Small Business Size Standards: Manufacturing and Industries With Employee-Based Size Standards in Other Sectors Except Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade, 9970-10009 [2023-02780]
Download as PDF
9970
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245–AH09
Small Business Size Standards:
Manufacturing and Industries With
Employee-Based Size Standards in
Other Sectors Except Wholesale Trade
and Retail Trade
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA or the Agency) is
increasing its employee-based small
business size definitions (commonly
referred to as ‘‘size standards’’) for
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) sectors related to
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas
Extraction (Sector 21); Utilities (Sector
22); Manufacturing (Sector 31–33);
Transportation and Warehousing (Sector
48–49); Information (Section 51);
Finance and Insurance (Sector 52);
Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services (Sector 54); and Administrative
and Support, Waste Management and
Remediation Services (Sector 56).
Specifically, in terms of industries
defined under the NAICS 2022 revision,
SBA is increasing 144 and retaining 268
employee-based size standards in those
sectors. SBA is also retaining the current
500-employee size standard for Federal
procurement of supplies under the
nonmanufacturer rule.
DATES: This rule is effective March 17,
2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Castilla, Economist, Office of
Size Standards, (202) 205–6618 or
sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Discussion of Size Standards
To determine eligibility for Federal
small business assistance, SBA
establishes small business size
definitions (usually referred to as ‘‘size
standards’’) for private sector industries
in the United States. SBA uses two
primary measures of business size for
size standards purposes: average annual
receipts and average number of
employees. SBA uses financial assets for
certain financial industries and refining
capacity, in addition to employees, for
the petroleum refining industry to
measure business size. In addition,
SBA’s Small Business Investment
Company (SBIC), Certified Development
Company (CDC/504), and 7(a) Loan
Programs use either the industry-based
size standards or tangible net worth and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
net income-based alternative size
standards to determine eligibility for
those programs.
In September 2010, Congress passed
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111–240, 124 Stat. 2504,
September 27, 2010) (‘‘Jobs Act’’),
requiring SBA to review all size
standards every five years and make
necessary adjustments to reflect current
industry and market conditions. In
accordance with the Jobs Act, in early
2016, SBA completed the first five-year
review of all size standards—except
those for agricultural enterprises for
which size standards were previously
set by Congress—and made appropriate
adjustments to size standards for a
number of industries to reflect current
industry and Federal market conditions.
SBA also adjusts its monetary-based size
standards for inflation at least once
every five years. An interim final rule
on SBA’s latest inflation adjustment to
size standards, effective December 19,
2022, was published in the Federal
Register on November 17, 2022 (87 FR
69118). SBA also updates its size
standards every five years to adopt the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) quinquennial North American
Industry Classification (NAICS)
revisions to its table of small business
size standards. On December 21, 2021,
OMB published its ‘‘Notice of NAICS
2022 Final Decisions . . .’’ (86 FR
72277), accepting the Economic
Classification Policy Committee (ECPC)
recommendations, as outlined in the
July 2, 2021, Federal Register notice (86
FR 35350), for ‘‘the 2022 Revision to the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS), . . . .’’ On July 5,
2022, SBA issued a proposed rule to
adopt the OMB’s NAICS 2022 revisions
for its table of size standards (87 FR
40034), which SBA finalized in
September 2022 with an effective date
of October 1, 2022 (87 FR 59240;
September 29, 2022).
This final rule is part of a series of
final rules that revised size standards of
industries grouped by various NAICS
sectors. Rather than revise all size
standards at one time, SBA is revising
size standards by grouping industries
within various NAICS sectors that use
the same size measure (i.e., employees
or receipts). In the prior review, SBA
revised size standards mostly on a
sector-by-sector basis. As part of the
second five-year review of size
standards under the Jobs Act, SBA has
already issued five final rules reviewing
all monetary-based size standards and
all employee-based size standards that
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
are part of the Wholesale Trade and
Retail Trade sectors.1
To complete its second five-year
review of size standards, SBA reviewed
size standards under Sector 31–33 and
other sectors with employee-based size
standards not part of Wholesale and
Retail Trade sectors to determine
whether the existing size standards
should be retained or revised based on
the current industry and Federal market
data. After its review, SBA published in
the April 26, 2022, issue of the Federal
Register (87 FR 24752) a proposed rule
(‘‘April 2022 proposed rule’’) to increase
the employee-based size standards for
150 industries or subindustries (or
‘‘exceptions’’) under NAICS 2017,
including 10 industries in NAICS Sector
21 (Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas
Extraction), 10 industries in NAICS
Sector 22 (Utilities), 120 industries in
NAICS sector 31–33 (Manufacturing),
five industries in Sector 48–49
(Transportation and Warehousing),
three industries in Sector 51
(Information), one subindustry
(‘‘exception’’) in Sector 54 (Professional,
Scientific and Technical Services), and
one subindustry (‘‘exception’’) in Sector
56 (Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation
Services). SBA also proposed to retain
the 500-employee size standard under
its nonmanufacturer rule.
In this final rule, SBA is adopting the
proposed size standards from the April
2022 proposed rule without change and
applying the adopted changes to the
recently adopted NAICS 2022 structure
following the methodology outlined in
the NAICS 2022 adoption final rule.
In conjunction with the current,
second five-year comprehensive size
standards review, SBA developed a
revised ‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’
(Methodology) for developing,
reviewing, and modifying size
standards, when necessary. SBA’s
revised Methodology provides a
detailed description of its analyses of
various industry and program factors
1 See Small Business Size Standards: Agriculture,
Forestry, Fishing and Hunting; Mining, Quarrying,
and Oil and Gas Extraction; Utilities; Construction
(87 FR 18607; March 31, 2022), Small Business Size
Standards: Transportation and Warehousing;
Information; Finance and Insurance; Real Estate and
Rental and Leasing (87 FR 18627; March 31, 2022),
Small Business Size Standards: Professional,
Scientific and Technical Services; Management of
Companies and Enterprises; Administrative and
Support and Waste Management and Remediation
Services (87 FR 18665; March 31, 2022), Small
Business Size Standards: Education Services;
Health Care and Social Assistance; Arts,
Entertainment and Recreation; Accommodation and
Food Services; Other Services (87 FR 18646; March
31, 2022), and Small Business Size Standards:
Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade (87 FR 35869;
June 14, 2022).
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
and data sources, and how the agency
uses the results to establish and revise
size standards. In the proposed rule
itself, SBA detailed how it applied its
revised Methodology to review and
modify, where necessary, the existing
size standards for industries covered in
this final rule. Prior to finalizing the
revised Methodology, SBA issued a
notification in the April 27, 2018,
edition of the Federal Register (83 FR
18468) to solicit comments from the
public and notify stakeholders of the
proposed changes to the Methodology.
SBA considered all public comments in
finalizing the revised Methodology. For
a summary of comments and SBA’s
responses, refer to the SBA’s April 11,
2019, Federal Register notification (84
FR 14587) of the issuance of the final
revised Methodology. SBA’s Size
Standard Methodology is available on
its website at www.sba.gov/size.
In evaluating an industry’s size
standard, as described in its Size
Standards Methodology as well as in the
April 2022 proposed rule, SBA
examines its characteristics (such as
average firm size, startup costs and
entry barriers, industry competition and
distribution of firms by size) and the
small business level and share of
Federal contract dollars in that industry.
SBA also examines the potential impact
a size standard revision might have on
its financial assistance programs, and
whether a business concern under a
revised size standard would be
dominant in its industry. SBA analyzed
the characteristics of each employeebased industry in NAICS Sector 31–33
and other sectors with employee-based
size standards, mostly using a special
tabulation obtained from the U.S.
Bureau of the Census from its 2012
Economic Census (the latest available
when the proposed rule was developed).
The 2012 Economic Census special
tabulation contains information for
different levels of NAICS categories on
average and median firm size in terms
of both receipts and employment, total
receipts generated by the four and eight
largest firms, the Herfindahl-Hirschman
Index (HHI), the Gini coefficient, and
size distributions of firms by various
receipts and employment size
groupings. To evaluate average asset
size, SBA combines the sales to total
assets ratios by industry, obtained from
the Risk Management Association’s
(RMA) Annual eStatement Studies
(https://www.rmahq.org/estatementstudies/) with the simple average
9971
receipts size by industry from the 2012
Economic Census tabulation to estimate
the average assets size for each industry.
SBA also evaluated the small business
level and share of Federal contracts in
each of the industries using data from
the Federal Procurement Data System—
Next Generation (FPDS–NG) for fiscal
years 2016–2018. Table 4 of the April
2022 proposed rule, Size Standards
Supported by Each Factor for Each
Industry (Employees), shows the results
of analyses of industry and Federal
contracting factors for each industry and
subindustry (‘‘exception’’) covered by
the proposed rule. Of the 427 industries
and 5 subindustries (i.e., ‘‘exceptions’’)
reviewed in the proposed rule, the
results from analyses of the latest
available data on the five primary
factors discussed above supported
increasing employee-based size
standards for 157 industries and 2
subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’), decreasing
size standards for 216 industries, and
maintaining size standards for 54
industries and 3 subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’). Table 1, Summary of
Calculated Size Standards (NAICS
2017), below, summarizes the analytical
results from the April 2022 proposed
rule by NAICS sector.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF CALCULATED SIZE STANDARDS
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
[NAICS 2017]
Number of
size standards
reviewed
Number of
size standards
increased
Number of
size standards
decreased
Number of
size standards
maintained
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction ............
Utilities ...........................................................................
Manufacturing ...............................................................
Transportation and Warehousing .................................
Information ....................................................................
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services ...........
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (Sector 11);
Finance and Insurance (Sector 52); Administrative
and Support, Waste Management and Remediation
Services (Sector 56).
24
11
360
15
12
7
3
15
11
123
5
3
1
1
9
0
187
8
7
3
2
0
0
50
2
2
3
0
.......................................................................................
432
159
216
57
NAICS
sector
NAICS sector title
21 .........................
22 .........................
31–33 ...................
48–49 ...................
51 .........................
54 .........................
Other ....................
Total ..............
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA
discussed the impacts of the COVID–19
pandemic on small businesses and
greater society. Recognizing the wideranging economic impacts of the
pandemic, SBA decided not to lower
any size standards for which the
analysis suggested lowering them.
Instead, SBA proposed to maintain all
size standards for industries in which
the analytical results supported a
decrease or no change to size standards
and adopt all size standards for which
the analytical results supported an
increase to size standards, except for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
nine industries where SBA’s evaluation
of dominance in field of operation
indicated that size standards should be
maintained at the current levels to
exclude dominant firms and one
industry for which SBA proposed to
adopt a smaller increase to the size
standard also to exclude dominant
firms.
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA
also evaluated the 500-employee size
standard applicable to
nonmanufacturers participating in the
Federal contracting market. SBA’s
regulations at 13 CFR 121.406 require
small business concerns to meet certain
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
requirements when they offer to the
Government an end item they did not
manufacture, process, or produce. These
requirements are known as the
nonmanufacturer rule. To qualify for a
Federal Government supply contract set
aside for small business, a
nonmanufacturer must have an average
of 500 or fewer employees over the past
24 months, be primarily engaged in
wholesale or retail trade activities and
supply the product of a U.S. small
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
9972
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
manufacturer.2 In the proposed rule,
SBA proposed to retain the 500employee size standard under the
nonmanufacturer rule.
In the Request for Comments section
of the proposed rule, SBA requested
comments on the appropriateness of the
current 500-employee size standard
under the nonmanufacturer rule and
suggestions for alternative measures to
an employee-based size standard that
would be more appropriate for size
determination of nonmanufacturers.
SBA also sought comments on its
proposal to increase size standards for
150 industries and retain the current
size standards for the remaining 282
industries or subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’) in Sector 31–33 and
other sectors with employee-based size
standards (excluding Wholesale Trade
and Retail Trade Sectors). Specifically,
SBA requested comments on whether
the proposed revisions are appropriate
for the industries covered by the
proposed rule; whether the decision not
to lower any size standards is justified
by considerations of impacts of the
COVID–19 pandemic; whether the equal
weighting of individual factors to derive
an industry size standard is appropriate;
and whether the data sources used in
developing proposed size standards
were appropriate or sufficient. SBA also
sought comments on its evaluation of
specific industries or subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’), including the
Information Technology Value Added
Resellers (ITVAR) exception to NAICS
541519 (Other Computer Related
Services), NAICS 482111 (Line Haul
Railroads), NAICS 482112 (Short Line
Railroads), the Environmental
Remediation Services (ERS) exception
to NAICS 562910 (Remediation
Services), and certain industries for
which SBA adjusted calculated size
standards based on its analysis of
dominance in field of operation.
To evaluate the impact of the changes
to size standards adopted in this final
rule on the Federal contracting market
and SBA’s loan programs, SBA analyzed
FPDS–NG data for fiscal years 2018–
2020 and internal data on its guaranteed
and disaster loan programs for fiscal
years 2018–2020. The results of this
analysis can be found in the Regulatory
Impact Analysis section of this final
rule.
In accordance with 13 CFR
121.102(e), SBA advises eligible parties
2 On June 6, 2022, SBA issued a final rule
implementing section 863 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Public Law
116–283, which changed the averaging period for
calculating employees for SBA’s employee-based
size standards from 12 months to 24 months (87 FR
34094).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
of the option to file a petition for
reconsideration of a revised, modified,
or established size standard at SBA’s
Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)
within 30 calendar days after
publication of this final rule in
accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(9) and
13 CFR 134 Subpart I. OHA can be
reached using the following contact
information: by mail at U.S. Small
Business Administration, Office of
Hearings and Appeals, 409 Third St.
SW, Eighth Floor, Washington, DC
20416, by email at ohafilings@sba.gov,
by phone at (202) 401–8200 TTY/TRS:
711, or by fax at (202) 205–7059.
Discussion of Comments
SBA received a total of 49 comments
on the proposed rule, 37 of which
pertained to SBA’s proposal to increase
the size standard for the ERS exception
to NAICS 562910 from 750 employees to
1,000 employees. Of the 37 comments
pertaining to the ERS exception, 28
opposed SBA’s proposed increase to the
size standard and nine supported SBA’s
proposal. SBA also received five
comments pertaining to general size
standards issues, two comments that
pertained to SBA’s proposal to retain
the 500-employee size standard under
its nonmanufacturer rule, one comment
on the ITVAR exception to NAICS
541519, one comment on SBA’s
proposed size standards for power
generation industries, one comment on
NAICS 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel
Contractors), one comment on NAICS
333310 (Commercial and Service
Industry Machinery Manufacturing),
and one comment that was outside the
scope of the rule.
As mandated by section 1344 of the
Jobs Act, SBA is required to hold not
less than two public forums during its
quinquennial review of size standards.
SBA held two virtual public forums on
size standards to update the public on
the status of the ongoing second fiveyear review of size standards and to
consider public testimony on changes
contained in the April 26, 2022,
proposed rule. The two virtual public
forums on size standards were held on
June 14, 2022, and on June 16, 2022.
The comments received during the
virtual public forums are included in
the count of comments above. All
comments to the proposed rule,
including those received as part of the
virtual public forums, are available at
www.regulations.gov (RIN 3245–AH09)
and are summarized and discussed by
topic below.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Comments Received During SBA’s
Virtual Public Forums on Size
Standards
As explained in the Discussion of
Comments section above, on June 14
and June 16, 2022, SBA held a series of
two virtual public forums on size
standards to update the public on the
status of the ongoing second five-year
review of size standards and to consider
public testimony on proposed changes
contained in the April 26, 2022,
proposed rule. Over the course of the
two days, of 87 total participants, SBA
received testimony from eight
commenters, of which seven provided
comments pertaining to the SBA’s
proposal to increase the size standard
for the ERS exception from 750
employees to 1,000 employees and one
provided comments pertaining to SBA’s
increases to size standards generally. Of
the seven comments that pertained to
the ERS exception, one commenter
expressed support for the SBA’s
proposed increase to the size standard
from 750 employees to 1,000 employees,
while six commenters opposed the
proposed increase, asking for a lower
size standard.
Regarding the public forum comments
pertaining to the ERS exception, one
commenter supporting the SBA’s
proposed change expressed that by
raising the size standard to 1,000
employees, SBA will support the
creation of a healthy industrial base of
ERS providers for Federal clients and
make it easier for small businesses to
build the strength and capabilities
needed to grow and successfully
graduate from small business status.
This commenter also urged SBA to
consider adopting a size standard of
1,200 employees based on SBA’s
analysis in the proposed rule of all firms
operating under the ERS exception
regardless of whether ERS was their
primary business activity.
Commenters opposed to SBA’s
proposed increase to the size standard
for the ERS exception expressed that
SBA’s proposed change would
adversely impact smaller small
businesses. One commenter also argued
that SBA’s reliance on Federal
contracting data for fiscal years 2016–
2018 led the Agency to make incorrect
conclusions about industry trends
following SBA’s prior increase to the
ERS size standard from 500 employees
to 750 employees, which resulted in
SBA proposing a size standard above
what SBA’s analysis would support if
more recent data were used.
Specifically, the commenter pointed out
that part of SBA’s rationale for
increasing the size standard for the ERS
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
exception is to address the decline in
small business participation that
occurred during fiscal years 2016–2018;
however, the commenter maintained
that, based on the latest available data,
small business participation has
increased significantly since that period.
The commenter further explained that
one reason for the lag between SBA’s
previous increase to the size standard
for ERS and a corresponding increase in
small business participation in the
Federal market could be due to the
nature of the Federal Government’s
procurement process in general which
in some cases could take months, if not
years, to award contracts due to
protests, shifting agency priorities,
funding levels, and other issues.
Moreover, this commenter raised
concerns that the Department of
Energy’s (DOE) reliance on management
and operating (M&O) contractors, of
which most are large businesses, may
have skewed SBA’s results. The
commenter argued that if SBA excludes
DOE’s M&O contracts under the ERS
exception from its analysis of industry
factors, small business participation
would be far more robust than what
SBA reported in the proposed rule.
Another commenter expressing
similar concerns about SBA’s use of
data from fiscal years 2016–2018 to
measure small business participation in
the Federal market also urged SBA to
consider startup costs in its analysis of
the industry size standard and utilize
more recent data from the Engineering
News-Record (ENR) (an industry trade
publication) of the top 200 ENR firms in
the industry when describing the
economic characteristics of ERS firms.
Another commenter urged SBA to
consider the Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA) Region 2 Superfund
program as a representation of the
NAICS 562910 remediation industry.
The commenter argued that these
program data demonstrate the ability of
firms well under the current 750employee size standard to fulfill the
Federal Government’s small business
remediation requirements; thus, it is
unnecessary for SBA to increase the size
standard beyond the current threshold
as the added competition from larger
firms could impact the number of
opportunities available for smaller small
firms that are already thriving under the
current 750-employee size standard.
SBA received three comments
expressing agreement with this
commenter, specifically in support of
the notion that the current size standard
of 750 employees is already appropriate.
Besides comments pertaining to the
ERS exception, during the public
forums on size standards, SBA also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
received one comment from a business
operating under NAICS 561110 (Office
of Administrative Services) pertaining
to SBA’s review of size standards
generally. The commenter opposed any
increases to size standards at this time,
citing concerns about an impending
economic recession, category
management impacts, and best-in-class
requirements, which together, reduce
small business opportunities and
eventually the total number of small
businesses participating in the Federal
market. The commenter urged SBA to
help small businesses facing these
concerns by improving its engagement
efforts through increased access to
financial assistance and other support
rather than increasing size standards.
The comments received during the
virtual public forums that pertain to the
ERS exception closely mirror the public
submissions received electronically
through the www.regulations.gov portal.
In fact, many commenters at the virtual
public forums also submitted more
detailed comments in writing,
elaborating on their oral testimony.
Thus, SBA is addressing these
comments as part of its summary and
response to comments under the
Comments to the Exception to NAICS
562910 (Environmental Remediation
Services) section of this final rule.
Similarly, SBA responds to the
comment opposing increases to size
standards generally as part of its
summary and response to comments
under the General Comments on SBA’s
Proposed Changes to Size Standards
section of this final rule.
Comments on SBA’s Proposed Changes
to Power Generation Industries
SBA received one comment from a
national trade association representing
nearly 900 local electric cooperatives
and other rural electric utilities
supporting SBA’s proposed changes to
size standards for industries under
NAICS Sector 22 (Utilities). Specifically,
the association agreed with SBA’s
decision to maintain the current size
standard for NAICS 221116 and adopt
adjusted calculated increases to size
standards for NAICS 221111, 221112,
221113, 221114, 221115, 221116,
221117, 221118, and 221210 based on
SBA’s analysis of dominance in field of
operation.
SBA Response
SBA appreciates the association’s
comments supporting SBA’s proposed
size standards for several select
industries under Sector 22, Utilities.
SBA agrees that the proposed size
standards are appropriate in terms of
industry market conditions in those
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9973
industries and believes that the changes
will ensure access to SBA’s programs for
the intended beneficiaries within these
industries while excluding the largest
and potentially dominant firms from
being considered small. Thus, in the
absence of opposing comments, SBA is
adopting the proposed size standards for
Sector 22 industries, as proposed.
Comments on the Federal Procurement
Size Standard for Nonmanufacturers
SBA received one comment,
expressing support for SBA’s proposal
to maintain the current 500-employee
size standard for nonmanufacturers. The
commenter expressed concern that if
SBA were to adopt a receipt-based size
standard, as explored by SBA in the
proposed rule, thousands of firms that
currently qualify as small under the
500-employee nonmanufacturer size
standard would lose their eligibility to
seek set-aside procurements for small
businesses. The commenter further
explained that a receipts-based size
standard would likely limit sales
volume for most resellers while also
impacting their ability to maintain
satisfactory employment levels. Thus,
the commenter urged SBA to retain the
current 500-employee size standard for
nonmanufacturer resellers.
SBA also received one comment
opposing SBA’s proposal to maintain
the current 500-employee size standard
for nonmanufacturers. The commenter
believed that SBA provided an
insufficient and non-compelling
rationale for not adopting the calculated
size standard of 550 employees for
nonmanufacturers, and instead
proposing to maintain the current 500employee size standard. Specifically,
the commenter expressed that SBA’s
rationale to maintain the size standard
simply because it is familiar to the
industry and working well in practice
sets a bad and arbitrary precedent. Thus,
the commenter urged SBA to follow the
results of its analysis and increase the
size standard for nonmanufacturers to
550 employees, as suggested by the
results. This commenter also expressed
support for maintaining an employeebased size standard for
nonmanufacturers rather than adopting
a receipts-based size standard.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters that an
employee-based size standard is most
appropriate for nonmanufacturers. In
the proposed rule, as an alternative,
SBA calculated a receipts-based size
standard of $27 million for
nonmanufacturers. However, although
SBA evaluated a receipt-based size
standard for nonmanufacturers, SBA
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
9974
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
believes that adopting a receipts-based
size standard, instead of an employeebased size standard, would be
inappropriate for several reasons.
Specifically, the Small Business Act
provides that the size of manufacturing
firms be based on the number of
employees and that the size of services
firms be based on average annual
receipts. Adopting a receipts-based size
standard under the nonmanufacturer
rule, which currently applies only to
Government acquisitions for supplies,
would cause many manufacturing
concerns supplying products to the
Government as nonmanufacturers under
the nonmanufacturer rule to be
evaluated under a receipts-based size
standard, which would be contrary to
the requirements of the Small Business
Act. Moreover, based on data from the
2017 Economic Census, SBA
determined that under the calculated
$27 million receipts-based size
standard, more than 35,000 firms would
lose their small business status they
currently enjoy under the 500-employee
nonmanufacturer size standard. Thus, as
proposed, SBA is maintaining an
employee-based size standard for
nonmanufacturers.
With respect to the comment
petitioning SBA to adopt 550 employees
as the size standard for
nonmanufacturers as suggested by
SBA’s analytical results, SBA disagrees
that its rationale for maintaining the
500-employee size standard is arbitrary.
As explained in the proposed rule, the
analytical results support raising the
size standard for nonmanufacturers
from 500 employees to 550 employees.
However, to maintain continuity with
general public familiarity with and long
acceptability of the 500-employee
nonmanufacturer size standard, SBA
proposed to maintain the current 500employee size standard. In the proposed
rule, SBA clarified why it believed that
the 500-employee size standard is
appropriate and working well for the
majority of firms to which it applies,
explaining that the 500-employee size
standard for nonmanufacturers is also
the most common size standard among
the manufacturing industries (NAICS
Sector 31–33) where some
manufacturers bid on supply contracts
under which they do not propose to
produce the particular product to be
supplied with their own labor force,
notwithstanding that they are capable of
doing so, and therefore must qualify as
small businesses under the
nonmanufacturer rule. Thus, SBA
believes that maintaining 500
employees as the size standard for
nonmanufacturers would promote
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
Comments on the Application of the
Nonmanufacturer Rule to Information
Technology Value Added Resellers
(ITVARs)
SBA received one comment urging
SBA to reconsider whether the
nonmanufacturer rule should apply to
the ITVAR exception to NAICS 541519
(Other Computer Related Services). The
commenter expressed that it may be
inconsistent for SBA to apply the
nonmanufacturer rule to the ITVAR
exception when most or all of the
supplies provided by resellers under
this exception would fall under one of
the NAICS codes for which class
waivers currently exist.
offer products not subject to a class
waiver.
SBA also believes it would be
inconsistent with the intent of the Small
Business Act if ITVAR resellers could
provide the supplies produced
primarily by a large original equipment
manufacturer (OEM), or other large
manufacturers, without a waiver of the
nonmanufacturer rule. SBA is
concerned that without the compliance
with the nonmanufacturer rule, the
ITVAR exception may allow small IT
resellers to simply serve as ‘‘pass
throughs’’ for large OEMs and other
large manufacturers. While SBA
recognizes that the nonmanufacturer
rule may work better for some products
than for others, it strongly believes that
the rule must apply to all supply
contracts equally. Thus, like all other
products and supplies, the
nonmanufacturer rule must also apply
to IT products, including those
purchased through the ITVAR
exception. Therefore, SBA is retaining
the requirement that the supply
component of small business set-aside
ITVAR contracts must comply with the
manufacturing performance
requirements or the SBA’s
nonmanufacturer rule.
SBA Response
As stated in Footnote 18 to SBA’s
table of size standards at 13 CFR
121.201, for a Federal contract to be
classified under the ITVAR exception
and its 150-employee size standard, it
must consist of at least 15 percent, but
not more than 50 percent of value-added
services. In addition, the offeror must
comply with the manufacturing
performance requirements, or comply
with the nonmanufacturer rule by
supplying the products of small
business concerns, unless SBA has
issued a class or contract specific
(individual) waiver of the
nonmanufacturer rule.
While SBA agrees with the
commenter that class waivers may
already exist for some IT products
commonly purchased using the ITVAR
exception, SBA also acknowledges that
not all IT products procured through the
ITVAR exception have a waiver of its
nonmanufacturer rule. Moreover,
considering the rapid pace of
development in the IT industry, SBA
believes that it is not unreasonable to
assume that there will be new products
purchased by the Federal Government
using the ITVAR exception in the future
that likewise do not qualify for a waiver.
Thus, by eliminating the
nonmanufacturer rule for the exception,
SBA could disadvantage small firms
who are currently offering, or plan to
Comments on NAICS 315210 (Cut and
Sew Apparel Contractors)
SBA received one comment
petitioning SBA to increase the size
standard for NAICS 315210 (Cut and
Sew Apparel Contractors) from 750
employees to 1,500 employees. The
commenter maintained that the
manufacture of personal protection
equipment (PPE) by Cut and Sew
Apparel Contractors and the reliance of
the Federal Government on this
industry to satisfy strategic objectives
related to sourcing PPE equipment and
supplies domestically suggests that the
threshold should be larger than 750
employees. Elaborating on this idea, the
commenter explained that increasing
the size standard would allow PPE
manufacturers to sufficiently scale up
their operations to meet the Federal
Government’s demand at lower costs.
Moreover, the commenter presented
data to show the high fixed costs of
production and relative labor intensity
of Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors
relative to other manufacturing
industries, which the commenter
believed justified an increase to the size
standard when considering the strategic
importance of firms within the Cut and
Sew Apparel Contractor industry. The
commenter also argued that, due to the
pandemic, the distribution of goods
being produced by Cut and Sew Apparel
Contractors has changed, and as a result,
consistency in its regulations and
increase compliance. Therefore, in an
effort to minimize the adverse
consequences on manufacturers who
may provide supplies to the Federal
Government as nonmanufacturers under
the nonmanufacturer rule, and to
promote fair competition among
manufacturers and nonmanufacturers,
SBA is adopting the predominant 500employee size standard for
manufacturers as the size standard for
nonmanufacturers who desire to bid on
Federal supply contracts.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
these companies must invest
significantly more in property, plant,
and equipment if they are to become
more cost-efficient producers of PPE.
The commenter explained that in order
to meet the Federal Government’s
demands for quality and quantity of
goods for PPE purchases, companies
must be larger, both in terms of capital
investment and employment size.
However, the commenter did not
provide any data on industry and
Federal contracting factors showing why
the size standard for the Cut and Sew
Apparel Contractor industry should be
increased from 750 employees to 1,500
employees.
SBA Response
SBA disagrees with the commenter’s
argument that SBA should increase the
size standard for NAICS 315210 based
on the industry’s importance to
Government purchases of PPE.
Specifically, SBA believes that the
commenter may have mis-identified the
proper NAICS code for which
Government purchases of PPE normally
fall under. Based on the NAICS manual,
available at www.census.gov/naics,
NAICS 315210 comprises firms that are
commonly referred to as contractors that
are primarily engaged in (1) cutting
materials owned by others for apparel
and accessories and/or (2) sewing
materials owned by others for apparel
and accessories. Normally, Federal
Government purchases of PPE do not
fall under this NAICS code as
Government purchases of PPE are
normally to acquire new materials and
equipment, and not to modify materials
and equipment already owned by the
Federal Government. Instead,
Government purchases of PPE usually
fall under NAICS 339112 (Surgical and
Medical Instrument Manufacturing),
NAICS 339113 (Surgical Appliance and
Supplies Manufacturing), or NAICS
423450 (Medical, Dental, and Hospital
Equipment and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers) 3 with Product Service
Code (PSC) 6515 (Medical and Surgical
Instruments, Equipment, and Supplies).
Based on an analysis of FPDS–NG data
for fiscal years 2018–2020, SBA found
that less than 0.1 percent of Government
purchases under PSC 6515 fall under
NAICS 315210 while nearly 80 percent
of Government purchases under PSC
6515 occur under one of the three
aforementioned NAICS codes. Since
3 Per the requirements at 13 CFR 121.402(b)(2),
acquisitions for supplies must be classified under
the appropriate manufacturing or supply NAICS
code, not under a Wholesale Trade or Retail Trade
NAICS code, however, FPDS–NG data shows that
some contracting activity may be misclassified
under these NAICS codes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PSC 6515 includes a broad range of
supplies, SBA also analyzed the data by
keywords to identify contracts for PPE,
including respirators, masks, surgical
gowns, and other PPE. SBA again found
that NAICS 315210 was insignificant in
terms of the total dollars obligated
towards purchases of these PPE items.
Thus, SBA does not agree that the
industry’s importance to Federal
Government purchases of PPE warrants
an increase to the size standard in
NAICS 315210 in order to enable the
industry to meet greater demand for
PPE.
Moreover, SBA’s analysis of industry
factors, as presented in Table 4 of the
April 2022 proposed rule, supported a
calculated size standard of only 450
employees for NAICS 315210. However,
in response to the economic challenges
presented by the COVID–19 pandemic
and the measures taken by Federal
Government to protect public health,
SBA decided to adopt a policy to not
lower size standards during the ongoing
second five-year review of size
standards in order to reduce the
economic impacts to small businesses.
Thus, SBA proposed to retain the
current size standard for NAICS 315210
at 750 employees even though the data
supported 450 employees. Based on the
2017 Economic Census data, 99.8
percent of firms are already small under
the current 750-employee size standard
for NAICS 315210. Increasing the size
standard to 1,500 employees might
include the largest and potentially
dominant firms as small, which would
run counter to the Small Business Act
requirement that the size standards
must exclude dominant firms from
being qualified as small.
Regarding the industries that most
accurately classify purchases of PPE,
namely NAICS 339112 and NAICS
339113, SBA has proposed to retain the
current size standard for NAICS 339112
at 1,000 employees and increase the size
standard for NAICS 339113 to 800
employees based on the analysis of
industry and Federal contracting factors.
While the commenter submitted data on
the costs of employment for firms
operating under NAICS 315210 relative
to other manufacturing industries, the
provided data are not at the 6-digit
industry level and do not demonstrate
that SBA’s analysis of NAICS 339112
and 339113 is insufficient. Thus, for the
above reasons, SBA is not adopting the
commenter’s recommendation to
increase the size standard for NAICS
315210 from 750 employees to 1,500
employees, nor is SBA adopting 1,500
employees as the size standard for other
three NAICS codes under which
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9975
solicitations for PPE are normally
categorized.
Comments on the Exception to NAICS
562910 (Environmental Remediation
Services)
As explained above in the Discussion
of Comments section of this final rule,
SBA received a total of 37 comments
pertaining to SBA’s proposal to increase
the size standard for the Environmental
Remediation Services (ERS) exception
to NAICS 562910 from 750 employees to
1,000 employees. Of the 37 comments
pertaining to the ERS exception, 28
(including six comments opposing
SBA’s proposal received during SBA’s
virtual public forums on size standards)
opposed SBA’s proposed increase and
nine (including one comment
supporting SBA’s proposal during the
virtual public forums) supported SBA’s
proposal. Below, SBA summarizes and
responds to comments supporting the
SBA’s proposed change to the ERS size
standard, then summarizes and
responds to comments opposing the
SBA’s proposed change.
Comments Supporting SBA’s Proposed
Change to the ERS Exception
A total of nine comments were
received supporting SBA’s proposal to
increase the size standard for the ERS
exception from 750 employees to 1,000
employees. One commenter supporting
SBA’s proposed increase to the size
standard argued that SBA’s current 750employee size standard is too restrictive
and has been a detriment to many
companies in the industry. The
commenter expressed that adopting a
1,000-employee size standard would
remove the restraint and allow for
further growth for companies without
forcing them to prematurely graduate
from the small business status and to
compete with larger firms with more
resources when they exceed the size
standard.
An additional four commenters,
submitting nearly identical comments,
supported SBA’s proposed increase to
the ERS size standard for similar
reasons, expressing that SBA’s proposed
increase would allow additional firms to
participate in Federal contracting as
small businesses, increase small
business competition, and ultimately
reverse the downward trend in small
business share of ERS contract dollars
from fiscal years 2013 to 2018. These
commenters further expressed that their
business would benefit from SBA’s
proposed change due to the increased
capabilities they could achieve under a
larger size standard which would allow
them to take on larger and more
complex remediation projects. One
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9976
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
commenter also supported SBA’s
proposal based on the belief that the
Federal Government will have access to
an expanded pool of more capable small
businesses to meet the demand for the
surge in ERS requirements expected as
part of the implementation of the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
(Pub. L. 117–58, November 15, 2021).
Three commenters petitioned SBA to
increase the size standard for the ERS
exception to 1,200 employees based on
SBA’s analysis in the proposed rule
which showed support for a size
standard as high as 1,200 employees
when including data from the largest
firms whose principal business
activities were generally unrelated to
ERS.
Referring to an opposing comment
received during SBA’s virtual public
forums on size standards that urged
SBA to exclude the Department of
Energy (DOE) contracts from its analysis
of the ERS exception due to DOE’s
unique reliance on large M&O
contractors, one commenter expressed
that the notion of excluding such
procurements, which are often related to
nuclear remediation, is in direct
contradiction to the definition of the
ERS subindustry, as stated in Footnote
14 of SBA’s Table of Size Standards at
13 CFR 121.201. The commenter
explained that this footnote specifically
lists nuclear remediation as an eligible
activity and further argued that the
justification for excluding DOE
contracts from the analysis simply
because they are dominated by large
businesses is not sufficient. This
commenter also opposed using the
Engineering News-Record (ENR) top 200
environmental firms list as a source of
industry data for evaluation of the ERS
size standard as suggested by one
commenter at the virtual public forums,
because the data do not cover the whole
industry and may contain subjective
measures of revenue that do not
comport with SBA’s definitions.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters
supporting SBA’s proposed increase to
the size standard for the ERS exception
that adopting a size standard of 1,000
employees would extend the runway for
firms to grow while still allowing access
to SBA’s contracting and financial
assistance programs. SBA also believes
that increasing the size standard to
1,000 employees would improve
competition in the industry and help
small businesses to earn more Federal
contracting dollars and compete for
more complex environmental
remediation projects, including those
that may become newly available as a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
result of the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act.
As explained in the proposed rule, the
procurement data analyzed by SBA
showed that the dollars awarded by
firms’ employment size were
concentrated among the largest firms.
Specifically, small firms with less than
or equal to 750 employees received
about 37 percent of the total ERS dollar
awards during fiscal years 2016–2018,
while firms with more than 5,000
employees accounted for about 60
percent of the total ERS contract awards,
with two firms alone accounting for
almost 40 percent of the total awards
under ERS activities. Firms between 750
employees and 5,000 employees
accounted for 3.5 percent of the total
ERS contract dollars. Procurement data
from FPDS–NG for fiscal years 2019–
2021 analyzed by SBA showed an
increase in the small business share of
ERS contract dollars to 43.5 percent and
a decrease in the share of the largest
firms (i.e., those with more than 5,000
employees) to 54 percent, with two of
them alone accounting for about 34
percent of total ERS dollars during that
period. Firms between 750 employees
and 5,000 employees accounted for
remaining 2.5 percent. While the small
business share of ERS contract dollars
increased from about 37 percent during
fiscal years 2016–2018 to about 43.5
percent during fiscal years 2019–2021,
this is still smaller than the
corresponding share of about 50 percent
during fiscal years 2013–2015.
Thus, SBA believes that the large
skewness in the distribution of ERS
firms by the number of employees, the
large percentage of ERS contracting
dollars being concentrated among very
large firms, a decrease in the small
business share of total ERS awards
compared with fiscal years 2013–2015,
and the analysis of industry factors
according to the SBA’s Size Standards
Methodology outlined in the proposed
rule support SBA’s proposal to increase
the ERS size standard to 1,000
employees. SBA believes that its
proposal to increase the size standard to
1,000 employees will further increase
small business participation in the
industry over time.
Regarding the adoption of a higher
calculated size standard of 1,200
employees for the ERS industry, SBA
does not believe that the calculated size
standard of 1,200 employees accurately
reflects the economic characteristics of
firms primarily engaged in the business
activities related to the ERS exception
since this calculation was based on
untrimmed data, and thus, included
very large firms whose primary activity
was likely unrelated to the ERS
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
exception. Moreover, in response to
comments pertaining to using the ENR
data on the top 200 environmental
firms, SBA agrees with commenters
supporting SBA’s increase to the ERS
size standard that this dataset is not
comprehensive enough for SBA’s size
standards purposes. For example, SBA’s
analysis of the ERS industry included
974 firms participating in Federal
contracting under the exception to
NAICS 562910 during fiscal years 2019–
2021, while the ENR dataset suggested
by the commenters only includes the
top 200 environmental firms.4 In order
to reliably evaluate the size standard of
any industry, SBA must rely on
comprehensive data that is
representative of the economic trends of
the entire industry, rather than only the
top firms.
Comments Opposing SBA’s Proposed
Change to the ERS Exception
Of the 28 comments opposing SBA’s
proposed change to the size standard for
the ERS exception, 27 comments
expressed similar arguments for why
SBA should retain the current 750employee size standard for the ERS
exception, including 21 comments
submitted through the regulations.gov
rulemaking portal, of which 20 were
nearly identical, and six comments
submitted orally through SBA’s Virtual
Public Forum on Size Standards. Many
of these 27 commenters, including the
20 commenters that submitted nearly
identical comments, and at least two
commenters at SBA’s Virtual Public
Forum on Size Standards were part of
a group of firms using data from
FEDMINE, a business intelligence
provider specializing in Federal
Government contracting, as the basis for
their comments. One commenter whose
comment was also based on the
FEDMINE report provided a list of 52
other firms that endorsed their
comment. The remaining commenters
that did not reference FEDMINE data
provided similar reasons as those
outlined by commenters using
FEDMINE data for opposing SBA’s
proposed increase to the ERS size
standard.
One commenter opposed to SBA’s
proposed size standard increase for the
ERS exception raised issues other than
those identified by the above 27
commenters, including establishing a
separate NAICS industry specifically for
munitions and unexploded ordnance
4 974 is the number of firms after the removal of
entities with null revenue and null number of
employees as well as the identified Government
entities and manufacturing firms. This number is
the total entities participating in the ERS activity
before trimming the data.
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
services. Below, SBA summarizes and
responds to these opposing comments
separately.
Comments Opposing SBA’s Proposed
Change to the ERS Exception for Similar
Reasons
SBA received 27 comments
petitioning SBA to retain the current
750-employee size standard for the ERS
exception based on similar arguments,
including six comments received during
the virtual public forums on size
standards and 21 comments received
through the www.regulations.gov
rulemaking portal of which 20 were
almost identical. The commenters
commissioned FEDMINE, a business
intelligence provider specializing in
Federal Government contracting, to
prepare a report on their behalf
regarding Federal spending under the
ERS exception for fiscal years 2016–
2021.
The commenters objected to SBA’s
proposed increase to the ERS size
standard on the grounds that more
recent data shows that SBA’s
calculation of the small business share
of the Federal market under NAICS
562910 is understated, and therefore,
undermines SBA’s justification for
increasing the size standard in order to
help small businesses better compete for
contracting opportunities. Specifically,
according to the commenters’ analysis,
the amount of Federal dollars awarded
to small businesses under the ERS
exception increased nearly 50 percent,
from about $1.4 billion in 2016 to about
$2.1 billion in 2021. The commenters
also provided data showing that the
small business share of the ERS Federal
spend increased from 35 percent in
2018 to 46 percent in 2021. The
commenters argued that increasing the
share of ERS Federal dollars obligated to
small firms demonstrates, contrary to
SBA’s analysis, that the prior increase in
the size standard for the exception from
500 employees to 750 employees was
effective in increasing competition in
the Federal market under the ERS
exception (81 FR 4436 (January 26,
2016)). The commenters contended that
SBA should evaluate data beyond fiscal
year 2018 for purposes of analyzing the
ERS exception because most Federal
dollar obligations under the exception
are awarded under indefinite delivery
contracts (IDCs), and as such, SBA
should recognize that there was a lapse
of time between when the ERS size
standard was increased in 2016 until
IDCs were awarded and significant
dollars were obligated to small
businesses under the new size standard.
These commenters also maintained
that the DOE’s unique procurement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
methods, including the Agency’s
reliance on management and operating
(M&O) contracts which are typically
awarded to large firms, have a
significant influence on SBA’s
calculations due to DOE’s high
proportion of total dollars obligated
under the ERS exception. Thus,
commenters urged SBA to exclude DOE
contracts from the analysis since they
do not accurately reflect market
conditions outside of the DOE.
Regarding the influence of DOE’s
procurement trends on SBA’s
calculations, the commenters presented
data showing the percent of DOE’s ERS
contracts dollars obligated to small
businesses and the proportion of total
ERS awards attributable to the DOE. The
data submitted by commenters showed
that for fiscal years 2016–2021, on
average, DOE awarded only about seven
percent of ERS contracting dollars to
small businesses while comprising
nearly 50 percent of total Federal ERS
spending. The commenters maintained
that unlike other Federal agencies, DOE
awards nearly all ERS work through its
M&O contractors, which are exclusively
large businesses. For example, the
commenters added, in fiscal year 2021,
of the $1.2 billion that DOE awarded
under the exception, only $3.2 million
(0.3%) was awarded to non-M&O
contracts. Subtracting the large business
M&O dollars from the DOE’s total ERS
dollars, the commenters found that the
small business share of total dollars was
97.8 percent. The commenters also
argued that since most M&O contractors
are joint ventures between two or more
large businesses, each with employee
counts far in excess of the SBA’s size
threshold, no reasonable increase in the
ERS size standard would influence the
ability of small businesses to compete at
the prime level in the DOE M&O market
and that the contracting dollars awarded
to small business is not likely to
increase simply because the number of
businesses considered small under the
exception has grown.
