Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Revisions to the Economic Data Reports Requirements; Amendment 52 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Commercial King and Tanner Crab Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, 7586-7591 [2023-02117]

Download as PDF 7586 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations scope of that authority as it amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Austin Municipal Airport, Austin, MN, to support instrument flight rule operations at this airport. History The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (87 FR 74050; December 2, 2022) for Docket No. FAA–2022–1464 to amend the Class E airspace at Austin, MN. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11. DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points. The Rule This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface to within a 7.3-mile (increased from a 6.3-mile) radius of Austin Municipal Airport, Austin, MN; removes the Austin VOR/DME and the associated extension from the airspace legal description; and updates the geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical database. This action is due to an airspace review conducted as part of the decommissioning of the Austin VOR/ DME which provided navigation information for the instrument procedures at this airport. FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15. Regulatory Notices and Analyses The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. (Lat. 43°39′46″ N, long. 92°55′59″ W) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7.3-mile radius of the Austin Municipal Airport. Environmental Review 50 CFR Parts 679 and 680 The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 5–6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows: ■ Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth. * * * * * AGL MN E5 Austin, MN [Amended] Austin Municipal Airport, MN PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 1, 2023. Martin A. Skinner, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center. [FR Doc. 2023–02404 Filed 2–3–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 15 CFR Part 902 [Docket No.: 230111–0005] RIN 0648–BL50 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Revisions to the Economic Data Reports Requirements; Amendment 52 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Commercial King and Tanner Crab Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: NMFS issues regulations to implement Amendment 52 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Commercial King and Tanner Crab Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (Crab FMP) and a regulatory amendment to revise regulations on Economic Data Reports (EDR) requirements for groundfish and crab fisheries off Alaska. This final rule removes third party data verification audits and blind formatting requirements from the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) crab fisheries EDR, the Bering Sea American Fisheries Act (AFA) pollock fishery Chinook Salmon EDR, and the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries EDR. This action also eliminates the EDR requirements for the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) trawl fisheries. This final rule is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Crab FMP, the Fishery Management Plans for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska Management Area (GOA FMP) and for the Groundfish of the BSAI Management SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1 DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Area (BSAI FMP), and other applicable laws. DATES: Effective March 8, 2023. ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of Amendment 52 to the Crab FMP, the Regulatory Impact Review (referred to as the ‘‘Analysis’’), and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this rule may be obtained from https:// www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region website at https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska. Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this final rule may be submitted by mail to NMFS Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668, Attn: Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division; and to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find the particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public’’ or by using the search function. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott A. Miller 907–586–7416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off Alaska under the BSAI FMP and the GOA FMP. NMFS manages the king and Tanner crab fisheries in the United States EEZ of the BSAI under the Crab FMP. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS approved, the BSAI FMP, the GOA FMP, and the Crab FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. A notice of availability for Amendment 52 to the Crab FMP was published in the Federal Register on October 6, 2022, with comments invited through December 5, 2022 (87 FR 60638). The proposed rule to implement Amendment 52 and the regulatory amendments was published in the Federal Register on November 1, 2022, with comments invited through December 1, 2022 (87 FR 65724). NMFS received one comment letter from one member of the public. The comment is summarized and responded to under the heading ‘‘Comments and Responses’’ below. A detailed review of the provisions and rationale for this action is provided in the preamble to the proposed rule and is briefly summarized in this final rule. Background Four EDR data collection programs are in place for crab and groundfish fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska. These VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 programs impose mandatory annual data reporting requirements for regulated entities participating in the BSAI Crab Rationalization (CR) fisheries, the AFA pollock fishery, the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries, and the GOA trawl fisheries. The purposes of EDRs are to gather data and information to improve the analyses developed by the Council on the social and economic effects of the catch share or rationalization programs, to understand the economic performance of participants in these programs, and to help estimate impacts of future issues, problems, or revisions to the programs covered by the EDRs. CR Program EDR The Crab EDR was implemented concurrently with the CR Program under Amendments 18 and 19 of the BSAI Crab FMP (70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005). The rule requiring the Crab EDR submission was codified in 50 CFR 680.6, which retroactively required participants to submit EDR forms for 1998, 2001, and 2004 calendar year operations by June 1, 2005, as well as to submit an annual Crab EDR form for calendar year 2005 and thereafter by May 1 of each following year. Amendment 42 (78 FR 36122, June 17, 2013) revised annual Crab EDR reporting requirements in order to eliminate redundant reporting requirements, standardize reporting across participants, and reduce costs associated with data collection. The amended rule extended the annual submission deadline to July 31. The reporting requirements for the Crab EDR apply to owners and leaseholders of catcher vessels (CVs) and catcher/processors (CPs) with landings of BSAI CR crab, including Community Development Quota (CDQ) allocated crab, and owners and leaseholders of Registered Crab Receivers (RCRs) who purchase and/or process landed BSAI CR crab during a calendar year. For all groups, the annual submission requirement is imposed on CR crab program participants who harvest, purchase, or process CR crab. The Crab EDR consists of reporting forms developed for three respective sectors: the Crab CV EDR, Crab processor EDR, and the Crab CP EDR. The CV and processor forms collect distinct sets of data elements, with the CP form combining all data elements collected in the CV form and applicable elements from the processor form. A complete list of the data elements for each of the forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES). PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7587 Amendment 80 EDR The Amendment 80 EDR was implemented on January 20, 2008 (72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007) as part of the Amendment 80 management program and codified in regulation at 50 CFR 679.94. Amendment 80 allocated several BSAI non-pollock trawl groundfish species among trawl fishery sectors and facilitated the formation of harvesting cooperatives in the non-AFA trawl CP sector. The initial Amendment 80 EDR submissions were due June 1, 2009, reporting data for the 2008 calendar year. The Amendment 80 EDR reporting requirements applied to all Amendment 80 Quota Share (QS) permit holders. Permit holders who actively operated an Amendment 80 vessel were required to complete the entire EDR form, while QS permit holders who did not operate a vessel were required to complete portions of the form pertaining to QS permit sale or lease costs and revenues. When the GOA Trawl EDR program was implemented for both CV and CP participants, it amended the Amendment 80 EDR at 50 CFR 679.94 to include the CPs participating in GOA trawl fisheries. It also changed the