. The NJDOT instead argued in favor
of a temporary waiver without specifically
commenting on its proposed timeframe.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
attempting to procure EV chargers. State
DOTs pointed to the fact that orders
placed for EV chargers remain unfilled
after considerable time due to supply
chain issues. The KDOT stated that they
had heard from their stakeholders that
wait times for some electrical
components in EV chargers stretched to
60–80 weeks, even without considering
the increased demand created by the
investments under BIL. The KDOT also
commented that although there are
some manufacturers with currently
available equipment that is Buy
America-compliant, they did not believe
there was adequate capacity yet to fill
the rapidly expanding need for EV
chargers.
In essence, these commenters stated
that the current delay in producing EV
chargers meant that chargers may be
ready for purchase after some phases of
the proposed waiver have already
ended, with particular emphasis on this
being the case for the first phase, which
was proposed as ending on December
31, 2022. FreeWire stated that they
doubted whether any States would
complete the installation of NEVI
projects before the first quarter of 2024,
at the earliest. FreeWire also stated that
they expected it to take State
administrators several months to design
and issue solicitations, with some States
expected to take longer as they have
indicated that they would take 1 to 2
years conducting further planning
before beginning the procurement
process. For the States that do issue
solicitations for NEVI projects in the
next several months, FreeWire
commented that they expected the
solicitation period to last several more
months, with more time being taken for
States to make awards. Similarly, EVgo
commented that many States plan to
solicit proposals for charging stations
beginning in late 2022 and extending
into early 2023. The Georgia Department
of Transportation (GDOT) mentioned
that it may not be ready to install EV
chargers until well after 2022, with
installation not expected to occur until
2024 at the earliest, meaning that the
2022 waiver period would be useless.
The MDOT similarly commented that,
to its knowledge, no State DOT or
associated vendor would be able to
benefit from the first phase of the waiver
as the earliest dates for project awards
they projected would be in the spring of
2023. East Bay Community Energy
stated that the short timeframe of the
first phase would likely have no impact
on market acceleration, and Tesla
commented that the first phase would
provide little relief since States have not
issued requests for proposals regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10627
EV charger deployment. Other issues
raised by commenters to justify an
extension of the proposed waiver’s
timeframe were the difficulty for EV
charger manufacturers and their
suppliers to understand the waiver;
price volatility; the need to alter
manufacturing processes; potentially
increased demand for EV chargers from
both the public and private sector,
which may result in potentially
increased cost; the additional time it
would take to conduct safety and
reliability testing on the newly
domestically produced chargers; the
necessary delay to ensure that there are
suitable numbers of replacement parts;
potential workforce issues; and the lack
of a final rule from FHWA on the
technical requirements for EV chargers
under the NEVI Formula Program. Due
to many of these factors, EVgo stated
that the limited number of chargers
available and the significant expected
increase in demand meant that chargers
may not be available until late 2024 or
early 2025.
In terms of the benefits of extending
the proposed waiver’s timeline, Siemens
Corporation (Siemens) commented that
a delay would be necessary to account
for the limited supply of EV chargers
that are currently available, and that the
timeline of any waiver needed to
consider the time it would take to
procure, deliver, and install EV chargers
in order for that waiver to have a
meaningful effect. Similarly, General
Motors (GM) stated that an extension
would provide the time necessary to
onshore supply chains, ramp up
production, and conduct necessary
testing of new chargers.
The FHWA Response: In terms of the
complete waiver phase of the proposed
waiver, FHWA does not agree with
commenters that it is necessary to
extend this phase beyond the date set
out in the proposed waiver; FHWA
instead believes that commenters
indicated why this phase is not in the
public interest. Commenters argued that
the complete waiver phase as proposed,
which would have occurred only in
calendar year 2022, would start and end
without a steady supply of EV chargers
available for procurement. The FHWA
disagrees with this assessment. For the
purpose of this waiver, the question is
whether there will be enough chargers
available to satisfy the demand posed by
recipients.
The purpose of the complete waiver
phase in the proposed waiver was to
provide time for EV charger
manufacturers to domestically assemble
a sufficient supply of chargers for when
the first phase-out period occurred.
Once EV charger manufacturers have
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10628
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
such a supply available, FHWA believes
it appropriate to phase out from this
waiver’s coverage all EV chargers that
do not have final assembly occur in the
United States. The EV charger
manufacturers, who FHWA believes
have the most insight as to when they
can domestically assemble an EV
charger, differed on what date they
recommended for the final assembly
phase to start. ChargePoint, Inc.
(ChargePoint), Blink Charging, and
PowerCharge requested that this phase
start in 2024; however, others, such as
Volta and Wallbox, approved of the
proposed date of January 1, 2023, for the
start of the final assembly phase. Based
on comments received, FHWA expects
recipients to start to procure chargers in
early 2023. The FHWA expects EV
charger manufacturers who stated a
preference for the final assembly phase
to start on January 1, 2023, to be able
to provide the limited number of
chargers requested by recipients in early
2023. Throughout 2023, as more
recipients seek to procure EV chargers,
FHWA expects this demand to be met
by increases in the number of
domestically assembled chargers
produced by EV charger manufactures.
As the proposed first phase-out date
of January 1, 2023, has already occurred
and, as described above, FHWA does
not believe it necessary to delay this
date, FHWA finds that a complete
waiver phase would not be in the public
interest.
Twenty-five Percent Phase: Other
commenters criticized the 25 percent
phase of the proposed waiver as being
overly complex and burdensome.
Several commenters pointed out that
this phase would not assist in reaching
the final 55 percent phase of the waiver.
Enel X Way USA, LLC (Enel X Way) and
Tritium commented that by eliminating
the 25 percent phase, manufacturers
would be provided more time to solidify
the necessary partnerships, suppliers,
and supply chain resources to ensure
that EV chargers are covered by the 55
percent phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees
that the 25 percent phase is unnecessary
and would not serve the public interest.
The FHWA initially proposed this phase
to serve as a gradual step between
having the waiver cover chargers whose
final assembly process occurred in the
United States and phasing out from
coverage under this waiver EV chargers
for which the cost of components
manufactured in the United States does
not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components, leading to the 55 percent
phase. The FHWA believed that doing
so would incentivize manufacturers
during the 25 percent phase to make
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
progress to reaching the point where
they could produce chargers that would
be covered by the 55 percent phase of
the waiver. The FHWA intended that
manufacturers would shift their
processes to account for the 25 percent
threshold and then shift again to
account for the 55 percent threshold.
Based on the comments received,
FHWA no longer believes that
manufacturers will make the initial shift
to produce chargers that could be
covered by the 25 percent phase.
Instead, FHWA believes that
manufacturers will simply shift their
processes to produce EV chargers that
are covered by the 55 percent phase,
rendering the 25 percent phase pointless
for many of them.
Further, for those manufactures that
do attempt to take advantage of the
existence of the 25 percent phase by
altering their processes to produce EV
chargers where the cost of components
manufactured in the United States
exceeds 25 percent of the cost of all
components, FHWA is concerned that
doing so may hinder these manufactures
from producing EV chargers that could
be covered by the 55 percent phase,
which undermines this waiver’s goal of
incentivizing the production of EV
chargers assembled and sourced in
America. While FHWA wishes to
incentivize companies to produce EV
chargers that are Buy Americacompliant as quickly as they are able to,
starting with EV chargers that would be
covered by the 55 percent phase, FHWA
no longer believes that the 25 percent
phase is a useful means in reaching this
goal.
Start of 55 Percent Phase: With the
removal of the complete waiver phase
and the 25 percent phase, this waiver
will start with the final assembly phase
on its effective date and its first phaseout will occur at the start of the 55
percent phase. At this time, EV chargers
covered by the final assembly phase for
which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components will be removed from this
waiver’s coverage. Removing the 25
percent phase, however, necessitates
consideration of when to now end the
final assembly phase and begin the first
phase-out period that commences the 55
percent phase.
Commenters gave a wide range of
dates for when the 55 percent phase
should start, from January 1, 2024, to
January 1, 2026. Again, FHWA finds the
dates that EV charger manufactures
suggested to be important
considerations, as they will be the ones
domestically sourcing chargers for the
55 percent phase. Many EV charger
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
manufacturers, such as Tritium, Enel X
Way, Siemens, and TeraWatt
Infrastructure (TeraWatt), did not
suggest an alternative to the 55 percent
phase while making recommendations
on other aspects of the proposed waiver,
indicating tacit approval of FHWA’s
proposed date of January 1, 2024.
Others, such as Wallbox, PowerCharge,
Volta, and Blink Charging, suggested
modifying this date to January 1, 2025.
SK Signet was among the few
commenters who argued for a proposed
date of January 1, 2026.
The FHWA Response: Given the range
of extension timelines suggested by
commenters, FHWA believes it is
appropriate to extend the date of the
final assembly phase such that it ends
on June 30, 2024. The first phase-out
period under this final waiver, starting
the 55 percent phase, where FHWA will
remove from the waiver EV chargers for
which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components, will therefore begin on
July 1, 2024. This date is between the
two dates proposed by the majority of
EV charger manufacturers. Similar to
the discussion on the final assembly
phase, this should not affect
manufacturers who recommended a
start date for the 55 percent phase of
January 1, 2024. For those that
recommended later dates, this may
serve to expedite the domestic sourcing
process so these manufactures can
compete with ones that are able to
domestically source by January 1, 2024.
In addition, FHWA notes that many
manufacturers recommended a date for
the start of the 55 percent phase at the
same time as they recommended a new
date for the start of the 25 percent
phase. With the 25 percent phase
removed, FHWA expects manufactures
to be able to modify their processes to
produce chargers covered by the 55
percent phase faster, as these
manufactures will not have to perform
an additional modification of their
processes to produce chargers that could
be covered by the 25 percent phase. The
FHWA believes that extending the start
of this first phase-out for a year properly
considers the concerns of many
commenters regarding the time it takes
to domestically source components,
without extending the waiver for so long
that it no longer provides a proper
incentive for manufactures to comply
with the Administration’s goals of
encouraging the domestic
manufacturing and assembling of EV
chargers. The FHWA expects all
recipients to procure EV chargers during
this phase, with many recipients that
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
had already procured chargers in
previous phases using this phase to
procure additional chargers using NEVI
Formula Program funds from additional
years.
The FHWA will also regularly
monitor the status of the domestic EV
charger industry. If the industry is
advancing with production of Buy
America-compliant EV chargers faster
than expected, FHWA may discontinue
this waiver or alter this waiver’s
timelines accordingly. To accomplish
this goal, FHWA will conduct biannual
RFIs to receive information on the status
of the EV charger industry during the
final assembly phase, which may lead
FHWA to commencing the first phaseout and starting the 55 percent phase
earlier than July 1, 2024. If FHWA plans
to modify this waiver, FHWA will
provide adequate notice of its intention
to do so. As required by section
70914(d) of BIL, 5 years from the
effective date of this waiver, FHWA will
also revisit this waiver to determine
whether there is still a need to continue
it or whether the domestic EV charger
industry has advanced to a point where
this waiver can be discontinued.
Removal of Defined Dates: Some
commenters went further than merely
extending the waiver and suggested that
the inclusion of any sort of date would
be inappropriate and that FHWA should
base its waiver off of market research or
other metrics. The Oklahoma
Department of Transportation (OKDOT)
requested FHWA publish an RFI and
conduct extensive research on the
availability of the materials
manufactured in the U.S. before phasing
out the waiver. The GDOT commented
that setting the duration of any phase in
advance would be arbitrary and that the
only baseline that should be used is EV
charger production data. The National
Association of Truck Stop Operators
(NATSO) and the Society of
Independent Gasoline Marketers of
America (SIGMA) jointly commented
that FHWA should waive Buy America
requirements until it is clear that a
competitive market of products that
meet Buy America requirements are
available at scale. The City of Dallas
stated that any timeframe should be
delayed until a predefined set of
manufacturing and installation metrics
are achieved. The AGC also agreed with
using market research to identify
manufacturing capacity for the purpose
of setting phase out dates. The AGC
argued that setting specific dates may
encourage EV charger manufacturers to
rush production to produce chargers
before these dates, causing them to fail
to test these chargers for safety and
reliability. The AGC also commented
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
that setting specific dates for the start of
phases risk manufacturers failing to
produce chargers that can be covered
under a given phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA
disagrees with commenters suggesting
that this waiver should not feature
specific dates and believes that specific
timeframes and phase-out dates are
useful in providing recipients of FHWA
financial assistance certainty as to the
requirements that will apply at any
given time for purchases of EV chargers.
Waiver periods that are tied only to the
results of contemporary market research
may change suddenly, disrupting
planning made by recipients, their
contractors, and subcontractors. In
addition, specific dates provide industry
vendors with a clear timetable to
encourage them to shift to
manufacturing and assembling EV
chargers domestically as quickly as
possible. Again, FHWA is issuing this
waiver both after considering the
current and projected state of the market
and to encourage an increase in
domestic content within the market over
time. While FHWA acknowledges that
some EV charger manufacturers may not
be able to produce compliant chargers
within the timeframe set out in this
waiver, FHWA believes that delaying
the phases of this waiver to account for
such manufacturers goes against the
purpose of Buy America requirements
and the Administration’s goals of
realizing American production of EV
chargers. In addition, FHWA intends to
collect new information as it becomes
available via biannual RFIs and, as
detailed above, may enter into the 55
percent phase before the scheduled July
1, 2024, date depending on the
information received.
Bifurcating Timeframes for ACL2 and
DCFC Chargers: Several commenters
brought up the differences between
ACL1 and ACL2 chargers and DCFC
chargers and argued that these
differences justified different waiver
timeframes for the two kinds of
chargers. EVgo commented that ACL2
chargers contain fewer components and
cost dramatically less than DCFC
chargers. EVgo further commented that
it expected the domestic DCFC charger
market to take longer to develop to a
point where those chargers could be
produced domestically at scale than
they expected for the domestic ACL2
charger market. EVgo claimed that
DCFCs require more highly specialized
manufacturing processes, that the ACL2
charger market is more robust currently
than the DCFC charger market, and that
the company expected demand to be
lower for ACL2 chargers in the NEVI
Formula Program. Electrify America
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10629
commented that because ACL2 chargers
have become relatively commoditized,
unlike DCFC chargers which are a
relatively new technology, there should
be different phase-out schedules for the
two kinds of chargers. Electrify America
suggested that ACL2 chargers follow the
proposed waiver phase-out schedule
whereas DCFC chargers be permitted an
extended schedule. ChargePoint, on the
other hand, stated that supply chains
were less advanced for ACL2 chargers
than DCFC chargers due to a lack of
prior demand for Buy Americacompliant ACL2 chargers and
recommended extending the waiver for
ACL2 chargers until January 1, 2024, to
account for that.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not
believe that there is a need to bifurcate
this waiver’s phase-out schedule for
ACL2 chargers and DCFC chargers. To
start with, the comments received on
this issue differed in the basic notion of
whether bifurcation was necessary to
account for delays in the ACL2 charger
market or delays in the DCFC charger
market. Further, FHWA does not intend
this waiver to be overly burdensome on
recipients and believes that bifurcating
phase-out periods would unnecessarily
confuse recipients as to which waiver
period a given charger may fall into,
without providing any clear benefit.
E. 350 kW DCFC Chargers
Some commenters raised special
concerns over 350kW DCFC chargers.
These comments generally proceeded
along the same path. First, these
commenters stated that DCFC chargers
are the best chargers to be purchased
using NEVI Formula Program funds.
Pilot Travel Centers LLC (Pilot), for
instance, commented that Congress,
FHWA, and States EV Deployment
Plans clearly favored deployment of 350
kW DCFC chargers. In a joint comment,
Pilot, GM, and EVgo further stated that
recent investments in EV charging
infrastructure illustrate a clear
preference for 350 kW DCFC chargers
and that this also matches a growing
trend in the automotive industry.
Commenters stated that if 350 kW DCFC
chargers were not available at scale,
States would instead purchase lower
power chargers, such as 150 kW DCFC
chargers that meet the proposed
standards promulgated by FHWA for the
NEVI Formula Program.17 These
17 The FHWA proposed regulations setting
minimum standards and requirements for projects
funded under the NEVI Formula Program on June
22, 2022. See 87 FR 37262. The FHWA proposed
that the maximum power per DCFC charging port
be at or above 150 kW, with each charging station
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
Continued
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10630
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
commenters believed that using 150 kW
DCFC chargers instead of 350 kW DCFC
chargers would result in an EV charging
network inadequately prepared for the
next generation of EVs.
Next, commenters stated that it was
not possible for 350 kW DCFC chargers
to comply with the proposed waiver’s
timeframe. The Alliance for Automotive
Innovation mentioned that the proposed
waiver did not give specific attention to
350 kW DCFC chargers, and the
commenter believed that the same
issues facing all EV chargers were
especially pronounced for 350 kW
DCFC chargers. A joint comment from
NATSO and SIGMA mentioned that
they were unaware of any data
suggesting that Buy America-compliant
350 kW DCFC chargers were available at
scale or will be available in time to meet
the timelines in the proposed waiver
and that FHWA should waive Buy
America requirements for these chargers
until it is clear that a competitive
market of compliant products is
available at scale.
To deal with this perceived concern,
some commenters requested FHWA
additionally extend its waiver schedule
specifically for 350 kW DCFC chargers.
The joint comment from the Pilot, GM,
and EVgo requested a focused 1-year
delay solely for 350 kW DCFC chargers
given what they claimed were
additional complexities and supply
chain challenges facing these chargers.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not
agree that it is necessary to give special
accommodations for 350 kW DCFC
chargers in this waiver. The FHWA
finds that the argument pushed by
commentators in favor of such
preference is flawed at its first premise.