Regarding the dollars obligated to
small businesses outside of DOE, the
commenters presented data showing
that since fiscal year 2016, the share of
non-DOE ERS contract dollars awarded
to small businesses increased from an
average of 53 percent in fiscal years
2013–2015 to an average of 63 percent
in fiscal years 2016–2018, and to an
average of 78 percent in fiscal years
2019–2021.
Moreover, the commenters expressed
concern with SBA’s impact analysis
which showed that two additional small
businesses would gain access to small
business set aside opportunities under
the proposed 1,000-employee size
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9977
standard for the ERS exception.
Specifically, the commenters expressed
that these newly eligible firms may
adversely impact smaller small
businesses competing for Federal
contracts under the exception. The
commenters argued that the addition of
larger and more experienced firms may
take away future opportunities from
currently small firms that are adequately
meeting small business procurement
needs of Federal agencies.
During SBA’s virtual public forums
on size standards, SBA received
comments expressing similar concerns
as those outlined above regarding SBA’s
use of data from fiscal years 2016–2018
to measure small business participation
in the Federal ERS market. One
commenter also urged SBA to consider
startup costs in its analysis of the
industry size standard and utilize more
recent data from the ENR, an industry
trade publication, which describes the
economic characteristics and primary
business activities of the top 200
engineering/environmental firms in the
industry down to the subsector level.
Another commenter urged SBA to
consider Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA) Region 2 Superfund
program as a representation of the ERS
industry. The commenter argued that
these program data demonstrate the
ability of small firms well under the
current 750-employee size standard to
fulfill the Federal Government’s
remediation requirements; thus, it is
unnecessary for SBA to increase the size
standard beyond the current threshold
as the added competition from larger
firms could impact the number of
opportunities available for smaller small
firms that are already thriving under the
current size standard. Additional
commenters at the virtual public forums
agreed with the commenter’s assertion
that the current 750-employee size
standard for the ERS exception is
adequate.
For the above reasons, these
commenters concluded that SBA’s 2016
increase in the ERS size standard from
500 employees to 750 employees
successfully increased small business
participation in ERS contracts and
preserved competition within the
industry. As such, the commenters
urged SBA to maintain the current 750employee threshold instead of adopting
1,000 employees, as proposed.
SBA Response
SBA has reviewed the data provided
by the above commenters and has
determined that the results largely agree
with the latest available data that SBA
evaluated in response to the
commenters’ arguments, as we
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
9978
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
discussed in the section Comments
Supporting SBA’s Proposed Change to
the ERS Exception above. Moreover,
consistent with the commenters, SBA
found that DOE awards accounted for
49.2 percent of total dollars obligated
under the ERS exception, of which only
about 8.5 percent were awarded to small
businesses through prime contracts.
However, although SBA’s further
analysis of the ERS industry confirmed
some of the data submitted by
commenters as presented above, SBA
also found important differences in the
commenter’s position and SBA’s
evaluation, particularly in regards to
SBA’s evaluation of size standards
generally and the proportion of dollars
awarded by DOE under the exception
through M&O contracts, a special class
of contracts under which the Federal
Government contracts for the operation,
management, or support, on its behalf,
of a government-owned or -controlled
establishment devoted to one or more
major government programs.
Regarding SBA’s evaluation of size
standards generally, in the proposed
rule, SBA described its methodology for
evaluating industry structure to derive
size standards based on five primary
factors including: average firm size
(simple and weighted average firm size
factors), startup costs and entry barriers
(average assets size factor), industry
competition (four-firm ratio factor),
distribution of firms by size (Gini
coefficient factor), and small business
success in receiving Federal contracts
under the current size standard (Federal
contracting factor). As detailed in Table
4 of the April 2022 proposed rule, based
on the data for fiscal years 2016–2018,
SBA found that three of the five
industry factors analyzed supported
raising the size standard for the ERS
industry above the current 750
employee threshold. Specifically, the
factors for simple and weighted average
firm size supported a size standard of
1,500 employees while the average
assets size and Gini coefficient
supported size standards of 850
employees and 1,250 employees,
respectively. Only the four-firm ratio
supported a size standard lower than
750 employees.
With respect to the Federal
contracting factor, which measures
small business participation in the
Federal market in terms of the share of
total Federal contract dollars awarded to
small businesses relative to the small
business share of an industry’s total
receipts, SBA found that the 750employee size standard was
appropriate. Based on SBA’s Size
Standards Methodology, if the share of
Federal contract dollars awarded to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
small businesses in an industry is
significantly smaller than the small
business share of total industry’s
receipts, all else remaining the same, a
justification would exist for considering
a size standard higher than the current
size standard. In cases, where small
business share of the Federal market is
already appreciably high relative to the
small business share of the overall
market, SBA generally assumes that the
existing size standard is adequate with
respect to the Federal contracting factor.
Thus, regarding the ERS exception
specifically, using the FPDS–NG data
for fiscal years 2016–2018, SBA
calculated a Federal contracting factor
to be 64.2 percent, indicating the small
business share of the Federal market is
appreciably high relative to the small
business share of industry receipts,
which supported a size standard of 750
employees. Based on this result, SBA
agrees with commenters that small
businesses in the ERS industry are wellrepresented in the Federal contracting
marketplace under the current 750employee size standard and have
adequate Federal contracting
opportunities.
In the proposed rule, as an additional
indicator, SBA also considered the
change in the share of total ERS contract
dollars awarded to small businesses
from fiscal years 2013–2015 (under the
500-employee size standard) to fiscal
years 2016–2018 (under the 750employee size standard), finding that
the small business share decreased from
about 50 percent during fiscal years
2013–2015 to about 37 percent during
fiscal years 2016–2018. This result,
alongside SBA’s analysis of industry
factors demonstrated that an additional
increase to the ERS size standard was
warranted in order to optimize and
protect the number of opportunities
available to small businesses in the ERS
industry. However, SBA notes that this
additional indicator was not the primary
basis for SBA’s proposed increase to the
size standard for the ERS exception.
SBA’s further analysis of data from
fiscal years 2019–2021 showed that the
small business share of total ERS
contract dollars increased to 43.5
percent from 37 percent in fiscal years
2016–2018; however as previously
stated, this is not a primary factor in
SBA’s comprehensive analysis of the
ERS industry nor is it the sole basis for
prescribing the size standard for the
industry.
Based solely on the Federal
contracting data, SBA agrees that the
750-employee size standard is
appropriate for the ERS industry.
However, while SBA believes that
analyzing Federal contracting trends,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
including the Federal contracting factor,
are an important component of SBA’s
evaluation of industry size standards,
SBA’s size standards methodology does
not provide for the weighting of one
factor more than others. In other words,
the methodology establishes that SBA
will give equal weights to all five
primary factors that are considered in
the evaluation of an industry size
standard. Thus, SBA believes that the
proposed size standard for the ERS
industry, which is based on SBA’s
comprehensive evaluation of industry
and Federal contracting factors,
accurately reflects the economic
characteristics of the industry, including
the high level of small business
participation in the Federal
marketplace.
Regarding DOE’s M&O contracts, SBA
generally recognizes the special nature
of M&O contracts which have received
special regulatory treatment under
Subpart 17.6 of the FAR. For example,
when evaluating agency contracting
performance under SBA’s procurement
scorecard assessment tool, starting from
fiscal year 2015, SBA evaluates DOE’s
prime contracting performance by
including M&O first tier subcontracts
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 644(g)(3). Thus,
SBA believes commenters may be
justified in requesting that SBA count
DOE’s M&O first tier subcontracts as
prime contracts consistent with SBA’s
procurement scorecard methodology.
However, SBA does not agree with
commenters that the dollars obligated
through DOE’s M&O contracts should be
excluded altogether from the evaluation
of the industry size standard since M&O
contracts are a valid and important part
of the overall Federal contracting
landscape, and because the DOE
accounts for roughly half of total ERS
contract dollars. SBA believes that
excluding M&O contracts from the
evaluation of size standards,
particularly for purposes of calculating
the Federal contracting factor, would
lead to unreliable results in industries
where M&O contracts are used
prominently.
Moreover, SBA found that, contrary to
the commenter’s suggestion, it is not
true that the majority of DOE contracts
classified under the ERS exception are
M&O contracts.5 SBA obtained data
from the DOE listing its M&O
contractors and showing the proportion
of total dollars awarded under the ERS
exception to M&O contractors for fiscal
years 2016–2021. The data showed that
the DOE did not award any contracts
5 See Guidance on the Department of Energy
Subcontracting Program, Section 1.2 Background.
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
under the ERS exception to firms
classified as an M&O contractor.
Based on data from the Electronic
Subcontracting Reporting System
(eSRS), SBA found that small businesses
were well represented in DOE’s first tier
subcontracts classified under NAICS
562910. Specifically, SBA analyzed the
data from fiscal years 2016–2021 and
found that, when accounting for the
dollars awarded to small businesses
through first-tier subcontracts, about 57
percent of total dollars awarded by DOE
under the ERS exception passed through
to small businesses. Thus, even if SBA
considered all DOE awards under the
exception as M&O contracts and
therefore counted the first-tier
subcontracts as prime contracts, SBA
believes that the evaluation would
reflect a high degree of small business
participation under the ERS exception,
which, as explained above, is consistent
with SBA’s results under the proposed
rule.
Nonetheless, in response to the
commenters’ petition, SBA conducted
an analysis of the ERS industry using
updated FPDS–NG data from fiscal
years 2019–2021 following the same
methodology as detailed in the
proposed rule and in the SBA’s Size
Standards Methodology. SBA’s analysis
using the more recent data did not
support a size standard lower than the
SBA’s proposed 1,000-employee size
standard. In fact, except for the
weighted average firm size, values of
each industry factor based on the data
for fiscal years 2019–2021 were higher
than those based on the data for fiscal
years 2016–2018. Although the
weighted average firm size was lower in
fiscal years 2016–2018, weighted
average firm size still supported a 1,500employee size standard. The Federal
contracting factor based on the data for
fiscal years 2019–2021 continued to
support the 750-employee size standard.
Regarding petitions by commenters
for SBA to use alternative sources of
data to evaluate industry characteristics,
specifically data from the ENR on the
top 200 environmental firms and EPA’s
Region 2 Superfund program, SBA
disagrees that these sources would
provide the best representation of the
ERS industry. SBA believes these data
are not comprehensive enough for
SBA’s purposes. For example, SBA’s
analysis of the ERS industry included
974 firms participating in Federal
contracting under the exception to
NAICS 562910 during fiscal years 2019–
2021, while the ENR dataset only
includes the top 200 environmental
firms. In order to reliably evaluate the
size standard of any industry, SBA must
rely on comprehensive data that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
representative of the economic trends of
the entire industry, rather than only the
top firms, or those associated with one
agency’s contracting program.
SBA does not agree with the
commenters that a few larger firms that
would qualify as small under the
proposed 1,000-employee size standard
would have significant adverse impacts
on small businesses under the current
750-employee size standard in terms of
access to Federal opportunities to
smaller small firms. The relevant data
does not demonstrate that the previous
increase in size standard from 500
employees to 750 employees had a
significant adverse impact on small
businesses below 500 employees in
terms of accessing Federal small
business opportunities. For example,
firms below 500 employees accounted
for 84 percent of total ERS dollars
awarded to small businesses during
fiscal years 2019–2021.
SBA believes that increasing the size
standard to the proposed 1,000employee level based on its
comprehensive evaluation of industry
and Federal contracting factors may
increase the number of set-asides in this
industry and further benefit the small
firms that are already well-represented
in the Federal contracting market at the
current 750-employee size standard.
SBA believes that increasing the size
standard to 1,000 employees will
expand the runway for small businesses
to compete for more complex
remediation projects while also
ensuring that the Federal Government
has access to a larger pool of qualified
small businesses to select from when
issuing solicitations for ERS. As such,
based on SBA’s evaluation of the above
public comments pertaining to the ERS
exception and SBA’s analyses of
industry and Federal contracting factors,
SBA is adopting 1,000 employees as the
size standard for ERS as proposed in the
April 2022 proposed rule.
Comments Opposing SBA’s Proposed
Change to the ERS Exception for Other
Reasons
One commenter opposing SBA’s
proposed increase to the size standard
for the ERS exception from 750
employees to 1,000 employees argued
that since SBA’s analysis of Federal
procurement data from fiscal years
2016–2018 in the proposed rule showed
that the dollars obligated to small
businesses decreased significantly
despite an increase to the size standard
from 500 employees to 750 employees
in 2016, SBA should forego increasing
the size standard again, and instead,
pursue other methods of increasing
small business participation.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9979
Specifically, the commenter petitioned
SBA to task, demand, encourage and/or
impose on Federal agencies higher small
business participation goals. The
commenter also argued that SBA’s
proposed size standard increase would
adversely impact competition because
currently small firms would find it
difficult to compete with larger firms
with more advanced capabilities. The
commenter also urged SBA to
implement rules and/or programs to
support smaller firms within the ERS
industry, for example, by creating a
class of set-aside opportunities reserved
for firms with fewer than 50 employees.
The commenter also expressed concerns
over what they viewed as
discriminatory and inconsistent
application of NAICS code selection by
contracting officers when determining
the applicable NAICS code for
munitions response services, which are
sometimes misclassified under the ERS
exception rather than the general NAICS
562910 or some other more appropriate
NAICS codes. The commenter
maintained that while some munitions
remediation projects may require
engineers for planning purposes (i.e.,
NAICS 541330) and geophysical survey
and mapping services (i.e., NAICS
541360), these services represent only a
small portion of the contract dollars
spent (usually 10–20%) on a munitions
remediation project. The commenter
further explained that the overwhelming
majority of funds allocated to munitions
remediation projects are spent on
unexploded object (UXO) technicians
and labor to remove and dispose of the
UXOs. Thus, citing the requirements of
ERS solicitations under Footnote 14, the
commenter argued that, since greater
than 50 percent of the work related to
munitions remediation would be
attributable to a single NAICS code, the
requirements for classifying the
solicitation under the ERS exception are
not met. To remedy the
misclassification of contracts for
munitions remediation services, the
commenter recommended that SBA
create a separate NAICS code for
munitions and UXO services and issue
guidance to contracting officers on the
appropriate use of the ERS exception.
SBA Response
SBA disagrees with the comment that
SBA should forego increasing the size
standard for the ERS exception and
instead pursue other methods of
increasing small business participation,
including higher small business goals
for Federal agencies and creating
separate set-aside opportunities for
smaller small firms. SBA believes that
establishing appropriate size standards
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9980
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
for industries based on its Size
Standards Methodology is not mutually
exclusive to conducting other
engagement efforts to increase small
business participation.
Moreover, SBA believes that the
aforementioned comment is largely
beyond the scope of this rulemaking as
the proposed rule did not propose any
changes to SBA’s goaling guidelines for
Federal agencies, nor did SBA propose
establishing a separate class of set-aside
opportunities for smaller small
businesses. By increasing the size
standard for the ERS exception to 1,000
employees, SBA will extend the runway
for firms to grow while also ensuring
that small businesses retain access to
SBA’s contracting and financial
assistance programs. Increasing the size
standard to 1,000 employees will also
improve competition in the industry
and help small businesses to earn more
Federal contracting dollars and compete
for and perform more complex
environmental remediation projects.
Regarding the misclassification of
munitions remediation projects under
the ERS exception rather than the
general NAICS 562910, or some other
more appropriate NAICS codes, SBA
notes that it is ultimately the
responsibility of the contracting officer
to designate the proper NAICS code
based on the principal purpose of the
product or service being acquired (13
CFR 121.402(b)). SBA does not believe
that changes to size standards, including
the creation of new NAICS industries or
exceptions, is an appropriate tool to
address incorrect NAICS code selections
by contracting officers. More
importantly, SBA does not have
authority to create new NAICS codes.
SBA has established a process for
affected parties to appeal with SBA’s
Office of Hearings and Appeal (OHA) a
contracting officer’s NAICS code
designation in its regulations at 13 CFR
121.1101. SBA encourages impacted
firms to use this process when they
believe that a contracting officer has
miscategorized a solicitation under an
improper NAICS code.
For the reasons stated above, SBA is
not adopting the recommendations of
the commenter and is instead adopting
1,000 employees as the size standard for
the ERS exception, as proposed in the
proposed rule.
General Comments on SBA’s Proposed
Changes to Size Standards
SBA received four comments
pertaining to its proposed changes to
size standards generally, including one
comment submitted orally as part of
SBA’s virtual public forum on size
standards. Of the four comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
received, two commenters supported
SBA’s proposed changes to size
standards while two commenters
opposed the SBA’s proposal. One
commenter supported SBA’s increases
to size standards, specifically for
industries under NAICS Sector 54, but
only for agencies other than the
Department of Defense (DOD). The
commenter expressed concern that
complex compliance requirements and
other factors make it too costly for small
businesses to compete against larger
established businesses and that
increases in the size thresholds would
only exacerbate this problem. The
commenter did not specify which size
levels would be more appropriate for
the Sector 54 industries covered under
this rule or offer data in support of their
position. Another commenter supported
SBA’s proposed changes to size
standards because they believed the
changes would be beneficial to all small
businesses, particularly to those
involved in government contracting.
Regarding the opposing comments,
one commenter expressed opposition to
SBA’s increases to size standards in
general, specifically for dump truck
operators due to the increased
competition that small operators face
from larger mid-sized trucking firms.
The commenter also urged SBA to look
into the commercial insurance industry
which has, according to the commenter,
more than doubled insurance rates over
a timespan of just a few months. The
commenter did not specify which
NAICS codes were the subject of their
comment, nor did they recommend any
actions SBA should take to address their
comment on the commercial insurance
industry.
SBA also received one comment
opposed to SBA’s changes to size
standards from a business operating
under NAICS 561110 (Office
Administrative Services). The
commenter opposed any increases to
size standards at this time, citing
concerns about an impending economic
recession, category management
impacts, and best-in-class requirements
which together reduce small business
opportunities and the total number of
small businesses. The commenter urged
SBA to help small businesses facing
these concerns by improving its
engagement efforts through increased
access to financial assistance and other
support rather than increasing size
standards.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters
supporting SBA’s proposed changes to
size standards that the proposed
changes are beneficial to small
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
businesses and will increase the number
of Federal contracting opportunities
available for small businesses. However,
SBA disagrees with the comment
supporting SBA’s proposed changes in
Sector 54, but only for agencies other
than DOD. SBA does not believe that
size standards should differ among
Federal agencies based on the
contracting preferences or requirements
of each agency as this would result in
a complicated regime of size standards
that may fluctuate along with an
agency’s budget and priorities instead of
the economic characteristics of the
industry in which a firm operates.
Moreover, to evaluate the size standards
for industries within Sector 54, SBA
relied on its size standards
methodology. SBA’s size standards
methodology describes how its analyses
of various industry and program factors
are used to establish and revise size
standards based on the latest data
available. Thus, SBA believes that the
size standards adopted in this final rule,
including for industries within Sector
54, appropriately reflect the intended
beneficiaries of SBA programs. Thus,
SBA is adopting the size standards for
industries in Sector 54 without change.
SBA also disagrees with the comment
that expressed opposition to SBA’s
increases to size standards in general,
but specifically for dump truck
operators, urging SBA to take action to
address increased insurance costs
imposed by the commercial insurance
industry. SBA believes that this
comment is out of the scope of this
rulemaking as dump truck operators
normally operate under NAICS 484220
(Specialized Freight (except Used
Goods) Trucking, Local), NAICS 532120
(Truck, Utility Trailer, and RV
(Recreational Vehicle) Rental and
Leasing), or NAICS 562119 (Other Waste
Collection), all of which have receiptsbased size standards and were not
covered under the proposed rule.
Moreover, SBA does not have the
authority to regulate the commercial
insurance industry, which operates
mostly under industries with receiptbased size standards not covered under
this rule. It is also unclear how an
adjustment to size standards within the
commercial insurance industry would
translate to lower insurance premiums
for small business owners. Thus, SBA is
not adjusting the size standards for any
industries in response to this comment.
SBA also disagrees with the comment
opposing any increases to size standards
based on various concerns including the
broader economic environment and
certain Federal contracting trends that
are reducing opportunities for small
businesses. SBA believes that all small
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
businesses will benefit under a size
standard that is appropriate to their
industry. SBA’s changes to size
standards help small businesses to
remain competitive in the Federal
market and ensure that SBA’s services
go to their intended beneficiaries.
Moreover, Table 9 of this final rule,
Impacts of Increasing Size Standards,
below, demonstrates the benefits of size
standards increases, which would
remain unrealized if SBA were to not
adopt any increases to size standards.
For example, based on its impact
analysis, SBA estimates that increasing
size standards would result in
additional contracting opportunities for
more than 100 small businesses worth
nearly $257 million. Thus, based on
SBA’s estimation of the positive net
benefits accruing to small businesses as
a result of the changes to size standards,
SBA disagrees with the commenter that
increases to size standards are harmful
to small businesses. Therefore, SBA is
adopting proposed increases to size
standards as presented in the proposed
rule.
Comments Pertaining to Other Issues
SBA received three comments
pertaining to issues other than those
already discussed above. One
commenter, representing an optics
manufacturer, in anticipation of SBA’s
adoption of Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) NAICS 2022 industry
structure, petitioned SBA to adopt 1,000
employees as the size standard for
NAICS 333310, which is a newly
defined industry under NAICS 2022
encompassing elements from NAICS
333314, 333316, and 333318. The
commenter argued that adopting the
higher size standard would expand the
runway for small businesses in this
industry to compete against a greater
number of large competitors with
greater resources. Another commenter
petitioned SBA to require all United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) regulated entities with current
USDA certification status to be available
for periodic surveys and questionnaires
regarding their ability to spot, detect
and report human trafficking. Another
commenter petitioned SBA to
reconsider the current minimum and
maximum size threshold values for
employee-based size standards. The
commenter expressed concern with
SBA’s language in the proposed rule
describing the minimum size standard
as the size an established small business
should be to have adequate capabilities
and resources to be able to compete for
and perform Federal contracts, but does
not account for small businesses that are
newly formed or just starting operations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
The commenter maintained that,
contrary to SBA’s language, as small
businesses adopt new technologies and
innovation, it is possible to have
adequate capabilities and resources to
perform Federal contracts without a
high employee count. Thus, the
commenter urged SBA to explore
measures such as financial statements,
sales revenue, years in business and
other applicable methods to determine
capability and competency. The
commenter also argued that SBA’s
minimum thresholds affect small
business access to Federal procurement.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with the comment
petitioning SBA to adopt 1,000
employees as the size standard for
NAICS 333310 under the NAICS 2022
industry structure. On July 5, 2022, SBA
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register with proposed
revisions to size standards based on
OMB’s NAICS 2022 structure (87 FR
40034). In the proposed rule, SBA
proposed 1,000 employees as the size
standard for NAICS 333310 and adopted
the proposed size standard in a final
rule, effective October 1, 2022 (87 FR
59240; September 29, 2022). In this final
rule, SBA is adopting changes to size
standards based on the NAICS 2017
structure and applying the adopted
changes to the recently adopted NAICS
2022 structure. SBA’s NAICS adoption
analysis, presented in this final rule
under the section ‘‘Applying the
Adopted Changes to the NAICS 2022
Structure,’’ supports adopting 1,000
employees as the size standard for
NAICS 333310 based on SBA’s
established NAICS adoption
methodology.
Regarding the comment petitioning
SBA to establish reporting requirements
for certain operators under USDA’s
regulations, SBA notes that it does not
have authority to regulate the trucking
industry, nor does the Agency have
purview over any USDA’s certification
programs. Thus, SBA has determined
that this comment is totally outside the
scope of this final rule.
Regarding the comment petitioning
SBA to reconsider the current minimum
and maximum threshold values for
employee-based size standards, SBA
evaluated employee-based size
standards under this rule using its ‘‘Size
Standards Methodology’’
(Methodology), issued on April 11,
2019, and available at www.sba.gov/size.
SBA’s Methodology provides a detailed
description of its analyses of various
industry and program factors and data
sources, and how the agency uses the
results to establish and revise size
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9981
standards. Prior to finalizing the revised
Methodology, SBA issued a notification
in the April 27, 2018, edition of the
Federal Register (83 FR 18468) to solicit
comments from the public and notify
stakeholders of the proposed changes to
the Methodology. SBA considered all
public comments in finalizing the
revised Methodology. For a summary of
comments and SBA’s responses, refer to
the SBA’s April 11, 2019, Federal
Register notification of the issuance of
the final revised Methodology (84 FR
14587).
Pursuant to the Methodology, SBA
has established 250 employees and
1,500 employees, respectively, as the
minimum and maximum size standard
levels for Manufacturing and other
industries (excluding Wholesale and
Retail Trade) with employee-based size
standards. Accordingly, SBA will not
generally propose or adopt a size
standard that is either below the
minimum level or above the maximum,
even though the calculations yield
values below the minimum or above the
maximum levels. As stated in the
proposed rule, the minimum size
standard reflects the size an established
small business should be to have
adequate capabilities and resources to
be able to compete for and perform
Federal contracts (but does not account
for small businesses that are newly
formed or just starting operations). On
the other hand, the maximum size
standard represents the level above
which businesses, if qualified as small,
would outcompete much smaller
businesses when accessing Federal
small business assistance. SBA notes
that SBA’s table of size standards at 13
CFR 121.201 only defines the largest a
business can be and still be considered
small. As such, although SBA uses 250
employees as the minimum size
threshold for SBA’s analysis of size
standards, firms with less than 250
employees may still qualify as small
businesses since they would be below
the size threshold for their respective
industry. Thus, SBA does not agree with
the commenter that maintaining a
minimum threshold for purposes of
analysis of industry factors
disadvantages small firms below the
minimum threshold or excludes them
from contracting opportunities.
Moreover, SBA believes that this
comment is likely beyond the scope of
this rulemaking as the proposed rule did
not propose any changes to SBA’s Size
Standards Methodology, which was
finalized through notice and comment
process in April 2019. SBA notes that
the size standards reflect the maximum
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9982
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
size a business can be to be considered
small.
Summary of Adopted Revisions to Size
Standards
Based on the evaluation of public
comments it received on the proposed
rule and on its analyses of industry and
Federal contracting factors using the
latest available data when the proposed
rule was prepared along with
considerations of impacts of the ongoing
COVID–19 pandemic, in this final rule,
SBA is adopting the size standards as
proposed in the April 26, 2022,
proposed rule. Thus, SBA is increasing
size standards for 150 industries under
NAICS 2017, including 10 industries in
NAICS Sector 21 (Mining, Quarrying,
and Oil and Gas Extraction), 10
industries in NAICS Sector 22
(Utilities), 120 industries in NAICS
Sector 31–33 (Manufacturing), five
industries in Sector 48–49
(Transportation and Warehousing),
three industries in NAICS Sector 51
(Information), and one subindustry (or
‘‘exception’’) each in NAICS Sector 54
(Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services) and in NAICS Sector 56
(Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation
Services). SBA’s size standards
revisions adopted in this rule can be
found in Table 2, Adopted Size
Standards Revisions (NAICS 2017). Also
presented in Table 2 are current and
calculated size standards for
comparison.
TABLE 2—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS
[NAICS 2017]
NAICS 2017 code
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
212113
212210
212222
212230
212291
212299
212313
212319
212322
212324
212325
212391
212392
212393
212399
221111
221112
221113
221114
221115
221116
221117
221118
221121
221122
221210
311111
311119
311211
311212
311213
311221
311224
311225
311230
311313
311314
311411
311422
311511
311512
311514
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
311611 ...................................
311824 ...................................
311920 ...................................
311930 ...................................
311941 ...................................
311942 ...................................
311991 ...................................
311999 ...................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Current size
standard
(employees)
NAICS 2017 industry title
Anthracite Mining ....................................................................
Iron Ore Mining .......................................................................
Silver Ore Mining ....................................................................
Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc Mining ..................................
Uranium-Radium-Vanadium Ore Mining .................................
All Other Metal Ore Mining .....................................................
Crushed and Broken Granite Mining and Quarrying ..............
Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying ......
Industrial Sand Mining ............................................................
Kaolin and Ball Clay Mining ....................................................
Clay and Ceramic and Refractory Minerals Mining ................
Potash, Soda, and Borate Mineral Mining ..............................
Phosphate Rock Mining ..........................................................
Other Chemical and Fertilizer Mineral Mining ........................
All Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining .....................................
Hydroelectric Power Generation .............................................
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation ...................................
Nuclear Electric Power Generation ........................................
Solar Electric Power Generation ............................................
Wind Electric Power Generation .............................................
Geothermal Electric Power Generation ..................................
Biomass Electric Power Generation .......................................
Other Electric Power Generation ............................................
Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control ......................
Electric Power Distribution ......................................................
Natural Gas Distribution ..........................................................
Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing ..........................................
Other Animal Food Manufacturing ..........................................
Flour Milling ............................................................................
Rice Milling ..............................................................................
Malt Manufacturing .................................................................
Wet Corn Milling .....................................................................
Soybean and Other Oilseed Processing ................................
Fats and Oils Refining and Blending ......................................
Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing .............................................
Beet Sugar Manufacturing ......................................................
Cane Sugar Manufacturing .....................................................
Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing ................
Specialty Canning ...................................................................
Fluid Milk Manufacturing .........................................................
Creamery Butter Manufacturing ..............................................
Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Product Manufacturing.
Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering .....................................
Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes Manufacturing from Purchased Flour.
Coffee and Tea Manufacturing ...............................................
Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing ...................
Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing.
Spice and Extract Manufacturing ............................................
Perishable Prepared Food Manufacturing ..............................
All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing .........................
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
Calculated
size
standard
(employees)
Proposed/
adopted size
standard
(employees)
250
750
250
750
250
750
750
500
500
750
500
750
1,000
500
500
500
750
750
250
250
250
250
250
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
500
500
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
750
750
600
1,400
1,100
1,400
900
1,250
850
550
750
1,050
650
1,050
1,350
600
600
750
950
1,150
700
1,150
1,050
550
650
950
1,100
1,150
1,250
650
1,050
750
900
1,300
1,250
1,100
1,300
1,150
1,050
1,100
1,400
1,150
1,000
1,000
250
1,400
250
1,400
250
1,250
850
550
750
750
650
1,050
1,000
600
600
750
950
1,150
500
1,150
250
550
650
950
1,100
1,150
1,250
650
1,050
750
500
1,300
1,250
1,100
1,300
1,150
1,050
1,100
1,400
1,150
750
1,000
1,000
750
1,150
850
1,150
850
750
1,000
750
1,000
1,100
850
1,000
1,100
850
500
500
500
650
700
700
650
700
700
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9983
TABLE 2—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS—Continued
[NAICS 2017]
NAICS 2017 code
312111
312112
312140
313220
313230
314999
315190
315990
316110
316992
321113
321114
321211
322110
322122
323111
323120
324122
324191
324199
325110
325120
325130
325220
325311
325312
325314
325320
325412
325520
325611
325612
325613
325910
325991
325998
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
326121 ...................................
326130 ...................................
326220
326299
327211
327410
327910
327992
327999
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
331313
331315
331420
331491
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
331492 ...................................
331512
331513
331523
331524
332112
332114
332117
332215
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
332439 ...................................
332613 ...................................
332722 ...................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Current size
standard
(employees)
NAICS 2017 industry title
Soft Drink Manufacturing ........................................................
Bottled Water Manufacturing ..................................................
Distilleries ................................................................................
Narrow Fabric Mills and Schiffli Machine Embroidery ............
Nonwoven Fabric Mills ............................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills ........................
Other Apparel Knitting Mills ....................................................
Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing ........
Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing ...............................
Women’s Handbag and Purse Manufacturing ........................
Sawmills ..................................................................................
Wood Preservation .................................................................
Hardwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing .....................
Pulp Mills .................................................................................
Newsprint Mills ........................................................................
Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) ..................
Support Activities for Printing .................................................
Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing ..........
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing ...........
All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing .........
Petrochemical Manufacturing .................................................
Industrial Gas Manufacturing ..................................................
Synthetic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing ............................
Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing
Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing ......................................
Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing .......................................
Fertilizer (Mixing Only) Manufacturing ....................................
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing .....
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing ............................
Adhesive Manufacturing .........................................................
Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing .............................
Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing ..................
Surface Active Agent Manufacturing ......................................
Printing Ink Manufacturing ......................................................
Custom Compounding of Purchased Resins .........................
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation
Manufacturing.
Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape Manufacturing ...............
Laminated Plastics Plate, Sheet (except Packaging), and
Shape Manufacturing.
Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing .........
All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing ...............................
Flat Glass Manufacturing ........................................................
Lime Manufacturing ................................................................
Abrasive Product Manufacturing .............................................
Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth Manufacturing ............
All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing.
Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum Production ............
Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing ....................
Copper Rolling, Drawing, Extruding, and Alloying .................
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum) Rolling,
Drawing, and Extruding.
Secondary Smelting, Refining, and Alloying of Nonferrous
Metal (except Copper and Aluminum).
Steel Investment Foundries ....................................................
Steel Foundries (except Investment) ......................................
Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries ...............................
Aluminum Foundries (except Die-Casting) .............................
Nonferrous Forging .................................................................
Custom Roll Forming ..............................................................
Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing ..................................
Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing.
Other Metal Container Manufacturing ....................................
Spring Manufacturing ..............................................................
Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer Manufacturing ..............
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
Calculated
size
standard
(employees)
Proposed/
adopted size
standard
(employees)
1,250
1,000
1,000
500
750
500
750
500
500
750
500
500
500
750
750
500
500
750
750
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
500
1,000
1,250
500
1,000
750
750
500
500
500
1,400
1,100
1,100
550
850
550
850
600
800
850
550
550
600
1,050
1,050
650
550
1,100
900
950
1,300
1,200
1,050
1,050
1,050
1,350
550
1,150
1,300
550
1,100
900
1,100
750
600
650
1,400
1,100
1,100
550
850
550
850
600
800
750
550
550
600
1,050
1,050
650
550
1,100
900
950
1,300
1,200
1,050
1,050
1,050
1,350
550
1,150
1,300
550
1,100
900
1,100
750
600
650
500
500
600
650
600
650
750
500
1,000
750
750
500
500
800
650
1,100
1,050
900
600
750
800
650
1,100
1,050
900
600
750
1,000
1,250
1,000
750
1,300
1,400
1,050
900
1,300
1,400
1,050
900
750
850
850
1,000
500
500
500
750
500
500
750
1,050
700
700
550
950
600
550
1,000
1,050
700
700
550
950
600
550
1,000
500
500
500
600
600
600
600
600
600
15FER2
9984
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS—Continued
[NAICS 2017]
NAICS 2017 industry title
332812 ...................................
Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware),
and Allied Services to Manufacturers.
Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing .................................
Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ....................
Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ..................
Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery Manufacturing
Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing ...........................
Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery
Manufacturing.
Power-Driven Hand Tool Manufacturing ................................
Packaging Machinery Manufacturing ......................................
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing .................
Scale and Balance Manufacturing ..........................................
Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing .................
Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, Transformer, and Other Inductor
Manufacturing.
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing.
Automatic Environmental Control Manufacturing for Residential, Commercial, and Appliance Use.
Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting Device Manufacturing ..
Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing .......................................
Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing .......
Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing.
Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing ...............................
Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing.
Primary Battery Manufacturing ...............................................
Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing ......................
Carbon and Graphite Product Manufacturing .........................
All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing.
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing.
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing .................
Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary
Equipment Manufacturing.
Ship Building and Repairing ...................................................
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing .......................
Household Furniture (except Wood and Metal) Manufacturing.
Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing ......................
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing ....................
Jewelry and Silverware Manufacturing ...................................
Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing .......................................
Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing ............
Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing ..................................
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing ..................................
Deep Sea Freight Transportation ...........................................
Coastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation ...................
Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger Transportation .............
Inland Water Freight Transportation .......................................
Inland Water Passenger Transportation .................................
All Other Publishers ................................................................
Music Publishers .....................................................................
Record Production and Distribution ........................................
Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles, Their Propulsion Units
and Propulsion Parts.
Environmental Remediation Services .....................................
332992
332996
333131
333243
333314
333924
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
333991
333993
333995
333997
334290
334416
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
334511 ...................................
334512 ...................................
334514
334517
334519
335122
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
335129 ...................................
335311 ...................................
335912
335931
335991
335999
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
336310 ...................................
336414 ...................................
336419 ...................................
336611 ...................................
336991 ...................................
337125 ...................................
337214
339113
339910
339930
339991
339994
339999
483111
483113
483114
483211
483212
511199
512230
512250
541715
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Current size
standard
(employees)
NAICS 2017 code
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
(Exception 3) .............
562910 (Exception .................
Table 3, Summary of Adopted Size
Standards Revisions by Sector (NAICS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
Proposed/
adopted size
standard
(employees)
500
600
600
1,250
500
500
500
500
750
1,300
550
900
550
600
900
1,300
550
900
550
600
900
500
500
750
500
750
500
950
600
800
700
800
550
950
600
800
700
800
550
1,250
1,350
1,350
500
650
650
750
1,000
500
500
850
1,200
600
600
850
1,200
600
600
500
750
550
800
550
800
1,000
500
750
500
1,300
600
900
600
1,300
600
900
600
1,000
1,050
1,050
1,250
1,000
1,300
1,050
1,300
1,050
1,250
1,000
750
1,300
1,050
950
1,300
1,050
950
1,000
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
500
750
500
500
750
250
1,250
1,100
800
700
700
600
750
550
1,050
800
550
1,050
550
550
900
900
1,300
1,100
800
700
700
600
750
550
1,050
800
550
1,050
550
550
900
900
1,300
750
1,000
1,000
2017), summarizes the adopted changes
to size standards by NAICS sector.
PO 00000
Calculated
size
standard
(employees)
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9985
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS BY SECTOR
[NAICS 2017]
Number of
size standards
reviewed
Number of
size standards
increased
Number of
size standards
decreased
Number of
size standards
maintained
Sector
Sector name
21 ....................
22 ....................
31–33 ..............
48–49 ..............
51 ....................
54 ....................
Other Sectors ..
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
Utilities ................................................................
Manufacturing .....................................................
Transportation and Warehousing .......................
Information .........................................................
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting; Finance and Insurance; Administrative and
Support, Waste Management and Remediation Services.
24
11
360
15
12
7
3
10
10
120
5
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
1
240
10
9
6
2
Total .........
.............................................................................
432
150
0
282
Applying the Adopted Changes to the
NAICS 2022 Structure
Under this final rule, SBA has
reviewed the size standards for 56
NAICS 2017 industries or their parts
with employee-based size standards
(excluding employee-based size
standards in Sectors 42 and 44–45) and
one industry with a receipts-based size
standard that were split, merged, or
modified to become part of 36 new
industries under OMB’s NAICS 2022
changes. Overall, OMB’s NAICS 2022
revisions created 111 new industries by
reclassifying, combining, or splitting
156 NAICS 2017 industries or their
parts.6
Prior to issuing this final rule on
employee-based size standards, SBA
incorporated OMB’s NAICS 2022
changes into its Table of Size Standards
at 13 CFR 121.201 in a final rule,
effective October 1, 2022 (87 FR 59240;
September 29, 2022), using the newly
adopted size standards under SBA’s
review of size standards under the Jobs
Act. Specifically, as stated above, as part
of SBA’s second five-year review of size
standards under the Jobs Act, SBA
revised all monetary-based size
standards and employee-based size
standards under NAICS Sectors 42
(Wholesale Trade) and 44–45 (Retail
Trade).
Of the 36 new industries with
employee-based size standards
(excluding Sectors 42 and 44–45) that
were created under the NAICS 2022
revision, 27 were formed by combining
more than one NAICS 2017 industry or
industry part, often with new 6-digit
codes and industry titles. Three new
industries were formed by changing the
6-digit code without changing the
industry title, two industries were
formed by changing the title without
changing the 6-digit code, and four
remaining industries had either their
content, definition, or content changed,
usually involving parts of NAICS 2017
industries.
SBA’s methodology for incorporating
OMB’s NAICS revisions into size
standards is generally well-established.
On October 22, 1999, SBA proposed to
replace the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) System with NAICS
1997 as the basis of industry definitions
for its table of small business size
standards (64 FR 57188). The proposed
rule included a set of guidelines or rules
that SBA applied to convert the size
standards for industries under SIC to
industries under NAICS. The guidelines
primarily aimed to minimize the impact
of applying a new industry
classification system on SBA’s size
standards and on small businesses that
qualified as small under the SIC-based
size standards. SBA received no
negative comments against the proposed
guidelines. Thus, SBA published its
final rule on May 15, 2000 (65 FR
30386), corrected on September 5, 2000
(65 FR 53533), adopting the resulting
table of size standards based on NAICS
1997 structure, as proposed. To be
consistent, SBA generally applied the
same guidelines when it updated its
table of size standards to adopt NAICS
2002, NAICS 2007, NAICS 2012, NAICS
2017, and NAICS 2022 revisions. In
those updates as well, SBA received no
adverse comments against using those
guidelines, or against the resulting
changes to the size standards. These
guidelines to adopt OMB’s NAICS
revisions were also included in the
SBA’s ‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’
white paper and SBA received no
adverse comments when the revised
methodology was open for public
comments. The applicable guidelines
are shown below in Table 4, ‘‘General
Guidelines to Establish Size Standards
for New Industries under NAICS 2022.’’
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
TABLE 4—GENERAL GUIDELINES TO ESTABLISH SIZE STANDARDS FOR NEW INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2022
If the NAICS 2022 industry is composed of:
The size standard for the NAICS 2022 industry code will be:
1. A single NAICS 2012 industry or part of a single NAICS 2012 industry.
2. Two or more NAICS 2017 industries; two or more parts of an NAICS
2017 industry; parts of two or more NAICS 2017 industries; or one or
more NAICS 2017 industries and part(s) of one or more NAICS 2017
industries, and
2a. they all have the same size standard .........................................
The same size standard as for the NAICS 2012 industry or part.
6 Complete information on the relationship
between NAICS 2017 and NAICS 2022 is available
on the U.S. Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau)
website at https://www.census.gov/naics/. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
The same size standard as for the NAICS 2017 industries or parts.
Census Bureau’s website also provides detailed
documentation on Federal notices involving the
replacement of SIC with NAICS, and all subsequent
NAICS updates and revisions, including both the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
July 2, 2021, and December 21, 2021, Federal
notices regarding the NAICS 2022 revision.
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9986
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—GENERAL GUIDELINES TO ESTABLISH SIZE STANDARDS FOR NEW INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2022—
Continued
If the NAICS 2022 industry is composed of:
The size standard for the NAICS 2022 industry code will be:
2b. they all have the same size measure (e.g., receipts, employees, etc.) but do not all have the same size standard.
2c. they have different size measures (i.e., for example, some are
based on receipts and others on employees) and hence do not
all have the same size standard.
Thus, in this final rule, SBA is
incorporating the adopted size
standards, as presented in Table 2
(above), into the table of size standards
based on NAICS 2022 following the
guidelines prescribed in Table 4 (above).
SBA identified 56 NAICS 2017 unique
industries or their parts reviewed under
this final rule that became part of 37
new industries under NAICS 2022. New
size standards for the 37 new NAICS
The same size standard as for the NAICS 2017 industry or part that
most closely matches the economic activity described by the NAICS
2022 industry, or
The highest size standard among the NAICS 2017 industries and
part(s) that comprise the NAICS 2022 industry, provided that the
highest size standard does not include dominant or potentially dominant firms.
The same size standard as for the NAICS 2017 industry or part that
most closely matches the economic activity described by the NAICS
2022 industry, or
The highest size standard among the NAICS 2017 industries and
part(s) that comprise the NAICS 2022 industry, provided that the
highest size standard does not include dominant or potentially dominant firms.
To apply this rule, SBA converts all size standards to a single measure
(e.g., receipts, employees, etc.) using the size measure for the
NAICS 2017 industry or part(s) that most closely match the economic activity described by the NAICS 2022 industry or using the
size measure that applies to most of the NAICS industries or parts
comprising the NAICS 2022 industry.