name of the form from the Amendment 80 EDR to the Annual Trawl CP EDR. Additional reporting elements specific to GOA Trawl CPs were added to the form. The rule also extended the requirement to complete all portions of the EDR form to owners and leaseholders of any vessel named on a License Limitation Program (LLP) groundfish license authorizing a CP using trawl gear to harvest and process LLP groundfish species in the GOA. The association between the GOA Trawl (CV and shoreside processor) EDR and Annual Trawl CP EDR has resulted in confusion. For the sake of clarity, in this final rule, the EDR currently specified under 50 CFR 679.94 is referenced as the Amendment 80 EDR (rather than the Annual Trawl CP EDR), and the EDR under 50 CFR 679.110(a)(1) and (2) is referenced as the GOA Trawl EDR; any relevant distinctions or overlaps are described as needed. The Amendment 80 EDR form has been submitted annually by Amendment 80 QS holders since 2008. A complete list of the data elements for each of the forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES). GOA Trawl EDR The GOA Trawl EDR was implemented on January 1, 2015 (79 FR 71313, December 2, 2014) and codified in regulation at 50 CFR 679.110. The initial GOA Trawl EDR submissions E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1 7588 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES were due June 1, 2016, for reporting 2015 calendar year data. The GOA Trawl EDR was implemented to collect relevant baseline information that could be used to assess the impacts of a future catch share program on affected harvesters, processors, and communities in the GOA. However, Council action on a catch share program that addressed issues with GOA bycatch management was suspended in December 2016, and no catch share program exists for GOA harvesters, processors, and communities. The intended submitters for the GOA Trawl EDR includes owners and leaseholders of CVs and CPs active in the Central and Western GOA groundfish trawl fishery and operators of shoreside processing facilities that receive groundfish catch from the GOA. The EDR consists of two distinct EDR forms, the GOA Trawl CV EDR and GOA Shoreside Processor EDR. An additional EDR form overlaps with the Amendment 80 EDR, as described above. The GOA Trawl CV EDR form is required for all trawl CVs that harvested groundfish in the GOA during the previous year. The GOA Shoreside Processor EDR form is required for all shore-based processors that receive and process groundfish from GOA trawl fisheries. The Annual Trawl CP EDR form is required for all vessel owners and leaseholders that catch and process groundfish in the GOA trawl fisheries. A complete list of the data elements for each of the forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES). Amendment 91 Chinook Salmon EDR The Amendment 91 EDR and additional record keeping and reporting requirements associated with monitoring of Chinook salmon bycatch avoidance measures for the AFA pollock fishery were implemented concurrently on March 5, 2012 (77 FR 5389, February 3, 2012). The implementation of the Amendment 91 EDR occurred approximately 17 months after Amendment 91 (75 FR 53026, August 30, 2010) went into effect. The initial submission of EDR forms required under 50 CFR 679.65 were due on June 1, 2013, reporting data for the 2012 calendar year. The Amendment 91 EDR was implemented to provide additional data to assess the effectiveness of the Chinook salmon bycatch management measures in the Bering Sea (BS) pollock fishery. The Amendment 91 EDR reporting requirement applies to owners and leaseholders of AFA CVs, CPs, and motherships active in the BS pollock fishery and to entities eligible to receive VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 Chinook salmon Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) allocation, including AFA in-shore sector harvest cooperative representatives, sector-based Incentive Plan Agreement representatives, and CDQ group representatives. In addition, vessel masters who actively participate in the AFA pollock fishery are required to complete the Amendment 91 Vessel Master Survey form and NMFS allows the owner or leaseholder of the vessel to submit this information, from multiple vessel masters, electronically to reduce respondent burden. The Amendment 91 EDR program consists of three separate forms: the Compensated Transfer Report (CTR), the Vessel Fuel Survey, and the Vessel Master Survey. The CTR collects transaction data on all compensated transfers of Chinook PSC by participants in the AFA fishery. The CTR is to be completed by all entities participating as lessor or lessee in compensated transfers of Chinook PSC. However, no such transactions have ever been reported. The Vessel Fuel Survey form is required for all AFA vessels that harvested BSAI pollock during the previous year and collects information about the vessel’s average fuel consumption, the total amount in gallons of fuel loaded onto the vessel, and total annual fuel cost. The Vessel Master Survey form is used to determine the fishing and bycatch conditions observed during the BSAI pollock fishery and factors that motivated Chinook salmon bycatch avoidance. A complete list of the data elements for each of the forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES). History and Need for This Action The Council developed this action beginning in February 2018 and made its final recommendation to NMFS after considerable public input in February 2022. This action removes third party data verification audits and blind formatting requirements from the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) crab fisheries EDR, the Bering Sea American Fisheries Act (AFA) pollock fishery Chinook Salmon EDR (Amendment 91 EDR), and the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries EDR, and eliminates the EDR requirements for the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) trawl fisheries. Removing the third party audit requirements reduces costs incurred for NMFS to administer the EDR program and associated cost recovery fees paid by industry while maintaining data quality due to the automated EDR data verification procedures that remain in place. Additionally, enforcement provisions exist for all recordkeeping and reporting requirements, including the EDR PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 program. A detailed explanation of the history of this action and need for this action is provided in the preamble to the proposed rule and not repeated here (87 FR 65724, November 1, 2022). Final Rule This final rule removes or revises regulations at 50 CFR parts 679 and 680. This final rule removes third-party data verification audits for the Crab EDR, the Amendment 91 EDR, and the Amendment 80 EDR and removes blind formatting requirements for the Crab EDR. This action also eliminates the GOA Trawl EDR requirements. Eliminating Data Verification Audits This final rule removes the data verification audit requirements at § 679.65(e), § 679.94(b), and § 680.6(f). Removal of the audit authorization eliminates the need for the data collection agent (DCA) to contract with a third-party auditor to conduct the audit portion of the data verification. EDR data verification currently employs a series of mainly automated validation procedures, including an audit process with the DCA. Except for removal of the audit process, these data validation procedures remain and continue to ensure the data reported are error-free. Enforcement actions will continue in cases of noncompliance with the EDR provisions as part of normal enforcement of recordkeeping and reporting requirements. This final rule also removes the definitions for ‘‘Designated data collection auditor’’ at § 679.2 and ‘‘Auditor’’ at § 680.2. Because this final rule removes the EDR audit requirements, these definitions are no longer needed. Eliminating Blind Formatting This final rule removes the definitions for ‘‘Blind data’’ at § 679.2 and § 680.2. Both definitions describe the required formatting process to remove the personal identifiers to the data collected from the EDRs. The identifiers include Federal fisheries permit numbers and State of Alaska vessel registration numbers that are essential data elements to analysts when developing reports and documents based on EDR data. Removing the blind formatting requirements makes the data aggregations and confidentiality protections for the Crab EDR comparable to the requirements under the other EDR programs. It also increases the usability and access to the EDR data for Council and NMFS analysts. E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Eliminating the GOA Trawl EDR This final rule removes and reserves Subpart J—Gulf of Alaska Trawl Economic Data. The original purpose of the GOA Trawl EDR was to establish a baseline information collection that could be used to assess the impacts of a catch share program. However, no catch share program has been developed to date or is currently contemplated. The original need for this data collection program has diminished since 2016 when the Council suspended work on a possible GOA catch share program, calling into question the efficacy of continuing the program. Eliminating the GOA Trawl EDR removes compliance costs for industry as well as agency costs, as