The FHWA proposed allowing 150 kW
DCFC chargers to be used on NEVI
Formula Program funded projects.
Commenters in favor of special
treatment for 350 kW DCFCs do so
under the idea that these chargers
should be purchased using NEVI
Formula Program funds and that this
waiver should encourage that. The
FHWA believes that the rulemaking for
the NEVI Formula Program, not this
waiver, is the appropriate place to make
that argument. This waiver is to
encourage the domestic production of
chargers that can be used on FHWA
assisted projects and delaying this
waiver’s timeframe for 350 kW DCFC
chargers does not comport with this
goal.
capable of providing at least 150 kW per charging
point.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
F. Definition of ‘‘EV Charger’’
Coverage of Waiver: In the proposed
waiver, FHWA defined an ‘‘EV charger’’
as ‘‘EV chargers and associated payment
systems, distribution systems,
telecommunications and networking
equipment, energy storage systems, and
other supporting equipment and
systems: (i) in the immediate vicinity of
a charger or group of chargers; and (ii)
essential to the function or operation of
a charger or group of chargers.’’ The
FHWA also stated that the term would
not include parking areas adjacent to the
EV chargers and lanes for vehicle
ingress and egress.
Many commenters expressed concern
over this proposed definition, with
some suggesting that it be expanded
while others stating that it was overly
broad. In the former group, Ford asked
for FHWA to consider including EV
charging posts and cable management
systems as part of the definition of ‘‘EV
charger.’’ The KDOT suggested that the
waiver also apply to other manufactured
products that are external to the EV
charger but in its immediate vicinity, as
well as switchboards, switchgears, and
panelboards. The MDOT recommended
that manufactured components for
battery storage and other alternative
power sources, such as solar panels, be
included in the definition of ‘‘EV
charger,’’ although MDOT admitted
doing so may cause confusion.
ElectricFish similarly requested that the
definition apply to battery storage
systems.
In the opposite group, many
commenters complained that the broad
definition in the proposed waiver for
‘‘EV chargers’’ could cause confusion
and delay. The AASHTO stated that this
definition would muddy the parameters
surrounding the waiver and complicate
the determination of compliance when
determining the cost of components for
the 55 percent phase. General Motors
stated that the broad proposed
definition may cause project delays
since equipment outside of the actual
EV charger might have its own supply
chain considerations, particular with
respect to utility-related equipment.
Volta similarly commented that systems
and technologies not core to the EV
charger itself, such as wireless and
telecommunications systems, are
frequently not manufactured in the
United States and that moving supply
chains to the United States for these
components would be extremely
difficult and costly. Revel agreed,
stating that the proposed definition
could increase noncompliance with Buy
America requirements because many of
these systems and technologies are not
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
produced domestically. In addition,
TeraWatt noted that the EV charging
market is not large enough to dictate a
domestic shift to the
telecommunications supply chain,
potentially resulting in no Buy Americacompliant telecommunications systems
being available and, if the proposed
definition is used, fewer Buy Americacompliant EV chargers. The Zero
Emission Transportation Association
(ZETA) and Shell both noted that
additional equipment encompassed by
FHWA’s proposed definition may
implicate other domestic content
procurement preferences, resulting in
confusion by recipients, their
contractors, and subcontractors and
potential delays. BTC Power
commented that including equipment
beyond the EV charger would make it
difficult for EV charger manufacturers to
certify Buy America compliance, given
that they might not necessarily have
insight into the domestic content of
pieces they don’t manufacture
themselves.
Finally, multiple commenters stated
that the proposed definition of ‘‘EV
charger’’ would disincentivize the
integration of helpful features such as
on-site renewable energy generation and
energy storage systems in EV charging
stations, since inclusion of such features
would require them to be Buy Americacompliant. Commenters presented
concerns that such domestically
produced technologies were not
available and therefore may not be
included in charging stations featuring
EV chargers purchased with FHWA
financial assistance. The ZETA noted
that FHWA should encourage including
on-site renewable energy generation in
charging stations, which would be
hindered if those technologies were
required to be Buy America-compliant
given that manufacturers were unlikely
to change their processes to
domestically manufacture those
technologies to support the minimal
quantity involved in EV charging
stations.
Commenters who suggested a
narrower definition that FHWA
originally proposed presented numerous
options. The AASHTO recommended
the definition only include the selfcontained EV charging unit itself. Autel
Energy (Autel) suggested that the
definition should only apply to those
components that are under the direct
control of the EV charger manufacturer.
Proterra recommended that FHWA limit
Buy America requirements to items that
are directly related to electric vehicle
supply equipment. Revel suggested that
the definition apply only to
technologies or systems permanently
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
affixed to the charger that are essential
to the charger’s function and operation.
Finally, Shell commented that Buy
America requirements should only
apply to the portion of the project which
the recipient deems eligible for EV
infrastructure-related Federal-aid
funding.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees
with the number of commenters
suggesting that the definition of ‘‘EV
charger’’ should be narrower than what
was presented in the proposed waiver.
After reviewing the comments received,
FHWA does not believe it is necessary
to include the associated equipment
specified in the proposed waiver as part
of this final waiver. Such equipment
will fall under FHWA’s current Buy
America requirements, which may
include coverage under the existing
Manufactured Products General Waiver.
In this final waiver, FHWA will
consider an ‘‘EV charger’’ as only the EV
charger unit itself and the equipment
contained inside it. As there are various
configurations possible for EV chargers,
FHWA is reliant on manufacturers to
determine which components are
within the EV charger and will therefore
be covered by this waiver.
The FHWA believes that it is
important to accelerate the domestic EV
charger manufacturing industry and that
it is feasible for manufacturers to
onshore production in the near future to
take advantage of the increased funding
for EV infrastructure projects. This
waiver serves to incentivize that
process. The FHWA does not believe,
however, that such incentives exist for
equipment associated with the EV
charger that may have uses beyond EV
charging infrastructure projects, such as
telecommunications equipment; for
these pieces of equipment, FHWA does
not think that the same incentive exists
to encourage their domestic production.
Including them under the definition of
‘‘EV charger’’ would mean that final
assembly of these pieces of equipment
would need to occur domestically and
many of them would need to be sourced
domestically in order to be covered by
this waiver, and FHWA does not believe
the EV charger market is large enough
to incentivize manufacturers of these
additional pieces of equipment to
domestically produce those pieces of
equipment. Under the proposed
definition of ‘‘EV charger,’’ this would
mean that certain pieces of equipment
associated with an EV charger could not
be covered by this waiver, potentially
leaving many EV charger stations
noncompliant with Buy America
requirements and hindering efforts to
complete EV infrastructure projects. The
FHWA believes that this possibility
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
justifies narrowing the definition of ‘‘EV
charger’’ than what was previously
proposed.
In summary, FHWA is choosing to
limit this waiver to the EV charger itself.
The FHWA believes doing so keeps the
waiver as simple as possible, compared
to other suggested definitions. By
limiting the definition to the EV charger
itself, EV charger manufacturers will be
able to determine if a charger is covered
by this waiver, while also providing
clarity to recipients, their contractors,
and subcontractors when procuring
chargers regarding how this waiver will
cover those chargers. The FHWA also
notes that much equipment associated
with EV chargers is covered by FHWA’s
Manufactured Products General Waiver
and, for this reason, defining ‘‘EV
charger’’ more narrowly should not
prevent projects from being delivered on
time.
Utility Equipment: Several
commenters sought clarity on how this
waiver would affect equipment used in
utility relocations and upgrades. Autel
questioned whether products used in
utility upgrades would be covered by
this waiver. The OKDOT commented
that the proposed waiver did not
address whether Buy America
requirements extend to utility
relocations and requested that utilities
be excluded from Buy America
requirements.
The FHWA Response: Based on the
definition used for ‘‘EV charger’’ in this
final waiver, equipment used in utility
relocations and upgrades would
generally not be covered by this waiver;
instead, FHWA’s Buy America
requirements would apply to such work.
Further, FHWA does not believe it is
necessary to treat utility-related work
for EV charger infrastructure projects
differently from utility-related work for
other Federal-aid highway projects.
G. Treatment of Components
Defining Components of EV Chargers:
Multiple commenters requested that
FHWA clearly delineate what
components are covered by this waiver.
Siemens recommended that FHWA
further define items that FHWA
considers to be components of EV
chargers for the purpose of computing
the domestic content of those
components. Tesla and the North
Central Texas Council of Governments
(NCTCOG) commented that FHWA
should release a list of all components
the proposed waiver would apply to.
ABB E-Mobility, on the other hand,
argued that FHWA should not create a
list of what it considers to be a
component of an EV charger because EV
charger technology is developing
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10631
rapidly, and components vary by
manufacturer.
The FHWA Response: In general, any
article, material, or supply that is
directly incorporated into the end
product (i.e., EV charger) is a
component. Given the various ways that
EV chargers are structured, and may be
structured in the future, FHWA agrees
with ABB E-Mobility that it is not useful
to define with particularity every
component used in an EV charger.
Determining Cost of Components:
Multiple commenters sought
clarification regarding how to determine
the cost of components to determine
whether an EV charger is covered by the
waiver. Enel X Way USA and Tritium
recommended that the subassembly of
foreign parts into components qualify as
part of the manufacturing process which
should be treated as part of the cost of
a component. Tritium also suggested
that manufactures should be able to
determine the cost of the component
using their manufacturing costs. The
NCTCOG asked whether the exclusion
of labor costs associated with the
manufacture of the end product also
prohibited inclusion of labor costs
associated with manufacture of
components. Wallbox recommended
adding the cost of labor towards final
assembly as a cost of the component,
and Tesla encouraged FHWA to include
labor costs for components that are
manufactured domestically and
included in the final EV charger.
Wallbox also recommended that FHWA
clarify that all components used in final
assembly, including components
purchased by the manufacturer from
upstream suppliers, count for domestic
content calculations in the 55 percent
phase. The National Electrical
Manufacturers Association questioned
whether Manufacturer Value Add or
Substantial Transformation is part of the
cost of a component.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not
believe that changes need to be made to
how the cost of components are
calculated from how was described in
the proposed waiver. The FHWA
proposed to determine the cost of
components for this waiver using the
same methodology used to calculate the
cost of components for the Buy
American statute under chapter 83 of
title 41, U.S.C., which generally applies
to supplies, construction, and services
acquired for public use. The FHWA
believes that utilizing existing
definitions rather than creating new
ones for this waiver provides more
consistency across Federal agencies and
more certainty to recipients, their
contractors, subcontractors, and EV
charger manufacturers. Per the
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10632
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
regulations implementing the Buy
American statute, the Federal
Acquisition Regulations (FAR), ‘‘cost of
component’’ is defined in FAR 25.003
as: ‘‘(1) For components purchased by
the contractor, the acquisition cost,
including transportation costs to the
place of incorporation into the end
product or construction material
(whether or not such costs are paid to
a domestic firm), and any applicable
duty (whether or not a duty-free entry
certificate is issued); or (2) for
components manufactured by the
contractor, all costs associated with the
manufacture of the component,
including transportation costs as
described in paragraph (1) . . . plus
allocable overhead costs, but excluding
profit. Cost of components does not
include any costs associated with the
manufacture of the end product.’’ 18 As
the Buy American statute is similar in
its goals to Buy America, FHWA
believes that relying on the definition
for ‘‘cost of components’’ in FAR 25.003
is preferrable to other methods, such as
considering whether substantial
transformation has occurred. For
components purchased and then
incorporated into an EV charger, the
cost of that component would be the
acquisition cost, including
transportation costs to the place of
incorporation (whether or not such costs
are paid to a domestic firm) and any
applicable duty (whether or not a dutyfree entry certificate is issued). For
components manufactured and then
incorporated into an EV charger, the
cost of that component would be all
costs associated with the manufacture of
the component, including transportation
costs to the place of incorporation, plus
allocable overhead costs, but excluding
profit. To the extent that costs do not fit
into this definition, FHWA will not
consider them in determining whether
an EV charger is covered by this
waiver’s 55 percent phase. For instance,
this would not cover Manufacturer
Value Add as that is not a cost
associated with the manufacture of the
component.
This definition would include the
cost of subassembly of foreign parts into
the component for components
manufactured by the EV charger
manufacturer as it is a cost associated
with the manufacture of the component.
For components purchased by the EV
charger manufacturer, the cost of
subassembly of foreign parts would be
reflected in the acquisition cost of that
component. Based on this definition,
the cost of all components used in final
assembly, whether manufactured or
18 See
48 CFR 25.003.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
purchased by the EV charger
manufacturer, will be considered when
determining whether a charger is
covered during the 55 percent phase of
this waiver.
In terms of labor costs, for purchased
components, FHWA expects the labor
cost to be built into the acquisition cost
of the component and it should not be
accounted for separately. For
manufactured components, labor costs
associated with the manufacture of the
end product will not be considered to be
the cost of a component; however, the
labor costs associated with the
manufacture of the component itself
will be. Such costs are costs associated
with the manufacture of the component.
Applicability of Buy America Iron and
Steel Requirements to Predominantly
Iron and Steel Components of EV
Chargers: Commenters disagreed over
whether FHWA should apply existing
Buy America requirements regarding
iron and steel to primarily steel and iron
components of EV chargers. On one
side, commenters argued that FHWA
should not apply such requirements to
any specific predominantly iron or steel
EV charger component. These
commenters argued that doing so would
complicate compliance and pose an
undue burden on EV charger
manufacturers in terms of time and cost.
TeraWatt also noted that because EV
chargers need to have their final
assembly occur in the United States and
meet the cost of component threshold
set out in this waiver to be covered by
it, there was no need to turn to FHWA’s
existing iron and steel requirements to
ensure the expansion of domestic
manufacturing capacity. The ZETA,
Enel X Way, and NCTCOG argued that
imposing FHWA’s existing iron and
steel requirements under Buy America
would create additional roadblocks to
the completion of EV charging
infrastructure projects. ABB E-Mobility
argued that the domestic availability of
steel for which all manufacturing
processes occurs in the United States is
limited and could be cost prohibitive
when integrated into EV chargers and
recommended FHWA not require that
predominantly steel components use
steel for which the entire manufacturing
process occurs in the United States. The
AGC further argued that singling out
any specific component to be excluded
from the waiver would provide
unnecessary complications and
potentially cause delays. Several
commenters added that FHWA’s current
steel and iron requirements under 23
U.S.C. 313 should not apply to EV
chargers at any point, claiming that
while EV chargers may contain iron and
steel components, they are not
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
predominantly steel and iron.
ChargePoint went further,
recommending that FHWA exclude any
steel and iron requirements indefinitely.
Other commenters disagreed and
stated that FHWA’s existing
requirements for iron and steel under
Buy America should apply to at least
some EV charger components. Nucor
and AISI, two opponents of the
proposed waiver, agreed that the waiver
should not apply to all components of
an EV charger. These two commenters
stated that the domestic steel industry
has the capacity to supply steel for use
in EV chargers and that products used
in EV chargers, such as the EV charger’s
housing, are readily available from
domestic steel producers. Tritium also
stated that it was comfortable with
excluding predominantly iron and steel
components from coverage under this
waiver if manufacturers were able to
count these excluded components to
meet the cost of component thresholds.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees
with certain commenters that it is in the
public interest to apply this waiver to
all components of an EV charger. In
general, except with respect to the
housing of an EV charger, commenters
to the proposed waiver did not provide
sufficient information as to which
components were predominantly iron or
steel. Without readily available
information on which components are
more often than not predominantly iron
or steel to apply a categorical rule,
FHWA does not find it appropriate to
place the onus on manufacturers and
recipients to sift through components
one by one to determine which are
predominantly iron or steel. By
specifying which predominantly steel
and iron components of an EV charger
are expected to comply with current
FHWA Buy America requirements,
manufacturers and recipients will have
certainty over which components are
covered, which will allow for projects
involving those chargers to be
completed more expeditiously.
The FHWA believes, however, that it
is practical to apply FHWA’s existing
Buy America requirements for
predominantly iron or steel components
to specifically identified components of
an EV charger that are predominantly
iron or steel. Based on comments
received, the only component identified
as potentially being predominantly iron
or steel is an EV charger’s housing. As
indicated in the responses to the 2021
RFI, the housing may comprise over 50
percent of the costs of the charger.
While other components may contain
some amounts of iron and steel, the
housing was the only component
mentioned by commenters to the 2021
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
RFI as being predominantly iron and
steel. In addition, ABB E-Mobility
commented on the proposed waiver of
the significant amounts of steel
included in the housing.
After reviewing the comments
received, FHWA believes that housing
predominantly made of iron or steel
should not be covered by this waiver
and therefore must comply with existing
FHWA Buy America requirements. The
purpose of FHWA’s Buy America
requirements is to ensure that, where
possible, iron and steel products are
produced in the United States. The
FHWA believes that waivers should be
used sparingly; if a product would
otherwise be covered by FHWA’s iron
and steel Buy America requirements,
FHWA believes those requirements
should apply to that product absent
sufficient justification to the contrary.
An EV charger’s housing has been
repeatedly described to FHWA as being
the single component with a significant
percentage of its costs being comprised
of the cost of its steel and iron. This also
aligns with FHWA’s existing treatment
of predominantly iron and steel
components of manufactured products.
Current FHWA policy does not
distinguish between predominantly iron
and steel components of any
manufactured product and
predominantly iron and steel
components of predominantly iron and
steel manufactured products, and
FHWA does not find it necessary to
create such a distinction here. The
FHWA agrees with Tritium, however,
that if an EV charger does feature a
housing that is predominantly iron or
steel, FHWA will consider the cost of
that cabinet when calculating the cost of
components to determine whether the
EV charger falls under this waiver
during the 55 percent phase.