2022 industries resulted in a reduction
in size standard for eight industries
under NAICS 2017, an increase to size
standard for 12 industries and 2 parts of
one industry, change in the size
standard from employees to receipts for
one industry, and no change in size
standards for the remaining 35 NAICS
2017 industries or their parts. Among
the 37 new industries under NAICS
2022 evaluated in this final rule,
compared to the size standards adopted
in the September 2022 NAICS 2022
adoption final rule, size standards
increased for 10 industries and
remained the same for the remaining 27
industries. Table 5, Size Standards for
Industries Under NAICS 2017 Matched
to NAICS 2022, below, presents these
results.
TABLE 5—SIZE STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2017 MATCHED TO NAICS 2022
NAICS 2022
code
NAICS 2022 industry title
212114 .........
Surface Coal Mining .........
Concordance
with NAICS
2017 code
212111
212113
212115 .........
Underground Coal Mining
212112
212113
212220 .........
212290 .........
212323 .........
Gold Ore and Silver Ore
Mining.
Other Metal Ore Mining ....
Kaolin, Clay, and Ceramic
and Refractory Minerals
Mining.
212221
212222
212291
212299
212324
212325
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
212390 .........
Other Nonmetallic Mineral
Mining and Quarrying.
212391
212392
212393
212399
311221 .........
315120 .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Wet Corn Milling and
Starch Manufacturing.
Apparel Knitting Mills ........
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
311221
315110
315190
PO 00000
NAICS 2017 industry title
(and specific piece of the
NAICS 2017 industry that
is contained in the NAICS
2022 industry)
NAICS 2017
standard prior to
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
NAICS 2022
standard after
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining.
Anthracite Mining—Anthracite surface mining.
Bituminous Coal Underground Mining.
Anthracite Mining—Anthracite underground mining.
Gold Ore Mining ...............
Silver Ore Mining ..............
Uranium-Radium-Vanadium Ore Mining.
All Other Metal Ore Mining
Kaolin and Ball Clay Mining.
1,250 .................
1,250 .................
1,250
250 ....................
...........................
250
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
250 ....................
...........................
250
1,500 .................
250 ....................
250 ....................
1,500 .................
750 ....................
1,500
250
250
1,250.
750 ....................
750 ....................
...........................
500 ....................
1,250
750
650.
Clay and Ceramic and Refractory Minerals Mining.
Potash, Soda, and Borate
Mineral Mining.
Phosphate Rock Mining ...
Other Chemical and Fertilizer Mineral Mining.
All Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining.
Wet Corn Milling ...............
500 ....................
...........................
650
750 ....................
500 ....................
1,050
1,000 .................
500 ....................
...........................
...........................
1,000
600
500 ....................
...........................
600
1,250 .................
1,250 .................
1,300
Hosiery and Sock Mills .....
Other Apparel Knitting
Mills.
750 ....................
750 ....................
750 ....................
...........................
750
850
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
NAICS 2017
standard
adopted under
this final rule
(employees)
NAICS 2022
standard under
this final rule
(employees or
$ million)
1,250.
1,500.
1,500.
600.
1,300.
850.
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9987
TABLE 5—SIZE STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2017 MATCHED TO NAICS 2022—Continued
NAICS 2022
code
315250 .........
NAICS 2022 industry title
Concordance
with NAICS
2017 code
Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing (except
Contractors).
315220
315240
315280
316990 .........
Other Leather and Allied
Product Manufacturing.
316992
316998
321215 .........
Engineered Wood Member
Manufacturing.
322120 .........
Paper Mills ........................
325314 .........
Fertilizer (Mixing Only)
Manufacturing.
325315 .........
Compost Manufacturing ...
325314
325992 .........
Photographic Film, Paper,
Plate, Chemical, and
Copy Toner Manufacturing.
All Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.
325992
333248 .........
321213
321214
322121
322122
325314
333244
333249
333310 .........
Commercial and Service
Industry Machinery
Manufacturing.
333314
333316
333318
333998 .........
All Other Miscellaneous
General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing.
333997
333999
334610 .........
Manufacturing and Reproducing Magnetic and
Optical Media.
334613
334614
335131 .........
335132 .........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
335139 .........
Residential Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing.
Commercial, Industrial,
and Institutional Electric
Lighting Fixture Manufacturing.
Electric Lamp Bulb and
Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing.
335121
335122
335110
335129
335910 .........
Battery Manufacturing ......
335911
335912
336110 .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Automobile and Light Duty
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
336111
PO 00000
NAICS 2017 industry title
(and specific piece of the
NAICS 2017 industry that
is contained in the NAICS
2022 industry)
NAICS 2017
standard prior to
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
NAICS 2022
standard after
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and
Sew Apparel Manufacturing.
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing.
Other Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing.
Women’s Handbag and
Purse Manufacturing.
All Other Leather Good
and Allied Product Manufacturing.
Engineered Wood Member
(except Truss) Manufacturing.
Truss Manufacturing .........
Paper (except Newsprint)
Mills.
Newsprint Mills .................
Fertilizer (Mixing Only)
Manufacturing—except
compost manufacturing.
Fertilizer (Mixing Only)
Manufacturing—compost manufacturing.
Photographic Film, Paper,
Plate, and Chemical
Manufacturing.
750 ....................
750 ....................
750
750 ....................
...........................
750
750 ....................
...........................
750
750 ....................
500 ....................
750
500 ....................
...........................
500
750 ....................
500 ....................
750
500 ....................
1,250 .................
...........................
1,250 .................
500
1,250
1,250.
750 ....................
500 ....................
...........................
500 ....................
1,050
550
550.
500 ....................
500 ....................
550
550.
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
750 ....................
750 ....................
750
500 ....................
...........................
500
500 ....................
1,000 .................
600
Photographic and
Photocopying Equipment Manufacturing.
Other Commercial and
Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing.
Scale and Balance Manufacturing.
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
........................
1,000 .................
...........................
1,000
500 ....................
500 ....................
700
All Other Miscellaneous
General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing.
Blank Magnetic and Optical Recording Media
Manufacturing.
Software and Other
Prerecorded Compact
Disc, Tape, and Record
Reproducing.
Residential Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing.
Commercial, Industrial,
and Institutional Electric
Lighting Fixture Manufacturing.
Electric Lamp Bulb and
Part Manufacturing.
500 ....................
...........................
500
1,000 .................
1,250 .................
1,000
1,250 .................
...........................
1,250
750 ....................
750 ....................
750
750.
500 ....................
500 ....................
600
600.
1,250 .................
1,250 .................
1,250
Other Lighting Equipment
Manufacturing.
Storage Battery Manufacturing.
Primary Battery Manufacturing.
Automobile Manufacturing
500 ....................
...........................
550
1,250 .................
1,250 .................
1,250
1,000 .................
...........................
1,300
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
Printing Machinery and
Equipment Manufacturing.
Other Industrial Machinery
Manufacturing.
Optical Instrument and
Lens Manufacturing.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
NAICS 2017
standard
adopted under
this final rule
(employees)
NAICS 2022
standard under
this final rule
(employees or
$ million)
750.
500.
500.
1,500.
750.
1,000.
700.
1,250.
1,250.
1,250.
1,500.
9988
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 5—SIZE STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2017 MATCHED TO NAICS 2022—Continued
NAICS 2022
code
NAICS 2022 industry title
Concordance
with NAICS
2017 code
336112
337126 .........
Household Furniture (except Wood and Upholstered) Manufacturing.
337124
337125
513110 .........
Newspaper Publishers ......
511110
519130
513120 .........
Periodical Publishers ........
511120
519130
513130 .........
Book Publishers ................
511130
519130
513140 .........
Directory and Mailing List
Publishers.
511140
519130
513191 .........
Greeting Card Publishers
511191
519130
513199 .........
All Other Publishers ..........
511199
519130
516210 .........
Media Streaming Distribution Services, Social
Networks, and Other
Media Networks and
Content Providers.
515111
515120
515210
519110
519130
517111 .........
Wired Telecommunications Carriers.
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite).
517311
517121 .........
Telecommunications Resellers.
517911
517122 .........
Agents for Wireless Telecommunications Services.
517312
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
517112 .........
517312
517911
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
NAICS 2017 industry title
(and specific piece of the
NAICS 2017 industry that
is contained in the NAICS
2022 industry)
NAICS 2017
standard prior to
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
NAICS 2022
standard after
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing.
Metal Household Furniture
Manufacturing.
1,500 .................
...........................
1,500
750 ....................
750 ....................
750
Household Furniture (except Wood and Metal)
Manufacturing.
Newspaper Publishers ......
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Internet
newspaper publishers.
Periodical Publishers ........
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals —Internet periodical publishers.
Book Publishers ................
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Internet
book publishers.
Directory and Mailing List
Publishers.
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Internet
directory and mailing list
publishers.
Greeting Card Publishers
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Internet
greeting card publishers.
All Other Publishers ..........
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—All
other Internet publishers.
Radio Networks ................
750 ....................
...........................
950
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
...........................
1,000
1,000
1,000.
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
...........................
1,000
1,000
1,000.
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
...........................
1,000
1,000
1,000.
1,250 .................
1,000 .................
1,250
1,000.
1,000 .................
...........................
1,000
1,500 .................
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
...........................
1,500
1,000
1,000.
500 ....................
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
...........................
550
1,000
1,000.
$41.5 million ......
$41.5 million ......
........................
$41.5 million ......
...........................
........................
$41.5 million ......
...........................
........................
$32.0 million ......
1,000 .................
...........................
...........................
........................
1,000
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
1,500.
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
1,500.
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
1,500.
1,500 .................
1,500 .................
1,500
1,500.
1,500 .................
...........................
1,500
Television Broadcasting—
television networks.
Cable and Other Subscription Programming.
News Syndicates ..............
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Internet
broadcasting.
Wired Telecommunications Carriers.
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite)—Except
agents for wireless telecommunications carriers.
Telecommunications Resellers—Except agents
for wireless telecommunications resellers.
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite)—Agents for
wireless telecommunications carriers.
Telecommunications Resellers—Agents for wireless telecommunications
resellers.
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
NAICS 2017
standard
adopted under
this final rule
(employees)
NAICS 2022
standard under
this final rule
(employees or
$ million)
950.
$41.5 million.
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9989
TABLE 5—SIZE STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIES UNDER NAICS 2017 MATCHED TO NAICS 2022—Continued
NAICS 2022
code
519290 .........
NAICS 2022 industry title
Concordance
with NAICS
2017 code
Web Search Portals and
All Other Information
Services.
519130
519190
By combining the results of Table 2
and Table 5 (above), in Table 6 (below),
Adopted Size Standard Revisions
NAICS 2017 industry title
(and specific piece of the
NAICS 2017 industry that
is contained in the NAICS
2022 industry)
NAICS 2017
standard prior to
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
NAICS 2022
standard after
NAICS 2022
adoption
(employees or
$ million)
Internet Publishing and
Broadcasting and Web
Search Portals—Web
search portals.
All Other Information Services.
1,000 .................
1,000 .................
NAICS 2017
standard
adopted under
this final rule
(employees)
1,000
NAICS 2022
standard under
this final rule
(employees or
$ million)
1,000.
$30.0 million.
(NAICS 2022), SBA presents revisions to
size standards resulting from the
incorporation of the adopted size
standards into the NAICS 2022
structure.
TABLE 6—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS
[NAICS 2022]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
2022 NAICS Code
212210
212230
212290
212313
212319
212322
212323
212390
221111
221112
221113
221114
221115
221117
221118
221121
221122
221210
311111
311119
311211
311212
311221
311224
311225
311230
311313
311314
311411
311422
311511
311514
311611
311824
311920
311930
311941
311942
311991
311999
312111
312112
312140
313220
313230
314999
315120
315990
316110
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standards
(employees)
NAICS 2022 industry title
Iron Ore Mining .................................................................................................................
Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc Mining ............................................................................
Other Metal Ore Mining ....................................................................................................
Crushed and Broken Granite Mining and Quarrying ........................................................
Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying ................................................
Industrial Sand Mining ......................................................................................................
Kaolin, Clay, and Ceramic and Refractory Minerals Mining ............................................
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying ............................................................
Hydroelectric Power Generation .......................................................................................
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation .............................................................................
Nuclear Electric Power Generation ..................................................................................
Solar Electric Power Generation ......................................................................................
Wind Electric Power Generation ......................................................................................
Biomass Electric Power Generation .................................................................................
Other Electric Power Generation ......................................................................................
Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control ................................................................
Electric Power Distribution ................................................................................................
Natural Gas Distribution ...................................................................................................
Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing ....................................................................................
Other Animal Food Manufacturing ...................................................................................
Flour Milling ......................................................................................................................
Rice Milling .......................................................................................................................
Wet Corn Milling and Starch Manufacturing ....................................................................
Soybean and Other Oilseed Processing ..........................................................................
Fats and Oils Refining and Blending ................................................................................
Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Beet Sugar Manufacturing ................................................................................................
Cane Sugar Manufacturing ...............................................................................................
Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing ..........................................................
Specialty Canning .............................................................................................................
Fluid Milk Manufacturing ...................................................................................................
Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Product Manufacturing .....................................
Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering ...............................................................................
Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes Manufacturing from Purchased Flour .....................
Coffee and Tea Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing .............................................................
Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing ................................
Spice and Extract Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Perishable Prepared Food Manufacturing ........................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing ..................................................................
Soft Drink Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Bottled Water Manufacturing ............................................................................................
Distilleries ..........................................................................................................................
Narrow Fabric Mills and Schiffli Machine Embroidery .....................................................
Nonwoven Fabric Mills .....................................................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills ..................................................................
Apparel Knitting Mills ........................................................................................................
Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing ..................................................
Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing .........................................................................
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
750
750
750
750
500
500
500
500
500
750
750
250
250
250
250
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
500
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
750
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
500
500
500
1,250
1,000
1,000
500
750
500
750
500
500
Adopted size
standards
(employees)
1,400
1,400
1,250
850
550
750
650
600
750
950
1,150
500
1,150
550
650
950
1,100
1,150
1,250
650
1,050
750
1,300
1,250
1,100
1,300
1,150
1,050
1,100
1,400
1,150
1,000
1,150
850
1,000
1,100
850
650
700
700
1,400
1,100
1,100
550
850
550
850
600
800
9990
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 6—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS—Continued
[NAICS 2022]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
2022 NAICS Code
321113
321114
321211
322110
323111
323120
324122
324191
324199
325110
325120
325130
325220
325311
325312
325314
325315
325320
325412
325520
325611
325612
325613
325910
325991
325998
326121
326130
326220
326299
327211
327410
327910
327992
327999
331313
331315
331420
331491
331492
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
331512
331513
331523
331524
332112
332114
332117
332215
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
332439
332613
332722
332812
......................
......................
......................
......................
332992
332996
333131
333243
333924
333991
333993
333995
333998
334290
334416
334511
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standards
(employees)
NAICS 2022 industry title
Sawmills ............................................................................................................................
Wood Preservation ...........................................................................................................
Hardwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing ...............................................................
Pulp Mills ..........................................................................................................................
Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) ............................................................
Support Activities for Printing ...........................................................................................
Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing ....................................................
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing .....................................................
All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing ...................................................
Petrochemical Manufacturing ...........................................................................................
Industrial Gas Manufacturing ............................................................................................
Synthetic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing ......................................................................
Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing ...........................................
Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing ................................................................................
Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing .................................................................................
Fertilizer (Mixing Only) Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Compost Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing ...............................................
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing .....................................................................
Adhesive Manufacturing ...................................................................................................
Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing .......................................................................
Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing ............................................................
Surface Active Agent Manufacturing ................................................................................
Printing Ink Manufacturing ................................................................................................
Custom Compounding of Purchased Resins ...................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing ...................
Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape Manufacturing .........................................................
Laminated Plastics Plate, Sheet (except Packaging), and Shape Manufacturing ...........
Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing ...................................................
All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing .........................................................................
Flat Glass Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Lime Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................
Abrasive Product Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth Manufacturing ......................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing .............................
Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum Production ......................................................
Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing ..............................................................
Copper Rolling, Drawing, Extruding, and Alloying ...........................................................
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding ......
Secondary Smelting, Refining, and Alloying of Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and
Aluminum).
Steel Investment Foundries ..............................................................................................
Steel Foundries (except Investment) ................................................................................
Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries .........................................................................
Aluminum Foundries (except Die-Casting) .......................................................................
Nonferrous Forging ...........................................................................................................
Custom Roll Forming ........................................................................................................
Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing ............................................................................
Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing.
Other Metal Container Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Spring Manufacturing ........................................................................................................
Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer Manufacturing ........................................................
Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to
Manufacturers.
Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ..............................................................
Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ............................................................
Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery Manufacturing .........................................
Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing ........................
Power-Driven Hand Tool Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Packaging Machinery Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing ...........................................................
All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing .............................
Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing ...........................................................
Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, Transformer, and Other Inductor Manufacturing ....................
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing.
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Adopted size
standards
(employees)
500
500
500
750
500
500
750
750
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
500
500
1,000
1,250
500
1,000
750
750
500
500
500
500
500
750
500
1,000
750
750
500
500
1,000
1,250
1,000
750
750
550
550
600
1,050
650
550
1,100
900
950
1,300
1,200
1,050
1,050
1,050
1,350
550
550
1,150
1,300
550
1,100
900
1,100
750
600
650
600
650
800
650
1,100
1,050
900
600
750
1,300
1,400
1,050
900
850
1,000
500
500
500
750
500
500
750
1,050
700
700
550
950
600
550
1,000
500
500
500
500
600
600
600
600
1,250
500
500
500
750
500
500
750
500
750
500
1,250
1,300
550
900
550
900
950
600
800
700
800
550
1,350
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9991
TABLE 6—ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS—Continued
[NAICS 2022]
Current size
standards
(employees)
2022 NAICS Code
NAICS 2022 industry title
334512 ......................
Automatic Environmental Control Manufacturing for Residential, Commercial, and Appliance Use.
Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting Device Manufacturing ............................................
Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing ................................................................................
Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing .................................................
Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing ...........
Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing .......................................
Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing ................................................................
Carbon and Graphite Product Manufacturing ..................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing ...............
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing ...................................
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing ...........................................................
Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Ship Building and Repairing .............................................................................................
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing .................................................................
Household Furniture (except Wood and Upholstered) Manufacturing .............................
Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing ................................................................
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing ..............................................................
Jewelry and Silverware Manufacturing .............................................................................
Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing ................................................................................
Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing ......................................................
Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing ...........................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing ............................................................................
Deep Sea Freight Transportation .....................................................................................
Coastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation .............................................................
Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger Transportation .......................................................
Inland Water Freight Transportation .................................................................................
Inland Water Passenger Transportation ...........................................................................
Music Publishers ...............................................................................................................
Record Production and Distribution ..................................................................................
Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles, Their Propulsion Units and Propulsion Parts ......
Environmental Remediation Services ...............................................................................
334514
334517
334519
335132
335311
335931
335991
335999
336310
336414
336419
336611
336991
337126
337214
339113
339910
339930
339991
339994
339999
483111
483113
483114
483211
483212
512230
512250
541715
562910
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
(Exception 3)
(Exception) ..
Table 7, Summary of Adopted Size
Standards Revisions by Sector (NAICS
2022), summarizes the adopted changes
to size standards in this final rule by
NAICS sector. Accordingly, of 412
NAICS 2022 employee-based size
standards reviewed in this rule, SBA is
increasing 144, including 117 in Sector
31–33, ten in Sector 22, eight in Sector
21, five in Sector 48–49, two in Sector
51, and one each in Sector 54 and Sector
56. SBA is retaining the remaining 268
employee-based size standards in those
sectors, including 204 size standards
that would decrease based on analytical
results. In the April 2022 proposed rule
as well as other rulemakings as part of
the second five-year review of size
Adopted size
standards
(employees)
500
650
750
1,000
500
500
750
500
750
500
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,250
1,000
750
1,000
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
500
750
500
750
250
1,250
750
850
1,200
600
600
800
600
900
600
1,050
1,300
1,050
1,300
1,050
950
1,100
800
700
700
600
750
550
1,050
800
550
1,050
550
900
900
1,300
1,000
standards, in response to the impact of
the COVID–19 pandemic, SBA
maintained current size standards
where the analytical results supported
decreases. SBA is also retaining the
remaining 64 size standards for which
the results suggested no changes.
TABLE 7—SUMMARY OF ADOPTED SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS BY SECTOR
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
[NAICS 2022]
Number of
size standards
reviewed
Number of
size standards
increased
Number of
size standards
decreased
Number of
size standards
maintained
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction ..
Utilities .................................................................
Manufacturing ......................................................
Transportation and Warehousing ........................
Information ...........................................................
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services ..
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting; Finance and Insurance; Administrative and Support, Waste Management and Remediation
Services.
17
11
346
15
13
7
3
8
10
117
5
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
229
10
11
6
2
..............................................................................
412
144
0
268
NAICS sector
Sector name
21 ...................................
22 ...................................
31–33 .............................
48–49 .............................
51 ...................................
54 ...................................
Other Sectors ................
Total ........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9992
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Evaluation of Dominance in Field of
Operation
SBA determined that for the
industries evaluated under this final
rule, no individual firm at or below the
revised size standards in Table 6 (above)
would be large enough to dominate its
field of operation. At the size standard
levels adopted in this final rule, based
on 2017 Economic Census, an
individual firm’s share of total industry
receipts among those industries would
be, on average, 2.3 percent, varying from
0.1 percent to 21.4 percent. Generally,
SBA believes the shares below 40
percent would preclude dominant firms
from qualifying as small and exerting
control on any industry. Thus, the above
market shares effectively preclude a
firm at or below the revised size
standards from exerting control on any
of the industries.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Alternatives Considered
In response to the unprecedented
economic impacts of the COVID–19
pandemic on small businesses and
government response, SBA is adopting
increases to size standards where the
data suggests increases are warranted;
and retaining all current size standards
where the data suggested lowering is
appropriate. SBA is also retaining all
current size standards where the data
suggested no changes to the current size
standards.
Nonetheless, SBA considered two
other alternatives. Alternative Option
One was to adopt changes to size
standards exactly as suggested by the
analytical results. In other words,
Alternative Option One would entail
increasing size standards for 144
industries or subindustries, decreasing
size standards for 204 industries or
subindustries, and retaining size
standards at their current levels for 64
industries or subindustries. Alternative
Option Two was to retain all current
size standards.
SBA is not adopting Alternative
Option One because it would cause a
substantial number of currently small
businesses to lose their small business
status and hence to lose their access to
Federal small business assistance,
especially small business set-aside
contracts and SBA’s financial assistance
in some cases. Impacts of lowering size
standards under Alternative Option One
are discussed in detail in the Regulatory
Impact Analysis section of this rule.
Lowering size standards in the current
environment would also run counter to
various measures the Federal
Government has implemented to help
small businesses and the overall
economy recover from the ongoing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
COVID–19 pandemic. Given the effects
of the 2007–2009 Great Recession, and
the resulting government actions to
support small businesses and the overall
economy, SBA also adopted a policy of
not decreasing size standards during the
first five-year review of size standards,
even though the data supported
decreases.
Under Alternative Option Two, given
the current COVID–19 pandemic, SBA
considered retaining the current levels
of all size standards even though the
analysis of relevant data suggested
changing them. Under this option, as
the current situation develops, SBA will
be able to assess new data available on
economic indicators, Federal
procurement, and SBA loans before
adopting changes to size standards.
However, SBA is not adopting
Alternative Option Two because results
discussed in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis section, below, show that
retaining all size standards at their
current levels would cause otherwise
qualified small businesses to forgo
various small business benefits
becoming available to them under the
option of increasing 144 and retaining
268 employee-based size standards.
Such benefits would include access to
Federal contracts set aside for small
businesses and capital through SBA’s
loan and SBIC programs, and
exemptions from paperwork and other
compliance requirements.
Federal Procurement Size Standard for
Nonmanufacturers
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA
proposed to maintain the 500-employee
size standard for nonmanufacturers.
Based on the evaluation of public
comments pertaining to SBA’s proposed
size standard, its analyses of industry
factors using the latest available data
when the proposed rule was prepared,
and SBA’s considerations of other
factors outlined in the proposed rule as
well as public comments discussed
above, in this final rule, SBA is adopting
500 employees as the size standard
applicable to nonmanufacturers under
13 CFR 121.406 as proposed in the April
26, 2022, proposed rule.
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801–808), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612),
Executive Orders 13563, 12988, and
13132, and the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this final
rule is a significant regulatory action for
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, in the next section SBA
provides a Regulatory Impact Analysis
of this final rule, including (1) A
statement of the need for the regulatory
action, (2) An examination of alternative
regulatory approaches, and (3) An
estimate of the benefits and costs—both
quantitative and qualitative—of the
regulatory action and the alternatives
considered.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. What is the need for this regulatory
action?
SBA’s mission is to aid and assist
small businesses through a variety of
financial, procurement, business
development and counseling, and
disaster assistance programs. To
determine the actual intended
beneficiaries of these programs, SBA
establishes numerical size standards by
industry to identify businesses that are
deemed small. Under the Small
Business Act (Act) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)),
SBA’s Administrator is responsible for
establishing small business size
definitions (or ‘‘size standards’’) and
ensuring that such definitions vary from
industry to industry to reflect
differences among various industries.
The Jobs Act requires SBA to review
every five years all size standards and
make necessary adjustments to reflect
current industry and Federal market
conditions. This final rule is part of the
second five-year review of size
standards in accordance with the Jobs
Act. The first five-year review of size
standards was completed in early 2016.
Such periodic reviews of size standards
provide SBA with an opportunity to
incorporate ongoing changes to industry
structure and Federal market
environment into size standards and to
evaluate the impacts of prior revisions
to size standards on small businesses.
This also provides SBA with an
opportunity to seek and incorporate
public input to the size standards
review and analysis. SBA believes that
the size standards revisions adopted for
industries being reviewed in this final
rule will make size standards more
reflective of the current economic
characteristics of businesses in those
industries and the latest trends in
Federal marketplace.
The revisions to the existing size
standards for 144 industries or
subindustries (or ‘‘exceptions’’),
including 117 industries in Sector 31–
33 and 27 industries and subindustries
in other sectors are consistent with
SBA’s statutory mandate to help small
businesses grow and create jobs and to
review and adjust size standards every
five years. This regulatory action
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
promotes the Administration’s goals and
objectives as well as meets the SBA’s
statutory responsibility. One of SBA’s
goals in support of promoting the
Administration’s objectives is to help
small businesses succeed through fair
and equitable access to capital and
credit, Federal Government contracts
and purchases, and management and
technical assistance. Reviewing and
modifying size standards, when
appropriate, ensures that intended
beneficiaries are able to access Federal
small business programs that are
designed to assist them to become
competitive and create jobs.
2. What are the potential benefits and
costs of this regulatory action?
OMB directs agencies to establish an
appropriate baseline to evaluate any
benefits, costs, or transfer impacts of
regulatory actions and alternative
approaches considered. The baseline
should represent the agency’s best
assessment of what the world would
look like absent the regulatory action.
For a new regulatory action
promulgating modifications to an
existing regulation (such as modifying
the existing size standards), a baseline
assuming no change to the regulation
(i.e., making no changes to current size
standards) generally provides an
appropriate benchmark for evaluating
benefits, costs, or transfer impacts of
regulatory changes and their
alternatives.
Changes to Size Standards
Based on the results from the analyses
of the latest industry and Federal
9993
from FPDS–NG for fiscal years 2018–
2020, about 41,838 unique firms in
those industries received at least one
Federal contract during that period, of
which 84.3 percent were small under
the current size standards. A total of
$231.6 billion in average annual
contract dollars were awarded to
businesses in those industries during
the period of evaluation, and 18.6
percent of the dollars awarded went to
small businesses. For industries and
subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’) reviewed
in this final rule, providing contract
dollars to small business through setasides is quite important. From the total
small business contract dollars awarded
during the period considered, 47.1
percent were awarded through various
small business set-aside programs and
52.9 percent were awarded through nonset aside contracts. Based on the SBA’s
internal data on its loan programs for
fiscal years 2018–2020, small businesses
in those industries received, on an
annual basis, a total of 4,877 7(a) and
504 loans in that period, totaling about
$3.1 billion, of which 75.8 percent was
issued through the 7(a) program and
24.2 percent was issued through the
504/CDC program. During fiscal years
2018–2020, small businesses in those
industries also received 255 loans
through the SBA’s Economic Injury
Disaster Loan (EIDL) program, totaling
about $11.4 million on an annual basis.7
Table 8, Baseline for All Industries
(NAICS 2022), below, provides these
baseline results for Manufacturing
(Sector 31–33) and all other sectors.
contracting data, evaluation of the
public comments on the proposed rule,
as well as consideration of the impact of
size standards changes on small
businesses and significant adverse
impacts of the COVID–19 emergency on
small businesses and the overall
economic activity, of the total of 412
industries and subindustries (or
‘‘exceptions’’) in Sector 31–33 and other
sectors that have employee-based size
standards, SBA increases size standards
for 144 industries or subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’) and maintain current
size standards for the remaining 268
industries or subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’).
The Baseline
For purposes of this regulatory action,
the baseline represents maintaining the
‘‘status quo,’’ i.e., making no changes to
the current size standards. Using the
number of small businesses and levels
of benefits (such as set-aside contracts,
SBA’s loans, disaster assistance, etc.)
they receive under the current size
standards as a baseline, one can
examine the potential benefits, costs,
and transfer impacts of changes to size
standards on small businesses and on
the overall economy.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census,
of a total of about 333,213 businesses in
industries in Sectors 31–33 and other
sectors with employee-based size
standards, 96.8 percent are considered
small under the current size standards.
That percentage varies from 88.0
percent in NAICS Sector 22 to 99.8
percent in Sector 11. Based on the data
TABLE 8—BASELINE FOR ALL INDUSTRIES
[NAICS 2022]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Sector 31–33
Number of industries or subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’) reviewed in this proposed rule ...............
Total firms in industries reviewed in this proposed rule (2017 Economic Census) 1 ..................
Total small firms in those industries under current size standards (2017 Economic Census 1 ..
Small firms as % of total firms (2017 Economic Census) 1 ........................................................
Total contract dollars ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .....................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current standards ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY2018–
2020) ........................................................................................................................................
Small business dollars as % of total dollars (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) ..................................
Total number of unique firms getting federal contracts (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .................
Total number of unique small firms getting small business contracts (FPDS–NG FY 2018–
2020) ........................................................................................................................................
Small firms getting federal contracts as % of total firms getting federal contracts (FPDS–NG
FY 2018–2020) ........................................................................................................................
Number of 7(a) and CDC/504 loans (FY 2018–2020) ................................................................
Amount of 7(a) and CDC/504 loans ($ million) (FY 2018–2020) ...............................................
Number of EIDL loans (FY 2018–2020) 2 ...................................................................................
7 The analysis of the disaster loan data excludes
physical disaster loans that are available to anyone
regardless of size, disaster loans issued to nonprofit
entities, and EIDLs issued under the COVID–19
relief program. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA
stopped accepting applications for new COVID
EIDL loans or advances. Thus, the disaster loan
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
analysis presented here pertains to the regular EIDL
loans only.
SBA estimates impacts of size standards changes
on EIDL loans by calculating the ratio of businesses
getting EIDL loans to total small businesses (based
on the Economic Census data) and multiplying it
by the number of impacted small firms. Due to data
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Other sectors
Total
346
259,377
250,804
96.7%
$181,818
66
73,836
71,813
97.3%
$49,758
412
333,213
322,617
96.8%
$231,576
$28,713
15.8%
34,225
$14,364
28.9%
9,312
$43,078
18.6%
41,838
29,056
7,291
35,268
84.9%
4,362
$2,863
202
78.3%
515
$248
53
84.3%
4,877
$3,111
255
limitations, for FY 2019–20, some loans with both
physical and EIDL loan components could not be
broken into the physical and EIDL loan amounts.
In such cases, SBA applied the ratio of EIDL
amount to total (physical loan + EIDL) amount
using FY 2016–18 data to the FY 2019–20 data to
obtain the amount attributable to the EIDL loans.
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9994
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 8—BASELINE FOR ALL INDUSTRIES—Continued
[NAICS 2022]
Sector 31–33
Amount of EIDL loans ($million) (FY 2018–2020) 2 ....................................................................
1 These
$8.3
Other sectors
$3.1
Total
$11.4
figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ‘‘exceptions’’ for which Economic Census data is not avail-
able.
2 Excludes COVID–19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped accepting applications for
new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Increases to Size Standards
As stated above, in terms of NAICS
2022, of 412 employee-based size
standards in Sectors 31–33 and other
sectors that are reviewed in this rule,
based on the results from analyses of
latest industry and Federal market data
as well as impacts of size standards
changes on small businesses and
considerations for the impacts from the
COVID–19 pandemic, SBA increases
144 size standards, including 117 in
Sector 31–33 and 27 in other sectors.
Below are descriptions of the benefits,
costs, and transfer impacts of these
increases to size standards.
Benefits of Increases to Size Standards
The most significant benefit to
businesses from increases to size
standards is gaining eligibility for
Federal small business assistance
programs or retaining that eligibility for
a longer period. These include SBA’s
business loan programs, EIDL program,
and Federal procurement programs
intended for small businesses. Federal
procurement programs provide targeted,
set-aside opportunities for small
businesses under SBA’s various
business development and contracting
programs. These include the 8(a)/
Business Development (BD) Program,
the Historically Underutilized Business
Zones (HUBZone) Program, the WomenOwned Small Businesses (WOSB)
Program, the Economically
Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small
Businesses (EDWOSB) Program, and the
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small
Businesses (SDVOSB) Program.
Besides set-aside contracting and
financial assistance discussed above,
small businesses also benefit through
reduced fees, less paperwork, and fewer
compliance requirements that are
available to small businesses through
the Federal Government programs.
However, SBA has no data to estimate
the number of small businesses
receiving such benefits.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census,
SBA estimates that in 144 industries or
subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’) in NAICS
Sector 31–33 and other sectors with
employee-based size standards for
which it is increasing size standards,
242 firms (see Table 9, Impacts of
Increasing Size Standards, below), not
small under the current size standards,
will become small under the adopted
size standards increases and therefore
become eligible for these programs. That
represents about 0.3 percent of all firms
classified as small under the current
size standards in industries for which
SBA is adopting increases to size
standards. SBA’s revised size standards
would result in an increase to the small
business share of total receipts in those
industries from 27.4 percent to 29.3
percent.
With more businesses qualifying as
small under the adopted increases to
size standards, Federal agencies will
have a larger pool of small businesses
from which to draw for their small
business procurement programs.
Growing small businesses that are close
to exceeding the current size standards
will be able to retain their small
business status for a longer period under
the higher size standards, thereby
enabling them to continue to benefit
from the small business programs.
Based on the FPDS–NG data for fiscal
years 2018–2020, SBA estimates that
109 firms that are active in Federal
contracting in those industries would
gain small business status under the
adopted size standards. Based on the
same data, SBA estimates that those
newly-qualified small businesses under
the higher size standards, if adopted,
could receive Federal small business
contracts totaling $256.6 million
annually. That represents a 2.4 percent
increase to small business contract
dollars from the baseline. Table 9
provides these results by NAICS sector.
The added competition from more
businesses qualifying as small can result
in lower prices to the Government for
procurements set aside or reserved for
small businesses, but SBA cannot
quantify this impact. Costs could be
higher when full and open contracts are
awarded to HUBZone businesses that
receive price evaluation preferences.
However, with agencies likely setting
aside more contracts for small
businesses in response to the
availability of a larger pool of small
businesses under the proposed increases
to size standards, HUBZone firms might
receive more set-aside contracts and
fewer full and open contracts, thereby
resulting in some cost savings to
agencies. SBA cannot estimate such cost
savings as it is impossible to determine
the number and value of unrestricted
contracts to be otherwise awarded to
HUBZone firms as set-asides. However,
such cost savings are likely to be
relatively small as only a small fraction
of full and open contracts are awarded
to HUBZone businesses.
As shown in Table 9, under SBA’s
7(a) and 504 loan programs, based on
the data for fiscal years 2018–2020, SBA
estimates that there will be no impact to
the number of firms receiving 7(a) and
504 loans.
TABLE 9—IMPACTS OF INCREASING SIZE STANDARDS
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Sector 31–33
Number of industries or subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’) with proposed increases to size standards ..........................................................................................................................................
Total current small businesses in industries with proposed increases to size standards (2017
Economic Census) 1 .................................................................................................................
Additional firms qualifying as small under proposed increases to size standards (2017 Economic Census) 1 .......................................................................................................................
% of additional firms qualifying as small relative to current small businesses in industries with
proposed increases to size standards (2017 Economic Census) 1 .........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Other sectors
Total
117
27
144
66,066
5,252
71,318
197
45
242
0.3%
0.9%
0.3%
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
9995
TABLE 9—IMPACTS OF INCREASING SIZE STANDARDS—Continued
Sector 31–33
Number of current unique small firms getting small business contracts in industries with proposed increases to size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) 2 ...........................................
Additional number of small business firms gaining small business status under proposed increases to size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) ..........................................................
% increase to number of small businesses relative to current unique small firms getting small
business contracts in industries with proposed increases to size standards (FPDS–NG FY
2018–2020) ..............................................................................................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current size standards in industries or subindustries with proposed increases to size standards ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .......
Estimated small business dollars available to newly-qualified small firms ($ million) (FPDS–
NG FY 2018–2020) 3 ................................................................................................................
% increase to small business dollars relative to total small business contract dollars under
current standards in industries with proposed increases to size standards ...........................
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small business in industries with proposed increases
to size standards (FY 2018–2020) ..........................................................................................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in industries with proposed increases to size standards ($ million) (FY 2018–2020) ............................................................
Estimated number of 7(a) and 504 loans to newly-qualified small firms ....................................
Estimated 7(a) and 504 loan amount to newly-qualified small firms ($ million) .........................
% increase to 7(a) and 504 loan amount relative to the total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans in
industries with proposed increases to size standards .............................................................
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries with proposed increases to size
standards (FY 2018–2020) 4 ....................................................................................................
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries with proposed increases to size
standards ($ million) (FY 2018–2020) 4 .............................................................................
Estimated no. of EIDL loans to newly-qualified small firms 4 ......................................................
Estimated EIDL loan amount to newly-qualified small firms ($ million) 4 ..............................
% increase to EIDL loan amount relative to the total amount of disaster loans in industries
with proposed increases to size standards 4 ...........................................................................
1 These
Other sectors
Total
13,854
603
14,320
89
22
109
0.6%
3.6%
0.8%
$9,617
$1,032
$10,648
$75.9
$180.6
$256.6
0.8%
17.5%
2.4%
1,120
44
1,164
$751
0
$0.0
$30
0
$0.0
$781
0
$0.0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
65
10
75
$2.9
0
$0.0
$0.7
0
$0.0
$3.5
0
$0.0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ‘‘exceptions’’ for which Economic Census data is not avail-
able.
2 Total impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms participate in more than one industry.
3 Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique firm times change in number of firms. Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA’s current size standards, not the contracting officer’s size designation.
4 Excludes COVID–19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped accepting applications for
new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Newly-qualified small businesses may
also benefit from the SBA’s EIDL
program. Since the benefit provided
through this program is contingent on
the occurrence and severity of a disaster
in the future, SBA cannot make a
precise estimate of this impact.
However, based on the disaster loan
program data for fiscal years 2018–2020,
SBA estimates that, on an annual basis,
the newly-defined small businesses
under the adopted increases to size
standards would not be impacted by
SBA’s changes to size standards.
Additionally, the newly-defined small
businesses would also benefit through
reduced fees, less paperwork, and fewer
compliance requirements that are
available to small businesses through
the Federal Government, but SBA has
no data to quantify this impact.
Costs of Increases to Size Standards
Besides having to register in the
System of Award Management (SAM) to
be eligible to participate in Federal
contracting and update the SAM profile
annually, small businesses incur no
direct costs to gain or retain their small
business status as a result of the adopted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
increases to size standards. All
businesses willing to do business with
the Federal Government must register in
SAM and update their SAM profiles
annually, regardless of their size status.
SBA believes that a vast majority of
impacted businesses that are willing to
participate in Federal contracting are
already registered in SAM and update
their SAM profiles annually. More
importantly, this final rule does not
establish the new size standards for the
very first time; rather it intends to
modify the existing size standards in
accordance with a statutory
requirement, the latest data, and other
relevant factors.
To the extent that the newly-qualified
small businesses could become active in
Federal procurement, the adopted
increases to size standards may entail
some additional administrative costs to
the Federal Government as a result of
more businesses qualifying as small for
Federal small business programs. For
example, there will be more firms
seeking SBA’s loans, more firms eligible
for enrollment in the Dynamic Small
Business Search (DSBS) database or in
certify.sba.gov, more firms seeking
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
certification as 8(a)/BD or HUBZone
firms or qualifying for small business,
WOSB, EDWOSB, and SDVOSB status,
and more firms applying for SBA’s 8(a)/
BD mentor-prote´ge´ programs. With an
expanded pool of small businesses, it is
likely that Federal agencies would set
aside more contracts for small
businesses under the increases to size
standards. One may surmise that this
might result in a higher number of small
business size protests and additional
processing costs to agencies. However,
the SBA’s historical data on the number
of size protests processed shows that the
number of size protests decreased
following the increases to size standards
as part of the first five-year review of
size standards. Specifically, on an
annual basis, the number of size protests
fell from about 600 during fiscal years
2011–2013 (review of most receiptsbased size standards was completed by
the end of FY 2013), as compared to
about 500 during fiscal years 2018–2020
when size standard increases were in
effect. That represents a 17 percent
decline.
Among those newly-defined small
businesses seeking SBA’s loans, there
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9996
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
could be some additional costs
associated with verification of their
small business status. However, small
business lenders have an option of using
the tangible net worth and net income
based alternative size standard instead
of using the industry-based size
standards to establish eligibility for
SBA’s loans. For these reasons, SBA
believes that these added administrative
costs will be minor because necessary
mechanisms are already in place to
handle these added requirements.
Additionally, some Federal contracts
may possibly have higher costs. With a
greater number of businesses defined as
small due to the adopted increases to
size standards, Federal agencies may
choose to set aside more contracts for
competition among small businesses
only instead of using a full and open
competition. The movement of contracts
from unrestricted competition to small
business set-aside contracts might result
in competition among fewer total
bidders, although there will be more
small businesses eligible to submit
offers under the adopted size standards.
However, the additional costs associated
with fewer bidders are expected to be
minor since, by law, procurements may
be set aside for small businesses under
the 8(a)/BD, HUBZone, WOSB,
EDWOSB, or SDVOSB programs only if
awards are expected to be made at fair
and reasonable prices.
Costs may also be higher when full
and open contracts are awarded to
HUBZone businesses that receive price
evaluation preferences. However, with
agencies likely setting aside more
contracts for small businesses in
response to the availability of a larger
pool of small businesses under the
adopted increases to size standards,
HUBZone firms might end up getting
fewer full and open contracts, thereby
resulting in some cost savings to
agencies. However, such cost savings
are likely to be minimal as only a small
fraction of unrestricted contracts are
awarded to HUBZone businesses.
Transfer Impacts of Increases to Size
Standards
The adopted increases to 144
employee-based size standards may
result in some redistribution of Federal
contracts between the newly-qualified
small businesses and large businesses
and between the newly-qualified small
businesses and small businesses under
the current standards. However, it
would have no impact on the overall
economic activity since total Federal
contract dollars available for businesses
to compete for will not change with
changes to size standards. While SBA
cannot quantify with certainty the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
actual outcome of the gains and losses
from the redistribution contracts among
different groups of businesses, it can
identify several probable impacts in
qualitative terms. With the availability
of a larger pool of small businesses
under the adopted increases to size
standards, some unrestricted Federal
contracts which would otherwise be
awarded to large businesses may be set
aside for small businesses. As a result,
large businesses may lose some Federal
contracting opportunities. Similarly,
some small businesses under the current
size standards may obtain fewer set
aside contracts due to the increased
competition from larger businesses
qualifying as small under the adopted
size standards. This impact may be
offset by a greater number of
procurements being set aside for all
small businesses. With larger businesses
qualifying as small under the higher size
standards, smaller small businesses
could face some disadvantage in
competing for set aside contracts against
their larger counterparts. However, SBA
cannot quantify these impacts.
