Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities, 8217-8219 [2023-02456]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
in part of your appeal requesting
amendment.
(2) How do I file a statement of
disagreement? You should mark both
your letter and the envelope, or the
subject of your email, ‘‘Privacy Act
Statement of Disagreement.’’ To avoid
mail delivery delays caused by
heightened security, we strongly suggest
that you email a statement of
disagreement to ipecfoia@ipec.eop.gov.
Our mailing address is: Office of the
Intellectual Property Enforcement
Coordinator, Executive Office of the
President, Washington, DC 20503, Attn:
Privacy Act Appeals Officer.
(3) What will we do with your
statement of disagreement? We shall
clearly note any portion of the record
that is disputed and provide copies of
the statement and, if we deem
appropriate, copies of our statement that
denied your request for an appeal for
amendment, to persons or other
agencies to whom the disputed record
has been disclosed.
(g) When appeal is required. Under
this section, you generally first must
submit a timely administrative appeal,
before seeking review of an adverse
determination or denial request by a
court.
§ 10400.24 What does it cost to get
records under the Privacy Act?
(a) Agreement to pay fees. Your
request is an agreement to pay fees. We
consider your Privacy Act request as
your agreement to pay all applicable
fees unless you specify a limit on the
amount of fees you agree to pay. We will
not exceed the specified limit without
your written agreement.
(b) How do we calculate fees? We will
charge a fee for duplication of a record
under the Privacy Act in the same way
we charge for duplication of records
under the FOIA in § 10400.11(c). There
are no fees to search for or review
records requested under the Privacy
Act.
Steven D. Aitken,
Legal Advisor, and Performing the Functions
and Duties of the Intellectual Property
Enforcement Coordinator, Office of the
Intellectual Property Enforcement
Coordinator.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[FR Doc. 2023–02552 Filed 2–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3330–F3–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 810
RIN 1994–AA04
Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy
Activities
National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On December 29, 2022, the
Secretary of Energy (‘‘Secretary’’) issued
determinations modifying the generally
authorized destination status of Mexico
and revoking the general authorizations
for exports of controlled nuclear
technology and assistance to Colombia
and Egypt under DOE’s regulation on
Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy
Activities. Accordingly, DOE is issuing
this final rule to remove the restriction
on the general authorization previously
applicable to Mexico and to remove
Colombia and Egypt from the generally
authorized destinations list in appendix
A.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
8, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Katie Strangis, Deputy Director, Office
of Nonproliferation and Arms Control
(NPAC), National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585, telephone (202)
586–8623; Mr. Thomas Reilly, Office of
the General Counsel, GC–53,
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585, telephone (202) 586–3417; or
Mr. Zachary Stern, Office of the General
Counsel, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585, telephone (202)
586–8627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background and Discussion of Final Rule
II. Good Cause for Dispensing With Notice
and Comment
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Background and Discussion of Final
Rule
On December 29, 2022, the Secretary
issued two determinations, (1)
‘‘determination and authorization
pursuant to section 57 b.(2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
regarding exports of nuclear technology
and assistance to Mexico’’ and (2)
‘‘determination and revocation of
general authorizations pursuant to
Department of Energy regulations at 10
CFR part 810 regarding exports of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8217
nuclear technology and assistance to
Colombia and Egypt,’’ modifying the
generally authorized destination status
of Mexico and revoking the general
authorizations for exports to Colombia
and Egypt of controlled nuclear
technology and assistance, which were
published in the Federal Register on
January 31, 2023 (88 FR 6243–6244); (88
FR 6247). The Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2077)
(AEA), enables peaceful nuclear trade
by helping to assure that nuclear
technologies exported from the United
States will not be used for non-peaceful
purposes.