The FHWA does not believe that
removing housings that are
predominantly iron or steel from this
waiver’s coverage will cause an undue
burden on EV charger manufacturers,
contrary to what was argued by some
commenters. Based on comments from
the steel industry, there is an adequate
amount of domestic steel available, and
commenters did not present arguments
that there was anything unique about an
EV charger’s housing that would
prevent it from being sourced and
assembled domestically, consistent with
how other predominantly steel and iron
components of manufactured products
are treated regularly in Federal-aid
highway projects.
H. Coverage of Subcomponents
Application of Waiver to
Subcomponents: Commenters suggested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
that the domestic content provisions of
this waiver should only apply at the
component level, not at the
subcomponent level. In essence, these
commenters requested that when
determining if EV chargers were covered
by the 55 percent phase, FHWA should
determine the cost of components
manufactured in the United States
without including the cost of
subcomponents. According to these
commenters, FHWA should allow for
the sourcing of subcomponents from
international sources throughout the
lifetime of this waiver due to the delay
it would take manufacturers to either
locate and substitute domestically
sourced subcomponents or alter the
designs of their chargers, the costs of
doing so, the challenge to track and
certify subcomponents, and their
opinion that applying this waiver at the
subcomponent level would not
meaningfully further FHWA’s domestic
manufacturing goals. The ZETA added
that they believe the standard of the 55
percent phase, where the waiver would
cover EV chargers only if the cost of
components manufactured in the United
States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of
all components, could only be
achievable if subcomponents could be
sourced internationally. ABB E-Mobility
urged FHWA to state that
subcomponents could be used without
regard to their country of origin, arguing
that there is a need to be able to source
subcomponents internationally and that
EV charging demand is unlikely to shift
production of these subcomponents to
the United States, considering the size
of the EV charger industry. BTC Power
recommended that FHWA should copy
the regulatory definition the Federal
Transit Administration uses for
determining whether a manufactured
product is considered produced in the
United States, with 49 CFR 661.5(d)(2)
stating that ‘‘[a] component is
considered of U.S. origin if it is
manufactured in the United States,
regardless of the origin of its
subcomponents.’’
The FHWA Response: To be covered
by the initial phase of this waiver, the
final assembly process of EV chargers
must occur in the United States; this
includes the incorporation of
subcomponents into the final EV
charger. It does not include the
assembly of the subcomponent itself or
the assembly of subcomponents into
components. To be covered by the 55
percent phase, the cost of components
manufactured in the United States must
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components. In alignment with the
definition of ‘‘cost of components’’ in
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10633
FAR 25.003, FHWA did not and does
not intend for subcomponents to be
considered when calculating the cost of
components to determine coverage
under the 55 percent phase. While the
cost of subcomponents may factor into
the cost of components, the cost of
subcomponents should not be
separately calculated and used to
determine whether a charger is covered
by this waiver.
Exclusion of ‘‘Non-Substantial’’
Components: PowerCharge requested
that non-substantial components of EV
chargers, such as screws and clips, be
exempt from the calculation of an EV
charger’s steel and iron content.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not
believe this change is necessary. At all
times that this waiver is active, it will
cover EV chargers where final assembly
occurs in the U.S. and, after the first
phase-out period, where the cost of
components manufactured in the U.S.
exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components. Screws and clips, which
PowerCharge mentioned as ‘‘nonsubstantial components,’’ will many
times be considered subcomponents,
which, as mentioned above, are not
included in calculations for the purpose
of determining coverage under the 55
percent phase. Further, to the extent
that a non-substantial component exists,
is not manufactured domestically, and
is included in an EV charger, that
charger may still be covered under this
waiver. Such components are likely to
cost a de minimis amount, and, even at
the 55 percent phase, this waiver still
covers EV chargers for which the cost of
components exceeds 55 percent of the
cost of all components. The FHWA does
not believe that including the costs of
such components in calculating the
costs of all components for the purpose
of the 55 percent phase presents a
significant burden to manufacturers and
does not find it necessary to explicitly
exclude minor components.
I. Buy America Processes
Standardized Certification Process:
Commenters routinely requested that
there be a standardized process to
demonstrate compliance with Buy
America requirements, with most of
them suggesting that FHWA develop
such a process. The AASHTO
recommended developing a process for
vendors to provide information about
the percentage of materials that are
sourced domestically, as well as a
consistent method for State DOTs to
confirm the accuracy of such
information. Blink Charging suggested
FHWA establish a compliance and
certification process specifically focused
on EV chargers. The EVCA expressed
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
10634
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
concern about the potential lack of
consistency if certification is not
standardized at the Federal level.
Wallbox suggested that a public or
third-party entity be responsible for Buy
America certification.
The FHWA Response: To the extent
that many commenters suggested a Buy
America certification process that
extended beyond EV chargers, that falls
outside the scope of this waiver. In
terms of designing a certification
process for EV chargers covered by this
waiver, FHWA does not believe it
necessary to alter its existing
certification processes specifically for
EV chargers. Doing so would create a
separate certification process for EV
chargers, which would cause
unnecessary confusion and delay as
recipients who are accustomed to
FHWA’s current certification process
learn how this new process would work.
List of Buy America-Certified
Products: Other commenters suggested
that FHWA should maintain a list of
Buy America compliant products,
including Buy America compliant EV
chargers.
The FHWA Response: Similarly, to
the extent that these commenters
suggested that FHWA maintain a list of
Buy America-compliant products
outside of EV chargers, that falls outside
the scope of this waiver. In terms of
compiling a list of which EV chargers
are covered by this waiver, this waiver
is not the appropriate place to require
that EV charger manufactures provide
information to the Agency, nor, as
mentioned above, does FHWA believe it
should undertake its own certification
process for EV chargers.
IV. Final Public Interest Waiver
Based on all the information available
to FHWA, FHWA concludes that
applying the Buy America requirements
of 23 U.S.C. 313 for steel, iron, and
manufactured products and section
70914 of BABA for construction
materials to EV chargers on FHWAassisted infrastructure projects would be
inconsistent with the public interest. A
waiver of these requirements under 23
U.S.C. 313(b)(1), 23 CFR 635.410(c), and
section 70914(b) of BABA, structured to
phase out over time, is thus appropriate.
In addition, FHWA is removing EV
chargers from being covered by the
existing Manufactured Products General
Waiver, starting on the date of this
notice. In consideration of the foregoing,
FHWA is issuing this waiver as stated
below:
The FHWA will apply a waiver of Buy
America requirements under 23 U.S.C.
313 and section 70914 of BABA to EV
chargers and all components of EV
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
chargers if final assembly occurs in the
United States for all chargers that are
manufactured from the effective date of
this waiver until June 30, 2024. This
phase applies only to EV chargers that
are manufactured during this period and
for which recipients begin installation
by October 1, 2024. In addition, all
predominantly steel and iron housing
components are excluded from the
waiver and must meet FHWA’s Buy
America requirements for steel and iron.
Starting on July 1, 2024, this waiver
will not apply to EV chargers for which
the cost of components manufactured in
the United States does not exceed 55
percent of the cost of all components.
This means that any EV chargers which
are manufactured on and after July 1,
2024, would be covered by this waiver
only if: (i) final assembly occurs in the
United States; and (ii) the cost of
components manufactured in the United
States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of
all components. All predominantly steel
and iron housing components continue
to be excluded from the waiver and
must meet FHWA’s Buy America
requirements for steel and iron. The cost
of any such housing shall be included
as a cost of an EV charger’s components
when calculating whether the cost of
components manufactured in the United
States exceed 55 percent of the cost of
all components. The FHWA considers
the ‘‘date of manufacture’’ to be the date
on which the EV charger, as defined
further below, has its final assembly
occur and is in an operational state.
This waiver will remain in place until
terminated by FHWA. In accordance
with section 70914(d)(1) of BABA,
FHWA will commence a review of this
waiver no later than 5 years from the
effective date of this waiver, at which
time FHWA may discontinue this
waiver if it is found to no longer be in
the public interest. The FHWA,
however, reserves the right to modify or
shorten the duration of this waiver or
any of its phases if it obtains
information indicating that this waiver
or any or its phases are no longer in the
public interest. The FHWA will conduct
RFIs every 6 months from this waiver’s
effective date to July 1, 2024, to receive
information on the state of the EV
charger industry. This information may
lead FHWA to amend this waiver to, for
example, state that EV chargers are
covered by this waiver only if final
assembly occurs in the United States
and the cost of components
manufactured in the United States
exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components for waivers that are
manufactured before July 1, 2024, with
the results of the RFIs determining what
this new date will be.
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the purpose of this waiver, FHWA
considers the cost of a component to be
based on whether it is purchased or
manufactured when it is incorporated
into the EV charger. The FHWA will use
the standards in FAR 25.003 to
determine the allowable costs included
in purchased or manufactured
components and will use the standards
in FAR 31.201–4 to determine overhead
costs that are generally allocable. In
other words, FHWA will include
acquisition costs (including
transportation costs to the place of
incorporation into the end product) and
any applicable duty (regardless of
whether a duty-free certificate of entry
is issued) for purchased components.
For manufactured components, FHWA
will include all costs associated with
the manufacture of the component
(including transportation costs and
quality testing) and allocable overhead
costs; FHWA will not include profits
and any labor costs associated with the
manufacture of the end product. The
FHWA will consider allocable overhead
costs to be (a) costs incurred specifically
for the contract; (b) benefit both the
contract and other work and can be
distributed to each in reasonable
proportion to the benefits received; or
(c) are necessary to the overall operation
of the business, even if a direct
relationship to any particular cost
objective cannot be shown.
For purpose of this waiver, FHWA
defines ‘‘EV charger’’ to mean the EV
charger unit itself and the equipment
contained inside it. This definition does
not include associated equipment
external to the EV charger, parking areas
adjacent to the EV charger, and lanes for
vehicle ingress and egress. In addition,
this waiver does not cover an EV
charger’s housing (also known as its
cabinet or enclosure) if it is comprised
predominantly of steel or iron; however,
the cost of housing comprised
predominantly of steel and iron must be
used in the cost of components
calculation. For the purposes of this
waiver, an EV charger’s housing is
defined as the component of the EV
charger that contains the electronics that
convert electricity to direct current.
For any areas, products, or materials
excluded from this waiver, FHWA’s
existing Buy America requirements and
policies will continue to apply,
including the new requirement
applicable to construction materials
established under BABA. This means,
for example, that the requirements of 23
U.S.C. 313 and section 70914 of BABA
will apply to the housing of an EV
charger if it is predominantly steel or
iron. The FHWA will consider the cost
of an EV charger’s housing when
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
considering whether the cost of
components manufactured in the United
States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of
all components in the EV charger, even
if that housing is predominantly steel or
iron and is not covered by this waiver.
In other words, starting on July 1, 2024,
the waiver will apply only to EV
chargers for which the cost of all
components, including the cost of the
housing if it is predominantly steel or
iron, manufactured in the United States
exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components, including a housing that is
predominantly steel or iron.
For purpose of this waiver, FHWA
considers an EV charger to fall under
the phase of the waiver that exists on
the date when that EV charger was
manufactured.
The OMB Implementation Guidance
provides that, before granting a waiver
in the public interest, to the extent
permitted by law, Agencies shall assess
whether a significant portion of any cost
advantage of a foreign-sourced product
is ‘‘the result of the use of dumped steel,
iron, or manufactured products or the
use of injuriously subsidized steel, iron,
or manufactured products.’’ OMB
Implementation Guidance at p. 12. E.O.
14005 at Section 5 includes a similar
requirement for ‘‘steel, iron, or
manufactured goods.’’ However,
because the public interest waiver that
FHWA is finalizing in this notice is not
based on consideration of the cost
advantage of any foreign-sourced steel,
iron, or manufactured product content
in EV chargers, there is not a specific
cost advantage for FHWA to now
consider.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 117 of the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act of 2008 (Pub.
L. 110–244), FHWA is providing this
notice as its finding that a waiver of Buy
America requirements is appropriate.
FHWA invites public comment on this
finding for an additional 5 days
following the date of publication of this
notice. Comments may be submitted to
FHWA’s website via the link provided
to the waiver page noted above by
February 27, 2023. Comments received
during that period will be reviewed, but
the finding will continue to remain
valid. Those comments may influence
FHWA’s decision to terminate or modify
a finding.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.85.
Shailen P. Bhatt,
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023–03498 Filed 2–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2022–0093]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Renewal of an Approved
Information Collection: Commercial
Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
FMCSA announces its plan to submit
the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. The FMCSA
requests to renew an ICR titled,
‘‘Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse.’’ The Agency’s
final rule, published December 5, 2016,
titled ‘‘Commercial Driver’s License
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse’’
(Clearinghouse) established the
regulatory requirements for the
Clearinghouse. The compliance date of
the final rule was January 6, 2020.
FMCSA began collecting data as
authorized users began registering in the
Clearinghouse in September 2019. This
ICR renewal is needed to support the
continuation of the querying and
reporting requirements to address the
problem of commercial driver’s license
(CDL) and commercial learner’s permit
(CLP) holders who test positive for the
use of controlled substances or the
misuse of alcohol and then continue to
perform safety sensitive functions,
including driving a commercial motor
vehicle (CMV), without completing the
required return-to-duty (RTD) process.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received on or before March 23, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Price, Chief, Drug and Alcohol
Programs Division, DOT, FMCSA, 6th
Floor, West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10635
0001; 202–366–2995; bryan.price@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Commercial Driver’s License
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.
OMB Control Number: 2126–0057.
Type of Request: Renewal of a
currently approved information
collection.
Respondents: Motor carriers
(employers), drivers, medical review
officers (MROs), substance abuse
professionals (SAPs), consortia/thirdparty administrators (C/TPAs), and State
Driver Licensing Agencies (SDLAs).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10,439,839. (This number is an update
from 10,289,839 respondents stated in
the 60-day FR.)
Estimated Time per Response: Varies;
10 to 20 minutes.
Expiration Date: February 28, 2023.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
A user’s role will determine the
frequency of the response in the
Clearinghouse.
• Employers, or C/TPAs acting on
behalf of an employer: at a minimum,
employers are required to query the
Clearinghouse for each driver they
currently employ at least once a year.
Employers must query the
Clearinghouse for all prospective
employees, as needed. In addition,
employers report to the Clearinghouse
alcohol confirmation tests with a
concentration of 0.04 or higher, refusal
to test (alcohol), refusal to test (drug)
that is not determined by an MRO, and
actual knowledge of violations, negative
RTD testing, and completion of the
follow-up testing plan. Employer
reporting must be completed by the
close of the third business day following
the date they obtained the information
on a driver.
• MROs: verified positive,
adulterated, or substituted drug test
result and refusals to tests (drug) must
be entered to the Clearinghouse on
occasion, but no later than 2 business
days after making a determination or
verification.
• SAPs: must enter the initial
assessment date and the date the driver
successfully complied with RTD
requirements. SAPs are required to enter
this information on occasion by the
close of business day following the date
of the initial assessment or completion
of the RTD process.
• SDLAs may query the
Clearinghouse prior to specified
licensing transactions to determine
whether drivers are listed in the
‘‘prohibited status.’’.
• Drivers provide general consent to
employer queries outside of the
Clearinghouse.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10619-10635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. 2022-0023]
Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is establishing a
temporary public interest waiver to waive Buy America requirements for
steel, iron, manufactured products, and construction materials in
electric vehicle (EV) chargers. This short-term, temporary waiver
enables EV charger acquisition and installation to immediately proceed
while also ensuring the application of Buy America to EV chargers by
the phasing out of the waiver over time. On the effective date of this
waiver, it will apply to all EV chargers manufactured by July 1, 2024,
whose final assembly occurs in the United States, and whose
installation has begun by October 1, 2024. Beginning with EV chargers
manufactured on July 1, 2024, FHWA will phase out coverage under this
waiver for those previously covered EV chargers where the cost of
components manufactured in the United States does not exceed 55 percent
of the cost of all components. This second phase will therefore apply
to all EV chargers that are manufactured on or after July 1, 2024,
whose final assembly occurs in the United States, and for which the
cost of components manufactured in the United States is at least 55
percent of the cost of all components. For all phases, EV charger
housing components that are predominantly steel and iron are excluded
from the waiver and must meet current FHWA Buy America requirements. As
of the effective date of this waiver, FHWA is also removing EV chargers
from its existing general applicability waiver for manufactured
products.
DATES: The temporary waiver is effective starting on March 23, 2023.
Comments may be submitted to FHWA's website via the link to this
waiver on https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/waivers.cfm
by February 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice,
please contact Mr. Brian Hogge, FHWA Office of Infrastructure, 202-366-
1562, or via email at [email protected]. For legal questions, please
contact Mr. David Serody, FHWA Office of Chief Counsel, 202-366-4241,
or via email at [email protected]. Office hours for FHWA are from 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Priorities of the Administration
The Biden-Harris Administration has laid out a bold vision for
making transformative transportation investments to support job growth
and reshape the U.S. transportation system, strengthen the U.S. economy
and competitiveness, and support a sustainable energy and climate
future. In January 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order (E.O.)