3. What alternatives have been
considered?
Under OMB Circular A–4, SBA is
required to consider regulatory
alternatives to the adopted changes in
this final rule. In this section, SBA
describes and analyzes two such
alternatives. Alternative Option One to
the final rule, a more stringent
alternative to the adopted change,
would propose adopting size standards
based solely on the analytical results. In
other words, the size standards of 144
industries or subindustries (or
‘‘exceptions’’) for which the analytical
results, as presented in Table 4 of the
April 2022 proposed rule, suggested
raising size standards would be raised.
However, the size standards of 204
industries for which the analytical
results suggest lowering size standards
would be lowered. For the 64 remaining
industries or subindustries for which
the results suggested no changes, size
standards would be maintained at their
current levels. Alternative Option Two
would propose retaining existing size
standards for all industries, given the
uncertainty generated by the ongoing
COVID–19 pandemic. Below, SBA
discusses benefits, costs and net impacts
of each option.
Alternative Option One: Adopting All
Calculated Size Standards
As discussed in the Alternatives
Considered section of this final rule,
Alternative Option One would cause a
substantial number of currently small
businesses to lose their small business
status and hence to lose their access to
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Federal small business assistance,
especially small business set-aside
contracts and SBA’s financial assistance
in some cases. These consequences
could be mitigated. For example, in
response to the 2008 Financial Crisis
and economic conditions that followed,
SBA adopted a general policy in the first
five-year review of size standards to not
lower any size standard (except to
exclude one or more dominant firms)
even when the analytical results
suggested the size standard should be
lowered. Currently, because of the
economic challenges presented by the
COVID–19 pandemic and the measures
taken to protect public health, SBA has
decided to adopt the same general
policy of not lowering size standards in
the ongoing second five-year review of
size standards review as well.
The primary benefits of adopting
Alternative Option One would include:
(1) SBA’s procurement, management,
technical and financial assistance
resources would be targeted to their
intended beneficiaries according to the
analytical results; (2) Adopting the size
standards based on the analytical results
would also promote consistency and
predictability of SBA’s implementation
of its authority to set or adjust size
standards; and (3) Firms who would
remain small would face less
competition from larger small firms for
the remaining set aside opportunities. In
the proposed rule, SBA sought
comments on the impact of adopting
size standards based on the analytical
results.
As explained in the ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ white paper, in addition
to adopting all results of the analysis of
the primary factors, SBA evaluates other
relevant factors as needed such as the
impact of the reductions or increases of
size standards on the distribution of
contracts awarded to small businesses
and may adopt different results with the
intention of mitigating potential
negative impacts.
We have already discussed the
benefits, costs and transfer impacts of
increasing 144 and retaining 268 size
standards. Below we discuss the
benefits, costs, and transfer impacts of
increasing 144, decreasing 204, and
retaining 64 size standards based on the
analytical results.
Benefits of Decreases to Size Standards
The most significant benefit to
businesses from decreases to size
standards when SBA’s analysis suggests
such decreases is to ensure that size
standards are more reflective of latest
industry structure and Federal market
trends and that Federal small business
assistance is more effectively targeted to
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
its intended beneficiaries. These include
SBA’s loan programs, EIDL program,
and Federal procurement programs
intended for small businesses. Federal
procurement programs provide targeted,
set-aside opportunities for small
businesses under SBA’s business
development programs, such as small
business, 8(a)/BD, HUBZone, WOSB,
EDWOSB, and SDVOSB programs. The
adoption of smaller size standards when
the results support them diminishes the
risk of awarding contracts to firms
which are not small anymore.
Decreasing size standards may reduce
the administrative costs of the
Government, because the risk of
awarding set aside contracts to other
than small businesses may diminish
when the size standards reflect better
the structure of the market. This may
also reduce the risks of providing SBA’s
loans to firms that are not needing them
the most or of allowing firms that are
not eligible for small business set-asides
to participate on the SBA procurement
programs, which might provide a better
chance for smaller firms to grow and
benefit from the opportunities available
on the Federal market and strengthen
the small business industrial base for
the Federal Government.
Costs of Decreases to Size Standards
Table 10, Impacts of Decreases to Size
Standards Under Alternative Option
One, shows the various impacts of
lowering size standards in 204
industries based solely on the analytical
results. Based on the 2017 Economic
Census, about 658 (0.3%) firms would
lose their small business status under
Alternative Option One. Similarly,
based on the FPDS–NG data for fiscal
years 2018–2020, 172 (0.7%) small
businesses participating in Federal
contracting would lose their small status
and become ineligible to compete for
set-aside contracts. With fewer
businesses qualifying as small under the
decreases to size standards, Federal
agencies will have a smaller pool of
9997
small businesses from which to draw for
their small business procurement
programs. For example, in Alternative
Option One, during fiscal years 2018–
2020, agencies awarded, on an annual
basis, about $28.3 billion in small
business contracts in those 204
industries for which this option
considered decreasing size standards.
Table 10 shows that lowering size
standards in 204 industries would
reduce Federal contract dollars awarded
to small businesses by $248 million or
about 0.9 percent relative to the baseline
level. Because of the importance of
these industries for the Federal
procurement, SBA may adopt mitigating
measures to reduce the negative impact.
SBA could take one or more of the
following three actions: (1) Accept
decreases in size standards as suggested
by the analytical results; (2) Decrease
size standards by a smaller amount than
the calculated threshold; or (3). Retain
the size standards at their current levels.
TABLE 10—IMPACTS OF DECREASES TO SIZE STANDARDS UNDER ALTERNATIVE OPTION ONE
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Sector 31–33
Number of industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards .............................
Total current small businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (2017 Economic Census) ................................................................................................
Estimated number of firms losing small status in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (2017 Economic Census) .................................................................
% of firms losing small status relative to current small businesses in industries for which SBA
considered decreasing size standards (2017 Economic Census) ..........................................
Number of current unique small firms getting small business contracts in industries for which
SBA considered decreasing size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) 1 ............................
Estimated number of small business firms that would have lost small business status in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) 1
% decrease to small business firms relative to current unique small firms getting small business contracts in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FPDS–
NG FY 2018–2020) 1 ................................................................................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current size standards in industries for which
SBA considered decreasing size standards ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .............
Estimated small business dollars not available to firms losing small business status in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY 2018–
2020) 2 ......................................................................................................................................
% decrease to small business dollars relative to total small business contract dollars under
current size standards in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards ...
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FY 2018–2020) ...................................................................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards ($ million) (FY 2018–2020) ..................................................
Estimated number of 7(a) and 504 loans not available to firms that would have lost small
business status in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards .............
Estimated 7(a) and 504 loan amount not available to firms that would have lost small status
($ million) ..................................................................................................................................
% decrease to 7(a) and 504 loan amount relative to the total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans
in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards ........................................
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FY 2018–2020) 3 ..............................................................................
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards ($ million) (FY 2018–2020) 3 .............................................................
Estimated number of EIDL loans not available to firms that would have lost small business
status in industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards 3 ...........................
Estimated EIDL loan amount not available to firms that would have lost small business status
($ million) 3 ...............................................................................................................................
% decrease to EIDL loan amount relative to the baseline 3 .......................................................
1 Total
Other sectors
Total
180
24
204
163,803
43,056
206,856
572
86
658
0.4%
0.2%
0.3%
19,687
5,731
24,839
132
50
172
0.7%
0.9%
0.7%
$15,325
12,932
$28,256
$128.6
$119.5
$248.0
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
2,875
325
3,200
$1,851
$147
$1,999
1
0
1
$0.2
$0.0
$0.2
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
115
17
132
$4.1
$1.1
$5.2
0
$0.0
0
$0.0
0.0%
$0.0
0.0%
$0.0
0.0%
impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms participate in more than one industry.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
9998
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
2 Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique small firm times change in number of firms.
Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA’s current size standards, not the contracting officer’s size designation.
3 Excludes COVID–19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped accepting applications for
new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Nevertheless, since Federal agencies
are still required to meet the statutory
small business contracting goal of 23
percent, actual impacts on the overall
set-aside activity are likely to be smaller
as agencies are likely to award more setaside contracts to small businesses that
continue to remain small under the
reduced size standards so that they
could meet their small business
contracting goals.
With fewer businesses qualifying as
small, the decreased competition can
also result in higher prices to the
Government for procurements set aside
or reserved for small businesses, but
SBA cannot quantify this impact.
Lowering size standards may cause
current small business contract or
option holders to lose their small
business status, thereby making those
dollars unavailable to count toward the
agencies’ small business procurement
goals. Additionally, impacted small
businesses will be unable to compete for
upcoming options as small businesses.
As shown in Table 10, decreases to
size standards would have a very minor
impact on small businesses applying for
SBA’s 7(a) and 504 loans because a vast
majority of such loans are issued to
businesses that are far below the current
or calculated size standards. For
example, based on the loan data for
fiscal years 2018–2020, SBA estimates
that about one of SBA’s 7(a) and 504
loans with total amounts of $0.2 million
could not be made to those small
businesses that would lose eligibility
under the calculated size standards.
That represents about 0.01 percent
decrease to the loan amount compared
to the baseline. However, the actual
impact on businesses seeking SBA’s
loans could be much less as businesses
losing small business eligibility under
the decreases to industry-based size
standards could still qualify for SBA’s
7(a) and CDC/504 loans under the
tangible net worth and net incomebased alternative size standard.
Businesses losing small business
status would also be impacted in terms
of access to loans through the SBA’s
EIDL program. However, SBA expects
such impact to be minimal as only a
small number of businesses in those
industries received such loans during
fiscal years 2018–2020. Additionally, all
those businesses were below the
calculated size standards. Since this
program is contingent on the occurrence
and severity of a disaster in the future,
SBA cannot make a precise estimate of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
this impact. However, based on the
disaster loan data for fiscal years 2018–
2020, SBA estimates that, under
Alternative Option One, no small
businesses would lose eligibility under
the calculated size standards (see Table
10).
Small businesses becoming other than
small if size standards were decreased
might lose benefits through reduced
fees, less paperwork, and fewer
compliance requirements that are
available to small businesses through
the Federal Government programs, but
SBA has no data to quantify this impact.
However, if agencies determine that
SBA’s size standards do not adequately
serve such purposes, they can establish
a different size standard with an
approval from SBA if they are required
to use SBA’s size standards for their
programs.
Transfer Impacts of Decreases to Size
Standards
If the size standards were decreased
under alternative option one, it may
result in a redistribution of Federal
contracts between small businesses
losing their small business status and
large businesses and between small
businesses losing their small business
status and small businesses remaining
small under the reduced size standards.
However, as under the adopted
increases to size standards, it would
have no impact on the overall economic
activity since the total Federal contract
dollars available for businesses to
compete for will stay the same. While
SBA cannot estimate with certainty the
actual outcome of the gains and losses
among different groups of businesses
from contract redistribution resulting
from decreases to size standards, it can
identify several probable impacts. With
a smaller pool of small businesses under
the decreases to size standards, some
set-aside Federal contracts to be
otherwise awarded to small businesses
may be competed on an unrestricted
basis. As a result, large businesses may
have more Federal contracting
opportunities. However, because
agencies are still required by law to
award 23 percent of Federal dollars to
small businesses, SBA expects the
movement of set-aside contracts to
unrestricted competition to be limited.
For the same reason, small businesses
under the reduced size standards are
likely to obtain more set-aside contracts
due to the reduced competition from
fewer businesses qualifying as small
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
under the decreases to size standards.
With some larger small businesses
losing small business status under the
decreases to size standards, smaller
small businesses would likely become
more competitive in obtaining set-aside
contracts. However, SBA cannot
quantify these impacts.
Net Impact of Alternative Option One
To estimate the net impacts of
Alternative Option One, SBA followed
the same methodology used to evaluate
the impacts increasing size standards
(see Table 9). However, under
Alternative Option One, SBA used the
calculated size standards instead of the
adopted increases to determine the
impacts of changes to current
thresholds. The impact of increases to
size standards were shown in Table 9
(above). Table 10 (above) and Table 11,
Net Impacts of Size Standards Changes
under Alternative Option One, below,
present the impact of the decreases of
size standards and the net impact of
adopting the calculated results under
alternative option one, respectively. Net
impacts are generally obtained by
subtracting impacts of decreases to size
standards in Table 10 from impacts of
increases to size standards in Table 9.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census
(the latest available when the proposed
rule was developed), SBA estimates that
in 349 industries and subindustries
(‘‘exceptions’’) reviewed in this final
rule for which the analytical results
suggested to change size standards,
about 415 firms (see Table 11), would
become other than small under
Alternative Option One. That represents
about 0.2 percent of all firms classified
as small under the current size
standards.
Based on the FPDS–NG data for fiscal
years 2018–2020, SBA estimates that
about 83 unique active firms in Federal
contracting in those industries would
lose their small business status under
alternative option one, most of them
from Sector 31–33. This represents a
decrease of about 0.3 percent of the total
number of small businesses
participating in Federal contracting
under the current size standards. Based
on the same data, SBA estimates that
about $8.6 million of Federal
procurement dollars would become
available to all small firms, including
those gaining small status. This
represents an increase of 0.02 percent
from the baseline. SBA estimates that
the dollars obligated to small businesses
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
will increase despite a reduction in the
total number of small firms because the
contract dollars to newly qualified small
businesses in sectors other than
manufacturing with increases to size
standards is higher than the contract
dollars to small businesses losing small
business status in sectors other than
manufacturing with decreases to size
standards.
Based on the SBA’s loan data for
fiscal years 2018–2020, the total number
of 7(a) and 504 loans may decrease by
about one loan, and the loan amount by
about $0.2 million. This represents a
0.01 percent decrease of the loan
amount relative to the baseline.
Firms’ participation under the SBA’s
EIDL program may be affected as well.
Since the benefit provided through this
9999
program is contingent on the occurrence
and severity of a disaster in the future,
SBA cannot make a meaningful estimate
of this impact. However, based on the
disaster loan program data for fiscal
years 2018–2020, SBA estimates that the
total number of EIDL loans will not be
impacted.
TABLE 11—NET IMPACTS OF SIZE STANDARDS CHANGES UNDER ALTERNATIVE OPTION ONE
Sector 31–33
Number of industries or subindustries (‘‘exceptions’’) with changes to size standards ..............
Total number of small firms under the current size standards in industries with changes to
size standards (2017 Economic Census) 1 ..............................................................................
Additional number of firms qualifying as small under size standards changes (2017 Economic
Census) 1 ..................................................................................................................................
% of additional firms qualifying as small relative to total current small firms (2017 Economic
Census) 1 ..................................................................................................................................
Number of current unique small firms getting small business contracts in industries with
changes to size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .........................................................
Additional number of unique small firms gaining small business status in industries with
changes to size standards (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) 2 .......................................................
% increase to small firms relative to current unique small firms gaining small business status
(FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .....................................................................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current size standards in industries with changes
to size standards ($ million) (FPDS–NG FY 2018–2020) .......................................................
Estimated small business dollars available to newly-qualified small firms ($ million) FPDS–
NG FY 2018–2020) ..................................................................................................................
% increase to dollars relative to total small business contract dollars under current size
standards ..................................................................................................................................
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses (FY 2018–2020) ...............................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses (FY 2018–2020) ...............................
Estimated number of additional 7(a) and 504 loans available to newly-qualified small firms ....
Estimated additional 7(a) and 504 loan amount to newly-qualified small firms ($ million) .........
% increase to 7(a)and 504 loan amount relative to the total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to
small businesses ......................................................................................................................
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses (FY 2018–2020) 4 ..........................................
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses (FY 2018–2020) 4 ..........................................
Estimated number of additional EIDL loans to newly qualified small firms 4 ..............................
Estimated additional EIDL loan amount to newly qualified small firms ($ million) 4 ...................
% increase to EIDL loan amount relative to the total amount of disaster loans to small businesses 4 ....................................................................................................................................
1 These
Other sectors
Total
299
50
349
229,933
48,322
278,255
¥375
¥40
¥415
¥0.2%
¥0.1%
¥0.2%
26,771
6,295
32,164
¥59
¥29
¥83
¥0.2%
¥0.5%
¥0.3%
$24,942
$13,962
$38,904
¥$52.6
$61.20
$8.6
¥0.2%
3,995
$2,603
¥1
¥$0.2
0.4%
368
$177
0
$0.0
0.02%
4,363
$2,780
¥1
¥$0.2
0.0%
180
$7.0
0
$0.0
0.0%
$27.0
$1.7
$0.0
$0.0
0.0%
207
$8.7
0
$0.0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ‘‘exceptions’’ for which Economic Census data is not avail-
able.
2 Total impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms participate in more than one industry.
3 Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique firm times change in number of firms. Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA’s current size standards, not the contracting officer’s size designation.
4 Excludes COVID–19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped accepting applications for
new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Alternative Option Two: Retaining All
Current Size Standards
Under this option, given the current
COVID–19 pandemic, as discussed
elsewhere, SBA considered retaining the
current levels of all size standards even
though the analytical results suggested
changing them. Under this option, as
the current situation develops, SBA will
be able to assess new data available on
economic indicators, Federal
procurement, and SBA loans as well.
When compared to the baseline, there is
a net impact of zero (i.e., zero benefit
and zero cost) for retaining all size
standards. However, this option would
cause otherwise qualified small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
businesses to forgo various small
business benefits (e.g., access to setaside contracts and capital) that become
available to them under the option of
increasing 144 and retaining 268 size
standards adopted under this final rule.
Moreover, retaining all size standards
under Alternative Option Two would
also be contrary to the SBA’s statutory
mandate to review and adjust, every five
years, all size standards to reflect
current industry and Federal market
conditions. Retaining all size standards
without required periodic adjustments
would increasingly exclude otherwise
eligible small firms from small business
benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801–
808
Subtitle E of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 801–808), also
known as the Congressional Review Act
or CRA, generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. SBA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
10000
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
States. A major rule under the CRA
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
The OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
According to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612,
when an agency issues a rulemaking, it
must prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis to address the impact of the
rule on small entities. This final rule
may have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small businesses
in the industries covered by this final
rule. As described above, this final rule
may affect small businesses seeking
Federal contracts, loans under SBA’s
7(a), 504, and EIDL programs, and
assistance under other Federal small
business programs.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a
final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) of this final rule addressing the
following questions: (1) What is the
need for and objective of the rule?; (2)
What are significant issues raised by the
public comments in response to the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
assessment of the agency of such issues,
and any changes made in the proposed
rule as a result of such comments?; (3)
What’s the agency’s response to any
comments filed by the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration in response to the
proposed rule and description of any
change made to the proposed rule in the
final rule as a result of the comments?;
(4) What is SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will
apply?; (5) What are the projected
reporting, record keeping, and other
compliance requirements of the rule?;
(6) What are the relevant Federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with the rule; and (7) What alternatives
will allow SBA to accomplish its
regulatory objectives while minimizing
the impact on small businesses?
1. What is the need for and objective
of the rule?
Changes in industry structure,
technological changes, productivity
growth, mergers and acquisitions, and
updated industry definitions have
changed the structure of many
industries covered by this final rule.
Such changes can be enough to support
revisions to current size standards for
some industries. Based on the analysis
of the latest data available, SBA believes
that the size standards adopted in this
final rule more appropriately reflect the
size of businesses that need Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
assistance. The 2010 Jobs Act also
requires SBA to review all size
standards and make necessary
adjustments to reflect market
conditions.
2. What are significant issues raised
by the public comments in response to
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
assessment of the agency of such issues,
and any changes made in the proposed
rule as a result of such comments?
SBA did not receive any public
comments to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis it provided in the
April 26, 2022, proposed rule.
3. What’s the agency’s response to any
comments filed by the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration in response to the
proposed rule and description of any
change made to the proposed rule in the
final rule as a result of the comments?
SBA did not receive any comments
from the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration in
response to the April 26, 2022, proposed
rule.
4. What is SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?
Based on data from the 2017
Economic Census, SBA estimates that
there are nearly 71,318 small firms
covered under this rulemaking in
industries with changes to size
standards. Under this final rule, SBA
estimates that nearly 242 additional
businesses will become small.
5. What are the projected reporting,
record keeping and other compliance
requirements of the rule?
The size standard changes in this final
rule impose no additional reporting or
record keeping requirements on small
businesses. However, qualifying for
Federal procurement and a number of
other programs requires that businesses
register in SAM and self-certify that
they are small at least once annually
(Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
52.204–13). For existing contracts, small
business contractors are required to
update their SAM registration as
necessary to ensure that they reflect the
contractor’s current status (FAR 52.219–
28). Businesses are also required to
verify that their SAM registration is
current, accurate, and complete with the
submission of an offer for every new
contract (FAR 52.204–7 and 52.204–8).
Therefore, businesses opting to
participate in those programs must
comply with SAM requirements. There
are no new costs associated with SAM
registration or annal re-certification.
Changing size standards alters the
access to SBA’s programs that assist
small businesses but does not impose a
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
regulatory burden because they neither
regulate nor control business behavior.
6. What are the relevant Federal rules,
which may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the rule?
Under section 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)(c),
Federal agencies must use SBA’s size
standards to define a small business,
unless specifically authorized by statute
to do otherwise. In 1995, SBA published
in the Federal Register a list of statutory
and regulatory size standards that
identified the application of SBA’s size
standards as well as other size standards
used by Federal agencies (60 FR 57988
(November 24, 1995)). SBA is not aware
of any Federal rule that would duplicate
or conflict with establishing size
standards.
However, the Small Business Act and
SBA’s regulations allow Federal
agencies to establish different size
standards if they believe that SBA’s size
standards are not appropriate for their
programs, with the approval of SBA’s
Administrator (13 CFR 121.903). The
Regulatory Flexibility Act authorizes an
Agency to establish an alternative small
business definition, after consultation
with the Office of Advocacy of the U.S.
Small Business Administration (5 U.S.C.
601(3)).
7. What alternatives will allow SBA to
accomplish its regulatory objectives
while minimizing the impact on small
entities?
By law, SBA is required to develop
numerical size standards for
establishing eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs. Other
than varying size standards by industry
and changing the size measures, no
practical alternative exists to the
systems of numerical size standards.
However, SBA considered two
alternatives to increasing 144 and
maintaining 268 size standards at their
current levels. The first alternative SBA
considered was adopting size standards
based solely on the analytical results,
including the results from the
evaluation of dominance and field of
operation. In other words, the size
standards of 144 industries for which
the analytical results suggest raising size
standards would be raised. However,
the size standards of 204 industries for
which the analytical results suggest
lowering size standards would be
lowered. This would cause a significant
number of small businesses to lose their
small business status, particularly in
Sector 31–33 (see Table 10). Under the
second alternative, in view of the
COVID–19 pandemic, SBA considered
retaining all size standards at the
current levels, even though the
analytical results may suggest increasing
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
144 and decreasing 204 size standards.
SBA believes retaining all size standards
at their current levels would be more
onerous for small businesses than the
option of increasing 144 and retaining
268 size standards. Postponing the
adoption of the higher calculated size
standards would be detrimental for
otherwise small businesses in terms of
access to various small business
benefits, including access to set-aside
contracts and capital through SBA
contracting and financial programs, and
exemptions from paperwork and other
compliance requirements.
Executive Order 13563
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes
the importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. A description of the need for
this regulatory action and benefits and
costs associated with this action,
including possible distributional
impacts that relate to Executive Order
13563, is included above in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis under
Executive Order 12866. Additionally,
Executive Order 13563, section 6, calls
for retrospective analyses of existing
rules.
The review of size standards in the
industries covered by this final rule is
consistent with section 6 of Executive
Order 13563 and the 2010 Jobs Act
which requires SBA to review every five
years all size standards and make
necessary adjustments to reflect market
conditions. Specifically, the 2010 Jobs
Act requires SBA to review at least onethird of all size standards during every
18-month period from the date of its
enactment (September 27, 2010) and to
review all size standards not less
frequently than once every five years,
thereafter. In accordance with the Jobs
Act, in early 2016, SBA completed the
first five-year review of the small
business size standard for each industry,
except those for agricultural enterprises
previously set by Congress, and made
appropriate adjustments to size
standards for a number of industries to
reflect current Federal and industry
market conditions.
SBA issued a revised white paper
entitled ‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’
and published a notice in the April 27,
2018, edition of the Federal Register (83
FR 18468) to advise the public that the
document is available for public review
and comments. The ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ white paper explains
how SBA establishes, reviews, and
modifies its receipts-based and
employee-based small business size
standards. SBA considered all input,
suggestions, recommendations, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
relevant information obtained from
industry groups, individual businesses,
and federal agencies before finalizing
and adopting the revised Methodology.
For a summary of comments received
and SBA’s responses, see the notice
published in the Federal Register on
April 11, 2019 (84 FR 14587). As part
of the second five-year review of size
standards under the Jobs Act, SBA has
already issued five final rules reviewing
all monetary-based size standards and
all employee-based size standards that
are part of the Wholesale Trade and
Retail Trade sectors (see Footnote 1,
above). This final rule is reviewing size
standards under Sector 31–33 and other
sectors with employee-based size
standards not part of Wholesale and
Retail Trade sectors completes SBA’s
second five-year review of size
standards under the Jobs Act. SBA
considered all input, suggestions,
recommendations, and relevant
information obtained from industry
groups, individual businesses, and
federal agencies in developing size
standards for those industries covered
by this final rule. As required by the
Jobs Act, SBA held two virtual public
forums on size standards on June 14 and
June 16, 2022, to update the public on
the second five-year review of size
standards and to consider public
testimony on proposed size standards in
the April 26, 2022, proposed rule. SBA
received a total of 49 comments
(including seven comments received
during the public forums on size
standards) to the proposed rule. In the
Discussion of Comments section of this
final rule, SBA summarizes and
provides responses to the comments
received on the proposed rule.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order
13132, SBA has determined that this
final rule will not have substantial,
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, SBA
has determined that this final rule has
no federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
10001
Paperwork Reduction Act
For the purpose of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35, SBA
has determined that this rule will not
impose any new reporting or record
keeping requirements.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government procurement,
Government property, Grant programs—
business, Individuals with disabilities,
Loan programs—business, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part 121
as follows:
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6),
636(a)(36), 662, and 694a(9); Pub. L. 116–136,
Section 1114.
2. In § 121.201, amend the table
‘‘Small Business Size Standards by
NAICS Industry’’ by revising entries
’’212210,’’ ‘‘212230,’’ ‘‘212290,’’
‘‘212313,’’ ‘‘212319,’’ ‘‘212322,’’
‘‘212323,’’ ‘‘212390,’’ entries ‘‘221111’’
through ‘‘221115,’’ ‘‘221117,’’ ‘‘221118,’’
‘‘221121,’’ ‘‘221122,’’ ‘‘221210,’’
‘‘311111,’’ ‘‘311119,’’ ‘‘311211,’’
‘‘311212,’’ ‘‘311221,’’ ‘‘311224,’’
‘‘311225,’’ ‘‘311230,’’ ‘‘311313,’’
‘‘311314,’’ ‘‘311411,’’ ‘‘311422,’’
‘‘311511,’’ ‘‘311514,’’ ‘‘311611,’’
‘‘311824,’’ ‘‘311920,’’ ‘‘311930,’’
‘‘311941,’’ ‘‘311942,’’ ‘‘311991,’’
‘‘311999,’’ ‘‘312111,’’ ‘‘312112,’’
‘‘312140,’’ ‘‘313220,’’ ‘‘313230,’’
‘‘314999,’’ ‘‘315120,’’ ‘‘315990,’’
‘‘316110,’’ ‘‘321113,’’ ‘‘321114,’’
‘‘321211,’’ ‘‘322110,’’ ‘‘323111,’’
‘‘323120,’’ ‘‘324122,’’ ‘‘324191,’’
‘‘324199,’’ ‘‘325110,’’ ‘‘325120,’’
‘‘325130,’’ ‘‘325220,’’ ‘‘325311,’’
‘‘325312,’’ ‘‘325314,’’ ‘‘325315,’’
‘‘325320,’’ ‘‘325412,’’ ‘‘325520,’’ entries
‘‘325611’’ through ‘‘325613,’’ ‘‘325910,’’
‘‘325991,’’ ‘‘325998,’’ ‘‘326121,’’
‘‘326130,’’ ‘‘326220,’’ ‘‘326299,’’
‘‘327211,’’ ‘‘327410,’’ ‘‘327910,’’
‘‘327992,’’ ‘‘327999,’’ ‘‘331313,’’
‘‘331315,’’ ‘‘331420,’’ ‘‘331491,’’
‘‘331492,’’ ‘‘331512,’’ ‘‘331513,’’
‘‘331523,’’ ‘‘331524,’’ ‘‘332112,’’
‘‘332114,’’ ‘‘332117,’’ ‘‘332215,’’
‘‘332439,’’ ‘‘332613,’’ ‘‘332722,’’
‘‘332812,’’ ‘‘332992,’’ ‘‘332996,’’
‘‘333131,’’ ‘‘333243,’’ ‘‘333924,’’
‘‘333991,’’ ‘‘333993,’’ ‘‘333995,’’
‘‘333998,’’ ‘‘334290,’’ ‘‘334416,’’
‘‘334511,’’ ‘‘334512,’’ ‘‘334514,’’
‘‘334517,’’ ‘‘334519,’’ ‘‘335132,’’
■
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
10002
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘335311,’’ ‘‘335931,’’ ‘‘335991,’’
‘‘335999,’’ ‘‘336310,’’ ‘‘336414,’’
‘‘336419,’’ ‘‘336611,’’ ‘‘336991,’’
‘‘337126,’’ ‘‘337214,’’ ‘‘339113,’’
‘‘339910,’’ ‘‘339930,’’ ‘‘339991,’’
‘‘339994,’’ ‘‘339999,’’ ‘‘483111,’’
‘‘483113,’’ ‘‘483114,’’ ‘‘483211,’’
‘‘483212,’’ ‘‘512230,’’ ‘‘512250,’’
‘‘541715,’’ and ‘‘562910 (Exception)’’ to
read as follows:
§ 121.201 What size standards has SBA
identified by North American Industry
Classification System codes?
*
*
*
*
*
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY
NAICS code
*
Size standards in
millions of dollars
NAICS U.S. industry title
*
*
*
*
Size standards in
number of
employees
*
*
*
*
Sector 21—Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
*
*
*
*
*
Subsector 212—Mining (except Oil and Gas)
*
212210 ...................
*
*
*
*
Iron Ore Mining ...........................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
212230 ...................
*
*
*
*
Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc Mining ......................................................................
*
............................
*
*
212290 ...................
*
*
*
*
Other Metal Ore Mining ..............................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
212313 ...................
212319 ...................
*
*
*
*
Crushed and Broken Granite Mining and Quarrying ..................................................
Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying ..........................................
*
............................
............................
*
*
212322 ...................
*
*
*
*
Industrial Sand Mining ................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
212323 ...................
*
*
*
*
Kaolin, Clay, and Ceramic and Refractory Minerals Mining .......................................
*
............................
*
*
212390 ...................
*
*
*
*
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying ......................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,400
1,400
1,250
850
550
750
650
600
*
Sector 22—Utilities
Subsector 221—Utilities
221111
221112
221113
221114
221115
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
Hydroelectric Power Generation .................................................................................
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation .......................................................................
Nuclear Electric Power Generation .............................................................................
Solar Electric Power Generation .................................................................................
Wind Electric Power Generation .................................................................................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
221117
221118
221121
221122
221210
*
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
*
*
*
*
Biomass Electric Power Generation ...........................................................................
Other Electric Power Generation ................................................................................
Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control ..........................................................
Electric Power Distribution ..........................................................................................
Natural Gas Distribution ..............................................................................................
*
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
750
950
1,150
500
1,150
*
550
650
950
1,100
1,150
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Sector 31–33—Manufacturing
Subsector 311—Food Manufacturing
311111
311119
311211
311212
...................
...................
...................
...................
Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Other Animal Food Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Flour Milling .................................................................................................................
Rice Milling ..................................................................................................................
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
311221 ...................
*
*
*
*
Wet Corn Milling and Starch Manufacturing ...............................................................
*
............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
1,250
650
1,050
750
*
1,300
10003
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards in
millions of dollars
Size standards in
number of
employees
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
Soybean and Other Oilseed Processing ....................................................................
Fats and Oils Refining and Blending ..........................................................................
Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing .................................................................................
Beet Sugar Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
Cane Sugar Manufacturing .........................................................................................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
1,250
1,100
1,300
1,150
1,050
*
311411 ...................
*
*
*
*
Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing .....................................................
*
............................
*
*
311422 ...................
*
*
*
*
Specialty Canning .......................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
311511 ...................
*
*
*
*
Fluid Milk Manufacturing .............................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
311514 ...................
*
*
*
*
Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Product Manufacturing ...............................
*
............................
*
*
311611 ...................
*
*
*
*
Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering .........................................................................
*
............................
*
*
311824 ...................
*
*
*
*
Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes Manufacturing from Purchased Flour ...............
*
............................
*
*
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
*
*
*
*
Coffee and Tea Manufacturing ...................................................................................
Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing .......................................................
Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing ...........................
Spice and Extract Manufacturing ................................................................................
Perishable Prepared Food Manufacturing ..................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing .............................................................
*
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
NAICS code
311224
311225
311230
311313
311314
311920
311930
311941
311942
311991
311999
1,100
1,400
1,150
1,000
1,150
850
1,000
1,100
850
650
700
700
Subsector 312—Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
312111 ...................
312112 ...................
Soft Drink Manufacturing ............................................................................................
Bottled Water Manufacturing ......................................................................................
............................
............................
*
312140 ...................
*
*
*
*
Distilleries ....................................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,400
1,100
*
1,100
*
Subsector 313—Textile Mills
*
313220 ...................
313230 ...................
*
*
*
*
*
Narrow Fabric Mills and Schiffli Machine Embroidery ................................................
Nonwoven Fabric Mills ................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
............................
............................
*
*
*
550
850
*
Subsector 314—Textile Product Mills
*
314999 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills ............................................................
*
............................
*
550
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Subsector 315—Apparel Manufacturing
*
315120 ...................
*
*
*
*
Apparel Knitting Mills ..................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
315990 ...................
*
*
*
*
Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing ............................................
*
............................
*
850
600
Subsector 316—Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing
316110 ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing ...................................................................
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
............................
15FER2
800
10004
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS code
*
Size standards in
millions of dollars
NAICS U.S. industry title
*
*
*
*
*
Size standards in
number of
employees
*
Subsector 321—Wood Product Manufacturing
321113 ...................
321114 ...................
321211 ...................
*
Sawmills ......................................................................................................................
Wood Preservation ......................................................................................................
Hardwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing .........................................................
*
*
*
............................
............................
............................
*
*
550
550
600
*
Subsector 322—Paper Manufacturing
322110 ...................
*
Pulp Mills .....................................................................................................................
*
*
*
............................
*
*
1,050
*
Subsector 323—Printing and Related Support Activities
323111 ...................
Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) .......................................................
............................
650
*
323120 ...................
*
*
*
*
Support Activities for Printing ......................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
............................
............................
............................
*
550
Subsector 324—Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing
*
324122 ...................
324191 ...................
324199 ...................
*
*
*
*
Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing ...............................................
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing ...............................................
All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing .............................................
1,100
900
950
Subsector 325—Chemical Manufacturing
325110 ...................
325120 ...................
325130 ...................
Petrochemical Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Industrial Gas Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Synthetic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing ................................................................
............................
............................
............................
*
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
*
*
*
*
Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing .....................................
Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing ............................................................................
Fertilizer (Mixing Only) Manufacturing ........................................................................
Compost Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing .........................................
*
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
*
325412 ...................
*
*
*
*
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing ................................................................
*
............................
*
*
...................
...................
...................
...................
*
*
*
*
Adhesive Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing ..................................................................
Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing ......................................................
Surface Active Agent Manufacturing ..........................................................................
*
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
*
325910 ...................
*
*
*
*
Printing Ink Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
325991 ...................
*
*
*
*
Custom Compounding of Purchased Resins ..............................................................
*
............................
*
*
325998 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing .............
*
............................
*
325220
325311
325312
325314
325315
325320
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
325520
325611
325612
325613
1,300
1,200
1,050
1,050
1,050
1,350
550
550
1,150
1,300
550
1,100
900
1,100
750
600
650
Subsector 326—Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
*
326121 ...................
*
*
*
*
Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape Manufacturing ....................................................
*
............................
*
*
326130 ...................
*
*
*
*
Laminated Plastics Plate, Sheet (except Packaging), and Shape Manufacturing .....
*
............................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
600
650
10005
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
Size standards in
number of
employees
NAICS code
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards in
millions of dollars
*
326220 ...................
*
*
*
*
Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing .............................................
*
............................
*
*
326299 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing ....................................................................
*
............................
*
800
650
Subsector 327—Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
*
327211 ...................
*
*
*
*
Flat Glass Manufacturing ............................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
327410 ...................
*
*
*
*
Lime Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
327910 ...................
*
*
*
*
Abrasive Product Manufacturing .................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
327992 ...................
*
*
*
*
Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth Manufacturing ................................................
*
............................
*
*
327999 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing ........................
*
............................
*
1,100
1,050
900
600
750
Subsector 331—Primary Metal Manufacturing
*
331313 ...................
*
*
*
*
Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum Production .................................................
*
............................
*
*
331315 ...................
*
*
*
*
Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing ........................................................
*
............................
*
*
331420 ...................
331491 ...................
331492 ...................
*
*
*
*
Copper Rolling, Drawing, Extruding, and Alloying ......................................................
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding
Secondary Smelting, Refining, and Alloying of Nonferrous Metal (except Copper
and Aluminum).
*
............................
............................
............................
*
*
...................
...................
...................
...................
*
*
*
*
Steel Investment Foundries ........................................................................................
Steel Foundries (except Investment) ..........................................................................
Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries ...................................................................
Aluminum Foundries (except Die-Casting) .................................................................
*
............................
............................
............................
............................
*
331512
331513
331523
331524
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,300
1,400
1,050
900
850
1,050
700
700
550
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Subsector 332—Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
*
332112 ...................
332114 ...................
332117 ...................
*
*
*
*
Nonferrous Forging .....................................................................................................
Custom Roll Forming ..................................................................................................
Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing .......................................................................
*
............................
............................
............................
*
*
332215 ...................
*
*
*
*
Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing.
*
............................
*
*
332439 ...................
*
*
*
*
Other Metal Container Manufacturing .........................................................................
*
............................
*
*
332613 ...................
*
*
*
*
Spring Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
332722 ...................
*
*
*
*
Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer Manufacturing ..................................................
*
............................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
950
600
550
1,000
600
600
600
10006
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
Size standards in
number of
employees
NAICS code
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards in
millions of dollars
*
332812 ...................
*
*
*
*
Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to
Manufacturers.
*
............................
*
*
332992 ...................
*
*
*
*
Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing ......................................................................
*
............................
*
*
332996 ...................
*
*
*
*
Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ........................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subsector 333—Machinery
*
600
1,300
550
*
Manufacturing (6)
*
333131 ...................
*
*
*
*
Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ......................................................
*
............................
*
*
333243 ...................
*
*
*
*
Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery Manufacturing ...................................
*
............................
*
*
333924 ...................
333991 ...................
*
*
*
*
Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing ..................
Power-Driven Hand Tool Manufacturing .....................................................................
*
............................
............................
*
*
333993 ...................
*
*
*
*
Packaging Machinery Manufacturing ..........................................................................
*
............................
*
*
333995 ...................
*
*
*
*
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing .....................................................
*
............................
*
*
333998 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing ........................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
900
550
900
950
600
800
700
*
Subsector 334—Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing (6)
*
334290 ...................
*
*
*
*
Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing .....................................................
*
............................
*
*
334416 ...................
*
*
*
*
Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, Transformer, and Other Inductor Manufacturing ...............
*
............................
*
*
334511 ...................
*
*
*
*
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and
Instrument Manufacturing.
Automatic Environmental Control Manufacturing for Residential, Commercial, and
Appliance Use.
*
............................
*
*
334514 ...................
*
*
*
*
Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting Device Manufacturing .......................................
*
............................
*
*
334517 ...................
334519 ...................
*
*
*
*
Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing ............................................
*
............................
............................
*
334512 ...................
*
*
*
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
550
1,350
............................
*
Subsector 335—Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component
800
*
650
850
1,200
600
*
Manufacturing (6)
*
335132 ...................
*
*
*
*
Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing ......
*
............................
*
*
335311 ...................
*
*
*
*
Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing .................................
*
............................
*
*
335931 ...................
*
*
*
*
Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing ..........................................................
*
............................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
600
800
600
10007
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
Size standards in
number of
employees
NAICS code
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards in
millions of dollars
*
335991 ...................
335999 ...................
*
*
*
*
Carbon and Graphite Product Manufacturing .............................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing .........
*
............................
............................
*
900
600
Subsector 336—Transportation Equipment Manufacturing (6)
*
336310 ...................
*
*
*
*
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing .............................
*
............................
*
*
336414 ...................
*
*
*
*
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing .....................................................
*
............................
*
*
336419 ...................
*
*
*
*
Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing.
*
............................
*
*
336611 ...................
*
*
*
*
Ship Building and Repairing .......................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
336991 ...................
*
*
*
*
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing ............................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,050
1,300
1,050
1,300
1,050
*
Subsector 337—Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
*
337126 ...................
*
*
*
*
Household Furniture (except Wood and Upholstered) Manufacturing .......................
*
............................
*
*
337214 ...................
*
*
*
*
Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing ...........................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
950
1,100
*
Subsector 339—Miscellaneous Manufacturing
*
339113 ...................
*
*
*
*
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing ........................................................
*
............................
*
*
339910 ...................
*
*
*
*
Jewelry and Silverware Manufacturing .......................................................................
*
............................
*
*
339930 ...................
*
*
*
*
Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing ...........................................................................
*
............................
*
*
339991 ...................
*
*
*
*
Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing ................................................
*
............................
*
*
339994 ...................
*
*
*
*
Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing ......................................................................
*
............................
*
*
339999 ...................
*
*
*
*
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing ......................................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
800
700
700
600
750
550
*
*
*
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
Sector 48–49—Transportation and Warehousing
*
*
*
*
*
Subsector 483—Water Transportation
483111 ...................
Deep Sea Freight Transportation ...............................................................................
............................
*
483113 ...................
*
*
*
*
Coastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation .......................................................
*
............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
1,050
*
800
10008
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS code
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards in
millions of dollars
Size standards in
number of
employees
483114 ...................
483211 ...................
483212 ...................
Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger Transportation .................................................
Inland Water Freight Transportation ...........................................................................
Inland Water Passenger Transportation .....................................................................
............................
............................
............................
550
1,050
550
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sector 51—Information
*
*
*
*
Subsector 512—Motion Picture and Sound Recording Industries
*
512230 ...................
*
*
*
*
Music Publishers .........................................................................................................
*
............................
*
*
512250 ...................
*
*
*
*
Record Production and Distribution ............................................................................
*
............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
900
900
*
Sector 54—Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
Subsector 541—Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
*
541715 ...................
541715 (Exception
1).
541715 (Exception
2).
541715 (Exception
3).
*
*
*
*
*
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology) 11.
Aircraft, Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts 11 ..............................................................
*
............................
............................
11 1,500
Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment 11 .........................................................
............................
11 1,250
Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles, Their Propulsion Units and Propulsion
Parts 11.
............................
11 1,300
*
*
*
*
*
*
11 1,000
*
Sector 56—Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subsector 562—Waste Management and Remediation Services
*
562910 (Exception)
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
Environmental Remediation Services 14 .....................................................................
*
*
*
*
............................
*
*
*
14 1,000
*
Footnotes
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6 NAICS Subsectors 333, 334, 335 and 336—For rebuilding machinery or equipment on a factory basis, or equivalent, use the NAICS code for
a newly manufactured product. Concerns performing major rebuilding or overhaul activities do not necessarily have to meet the criteria for being
a ‘‘manufacturer’’ although the activities may be classified under a manufacturing NAICS code. Ordinary repair services or preservation are not
considered rebuilding.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
11 NAICS code 541713, 541714, and 541715—
(a) ‘‘Research and Development’’ means laboratory or other physical research and development. It does not include economic, educational, engineering, operations, systems, or other nonphysical research; or computer programming, data processing, commercial and/or medical laboratory
testing.