the GOA Trawl fishery is not managed under a catch share program subject to cost recovery. This final rule also revises the section heading at § 679.94 and revises § 679.94(a)(1) to remove GOA Trawl CPs from the requirement to submit the Amendment 80 EDR form. When the GOA Trawl EDR program was implemented, it required owners and leaseholders of any vessel named on an LLP groundfish license authorizing a CP using trawl gear to harvest and process LLP groundfish species in the GOA to complete all portions of the Amendment 80 EDR form. This final rule limits the Amendment 80 EDR requirement to Amendment 80 QS permit holders alone. DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES Comments and Responses NMFS received one unique comment from one member of the public on the proposed rule. Comment 1: The commenter asserts that removing data verification allows increasing corruption in management of the North Pacific fishery. The commenter further asserts that corrupt management by this agency will result in fish species going extinct and further asserts that this has happened in most areas managed by this agency. The commenter further asserts that the commercial fishing industry has undue influence in the management process and that management of the public resource is being compromised by excessive quotas resulting in starvation, and human predation, of marine mammals. Finally, the commenter asserts that there is no environmental conservation occurring, that there is no reason for this action, and that the action is objectionable. Response: NMFS acknowledges the comment regarding the proposed rule’s inadvertent removal of the DCA data verification process in regulatory text VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 edits. In accordance with the proposed rule’s goal, this final rule revises the regulations to remove only the authorization for data verification audits. This final rule retains data verification regulations and data verification procedures remain in place. This final rule eliminates the automated audits of EDR submissions, as analysis has shown that no data verification audit, over the entire history of the EDR program, has resulted in a finding of noncompliance. The remainder of the comment is outside of the scope of this action. This final rule addresses the collection of EDR data and is not intended to broadly manage commercial or subsistence fisheries. NMFS manages commercial, recreational, and subsistence fisheries consistent with the provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable law. Changes From Proposed to Final Rule NMFS made three changes to the final rule that are related to both the comment received on the proposed rule and internal review. Namely, this final rule corrects inadvertent errors in the regulatory text included in the proposed rule. The preamble to the proposed rule accurately stated that, except for the audit component, the data verification process would remain in place. And, indeed, the Council did not recommend removal of the data verification process by the DCA and the Analysis prepared in support of this action specifically indicates that the data verification procedures will continue. But the proposed rule regulatory text edits inadvertently proposed deleting data verification processes that were meant to remain in place. This final rule corrects those errors as further detailed below. First, in § 679.65, which describes the Chinook Salmon EDR program, NMFS inadvertently proposed deleting the entirety of paragraph (e), which includes regulation text describing both the EDR verification and audit procedures. This final rule revises the introductory text to paragraph (e) to remove the references to audit procedures and the associated designated data collection auditor (DDCA). Paragraph (e)(1) is revised to change the reference to the DDCA to the DCA; paragraph (e)(2), which describes the audit process, is removed. Second, in § 679.94, NMFS inadvertently proposed removing the entirety of paragraph (b), which includes regulations pertaining to both the EDR verification process and the audit process. This final rule revises paragraph (b)(1) and (2) to remove only the reference to the DDCA; paragraph PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7589 (b)(3), which describes the audit process, is removed. Third, NMFS inadvertently proposed removing the entirety of §§ 680.6(f) and (g). This final rule removes only paragraph (f)(3), in order to remove the requirement to provide copies of additional data to the DDCA. Removal of paragraph (f)(3) is consistent with the removal of the third party audit process. Paragraph (g) remains unchanged from the proposed rule and provides the DCA with the authorization to request voluntary submission of economic data that may be used in the data verification process, which will remain in place after the removal of the third party audit process. Other Regulatory Changes This final rule revises regulations at §§ 680.6(a)(2), (a)(3), (c), (d), (e)(1), and (e)(2) to update the instructions for submitting Crab EDR forms to be consistent with the submission instructions for the Amendment 80 EDR implemented in 2008. OMB Revisions to PRA References in 15 CFR 902.1(b) Section 3507(c)(B)(i) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires that agencies inventory and display a current control number assigned by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each agency’s information collection. Section 902.1(b) identifies the location of NOAA regulations for which OMB approval numbers have been issued. Because this rule discontinued the collection-ofinformation for OMB Control Number 0648–0700 and removes § 679.110, 15 CFR 902.1(b) is revised to correctly reference these changes. Classification Pursuant to sections 304(b) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final rule is consistent with the FMPs, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law. This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866. Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1 7590 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations No comments were received regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required and none was prepared. Regulatory Impact Review A Regulatory Impact Review was prepared to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The Council recommended Amendment 52 and the regulatory revisions in this final rule based on those measures that maximized net benefits to the Nation. Specific aspects of the economic analysis are discussed above in the Certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act section. DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES Collection-of-Information Requirements This final rule contains information collection requirements subject to the PRA and which have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget OMB. OMB has approved discontinuing OMB Control Number 0648–0700 (Gulf of Alaska Catcher Vessel and Processor Trawl EDR), which covered the economic data collection requirements for the GOA Trawl EDR Program. OMB Control Number 0648–0700 was discontinued on December 31, 2022. This final rule contains collection of information requirements subject to review and approval by OMB under the PRA. NMFS has submitted these requirements to OMB for approval under OMB control numbers 0648–0518 (Alaska Region Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab EDRs); 0648–0564 (Groundfish Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR); and 0648–0633 (Alaska Chinook Salmon EDR). The public reporting burden for the information collection requirements provided below includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. OMB Control Number 0648–0518 NMFS revises and extends by three years OMB Control Number 0648–0518. This collection covers the economic data collection requirements for the CR Program and is necessary to monitor and evaluate the CR Program. This collection is revised to remove third-party data verification audits and blind formatting requirements for the BSAI crab fisheries EDR because this final rule removes these requirements. The three crab EDR forms are revised to pre-fill data fields that do not change frequently to reduce the burden of the crab EDR forms. Pre-filling the data fields is estimated to reduce the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 respondent’s data entry time by 15 minutes. However, since the burden hour estimates for the forms are rounded to the nearest hour, this modest reduction will not decrease the public reporting burden. Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to average 20 hours each for the Annual Catcher Vessel Crab EDR and the Annual CP Crab EDR, 16 hours for the Annual Processor Crab EDR, and 1 hour for an EDR certification page. The estimated number of respondents for this collection is 77; the estimated total annual burden hours is 1,449 hours; and the estimated total annual cost to the public for recordkeeping and reporting costs is $385. OMB Control Number 0648–0564 NMFS revises and extends by three years OMB Control Number 0648–0564. This collection covers the economic data collection requirements for Amendment 80 and GOA trawl CPs. This collection is necessary to help evaluate the Amendment 80 Program, including program-eligible trawl CPs, and is used by NMFS and the Council to assess the impacts of major changes in the groundfish management regime, including programs for prohibited species catch species and target species. This collection is revised to remove third-party data verification audits for the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR and remove requirements for the GOA Trawl EDR Program because this final rule removes regulations for the audit authorization and eliminates the GOA Trawl EDR Program. Eliminating the program simplifies the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor form. This form is revised to remove data fields that are not being used in analyses and to pre-fill data fields that do not change frequently. These changes to the form are expected to reduce the time burden per respondent by approximately two hours. Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to average 20 hours for the Annual GOA Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR. The estimated number of respondents for this collection is 22; the estimated total annual burden hours are 440 hours; and the estimated total annual cost to the public for recordkeeping and reporting costs is $110. OMB Control Number 0648–0633 NMFS revises OMB Control Number 0648–0633 to remove the verification audit for the Compensated Transfer Report because this final rule removes the authorization for third party data verification audits. PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to average 40 hours for the Compensated Transfer Report, 4 hours for the Vessel Fuel Survey, and 4 hours for the Vessel Master Survey. Public Comment We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. Written comments and recommendations for these information collections should be submitted on the following website: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find the particular information collection by using the search function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA collections of information may be viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRASearch. List of Subjects 15 CFR Part 902 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 50 CFR Part 679 Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 50 CFR Part 680 Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: January 27, 2023. Samuel D. Rauch, III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part 902 and 50 CFR parts 679 and 680 as follows: Title 15—Commerce and Foreign Trade PART 902—NOAA INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB CONTROL NUMBERS 1. The authority citation for part 902 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations § 902.1 [Amended] 2. In § 902.1, in the table in paragraph (b), under the heading ‘‘50 CFR’’, remove the entry for ‘‘679.110(a) through (f)’’. * * * * * ■ designated representative, if applicable, must respond to inquiries by NMFS, the DCA within 20 days of the date of issuance of the inquiry. * * * * * Subpart J—[Removed and Reserved] Title 50—Wildlife and Fisheries 7. Remove and reserve subpart J, consisting of § 679.110. ■ PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA PART 680—SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA 3. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as follows: ■ BILLING CODE 3510–22–P [Amended] 4. In § 679.2, remove the definitions for ‘‘Blind data’’ and ‘‘Designated data collection auditor’’. ■ 5. In § 679.65, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows: § 679.65 Bering Sea Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management Program Economic Data Report (Chinook salmon EDR program). * * * * * (e) Chinook salmon EDR verification procedures. NMFS or the data collection agent (DCA) will conduct verification of Chinook salmon EDR information with the persons identified at § 679.65(b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), (d)(1)(i), and (d)(1)(ii). (1) The persons identified at § 679.65(b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), (d)(1)(i), and (d)(1)(ii) must respond to inquiries by NMFS and its DCA for purposes of the CTR, within 20 days of the date of issuance of the inquiry. (2) [Reserved]. ■ 6. In § 679.94, revise the section heading, paragraph (a)(1), paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), and remove paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: DDrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES § 679.94 Economic data report (EDR) for the Amendment 80 sector. (a) * * * (1) Requirement to submit an EDR. A person who held an Amendment 80 QS permit during a calendar year must submit a complete Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR for that calendar year by following the instructions on the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR form. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) NMFS or the DCA will conduct verification of information with a person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR, or if applicable, that person’s designated representative. (2) A person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR or 16:26 Feb 03, 2023 Jkt 259001 [FR Doc. 2023–02117 Filed 2–3–23; 8:45 am] 8. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 continues to read as follows: ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 processor EDR for annual data for the previous calendar year. (2) Any holder of a registered crab receiver (RCR) permit that obtained custom processing for CR Program crab in the previous calendar year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, a completed processor EDR for annual data for the previous calendar year. * * * * * ■ Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L. 111–281. § 679.2 7591 Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109– 241; Pub. L. 109–479. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY § 680.2 40 CFR Part 70 [Amended] 9. In § 680.2, remove the definitions for ‘‘Auditor’’ and ‘‘Blind data’’. ■ 10. In § 680.6, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (3), (c), (d), (e)(1) and (2), and remove paragraph (f)(3) to read as follows: ■ § 680.6 Crab economic data report (EDR). (a) * * * (2) A completed EDR or EDR certification pages must be submitted to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, for each calendar year on or before 1700 hours, A.l.t., July 31 of the following year. (3) Annual EDR forms for catcher vessels, catcher/processors, shoreside crab processors, and stationary floating crab processors are available on the NMFS Alaska Region website at https:// alaskafisheries.noaa.gov or by contacting NMFS at 1–800–304–4846. * * * * * (c) Annual catcher vessel crab EDR. Any owner or leaseholder of a catcher vessel that landed CR crab in the previous calendar year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, a completed catcher vessel EDR for annual data for the previous calendar year. (d) Annual catcher/processor crab EDR. Any owner or leaseholder of a catcher/processor that harvested or processed CR crab in the previous calendar year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFSissued EDR form, a completed catcher/ processor EDR for annual data for the previous calendar year. (e) * * * (1) Any owner or leaseholder of an SFCP or a shoreside crab processor that processed CR crab, including custom processing of CR crab performed for other crab buyers, in the previous calendar year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, a completed PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 [EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0623; FRL–10031– 03–R9] Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; California; San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; Correction Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule; correction. AGENCY: On December 23, 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a direct final rule in the Federal Register to approve revisions to the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) Operating Permit Program (title V) of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD or ‘‘District’’) in California. In that rulemaking, the EPA included an incorrect effective date in Section VI of the document and in the instructions to amend the regulatory text. This document corrects the errors in the direct final rule. DATES: This correction is effective February 21, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La Weeda Ward, Permits Office (Air–3–1), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (213) 244–1812, ward.laweeda@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In our direct final rule published December 23, 2022 (87 FR 78871), the EPA included an incorrect effective date in the document and instructions to amend the regulatory text. We are correcting the effective date to the date 60 days after publication in the Federal Register because the language in 40 CFR 70.4(b)(11)(i) states that part 70 sources have one year to submit permit applications after the effective date of the permit program. Final rules from past actions in California match the effective date of the program with the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7586-7591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 902