14008, titled ``Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad'' (86 FR
7619, Feb. 1, 2021). This E.O. states that the U.S. faces ``a climate
crisis that threatens our people and communities, public health and
economy, and starkly, our ability to live on planet Earth.'' The
President directed the Federal Government ``to organize and deploy the
full capacity of its agencies to combat the climate crisis to implement
a governmentwide approach that reduces climate pollution in every
sector of the economy,'' including through the ``deployment of clean
energy technologies and infrastructure.'' The President has set the
ambitious goal of building a national network of 500,000 EV chargers by
2030.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ White House Fact Sheet: Biden Administration Advances
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure (Apr. 22, 2021), available
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-biden-administration-advances-electric-vehicle-charging-infrastructure/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 15, 2021, the President signed into law the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the
[[Page 10620]]
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Pub. L. 117-58). The BIL
makes the most transformative investment in EV charging in U.S.
history, including $5 billion over 5 years that will be made available
under the new National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula
Program.\2\ As outlined in statute, the purpose of the NEVI Formula
Program is to ``provide funding to States to strategically deploy EV
charging infrastructure and to establish an interconnected network to
facilitate data collection, access, and reliability.'' See BIL,
Division J, Title VIII, Highway Infrastructure Program heading,
Paragraph (2). This purpose would be satisfied by creating a
convenient, affordable, reliable, and equitable network of EV chargers
throughout the country. The BIL also includes many additional funding
and financing programs with eligibilities for EV charging
infrastructure, including formula, discretionary, other allocated, and
innovative finance programs.\3\ These historic investments across the
Federal Government in EV charging under BIL will put the U.S. on a path
to meeting the President's goal for EV charging infrastructure and
ensuring a convenient, reliable, affordable, and equitable charging
experience for all users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See https://highways.dot.gov/newsroom/president-biden-usdot-and-usdoe-announce-5-billion-over-five-years-national-ev-charging.
\3\ Federal Funding is Available For Electric Vehicle Charging
Infrastructure On the National Highway System, FHWA (April 22,
2022), available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environmentalternative_fuel_corridors/resources/ev_funding_report_2022.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the same time as the Administration seeks to ensure successful
and timely delivery of EV infrastructure projects, the Administration
also seeks to maximize the use of American made products and materials.
In January 2021, President Biden issued E.O. 14005, titled ``Ensuring
the Future is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers'' (86
FR 7475, Jan. 28, 2021). This E.O. states that the U.S. Government
``should, consistent with applicable law, use terms and conditions of
Federal financial assistance awards and Federal procurements to
maximize the use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and
services offered in, the United States.'' The FHWA is committed to
ensuring strong and effective Buy America implementation consistent
with E.O. 14005.
B. FHWA Buy America Requirements
The FHWA's existing Buy America requirements for steel, iron, and
manufactured products are set forth at 23 U.S.C. 313 and 23 CFR
635.410. The FHWA also has a standing waiver under 23 U.S.C. 313(b),
the Manufactured Products General Waiver, which has been in effect
since 1983 and covers manufactured products that are not predominantly
steel and iron and are funded under title 23, U.S.C.\4\ See 48 FR 53099
(Nov. 25, 1983). Thus, FHWA's current Buy America requirements apply to
FHWA-funded projects and require that all steel and iron that are
permanently incorporated into a project must be produced in the United
States unless a waiver is granted, including predominantly steel and
iron components of a manufactured product. As applied to products other
than iron and steel, the term ``produced'' in 23 U.S.C. 313 includes
physical final assembly and manufacturing processes. This requirement
applies to the obligation of funds authorized to carry out title 23,
U.S.C. In addition, for all predominantly steel or iron materials,
products, or components to be used in projects that involve the
obligation of title 23, U.S.C. funds, all manufacturing processes,
including application of coating, must occur in the U.S. Coating
includes all processes which protect or enhance the value of the
material to which the coating is applied. In addition, under 23 U.S.C.
313(h), the Buy America requirements apply to all contracts that are
eligible for FHWA assistance regardless of the funding source if any
contract within the scope of a determination under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) involves an obligation of Federal
funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As explained in Section III.A below, while the Manufactured
Products General Waiver continues to remain in effect, FHWA is
removing EV chargers, as defined below, from its coverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BIL also includes new Build America, Buy America (``BABA'')
provisions to strengthen domestic manufacturing, which expand the
coverage and application of Buy America preferences in Federal
financial assistance programs for infrastructure. BIL, div. G sections
70901-27. The BABA applies those requirements to obligations made after
May 14, 2022. BIL section 70914(a). However, BABA's domestic content
procurement preferences only apply to the extent that a domestic
content procurement preference, as described in section 70914, does not
already apply to iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction
materials. BIL section 70917(a)-(b). Where they do apply, BABA requires
that funds for a Federal financial assistance program for
infrastructure may not be obligated for a project unless all of the
iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in
the project are produced in the United States. BIL section 70914(a).
Under BABA, iron or steel products are considered to be produced in the
United States if all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting
stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United
States. BIL section 70912(6)(A). Manufactured products are considered
to be produced in the United States if (i) the manufactured product was
manufactured in the United States; and (ii) the cost of the components
of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured
in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of
all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for
determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured
product has been established under applicable law or regulation. BIL
section 70912(6)(B). Finally, under BABA, a construction material is
considered to be produced in the United States if all manufacturing
processes for the construction material occurred in the United States.
BIL section 70912(6)(C).
By statute at 23 U.S.C. 313, FHWA has domestic content preferences
for steel, iron, and manufactured products, so the requirements under
23 U.S.C. 313 apply to steel, iron, and manufactured products instead
of the requirements under BABA. As FHWA's existing Buy America
requirement does not specifically cover construction materials, other
than to the extent that such materials would already be considered
iron, steel, or manufactured products, the Buy America preferences
under section 70914 of BABA apply for construction materials. For the
purpose of this notice, ``Buy America requirements'' refers to FHWA's
existing requirements for steel, iron, and manufactured products under
23 U.S.C. 313 and requirements for construction materials under section
70914 of BABA.
The BABA further required the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
to issue guidance to assist in applying BABA's requirements. BIL
section 70915. On April 18, 2022, OMB issued memorandum M-22-11,
``Initial Implementation Guidance on Application of Buy America
Preference in Federal Financial Assistance Programs for
Infrastructure'' (``Implementation Guidance''). Section VII(b) of the
Implementation Guidance states that ``Federal agencies may wish to
consider issuing a limited number of general applicability public
interest waivers in the interest of efficiency and
[[Page 10621]]
to ease burdens for recipients.'' Implementation Guidance at p. 10.
Under 23 U.S.C. 313(b) and section 70914(b) of BABA, FHWA may
consider a Buy America waiver when either (i) the application of the
requirements under 23 U.S.C. 313(b) and section 70914 of BABA would be
inconsistent with the public interest; or (ii) when products are not
produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available
quantities of a satisfactory quality.\5\ This waiver is being issued on
the basis of its consistency with the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 70914(b)(3) of BABA also provides a cost-based
condition for a waiver, which FHWA's regulation addresses at 23 CFR
635.410(b)(3) through alternate bid procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Summary of FHWA's Proposed Waiver of Buy America Requirements for EV
Chargers
In order to ensure delivery and meaningful results on EV charging
projects using Federal-aid highway funds throughout the U.S., FHWA
issued a Notice of Proposed Waiver of Buy America Requirements for
Electric Vehicle Chargers on August 31, 2022, at 87 FR 53539. The FHWA
proposed a waiver of Buy America requirements with respect to steel,
iron, manufactured products, and construction materials for EV chargers
on FHWA-assisted infrastructure projects, on the basis that applying
the domestic content preferences for these materials would be
inconsistent with the public interest. 87 FR 53539. In doing so, FHWA
also proposed removing EV chargers from the Manufactured Products
General Waiver to allow for the uniform implementation of all Buy
America requirements applicable to an EV charger. Through this proposed
waiver, FHWA sought to treat EV chargers as manufactured products
subject to their own, separate waiver. FHWA structured the proposed
waiver to partially phase out over a specified timeframe to a domestic
content threshold that is generally consistent with how manufactured
products are covered under section 70914 of BABA. In proposing this
waiver, FHWA considered information gathered from a November 24, 2021,
Request for Information (RFI), published collectively by DOT and the
U.S. Department of Energy. 86 FR 67115 (Nov. 24, 2021). In line with
FHWA policy, Section 123 of Division A of Public Law 111-117, and
Section 117 of Public Law 110-244, FHWA also included a link to the
proposed waiver on its website.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/waivers.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the proposed waiver, FHWA proposed that the term ``EV charger''
include EV chargers and associated payment systems, distribution
systems, telecommunications and networking equipment, energy storage
systems, and other supporting equipment and systems that are (i) in the
immediate vicinity of a charger or group of chargers and (ii) essential
to the function or operation of a charger or group of chargers. The
FHWA proposed the term ``charger'' exclude parking areas adjacent to
the EV chargers and lanes for vehicle ingress and egress.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA proposed to initially apply a complete
waiver to EV chargers and all components of EV chargers that are
installed in a project during calendar year 2022. The FHWA proposed to
consider an EV charger as being ``installed in a project'' when the EV
charger is permanently incorporated into or affixed to a Federal-aid
funded infrastructure project. Following the initial proposed phase in
calendar year 2022, FHWA proposed to partially phase-out the waiver in
two steps during calendar year 2023. Beginning on January 1, 2023, FHWA
proposed to remove from the waiver EV chargers whose final assembly
does not occur in the United States. Beginning on July 1, 2023, FHWA
proposed to additionally remove from the waiver EV chargers for which
the cost of components manufactured in the U.S. does not exceed 25
percent of the cost of all components. Beginning on January 1, 2024,
and thereafter, FHWA proposed to remove from the waiver EV chargers for
which the cost of components manufactured in the U.S. does not exceed
55 percent of the cost of all components. The final waiver, which would
be applicable only if final assembly occurred in the U.S. and the cost
of components manufactured in the U.S. exceeded 55 percent of the cost
of all components, was proposed as remaining in place until terminated
by FHWA.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA proposed that the cost of components
that are purchased when they are incorporated into an EV charger be
determined by including the acquisition costs (including transportation
costs to the place of incorporation into the end product) and any
applicable duty (regardless of whether a duty-free certificate of entry
is issued). The FHWA proposed that the cost of manufactured components
include all costs associated with the manufacture of the component
(including transportation costs and quality testing), and allocable
overhead costs, but FHWA proposed to exclude profits and any labor
costs associated with the manufacture of the end product. The FHWA
proposed that costs include costs incurred specifically for the
contract; benefit both the contract and other work and can be
distributed to each in reasonable proportion to the benefits received;
or are necessary to the overall operation of the business, even if a
direct relationship to any particular cost objective cannot be shown.
In the proposed waiver, FHWA requested comments on all aspects of
the proposed waiver, including the definition of ``EV charger;'' the
phases of the proposed schedule set forth in the proposed waiver;
alternative dates and supporting information for alternative dates if
applicable; whether there should be four phases as proposed; how many
chargers would be fully compliant with BABA requirements at each phase
of the proposed waiver and by the end of the 5-year NEVI Program and
how many would not be compliant at each phase; the reliability of
chargers; the cost completeness of chargers; production rates and
capacity of chargers; the timing of delivery upon the order or purchase
of chargers; whether industry expects its production rates and capacity
for chargers to be consistent with the proposed schedule; how the
proposed schedule or alternative dates impact installation schedules in
the field; whether to establish different phase-out schedules for
Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC) chargers and Alternating-Current
Level 1 (ACL1) and Level 2 (ACL2) chargers; the proposed meaning of
cost of component; whether to use the installation date of the EV
charger or some other date to determine which phase a given charger
would be covered by; whether and how to apply FHWA's existing Buy
America requirement for iron and steel to any specific predominantly
steel and iron EV charger components; and the reliable availability of
such steel and iron components which are capable of complying with
FHWA's existing Buy America policy.
II. Summary of Major Changes Reflected in the Final Waiver
In light of the comments received on the proposed waiver
demonstrating the inability of EV charger manufacturers to produce a
steady and reliable supply of EV chargers, FHWA is making several
changes to the timeline in the final waiver for multiple reasons
described in further detail below, including to allow manufacturers
additional time to domestically source components for their EV
chargers:
[[Page 10622]]
1. FHWA is eliminating the proposed first phase in the proposed
waiver, which would have applied a complete waiver of Buy America
requirements to EV chargers and all components of EV chargers.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Throughout this notice, this phase will be referred to as
the ``complete waiver'' phase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The start date of the second phase of the proposed waiver (the
first phase of the final waiver), which removes from the waiver EV
chargers whose final assembly process does not occur in the U.S., will
now occur on the effective date of this waiver instead of January 1,
2023, and the end date of this phase has been extended to June 30,
2024.\8\ In addition, during this phase, any housing components that
are predominantly steel and iron must comply with existing FHWA Buy
America steel and iron requirements, meaning that if predominantly iron
and steel housing is used for the EV charger, the housing must be
entirely manufactured in the United States according to FHWA standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Throughout this notice, this phase will be referred to as
the ``final assembly phase.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The third phase of the proposed waiver, which would have removed
from the waiver EV chargers for which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not exceed 25 percent of the cost of all
components, has been eliminated in the final waiver.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Throughout this notice, this phase will be referred to as
the ``25 percent phase.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The start date of the fourth phase of the proposed waiver (the
second phase of the final waiver), which removes from the waiver EV
chargers for which the cost of components manufactured in the U.S. does
not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components, has been extended
from beginning on January 1, 2024, as in the proposed waiver, to
beginning on July 1, 2024.\10\ In addition, any housing components that
are predominantly steel and iron must continue to comply with FHWA Buy
America steel and iron requirements, meaning that the housing must be
entirely manufactured in the United States according to FHWA standards.
The cost of predominantly steel and iron EV charger housing will also
count towards determining whether 55 percent of the cost of all
components are manufactured in the U.S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Throughout this notice, this phase will be referred to as
the ``55 percent phase.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. As required under section 70914(d) of BABA, FHWA is clarifying
that it will revisit this waiver and determine whether there is
continued need for it within 5 years from the effective date of this
notice. The FHWA will also publish RFIs every 6 months until the start
of the 55 percent phase to acquire information about the state of the
EV charging industry.
6. The proposed waiver also used the installation date of the EV
charger to determine which phase of the waiver would apply to any given
EV charger. The final waiver instead uses the date on which an EV
charger is manufactured, which is defined in further detail below in
Section III.C. However, any EV chargers manufactured before June 30,
2024, (the end of the final assembly phase) will need to begin
installation by October 1, 2024, to be covered by this waiver.
7. The FHWA also has simplified and narrowed the definition of ``EV
charger'' in a manner that will maximize the use of domestic goods,
products, and materials. The proposed waiver defined ``EV charger'' to
include EV chargers and associated payment systems, distribution
systems, telecommunications and networking equipment, energy storage
systems, and other supporting equipment and systems: (i) in the
immediate vicinity of a charger or group of chargers; and (ii)
essential to the function or operation of a charger or group of
chargers. The definition of ``EV charger'' as used in this final waiver
only refers to the self-contained EV charging unit; it does not include
associated equipment.
The reasons for these changes are discussed in more detail in the
next section.
III. Response to Comments Received
The FHWA received 92 comments and 1 supplemental comment from 89
different commenters, including automobile manufacturers, EV charger
manufacturers, EV charger installers, members of the steel and aluminum
industries, labor organizations, private associations, public
associations, local public agencies, State departments of
transportation (State DOT), and several individuals. While several
commenters raised objections to the waiver as proposed, most commenters
were in favor of some version of a waiver of applicable Buy America
requirements. The FHWA discusses the main objections to the proposed
waiver and major categories of comments below.
In accordance with section 70916(c) of BIL, FHWA consulted with the
National Institute of Standards and Technology's Hollings Manufacturing
Extension Partnership before issuing this waiver.
A. Applicability of FHWA's Manufactured Products General Waiver to EV
Chargers
The proposed waiver suggested removing EV chargers from FHWA's
Manufactured Products General Waiver. By doing so, the manufactured
product content in EV chargers would be subject to the requirements of
23 U.S.C. 313, with this waiver serving to provide a phased approach to
exempt certain chargers from these requirements over time. The FHWA
stated that continuing to apply the Manufactured Products General
Waiver to EV chargers would be inconsistent with the objectives of BABA
and is not supported by currently available information on domestic
manufacturing capabilities. Removing EV chargers from the Manufactured
Products General Waiver and issuing this final waiver allows all
aspects of EV chargers to be covered by a single waiver and thus Buy
America-compliant. The FHWA believes that individuals who take
advantage of this waiver can avoid confusion and know the domestic
content procurement preferences applicable to EV chargers.
The FHWA did not receive substantive comments objecting to this
approach and is therefore removing EV chargers, as defined in this
waiver, from FHWA's existing Manufactured Products General Waiver.
B. Opposition to the Proposed Waiver
Eight commenters, (the Steel Manufactures Association (SMA), United
Steelworkers, Nucor Corporation, Aluminum Extruders Fair Trade
Committee (AEFTC), American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Alliance
for American Manufacturing (AAM), BorgWarner, Inc., and the American
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations) expressed
that they did not support the proposed waiver, presenting various
objections that are summarized below:
Indefinite Duration of Proposed Waiver: SMA and the Nucor
Corporation criticized the proposed waiver as being of an indefinite
duration, arguing that this was contrary to OMB's Implementation
Guidance, which stated that waivers should be time-limited. United
Steelworkers also noted that FHWA's Manufactured Products General
Waiver remains in place after almost 40 years and was concerned that
FHWA would similarly fail to narrow the proposed waiver after its
initialization.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees that the waiver is not, and should
not be, indefinite and, as clarified in more detail below, will review
the waiver
[[Page 10623]]
(including by providing an opportunity for public notice and comment)
within 5 years of its issuance, and will discontinue the waiver if it
is found to no longer be in the public interest at that time, in
accordance with section 70914(d) of BABA. The FHWA will also monitor
the domestic supply of EV chargers throughout the course of this waiver
and may choose to discontinue this waiver or make changes to the
timeline described below if FHWA finds that there is a sufficient
domestic supply of EV chargers available. Specifically, as further
explained below, this waiver will only feature two phases: a final
assembly phase and, after a phase-out period, a 55 percent phase.