(b) For research and development contracts requiring the delivery of a manufactured product, the appropriate size standard is that of the manufacturing industry.
(c) For purposes of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Transfer Technology (STTR) programs, the term ‘‘research’’ or ‘‘research and development’’ means any activity which is (A) a systematic, intensive study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the subject studied; (B) a systematic study directed specifically toward applying new knowledge to meet a recognized need; or (C)
a systematic application of knowledge toward the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet specific requirements. See 15 U.S.C. 638(e)(5) and section 3 of the SBIR and
STTR policy directives available at www.sbir.gov. For size eligibility requirements for the SBIR and STTR programs, see § 121.702 of this part.
(d) ‘‘Research and Development’’ for guided missiles and space vehicles includes evaluations and simulation, and other services requiring thorough knowledge of complete missiles and spacecraft.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
14 NAICS
10009
562910—Environmental Remediation Services:
(a) For SBA assistance as a small business concern in the industry of Environmental Remediation Services, other than for Government procurement, a concern must be engaged primarily in furnishing a range of services for the remediation of a contaminated environment to an acceptable condition including, but not limited to, preliminary assessment, site inspection, testing, remedial investigation, feasibility studies, remedial
design, containment, remedial action, removal of contaminated materials, storage of contaminated materials and security and site closeouts. If
one of such activities accounts for 50 percent or more of a concern’s total revenues, employees, or other related factors, the concern’s primary
industry is that of the particular industry and not the Environmental Remediation Services Industry.
(b) For purposes of classifying a Government procurement as Environmental Remediation Services, the general purpose of the procurement
must be to restore or directly support the restoration of a contaminated environment (such as, preliminary assessment, site inspection, testing,
remedial investigation, feasibility studies, remedial design, remediation services, containment, removal of contaminated materials, storage of contaminated materials or security and site closeouts), although the general purpose of the procurement need not necessarily include remedial actions. Also, the procurement must be composed of activities in three or more separate industries with separate NAICS codes or, in some instances (e.g., engineering), smaller sub-components of NAICS codes with separate, distinct size standards. These activities may include, but are
not limited to, separate activities in industries such as: Heavy Construction; Specialty Trade Contractors; Engineering Services; Architectural
Services; Management Consulting Services; Hazardous and Other Waste Collection; Remediation Services, Testing Laboratories; and Research
and Development in the Physical, Engineering and Life Sciences. If any activity in the procurement can be identified with a separate NAICS
code, or component of a code with a separate distinct size standard, and that industry accounts for 50 percent or more of the value of the entire
procurement, then the proper size standard is the one for that particular industry, and not the Environmental Remediation Service size standard.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–02780 Filed 2–14–23; 8:45 am]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES2
BILLING CODE 8026–09–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:38 Feb 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\15FER2.SGM
15FER2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9970-10009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02780]
[[Page 9969]]
Vol. 88
Wednesday,
No. 31
February 15, 2023
Part II
Small Business Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
13 CFR Part 121
Small Business Size Standards: Manufacturing and Industries With
Employee-Based Size Standards in Other Sectors Except Wholesale Trade
and Retail Trade; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 9970]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245-AH09
Small Business Size Standards: Manufacturing and Industries With
Employee-Based Size Standards in Other Sectors Except Wholesale Trade
and Retail Trade
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or the Agency) is
increasing its employee-based small business size definitions (commonly
referred to as ``size standards'') for North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) sectors related to Mining, Quarrying, and
Oil and Gas Extraction (Sector 21); Utilities (Sector 22);
Manufacturing (Sector 31-33); Transportation and Warehousing (Sector
48-49); Information (Section 51); Finance and Insurance (Sector 52);
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services (Sector 54); and
Administrative and Support, Waste Management and Remediation Services
(Sector 56). Specifically, in terms of industries defined under the
NAICS 2022 revision, SBA is increasing 144 and retaining 268 employee-
based size standards in those sectors. SBA is also retaining the
current 500-employee size standard for Federal procurement of supplies
under the nonmanufacturer rule.
DATES: This rule is effective March 17, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Castilla, Economist, Office of
Size Standards, (202) 205-6618 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Size Standards
To determine eligibility for Federal small business assistance, SBA
establishes small business size definitions (usually referred to as
``size standards'') for private sector industries in the United States.
SBA uses two primary measures of business size for size standards
purposes: average annual receipts and average number of employees. SBA
uses financial assets for certain financial industries and refining
capacity, in addition to employees, for the petroleum refining industry
to measure business size. In addition, SBA's Small Business Investment
Company (SBIC), Certified Development Company (CDC/504), and 7(a) Loan
Programs use either the industry-based size standards or tangible net
worth and net income-based alternative size standards to determine
eligibility for those programs.
In September 2010, Congress passed the Small Business Jobs Act of
2010 (Pub. L. 111-240, 124 Stat. 2504, September 27, 2010) (``Jobs
Act''), requiring SBA to review all size standards every five years and
make necessary adjustments to reflect current industry and market
conditions. In accordance with the Jobs Act, in early 2016, SBA
completed the first five-year review of all size standards--except
those for agricultural enterprises for which size standards were
previously set by Congress--and made appropriate adjustments to size
standards for a number of industries to reflect current industry and
Federal market conditions. SBA also adjusts its monetary-based size
standards for inflation at least once every five years. An interim
final rule on SBA's latest inflation adjustment to size standards,
effective December 19, 2022, was published in the Federal Register on
November 17, 2022 (87 FR 69118). SBA also updates its size standards
every five years to adopt the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
quinquennial North American Industry Classification (NAICS) revisions
to its table of small business size standards. On December 21, 2021,
OMB published its ``Notice of NAICS 2022 Final Decisions . . .'' (86 FR
72277), accepting the Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC)
recommendations, as outlined in the July 2, 2021, Federal Register
notice (86 FR 35350), for ``the 2022 Revision to the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS), . . . .'' On July 5, 2022, SBA
issued a proposed rule to adopt the OMB's NAICS 2022 revisions for its
table of size standards (87 FR 40034), which SBA finalized in September
2022 with an effective date of October 1, 2022 (87 FR 59240; September
29, 2022).
This final rule is part of a series of final rules that revised
size standards of industries grouped by various NAICS sectors. Rather
than revise all size standards at one time, SBA is revising size
standards by grouping industries within various NAICS sectors that use
the same size measure (i.e., employees or receipts). In the prior
review, SBA revised size standards mostly on a sector-by-sector basis.
As part of the second five-year review of size standards under the Jobs
Act, SBA has already issued five final rules reviewing all monetary-
based size standards and all employee-based size standards that are
part of the Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade sectors.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Small Business Size Standards: Agriculture, Forestry,
Fishing and Hunting; Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction;
Utilities; Construction (87 FR 18607; March 31, 2022), Small
Business Size Standards: Transportation and Warehousing;
Information; Finance and Insurance; Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing (87 FR 18627; March 31, 2022), Small Business Size
Standards: Professional, Scientific and Technical Services;
Management of Companies and Enterprises; Administrative and Support
and Waste Management and Remediation Services (87 FR 18665; March
31, 2022), Small Business Size Standards: Education Services; Health
Care and Social Assistance; Arts, Entertainment and Recreation;
Accommodation and Food Services; Other Services (87 FR 18646; March
31, 2022), and Small Business Size Standards: Wholesale Trade and
Retail Trade (87 FR 35869; June 14, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To complete its second five-year review of size standards, SBA
reviewed size standards under Sector 31-33 and other sectors with
employee-based size standards not part of Wholesale and Retail Trade
sectors to determine whether the existing size standards should be
retained or revised based on the current industry and Federal market
data. After its review, SBA published in the April 26, 2022, issue of
the Federal Register (87 FR 24752) a proposed rule (``April 2022
proposed rule'') to increase the employee-based size standards for 150
industries or subindustries (or ``exceptions'') under NAICS 2017,
including 10 industries in NAICS Sector 21 (Mining, Quarrying, and Oil
and Gas Extraction), 10 industries in NAICS Sector 22 (Utilities), 120
industries in NAICS sector 31-33 (Manufacturing), five industries in
Sector 48-49 (Transportation and Warehousing), three industries in
Sector 51 (Information), one subindustry (``exception'') in Sector 54
(Professional, Scientific and Technical Services), and one subindustry
(``exception'') in Sector 56 (Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation Services). SBA also proposed to retain the
500-employee size standard under its nonmanufacturer rule.
In this final rule, SBA is adopting the proposed size standards
from the April 2022 proposed rule without change and applying the
adopted changes to the recently adopted NAICS 2022 structure following
the methodology outlined in the NAICS 2022 adoption final rule.
In conjunction with the current, second five-year comprehensive
size standards review, SBA developed a revised ``Size Standards
Methodology'' (Methodology) for developing, reviewing, and modifying
size standards, when necessary. SBA's revised Methodology provides a
detailed description of its analyses of various industry and program
factors
[[Page 9971]]
and data sources, and how the agency uses the results to establish and
revise size standards. In the proposed rule itself, SBA detailed how it
applied its revised Methodology to review and modify, where necessary,
the existing size standards for industries covered in this final rule.
Prior to finalizing the revised Methodology, SBA issued a notification
in the April 27, 2018, edition of the Federal Register (83 FR 18468) to
solicit comments from the public and notify stakeholders of the
proposed changes to the Methodology. SBA considered all public comments
in finalizing the revised Methodology. For a summary of comments and
SBA's responses, refer to the SBA's April 11, 2019, Federal Register
notification (84 FR 14587) of the issuance of the final revised
Methodology. SBA's Size Standard Methodology is available on its
website at www.sba.gov/size.
In evaluating an industry's size standard, as described in its Size
Standards Methodology as well as in the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA
examines its characteristics (such as average firm size, startup costs
and entry barriers, industry competition and distribution of firms by
size) and the small business level and share of Federal contract
dollars in that industry. SBA also examines the potential impact a size
standard revision might have on its financial assistance programs, and
whether a business concern under a revised size standard would be
dominant in its industry. SBA analyzed the characteristics of each
employee-based industry in NAICS Sector 31-33 and other sectors with
employee-based size standards, mostly using a special tabulation
obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census from its 2012 Economic
Census (the latest available when the proposed rule was developed). The
2012 Economic Census special tabulation contains information for
different levels of NAICS categories on average and median firm size in
terms of both receipts and employment, total receipts generated by the
four and eight largest firms, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), the
Gini coefficient, and size distributions of firms by various receipts
and employment size groupings. To evaluate average asset size, SBA
combines the sales to total assets ratios by industry, obtained from
the Risk Management Association's (RMA) Annual eStatement Studies
(https://www.rmahq.org/estatement-studies/) with the simple average
receipts size by industry from the 2012 Economic Census tabulation to
estimate the average assets size for each industry. SBA also evaluated
the small business level and share of Federal contracts in each of the
industries using data from the Federal Procurement Data System--Next
Generation (FPDS-NG) for fiscal years 2016-2018. Table 4 of the April
2022 proposed rule, Size Standards Supported by Each Factor for Each
Industry (Employees), shows the results of analyses of industry and
Federal contracting factors for each industry and subindustry
(``exception'') covered by the proposed rule. Of the 427 industries and
5 subindustries (i.e., ``exceptions'') reviewed in the proposed rule,
the results from analyses of the latest available data on the five
primary factors discussed above supported increasing employee-based
size standards for 157 industries and 2 subindustries (``exceptions''),
decreasing size standards for 216 industries, and maintaining size
standards for 54 industries and 3 subindustries (``exceptions''). Table
1, Summary of Calculated Size Standards (NAICS 2017), below, summarizes
the analytical results from the April 2022 proposed rule by NAICS
sector.
Table 1--Summary of Calculated Size Standards
[NAICS 2017]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of size Number of size Number of size Number of size
NAICS sector NAICS sector standards standards standards standards
title reviewed increased decreased maintained
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21............................ Mining, 24 15 9 0
Quarrying, and
Oil and Gas
Extraction.
22............................ Utilities....... 11 11 0 0
31-33......................... Manufacturing... 360 123 187 50
48-49......................... Transportation 15 5 8 2
and Warehousing.
51............................ Information..... 12 3 7 2
54............................ Professional, 7 1 3 3
Scientific and
Technical
Services.
Other......................... Agriculture, 3 1 2 0
Forestry,
Fishing and
Hunting (Sector
11); Finance
and Insurance
(Sector 52);
Administrative
and Support,
Waste
Management and
Remediation
Services
(Sector 56).
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................ 432 159 216 57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA discussed the impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic on small businesses and greater society. Recognizing
the wide-ranging economic impacts of the pandemic, SBA decided not to
lower any size standards for which the analysis suggested lowering
them. Instead, SBA proposed to maintain all size standards for
industries in which the analytical results supported a decrease or no
change to size standards and adopt all size standards for which the
analytical results supported an increase to size standards, except for
nine industries where SBA's evaluation of dominance in field of
operation indicated that size standards should be maintained at the
current levels to exclude dominant firms and one industry for which SBA
proposed to adopt a smaller increase to the size standard also to
exclude dominant firms.
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA also evaluated the 500-
employee size standard applicable to nonmanufacturers participating in
the Federal contracting market. SBA's regulations at 13 CFR 121.406
require small business concerns to meet certain requirements when they
offer to the Government an end item they did not manufacture, process,
or produce. These requirements are known as the nonmanufacturer rule.
To qualify for a Federal Government supply contract set aside for small
business, a nonmanufacturer must have an average of 500 or fewer
employees over the past 24 months, be primarily engaged in wholesale or
retail trade activities and supply the product of a U.S. small
[[Page 9972]]
manufacturer.\2\ In the proposed rule, SBA proposed to retain the 500-
employee size standard under the nonmanufacturer rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On June 6, 2022, SBA issued a final rule implementing
section 863 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2021, Public Law 116-283, which changed the averaging period
for calculating employees for SBA's employee-based size standards
from 12 months to 24 months (87 FR 34094).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Request for Comments section of the proposed rule, SBA
requested comments on the appropriateness of the current 500-employee
size standard under the nonmanufacturer rule and suggestions for
alternative measures to an employee-based size standard that would be
more appropriate for size determination of nonmanufacturers.
SBA also sought comments on its proposal to increase size standards
for 150 industries and retain the current size standards for the
remaining 282 industries or subindustries (``exceptions'') in Sector
31-33 and other sectors with employee-based size standards (excluding
Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade Sectors). Specifically, SBA requested
comments on whether the proposed revisions are appropriate for the
industries covered by the proposed rule; whether the decision not to
lower any size standards is justified by considerations of impacts of
the COVID-19 pandemic; whether the equal weighting of individual
factors to derive an industry size standard is appropriate; and whether
the data sources used in developing proposed size standards were
appropriate or sufficient. SBA also sought comments on its evaluation
of specific industries or subindustries (``exceptions''), including the
Information Technology Value Added Resellers (ITVAR) exception to NAICS
541519 (Other Computer Related Services), NAICS 482111 (Line Haul
Railroads), NAICS 482112 (Short Line Railroads), the Environmental
Remediation Services (ERS) exception to NAICS 562910 (Remediation
Services), and certain industries for which SBA adjusted calculated
size standards based on its analysis of dominance in field of
operation.
To evaluate the impact of the changes to size standards adopted in
this final rule on the Federal contracting market and SBA's loan
programs, SBA analyzed FPDS-NG data for fiscal years 2018-2020 and
internal data on its guaranteed and disaster loan programs for fiscal
years 2018-2020. The results of this analysis can be found in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis section of this final rule.
In accordance with 13 CFR 121.102(e), SBA advises eligible parties
of the option to file a petition for reconsideration of a revised,
modified, or established size standard at SBA's Office of Hearings and
Appeals (OHA) within 30 calendar days after publication of this final
rule in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(9) and 13 CFR 134 Subpart I.
OHA can be reached using the following contact information: by mail at
U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Hearings and Appeals, 409
Third St. SW, Eighth Floor, Washington, DC 20416, by email at
[email protected], by phone at (202) 401-8200 TTY/TRS: 711, or by fax
at (202) 205-7059.
Discussion of Comments
SBA received a total of 49 comments on the proposed rule, 37 of
which pertained to SBA's proposal to increase the size standard for the
ERS exception to NAICS 562910 from 750 employees to 1,000 employees. Of
the 37 comments pertaining to the ERS exception, 28 opposed SBA's
proposed increase to the size standard and nine supported SBA's
proposal. SBA also received five comments pertaining to general size
standards issues, two comments that pertained to SBA's proposal to
retain the 500-employee size standard under its nonmanufacturer rule,
one comment on the ITVAR exception to NAICS 541519, one comment on
SBA's proposed size standards for power generation industries, one
comment on NAICS 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors), one comment
on NAICS 333310 (Commercial and Service Industry Machinery
Manufacturing), and one comment that was outside the scope of the rule.
As mandated by section 1344 of the Jobs Act, SBA is required to
hold not less than two public forums during its quinquennial review of
size standards. SBA held two virtual public forums on size standards to
update the public on the status of the ongoing second five-year review
of size standards and to consider public testimony on changes contained
in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule. The two virtual public forums on
size standards were held on June 14, 2022, and on June 16, 2022. The
comments received during the virtual public forums are included in the
count of comments above. All comments to the proposed rule, including
those received as part of the virtual public forums, are available at
www.regulations.gov (RIN 3245-AH09) and are summarized and discussed by
topic below.
Comments Received During SBA's Virtual Public Forums on Size Standards
As explained in the Discussion of Comments section above, on June
14 and June 16, 2022, SBA held a series of two virtual public forums on
size standards to update the public on the status of the ongoing second
five-year review of size standards and to consider public testimony on
proposed changes contained in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule. Over
the course of the two days, of 87 total participants, SBA received
testimony from eight commenters, of which seven provided comments
pertaining to the SBA's proposal to increase the size standard for the
ERS exception from 750 employees to 1,000 employees and one provided
comments pertaining to SBA's increases to size standards generally. Of
the seven comments that pertained to the ERS exception, one commenter
expressed support for the SBA's proposed increase to the size standard
from 750 employees to 1,000 employees, while six commenters opposed the
proposed increase, asking for a lower size standard.
Regarding the public forum comments pertaining to the ERS
exception, one commenter supporting the SBA's proposed change expressed
that by raising the size standard to 1,000 employees, SBA will support
the creation of a healthy industrial base of ERS providers for Federal
clients and make it easier for small businesses to build the strength
and capabilities needed to grow and successfully graduate from small
business status. This commenter also urged SBA to consider adopting a
size standard of 1,200 employees based on SBA's analysis in the
proposed rule of all firms operating under the ERS exception regardless
of whether ERS was their primary business activity.
Commenters opposed to SBA's proposed increase to the size standard
for the ERS exception expressed that SBA's proposed change would
adversely impact smaller small businesses. One commenter also argued
that SBA's reliance on Federal contracting data for fiscal years 2016-
2018 led the Agency to make incorrect conclusions about industry trends
following SBA's prior increase to the ERS size standard from 500
employees to 750 employees, which resulted in SBA proposing a size
standard above what SBA's analysis would support if more recent data
were used. Specifically, the commenter pointed out that part of SBA's
rationale for increasing the size standard for the ERS
[[Page 9973]]
exception is to address the decline in small business participation
that occurred during fiscal years 2016-2018; however, the commenter
maintained that, based on the latest available data, small business
participation has increased significantly since that period. The
commenter further explained that one reason for the lag between SBA's
previous increase to the size standard for ERS and a corresponding
increase in small business participation in the Federal market could be
due to the nature of the Federal Government's procurement process in
general which in some cases could take months, if not years, to award
contracts due to protests, shifting agency priorities, funding levels,
and other issues. Moreover, this commenter raised concerns that the
Department of Energy's (DOE) reliance on management and operating (M&O)
contractors, of which most are large businesses, may have skewed SBA's
results. The commenter argued that if SBA excludes DOE's M&O contracts
under the ERS exception from its analysis of industry factors, small
business participation would be far more robust than what SBA reported
in the proposed rule.
Another commenter expressing similar concerns about SBA's use of
data from fiscal years 2016-2018 to measure small business
participation in the Federal market also urged SBA to consider startup
costs in its analysis of the industry size standard and utilize more
recent data from the Engineering News-Record (ENR) (an industry trade
publication) of the top 200 ENR firms in the industry when describing
the economic characteristics of ERS firms. Another commenter urged SBA
to consider the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Region 2
Superfund program as a representation of the NAICS 562910 remediation
industry. The commenter argued that these program data demonstrate the
ability of firms well under the current 750-employee size standard to
fulfill the Federal Government's small business remediation
requirements; thus, it is unnecessary for SBA to increase the size
standard beyond the current threshold as the added competition from
larger firms could impact the number of opportunities available for
smaller small firms that are already thriving under the current 750-
employee size standard. SBA received three comments expressing
agreement with this commenter, specifically in support of the notion
that the current size standard of 750 employees is already appropriate.
Besides comments pertaining to the ERS exception, during the public
forums on size standards, SBA also received one comment from a business
operating under NAICS 561110 (Office of Administrative Services)
pertaining to SBA's review of size standards generally. The commenter
opposed any increases to size standards at this time, citing concerns
about an impending economic recession, category management impacts, and
best-in-class requirements, which together, reduce small business
opportunities and eventually the total number of small businesses
participating in the Federal market. The commenter urged SBA to help
small businesses facing these concerns by improving its engagement
efforts through increased access to financial assistance and other
support rather than increasing size standards.
The comments received during the virtual public forums that pertain
to the ERS exception closely mirror the public submissions received
electronically through the www.regulations.gov portal. In fact, many
commenters at the virtual public forums also submitted more detailed
comments in writing, elaborating on their oral testimony. Thus, SBA is
addressing these comments as part of its summary and response to
comments under the Comments to the Exception to NAICS 562910
(Environmental Remediation Services) section of this final rule.
Similarly, SBA responds to the comment opposing increases to size
standards generally as part of its summary and response to comments
under the General Comments on SBA's Proposed Changes to Size Standards
section of this final rule.
Comments on SBA's Proposed Changes to Power Generation Industries
SBA received one comment from a national trade association
representing nearly 900 local electric cooperatives and other rural
electric utilities supporting SBA's proposed changes to size standards
for industries under NAICS Sector 22 (Utilities). Specifically, the
association agreed with SBA's decision to maintain the current size
standard for NAICS 221116 and adopt adjusted calculated increases to
size standards for NAICS 221111, 221112, 221113, 221114, 221115,
221116, 221117, 221118, and 221210 based on SBA's analysis of dominance
in field of operation.
SBA Response
SBA appreciates the association's comments supporting SBA's
proposed size standards for several select industries under Sector 22,
Utilities. SBA agrees that the proposed size standards are appropriate
in terms of industry market conditions in those industries and believes
that the changes will ensure access to SBA's programs for the intended
beneficiaries within these industries while excluding the largest and
potentially dominant firms from being considered small. Thus, in the
absence of opposing comments, SBA is adopting the proposed size
standards for Sector 22 industries, as proposed.
Comments on the Federal Procurement Size Standard for Nonmanufacturers
SBA received one comment, expressing support for SBA's proposal to
maintain the current 500-employee size standard for nonmanufacturers.
The commenter expressed concern that if SBA were to adopt a receipt-
based size standard, as explored by SBA in the proposed rule, thousands
of firms that currently qualify as small under the 500-employee
nonmanufacturer size standard would lose their eligibility to seek set-
aside procurements for small businesses. The commenter further
explained that a receipts-based size standard would likely limit sales
volume for most resellers while also impacting their ability to
maintain satisfactory employment levels. Thus, the commenter urged SBA
to retain the current 500-employee size standard for nonmanufacturer
resellers.
SBA also received one comment opposing SBA's proposal to maintain
the current 500-employee size standard for nonmanufacturers. The
commenter believed that SBA provided an insufficient and non-compelling
rationale for not adopting the calculated size standard of 550
employees for nonmanufacturers, and instead proposing to maintain the
current 500-employee size standard. Specifically, the commenter
expressed that SBA's rationale to maintain the size standard simply
because it is familiar to the industry and working well in practice
sets a bad and arbitrary precedent. Thus, the commenter urged SBA to
follow the results of its analysis and increase the size standard for
nonmanufacturers to 550 employees, as suggested by the results. This
commenter also expressed support for maintaining an employee-based size
standard for nonmanufacturers rather than adopting a receipts-based
size standard.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters that an employee-based size standard is
most appropriate for nonmanufacturers. In the proposed rule, as an
alternative, SBA calculated a receipts-based size standard of $27
million for nonmanufacturers. However, although SBA evaluated a
receipt-based size standard for nonmanufacturers, SBA
[[Page 9974]]
believes that adopting a receipts-based size standard, instead of an
employee-based size standard, would be inappropriate for several
reasons. Specifically, the Small Business Act provides that the size of
manufacturing firms be based on the number of employees and that the
size of services firms be based on average annual receipts. Adopting a
receipts-based size standard under the nonmanufacturer rule, which
currently applies only to Government acquisitions for supplies, would
cause many manufacturing concerns supplying products to the Government
as nonmanufacturers under the nonmanufacturer rule to be evaluated
under a receipts-based size standard, which would be contrary to the
requirements of the Small Business Act. Moreover, based on data from
the 2017 Economic Census, SBA determined that under the calculated $27
million receipts-based size standard, more than 35,000 firms would lose
their small business status they currently enjoy under the 500-employee
nonmanufacturer size standard. Thus, as proposed, SBA is maintaining an
employee-based size standard for nonmanufacturers.
With respect to the comment petitioning SBA to adopt 550 employees
as the size standard for nonmanufacturers as suggested by SBA's
analytical results, SBA disagrees that its rationale for maintaining
the 500-employee size standard is arbitrary. As explained in the
proposed rule, the analytical results support raising the size standard
for nonmanufacturers from 500 employees to 550 employees. However, to
maintain continuity with general public familiarity with and long
acceptability of the 500-employee nonmanufacturer size standard, SBA
proposed to maintain the current 500-employee size standard. In the
proposed rule, SBA clarified why it believed that the 500-employee size
standard is appropriate and working well for the majority of firms to
which it applies, explaining that the 500-employee size standard for
nonmanufacturers is also the most common size standard among the
manufacturing industries (NAICS Sector 31-33) where some manufacturers
bid on supply contracts under which they do not propose to produce the
particular product to be supplied with their own labor force,
notwithstanding that they are capable of doing so, and therefore must
qualify as small businesses under the nonmanufacturer rule. Thus, SBA
believes that maintaining 500 employees as the size standard for
nonmanufacturers would promote consistency in its regulations and
increase compliance. Therefore, in an effort to minimize the adverse
consequences on manufacturers who may provide supplies to the Federal
Government as nonmanufacturers under the nonmanufacturer rule, and to
promote fair competition among manufacturers and nonmanufacturers, SBA
is adopting the predominant 500-employee size standard for
manufacturers as the size standard for nonmanufacturers who desire to
bid on Federal supply contracts.
Comments on the Application of the Nonmanufacturer Rule to Information
Technology Value Added Resellers (ITVARs)
SBA received one comment urging SBA to reconsider whether the
nonmanufacturer rule should apply to the ITVAR exception to NAICS
541519 (Other Computer Related Services). The commenter expressed that
it may be inconsistent for SBA to apply the nonmanufacturer rule to the
ITVAR exception when most or all of the supplies provided by resellers
under this exception would fall under one of the NAICS codes for which
class waivers currently exist.
SBA Response
As stated in Footnote 18 to SBA's table of size standards at 13 CFR
121.201, for a Federal contract to be classified under the ITVAR
exception and its 150-employee size standard, it must consist of at
least 15 percent, but not more than 50 percent of value-added services.
In addition, the offeror must comply with the manufacturing performance
requirements, or comply with the nonmanufacturer rule by supplying the
products of small business concerns, unless SBA has issued a class or
contract specific (individual) waiver of the nonmanufacturer rule.
While SBA agrees with the commenter that class waivers may already
exist for some IT products commonly purchased using the ITVAR
exception, SBA also acknowledges that not all IT products procured
through the ITVAR exception have a waiver of its nonmanufacturer rule.
Moreover, considering the rapid pace of development in the IT industry,
SBA believes that it is not unreasonable to assume that there will be
new products purchased by the Federal Government using the ITVAR
exception in the future that likewise do not qualify for a waiver.
Thus, by eliminating the nonmanufacturer rule for the exception, SBA
could disadvantage small firms who are currently offering, or plan to
offer products not subject to a class waiver.
SBA also believes it would be inconsistent with the intent of the
Small Business Act if ITVAR resellers could provide the supplies
produced primarily by a large original equipment manufacturer (OEM), or
other large manufacturers, without a waiver of the nonmanufacturer
rule. SBA is concerned that without the compliance with the
nonmanufacturer rule, the ITVAR exception may allow small IT resellers
to simply serve as ``pass throughs'' for large OEMs and other large
manufacturers. While SBA recognizes that the nonmanufacturer rule may
work better for some products than for others, it strongly believes
that the rule must apply to all supply contracts equally. Thus, like
all other products and supplies, the nonmanufacturer rule must also
apply to IT products, including those purchased through the ITVAR
exception. Therefore, SBA is retaining the requirement that the supply
component of small business set-aside ITVAR contracts must comply with
the manufacturing performance requirements or the SBA's nonmanufacturer
rule.
Comments on NAICS 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors)
SBA received one comment petitioning SBA to increase the size
standard for NAICS 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors) from 750
employees to 1,500 employees. The commenter maintained that the
manufacture of personal protection equipment (PPE) by Cut and Sew
Apparel Contractors and the reliance of the Federal Government on this
industry to satisfy strategic objectives related to sourcing PPE
equipment and supplies domestically suggests that the threshold should
be larger than 750 employees. Elaborating on this idea, the commenter
explained that increasing the size standard would allow PPE
manufacturers to sufficiently scale up their operations to meet the
Federal Government's demand at lower costs. Moreover, the commenter
presented data to show the high fixed costs of production and relative
labor intensity of Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors relative to other
manufacturing industries, which the commenter believed justified an
increase to the size standard when considering the strategic importance
of firms within the Cut and Sew Apparel Contractor industry. The
commenter also argued that, due to the pandemic, the distribution of
goods being produced by Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors has changed,
and as a result,
[[Page 9975]]
these companies must invest significantly more in property, plant, and
equipment if they are to become more cost-efficient producers of PPE.
The commenter explained that in order to meet the Federal Government's
demands for quality and quantity of goods for PPE purchases, companies
must be larger, both in terms of capital investment and employment
size. However, the commenter did not provide any data on industry and
Federal contracting factors showing why the size standard for the Cut
and Sew Apparel Contractor industry should be increased from 750
employees to 1,500 employees.
SBA Response
SBA disagrees with the commenter's argument that SBA should
increase the size standard for NAICS 315210 based on the industry's
importance to Government purchases of PPE. Specifically, SBA believes
that the commenter may have mis-identified the proper NAICS code for
which Government purchases of PPE normally fall under. Based on the
NAICS manual, available at www.census.gov/naics, NAICS 315210 comprises
firms that are commonly referred to as contractors that are primarily
engaged in (1) cutting materials owned by others for apparel and
accessories and/or (2) sewing materials owned by others for apparel and
accessories. Normally, Federal Government purchases of PPE do not fall
under this NAICS code as Government purchases of PPE are normally to
acquire new materials and equipment, and not to modify materials and
equipment already owned by the Federal Government. Instead, Government
purchases of PPE usually fall under NAICS 339112 (Surgical and Medical
Instrument Manufacturing), NAICS 339113 (Surgical Appliance and
Supplies Manufacturing), or NAICS 423450 (Medical, Dental, and Hospital
Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers) \3\ with Product Service
Code (PSC) 6515 (Medical and Surgical Instruments, Equipment, and
Supplies). Based on an analysis of FPDS-NG data for fiscal years 2018-
2020, SBA found that less than 0.1 percent of Government purchases
under PSC 6515 fall under NAICS 315210 while nearly 80 percent of
Government purchases under PSC 6515 occur under one of the three
aforementioned NAICS codes. Since PSC 6515 includes a broad range of
supplies, SBA also analyzed the data by keywords to identify contracts
for PPE, including respirators, masks, surgical gowns, and other PPE.
SBA again found that NAICS 315210 was insignificant in terms of the
total dollars obligated towards purchases of these PPE items. Thus, SBA
does not agree that the industry's importance to Federal Government
purchases of PPE warrants an increase to the size standard in NAICS
315210 in order to enable the industry to meet greater demand for PPE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Per the requirements at 13 CFR 121.402(b)(2), acquisitions
for supplies must be classified under the appropriate manufacturing
or supply NAICS code, not under a Wholesale Trade or Retail Trade
NAICS code, however, FPDS-NG data shows that some contracting
activity may be misclassified under these NAICS codes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, SBA's analysis of industry factors, as presented in Table
4 of the April 2022 proposed rule, supported a calculated size standard
of only 450 employees for NAICS 315210. However, in response to the
economic challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures
taken by Federal Government to protect public health, SBA decided to
adopt a policy to not lower size standards during the ongoing second
five-year review of size standards in order to reduce the economic
impacts to small businesses. Thus, SBA proposed to retain the current
size standard for NAICS 315210 at 750 employees even though the data
supported 450 employees. Based on the 2017 Economic Census data, 99.8
percent of firms are already small under the current 750-employee size
standard for NAICS 315210. Increasing the size standard to 1,500
employees might include the largest and potentially dominant firms as
small, which would run counter to the Small Business Act requirement
that the size standards must exclude dominant firms from being
qualified as small.
Regarding the industries that most accurately classify purchases of
PPE, namely NAICS 339112 and NAICS 339113, SBA has proposed to retain
the current size standard for NAICS 339112 at 1,000 employees and
increase the size standard for NAICS 339113 to 800 employees based on
the analysis of industry and Federal contracting factors. While the
commenter submitted data on the costs of employment for firms operating
under NAICS 315210 relative to other manufacturing industries, the
provided data are not at the 6-digit industry level and do not
demonstrate that SBA's analysis of NAICS 339112 and 339113 is
insufficient. Thus, for the above reasons, SBA is not adopting the
commenter's recommendation to increase the size standard for NAICS
315210 from 750 employees to 1,500 employees, nor is SBA adopting 1,500
employees as the size standard for other three NAICS codes under which
solicitations for PPE are normally categorized.
Comments on the Exception to NAICS 562910 (Environmental Remediation
Services)
As explained above in the Discussion of Comments section of this
final rule, SBA received a total of 37 comments pertaining to SBA's
proposal to increase the size standard for the Environmental
Remediation Services (ERS) exception to NAICS 562910 from 750 employees
to 1,000 employees. Of the 37 comments pertaining to the ERS exception,
28 (including six comments opposing SBA's proposal received during
SBA's virtual public forums on size standards) opposed SBA's proposed
increase and nine (including one comment supporting SBA's proposal
during the virtual public forums) supported SBA's proposal. Below, SBA
summarizes and responds to comments supporting the SBA's proposed
change to the ERS size standard, then summarizes and responds to
comments opposing the SBA's proposed change.
Comments Supporting SBA's Proposed Change to the ERS Exception
A total of nine comments were received supporting SBA's proposal to
increase the size standard for the ERS exception from 750 employees to
1,000 employees. One commenter supporting SBA's proposed increase to
the size standard argued that SBA's current 750-employee size standard
is too restrictive and has been a detriment to many companies in the
industry. The commenter expressed that adopting a 1,000-employee size
standard would remove the restraint and allow for further growth for
companies without forcing them to prematurely graduate from the small
business status and to compete with larger firms with more resources
when they exceed the size standard.
An additional four commenters, submitting nearly identical
comments, supported SBA's proposed increase to the ERS size standard
for similar reasons, expressing that SBA's proposed increase would
allow additional firms to participate in Federal contracting as small
businesses, increase small business competition, and ultimately reverse
the downward trend in small business share of ERS contract dollars from
fiscal years 2013 to 2018. These commenters further expressed that
their business would benefit from SBA's proposed change due to the
increased capabilities they could achieve under a larger size standard
which would allow them to take on larger and more complex remediation
projects. One
[[Page 9976]]
commenter also supported SBA's proposal based on the belief that the
Federal Government will have access to an expanded pool of more capable
small businesses to meet the demand for the surge in ERS requirements
expected as part of the implementation of the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58, November 15, 2021). Three commenters
petitioned SBA to increase the size standard for the ERS exception to
1,200 employees based on SBA's analysis in the proposed rule which
showed support for a size standard as high as 1,200 employees when
including data from the largest firms whose principal business
activities were generally unrelated to ERS.
Referring to an opposing comment received during SBA's virtual
public forums on size standards that urged SBA to exclude the
Department of Energy (DOE) contracts from its analysis of the ERS
exception due to DOE's unique reliance on large M&O contractors, one
commenter expressed that the notion of excluding such procurements,
which are often related to nuclear remediation, is in direct
contradiction to the definition of the ERS subindustry, as stated in
Footnote 14 of SBA's Table of Size Standards at 13 CFR 121.201. The
commenter explained that this footnote specifically lists nuclear
remediation as an eligible activity and further argued that the
justification for excluding DOE contracts from the analysis simply
because they are dominated by large businesses is not sufficient. This
commenter also opposed using the Engineering News-Record (ENR) top 200
environmental firms list as a source of industry data for evaluation of
the ERS size standard as suggested by one commenter at the virtual
public forums, because the data do not cover the whole industry and may
contain subjective measures of revenue that do not comport with SBA's
definitions.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters supporting SBA's proposed increase to
the size standard for the ERS exception that adopting a size standard
of 1,000 employees would extend the runway for firms to grow while
still allowing access to SBA's contracting and financial assistance
programs. SBA also believes that increasing the size standard to 1,000
employees would improve competition in the industry and help small
businesses to earn more Federal contracting dollars and compete for
more complex environmental remediation projects, including those that
may become newly available as a result of the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act.
As explained in the proposed rule, the procurement data analyzed by
SBA showed that the dollars awarded by firms' employment size were
concentrated among the largest firms. Specifically, small firms with
less than or equal to 750 employees received about 37 percent of the
total ERS dollar awards during fiscal years 2016-2018, while firms with
more than 5,000 employees accounted for about 60 percent of the total
ERS contract awards, with two firms alone accounting for almost 40
percent of the total awards under ERS activities. Firms between 750
employees and 5,000 employees accounted for 3.5 percent of the total
ERS contract dollars. Procurement data from FPDS-NG for fiscal years
2019-2021 analyzed by SBA showed an increase in the small business
share of ERS contract dollars to 43.5 percent and a decrease in the
share of the largest firms (i.e., those with more than 5,000 employees)
to 54 percent, with two of them alone accounting for about 34 percent
of total ERS dollars during that period. Firms between 750 employees
and 5,000 employees accounted for remaining 2.5 percent. While the
small business share of ERS contract dollars increased from about 37
percent during fiscal years 2016-2018 to about 43.5 percent during
fiscal years 2019-2021, this is still smaller than the corresponding
share of about 50 percent during fiscal years 2013-2015.
Thus, SBA believes that the large skewness in the distribution of
ERS firms by the number of employees, the large percentage of ERS
contracting dollars being concentrated among very large firms, a
decrease in the small business share of total ERS awards compared with
fiscal years 2013-2015, and the analysis of industry factors according
to the SBA's Size Standards Methodology outlined in the proposed rule
support SBA's proposal to increase the ERS size standard to 1,000
employees. SBA believes that its proposal to increase the size standard
to 1,000 employees will further increase small business participation
in the industry over time.
Regarding the adoption of a higher calculated size standard of
1,200 employees for the ERS industry, SBA does not believe that the
calculated size standard of 1,200 employees accurately reflects the
economic characteristics of firms primarily engaged in the business
activities related to the ERS exception since this calculation was
based on untrimmed data, and thus, included very large firms whose
primary activity was likely unrelated to the ERS exception. Moreover,
in response to comments pertaining to using the ENR data on the top 200
environmental firms, SBA agrees with commenters supporting SBA's
increase to the ERS size standard that this dataset is not
comprehensive enough for SBA's size standards purposes. For example,
SBA's analysis of the ERS industry included 974 firms participating in
Federal contracting under the exception to NAICS 562910 during fiscal
years 2019-2021, while the ENR dataset suggested by the commenters only
includes the top 200 environmental firms.\4\ In order to reliably
evaluate the size standard of any industry, SBA must rely on
comprehensive data that is representative of the economic trends of the
entire industry, rather than only the top firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 974 is the number of firms after the removal of entities
with null revenue and null number of employees as well as the
identified Government entities and manufacturing firms. This number
is the total entities participating in the ERS activity before
trimming the data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments Opposing SBA's Proposed Change to the ERS Exception
Of the 28 comments opposing SBA's proposed change to the size
standard for the ERS exception, 27 comments expressed similar arguments
for why SBA should retain the current 750-employee size standard for
the ERS exception, including 21 comments submitted through the
regulations.gov rulemaking portal, of which 20 were nearly identical,
and six comments submitted orally through SBA's Virtual Public Forum on
Size Standards. Many of these 27 commenters, including the 20
commenters that submitted nearly identical comments, and at least two
commenters at SBA's Virtual Public Forum on Size Standards were part of
a group of firms using data from FEDMINE, a business intelligence
provider specializing in Federal Government contracting, as the basis
for their comments. One commenter whose comment was also based on the
FEDMINE report provided a list of 52 other firms that endorsed their
comment. The remaining commenters that did not reference FEDMINE data
provided similar reasons as those outlined by commenters using FEDMINE
data for opposing SBA's proposed increase to the ERS size standard.
One commenter opposed to SBA's proposed size standard increase for
the ERS exception raised issues other than those identified by the
above 27 commenters, including establishing a separate NAICS industry
specifically for munitions and unexploded ordnance
[[Page 9977]]
services. Below, SBA summarizes and responds to these opposing comments
separately.
Comments Opposing SBA's Proposed Change to the ERS Exception for
Similar Reasons
SBA received 27 comments petitioning SBA to retain the current 750-
employee size standard for the ERS exception based on similar
arguments, including six comments received during the virtual public
forums on size standards and 21 comments received through the
www.regulations.gov rulemaking portal of which 20 were almost
identical. The commenters commissioned FEDMINE, a business intelligence
provider specializing in Federal Government contracting, to prepare a
report on their behalf regarding Federal spending under the ERS
exception for fiscal years 2016-2021.
The commenters objected to SBA's proposed increase to the ERS size
standard on the grounds that more recent data shows that SBA's
calculation of the small business share of the Federal market under
NAICS 562910 is understated, and therefore, undermines SBA's
justification for increasing the size standard in order to help small
businesses better compete for contracting opportunities. Specifically,
according to the commenters' analysis, the amount of Federal dollars
awarded to small businesses under the ERS exception increased nearly 50
percent, from about $1.4 billion in 2016 to about $2.1 billion in 2021.
The commenters also provided data showing that the small business share
of the ERS Federal spend increased from 35 percent in 2018 to 46
percent in 2021. The commenters argued that increasing the share of ERS
Federal dollars obligated to small firms demonstrates, contrary to
SBA's analysis, that the prior increase in the size standard for the
exception from 500 employees to 750 employees was effective in
increasing competition in the Federal market under the ERS exception
(81 FR 4436 (January 26, 2016)). The commenters contended that SBA
should evaluate data beyond fiscal year 2018 for purposes of analyzing
the ERS exception because most Federal dollar obligations under the
exception are awarded under indefinite delivery contracts (IDCs), and
as such, SBA should recognize that there was a lapse of time between
when the ERS size standard was increased in 2016 until IDCs were
awarded and significant dollars were obligated to small businesses
under the new size standard.
These commenters also maintained that the DOE's unique procurement
methods, including the Agency's reliance on management and operating
(M&O) contracts which are typically awarded to large firms, have a
significant influence on SBA's calculations due to DOE's high
proportion of total dollars obligated under the ERS exception. Thus,
commenters urged SBA to exclude DOE contracts from the analysis since
they do not accurately reflect market conditions outside of the DOE.