50 CFR Parts 679 and 680

[Docket No.: 230111-0005]
RIN 0648-BL50


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Revisions to 
the Economic Data Reports Requirements; Amendment 52 to the Fishery 
Management Plan for the Commercial King and Tanner Crab Fisheries of 
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to implement Amendment 52 to the 
Fishery Management Plan for the Commercial King and Tanner Crab 
Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (Crab FMP) and a 
regulatory amendment to revise regulations on Economic Data Reports 
(EDR) requirements for groundfish and crab fisheries off Alaska. This 
final rule removes third party data verification audits and blind 
formatting requirements from the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) 
crab fisheries EDR, the Bering Sea American Fisheries Act (AFA) pollock 
fishery Chinook Salmon EDR, and the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries EDR. 
This action also eliminates the EDR requirements for the Gulf of Alaska 
(GOA) trawl fisheries. This final rule is intended to promote the goals 
and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Crab FMP, the Fishery 
Management Plans for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska Management Area 
(GOA FMP) and for the Groundfish of the BSAI Management

[[Page 7587]]

Area (BSAI FMP), and other applicable laws.

DATES: Effective March 8, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of Amendment 52 to the Crab FMP, the 
Regulatory Impact Review (referred to as the ``Analysis''), and the 
Categorical Exclusion prepared for this rule may be obtained from 
https://www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region website at 
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
    Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other 
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this 
final rule may be submitted by mail to NMFS Alaska Region, P.O. Box 
21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668, Attn: Assistant Regional Administrator, 
Sustainable Fisheries Division; and to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find the particular information collection by selecting 
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public'' or by using the 
search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott A. Miller 907-586-7416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the 
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off Alaska under the BSAI FMP and the GOA 
FMP. NMFS manages the king and Tanner crab fisheries in the United 
States EEZ of the BSAI under the Crab FMP. The North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS approved, the BSAI FMP, 
the GOA FMP, and the Crab FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    A notice of availability for Amendment 52 to the Crab FMP was 
published in the Federal Register on October 6, 2022, with comments 
invited through December 5, 2022 (87 FR 60638). The proposed rule to 
implement Amendment 52 and the regulatory amendments was published in 
the Federal Register on November 1, 2022, with comments invited through 
December 1, 2022 (87 FR 65724). NMFS received one comment letter from 
one member of the public. The comment is summarized and responded to 
under the heading ``Comments and Responses'' below.
    A detailed review of the provisions and rationale for this action 
is provided in the preamble to the proposed rule and is briefly 
summarized in this final rule.

Background

    Four EDR data collection programs are in place for crab and 
groundfish fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska. These programs impose 
mandatory annual data reporting requirements for regulated entities 
participating in the BSAI Crab Rationalization (CR) fisheries, the AFA 
pollock fishery, the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries, and the GOA trawl 
fisheries. The purposes of EDRs are to gather data and information to 
improve the analyses developed by the Council on the social and 
economic effects of the catch share or rationalization programs, to 
understand the economic performance of participants in these programs, 
and to help estimate impacts of future issues, problems, or revisions 
to the programs covered by the EDRs.

CR Program EDR

    The Crab EDR was implemented concurrently with the CR Program under 
Amendments 18 and 19 of the BSAI Crab FMP (70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005). 
The rule requiring the Crab EDR submission was codified in 50 CFR 
680.6, which retroactively required participants to submit EDR forms 
for 1998, 2001, and 2004 calendar year operations by June 1, 2005, as 
well as to submit an annual Crab EDR form for calendar year 2005 and 
thereafter by May 1 of each following year. Amendment 42 (78 FR 36122, 
June 17, 2013) revised annual Crab EDR reporting requirements in order 
to eliminate redundant reporting requirements, standardize reporting 
across participants, and reduce costs associated with data collection. 
The amended rule extended the annual submission deadline to July 31.
    The reporting requirements for the Crab EDR apply to owners and 
leaseholders of catcher vessels (CVs) and catcher/processors (CPs) with 
landings of BSAI CR crab, including Community Development Quota (CDQ) 
allocated crab, and owners and leaseholders of Registered Crab 
Receivers (RCRs) who purchase and/or process landed BSAI CR crab during 
a calendar year. For all groups, the annual submission requirement is 
imposed on CR crab program participants who harvest, purchase, or 
process CR crab.
    The Crab EDR consists of reporting forms developed for three 
respective sectors: the Crab CV EDR, Crab processor EDR, and the Crab 
CP EDR. The CV and processor forms collect distinct sets of data 
elements, with the CP form combining all data elements collected in the 
CV form and applicable elements from the processor form. A complete 
list of the data elements for each of the forms is in Section 3.2 of 
the Analysis (see ADDRESSES).

Amendment 80 EDR

    The Amendment 80 EDR was implemented on January 20, 2008 (72 FR 
52668, September 14, 2007) as part of the Amendment 80 management 
program and codified in regulation at 50 CFR 679.94. Amendment 80 
allocated several BSAI non-pollock trawl groundfish species among trawl 
fishery sectors and facilitated the formation of harvesting 
cooperatives in the non-AFA trawl CP sector. The initial Amendment 80 
EDR submissions were due June 1, 2009, reporting data for the 2008 
calendar year. The Amendment 80 EDR reporting requirements applied to 
all Amendment 80 Quota Share (QS) permit holders. Permit holders who 
actively operated an Amendment 80 vessel were required to complete the 
entire EDR form, while QS permit holders who did not operate a vessel 
were required to complete portions of the form pertaining to QS permit 
sale or lease costs and revenues.
    When the GOA Trawl EDR program was implemented for both CV and CP 
participants, it amended the Amendment 80 EDR at 50 CFR 679.94 to 
include the CPs participating in GOA trawl fisheries. It also changed 
the name of the form from the Amendment 80 EDR to the Annual Trawl CP 
EDR. Additional reporting elements specific to GOA Trawl CPs were added 
to the form. The rule also extended the requirement to complete all 
portions of the EDR form to owners and leaseholders of any vessel named 
on a License Limitation Program (LLP) groundfish license authorizing a 
CP using trawl gear to harvest and process LLP groundfish species in 
the GOA. The association between the GOA Trawl (CV and shoreside 
processor) EDR and Annual Trawl CP EDR has resulted in confusion. For 
the sake of clarity, in this final rule, the EDR currently specified 
under 50 CFR 679.94 is referenced as the Amendment 80 EDR (rather than 
the Annual Trawl CP EDR), and the EDR under 50 CFR 679.110(a)(1) and 
(2) is referenced as the GOA Trawl EDR; any relevant distinctions or 
overlaps are described as needed.
    The Amendment 80 EDR form has been submitted annually by Amendment 
80 QS holders since 2008. A complete list of the data elements for each 
of the forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES).