During the final assembly phase, FHWA will conduct biannual RFIs to
assess industry progress on producing a charger that would be covered
by the 55 percent phase and whether the EV charger industry is on track
to meet the timeline set out in this waiver. Based on information
received during these RFIs, FHWA may determine during the final
assembly phase that domestic manufacturing capacity is able to produce
a sufficient amount of chargers to meet the demand of recipients that
would exist under the 55 percent phase. If this occurs, FHWA may
discontinue the final assembly phase and proceed immediately to the 55
percent phase by phasing out from this waiver's coverage EV chargers
for which the cost of components manufactured in the U.S. does not
exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components.
Congressional Intent of Domestic Content Preferences: AISI and the
Nucor Corporation argued that the proposed waiver was contrary to
Congress' intent in establishing Buy America requirements, as these
commenters believed that Congress intended Buy America requirements to
cover all items made primarily of iron and steel. The SMA, AAM, and
Nucor Corporation added that it is the Administration's policy to
maximize the use of domestic steel, iron, manufactured products, or
construction materials in federally funded infrastructure, not to use
foreign items. Similarly, objecting commenters argued that the waiver
is contrary to Congress' intent in passing BABA, noting the
Congressional findings in section 70911 of BABA and stating that
section 70914(a) required that FHWA ensure that Buy America
requirements apply to iron, steel, manufactured products, and
construction materials.
The FHWA Response: FHWA acknowledges that compliance with Buy
America is both an Administration priority and required under Federal
law. Also, EV chargers purchased using funds from the NEVI Formula
Program established by Congress as part of BIL are to be administered
under title 23, U.S.C.,\11\ including the Buy America requirements
under 23 U.S.C. 313. At the same time, however, FHWA does not believe
that Congress envisioned applying FHWA's Buy America requirement (now
codified at 23 U.S.C. 313) to EV chargers when it first enacted these
requirements, starting in 1978 with the Surface Transportation
Assistance Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-599). Rather, for the foreseeable
future where this waiver is necessary to encourage domestic industry to
ramp up production of EV chargers, it furthers Congressional intent for
EV chargers purchased through the NEVI Program to more closely align
with the requirements of BABA, which, like the NEVI Formula Program,
was also established in BIL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See BIL, Division J, Title VIII, Highway Infrastructure
Program heading, Paragraph 2, twenty-fourth proviso.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to its authority under Buy America, FHWA believes it is in
the public interest, as well as more in harmony with the Congressional
intent behind BABA and the BIL, to waive certain Buy America
requirements for a temporary period when FHWA is not convinced that
manufacturers would be able to meet demand for Buy America-compliant EV
chargers on FHWA-funded projects, which would threaten the ability for
those infrastructure projects to be completed in a timely manner. The
FHWA believes it most appropriate to carry out Congress' intent to
timely complete EV charger infrastructure projects and ensure that the
steel, iron, manufactured products, and construction materials used in
infrastructure projects are produced in the United States through a
specially tailored waiver that balances the need to have a supply of EV
chargers with the need to ramp up domestic production through a phased
approach, which, during the 55 percent phase, will cover EV chargers in
close alignment with the BABA standards for manufactured products. The
FHWA also proposed and intends to implement a final waiver with a
phased approach, which provides an incentive for manufacturers to shift
toward domestic manufacturing processes to comply with the narrowing
scope of the waiver.
Further, as discussed in more detail below, FHWA plans to exclude
the housing, cabinet, or enclosure of an EV charger (hereinafter
referred to as the ``housing'') of EV chargers, if that component is
predominantly steel or iron, from coverage under both phases of this
waiver. Doing so gives effect to FHWA's long-standing practice of
excluding predominantly steel and iron components of manufactured
products from the Manufactured Products General Waiver. This also seeks
to remove uncertainty among recipients \12\ and the EV charger industry
over which components would need to comply with FHWA's existing
requirements for iron and steel. The FHWA believes that this final
waiver therefore is consistent with the public interest and is
justified pursuant to section 70914(b)(1) of BABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ When used in this notice, a recipient refers to direct
recipients of FHWA financial assistance, subrecipients, and pass-
through entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence of Buy America-Compliant EV Chargers: The eight commenters
that objected to the proposed waiver also disputed points made in the
notice justifying the proposed waiver and claimed that this meant that
there was no public interest justification for the proposed waiver. The
Nucor Corporation, AEFTC, and BorgWarner, Inc., for example, stated
that there are existing EV chargers that are compliant with FHWA's Buy
America requirements and that a waiver would disadvantage these
manufacturers that have already made significant investments to be Buy
America-compliant. These commenters pointed to companies that responded
in the 2021 RFI by stating that their EV chargers met FHWA's Buy
America requirements for steel and iron as well as other companies that
have stated that they can meet FHWA's overall Buy America requirements.
The FHWA Response: While FHWA acknowledges the progress that some
companies have made in manufacturing Buy America-compliant EV chargers,
FHWA is still uncertain whether these companies can respond to the
immediate demand for EV chargers that will result from programs under
BIL, such as the NEVI Formula program and supply equipment that is
certified as fully Buy America-compliant. The FHWA is also unsure if
statements that existing EV chargers are Buy America-compliant are
relying on the Manufactured Products General Waiver being available to
cover non-domestic components that are not predominantly steel or iron.
While some manufactures may be able to domestically assemble chargers
at the present, FHWA is concerned that many manufacturers could not
produce Buy America-compliant chargers without the Manufactured
Products General Waiver being in effect. The FHWA believes, as noted
above, that removing EV chargers
[[Page 10624]]
from the Manufactured Products General Waiver aligns with the goals of
Buy America requirements and seeks to ensure that EV chargers are
produced with domestic manufactured components. Finally, FHWA seeks to
reiterate that this waiver does not prohibit the purchase of Buy
America-compliant EV chargers by a recipient if such chargers are
available; the comments received, however, indicate a limited supply of
EV chargers that is currently insufficient to ensure that EV charger
infrastructure projects are delivered on time, which is the basis for
this waiver.
Existing Buy America Processes: Similarly, commenters mentioned
that FHWA has long-standing and well-developed regulatory and
administrative rules related to the implementation and enforcement of
Buy America requirements for steel and that suppliers on FHWA projects
have needed to comply with these steel requirements for decades.
According to these commenters, this history of compliance meant that
there should be no uncertainty and no additional time needed to comply
with Buy America steel requirements as applied to EV chargers, contrary
to what they argued was depicted in the proposed waiver.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees that there are steel suppliers who
are highly knowledgeable about FHWA's Buy America requirements as they
apply to steel. At the same time, EV chargers that are currently on the
market may not have been designed to be compliant with FHWA's Buy
America requirements, especially considering that they may have been
designed with the belief that they would be covered by FHWA's
Manufactured Products General Waiver. Further, they may contain steel
components obtained from suppliers all over the world. The FHWA
believes that the presence of steel in an EV charger does not mean that
recipients could comply with Buy America requirements merely by
complying with existing Buy America steel requirements. Further, it is
not clear to FHWA that EV chargers that are currently available on the
market use Buy America compliant steel, or that other aspects of the EV
charger would not render them noncompliant with Buy America
requirements without this waiver going into effect. Again, FHWA
stresses that the purpose of this waiver is to encourage manufacturers
of EV chargers to transition to a point where they utilize components
manufactured in America, including those made out of steel. As noted
below, while the housing of an EV charger is a specific component that
when made predominantly of iron and steel does not need to be covered
by this waiver, this is not true for all components of EV chargers.
Traceability of Steel Inputs: The Nucor Corporation, SMA, and AISI
also argued that certifying that steel is Buy America-compliant is not
new or difficult, contrary to how they claimed it was presented as a
justification for the proposed waiver. These commenters stated that
there is nothing unique about the steel used in EV chargers that would
make Buy America certification more difficult, as mill test
certificates for steel inputs are routinely provided to distributors
and fabricators that these commenters allege provide complete
traceability throughout the distribution chain.
The FHWA Response: FHWA understands that steel producers have
developed certain methods they use to certify that their steel is Buy
America-compliant, but FHWA does not believe that this affects the need
for this waiver. As set out in the proposed waiver, there is a need to
establish compliance and certification processes focused specifically
on EV chargers. The FHWA does not believe that just because there are
existing processes for certifying that steel is Buy America-compliant
intrinsically means that there are existing processes for certifying
that the EV charger and all of its components are Buy America-
compliant.
At the same time, as described in more detail below, FHWA does
believe that these commenters make a valid point for predominantly
steel and iron components of EV chargers that are widely available from
domestic suppliers. This is one of the reasons why FHWA is excluding
the housing of a charger if it is predominantly iron or steel from
coverage under this waiver. The commenters' point, however, does not
hold for other components that are not predominantly iron or steel and
for which the ability for any small amount of steel to be accurately
traced in them does not necessarily ensure that the EV charger is Buy
America-compliant.
Environmental Impacts of Foreign Steel: The Nucor Corporation, SMA,
and AISI further claimed that foreign steel is often produced and
transported with significantly higher greenhouse gas emissions that
would occur with domestic production and transportation, which they
argued meant that allowing for the use of foreign steel would be
counter to the environmental goals undergirding the purchase and
installation of EV chargers.
The FHWA Response: Through this waiver, FHWA seeks to incentivize
domestic manufacturers to ramp up production and make needed
investments to build and expand domestic production in order to support
a sustainable energy and climate future. The FHWA does not intend for
recipients of FHWA financial assistance to continue to rely on
components manufactured overseas that might have steel in them to the
extent practical once those components are manufactured and available
in the United States; this is the intent behind the phase-out of
chargers for the 55 percent phase and potential future phases. Further,
while FHWA's existing Buy America requirements would apply to any steel
or iron component of an EV charger, they would not cover the charger
itself. The FHWA believes that this waiver, which, after a phase out
period, waives Buy America requirements only for EV chargers where
final assembly occurs in the U.S. and the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components, which would align with BABA's requirements for manufactured
products, encourages recipients, their contractors, and subcontractors
to utilize more domestic steel than under FHWA's existing Buy America
requirements.
C. Applicability Date of Waiver and Waiver Phase-Out Periods
Thirty-three commenters recommended a different date of
applicability than the installation date used in the proposed
waiver.\13\ Commenters noted that there may be a significant difference
in time between when a product is manufactured and when it is installed
due to unforeseen circumstances, such as permitting delays, supply
chain constraints, utility interconnection delays, delivery delays,
prolonged adverse weather, potential workforce shortages, and routine
certification and quality checks that commercial operators perform on
industrial products before putting them into service. Such
circumstances could result in EV chargers being manufactured during one
phase of the proposed waiver (and consistent with the requirements in
place during that phase) and installed in another,
[[Page 10625]]
resulting in those chargers no longer being covered by this waiver and
risking them not being Buy America-compliant. These commenters stated
that relying on the installation date would prevent recipients, their
contractors, subcontractors, and EV charger manufacturers from knowing
which phase of the proposed waiver any given EV charger might be
covered by, creating uncertainty and financial risk; commenters warned
that this could discourage parties from moving forward with purchase
decisions until the start of the 55 percent phase. The EV charger
manufacturers also noted that they would not be able to certify with
certainty that their EV chargers were covered by this waiver and
therefore Buy America-compliant, as they would have no control over the
date their chargers were installed. Finally, commenters pointed out
that using the date of installation would potentially risk
manufacturers either producing a glut of EV chargers that could not be
used on FHWA-assisted projects or that manufacturers would delay
producing chargers until those chargers would be compliant with the 55
percent phase to ensure their ability to be used in FHWA-funded
projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Unlike the effective date, which is the date where this
waiver's first phase would begin, the date of applicability refers
to the date on which an event occurs that determines which phase of
this waiver would cover a specific EV charger. For example, under
this final waiver, an EV charger with a date of applicability of
July 20, 2023, would need to have final assembly occur in the United
States to be covered by this waiver. An EV charger with a date of
applicability of July 20, 2024, on the other hand, would need to
have final assembly occur in the United States and have at least 55
percent of the cost of all components manufactured in the United
States to be covered by this waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In terms of alternatives, the most common suggestion made by
commenters, including Wallbox, USA, Inc. (Wallbox), PowerCharge, bp
pulse fleet, the Electric Vehicle Charging Association (EVCA), Tesla,
Inc. (Tesla), the American Association of State Highway Traffic
Officials (AASHTO), and the Associated General Contractors of America
(AGC), recommended that FHWA use the manufacture date of the EV charger
as the date of applicability. AASHTO noted that this would allow EV
charger manufacturers to sell and install equipment that had been
manufactured prior to this waiver's effective date. The AGC commented
that using the manufacture date would reduce the opportunity for
external factors to cause delays, as the manufacture date occurs at the
beginning of the EV charger production process. Wallbox stated that
using the date of final assembly as the date of applicability could
allow EV suppliers to streamline reporting and enforcement of Buy
America requirements.
Eight commenters (including Revel Transit (Revel), EVgo, Electrify
America, LLC (Electrify America), and FreeWire Technologies (FreeWire))
recommended that the date on which FHWA obligated funds be used as the
date of applicability, arguing that it was more predictable than the
date of installation. The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT)
commented that using the date of obligation would allow recipients to
move forward on EV charging infrastructure projects with an exact
understanding of how this waiver would apply to their projects; EVgo
similarly stated that this would ensure applicants for FHWA financial
assistance would be aware of what phase of this waiver would be
applicable to their project. The Maryland Department of Transportation
(MDOT) stated that using the date of obligation would allow vendors to
provide existing EV chargers for projects to enable those projects to
be implemented as soon as possible.
Other commenters recommended using the date on which an EV charger
is purchased as the date of applicability for this waiver and its
phases. Volta Inc. (Volta) stated that the date a charger is purchased
is the date at which vendors solidify pricing and orders with their
suppliers. Shell USA, Inc. (Shell) commented that using the purchase
date as the date of applicability would enable both the project
applicant and their EV charger vendor or supplier to ascertain their
ability to be covered under this waiver and its phases with a high
degree of predictability.
Other suggestions for the date of applicability included the date
on which a solicitation is released, the date where the funding
agreement between the FHWA and awarded entity is executed, the date on
which the submission of bids for the project is due, the date that the
EV charger is shipped from the manufacturer, the date of delivery of
the EV charger, and to match the phase of the waiver with funding
dedicated for specific fiscal years.
The FHWA Response: After reviewing the comments, FHWA agrees that
relying on the date of installation to determine the date of
applicability is impractical. Due to the current unavailability of Buy
America-compliant EV chargers, as well as other factors noted by
commenters such as the time to acquire proper permits and approvals
that might delay installation after procurement of an EV charger,
recipients of FHWA financial assistance who purchase EV chargers might
not know when those chargers will be installed on their EV
infrastructure projects at the time of purchase. Using the installation
date as the date of applicability could mean that those recipients,
their contractors, and subcontractors would face uncertainty over
whether, by the time an EV charger is installed, that EV charger would
still be covered by the phase of the waiver existing when the charger
was purchased, which FHWA believes will determine how that charger is
manufactured. The FHWA acknowledges that uncertainty surrounding when a
procured EV charger will be installed could result in parties waiting
to purchase EV chargers until the 55 percent phase of this waiver,
which goes against the purpose of this waiver in promoting the timely
delivery of EV infrastructure projects.
In considering alternative effective dates, FHWA acknowledges that
the goal should be to provide certainty to EV charger manufacturers and
to those purchasing EV chargers with Federal-aid funds that the EV
charger they will manufacture, purchase, and install will comply with
this waiver. For that reason, FHWA agrees with the plurality of
commenters suggesting an alternative and believes that the most
appropriate date of applicability would be the date on which an EV
charger is manufactured. The FHWA considers the ``date of manufacture''
to be the date on which the EV charger, as defined further below, has
its final assembly occur and is in an operational state. The
manufacturer will be in the best position to know if their chargers
comply with this waiver, as they would be the ones to ensure that the
chargers are domestically assembled or sourced. A purchaser can
therefore be confident that, for example, if they enter into a purchase
order for a charger that is domestically assembled to comply with the
final assembly phase of this waiver, they will receive a charger
compliant with this waiver so long as the manufacturer can manufacture
a domestically assembled charger by June 30, 2024. If a manufacturer
cannot, a purchaser can turn to another manufacturer to receive a
charger that complies with this waiver.
To ensure the timely delivery of EV charger infrastructure
projects, for EV chargers manufactured during this waiver's final
assembly phase, FHWA expects recipients will begin installation of
those EV chargers by October 1, 2024.
D. Timeline of Waiver
Removing Phases from the Waiver: The most common category of
comment FHWA received on the proposed waiver was with respect to the
phase-out timeline proposed. Of 89 unique commenters, 48 recommended an
extension for the waiver. Of the other 41 commenters, 17 agreed with
the need for a waiver without mentioning extending the proposed
waiver's timelines, 5 had an unclear position, 3 did not mention
extending the waiver's timeframes but instead requested that the waiver
have a flexible duration, 2 argued that the final waiver should not
[[Page 10626]]
have any phases, and the remaining 14 argued against a waiver
entirely.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Eight of these 14 commenters were the commenters mentioned
in Section III.A. The remaining six presented objections against the
waiver without providing substantive arguments as to their
reasoning.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The two commenters who argued that the final waiver should not have
any phases, FreeWire and Broadband Telecom Power, Inc. (BTC Power),
stated that the proposed phases were unnecessary, added compliance
tracking challenges for the industry, and lacked commensurate benefit
for EV charging projects. FreeWire also stated that they assumed some
EV charger manufacturers would be able to more readily source
components domestically than perform final assembly domestically.