Regarding the influence of DOE's procurement trends on SBA's
calculations, the commenters presented data showing the percent of
DOE's ERS contracts dollars obligated to small businesses and the
proportion of total ERS awards attributable to the DOE. The data
submitted by commenters showed that for fiscal years 2016-2021, on
average, DOE awarded only about seven percent of ERS contracting
dollars to small businesses while comprising nearly 50 percent of total
Federal ERS spending. The commenters maintained that unlike other
Federal agencies, DOE awards nearly all ERS work through its M&O
contractors, which are exclusively large businesses. For example, the
commenters added, in fiscal year 2021, of the $1.2 billion that DOE
awarded under the exception, only $3.2 million (0.3%) was awarded to
non-M&O contracts. Subtracting the large business M&O dollars from the
DOE's total ERS dollars, the commenters found that the small business
share of total dollars was 97.8 percent. The commenters also argued
that since most M&O contractors are joint ventures between two or more
large businesses, each with employee counts far in excess of the SBA's
size threshold, no reasonable increase in the ERS size standard would
influence the ability of small businesses to compete at the prime level
in the DOE M&O market and that the contracting dollars awarded to small
business is not likely to increase simply because the number of
businesses considered small under the exception has grown.
Regarding the dollars obligated to small businesses outside of DOE,
the commenters presented data showing that since fiscal year 2016, the
share of non-DOE ERS contract dollars awarded to small businesses
increased from an average of 53 percent in fiscal years 2013-2015 to an
average of 63 percent in fiscal years 2016-2018, and to an average of
78 percent in fiscal years 2019-2021.
Moreover, the commenters expressed concern with SBA's impact
analysis which showed that two additional small businesses would gain
access to small business set aside opportunities under the proposed
1,000-employee size standard for the ERS exception. Specifically, the
commenters expressed that these newly eligible firms may adversely
impact smaller small businesses competing for Federal contracts under
the exception. The commenters argued that the addition of larger and
more experienced firms may take away future opportunities from
currently small firms that are adequately meeting small business
procurement needs of Federal agencies.
During SBA's virtual public forums on size standards, SBA received
comments expressing similar concerns as those outlined above regarding
SBA's use of data from fiscal years 2016-2018 to measure small business
participation in the Federal ERS market. One commenter also urged SBA
to consider startup costs in its analysis of the industry size standard
and utilize more recent data from the ENR, an industry trade
publication, which describes the economic characteristics and primary
business activities of the top 200 engineering/environmental firms in
the industry down to the subsector level. Another commenter urged SBA
to consider Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Region 2 Superfund
program as a representation of the ERS industry. The commenter argued
that these program data demonstrate the ability of small firms well
under the current 750-employee size standard to fulfill the Federal
Government's remediation requirements; thus, it is unnecessary for SBA
to increase the size standard beyond the current threshold as the added
competition from larger firms could impact the number of opportunities
available for smaller small firms that are already thriving under the
current size standard. Additional commenters at the virtual public
forums agreed with the commenter's assertion that the current 750-
employee size standard for the ERS exception is adequate.
For the above reasons, these commenters concluded that SBA's 2016
increase in the ERS size standard from 500 employees to 750 employees
successfully increased small business participation in ERS contracts
and preserved competition within the industry. As such, the commenters
urged SBA to maintain the current 750-employee threshold instead of
adopting 1,000 employees, as proposed.
SBA Response
SBA has reviewed the data provided by the above commenters and has
determined that the results largely agree with the latest available
data that SBA evaluated in response to the commenters' arguments, as we
[[Page 9978]]
discussed in the section Comments Supporting SBA's Proposed Change to
the ERS Exception above. Moreover, consistent with the commenters, SBA
found that DOE awards accounted for 49.2 percent of total dollars
obligated under the ERS exception, of which only about 8.5 percent were
awarded to small businesses through prime contracts.
However, although SBA's further analysis of the ERS industry
confirmed some of the data submitted by commenters as presented above,
SBA also found important differences in the commenter's position and
SBA's evaluation, particularly in regards to SBA's evaluation of size
standards generally and the proportion of dollars awarded by DOE under
the exception through M&O contracts, a special class of contracts under
which the Federal Government contracts for the operation, management,
or support, on its behalf, of a government-owned or -controlled
establishment devoted to one or more major government programs.
Regarding SBA's evaluation of size standards generally, in the
proposed rule, SBA described its methodology for evaluating industry
structure to derive size standards based on five primary factors
including: average firm size (simple and weighted average firm size
factors), startup costs and entry barriers (average assets size
factor), industry competition (four-firm ratio factor), distribution of
firms by size (Gini coefficient factor), and small business success in
receiving Federal contracts under the current size standard (Federal
contracting factor). As detailed in Table 4 of the April 2022 proposed
rule, based on the data for fiscal years 2016-2018, SBA found that
three of the five industry factors analyzed supported raising the size
standard for the ERS industry above the current 750 employee threshold.
Specifically, the factors for simple and weighted average firm size
supported a size standard of 1,500 employees while the average assets
size and Gini coefficient supported size standards of 850 employees and
1,250 employees, respectively. Only the four-firm ratio supported a
size standard lower than 750 employees.
With respect to the Federal contracting factor, which measures
small business participation in the Federal market in terms of the
share of total Federal contract dollars awarded to small businesses
relative to the small business share of an industry's total receipts,
SBA found that the 750-employee size standard was appropriate. Based on
SBA's Size Standards Methodology, if the share of Federal contract
dollars awarded to small businesses in an industry is significantly
smaller than the small business share of total industry's receipts, all
else remaining the same, a justification would exist for considering a
size standard higher than the current size standard. In cases, where
small business share of the Federal market is already appreciably high
relative to the small business share of the overall market, SBA
generally assumes that the existing size standard is adequate with
respect to the Federal contracting factor. Thus, regarding the ERS
exception specifically, using the FPDS-NG data for fiscal years 2016-
2018, SBA calculated a Federal contracting factor to be 64.2 percent,
indicating the small business share of the Federal market is
appreciably high relative to the small business share of industry
receipts, which supported a size standard of 750 employees. Based on
this result, SBA agrees with commenters that small businesses in the
ERS industry are well-represented in the Federal contracting
marketplace under the current 750-employee size standard and have
adequate Federal contracting opportunities.
In the proposed rule, as an additional indicator, SBA also
considered the change in the share of total ERS contract dollars
awarded to small businesses from fiscal years 2013-2015 (under the 500-
employee size standard) to fiscal years 2016-2018 (under the 750-
employee size standard), finding that the small business share
decreased from about 50 percent during fiscal years 2013-2015 to about
37 percent during fiscal years 2016-2018. This result, alongside SBA's
analysis of industry factors demonstrated that an additional increase
to the ERS size standard was warranted in order to optimize and protect
the number of opportunities available to small businesses in the ERS
industry. However, SBA notes that this additional indicator was not the
primary basis for SBA's proposed increase to the size standard for the
ERS exception. SBA's further analysis of data from fiscal years 2019-
2021 showed that the small business share of total ERS contract dollars
increased to 43.5 percent from 37 percent in fiscal years 2016-2018;
however as previously stated, this is not a primary factor in SBA's
comprehensive analysis of the ERS industry nor is it the sole basis for
prescribing the size standard for the industry.
Based solely on the Federal contracting data, SBA agrees that the
750-employee size standard is appropriate for the ERS industry.
However, while SBA believes that analyzing Federal contracting trends,
including the Federal contracting factor, are an important component of
SBA's evaluation of industry size standards, SBA's size standards
methodology does not provide for the weighting of one factor more than
others. In other words, the methodology establishes that SBA will give
equal weights to all five primary factors that are considered in the
evaluation of an industry size standard. Thus, SBA believes that the
proposed size standard for the ERS industry, which is based on SBA's
comprehensive evaluation of industry and Federal contracting factors,
accurately reflects the economic characteristics of the industry,
including the high level of small business participation in the Federal
marketplace.
Regarding DOE's M&O contracts, SBA generally recognizes the special
nature of M&O contracts which have received special regulatory
treatment under Subpart 17.6 of the FAR. For example, when evaluating
agency contracting performance under SBA's procurement scorecard
assessment tool, starting from fiscal year 2015, SBA evaluates DOE's
prime contracting performance by including M&O first tier subcontracts
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 644(g)(3). Thus, SBA believes commenters may be
justified in requesting that SBA count DOE's M&O first tier
subcontracts as prime contracts consistent with SBA's procurement
scorecard methodology. However, SBA does not agree with commenters that
the dollars obligated through DOE's M&O contracts should be excluded
altogether from the evaluation of the industry size standard since M&O
contracts are a valid and important part of the overall Federal
contracting landscape, and because the DOE accounts for roughly half of
total ERS contract dollars. SBA believes that excluding M&O contracts
from the evaluation of size standards, particularly for purposes of
calculating the Federal contracting factor, would lead to unreliable
results in industries where M&O contracts are used prominently.
Moreover, SBA found that, contrary to the commenter's suggestion,
it is not true that the majority of DOE contracts classified under the
ERS exception are M&O contracts.\5\ SBA obtained data from the DOE
listing its M&O contractors and showing the proportion of total dollars
awarded under the ERS exception to M&O contractors for fiscal years
2016-2021. The data showed that the DOE did not award any contracts
[[Page 9979]]
under the ERS exception to firms classified as an M&O contractor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Guidance on the Department of Energy Subcontracting
Program, Section 1.2 Background.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on data from the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System
(eSRS), SBA found that small businesses were well represented in DOE's
first tier subcontracts classified under NAICS 562910. Specifically,
SBA analyzed the data from fiscal years 2016-2021 and found that, when
accounting for the dollars awarded to small businesses through first-
tier subcontracts, about 57 percent of total dollars awarded by DOE
under the ERS exception passed through to small businesses. Thus, even
if SBA considered all DOE awards under the exception as M&O contracts
and therefore counted the first-tier subcontracts as prime contracts,
SBA believes that the evaluation would reflect a high degree of small
business participation under the ERS exception, which, as explained
above, is consistent with SBA's results under the proposed rule.
Nonetheless, in response to the commenters' petition, SBA conducted
an analysis of the ERS industry using updated FPDS-NG data from fiscal
years 2019-2021 following the same methodology as detailed in the
proposed rule and in the SBA's Size Standards Methodology. SBA's
analysis using the more recent data did not support a size standard
lower than the SBA's proposed 1,000-employee size standard. In fact,
except for the weighted average firm size, values of each industry
factor based on the data for fiscal years 2019-2021 were higher than
those based on the data for fiscal years 2016-2018. Although the
weighted average firm size was lower in fiscal years 2016-2018,
weighted average firm size still supported a 1,500-employee size
standard. The Federal contracting factor based on the data for fiscal
years 2019-2021 continued to support the 750-employee size standard.
Regarding petitions by commenters for SBA to use alternative
sources of data to evaluate industry characteristics, specifically data
from the ENR on the top 200 environmental firms and EPA's Region 2
Superfund program, SBA disagrees that these sources would provide the
best representation of the ERS industry. SBA believes these data are
not comprehensive enough for SBA's purposes. For example, SBA's
analysis of the ERS industry included 974 firms participating in
Federal contracting under the exception to NAICS 562910 during fiscal
years 2019-2021, while the ENR dataset only includes the top 200
environmental firms. In order to reliably evaluate the size standard of
any industry, SBA must rely on comprehensive data that is
representative of the economic trends of the entire industry, rather
than only the top firms, or those associated with one agency's
contracting program.
SBA does not agree with the commenters that a few larger firms that
would qualify as small under the proposed 1,000-employee size standard
would have significant adverse impacts on small businesses under the
current 750-employee size standard in terms of access to Federal
opportunities to smaller small firms. The relevant data does not
demonstrate that the previous increase in size standard from 500
employees to 750 employees had a significant adverse impact on small
businesses below 500 employees in terms of accessing Federal small
business opportunities. For example, firms below 500 employees
accounted for 84 percent of total ERS dollars awarded to small
businesses during fiscal years 2019-2021.
SBA believes that increasing the size standard to the proposed
1,000-employee level based on its comprehensive evaluation of industry
and Federal contracting factors may increase the number of set-asides
in this industry and further benefit the small firms that are already
well-represented in the Federal contracting market at the current 750-
employee size standard. SBA believes that increasing the size standard
to 1,000 employees will expand the runway for small businesses to
compete for more complex remediation projects while also ensuring that
the Federal Government has access to a larger pool of qualified small
businesses to select from when issuing solicitations for ERS. As such,
based on SBA's evaluation of the above public comments pertaining to
the ERS exception and SBA's analyses of industry and Federal
contracting factors, SBA is adopting 1,000 employees as the size
standard for ERS as proposed in the April 2022 proposed rule.
Comments Opposing SBA's Proposed Change to the ERS Exception for Other
Reasons
One commenter opposing SBA's proposed increase to the size standard
for the ERS exception from 750 employees to 1,000 employees argued that
since SBA's analysis of Federal procurement data from fiscal years
2016-2018 in the proposed rule showed that the dollars obligated to
small businesses decreased significantly despite an increase to the
size standard from 500 employees to 750 employees in 2016, SBA should
forego increasing the size standard again, and instead, pursue other
methods of increasing small business participation. Specifically, the
commenter petitioned SBA to task, demand, encourage and/or impose on
Federal agencies higher small business participation goals. The
commenter also argued that SBA's proposed size standard increase would
adversely impact competition because currently small firms would find
it difficult to compete with larger firms with more advanced
capabilities. The commenter also urged SBA to implement rules and/or
programs to support smaller firms within the ERS industry, for example,
by creating a class of set-aside opportunities reserved for firms with
fewer than 50 employees. The commenter also expressed concerns over
what they viewed as discriminatory and inconsistent application of
NAICS code selection by contracting officers when determining the
applicable NAICS code for munitions response services, which are
sometimes misclassified under the ERS exception rather than the general
NAICS 562910 or some other more appropriate NAICS codes. The commenter
maintained that while some munitions remediation projects may require
engineers for planning purposes (i.e., NAICS 541330) and geophysical
survey and mapping services (i.e., NAICS 541360), these services
represent only a small portion of the contract dollars spent (usually
10-20%) on a munitions remediation project. The commenter further
explained that the overwhelming majority of funds allocated to
munitions remediation projects are spent on unexploded object (UXO)
technicians and labor to remove and dispose of the UXOs. Thus, citing
the requirements of ERS solicitations under Footnote 14, the commenter
argued that, since greater than 50 percent of the work related to
munitions remediation would be attributable to a single NAICS code, the
requirements for classifying the solicitation under the ERS exception
are not met. To remedy the misclassification of contracts for munitions
remediation services, the commenter recommended that SBA create a
separate NAICS code for munitions and UXO services and issue guidance
to contracting officers on the appropriate use of the ERS exception.
SBA Response
SBA disagrees with the comment that SBA should forego increasing
the size standard for the ERS exception and instead pursue other
methods of increasing small business participation, including higher
small business goals for Federal agencies and creating separate set-
aside opportunities for smaller small firms. SBA believes that
establishing appropriate size standards
[[Page 9980]]
for industries based on its Size Standards Methodology is not mutually
exclusive to conducting other engagement efforts to increase small
business participation.
Moreover, SBA believes that the aforementioned comment is largely
beyond the scope of this rulemaking as the proposed rule did not
propose any changes to SBA's goaling guidelines for Federal agencies,
nor did SBA propose establishing a separate class of set-aside
opportunities for smaller small businesses. By increasing the size
standard for the ERS exception to 1,000 employees, SBA will extend the
runway for firms to grow while also ensuring that small businesses
retain access to SBA's contracting and financial assistance programs.
Increasing the size standard to 1,000 employees will also improve
competition in the industry and help small businesses to earn more
Federal contracting dollars and compete for and perform more complex
environmental remediation projects.
Regarding the misclassification of munitions remediation projects
under the ERS exception rather than the general NAICS 562910, or some
other more appropriate NAICS codes, SBA notes that it is ultimately the
responsibility of the contracting officer to designate the proper NAICS
code based on the principal purpose of the product or service being
acquired (13 CFR 121.402(b)). SBA does not believe that changes to size
standards, including the creation of new NAICS industries or
exceptions, is an appropriate tool to address incorrect NAICS code
selections by contracting officers. More importantly, SBA does not have
authority to create new NAICS codes. SBA has established a process for
affected parties to appeal with SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeal
(OHA) a contracting officer's NAICS code designation in its regulations
at 13 CFR 121.1101. SBA encourages impacted firms to use this process
when they believe that a contracting officer has miscategorized a
solicitation under an improper NAICS code.
For the reasons stated above, SBA is not adopting the
recommendations of the commenter and is instead adopting 1,000
employees as the size standard for the ERS exception, as proposed in
the proposed rule.
General Comments on SBA's Proposed Changes to Size Standards
SBA received four comments pertaining to its proposed changes to
size standards generally, including one comment submitted orally as
part of SBA's virtual public forum on size standards. Of the four
comments received, two commenters supported SBA's proposed changes to
size standards while two commenters opposed the SBA's proposal. One
commenter supported SBA's increases to size standards, specifically for
industries under NAICS Sector 54, but only for agencies other than the
Department of Defense (DOD). The commenter expressed concern that
complex compliance requirements and other factors make it too costly
for small businesses to compete against larger established businesses
and that increases in the size thresholds would only exacerbate this
problem. The commenter did not specify which size levels would be more
appropriate for the Sector 54 industries covered under this rule or
offer data in support of their position. Another commenter supported
SBA's proposed changes to size standards because they believed the
changes would be beneficial to all small businesses, particularly to
those involved in government contracting.
Regarding the opposing comments, one commenter expressed opposition
to SBA's increases to size standards in general, specifically for dump
truck operators due to the increased competition that small operators
face from larger mid-sized trucking firms. The commenter also urged SBA
to look into the commercial insurance industry which has, according to
the commenter, more than doubled insurance rates over a timespan of
just a few months. The commenter did not specify which NAICS codes were
the subject of their comment, nor did they recommend any actions SBA
should take to address their comment on the commercial insurance
industry.
SBA also received one comment opposed to SBA's changes to size
standards from a business operating under NAICS 561110 (Office
Administrative Services). The commenter opposed any increases to size
standards at this time, citing concerns about an impending economic
recession, category management impacts, and best-in-class requirements
which together reduce small business opportunities and the total number
of small businesses. The commenter urged SBA to help small businesses
facing these concerns by improving its engagement efforts through
increased access to financial assistance and other support rather than
increasing size standards.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with commenters supporting SBA's proposed changes to
size standards that the proposed changes are beneficial to small
businesses and will increase the number of Federal contracting
opportunities available for small businesses. However, SBA disagrees
with the comment supporting SBA's proposed changes in Sector 54, but
only for agencies other than DOD. SBA does not believe that size
standards should differ among Federal agencies based on the contracting
preferences or requirements of each agency as this would result in a
complicated regime of size standards that may fluctuate along with an
agency's budget and priorities instead of the economic characteristics
of the industry in which a firm operates. Moreover, to evaluate the
size standards for industries within Sector 54, SBA relied on its size
standards methodology. SBA's size standards methodology describes how
its analyses of various industry and program factors are used to
establish and revise size standards based on the latest data available.
Thus, SBA believes that the size standards adopted in this final rule,
including for industries within Sector 54, appropriately reflect the
intended beneficiaries of SBA programs. Thus, SBA is adopting the size
standards for industries in Sector 54 without change.
SBA also disagrees with the comment that expressed opposition to
SBA's increases to size standards in general, but specifically for dump
truck operators, urging SBA to take action to address increased
insurance costs imposed by the commercial insurance industry. SBA
believes that this comment is out of the scope of this rulemaking as
dump truck operators normally operate under NAICS 484220 (Specialized
Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local), NAICS 532120 (Truck,
Utility Trailer, and RV (Recreational Vehicle) Rental and Leasing), or
NAICS 562119 (Other Waste Collection), all of which have receipts-based
size standards and were not covered under the proposed rule. Moreover,
SBA does not have the authority to regulate the commercial insurance
industry, which operates mostly under industries with receipt-based
size standards not covered under this rule. It is also unclear how an
adjustment to size standards within the commercial insurance industry
would translate to lower insurance premiums for small business owners.
Thus, SBA is not adjusting the size standards for any industries in
response to this comment.
SBA also disagrees with the comment opposing any increases to size
standards based on various concerns including the broader economic
environment and certain Federal contracting trends that are reducing
opportunities for small businesses. SBA believes that all small
[[Page 9981]]
businesses will benefit under a size standard that is appropriate to
their industry. SBA's changes to size standards help small businesses
to remain competitive in the Federal market and ensure that SBA's
services go to their intended beneficiaries. Moreover, Table 9 of this
final rule, Impacts of Increasing Size Standards, below, demonstrates
the benefits of size standards increases, which would remain unrealized
if SBA were to not adopt any increases to size standards. For example,
based on its impact analysis, SBA estimates that increasing size
standards would result in additional contracting opportunities for more
than 100 small businesses worth nearly $257 million. Thus, based on
SBA's estimation of the positive net benefits accruing to small
businesses as a result of the changes to size standards, SBA disagrees
with the commenter that increases to size standards are harmful to
small businesses. Therefore, SBA is adopting proposed increases to size
standards as presented in the proposed rule.
Comments Pertaining to Other Issues
SBA received three comments pertaining to issues other than those
already discussed above. One commenter, representing an optics
manufacturer, in anticipation of SBA's adoption of Office of Management
and Budget's (OMB) NAICS 2022 industry structure, petitioned SBA to
adopt 1,000 employees as the size standard for NAICS 333310, which is a
newly defined industry under NAICS 2022 encompassing elements from
NAICS 333314, 333316, and 333318. The commenter argued that adopting
the higher size standard would expand the runway for small businesses
in this industry to compete against a greater number of large
competitors with greater resources. Another commenter petitioned SBA to
require all United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulated
entities with current USDA certification status to be available for
periodic surveys and questionnaires regarding their ability to spot,
detect and report human trafficking. Another commenter petitioned SBA
to reconsider the current minimum and maximum size threshold values for
employee-based size standards. The commenter expressed concern with
SBA's language in the proposed rule describing the minimum size
standard as the size an established small business should be to have
adequate capabilities and resources to be able to compete for and
perform Federal contracts, but does not account for small businesses
that are newly formed or just starting operations. The commenter
maintained that, contrary to SBA's language, as small businesses adopt
new technologies and innovation, it is possible to have adequate
capabilities and resources to perform Federal contracts without a high
employee count. Thus, the commenter urged SBA to explore measures such
as financial statements, sales revenue, years in business and other
applicable methods to determine capability and competency. The
commenter also argued that SBA's minimum thresholds affect small
business access to Federal procurement.
SBA Response
SBA agrees with the comment petitioning SBA to adopt 1,000
employees as the size standard for NAICS 333310 under the NAICS 2022
industry structure. On July 5, 2022, SBA published a proposed rule in
the Federal Register with proposed revisions to size standards based on
OMB's NAICS 2022 structure (87 FR 40034). In the proposed rule, SBA
proposed 1,000 employees as the size standard for NAICS 333310 and
adopted the proposed size standard in a final rule, effective October
1, 2022 (87 FR 59240; September 29, 2022). In this final rule, SBA is
adopting changes to size standards based on the NAICS 2017 structure
and applying the adopted changes to the recently adopted NAICS 2022
structure. SBA's NAICS adoption analysis, presented in this final rule
under the section ``Applying the Adopted Changes to the NAICS 2022
Structure,'' supports adopting 1,000 employees as the size standard for
NAICS 333310 based on SBA's established NAICS adoption methodology.
Regarding the comment petitioning SBA to establish reporting
requirements for certain operators under USDA's regulations, SBA notes
that it does not have authority to regulate the trucking industry, nor
does the Agency have purview over any USDA's certification programs.
Thus, SBA has determined that this comment is totally outside the scope
of this final rule.
Regarding the comment petitioning SBA to reconsider the current
minimum and maximum threshold values for employee-based size standards,
SBA evaluated employee-based size standards under this rule using its
``Size Standards Methodology'' (Methodology), issued on April 11, 2019,
and available at www.sba.gov/size. SBA's Methodology provides a
detailed description of its analyses of various industry and program
factors and data sources, and how the agency uses the results to
establish and revise size standards. Prior to finalizing the revised
Methodology, SBA issued a notification in the April 27, 2018, edition
of the Federal Register (83 FR 18468) to solicit comments from the
public and notify stakeholders of the proposed changes to the
Methodology. SBA considered all public comments in finalizing the
revised Methodology. For a summary of comments and SBA's responses,
refer to the SBA's April 11, 2019, Federal Register notification of the
issuance of the final revised Methodology (84 FR 14587).
Pursuant to the Methodology, SBA has established 250 employees and
1,500 employees, respectively, as the minimum and maximum size standard
levels for Manufacturing and other industries (excluding Wholesale and
Retail Trade) with employee-based size standards. Accordingly, SBA will
not generally propose or adopt a size standard that is either below the
minimum level or above the maximum, even though the calculations yield
values below the minimum or above the maximum levels. As stated in the
proposed rule, the minimum size standard reflects the size an
established small business should be to have adequate capabilities and
resources to be able to compete for and perform Federal contracts (but
does not account for small businesses that are newly formed or just
starting operations). On the other hand, the maximum size standard
represents the level above which businesses, if qualified as small,
would outcompete much smaller businesses when accessing Federal small
business assistance. SBA notes that SBA's table of size standards at 13
CFR 121.201 only defines the largest a business can be and still be
considered small. As such, although SBA uses 250 employees as the
minimum size threshold for SBA's analysis of size standards, firms with
less than 250 employees may still qualify as small businesses since
they would be below the size threshold for their respective industry.
Thus, SBA does not agree with the commenter that maintaining a minimum
threshold for purposes of analysis of industry factors disadvantages
small firms below the minimum threshold or excludes them from
contracting opportunities. Moreover, SBA believes that this comment is
likely beyond the scope of this rulemaking as the proposed rule did not
propose any changes to SBA's Size Standards Methodology, which was
finalized through notice and comment process in April 2019. SBA notes
that the size standards reflect the maximum
[[Page 9982]]
size a business can be to be considered small.
Summary of Adopted Revisions to Size Standards
Based on the evaluation of public comments it received on the
proposed rule and on its analyses of industry and Federal contracting
factors using the latest available data when the proposed rule was
prepared along with considerations of impacts of the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, in this final rule, SBA is adopting the size standards as
proposed in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule. Thus, SBA is increasing
size standards for 150 industries under NAICS 2017, including 10
industries in NAICS Sector 21 (Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas
Extraction), 10 industries in NAICS Sector 22 (Utilities), 120
industries in NAICS Sector 31-33 (Manufacturing), five industries in
Sector 48-49 (Transportation and Warehousing), three industries in
NAICS Sector 51 (Information), and one subindustry (or ``exception'')
each in NAICS Sector 54 (Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services) and in NAICS Sector 56 (Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation Services). SBA's size standards revisions
adopted in this rule can be found in Table 2, Adopted Size Standards
Revisions (NAICS 2017). Also presented in Table 2 are current and
calculated size standards for comparison.
Table 2--Adopted Size Standards Revisions
[NAICS 2017]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed/
NAICS 2017 industry Current size Calculated adopted size
NAICS 2017 code title standard size standard standard
(employees) (employees) (employees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
212113................................ Anthracite Mining....... 250 600 250
212210................................ Iron Ore Mining......... 750 1,400 1,400
212222................................ Silver Ore Mining....... 250 1,100 250
212230................................ Copper, Nickel, Lead, 750 1,400 1,400
and Zinc Mining.
212291................................ Uranium-Radium-Vanadium 250 900 250
Ore Mining.
212299................................ All Other Metal Ore 750 1,250 1,250
Mining.
212313................................ Crushed and Broken 750 850 850
Granite Mining and
Quarrying.
212319................................ Other Crushed and Broken 500 550 550
Stone Mining and
Quarrying.
212322................................ Industrial Sand Mining.. 500 750 750
212324................................ Kaolin and Ball Clay 750 1,050 750
Mining.
212325................................ Clay and Ceramic and 500 650 650
Refractory Minerals
Mining.
212391................................ Potash, Soda, and Borate 750 1,050 1,050
Mineral Mining.
212392................................ Phosphate Rock Mining... 1,000 1,350 1,000
212393................................ Other Chemical and 500 600 600
Fertilizer Mineral
Mining.
212399................................ All Other Nonmetallic 500 600 600
Mineral Mining.
221111................................ Hydroelectric Power 500 750 750
Generation.
221112................................ Fossil Fuel Electric 750 950 950
Power Generation.
221113................................ Nuclear Electric Power 750 1,150 1,150
Generation.
221114................................ Solar Electric Power 250 700 500
Generation.
221115................................ Wind Electric Power 250 1,150 1,150
Generation.
221116................................ Geothermal Electric 250 1,050 250
Power Generation.
221117................................ Biomass Electric Power 250 550 550
Generation.
221118................................ Other Electric Power 250 650 650
Generation.
221121................................ Electric Bulk Power 500 950 950
Transmission and
Control.
221122................................ Electric Power 1,000 1,100 1,100
Distribution.
221210................................ Natural Gas Distribution 1,000 1,150 1,150
311111................................ Dog and Cat Food 1,000 1,250 1,250
Manufacturing.
311119................................ Other Animal Food 500 650 650
Manufacturing.
311211................................ Flour Milling........... 1,000 1,050 1,050
311212................................ Rice Milling............ 500 750 750
311213................................ Malt Manufacturing...... 500 900 500
311221................................ Wet Corn Milling........ 1,250 1,300 1,300
311224................................ Soybean and Other 1,000 1,250 1,250
Oilseed Processing.
311225................................ Fats and Oils Refining 1,000 1,100 1,100
and Blending.
311230................................ Breakfast Cereal 1,000 1,300 1,300
Manufacturing.
311313................................ Beet Sugar Manufacturing 750 1,150 1,150
311314................................ Cane Sugar Manufacturing 1,000 1,050 1,050
311411................................ Frozen Fruit, Juice, and 1,000 1,100 1,100
Vegetable Manufacturing.
311422................................ Specialty Canning....... 1,250 1,400 1,400
311511................................ Fluid Milk Manufacturing 1,000 1,150 1,150
311512................................ Creamery Butter 750 1,000 750
Manufacturing.
311514................................ Dry, Condensed, and 750 1,000 1,000
Evaporated Dairy
Product Manufacturing.
311611................................ Animal (except Poultry) 1,000 1,150 1,150
Slaughtering.
311824................................ Dry Pasta, Dough, and 750 850 850
Flour Mixes
Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour.
311920................................ Coffee and Tea 750 1,000 1,000
Manufacturing.
311930................................ Flavoring Syrup and 1,000 1,100 1,100
Concentrate
Manufacturing.
311941................................ Mayonnaise, Dressing, 750 850 850
and Other Prepared
Sauce Manufacturing.
311942................................ Spice and Extract 500 650 650
Manufacturing.
311991................................ Perishable Prepared Food 500 700 700
Manufacturing.
311999................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 700 700
Food Manufacturing.
[[Page 9983]]
312111................................ Soft Drink Manufacturing 1,250 1,400 1,400
312112................................ Bottled Water 1,000 1,100 1,100
Manufacturing.
312140................................ Distilleries............ 1,000 1,100 1,100
313220................................ Narrow Fabric Mills and 500 550 550
Schiffli Machine
Embroidery.
313230................................ Nonwoven Fabric Mills... 750 850 850
314999................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 550 550
Textile Product Mills.
315190................................ Other Apparel Knitting 750 850 850
Mills.
315990................................ Apparel Accessories and 500 600 600
Other Apparel
Manufacturing.
316110................................ Leather and Hide Tanning 500 800 800
and Finishing.
316992................................ Women's Handbag and 750 850 750
Purse Manufacturing.
321113................................ Sawmills................ 500 550 550
321114................................ Wood Preservation....... 500 550 550
321211................................ Hardwood Veneer and 500 600 600
Plywood Manufacturing.
322110................................ Pulp Mills.............. 750 1,050 1,050
322122................................ Newsprint Mills......... 750 1,050 1,050
323111................................ Commercial Printing 500 650 650
(except Screen and
Books).
323120................................ Support Activities for 500 550 550
Printing.
324122................................ Asphalt Shingle and 750 1,100 1,100
Coating Materials
Manufacturing.
324191................................ Petroleum Lubricating 750 900 900
Oil and Grease
Manufacturing.
324199................................ All Other Petroleum and 500 950 950
Coal Products
Manufacturing.
325110................................ Petrochemical 1,000 1,300 1,300
Manufacturing.
325120................................ Industrial Gas 1,000 1,200 1,200
Manufacturing.
325130................................ Synthetic Dye and 1,000 1,050 1,050
Pigment Manufacturing.
325220................................ Artificial and Synthetic 1,000 1,050 1,050
Fibers and Filaments
Manufacturing.
325311................................ Nitrogenous Fertilizer 1,000 1,050 1,050
Manufacturing.
325312................................ Phosphatic Fertilizer 750 1,350 1,350
Manufacturing.
325314................................ Fertilizer (Mixing Only) 500 550 550
Manufacturing.
325320................................ Pesticide and Other 1,000 1,150 1,150
Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing.
325412................................ Pharmaceutical 1,250 1,300 1,300
Preparation
Manufacturing.
325520................................ Adhesive Manufacturing.. 500 550 550
325611................................ Soap and Other Detergent 1,000 1,100 1,100
Manufacturing.
325612................................ Polish and Other 750 900 900
Sanitation Good
Manufacturing.
325613................................ Surface Active Agent 750 1,100 1,100
Manufacturing.
325910................................ Printing Ink 500 750 750
Manufacturing.
325991................................ Custom Compounding of 500 600 600
Purchased Resins.
325998................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 650 650
Chemical Product and
Preparation
Manufacturing.
326121................................ Unlaminated Plastics 500 600 600
Profile Shape
Manufacturing.
326130................................ Laminated Plastics 500 650 650
Plate, Sheet (except
Packaging), and Shape
Manufacturing.
326220................................ Rubber and Plastics 750 800 800
Hoses and Belting
Manufacturing.
326299................................ All Other Rubber Product 500 650 650
Manufacturing.
327211................................ Flat Glass Manufacturing 1,000 1,100 1,100
327410................................ Lime Manufacturing...... 750 1,050 1,050
327910................................ Abrasive Product 750 900 900
Manufacturing.
327992................................ Ground or Treated 500 600 600
Mineral and Earth
Manufacturing.
327999................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 750 750
Nonmetallic Mineral
Product Manufacturing.
331313................................ Alumina Refining and 1,000 1,300 1,300
Primary Aluminum
Production.
331315................................ Aluminum Sheet, Plate, 1,250 1,400 1,400
and Foil Manufacturing.
331420................................ Copper Rolling, Drawing, 1,000 1,050 1,050
Extruding, and Alloying.
331491................................ Nonferrous Metal (except 750 900 900
Copper and Aluminum)
Rolling, Drawing, and
Extruding.
331492................................ Secondary Smelting, 750 850 850
Refining, and Alloying
of Nonferrous Metal
(except Copper and
Aluminum).
331512................................ Steel Investment 1,000 1,050 1,050
Foundries.
331513................................ Steel Foundries (except 500 700 700
Investment).
331523................................ Nonferrous Metal Die- 500 700 700
Casting Foundries.
331524................................ Aluminum Foundries 500 550 550
(except Die-Casting).
332112................................ Nonferrous Forging...... 750 950 950
332114................................ Custom Roll Forming..... 500 600 600
332117................................ Powder Metallurgy Part 500 550 550
Manufacturing.
332215................................ Metal Kitchen Cookware, 750 1,000 1,000
Utensil, Cutlery, and
Flatware (except
Precious) Manufacturing.
332439................................ Other Metal Container 500 600 600
Manufacturing.
332613................................ Spring Manufacturing.... 500 600 600
332722................................ Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, 500 600 600
and Washer
Manufacturing.
[[Page 9984]]
332812................................ Metal Coating, Engraving 500 600 600
(except Jewelry and
Silverware), and Allied
Services to
Manufacturers.
332992................................ Small Arms Ammunition 1,250 1,300 1,300
Manufacturing.
332996................................ Fabricated Pipe and Pipe 500 550 550
Fitting Manufacturing.
333131................................ Mining Machinery and 500 900 900
Equipment Manufacturing.
333243................................ Sawmill, Woodworking, 500 550 550
and Paper Machinery
Manufacturing.
333314................................ Optical Instrument and 500 600 600
Lens Manufacturing.
333924................................ Industrial Truck, 750 900 900
Tractor, Trailer, and
Stacker Machinery
Manufacturing.
333991................................ Power-Driven Hand Tool 500 950 950
Manufacturing.
333993................................ Packaging Machinery 500 600 600
Manufacturing.
333995................................ Fluid Power Cylinder and 750 800 800
Actuator Manufacturing.
333997................................ Scale and Balance 500 700 700
Manufacturing.
334290................................ Other Communications 750 800 800
Equipment Manufacturing.
334416................................ Capacitor, Resistor, 500 550 550
Coil, Transformer, and
Other Inductor
Manufacturing.
334511................................ Search, Detection, 1,250 1,350 1,350
Navigation, Guidance,
Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and
Instrument
Manufacturing.
334512................................ Automatic Environmental 500 650 650
Control Manufacturing
for Residential,
Commercial, and
Appliance Use.
334514................................ Totalizing Fluid Meter 750 850 850
and Counting Device
Manufacturing.
334517................................ Irradiation Apparatus 1,000 1,200 1,200
Manufacturing.
334519................................ Other Measuring and 500 600 600
Controlling Device
Manufacturing.
335122................................ Commercial, Industrial, 500 600 600
and Institutional
Electric Lighting
Fixture Manufacturing.
335129................................ Other Lighting Equipment 500 550 550
Manufacturing.
335311................................ Power, Distribution, and 750 800 800
Specialty Transformer
Manufacturing.
335912................................ Primary Battery 1,000 1,300 1,300
Manufacturing.
335931................................ Current-Carrying Wiring 500 600 600
Device Manufacturing.
335991................................ Carbon and Graphite 750 900 900
Product Manufacturing.
335999................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 600 600
Electrical Equipment
and Component
Manufacturing.
336310................................ Motor Vehicle Gasoline 1,000 1,050 1,050
Engine and Engine Parts
Manufacturing.
336414................................ Guided Missile and Space 1,250 1,300 1,300
Vehicle Manufacturing.
336419................................ Other Guided Missile and 1,000 1,050 1,050
Space Vehicle Parts and
Auxiliary Equipment
Manufacturing.
336611................................ Ship Building and 1,250 1,300 1,300
Repairing.
336991................................ Motorcycle, Bicycle, and 1,000 1,050 1,050
Parts Manufacturing.
337125................................ Household Furniture 750 950 950
(except Wood and Metal)
Manufacturing.
337214................................ Office Furniture (except 1,000 1,100 1,100
Wood) Manufacturing.
339113................................ Surgical Appliance and 750 800 800
Supplies Manufacturing.
339910................................ Jewelry and Silverware 500 700 700
Manufacturing.
339930................................ Doll, Toy, and Game 500 700 700
Manufacturing.
339991................................ Gasket, Packing, and 500 600 600
Sealing Device
Manufacturing.
339994................................ Broom, Brush, and Mop 500 750 750
Manufacturing.
339999................................ All Other Miscellaneous 500 550 550
Manufacturing.
483111................................ Deep Sea Freight 500 1,050 1,050
Transportation.
483113................................ Coastal and Great Lakes 750 800 800
Freight Transportation.
483114................................ Coastal and Great Lakes 500 550 550
Passenger
Transportation.
483211................................ Inland Water Freight 750 1,050 1,050
Transportation.
483212................................ Inland Water Passenger 500 550 550
Transportation.
511199................................ All Other Publishers.... 500 550 550
512230................................ Music Publishers........ 750 900 900
512250................................ Record Production and 250 900 900
Distribution.
541715 (Exception 3).................. Guided Missiles and 1,250 1,300 1,300
Space Vehicles, Their
Propulsion Units and
Propulsion Parts.
562910 (Exception..................... Environmental 750 1,000 1,000
Remediation Services.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3, Summary of Adopted Size Standards Revisions by Sector
(NAICS 2017), summarizes the adopted changes to size standards by NAICS
sector.
[[Page 9985]]
Table 3--Summary of Adopted Size Standards Revisions by Sector
[NAICS 2017]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of size Number of size Number of size Number of size
Sector Sector name standards standards standards standards
reviewed increased decreased maintained
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21............................................ Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and 24 10 0 14
Gas Extraction.
22............................................ Utilities....................... 11 10 0 1
31-33......................................... Manufacturing................... 360 120 0 240
48-49......................................... Transportation and Warehousing.. 15 5 0 10
51............................................ Information..................... 12 3 0 9
54............................................ Professional, Scientific and 7 1 0 6
Technical Services.
Other Sectors................................. Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 3 1 0 2
and Hunting; Finance and
Insurance; Administrative and
Support, Waste Management and
Remediation Services.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... ................................ 432 150 0 282
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applying the Adopted Changes to the NAICS 2022 Structure
Under this final rule, SBA has reviewed the size standards for 56
NAICS 2017 industries or their parts with employee-based size standards
(excluding employee-based size standards in Sectors 42 and 44-45) and
one industry with a receipts-based size standard that were split,
merged, or modified to become part of 36 new industries under OMB's
NAICS 2022 changes. Overall, OMB's NAICS 2022 revisions created 111 new
industries by reclassifying, combining, or splitting 156 NAICS 2017
industries or their parts.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Complete information on the relationship between NAICS 2017
and NAICS 2022 is available on the U.S. Bureau of the Census (Census
Bureau) website at https://www.census.gov/naics/. The Census
Bureau's website also provides detailed documentation on Federal
notices involving the replacement of SIC with NAICS, and all
subsequent NAICS updates and revisions, including both the July 2,
2021, and December 21, 2021, Federal notices regarding the NAICS
2022 revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to issuing this final rule on employee-based size standards,
SBA incorporated OMB's NAICS 2022 changes into its Table of Size
Standards at 13 CFR 121.201 in a final rule, effective October 1, 2022
(87 FR 59240; September 29, 2022), using the newly adopted size
standards under SBA's review of size standards under the Jobs Act.
Specifically, as stated above, as part of SBA's second five-year review
of size standards under the Jobs Act, SBA revised all monetary-based
size standards and employee-based size standards under NAICS Sectors 42
(Wholesale Trade) and 44-45 (Retail Trade).
Of the 36 new industries with employee-based size standards
(excluding Sectors 42 and 44-45) that were created under the NAICS 2022
revision, 27 were formed by combining more than one NAICS 2017 industry
or industry part, often with new 6-digit codes and industry titles.
Three new industries were formed by changing the 6-digit code without
changing the industry title, two industries were formed by changing the
title without changing the 6-digit code, and four remaining industries
had either their content, definition, or content changed, usually
involving parts of NAICS 2017 industries.
SBA's methodology for incorporating OMB's NAICS revisions into size
standards is generally well-established. On October 22, 1999, SBA
proposed to replace the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) System
with NAICS 1997 as the basis of industry definitions for its table of
small business size standards (64 FR 57188). The proposed rule included
a set of guidelines or rules that SBA applied to convert the size
standards for industries under SIC to industries under NAICS. The
guidelines primarily aimed to minimize the impact of applying a new
industry classification system on SBA's size standards and on small
businesses that qualified as small under the SIC-based size standards.
SBA received no negative comments against the proposed guidelines.
Thus, SBA published its final rule on May 15, 2000 (65 FR 30386),
corrected on September 5, 2000 (65 FR 53533), adopting the resulting
table of size standards based on NAICS 1997 structure, as proposed. To
be consistent, SBA generally applied the same guidelines when it
updated its table of size standards to adopt NAICS 2002, NAICS 2007,
NAICS 2012, NAICS 2017, and NAICS 2022 revisions. In those updates as
well, SBA received no adverse comments against using those guidelines,
or against the resulting changes to the size standards. These
guidelines to adopt OMB's NAICS revisions were also included in the
SBA's ``Size Standards Methodology'' white paper and SBA received no
adverse comments when the revised methodology was open for public
comments. The applicable guidelines are shown below in Table 4,
``General Guidelines to Establish Size Standards for New Industries
under NAICS 2022.''
