Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits, 7877-7879 [2023-02410]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Other printed endorsements are not required to request ancillary services in conjunction with an Intelligent Mail barcode used on First-Class Mail or Periodicals mailpieces, and their use may produce unintended results. FullService and Seamless Acceptance mailers that desire separate address corrections using Address Service and Change Service ancillary services must request ACS and will receive the ACS notices through Full Service. See 705.23.5.2 for additional standards. For other mailers, in order to receive requested ACS information, mailers must notify the NCSC, ACS Department in Memphis, TN, in writing, seven days prior to mailing to establish a method for ACS notice fulfillment and to arrange for payment of electronic or automated address correction fees. Mailpieces must meet the following specifications: * * * * * 700 Special Standards * * * * * 705 Advanced Preparation and Special Postage Payment Systems * * 23.0 * * * Full-Service Automation Option * 23.5 * * * * * Additional Standards * 23.5.2 * * b. Complimentary ACS ancillary service address correction notices for mailpieces in full-service mailings are available for: 1. First-Class Mail letters and flats, provided at no charge (printed endorsement not required for letters). 2. Periodicals letters and flats, provided at no charge (printed endorsement not required). 3. USPS Marketing Mail letters and flats or BPM flats, provided at no charge. USPS Marketing Mail and BPM pieces must include a printed on-piece endorsement in addition to encoding the ACS ancillary service request into the Intelligent Mail barcode. See 507.4.2 for additional standards. c. Mailers must use the ACS address correction information provided by USPS to update their address records to receive notices without paying additional fees. Beginning July 9, 2023, address corrections will only be provided electronically in the Business Customer Gateway under Mailing Reports utilizing the Data Distribution and Informed Visibility Dashboard d. A new Service Type Identifier (STID) Table will be published on PostalPro removing all STID references for manual corrections when mailers present qualifying Full-Service mail. * * * * * Tram T. Pham, Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance. * [FR Doc. 2023–02309 Filed 2–6–23; 8:45 am] Address Correction Notices [Revise the text of 23.5.2 to read as follows:] Mailers presenting mailpieces (except for those noted below) that qualify for the full-service Intelligent Mail option will receive automated address correction notices electronically when the pieces are encoded with Intelligent Mail barcodes with ‘‘Address Service Requested’’ or ‘‘Change Service Requested’’ under standards for OneCode ACS and under the following conditions: a. Mailpieces must include the appropriate ACS service type ID in the Intelligent Mail barcode to match the ancillary service requested. See 507.1.5 for mail disposition and address correction combinations by class of mail. BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0584; FRL–9939–02– R9] Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a revision to SUMMARY: 7877 the Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District’s (TCAPCD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision governs the District’s issuance of permits for stationary sources, and focuses on the preconstruction review and permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’). DATES: This rule is effective March 9, 2023. The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket No. EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0584. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Batchelder, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415) 947–4174, or by email to batchelder.amber@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. ADDRESSES: Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On July 14, 2022, 1 the EPA proposed to approve the rule listed in Table 1 into the California SIP. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE Local agency TCAPCD ........ 1 87 Rule No. 429 Rule title Adopted Federal New Source Review ................................................................................ FR 42132. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Feb 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 07/06/21 Submitted 08/03/21 7878 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations For areas designated nonattainment for one or more National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the applicable SIP must include preconstruction review and permitting requirements for new or modified major stationary sources of such nonattainment pollutant(s) under part D of title I of the Act, commonly referred to as Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR). The rule listed in Table 1 contains the District’s NNSR permit program applicable to new and modified major sources located in Tuolumne County. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, no comments were submitted on our proposal. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted on our proposal. We continue to find that Rule 429 satisfies the relevant requirements for a CAA NNSR program for ozone, as well as the associated visibility requirements for sources subject to review under such a program in accordance with 40 CFR 51.307. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is approving the submitted rule. This action incorporates the submitted rule into the California SIP. In conjunction with the EPA’s SIP approval of the District’s visibility program for sources subject to the NNSR program, this action also revises the scope of the visibility Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) at 40 CFR 52.28 in California so that this FIP no longer applies to sources located in Tuolumne County that are subject to the District’s visibility program. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is incorporating by reference Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District Rule 429 as described in Section I of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Feb 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. The state did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goals of Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and indigenous peoples. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 10, 2023. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: January 31, 2023. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Subpart F—California ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(591) to read as follows: ■ § 52.220 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0609; FRL–10025– 03–R9] Identification of plan-in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (591) The following new regulation was submitted on August 3, 2021 by the Governor’s designee. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 429, Federal New Source Review, adopted on July 6, 2021. (2) [Reserved] (B) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved] 3. Section 52.281 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(8) to read as follows: ■ § 52.281 Visibility protection. * * * * * (d) * * * (8) Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2023–02410 Filed 2–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES Local agency 323 MCAQD .......... 324 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a revision to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department’s (MCAQD or ‘‘County’’) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) from combustion equipment and internal combustion engines. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) and making the determination that the County’s control measures implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for major sources of NOX under the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). DATES: These rules are effective on March 9, 2023. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0609. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly SUMMARY: available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. La Kenya Evans-Hopper, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972–3245 or by email at evanshopper.lakenya@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Proposed Action and Interim Final Determination II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action and Interim Final Determination On August 4, 2022 (87 FR 47666), the EPA proposed to approve the following two rules submitted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) into the Arizona SIP. Rule title Revised Fuel Burning Equipment from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Sources. Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE) ..................... June 23, 2021 .... June 30, 2021. June 23, 2021 .... June 30, 2021. We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation. On the same day, we also made an interim final determination (87 FR 47632) that the submittal from the ADEQ corrected SIP deficiencies from a previous submittal, allowing us to defer the imposition of sanctions resulting from our previous disapproval action concerning the County’s RACT demonstration for major sources of NOX.1 FR 971 (February 8, 2021). VerDate Sep<11>2014 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Rule No. MCAQD .......... 1 86 Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County; Reasonably Available Control Technology—Combustion Sources 7879 17:54 Feb 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted during the public comment period. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules into the Arizona SIP. The June 30, 2021 versions of Rule 323 and Rule 324 will replace the November 2, 2016 versions of these rules in the SIP. On December 30, 2022 (87 FR 80462) we finalized approval for MCAQD Rule 322 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Submitted to replace the SIP-approved version of that rule, which, together with our approval of Rules 323 and 324, would address our previous disapproval of the major sources of NOX RACT element. Therefore, we find that all three rules regulating major sources of NOX in Maricopa County meet the applicable CAA requirements and include requirements that are consistent with RACT for NOX sources. Based on this finding, the EPA concludes that the submitted rules satisfy CAA section 182 RACT requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for major sources of NOX. E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7877-7879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0584; FRL-9939-02-R9]


Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Tuolumne County Air 
Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a 
revision to the Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District's 
(TCAPCD or ``District'') portion of the California State Implementation 
Plan (SIP). This revision governs the District's issuance of permits 
for stationary sources, and focuses on the preconstruction review and 
permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of 
title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'').

DATES: This rule is effective March 9, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0584. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if 
you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation 
at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Batchelder, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415) 947-4174, or by 
email to [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,'' 
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On July 14, 2022,\1\ the EPA proposed to approve the rule listed in 
Table 1 into the California SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 87 FR 42132.

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Local agency              Rule No.              Rule title                Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TCAPCD.............................         429  Federal New Source Review......        07/06/21        08/03/21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 7878]]

    For areas designated nonattainment for one or more National Ambient 
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the applicable SIP must include 
preconstruction review and permitting requirements for new or modified 
major stationary sources of such nonattainment pollutant(s) under part 
D of title I of the Act, commonly referred to as Nonattainment New 
Source Review (NNSR). The rule listed in Table 1 contains the 
District's NNSR permit program applicable to new and modified major 
sources located in Tuolumne County. Our proposed action contains more 
information on the rule and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, no comments were submitted on our proposal.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted on our proposal. We continue to find 
that Rule 429 satisfies the relevant requirements for a CAA NNSR 
program for ozone, as well as the associated visibility requirements 
for sources subject to review under such a program in accordance with 
40 CFR 51.307. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the 
Act, the EPA is approving the submitted rule. This action incorporates 
the submitted rule into the California SIP. In conjunction with the 
EPA's SIP approval of the District's visibility program for sources 
subject to the NNSR program, this action also revises the scope of the 
visibility Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) at 40 CFR 52.28 in 
California so that this FIP no longer applies to sources located in 
Tuolumne County that are subject to the District's visibility program.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is incorporating by reference Tuolumne County Air 
Pollution Control District Rule 429 as described in Section I of this 
preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials 
available through https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the 
EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more 
information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    The state did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as 
part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in the record 
inconsistent with the stated goals of Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 
7629, February 16, 1994) of achieving environmental justice for people 
of color, low-income populations, and indigenous peoples.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 10, 2023. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental 
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 31, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

[[Page 7879]]

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(591) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan-in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (591) The following new regulation was submitted on August 3, 2021 
by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Tuolumne County Air Pollution 
Control District.
    (1) Rule 429, Federal New Source Review, adopted on July 6, 2021.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]

0
3. Section 52.281 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(8) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.281  Visibility protection.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (8) Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-02410 Filed 2-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.