Instead of phases, BTC Power recommended that the waiver start on its
effective date with the 55 percent phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not agree that a single-phase approach
would serve the public interest more than a waiver where coverage of
certain chargers is gradually phased out through phases. As noted
below, commenters raised many more concerns with domestically sourcing
components than they did with ensuring that final assembly of EV
chargers occurs in the United States, and FHWA believes that EV charger
manufacturers will be able to assemble chargers domestically before
they are able to ensure that 55 percent of components, by cost, are
manufactured in the United States. The FHWA received no indication that
there were manufacturers who would have more difficulty having final
assembly of their chargers occur in the United States, beyond
FreeWire's assumption, and FHWA does not believe the hypothetical
existence of such companies justifies adding complexity to the waiver.
The FHWA also believes that the phased approach provides an
incentive to manufacturers to ramp up production while, crucially,
ensuring that there is a steady supply of EV chargers available that
covered by this waiver and therefore Buy America-compliant. Having the
waiver start at the 55 percent phase, like BTC Power suggested, risks
having a limited supply of covered chargers at this waiver's effective
date, which may unnecessarily delay EV charger infrastructure projects.
Further, this waiver does not require that EV charger manufacturers
create chargers that comply with any given phase; manufactures may
choose to ignore this waiver and produce otherwise Buy America-
compliant chargers. What this waiver does is provide certainty to how
manufactures can achieve Buy America compliance and sets steps for them
to reach a point where an EV charger would be covered if the EV charger
met certain conditions similar to the requirements imposed on a
manufactured product under BABA.
Extension of Waiver's Time Periods: Of the 48 commenters arguing
for an extension of the waiver, there were various suggestions on how
long that extension should be. Some commenters, such as AASHTO, argued
for extending the dates of the final assembly, 25 percent, and 55
percent phases by 2 years from what was in the proposed waiver. Others,
such as the Electric Drive Transportation Association and PowerCharge,
recommended extended those same dates by 1 year from what was in the
proposed waiver. Still others recommended extending those dates by 6
months from what was in the proposed waiver. Finally, many commenters
argued for modifying the dates of the phase-out periods from the
proposed waiver in non-uniform durations. Tesla, for example,
recommended keeping the start of the final assembly phase on January 1,
2023, but recommended delaying the start of the 25 percent and 55
percent phases by 6 months. The Ford Motor Company (Ford), Wallbox, and
Blink Charging Co. (Blink Charging) similarly recommended keeping the
start of the final assembly phase at January 1, 2023, but recommended
delaying the start of the 25 percent phase by 6 months and the start of
the 55 percent phase by 1 year. Finally, several commenters also asked
for FHWA to evaluate the progress of the EV charger industry and listen
to feedback from recipients and the EV charger industry to determine
whether phases should be subsequently extended.
These 48 commenters routinely mentioned that the proposed waiver's
timeline was not achievable and that an extension was necessary to
ensure that EV chargers which would be covered by this waiver would be
available. Some commenters stated that EV charger manufacturers would
not be able to domestically assemble EV chargers on the proposed
waiver's timeframe. EVgo, for instance, stated that domestically
assembled chargers would not be available at sufficient scale by
January 1, 2023, and Electrify America commented that they thought
domestic assembly of 150 kilowatt (kW) EV chargers would be underway
industry-wide only by the latter half of 2023, with reliability testing
concluding and those chargers being available for purchase in 2024.
EVgo further commented that it conducts up to a yearlong
``qualification process'' for new suppliers which requires a nearly
produced or produced test unit.
Multiple members of the EV charging industry argued in favor of
extending the proposed waiver's timeframe, generally due to concerns
with sourcing EV charger components domestically to allow a charger to
be covered under the 55 percent phase.\15\ The only EV charger
manufacturer who stated that they could meet the proposed waiver's
timeframes was ABB E-Mobility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As noted above, several members of the EV charging industry
did not comment on the proposed waiver's timeframe, including
Tritium, Siemens, Enel X Way, TeraWatt, and FLO EV Charging.
ChargePoint commented that a blanket waiver for ACL2 chargers should
be extended until January 1, 2024, without making clear when
subsequent phases for these chargers would start; this point is
discussed in Section III.C further below. The bp pulse fleet did not
comment either way, stating that it would rely on others to speak to
the appropriate schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeWire requested an extension so that recipients and the EV
charger industry could have time to complete a thorough assessment of
the cost of components and to establish proper certifications. FreeWire
also stated that FHWA was underestimating the complexity and long-lead
time it would take to source components and that ongoing supply chain
disruptions limited the availability of domestic components. For these
reasons, FreeWire requested that all Buy America requirements become
effective on July 1, 2024, one-and-a-half years after the final
assembly phase and 6 months after the 55 percent phase would have
started in the proposed waiver.
SK Signet commented that while domestic assembly might be
achievable in the near future, some components are not available from
domestic sources, while other components were available domestically
but at vastly greater prices than foreign components. SK Signet
recommended delaying the start of the final assembly phase until July
1, 2023, and the 55 percent phase until January 1, 2026.
Blink Charging stated that establishing sufficient domestic
production, securing new suppliers, and validating the safety of their
products takes time, which is amplified by the ongoing equipment and
materials shortages and shipment delays stemming from global supply
chain constraints. Blink Charging further commented that these
constraints are particularly acute for DCFC components and recommended
a 1-year delay in phase-out dates.
Wallbox stated that it would be ready for final assembly in the
U.S. shortly but
[[Page 10627]]
that there were significant challenges facing the industry in terms of
the procurement and sourcing of components, which would be exacerbated
by the demand for components caused by the NEVI Formula Program.
Wallbox suggested having the final assembly phase start on January 1,
2023, as proposed in the waiver, with subsequent phase-out periods each
starting 1 year later. Wallbox did not clearly indicate that they could
domestically assemble EV chargers by January 1, 2023; however, they
hinted that they could and did not recommend an extension to the
proposed waiver's January 1, 2023, date.
Volta, on the other hand, commented that they believed it possible
to domestically assemble EV chargers by January 1, 2023, but thought
that starting the 55 percent phase on January 1, 2024, was unreasonable
based on its suppliers' low confidence of being able to produce an EV
charger that could be covered by the 55 percent phase.
Among other companies, WiTricity stated that many EV charger
components are not manufactured in the United States, which they stated
would only happen if chargers were manufactured in sufficient volume to
generate adequate demand. Tesla added that an extension to the timeline
of the proposed waiver would allow manufactures time to fully assess
their supply chains, calculate domestic content values, enter into new
supply agreements, and reorient their supply chains.
Many State officials also argued in favor of extending the proposed
waiver's timeframe for the same reasons mentioned by EV charger
manufacturers.\16\ The AASHTO similarly claimed delays and increased
costs could result if EV charging equipment providers were required to
shift component sourcing to domestic suppliers, who may struggle with
availability due to limited quantities of EV chargers and EV charger
components and high demand. The AASHTO also commented that the
practical ability for the industry to source American-made EV charger
components would take longer than the proposed timeframe permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The AASHTO, the National Association of State Energy
Officials, and a total of 18 State DOTs submitted comments, with all
but one State DOT, the New Jersey Department of Transportation
(NJDOT), indicating that the proposed timeline is not achievable.
The NJDOT instead argued in favor of a temporary waiver without
specifically commenting on its proposed timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
State DOTs also requested the proposed timeline be extended due to
the experience they have had in attempting to procure EV chargers.
State DOTs pointed to the fact that orders placed for EV chargers
remain unfilled after considerable time due to supply chain issues. The
KDOT stated that they had heard from their stakeholders that wait times
for some electrical components in EV chargers stretched to 60-80 weeks,
even without considering the increased demand created by the
investments under BIL. The KDOT also commented that although there are
some manufacturers with currently available equipment that is Buy
America-compliant, they did not believe there was adequate capacity yet
to fill the rapidly expanding need for EV chargers.
In essence, these commenters stated that the current delay in
producing EV chargers meant that chargers may be ready for purchase
after some phases of the proposed waiver have already ended, with
particular emphasis on this being the case for the first phase, which
was proposed as ending on December 31, 2022. FreeWire stated that they
doubted whether any States would complete the installation of NEVI
projects before the first quarter of 2024, at the earliest. FreeWire
also stated that they expected it to take State administrators several
months to design and issue solicitations, with some States expected to
take longer as they have indicated that they would take 1 to 2 years
conducting further planning before beginning the procurement process.
For the States that do issue solicitations for NEVI projects in the
next several months, FreeWire commented that they expected the
solicitation period to last several more months, with more time being
taken for States to make awards. Similarly, EVgo commented that many
States plan to solicit proposals for charging stations beginning in
late 2022 and extending into early 2023. The Georgia Department of
Transportation (GDOT) mentioned that it may not be ready to install EV
chargers until well after 2022, with installation not expected to occur
until 2024 at the earliest, meaning that the 2022 waiver period would
be useless. The MDOT similarly commented that, to its knowledge, no
State DOT or associated vendor would be able to benefit from the first
phase of the waiver as the earliest dates for project awards they
projected would be in the spring of 2023. East Bay Community Energy
stated that the short timeframe of the first phase would likely have no
impact on market acceleration, and Tesla commented that the first phase
would provide little relief since States have not issued requests for
proposals regarding EV charger deployment. Other issues raised by
commenters to justify an extension of the proposed waiver's timeframe
were the difficulty for EV charger manufacturers and their suppliers to
understand the waiver; price volatility; the need to alter
manufacturing processes; potentially increased demand for EV chargers
from both the public and private sector, which may result in
potentially increased cost; the additional time it would take to
conduct safety and reliability testing on the newly domestically
produced chargers; the necessary delay to ensure that there are
suitable numbers of replacement parts; potential workforce issues; and
the lack of a final rule from FHWA on the technical requirements for EV
chargers under the NEVI Formula Program. Due to many of these factors,
EVgo stated that the limited number of chargers available and the
significant expected increase in demand meant that chargers may not be
available until late 2024 or early 2025.
In terms of the benefits of extending the proposed waiver's
timeline, Siemens Corporation (Siemens) commented that a delay would be
necessary to account for the limited supply of EV chargers that are
currently available, and that the timeline of any waiver needed to
consider the time it would take to procure, deliver, and install EV
chargers in order for that waiver to have a meaningful effect.
Similarly, General Motors (GM) stated that an extension would provide
the time necessary to onshore supply chains, ramp up production, and
conduct necessary testing of new chargers.
The FHWA Response: In terms of the complete waiver phase of the
proposed waiver, FHWA does not agree with commenters that it is
necessary to extend this phase beyond the date set out in the proposed
waiver; FHWA instead believes that commenters indicated why this phase
is not in the public interest. Commenters argued that the complete
waiver phase as proposed, which would have occurred only in calendar
year 2022, would start and end without a steady supply of EV chargers
available for procurement. The FHWA disagrees with this assessment. For
the purpose of this waiver, the question is whether there will be
enough chargers available to satisfy the demand posed by recipients.
The purpose of the complete waiver phase in the proposed waiver was
to provide time for EV charger manufacturers to domestically assemble a
sufficient supply of chargers for when the first phase-out period
occurred. Once EV charger manufacturers have
[[Page 10628]]
such a supply available, FHWA believes it appropriate to phase out from
this waiver's coverage all EV chargers that do not have final assembly
occur in the United States. The EV charger manufacturers, who FHWA
believes have the most insight as to when they can domestically
assemble an EV charger, differed on what date they recommended for the
final assembly phase to start. ChargePoint, Inc. (ChargePoint), Blink
Charging, and PowerCharge requested that this phase start in 2024;
however, others, such as Volta and Wallbox, approved of the proposed
date of January 1, 2023, for the start of the final assembly phase.
Based on comments received, FHWA expects recipients to start to procure
chargers in early 2023. The FHWA expects EV charger manufacturers who
stated a preference for the final assembly phase to start on January 1,
2023, to be able to provide the limited number of chargers requested by
recipients in early 2023. Throughout 2023, as more recipients seek to
procure EV chargers, FHWA expects this demand to be met by increases in
the number of domestically assembled chargers produced by EV charger
manufactures.
As the proposed first phase-out date of January 1, 2023, has
already occurred and, as described above, FHWA does not believe it
necessary to delay this date, FHWA finds that a complete waiver phase
would not be in the public interest.
Twenty-five Percent Phase: Other commenters criticized the 25
percent phase of the proposed waiver as being overly complex and
burdensome. Several commenters pointed out that this phase would not
assist in reaching the final 55 percent phase of the waiver. Enel X Way
USA, LLC (Enel X Way) and Tritium commented that by eliminating the 25
percent phase, manufacturers would be provided more time to solidify
the necessary partnerships, suppliers, and supply chain resources to
ensure that EV chargers are covered by the 55 percent phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees that the 25 percent phase is
unnecessary and would not serve the public interest. The FHWA initially
proposed this phase to serve as a gradual step between having the
waiver cover chargers whose final assembly process occurred in the
United States and phasing out from coverage under this waiver EV
chargers for which the cost of components manufactured in the United
States does not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components,
leading to the 55 percent phase. The FHWA believed that doing so would
incentivize manufacturers during the 25 percent phase to make progress
to reaching the point where they could produce chargers that would be
covered by the 55 percent phase of the waiver. The FHWA intended that
manufacturers would shift their processes to account for the 25 percent
threshold and then shift again to account for the 55 percent threshold.
Based on the comments received, FHWA no longer believes that
manufacturers will make the initial shift to produce chargers that
could be covered by the 25 percent phase. Instead, FHWA believes that
manufacturers will simply shift their processes to produce EV chargers
that are covered by the 55 percent phase, rendering the 25 percent
phase pointless for many of them.
Further, for those manufactures that do attempt to take advantage
of the existence of the 25 percent phase by altering their processes to
produce EV chargers where the cost of components manufactured in the
United States exceeds 25 percent of the cost of all components, FHWA is
concerned that doing so may hinder these manufactures from producing EV
chargers that could be covered by the 55 percent phase, which
undermines this waiver's goal of incentivizing the production of EV
chargers assembled and sourced in America. While FHWA wishes to
incentivize companies to produce EV chargers that are Buy America-
compliant as quickly as they are able to, starting with EV chargers
that would be covered by the 55 percent phase, FHWA no longer believes
that the 25 percent phase is a useful means in reaching this goal.
Start of 55 Percent Phase: With the removal of the complete waiver
phase and the 25 percent phase, this waiver will start with the final
assembly phase on its effective date and its first phase-out will occur
at the start of the 55 percent phase. At this time, EV chargers covered
by the final assembly phase for which the cost of components
manufactured in the U.S. does not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all
components will be removed from this waiver's coverage. Removing the 25
percent phase, however, necessitates consideration of when to now end
the final assembly phase and begin the first phase-out period that
commences the 55 percent phase.
Commenters gave a wide range of dates for when the 55 percent phase
should start, from January 1, 2024, to January 1, 2026. Again, FHWA
finds the dates that EV charger manufactures suggested to be important
considerations, as they will be the ones domestically sourcing chargers
for the 55 percent phase. Many EV charger manufacturers, such as
Tritium, Enel X Way, Siemens, and TeraWatt Infrastructure (TeraWatt),
did not suggest an alternative to the 55 percent phase while making
recommendations on other aspects of the proposed waiver, indicating
tacit approval of FHWA's proposed date of January 1, 2024. Others, such
as Wallbox, PowerCharge, Volta, and Blink Charging, suggested modifying
this date to January 1, 2025. SK Signet was among the few commenters
who argued for a proposed date of January 1, 2026.
The FHWA Response: Given the range of extension timelines suggested
by commenters, FHWA believes it is appropriate to extend the date of
the final assembly phase such that it ends on June 30, 2024. The first
phase-out period under this final waiver, starting the 55 percent
phase, where FHWA will remove from the waiver EV chargers for which the
cost of components manufactured in the U.S. does not exceed 55 percent
of the cost of all components, will therefore begin on July 1, 2024.
This date is between the two dates proposed by the majority of EV
charger manufacturers. Similar to the discussion on the final assembly
phase, this should not affect manufacturers who recommended a start
date for the 55 percent phase of January 1, 2024. For those that
recommended later dates, this may serve to expedite the domestic
sourcing process so these manufactures can compete with ones that are
able to domestically source by January 1, 2024. In addition, FHWA notes
that many manufacturers recommended a date for the start of the 55
percent phase at the same time as they recommended a new date for the
start of the 25 percent phase. With the 25 percent phase removed, FHWA
expects manufactures to be able to modify their processes to produce
chargers covered by the 55 percent phase faster, as these manufactures
will not have to perform an additional modification of their processes
to produce chargers that could be covered by the 25 percent phase. The
FHWA believes that extending the start of this first phase-out for a
year properly considers the concerns of many commenters regarding the
time it takes to domestically source components, without extending the
waiver for so long that it no longer provides a proper incentive for
manufactures to comply with the Administration's goals of encouraging
the domestic manufacturing and assembling of EV chargers. The FHWA
expects all recipients to procure EV chargers during this phase, with
many recipients that
[[Page 10629]]
had already procured chargers in previous phases using this phase to
procure additional chargers using NEVI Formula Program funds from
additional years.
The FHWA will also regularly monitor the status of the domestic EV
charger industry. If the industry is advancing with production of Buy
America-compliant EV chargers faster than expected, FHWA may
discontinue this waiver or alter this waiver's timelines accordingly.
To accomplish this goal, FHWA will conduct biannual RFIs to receive
information on the status of the EV charger industry during the final
assembly phase, which may lead FHWA to commencing the first phase-out
and starting the 55 percent phase earlier than July 1, 2024. If FHWA
plans to modify this waiver, FHWA will provide adequate notice of its
intention to do so. As required by section 70914(d) of BIL, 5 years
from the effective date of this waiver, FHWA will also revisit this
waiver to determine whether there is still a need to continue it or
whether the domestic EV charger industry has advanced to a point where
this waiver can be discontinued.