GOA Trawl EDR

    The GOA Trawl EDR was implemented on January 1, 2015 (79 FR 71313, 
December 2, 2014) and codified in regulation at 50 CFR 679.110. The 
initial GOA Trawl EDR submissions

[[Page 7588]]

were due June 1, 2016, for reporting 2015 calendar year data. The GOA 
Trawl EDR was implemented to collect relevant baseline information that 
could be used to assess the impacts of a future catch share program on 
affected harvesters, processors, and communities in the GOA. However, 
Council action on a catch share program that addressed issues with GOA 
bycatch management was suspended in December 2016, and no catch share 
program exists for GOA harvesters, processors, and communities.
    The intended submitters for the GOA Trawl EDR includes owners and 
leaseholders of CVs and CPs active in the Central and Western GOA 
groundfish trawl fishery and operators of shoreside processing 
facilities that receive groundfish catch from the GOA. The EDR consists 
of two distinct EDR forms, the GOA Trawl CV EDR and GOA Shoreside 
Processor EDR. An additional EDR form overlaps with the Amendment 80 
EDR, as described above.
    The GOA Trawl CV EDR form is required for all trawl CVs that 
harvested groundfish in the GOA during the previous year. The GOA 
Shoreside Processor EDR form is required for all shore-based processors 
that receive and process groundfish from GOA trawl fisheries. The 
Annual Trawl CP EDR form is required for all vessel owners and 
leaseholders that catch and process groundfish in the GOA trawl 
fisheries. A complete list of the data elements for each of the forms 
is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES).

Amendment 91 Chinook Salmon EDR

    The Amendment 91 EDR and additional record keeping and reporting 
requirements associated with monitoring of Chinook salmon bycatch 
avoidance measures for the AFA pollock fishery were implemented 
concurrently on March 5, 2012 (77 FR 5389, February 3, 2012). The 
implementation of the Amendment 91 EDR occurred approximately 17 months 
after Amendment 91 (75 FR 53026, August 30, 2010) went into effect. The 
initial submission of EDR forms required under 50 CFR 679.65 were due 
on June 1, 2013, reporting data for the 2012 calendar year. The 
Amendment 91 EDR was implemented to provide additional data to assess 
the effectiveness of the Chinook salmon bycatch management measures in 
the Bering Sea (BS) pollock fishery.
    The Amendment 91 EDR reporting requirement applies to owners and 
leaseholders of AFA CVs, CPs, and motherships active in the BS pollock 
fishery and to entities eligible to receive Chinook salmon Prohibited 
Species Catch (PSC) allocation, including AFA in-shore sector harvest 
cooperative representatives, sector-based Incentive Plan Agreement 
representatives, and CDQ group representatives. In addition, vessel 
masters who actively participate in the AFA pollock fishery are 
required to complete the Amendment 91 Vessel Master Survey form and 
NMFS allows the owner or leaseholder of the vessel to submit this 
information, from multiple vessel masters, electronically to reduce 
respondent burden.
    The Amendment 91 EDR program consists of three separate forms: the 
Compensated Transfer Report (CTR), the Vessel Fuel Survey, and the 
Vessel Master Survey. The CTR collects transaction data on all 
compensated transfers of Chinook PSC by participants in the AFA 
fishery. The CTR is to be completed by all entities participating as 
lessor or lessee in compensated transfers of Chinook PSC. However, no 
such transactions have ever been reported. The Vessel Fuel Survey form 
is required for all AFA vessels that harvested BSAI pollock during the 
previous year and collects information about the vessel's average fuel 
consumption, the total amount in gallons of fuel loaded onto the 
vessel, and total annual fuel cost. The Vessel Master Survey form is 
used to determine the fishing and bycatch conditions observed during 
the BSAI pollock fishery and factors that motivated Chinook salmon 
bycatch avoidance. A complete list of the data elements for each of the 
forms is in Section 3.2 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES).

History and Need for This Action

    The Council developed this action beginning in February 2018 and 
made its final recommendation to NMFS after considerable public input 
in February 2022. This action removes third party data verification 
audits and blind formatting requirements from the Bering Sea and 
Aleutian Islands (BSAI) crab fisheries EDR, the Bering Sea American 
Fisheries Act (AFA) pollock fishery Chinook Salmon EDR (Amendment 91 
EDR), and the BSAI Amendment 80 fisheries EDR, and eliminates the EDR 
requirements for the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) trawl fisheries. Removing the 
third party audit requirements reduces costs incurred for NMFS to 
administer the EDR program and associated cost recovery fees paid by 
industry while maintaining data quality due to the automated EDR data 
verification procedures that remain in place. Additionally, enforcement 
provisions exist for all recordkeeping and reporting requirements, 
including the EDR program. A detailed explanation of the history of 
this action and need for this action is provided in the preamble to the 
proposed rule and not repeated here (87 FR 65724, November 1, 2022).

Final Rule

    This final rule removes or revises regulations at 50 CFR parts 679 
and 680. This final rule removes third-party data verification audits 
for the Crab EDR, the Amendment 91 EDR, and the Amendment 80 EDR and 
removes blind formatting requirements for the Crab EDR. This action 
also eliminates the GOA Trawl EDR requirements.

Eliminating Data Verification Audits

    This final rule removes the data verification audit requirements at 
Sec.  679.65(e), Sec.  679.94(b), and Sec.  680.6(f). Removal of the 
audit authorization eliminates the need for the data collection agent 
(DCA) to contract with a third-party auditor to conduct the audit 
portion of the data verification. EDR data verification currently 
employs a series of mainly automated validation procedures, including 
an audit process with the DCA. Except for removal of the audit process, 
these data validation procedures remain and continue to ensure the data 
reported are error-free. Enforcement actions will continue in cases of 
noncompliance with the EDR provisions as part of normal enforcement of 
recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
    This final rule also removes the definitions for ``Designated data 
collection auditor'' at Sec.  679.2 and ``Auditor'' at Sec.  680.2. 
Because this final rule removes the EDR audit requirements, these 
definitions are no longer needed.

Eliminating Blind Formatting

    This final rule removes the definitions for ``Blind data'' at Sec.  
679.2 and Sec.  680.2. Both definitions describe the required 
formatting process to remove the personal identifiers to the data 
collected from the EDRs. The identifiers include Federal fisheries 
permit numbers and State of Alaska vessel registration numbers that are 
essential data elements to analysts when developing reports and 
documents based on EDR data. Removing the blind formatting requirements 
makes the data aggregations and confidentiality protections for the 
Crab EDR comparable to the requirements under the other EDR programs. 
It also increases the usability and access to the EDR data for Council 
and NMFS analysts.