Part 810 of title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations (part 810) implements
section 57 b.(2) of the AEA, pursuant to
which the Secretary has granted a
general authorization for certain
categories of activities which the
Secretary has found to be non-inimical
to the interest of the United States—
including assistance or transfers of
technology to the generally authorized
destinations listed in appendix A to part
810. The Appendix A list currently
includes Colombia, Egypt, and Mexico,
with Mexico currently listed as a
generally authorized destination only
for activities related to INFCIRC/203
Parts 1 and 2 and INFCIRC/825. In light
of the Secretary’s Determinations to
expand Mexico’s generally authorized
status to cover the full scope of exports
of part 810-controlled nuclear
technology and assistance, and to
revoke the general authorizations for
exports of part 810-controlled nuclear
technology and assistance to Colombia
and Egypt, DOE is amending the
generally authorized destinations list in
appendix A by removing the restrictive
language after Mexico and removing
Colombia and Egypt from Appendix A.
II. Good Cause for Dispensing With
Notice and Comment
In accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), an agency may
waive the notice and comment
procedure if it finds, for good cause, that
it is ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(b). Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
provides that an agency may waive the
30-day delayed effective date upon
finding of good cause.
DOE finds good cause that notice and
comment for this rule is unnecessary
due to the nature of the revisions. This
final rule simply makes ministerial
changes to appendix A by removing the
restriction on the general authorization
previously applicable to Mexico and by
removing Colombia and Egypt from the
generally authorized destinations list.
Comments cannot alter the regulation
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
8218
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
given that the modification of Mexico’s
generally authorized destination status
and the revocation of the general
authorizations for Colombia and Egypt
have already been made effective
through the Secretarial Determinations
issued on December 29, 2022, and
published on January 31, 2023, at 88 FR
6243–6244 and 88 FR 6247.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that
there is good cause to publish this rule
without prior opportunity for public
comment because the action merely
aligns appendix A with the Secretarial
Determinations. A delay in effective
date is unnecessary for these same
reasons. Therefore, these amendments
are published as final and are effective
February 8, 2023.
III. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ 58
FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was not subject
to review under that Executive order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
found in DOE’s National Environmental
Policy Act regulations at paragraph A5
of appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part
1021, which applies to a rulemaking
that amends an existing rule or
regulation and that does not change the
environmental effect of the rule or
regulation being amended. Accordingly,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As discussed
previously, DOE has determined that
providing notice and opportunity for
public comment on this final rule are
unnecessary. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared
for this final rule.
The changes to appendix A are
summarized in Section I of this
document. DOE has reviewed the
changes under the provisions of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the
procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. The changes update
the list of generally authorized
destinations. They do not expand the
scope of activities currently regulated
under 10 CFR part 810.
DOE estimates that approximately 10
percent of the entities impacted by the
part 810 regulation are small businesses.
Small businesses impacted by the part
810 regulation generally fall within two
North American Industry Classification
System codes: engineering services
(541330) and computer systems designs
services (541512). Often, their requests
for authorization include the transfer of
computer codes or other similar
products. Generally speaking, small
businesses reported that their initial
filing of a part 810 request for
authorization required up to 40 hours of
legal assistance, but follow-on reporting
and requests required significantly less
assistance.
The requirements for small businesses
exporting nuclear technology abroad
would not substantively change because
the revisions to this rule do not add new
burdens or duties to small businesses.
The obligations of any person subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States who
engages directly or indirectly in the
production of special nuclear material
outside the United States have not
changed in a manner that would
provide any significant economic
impact on small businesses. This
rulemaking change requires such
persons to obtain specific authorization
before making such transfers to
Colombia and Egypt, but this change is
not expected to have any significant
impact. Conversely, this rulemaking no
longer requires such persons to obtain
specific authorization before making
such transfers to Mexico, which is
expected to ease the burden on small
businesses.
On the basis of the foregoing, DOE
certifies this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule imposes no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA) requires each Federal
agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Tribal governments, and the private
sector. Public Law 104–4, sec. 201
(codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For
regulatory actions likely to result in a
rule that may cause the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits,
and other effects on the national
economy (2 U.S.C. 1532(a),(b)). DOE
examined this final rule according to
UMRA and its statement of policy and
has determined that the rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate,
nor a mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year. Accordingly, no further
assessment or analysis is required under
UMRA.
F. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. DOE has examined this
rule and has determined that it would
not preempt State law and would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any
rulemaking that may affect family wellbeing. This rule would have no impact
on the autonomy or integrity of the
family as an institution. Accordingly,
DOE has concluded that it is not
necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
H. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OMB a Statement
of Energy Effects for any significant
energy action. A ‘‘significant energy
action’’ is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected
to lead to promulgation of a final rule,
and that: (1) is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, or
any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action would not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy and is
therefore not a significant energy action.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
I. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB’s guidelines were published
at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and
DOE’s guidelines were published at 67
FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed this rule under the OMB and
DOE guidelines and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies
in those guidelines.
J. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
submit to Congress a report regarding
the issuance of this final rule prior to
the effective date set forth at the outset
of this rulemaking. The report will state
that it has been determined that the rule
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 801(2).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 810
Signing Authority
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on December 29,
2022, by Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of
Energy. That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only,
and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
12 CFR Part 201
Signed in Washington, DC, on February 1,
2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Energy
amends part 810 of chapter III of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations as set
forth below.
PART 810—ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN
ATOMIC ENERGY ACTIVITIES
1. The authority citation for part 810
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 57, 127, 128, 129, 161,
222, and 232 Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended by the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95–242, 68 Stat. 932,
948, 950, 958, 92 Stat. 126, 136, 137, 138 (42
U.S.C. 2077, 2156, 2157, 2158, 2201, 2272,
2280), and the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub. L.
108–458, 118 Stat. 3768; Sec. 104 of the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Pub. L.
93–438; Sec. 301, Department of Energy
Organization Act, Pub. L. 95–91; National
Nuclear Security Administration Act, Pub. L.
106–65, 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., as amended.
Appendix A to Part 810 [Amended]
2. Appendix A to part 810 is amended
by:
■ a. Removing ‘‘Colombia’’ and ‘‘Egypt’’;
and
■ b. Removing the text ‘‘(For all
activities related to INFCIRC/203 Parts 1
and 2 and INFCIRC/825 only)’’ after
‘‘Mexico’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2023–02456 Filed 2–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Foreign relations, Nuclear energy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8219
[Docket No. R–1801]
RIN 7100–AG54
Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by
Federal Reserve Banks
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (‘‘Board’’) has
adopted final amendments to its
Regulation A to reflect the Board’s
approval of an increase in the rate for
primary credit at each Federal Reserve
Bank. The secondary credit rate at each
Reserve Bank automatically increased
by formula as a result of the Board’s
primary credit rate action.
DATES:
Effective date: The amendments to
part 201 (Regulation A) are effective
February 8, 2023.
Applicability date: The rate changes
for primary and secondary credit were
applicable on February 2, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M.
Benjamin Snodgrass, Senior Counsel
(202–263–4877), Legal Division, or
Nicole Trachman, Financial Institution
& Policy Analyst (202–973–5055),
Division of Monetary Affairs; for users
of telephone systems via text telephone
(TTY) or any TTY-based
Telecommunications Relay Services
(TRS), please call 711 from any
telephone, anywhere in the United
States; Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th and C
Streets NW, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Reserve Banks make primary
and secondary credit available to
depository institutions as a backup
source of funding on a short-term basis,
usually overnight. The primary and
secondary credit rates are the interest
rates that the twelve Federal Reserve
Banks charge for extensions of credit
under these programs. In accordance
with the Federal Reserve Act, the
primary and secondary credit rates are
established by the boards of directors of
the Federal Reserve Banks, subject to
review and determination of the Board.
On February 1, 2023, the Board voted
to approve a 0.25 percentage point
increase in the primary credit rate,
thereby increasing the primary credit
rate from 4.50 percent to 4.75 percent.