Table 4--General Guidelines To Establish Size Standards for New
Industries Under NAICS 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The size standard for the NAICS
If the NAICS 2022 industry is composed 2022 industry code will be:
of:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. A single NAICS 2012 industry or part The same size standard as for
of a single NAICS 2012 industry. the NAICS 2012 industry or
part.
2. Two or more NAICS 2017 industries; ...............................
two or more parts of an NAICS 2017
industry; parts of two or more NAICS
2017 industries; or one or more NAICS
2017 industries and part(s) of one or
more NAICS 2017 industries, and
2a. they all have the same size The same size standard as for
standard. the NAICS 2017 industries or
parts.
[[Page 9986]]
2b. they all have the same size The same size standard as for
measure (e.g., receipts, the NAICS 2017 industry or
employees, etc.) but do not all part that most closely matches
have the same size standard. the economic activity
described by the NAICS 2022
industry, or
The highest size standard among
the NAICS 2017 industries and
part(s) that comprise the
NAICS 2022 industry, provided
that the highest size standard
does not include dominant or
potentially dominant firms.
2c. they have different size The same size standard as for
measures (i.e., for example, some the NAICS 2017 industry or
are based on receipts and others part that most closely matches
on employees) and hence do not all the economic activity
have the same size standard. described by the NAICS 2022
industry, or
The highest size standard among
the NAICS 2017 industries and
part(s) that comprise the
NAICS 2022 industry, provided
that the highest size standard
does not include dominant or
potentially dominant firms.
To apply this rule, SBA
converts all size standards to
a single measure (e.g.,
receipts, employees, etc.)
using the size measure for the
NAICS 2017 industry or part(s)
that most closely match the
economic activity described by
the NAICS 2022 industry or
using the size measure that
applies to most of the NAICS
industries or parts comprising
the NAICS 2022 industry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus, in this final rule, SBA is incorporating the adopted size
standards, as presented in Table 2 (above), into the table of size
standards based on NAICS 2022 following the guidelines prescribed in
Table 4 (above).
SBA identified 56 NAICS 2017 unique industries or their parts
reviewed under this final rule that became part of 37 new industries
under NAICS 2022. New size standards for the 37 new NAICS 2022
industries resulted in a reduction in size standard for eight
industries under NAICS 2017, an increase to size standard for 12
industries and 2 parts of one industry, change in the size standard
from employees to receipts for one industry, and no change in size
standards for the remaining 35 NAICS 2017 industries or their parts.
Among the 37 new industries under NAICS 2022 evaluated in this final
rule, compared to the size standards adopted in the September 2022
NAICS 2022 adoption final rule, size standards increased for 10
industries and remained the same for the remaining 27 industries. Table
5, Size Standards for Industries Under NAICS 2017 Matched to NAICS
2022, below, presents these results.
Table 5--Size Standards for Industries Under NAICS 2017 Matched to NAICS 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS 2017 industry NAICS 2017
title (and specific NAICS 2017 standard NAICS 2022 standard standard
NAICS 2022 industry Concordance piece of the NAICS prior to NAICS 2022 after NAICS 2022 adopted under NAICS 2022 standard
NAICS 2022 code title with NAICS 2017 industry that is adoption (employees or $ adoption (employees or $ this final under this final rule
2017 code contained in the million) million) rule (employees or $ million)
NAICS 2022 industry) (employees)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
212114............................. Surface Coal Mining... 212111 Bituminous Coal and 1,250................... 1,250................... 1,250 1,250.
Lignite Surface
Mining.
212113 Anthracite Mining-- 250..................... ........................ 250
Anthracite surface
mining.
212115............................. Underground Coal 212112 Bituminous Coal 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Mining. Underground Mining.
212113 Anthracite Mining-- 250..................... ........................ 250
Anthracite
underground mining.
212220............................. Gold Ore and Silver 212221 Gold Ore Mining...... 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Ore Mining. 212222 Silver Ore Mining.... 250..................... 250
212290............................. Other Metal Ore Mining 212291 Uranium-Radium- 250..................... 750..................... 250 1,250.
Vanadium Ore Mining.
212299 All Other Metal Ore 750..................... ........................ 1,250
Mining.
212323............................. Kaolin, Clay, and 212324 Kaolin and Ball Clay 750..................... 500..................... 750 650.
Ceramic and Mining.
Refractory Minerals
Mining.
212325 Clay and Ceramic and 500..................... ........................ 650
Refractory Minerals
Mining.
212390............................. Other Nonmetallic 212391 Potash, Soda, and 750..................... 500..................... 1,050 600.
Mineral Mining and Borate Mineral
Quarrying. Mining.
212392 Phosphate Rock Mining 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
212393 Other Chemical and 500..................... ........................ 600
Fertilizer Mineral
Mining.
212399 All Other Nonmetallic 500..................... ........................ 600
Mineral Mining.
311221............................. Wet Corn Milling and 311221 Wet Corn Milling..... 1,250................... 1,250................... 1,300 1,300.
Starch Manufacturing.
315120............................. Apparel Knitting Mills 315110 Hosiery and Sock 750..................... 750..................... 750 850.
Mills.
315190 Other Apparel 750..................... ........................ 850
Knitting Mills.
[[Page 9987]]
315250............................. Cut and Sew Apparel 315220 Men's and Boys' Cut 750..................... 750..................... 750 750.
Manufacturing (except and Sew Apparel
Contractors). Manufacturing.
315240 Women's, Girls', and 750..................... ........................ 750
Infants' Cut and Sew
Apparel
Manufacturing.
315280 Other Cut and Sew 750..................... ........................ 750
Apparel
Manufacturing.
316990............................. Other Leather and 316992 Women's Handbag and 750..................... 500..................... 750 500.
Allied Product Purse Manufacturing.
Manufacturing.
316998 All Other Leather 500..................... ........................ 500
Good and Allied
Product
Manufacturing.
321215............................. Engineered Wood Member 321213 Engineered Wood 750..................... 500..................... 750 500.
Manufacturing. Member (except
Truss) Manufacturing.
321214 Truss Manufacturing.. 500..................... ........................ 500
322120............................. Paper Mills........... 322121 Paper (except 1,250................... 1,250................... 1,250 1,250.
Newsprint) Mills.
322122 Newsprint Mills...... 750..................... ........................ 1,050
325314............................. Fertilizer (Mixing 325314 Fertilizer (Mixing 500..................... 500..................... 550 550.
Only) Manufacturing. Only) Manufacturing--
except compost
manufacturing.
325315............................. Compost Manufacturing. 325314 Fertilizer (Mixing 500..................... 500..................... 550 550.
Only) Manufacturing--
compost
manufacturing.
325992............................. Photographic Film, 325992 Photographic Film, 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Paper, Plate, Paper, Plate, and
Chemical, and Copy Chemical
Toner Manufacturing. Manufacturing.
333248............................. All Other Industrial 333244 Printing Machinery 750..................... 750..................... 750 750.
Machinery and Equipment
Manufacturing. Manufacturing.
333249 Other Industrial 500..................... ........................ 500
Machinery
Manufacturing.
333310............................. Commercial and Service 333314 Optical Instrument 500..................... 1,000................... 600 1,000.
Industry Machinery and Lens
Manufacturing. Manufacturing.
333316 Photographic and 1,000................... 1,000................... ..............
Photocopying
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333318 Other Commercial and 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
Service Industry
Machinery
Manufacturing.
333998............................. All Other 333997 Scale and Balance 500..................... 500..................... 700 700.
Miscellaneous General Manufacturing.
Purpose Machinery
Manufacturing.
333999 All Other 500..................... ........................ 500
Miscellaneous
General Purpose
Machinery
Manufacturing.
334610............................. Manufacturing and 334613 Blank Magnetic and 1,000................... 1,250................... 1,000 1,250.
Reproducing Magnetic Optical Recording
and Optical Media. Media Manufacturing.
334614 Software and Other 1,250................... ........................ 1,250
Prerecorded Compact
Disc, Tape, and
Record Reproducing.
335131............................. Residential Electric 335121 Residential Electric 750..................... 750..................... 750 750.
Lighting Fixture Lighting Fixture
Manufacturing. Manufacturing.
335132............................. Commercial, 335122 Commercial, 500..................... 500..................... 600 600.
Industrial, and Industrial, and
Institutional Institutional
Electric Lighting Electric Lighting
Fixture Manufacturing. Fixture
Manufacturing.
335139............................. Electric Lamp Bulb and 335110 Electric Lamp Bulb 1,250................... 1,250................... 1,250 1,250.
Other Lighting and Part
Equipment Manufacturing.
Manufacturing.
335129 Other Lighting 500..................... ........................ 550
Equipment
Manufacturing.
335910............................. Battery Manufacturing. 335911 Storage Battery 1,250................... 1,250................... 1,250 1,250.
Manufacturing.
335912 Primary Battery 1,000................... ........................ 1,300
Manufacturing.
336110............................. Automobile and Light 336111 Automobile 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.
Manufacturing.
[[Page 9988]]
336112 Light Truck and 1,500................... ........................ 1,500
Utility Vehicle
Manufacturing.
337126............................. Household Furniture 337124 Metal Household 750..................... 750..................... 750 950.
(except Wood and Furniture
Upholstered) Manufacturing.
Manufacturing.
337125 Household Furniture 750..................... ........................ 950
(except Wood and
Metal) Manufacturing.
513110............................. Newspaper Publishers.. 511110 Newspaper Publishers. 1,000................... 1,000................... 1,000 1,000.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
Internet newspaper
publishers.
513120............................. Periodical Publishers. 511120 Periodical Publishers 1,000................... 1,000................... 1,000 1,000.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals --
Internet periodical
publishers.
513130............................. Book Publishers....... 511130 Book Publishers...... 1,000................... 1,000................... 1,000 1,000.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
Internet book
publishers.
513140............................. Directory and Mailing 511140 Directory and Mailing 1,250................... 1,000................... 1,250 1,000.
List Publishers. List Publishers.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
Internet directory
and mailing list
publishers.
513191............................. Greeting Card 511191 Greeting Card 1,500................... 1,000................... 1,500 1,000.
Publishers. Publishers.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
Internet greeting
card publishers.
513199............................. All Other Publishers.. 511199 All Other Publishers. 500..................... 1,000................... 550 1,000.
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
All other Internet
publishers.
516210............................. Media Streaming 515111 Radio Networks....... $41.5 million........... $41.5 million........... .............. $41.5 million.
Distribution
Services, Social
Networks, and Other
Media Networks and
Content Providers.
515120 Television $41.5 million........... ........................ ..............
Broadcasting--televi
sion networks.
515210 Cable and Other $41.5 million........... ........................ ..............
Subscription
Programming.
519110 News Syndicates...... $32.0 million........... ........................ ..............
519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... ........................ 1,000
and Broadcasting and
Web Search Portals--
Internet
broadcasting.
517111............................. Wired 517311 Wired 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Telecommunications Telecommunications
Carriers. Carriers.
517112............................. Wireless 517312 Wireless 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Telecommunications Telecommunications
Carriers (except Carriers (except
Satellite). Satellite)--Except
agents for wireless
telecommunications
carriers.
517121............................. Telecommunications 517911 Telecommunications 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Resellers. Resellers--Except
agents for wireless
telecommunications
resellers.
517122............................. Agents for Wireless 517312 Wireless 1,500................... 1,500................... 1,500 1,500.
Telecommunications Telecommunications
Services. Carriers (except
Satellite)--Agents
for wireless
telecommunications
carriers.
517911 Telecommunications 1,500................... ........................ 1,500
Resellers--Agents
for wireless
telecommunications
resellers.
[[Page 9989]]
519290............................. Web Search Portals and 519130 Internet Publishing 1,000................... 1,000................... 1,000 1,000.
All Other Information and Broadcasting and
Services. Web Search Portals--
Web search portals.
519190 All Other Information $30.0 million...........
Services.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By combining the results of Table 2 and Table 5 (above), in Table 6
(below), Adopted Size Standard Revisions (NAICS 2022), SBA presents
revisions to size standards resulting from the incorporation of the
adopted size standards into the NAICS 2022 structure.
Table 6--Adopted Size Standards Revisions
[NAICS 2022]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current size Adopted size
2022 NAICS Code NAICS 2022 industry title standards standards
(employees) (employees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
212210..................................... Iron Ore Mining.................... 750 1,400
212230..................................... Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc 750 1,400
Mining.
212290..................................... Other Metal Ore Mining............. 750 1,250
212313..................................... Crushed and Broken Granite Mining 750 850
and Quarrying.
212319..................................... Other Crushed and Broken Stone 500 550
Mining and Quarrying.
212322..................................... Industrial Sand Mining............. 500 750
212323..................................... Kaolin, Clay, and Ceramic and 500 650
Refractory Minerals Mining.
212390..................................... Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining 500 600
and Quarrying.
221111..................................... Hydroelectric Power Generation..... 500 750
221112..................................... Fossil Fuel Electric Power 750 950
Generation.
221113..................................... Nuclear Electric Power Generation.. 750 1,150
221114..................................... Solar Electric Power Generation.... 250 500
221115..................................... Wind Electric Power Generation..... 250 1,150
221117..................................... Biomass Electric Power Generation.. 250 550
221118..................................... Other Electric Power Generation.... 250 650
221121..................................... Electric Bulk Power Transmission 500 950
and Control.
221122..................................... Electric Power Distribution........ 1,000 1,100
221210..................................... Natural Gas Distribution........... 1,000 1,150
311111..................................... Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing..... 1,000 1,250
311119..................................... Other Animal Food Manufacturing.... 500 650
311211..................................... Flour Milling...................... 1,000 1,050
311212..................................... Rice Milling....................... 500 750
311221..................................... Wet Corn Milling and Starch 1,250 1,300
Manufacturing.
311224..................................... Soybean and Other Oilseed 1,000 1,250
Processing.
311225..................................... Fats and Oils Refining and Blending 1,000 1,100
311230..................................... Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing..... 1,000 1,300
311313..................................... Beet Sugar Manufacturing........... 750 1,150
311314..................................... Cane Sugar Manufacturing........... 1,000 1,050
311411..................................... Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable 1,000 1,100
Manufacturing.
311422..................................... Specialty Canning.................. 1,250 1,400
311511..................................... Fluid Milk Manufacturing........... 1,000 1,150
311514..................................... Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated 750 1,000
Dairy Product Manufacturing.
311611..................................... Animal (except Poultry) 1,000 1,150
Slaughtering.
311824..................................... Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes 750 850
Manufacturing from Purchased Flour.
311920..................................... Coffee and Tea Manufacturing....... 750 1,000
311930..................................... Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate 1,000 1,100
Manufacturing.
311941..................................... Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other 750 850
Prepared Sauce Manufacturing.
311942..................................... Spice and Extract Manufacturing.... 500 650
311991..................................... Perishable Prepared Food 500 700
Manufacturing.
311999..................................... All Other Miscellaneous Food 500 700
Manufacturing.
312111..................................... Soft Drink Manufacturing........... 1,250 1,400
312112..................................... Bottled Water Manufacturing........ 1,000 1,100
312140..................................... Distilleries....................... 1,000 1,100
313220..................................... Narrow Fabric Mills and Schiffli 500 550
Machine Embroidery.
313230..................................... Nonwoven Fabric Mills.............. 750 850
314999..................................... All Other Miscellaneous Textile 500 550
Product Mills.
315120..................................... Apparel Knitting Mills............. 750 850
315990..................................... Apparel Accessories and Other 500 600
Apparel Manufacturing.
316110..................................... Leather and Hide Tanning and 500 800
Finishing.
[[Page 9990]]
321113..................................... Sawmills........................... 500 550
321114..................................... Wood Preservation.................. 500 550
321211..................................... Hardwood Veneer and Plywood 500 600
Manufacturing.
322110..................................... Pulp Mills......................... 750 1,050
323111..................................... Commercial Printing (except Screen 500 650
and Books).
323120..................................... Support Activities for Printing.... 500 550
324122..................................... Asphalt Shingle and Coating 750 1,100
Materials Manufacturing.
324191..................................... Petroleum Lubricating Oil and 750 900
Grease Manufacturing.
324199..................................... All Other Petroleum and Coal 500 950
Products Manufacturing.
325110..................................... Petrochemical Manufacturing........ 1,000 1,300
325120..................................... Industrial Gas Manufacturing....... 1,000 1,200
325130..................................... Synthetic Dye and Pigment 1,000 1,050
Manufacturing.
325220..................................... Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and 1,000 1,050
Filaments Manufacturing.
325311..................................... Nitrogenous Fertilizer 1,000 1,050
Manufacturing.
325312..................................... Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing 750 1,350
325314..................................... Fertilizer (Mixing Only) 500 550
Manufacturing.
325315..................................... Compost Manufacturing.............. 500 550
325320..................................... Pesticide and Other Agricultural 1,000 1,150
Chemical Manufacturing.
325412..................................... Pharmaceutical Preparation 1,250 1,300
Manufacturing.
325520..................................... Adhesive Manufacturing............. 500 550
325611..................................... Soap and Other Detergent 1,000 1,100
Manufacturing.
325612..................................... Polish and Other Sanitation Good 750 900
Manufacturing.
325613..................................... Surface Active Agent Manufacturing. 750 1,100
325910..................................... Printing Ink Manufacturing......... 500 750
325991..................................... Custom Compounding of Purchased 500 600
Resins.
325998..................................... All Other Miscellaneous Chemical 500 650
Product and Preparation
Manufacturing.
326121..................................... Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape 500 600
Manufacturing.
326130..................................... Laminated Plastics Plate, Sheet 500 650
(except Packaging), and Shape
Manufacturing.
326220..................................... Rubber and Plastics Hoses and 750 800
Belting Manufacturing.
326299..................................... All Other Rubber Product 500 650
Manufacturing.
327211..................................... Flat Glass Manufacturing........... 1,000 1,100
327410..................................... Lime Manufacturing................. 750 1,050
327910..................................... Abrasive Product Manufacturing..... 750 900
327992..................................... Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth 500 600
Manufacturing.
327999..................................... All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic 500 750
Mineral Product Manufacturing.
331313..................................... Alumina Refining and Primary 1,000 1,300
Aluminum Production.
331315..................................... Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil 1,250 1,400
Manufacturing.
331420..................................... Copper Rolling, Drawing, Extruding, 1,000 1,050
and Alloying.
331491..................................... Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and 750 900
Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and
Extruding.
331492..................................... Secondary Smelting, Refining, and 750 850
Alloying of Nonferrous Metal
(except Copper and Aluminum).
331512..................................... Steel Investment Foundries......... 1,000 1,050
331513..................................... Steel Foundries (except Investment) 500 700
331523..................................... Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting 500 700
Foundries.
331524..................................... Aluminum Foundries (except Die- 500 550
Casting).
332112..................................... Nonferrous Forging................. 750 950
332114..................................... Custom Roll Forming................ 500 600
332117..................................... Powder Metallurgy Part 500 550
Manufacturing.
332215..................................... Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, 750 1,000
Cutlery, and Flatware (except
Precious) Manufacturing.
332439..................................... Other Metal Container Manufacturing 500 600
332613..................................... Spring Manufacturing............... 500 600
332722..................................... Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer 500 600
Manufacturing.
332812..................................... Metal Coating, Engraving (except 500 600
Jewelry and Silverware), and
Allied Services to Manufacturers.
332992..................................... Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing 1,250 1,300
332996..................................... Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting 500 550
Manufacturing.
333131..................................... Mining Machinery and Equipment 500 900
Manufacturing.
333243..................................... Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper 500 550
Machinery Manufacturing.
333924..................................... Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, 750 900
and Stacker Machinery
Manufacturing.
333991..................................... Power-Driven Hand Tool 500 950
Manufacturing.
333993..................................... Packaging Machinery Manufacturing.. 500 600
333995..................................... Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator 750 800
Manufacturing.
333998..................................... All Other Miscellaneous General 500 700
Purpose Machinery Manufacturing.
334290..................................... Other Communications Equipment 750 800
Manufacturing.
334416..................................... Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, 500 550
Transformer, and Other Inductor
Manufacturing.
334511..................................... Search, Detection, Navigation, 1,250 1,350
Guidance, Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and Instrument
Manufacturing.
[[Page 9991]]
334512..................................... Automatic Environmental Control 500 650
Manufacturing for Residential,
Commercial, and Appliance Use.
334514..................................... Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting 750 850
Device Manufacturing.
334517..................................... Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing 1,000 1,200
334519..................................... Other Measuring and Controlling 500 600
Device Manufacturing.
335132..................................... Commercial, Industrial, and 500 600
Institutional Electric Lighting
Fixture Manufacturing.
335311..................................... Power, Distribution, and Specialty 750 800
Transformer Manufacturing.
335931..................................... Current-Carrying Wiring Device 500 600
Manufacturing.
335991..................................... Carbon and Graphite Product 750 900
Manufacturing.
335999..................................... All Other Miscellaneous Electrical 500 600
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing.
336310..................................... Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and 1,000 1,050
Engine Parts Manufacturing.
336414..................................... Guided Missile and Space Vehicle 1,250 1,300
Manufacturing.
336419..................................... Other Guided Missile and Space 1,000 1,050
Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary
Equipment Manufacturing.
336611..................................... Ship Building and Repairing........ 1,250 1,300
336991..................................... Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts 1,000 1,050
Manufacturing.
337126..................................... Household Furniture (except Wood 750 950
and Upholstered) Manufacturing.
337214..................................... Office Furniture (except Wood) 1,000 1,100
Manufacturing.
339113..................................... Surgical Appliance and Supplies 750 800
Manufacturing.
339910..................................... Jewelry and Silverware 500 700
Manufacturing.
339930..................................... Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing.. 500 700
339991..................................... Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device 500 600
Manufacturing.
339994..................................... Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing 500 750
339999..................................... All Other Miscellaneous 500 550
Manufacturing.
483111..................................... Deep Sea Freight Transportation.... 500 1,050
483113..................................... Coastal and Great Lakes Freight 750 800
Transportation.
483114..................................... Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger 500 550
Transportation.
483211..................................... Inland Water Freight Transportation 750 1,050
483212..................................... Inland Water Passenger 500 550
Transportation.
512230..................................... Music Publishers................... 750 900
512250..................................... Record Production and Distribution. 250 900
541715 (Exception 3)....................... Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles, 1,250 1,300
Their Propulsion Units and
Propulsion Parts.
562910 (Exception)......................... Environmental Remediation Services. 750 1,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 7, Summary of Adopted Size Standards Revisions by Sector
(NAICS 2022), summarizes the adopted changes to size standards in this
final rule by NAICS sector. Accordingly, of 412 NAICS 2022 employee-
based size standards reviewed in this rule, SBA is increasing 144,
including 117 in Sector 31-33, ten in Sector 22, eight in Sector 21,
five in Sector 48-49, two in Sector 51, and one each in Sector 54 and
Sector 56. SBA is retaining the remaining 268 employee-based size
standards in those sectors, including 204 size standards that would
decrease based on analytical results. In the April 2022 proposed rule
as well as other rulemakings as part of the second five-year review of
size standards, in response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, SBA
maintained current size standards where the analytical results
supported decreases. SBA is also retaining the remaining 64 size
standards for which the results suggested no changes.
Table 7--Summary of Adopted Size Standards Revisions by Sector
[NAICS 2022]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of size Number of size Number of size Number of size
NAICS sector Sector name standards standards standards standards
reviewed increased decreased maintained
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21............................................. Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas 17 8 0 9
Extraction.
22............................................. Utilities.............................. 11 10 0 1
31-33.......................................... Manufacturing.......................... 346 117 0 229
48-49.......................................... Transportation and Warehousing......... 15 5 0 10
51............................................. Information............................ 13 2 0 11
54............................................. Professional, Scientific and Technical 7 1 0 6
Services.
Other Sectors.................................. Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and 3 1 0 2
Hunting; Finance and Insurance;
Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... ....................................... 412 144 0 268
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9992]]
Evaluation of Dominance in Field of Operation
SBA determined that for the industries evaluated under this final
rule, no individual firm at or below the revised size standards in
Table 6 (above) would be large enough to dominate its field of
operation. At the size standard levels adopted in this final rule,
based on 2017 Economic Census, an individual firm's share of total
industry receipts among those industries would be, on average, 2.3
percent, varying from 0.1 percent to 21.4 percent. Generally, SBA
believes the shares below 40 percent would preclude dominant firms from
qualifying as small and exerting control on any industry. Thus, the
above market shares effectively preclude a firm at or below the revised
size standards from exerting control on any of the industries.
Alternatives Considered
In response to the unprecedented economic impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on small businesses and government response, SBA is adopting
increases to size standards where the data suggests increases are
warranted; and retaining all current size standards where the data
suggested lowering is appropriate. SBA is also retaining all current
size standards where the data suggested no changes to the current size
standards.
Nonetheless, SBA considered two other alternatives. Alternative
Option One was to adopt changes to size standards exactly as suggested
by the analytical results. In other words, Alternative Option One would
entail increasing size standards for 144 industries or subindustries,
decreasing size standards for 204 industries or subindustries, and
retaining size standards at their current levels for 64 industries or
subindustries. Alternative Option Two was to retain all current size
standards.
SBA is not adopting Alternative Option One because it would cause a
substantial number of currently small businesses to lose their small
business status and hence to lose their access to Federal small
business assistance, especially small business set-aside contracts and
SBA's financial assistance in some cases. Impacts of lowering size
standards under Alternative Option One are discussed in detail in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis section of this rule. Lowering size
standards in the current environment would also run counter to various
measures the Federal Government has implemented to help small
businesses and the overall economy recover from the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic. Given the effects of the 2007-2009 Great Recession, and the
resulting government actions to support small businesses and the
overall economy, SBA also adopted a policy of not decreasing size
standards during the first five-year review of size standards, even
though the data supported decreases.
Under Alternative Option Two, given the current COVID-19 pandemic,
SBA considered retaining the current levels of all size standards even
though the analysis of relevant data suggested changing them. Under
this option, as the current situation develops, SBA will be able to
assess new data available on economic indicators, Federal procurement,
and SBA loans before adopting changes to size standards. However, SBA
is not adopting Alternative Option Two because results discussed in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis section, below, show that retaining all size
standards at their current levels would cause otherwise qualified small
businesses to forgo various small business benefits becoming available
to them under the option of increasing 144 and retaining 268 employee-
based size standards. Such benefits would include access to Federal
contracts set aside for small businesses and capital through SBA's loan
and SBIC programs, and exemptions from paperwork and other compliance
requirements.
Federal Procurement Size Standard for Nonmanufacturers
In the April 2022 proposed rule, SBA proposed to maintain the 500-
employee size standard for nonmanufacturers. Based on the evaluation of
public comments pertaining to SBA's proposed size standard, its
analyses of industry factors using the latest available data when the
proposed rule was prepared, and SBA's considerations of other factors
outlined in the proposed rule as well as public comments discussed
above, in this final rule, SBA is adopting 500 employees as the size
standard applicable to nonmanufacturers under 13 CFR 121.406 as
proposed in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801-808), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612),
Executive Orders 13563, 12988, and 13132, and the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
final rule is a significant regulatory action for purposes of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, in the next section SBA provides a Regulatory
Impact Analysis of this final rule, including (1) A statement of the
need for the regulatory action, (2) An examination of alternative
regulatory approaches, and (3) An estimate of the benefits and costs--
both quantitative and qualitative--of the regulatory action and the
alternatives considered.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. What is the need for this regulatory action?
SBA's mission is to aid and assist small businesses through a
variety of financial, procurement, business development and counseling,
and disaster assistance programs. To determine the actual intended
beneficiaries of these programs, SBA establishes numerical size
standards by industry to identify businesses that are deemed small.
Under the Small Business Act (Act) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)), SBA's
Administrator is responsible for establishing small business size
definitions (or ``size standards'') and ensuring that such definitions
vary from industry to industry to reflect differences among various
industries. The Jobs Act requires SBA to review every five years all
size standards and make necessary adjustments to reflect current
industry and Federal market conditions. This final rule is part of the
second five-year review of size standards in accordance with the Jobs
Act. The first five-year review of size standards was completed in
early 2016. Such periodic reviews of size standards provide SBA with an
opportunity to incorporate ongoing changes to industry structure and
Federal market environment into size standards and to evaluate the
impacts of prior revisions to size standards on small businesses. This
also provides SBA with an opportunity to seek and incorporate public
input to the size standards review and analysis. SBA believes that the
size standards revisions adopted for industries being reviewed in this
final rule will make size standards more reflective of the current
economic characteristics of businesses in those industries and the
latest trends in Federal marketplace.
The revisions to the existing size standards for 144 industries or
subindustries (or ``exceptions''), including 117 industries in Sector
31-33 and 27 industries and subindustries in other sectors are
consistent with SBA's statutory mandate to help small businesses grow
and create jobs and to review and adjust size standards every five
years. This regulatory action
[[Page 9993]]
promotes the Administration's goals and objectives as well as meets the
SBA's statutory responsibility. One of SBA's goals in support of
promoting the Administration's objectives is to help small businesses
succeed through fair and equitable access to capital and credit,
Federal Government contracts and purchases, and management and
technical assistance. Reviewing and modifying size standards, when
appropriate, ensures that intended beneficiaries are able to access
Federal small business programs that are designed to assist them to
become competitive and create jobs.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory
action?
OMB directs agencies to establish an appropriate baseline to
evaluate any benefits, costs, or transfer impacts of regulatory actions
and alternative approaches considered. The baseline should represent
the agency's best assessment of what the world would look like absent
the regulatory action. For a new regulatory action promulgating
modifications to an existing regulation (such as modifying the existing
size standards), a baseline assuming no change to the regulation (i.e.,
making no changes to current size standards) generally provides an
appropriate benchmark for evaluating benefits, costs, or transfer
impacts of regulatory changes and their alternatives.
Changes to Size Standards
Based on the results from the analyses of the latest industry and
Federal contracting data, evaluation of the public comments on the
proposed rule, as well as consideration of the impact of size standards
changes on small businesses and significant adverse impacts of the
COVID-19 emergency on small businesses and the overall economic
activity, of the total of 412 industries and subindustries (or
``exceptions'') in Sector 31-33 and other sectors that have employee-
based size standards, SBA increases size standards for 144 industries
or subindustries (``exceptions'') and maintain current size standards
for the remaining 268 industries or subindustries (``exceptions'').
The Baseline
For purposes of this regulatory action, the baseline represents
maintaining the ``status quo,'' i.e., making no changes to the current
size standards. Using the number of small businesses and levels of
benefits (such as set-aside contracts, SBA's loans, disaster
assistance, etc.) they receive under the current size standards as a
baseline, one can examine the potential benefits, costs, and transfer
impacts of changes to size standards on small businesses and on the
overall economy.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census, of a total of about 333,213
businesses in industries in Sectors 31-33 and other sectors with
employee-based size standards, 96.8 percent are considered small under
the current size standards. That percentage varies from 88.0 percent in
NAICS Sector 22 to 99.8 percent in Sector 11. Based on the data from
FPDS-NG for fiscal years 2018-2020, about 41,838 unique firms in those
industries received at least one Federal contract during that period,
of which 84.3 percent were small under the current size standards. A
total of $231.6 billion in average annual contract dollars were awarded
to businesses in those industries during the period of evaluation, and
18.6 percent of the dollars awarded went to small businesses. For
industries and subindustries (``exceptions'') reviewed in this final
rule, providing contract dollars to small business through set-asides
is quite important. From the total small business contract dollars
awarded during the period considered, 47.1 percent were awarded through
various small business set-aside programs and 52.9 percent were awarded
through non-set aside contracts. Based on the SBA's internal data on
its loan programs for fiscal years 2018-2020, small businesses in those
industries received, on an annual basis, a total of 4,877 7(a) and 504
loans in that period, totaling about $3.1 billion, of which 75.8
percent was issued through the 7(a) program and 24.2 percent was issued
through the 504/CDC program. During fiscal years 2018-2020, small
businesses in those industries also received 255 loans through the
SBA's Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program, totaling about
$11.4 million on an annual basis.\7\ Table 8, Baseline for All
Industries (NAICS 2022), below, provides these baseline results for
Manufacturing (Sector 31-33) and all other sectors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The analysis of the disaster loan data excludes physical
disaster loans that are available to anyone regardless of size,
disaster loans issued to nonprofit entities, and EIDLs issued under
the COVID-19 relief program. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped
accepting applications for new COVID EIDL loans or advances. Thus,
the disaster loan analysis presented here pertains to the regular
EIDL loans only.
SBA estimates impacts of size standards changes on EIDL loans by
calculating the ratio of businesses getting EIDL loans to total
small businesses (based on the Economic Census data) and multiplying
it by the number of impacted small firms. Due to data limitations,
for FY 2019-20, some loans with both physical and EIDL loan
components could not be broken into the physical and EIDL loan
amounts. In such cases, SBA applied the ratio of EIDL amount to
total (physical loan + EIDL) amount using FY 2016-18 data to the FY
2019-20 data to obtain the amount attributable to the EIDL loans.
Table 8--Baseline for All Industries
[NAICS 2022]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 31-33 Other sectors Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of industries or subindustries (``exceptions'') reviewed 346 66 412
in this proposed rule..........................................
Total firms in industries reviewed in this proposed rule (2017 259,377 73,836 333,213
Economic Census) \1\...........................................
Total small firms in those industries under current size 250,804 71,813 322,617
standards (2017 Economic Census \1\............................
Small firms as % of total firms (2017 Economic Census) \1\...... 96.7% 97.3% 96.8%
Total contract dollars ($ million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)....... $181,818 $49,758 $231,576
Total small business contract dollars under current standards ($ $28,713 $14,364 $43,078
million) (FPDS-NG FY2018-2020).................................
Small business dollars as % of total dollars (FPDS-NG FY 2018- 15.8% 28.9% 18.6%
2020)..........................................................
Total number of unique firms getting federal contracts (FPDS-NG 34,225 9,312 41,838
FY 2018-2020)..................................................
Total number of unique small firms getting small business 29,056 7,291 35,268
contracts (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)...............................
Small firms getting federal contracts as % of total firms 84.9% 78.3% 84.3%
getting federal contracts (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)...............
Number of 7(a) and CDC/504 loans (FY 2018-2020)................. 4,362 515 4,877
Amount of 7(a) and CDC/504 loans ($ million) (FY 2018-2020)..... $2,863 $248 $3,111
Number of EIDL loans (FY 2018-2020) \2\......................... 202 53 255
[[Page 9994]]
Amount of EIDL loans ($million) (FY 2018-2020) \2\.............. $8.3 $3.1 $11.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ``exceptions'' for which
Economic Census data is not available.
\2\ Excludes COVID-19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped
accepting applications for new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Increases to Size Standards
As stated above, in terms of NAICS 2022, of 412 employee-based size
standards in Sectors 31-33 and other sectors that are reviewed in this
rule, based on the results from analyses of latest industry and Federal
market data as well as impacts of size standards changes on small
businesses and considerations for the impacts from the COVID-19
pandemic, SBA increases 144 size standards, including 117 in Sector 31-
33 and 27 in other sectors. Below are descriptions of the benefits,
costs, and transfer impacts of these increases to size standards.
Benefits of Increases to Size Standards
The most significant benefit to businesses from increases to size
standards is gaining eligibility for Federal small business assistance
programs or retaining that eligibility for a longer period. These
include SBA's business loan programs, EIDL program, and Federal
procurement programs intended for small businesses. Federal procurement
programs provide targeted, set-aside opportunities for small businesses
under SBA's various business development and contracting programs.
These include the 8(a)/Business Development (BD) Program, the
Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZone) Program, the Women-
Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) Program, the Economically Disadvantaged
Women-Owned Small Businesses (EDWOSB) Program, and the Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB) Program.
Besides set-aside contracting and financial assistance discussed
above, small businesses also benefit through reduced fees, less
paperwork, and fewer compliance requirements that are available to
small businesses through the Federal Government programs. However, SBA
has no data to estimate the number of small businesses receiving such
benefits.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census, SBA estimates that in 144
industries or subindustries (``exceptions'') in NAICS Sector 31-33 and
other sectors with employee-based size standards for which it is
increasing size standards, 242 firms (see Table 9, Impacts of
Increasing Size Standards, below), not small under the current size
standards, will become small under the adopted size standards increases
and therefore become eligible for these programs. That represents about
0.3 percent of all firms classified as small under the current size
standards in industries for which SBA is adopting increases to size
standards. SBA's revised size standards would result in an increase to
the small business share of total receipts in those industries from
27.4 percent to 29.3 percent.
With more businesses qualifying as small under the adopted
increases to size standards, Federal agencies will have a larger pool
of small businesses from which to draw for their small business
procurement programs. Growing small businesses that are close to
exceeding the current size standards will be able to retain their small
business status for a longer period under the higher size standards,
thereby enabling them to continue to benefit from the small business
programs.
Based on the FPDS-NG data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates
that 109 firms that are active in Federal contracting in those
industries would gain small business status under the adopted size
standards. Based on the same data, SBA estimates that those newly-
qualified small businesses under the higher size standards, if adopted,
could receive Federal small business contracts totaling $256.6 million
annually. That represents a 2.4 percent increase to small business
contract dollars from the baseline. Table 9 provides these results by
NAICS sector.
The added competition from more businesses qualifying as small can
result in lower prices to the Government for procurements set aside or
reserved for small businesses, but SBA cannot quantify this impact.
Costs could be higher when full and open contracts are awarded to
HUBZone businesses that receive price evaluation preferences. However,
with agencies likely setting aside more contracts for small businesses
in response to the availability of a larger pool of small businesses
under the proposed increases to size standards, HUBZone firms might
receive more set-aside contracts and fewer full and open contracts,
thereby resulting in some cost savings to agencies. SBA cannot estimate
such cost savings as it is impossible to determine the number and value
of unrestricted contracts to be otherwise awarded to HUBZone firms as
set-asides. However, such cost savings are likely to be relatively
small as only a small fraction of full and open contracts are awarded
to HUBZone businesses.
As shown in Table 9, under SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan programs, based
on the data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates that there will
be no impact to the number of firms receiving 7(a) and 504 loans.
Table 9--Impacts of Increasing Size Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 31-33 Other sectors Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of industries or subindustries (``exceptions'') with 117 27 144
proposed increases to size standards...........................
Total current small businesses in industries with proposed 66,066 5,252 71,318
increases to size standards (2017 Economic Census) \1\.........
Additional firms qualifying as small under proposed increases to 197 45 242
size standards (2017 Economic Census) \1\......................
% of additional firms qualifying as small relative to current 0.3% 0.9% 0.3%
small businesses in industries with proposed increases to size
standards (2017 Economic Census) \1\...........................
[[Page 9995]]
Number of current unique small firms getting small business 13,854 603 14,320
contracts in industries with proposed increases to size
standards (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020) \2\...........................
Additional number of small business firms gaining small business 89 22 109
status under proposed increases to size standards (FPDS-NG FY
2018-2020).....................................................
% increase to number of small businesses relative to current 0.6% 3.6% 0.8%
unique small firms getting small business contracts in
industries with proposed increases to size standards (FPDS-NG
FY 2018-2020)..................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current size $9,617 $1,032 $10,648
standards in industries or subindustries with proposed
increases to size standards ($ million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020).
Estimated small business dollars available to newly-qualified $75.9 $180.6 $256.6
small firms ($ million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020) \3\.............
% increase to small business dollars relative to total small 0.8% 17.5% 2.4%
business contract dollars under current standards in industries
with proposed increases to size standards......................
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small business in 1,120 44 1,164
industries with proposed increases to size standards (FY 2018-
2020)..........................................................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in $751 $30 $781
industries with proposed increases to size standards ($
million) (FY 2018-2020)........................................
Estimated number of 7(a) and 504 loans to newly-qualified small 0 0 0
firms..........................................................
Estimated 7(a) and 504 loan amount to newly-qualified small $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
firms ($ million)..............................................
% increase to 7(a) and 504 loan amount relative to the total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
amount of 7(a) and 504 loans in industries with proposed
increases to size standards....................................
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries 65 10 75
with proposed increases to size standards (FY 2018-2020) \4\...
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries $2.9 $0.7 $3.5
with proposed increases to size standards ($ million) (FY 2018-
2020) \ 4\.....................................................
Estimated no. of EIDL loans to newly-qualified small firms \4\.. 0 0 0
Estimated EIDL loan amount to newly-qualified small firms ($ $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
million) \ 4\..................................................
% increase to EIDL loan amount relative to the total amount of 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
disaster loans in industries with proposed increases to size
standards \4\..................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ``exceptions'' for which
Economic Census data is not available.
\2\ Total impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms
participate in more than one industry.
\3\ Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique firm times
change in number of firms. Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA's current size standards, not the
contracting officer's size designation.
\4\ Excludes COVID-19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped
accepting applications for new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Newly-qualified small businesses may also benefit from the SBA's
EIDL program. Since the benefit provided through this program is
contingent on the occurrence and severity of a disaster in the future,
SBA cannot make a precise estimate of this impact. However, based on
the disaster loan program data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA
estimates that, on an annual basis, the newly-defined small businesses
under the adopted increases to size standards would not be impacted by
SBA's changes to size standards.
Additionally, the newly-defined small businesses would also benefit
through reduced fees, less paperwork, and fewer compliance requirements
that are available to small businesses through the Federal Government,
but SBA has no data to quantify this impact.
Costs of Increases to Size Standards
Besides having to register in the System of Award Management (SAM)
to be eligible to participate in Federal contracting and update the SAM
profile annually, small businesses incur no direct costs to gain or
retain their small business status as a result of the adopted increases
to size standards. All businesses willing to do business with the
Federal Government must register in SAM and update their SAM profiles
annually, regardless of their size status. SBA believes that a vast
majority of impacted businesses that are willing to participate in
Federal contracting are already registered in SAM and update their SAM
profiles annually. More importantly, this final rule does not establish
the new size standards for the very first time; rather it intends to
modify the existing size standards in accordance with a statutory
requirement, the latest data, and other relevant factors.
To the extent that the newly-qualified small businesses could
become active in Federal procurement, the adopted increases to size
standards may entail some additional administrative costs to the
Federal Government as a result of more businesses qualifying as small
for Federal small business programs. For example, there will be more
firms seeking SBA's loans, more firms eligible for enrollment in the
Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) database or in certify.sba.gov,
more firms seeking certification as 8(a)/BD or HUBZone firms or
qualifying for small business, WOSB, EDWOSB, and SDVOSB status, and
more firms applying for SBA's 8(a)/BD mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute]
programs. With an expanded pool of small businesses, it is likely that
Federal agencies would set aside more contracts for small businesses
under the increases to size standards. One may surmise that this might
result in a higher number of small business size protests and
additional processing costs to agencies. However, the SBA's historical
data on the number of size protests processed shows that the number of
size protests decreased following the increases to size standards as
part of the first five-year review of size standards. Specifically, on
an annual basis, the number of size protests fell from about 600 during
fiscal years 2011-2013 (review of most receipts-based size standards
was completed by the end of FY 2013), as compared to about 500 during
fiscal years 2018-2020 when size standard increases were in effect.
That represents a 17 percent decline.
Among those newly-defined small businesses seeking SBA's loans,
there
[[Page 9996]]
could be some additional costs associated with verification of their
small business status. However, small business lenders have an option
of using the tangible net worth and net income based alternative size
standard instead of using the industry-based size standards to
establish eligibility for SBA's loans. For these reasons, SBA believes
that these added administrative costs will be minor because necessary
mechanisms are already in place to handle these added requirements.
Additionally, some Federal contracts may possibly have higher
costs. With a greater number of businesses defined as small due to the
adopted increases to size standards, Federal agencies may choose to set
aside more contracts for competition among small businesses only
instead of using a full and open competition. The movement of contracts
from unrestricted competition to small business set-aside contracts
might result in competition among fewer total bidders, although there
will be more small businesses eligible to submit offers under the
adopted size standards. However, the additional costs associated with
fewer bidders are expected to be minor since, by law, procurements may
be set aside for small businesses under the 8(a)/BD, HUBZone, WOSB,
EDWOSB, or SDVOSB programs only if awards are expected to be made at
fair and reasonable prices.
Costs may also be higher when full and open contracts are awarded
to HUBZone businesses that receive price evaluation preferences.