[[Page 7589]]

Eliminating the GOA Trawl EDR

    This final rule removes and reserves Subpart J--Gulf of Alaska 
Trawl Economic Data. The original purpose of the GOA Trawl EDR was to 
establish a baseline information collection that could be used to 
assess the impacts of a catch share program. However, no catch share 
program has been developed to date or is currently contemplated. The 
original need for this data collection program has diminished since 
2016 when the Council suspended work on a possible GOA catch share 
program, calling into question the efficacy of continuing the program. 
Eliminating the GOA Trawl EDR removes compliance costs for industry as 
well as agency costs, as the GOA Trawl fishery is not managed under a 
catch share program subject to cost recovery.
    This final rule also revises the section heading at Sec.  679.94 
and revises Sec.  679.94(a)(1) to remove GOA Trawl CPs from the 
requirement to submit the Amendment 80 EDR form. When the GOA Trawl EDR 
program was implemented, it required owners and leaseholders of any 
vessel named on an LLP groundfish license authorizing a CP using trawl 
gear to harvest and process LLP groundfish species in the GOA to 
complete all portions of the Amendment 80 EDR form. This final rule 
limits the Amendment 80 EDR requirement to Amendment 80 QS permit 
holders alone.

Comments and Responses

    NMFS received one unique comment from one member of the public on 
the proposed rule.
    Comment 1: The commenter asserts that removing data verification 
allows increasing corruption in management of the North Pacific 
fishery. The commenter further asserts that corrupt management by this 
agency will result in fish species going extinct and further asserts 
that this has happened in most areas managed by this agency. The 
commenter further asserts that the commercial fishing industry has 
undue influence in the management process and that management of the 
public resource is being compromised by excessive quotas resulting in 
starvation, and human predation, of marine mammals. Finally, the 
commenter asserts that there is no environmental conservation 
occurring, that there is no reason for this action, and that the action 
is objectionable.
    Response: NMFS acknowledges the comment regarding the proposed 
rule's inadvertent removal of the DCA data verification process in 
regulatory text edits. In accordance with the proposed rule's goal, 
this final rule revises the regulations to remove only the 
authorization for data verification audits. This final rule retains 
data verification regulations and data verification procedures remain 
in place. This final rule eliminates the automated audits of EDR 
submissions, as analysis has shown that no data verification audit, 
over the entire history of the EDR program, has resulted in a finding 
of noncompliance. The remainder of the comment is outside of the scope 
of this action. This final rule addresses the collection of EDR data 
and is not intended to broadly manage commercial or subsistence 
fisheries. NMFS manages commercial, recreational, and subsistence 
fisheries consistent with the provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act 
and other applicable law.

Changes From Proposed to Final Rule

    NMFS made three changes to the final rule that are related to both 
the comment received on the proposed rule and internal review. Namely, 
this final rule corrects inadvertent errors in the regulatory text 
included in the proposed rule. The preamble to the proposed rule 
accurately stated that, except for the audit component, the data 
verification process would remain in place. And, indeed, the Council 
did not recommend removal of the data verification process by the DCA 
and the Analysis prepared in support of this action specifically 
indicates that the data verification procedures will continue. But the 
proposed rule regulatory text edits inadvertently proposed deleting 
data verification processes that were meant to remain in place. This 
final rule corrects those errors as further detailed below.
    First, in Sec.  679.65, which describes the Chinook Salmon EDR 
program, NMFS inadvertently proposed deleting the entirety of paragraph 
(e), which includes regulation text describing both the EDR 
verification and audit procedures. This final rule revises the 
introductory text to paragraph (e) to remove the references to audit 
procedures and the associated designated data collection auditor 
(DDCA). Paragraph (e)(1) is revised to change the reference to the DDCA 
to the DCA; paragraph (e)(2), which describes the audit process, is 
removed. Second, in Sec.  679.94, NMFS inadvertently proposed removing 
the entirety of paragraph (b), which includes regulations pertaining to 
both the EDR verification process and the audit process. This final 
rule revises paragraph (b)(1) and (2) to remove only the reference to 
the DDCA; paragraph (b)(3), which describes the audit process, is 
removed. Third, NMFS inadvertently proposed removing the entirety of 
Sec. Sec.  680.6(f) and (g). This final rule removes only paragraph 
(f)(3), in order to remove the requirement to provide copies of 
additional data to the DDCA. Removal of paragraph (f)(3) is consistent 
with the removal of the third party audit process. Paragraph (g) 
remains unchanged from the proposed rule and provides the DCA with the 
authorization to request voluntary submission of economic data that may 
be used in the data verification process, which will remain in place 
after the removal of the third party audit process.

Other Regulatory Changes

    This final rule revises regulations at Sec. Sec.  680.6(a)(2), 
(a)(3), (c), (d), (e)(1), and (e)(2) to update the instructions for 
submitting Crab EDR forms to be consistent with the submission 
instructions for the Amendment 80 EDR implemented in 2008.

OMB Revisions to PRA References in 15 CFR 902.1(b)

    Section 3507(c)(B)(i) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires 
that agencies inventory and display a current control number assigned 
by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each 
agency's information collection. Section 902.1(b) identifies the 
location of NOAA regulations for which OMB approval numbers have been 
issued. Because this rule discontinued the collection-of-information 
for OMB Control Number 0648-0700 and removes Sec.  679.110, 15 CFR 
902.1(b) is revised to correctly reference these changes.

Classification

    Pursuant to sections 304(b) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 
the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final rule is 
consistent with the FMPs, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 
and other applicable law.
    This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.

Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce 
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the 
proposed rule and is not repeated here.

[[Page 7590]]

No comments were received regarding this certification. As a result, a 
regulatory flexibility analysis was not required and none was prepared.

Regulatory Impact Review

    A Regulatory Impact Review was prepared to assess all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives. A copy of this analysis 
is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The Council recommended 
Amendment 52 and the regulatory revisions in this final rule based on 
those measures that maximized net benefits to the Nation. Specific 
aspects of the economic analysis are discussed above in the 
Certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act section.

Collection-of-Information Requirements

    This final rule contains information collection requirements 
subject to the PRA and which have been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget OMB. OMB has approved discontinuing OMB Control 
Number 0648-0700 (Gulf of Alaska Catcher Vessel and Processor Trawl 
EDR), which covered the economic data collection requirements for the 
GOA Trawl EDR Program. OMB Control Number 0648-0700 was discontinued on 
December 31, 2022.
    This final rule contains collection of information requirements 
subject to review and approval by OMB under the PRA. NMFS has submitted 
these requirements to OMB for approval under OMB control numbers 0648-
0518 (Alaska Region Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab EDRs); 0648-
0564 (Groundfish Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR); and 0648-0633 (Alaska 
Chinook Salmon EDR). The public reporting burden for the information 
collection requirements provided below includes the time for reviewing 
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information.