Removal of Defined Dates: Some commenters went further than merely
extending the waiver and suggested that the inclusion of any sort of
date would be inappropriate and that FHWA should base its waiver off of
market research or other metrics. The Oklahoma Department of
Transportation (OKDOT) requested FHWA publish an RFI and conduct
extensive research on the availability of the materials manufactured in
the U.S. before phasing out the waiver. The GDOT commented that setting
the duration of any phase in advance would be arbitrary and that the
only baseline that should be used is EV charger production data. The
National Association of Truck Stop Operators (NATSO) and the Society of
Independent Gasoline Marketers of America (SIGMA) jointly commented
that FHWA should waive Buy America requirements until it is clear that
a competitive market of products that meet Buy America requirements are
available at scale. The City of Dallas stated that any timeframe should
be delayed until a predefined set of manufacturing and installation
metrics are achieved. The AGC also agreed with using market research to
identify manufacturing capacity for the purpose of setting phase out
dates. The AGC argued that setting specific dates may encourage EV
charger manufacturers to rush production to produce chargers before
these dates, causing them to fail to test these chargers for safety and
reliability. The AGC also commented that setting specific dates for the
start of phases risk manufacturers failing to produce chargers that can
be covered under a given phase.
The FHWA Response: FHWA disagrees with commenters suggesting that
this waiver should not feature specific dates and believes that
specific timeframes and phase-out dates are useful in providing
recipients of FHWA financial assistance certainty as to the
requirements that will apply at any given time for purchases of EV
chargers. Waiver periods that are tied only to the results of
contemporary market research may change suddenly, disrupting planning
made by recipients, their contractors, and subcontractors. In addition,
specific dates provide industry vendors with a clear timetable to
encourage them to shift to manufacturing and assembling EV chargers
domestically as quickly as possible. Again, FHWA is issuing this waiver
both after considering the current and projected state of the market
and to encourage an increase in domestic content within the market over
time. While FHWA acknowledges that some EV charger manufacturers may
not be able to produce compliant chargers within the timeframe set out
in this waiver, FHWA believes that delaying the phases of this waiver
to account for such manufacturers goes against the purpose of Buy
America requirements and the Administration's goals of realizing
American production of EV chargers. In addition, FHWA intends to
collect new information as it becomes available via biannual RFIs and,
as detailed above, may enter into the 55 percent phase before the
scheduled July 1, 2024, date depending on the information received.
Bifurcating Timeframes for ACL2 and DCFC Chargers: Several
commenters brought up the differences between ACL1 and ACL2 chargers
and DCFC chargers and argued that these differences justified different
waiver timeframes for the two kinds of chargers. EVgo commented that
ACL2 chargers contain fewer components and cost dramatically less than
DCFC chargers. EVgo further commented that it expected the domestic
DCFC charger market to take longer to develop to a point where those
chargers could be produced domestically at scale than they expected for
the domestic ACL2 charger market. EVgo claimed that DCFCs require more
highly specialized manufacturing processes, that the ACL2 charger
market is more robust currently than the DCFC charger market, and that
the company expected demand to be lower for ACL2 chargers in the NEVI
Formula Program. Electrify America commented that because ACL2 chargers
have become relatively commoditized, unlike DCFC chargers which are a
relatively new technology, there should be different phase-out
schedules for the two kinds of chargers. Electrify America suggested
that ACL2 chargers follow the proposed waiver phase-out schedule
whereas DCFC chargers be permitted an extended schedule. ChargePoint,
on the other hand, stated that supply chains were less advanced for
ACL2 chargers than DCFC chargers due to a lack of prior demand for Buy
America-compliant ACL2 chargers and recommended extending the waiver
for ACL2 chargers until January 1, 2024, to account for that.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not believe that there is a need to
bifurcate this waiver's phase-out schedule for ACL2 chargers and DCFC
chargers. To start with, the comments received on this issue differed
in the basic notion of whether bifurcation was necessary to account for
delays in the ACL2 charger market or delays in the DCFC charger market.
Further, FHWA does not intend this waiver to be overly burdensome on
recipients and believes that bifurcating phase-out periods would
unnecessarily confuse recipients as to which waiver period a given
charger may fall into, without providing any clear benefit.
E. 350 kW DCFC Chargers
Some commenters raised special concerns over 350kW DCFC chargers.
These comments generally proceeded along the same path. First, these
commenters stated that DCFC chargers are the best chargers to be
purchased using NEVI Formula Program funds. Pilot Travel Centers LLC
(Pilot), for instance, commented that Congress, FHWA, and States EV
Deployment Plans clearly favored deployment of 350 kW DCFC chargers. In
a joint comment, Pilot, GM, and EVgo further stated that recent
investments in EV charging infrastructure illustrate a clear preference
for 350 kW DCFC chargers and that this also matches a growing trend in
the automotive industry. Commenters stated that if 350 kW DCFC chargers
were not available at scale, States would instead purchase lower power
chargers, such as 150 kW DCFC chargers that meet the proposed standards
promulgated by FHWA for the NEVI Formula Program.\17\ These
[[Page 10630]]
commenters believed that using 150 kW DCFC chargers instead of 350 kW
DCFC chargers would result in an EV charging network inadequately
prepared for the next generation of EVs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The FHWA proposed regulations setting minimum standards and
requirements for projects funded under the NEVI Formula Program on
June 22, 2022. See 87 FR 37262. The FHWA proposed that the maximum
power per DCFC charging port be at or above 150 kW, with each
charging station capable of providing at least 150 kW per charging
point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, commenters stated that it was not possible for 350 kW DCFC
chargers to comply with the proposed waiver's timeframe. The Alliance
for Automotive Innovation mentioned that the proposed waiver did not
give specific attention to 350 kW DCFC chargers, and the commenter
believed that the same issues facing all EV chargers were especially
pronounced for 350 kW DCFC chargers. A joint comment from NATSO and
SIGMA mentioned that they were unaware of any data suggesting that Buy
America-compliant 350 kW DCFC chargers were available at scale or will
be available in time to meet the timelines in the proposed waiver and
that FHWA should waive Buy America requirements for these chargers
until it is clear that a competitive market of compliant products is
available at scale.
To deal with this perceived concern, some commenters requested FHWA
additionally extend its waiver schedule specifically for 350 kW DCFC
chargers. The joint comment from the Pilot, GM, and EVgo requested a
focused 1-year delay solely for 350 kW DCFC chargers given what they
claimed were additional complexities and supply chain challenges facing
these chargers.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not agree that it is necessary to give
special accommodations for 350 kW DCFC chargers in this waiver. The
FHWA finds that the argument pushed by commentators in favor of such
preference is flawed at its first premise. The FHWA proposed allowing
150 kW DCFC chargers to be used on NEVI Formula Program funded
projects. Commenters in favor of special treatment for 350 kW DCFCs do
so under the idea that these chargers should be purchased using NEVI
Formula Program funds and that this waiver should encourage that. The
FHWA believes that the rulemaking for the NEVI Formula Program, not
this waiver, is the appropriate place to make that argument. This
waiver is to encourage the domestic production of chargers that can be
used on FHWA assisted projects and delaying this waiver's timeframe for
350 kW DCFC chargers does not comport with this goal.
F. Definition of ``EV Charger''
Coverage of Waiver: In the proposed waiver, FHWA defined an ``EV
charger'' as ``EV chargers and associated payment systems, distribution
systems, telecommunications and networking equipment, energy storage
systems, and other supporting equipment and systems: (i) in the
immediate vicinity of a charger or group of chargers; and (ii)
essential to the function or operation of a charger or group of
chargers.'' The FHWA also stated that the term would not include
parking areas adjacent to the EV chargers and lanes for vehicle ingress
and egress.
Many commenters expressed concern over this proposed definition,
with some suggesting that it be expanded while others stating that it
was overly broad. In the former group, Ford asked for FHWA to consider
including EV charging posts and cable management systems as part of the
definition of ``EV charger.'' The KDOT suggested that the waiver also
apply to other manufactured products that are external to the EV
charger but in its immediate vicinity, as well as switchboards,
switchgears, and panelboards. The MDOT recommended that manufactured
components for battery storage and other alternative power sources,
such as solar panels, be included in the definition of ``EV charger,''
although MDOT admitted doing so may cause confusion. ElectricFish
similarly requested that the definition apply to battery storage
systems.
In the opposite group, many commenters complained that the broad
definition in the proposed waiver for ``EV chargers'' could cause
confusion and delay. The AASHTO stated that this definition would muddy
the parameters surrounding the waiver and complicate the determination
of compliance when determining the cost of components for the 55
percent phase. General Motors stated that the broad proposed definition
may cause project delays since equipment outside of the actual EV
charger might have its own supply chain considerations, particular with
respect to utility-related equipment. Volta similarly commented that
systems and technologies not core to the EV charger itself, such as
wireless and telecommunications systems, are frequently not
manufactured in the United States and that moving supply chains to the
United States for these components would be extremely difficult and
costly. Revel agreed, stating that the proposed definition could
increase noncompliance with Buy America requirements because many of
these systems and technologies are not produced domestically. In
addition, TeraWatt noted that the EV charging market is not large
enough to dictate a domestic shift to the telecommunications supply
chain, potentially resulting in no Buy America-compliant
telecommunications systems being available and, if the proposed
definition is used, fewer Buy America-compliant EV chargers. The Zero
Emission Transportation Association (ZETA) and Shell both noted that
additional equipment encompassed by FHWA's proposed definition may
implicate other domestic content procurement preferences, resulting in
confusion by recipients, their contractors, and subcontractors and
potential delays. BTC Power commented that including equipment beyond
the EV charger would make it difficult for EV charger manufacturers to
certify Buy America compliance, given that they might not necessarily
have insight into the domestic content of pieces they don't manufacture
themselves.
Finally, multiple commenters stated that the proposed definition of
``EV charger'' would disincentivize the integration of helpful features
such as on-site renewable energy generation and energy storage systems
in EV charging stations, since inclusion of such features would require
them to be Buy America-compliant. Commenters presented concerns that
such domestically produced technologies were not available and
therefore may not be included in charging stations featuring EV
chargers purchased with FHWA financial assistance. The ZETA noted that
FHWA should encourage including on-site renewable energy generation in
charging stations, which would be hindered if those technologies were
required to be Buy America-compliant given that manufacturers were
unlikely to change their processes to domestically manufacture those
technologies to support the minimal quantity involved in EV charging
stations.
Commenters who suggested a narrower definition that FHWA originally
proposed presented numerous options. The AASHTO recommended the
definition only include the self-contained EV charging unit itself.
Autel Energy (Autel) suggested that the definition should only apply to
those components that are under the direct control of the EV charger
manufacturer. Proterra recommended that FHWA limit Buy America
requirements to items that are directly related to electric vehicle
supply equipment. Revel suggested that the definition apply only to
technologies or systems permanently
[[Page 10631]]
affixed to the charger that are essential to the charger's function and
operation. Finally, Shell commented that Buy America requirements
should only apply to the portion of the project which the recipient
deems eligible for EV infrastructure-related Federal-aid funding.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees with the number of commenters
suggesting that the definition of ``EV charger'' should be narrower
than what was presented in the proposed waiver. After reviewing the
comments received, FHWA does not believe it is necessary to include the
associated equipment specified in the proposed waiver as part of this
final waiver. Such equipment will fall under FHWA's current Buy America
requirements, which may include coverage under the existing
Manufactured Products General Waiver. In this final waiver, FHWA will
consider an ``EV charger'' as only the EV charger unit itself and the
equipment contained inside it. As there are various configurations
possible for EV chargers, FHWA is reliant on manufacturers to determine
which components are within the EV charger and will therefore be
covered by this waiver.
The FHWA believes that it is important to accelerate the domestic
EV charger manufacturing industry and that it is feasible for
manufacturers to onshore production in the near future to take
advantage of the increased funding for EV infrastructure projects. This
waiver serves to incentivize that process. The FHWA does not believe,
however, that such incentives exist for equipment associated with the
EV charger that may have uses beyond EV charging infrastructure
projects, such as telecommunications equipment; for these pieces of
equipment, FHWA does not think that the same incentive exists to
encourage their domestic production. Including them under the
definition of ``EV charger'' would mean that final assembly of these
pieces of equipment would need to occur domestically and many of them
would need to be sourced domestically in order to be covered by this
waiver, and FHWA does not believe the EV charger market is large enough
to incentivize manufacturers of these additional pieces of equipment to
domestically produce those pieces of equipment. Under the proposed
definition of ``EV charger,'' this would mean that certain pieces of
equipment associated with an EV charger could not be covered by this
waiver, potentially leaving many EV charger stations noncompliant with
Buy America requirements and hindering efforts to complete EV
infrastructure projects. The FHWA believes that this possibility
justifies narrowing the definition of ``EV charger'' than what was
previously proposed.
In summary, FHWA is choosing to limit this waiver to the EV charger
itself. The FHWA believes doing so keeps the waiver as simple as
possible, compared to other suggested definitions. By limiting the
definition to the EV charger itself, EV charger manufacturers will be
able to determine if a charger is covered by this waiver, while also
providing clarity to recipients, their contractors, and subcontractors
when procuring chargers regarding how this waiver will cover those
chargers. The FHWA also notes that much equipment associated with EV
chargers is covered by FHWA's Manufactured Products General Waiver and,
for this reason, defining ``EV charger'' more narrowly should not
prevent projects from being delivered on time.
Utility Equipment: Several commenters sought clarity on how this
waiver would affect equipment used in utility relocations and upgrades.
Autel questioned whether products used in utility upgrades would be
covered by this waiver. The OKDOT commented that the proposed waiver
did not address whether Buy America requirements extend to utility
relocations and requested that utilities be excluded from Buy America
requirements.
The FHWA Response: Based on the definition used for ``EV charger''
in this final waiver, equipment used in utility relocations and
upgrades would generally not be covered by this waiver; instead, FHWA's
Buy America requirements would apply to such work. Further, FHWA does
not believe it is necessary to treat utility-related work for EV
charger infrastructure projects differently from utility-related work
for other Federal-aid highway projects.
G. Treatment of Components
Defining Components of EV Chargers: Multiple commenters requested
that FHWA clearly delineate what components are covered by this waiver.
Siemens recommended that FHWA further define items that FHWA considers
to be components of EV chargers for the purpose of computing the
domestic content of those components. Tesla and the North Central Texas
Council of Governments (NCTCOG) commented that FHWA should release a
list of all components the proposed waiver would apply to. ABB E-
Mobility, on the other hand, argued that FHWA should not create a list
of what it considers to be a component of an EV charger because EV
charger technology is developing rapidly, and components vary by
manufacturer.
The FHWA Response: In general, any article, material, or supply
that is directly incorporated into the end product (i.e., EV charger)
is a component. Given the various ways that EV chargers are structured,
and may be structured in the future, FHWA agrees with ABB E-Mobility
that it is not useful to define with particularity every component used
in an EV charger.
Determining Cost of Components: Multiple commenters sought
clarification regarding how to determine the cost of components to
determine whether an EV charger is covered by the waiver. Enel X Way
USA and Tritium recommended that the subassembly of foreign parts into
components qualify as part of the manufacturing process which should be
treated as part of the cost of a component. Tritium also suggested that
manufactures should be able to determine the cost of the component
using their manufacturing costs. The NCTCOG asked whether the exclusion
of labor costs associated with the manufacture of the end product also
prohibited inclusion of labor costs associated with manufacture of
components. Wallbox recommended adding the cost of labor towards final
assembly as a cost of the component, and Tesla encouraged FHWA to
include labor costs for components that are manufactured domestically
and included in the final EV charger. Wallbox also recommended that
FHWA clarify that all components used in final assembly, including
components purchased by the manufacturer from upstream suppliers, count
for domestic content calculations in the 55 percent phase. The National
Electrical Manufacturers Association questioned whether Manufacturer
Value Add or Substantial Transformation is part of the cost of a
component.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not believe that changes need to be
made to how the cost of components are calculated from how was
described in the proposed waiver. The FHWA proposed to determine the
cost of components for this waiver using the same methodology used to
calculate the cost of components for the Buy American statute under
chapter 83 of title 41, U.S.C., which generally applies to supplies,
construction, and services acquired for public use. The FHWA believes
that utilizing existing definitions rather than creating new ones for
this waiver provides more consistency across Federal agencies and more
certainty to recipients, their contractors, subcontractors, and EV
charger manufacturers. Per the
[[Page 10632]]
regulations implementing the Buy American statute, the Federal
Acquisition Regulations (FAR), ``cost of component'' is defined in FAR
25.003 as: ``(1) For components purchased by the contractor, the
acquisition cost, including transportation costs to the place of
incorporation into the end product or construction material (whether or
not such costs are paid to a domestic firm), and any applicable duty
(whether or not a duty-free entry certificate is issued); or (2) for
components manufactured by the contractor, all costs associated with
the manufacture of the component, including transportation costs as
described in paragraph (1) . . . plus allocable overhead costs, but
excluding profit. Cost of components does not include any costs
associated with the manufacture of the end product.'' \18\ As the Buy
American statute is similar in its goals to Buy America, FHWA believes
that relying on the definition for ``cost of components'' in FAR 25.003
is preferrable to other methods, such as considering whether
substantial transformation has occurred. For components purchased and
then incorporated into an EV charger, the cost of that component would
be the acquisition cost, including transportation costs to the place of
incorporation (whether or not such costs are paid to a domestic firm)
and any applicable duty (whether or not a duty-free entry certificate
is issued). For components manufactured and then incorporated into an
EV charger, the cost of that component would be all costs associated
with the manufacture of the component, including transportation costs
to the place of incorporation, plus allocable overhead costs, but
excluding profit. To the extent that costs do not fit into this
definition, FHWA will not consider them in determining whether an EV
charger is covered by this waiver's 55 percent phase. For instance,
this would not cover Manufacturer Value Add as that is not a cost
associated with the manufacture of the component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 48 CFR 25.003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This definition would include the cost of subassembly of foreign
parts into the component for components manufactured by the EV charger
manufacturer as it is a cost associated with the manufacture of the
component. For components purchased by the EV charger manufacturer, the
cost of subassembly of foreign parts would be reflected in the
acquisition cost of that component. Based on this definition, the cost
of all components used in final assembly, whether manufactured or
purchased by the EV charger manufacturer, will be considered when
determining whether a charger is covered during the 55 percent phase of
this waiver.