However, with agencies likely setting aside more contracts for small
businesses in response to the availability of a larger pool of small
businesses under the adopted increases to size standards, HUBZone firms
might end up getting fewer full and open contracts, thereby resulting
in some cost savings to agencies. However, such cost savings are likely
to be minimal as only a small fraction of unrestricted contracts are
awarded to HUBZone businesses.
Transfer Impacts of Increases to Size Standards
The adopted increases to 144 employee-based size standards may
result in some redistribution of Federal contracts between the newly-
qualified small businesses and large businesses and between the newly-
qualified small businesses and small businesses under the current
standards. However, it would have no impact on the overall economic
activity since total Federal contract dollars available for businesses
to compete for will not change with changes to size standards. While
SBA cannot quantify with certainty the actual outcome of the gains and
losses from the redistribution contracts among different groups of
businesses, it can identify several probable impacts in qualitative
terms. With the availability of a larger pool of small businesses under
the adopted increases to size standards, some unrestricted Federal
contracts which would otherwise be awarded to large businesses may be
set aside for small businesses. As a result, large businesses may lose
some Federal contracting opportunities. Similarly, some small
businesses under the current size standards may obtain fewer set aside
contracts due to the increased competition from larger businesses
qualifying as small under the adopted size standards. This impact may
be offset by a greater number of procurements being set aside for all
small businesses. With larger businesses qualifying as small under the
higher size standards, smaller small businesses could face some
disadvantage in competing for set aside contracts against their larger
counterparts. However, SBA cannot quantify these impacts.
3. What alternatives have been considered?
Under OMB Circular A-4, SBA is required to consider regulatory
alternatives to the adopted changes in this final rule. In this
section, SBA describes and analyzes two such alternatives. Alternative
Option One to the final rule, a more stringent alternative to the
adopted change, would propose adopting size standards based solely on
the analytical results. In other words, the size standards of 144
industries or subindustries (or ``exceptions'') for which the
analytical results, as presented in Table 4 of the April 2022 proposed
rule, suggested raising size standards would be raised. However, the
size standards of 204 industries for which the analytical results
suggest lowering size standards would be lowered. For the 64 remaining
industries or subindustries for which the results suggested no changes,
size standards would be maintained at their current levels. Alternative
Option Two would propose retaining existing size standards for all
industries, given the uncertainty generated by the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic. Below, SBA discusses benefits, costs and net impacts of each
option.
Alternative Option One: Adopting All Calculated Size Standards
As discussed in the Alternatives Considered section of this final
rule, Alternative Option One would cause a substantial number of
currently small businesses to lose their small business status and
hence to lose their access to Federal small business assistance,
especially small business set-aside contracts and SBA's financial
assistance in some cases. These consequences could be mitigated. For
example, in response to the 2008 Financial Crisis and economic
conditions that followed, SBA adopted a general policy in the first
five-year review of size standards to not lower any size standard
(except to exclude one or more dominant firms) even when the analytical
results suggested the size standard should be lowered. Currently,
because of the economic challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic
and the measures taken to protect public health, SBA has decided to
adopt the same general policy of not lowering size standards in the
ongoing second five-year review of size standards review as well.
The primary benefits of adopting Alternative Option One would
include: (1) SBA's procurement, management, technical and financial
assistance resources would be targeted to their intended beneficiaries
according to the analytical results; (2) Adopting the size standards
based on the analytical results would also promote consistency and
predictability of SBA's implementation of its authority to set or
adjust size standards; and (3) Firms who would remain small would face
less competition from larger small firms for the remaining set aside
opportunities. In the proposed rule, SBA sought comments on the impact
of adopting size standards based on the analytical results.
As explained in the ``Size Standards Methodology'' white paper, in
addition to adopting all results of the analysis of the primary
factors, SBA evaluates other relevant factors as needed such as the
impact of the reductions or increases of size standards on the
distribution of contracts awarded to small businesses and may adopt
different results with the intention of mitigating potential negative
impacts.
We have already discussed the benefits, costs and transfer impacts
of increasing 144 and retaining 268 size standards. Below we discuss
the benefits, costs, and transfer impacts of increasing 144, decreasing
204, and retaining 64 size standards based on the analytical results.
Benefits of Decreases to Size Standards
The most significant benefit to businesses from decreases to size
standards when SBA's analysis suggests such decreases is to ensure that
size standards are more reflective of latest industry structure and
Federal market trends and that Federal small business assistance is
more effectively targeted to
[[Page 9997]]
its intended beneficiaries. These include SBA's loan programs, EIDL
program, and Federal procurement programs intended for small
businesses. Federal procurement programs provide targeted, set-aside
opportunities for small businesses under SBA's business development
programs, such as small business, 8(a)/BD, HUBZone, WOSB, EDWOSB, and
SDVOSB programs. The adoption of smaller size standards when the
results support them diminishes the risk of awarding contracts to firms
which are not small anymore.
Decreasing size standards may reduce the administrative costs of
the Government, because the risk of awarding set aside contracts to
other than small businesses may diminish when the size standards
reflect better the structure of the market. This may also reduce the
risks of providing SBA's loans to firms that are not needing them the
most or of allowing firms that are not eligible for small business set-
asides to participate on the SBA procurement programs, which might
provide a better chance for smaller firms to grow and benefit from the
opportunities available on the Federal market and strengthen the small
business industrial base for the Federal Government.
Costs of Decreases to Size Standards
Table 10, Impacts of Decreases to Size Standards Under Alternative
Option One, shows the various impacts of lowering size standards in 204
industries based solely on the analytical results. Based on the 2017
Economic Census, about 658 (0.3%) firms would lose their small business
status under Alternative Option One. Similarly, based on the FPDS-NG
data for fiscal years 2018-2020, 172 (0.7%) small businesses
participating in Federal contracting would lose their small status and
become ineligible to compete for set-aside contracts. With fewer
businesses qualifying as small under the decreases to size standards,
Federal agencies will have a smaller pool of small businesses from
which to draw for their small business procurement programs. For
example, in Alternative Option One, during fiscal years 2018-2020,
agencies awarded, on an annual basis, about $28.3 billion in small
business contracts in those 204 industries for which this option
considered decreasing size standards. Table 10 shows that lowering size
standards in 204 industries would reduce Federal contract dollars
awarded to small businesses by $248 million or about 0.9 percent
relative to the baseline level. Because of the importance of these
industries for the Federal procurement, SBA may adopt mitigating
measures to reduce the negative impact. SBA could take one or more of
the following three actions: (1) Accept decreases in size standards as
suggested by the analytical results; (2) Decrease size standards by a
smaller amount than the calculated threshold; or (3). Retain the size
standards at their current levels.
Table 10--Impacts of Decreases to Size Standards Under Alternative Option One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 31-33 Other sectors Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of industries for which SBA considered decreasing size 180 24 204
standards......................................................
Total current small businesses in industries for which SBA 163,803 43,056 206,856
considered decreasing size standards (2017 Economic Census)....
Estimated number of firms losing small status in industries for 572 86 658
which SBA considered decreasing size standards (2017 Economic
Census)........................................................
% of firms losing small status relative to current small 0.4% 0.2% 0.3%
businesses in industries for which SBA considered decreasing
size standards (2017 Economic Census)..........................
Number of current unique small firms getting small business 19,687 5,731 24,839
contracts in industries for which SBA considered decreasing
size standards (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020) \1\......................
Estimated number of small business firms that would have lost 132 50 172
small business status in industries for which SBA considered
decreasing size standards (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020) \1\...........
% decrease to small business firms relative to current unique 0.7% 0.9% 0.7%
small firms getting small business contracts in industries for
which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FPDS-NG FY 2018-
2020) \1\......................................................
Total small business contract dollars under current size $15,325 12,932 $28,256
standards in industries for which SBA considered decreasing
size standards ($ million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)..............
Estimated small business dollars not available to firms losing $128.6 $119.5 $248.0
small business status in industries for which SBA considered
decreasing size standards ($ million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)
\2\............................................................
% decrease to small business dollars relative to total small 0.8% 0.9% 0.9%
business contract dollars under current size standards in
industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards..
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in 2,875 325 3,200
industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards
(FY 2018-2020).................................................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses in $1,851 $147 $1,999
industries for which SBA considered decreasing size standards
($ million) (FY 2018-2020).....................................
Estimated number of 7(a) and 504 loans not available to firms 1 0 1
that would have lost small business status in industries for
which SBA considered decreasing size standards.................
Estimated 7(a) and 504 loan amount not available to firms that $0.2 $0.0 $0.2
would have lost small status ($ million).......................
% decrease to 7(a) and 504 loan amount relative to the total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
amount of 7(a) and 504 loans in industries for which SBA
considered decreasing size standards...........................
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries for 115 17 132
which SBA considered decreasing size standards (FY 2018-2020)
\3\............................................................
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses in industries for $4.1 $1.1 $5.2
which SBA considered decreasing size standards ($ million) (FY
2018-2020) \3\.................................................
Estimated number of EIDL loans not available to firms that would 0 $0.0 0
have lost small business status in industries for which SBA
considered decreasing size standards \3\.......................
Estimated EIDL loan amount not available to firms that would $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
have lost small business status ($ million) \3\................
% decrease to EIDL loan amount relative to the baseline \3\..... 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Total impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms
participate in more than one industry.
[[Page 9998]]
\2\ Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique small firm
times change in number of firms. Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA's current size standards, not
the contracting officer's size designation.
\3\ Excludes COVID-19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped
accepting applications for new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Nevertheless, since Federal agencies are still required to meet the
statutory small business contracting goal of 23 percent, actual impacts
on the overall set-aside activity are likely to be smaller as agencies
are likely to award more set-aside contracts to small businesses that
continue to remain small under the reduced size standards so that they
could meet their small business contracting goals.
With fewer businesses qualifying as small, the decreased
competition can also result in higher prices to the Government for
procurements set aside or reserved for small businesses, but SBA cannot
quantify this impact. Lowering size standards may cause current small
business contract or option holders to lose their small business
status, thereby making those dollars unavailable to count toward the
agencies' small business procurement goals. Additionally, impacted
small businesses will be unable to compete for upcoming options as
small businesses.
As shown in Table 10, decreases to size standards would have a very
minor impact on small businesses applying for SBA's 7(a) and 504 loans
because a vast majority of such loans are issued to businesses that are
far below the current or calculated size standards. For example, based
on the loan data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates that about
one of SBA's 7(a) and 504 loans with total amounts of $0.2 million
could not be made to those small businesses that would lose eligibility
under the calculated size standards. That represents about 0.01 percent
decrease to the loan amount compared to the baseline. However, the
actual impact on businesses seeking SBA's loans could be much less as
businesses losing small business eligibility under the decreases to
industry-based size standards could still qualify for SBA's 7(a) and
CDC/504 loans under the tangible net worth and net income-based
alternative size standard.
Businesses losing small business status would also be impacted in
terms of access to loans through the SBA's EIDL program. However, SBA
expects such impact to be minimal as only a small number of businesses
in those industries received such loans during fiscal years 2018-2020.
Additionally, all those businesses were below the calculated size
standards. Since this program is contingent on the occurrence and
severity of a disaster in the future, SBA cannot make a precise
estimate of this impact. However, based on the disaster loan data for
fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates that, under Alternative Option
One, no small businesses would lose eligibility under the calculated
size standards (see Table 10).
Small businesses becoming other than small if size standards were
decreased might lose benefits through reduced fees, less paperwork, and
fewer compliance requirements that are available to small businesses
through the Federal Government programs, but SBA has no data to
quantify this impact. However, if agencies determine that SBA's size
standards do not adequately serve such purposes, they can establish a
different size standard with an approval from SBA if they are required
to use SBA's size standards for their programs.
Transfer Impacts of Decreases to Size Standards
If the size standards were decreased under alternative option one,
it may result in a redistribution of Federal contracts between small
businesses losing their small business status and large businesses and
between small businesses losing their small business status and small
businesses remaining small under the reduced size standards. However,
as under the adopted increases to size standards, it would have no
impact on the overall economic activity since the total Federal
contract dollars available for businesses to compete for will stay the
same. While SBA cannot estimate with certainty the actual outcome of
the gains and losses among different groups of businesses from contract
redistribution resulting from decreases to size standards, it can
identify several probable impacts. With a smaller pool of small
businesses under the decreases to size standards, some set-aside
Federal contracts to be otherwise awarded to small businesses may be
competed on an unrestricted basis. As a result, large businesses may
have more Federal contracting opportunities. However, because agencies
are still required by law to award 23 percent of Federal dollars to
small businesses, SBA expects the movement of set-aside contracts to
unrestricted competition to be limited. For the same reason, small
businesses under the reduced size standards are likely to obtain more
set-aside contracts due to the reduced competition from fewer
businesses qualifying as small under the decreases to size standards.
With some larger small businesses losing small business status under
the decreases to size standards, smaller small businesses would likely
become more competitive in obtaining set-aside contracts. However, SBA
cannot quantify these impacts.
Net Impact of Alternative Option One
To estimate the net impacts of Alternative Option One, SBA followed
the same methodology used to evaluate the impacts increasing size
standards (see Table 9). However, under Alternative Option One, SBA
used the calculated size standards instead of the adopted increases to
determine the impacts of changes to current thresholds. The impact of
increases to size standards were shown in Table 9 (above). Table 10
(above) and Table 11, Net Impacts of Size Standards Changes under
Alternative Option One, below, present the impact of the decreases of
size standards and the net impact of adopting the calculated results
under alternative option one, respectively. Net impacts are generally
obtained by subtracting impacts of decreases to size standards in Table
10 from impacts of increases to size standards in Table 9.
Based on the 2017 Economic Census (the latest available when the
proposed rule was developed), SBA estimates that in 349 industries and
subindustries (``exceptions'') reviewed in this final rule for which
the analytical results suggested to change size standards, about 415
firms (see Table 11), would become other than small under Alternative
Option One. That represents about 0.2 percent of all firms classified
as small under the current size standards.
Based on the FPDS-NG data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates
that about 83 unique active firms in Federal contracting in those
industries would lose their small business status under alternative
option one, most of them from Sector 31-33. This represents a decrease
of about 0.3 percent of the total number of small businesses
participating in Federal contracting under the current size standards.
Based on the same data, SBA estimates that about $8.6 million of
Federal procurement dollars would become available to all small firms,
including those gaining small status. This represents an increase of
0.02 percent from the baseline. SBA estimates that the dollars
obligated to small businesses
[[Page 9999]]
will increase despite a reduction in the total number of small firms
because the contract dollars to newly qualified small businesses in
sectors other than manufacturing with increases to size standards is
higher than the contract dollars to small businesses losing small
business status in sectors other than manufacturing with decreases to
size standards.
Based on the SBA's loan data for fiscal years 2018-2020, the total
number of 7(a) and 504 loans may decrease by about one loan, and the
loan amount by about $0.2 million. This represents a 0.01 percent
decrease of the loan amount relative to the baseline.
Firms' participation under the SBA's EIDL program may be affected
as well. Since the benefit provided through this program is contingent
on the occurrence and severity of a disaster in the future, SBA cannot
make a meaningful estimate of this impact. However, based on the
disaster loan program data for fiscal years 2018-2020, SBA estimates
that the total number of EIDL loans will not be impacted.
Table 11--Net Impacts of Size Standards Changes Under Alternative Option One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 31-33 Other sectors Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of industries or subindustries (``exceptions'') with 299 50 349
changes to size standards......................................
Total number of small firms under the current size standards in 229,933 48,322 278,255
industries with changes to size standards (2017 Economic
Census) \1\....................................................
Additional number of firms qualifying as small under size -375 -40 -415
standards changes (2017 Economic Census) \1\...................
% of additional firms qualifying as small relative to total -0.2% -0.1% -0.2%
current small firms (2017 Economic Census) \1\.................
Number of current unique small firms getting small business 26,771 6,295 32,164
contracts in industries with changes to size standards (FPDS-NG
FY 2018-2020)..................................................
Additional number of unique small firms gaining small business -59 -29 -83
status in industries with changes to size standards (FPDS-NG FY
2018-2020) \2\.................................................
% increase to small firms relative to current unique small firms -0.2% -0.5% -0.3%
gaining small business status (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)...........
Total small business contract dollars under current size $24,942 $13,962 $38,904
standards in industries with changes to size standards ($
million) (FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)................................
Estimated small business dollars available to newly-qualified -$52.6 $61.20 $8.6
small firms ($ million) FPDS-NG FY 2018-2020)..................
% increase to dollars relative to total small business contract -0.2% 0.4% 0.02%
dollars under current size standards...........................
Total number of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses (FY 2018- 3,995 368 4,363
2020)..........................................................
Total amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses (FY 2018- $2,603 $177 $2,780
2020)..........................................................
Estimated number of additional 7(a) and 504 loans available to -1 0 -1
newly-qualified small firms....................................
Estimated additional 7(a) and 504 loan amount to newly-qualified -$0.2 $0.0 -$0.2
small firms ($ million)........................................
% increase to 7(a)and 504 loan amount relative to the total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
amount of 7(a) and 504 loans to small businesses...............
Total number of EIDL loans to small businesses (FY 2018-2020) 180 $27.0 207
\4\............................................................
Total amount of EIDL loans to small businesses (FY 2018-2020) $7.0 $1.7 $8.7
\4\............................................................
Estimated number of additional EIDL loans to newly qualified 0 $0.0 0
small firms \4\................................................
Estimated additional EIDL loan amount to newly qualified small $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
firms ($ million) \4\..........................................
% increase to EIDL loan amount relative to the total amount of 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
disaster loans to small businesses \4\.........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These figures do not include two 6-digit NAICS industries and 5 subindustries or ``exceptions'' for which
Economic Census data is not available.
\2\ Total impact represents total unique number of firms impacted to avoid double counting as some firms
participate in more than one industry.
\3\ Additional dollars are calculated multiplying average small business dollars obligated per unique firm times
change in number of firms. Numbers of firms are calculated using the SBA's current size standards, not the
contracting officer's size designation.
\4\ Excludes COVID-19 related EIDL loans due to their temporary nature. Effective January 1, 2022, SBA stopped
accepting applications for new COVID EIDL loans or advances.
Alternative Option Two: Retaining All Current Size Standards
Under this option, given the current COVID-19 pandemic, as
discussed elsewhere, SBA considered retaining the current levels of all
size standards even though the analytical results suggested changing
them. Under this option, as the current situation develops, SBA will be
able to assess new data available on economic indicators, Federal
procurement, and SBA loans as well. When compared to the baseline,
there is a net impact of zero (i.e., zero benefit and zero cost) for
retaining all size standards. However, this option would cause
otherwise qualified small businesses to forgo various small business
benefits (e.g., access to set-aside contracts and capital) that become
available to them under the option of increasing 144 and retaining 268
size standards adopted under this final rule. Moreover, retaining all
size standards under Alternative Option Two would also be contrary to
the SBA's statutory mandate to review and adjust, every five years, all
size standards to reflect current industry and Federal market
conditions. Retaining all size standards without required periodic
adjustments would increasingly exclude otherwise eligible small firms
from small business benefits.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808
Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 801-808), also known as the
Congressional Review Act or CRA, generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule
report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. SBA will
submit a report containing this rule and other required information to
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United
[[Page 10000]]
States. A major rule under the CRA cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal Register. The OMB's Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
According to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, when an agency issues a rulemaking, it must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis to address the impact of the rule on small
entities. This final rule may have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small businesses in the industries covered by
this final rule. As described above, this final rule may affect small
businesses seeking Federal contracts, loans under SBA's 7(a), 504, and
EIDL programs, and assistance under other Federal small business
programs.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) of this final rule addressing the following questions:
(1) What is the need for and objective of the rule?; (2) What are
significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, assessment of the agency of
such issues, and any changes made in the proposed rule as a result of
such comments?; (3) What's the agency's response to any comments filed
by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
in response to the proposed rule and description of any change made to
the proposed rule in the final rule as a result of the comments?; (4)
What is SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?; (5) What are the projected
reporting, record keeping, and other compliance requirements of the
rule?; (6) What are the relevant Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the rule; and (7) What alternatives will
allow SBA to accomplish its regulatory objectives while minimizing the
impact on small businesses?
1. What is the need for and objective of the rule?
Changes in industry structure, technological changes, productivity
growth, mergers and acquisitions, and updated industry definitions have
changed the structure of many industries covered by this final rule.
Such changes can be enough to support revisions to current size
standards for some industries. Based on the analysis of the latest data
available, SBA believes that the size standards adopted in this final
rule more appropriately reflect the size of businesses that need
Federal assistance. The 2010 Jobs Act also requires SBA to review all
size standards and make necessary adjustments to reflect market
conditions.
2. What are significant issues raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, assessment of
the agency of such issues, and any changes made in the proposed rule as
a result of such comments?
SBA did not receive any public comments to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis it provided in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule.
3. What's the agency's response to any comments filed by the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in response
to the proposed rule and description of any change made to the proposed
rule in the final rule as a result of the comments?
SBA did not receive any comments from the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in response to the April
26, 2022, proposed rule.
4. What is SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?
Based on data from the 2017 Economic Census, SBA estimates that
there are nearly 71,318 small firms covered under this rulemaking in
industries with changes to size standards. Under this final rule, SBA
estimates that nearly 242 additional businesses will become small.
5. What are the projected reporting, record keeping and other
compliance requirements of the rule?
The size standard changes in this final rule impose no additional
reporting or record keeping requirements on small businesses. However,
qualifying for Federal procurement and a number of other programs
requires that businesses register in SAM and self-certify that they are
small at least once annually (Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
52.204-13). For existing contracts, small business contractors are
required to update their SAM registration as necessary to ensure that
they reflect the contractor's current status (FAR 52.219-28).
Businesses are also required to verify that their SAM registration is
current, accurate, and complete with the submission of an offer for
every new contract (FAR 52.204-7 and 52.204-8). Therefore, businesses
opting to participate in those programs must comply with SAM
requirements. There are no new costs associated with SAM registration
or annal re-certification. Changing size standards alters the access to
SBA's programs that assist small businesses but does not impose a
regulatory burden because they neither regulate nor control business
behavior.
6. What are the relevant Federal rules, which may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the rule?
Under section 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
632(a)(2)(c), Federal agencies must use SBA's size standards to define
a small business, unless specifically authorized by statute to do
otherwise. In 1995, SBA published in the Federal Register a list of
statutory and regulatory size standards that identified the application
of SBA's size standards as well as other size standards used by Federal
agencies (60 FR 57988 (November 24, 1995)). SBA is not aware of any
Federal rule that would duplicate or conflict with establishing size
standards.
However, the Small Business Act and SBA's regulations allow Federal
agencies to establish different size standards if they believe that
SBA's size standards are not appropriate for their programs, with the
approval of SBA's Administrator (13 CFR 121.903). The Regulatory
Flexibility Act authorizes an Agency to establish an alternative small
business definition, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of
the U.S. Small Business Administration (5 U.S.C. 601(3)).
7. What alternatives will allow SBA to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact on small entities?
By law, SBA is required to develop numerical size standards for
establishing eligibility for Federal small business assistance
programs. Other than varying size standards by industry and changing
the size measures, no practical alternative exists to the systems of
numerical size standards.
However, SBA considered two alternatives to increasing 144 and
maintaining 268 size standards at their current levels. The first
alternative SBA considered was adopting size standards based solely on
the analytical results, including the results from the evaluation of
dominance and field of operation. In other words, the size standards of
144 industries for which the analytical results suggest raising size
standards would be raised. However, the size standards of 204
industries for which the analytical results suggest lowering size
standards would be lowered. This would cause a significant number of
small businesses to lose their small business status, particularly in
Sector 31-33 (see Table 10). Under the second alternative, in view of
the COVID-19 pandemic, SBA considered retaining all size standards at
the current levels, even though the analytical results may suggest
increasing
[[Page 10001]]
144 and decreasing 204 size standards. SBA believes retaining all size
standards at their current levels would be more onerous for small
businesses than the option of increasing 144 and retaining 268 size
standards. Postponing the adoption of the higher calculated size
standards would be detrimental for otherwise small businesses in terms
of access to various small business benefits, including access to set-
aside contracts and capital through SBA contracting and financial
programs, and exemptions from paperwork and other compliance
requirements.
Executive Order 13563
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. A description of the need for this regulatory action and
benefits and costs associated with this action, including possible
distributional impacts that relate to Executive Order 13563, is
included above in the Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order
12866. Additionally, Executive Order 13563, section 6, calls for
retrospective analyses of existing rules.
The review of size standards in the industries covered by this
final rule is consistent with section 6 of Executive Order 13563 and
the 2010 Jobs Act which requires SBA to review every five years all
size standards and make necessary adjustments to reflect market
conditions. Specifically, the 2010 Jobs Act requires SBA to review at
least one-third of all size standards during every 18-month period from
the date of its enactment (September 27, 2010) and to review all size
standards not less frequently than once every five years, thereafter.
In accordance with the Jobs Act, in early 2016, SBA completed the first
five-year review of the small business size standard for each industry,
except those for agricultural enterprises previously set by Congress,
and made appropriate adjustments to size standards for a number of
industries to reflect current Federal and industry market conditions.
SBA issued a revised white paper entitled ``Size Standards
Methodology'' and published a notice in the April 27, 2018, edition of
the Federal Register (83 FR 18468) to advise the public that the
document is available for public review and comments. The ``Size
Standards Methodology'' white paper explains how SBA establishes,
reviews, and modifies its receipts-based and employee-based small
business size standards. SBA considered all input, suggestions,
recommendations, and relevant information obtained from industry
groups, individual businesses, and federal agencies before finalizing
and adopting the revised Methodology. For a summary of comments
received and SBA's responses, see the notice published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2019 (84 FR 14587). As part of the second five-
year review of size standards under the Jobs Act, SBA has already
issued five final rules reviewing all monetary-based size standards and
all employee-based size standards that are part of the Wholesale Trade
and Retail Trade sectors (see Footnote 1, above). This final rule is
reviewing size standards under Sector 31-33 and other sectors with
employee-based size standards not part of Wholesale and Retail Trade
sectors completes SBA's second five-year review of size standards under
the Jobs Act. SBA considered all input, suggestions, recommendations,
and relevant information obtained from industry groups, individual
businesses, and federal agencies in developing size standards for those
industries covered by this final rule. As required by the Jobs Act, SBA
held two virtual public forums on size standards on June 14 and June
16, 2022, to update the public on the second five-year review of size
standards and to consider public testimony on proposed size standards
in the April 26, 2022, proposed rule. SBA received a total of 49
comments (including seven comments received during the public forums on
size standards) to the proposed rule. In the Discussion of Comments
section of this final rule, SBA summarizes and provides responses to
the comments received on the proposed rule.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that this
final rule will not have substantial, direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. Therefore, SBA has determined that this final rule has
no federalism implications warranting preparation of a federalism
assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
For the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35,
SBA has determined that this rule will not impose any new reporting or
record keeping requirements.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement,
Government property, Grant programs--business, Individuals with
disabilities, Loan programs--business, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part
121 as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(a)(36), 662, and
694a(9); Pub. L. 116-136, Section 1114.
0
2. In Sec. 121.201, amend the table ``Small Business Size Standards by
NAICS Industry'' by revising entries ''212210,'' ``212230,''
``212290,'' ``212313,'' ``212319,'' ``212322,'' ``212323,'' ``212390,''
entries ``221111'' through ``221115,'' ``221117,'' ``221118,''
``221121,'' ``221122,'' ``221210,'' ``311111,'' ``311119,'' ``311211,''
``311212,'' ``311221,'' ``311224,'' ``311225,'' ``311230,'' ``311313,''
``311314,'' ``311411,'' ``311422,'' ``311511,'' ``311514,'' ``311611,''
``311824,'' ``311920,'' ``311930,'' ``311941,'' ``311942,'' ``311991,''
``311999,'' ``312111,'' ``312112,'' ``312140,'' ``313220,'' ``313230,''
``314999,'' ``315120,'' ``315990,'' ``316110,'' ``321113,'' ``321114,''
``321211,'' ``322110,'' ``323111,'' ``323120,'' ``324122,'' ``324191,''
``324199,'' ``325110,'' ``325120,'' ``325130,'' ``325220,'' ``325311,''
``325312,'' ``325314,'' ``325315,'' ``325320,'' ``325412,'' ``325520,''
entries ``325611'' through ``325613,'' ``325910,'' ``325991,''
``325998,'' ``326121,'' ``326130,'' ``326220,'' ``326299,'' ``327211,''
``327410,'' ``327910,'' ``327992,'' ``327999,'' ``331313,'' ``331315,''
``331420,'' ``331491,'' ``331492,'' ``331512,'' ``331513,'' ``331523,''
``331524,'' ``332112,'' ``332114,'' ``332117,'' ``332215,'' ``332439,''
``332613,'' ``332722,'' ``332812,'' ``332992,'' ``332996,'' ``333131,''
``333243,'' ``333924,'' ``333991,'' ``333993,'' ``333995,'' ``333998,''
``334290,'' ``334416,'' ``334511,'' ``334512,'' ``334514,'' ``334517,''
``334519,'' ``335132,''
[[Page 10002]]
``335311,'' ``335931,'' ``335991,'' ``335999,'' ``336310,'' ``336414,''
``336419,'' ``336611,'' ``336991,'' ``337126,'' ``337214,'' ``339113,''
``339910,'' ``339930,'' ``339991,'' ``339994,'' ``339999,'' ``483111,''
``483113,'' ``483114,'' ``483211,'' ``483212,'' ``512230,'' ``512250,''
``541715,'' and ``562910 (Exception)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 121.201 What size standards has SBA identified by North American
Industry Classification System codes?
* * * * *
Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size standards Size standards
NAICS code NAICS U.S. industry title in millions of in number of
dollars employees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 21--Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 212--Mining (except Oil and Gas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
212210................................. Iron Ore Mining.................... ................ 1,400
* * * * * * *
212230................................. Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc ................ 1,400
Mining.
* * * * * * *
212290................................. Other Metal Ore Mining............. ................ 1,250
* * * * * * *
212313................................. Crushed and Broken Granite Mining ................ 850
and Quarrying.
212319................................. Other Crushed and Broken Stone ................ 550
Mining and Quarrying.
* * * * * * *
212322................................. Industrial Sand Mining............. ................ 750
* * * * * * *
212323................................. Kaolin, Clay, and Ceramic and ................ 650
Refractory Minerals Mining.
* * * * * * *
212390................................. Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining ................ 600
and Quarrying.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 22--Utilities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 221--Utilities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
221111................................. Hydroelectric Power Generation..... ................ 750
221112................................. Fossil Fuel Electric Power ................ 950
Generation.
221113................................. Nuclear Electric Power Generation.. ................ 1,150
221114................................. Solar Electric Power Generation.... ................ 500
221115................................. Wind Electric Power Generation..... ................ 1,150
* * * * * * *
221117................................. Biomass Electric Power Generation.. ................ 550
221118................................. Other Electric Power Generation.... ................ 650
221121................................. Electric Bulk Power Transmission ................ 950
and Control.
221122................................. Electric Power Distribution........ ................ 1,100
221210................................. Natural Gas Distribution........... ................ 1,150
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 31-33--Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 311--Food Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
311111................................. Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing..... ................ 1,250
311119................................. Other Animal Food Manufacturing.... ................ 650
311211................................. Flour Milling...................... ................ 1,050
311212................................. Rice Milling....................... ................ 750
* * * * * * *
311221................................. Wet Corn Milling and Starch ................ 1,300
Manufacturing.
[[Page 10003]]
311224................................. Soybean and Other Oilseed ................ 1,250
Processing.
311225................................. Fats and Oils Refining and Blending ................ 1,100
311230................................. Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing..... ................ 1,300
311313................................. Beet Sugar Manufacturing........... ................ 1,150
311314................................. Cane Sugar Manufacturing........... ................ 1,050
* * * * * * *
311411................................. Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable ................ 1,100
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
311422................................. Specialty Canning.................. ................ 1,400
* * * * * * *
311511................................. Fluid Milk Manufacturing........... ................ 1,150
* * * * * * *
311514................................. Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated ................ 1,000
Dairy Product Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
311611................................. Animal (except Poultry) ................ 1,150
Slaughtering.
* * * * * * *
311824................................. Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes ................ 850
Manufacturing from Purchased Flour.
* * * * * * *
311920................................. Coffee and Tea Manufacturing....... ................ 1,000
311930................................. Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate ................ 1,100
Manufacturing.
311941................................. Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other ................ 850
Prepared Sauce Manufacturing.
311942................................. Spice and Extract Manufacturing.... ................ 650
311991................................. Perishable Prepared Food ................ 700
Manufacturing.
311999................................. All Other Miscellaneous Food ................ 700
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 312--Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
312111................................. Soft Drink Manufacturing........... ................ 1,400
312112................................. Bottled Water Manufacturing........ ................ 1,100
* * * * * * *
312140................................. Distilleries....................... ................ 1,100
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 313--Textile Mills
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
313220................................. Narrow Fabric Mills and Schiffli ................ 550
Machine Embroidery.
313230................................. Nonwoven Fabric Mills.............. ................ 850
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 314--Textile Product Mills
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
314999................................. All Other Miscellaneous Textile ................ 550
Product Mills.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 315--Apparel Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
315120................................. Apparel Knitting Mills............. ................ 850
* * * * * * *
315990................................. Apparel Accessories and Other ................ 600
Apparel Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 316--Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
316110................................. Leather and Hide Tanning and ................ 800
Finishing.
[[Page 10004]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 321--Wood Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
321113................................. Sawmills........................... ................ 550
321114................................. Wood Preservation.................. ................ 550
321211................................. Hardwood Veneer and Plywood ................ 600
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 322--Paper Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
322110................................. Pulp Mills......................... ................ 1,050
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 323--Printing and Related Support Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
323111................................. Commercial Printing (except Screen ................ 650
and Books).
* * * * * * *
323120................................. Support Activities for Printing.... ................ 550
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 324--Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
324122................................. Asphalt Shingle and Coating ................ 1,100
Materials Manufacturing.
324191................................. Petroleum Lubricating Oil and ................ 900
Grease Manufacturing.
324199................................. All Other Petroleum and Coal ................ 950
Products Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 325--Chemical Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
325110................................. Petrochemical Manufacturing........ ................ 1,300
325120................................. Industrial Gas Manufacturing....... ................ 1,200
325130................................. Synthetic Dye and Pigment ................ 1,050
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325220................................. Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and ................ 1,050
Filaments Manufacturing.
325311................................. Nitrogenous Fertilizer ................ 1,050
Manufacturing.
325312................................. Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing ................ 1,350
325314................................. Fertilizer (Mixing Only) ................ 550
Manufacturing.
325315................................. Compost Manufacturing.............. ................ 550
325320................................. Pesticide and Other Agricultural ................ 1,150
Chemical Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325412................................. Pharmaceutical Preparation ................ 1,300
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325520................................. Adhesive Manufacturing............. ................ 550
325611................................. Soap and Other Detergent ................ 1,100
Manufacturing.
325612................................. Polish and Other Sanitation Good ................ 900
Manufacturing.
325613................................. Surface Active Agent Manufacturing. ................ 1,100
* * * * * * *
325910................................. Printing Ink Manufacturing......... ................ 750
* * * * * * *
325991................................. Custom Compounding of Purchased ................ 600
Resins.
* * * * * * *
325998................................. All Other Miscellaneous Chemical ................ 650
Product and Preparation
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 326--Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
326121................................. Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape ................ 600
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326130................................. Laminated Plastics Plate, Sheet ................ 650
(except Packaging), and Shape
Manufacturing.
[[Page 10005]]
* * * * * * *
326220................................. Rubber and Plastics Hoses and ................ 800
Belting Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326299................................. All Other Rubber Product ................ 650
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 327--Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
327211................................. Flat Glass Manufacturing........... ................ 1,100
* * * * * * *
327410................................. Lime Manufacturing................. ................ 1,050
* * * * * * *
327910................................. Abrasive Product Manufacturing..... ................ 900
* * * * * * *
327992................................. Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth ................ 600
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
327999................................. All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic ................ 750
Mineral Product Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 331--Primary Metal Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
331313................................. Alumina Refining and Primary ................ 1,300
Aluminum Production.
* * * * * * *
331315................................. Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil ................ 1,400
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
331420................................. Copper Rolling, Drawing, Extruding, ................ 1,050
and Alloying.
331491................................. Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and ................ 900
Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and
Extruding.
331492................................. Secondary Smelting, Refining, and ................ 850
Alloying of Nonferrous Metal
(except Copper and Aluminum).
* * * * * * *
331512................................. Steel Investment Foundries......... ................ 1,050
331513................................. Steel Foundries (except Investment) ................ 700
331523................................. Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting ................ 700
Foundries.
331524................................. Aluminum Foundries (except Die- ................ 550
Casting).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 332--Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
332112................................. Nonferrous Forging................. ................ 950
332114................................. Custom Roll Forming................ ................ 600
332117................................. Powder Metallurgy Part ................ 550
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332215................................. Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, ................ 1,000
Cutlery, and Flatware (except
Precious) Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332439................................. Other Metal Container Manufacturing ................ 600
* * * * * * *
332613................................. Spring Manufacturing............... ................ 600
* * * * * * *
332722................................. Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer ................ 600
Manufacturing.
[[Page 10006]]
* * * * * * *
332812................................. Metal Coating, Engraving (except ................ 600
Jewelry and Silverware), and
Allied Services to Manufacturers.
* * * * * * *
332992................................. Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing ................ 1,300
* * * * * * *
332996................................. Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting ................ 550
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 333--Machinery Manufacturing \(6)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
333131................................. Mining Machinery and Equipment ................ 900
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333243................................. Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper ................ 550
Machinery Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333924................................. Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, ................ 900
and Stacker Machinery
Manufacturing.
333991................................. Power-Driven Hand Tool ................ 950
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333993................................. Packaging Machinery Manufacturing.. ................ 600
* * * * * * *
333995................................. Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator ................ 800
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333998................................. All Other Miscellaneous General ................ 700
Purpose Machinery Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 334--Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing \(6)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
334290................................. Other Communications Equipment ................ 800
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334416................................. Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, ................ 550
Transformer, and Other Inductor
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334511................................. Search, Detection, Navigation, ................ 1,350
Guidance, Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and Instrument
Manufacturing.
334512................................. Automatic Environmental Control ................ 650
Manufacturing for Residential,
Commercial, and Appliance Use.
* * * * * * *
334514................................. Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting ................ 850
Device Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334517................................. Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing ................ 1,200
334519................................. Other Measuring and Controlling ................ 600
Device Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 335--Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component Manufacturing (6)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
335132................................. Commercial, Industrial, and ................ 600
Institutional Electric Lighting
Fixture Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335311................................. Power, Distribution, and Specialty ................ 800
Transformer Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335931................................. Current-Carrying Wiring Device ................ 600
Manufacturing.
[[Page 10007]]
* * * * * * *
335991................................. Carbon and Graphite Product ................ 900
Manufacturing.
335999................................. All Other Miscellaneous Electrical ................ 600
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 336--Transportation Equipment Manufacturing \(6)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
336310................................. Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and ................ 1,050
Engine Parts Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336414................................. Guided Missile and Space Vehicle ................ 1,300
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336419................................. Other Guided Missile and Space ................ 1,050
Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary
Equipment Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336611................................. Ship Building and Repairing........ ................ 1,300
* * * * * * *
336991................................. Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts ................ 1,050
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 337--Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
337126................................. Household Furniture (except Wood ................ 950
and Upholstered) Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
337214................................. Office Furniture (except Wood) ................ 1,100
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 339--Miscellaneous Manufacturing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
339113................................. Surgical Appliance and Supplies ................ 800
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339910................................. Jewelry and Silverware ................ 700
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339930................................. Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing.. ................ 700
* * * * * * *
339991................................. Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device ................ 600
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339994................................. Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing ................ 750
* * * * * * *
339999................................. All Other Miscellaneous ................ 550
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 48-49--Transportation and Warehousing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 483--Water Transportation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
483111................................. Deep Sea Freight Transportation.... ................ 1,050
* * * * * * *
483113................................. Coastal and Great Lakes Freight ................ 800
Transportation.
[[Page 10008]]
483114................................. Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger ................ 550
Transportation.
483211................................. Inland Water Freight Transportation ................ 1,050
483212................................. Inland Water Passenger ................ 550
Transportation.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 51--Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 512--Motion Picture and Sound Recording Industries
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
512230................................. Music Publishers................... ................ 900
* * * * * * *
512250................................. Record Production and Distribution. ................ 900
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 54--Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 541--Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
541715................................. Research and Development in the ................ \11\ 1,000
Physical, Engineering, and Life
Sciences (except Nanotechnology
and Biotechnology) \11\.
541715 (Exception 1)................... Aircraft, Aircraft Engine and ................ \11\ 1,500
Engine Parts \11\.
541715 (Exception 2)................... Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary ................ \11\ 1,250
Equipment \11\.
541715 (Exception 3)................... Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles, ................ \11\ 1,300
Their Propulsion Units and
Propulsion Parts \11\.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector 56--Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsector 562--Waste Management and Remediation Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
562910 (Exception)..................... Environmental Remediation Services ................ \14\ 1,000
\14\.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
* * * * * * *
\6\ NAICS Subsectors 333, 334, 335 and 336--For rebuilding machinery or equipment on a factory basis, or
equivalent, use the NAICS code for a newly manufactured product. Concerns performing major rebuilding or
overhaul activities do not necessarily have to meet the criteria for being a ``manufacturer'' although the
activities may be classified under a manufacturing NAICS code. Ordinary repair services or preservation are
not considered rebuilding.
* * * * * * *
\11\ NAICS code 541713, 541714, and 541715--
(a) ``Research and Development'' means laboratory or other physical research and development. It does not
include economic, educational, engineering, operations, systems, or other nonphysical research; or computer
programming, data processing, commercial and/or medical laboratory testing.
(b) For research and development contracts requiring the delivery of a manufactured product, the appropriate
size standard is that of the manufacturing industry.
(c) For purposes of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Transfer Technology (STTR)
programs, the term ``research'' or ``research and development'' means any activity which is (A) a systematic,
intensive study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the subject studied; (B) a systematic
study directed specifically toward applying new knowledge to meet a recognized need; or (C) a systematic
application of knowledge toward the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including
design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet specific requirements. See 15
U.S.C. 638(e)(5) and section 3 of the SBIR and STTR policy directives available at www.sbir.gov. For size
eligibility requirements for the SBIR and STTR programs, see Sec. 121.702 of this part.
(d) ``Research and Development'' for guided missiles and space vehicles includes evaluations and simulation, and
other services requiring thorough knowledge of complete missiles and spacecraft.
* * * * * * *
[[Page 10009]]
\14\ NAICS 562910--Environmental Remediation Services:
(a) For SBA assistance as a small business concern in the industry of Environmental Remediation Services, other
than for Government procurement, a concern must be engaged primarily in furnishing a range of services for the
remediation of a contaminated environment to an acceptable condition including, but not limited to,
preliminary assessment, site inspection, testing, remedial investigation, feasibility studies, remedial
design, containment, remedial action, removal of contaminated materials, storage of contaminated materials and
security and site closeouts. If one of such activities accounts for 50 percent or more of a concern's total
revenues, employees, or other related factors, the concern's primary industry is that of the particular
industry and not the Environmental Remediation Services Industry.
(b) For purposes of classifying a Government procurement as Environmental Remediation Services, the general
purpose of the procurement must be to restore or directly support the restoration of a contaminated
environment (such as, preliminary assessment, site inspection, testing, remedial investigation, feasibility
studies, remedial design, remediation services, containment, removal of contaminated materials, storage of
contaminated materials or security and site closeouts), although the general purpose of the procurement need
not necessarily include remedial actions. Also, the procurement must be composed of activities in three or
more separate industries with separate NAICS codes or, in some instances (e.g., engineering), smaller sub-
components of NAICS codes with separate, distinct size standards. These activities may include, but are not
limited to, separate activities in industries such as: Heavy Construction; Specialty Trade Contractors;
Engineering Services; Architectural Services; Management Consulting Services; Hazardous and Other Waste
Collection; Remediation Services, Testing Laboratories; and Research and Development in the Physical,
Engineering and Life Sciences. If any activity in the procurement can be identified with a separate NAICS
code, or component of a code with a separate distinct size standard, and that industry accounts for 50 percent
or more of the value of the entire procurement, then the proper size standard is the one for that particular
industry, and not the Environmental Remediation Service size standard.
* * * * * * *
Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-02780 Filed 2-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P