OMB Control Number 0648-0518

    NMFS revises and extends by three years OMB Control Number 0648-
0518. This collection covers the economic data collection requirements 
for the CR Program and is necessary to monitor and evaluate the CR 
Program.
    This collection is revised to remove third-party data verification 
audits and blind formatting requirements for the BSAI crab fisheries 
EDR because this final rule removes these requirements. The three crab 
EDR forms are revised to pre-fill data fields that do not change 
frequently to reduce the burden of the crab EDR forms. Pre-filling the 
data fields is estimated to reduce the respondent's data entry time by 
15 minutes. However, since the burden hour estimates for the forms are 
rounded to the nearest hour, this modest reduction will not decrease 
the public reporting burden.
    Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to 
average 20 hours each for the Annual Catcher Vessel Crab EDR and the 
Annual CP Crab EDR, 16 hours for the Annual Processor Crab EDR, and 1 
hour for an EDR certification page.
    The estimated number of respondents for this collection is 77; the 
estimated total annual burden hours is 1,449 hours; and the estimated 
total annual cost to the public for recordkeeping and reporting costs 
is $385.

OMB Control Number 0648-0564

    NMFS revises and extends by three years OMB Control Number 0648-
0564. This collection covers the economic data collection requirements 
for Amendment 80 and GOA trawl CPs. This collection is necessary to 
help evaluate the Amendment 80 Program, including program-eligible 
trawl CPs, and is used by NMFS and the Council to assess the impacts of 
major changes in the groundfish management regime, including programs 
for prohibited species catch species and target species.
    This collection is revised to remove third-party data verification 
audits for the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR and remove 
requirements for the GOA Trawl EDR Program because this final rule 
removes regulations for the audit authorization and eliminates the GOA 
Trawl EDR Program. Eliminating the program simplifies the Annual Trawl 
Catcher/Processor form. This form is revised to remove data fields that 
are not being used in analyses and to pre-fill data fields that do not 
change frequently. These changes to the form are expected to reduce the 
time burden per respondent by approximately two hours.
    Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to 
average 20 hours for the Annual GOA Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR.
    The estimated number of respondents for this collection is 22; the 
estimated total annual burden hours are 440 hours; and the estimated 
total annual cost to the public for recordkeeping and reporting costs 
is $110.

OMB Control Number 0648-0633

    NMFS revises OMB Control Number 0648-0633 to remove the 
verification audit for the Compensated Transfer Report because this 
final rule removes the authorization for third party data verification 
audits.
    Public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to 
average 40 hours for the Compensated Transfer Report, 4 hours for the 
Vessel Fuel Survey, and 4 hours for the Vessel Master Survey.

Public Comment

    We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment 
on proposed and continuing information collections, which helps us 
assess the impact of our information collection requirements and 
minimize the public's reporting burden. Written comments and 
recommendations for these information collections should be submitted 
on the following website: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 
Find the particular information collection by using the search function 
and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control 
Number.
    Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is required 
to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for failure to 
comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of 
the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently 
valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA collections of 
information may be viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRASearch.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 902

    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

50 CFR Part 679

    Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

50 CFR Part 680

    Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 27, 2023.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part 
902 and 50 CFR parts 679 and 680 as follows:

Title 15--Commerce and Foreign Trade

PART 902--NOAA INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE 
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB CONTROL NUMBERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 902 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

[[Page 7591]]

Sec.  902.1  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  902.1, in the table in paragraph (b), under the heading 
``50 CFR'', remove the entry for ``679.110(a) through (f)''.
* * * * *

Title 50--Wildlife and Fisheries

PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA

0
3. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.; 
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.


Sec.  679.2  [Amended]

0
4. In Sec.  679.2, remove the definitions for ``Blind data'' and 
``Designated data collection auditor''.

0
5. In Sec.  679.65, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:


Sec.  679.65  Bering Sea Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management Program 
Economic Data Report (Chinook salmon EDR program).

* * * * *
    (e) Chinook salmon EDR verification procedures. NMFS or the data 
collection agent (DCA) will conduct verification of Chinook salmon EDR 
information with the persons identified at Sec.  679.65(b)(1), (b)(2), 
(c)(1), (d)(1)(i), and (d)(1)(ii).
    (1) The persons identified at Sec.  679.65(b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), 
(d)(1)(i), and (d)(1)(ii) must respond to inquiries by NMFS and its DCA 
for purposes of the CTR, within 20 days of the date of issuance of the 
inquiry.
    (2) [Reserved].

0
6. In Sec.  679.94, revise the section heading, paragraph (a)(1), 
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), and remove paragraph (b)(3) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  679.94  Economic data report (EDR) for the Amendment 80 sector.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Requirement to submit an EDR. A person who held an Amendment 80 
QS permit during a calendar year must submit a complete Annual Trawl 
Catcher/Processor EDR for that calendar year by following the 
instructions on the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR form.
* * * * *
    (b) * * * (1) NMFS or the DCA will conduct verification of 
information with a person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/
Processor EDR, or if applicable, that person's designated 
representative.
    (2) A person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor 
EDR or designated representative, if applicable, must respond to 
inquiries by NMFS, the DCA within 20 days of the date of issuance of 
the inquiry.
* * * * *

Subpart J--[Removed and Reserved]

0
7. Remove and reserve subpart J, consisting of Sec.  679.110.

PART 680--SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF 
ALASKA

0
8. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub. L. 109-479.


Sec.  680.2  [Amended]

0
9. In Sec.  680.2, remove the definitions for ``Auditor'' and ``Blind 
data''.

0
10. In Sec.  680.6, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (3), (c), (d), (e)(1) 
and (2), and remove paragraph (f)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  680.6  Crab economic data report (EDR).

    (a) * * *
    (2) A completed EDR or EDR certification pages must be submitted to 
NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, for each 
calendar year on or before 1700 hours, A.l.t., July 31 of the following 
year.
    (3) Annual EDR forms for catcher vessels, catcher/processors, 
shoreside crab processors, and stationary floating crab processors are 
available on the NMFS Alaska Region website at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov or by contacting NMFS at 1-800-304-4846.
* * * * *
    (c) Annual catcher vessel crab EDR. Any owner or leaseholder of a 
catcher vessel that landed CR crab in the previous calendar year must 
submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR form, a 
completed catcher vessel EDR for annual data for the previous calendar 
year.
    (d) Annual catcher/processor crab EDR. Any owner or leaseholder of 
a catcher/processor that harvested or processed CR crab in the previous 
calendar year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-
issued EDR form, a completed catcher/processor EDR for annual data for 
the previous calendar year.
    (e) * * * (1) Any owner or leaseholder of an SFCP or a shoreside 
crab processor that processed CR crab, including custom processing of 
CR crab performed for other crab buyers, in the previous calendar year 
must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued EDR 
form, a completed processor EDR for annual data for the previous 
calendar year.
    (2) Any holder of a registered crab receiver (RCR) permit that 
obtained custom processing for CR Program crab in the previous calendar 
year must submit to NMFS, in the manner specified on the NMFS-issued 
EDR form, a completed processor EDR for annual data for the previous 
calendar year.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-02117 Filed 2-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.