In addition, the Board had previously
approved the renewal of the secondary
credit rate formula, the primary credit
rate plus 50 basis points. Under the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8217-8219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02456]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 810
RIN 1994-AA04
Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On December 29, 2022, the Secretary of Energy (``Secretary'')
issued determinations modifying the generally authorized destination
status of Mexico and revoking the general authorizations for exports of
controlled nuclear technology and assistance to Colombia and Egypt
under DOE's regulation on Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy
Activities. Accordingly, DOE is issuing this final rule to remove the
restriction on the general authorization previously applicable to
Mexico and to remove Colombia and Egypt from the generally authorized
destinations list in appendix A.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 8, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Katie Strangis, Deputy Director,
Office of Nonproliferation and Arms Control (NPAC), National Nuclear
Security Administration, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585, telephone (202) 586-8623; Mr. Thomas Reilly,
Office of the General Counsel, GC-53, Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, telephone (202) 586-3417;
or Mr. Zachary Stern, Office of the General Counsel, National Nuclear
Security Administration, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585, telephone (202) 586-8627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Discussion of Final Rule
II. Good Cause for Dispensing With Notice and Comment
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Background and Discussion of Final Rule
On December 29, 2022, the Secretary issued two determinations, (1)
``determination and authorization pursuant to section 57 b.(2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, regarding exports of nuclear
technology and assistance to Mexico'' and (2) ``determination and
revocation of general authorizations pursuant to Department of Energy
regulations at 10 CFR part 810 regarding exports of nuclear technology
and assistance to Colombia and Egypt,'' modifying the generally
authorized destination status of Mexico and revoking the general
authorizations for exports to Colombia and Egypt of controlled nuclear
technology and assistance, which were published in the Federal Register
on January 31, 2023 (88 FR 6243-6244); (88 FR 6247). The Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2077) (AEA), enables peaceful
nuclear trade by helping to assure that nuclear technologies exported
from the United States will not be used for non-peaceful purposes.
Part 810 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (part 810)
implements section 57 b.(2) of the AEA, pursuant to which the Secretary
has granted a general authorization for certain categories of
activities which the Secretary has found to be non-inimical to the
interest of the United States--including assistance or transfers of
technology to the generally authorized destinations listed in appendix
A to part 810. The Appendix A list currently includes Colombia, Egypt,
and Mexico, with Mexico currently listed as a generally authorized
destination only for activities related to INFCIRC/203 Parts 1 and 2
and INFCIRC/825. In light of the Secretary's Determinations to expand
Mexico's generally authorized status to cover the full scope of exports
of part 810-controlled nuclear technology and assistance, and to revoke
the general authorizations for exports of part 810-controlled nuclear
technology and assistance to Colombia and Egypt, DOE is amending the
generally authorized destinations list in appendix A by removing the
restrictive language after Mexico and removing Colombia and Egypt from
Appendix A.
II. Good Cause for Dispensing With Notice and Comment
In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), an
agency may waive the notice and comment procedure if it finds, for good
cause, that it is ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
provides that an agency may waive the 30-day delayed effective date
upon finding of good cause.
DOE finds good cause that notice and comment for this rule is
unnecessary due to the nature of the revisions. This final rule simply
makes ministerial changes to appendix A by removing the restriction on
the general authorization previously applicable to Mexico and by
removing Colombia and Egypt from the generally authorized destinations
list. Comments cannot alter the regulation
[[Page 8218]]
given that the modification of Mexico's generally authorized
destination status and the revocation of the general authorizations for
Colombia and Egypt have already been made effective through the
Secretarial Determinations issued on December 29, 2022, and published
on January 31, 2023, at 88 FR 6243-6244 and 88 FR 6247.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that there is good cause to publish
this rule without prior opportunity for public comment because the
action merely aligns appendix A with the Secretarial Determinations. A
delay in effective date is unnecessary for these same reasons.
Therefore, these amendments are published as final and are effective
February 8, 2023.
III. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning
and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this action
was not subject to review under that Executive order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule is covered under the Categorical
Exclusion found in DOE's National Environmental Policy Act regulations
at paragraph A5 of appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021, which
applies to a rulemaking that amends an existing rule or regulation and
that does not change the environmental effect of the rule or regulation
being amended. Accordingly, neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As discussed
previously, DOE has determined that providing notice and opportunity
for public comment on this final rule are unnecessary. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared for this final rule.
The changes to appendix A are summarized in Section I of this
document. DOE has reviewed the changes under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. The changes update the list of generally authorized
destinations. They do not expand the scope of activities currently
regulated under 10 CFR part 810.
DOE estimates that approximately 10 percent of the entities
impacted by the part 810 regulation are small businesses. Small
businesses impacted by the part 810 regulation generally fall within
two North American Industry Classification System codes: engineering
services (541330) and computer systems designs services (541512).
Often, their requests for authorization include the transfer of
computer codes or other similar products. Generally speaking, small
businesses reported that their initial filing of a part 810 request for
authorization required up to 40 hours of legal assistance, but follow-
on reporting and requests required significantly less assistance.
The requirements for small businesses exporting nuclear technology
abroad would not substantively change because the revisions to this
rule do not add new burdens or duties to small businesses. The
obligations of any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States who engages directly or indirectly in the production of special
nuclear material outside the United States have not changed in a manner
that would provide any significant economic impact on small businesses.
This rulemaking change requires such persons to obtain specific
authorization before making such transfers to Colombia and Egypt, but
this change is not expected to have any significant impact. Conversely,
this rulemaking no longer requires such persons to obtain specific
authorization before making such transfers to Mexico, which is expected
to ease the burden on small businesses.
On the basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a regulatory flexibility
analysis for this rulemaking.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule imposes no information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires each
Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on
State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector. Public
Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For regulatory actions
likely to result in a rule that may cause the expenditure by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector of $100 million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency to publish a
written statement that estimates the resulting costs, benefits, and
other effects on the national economy (2 U.S.C. 1532(a),(b)). DOE
examined this final rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy
and has determined that the rule contains neither an intergovernmental
mandate, nor a mandate that may result in the expenditure by State,
local, and Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any year. Accordingly, no further
assessment or analysis is required under UMRA.
F. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. Agencies are required to examine the constitutional and
statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has examined this rule and has
determined that it would not preempt State law and would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rulemaking that may affect family well-
being. This rule would have no impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is
not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
H. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR
28355 (May
[[Page 8219]]
22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB a
Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy action. A
``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a final
rule, and that: (1) is a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use. This regulatory
action would not have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy and is therefore not a significant
energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy
Effects.
I. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under guidelines established by each
agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed this
rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has concluded that it is
consistent with applicable policies in those guidelines.
J. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will submit to Congress a report
regarding the issuance of this final rule prior to the effective date
set forth at the outset of this rulemaking. The report will state that
it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 801(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 810
Foreign relations, Nuclear energy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on December
29, 2022, by Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of Energy. That document with
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on February 1, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Energy
amends part 810 of chapter III of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below.
PART 810--ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN ATOMIC ENERGY ACTIVITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 810 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 57, 127, 128, 129, 161, 222, and 232 Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended by the Nuclear Nonproliferation Act
of 1978, Pub. L. 95-242, 68 Stat. 932, 948, 950, 958, 92 Stat. 126,
136, 137, 138 (42 U.S.C. 2077, 2156, 2157, 2158, 2201, 2272, 2280),
and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004,
Pub. L. 108-458, 118 Stat. 3768; Sec. 104 of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-438; Sec. 301, Department of
Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91; National Nuclear Security
Administration Act, Pub. L. 106-65, 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., as
amended.
Appendix A to Part 810 [Amended]
0
2. Appendix A to part 810 is amended by:
0
a. Removing ``Colombia'' and ``Egypt''; and
0
b. Removing the text ``(For all activities related to INFCIRC/203 Parts
1 and 2 and INFCIRC/825 only)'' after ``Mexico''.
[FR Doc. 2023-02456 Filed 2-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P