In terms of labor costs, for purchased components, FHWA expects the
labor cost to be built into the acquisition cost of the component and
it should not be accounted for separately. For manufactured components,
labor costs associated with the manufacture of the end product will not
be considered to be the cost of a component; however, the labor costs
associated with the manufacture of the component itself will be. Such
costs are costs associated with the manufacture of the component.
Applicability of Buy America Iron and Steel Requirements to
Predominantly Iron and Steel Components of EV Chargers: Commenters
disagreed over whether FHWA should apply existing Buy America
requirements regarding iron and steel to primarily steel and iron
components of EV chargers. On one side, commenters argued that FHWA
should not apply such requirements to any specific predominantly iron
or steel EV charger component. These commenters argued that doing so
would complicate compliance and pose an undue burden on EV charger
manufacturers in terms of time and cost. TeraWatt also noted that
because EV chargers need to have their final assembly occur in the
United States and meet the cost of component threshold set out in this
waiver to be covered by it, there was no need to turn to FHWA's
existing iron and steel requirements to ensure the expansion of
domestic manufacturing capacity. The ZETA, Enel X Way, and NCTCOG
argued that imposing FHWA's existing iron and steel requirements under
Buy America would create additional roadblocks to the completion of EV
charging infrastructure projects. ABB E-Mobility argued that the
domestic availability of steel for which all manufacturing processes
occurs in the United States is limited and could be cost prohibitive
when integrated into EV chargers and recommended FHWA not require that
predominantly steel components use steel for which the entire
manufacturing process occurs in the United States. The AGC further
argued that singling out any specific component to be excluded from the
waiver would provide unnecessary complications and potentially cause
delays. Several commenters added that FHWA's current steel and iron
requirements under 23 U.S.C. 313 should not apply to EV chargers at any
point, claiming that while EV chargers may contain iron and steel
components, they are not predominantly steel and iron. ChargePoint went
further, recommending that FHWA exclude any steel and iron requirements
indefinitely.
Other commenters disagreed and stated that FHWA's existing
requirements for iron and steel under Buy America should apply to at
least some EV charger components. Nucor and AISI, two opponents of the
proposed waiver, agreed that the waiver should not apply to all
components of an EV charger. These two commenters stated that the
domestic steel industry has the capacity to supply steel for use in EV
chargers and that products used in EV chargers, such as the EV
charger's housing, are readily available from domestic steel producers.
Tritium also stated that it was comfortable with excluding
predominantly iron and steel components from coverage under this waiver
if manufacturers were able to count these excluded components to meet
the cost of component thresholds.
The FHWA Response: FHWA agrees with certain commenters that it is
in the public interest to apply this waiver to all components of an EV
charger. In general, except with respect to the housing of an EV
charger, commenters to the proposed waiver did not provide sufficient
information as to which components were predominantly iron or steel.
Without readily available information on which components are more
often than not predominantly iron or steel to apply a categorical rule,
FHWA does not find it appropriate to place the onus on manufacturers
and recipients to sift through components one by one to determine which
are predominantly iron or steel. By specifying which predominantly
steel and iron components of an EV charger are expected to comply with
current FHWA Buy America requirements, manufacturers and recipients
will have certainty over which components are covered, which will allow
for projects involving those chargers to be completed more
expeditiously.
The FHWA believes, however, that it is practical to apply FHWA's
existing Buy America requirements for predominantly iron or steel
components to specifically identified components of an EV charger that
are predominantly iron or steel. Based on comments received, the only
component identified as potentially being predominantly iron or steel
is an EV charger's housing. As indicated in the responses to the 2021
RFI, the housing may comprise over 50 percent of the costs of the
charger. While other components may contain some amounts of iron and
steel, the housing was the only component mentioned by commenters to
the 2021
[[Page 10633]]
RFI as being predominantly iron and steel. In addition, ABB E-Mobility
commented on the proposed waiver of the significant amounts of steel
included in the housing.
After reviewing the comments received, FHWA believes that housing
predominantly made of iron or steel should not be covered by this
waiver and therefore must comply with existing FHWA Buy America
requirements. The purpose of FHWA's Buy America requirements is to
ensure that, where possible, iron and steel products are produced in
the United States. The FHWA believes that waivers should be used
sparingly; if a product would otherwise be covered by FHWA's iron and
steel Buy America requirements, FHWA believes those requirements should
apply to that product absent sufficient justification to the contrary.
An EV charger's housing has been repeatedly described to FHWA as being
the single component with a significant percentage of its costs being
comprised of the cost of its steel and iron. This also aligns with
FHWA's existing treatment of predominantly iron and steel components of
manufactured products. Current FHWA policy does not distinguish between
predominantly iron and steel components of any manufactured product and
predominantly iron and steel components of predominantly iron and steel
manufactured products, and FHWA does not find it necessary to create
such a distinction here. The FHWA agrees with Tritium, however, that if
an EV charger does feature a housing that is predominantly iron or
steel, FHWA will consider the cost of that cabinet when calculating the
cost of components to determine whether the EV charger falls under this
waiver during the 55 percent phase.
The FHWA does not believe that removing housings that are
predominantly iron or steel from this waiver's coverage will cause an
undue burden on EV charger manufacturers, contrary to what was argued
by some commenters. Based on comments from the steel industry, there is
an adequate amount of domestic steel available, and commenters did not
present arguments that there was anything unique about an EV charger's
housing that would prevent it from being sourced and assembled
domestically, consistent with how other predominantly steel and iron
components of manufactured products are treated regularly in Federal-
aid highway projects.
H. Coverage of Subcomponents
Application of Waiver to Subcomponents: Commenters suggested that
the domestic content provisions of this waiver should only apply at the
component level, not at the subcomponent level. In essence, these
commenters requested that when determining if EV chargers were covered
by the 55 percent phase, FHWA should determine the cost of components
manufactured in the United States without including the cost of
subcomponents. According to these commenters, FHWA should allow for the
sourcing of subcomponents from international sources throughout the
lifetime of this waiver due to the delay it would take manufacturers to
either locate and substitute domestically sourced subcomponents or
alter the designs of their chargers, the costs of doing so, the
challenge to track and certify subcomponents, and their opinion that
applying this waiver at the subcomponent level would not meaningfully
further FHWA's domestic manufacturing goals. The ZETA added that they
believe the standard of the 55 percent phase, where the waiver would
cover EV chargers only if the cost of components manufactured in the
United States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all components, could
only be achievable if subcomponents could be sourced internationally.
ABB E-Mobility urged FHWA to state that subcomponents could be used
without regard to their country of origin, arguing that there is a need
to be able to source subcomponents internationally and that EV charging
demand is unlikely to shift production of these subcomponents to the
United States, considering the size of the EV charger industry. BTC
Power recommended that FHWA should copy the regulatory definition the
Federal Transit Administration uses for determining whether a
manufactured product is considered produced in the United States, with
49 CFR 661.5(d)(2) stating that ``[a] component is considered of U.S.
origin if it is manufactured in the United States, regardless of the
origin of its subcomponents.''
The FHWA Response: To be covered by the initial phase of this
waiver, the final assembly process of EV chargers must occur in the
United States; this includes the incorporation of subcomponents into
the final EV charger. It does not include the assembly of the
subcomponent itself or the assembly of subcomponents into components.
To be covered by the 55 percent phase, the cost of components
manufactured in the United States must exceed 55 percent of the cost of
all components. In alignment with the definition of ``cost of
components'' in FAR 25.003, FHWA did not and does not intend for
subcomponents to be considered when calculating the cost of components
to determine coverage under the 55 percent phase. While the cost of
subcomponents may factor into the cost of components, the cost of
subcomponents should not be separately calculated and used to determine
whether a charger is covered by this waiver.
Exclusion of ``Non-Substantial'' Components: PowerCharge requested
that non-substantial components of EV chargers, such as screws and
clips, be exempt from the calculation of an EV charger's steel and iron
content.
The FHWA Response: FHWA does not believe this change is necessary.
At all times that this waiver is active, it will cover EV chargers
where final assembly occurs in the U.S. and, after the first phase-out
period, where the cost of components manufactured in the U.S. exceeds
55 percent of the cost of all components. Screws and clips, which
PowerCharge mentioned as ``non-substantial components,'' will many
times be considered subcomponents, which, as mentioned above, are not
included in calculations for the purpose of determining coverage under
the 55 percent phase. Further, to the extent that a non-substantial
component exists, is not manufactured domestically, and is included in
an EV charger, that charger may still be covered under this waiver.
Such components are likely to cost a de minimis amount, and, even at
the 55 percent phase, this waiver still covers EV chargers for which
the cost of components exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components. The FHWA does not believe that including the costs of such
components in calculating the costs of all components for the purpose
of the 55 percent phase presents a significant burden to manufacturers
and does not find it necessary to explicitly exclude minor components.
I. Buy America Processes
Standardized Certification Process: Commenters routinely requested
that there be a standardized process to demonstrate compliance with Buy
America requirements, with most of them suggesting that FHWA develop
such a process. The AASHTO recommended developing a process for vendors
to provide information about the percentage of materials that are
sourced domestically, as well as a consistent method for State DOTs to
confirm the accuracy of such information. Blink Charging suggested FHWA
establish a compliance and certification process specifically focused
on EV chargers. The EVCA expressed
[[Page 10634]]
concern about the potential lack of consistency if certification is not
standardized at the Federal level. Wallbox suggested that a public or
third-party entity be responsible for Buy America certification.
The FHWA Response: To the extent that many commenters suggested a
Buy America certification process that extended beyond EV chargers,
that falls outside the scope of this waiver. In terms of designing a
certification process for EV chargers covered by this waiver, FHWA does
not believe it necessary to alter its existing certification processes
specifically for EV chargers. Doing so would create a separate
certification process for EV chargers, which would cause unnecessary
confusion and delay as recipients who are accustomed to FHWA's current
certification process learn how this new process would work.
List of Buy America-Certified Products: Other commenters suggested
that FHWA should maintain a list of Buy America compliant products,
including Buy America compliant EV chargers.
The FHWA Response: Similarly, to the extent that these commenters
suggested that FHWA maintain a list of Buy America-compliant products
outside of EV chargers, that falls outside the scope of this waiver. In
terms of compiling a list of which EV chargers are covered by this
waiver, this waiver is not the appropriate place to require that EV
charger manufactures provide information to the Agency, nor, as
mentioned above, does FHWA believe it should undertake its own
certification process for EV chargers.
IV. Final Public Interest Waiver
Based on all the information available to FHWA, FHWA concludes that
applying the Buy America requirements of 23 U.S.C. 313 for steel, iron,
and manufactured products and section 70914 of BABA for construction
materials to EV chargers on FHWA-assisted infrastructure projects would
be inconsistent with the public interest. A waiver of these
requirements under 23 U.S.C. 313(b)(1), 23 CFR 635.410(c), and section
70914(b) of BABA, structured to phase out over time, is thus
appropriate. In addition, FHWA is removing EV chargers from being
covered by the existing Manufactured Products General Waiver, starting
on the date of this notice. In consideration of the foregoing, FHWA is
issuing this waiver as stated below:
The FHWA will apply a waiver of Buy America requirements under 23
U.S.C. 313 and section 70914 of BABA to EV chargers and all components
of EV chargers if final assembly occurs in the United States for all
chargers that are manufactured from the effective date of this waiver
until June 30, 2024. This phase applies only to EV chargers that are
manufactured during this period and for which recipients begin
installation by October 1, 2024. In addition, all predominantly steel
and iron housing components are excluded from the waiver and must meet
FHWA's Buy America requirements for steel and iron.
Starting on July 1, 2024, this waiver will not apply to EV chargers
for which the cost of components manufactured in the United States does
not exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components. This means that
any EV chargers which are manufactured on and after July 1, 2024, would
be covered by this waiver only if: (i) final assembly occurs in the
United States; and (ii) the cost of components manufactured in the
United States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all components. All
predominantly steel and iron housing components continue to be excluded
from the waiver and must meet FHWA's Buy America requirements for steel
and iron. The cost of any such housing shall be included as a cost of
an EV charger's components when calculating whether the cost of
components manufactured in the United States exceed 55 percent of the
cost of all components. The FHWA considers the ``date of manufacture''
to be the date on which the EV charger, as defined further below, has
its final assembly occur and is in an operational state.
This waiver will remain in place until terminated by FHWA. In
accordance with section 70914(d)(1) of BABA, FHWA will commence a
review of this waiver no later than 5 years from the effective date of
this waiver, at which time FHWA may discontinue this waiver if it is
found to no longer be in the public interest. The FHWA, however,
reserves the right to modify or shorten the duration of this waiver or
any of its phases if it obtains information indicating that this waiver
or any or its phases are no longer in the public interest. The FHWA
will conduct RFIs every 6 months from this waiver's effective date to
July 1, 2024, to receive information on the state of the EV charger
industry. This information may lead FHWA to amend this waiver to, for
example, state that EV chargers are covered by this waiver only if
final assembly occurs in the United States and the cost of components
manufactured in the United States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all
components for waivers that are manufactured before July 1, 2024, with
the results of the RFIs determining what this new date will be.
For the purpose of this waiver, FHWA considers the cost of a
component to be based on whether it is purchased or manufactured when
it is incorporated into the EV charger. The FHWA will use the standards
in FAR 25.003 to determine the allowable costs included in purchased or
manufactured components and will use the standards in FAR 31.201-4 to
determine overhead costs that are generally allocable. In other words,
FHWA will include acquisition costs (including transportation costs to
the place of incorporation into the end product) and any applicable
duty (regardless of whether a duty-free certificate of entry is issued)
for purchased components. For manufactured components, FHWA will
include all costs associated with the manufacture of the component
(including transportation costs and quality testing) and allocable
overhead costs; FHWA will not include profits and any labor costs
associated with the manufacture of the end product. The FHWA will
consider allocable overhead costs to be (a) costs incurred specifically
for the contract; (b) benefit both the contract and other work and can
be distributed to each in reasonable proportion to the benefits
received; or (c) are necessary to the overall operation of the
business, even if a direct relationship to any particular cost
objective cannot be shown.
For purpose of this waiver, FHWA defines ``EV charger'' to mean the
EV charger unit itself and the equipment contained inside it. This
definition does not include associated equipment external to the EV
charger, parking areas adjacent to the EV charger, and lanes for
vehicle ingress and egress. In addition, this waiver does not cover an
EV charger's housing (also known as its cabinet or enclosure) if it is
comprised predominantly of steel or iron; however, the cost of housing
comprised predominantly of steel and iron must be used in the cost of
components calculation. For the purposes of this waiver, an EV
charger's housing is defined as the component of the EV charger that
contains the electronics that convert electricity to direct current.
For any areas, products, or materials excluded from this waiver,
FHWA's existing Buy America requirements and policies will continue to
apply, including the new requirement applicable to construction
materials established under BABA. This means, for example, that the
requirements of 23 U.S.C. 313 and section 70914 of BABA will apply to
the housing of an EV charger if it is predominantly steel or iron. The
FHWA will consider the cost of an EV charger's housing when
[[Page 10635]]
considering whether the cost of components manufactured in the United
States exceeds 55 percent of the cost of all components in the EV
charger, even if that housing is predominantly steel or iron and is not
covered by this waiver. In other words, starting on July 1, 2024, the
waiver will apply only to EV chargers for which the cost of all
components, including the cost of the housing if it is predominantly
steel or iron, manufactured in the United States exceeds 55 percent of
the cost of all components, including a housing that is predominantly
steel or iron.
For purpose of this waiver, FHWA considers an EV charger to fall
under the phase of the waiver that exists on the date when that EV
charger was manufactured.
The OMB Implementation Guidance provides that, before granting a
waiver in the public interest, to the extent permitted by law, Agencies
shall assess whether a significant portion of any cost advantage of a
foreign-sourced product is ``the result of the use of dumped steel,
iron, or manufactured products or the use of injuriously subsidized
steel, iron, or manufactured products.'' OMB Implementation Guidance at
p. 12. E.O. 14005 at Section 5 includes a similar requirement for
``steel, iron, or manufactured goods.'' However, because the public
interest waiver that FHWA is finalizing in this notice is not based on
consideration of the cost advantage of any foreign-sourced steel, iron,
or manufactured product content in EV chargers, there is not a specific
cost advantage for FHWA to now consider.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 117 of the SAFETEA-LU
Technical Corrections Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-244), FHWA is providing
this notice as its finding that a waiver of Buy America requirements is
appropriate. FHWA invites public comment on this finding for an
additional 5 days following the date of publication of this notice.
Comments may be submitted to FHWA's website via the link provided to
the waiver page noted above by February 27, 2023. Comments received
during that period will be reviewed, but the finding will continue to
remain valid. Those comments may influence FHWA's decision to terminate
or modify a finding.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.85.
Shailen P. Bhatt,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-03498 Filed 2-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P